Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    The Survival Game: How Game Theory Explains the Biology of Cooperation and Competition
    Unavailable
    The Survival Game: How Game Theory Explains the Biology of Cooperation and Competition
    Unavailable
    The Survival Game: How Game Theory Explains the Biology of Cooperation and Competition
    Ebook447 pages8 hours

    The Survival Game: How Game Theory Explains the Biology of Cooperation and Competition

    By David P. Barash, Ph.D.

    3.5/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this ebook

    From a zoologist and psychologist, an astonishing look at the biological and strategic roots of human decisions

    Humans, like bacteria, woodchucks, chimpanzees, and other animals, compete or cooperate in order to get food, shelter, territory, and other resources to survive. But how do they decide whether to muscle out or team up with the competition?

    In The Survival Game, David P. Barash synthesizes the newest ideas from psychology, economics, and biology to explore and explain the roots of human strategy. Drawing on game theory-the study of how individuals make decisions-he explores the give-and-take of spouses in determining an evening's plans, the behavior of investors in a market bubble, and the maneuvers of generals on a battlefield alongside the mating and fighting strategies of "less rational" animals. Ultimately, Barash's lively and clear examples shed light on what makes our decisions human, and what we can glean from game theory and the natural world as we negotiate and compete every day.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherMacmillan Publishers
    Release dateSep 1, 2004
    ISBN9781429932561
    Unavailable
    The Survival Game: How Game Theory Explains the Biology of Cooperation and Competition
    Author

    David P. Barash, Ph.D.

    David P. Barash holds a Ph.D. in zoology and is currently professor of psychology at the University of Washington, Seattle. He has written more than a dozen books, including Making Sense of Sex with Judith Lipton, Ideas of Human Nature, and The Mammal in the Mirror, as well as popular articles in Playboy, Psychology Today, and the New York Times.

    Related to The Survival Game

    Related ebooks

    Biology For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Opportunity Costs

      Feb 7, 2020

      Opportunity Costs
      10 min read

    • Article

      Why Your Brain Hates Other People

      Dec 14, 2017

      As a kid, I saw the 1968 version of Planet of the Apes. As a future primatologist, I was mesmerized. Years later I discovered an anecdote about its filming: At lunchtime, the people playing chimps and those playing gorillas ate in separate groups. It

      17 min read

    • Article

      Why Your Brain Hates Other People

      Jun 22, 2017

      As a kid, I saw the 1968 version of Planet of the Apes. As a future primatologist, I was mesmerized. Years later I discovered an anecdote about its filming: At lunchtime, the people playing chimps and those playing gorillas ate in separate groups. It

      17 min read

    • Article

      Selfishness Is Learned: We tend to be cooperative—unless we think too much.

      Jun 9, 2016

      Many people cheat on taxes—no mystery there. But many people don’t, even if they wouldn’t be caught—now, that’s weird. Or is it? Psychologists are deeply perplexed by human moral behavior, because it often doesn’t seem to make any logical sense. You

      11 min read

    • Article

      Strategically Incompetent

      Jul 30, 2018

      Strategically Incompetent
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

      Apr 30, 2018

      The Prisoner’s Dilemma Game
      2 min read

    • Article

      The Cat In The Hat Is Right About Parenting

      Apr 26, 2019

      WHY DO PARENTS still read The Cat in the Hat to their children? The cat gives terrible advice, after all. His risk assessments are poor. He urges reluctant kids to break rules. His games are unstructured and seemingly pointless; “UP-UP-UP with a fish

      5 min read

    • Article

      The Big Idea: Is There Such A Thing As The Perfect Game?

      Oct 9, 2023

      When I was younger, my sister and I loved playing snakes and ladders. I think we both believed that we were somehow responsible for sending each other down the snakes, or for victoriously climbing a ladder. Now, of course, I know that we were totally

      4 min read

    • Article

      Chasing Coincidences: Why it’s hard to recognize the unlikely.

      Aug 15, 2013

      Whenever I fly, I like to talk to the person sitting next to me. Once in a while, I find that we know at least one person in common. If you are like me, perhaps coincidences such as this happen in your life as well. The most unusual coincidence in my

      6 min read

    • Article

      Landscape Of Uncertainty

      Jun 6, 2022

      Landscape Of Uncertainty
      4 min read

    • Article

      Squid Game Owes Its Popularity To Anxieties Of Modern Life

      Oct 9, 2021

      Squid Game, a Netflix series made in Korea by Hwang Dong-hyuk, was released on 17 September and within 10 days was the platform’s highest ranking show in 90 countries. It’s the first time a Korean drama has ever been at the top of the US charts; 95%

      3 min read

    • Article

      Nudge Theory

      Feb 18, 2022

      Nudge Theory
      14 min read

    • Article

      The Game Of Life

      Dec 25, 2023

      The Game Of Life
      4 min read

    • Article

      It’s Not Irrational to Party Like It’s 1999

      Nov 17, 2021

      Must we always follow reason? Do I need a rational argument for why I should fall in love, cherish my children, enjoy the pleasures of life? Isn’t it sometimes OK to go crazy, to be silly, to stop making sense? If rationality is so great, why do we a

      9 min read

    • Article

      The Bugs in Our Mindware: Many obstacles lie on the path to rational thought.

