Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The Final Days of Alastair Nicholson: Chief Justice Family Court of Australia
    The Final Days of Alastair Nicholson: Chief Justice Family Court of Australia
    The Final Days of Alastair Nicholson: Chief Justice Family Court of Australia
    Ebook101 pages1 hour

    The Final Days of Alastair Nicholson: Chief Justice Family Court of Australia

    By William John Stapleton

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Refusing to hide, Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia Alastair Nicholson, scheduled to appear before an inquiry into family law and child support, entered Australia's Parliament House in Canberra via the front door on the 10th October 2003.

    As Chief Justice of one of the most unpopular courts in the country, Nicholson had become a key figure fuelling discontent with Australia's political, bureaucratic and judicial wings of government. With millions of Australians having gone through the shredder of the country's divorce regime, he had become a focus for community discontent.

    So heightened had the debate around Nicholson become that politicians rightly feared the general public were losing faith in the country's governance.

    Nicholson was arguably the single most outspoken, certainly the most controversial judge ever to serve in the Australian court system; deeply hated by some, admired by others. Politicians from both sides of politics had reason to fear his ever ready tongue.

    The appearance before the Inquiry of the one man who had done more to shape the nature of Australian family law than any other individual had been looked forward to by his critics with a kind of wonder and anticipation, a fascination for the grotesque.

    Despite a plethora of Inquiries, including a devastating critique from the government's chief adviser on legal matters the Australian Law Reform Commission, doubt was not a trait Nicholson ever displayed in public.

    Was this the inquiry which would finally nail him to the wall?

    To the chagrin of his critics, Nicholson showed not a sliver of regret or self-doubt. He has continued to be outspoken since his retirement from the bench and move into academic life.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublishereBookIt.com
    Release dateApr 26, 2016
    ISBN9781456615154
    The Final Days of Alastair Nicholson: Chief Justice Family Court of Australia

    Read more from William John Stapleton

    Related to The Final Days of Alastair Nicholson

    Related ebooks

    Law For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Genes And Science

      Jan 16, 2022

      Genes And Science
      8 min read

    • Article

      Easing The Pain Of Separation

      Nov 20, 2023

      Easing The Pain Of Separation
      7 min read

    • Article

      Watch And Learn

      Nov 13, 2023

      Moree is a farming town on the black-soil plains 630km northwest of Sydney with an ugly past and an elegant presence in the weary struggle to reconcile Aboriginal and white Australia. In the broiling summer of 1965, Charles Perkins, the first Aborigi

      2 min read

    • Article

      The Right To Be Wrong

      Nov 28, 2021

      The Right To Be Wrong
      2 min read

    • Article

      Peeling Back The Layers

      Sep 4, 2022

      Peeling Back The Layers
      8 min read

    • Article

      Commentary: The Enduring Legacy Of 'The Nicholas Effect'

      Oct 4, 2019

      You may remember the story of how my young son, Nicholas, was killed. Many people do. My wife, Maggie, and I and our two children were on vacation, traveling at night on a divided highway in southern Italy when a car with two masked men pulled up alo

      4 min read

    • Article

      Abuse In State Institutions

      Jul 3, 2022

      Abuse In State Institutions
      8 min read

    • Article

      HEART Of The MATTER

      Dec 30, 2019

      HEART Of The MATTER
      6 min read

    • Article

      Australian PM's Move To Enlist Ex-NBA Star Shaq O'Neal For Indigenous Campaign A Strange One

      Aug 29, 2022

      On Saturday, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese met America's former NBA star and current TV personality Shaquille O'Neal in Sydney to enlist the sport star's support for constitutional recognition for an Indigenous voice. O'Neal voiced his s

      4 min read

    • Article

      Nikola Tesla’s legacy

      Oct 23, 2022

      Nikola Tesla (“Beam me up”, October 15) is most remembered for two inventions: the transformer and the three-phase induction motor. These, along with synchronous generators, have formed the backbone of the worldwide AC electric power system that is a

      6 min read

    • Article

      Why Does China's Treatment Of Uygurs In Xinjiang Get More Attention In Australia Than Canberra's Detention Of Asylum Seekers?

