Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World
    Unavailable
    The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World
    Unavailable
    The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World
    Audiobook (abridged)5 hours

    The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World

    Written by Niall Ferguson

    Narrated by Simon Prebble

    3.5/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this audiobook

    The abridged, downloadable audiobook edition of Niall Ferguson's epic and highly readable history, The Ascent of Money.

    Behind each great historical phenomenon there lies a financial secret - Niall Ferguson uncovers the hidden stories behind history.

    Bread, cash, dosh, dough, loot. Call it what you like, it matters now more than ever. In The Ascent of Money, Niall Ferguson shows that finance is the foundation of all human progress and the lifeblood of history.

    From the cash injection that funded the Italian Renaissance to the stock market bubble that sparked the French Revolution, from the bonds that fuelled Britain's war effort to the Wall Street Crash and today's meltdown, this is the story of boom and bust as it's never been told before.

    Whether you're scraping by or rolling in it, there's no better time to understand the ascent of money.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherPenguin UK Audio
    Release dateOct 14, 2010
    ISBN9780141049366
    Unavailable
    The Ascent of Money: A Financial History of the World

    More audiobooks from Niall Ferguson

    Related to The Ascent of Money

    Related audiobooks

    Economics For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      LUCY WORSLEY ON ROYAL SECRETS & LIES

      Oct 29, 2020

      Q: WHAT DREW YOU TO INVESTIGATING SOME OF THE MISCONCEPTIONS AND INACCURACIES OF ROYAL HISTORY? A: I’ve made some other programmes along the lines of ‘history’s biggest fibs’, and what I like about the subject is that it’s not just about what happe

      3 min read

    • Article

      Bird’s Words

      Jun 5, 2023

      Here is a Pegasus cup. Cups are sold liberally at a cafe by the River Orne near Ranville in Normandy, northern France. At this time of the year, early June, the place is abuzz with tourists wanting to buy these cups and other memorabilia from the caf

      3 min read

    • Article

      Welcome

      Feb 20, 2020

      “If there’s one thing people know about Henry V, it’s that he was a great warrior king, who crushed the French at Agincourt in 1415. But while his military prowess was certainly formidable, his lesser-known achievements in diplomacy and peacemaking w

      1 min read

    • Article

      How Napoleon Won In The End

      May 25, 2023

      Reports of the death of the Fifth Republic have been greatly exaggerated. There are no pyramids of moutons morts blocking the Grande Corniche. The gilets jaunes whistle cheerfully as they jet-wash the paving stones of the Promenade des Anglais. And t

      3 min read

    • Article

      More From Us

      Mar 18, 2021

      More From Us
      1 min read

    • Article

      Coin Demand Continues to Outstrip Supply

      Apr 11, 2022

      Are we witnessing the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse? Coin prices continue to climb as conquest, war, famine and death discourage investment in stock markets. These catastrophes, also identified as sword, famine, wild beasts and plague in Ezekiel, a

      1 min read

    • Article

      Triumph And Illusion The Hundred Years War

      Nov 15, 2023

      ‘Given the profound importance of the Hundred Years’ War, it's astounding that its details are so little taught and so little understood.’ Older readers, recalling with pride such victories as Crécy, Poitiers and Agincourt, may raise an eyebrow at th

      1 min read

    • Article

      Sheikh Up The Telegraph

      Feb 29, 2024

      NOT SINCE 1985 HAS A foreign bid for a British business so animated the Westminster classes. Then, the fate of a Somerset helicopter-maker, Westland, sparked a serious and soul-searching debate over whether our future lay with the transatlantic Speci

      3 min read

    • Article

      “That's The Way To Do It”: A Two-minute History Of Punch And Judy

      Sep 28, 2023

      HE Here's a selection of the exciting content that's available on our website historyextra.com In this new video on the website, Dr Kathryn Ferry explores the surprisingly long lives of seaside favourites Mr Punch and his long-suffering wife, Judy. h

