Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    The Conscience of a Liberal
    Unavailable
    The Conscience of a Liberal
    Unavailable
    The Conscience of a Liberal
    Audiobook9 hours

    The Conscience of a Liberal

    Written by Paul Krugman

    Narrated by Jason Culp

    4/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this audiobook

    America emerged from Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal with strong democratic values and broadly shared prosperity. But for the past thirty years American politics has been dominated by a conservative movement determined to undermine the New Deal's achievements.

    Now, the tide may be turning-and in The Conscience of a Liberal Paul Krugman, the world's most widely read economist and one of its most influential political commentators, charts the way to reform.

    Krugman ranges over a century of history and shows that neither the American middle-class nor the baby boomers grew up in the increasingly oligarchic nation we have become over the past generation evolved naturally: both were created, to a large extent, by government policies guided by organized political movements.

    The Conscience of a Liberal     promises to reshape public debate about American social policy and become a touchstone work for an entire generation.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherPenguin Random House Audio
    Release dateOct 2, 2007
    ISBN9780739358672
    Unavailable
    The Conscience of a Liberal

    Related to The Conscience of a Liberal

    Related audiobooks

    Public Policy For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Liz Truss' Exit As UK PM Highlights Failure Of Western Democracies To Govern Fairly

      Nov 5, 2022

      Liz Truss' catastrophically brief tenure as Britain's prime minister - the fourth leader in six years of the world's sixth-largest economy - has shattered the illusion that democracy is the be-all and end-all of approaches to governing societies and

      6 min read

    • Article

      This Is How Democracy Dies

      Jan 29, 2020

      This Is How Democracy Dies
      3 min read

    • Article

      U.S. Governance: Not The Gold Standard

      Dec 16, 2021

      China has recently consolidated the theories and practices associated with its whole-process people’s democracy, which was first named formally in 2019, and more clearly expressed this year. As a recent white paper on the subject clarifies, it reflec

      4 min read

    • Article

      The End of Liberalism

      Jun 4, 2018

      The End of Liberalism
      7 min read

    • Article

      Undoing the World America Made Mr. Trump Goes to Davos

      Feb 5, 2018

      Could this be it? Might the American Century actually clock out at just 72 years, from 1945 to 2017? No longer than Louis XIV ruled France? Only 36 months more than the Soviet Union lasted, after all that bother? The question sounds preposterous. Fo

      5 min read

    • Article

      A Shift in Democracy

      Dec 23, 2021

      The U.S. hosted the virtual “Summit for Democracy” on December 9-10. It is a striking irony that it occurred shortly after the U.S. chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, which it invaded basically to establish “democracy” and eliminate terrorism. Bomb

      5 min read

    • Article

      Sharing The Great American Dream

      Oct 29, 2020

      ROBERT PUTNAM is an American intellectual institution. His books, from Bowling Alone (2000) on the decline of community to Our Kids (2015) on the diminishing promise of equal opportunity, are committed social science at its best, and they stimulated

      6 min read

    • Article

      Can Biden’s Summit For Democracy Restore Shrinking Freedoms?

      Dec 2, 2021

      The planning started within days of President Joe Biden’s inauguration, and now it’s happening: a gathering of more than 100 world leaders to launch a democratic fightback against the rising influence and assertiveness of autocracies like Russia and

      3 min read

    • Article

      From The Editor

      Jan 17, 2022

      DEBATES ABOUT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DEMOCRACY are as old as democracy itself. But in the broader span of history, people power has only ever gotten more desirable. It was the quest for democracy that dominated so much of the last century, especially a

      2 min read

    • Article

      Republics Large and Small

      Aug 4, 2021

      In the beginning, the American Revolution was about liberty. To the Americans, as to their ideological mentors, the radical English Whigs, liberty was the antithesis and eternal antagonist of power. Power meant simply control over the lives of one’s

      19 min read

    • Article

      Goodbye, Globalization?

      Aug 18, 2022

      Goodbye, Globalization?
      12 min read

    • Article

      The Abandonment Of Growth And The Decline Of The West

      Sep 15, 2022

      From the founding of the republic to the turn of the millennium, America’s core economic creed was growth. That growth religion enabled the United States to become the world’s richest and most powerful nation, and dramatically improved Americans’ qua

      42 min read

    • Article

      Breaking Down Stereotypes

      Jul 15, 2021

      Richard Wolff, an American Marxian economist and professor emeritus of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, shared his observations on the role of the Communist Party of China (CPC) in China’s development and China-U.S. ties in an ex

      4 min read

    • Article

      Does A Rebirth Of Democracy Lie Ahead?

