Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The Winter King
    The Winter King
    The Winter King
    Audiobook (abridged)6 hours

    The Winter King

    Written by Bernard Cornwell

    Narrated by Tim Pigott-Smith

    4/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    It takes a remarkable writer to make an old story as fresh and compelling as the first time we heard it. With The Winter King, the first volume of his magnificent Warlord Chronicles, Bernard Cornwell finally turns to the story he was born to write: the mythic saga of King Arthur.

    The tale begins in Dark Age Britain, a land where Arthur has been banished and Merlin has disappeared, where a child-king sits unprotected on the throne, where religion vies with magic for the souls of the people. It is to this desperate land that Arthur returns, a man at once utterly human and truly heroic: a man of honor, loyalty, and amazing valor; a man who loves Guinevere more passionately than he should; a man whose life is at once tragic and triumphant.

    As Arthur fights to keep a flicker of civilization alive in a barbaric world, Bernard Cornwell makes a familiar tale into a legend all over again.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherHarperAudio
    Release dateMar 30, 2010
    ISBN9780062009470
    The Winter King
    Author

    Bernard Cornwell

    BERNARD CORNWELL is the author of over fifty novels, including the acclaimed New York Times bestselling Saxon Tales, which serve as the basis for the hit Netflix series The Last Kingdom. He lives with his wife on Cape Cod and in Charleston, South Carolina.

    More audiobooks from Bernard Cornwell

    Related to The Winter King

    Titles in the series (6)

    View More
    View More

    Related audiobooks

    General Fiction For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Carningli

      Mar 22, 2024

      Carningli
      4 min read

    • Article

      Two Go Wild In Wales

      Aug 19, 2020

      Two Go Wild In Wales
      6 min read

    • Article

      Break For The BORDER

      Sep 29, 2020

      Break For The BORDER
      4 min read

    • Article

      Gods, Men And Monsters

      Feb 16, 2021

      Gods, Men And Monsters
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Sands of TREGANLLAW

      May 5, 2022

      England, 1497. Henry VII, the first Tudor king, reigns, having vanquished Richard III, the last monarch of the House of York, at the Battle of Bosworth in 1485. A young man calling himself Richard, Duke of York has spent years striving for recogniti

      5 min read

    • Article

      Corndon Hill

      Nov 5, 2021

      Corndon Hill
      3 min read

    • Article

      Building Character In CORNWALL

      Mar 19, 2020

      Marcus Leach is a writer and speaker with a passion for adventure and the outdoorsI It’s character-building,” I shouted through the roar of the wind as the rain continued to lash at our exposed faces. Kim’s expression told me that she didn’t entirely

      6 min read

    • Article

      Speaking To Us From Highclere Castle Lord And Lady Carnarvon On How Their Magnificent Estate Opened Its Doors To Young Wartime Evacuees And Future Plans To Mark V.e. Day

      May 11, 2020

      It is one of Britain’s most distinguished stately homes, visited by royalty – including the Queen – throughout history and the magnificent setting for the hit drama Downton Abbey . But during the Second World War, Highclere Castle near Newbury, Hamps

      4 min read

    • Article

      Haunted In An Irish Castle

      Nov 5, 2018

      Haunted In An Irish Castle
      6 min read

    • Article

      Myths And Monsters

      Dec 22, 2020

      Myths And Monsters
      4 min read

    • Article

      Mynydd Enlli

      Aug 5, 2022

      Mynydd Enlli
      3 min read

    • Article

      Tripping The Light Fintastic

      Jul 5, 2023

      ON a peaceful summer’s evening, a beautiful girl with long, golden hair floated in a rockpool near Cury in Cornwall, sobbing inconsolably. An old man drew near and, startled, she leapt, revealing a hint of fish tail. Keen to help a damsel in distress

      6 min read

    • Article

      The Field From The Archives

      Dec 10, 2020

      BEING an American, there is a telephone at my bedside, and I was awakened on the first morning of the New Year by the ringing of the bell. The familiar voice of Holland, my huntsman, came over the wire: “Good morning, sir. Happy New Year. Is it brown

      4 min read

    • Article

      Arthur’s Seat

      Jan 19, 2021

      Arthur’s Seat
      4 min read

    • Article

      Building Character In CORNWALL

      Mar 5, 2020

      Bailey Autograph 7 days October 2019 The wild, back-to-nature appeal of a rugged coastline, the engaging blend of myth and history and the wonder that is the Eden Project It’s character-building,” I shouted through the roar of the wind as the rain co

      6 min read

    • Article

      Land Of Myths And Legends

      Jun 22, 2023

      Land Of Myths And Legends
      7 min read

    • Article

      Magnets: Carried through time, lovers seek their purpose.