      Apr 1, 2021

      But few mainstream media outlets covered the comments at the UN, including in countries seen as diligent on human rights issues - though in Australia there was mocking coverage pointing out North Korea's "totalitarian dictatorship" after its state me

      5 min read

    • Article

      Life After Life

      Dec 4, 2023

      Life After Life
      8 min read

    • Article

      Let’s Get Metaphysical

      Apr 16, 2023

      Congratulations, Mark Broatch, on “Senses of Wonder” (April 8). It showed so well the wondrous world we live in ‒ its beauty and mysteries. Professor Ashley Ward’s tantalising remark that “none of these things, in the strictest sense, exists” leaves

      6 min read

    • Article

      Foreword

      Feb 12, 2021

      Foreword
      3 min read

    • Article

      In Australia, 'False Information' Leads Malaysians To Conflate Bumiputra Policy With Rights For First Peoples

      Sep 10, 2023

      As Australia gears up for a referendum on recognising its first peoples, the spread of "false information" through the Malaysian community has raised concerns it is misleading some members to believe the issue is comparable to the Southeast Asian cou

      4 min read

    • Article

      Look Who Woke Up

      Jun 27, 2021

      Look Who Woke Up
      2 min read

    • Article

      Doctors And Diagnosis

      Sep 18, 2022

      Thank you, Marie Murray, for your Upfront about endometrial cancer (September 10). It’s the same story I have told to many women in the 17 years since my cancer was diagnosed. I also experienced break-through bleeding in my mid-to-late-50s and brough

      6 min read

    • Article

      Australia's Indefinite Detention System Ends, But Anti-immigration Sentiment Still Well Alive

      Dec 8, 2023

      Australia's 20-year indefinite detention system for immigrants may have been finally brought to its knees, but systemic problems in governments that gave it life have not. After the High Court last month ruled that politicians had for too long been p

      3 min read

    • Article

      The Inside Story

      Mar 20, 2022

      The Inside Story
      2 min read

    • Article

      Learning To Love Big Brother

      Nov 26, 2020

      Learning To Love Big Brother
      3 min read

    • Article

      Rape And The Justice System

      Mar 27, 2022

      Oh, for the day when those who rape are actually convicted without the complainant being further brutalised by the justice system. I was interested to read about the rape myths researcher Elisabeth McDonald describes (“Bitter justice”, March 19). Fif

      8 min read

    • Article

      Better Call Ken

      Dec 15, 2021

      Better Call Ken
      20 min read

    • Article

      Vote for Tīrau

      Jun 18, 2023

      Vote for Tīrau
      7 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for The Final Days of Alastair Nicholson

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      The Final Days of Alastair Nicholson - William John Stapleton

      Pain.

      The Final Days of Alastair Nicholson: Chief Justice Family Court of Australia

      Refusing to hide, Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia Alastair Nicholson entered Australia’s Parliament House in Canberra via the front door on the 10th October 2003. Built in the 1980s atop an artificial hill, Parliament House is one of Australia’s largest and most distinctive buildings. With 4,700 rooms, it is shaped in the form of two boomerangs and topped by an 81 meter 250 tone flagpole.

      Whether the politicians conducting a Parliamentary Inquiry into family law and child support inside The House that day were actually serving the interests of those who had elected them was questionable.

      As Chief Justice of one of the most unpopular courts in the country, Nicholson had become a key figure fuelling discontent with Australia’s political, bureaucratic and judicial wings of government. With millions of Australians having gone through the shredder of the country’s divorce regime, he had become a focus for community discontent.

      So heightened had the debate around Nicholson become that politicians rightly feared the general public were losing faith in the country’s governance.

      Nicholson was arguably the single most outspoken, certainly the most controversial judge ever to serve in the Australian court system; deeply hated by some, admired by others. Politicians from both sides of politics had reason to fear his ever ready tongue.

      Nicholson’s appointment for the day was to appear before the House of Representatives’ Family and Community Affairs Committee chaired by National Party politician Kay Hull.

      For months, under the full glare of media attention, the Committee had been conducting a public inquiry into the hot button issues of family law and child support

      The Inquiry had prompted extensive media coverage and debate.

      The appearance of the one man who had done more to shape the nature of Australian family law than any other individual had been looked forward to by his critics with a kind of wonder and anticipation, a fascination for the grotesque.

