True North: Peary, Cook, and the Race to the Pole
Published by Penguin Random House Audio
4/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this audiobook
In 1909, two men laid rival claims to the North Pole. They had been friends and shipmates, with Frederic Cook, a doctor, accompanying Robert Peary, a civil engineer, on an expedition to northern Greenland in 1891. When Peary's leg was shattered in an accident, Cook took care of him. But all goodwill was gone by the summer of 1909 when Peary said he had reached the Pole in September 1909, while Cooked presented evidence that he had gotten there earlier-in 1908. "What a consummate cur he is," said Robert Peary of Frederick Cook in 1911. Cook responded by saying, "Peary has stooped to every crime from rape to murder." In this wonderfully engaging and researched narrative, Bruce Henderson writes about one of the most enduring and fiery feuds in the history of exploration.
Related to True North
Related audiobooks
Voices of Famous Polar Explorers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Untold Story of Shields Green: The Life and Death of a Harper's Ferry Raider Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Barry Pain - A Short Story Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Home Front: 1941-1942 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fights on the Little Horn: Unveiling the Mysteries of Custer's Last Stand Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Biggest Political Mistakes in the History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLost Destiny: Joe Kennedy Jr. and the Doomed WWII Mission to Save London Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Poetry of Rupert Brooke Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Arctic Convoys: Bletchley Park and the War for the Seas Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Bomb Group: The Eighth Air Force's 381st and The Allied Air Offensive Over Europe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShackleton and the Lost Antarctic Expedition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistory Revealed: Brunel the Great Engineer: Episode 46 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsForever England: The Life Of Rupert Brooke Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wolf: How One German Raider Terrorized the Allies in the Most Epic Voyage of WWI Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dinner in Camelot: The Night America's Greatest Scientists, Writers, and Scholars Partied at the Kennedy White House Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMixing It: Diversity in World War Two Britain Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rocket Age: The Race to the Moon and What It Took to Get There Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJohn F. Kennedy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5We Don't Know Ourselves: A Personal History of Modern Ireland Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Famous Heroes of the American West Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Drop Dead: A Horrible History of Hanging in Canada Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pathfinder Pioneer: The Memoir of a Lead Bomber Pilot in World War II Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Poetry of Robert Seymour Bridges Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Great Escape: Nine Jews Who Fled Hitler and Changed the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Black Mass: Whitey Bulger, the FBI, and a Devil's Deal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boone: A Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Most Dangerous Game Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Behold a Pale Horse Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
History For You
The Secret History of the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Korean War: A History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of Five Rings Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Demon Copperhead: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5All the Sinners Bleed: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Razorblade Tears: A Novel Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Who Cooked the Last Supper?: The Women's History of the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Little Book of Hygge: Danish Secrets to Happy Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hell's Princess: The Mystery of Belle Gunness, Butcher of Men Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Knowing What We Know: The Transmission of Knowledge: From Ancient Wisdom to Modern Magic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Endurance Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Astor: The Rise and Fall of an American Fortune Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wilmington's Lie: The Murderous Coup of 1898 and the Rise of White Supremacy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mary Magdalene: Women, the Church, and the Great Deception Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Valiant Women: The Extraordinary American Servicewomen Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Overstory Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Leave the World Behind: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Black AF History: The Un-Whitewashed Story of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Radium Girls: The Dark Story of America's Shining Women Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cuba (Winner of the Pulitzer Prize): An American History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Small Mercies: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for True North
25 ratings3 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I learned that Peary had discovered the North Pole. Turns out that may not be true. Bruce Hendeson tells the story of Cook and Peary both trying to be the first to reach the North Pole. Both men had worked together on an earlier norther expedition. Cook had parted ways and explored Alaska. Then took a shot at reaching the North Pole. At the same time Peary was organizing another attempt at the unexplored top of the world.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5It took a little bit to get into this book, but once I did, I listened to it everyday on my way home from work as a way to let go of the thoughts of work. As the polar race progressed, the author's bias did show, but after listening to the whole book, I think some bias towards Cook was really deserved.
What I learned from this book: Peary was a rat bas*&^d. I shouted this at the CD player more than a few times. He was a rat bas*(&& to his wife, to his obligations with the Navy, to the Eskimo peoples, to anyone else who got in his way of fame in the Arctic, and especially to Cook and anyone associated with Cook. RAT B(*&*&^.
Cook most likely found the North Pole first, but his proofs could not be found. Peary most likely missed the Pole.
Polar exploration works much better if you go as a small expedition and work closely with the native peoples, who live there all the time.
