Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    The Logic of Simultaneity: Relativity without Inertial Frames
    The Logic of Simultaneity: Relativity without Inertial Frames
    The Logic of Simultaneity: Relativity without Inertial Frames
    Ebook102 pages1 hour

    The Logic of Simultaneity: Relativity without Inertial Frames

    By Priidu Tänava

    4/5

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    This book is an account of my first encounter with Einstein's Special Relativity. It is inevitable that in trying to unravel the theory's logical inconsistencies I did not at first attempt succeed in correcting it. The logic does not stand the test of a detailed follow through. Our fundamental understanding of relativity in the universe is thus still waiting to be put right. Patience. (Feb. 2019)

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherPriidu Tänava
    Release dateMay 31, 2016
    ISBN9789949389483
    The Logic of Simultaneity: Relativity without Inertial Frames

    Related to The Logic of Simultaneity

    Related ebooks

    Physics For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Actually, There Is a Time Like the Present

      Nov 30, 2017

      We’ve all heard it before: There’s no time like the present. Broadly speaking, of course, it means to “seize the opportunity right now,” or maybe in my case, to avoid procrastinating. From a psychological perspective, this makes a lot of sense. As hu

      4 min read

    • Article

      The Math That Takes Newton Into the Quantum World

      Feb 28, 2019

      In my 50s, too old to become a real expert, I have finally fallen in love with algebraic geometry. As the name suggests, this is the study of geometry using algebra. Around 1637, René Descartes laid the groundwork for this subject by taking a plane,

      9 min read

    • Article

      Physics Has Demoted Mass

      Nov 9, 2017

      You’re sitting here, reading this article. Maybe it’s a hard copy, or an e-book on a tablet computer or e-reader. It doesn’t matter. Whatever you’re reading it on, we can be reasonably sure it’s made of some kind of stuff: paper, card, plastic, perha

      10 min read

    • Article

      What Is Dark Matter Made Of?

      Jan 27, 2022

      What Is Dark Matter Made Of?
      3 min read

    • Article

      Paradox Is Illuminating the Black Hole

      Apr 11, 2019

      This essay is one of the five winners in the 2019 writing competition held by the Black Hole Initiative at Harvard University. “The Black Hole Initiative offers a unique environment for thinking about the topic of black holes more creatively and comp

      6 min read

    • Article

      To Understand Your Past, Look to Your Future: An alternative to the Newtonian worldview promises to help explain quantum weirdness.

      May 19, 2016

      You’re thinking about time all wrong, according to our best physical theories. In Einstein’s general theory of relativity, there’s no conceptual distinction between the past and the future, let alone an objective line of “now.” There’s also no sense

      9 min read

    • Article

      Set Your Alarm Clock

      Oct 29, 2018

      Set Your Alarm Clock
      4 min read

    • Article

      When Gravity Breaks Down

      Feb 15, 2019

      When Gravity Breaks Down
      5 min read

    • Article

      Could the Universe Be Finite?

      Dec 15, 2023

      On recent estimates, the observable universe—the portion of the universe that we can detect through our telescopes—extends about 47 billion light-years in every direction. But the limit of what we can see is one thing, and the limit of what exists is

      7 min read

    • Article

      The End of the Dark Universe?

      Mar 13, 2024

      Please excuse me for being excited, but this hasn’t happened for more than four decades: Physicists have found a new approach to solving a problem which is almost a century old—how to combine quantum physics with gravity. The new idea comes from John

      5 min read

    • Article

      Secrets Of Gravity

      Feb 22, 2024

      Secrets Of Gravity
      9 min read

    • Article

      The Mystery of Time’s Arrow

      Apr 4, 2019

      As conscious beings, we are constantly aware of the relentless march of time. You can make an egg into an omelet, but you can’t turn an omelet back into an egg. Dropped glasses shatter and do not reassemble themselves. Above all, we age and become de

      9 min read

    • Article

      Paradox Is Illuminating the Black Hole

      Jan 31, 2019

      An Introduction to the Black Hole Institute Fittingly, the Black Hole Initiative (BHI) was founded 100 years after Karl Schwarzschild solved Einstein’s equations for general relativity—a solution that described a black hole decades before the first a

      7 min read

    • Article

      The Case for Fewer Dimensions: At small scales, gravity seems to blow up—but not if space becomes 1-D.

      Oct 8, 2015

      The adventures of the classic science-fiction novel Flatland by Edwin Abbott have sprung to life. The novel is narrated by a two-dimensional creature who calls himself “A Square,” who learns he has been embedded in a three-dimensional realm called Sp

      7 min read

    • Article

      The Mystery of Time’s Arrow: Past and future may not be what they seem.