      Apr 12, 2021

      One vision from a U.S. government think tank imagines how innovation and scientific progress could pave the way.

      2 min read

    Reviews for The Conscience of a Liberal

    4/5

    188 ratings11 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 2/5
      Feels one sided. Both parties seem equally big business friendly to me..
    • 5/5
      My book club outvoted me--I didn't want to read this book, because I figured a regular reader of Krugman's columns would not get much from it. I guess I thought this was a compendium of the columns or something.

      Boy, was I wrong! This is a great book, must reading for anyone who cares about the direction we have been moving in. Krugman makes a good case for political action now to get a universal health care plan in place, let the tax cuts expire, reverse the government's attacks on unions and so forth. I particularly liked that he put all of this in historical context as well as in comparison with other OECD countries.

      Really, I think, a must-read book!
    • 3/5
      Pretty easy read. I think it wasn't as statistically heavy as I was expecting but it was still pretty interesting. I think the basic argument made here is that after the guilded age, the US went into a "great compression," and it was an objectively good thing. Sometime in the late 60's and early 70's there were interests within the Republican party (greatly influenced by an undercurrent of racism) that wanted to rebel against that great compression, and the New Deal and what we're experiencing now is culmination of that.

      The arguments are compelling, but having been written in 2007, many of the ideas have come and manifested itself. In fact it seems like Obama read this book before endeavoring into his bid for health care reform. Worth a read, but lacks the punch of true insight, and 5 years in politics is a lifetime.
    • 5/5
      In The Conscience of a Liberal, Paul Krugman, Nobel Prize laureate in economics, provides a concise economic history of the United States since the 1920s, showing the direct connection between politics and the economy. He challenges the orthodox view that the economy is largely controlled by impersonal "market forces" and instead argues that political agendas and government policies driven by those agendas have had a major impact on economic conditions, especially in terms of the distribution of wealth and disparities in income. While economics has been described as the "dismal science", Krugman's writing is clear and very readable. He supports his arguments with ample statistical evidence, but in a non-wonkish style that can be readily understood by non-economists. Krugman notes that we are moving into an age of economic inequality on a level not seen since the "long Gilded Age" which ended with the Great Depression and the advent of the New Deal. As in the Gilded Age, we now have a political system dominated by the economic orthodoxy of the Republican Party, friendly to corporations and the weatlhy and hostile to organized labor and the working class and largely indifferent to the middle class. The New Deal began what Krugman calls the "Great Compression", a redistribution of weatlth downward from the top to a rapidly expanding middle class. The creation of Social Security, and later Medicare, helped to provide economic security for millions of the most vulnerable and provided a boost to the economy in general. Then the massive spending of the Second World War brought the nation back to prosperity, creating almost full employment and further moving wealth to the middle class. The GI Bill and the growth of labor unions in the postwar decades were crucial in creating good-paying jobs for millions of veterans and elevating the majority of the population into the middle class.But since the "Reagan revolution" of the 1980s, the GOP has been taken over by movement conservatism, which in turn has pulled the entire political spectrum farther to the right. The major parties once had a large area of ideological overlap in the center, but the new Republican Party has gone so far to the radical right that there is no longer any bipartisan center in Congress or in most state legislatures. Whereas, Krugman writes, Eisenhower Republicans had come to accept Social Security and other fundamental institutions created by the New Deal, the new Republicans are determined to undo all progressive economic policy enacted since the time of FDR. They have largely succeded in reducing taxes on the highest incomes to the lowest level in decades, reducing or eliminating most corporate income tax and drastically reducing the capital gains tax. At the same time, they have promoted the massive inflation of corporate CEO salaries and benefits so that American business executives are paid much more lavishly than their foreign counterparts in other prosperous nations, while the buying power of most American workers has stagnated for decades.As Krugman argues, the economic policies of the GOP would be wildly unpopular, if they were presented nakedly in their true nature. But movement conservatives have brilliantly used a faux populism to disguise their economic agenda, getting millions of middle class, and even working class, voters to vote against their own interests. This is largely achieved through the "politics of mass distraction" as Krugman describes it. Central to this strategy has been the appeal to white supremacy, which converted millions of Southern Democrats into Republicans, creating the Southern base for the party that was once that of Lincoln. Movement conservatives have also harnessed the religious fanaticism of voters most concerned about such issues as abortion, sexuality, and prayer in public places, as well as "gun rights" and the "sanctity of marriage" and the traditional home life idealized in 1950s television sitcoms. Krugman's Conscience of a Liberal was published five years ago, before the election of President Obama and the subsequent Tea Party backlash. The radicalization of the GOP has only gottem worse since then. But he also wrote before the emergence of Occupy Wall Street and the counter-offensive organized by labor unions in Wisconsin, Ohio and elsewhere. Although the economic disparity he decried in the book seems to be worsening, the genuine populist resistance to the dominant ideological agenda is gaining strength. Krugman provides both a dire warning and a call to action to restore economic fairness, and a more secure life for the vast majority, while we still have the means to do so through the power of the ballot.
