Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Reductionism in Art and Brain Science: Bridging the Two Cultures
    Reductionism in Art and Brain Science: Bridging the Two Cultures
    Reductionism in Art and Brain Science: Bridging the Two Cultures
    Audiobook4 hours

    Reductionism in Art and Brain Science: Bridging the Two Cultures

    Written by Eric R. Kandel

    Narrated by James Anderson Foster

    4/5

    ()

    Switch to ebook

    About this audiobook

    Are art and science separated by an unbridgeable divide? Can they find common ground? In this book, neuroscientist Eric R. Kandel, whose remarkable scientific career and deep interest in art give him a unique perspective, demonstrates how science can inform the way we experience a work of art and seek to understand its meaning. Kandel illustrates how reductionism-the distillation of larger scientific or aesthetic concepts into smaller, more tractable components-has been used by scientists and artists alike to pursue their respective truths. He draws on his Nobel Prize-winning work revealing the neurobiological underpinnings of learning and memory in sea slugs to shed light on the complex workings of the mental processes of higher animals.

    In Reductionism in Art and Brain Science, Kandel shows how this radically reductionist approach, applied to the most complex puzzle of our time-the brain-has been employed by modern artists who distill their subjective world into color, form, and light. Kandel demonstrates through bottom-up sensory and top-down cognitive functions how science can explore the complexities of human perception and help us to perceive, appreciate, and understand great works of art.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherTantor Media, Inc
    Release dateJan 30, 2018
    ISBN9781977373762
    Author

    Eric R. Kandel

    Eric R. Kandel is the University Professor and Fred Kavli Professor at Columbia University and a Senior Investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The recipient of the 2000 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his studies of learning and memory, he is the author of In Search of Memory, a memoir that won a Los Angeles Times Book Prize; The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain, from Vienna 1900 to the Present, which won the Bruno Kreisky Award in Literature, Austria’s highest literary award; and Reductionism in Art and Science: Bridging the Two Cultures, a book about the New York School of abstract art. He is also the coauthor of Principles of Neural Science, the standard textbook in the field.

    More audiobooks from Eric R. Kandel

    Related to Reductionism in Art and Brain Science

    Related audiobooks

    Art For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      21 Must-read Art Books

      Nov 27, 2020

      21 Must-read Art Books
      5 min read

    • Article

      The Self Is Other People

      Apr 3, 2018

      The Self Is Other People
      3 min read

    • Article

      Picasso and Einstein Got the Picture: Breakthroughs in science and art begin with an image.

      May 15, 2014

      Most of the big steps forward in science are made possible by visualization. Albert Einstein said he visualized the theory of relativity before he worked out the formula. Previous explanations of the universe made no aesthetic sense to him. He was ma

      6 min read

    • Article

      The Reality of Color Is Perception

      Jan 11, 2018

      Philosophers have a bad reputation for casting unwarranted doubt on established facts. Little could be more certain than your belief that the cloudless sky, on a summer afternoon, is blue. Yet we may wonder in earnest, is it also blue for the birds w

      7 min read

    • Article

      The Reality of Color Is Perception: An argument for a new definition of color.

      Jul 23, 2015

      Philosophers have a bad reputation for casting unwarranted doubt on established facts. Little could be more certain than your belief that the cloudless sky, on a summer afternoon, is blue. Yet we may wonder in earnest, is it also blue for the birds w

      7 min read

    • Article

      The Purpose Of Art

      Aug 10, 2020

      The Purpose Of Art
      4 min read

    • Article

      GAINED in TRANSLATION

      Nov 17, 2022

      GAINED in TRANSLATION
      6 min read

    • Article

      Talk About the Passion

      Aug 9, 2023

      Talk About the Passion
      19 min read

    • Article

      Around The Web

      Nov 7, 2020

      The categories of Image, Word, Orientation and Action constitute the main divisions of the Warburg Institute Library and encapsulate its aim: to study the tenacity of symbols and images in European art and architecture (Image, 1st floor); the persist

      1 min read

    • Article

      Who Said Science and Art Were Two Cultures?

      Nov 17, 2021

      On a May evening in 1959, C.P. Snow, a popular novelist and former research scientist, gave a lecture before a gathering of dons and students at the University of Cambridge, his alma mater. He called his talk “The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revo

      8 min read

    • Article

      State Of The Art: Georgii Uvs

      Jul 19, 2022

      State Of The Art: Georgii Uvs
      1 min read

    • Article

      Seven Seconds In The Life Of The Honeyed Muse Or, What Is Art?

      Jan 1, 2019

      1.1 In trying to think about what art is, we might begin with the mind-clearing assumption that art itself is not a real entity, but a notion, an idea, a concept within which we group the real entities of “artist” (the maker) and a “work of art” (the

      20 min read

    • Article

      Why Do So Many Scientists Want to be Filmmakers?

