Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Changing the Way We Die: Compassionate End of Life Care and The Hospice Movement
Changing the Way We Die: Compassionate End of Life Care and The Hospice Movement
Changing the Way We Die: Compassionate End of Life Care and The Hospice Movement
Ebook292 pages5 hours

Changing the Way We Die: Compassionate End of Life Care and The Hospice Movement

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

There’s a quiet revolution happening in the way we die. More than 1.5 million Americans a year die in hospice care—nearly 44 percent of all deaths—and a vast industry has sprung up to meet the growing demand. Once viewed as a New Age indulgence, hospice is now a $14 billion business and one of the most successful segments in health care. Changing the Way We Die, by award-winning journalists Fran Smith and Sheila Himmel, is the first book to take a broad, penetrating look at the hospice landscape, through gripping stories of real patients, families, and doctors, as well as the corporate giants that increasingly own the market. Changing the Way We Die is a vital resource for anyone who wants to be prepared to face life’s most challenging and universal event. You will learn: — Hospice use is soaring, yet most people come too late to get the full benefits. — With the age tsunami, it becomes even more critical for families and patients to choose end-of-life care wisely. — Hospice at its best is much more than a way to relieve the suffering of dying. It is a way to live.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherViva Editions
Release dateOct 28, 2013
ISBN9781936740604
Changing the Way We Die: Compassionate End of Life Care and The Hospice Movement
Author

Fran Smith

Fran Smith is a writer, editor, writing coach, and communications consultant. Her work has appeared in O, The Oprah Magazine; Redbook; Salon; Good Housekeeping; Prevention; Health; the Los Angeles Times; USA Today, and dozens of other publications and websites. She has won many awards for medical reporting, health care investigations, and feature writing, and shared a Pulitzer Prize as a reporter at the San Jose Mercury News. Fran co-authored the first reporters' guidebook published by the Association of Health Care Journalists, and she is a frequent speaker on the power of storytelling, health care writing, and effective communications. A history buff, she is also the author of Breaking Ground: The Daring Women of the YWCA of the Santa Clara Valley, 1905 - 2005. (YWCA: 2005). She lives in New York.Sheila Himmel is a Psychology Today blogger and co-author of Hungry: A Mother and Daughter Fight Anorexia (Penguin, 2009). She is a contributor to Restoring Our Bodies, Reclaiming Our Lives: Guidance and Reflections on Recovery from Eating Disorders (April 2011). Sheila writes for publications ranging from the New York Times to Eating Well to IEEE Spectrum: The Magazine of Technology Insiders. Her work has appeared in USA Today, the Washington Post, the Robb Report, M Magazine, and the online magazine Obit. As a restaurant critic of the San Jose Mercury News, Sheila won a James Beard Foundation Award for feature writing. She won awards from the Association of Food Journalists and the Associated Press News Editors Association, and uncovered fraud at a prominent Silicon Valley restaurant, revealing its longtime substitution of pork for veal. She lives in the San Francisco Bay Area.Activist, anthropologist, author, caregiver, ecologist, LSD researcher, teacher, and Zen Buddhism priest -- Joan Halifax is many things to many people. Yet they all seem to agree that no matter what role she plays, Halifax is consistently courageous and compassionate. Halifax runs the Upaya Zen Center in New Mexico, a Zen Peacemaker community she opened in 1990 after founding and leading the Ojai Foundation in California for ten years. Her practice focuses on socially engaged Buddhism, which aims to alleviate suffering through meditation, interfaith cooperation, and social service.As director of the Project on Being With Dying, Halifax has helped caregivers cope with death and dying for more than three decades. Her book Being With Dying helps clergy, community activists, medical professionals, social workers and spiritual seekers remove fear from the end of life. Halifax is a distinguished invited scholar of the U.S. Library of Congress and the only woman and Buddhist on the Tony Blair Foundation's Advisory Council. She resides in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Related to Changing the Way We Die

