Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Passenger to Frankfurt
Passenger to Frankfurt
Passenger to Frankfurt
Ebook292 pages4 hours

Passenger to Frankfurt

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars

3/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Christie's superb stand-alone mystery, Passenger to Frankfurt, is a true masterwork of surprise and suspense, as a diplomat comes to the aid of a terrified woman in an airport, only to find that his identity has been stolen and his life is suddenly in serious jeopardy.

Sir Stafford Nye's flight home from Malaya takes an unprecedented twist when a young woman confides in him that someone is trying to kill her. In a moment of weakness, he agrees to lend her his passport. Unwittingly, the diplomat has put his own life on the line.

When he meets the mystery woman again, she is a different person, and he finds himself drawn into a battle against an invisible—and altogether more dangerous—enemy. . . .

LanguageEnglish
PublisherHarperCollins
Release dateFeb 10, 2010
ISBN9780062006684
Author

Agatha Christie

Agatha Christie is the most widely published author of all time, outsold only by the Bible and Shakespeare. Her books have sold more than a billion copies in English and another billion in a hundred foreign languages. She died in 1976, after a prolific career spanning six decades.

Read more from Agatha Christie

Related to Passenger to Frankfurt

Related ebooks

Related articles

Reviews for Passenger to Frankfurt

Rating: 2.782216458247423 out of 5 stars
3/5

388 ratings24 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Tis has a perfect beginning --a British bureaucrat with too much humor for is job is approached by a young wqman in Frankfort airport who asks him to let her impersonate her because her life is in danger -- he does, and se turns out to be a British intelligence agent, and he is drawn into countering a plot; unfortunately the conspiracy against world peace is a rather tedious conventional one. In some ways it reminds he of Destination Unknown, which also has an interesting beginning involving impersonation and a rather incredible plot.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    By the time I finished the book I was astonished by the turn of events. This was the first novel by Mrs. Christie that hasn't gone well with me. And I think for that Mrs. Christie herself is to be blamed entirely. Firstly for choosing espionage as the center theme for this book. And secondly for writing this book.Well if anything, one thing is assured and that's espionage is not Mrs. Christie forte. As much as I appreciate Mrs. Christie's work, this book fails to impress at all.This book begins with intriguing plot involving a diplomat and mysterious look alike girl who thinks her life is in danger. And then the plot thickens for some next few pages as this diplomat tries to search this girl, he even succeeded and then right in the middle of the book Mrs. Christie loses the plot and started babbling about god knows what for the next 200 pages and then in the end she again catches your attention and finish off in style like always. This book suffers from a few drawbacks. To begin with, the story fails to pick up at any point of time, it was rather like reading excerpts patch together to assemble a book. The story is little disoriented as in, the beginning and the ending are so much out of sync that it felt like they came from two different books. Also the story sways from one character to another a lot, so it actually tricky to comprehend what actually is going on. The lack of a dedicated protagonist also works against the benefit of the book. Moreover there are several questions left unanswered which leave the reader pondering at the end and rather gives an impression of an incomplete story.These are a lot of drawbacks to even deserve two stars but there are also a few things which work in favor of Mrs Christie like the eloquence of this master story teller which make this novel an easy read despite of its flawed story.I would say if you are not a die hard Christie fan you can give this book a pass and devour something worthy
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    this is the first AC mystery i read for 40 years. to my surprise, Agatha is for adults, too!
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    This was not a good choice for my very first Agatha Christie. I was much more in the mood for a "whodunnit" and I got a "what'sgoingon". It felt like two more or less incomplete books shoved into one and I couldn't quite follow either of them. Perhaps it makes more sense to the veteran Christie fan. I'll try a different one of hers next time.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Generally I enjoy Agatha Christie's works but I have to say, I found this one to be wanting. This is supposed to be an international spy thriller, like James Bond fighting SPECTER, but it is either to short or to grand in attempt. I loved the first couple chapters. Then it seemed to become unfocused and very unbelievable, wondering around from group to group. She never really spent enough time anywhere to make a good story, finally finishing in a way that suggests she was tired of the book and wanted it to end fairly well. Certainly avoid this one if it's an introduction to Christie.Stafford Nye is a minor diplomat for the British government and because of his attitude of having some fun over seriousness, he has not advanced nearly as far as he could. On one trip home from Malaya he ran into another passenger who asked a favor from him and brought him into a whole other realm of international politics.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I've read a bit of Agatha Christie but after seven chapters, I wasn't sure who I was reading. It started so very AC but then went off on tangents that made me question if there were a conspiracy in writing the book. I will continue to read AC but I would not recommend this book to anyone but a hardcore AC fan.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Written late in Agatha Christie's career, this story begins with an introduction from the author in which she talks about where her ideas come from. It gives an interesting insight into the way Agatha Christie thought. She says that the ideas for the story and the characters are her own, but that the setting is usually real, somewhere she has been, and the action for the story may come from something she has observed or read in a newspaper.In her own words - Introduction: The Author SpeaksPASSENGER TO FRANKFURT was the last of Agatha Christie's stand-alone novels, written when she was 80, six years before her death. I think her readers at the time would mainly have been very disappointed in the novel, not so much in the standard of the writing, but in her preoccupation with the idea that evil powers are taking over the world. Of course she prepares us in a way in the Introduction, by saying "it is not an impossible story - it is only a fantastic one". She seems to be saying that if we look for the sort of events we find in the novel we will also find similar ones reported in our daily newspapers. What she has done is bring instances of them together.However the sort of paranoia she displays here has surfaced before in her "espionage" novels and in the preoccupation she showed with a controlling evil force behind European economies, or the idea of a master criminal who was controlling world events. So these fears are not new to Christie.I think she probably is reflecting what people of her age must have been thinking in the late 1960s - is this what we won the Second World War for? A society of unrest, political upheaval, student protest, permissiveness, the collapse of the old social order, the rise of neo-Nazism?However Agatha Christie is not Ian Fleming and she does not carry this sort of novel off at all well. It seems to degenerate into political polemic but the reader is not even really sure what side some of the characters are on. And then at the end there is a touch of romance!It is the only one of her novels that I have nearly not finished. I was tempted to put it down several times, and from what I have read of other reviews, I am not on my own.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I had to quit reading this book. I kept falling asleep. Now, that doesn't mean the book is unreadable, but at this point in my life it didn't hold my interest. Very slow pace and what to me, was a very uninteresting premise. I'll have to stick to Christie's mysteries.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    This book confused me, it felt like "snippets" of conversations, ideas, circumstances here & there......