      Feb 6, 2014

      Moon Colony B, 2213 Former Ponzi-schemer Mary Pillar digs through a trashcan. It smells like rotten eggs and milk. She is elderly and homeless, living in an alley between two eco-efficient skyscrapers. Dust particles dance around her. She has lost ev

      11 min read

    • Article

      A Right Can Of Worms

      Mar 18, 2020

      • When is a worm not a worm? When it’s a wyrm. The word we use derives from the Old English wyrm, a poetic term for a serpent or dragon, a regular figure in a number of widespread mythologies, often large and fearsome, and mercifully unrelated to our

      1 min read

    • Article

      Notes From The Isles

      Dec 16, 2022

      Notes From The Isles
      4 min read

    • Article

      Notes From The Isles

      Apr 14, 2023

      Yet again nemesis has smothered my hubris. Having boasted of my expertise in getting the car up our steep, icy track, I awoke to find myself snowed in, near the top of a glacier, totally cut off from all traffic. A nephew and his wife, who were comin

      4 min read

    • Article

      Searching for CAMELOT

      Jun 10, 2022

      Searching for CAMELOT
      6 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for The Winter King

    4/5

    66 ratings38 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      I'm a huge fan of Arthurian literature - I've probably read over 50 books on the topic since I was a teenager - and I wasn't sure how I would feel about Cornwell's take on the subject. I've always felt the myth was more important than the history when it comes to Arthur, and I knew Cornwell would at least strip the work of most of the usual anachronisms. He actually did more, transforming even the most basic of relationships and events, until only his adherance to the most basic themes of Arthurian legend allow this book to be considered part of the genre.At first it upset me. I couldn't see what the benefit was of having a character called Elaine only to make her Lancelot's mother. But as I read on, I saw the appeal. As any lover of the genre will tell you, almost nothing is known about a historical Arthur; even his existance cannot be verified, and so everyone who writes an Arthur book changes things to suit their point.So why not change things drastically? Cornwell has this story dictated by one of the knights to a Queen who wants a more glamourous story than the one the knight is telling. He knows she is probably changing it in the translation process before the books are even done. Cornwell gives us a deliberately different Arthur, but one in which we can see how and why the story would have been twisted as it was passed down.Arthurian legend has always been a mash-up of history and myth, and Cornwell makes that the theme of of his version. This first book in the series is really great, and can stand alone without its two sequels. Cornwell's great launguage, evocative and spare descriptions, and effortless characterization are here, as are what is most important in Arthur stories: the dream of a golden age that rises above the men and women who inspired it.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      The power vacuum left when the Romans retreat from Britain, had been filled by kings and warlords who not only fight amongst themselves but also fight off invading Saxons and Irish warbands. One king, Uther, manages to cobble together a group of kingdoms. But he's dying, and leaves behind him only one legitimate son, Mordredd, born with a club foot. He gets a promise from one of his allies, that he will marry Mordredd's mother, Uther's queen, and act as regent until Mordredd, then only a baby, comes of age.When Uther dies, the king betrays his promise and attacks, killing Uther's widow and attempting to kill Mordredd. But Merlin's band of Druids and outcasts manages to save and hide the future king.Into that tableau comes Uther's bastard son Arthur, who had been banished to Amorica and who is now a warlord of great renown. Arthur promises to protect Mordredd and hold the kingdom for his half-brother.Following the actual historical record (what there is of it), the tale is unlike all the other Arthurian books I've read. There's little brightness in the world of the Dark Ages. It is full of betrayals and endless wars and few men of honor to be found. Even Arthur is flawed and despite his desire to war for peace, he's foiled at almost every turn if not by his own flaws, then by betrayals and impossible odds.An amazing book.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 2/5
      Bernard Cornwell's The Winter King is the first in his trilogy of books dealing with the story of King Arthur. Our narrator, Derfel, is a Saxon orphan who was adopted by Merlin, a one of Arthur's confidantes and chief fighters. The story opens when Derfel is in his old age; he has become a monk, and is engaged in writing down Arthur's story. He tells it to his queen, Igraine, and their conversations interject the main narrative of Arthur's rise to power.Cornwell makes his Arthur not a king, but a warlord entrusted with the life of the infant king Mordred. Arthur's goal is to unite the tribes of Britain under one peaceful ruler, and to hold back the Saxon invaders. Meanwhile, the mysterious Merlin is searching for the Treasures of Britain, thirteen objects that will allow their possessor to summon the British gods, and restore Britain to its rightful place.I've read a fair amount of Arthurian literature, and I have to say, Cornwell's version of the story is far from my favourite. Derfel is a lifeless narrator, with little personality and even