Related ebooks

Social Science For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Changing the Way We Die

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5

6 ratings12 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    From the outset of "Changing The Way We Die" I talked to people about it and recommended it as with great personal relief I was so thankful for this subject to be presented in such a forthright manner. I do believe this book will be very successful as it is a clear exposition on the choices people can make to be better prepared for their end-of-life experience, and it is relayed via real and personal experiences. The history of hospice care is interesting and revealing giving overviews on the different types of hospice programs available today and how people can be aware of the options that might not be explained to them when they most need to know them. Probably depending on a person's timely need to know, this may or may not be a page-turner, but at any level it is an excellent guide.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I received this book for free as part of LibraryThing's Early Reviewer program; this review is not affected by this fact.I'm not sure "enjoyed" is a good word for this book, since it's definitely not an easy read - but it is worth reading and I'm glad I did. I appreciated the use of different families' stories, although some were heartbreaking and really hit home, having experienced the death of my grandfather-in-law in a less than ideal way. The information on the origins and original goals of hospice was fascinating, and led me to search out other information (there's a fascinating documentary about Bethesda Hospice produced by the BBC that I highly recommend, if you can find it). I've been encouraged to start/continue conversations with my wife, parents, and in-laws about what we really want to happen as time goes on. Not easy, but necessary.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I was somewhat familiar with hospice .. but I learned quite a lot of new information. My mother died this past year after 9 years of alzheimer's. My sister, one friend and I cared for her. Toward the end some friends asked us when we were calling hospice.. I wasn't sure when we were 'suppose' to call them. We had not taken her to a dr in over 2 years, no need, no pain , no issues to talk to a dr about.. She just gradually got weaker and died in her own bed after not eating/drinking about 8 days before. I feel we (and she)were ready for her death and not sure if anything would have been different with hospice. I do understand many deaths are so different than hers and I can completely understand the benefits of hospice . This book was very informative. Well written.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    When Smith and Himmel lost their fathers around the same time, one of them had a good experience and one not so much.  They decided to do some research on hospice, and attempt to find out just how successful hospice care is.  This is a comprehensive look at hospice from four perspectives, first examining the philosophy and history of hospice care.  This section is followed by examining hospice from the experience of the patient, and then of the survivors.  Finally, the history and role of providers of hospice care is examined.  These four sections are told both factually, with resources listed, and illustrated also with personal stories and experiences, which makes for some very interesting reading.  You will read stories about marriages that come out of survivor groups, as well as medicare regulations.  A LOT of information is packed into this very readable 200 page book.  Although I have studied death and dying, it was years ago in college and I wanted an update because my mother is currently dealing with Parkinsons/Lewey-Body and has been in hospice care for five months, in an assisted living facility. When I first became aware of hospice it was mostly a volunteer non-profit service; I had no idea that medicare covers it today.The most important aspect of hospice philosophy addressed is that the patient gets good palliative care and makes her own choices about how she wants to live the rest of her life.   We will all die, but we can make SOME choices, IF we do so early enough, about our deaths.  That is do we want to be in a hospital, a hospice setting, or at home.  How do we want to utilize pain meds, who do we want as visitors or to care for us physically, and, what kind of life-extending care do we want.  These are addressed from the patients' perspective and experience as well as the family's, with hospice workers to clarify choices and options and help smooth family disagreements. Hospice means the end to curative care and the movement to palliative care, which can be difficult to face and for families to reach agreement about.The survivors are offered extensive support during and after the death of the patient, for a minimum of a year, depending on the program.The last section of the book, about providers, was very interesting to me.  It traces the growth of hospice from the work of individual, usually voluntary workers, to its current state as big corporate business.  When one particular hospice worker came to believe that the movement could not survive financially without more support, he first worked to develop rules and regs for the industry, and then pushed for legislation for medicare to cover hospice care.  When that passed and it became evident a LARGE amount of money was about to become available, investors and corporations became interested in getting their piece of the hospice pie and companies like VITAS were formed.  