    • 4/5
      Well written and full of data backing up Krugman's reasons why anyone with a brain, a soul, isn't super wealthy or who just gives a damn about America and Americans considers themselves a liberal.
    • 4/5
      I don't read Krugman's columns much, so didn't have many preconceived expectations. Thought he made a lot of interesting points, in particular about our country's financial history, but thought the evidence for many of his claims seemed sparse. In particular, many of his comments about the Republican party, if true -- I'm not 100% convinced, really scare me.
    • 5/5
      Krugman takes the reader on a succinct and readable journey through of US economic history beginning from about 1900 up to the present. His focus is how the average (or more precisely median) worker has fared. Krugman recounts the great economic inequality in the pre-Great Depression era and demonstrates that nearly identical levels of inequality have returned. Krugman’s primary argument is that US government policies and actions can be used to reduce economic inequality and that it did so in response to the Great Depression, through World War Two and beyond. He calls this era the Great Compression when the average CEO of a large company made about 30 times the income of an average worker rather than today’s multiplier of 300. He further argues that conservative political forces used Nixon’s Southern strategy to divide workers and attain power. Once there, these forces applied Friedman economics (and some made-up economics like the ‘supply-side’ craze) to government policies, declared war on unions, and deregulated across the board. Krugman presciently argued that the Republicans’ politics of racial division were nearing the end of the road as the demographics of the US changed. Krugman expected the recent victory by a progressive Democrat in 2008. He sets forth several fairly specific policy recommendations for progressives (liberals who do things): universal health insurance, a more progressive tax structure, increase the minimum wage, and make union organizing easier. Part of his argument for giving priority to universal health insurance is that it will demonstrate that the government can indeed institute policies that make a person’s life better. After several decades of anti-government rhetoric, such a demonstration is necessary.Krugman’s prescriptions are not a complete progressive agenda – he barely touches on the environment – but if President Obama and Congress institute Krugman’s ideas in the economic realm we will have a fairer society where the benefits of economic activity are more equitably shared. My personal feeling is they should act aggressively and swiftly on multiple fronts before the GOP has recovered its footing and to occupy the inevitable political counterattack busy with many challenges at once.
    • 4/5
      Paul Krugman has quickly become my favorite economist. Of course, I really don't know that many economists, so that isn't such a high bar to clear. However, it was so refreshing to read an unapologetic defense of liberal (yes...liberal, not "progressive") economics. I fully believe that among the many items that will place the Bush presidency near the top of the historical list of failed administrations is the economic disaster in the form of a new Gilded Age that his policies have brought forward. The complete submission to the "market" without any concern for the fact that markets display no morals have brought our nation to the point were there is a new super-rich class that are not beholden to anyone in any way. Krugman details how this came to be, how well the US economy did from the perspective of the median income earner prior to now and suggests how to resolve and return to some sensible economic policy.
    • 5/5
      Enjoyed this much more than "The Great Unravelling."
    • 4/5
      Paul Krugman has been for a long time a lone beacon of sanity in the current US descent into darkness. I had high hopes for this book (which had generally good reviews) but am overall disappointed by the disjointed pieces that make up this book: a history of US income inequality in the 20th century (Gilded Age inequality, New Deal compression, rapid divergence by a growing class of ultra-rich since the Eighties), a paean to taxes and unions, an analysis of the rise of movement "conservatives", the Southern strategy and race in US politics, a plea and plan for government-funded health care and a surprisingly rosy outlook. The title "Conscience of a Liberal" is also a misnomer, as the book does neither discuss morale nor liberal values per se. The book dwells (apart from a few words on FDR's New Deal) mostly on conservative initiatives and Krugman's ideas for pushback (a health care plan, taxes and unions).I have three issues with this book: nostalgia, picking the wrong fight and the easy way out.Nostalgia. Krugman combines