    The book begins w/ a man giving his overcloak & passport to a young woman, as she has convinced him that if she gets on her prearranged flight, that she will be killed..... So while she "steal" his things (so that she might take on his identity), he goes to the airport concession & purchases a stuffed panda for his niece.....................

    When he goes back to London, it is that he is in the Secret Service & everyone there is discombobulated not being able to figure out what happened....

    I still really never understood the point or anything about the story, not to mention all the spy stuff bored me as I found the characters flat & dull... not anyone to like or care about.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I love most of Christie's mysteries, with their superb dialog and clever and creative plotting. But this, the last of her spy novels, was horrid. She never was very good at big thrillers and this one, marketed as her 80th book in her 80th year, is very disjointed, ridiculous, and pointless. The beginning is beguiling but then wanders off into a chatty and batty mess.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    One of the BEST from Agatha Christie. Although it is fiction, there are many parallels to the political situation occurring around the world in the 21st century.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Another Christie thriller. This is very much of its time and has elements of 'The Boys From Brazil' as well as picking up on conspiracy theme explored in other of her thrillers like 'Destination Unknown' and 'The Big Four'. Not her best but still quite enjoyable.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    This is one of the few Christie books that hasn't aged well. Passenger to Frankfurt is more of a suspense/spy thriller than a mystery novel in the classic Christie style.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    It is a strange thing when a writer attempts to pull off a global conspiracy in a book that doesn't really appear to have the space for it. This is what Ms. Christie does in Passenger to Franfurt. A very disjointed book, starting off with intriguing characters and a lovely confontation in the Frankfurt airport, but then going into They Saved Hitler's Brain mode with a global neo-Nazi conspiracy, and ending abruptly with a seemingly John Galt-ish invention of a magic powder that will save the world. Nevertheless, Christie is an enjoyable writer and each individual scene taken on its own is well written and interesting. Good book to stick in a purse and read a few pages when you have time.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Christie tries to do Bond but ends up more like Buchan, not really very focused...
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is an odd book.The first half of it is simply fantastic, being thrilling spy stuff. Then about half-way through it suddenly starts being...not quite so good. Downright odd, in fact. Nevertheless, I keep it for the first half, which is worth the price of admission.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    It's dry and deadly dull in several spots, but it's still Dame Agatha. She gives all of her characters depth, which is hard to do. If you're looking for a romp, this isn't it. If you're looking for a LeCarre, it's closer to that.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I’ve read almost all of Agatha Chrisie’s mysteries and a couple of her books written under the pen name Westmacott. This particular book seems to bridge between her mysteries and her Westmacott series. There are some of the elements of her mysteries but there is also the verbosity and elements of the Westmacott books, as far as the focus on the characters and what they are about.Sir Stafford Nye is a member of the diplomatic corp. On his way home from Malaya he is sitting out a weather delay at Frankfurt Airport. A woman approaches him with a proposition, which he accepts. The results of his actions could jeopardize his professional reputation, which seems to be questionable as is.After arriving home, he makes an effort to reconnect and does, with the woman, which leads him into connecting with people who believe they are in contact with Hitler’s son, during this past WWII time. These people believe that the son of Hitler is alive and on the move to pick up where Hitler left off.This is more of an espionage that a mystery. For me it wasn’t one of her best. The long meetings and dialogues make it a bit dull, along with the number of characters. I’ve read other of her books and enjoyed them much more.