less insight into Arthur's character. He spends chapters talking about how Arthur's decisions resulted in war and grief, and that Arthur's defining trait is his ambition, but then remarks that Arthur was the greatest man he ever knew. To me, Cornwell's Arthur is an idiot - he marries Guinevere in secret and moans about how much he loves her, when clearly she is interested only in his power. Really, he is quite pathetic.Lancelot is another character who I dislike. In The Winter King, he is not a dashing soldier, but a lazy man who is scared of fighting. He is smug and haughty, and his good looks are his only positive feature.So, what about this book is good? Well, I suppose it is quite historically accurate. However, this means that it is rather unpleasant as well. Cornwell fills his pages with violence, rape, descriptions of urination and filth, and makes Britain altogether unattractive. Realistically, it probably was fairly horrible, but for me, this didn't make for good reading. The descriptions of battle were well done, and I enjoyed the sections where Derfel discusses tactical strategies and the soldiers' religion of Mithras. However, these sections were few and far between, and as a result, this book took me weeks to read. Even though my OCD personality will flinch as I write this, I know that I will never read the other two books in this trilogy. This Arthur is not my Arthur, and it disappointed me - so much, in fact, that it may be time for a reread of The Mists of Avalon.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      This book is the first of a trilogy based on the legendary Arthur. The bastard son of High King Uther Pendragon, Arthur himself is not consider of royal lineage (although he does bear the title Lord) and is sworn protector of Uther's heir, the infant King Mordred. Like Cornwell's Saxon chronicles, The Winter King is told as a memoir by a fictional character who manages to be in all the important places at the right time. In this series, the narrator is an aged monk named Derfel, once the warlord Lord Derfel Cadarn, a disciple of Merlin and a member of the Mithraic cult of warriors. How Derfel makes the whole-hearted switch to Christianity is not covered in this book. The story introduces a few characters familiar to those acquainted with the Arthurian legends. I already mentioned Uther, in this story the aged (and quickly late) High King who lost one son named Mordred in battle, and sired another about a year before his death. The infant King Mordred is a deformed child with a club foot, and there is much grumbling that such a creature not be allowed to live. Morgan, Arthur's sister, had her face maimed and perpetually wears a golden mask. She is a disciple of Merlin, who is lord over a kingdom of misfits. Derfel himself is of Saxon origin and was left for dead by a druid in a ceremony commemorating a victory. Nimue (who, in Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur, fills in as the Lady of the Lake when the lady is killed), is Derfel's age, and becomes Merlin's mistress as well as apprentice. King Ban of Benoic loses his kingdom and his life to a Frankish invasion, but his sons Lancelot and Gallahad escape. Gallahad and Derfel are inseparable companions; Gallahad the epitome of a chivalrous knight. Lancelot is a douche of the first order, claiming great feats of heroism while never actually risking his skin. Guinevere, aka "The Whore of Henis Wyren," is Arthur's wife. Arthur's inability to keep it in his pants led to him eschewing a political marriage that would have bought peace among the British tribes (mostly in what is now Wales), allowing them to focus on the encroaching Saxons. As a result of the affront, the kingdoms of Britain polarize to Arthur or his enemy, the King of Powys. Much of the book covers the course of this war.While Cornwell spins a good amount of his own fiction, the setting itself is historically quite plausible. The druids use symbolism and other tricks to rattle the nerves of the believers, but there is no true magic here, nor mystical intervention by the gods. In an amusing twist, Derfel is actually recording this tale as he describes it to a princess many years later. The legends that we are most familiar with are actually believed to have been fact by this princess, errors which Derfel periodically breaks from his narrative to explain to his anxious listener. The climatic battle becomes a draw, mostly because it's never completed thanks to the timely intervention of Merlin and a band of Irish mercenaries that unexpectedly join with Arthur. The King of Powys is killed in battle, and his son, much like Arthur. desires peace among Britons.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      First book in The Warlord Chronicles (Arthurian) trilogy.Cornwell is a first-rate writer of historical action-adventure stories. He’s also extremely creative in the ways he uses his historical material. I always enjoy reading the historical notes at the end of his books, because they give fascinating details about the site, usually, of the action and, of course, when he deviates from historical accuracy.But in this series, about the legendary Arthur, Cornwell outdoes himself. Sticking as he usually does to historical facts, Cornwell is left with very few verifiable “facts, indeed--including whether or not Arthur really existed. Not to worry--he uses what can be surmised and for which there is evidence--and completely tosses the usual Arthurian story, based on Sir Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur, out the window. Instead he creates a story based on the historical time