It is the largest one today (and the one that provides services for my mother).  Of course there has also been a field day for the attorneys and more than  one lawsuit has been filed against VITAS and other providers.I found the financial aspects of hospice and medicare to be VERY interesting especially because I recently saw an article in the press about hospice care "draining large sums of money from medicare".  After reading this book I don't believe that to be the case.  There are many aspects of finances that come into play and are examined by Smith and Hillel, who cite their sources.  It appears that hospice care actually costs less than not having hospice care.  Interestingly, patients who use hospice early enough actually live longer by 37 days.  Medicare is no longer paying for curative treatment and there are typically no more long, painful, expensive and repeated trips to the hospital.  This is probably clear to anyone who has ever received a hospital bill.  In my mom's case, she was repeatedly falling and every unobserved fall in her facility meant a trip to the ER due to their regulations.  She did not need ER treatment and the experience was frustrating to everyone involved,  from the responding emergency personnel who were by then on a first name basis with her, to the ER personnel and docs, not to mention my mom who hated it.  Now if she falls (several safety measures have been put in place) rather than a 911 call, her facility calls hospice and the nurse comes out and assesses her and she gets to stay at her place.  There is a lot more to the financial piece and the story is well told by the authors and makes interesting reading.  It is a quick course in how medical care and philosophy become institutionalized.  Hospice is considered by many to be the most successful part of the U.S. health care system and many wonder why we can't extend some hospice policies to the rest of the system.This book was a five star read for me, to my surprise.  I also found it hopeful and encouraging.  We may not have control over our deaths, but hospice can give us more choices as to how we live out our remaining time.This review is from an Advanced Reading Copy I received from the publisher.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    At this point in my life I have been facing some major decisions and most are very difficult. Many have to do with my elderly grandmother that is suffering from the disease known as Alzheimer's. It has destroyed both her mind and her spirit and has left a shell of a being that we hardly recognize. At this moment in time we are in the process of preparing her for hospice. In desperation I have sought out information from my local library, since my other relatives are deceased. I never thought that I would have to make end of life decisions for a grandparent at the age of 35. This book has been a tremendous help for me and has allowed me to ask questions of both the home health nurse and hospice nurse. It has brought comfort in the idea that I know that my grandmother will be given an opportunity to transition with dignity. I support the concept that elders should be allowed to pass away in their home if possible. If you have a loved one that is entering the hospice program than this book is a must read. There is so much stress involved when it comes to the end of stage life, that it really helps to have some extra advice on the side. Death does not have to be scary for either the family or the person transitioning. I highly recommend this book to both caregivers and family members.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I think anyone caring for an aged loved one or a loved one who has an illness that will probably result in death should read this book. I did not know much about the hospice movement before reading it, but now, after reading it, I have a whole new understanding and appreciation of this important movement. The authors have presented, with many compelling and interesting stories as well as great, sound research and investigation, a very good primer on what hospice care provides its history and its future. I liked the approach of the authors took throughout the book, as well as the way they brought home the true meaning of the hospice movement and its impact on our society. I was particularly interested in the fact that the movement involves the whole family, not just the patient involved and that the movement advocates palliative care as the only real way to go. I know I would prefer this. This book can hopefully shift attitudes and ideas people have about end of life care for themselves or for loved ones, because I think it is a necessary shift, based on what I am seeing around me. Yes, the basic, overall subject of death can be depressing, but it is one we all must begin to think about sooner or later. Having this book as a reference can definitely help in the decision-making process. I think anyone who wants to explore this subject further, or who wants a basic understanding and/or understanding of what hospice is all about should read this book. In addition, medical professionals and social workers who deal with these issues should definitely read this book, as it can provide great information and fill in any gaps they may have. I received this from Goodreads to read and review.