Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Trial
The Trial
The Trial
Audiobook8 hours

The Trial

Written by Franz Kafka

Narrated by Rupert Degas

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

About this audiobook

The Trial is one of the great works of the twentieth century: an extraordinary vision of one man put on trial by an anonymous authority on an unspecified charge. Josef K, 30, lives in a large town in an unspecified country. He is summonsed to answer a charge and appears in the court room for his trial. Franz Kafka evokes all the reality of trial without any of the specifics in a society that seems to have degraded into chaos: squalid environment, rats, yellow liquid shooting out of a hole in the wall. Guards, claustrophobia, anxiety – this is a gripping story and an allegory of modern life. This text remains just as relevant a century after it was written.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateFeb 1, 2007
ISBN9789629545994
Author

Franz Kafka

Franz Kafka (Praga, 1883 - Kierling, Austria, 1924). Escritor checo en lengua alemana. Nacido en el seno de una familia de comerciantes judíos, se formó en un ambiente cultural alemán y se doctoró en Derecho. Su obra, que nos ha llegado en contra de su voluntad expresa, pues ordenó a su íntimo amigo y consejero literario Max Brod que, a su muerte, quemara todos sus manuscritos, constituye una de las cumbres de la literatura alemana y se cuenta entre las más influyentes e innovadoras del siglo xx. Entre 1913 y 1919 escribió El proceso, La metamorfosis y publicó «El fogonero». Además de las obras mencionadas, en Nórdica hemos publicado Cartas a Felice.

More audiobooks from Franz Kafka

Related to The Trial

Related audiobooks

Classics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Trial

Rating: 4.007352941176471 out of 5 stars
4/5

272 ratings105 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    My second Kafka, and I am now pretty sure he is indeed not my cup of tea. I think the ideas in his works are interesting, the surrealism/absurdity is something I enjoy at other times and it does work, but somehow I just find it quite tedious to read in Kafka. The story-lines intrigue me, but getting through them takes effort. I think he's worth reading, but at the same time I hesitate to recommend him.

    1 person found this helpful

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The Trial by Franz Kafka is one of the masterpieces of existential literature. Or so it is said. Since I'm not up to date on my existential philosophy, the book was largely wasted on me. It's always a challenge to read books that come at life from a different world view than one's own, but to give them a fair chance requires wrestling with their philosophical underpinnings. I'm not at a point in my reading life or my intellectual life where I'm interested in exploring the existential experiences described by Franz Kafka in The Trial.Kafka certainly knows how to create atmosphere and bring a story to life, but the problems for me were the absurdist plot and the unappealing main character, Josef K. While I admire Kafka's craft as a writer, and acknowledge The Trial as an important work of literature, it's simply not to my taste at this stage of my life.

    1 person found this helpful

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    First thing.. this book was unfinished and published after his death, and it reads that way. I can't imagine this is what Kafka would have wanted the world to read. But here we are. The only thing I would like to add to what has been written already is that our protagonist K's behavior is rarely mentioned. He's an idiot. The system he is in is oppressive and capricious but his own behavior is inexplicable and frustrating. I can appreciate this book for its historical context in literature but it's not a "good read".

    1 person found this helpful

  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    The worst book I have ever read. Kafka was either drunk, crazy or under some drugs when he wrote that book.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    What a weird and wonderful work. I knew nothing of Kafka or his work before embarking upon this but I found it well written and impactful, as well as making interesting points around the notions of freedom, oppression, bureaucracy and the state.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Indrukwekkende klassieker, blijft nog altijd zeer bevreemdend. Belangrijk thema is zeker de onmacht van het individu tegenover de anonieme maatschappelijke macht, maar nog belangrijker is dat van de menselijke relaties: wie ben ik en hoe wordt ik bekeken in de ogen van de anderen?
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Well read by the narrator. No idea what happened, which might be the point
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    The Trial by Franz Kafka (1925)

    I'm having a difficult time with this book. Aside from it being written back in 1925 in German, the author never finished it at that time. Essentially, it is about a man who wakes up to find he is arrested for a crime that is never specified. It almost feels like a dog chasing its tail...I wonder how this trial will proceed with the rantings from this narcissistic protagonist. It is rather amusing how he defends himself against a crime to which he has no knowledge of committing!

    Having done some research it seems that this book was finished by someone else hence the lack of continuity or direction in this book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Trial is a compelling read, but also frustrating. Questions are never answered and your left scream WHY???? K wakes up to find out he is being arrested, he is never told why, he is free to go about his daily life as long as when he is summoned to the court he comes. He tries to dismiss the trial as nothing more than a shady court system trying to get a bribe out of him. More people learn of his trial and he begins to take it more serious. K explores options and meets other people on trial. The ending will mess you up.