period in which Arthur probably lived--the 5th century C.E. No knights in shining armor--there were no such things as knights the, and men fought--usually in a shield wall--in leather armor. No Round Table, no glamor--just the realities of what would be called the Dark Ages. Christianity was by no means settled in Britain, and it had very little resemblance to what we know as Christianity today. Arthur was a warlord, who united the petty kingdoms (or tried to) against the Saxon invasion. No quest for the Holy Grail--just the desperation of beating back one of the many invasions that shaped the current people known as the English.Many of the old familiar names are present--Guinivere, Lancelot, Bors, Geraint, Excalibur, Merlin, Nimue, Pellinore, Morgan and many more. But they are hardly recognizable in the brand-new, yet far more authentic tale that Cornwell weaves.I happen to love the usual Arthurian tales; I think they are some of the best fantasy ever written. But at least in this first book, I really like what Cornwell has done with this material. It’s a whacking good story, fast-paced and well written--typical Cornwell strengths.There’s one minor almost-caveat, however. The story is told by Dervel Cadarn, a spearman in Arthur’s army. He works very well as a narrator, and lends a very personal touch to the story. Cornwell is a prolific writer, and has written other series. I am currently reading The Last Kindom, the first book in his trilogy, The Saxon Tales, which is set about four centuries later than The Warlord Chronicles. Britain is again facing an invasion, this time of Danes. Again, one king, Alfred the Great, will try to unite the British against the invaders. Again the story is narrated by a fighting man, Uhtred. It’s easy to see how such a story structure and especially the device of such a narrator works well. But if you read both series, they will have a familiarity, because character development is not one of Cornwell’s strong suits nor does it necessarily have to be, given the genre.But taken by itself, The Winter King is a remarkably good story told very, very well. highly recommended.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      Incredible. A story so brutal and so realised I felt I was standing in the Dark Ages and at times wishing I was stood alongside Arthur. This is a retelling of the Arthurian legend told through the eyes of a monk, Derfel, who looks back on his life and reveals the truth of Arthur as he witnessed it. For this to work, Derfel becomes a central character, one who you believe in and one you accept was there as events unfolded. This could easily feel contrived, yet it works seamlessly. The first 80 pages are slow, and be warned confusing, as a list of characters and places had me constantly referring to the character list and map in the front. Yet it is a measured build up, and with a beautiful piece of misdirection (which having read the book before still fooled me.) When Arthur eventually appears (and I’m not ashamed to admit the hairs on the back of my neck stood up) the narrative takes hold. Yet this isn’t just a tale of battle after battle, there are some poignant character interactions which just adds to the layers of the story. All of the characters feel real, from Merlin’s sarcastic wit and his attitude towards the affairs of man, to Arthur’s honourable yet essentially flawed traits. As someone who loves the Arthurian mythology and has pagan tendencies anyway, this book is always going to be difficult to dislike. My knowledge of the mythology and the religion of the times is greater then when I first read this ten years ago, but which just makes me appreciate and love this book even more. The level of detail is breathtaking. It is not an exaggeration to say you can almost smell the smoke from the woodfires and feel the chill from the night air. Anyone with even a slither of interest in the mythology of Arthur, needs to start here. Read it, then await his return...
    • 3/5
      This book came as a recommendation when I was looking to expand beyond my usual reading genre. It is certainly well written. It just didn't hold my attention. Too much battle and politics, not enough love and life. A man's book.
    • 4/5
      Another good solid story from Cornwell although not his best work. There were some parts, in this first chronicle, where the writing seemed stilted and repetitive. I will absolutely read the next chronicle because although this may be his weakest book I've read, Mr. Corwell's overall writing has proven to be stupendous. I expect things to pick up in the next book.
    • 4/5
      Okay, so I'm a sucker for the Arthurian legend... But as someone who primarily reads "literary" works, I must say a well-told story is something worth cherishing. Cornwell is a master story-teller.
    • 4/5
      The author has spun a picaresque tale loosely based on the Arthur cum Camelot legend but cleverly set in a historical context. That context is Britain in the Dark Ages of the late fifth century. Against this setting Cornwell explores familiar themes of duty vs. self-interest, greed vs. charity, courage vs. cowardice, and good vs. evil, to mention a few. Imposed on this ethos he explores a greater struggle between Britain's ancient paganism and an upstart Christianity, struggling to establish itself as the dominant spiritual force. An entertaining and thoughtful read.
    • 4/5
      Cornwell’s done some solid work here. historically accurate and yet satisfyingly recognizable as tales of Arthur. he’s mixed the actual Old Welsh names and places with the later French Norman names to achieve this.