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The authors introduce us to the growing hospice movement by stating that "Hospice is not a place but a philosophy about living, dying, and dignity, and a set of practices to ease suffering." They also state that "Hospice is the most successful segment of the health care system, in family satisfaction and cost effectiveness, yet it is widely feared and misunderstood." They have divided their book into four main sections. The first part introduces us to the concept of hospice and why it often makes sense as a choice for the terminally ill, how it began with stiff opposition from the standard medical community, and how it offers hope to those who can no longer be cured, but who want to continue living as well as possible and to die with dignity and with positive support for their own wishes as to how to manage their final days.The second and third parts introduce us to the patients who have benefited from their stay in hospice care and to the surviving families who have benefited by the continued involvement from hospice in helping them handle their grief.Finally, the last part deals with the new directions happening in the hospice movement where not for profit groups often have been taken over by for profit corporations where the standard of care is sometimes subsumed by the need to cut costs for the "bottom line" and thus make more money for their shareholders.The authors for the most part gave a balanced view of the hospice movement emphasizing its strengths, and noting its detractors, and were not afraid to mention times when the movement failed its patients. The patients' and families' stories gave the most convincing reasons to consider hospice while the history of the takeover by large corporations could have been shortened and in some ways made one doubt the ability of hospice in the future to carry out its stated goals of compassionate and complete care for the dying at the end of life
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A comprehensive overview of hospice care, including its history and the impact of government regulation (Medicare, Medicaid) as well as positive and negative consequences of big business involvement in the field. For anyone concerned about easing emotional and physical pains, the real life stories from the perspectives of family members of actual patients offer the most compelling reasons for making hospice care an option for self or loved ones facing death. The authors' apparent support for the ACA may or may not be warranted depending on the law's ultimate political fate.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I've heard of hospice care for a good many years now, but was never sure exactly what it meant. As someone nearing retirement myself, and with several aging family members, I was very glad to read this book and learn more, for my own sake and for theirs.The book contains a solid history of hospice care, as well as information about what it generally does and does not do, and various accounts of people who it has helped. I think the things that struck me the most is that it tr5ies to include the entire family in the process, not just the "patient", AND that most hospices advocate strongly for palliative care; they are not concerned that someone with only weeks to live might get hooked on opiates and so would rather let them suffer. I know that would be a relief to me if I had a painful and fatal disease!A small quibble: the structure of the book could have been more cohesively organized. In some chapters it veers from modern practice to history, to case study... and then veers around again. I found that awkward to read.Still- it's a very valuable book that gives a clear look at the current and historical hospice movement, and what it means to individual people and families.Note that I got an ARC of this book from VIVA Productions.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I've been a hospice volunteer for over ten years, and so I was pleased to receive this book, and interested to read it. However, I was a little confused by the structure and couldn't quite figure out what it was trying to accomplish. I know it was supposed to be an introduction to hospice for people who may have been unfamiliar with it, but it seemed too random, too unstructured, too digressive and crowded with examples to have succeeded in this goal. For example, I would have expected Part Four, "The Providers," to give an overview of the members of a typical hospice team, giving the responsibilities of each member and perhaps followed by some case history examples. Instead, the first chapter heading is "The gift of grace," where we jump from two patients who thought they didn't want spiritual care, to Cicely Saunders, founder of hospice; to a very short (less than a page) digression about volunteers; back to spirituality and chaplains; to Dignity Therapy and some initially resistant patients; and finally back to spirituality and prayer. Perhaps that whole chapter was supposed to be about spiritual providers; as the next short chapter, "A new course for doctors," was about hospice doctors. But then the next chapter, "Dying for dollars," is about for-profit hospices - so I guess my assumption about what was meant by providers was wrong. This review is similar to the book: digressive, littered with specific examples that don't really address what I'm trying to say. As is evident, I was left with a jumbled mind.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The book tried to cover a massive topic with examples. As such, the book was appropriately human and personal but it left me wondering how different the message would have been with different examples. Despite that, it made me think and dispelled various misconceptions I had about hospices so it fulfilled its goal perfectly.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "Changing The Way We Die" is a great book! We need more care and compassion for the people who are preparing to leave this life. Everyone should read this book.