      Jan 30, 2014

      As conscious beings, we are constantly aware of the relentless march of time. You can make an egg into an omelet, but you can’t turn an omelet back into an egg. Dropped glasses shatter and do not reassemble themselves. Above all, we age and become de

      9 min read

    • Article

      The Quantum Mechanics of Fate: How time travel might explain some of science’s biggest puzzles.

      Jan 30, 2014

      The objective world simply is, it does not happen,” wrote mathematician and physicist Hermann Weyl in 1949. From his point of view, the universe is laid out in time as surely as it is laid out in space. Time does not pass, and the past and future are

      6 min read

    • Article

      Cosmic Mariners

      Oct 16, 2019

      Cosmic Mariners
      8 min read

    • Article

      The End of Time

      Sep 6, 2018

      Carlo Rovelli, physicist and author of “The Order of Time,” writes: In the fundamental physics of the world, there is neither space nor time.

      6 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for The Logic of Simultaneity

    4/5

    1 rating0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      The Logic of Simultaneity - Priidu Tänava

      Preface

      Our description of three-dimensional space does not include time. When we do include time, space can no longer be unambiguously described. This gives us both relativity and quantum physics. Next to spatial ambiguity, time and simultaneity are unambiguous and let us seek consistency in detail.

      In this essay I present a theory of relativity that is based on the constancy of the speed of light, but does not use inertial frames of reference and allows precise geometrical description. The geometries are observer independent and lead to a stable cosmological model of space and time. Cosmological stability is inevitable from the perspective of information processing, which is the broad context of my reasoning.

      Due to the predominance of logical reasoning, and the author’s inexperience, the narrative can be hard to follow. I hope those persisting will see some aesthetic beauty in the design. This is my universe. Welcome.

      Priidu Tänava

      1 Introduction

      1.1 Special Relativity

      And I say it’s not possible.

      12 Angry Men (1957 film)

      Galilean Relativity gives us the concept of the inertial frame of reference and the first inertial frame is the enclosed ship cabin. Important in Galilean Relativity is that the inertial frames contain each other, forming a hierarchy. This gives a clear meaning to the word stationary. Smaller inertial frames can be stationary or moving in the containing context of a larger frame. The broad meaning of relativity is that for the purposes of physical experiments the contexts are equal. The movement of one frame inside another gives the moving frame no special physical properties. In Galilean Relativity the difference between stationary and moving is created by a visual reference, or by means of a medium, like air or water. This works within the context of the Earth but fails when we want to determine the movement of the Earth itself. The universe as a global context gives us neither a stationary visual reference nor a medium. The inertial linear movement in it appears to be entirely relative and no difference between stationary and moving can be made.

      Special Relativity recognizes the inherent equality between inertial frames in the laws of physics. At the same time it builds on the difference between stationary and moving that is created through the hierarchical containment of the frames. It declares that no single top level universal context exists. Instead, all inertial frames contain each other in a relativistic way. The new meaning of relativity is that every inertial frame can equally assume the role of the globally stationary context in which other frames are seen as moving. In the process the moving frame’s coordinate system is adjusted to allow for the constant speed of light, and the difference between stationary and moving becomes a difference between undistorted and distorted.

      In Galilean Relativity the inertial frames of reference are artificial constructs. It is a convenience for us to see ourselves as stationary or moving on the surface of the Earth. The meaning of relativity is that the difference has no physical reality. We may therefore be justified in asking why build on the concept of the inertial frames of reference in an attempt to explain relativity in the universe? The problem is that there is always a fundamental inequality between stationary and moving. In Galilean Relativity it is the hierarchical containment, in Special Relativity it is the distortedness of the coordinate systems. Whichever way we reason, the word stationary implies a privilege and the difference between the states of stationary and moving is not relative. By holding on to the difference, Special Relativity appears to be declaring the inertial frames to be equal in their right to be unequal. In the mix there is no place for a single common context for all observers, as such a context would be preferential amongst peers. Yet there appears to be no gain either. On the contrary, the originally artificial inequality between two chosen inertial frames has now acquired a physical meaning, and the relativity underlying the Galilean inertial frames has been lost.

      Both the underlying absoluteness and the lack of a meaningful global context, consequences of using inertial frames without a valid containing context, are the source of Special Relativity’s logical difficulties. At the same time, to enable constant speed of light for all observers in the universe, there inevitably have to be coordinate adjustments of some kind. These adjustments can only be relativistic and fit into a common context if they are sensitive to the direction of movement. An example of this is the wavelength shift of light. In Special Relativity they are not. The coordinate distortions there differentiate between stationary and moving, not on the direction of movement. If the universe has a common coordinate system of some kind, the Special Relativity’s description of movement in it can only be absolute.

      The next question we ask, not having a meaningful global context, is what the basis for a common physical reality between the frames is. The meaning of relativity includes the requirement that any distortions created by movement must be consistent amongst observers. A theory explaining relativity should be able to demonstrate this consistency.

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1