Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    Changing My Mind: Occasional Essays
    Unavailable
    Changing My Mind: Occasional Essays
    Unavailable
    Changing My Mind: Occasional Essays
    Audiobook12 hours

    Changing My Mind: Occasional Essays

    Written by Zadie Smith

    Narrated by Barbara Rosenblat

    4/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this audiobook

    "[These essays] reflect a lively, unselfconscious, rigorous, erudite, and earnestly open mind that's busy refining its view of life, literature, and a great deal in between." --Los Angeles Times

    Split into five sections--Reading, Being, Seeing, Feeling, and Remembering--Changing My Mind finds Zadie Smith casting an acute eye over material both personal and cultural. This engaging collection of essays, some published here for the first time, reveals Smith as a passionate and precise essayist, equally at home in the world of great books and bad movies, family and philosophy, British comedians and Italian divas. Whether writing on Katherine Hepburn, Kafka, Anna Magnani, or Zora Neale Hurston, she brings deft care to the art of criticism with a style both sympathetic and insightful. Changing My Mind is journalism at its most expansive, intelligent, and funny--a gift to readers and writers both.

    Zadie Smith's newest novel, Swing Time, will be published by Penguin Press in November 2016.


    From the Trade Paperback edition.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherPenguin Random House Audio
    Release dateNov 12, 2009
    ISBN9781101145852
    Unavailable
    Changing My Mind: Occasional Essays

    Related to Changing My Mind

    Related audiobooks

    Literary Criticism For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Criticism, Anyone?: An Ode to Martin Amis

      Jun 12, 2023

      The author of some 25 books, many of them brilliant, he seemed incapable of writing a bland string of words. The post Criticism, Anyone?: An Ode to Martin Amis appeared first on The Millions.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Martin Amis Delivers The ‘Inside Story,’ A Sprawling Autobiographical Novel

      Oct 27, 2020

      The British novelist writes from a position of gratitude – toward family, friends, and mentors – rather than from anger or self-pity.

      3 min read

    • Article

      How to Have an Opinion: The Criticism of Martin Seymour-Smith

      Oct 9, 2018

      Martin Seymour-Smith was a grumpy fellow. A promising poet who took up writing big reference books of literary criticism, his highly idiosyncratic 1977 survey Who’s Who In Twentieth Century Literature is deliciously highbrow junk food. But like straw

      4 min read

    • Article

      Global Non-fiction Market

      Sep 2, 2021

      Brick is a Canadian international literary journal published twice a year. The editorial team like to publish ‘invigorating and challenging literary essays, interviews, memoirs, travelogues, belles lettres, and unusual musings’. Note, no fiction. Thi

      1 min read

    • Article

      International Zine Scene

      Jan 6, 2022

      McCoy’s Monthly is a zine with a team who despise literary conventions. They like to publish ‘original, unique writing unrestricted’ by conventions of what is literary. They also like writers of all backgrounds and styles. Submit long or short storie

      3 min read

    • Article

      EDITOR’S Note

      Oct 11, 2017

      THE WRITERS I HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF TALKING WITH these days have one thing in common: They are all incredibly busy. I believe the most precious gift one could offer a creative person is time: unscheduled, unencumbered, unhurried time. But when I hear

      1 min read

    • Article

      EDITOR’S Note

      Oct 11, 2017

      THE WRITERS I HAVE THE PRIVILEGE OF TALKING WITH these days have one thing in common: They are all incredibly busy. I believe the most precious gift one could offer a creative person is time: unscheduled, unencumbered, unhurried time. But when I hear

      1 min read

    • Article

      Questioning Her Own Questioning: On Leslie Jamison’s ‘Make It Scream, Make It Burn’

      Mar 9, 2020

      As skeptical as Jamison has become of skepticism, she’s still a skeptic in a certain essayistic sense: she’s always digging deeper, refusing to trust surface appearances. The post Questioning Her Own Questioning: On Leslie Jamison’s ‘Make It Scream,

      5 min read

    • Article

      5 Books Making News This Week: Murder, Manifestos & Math Students

      Mar 21, 2017

      This year’s National Book Critics Circle Awards go to Louise Erdrich’s LaRose (fiction), Matthew Desmond’s Evicted (nonfiction), Ruth Franklin’s Shirley Jackson (biography), Carol Anderson’s White Rage (criticism), Ishion Hutchinson’s House of Lords