Book preview

Changing the Way We Die - Fran Smith

introduction

NOBODY WANTS TO DIE BADLY. HOSPICE CARE OFFERS THE best hope for dying well and living fully until we do. It should be routine, like surgery for appendicitis or antibiotics for a bacterial infection. But it is not, because hospice occupies a strange, uneasy place in the health care system, in the popular imagination, and in a famously youth-obsessed society that does not like to think about mortality.

We wrote this book to lift hospice out of the shadows. We set out to explore how its compassionate, holistic approach is changing the way Americans die and how its principles can be integrated into health care broadly, to improve care for everyone. We discovered that hospice is much more than a way to relieve the discomforts of dying. It is a way to live.

Hospice use is soaring, yet most people come too late to get the full benefits. Most Americans want to die at home, not in hospitals, hooked up to machines. And with hospice help, more people are dying at home, but often only after tumultuous hospital stays and intensive, sometimes painful, ultimately futile last-ditch measures—surgery, a ventilator, a feeding tube, one more dose of chemo.

Hospice is the most successful segment of the health care system, in family satisfaction and cost effectiveness, yet it is widely feared and misunderstood. Many people think hospice is a place, and not a place you’d ever want to go. A friend—smart, worldly, accomplished—told us that she thought hospice was like a parking garage where you’re waiting to die. Hospice is not a place but a philosophy about living, dying, and dignity, and a set of practices to ease suffering. It does not mean giving up. Against all expectations, hospice care can open up time and emotional space for hope and healing.

Just as the age tsunami hits America and the need for end-of-life care grows, increasing commercialization by big business threatens hospice as we know it. For-profit hospices account for all the growth in the field over the past decade, and, as we show in the book, this shift raises troubling questions. Meanwhile, 8,000 people turn sixty-five every day, and will for the next sixteen years. We need great hospice care more than ever.

In our research, we sat at the bedsides of patients, talked with families, followed around doctors and nurses, and interviewed some of the founders of the hospice movement in America. Among the many truths we learned, we both found this to be the most resonant:

When people acknowledge that dying is not if but when, the essential question is: What do you want to do with the rest of your life?

About 1.5 million Americans a year die in hospice care—44 percent of all deaths. A $14 billion industry serves the growing demand. Hospices seem to be everywhere—in nursing homes, hospitals, and prisons. You can even get hospice for your pet when the time comes. In some communities, competition for dying patients drives hospices to advertise on AM radio, like car-donation hustlers and the makers of anti-wrinkle creams. Shares of hospice companies trade on Wall Street.

We’ve come a long way since the early days, just forty years ago, when a handful of crusaders started the hospice movement. They met with derision and hostility. Was hospice a New Age indulgence? A quasi-religious practice? A rejection of wondrous medical advances? Many skeptics believed the movement would fade, certain that no red-blooded American would just go home and die rather than fight like hell, try every technological marvel out there, until that final breath.

The skeptics were wrong about the movement, but right about something deeper. Call it denial, blind optimism, or faith in the curative power of medical science—there is a collective resistance to accepting death as inevitable and to seriously planning for it. When we started telling people about this project, the less they knew about hospice the more warily they reacted. Why hospice? some friends asked, stiffening or subtly leaning away, as if we had a contagious disease. Isn’t it depressing? Nurses and doctors who work in hospice get used to these questions and to the implication: that the experiences of the dying are far removed from the concerns of the living.

But people who had hospice support while caring for a dying loved one and those who wished they had, after watching someone die without it, eagerly shared their stories. Strangers did too. The first time we met our book agent, in a busy café near Manhattan’s Union Square, we talked about hospice for nearly an hour. As we stood to leave, a woman alone at the next table came over, admitted to eavesdropping, and told us about the wonderful hospice care her late husband had received. Again and again people said they wished they’d known about hospice sooner.

