Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
Dracula
Unavailable
Dracula
Unavailable
Dracula
Ebook572 pages8 hours

Dracula

Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

4.5/5

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this ebook

This new edition of Dracula, offering the complete text of the original book with more than 50 original illustrations in the form of horizontal and vertical panels, spot illustrations, and ornate borders by Becky Cloonan, will delight Dracula fans. This is a Dracula we've never seen before—contemporary, edgy, stylishly macabre with Victorian overtones, and an unusual color palette.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherHarperCollins
Release dateApr 10, 2012
ISBN9780062198914
Author

Bram Stoker

Bram (Abraham) Stoker was an Irish novelist, born November 8, 1847 in Dublin, Ireland. 'Dracula' was to become his best-known work, based on European folklore and stories of vampires. Although most famous for writing 'Dracula', Stoker wrote eighteen books before he died in 1912 at the age of sixty-four.

Read more from Bram Stoker

Related to Dracula

Related ebooks

Related articles

Reviews for Dracula

Rating: 4.328587075575028 out of 5 stars
4.5/5

913 ratings278 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Were it not for audiobooks, I don't think I'd have read any classics in the last two years. This is a great way to slowly slog through the ones you've been meaning to read just because, but don't think you'll like much. Dracula has been on my to-read list since middle school, but only because it's a thing I felt I should read, not because I was especially interested. Thank you, audiobook, for making it so that I did not need to DNF!

    For real, if I had been reading this in print format, I really do not think we would have been friends. The story goes by so slowly, the characters are flat, and there is very little action for a horror novel. Add to this the fact that pretty much ALL of pop culture is one big giant spoiler for the plot, and the book is insanely boring at most points.

    Even worse, pop culture took all the good ideas out of Dracula and so, basically, what you're left to be surprised by is all of the things pop culture changed so that the book could actually be interesting. Take, for example, Van Helsing and Dracula's battle. I went in expecting this:



    If that's what you're hoping for, let me just tell you that you're WRONG. In fact, Van Helsing is an old, fat doctor with an absurd accent. Dracula is a tall, old man with a long white mustache. Umm, yuck, really? Sadly, 'tis true. The action in the book is more of the mental battle variety than anything else. They do a lot more talking than fighting.

    Mental standoffs can be pretty cool though, characters trying to outmaneuver one another. I mean, that's what made the first half of Death Note so freaking cool. Unfortunately, these characters are dumb. Certainly, knowing what's happening going into the book, but even given that they're working with no knowledge, their reasoning abilities are limited.

    What really got to me was that, near the end, they've figured out what happened to Lucy Westenra, watched her become a vampire, and killed her. Now they're searching for Dracula to kill him too. They decide that they need to do this without the cleverest of the bunch, Mina Harker, because ladies cannot handle this sort of thing, duh. They leave her alone and come back to find her weak, pale and tired, and it takes them freaking ages to think maybe Dracula has something to do with this, since these symptoms are remarkably similar to Lucy's. Basically, everyone's pathetic.

    Speaking of Mina, she is by far the most interesting and clever character, but, because of the time period, she gets very little respect. I mean, yeah, the guys appreciate what a great typist she is and admire her intellect, but, ultimately, she's more of a curiosity than a compatriot. They leave her out of things because she's a woman, and view her most important role to be that of a shoulder to cry on, of feminine comfort, despite the fact that she's the one who ultimately figures everything out. I know it's a different time, but it still pisses me right the fuck off.

    Oh, also supremely annoying? The infinite references to God. Seriously, every couple of minutes someone would intone "it's in God's hands." At first it didn't bother me, because that's the kind of stupid shit people would say, and still do say, in crises. However, after the first fifty times, I pretty much wanted to start ripping people's heads off every time it happened. I GOT it already: you're all good Christians. Shut the fuck up, okay?



    The only thing that made this book bearable for me was the fact that Audible did a wonderful job putting together the audio. They brought in a stellar cast, and really fit the voices to the characters. My favorite voice actors were Alan Cumming and Katherine Kellgren. Tim Curry does a good job, but he's doing that stupid Van Helsing accent, so I couldn't love his performance as much.