      he chose to begin the story in the middle of the story from the world’s point of view, after Arthur has already made a name for himself as a military innovator (ie cavalry) undefeatable in the field and been banished to Armorica with King Ban.

      i was always impressed with Mary Stewart’s take on the Arthur legend in many ways but in particular that there was no Lancelot because, frankly, there was no mention of such a being in any of the historical documents/tales before Chretian de Troyes. Bedwyr stood in the place of Arthur’s best friend. so, Cornwall’s book begins well enough in this vein with no mention of Lancelot but then, in Armorica, we meet the famed warrior and i balked. however, i kept reading and very quickly became a fan of what Cornwall did with and to the character. a bit of brilliance, really, in that he makes Lancelot out to be nothing more than a fraud by means of the fili or storytellers that he and his father King Ban entertain constantly. why do we know about Lancelot and think him All That and a Bag of Chips? because he made up LIES about himself to fool everyone into thinking he was the epitome of chivalry and knighthood when, in fact, he was everything but. Cornwell’s Lancelot is a coward, bully, liar, and very poor warrior, constantly playing passive-aggressive and even borderline roles to make his way in life. to bring this into a more contemporary light, he is the equivalent of Gilderoy Lockhart in Harry Potter. with one blow, Cornwell has included Lancelot in his story for those who would cry out in anguish if he were not there and yet discredited everything we know about him.

      like Stewart’s story, this one is told in the first person but this time, instead of Merlin himself, it’s from the POV of an relatively unknown character named Derfel who was raised by Merlin. another little bit of brilliance on Cornwell’s part, Derfel was a Saint in the medieval church and traditionally one of Arthur’s warriors who survived Camlann and went into the clerical life afterward. Cornwall has him writing his memoirs of his days with Arthur. would that he had done so and it survived in truth.

      the history is a bit dense at first with all the archaic names and places thrown at the reader in the first part of the book but it soon becomes familiar and the story takes off in earnest. the narration is mostly transparent but there are times when Derfel is in the “present” speaking of writing this tale to a young a queen who seems to be a descendent of Arthur’s. she asks questions of Derfel that the reader might find interesting or, at the very least, illuminating.