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    A minor diplomat's flight is re-directed to the Frankfurt Airport, where he meets a mysterious woman who asks him for his passport and boarding ticket so that she can go in his place on the connecting flight, or else she is at risk of being murdered. He soon finds himself wrapped up in an international intrigue with fatal consequences. This book starts off interestingly enough with several successions of cat-and-mouse games. It's almost like a 'cozy' spy thriller, if such a thing existed. But then about halfway through, it really starts to go off the rails. We stop seeing our two main leads and spend a lot of time with various stuffy old men in boardrooms conversing on the dangers of the "youth" and what to do about it without ever getting anywhere.Now, some of those youths are neo-Nazis and should rightly be feared. Others are simply critical of the Vietnam War, for example, or are fighting for racial equality. Still others are in the depths of drug addictions. These seem to all be lumped together as one massive issue across the globe. The book has no real villain and no real focus as a consequence. No wonder that Christie wrote herself into a corner and 'solved' the whole thing by one double agent being unmasked (even though that didn't really solve anything....).Also, this book really shows its author's age, with several references to one character being "yellow" (i.e., Asian) and one use of the n- word. The only reason I give it two stars is because the first few chapters started out strong; too bad Christie's writing then took a steep downhill plummet.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    In There is a Tide, Poirot remarks to Superintendent Spence that it's always the human interest that gets him. I think that is what I like so much about Agatha Christie's books – her incisive and almost brutal analyses of all the people in her books. This is especially well achieved in her books about murders within families. Unfortunately, that's also what this book lacks.Passenger to Frankfurt seems to be Agatha Christie's attempt to write a thriller. I am not sure how many of these non-murder mystery books she's written; this is the first one I've read. It follows a global conspiracy to control the world, reviving Nazism along the way. The protagonist is a British diplomat, who is aided by a beautiful female spy.The book features some traditional Christie trademarks, like the couple falling in love, and some incisive commentary about the players in the conspiracy. However, most of it felt muddled and incomprehensible, and a little dated. I think Christie's brand of sensationalism works really well for small towns, but doesn't translate well to global events. I also didn't really understand how each event led to the next, and there were way too many characters introduced, so I couldn't keep track of who was who. The narrative wasn't cohesive, with viewpoints being switched erratically. I'd stick to Christie's murder mysteries.Originally posted on my blog.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    You can create a third world now, or so everyone thinks, but the third world will have the same people in it as the first world or the second world or whatever names you like to call things. And when you have the same human beings running things, they’ll run them the same way. You’ve only got to look at history.’ ‘Does anybody care to look at history nowadays?’

    The thing is, I actually enjoyed the first half of the book.....then it became more and more convoluted and bizarre.

    Ok, a bit more detail: I could follow the plot up to about the half-way mark and had even made peace with the plot basically being about a resurgence of Nazi-Germany, orchestrated by some weird Countess and thwarted by some English gentleman, his girlfriend, and his auntie (who incidentally was at school with the Countess).

    As a plot it was way out there, like a deliberately bad space opera,......and it was only the ridiculousness of the whole thing that made it bearable.
    But it didn't stop there (or anywhere, really), on top of the plot we also get what I think was Christie's re-imagination of Charles de Gaulle - as the Marshal ??? - but being somewhat deranged and hell-bent on declaring war on all youths, because they are the root of the evil that seems to have befallen the world (seriously, in the context of the plot this is supposed to make some sense - because young people are incapable of individual thought?).