      1 min read

    • Article

      Cold Comfort

      May 1, 2022

      Cold Comfort
      2 min read

    • Article

      "The 1848 Uprisings Were A Dissonant Orchestra Of Ambitions And Intentions"

      Apr 13, 2023

      Matt Elton: Before we explore the causes of the revolutions of 1848, could you sketch out where and when they took place? Christopher Clark: In January 1848, revolution broke out in Palermo and N aples, two major cities of what was then called the Ki

      9 min read

    • Article

      Shockwaves Of Revolution

      Jul 8, 2021

      Shockwaves Of Revolution
      10 min read

    • Article

      This Easter, 100 Years On, I'm Wondering If The Twenties Could Roar Again

      Apr 5, 2021

      KICKING OFF THE 20TH CENTURY The early part of the 20th century was an exciting time to be alive. With the development of electric railways, subway trains, and the mass production of double-decker buses, people could travel inexpensively and comforta

      4 min read

    • Article

      Welcome

      Oct 10, 2019

      Welcome
      1 min read

    • Article

      The Golden Age of Piracy

      Dec 28, 2021

      The Golden Age of Piracy
      1 min read

    • Article

      A Unique Peruvian Export

      Sep 10, 2021

      A Unique Peruvian Export
      2 min read

    • Article

      Trading Blows

      May 16, 2021

      Trading Blows
      4 min read

    • Article

      More From Us

      Sep 2, 2021

      In 2021, are we reaching a different understanding of what it means to be “historically accurate”? And have we moved on from the more familiar stories and cosy adaptations of Sunday nights past? Anthony Delaney and Madeleine Pelling explore historica

      1 min read

    • Article

      Riots in Paris

      Dec 7, 2018

      Riots in Paris
      5 min read

    • Article

      Pubs, Plants And Reporting

      Jan 19, 2023

      Historians usually have hindsight and archive material to suit their narrative. Writing in real time about Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, Owen Matthews (half Russian; Christ Church, Oxford; former Newsweek Moscow bureau chief) has had neither. Fluent,

      2 min read

    • Article

      Reevaluating Agincourt

      Nov 2, 2023

      Reevaluating Agincourt
      5 min read

    • Article

      The Aukus Ruckus, European Elections And Bond’s New Star

      Sep 24, 2021

      The announcement of a new trilateral defence pact between the US, UK and Australia last week seemed to take everyone by surprise – not least France, left red-faced after a multibillion-dollar submarine contract with Australia was ripped up. But amid