    Even with the marvelous audio work, this still only came out to a meh for me. I highly recommend the audio version, whether you think you'll like the book or not.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    What a beautifully written and scary book. Wonderful as an audiobook. The reader does a great job with accents and emotions. Glad I listened to it.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Bram Stoker’s The Illustrated Dracula features illustrations from Jae Lee, who’s worked on X-Factor, Inhumans, and Fantastic Four: 1234 for Marvel Comics as well as other work for DC and Image Comics. The book itself reprints Stoker’s text, which uses the epistolary novel format that was popular in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and introduces the reader to Count Dracula, Jonathan and Mina Harker, Renfield, Abraham Van Helsing, and Lucy Westenra. Lee includes multiple black-and-white illustrations throughout the story as well as four full-color illustrations that capture the gothic, dreamlike quality of the narrative. Lee’s portrayal of Dracula appears to borrow from the depiction of Count Orlok in F.W. Murnau’s 1922 film, Nosferatu, rather than Stoker’s own description or the appearance of the historical Vlad Țepeș. Those benefits aside, there are some typographical errors throughout the work. That said, the illustrations and the high-quality materials of which this book is constructed make it a good gift edition for those new to the story or friends in need of a new copy.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I was absolutely captivated by this story from the very beginning and the characters are so well described that I couldn’t stop reading.

    The cinema was my only exposure to this story before now and what can I say but the cinema destroyed these fascinating characters by either sidelining them, not including them or over sexualizing them for the entertainment value. Lucy and Mina are two of the strongest female characters that I have ever seen in literature and their friendship is wonderful. The gentlemen in this story are very courageous and it is amazing how determined they were to see Dracula destroyed because it was the right thing to do and not for revenge.

    My only con is there are times that the author gets a little wordy with some of his side stories and conversations that I almost wanted to skip some of it.

    This is a great performance to listen to. All the actors not only had to act out their main part but also any of the other characters when the story was being told from the journal writer’s point of view. The actors did a great job of maintaining each characters personalities and subtleties no matter which actor was speaking for the character. It is exceptionally well done.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Tried for years to get through this book. Never could quite do it...
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I found the book easily digestible for an older book. The format felt quite modern, being a combination of letters and journal entries from various narrators. The descriptions and emotions were lush and enveloping. The entries written from VanHelsing’s point of view were the only ones I had difficulty getting through- the language choices are meant to portray a highly intelligent person for whom English is not native, but for me it wound up being repetitive and harder to relate to. Also, the portrayal of women was hard to swallow at times. Baring in mind that it was another time, and that it might even hold a hint of satire against chauvinism, it was still at times irking. Overall, glad I finally read this classic and would definitely recommend!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Van Helsing sat with the Harker child on his lap; Van Helsing was momentarily pensive as his breathing continued stertorously. He was thankful that the child's breathing was normal, not stertorous. His suspicions had been numbed since the events with the Count some seven years before. He was also aware that both Jonathan and Mina would conscript this every instant to their journals. It was a shame he still spoke German. Why didn't anyone notice this? Yes, they had encountered True Evil and prevailed through serial implausibility on the part of Undead genius and reduced him to ashes with a Bowie knife.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Dracula. Bram Stoker. Modern Library Paperback Edition. 2001. The first time I read Dracula I was at home between sophomore and junior years at Montevallo, I think. I had nightmares about vampire cats that were so real I crawled in bed with Mother and only read the book during the daylight hours. This time it was more uncomfortable, not because I think vampires are real, but I was shocked by the evil personified that the book described and surprised by the Catholicism that permeated the determined search to destroy the evil. It was long and not as suspenseful as I remembered more of it as I read. It is much deeper than the modern vampire books and movies.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Quite good, and surprisingly funny in spots. It really was a "technothriller" of sorts in its time.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    - Too Sensual to Ignore -“Dracula” by Bram Stoker relays the tales of an up-and-coming realtor, Jonathan Harker, who travels from England to Transylvania to meet a client; Count Dracula. In the classic interpretation of good versus evil, Jonathan and several of his acquaintances seek out the monster that killed one of their beloved companions. Their journey is filled with superstition, which is seen within the very first chapter of Jonathan’s diary during his journey to the Count’s home; many community members warn him of the dangers that awaits, and some even beg that he returns to his home. The book fashioned a new era within the literary field alongside such works as “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley and “The strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Hyde” by Robert Louis Stevenson. It is a collection of reminiscences, transposed in diary entries, victrola recordings, and recounts of events throughout the time period. It dives into the parasitic indulgence so deftly hidden within Victorian London. There is a certain theme found in each of the novels I mentioned; the human form, when molested, may unleash a creature reeking with God’s defamation. I would recommend this book to readers with an interest in folklore/urban legends, gothic fiction, classics, horror novels, and the victorian perception of evil. It is definitely worth picking up if you are curious about the beginnings of these kinds of books, as well. It is an excellent subject to use for a case study of the genre.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    There are darknesses in life and there are lights, and you are one of the lights, the light of all lights.
    Why am I always so surprised that classics are seriously fantastic?