    "‘Riot must be put down. Rebellion! Insurrection! The danger to men, women and children, to property. I go forth now to quell the insurrection, to speak to them as their father, their leader. These students, these criminals even, they are my children. They are the youth of France. I go to speak to them of that. They shall listen to me, governments will be revised, their studies can be resumed under their own auspices. Their grants have been insufficient, their lives have been deprived of beauty, of leadership. I come to promise all this. I speak in my own name. I shall speak also in your name, the name of the Government, you have done your best, you have acted as well as you know how. But it needs higher leadership. It needs my leadership. I go now. I have lists of further coded wires to be sent. Such nuclear deterrents as can be used in unfrequented spots can be put into action in such a modified form that though they may bring terror to the mob, we ourselves shall know that there is no real danger in them. I have thought out everything. My plan will go."

    We also get some science, well pseudo-science, about drugs and mind-control. In particular, drugs that make people benevolent, but may also lobotomise them.

    Seriously, tho, where I lost it was with the seemingly endless political theorizing between the parts that actually moved the plot forward. So boring, so weird, so making me forget what point we were at in the story.

    Having finished, my verdict is that this truly is a terrible book, not just a terrible Christie book, but a pretty poor work of writing altogether. However, it is worth reading it to see that towards the end of her career, Christie really did lose touch with the world and her readers. The only question is whether this was a result of some sort of dementia or whether there was another reason.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Sir Stafford Nye er en slags diplomat, men ikke ret god for han tager ikke tingene alvorligt nok. I lufthavnen bliver han overtalt til at lave et stunt med at få sit pas stjålet og brugt af grevinde Renata Zerkowski som er på mission for en komite af folk med indflydelse som er ved at bore i, hvem der står bag uroligheder rundt omkring i verden. Komiteen omfatter en dygtig efterretningsmand Horsham og en Lord Altamount og rigmanden Robinson.Grevinde Charlotte von Waldsausen leder dem til Franz Josef, som er en smuk ung mand, som hilses med et Heil og med fanfaren for Den unge Siegfried som kendingsmelodi. Den mystiske sammensværgelse rekrutterer masser af unge og vælter sig i penge og våben, sågar flyvemaskiner uden at myndighederne kan stille noget op. (Det lyder ikke ret sandsynligt.)Ind på banen kommer professor Robert Shoreham og redder verden med projekt Benvo, der gør alle folk flinke og fornuftige. Dog skal James Kleek og Milly Jean lige afsløres som forrædere dog først efter at have skudt Lord Altamount.Næsten alle i komiteen og sågar Waldsausen kender også Nye's grandtante Lady Matilda Baldwen-White.Og til sidst bliver Nye og grevinden også gift med hinanden.Plottet er Bond-agtigt, men meget utroværdigt og sært. Bogen er skrevet på Agatha Christies gamle dage, hvilket mærkes tydeligt.Sær og dårlig bog. Og endda mere dårlig end sær.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Agatha Christie’s fans might not enjoy this book so much. It departs completely from Mrs. Christie’s style. (Actually, I find a lot of The Big Four in it.) First of all, it is a spy thriller—but not like other and older Christie’s spy thrillers. It reminded me a lot of Buchan’s books—especially The 39 Steps. So, if you don’t like old-fashioned spy thrillers, step away from the bookshelf! If you read Buchan and liked it, you will enjoy this book. Mrs. Christie was highly criticized, even ridiculed, when the book appeared. A fellow writer condemned its “idiotic conventions.” A highly condescending critic wondered if “the old dear” understood “the difference between a hippie and a skinhead.” But we will never know, because she never mentioned either in the book. (And I wonder if this critic actually read her book...) Another critic wrote that the plot was “inconceivable,” which is surprising, considering he was old enough to have heard of Hitler’s Youth. For him the book’s end was “incomprehensible muddle,” yet, it was clear to me. The same critic believed Mrs. Christie did not understand what “Third World” meant; yet it was clear she used it not with the connotation of “Third World Country,” but the (utopian) world the rebelled youths thought they were helping to create. It is clear that her critics never perused the pages of John Buchan; they would have been well informed had they bothered, instead of dishonorably belittling an eighty year-old extremely lucid lady. She was quite right when she described how the youths were being brainwashed: "against their mode of government; [...] their parental customs, [...] the religions in which they have been brought up." Just the way it is happening with our kids in schools and libraries nowadays. Incomprehensible muddle? I think not!