      7 min read

    • Article

      Atticus Review

      Feb 26, 2022

      THE WEBSITE FOR THE 10-YEAR-OLD journal Atticus Review has a lot going on. You can read fiction, poetry, and creative nonfiction by contributors from around the world. You can subscribe to “The Weekly Atticus” for short essays and letters penned by t

      4 min read

    • Article

      Fiction on Trial

      Sep 5, 2023

      Fiction on Trial
      10 min read

    • Article

      Quick Picks

      Jan 27, 2020

      Genre: Memoir Here’s another of those books that find the author hitching their proverbial wagon to that of a superstar, in this case the former Bobby Zimmerman, who Kemp met and befriended when the two were just average middle-class Jewish kids in n

      1 min read

    Reviews for Changing My Mind

    4/5

    135 ratings13 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      One of Ms. Smith's projects in this rather sprawling collection is an assembly of the disparate. That sounds Foucauldian and I think I am wide of the mark with my designation, but only just. Such strange pieces are collected between these soft covers and I remain on the margins of my wits to discern the "what for." It speaks of my amateur treatment of essays that I regard the value of such in its ability to persuade me to the author's perspective. By my metric the early essays were failures. I didn't want to read Hurston or any more Forster; it was quite the contrary, if fact, I thought I don't need to bother. Not now anyway. Ruminations on Barthes and Nabokov were a different kettle but it should be stated throughout these myriad points of interest, I loved Smith's observations and language.

      The essay Speaking in Tongues should be a necessary primer for those about to read NW. I wish I had encountered the essay before the novel. The Liberian journalism and cinematic sketches were sound if egregious. The autobiographical pieces on approach too the novel and her memories of her father are sublime. Such is the dearest under the sun, especially to this cranky sod who can't seem to step aside from the latest United loss.

      The collection concludes with a eulogy of sorts to David Foster Wallace. Again Zadie Smith has not pushed my hand into another reading of DFW, I doubt nay one could these days. I am glad to have had this time with Smith's nonfiction.