    So what is the point of The Trial? There are lots of meanings that can be placed to what is read. Bureaucracy, a variety of metaphors the trial represents, or simply nothing but the text that is provided. Either way its a great short read that is interesting til the end. I didn’t know how I felt at the ending, was just kind of lost for a feeling, but I think that feeling of not know what I am feeling fits well with The Trial.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The following excerpts sum up the book perfectly: K.: How can I go in to the bank when I'm under arrest?Supervisor: It's true that you're under arrest, but that shouldn't stop you from carrying out your job. And there shouldn't be anything to stop you from carrying on with your usual life. In that case, it's not too bad, being under arrest, said K. I never meant it should be anything else, said the supervisor. It hardly seems to have been necessary to notify me of the arrest, said K. K.: "Your question, my Lord, as to whether I am a house painter - in fact even more than that, you did not ask at all but merely imposed on me - is symptomatic of the whole way these proceedings against me are being carried out.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I am confused. I still do not know what was the charge. It went way over my head.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    “The right understanding of any matter and a misunderstanding of the same matter do not wholly exclude each other.”The novel opens with Josef K.'s sudden arrest in his room at his lodging house on the morning of his birthday. Two guards inform him that he is under arrest, but they don't tell him on what charges, nor do they know what the charges are. K. is then taken next door where he is subjected to an equally puzzling and brief interrogation by the inspector. The inspector informs K. that he is under arrest, but is free to go to work at his bank and otherwise live life as usual. The book carries on to cover the following year as K. struggles against an unseen and seemingly all powerful legal system.The book was not published until after Kafka's death in 1924,despite being written over a decade earlier. Therefore published before the outbreak of Nazism in Germany and the rise to power of Josef Stalin in Russia. Many readers thus see this novel as a critique on totalitarianism and personally I find it hard to disagree with them. The image of all encompassing power seems to be the central theme as does the relationship between justice and the law. K. never discovers what he has been charged with and no one seems either able or willing to discuss his case directly with him. Much of the legal machinations seem to be based on crony-ism. Isolation of the individual is also a major theme. K. feels alienation against an indifferent society. This impression is not helped when a priest that K. meets appears in league with the legal system.Yet strangely despite this isolation sex also seems to be a fairly important component of this novel. Once K. is arrested he appears suddenly attractive to members of the opposite sex.Personally, although I found this a thought provoking read I found it hard going and did not particularly enjoy the author's writing style. Paragraphs that go on for several pages were just too much like hard work but there was just enough interest to keep me going.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    While I can't say I enjoyed it, I certainly got more out of it this time than I did 30 years ago in high school.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Kafka's clever take on complex beauracracy is a fascinating if challenging read. Waiting to have the crime he is accused of revealed as we read is in itself a ploy that leads to the reader experiencing a small measure of the ever increasing frustration and bewilderment that the character is experiencing. My first read of a Kafka novel, and now a confirmed fan.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The craziness of the society it portrays is quite entertaining. Of course the absurdity of the whole thing criticizes the same absurdities, albeit exaggerated, he saw in our society.
    I enjoyed the follies it describes.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Kafka did a brilliant job of portraying the frustration and confusion of being thrust down the "rabbit hole" of the mysterious court system. Or, maybe I should say "up" because the ubiquitous courtrooms were most often found after climbing dark wandering staircases or opening unmarked attic doors. Not knowing what one is accused of and getting hopelessly lost in the labyrinth of this mockery of justice is enough to make anyone give up in utter futility.And that's what I did. Even though it was brilliantly written, the sense of doom was conveyed so well that I could only read the book in small increments and felt myself, as K did, gulping for fresh air when it mercifully ended.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Kafka writes in such simple German, yet he uses the language in subtle ways. For those who can, you should definitely read the German version.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Loads of suspense, excellent audio quality, would defenitely recommend it.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The classic depiction of modern bureaucratic hell. A trial in which the accused does not know who or for what he is accused and cannot get the answer until it is too late.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book just left me deflated. It wasn't until the end that I really pitied K, and thought of how frightening this whole ordeal would be were I in his position.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    By the most shallow interpretation this is a pessimist's simple metaphor for life: we are born/arrested without consent, then subjected to unfairness beyond our control unto death. The introduction would have me look more deeply for Judaic-Talmudic references (wouldn't know one if it slapped me), messages about sexuality (I do tend to see those), or a prophetic rendering of the fate of Jewish citizens in Eastern Europe during World War II. It would also not be difficult to read several of the characters as self-doubt personified, reflecting the way each of us is prone to criticize or overthink our own actions in an adverse environment.The plot wasn't so dull as I feared it might be, since Joseph K. has freedom of movement and makes the most of it. He tries every emotional response to his straits but to no avail. Whether he rails against the irrationality of his captors or attempts to reason with them, it's all for naught. He comes on too strongly with women and is too self-centered, sometimes aggressive with those he judges inferior, but there's never any clue dropped to suggest what he's charged with. He never aggressively seeks his right to know, but that's of a piece with the metaphor: once it is determined that life is unfair, there's little point in asking why.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Kind of a frustrating read, as I suppose it was intended to be.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This was the first Kafka I have ever read. Like most of his works, he never completed this, and it was published only after his early death from tuberculosis in 1924. Although the term "Kafkaesque" is often used simply to describe an impenetrable bureaucracy or maze, this novel has a nightmarish quality about it, with the inexplicable events happening to Josef K after his arrest for a crime that is unknown to both Josef and the reader. He confronts a colourful and strange array of bizarre characters while trying to navigate his way through this moral and judicial maze. The ending of the novel as published is abrupt and violent. There have been many interpretations of this over the years, but overall it is perhaps best to see simply as a piece of (mostly) atmospheric absurdist literature, with humorous undertones, and not try to over-analyse it. The very structure of the text makes it quite hard to read, being divided mostly into very long paragraphs, with dialogue embedded within them, not on separate lines, a characteristic that often puts me off reading a novel, though in this case, it seems appropriate.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    It's funny because it's true
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A story of half-blind justice from all viewpoints.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Unforgettable story of a man who finds himself arrested and on trial for no apparent reason. I found this much more compelling and easy to read than The Castle, which I still haven't managed to finish. There are so many other books which deal with similar subjects either seriously or as pulp fiction, but reading Kafka's story is a unique experience.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    At least as I understood it, The Trial is a black comedy that contrasts the disconnectedness of individuals from larger societal agencies. As governments and corporations have become larger and more powerful, the world has become increasingly Kafkaesque, surreal and full of bewildering mini-trials to accompany their big-brother trials. Humans evolved under social conditions where tribal elders were accessible, but mass culture leaves people isolated without power, and unable to form relationships of reciprocal influence. Kafka portrays all this in a way that reveals the absurdity of the modern individual's plight.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I've always avoided literary criticism, introductions, translator's prefaces, and the like because I've often found them either stultifying or only tangentially connected to the work in question; I also don't like being told what to look for or think about. After reading a book, criticism can be interesting though. Anyway, as a result I have no idea what's proper or improper to think about Kafka or The Trial.