Eventually the truth will out, although it may take a long, long time. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5True North: Peary, Cook, and the Race to the Pole by Bruce Henderson places itself within the longstanding debate of who reached the North Pole first: Dr. Frederick A. Cook or Navy Officer Robert E. Peary. Both claimed to have reached it within one year of each other, Cook in April of 1908 and Peary in April of 1909. Historically, credit for the North Pole discovery has gone to Peary, and much criticism has been aimed at Cook for fabricating his story. Henderson addresses the possibility that Cook may have reached the Pole first and has thus been cheated of his acclamation. A reexamination of evidence, Henderson hopes, will shed more light on the controversy because recent history has charged that Peary lied about the distances he travelled while Cook has gained merit due to his accurate descriptions of the northern regions verified by later explorers. Henderson begins True North when the two are just children, setting up a foundation to help readers understand the two men and what may have motivated their drive to reach the pole. It is not until the middle of the book, in fact, that the race to the North Pole becomes the focus.Cook and Peary initially worked together to cross and map the Greenland ice cap. Due to conflict during the expedition, Cook decided not to work with Peary again when called upon to do so, instead choosing to lead Greenland expeditions of his own. Peary returned to Greenland to collect iron meteorites sacred to the native people while Cook returned to take up tourist groups of hunters and explorers. Beginning in 1898, Peary made a few failed attempts to reach the North Pole and Cook ventured to the South Pole (1897-1899) and to the summit of Mt. McKinley (1906). During the years in Greenland he spent to achieve his goal, Henderson describes in detail how Peary abused the native people of Greenland, cheated on his wife, and grew increasingly obsessed with fame. Contrasted against this was Cooks modest desire to explore and record. It was not until 1907 that Cook secretly decided to try to reach the North Pole, setting out with two natives and one white man in early 1908, covering the 500 miles in just two months. During the return trip, the Cook explorers got trapped over winter and did not return until 1909. Over the course of this delay, Peary reached the North Pole and claimed the discovery for himself, though he had yet to announce it by the time Cook returned from his expedition. Before Peary was even back from his mission, Cook sent off his own story to a newspaper and proclaimed to the world that he had discovered the North Pole. After Peary declared that he had discovered the North Pole first, it had to be decided who had really done it first, if at all.Back at home, the controversy began when Cook, challenged to produce his data, could not because Peary refused to bring it home on his ship. Embroiled in a smear campaign against his honor, Cook was soon denied notoriety and credit for the discovery of the North Pole, which was given to Peary despite his own questionable data. Though Henderson never explicitly states who he believes discovered the pole and does not take sides throughout the book, it is clear that he believes the honor of the discovery should go to Cook, since it appears from record that he got the closest to the pole. Evident in his depictions of Cook versus Peary, Henderson’s motive is to prove that Cook was indeed cheated out of a victory that was rightfully his. Through Henderson’s descriptions, Peary is shown to be an egotistical and hard-handed man concerned only with fame, with a boisterous attitude and little respect for other people. In opposition, Cook is portrayed as being very humble and quiet, an inventive man who is content to share victory. When the events of the contested pole discovery come about, Henderson details how Cook was thwarted his due by Peary’s sabotage, and raises suspicion for Peary’s claim by pointing out that Peary would not hand over his own notes for inspection before Cook released a statement, insinuating that Peary was getting information from Cook to use in his own dubious notes. As told by Henderson, Cook’s evidence, though he produced no notes as proof and with only a diary and the statements of him and his Eskimo companions to back him up, is still more credible than Peary and the incomplete notes he supplies. It is even insinuated that Peary was responsible for Cook later going to prison for mail fraud because the judge trying the case was a friend of the family. Henderson finishes up his assessment by listing all of the ways in which Cook was right or credible in both his pole and Mt McKinley claims. So, despite Henderson never explicitly stating to support Cook, it comes through in his presentation of facts and their evident bias. Whether or not the facts are true as stated, Henderson clearly wants us to see things a certain way.Henderson’s source usage raises concerns over his presentation of facts and how they support his central purpose. True North is rich in detail and follows the separate and intertwining paths of Cook and Peary closely, even to minute detail. Yet the background provided, including an array of personal stories and emotions too intimate to be part of common knowledge, is given no footnoted documentation, which calls into question the validity of the information, its truthfulness, and whether or not Henderson is being true to the facts and portraying them accurately. A reader would have a difficult time verifying many of the things said and claimed to have happened by Henderson. Henderson does provide a selection of source notes at the end of the book, which serve the purpose of explaining where some of the specific personal statements come from. These are actually very informative and valuable to the credibility of the story because they are all primary sources, sources that come direct from people involved or in the time- they are the words of Cook, of Peary, of people witness to the events in question. There is included a bibliography at the back, but without the aid of footnotes, one cannot tell if the books listed at the end are indeed used and where.True North is a very well written and engaging book, not at all difficult to read and follow. Bruce Henderson is a writer by career with over 20 nonfiction books in his catalog, and he instructs writing classes at Stanford University. Though very skilled at writing, capable of writing a book that is as informative as it is entertaining, it is important to keep in mind that Henderson is not a trained historian and therefore may have approached his subjects with an eye for writing a good story rather than telling balanced fact based history, which would explain his treatment of sources and clear bias. Even with Henderson’s notable favoritism, however, the book does present a complete story and sequence of events for both camps. Additionally, the book is full of information about ice travel, geography, and Eskimo culture. For anyone interested in the lives of Cook and Peary, in Arctic travel, or in exploration in general, True North would be well worth the read.