his description of US 20th century inequality with a nostalgic look at the Fifties and Sixties. I might not have personal recollections about that time, what I have read about (and increasingly looked at) that time period, it was everything but harmonious. The Krugmanian harmony was restricted to the white suburbs, the playground of organization man. The other America had to fight the battles of anti-communism (McCarthy anyone?) and civil rights. Krugman does not need to indulge in nostalgia to present his powerful arguments against income inequality. It would even help him to see some of the pernicious effects the unions inflicted on US competitiveness in the Sixties and Seventies. Better collective bargaining would help the poor in America. It is a fine line, however, between empowering unions and shackling management, protecting outdated work processes and jobs. A look at heavily unionized sectors (such as airlines and teaching) should give Krugman pause to think.The wrong fight. Universal health care is yesterday's fight. The conservatives have intellectually lost this battle, all that remains is mopping up. Krugman was influential in winning this battle but this book is merely a coda. After the next presidential election, universal healthcare will come to all Americans, at last, in one form or another. Conservatives will guarantee that the system will be less efficient than in most other countries so that conservatives can preserve their mantra that government doesn't work.The easy way out. Racism and the Southern strategy are the source of all evil in Krugman's view. The book's villain is Ronald Reagan who in Krugman's dictum led, as a race-baiting pied piper, the white Southerners from the Democratic to the Republican party. That shattered the alliance of Northern liberals and Southern transfer receivers. Krugman postulates declining racism and an increase of minority voters and concludes that the Republican strategy will fail. While race is a good predictor in the South, it cannot help why liberal Minnesota has become a swing state. Krugman neglects to mention the remarkable emergence of Southern economic power (Southwest Airlines, Walmart, Coca-Cola, even Enron) as well as the huge demographic shift to the South (Texas, Florida).What I would have liked Krugman to discuss is the preponderant influence of the ultra-rich and corporations. He mentions trust-funded conservative think-tanks but does not dwell on media concentration nor on the demographics of US politicians themselves. A requirement for US politicians is a multi-million campaign fund, which restricts the possible candidates to rich people and dependents of certain institutions. Granted, the US has always been a rich man's country (starting with the Constitution which assigned the votes of those too poor to own even their own bodies to their owners). Most of the founding fathers were filthy rich. Those that were not (Tom Paine, Samuel Adams) were quickly pushed to the side lines. A government truly representative of the people might provide politics for the people. Given the entrenched opposition to a more equitable USA, there are no easy solutions. I wish Krugman had offered some more light.
    • 5/5
      Silly me, as much as I've liked Paul Krugman's commentary in the _New York Times_ I didn't know until right before reading his book that hs is an economist. Economics has always been a subject I've been too timid to tackle, but Krugman writes so clearly that I can understand what he has to saylIn this wonderful book, he explains the political economy of the US since what he calles the "Long Gilded Age" which extends to the Great Depression. He makes some fascinating points, all of which he backs up with research.1) Income inequality is as high now as it was in the Long Gilded Age.2) The middle class America that he and many of us grew up in did not come about naturally by the maturation of the economy, but was created by the New Deal policies of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.3) During the time of the strength of the middle class, bipartisanship was much more in evidence.4) Movement conservatives have polarized the country by moving away from bipartisanship... the shift has not come from the Democrats moving farther left, but almost entireily by the GOP moving sharply to the right.5) Movement conservatives have tried to roll back the New Deal, and have succeeded in many ways, leading to new high levels of income inequality.6) Income inequality leads inevitably to a lessening of democracy.7) Issues of race played a key part in the success of movement conservatism.8) Movement conservatism has taken over the Republican Party so that there are few non-movement conservatives left. They have been so successful because they have proved able to win elections.Krugman sees reason to hope. Movement conservatism has become less attractive because it is rife with croneyism,, which leads to incompetence. Race is becoming less a factor as the country becomes more tolerant.So Krugman asks what progressives should do now to increase democracy and lessen the effects of income inequality. He suggests the first step is to complete the New Deal by providing guaranteed universal health care. He then does a masterful job of explaining why the US health care system is no better than most others but costs so much more, and what it would take to fix it.Despite all the belief that in America anyone can climb high, he shows that there is strong inequality of opportunity in the US, and he talks about ways of improving that.Overall, the book is an excellent history of the US political economy since the 1920s, and a call to action by liberals to pursue policies to increase democracy and equality for all Americans.