      1 min read

    Reviews for The Ascent of Money

    3.5/5

    545 ratings35 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      The subtitle of the book "A Financial History of the World" is something of a misnomer, though Ferguson (also the author of a two-volume history of the Rothschild family) does cover quite a bit of ground, in time and space, discussing how money evolved, and then how other kinds of financial transactions (stocks, bonds, derivatives) evolved. In fact, there's quite a lot of discussion relating financial products to natural evolution. One interesting thing about the book (at least the hardcover edition) is that it came out in the early summer of 2008, before the crash that hit the financial markets later that year. There are a number of hints in the book that Ferguson (among others) saw something coming, though it's questionable whether he saw the crash. Generally, a pretty light read, and Ferguson does a decent job of explaining some abstruse terms in a more comprehensible fashion. For those interested, he tends to be lightly critical of the capitalist model; this is not an analysis from the left, a la Piketty. Those of you who are concerned about the angle an author takes, be warned. I did like the book, and do recommend it.
    • 3/5
      The anecdotal aspects of the book were appreicated, but obviously not conclusive. The financial theory remained just of out of reach and I often felt lost, or that I was being sold something. Despite my interior antipathies, I have always liked Ferguson. the accompanying PBS film challenged that devotion, but alas I plowed through the book with a dusting of enlightenment, which is all I hoped for, anyway.
    • 3/5
      This is a nice survey of the world of finance. It's a collection of stories - lots of crashes, of course, starting with John Law in the 18th Century. We get to watch the Rothschilds get rich in the 19th Century. The timing of the book was a bit awkward - it seems he was writing in May of 2008. He did say that credit default swaps looked like a looming problem - itsn't that what brought down Lehman Brothers in October?The main problem with the book is that it doesn't have a thesis. It's a bunch of evidence that doesn't really go anywhere. The lack of evidence means that there is no real analysis of the evidence - there is no need to push down to the real nuts and bolts details. So the whole thing is a kind of broad brush survey without any solid substance.
    • 2/5
      Mediocre content, horribly bad writing.
    • 3/5
      The author reviews the history of money and finance through the ages. A little too detailed in some areas for me, but some interesting points.
    • 2/5
      This book is terrible. It is a list of capitalism's failures while simultaneiously claiming it has nothing to do with capitalism. From an objective standpoint it doesn't seem to have a central thesis or even any kind of point besides "Capitalism is great!".
    • 3/5
      I learnt a reasonable amount from this book, but I began to get troublingly lost in the later passages, and ended up not getting what I came for in terms of explication of the latest events in the world of money.
    • 3/5
      Good book but light on the "history" and very much focused on banking, events, and money transaction in the 1900's, early 2000's and mostly the USA; what was included was interesting, such as the development of insurance... the insuring of ships and tradegoods in the 1600/1700s... and how that progressed to what we call insurance today. However, I thought there would be more history so, personally, I was disappointed... but overall it was probably a good book for those looking to understand the author's views of the events between about 1920-2008 that shaped the mostly-USA-oriented market. It *does* mention foreign markets but seemed to always be in relationship to the USA.
    • 4/5
      Are you tired of financial news? The past years have provided a continuing stream of financial problems from the United States and around the world. It might be time to update your news perspective by looking at lessons learned from history. "The Ascent of Money" by economist, historian and author, Niall Ferguson, gives an alternative view of the historical antecedents of financial transactions that play into today's news.

      "The Ascent of Money - A Financial History of the World" uses financial history as the backdrop for human progress, innovation, and change over the centuries. A simple definition of money as "the medium for exchange" is only the beginning of the story. The big story is neatly summarized by the author on page 341: "Today's financial world is the result of four millennia of economic evolution. Money - the crystallized relationship between debtor and creditor - begat banks, clearing houses for ever larger aggregations of borrowing and lending. From the thirteenth century onwards, government bonds introduced the securitization of streams of interest payments; while bond markets revealed the benefits of regulated public markets for trading and pricing securities. From the seventeenth century, equity in corporations could be bought and sold in similar ways.

      From the eighteenth century, insurance funds and then pension funds exploited economies of scale and the laws of averages to provide financial protection against calculable risk. From the nineteenth, futures and options offered more specialized and sophisticated instruments: the first derivatives. And, from the twentieth, households were encouraged, for political reasons, to increase leverage and skew their portfolios in favour of real estate."

      I found the historical trek through financial history, wars, booms, bubbles, and busts a fascinating read. From explorers seeking gold and silver in South America, banking to enable Italian trade with China, bond markets to finance wars, stock markets to finance expansion, inflation and money supply growth, and on to the present day real estate and sub prime mortgages there is a story that ties financial transactions and history together.
    • 3/5
      This book has left me more confused about the world of finance than I was before I read it. I enjoyed the descriptions of the beginning of the insurance industry and the role of Italy and France in early banking. But as for hedge funds, swaps, futures and modern finance, I'm confused.
    • 5/5
      I'm recommending we require all Eco/Fin majors by this and that we use chapters of it for all the appropriate classes. PBS has also made a documentary of it, so it'd be like using Commanding Heights.

      Ferguson is a professor of history and business administration at Harvard. The book is indeed a history of finance and a history of the (Western) world through the lens of financial evolution. Published mid-2008, it gives a great overview of how we got to our current financial crisis and similarities to previous crises.

