The Atlantic

Trump's 'Animals' Remark Explains Why He's Losing the Immigration Debate

The president can still advance his restrictionist agenda—but first he must accept that a large-scale amnesty is the only way to make it a reality.
Source: Manuel Balce Ceneta / AP

This story was updated on May 17, 2018 at 10:37 a.m.

Has Donald Trump declared that all of the unauthorized migrants his administration has deported from the U.S. are “animals”? A California sheriff, Margaret Mims, expressed her frustration in a meeting with Trump over the fact that a new state law had limited her local department’s ability to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, thus making it harder for federal immigration authorities to, in her words, “find the bad guys.” Mims lamented that even if she was holding a known member of MS-13, the notoriously brutal transnational gang, she might be barred from notifying ICE. The president responded forcefully: “We have people coming into the country, or trying to come in—and we’re stopping a lot of them—but we’re taking people out of the country. You wouldn’t believe how bad these people are. These aren’t people. These are animals. And we’re taking them out of the country at a level and at a rate that’s never happened before.”

Given the context, it is fairly clear that Trump was referring to violentunauthorized migrants, including mothers and children and countless others who command the sympathy of all decent people. When pressed on whether this is entirely fair, the response has almost invariably been that Trump does not deserve the benefit of the doubt. Trump’s ferocious rhetoric has been one of his greatest assets. It helped him make mincemeat of his rivals for the Republican presidential nomination, and it continues to electrify his devotees. Yet this recent contretemps is a reminder that his rhetoric can also be turned against him, and to devastating effect.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from The Atlantic

The Atlantic8 min readAmerican Government
The Most Consequential Recent First Lady
This article was featured in the One Story to Read Today newsletter. Sign up for it here. The most consequential first lady of modern times was Melania Trump. I know, I know. We are supposed to believe it was Hillary Clinton, with her unbaked cookies
The Atlantic3 min readCrime & Violence
Donald Trump’s ‘Fraudulent Ways’ Cost Him $355 Million
A New York judge fined Donald Trump $355 million today, finding “overwhelming evidence” that he and his lieutenants at the Trump Organization made false statements “with the intent to defraud.” Justice Arthur Engoron’s ruling in the civil fraud case
The Atlantic7 min readAmerican Government
The Americans Who Need Chaos
This is Work in Progress, a newsletter about work, technology, and how to solve some of America’s biggest problems. Sign up here. Several years ago, the political scientist Michael Bang Petersen, who is based in Denmark, wanted to understand why peop

Related Books & Audiobooks