    1 person found this helpful

  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    In the ’20s, Christie wrote several thrillers before she was firmly established as the ‘Queen of Crime’. None of them were amazing – indeed, we’ll see most of them coming up in the next couple of posts – but neither were any as misguided as this one, perhaps unwisely chosen to celebrate Christie’s 80th birthday. (It’s a wonder her reputation didn’t slide further during her last years.) A 'North by Northwest' scenario sees a diplomat caught up in what can only be described as a web of international intrigue (what else would you call it?), up against the usual world-domination seeking manic. So many questions… I just don’t care.

Book preview

Passenger to Frankfurt - Agatha Christie

Introduction

The Author speaks:

The first question put to an author, personally, or through the post, is:

‘Where do you get your ideas from?’

The temptation is great to reply: ‘I always go to Harrods,’ or ‘I get them mostly at the Army & Navy Stores,’ or, snappily, ‘Try Marks and Spencer.’

The universal opinion seems firmly established that there is a magic source of ideas which authors have discovered how to tap.

One can hardly send one’s questioners back to Elizabethan times, with Shakespeare’s:

Tell me, where is fancy bred,

Or in the heart or in the head?

How begot, how nourished?

Reply, reply.

You merely say firmly: ‘My own head.’

That, of course, is no help to anybody. If you like the look of your questioner you relent and go a little further.

‘If one idea in particular seems attractive, and you feel you could do something with it, then you toss it around, play tricks with it, work it up, tone it down, and gradually get it into shape. Then, of course, you have to start writing it. That’s not nearly such fun–it becomes hard work. Alternatively, you can tuck it carefully away, in storage, for perhaps using in a year or two years’ time.’

A second question–or rather a statement–is then likely to be:

‘I suppose you take most of your characters from real life?’

An indignant denial to that monstrous suggestion.

‘No, I don’t. I invent them. They are mine. They’ve got to be my characters–doing what I want them to do, being what I want them to be–coming alive for me, having their own ideas sometimes, but only because I’ve made them become real.’

So the author has produced the ideas, and the characters–but now comes the third necessity–the setting. The first two come from inside sources, but the third is outside–it must be there–waiting–in existence already. You don’t invent that–it’s there–it’s real.

You have been perhaps for a cruise on the Nile–you remember it all–just the setting you want for this particular story. You have had a meal at a Chelsea café. A quarrel was going on–one girl pulled out a handful of another girl’s hair. An excellent start for the book you are going to write next. You travel on the Orient Express. What fun to make it the scene for a plot you are considering. You go to tea with a friend. As you arrive her brother closes a book he is reading–throws it aside, says: ‘Not bad, but why on earth didn’t they ask Evans?’

So you decide immediately a book of yours shortly to be written will bear the title, Why Didn’t They Ask Evans?

You don’t know yet who Evans is going to be. Never mind. Evans will come in due course–the title is fixed.

So, in a sense, you don’t invent your settings. They are outside you, all around you, in existence–you have only to stretch out your hand and pick and choose. A railway train, a hospital, a London hotel, a Caribbean beach, a country village, a cocktail party, a girls’ school.

But one thing only applies–they must be there–in existence. Real people, real places. A definite place in time and space. If here and now–how shall you get full information–apart from the evidence of your own eyes and ears? The answer is frighteningly simple.

It is what the Press brings to you every day, served up in your morning paper under the general heading of News. Collect it from the front page. What is going on in the world today? What is everyone saying, thinking, doing? Hold up a mirror to 1970 in England.

Look at that front page every day for a month, make notes, consider and classify.

Every day there is a killing.

A girl strangled.

Elderly woman attacked and robbed of her meagre savings.

Young men or boys–attacking or attacked.

Buildings and telephone kiosks smashed and gutted.

Drug smuggling.

Robbery and assault.

Children missing and children’s murdered bodies found not far from their homes.

Can this be England? Is England really like this? One feels–no–not yet, but it could be.

Fear is awakening–fear of what may be. Not so much because of actual happenings but because of the possible causes behind them. Some known, some unknown, but felt. And not only in our own country. There are smaller paragraphs on other pages–giving news from Europe–from Asia–from the Americas–Worldwide News.

Hi-jacking of planes.

Kidnapping.

Violence.

Riots.

Hate.

Anarchy–all growing stronger.

All seeming to lead to worship of destruction, pleasure in cruelty.

What does it all mean? An Elizabethan phrase echoes from the past, speaking of Life:

…it is a tale

Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,

Signifying nothing.