      From the invention of fiat money causing the French Revolution, to microfinance combating poverty today, Ferguson does a great job tying everything together. In latter chapters he quotes (but also challenges) others I've read over the years, like Joe Stiglitz and Thomas Perkins. He also hails the merits of behavior finance and decries the "short-term capital mismanagement" of the quants at LTCM in the 90s.

      Superbly done. 4.5 stars out of 5.
    • 3/5
      I'm not completely financially illiterate, but economic theory has the power to both mystify and bore me more than most other topics. This book helped to explain the ways in which financial markets developed in an interesting enough way to keep my attention.
    • 3/5
      Interesting enough but as I read/listened through I felt the lack of a theoretical/interpretational framework. Narrative history fair enough but all too easily edges into "one damn thing after another". The framework all comes along in a lump at the end with numerous concepts pretty much in list form and rather indigestible. some of his "pop history" analogies and phrasing can be annoying or trivialisiing, eg "Chimerica". Choice of topics also sometimes favours the sensational: eg, John Law is a colourful enough rogue but surely only a symptom of the absolutist distortions of the bourbon monarchy. What comes across strongly is how finance has become eve more complex to the point of incomprehensibility at least to this reader. i can just about keep up as far as consols and the Rothschilds, but once we get to the late 19th C and beyond it becomes bewildering. I wonder how much this is a weakness in the writing and how much a matter of reality. LTCM for example, as a bunch of Nobel economists went spectacularly down the toilet; did they understand how it all worked? or was their mistake to think they understood it? Soros, by this account, seems to have some grasp, not only of how to beat the market, but how it actually works: the effects of expectation upon expectation. What is not really examined is how, despite fluctuations, crashes and con men, the real economy does overall move forward. In the long run, we're not all dead; most of us are at least slightly better off.Ferguson does paint the dismal science in bright, if occasionally gaudy, colours, and tells good stories. He comes across as more intelligent and reasonable than one might expect from some of his political positions
    • 4/5
      Fun and scary at the same time. There are short stories from the history of finance scattered throughout, like the Medici, John Law and the Mississippi Company, and the Rothschilds. But much of the book is about the twentieth century, and much is necessarily a lesson in how finance works. I'm a little ignorant of finance and found it hard to follow in places. The discussion of inflation, which forms a large part of the book, is good. But the discussion of risk, once it goes beyond straightforward insurance, soon gets difficult to follow, mainly because it doesn't try to explain or hold your hand. I would not have followed much of the discussion on the global financial crisis if I had not read John Lanchester's "Whoops" recently.But it does shine in places, and he puts out some strong and controversial ideas towards the end - even if it is a popular book and he's being sensationalist, it's always good to see historians challenging themselves by trying to predict the future.
    • 4/5
      I rather enjoyed this book although I am, like some other reviewers have admitted, financially challenged. Ferguson writes in a style aimed at the general reader who may not know his Fannie Maes from his Blue Chip preferred. I do think that the book tried to be too much of an overall survey, which left some subjects inadequately covered. This especially seemed true in the arena of more recent events. However, his sections on early financial history, including the origins of the several types of financial institutions, were excellent.
    • 4/5
      The best explanation of the history and development of finance and financial instruments I have read, making complex derivatives as easy to understand as compound interest. Particularly interesting in its explanation of how most important world events since the Renaissance have had origins in financial decisions (eg want to know why the Confederates lost the war? At least one of the reasons was the decline of the Cotton Bond) and how financial instruments have generally been a power for good - perhaps the most continuous driver of positive change. Ferguson writes in a down to earth style and seems to enjoy the smashing of shibolleths. Property the best bet? The figures don't back it up. Third world the cause of most financial problems? Generally its the UK and Europe that have caused most trouble. Financial modeling as the key to smooth flawless market predictions? Never underestimate the human capacity for delusion and stupidity. Highly recommended
    • 5/5