      i wish the 2004 movie starring Clive Owen that sought to put a more historical spin on Arthur had been based on this book rather than whatever it was based on.
    • 3/5
      Before reading this “revised” adaptation of the Arthur legend I imagined it would be along the lines of the 2004 “King Arthur” film. In a sense it is, but on the other hand this is a very different approach.This novel and the aforementioned film are more realistic in that they avoid the sorcery aspects that are evident in every other Arthurian book or film I’ve ever read/seen.Thus, here we have a tale that uses little of the well-known legends, such as a magnificent Camelot, the Lady of the Lake, and the round table. The famous characters of Guinevere, Merlin, Galahad, and Lancelot all appear, yet they are even further removed from their legends than they are in the “King Arthur” film.Merlin is a famous druid here, thus in some respects he does fit in with the wizard character that he’s best known for, though he has no magical powers. It’s clever how he and other druids make themselves powerful by playing on people’s superstitions. It’s often quite amusing too, as on several occasions I laughed aloud, such as when one druid starts hopping alongside a ditch as part of his casting spells, while on another occasion a female with “the power” retaliates by hissing and throwing two handfuls of soil in the air. It comes across funnier because the narrating character recalls these events in all seriousness.Regarding the narrating character: here we have Derfel, one of Arthur’s most trusted warlords, though to begin with he’s a young lad – a Saxon, in fact, who’s grown up with the Britons. He makes a good lead character. He effectively replaces the role usually occupied by Lancelot.One of the biggest changes in this compared to other Arthurian retellings is Lancelot’s character. He’s rightly branded by Derfel as a coward, not as an infallible hero. But despite this new take on something old, I must admit to being a little disappointed. This is partly through many sections dragging on for too long, but mainly because – as with all Bernard Cornwell novels I’ve read to date – the style lets the narrative down.Three style aspects in particular let this otherwise talented author down. One is the amount of long-winded sentences. Most of these could’ve been reduced in length. Why Mr Cornwell feels the need to keep a sentence running with superfluous “ands”, other conjunctions, and commas I don’t know.Below is a typical example of an over-long sentence:>The enemy was six paces away now and still coming, and all around us the greenwood lay warm and breathless and I could smell the two men, smell their leather and the lingering scent of their horses as sweat dripped into my eyes and I almost whimpered aloud in terror, but then Gwlyddyn leaped out of his ambush and screamed a war cry as he ran forward.“If anyone,” he called after the man, “has any authority in this country.”<>“The best way,” I said, “of making Nimue do anything is to forbid her to do it.”“And so long as you carry the scar, Derfel,” she said, “your life is mine, and so long as I carry the scar, my life is yours. Do you understand that?"“Yes,” I said.“One day, Derfel,” Nimue said, “I will call on you, and if you do not come then the scar will mark you to the Gods for a false friend, a traitor and an enemy.”“Yes,” I said.
    • 5/5
      Cornwell's opening act into his original interpretation of Arthur is a smash hit. I've read several reviews complaining of the slow plot development, yet this is necessary in order to introduce and build an incredible number of characters, sideplots, and scenery in Dark Age Britain. The attention to detail by Cornwell makes this work one of the best in modern historical fiction.
    • 5/5
      This was the first Arthurian novel I ever read. I really enjoyed it. I felt it was well written and there were interesting characters. I also thought the battle scenes were described well and I was able to easily understand what was going on. There was also some language, so if you take offense to that then this is not your book. On the whole I really like this book and I am excited to continue on with the series.
    • 5/5
      I remember the story as a whole...not which events happened in each book. After saying that just let me say that these three books are my absolute favorite story. Arthur is shown in a way that could have been real. Its not the same old Camelot and the Knights of the Round Table. The only problem I have with Cornwell's writings is that the main character is always pretty much the same. That’s the case in the books that I have read by him anyway. Thomas, Saban, and especially Uhtred are very much like Derfel.
    • 1/5
      this is abridged version. please be advised before you waste your credit. The unabridged is 19 hours this is only 6.
    • 5/5
      Cornwell superbly captures the real Arthur in this work. He does a heck of a job carrying you to the battlefields and paints a chilling picture of Dark Age combat. Believable human characters act on a richly described stage.
    • 4/5
      This is some great escapist writing for me. Bernard Cornwell knows how to deliver the goods when it comes to high adventure. Probably not as historically based as the Sharpe series since there are so few sources on King Arthur but at least this story is a little more down to earth then say Marion Zimmer Bradley. Not so much high magic as more believable battle scenes. He does a good job of creating an intriguing cast of political characters and religious tension between the pagan/druids and the christian missionaries. I also love that Lancelot is complete coward and opportunist. I like to look up the names he uses to see any actual historical links. he has done a great job with the Welsh words so far as I can tell. I'm looking forward to reading the Enemy of God, the second of the series.
    • 1/5
      I got a hundred pages into this and then wondered why I was bothering as I was bored.Sharpe is MUCH better.
    • 5/5
      I have read many books about King Arthur. I really liked Bernard Cornwell as an author because of the detail and the imagination. It gave the reader a more realistic idea of what it might have been like to live in the Arthurian era. At the end he establishes how little is historically know about King Arthur and gives a brief history of who King Arthur might be based on in the historical past. I found this book to be fascinating and look forward to reading more by this author.
    • 5/5
      In the interesting note at the end of this book we are told that facts about the life of Arthur are sparse to say the least. One thing is certain however,and that is that if he did exist at all then he is of the 'Dark Ages' and not from the Medieval period as usually depicted.In this the first of the 'Warlord Chronicles' trilogy, Arthur emerges as a powerful leader who committed the fatal error of falling in love with the wrong woman and by so doing,plunging his beloved country into terrible war.A splendid series whichI understand Bernard Cornwell gives as his favourite.