      Mar 22, 2018

      For the past five years, Nautilus has asked scientists what they would be if they weren’t a scientist. I can now report what, above all, they want to be. “Film director,” says physicist David Deutsch. “A filmmaker,” says neuroscientist Antonio Damasi

      9 min read

    • Article

      Body Language

      Feb 15, 2021

      Early in the autumn, we issued a rare call for pitches that didn’t lead with a theme, giving our communities and contributors a chance to have a say in shaping the next issue in a time of such trenchant irresolution. In response, we heard meditations

      7 min read

    • Article

      Shim Moon-Seup

      May 10, 2023

      Shim Moon-Seup
      10 min read

    • Article

      Art Matters

      Jun 9, 2020

      The great spiritual writer Thomas Merton once said: “Art enables us to find ourselves and lose ourselves at the same time.” I was reflecting this statement as we were putting together this issue - centered around the power of art and how it plays a p

      1 min read

    • Article

      Giving It Time | Art

      May 3, 2019

      Q: How do you look back at your own career (his first show was in 1997)? I often describe this book covering two decades of work as a "retro-prospective," looking back in order to look ahead more clearly. I don't reflect on my past work in evaluative

      1 min read

    • Article

      The Rhythm of Sculpture

      Jun 28, 2018

      This article is part of Nautilus’ month-long exploration of the science and art of time. Read the introduction here. In the studio, time does not pass—there is only an “eternal now.” The art coming from the studio is a crystallized form of the artist

      3 min read

    • Article

      Challenging Orthodox Science

      Jul 15, 2021

      TO SEND REVIEW COPIES, CONTACT THE BOOK REVIEWS EDITOR AT DVBARRETT@FORTEANTIMES.COM Imants Barušs Imprint Academic 2021 Pb, 228pp, £14.95, ISBN 9781788360418 The late William Corliss was very fond of a particular quotation from the 19th-century psyc

      11 min read

    • Article

      Rediscovering The Legends

      Mar 13, 2023

      Rediscovering The Legends
      5 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Reductionism in Art and Brain Science

    4/5

    37 ratings2 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 5/5
      The fun you can bible probably the best book ever written !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • 4/5
      All fear of reductionism is a fear of change. We have our philosophies, our models of what is true, and when someone comes along and disturbs that, we don’t like it.The advance of science has been to break down, to reduce, all processes to their smallest fundamental events. For example, materials were once understood as whole things, then as attribute and extension, then as atoms, then subatomic particles, and finally as field interactions. All of this is true, but it doesn’t help an engineer determine the fatigue strength of a piece of steel. Macro properties are not destroyed by understanding micro properties. The same is true of, say, consciousness. If we break it down, understand it in terms of chemistry and electrical interaction that should not stop people using the higher understanding as a model. It remains analysable as a single unit, even when its basis is fully understood in terms of tiny events. Where this advance does cause a problem is when certain philosophies depend on a particular model for their existence. Life is completely understood as chemistry, but that causes problems for any philosophy that requires it to be separate from chemistry. The only people who need to be scared of reductionism in this sense are those whose philosophy is built on “the spark of life”, or some other piece of magic. As for the rest of things, an irregular set of surfaces, red in colour, with a linear green attachment, comprising various mechanisms for the chemical and photosynthetic transfer of energy, is still a rose by any other name, and it still smells as sweet.Of course as Kandel implicitly suggests it depends on what we mean by 'fear', I suppose. There are actual limits to the utility of reductionism. Like any tools, the answers reductionism gives you depends on the precise nature of the tools you use. As an analogy imagine you have a cylindrical chocolate cake. You take a knife, and make one plane cut that passes through the centre of the cake. How big are the resulting pieces? Theoretically, the answer is that you have two halves. But in reality? In reality, you also have crumbs, and bits stick to the knife. How much of each depends on things like how dry or moist the cake is, how smooth the knife is, etc., etc., etc. We really consider the analogous properties of the analytical tools we use when we perform reductionist science. Even numbers are not immune. Numbers are often treated as if they are somehow incredibly precise, when in fact we use them to mean very different things. 'One' football team has little in common with 'one' maggot, 'one' forest, 'one' universe . . . Even in a more abstract sense, numerical systems do not agree. Fractions and decimals cannot be exactly mapped one to the other, for example. So I don't fear reductionism; but I do find myself bemused as to why this (or any other) scientific method is treated as if infallible; especially by those who can clearly see the problems with treating religious dogma as infallible. All scientific theories are descriptions; no matter how accurate, they are not 'the truth' any more than a map actually is the land it represents.