      A well written history of the development of financial history, The Ascent of Money, does a great job to explain how our current economic system grew up. It is very detailed in coverage, but doesn't go into every detail of financial history by only going over the big concepts over time - banking, debts, equities, risk, future/derivatives, real estate. The reader will definitely get a heavy Anglo-centric view of the world, specifically in discussing modern times. It would have been nice to bring in over happenings or the lack of happenings into the picture to give the full idea of how financial development affects nations.Highly recommended. You will not be disappointed.
    • 4/5
      A number of years ago, I fell in love with the three volumes of “History of Commerce” written by Fernand Braudel. The French historian’s sweeping narrative of the rise and evolution of the many elements that became the foundation of the modern global economy overflowed with the details that can bring a dry story to life. While Niall Ferguson may or may not relish his name and his writing being linked to Fernand Braudel, but I often recalled that earlier work as I read the British historian’s new single volume “The Ascent of Money, A Financial History of the World.”With a more modest ambition, Ferguson is able in just six chapters to recount the story of the adoption and evolution of money in its various forms, drawing on history, economic theory, political science, and behavioral psychology among other fields, to present his story of our world financial system. Beginning with the creation and evolution of money itself, both currency and coinage, he proceeds to discuss bonds, investment bubbles, risk management, real estate (especially domestic residential real estate), and the place and future role of the U.S. dollar in the world financial system.With his book hitting the stores just as we entered the latest economic recession, Ferguson attempted perhaps unwisely to reframe his work without rewriting it and emphasize those aspects that related to the suspected root causes of this still ongoing crisis. His effort was not a failure but to a degree distracts the reader from the book’s more general, fundamental relevance and value.Compared to Braudel’s delightful though admittedly encyclopedic approach, Ferguson’s is a speed skater’s version of the story and I believe both deserve a place in your library.
    • 5/5
      An excellent exposition by an expert on a difficult subject. Very convincing. Has to be read.
    • 3/5
      I was hoping for more of a history, especially ancient history. Sometimes, the book became a little too technical and assumed too much of the reader's understanding of money market terminology. But overall, a good read.
    • 4/5
      Interesting, but could have been far better if it had gone a bit further beyond personalities.
    • 4/5
      Good in its covering of the major events and crises that hit the financial world; from Florence's Medici family to the 1929 Wall Street crash, the book explores financial events and how what happened often led to other unrelated events, many of which shaped the world we live in. Reading it you really get the feeling that we humans are often too eager to repeat the mistakes of history, as it draws parallels between todays financial crisis and those of days gone. A good read indeed.
    • 5/5
      I was drawn to this book after watching BBC documentary from same author. There are lots of facts presented in understandable and logical manner. Great book for financial education. Last part, prologue, added recently is explaining problems running in monetary world during financial crisis of 2008 with fine explanations of mistakes people are doing in their research and analysis which is worth of book alone.I would like that author tried to incorporate Veblen thoughts more into this work although he is citing Veblen in this book. Veblen theories of conspicuous consumption would increase quality of explanations in chapters about houses and Chinamerica.
    • 4/5
      I just finished [The Ascent of Money] by [Niall Ferguson]. Ferguson says that the purpose of this book is to educate. He quotes a number of statistics about widespread ignorance of financial matters. He also makes a statement that rather than being "filty lucre", money is the root of most progress.I'd say he does a decent job in the first few chapters just in introducing various financial ideas. It begins by talking about the start of banking systems. He points out how Spain's extraction of gold from Peru was a mixed blessing, because, even if it the money supply is gold, the expansion of the money supply still devalues the currency. And, because they were rolling in gold, Spain got left behind in other developments.What will probably stick with me is the story about the Dutch East India company, the first, or one of the first, stock corporations, and how it spread the risk, and produced a decent return for a long time.He goes on to do a pretty good job of explaining why bond prices can fluctuate depending on risk, and what hedge funds are. I have to admit, that, by that time, I was anxious for the book to end. There was so much going on at the end, as it got into more recent events, that I was overwhelmed. This is probably because I am not really very interested