    I loved everything about this! Even knowing the general story, having absorbed it via osmosis most of my life and having once watched a terribly adapted play put on by my high school peers, I was still pulled in by the tension, the terror, and the themes. I loved every character and found the plot to be very climactic and engaging.

    The writing style was superb! Each narrator had a consistent voice that defined them and made their perspective all the more interesting. My personal favorite was Dr. John Seward. He had a very lyrical way of viewing the world and it made his sections beautiful to read. The opening part with Jonathan Harker's imprisonment in Dracula's Castle was palpably tense and drew me in immediately. All in all, the entire thing was excellent!

    For life be, after all, only a waitin' for somethin' else than what we're doin'; and death be all that we can rightly depend on.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    By turns melodramatic, contrived and repetitive it is, nonetheless, a spine-tingling tale - a classic.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Still scary.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    After Twilight, True Blood, Let the Right One In and other modern vampire stories, I was eager to read the original and settle down some facts. It is a true horror story balancing between the psychological and physical world somewhere. The way it is told is surprisingly modern and structured, and you'll never drop out, as the story line is retold several times. The plot itself was like a river, some times very exiting, others quit shallow and slow. The ideology struck me as extremely sexist, which was a huge turn down for me. The dialects and accents was at times was hard to read, but it felt blooming right in some cases (not always). Over all a good book, worth it's place on the classical list for sure, but not some thing I'll reread any day soon...
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A little longer than needed (especially if you know what happens), but it does have it's merits and the style is not bad. I really liked that the audio version used a different narrator for each character.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The opening scenes in Transylvania are by far the best parts of the book. After that it all becomes slow and bloated, with an anticlimatic ending - slow build up and then very quickly all over. However, still a good read. The fact that it's all women who seem to get it in the neck tells you all you need to know what this is all about. It would be interesting to read about how this was received at the time. 3.5 stars.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I really enjoyed this one. I knew it wasn't going to be anything like the movies, so I was prepared for that. I will say that while I wasn't expecting so much to be about Lucy, I truly enjoyed her nonetheless. I do want to know what the heck happened to Jon Harker between leaving Castle Dracula and showing up at a hospital. Why didn't Drac kill him? The world may never know.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I am really not a fan of vampire fiction but I have to say that this forerunner to the modern craze is quite good. Of course, it helps that Simon Vance narrates. He is amazing at giving the different characters accents and intonations that distinguish them from each other. A young British solicitor, Jonathon Harker, travels to Transylvania to acquaint Count Dracula with the details of a property that he has purchased in London. He keeps a journal and writes letters to his employer and his fiancee about everything he experiences. Although Dracula intended him to fall prey to three women vampires in his castle after he left for Britain, Jonathon manages to escape and flee to a hospital in Budapest. He cannot remember anything about his sojourn but he knows it was horrible. His fiance, Mina, goes out to him and they marry. In the interim Mina has had her own vampire experiences. She was staying with her friend Lucy in Whitby when a mysterious ship comes into harbour. Every member of the crew has been killed. Only a large black dog was seen jumping from the ship to shore. Of course, this was the Count and he hangs around Whitby long enough to infect Lucy. Lucy was loved by three men who banded together to save her after bringing in a Dutch doctor, Van Helsing. They are unsuccessful and they, together with the Harkers, decide to hunt down and finish off the Count.Pretty typical gothic novel from the time but it was probably a sensation when it came out.