      Despite a plethora of Inquiries, including a devastating critique from the government’s chief adviser on legal matters the Australian Law Reform Commission, doubt was not a trait Nicholson ever displayed in public.

      Was this the inquiry which would finally nail him to the wall?

      Nicholson, with more front than Selfridges as the saying went, took not one step backwards throughout the day.

      He showed not a single shiver of regret or concern at the controversy level of debate now surrounding his Court.

      Perhaps more than anything it was his singular lack of empathy for the litigants struggling through his court which fascinated and repelled the public, particularly separated fathers and their lobby groups.

      Nicholson, only the Family Court of Australia’s second Chief Justice since its formation in the mid-1970s, had held the position since 1988. He would not retire until the following year. From one cosy sinecure to the next, he then went on to become an Honorary Professional Fellow at Melbourne University, first with the Faculty of Criminology and later with the Faculty of Law.

      The nature of family law in Australia was almost entirely dominated by Nicholson at the time he appeared before the parliamentary committee inquiry.

      To the present day his influence remains strong. On the face of it, Nicholson had one of the country’s most distinguished legal careers. Born in 1938, he joined the Victorian Bar in 1963 after graduating from Melbourne University. He became a Queen’s Council in 1979 and was a Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria between 1982 and 1988. He was Judge Advocate General for the Australian Defence Force until 1992. In retirement he still retains a number of honorary positions, including as Chair of the National Centre Against Bullying.

      None of these fitted very well with his later façade as darling of the left, alleged champion of oppressed and disadvantaged.

      Appointed by then Prime Minister Bob Hawke, Nicholson’s primary qualification for becoming the Family Court’s Chief Justice was his loyalty to the Labor Party. He had twice run for election in the Victorian seat of Chisholm as a member of the Labor Party, failing in both 1972 and 1974.

      Bob Hawke, under questioning at the time of Nicholson’s retirement, expressed no regret at the appointment - despite the disrepute which his detractors claimed Nicholson had left the Family Court in administrative disarray, mired in controversy and with its public reputation in tatters. Hawke said he believed Nichols on had done an excellent job.

      The nature, style and substance of family law in Australia were almost entirely dominated by Nicholson at the time he appeared before the parliamentary committee inquiry. To this day his influence remains strong.

      In more than a quarter of a century no Chief Justice of the Court, either its founding head Elizabeth Evatt or Chief Justice Nicholson, who came to power in 1988, had ever, that Dads On The Air could find, said a positive public word about fathers or fatherhood.

      Amongst bureaucratic and academic feminists Nicholson was revered as a hero promoting women’s and children’s rights.

      But to his many critics in government, the legal profession and the community, Nicholson’s legacy was a destructive, dysfunctional and discredited Family Court.

      To fathers’ and family law reform groups’ Nicholson was Public Enemy Number One.

      Nicholson in turn was a staunch defender of the Family Court and its practices and an equally vocal critic of father's groups, which he dismissed as sinister and dysfunctional.

      To his vociferous critics on the country’s ballooning separated men’s internet news and chat lines he was the focus of blame for everything that had gone wrong in their lives. For them his reign had seemed interminable, and they blamed him personally for everything that was wrong with family law.

      The Australian tradition of judges refraining from speaking in public about current events or the social debates of the day was not one to which Nicholson adhered. He never hesitated to express his opinions to the media on any subject that interested him or reflected in some way on human rights or family law.

      Nicholson’s numerous pronouncements were followed by his critics with a kind of lurid fascination.

      But since the 1980s, nothing had ever stopped Nicholson speaking out on his numerous hobby horses.  In the year or so before the inquiry began Nicholson had created a series of stirs; one of them by calling for the removal of the common-law defence of reasonable chastisement. He supported the call for laws banning physical punishment of children so that smacking would become socially unacceptable.

      Next, he declared, after a retrial of an unrepresented woman in a case where there were accusations of domestic violence, that the lack of Legal Aid appeared to infringe the practical enjoyment of rights under international conventions.

      Never mind the numerous self-represented men who struggled every day to get a fair hearing in the court. Most fathers found themselves denied Legal

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1