    So, a few uninformed thoughts as I'm still reading it.

    Existentialism has a bad habit of co-opting any work that can be even partially read as existentialist. Once that's done, and you know about it, it's difficult to read whatever it is without existentialism in mind.

    The simplest reading of The Trial is that K. is trapped in an overwhelming, soft tyranny of bureaucracy, as faceless as his accusers, who are also rather trapped in a self-perpetuating machine. Considering the environment Kafka lived in--Eastern Europe with its ancient, headless mob of anti-Semitism--and his background in law it's not unreasonable to think that he drew from the tortured circles of law and the creeping fear of unchecked, nameless depersonalization of totalitarianism and prejudice. Lost in a bureaucratic tangle of unfair power positions and esoteric rules is a fear most people can relate to.

    K.'s predicament reminded me somewhat of Survival in Auschwitz in that K., like Levi and other holocaust victims, was thrown into a sort of large scale social Darwinism. K. seems unfit.

    I constantly think of the book as a parable of humanity: birth is the unnamed crime, life is the defense, death is the trial. K.'s increasing inability to think rationally as he became obsessed by the proceedings, his instinctual turn toward immobility and sexual gratification, and his realization that he would be unable to account for every moment of his life all fit in. But I'm not big on that sort of thing and as I continue to read the book the idea will probably collapse. Law=God, bureaucracy=inept intercessor, K.=unable to autonomously leave the trap? Meh.

    Brilliant, especially from Block on, so brilliant as to almost ruin you for other books. Kafka's prose carries forward relentlessly without ever sacrificing subtlety.

    Block and the lawyer comprise a perverted deathbed.

    K.'s execution is handled exceptionally and tinged with a revelation withheld, if there is one to withhold. Reminiscent of the grandmother's death in O'Connor's "A Good Man Is Hard to Find."

    Not my favorite novel of the 20th century, but certainly one of the best. The Trial seeps into your bones; if you read it it's with you for good.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is a nearly flawless audiobook, read in a mostly dry tone that is both funny and creepy, which I imagine was what Kafka was going for in this his iconic work. Hell may be the absence of reason. But Hell can have a reason all its own, which we discover too late.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Prescient dystopic novel with that special Kafka brand of fatalism. Classic. Dry. Baleful as a yowling cat. It's possible some of my feelings about Kafka are colored by the translators. This is not an easy read.