      May 7, 2015

      Three baseball umpires are talking about how they play the game. The first says, “I call ’em as they are.” The second, “I call ’em as I see ’em.” And the third says, “They ain’t nothin’ till I call ’em.” Most of the time all of us are like the first

      17 min read

    • Article

      Why It Pays to Play Around

      Jun 6, 2019

      The 19th-century physicist Hermann von Helmholtz compared his progress in solving a problem to that of a mountain climber “compelled to retrace his steps because his progress stopped.” A mountain climber, von Helmholtz said, “hits upon traces of a fr

      8 min read

    • Article

      Why It Pays to Play Around

      Dec 16, 2020

      The 19th-century physicist Hermann von Helmholtz compared his progress in solving a problem to that of a mountain climber “compelled to retrace his steps because his progress stopped.” A mountain climber, von Helmholtz said, “hits upon traces of a fr

      8 min read

    • Article

      The Brain on Trial: It’s not fair to ask jurors to vote on a death penalty.

      Sep 5, 2013

      In his most recent book, Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Thinking, the philosopher Daniel Dennett has revisited his 1991 observation that consciousness arises out of a selection process in the brain akin to what makes someone or something famous.

      10 min read

    Reviews for The Survival Game

    3.5/5

    2 ratings2 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 3/5
      This book is definitely not Pareto-optimal.If that means nothing to you, ironically, this book may be for you. That's because it is a very non-technical introduction to game theory -- that is, the branch of mathematics devoted to determining the best "strategy" when confronted with a particular set of choices (euphemistically called "games"). A game might consist of deciding whether a wife should go to an event her husband loves and she despises, because she loves him ("Battle of the Sexes"), whether to turn stool pigeon after being arrested ("Prisoner's Dilemma"), or how often to play heads or tails in a heads or tails matching game. Or it might consist of deciding whether to ratchet up the threat to North Korea or try negotiating instead. All of these are "games"; in theory at least, all of them are the province of game theory.Game theory has been one of the most intensively studied areas of mathematics in the last half a century, and the results have been vitally important in economics and often useful in other areas as well. And it is in fact a relatively straightforward area of mathematics (generally no calculus needed, e.g.). But it isn't entirely mathematics-free (having the ability to do arithmetic is necessary, and I wouldn't want to try it without algebra, either). Author Barash has attempted to present game theory with as little mathematics as possible -- so little that he doesn't even allow himself to produce mathematical formulae.Obviously this means that you won't learn any actual game theory from this book. But you will learn a little about what the field can do, and some terminology. Such as Pareto optimality. A situation is Pareto optimal if you can't improve one person's life without making someone else's life worse. Take a very simple example: Suppose you have two people. One of them has a billion dollars; the other has a hundred dollars. If the first guy had a hundred dollars taken away from him by a tax, he would be only very slightly worse off, but if the second guy were given a hundred dollars, he would be much, much better off. Thus, by taking $100 from the first to give to the second, we significantly increase the overall well-being of the two. But this is not Pareto-optimal, because transferring the $100, although it makes one player much better off, makes the other ever so slightly worse off. There is, in this case, a more optimal situation (two guys with half a billion dollars are both in a very fine situation), but there is no way to get from one way to the other without depriving one of them. A plan can only be Pareto-optimal if you can get from the start to the end while making everyone's life better every step along the way.(Note incidentally that this is why things like tax reform are so hard: We know that a tax system with lower rates and fewer deductions is generally more fair than a system with higher rates and more various deductions that brings in equal revenue, but there is no Pareto-optimal way to get from the latter to the former; someone is always hurt, and so someone screams.)So: A Pareto-optimal non-mathematical game theory book would be one that you can read -- and then, if you want, turn and go into a real game theory book and learn the mathematics, without the first book getting in your way.Unfortunately, it isn't possible with this book. That's because it gives you a whole bunch of misleading descriptions of games. Having read most of the book, one that particularly got to me is Barash's description, on p. 172ff., of a game known as "Deadlock". Only he doesn't call it "Deadlock." He calls it a variation of "Prisoner's Dilemma." It is not. It applies in different situations. There are far too many instances of this.Does the terminology matter? If you just want an idea of how game theory works, then no, it doesn't, and this is a good and interesting volume. But when I first encountered game theory, it was in a similar book that mis-defined the most important game of all, "Prisoner's Dilemma." It took me a very long time to realize that I had gotten a classic game wrong. I had a lot of re-learning to do, and it interfered with my ability to understand the field. The sort of mis-definition Barash engages in could be very handicapping if you want to really learn game theory. So don't get yourself into a place which is not Pareto-optimal. If you want to really learn game theory, bite the bullet and buy a book with some actual math in it. If you are sure you don't want to learn the math -- if you just want to have some fun -- then this book should be just fine.Signed, the Curmudgeonly Mathematician.
    • 4/5
      Read many years ago, today tossing it into the donate box.It does stick me and I am glad to have read it - especially the long account of 'tit-for-tat'.Basically, you should cooperate until the other person/side/team 'defects' or breaks the trust. Then you should defect. It they again cooperate you should too until they defect again.Assume cooperation until proven otherwise is a pretty good strategy, generally.