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    If you've only seen Dracula movies, you really have no idea who and what Dracula is. Read the book. Stoker has a deft hand at creepy atmospheres and surreal description. The journal format is compelling even today. Since it was written in the 19th century, I can't say this is an edge-of-your-seat page-turner. That just wasn't the way they rolled back then. But it's a beautifully written book full of pathos and claustrophobic fear. You won't forget this book and it'll ruin vampire movies for you forever.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Bram Stoker's Dracula is a celebrated classic for good reason. So much in popular culture since its publication over a century ago originates from the creation of this single character—this undead, parasite of the night.The story itself is a brilliant, wordy mess of journal entries written by forlorn characters desperate to understand an unfamiliar evil. But rather than compulsively turning the pages, you're more likely to wander through the confusion thinking, "What is going on here?" Dracula has its moments—alarming revelations that will chill your bones—but I'd be understating if I said you'll have to slog through a bunch of babble to get there.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Read this for a college course called The Literature of Evil.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Delightfully well-written, modern in pacing, unusual in form. Very good.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I have read many vampire stories, from the scary (Salem's Lot) to the romantic (Twilight) but, despite it's age, this is by far the creepiest vampire novel I have read. In fact, this is the only vampire story that has ever disturbed my sleep. The old-world language and diary format lend it an air of tension to this novel that is lacking in other vampire books that I have read. Most horror books are scary, but fairly predictable. Not so, Bram Stoker's Dracula. I found this story to be intriguing and enthralling and I found myself unable to put it down. This is the original vampire novel and, in my opinion, still the best.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I've never actually seen any Dracula movies but I've seen and read my fair share of vampires in general. They seem to be popular in fiction these days. I know this book has been on my mental list of books to eventually read but no need to really soon for years. Then I watched the movie 'League of Extraordinary Gentlemen' the other week and it made a reference to Dracula. For some reason that cause me to transfer the book to my actual 'to read' list. And so when I saw it on the library shelves’ audio books section I decided now was as good a time as any to read it, or rather listen to it. I didn't really know what to expect so there was no disappointments of any kind. It was a fairly entertaining book really. I'm glad I got to it since it is a classic, but I will most likely not read it again. I really liked the beginning of the book, but the middle seemed to drag a little for me and the end seemed slightly rushed. But the beginning was fantastic. I wasn't sure the book would succeed in the 'creepy' since 'creepy' in the 1800s might have been different from the 'creepy' of today, but there were parts that may have caused a shudder. I believe it was the writing style that allowed this. The book was an 'okay' for me. It was slightly less than a "I sincerely like it". But I am glad I got to it. I do think any reader should get into some classics at some point in their life. If for nothing else, to see and debate on why they are considered classics. :)
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    What can I say that hasn’t already been said about Dracula – one of the earliest vampire novels? I do love the epistolary style… it reminds me of modern social/viral media horror, e.g. NIN’s Year Zero and various faked zombie virus outbreaks. Stoker’s vampire definitely has one foot in the grave – he’s a far cry from the modern idea of a seductive, brooding, anti-hero vampire. As much as I love some (and I must stress ‘some’) of these newer vampires, Dracula reveals the dark history behind the Lestats, Spikes, and Angels of the world.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I remember when I was about 11 or 12 years old rummaging through a second hand bookshop in Egham. I had this urge to buy a book, my first ever book that I'd paid for with my own money. After much faffing about I settled upon a rather aged and dog-eared paperback by Bram Stoker titled Dracula. I don't remember the cover but I do remember the smell. There's a very distinct smell about second hand books, which gets more distinct the older they get!