Our own losses planted the seeds for the book. Our fathers died around the same time, Fran’s in a hospital, Sheila’s in hospice care. We talked about what happened and how we felt about it, as friends do. It is always sad when a life winds down, but we realized that it does not have to be awful. With Fran’s dad it was.

FRAN: My mother was alone by his side at the Veterans Administration Hospital in Brooklyn. As his breathing turned shallow and labored, she stroked his hand and whispered, It’s OK. You can rest now. I’ll be fine. Go to sleep. Then, as if on cue, he did. She told me this when I arrived about forty minutes later. It was a cold January morning.

Where were you? she asked me. Simple question or accusation?

Before I could answer, she broke down in sobs.

I had taken the night shift. We did not call it that, but in those shapeless days, as my father lay there with pneumonia, my mother, my brother, and I fell into a pattern of taking turns, spelling each other: I’ll stay, you eat, I’m not hungry, get some sleep. We knew the end was imminent. It was his second hospitalization for pneumonia in a month. This time we decided against antibiotics. My father had checked off this option on the advance directive that he had signed years earlier—and that we’d looked at, for the first time, just days before. But what was supposed to happen next? The directive did not hint at what my ninety-year-old father would have wanted as the clock ran down. Should my brother and I keep vigil? Did he want his wife of fifty-seven years to witness his death by herself? Did she?

Nobody on the hospital staff brought up such questions, and we did not think to raise them. Nobody mentioned hospice, and we did not ask for it. Instead: You eat, I’ll stay, should I pick up milk on the way home?

My father had vanished long before he died, slipping away into dementia and almost complete physical incapacity. It started just before my husband and I had our daughter. At her first birthday party, she and my father both knocked around with their walkers. He joked about it, we all did, as if he, like the baby, would soon outgrow the contraption and run free. Over time, I realized they were like two arms of an X, intersecting at a single point as she developed and he declined. He shed the walker not long after she did, because he needed a wheelchair. A year or so later, when I no longer had to buy diapers, my mother began to order them in bulk. By the time my daughter learned to write her name, he did not remember anyone’s.

Sitting beside him that last night, I silently begged him to talk to me. Families often hope for a miracle, and this was mine. Hey Daddy, it’s me, I said, more than once. And then, partly to fill the silence, I love you.

Late at night a nurse came, all brisk efficiency. After she left, I slid onto the bed’s edge, and his eyes flew open and met mine. His gaze seemed clear, focused. Hey Daddy, I said. I’m so happy to see you.

I wanted to believe he recognized me. More likely it was I who recognized him, able at last to see my father inside the shell he had become.

Look at that! said the nurse, who had come back. He’s smiling at you.

After he fell asleep, I drove back to my mother’s apartment to nap and shower. When I woke up, she had already left for the hospital. I scrambled to get ready and join her, but on the way I decided to run an errand. Even the most astute hospice professional cannot predict the moment of death, but I have wondered whether I would have been at my father’s bedside that morning if our family had known more about what to expect.

I have wondered even more what his life in the lead-up would have looked like had hospice been involved, or any professional with the will and skill to talk frankly about dying and the decisions ahead. He died peacefully, but after years of hell for everyone, him especially. He had been treated for infections and other ailments in his last years. In hindsight, we could have said no to antibiotics much earlier. I know he would not have wanted to live utterly helplessly, as he did. But nobody asked if we wanted to consider an alternative, and the possibility never crossed our minds.

SHEILA: My father turned toward the daylight the moment before he died, as if following a movie script. The dutiful elder son, he believed in doing things the right way. On a sunny Easter morning, Mom, my sister, and I crunched around his diminished body in the nursing home bed. Mom and Nancy each held a hand while I rubbed his bony shoulder. We cried, told him we loved him, and said we’d be OK; he could go. He hadn’t been conscious in many days, hadn’t eaten in a week. His feet were cold and blue, his skin papery gray. His breaths got raspier and more startling—the proverbial rattle—and further apart. Then, he wasn’t there anymore. We waited for another breath, but his spirit had flown away and left its lifeless casing, like a husk. It was so peaceful. There had been four of us in the room, and now there were three.