And yet one knows–of one’s own knowledge–how much goodness there is in this world of ours–the kindnesses done, the goodness of heart, the acts of compassion, the kindness of neighbour to neighbour, the helpful actions of girls and boys.

Then why this fantastic atmosphere of daily news–of things that happen–that are actual facts?

To write a story in this year of Our Lord 1970–you must come to terms with your background. If the background is fantastic, then the story must accept its background. It, too, must be a fantasy–an extravaganza. The setting must include the fantastic facts of daily life.

Can one envisage a fantastic cause? A secret Campaign for Power? Can a maniacal desire for destruction create a new world? Can one go a step further and suggest deliverance by fantastic and impossible-sounding means?

Nothing is impossible, science has taught us that.

This story is in essence a fantasy. It pretends to be nothing more.

But most of the things that happen in it are happening, or giving promise of happening in the world of today.

It is not an impossible story–it is only a fantastic one.

Book 1

Interrupted Journey

Chapter 1

Passenger To Frankfurt

I

‘Fasten your seat-belts, please.’ The diverse passengers in the plane were slow to obey. There was a general feeling that they couldn’t possibly be arriving at Geneva yet. The drowsy groaned and yawned. The more than drowsy had to be gently roused by an authoritative stewardess.

‘Your seat-belts, please.’

The dry voice came authoritatively over the Tannoy. It explained in German, in French, and in English that a short period of rough weather would shortly be experienced. Sir Stafford Nye opened his mouth to its full extent, yawned and pulled himself upright in his seat. He had been dreaming very happily of fishing an English river.

He was a man of forty-five, of medium height, with a smooth, olive, clean-shaven face. In dress he rather liked to affect the bizarre. A man of excellent family, he felt fully at ease indulging any such sartorial whims. If it made the more conventionally dressed of his colleagues wince occasionally, that was merely a source of malicious pleasure to him. There was something about him of the eighteenth-century buck. He liked to be noticed.

His particular kind of affectation when travelling was a kind of bandit’s cloak which he had once purchased in Corsica. It was of a very dark purply-blue, had a scarlet lining and had a kind of burnous hanging down behind which he could draw up over his head when he wished to, so as to obviate draughts.

Sir Stafford Nye had been a disappointment in diplomatic circles. Marked out in early youth by his gifts for great things, he had singularly failed to fulfil his early promise. A peculiar and diabolical sense of humour was wont to afflict him in what should have been his most serious moments. When it came to the point, he found that he always preferred to indulge his delicate Puckish malice to boring himself. He was a well-known figure in public life without ever having reached eminence. It was felt that Stafford Nye, though definitely brilliant, was not–and presumably never would be–a safe man. In these days of tangled politics and tangled foreign relations, safety, especially if one were to reach ambassadorial rank, was preferable to brilliance. Sir Stafford Nye was relegated to the shelf, though he was occasionally entrusted with such missions as needed the art of intrigue, but were not of too important or public a nature. Journalists sometimes referred to him as the dark horse of diplomacy.

Whether Sir Stafford himself was disappointed with his own career, nobody ever knew. Probably not even Sir Stafford himself. He was a man of a certain vanity, but he was also a man who very much enjoyed indulging his own proclivities for mischief.

He was returning now from a commission of inquiry in Malaya. He had found it singularly lacking in interest. His colleagues had, in his opinion, made up their minds beforehand what their findings were going to be. They saw and they listened, but their preconceived views were not affected. Sir Stafford had thrown a few spanners into the works, more for the hell of it than from any pronounced convictions. At all events, he thought, it had livened things up. He wished there were more possibilities of doing that sort of thing. His fellow members of the commission had been sound, dependable fellows, and remarkably dull. Even the well-known Mrs Nathaniel Edge, the only woman member, well known as having bees in her bonnet, was no fool when it came down to plain facts. She saw, she listened and she played safe.

He had met her before on the occasion of a problem to be solved in one of the Balkan capitals. It was there that Sir Stafford Nye had not been able to refrain from embarking on a few interesting suggestions. In that scandal-loving periodical Inside News it was insinuated that Sir Stafford Nye’s presence in that Balkan capital was intimately connected with Balkan problems, and that his mission was a secret one of the greatest delicacy. A kind of friend had sent Sir Stafford a copy of this with the relevant passage marked. Sir Stafford was not taken aback. He read it with a delighted grin. It amused him very much to reflect how ludicrously far from the truth the journalists were on this occasion. His presence in Sofiagrad had been due entirely to a blameless interest in the rarer wild flowers and to the urgencies of an elderly friend of his, Lady Lucy Cleghorn, who was indefatigable in her quest for these shy floral rarities, and who at any moment would scale a rock cliff or leap joyously into a bog at the sight of some flowerlet, the length of whose Latin name was in inverse proportion to its size.