in the financial markets in themselves.What I am interested in (and had some hope in the early chapters that Ferguson might address) is how you can have an economic system with some of the benefits of a modified capitalism - which I see as the fluency of money as a means of exchange, and being able for some at least to accumulate some capital to do some creative things - and yet not be locked into the boom/bust cycle. In other words the boom/bust cycle could be described as having to consume for the economy to be healthy - by healthy I mean providing a livlihood to the great mass of people, and providing a means for them to develop themselves (as opposed to making a killing). Not only do we have to consume, so the economy won't contract, but even that is not enough to ensure that there aren't huge groups of people unable to live adequately while others have more wealth than they could ever use.We're told the health of the economy is affected by the health of the automobile industry, yet I want people to buy fewer cars. We should have fewer cars, and better ways of getting around. We need an economic system that allows for less consumption for some, and more for those whose basic needs are not being met now. I want to read books by people who are beginning to puzzle out what that system is.While this book wasn't that, it did give some pretty clear explanations of some basic financial institutions and some of their history. It's worth a read, but don't feel bad if you abandon it somewhere in the middle.
    • 4/5
      As a non-economist I found this a useful and interesting introduction to the financial history. The focus is Western, perhaps justifiably, and clearly written with the present (looming as the book was written) financial crisis. This might mean the book becomes less relevant over time, but I suspect not. As the book explains, we have seen similar downturns before and can expect them again as the financial system evolves. I feel marginally wiser having read it, so it was certainly worthwhile!
    • 4/5
      Money Makes the World Go RoundThe latest book by Harvard professor and popular commentator Niall Ferguson is a historical look at the rise of finance. Ever wonder how the stock market came to be? Exactly how and why did the evolution of credit lead to the rise of civilizations? Could all the world's conflicts be explained by economics? These are the historical questions Ferguson poses and attempts to answer in "The Ascent of Money."Ferguson's primary purpose for the book is by using economic history to help explain the complexities of modern financial institutions. Why, might you ask is this important? Because the average person knows little to nothing about such simple financial facts such as the interest rate charged by their credit card. Never before, in this globalized, highly coupled world that we live in today, has financial knowledge and a fundamental understanding of financial institutions been more important than it is today. Everyone is affected by world markets, interest rates, and inflation one way or another.While I think Ferguson does an admirable job in explaining such complex subjects such as mortgage-backed securities or credit-default swaps, I still think that anyone who does not have a Econ 101 or Fin 101 will still have problems following these inherently difficult to understand topics. Ferguson's writing, thank goodness, does not contain the snobbery that sometimes comes across when he appears as a commentator.As for the historical content, I think Ferguson is a little selective in some of the topics he chooses. As one would expect, Lord Rothschild is used throughout the book as an example to explain the rise of debt worldwide. There are detailed accounts of the rise and fall of Argentina, the American Civil War, the French Revolution, and much more.Regarding Ferguson's philosophy. He appears to be a pragmatic neoliberal. He is a proponent of free-trade, but for example he writes that "of all the lessons to have emerged from this collective effort... inept or inflexible monetary policy in the wake of a sharp decline in asset prices can turn a correction into a recession and a recession into a depression." (p. 163). Ferguson takes exception with the Keynesians like Stiglitz and Krugman but while at the same time exploring the relative benefits of Milton Friedman's Chicago School "Washington Consensus". He describes Chile's economy as the shining star in Latin America following Pinochet while passing judgment over the massive human costs. And finally, he places the primary blame on Alan Greenspan for his "loose" monetary policy for the current crisis we find ourselves in.Some reviewers have critiqued the book for its lack of historical breadth, and to some extent I would agree. However, the book is already 350+ pages, and more historical examples would dilute Ferguson's arguments. As ambitious as it is to try to explain such a complicated subject, Ferguson is mostly on the mark. I highly recommend this book for anyone who wants to know more about the history of finance.
    • 4/5