    • 5/5
      The finest Arthurian novel I have read, I think. Cornwell weaves a compelling tale that is not necessarily true to the legend, but explains the legend in a manner that is truthful and intriguing. This first volume thrusts us into a world that seems strange to us, but Cornwell’s writing makes us feel quickly at home. It is easy to get lost in this place, and after three volumes you can do nothing but wish there had been more.
    • 4/5
      It's the first in a trilogy of what the Arthur story would've been had it actually been true. It's completely believable - Bernard Cornwell has a true gift for writing historical fiction. From the narrator's unique perspective, to the lush descriptions of the landscapes and the people, to the fantastically gruesome battle scenes - it's all done in such a way that you feel a sort of voyeuristic pleasure at watching these people's destinies unfold. It wasn't easy reading, to be sure, but it was certainly entertaining.
    • 5/5
      Quick disclosure --- I adore Arthurian legend and will read almost anything that promises a story with Arthur and the knights of the round table. I have to admit, this book did not disappoint.The Winter King is narrated by Derfel, a Saxon born ward of Merlin and a warrior in Arthur's army. He tells the tale for Igraine, Queen of Powys, who is his patron. He begins the long tale at the Tor, Merlin's home, when Mordred is born, the grandson of Uther Pendragon and the eventual leader of Dumnonia. Years of invasion, fighting, and suffering follow which he describes in detail. As a child, Derfel yearns to become a warrior and, years later, is granted his wish by Arthur. After proving his worth and loyalty, Derfel finds himself serving directly under Arthur. He travels across Britain fighting for the peace Arthur believes he can bring to the land. He eventually finds himself titled Lord Derfel and disagreeing with many of Arthur's ideas, yet, he fights anyway in the hope that the much wished for peace will come. It is also his friendship and admiration for Arthur that keeps him fighting, if for nothing else.Cornwell brings to life the dramatic fights, the grisly life, and spoils and indecency of war. He does not shirk from the brutality and blood and, if you happen to be squeamish, he may not be the author for you. I mean that in a very good way. He brings you into the fight, you hear the clanging of swords, smell the men, and feel the pain. He holds nothing back from the way he describes the lifestyles of the individuals, the rituals of the numerous religions, and the fighting itself. It is brutal, disgusting, and above all, fantastic.What I truly enjoyed about this book was the fact that it was told from an observer's point of view. I know Arthur and his tale, but to hear it from Derfel makes it fresh and interesting. I feel sometimes that I have read the same story over and over and this one felt very different. In fact, it made me want to read books two and three in the series. I want to listen to Derfel finish his tale and I want to know more about these brutal people.One drawback, there is an incredibly long list of characters in this book. Sometimes it can be hard to keep them straight but that didn't take much away from the story for me. Although, at times, it can be confusing since many of the spellings are similar. After you get into the story, the traits make each character unique, plus there is a list in the front of the book that is useful when you need to remember who someone is.
    • 5/5
      Like his literary ancestor, Sir Walter Scott, Bernard Cornwell is a best-selling author of historical fiction whose output is prodigious and has presumably made him wealthy. And the comparision shouldn't offend Walter Scott fans because Mr. Cornwell is really good. "The Winter King" is the first book of the "Warlord Chronicles" which represents Mr. Cornwell's attempt to portray Arthur as a real flesh-and-blood person rather than as a mythical figure. Of course, that's been attempted many times before (and in a variety of mediums) but I doubt that anyone has been more successful in breathing life into Arthur and the supporting cast of his legend. Of course, much of the book is fictionalized in the sense that it often departs from the legend but that's fair enough: the legend itself is fiction (although that isn't to say it can't have a historical basis). Much of the story is told (in hindsight) through the eyes of Derfel,an orphan who was adopted by the wizard Merlin and who grows up to be a great warrior in the service of Arthur. This device personalizes the story and gives it an immediacy which makes it seem that much more real. Adding to that illusion is the wealth of period detail which is a hallmark of Mr. Cornwell's works. I'm not going to say much about the plot other than it roughly parallels the legend (although it adds plenty of embellishments and twists). Overall, I found this triology to be a rich and satisfying read. Yes, it was written by a purveyor of mass-market fiction, but it's still a serious work.
    • 4/5
      This is a tale about King Arthur, but not with the typical romantic trappings which were created in the 1500s. This is the story of the Arthur who may have been, set in the early fifth century Britain. It is a fascinating look at a perilous time in the history of Britain, a time when cultures and religions are clashing and there is no certain outcome. The setting alone made this book worth the read for me. The author has illuminated the Dark Ages and made them come alive. The narrator of the tale was a warrior with Arthur and in his old age has become a monk. I am interested to see how he got there, because in the story he is a dedicated pagan and was raised by Merlin. One of the aspects of this story which I found most interesting was the description of the various religions and how the followers of each perceived each other. I look forward to finding and reading the sequels to this story. If I were to pick at anything, it might be that at times the story is repetitive. That didn't bother me enough to slow me down.
    • 3/5
      High King Uther has died, leaving his infant grandson as heir and his bastard son and gifted warlord Arthur as his protector in a country that has fallen into chaos, with threats from both within and without. Told in the first person from the flawed perspective of one of Arthur’s sworn soldiers, Derfel, in his old age, The Winter King humanizes many of the characters from the legendary tale of Arthur, bringing both perspective and realism to the story.