A small band of enthusiasts had been pursuing this botanical search on the slopes of mountains for about ten days when it occurred to Sir Stafford that it was a pity the paragraph was not true. He was a little–just a little–tired of wild flowers and, fond as he was of dear Lucy, her ability despite her sixty-odd years to race up hills at top speed, easily outpacing him, sometimes annoyed him. Always just in front of him he saw the seat of those bright royal blue trousers and Lucy, though scraggy enough elsewhere, goodness knows, was decidedly too broad in the beam to wear royal blue corduroy trousers. A nice little international pie, he had thought, in which to dip his fingers, in which to play about…

In the aeroplane the metallic Tannoy voice spoke again. It told the passengers that owing to heavy fog at Geneva, the plane would be diverted to Frankfurt airport and proceed from there to London. Passengers to Geneva would be re-routed from Frankfurt as soon as possible. It made no difference to Sir Stafford Nye. If there was fog in London, he supposed they would re-route the plane to Prestwick. He hoped that would not happen. He had been to Prestwick once or twice too often. Life, he thought, and journeys by air, were really excessively boring. If only–he didn’t know–if only–what?

II

It was warm in the Transit Passenger Lounge at Frankfurt, so Sir Stafford Nye slipped back his cloak, allowing its crimson lining to drape itself spectacularly round his shoulders. He was drinking a glass of beer and listening with half an ear to the various announcements as they were made.

‘Flight 4387. Flying to Moscow. Flight 2381 bound for Egypt and Calcutta.’

Journeys all over the globe. How romantic it ought to be. But there was something about the atmosphere of a Passengers’ Lounge in an airport that chilled romance. It was too full of people, too full of things to buy, too full of similarly coloured seats, too full of plastic, too full of human beings, too full of crying children. He tried to remember who had said:

I wish I loved the Human Race;

I wish I loved its silly face.

Chesterton perhaps? It was undoubtedly true. Put enough people together and they looked so painfully alike that one could hardly bear it. An interesting face now, thought Sir Stafford. What a difference it would make. He looked disparagingly at two young women, splendidly made up, dressed in the national uniform of their country–England he presumed–of shorter and shorter miniskirts, and another young woman, even better made up–in fact quite good-looking–who was wearing what he believed to be called a culotte suit. She had gone a little further along the road of fashion.

He wasn’t very interested in nice-looking girls who looked like all the other nice-looking girls. He would like someone to be different. Someone sat down beside him on the plastic-covered artificial leather settee on which he was sitting. Her face attracted his attention at once. Not precisely because it was different, in fact he almost seemed to recognize it as a face he knew. Here was someone he had seen before. He couldn’t remember where or when but it was certainly familiar. Twenty-five or six, he thought, possibly, as to age. A delicate high-bridged aquiline nose, a black heavy bush of hair reaching to her shoulders. She had a magazine in front of her but she was not paying attention to it. She was, in fact, looking with something that was almost eagerness at him. Quite suddenly she spoke. It was a deep contralto voice, almost as deep as a man’s. It had a very faint foreign accent. She said,

‘Can I speak to you?’

He studied her for a moment before replying. No–not what one might have thought–this wasn’t a pick-up. This was something else.

‘I see no reason,’ he said, ‘why you should not do so. We have time to waste here, it seems.’

‘Fog,’ said the woman, ‘fog in Geneva, fog in London, perhaps. Fog everywhere. I don’t know what to do.’

‘Oh, you mustn’t worry,’ he said reassuringly, ‘they’ll land you somewhere all right. They’re quite efficient, you know. Where are you going?’

‘I was going to Geneva.’

‘Well, I expect you’ll get there in the end.’

‘I have to get there now. If I can get to Geneva, it will be all right. There is someone who will meet me there. I can be safe.’

‘Safe?’ He smiled a little.

She said, ‘Safe is a four-letter word but not the kind of four-letter word that people are interested in nowadays. And yet it can mean a lot. It means a lot to me.’ Then she said, ‘You see, if I can’t get to Geneva, if I have to leave this plane here, or go on in this plane to London with no arrangements made, I shall be killed.’ She looked at him sharply. ‘I suppose you don’t believe that.’

