From the Publisher

A leading Supreme Court expert recounts the personal and philosophical rivalries that forged our nation's highest court and continue to shape our daily lives.

The Supreme Court is the most mysterious branch of government, and yet the Court is at root a human institution, made up of very bright people with very strong egos, for whom political and judicial conflicts often become personal.

In this compelling work of character-driven history, Jeffrey Rosen recounts the history of the Court through the personal and philosophical rivalries on the bench that transformed the law-and by extension, our lives. The story begins with the great Chief Justice John Marshall and President Thomas Jefferson, cousins from the Virginia elite whose differing visions of America set the tone for the Court's first hundred years. The tale continues after the Civil War with Justices John Marshall Harlan and Oliver Wendell Holmes, who clashed over the limits of majority rule. Rosen then examines the Warren Court era through the lens of the liberal icons Hugo Black and William O. Douglas, for whom personality loomed larger than ideology. He concludes with a pairing from our own era, the conservatives William H. Rehnquist and Antonin Scalia, only one of whom was able to build majorities in support of his views.

Through these four rivalries, Rosen brings to life the perennial conflict that has animated the Court-between those justices guided by strong ideology and those who forge coalitions and adjust to new realities. He illuminates the relationship between judicial temperament and judicial success or failure. The stakes are nothing less than the future of American jurisprudence.
Published: Tantor Audio on
ISBN: 9781400103768
Listen on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
Availability for The Supreme Court by Alan Sklar and Jeffrey Rosen
With a 30 day free trial you can listen to one free audiobook per month

    Related Articles

    1 min read

    Insider-Trading Law: A Supreme Court Ruling Gives Prosecutors A Boost

    JEFF JOHN ROBERTS IN DECEMBER, the Supreme Court handed down its first ruling about insider trading in more than two decades. It affirmed the conviction of a grocery wholesaler named Bassam Salman, who traded on tips from his banker brother-in-law, making hundreds of thousands of dollars in the process. Lawyers for Salman pointed to the precedent set in the overturned convictions of traders Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson in 2014. They argued that because Salman’s brother-in-law didn’t receive any financial benefit from passing information, it wasn’t insider trading. That argument failed to
    3 min read

    5 Insights Into Judge Neil Gorsuch After 2nd Day Of Confirmation Hearings

    After a day of statements, Tuesday's Supreme Court confirmation hearing was all about answers. Judge Neil Gorsuch was careful in his responses to Senate Judiciary Committee members, but there were still a number of insights that marked the day. Read our full Day 2 coverage here. These are five highlights: 1. Judicial independence Gorsuch says he will be an independent voice on the court. Senators have repeatedly questioned Gorsuch about his willingness to possibly rule against the man who nominated him, should a case involving President Trump come before the court. Trump has not hesitated to c
    The Atlantic
    5 min read

    When Your Judge Isn't A Lawyer

    Do you want to be a massage therapist in Helena, Montana? You’ll need 500 hours of study to receive your license first. What about a barber at a shop in Billings? Get ready to spend 1,500 hours practicing your craft. How about one of state’s justices of the peace, with the power to send defendants to prison for up to six months? You’re in luck—only a four-day certification course is necessary. No law degree is required, either—only the approval of the voters in your county. While Montana’s rules are not the norm in America, they’re also not unheard of. Twenty-eight states require all judges pr