      I picked this up on the recommendation of some of the readers of /r/Fantasy, who suggested it as an Arthurian tale that might not drive me nuts. Unfortunately, I really just do not click with ye olde Arthur of the Britons, and I was honestly glad to be finished with this story, even though it was really written very well.

      I did kind of get a kick out of some of the locales of this book, though, as on one of my trips to England I went to Glastonbury and got to see the holy thorn and the tor, and see some of the locales legend has associated with the story, and this is the first Arthurian tale I’ve picked up since that visit.

      Either way, very good historical fiction; I’d have loved it more if they’d changed all the names to protect the guilty.
    • 5/5
      This has to be THE best book ever written. There is a line, about 100 pages in that reads "for at last Srthur had come" and iot never fails to bring racking sobs to my throat. How weird they must think I am ont he underground.
    • 4/5
      imaginative retelling of what the 'truth' behind the Arthur legend might have been - with Arthur a general, battling to reunite warring Celtic tribes so that they can better resist the Saxon invader.
    • 1/5
      I did not like this book one bit.

      I think you either enjoy Arthurian novels or you don't and I'm of the latter persuasion. I don't like them at all and will not be starting any more. I just can't wrap my tongue around the Welsh spelling. Then there is the issue of trying to figure out if they are talking about a place name, person or some religious object. It was all too confusing to enjoy.