‘I’m afraid I don’t.’

‘It’s quite true. People can be. They are, every day.’

‘Who wants to kill you?’

‘Does it matter?’

‘Not to me.’

‘You can believe me if you wish to believe me. I am speaking the truth. I want help. Help to get to London safely.’

‘And why should you select me to help you?’

‘Because I think that you know something about death. You have known of death, perhaps seen death happen.’

He looked sharply at her and then away again.

‘Any other reason?’ he said.

‘Yes. This.’ She stretched out her narrow olive-skinned hand and touched the folds of the voluminous cloak. ‘This,’ she said.

For the first time his interest was aroused.

‘Now what do you mean by that?’

‘It’s unusual–characteristic. It’s not what everyone wears.’

‘True enough. It’s one of my affectations, shall we say?’

‘It’s an affectation that could be useful to me.’

‘What do you mean?’

‘I am asking you something. Probably you will refuse but you might not refuse because I think you are a man who is ready to take risks. Just as I am a woman who takes risks.’

‘I’ll listen to your project,’ he said, with a faint smile.

‘I want your cloak to wear. I want your passport. I want your boarding ticket for the plane. Presently, in twenty minutes or so, say, the flight for London will be called. I shall have your passport, I shall wear your cloak. And so I shall travel to London and arrive safely.’

‘You mean you’ll pass yourself off as me? My dear girl.’

She opened a handbag. From it she took a small square mirror.

‘Look there,’ she said. ‘Look at me and then look at your own face.’

He saw then, saw what had been vaguely nagging at his mind. His sister, Pamela, who had died about twenty years ago. They had always been very alike, he and Pamela. A strong family resemblance. She had had a slightly masculine type of face. His face, perhaps, had been, certainly in early life, of a slightly effeminate type. They had both had the high-bridged nose, the tilt of eyebrows, the slightly sideways smile of the lips. Pamela had been tall, five foot eight, he himself five foot ten. He looked at the woman who had tendered him the mirror.

‘There is a facial likeness between us, that’s what you mean, isn’t it? But my dear girl, it wouldn’t deceive anyone who knew me or knew you.’

‘Of course it wouldn’t. Don’t you understand? It doesn’t need to. I am travelling wearing slacks. You have been travelling with the hood of your cloak drawn up round your face. All I have to do is to cut off my hair, wrap it up in a twist of newspaper, throw it in one of the litter-baskets here. Then I put on your burnous, I have your boarding card, ticket, and passport. Unless there is someone who knows you well on this plane, and I presume there is not or they would have spoken to you already, then I can safely travel as you. Showing your passport when it’s necessary, keeping the burnous and cloak drawn up so that my nose and eyes and mouth are about all that are seen. I can walk out safely when the plane reaches its destination because no one will know I have travelled by it. Walk out safely and disappear into the crowds of the city of London.’

‘And what do I do?’ asked Sir Stafford, with a slight smile.

‘I can make a suggestion if you have the nerve to face it.’

‘Suggest,’ he said. ‘I always like to hear suggestions.’

‘You get up from here, you go away and buy a magazine or a newspaper, or a gift at the gift counter. You leave your cloak hanging here on the seat. When you come back with whatever it is, you sit down somewhere else–say at the end of that bench opposite here. There will be a glass in front of you, this glass still. In it there will be something that will send you to sleep. Sleep in a quiet corner.’

‘What happens next?’

‘You will have been presumably the victim of a robbery,’ she said. ‘Somebody will have added a few knock-out drops to your drink, and will have stolen your wallet from you. Something of that kind. You declare your identity, say that your passport and things are stolen. You can easily establish your identity.’

‘You know who I am? My name, I mean?’

‘Not yet,’ she said. ‘I haven’t seen your passport yet. I’ve no idea who you are.’

‘And yet you say I can establish my identity easily.’

‘I am a good judge of people. I know who is important or who isn’t. You are an important person.’

‘And why should I do all this?’

‘Perhaps to save the life of a fellow human being.’

‘Isn’t that rather a highly coloured story?’

‘Oh yes. Quite easily not believed. Do you believe it?’

He looked at her thoughtfully. ‘You know what you’re talking like? A beautiful spy in a thriller.’

‘Yes, perhaps. But I am not beautiful.’

‘And you’re not a spy?’

‘I might be so described, perhaps. I have certain information. Information I want to preserve. You will have to take my word for it, it is information that would be valuable to your country.’

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1