• audiobook
    0% of Lords of Finance completed

From the Publisher

It is commonly believed that the Great Depression that began in 1929 resulted from a confluence of events beyond any one person's or government's control. In fact, as Liaquat Ahamed reveals, it was the decisions made by a small number of central bankers that were the primary cause of the economic meltdown, the effects of which set the stage for World War II and reverberated for decades.

In Lords of Finance, we meet the neurotic and enigmatic Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, the xenophobic and suspicious Émile Moreau of the Banque de France, the arrogant yet brilliant Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, and Benjamin Strong of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, whose façade of energy and drive masked a deeply wounded and overburdened man. After the First World War, these central bankers attempted to reconstruct the world of international finance. Despite their differences, they were united by a common fear-that the greatest threat to capitalism was inflation-and by a common vision that the solution was to turn back the clock and return the world to the gold standard.

For a brief period in the mid-1920s, they appeared to have succeeded. The world's currencies were stabilized, and capital began flowing freely across the globe. But beneath the veneer of boomtown prosperity, cracks started to appear in the financial system. The gold standard that all had believed would provide an umbrella of stability proved to be a straitjacket, and the world economy began that terrible downward spiral known as the Great Depression.

As yet another period of economic turmoil makes headlines today, the Great Depression and the year 1929 remain the benchmark for true financial mayhem. Offering a new understanding of the global nature of financial crises, Lords of Finance is a potent reminder of the enormous impact that the decisions of central bankers can have, of their fallibility, and of the terrible human consequences that can result when they are wrong.
Published: Tantor Audio on
ISBN: 9781400111794
Listen on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
Availability for Lords of Finance: The Bankers Who Broke the World
With a 30 day free trial you can listen to one free audiobook per month

    Related Articles

    Bloomberg Businessweek
    2 min read

    How Populism May Stifle Growth

    The global economy is gathering momentum, the International Monetary Fund has declared. That’s probably correct and undeniably encouraging, but there’s an ominous discord between this expansion and what’s euphemistically called political uncertainty—that is, the stresses caused by surging antitrade, antimarket, anti-immigrant populism. This could be the prelude to some seriously bad policies, enough to derail one or more leading economies and stall the global expansion. There’s another danger, less obvious but no less important: the prospect of chronic underperformance. Even if the new politi
    2 min read

    The Weird World of Negative Interest Rates

    IT WAS LONG THOUGHT that interest rates could never go below zero. People would surely hoard cash before they paid banks for the privilege of holding it for them. But this year the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, and others have officially ventured into negative interest rate territory. It’s a bold experiment in economic stimulus—with big risks to global investors. Right now there are a whopping $10 trillion in total negative-yielding sovereign bonds outstanding worldwide, according to a report by Fitch Ratings. Just as startling: 28% of the total value of J.P. Morgan’s global gover
    Bloomberg Businessweek
    2 min read

    It’s Wrong to Bully Central Banks

    The long-cherished principle of independence for central banks seems to be under attack around the world. That principle is worth defending: U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, for one, went too far in his repeated criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen. At the same time, central banks can’t expect to be above criticism or beyond politics. The case for leaving the banks alone to conduct monetary policy rests on three points. First, a government that controls a central bank might be tempted to finance unaffordable budget deficits by printing money. (See Zimbabwe.) Second, to provide ec