    • 4/5
      I absolutely love Zadie Smith but this collection of essays was a mixed bag. The first essay, “Their Eyes Were Watching God: What Does Soulful mean,” was especially good mostly because I just read the Zora Neale Hurston book in July. I appreciated almost every word Smith had to say on the subject. Essays about Nabokov, Barthes, Kafka and especially David Foster Wallace….not so much. The Wallace essay was downright deadly boring and long. Just terrible.The essay about Katharine Hepburn and Greta Garbo was absolutely fascinating. So much I never knew about these women was brought out beautifully by Smith. And her essay entitled “Smith Family Christmas” was wonderful and this passage really hit home:”Santa help me but I believe this too. You know you believe it when you start your own little family with some person you met four years ago in a bar, and then he tries to open the presents on Christmas Eve because that’s what he did in his family and you have the strong urge to run screaming from the building holding your banner about the end and how it is nigh. It is a moving and comic thing---a Murdochian scuffle between the Real and the Dream---to watch a young couple as they teeter around the Idea of Christmas, trying to avoid internecine festive warfare.”So like many essay collections this one had its ups and downs but on the whole was really quite good. Recommended.
    • 5/5
      Not sure how to review a book of essays, but I'll just say that I thoroughly enjoyed this. Even the somewhat lighter pieces like the movie reviews and Hollywood tales were by turns funny and intriguing esp. the portraits of Katherine Hepburn and Greta Garbo. The best parts were about writing and rules for novelists and also the essays about other writers and other books. The main ones being about Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God, George Eliot's Middlemarch, Vladimir Nabokov's Pnin, Joseph O'Neill's Netherland, Tom McCarthy's Remainder (which might also contain #ASMRinFiction if the reference to the main character's tingling sensation means what I think it means) and David Foster Wallace's Brief Interviews with Hideous Men. Most of those I have never read but Smith's essays make all them sound intriguing. And I'm even more interested in reading those books of Smith's that I've missed along the way.
    • 5/5
      A disparate and wide ranging series of essays, mixing criticism of books and films, family history and travelogue. Smith is never less than engaging and thought provoking, whatever she writes about. The sections about her father are particularly moving, as is the account of the devastation she found on a trip to Liberia, the film criticism is very funny in places and the literary criticism clever and perceptive, though the final section on David Foster Wallace is hard work.
    • 5/5
      Summary: A collection of Zadie Smith’s essays submitted to various magazines and venues. The topics range from literary criticism to film reviews to stories about her family.Review: Zadie Smith is so good. I remember reading [White Teeth], knowing that when the author wrote it, she wasn’t so much older than I was. That blew me away. Now Smith is older and perhaps wiser, and [Changing My Mind] reflects a lot of that. It catalogues some of her changing opinions, both as a reader, a writer, and a person. However, no matter if she is twenty-one or thirty-five, Zadie Smith’s mind is elegant and agile. It performs like a well-tuned piano — the parts work together seamlessly and what comes out is intellectual music.Her meditation on the middle path of E.M Forster caused me to have a huge crush on him (and dig out my old copy of [Maurice]). Her analysis of Barthes’ “Death of the Author” theory and Nabakov’s larger-than-life authorial persona helped me articulate some of my own ambiguous opinions on authorial presence. Her argument for Kafka as everyman was a refreshing breath of air. Her love song to Zora Neal Hurston made me sniffle. Her film reviews are witty and rigorous. I especially love this line:“I base this upon the stupidity/pleasure axis I apply to popular artists: how much pleasure they give versus how stupid one has to become to receive said pleasure.” (Pg. 168)Is that not perfect?Zadie Smith is the kind of thinker I would like to be. Now, I will point out that [Changing My Mind] is not for everybody. The first section especially seems geared towards those with high literary tastes who have read Eliot and Kafka, and who sit around at dinner parties and talk about things like the death of the author or the future of the novel. Not everybody is into these hyper-literary pretentions. There were certain parts where even I felt a bit alienated, and I’m normally the perfect audience for these types of thoughts. But that alienation — and fatigue, because there is some of that too — was rare and in between.Conclusion: A wonderful collection of essays. I know that I’ll be thinking about them for days to come.
    • 3/5
      Interesting, but so much of it was so trivial. Honestly, Zadie Smith is an amazing writer, but I still don't care what she thought about Memoirs of a Geisha.
    • 2/5
      Changing my mind. Occasional essays demonstrates that essay writing is not for everyone. Firstly, Zadie Smith seems to struggle to find the right form, an for lack of a format falls back on her university years, or so it seems. Some of the essays, particularly those about literature read like university term papers. For instance, the essays on Kafka, Barthes and Nabokov, Middlemarch and "Two Directions for the Novel" are longish and larded with long quotations, which are set apart. The essay on Barthes and Nabokov is 15 pages long with no less than 18 longish footnotes, and the essay on Kafka packs 16 footnotes in just 12 pages. The numerous long quotations and footnotes make for very uncomfortable and scholarly reading.The essays in Changing my mind. Occasional essays are grouped in five section, viz. "Reading", "Being", "Seeing", "Feeling" and "Remembering". This division and the titles of the sections is reminiscent of the essay collections by Susan Sontag, compare for instance with Where the stress falls, which is divided into three sections "Reading", "Seeing" and "There and Here". Is this a tribute to Susan Sontag?However, it is obvious that the essays of Zadie Smith cannot compare even a little with the essays of Susan Sontag. The essays by Zadie Smith uttely lack originality. They were not written out of curiosity of the author, or the author's initiative to explore and attempt to capture a vision. They were not even, as Somerset Maugham migh call it, literary diversions, written to please the author. Most of the essays in this collection were written at request, or as the author puts it in the "Foreword" (..) requests that came in now and then. Two thousand words about Christmas? About Katherine Hepburn? Kafka? Liberia? A hundred thousand words piled up that way.Where is the passion? Where is the sense of novelty and pleasure of writing as an adventure? It is not there. Changing my mind. Occasional essays is the result of Zadie Smith plodding from deadline to deadline.Zadie Smith is a very successful author at a still very young age. Apparently, a number of these essays must have been written very early on in her career, or as she writes in the "Foreword" when you are first published at a young age, your writing grows with you. (...) Changing my mind seemed an apt, confessional title to describe this process. (p. xiii). In essence, the collection of essays in Changing my mind. Occasional essays are early attempts by an author who has not yet found a form.