    Back then I took maybe two days to read it from cover to cover and really enjoyed it. Re-reading it nigh on 38 years later on the Kindle I find I have lost none of the enjoyment. It's an excellent book that keeps you with the story all the way through. It's also interesting to see how cinema has changed the story when it's been adapted by Hammer and Hollywood, it's often been made much more sexualised and at the same time less horrific. Perhaps the closest film regarding Dracula in 'feel' to me would be Polanski's 'The Dance of the Vampire Killers'.

    If you haven't read it then do. Free on ebook readers as well!

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    eBook

    It's hard, at this point in my life, not to feel as though I've already read this book. The Dracula story has been told and retold and reimagined and reinterpreted so many times that it was kind of shocking to realize I've never actually dealt with Stoker's original work.

    That said, I don't feel that I have too much to say about it. Vampires and sex and blood and superstition and science and religion ... it's all kind of played out. The most unexpected part of the book was the relish Stoker seems to have taken in writing an epistolary work. There are letters, diaries, shorthand accounts, phonographic recordings, telegrams, and newspaper articles, and not only is this how Stoker chooses to tell the story, it's how the characters try to tell the story.

    The characters, as much as the author, are fascinated by more than just the account of their experiences. They are fascinated by how they record those experiences, commenting frequently on their methods. A not-insignificant portion of the story is actually just the main characters reading one another's writing and transcribing an additional copy.

    It seems strange that a book about vampires would get so excited about writing in shorthand or transcribing a phonographic cylinder, but it does make sense for these people to react to the supernatural with the logical and rational response of simply recording their observations.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I recently discovered that I do not actually own a copy of 'Dracula', which horrifies me! I was really quite convinced I did...As a fan of gothic literature, 'Dracula' is of course mandatory reading. I really love the novel, and the diary style in which it is written, which gives you a great insight into the thoughts and ideas of the characters in the novel. Well-written, mysterious and a real page-turner. Still one of my favourites...Really need to buy it some time! :/
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Finally, I finally read the classic Dracula by Bram Stoker which has spawned a genre onto itself!Very atmospheric novel which begins with Count Dracula preparing for his departure from Transylvania and his arrival to London with the help of young solicitor Jonathon Harker. The reader doesn't quite know all that transpired while Jonathon was trapped in Dracula's castle but it left him a scarred man. Once he's back in London and recovering in the care of his loving new wife, Mina, Dracula, once again rears his otherworldly head and preys on the one Jonathon loves.I found Stokers characters, for the most part, strongly defined. Although, at times, Jonathon and his friends seem like the Keystone Kops as they attempt to capture and defeat Dracula and there is more verbage than action, I can see how Victorian readers would find this novel titillating. I certainly recommend this novel, not too ghoulish, gorey nor frightful.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I have a hard time with classics, I don't like books with vampires, so why then did I enjoy the 1897 classic novel about the vampire to top all vampires, Count Dracula? I won't go into the plot, I'm sure that there are many descriptions that are far better than I could write, but I will try to explain my feelings about this book.First, I have to say that I've never watched the movie so I had no idea of the tale that would be related, so I was enveloped into the story at the very beginning, travelling through what is described as a beautiful land but with residents that are frightened of something, but no idea what.The story was captivating, how this group came together to defeat this evil creature and save the lives of women and children that were threatened. However, the characters were, IMO, a little two dimensional and the style was a little difficult to follow in a few areas, but overall, I liked the story being told in their diaries and letters. At the time of the original publication, I would imagine that Victorian England was scandalized by the behavior of Dracula and his victims, because even though there may have been discussions of folklore related to vampires, I doubt there were few books telling the tales.So for me this classic was a winner. But don't think that I will be searching or reading more vampire literature, I think I've had made fill.