      This was an interesting look at the history of finance. Gave me some insight into why money is handled the way it is, from the stock market to life insurance. Neat book.
    • 3/5
      Adult nonfiction. pretty interesting, just too long for me to finish at the time (have a mess of other audio books to get through, and there was still a wait-list for this one).
    • 2/5
      The author has enjoyed privileged access, as a well-schooled Harvard professor, to the finest peer-reviewed thinking drawn from historical records and economic data. He apparently uses very little of it. In this work, he chose to present an overview of financial practices, from the first forms of currency in Ancient Mesopotamia to the massive volumes of unregulated asset-backed securities trading conducted in the 1920's and 2000's. He touches only slightly on the high-tech financial manipulations of the enormous private banks using international markets, and the impact of technological “steroids”, by the private traders of the twenty-first century.In six chapters, Ferguson describes an evolution of finance – currency, credit, bonds, corporate stock, insurance, and real estate. He compares financial development to biological “natural selection”. While this is a helpful model, he uses it descriptively, and fails to provide prescriptive references or validation. For example, he fails to show us how the increasing “organization of specialized parts” model helps us understand how speculators removed $40 trillion from the U.S. Economy in 2008. It does, but he doesn’t. Irritatingly, Ferguson only appears to illuminate economic systems. He refuses to answer even the obvious Questions which burden even a lay audience today. What role can our Representatives in Congress play? Should tax payers bail out the private banks which manipulate “bubbles” or should Government stop funding the enormous profits of private banks and provide its own lending as a public service? Ferguson takes the time to explain various elementary financial concepts – known to virtually all consumers who have opened a bank account. He sticks to the “history” of the institutions without understanding the tools they use – the econometrics, the stochastics, the “rating” games and “financial product” sleight of hand. The history of the bond, equity, and real estate markets, across time and continents, is of course invaluable. Professor Ferguson describes the primitive and repeated mania which is behind many of the disasters of history. He places bank speculation at the heart of many of them. Financial “bubbles”are driven by speculation, greed, and the willingness of gamblers to take risks with money. There is an odd disconnect, however, within his procrustean “five stages” of financial bubbles: displacement, euphoria, mania, distress, and revulsion. To his credit, Ferguson at least spares us from excesses of “opinion”. He reports the events and sequences. The area of some exception is when Professor Ferguson describes European financiers as the source of modern wealth and prosperity. Banks clearly played formative roles in Italy in the late Middle Ages, and among the Dutch in the 17th century. John Law’s publicly-funded private bank – making vast investments in infrastructure using paper money to replace metal currency – enabled King Louis XV to bring the economy of France back from the ruin of Louis XIV. The growth of Great Britain's empire is at least partially attributed to the investments made by the Bank of England in 1694. The rise of a middle class is attributed to the efforts by Government to open up and protect markets and increase trading volumes.However, Professor Ferguson fails to even point us toward the answers to hard research questions. Does this work help answer The Questions our circumstances bring to the table? Clearly the financial “bubbles” documented in the book are for the most part deliberately created by plutocrats and bankers. Governments for the most part provide the data, and to a various and indeterminate extent are used by the bankers to exacerbate their manipulations. For example, look at John Law’s impact on France in the 1600s. The recovery of the world from the economic exhaustion in WWI and WWII, and the use of Keynesian theory. The fact that in the entire global history, there are no examples of a laissez-faire economy. Why is there no data available online from the 1929 Depression and its causes? Why are we not learning more from history and using the tools now available to analyze these events?
    • 4/5
      This book is a fascinating look at the development of money from shells to coins to paper money to today’s complex financial instruments such as the famed credit default swaps at the center of the recent financial meltdown. All of these are levels of abstraction that allow for easier transactions. Without them, we would be trying to pay for our iPhones with carts full of grain. What Ferguson does is walk through the development of these financial innovations and show how they happened, how they work, and the impact each had on history. I enjoyed the book, but it was at times a bit of a chore to read. If you like history and would like to learn more about finance, this book is worth reading.