    • 4/5
      My idea of escapist reading these days is something that requires my attention and engages me all the way, so I'm on a nonfiction kick—which is probably working too well, because I'm having trouble tearing myself away long enough to do a whole bunch of work reading I need to take care of at home, and now have it all piled up for this weekend. Oh well, at least it's a long weekend and I can do both.I got into this one in anticipation of reading her new novel once I'm in a fiction-y mood again. The essays here weren’t particularly pertinent to anything in my life—I don’t care about the posthumous disposition of Kafka’s work, and I never really got on the David Foster Wallace train—but I like seeing how she does her reviewing, what's in her toolbox. She does a lot of thinking on her pages, and it veered close to being a vanity production in a lot of places, but I still enjoy watching her do it.
    • 5/5
      Summary: A collection of Zadie Smith’s essays submitted to various magazines and venues. The topics range from literary criticism to film reviews to stories about her family.Review: Zadie Smith is so good. I remember reading [White Teeth], knowing that when the author wrote it, she wasn’t so much older than I was. That blew me away. Now Smith is older and perhaps wiser, and [Changing My Mind] reflects a lot of that. It catalogues some of her changing opinions, both as a reader, a writer, and a person. However, no matter if she is twenty-one or thirty-five, Zadie Smith’s mind is elegant and agile. It performs like a well-tuned piano — the parts work together seamlessly and what comes out is intellectual music.Her meditation on the middle path of E.M Forster caused me to have a huge crush on him (and dig out my old copy of [Maurice]). Her analysis of Barthes’ “Death of the Author” theory and Nabakov’s larger-than-life authorial persona helped me articulate some of my own ambiguous opinions on authorial presence. Her argument for Kafka as everyman was a refreshing breath of air. Her love song to Zora Neal Hurston made me sniffle. Her film reviews are witty and rigorous. I especially love this line:“I base this upon the stupidity/pleasure axis I apply to popular artists: how much pleasure they give versus how stupid one has to become to receive said pleasure.” (Pg. 168)Is that not perfect?Zadie Smith is the kind of thinker I would like to be. Now, I will point out that [Changing My Mind] is not for everybody. The first section especially seems geared towards those with high literary tastes who have read Eliot and Kafka, and who sit around at dinner parties and talk about things like the death of the author or the future of the novel. Not everybody is into these hyper-literary pretentions. There were certain parts where even I felt a bit alienated, and I’m normally the perfect audience for these types of thoughts. But that alienation — and fatigue, because there is some of that too — was rare and in between.Conclusion: A wonderful collection of essays. I know that I’ll be thinking about them for days to come.
    • 4/5
      Smart, smart, smart. I can't imagine reading literary criticism in bed written by anyone else. Her essay on Obama's capacity to speak multiple versions of English should be assigned college reading. And her memoirs are rich, lively, worth studying.
    • 3/5
      Changing My Mind is a mixed bag of essays, all written with intelligence and insight but many of narrow interest. I found the essays on "Their Eyes Were Watching God", "That Crafty Feeling", Speaking in Tongues" and the three memoir pieces under the heading of Feeling very good and thought provoking. The rest I found a struggle.
    • 4/5
      Zadie Smith is a British writer who achieved great fame with her first novel, White Teeth. The book was good, but the hype concentrated on the fact that it had been written by a young, beautiful black woman who had grown up on a council estate in Willesden. Her second novel did not do well, and Smith gave a few bitter interviews and then disappeared. She spent that time back in her academic comfort zone (she has a degree from Cambridge) and writing things like movie reviews and magazine articles about her family. She has since brought out another book, On Beauty, which was successful on its own merits and now she has had this book of essays published.Changing My Mind was a very uneven read, and I think she might have been better served by waiting a few years, until there was a better selection of material to chose from. Many of the essays, the ones that discuss authors and books or the ones that talk about her family are amazing. Then there are a few moderately interesting pieces about Liberia and her own writing methods that are worth reading, but not exciting and then there are the bits from when she reviewed movies for a newspaper. Essays about movies, or Hollywood, can be riveting, but Smith has too sharp a mind and, while she seems to like film, isn't a real fan or expert. So this section consists of describing the plots of various movies and there's a sense that she's looking down on the whole endeavor.The essays on literature, however, are fantastic. She has the ability to delve deeply into a topic without talking down to her audience or making it too difficult to understand. I did have to pay attention, especially to the essay on David Foster Wallace, but I was never lost. She discusses Their Eyes Were Watching God, Middlemarch, Brief Interviews with Hideous Men, Kafka, Nabokov, E.M. Forster and Barthes and each essay was a revelation (to me, at least).
    • 5/5
      This book is a collection of essays that give you a chance to befriend the author. The book is divided into four sections that are: Reading, Being, Seeing and Feeling. Reading this book made me look at some things a little differently. I started understanding things that I never understood before. At the same time, I was forced to rethink some of my own thoughts because I saw them from a different perspective.If you like to dig deep down and think about the meaning behind life, this is the perfect book to sit down with.