All the elements of active dying we knew to be normal because the hospice nurse had told us. For four and a half months, we had the hospice nurses, social worker, aides, and a 24-hour hotline to ask about what might happen next. He died a month after turning eighty-three, officially from heart failure. The California death certificate requires one immediate cause of death.

Three years earlier, dementia had descended, and instability on his feet. He stayed in bed and was uninterested when people came to visit. Mom hired a companion, who helped a lot until Dad became incontinent. The man didn’t change diapers.

As months went by, he fell, setting off alarms and hospitalizations, each time coming back weaker, like a broken prizefighter on the way down. Still, he clung to a tradition he had followed in business and personal matters— weighing the facts, making a plan, doing things right. For a while, being in a nursing home was the right choice. He became his friendly self again, and got up for meals and occupational therapy. Until he didn’t. The nursing home staff suggested it might be time to consult hospice.

Again, life improved temporarily. Medications were simplified, side effects eliminated, including dizziness that may have been caused by the blood pressure medication he’d been taking for years. There would be no more badgering him to go to OT, no more ambulances. It was as if a shroud of anxiety had lifted because we could ask someone what was OK, what to do or say that might help him or us. We could just sit there with him, talking, holding his hand. Thanks to the hospice nurses, we knew he didn’t have to do anything.

As they told us he would, Dad grew weaker and more confused until the intermittent responsive days dwindled to a stop. In the last weeks, he wasn’t in pain, but it was as if he was visiting elsewhere while his body stayed in bed.

On a Friday in April, the hospice nurse told Mom he would likely die in the next day or so. My sister, Nancy, and her family again flew in from Seattle.

Saturday afternoon we gathered in Dad’s room, with cards, photos, and kids’ art on the walls, and started talking about funeral arrangements. Just so you know, hearing is the last sense to go, the nurse said, not unkindly. We had to laugh, because Dad wouldn’t have minded: We were making plans so that things would be done right.

THE LONG ROAD TO THE END

Our own experiences got us thinking about the difference that hospice can make, but they do not make us experts. Our training and instincts as journalists are to make sense of complicated situations by documenting other people’s experiences. That’s why we collected so many stories from people on both the receiving and the giving ends of hospice care. With their consent, we use only real names—no composites or invented details to protect anonymity. Hospice can emerge from the shadows only if we all see how it works for people living lives as real, as rich, and as flawed as anyone else’s.

Death comes differently today than at any other time in history. Most of us are not likely to have the swift, sudden death of a virulent infection, the leading cause of death until the twentieth century. We probably will not die in an instant of a heart attack (or in a plane crash, a terrorist attack, or any of the headline-making catastrophes we worry about). Sanitation and modern medicine have transformed dying from a quick, unhappy event that takes loved ones by surprise into a gradual process.

We have time to anticipate the end. Families have time to prepare. That may sound like a curse. Changing the Way We Die shows that hospice can make it a gift.

Part One, The Choice, explains what hospice is all about. Why do people suffer? Can hospice care really bring relief? How? Why don’t more people seek such help? We trace these questions back to the founding of hospice, when high ideals created a revolutionary way of caring for the dying only to collide with economic and political realities.

Part Two, The Patients, focuses on the decisions that hospice has allowed some people to make—and the outcomes of those decisions. What prompts people to turn to hospice? How do they know the time is right? What is their experience? Do their loved ones have regrets? We tell very different stories—from a young father who loved the care he received in hospice only to get transferred out, to a ninety-one-year-old woman whose fifteen months on hospice got her walking again, visiting favorite places, and meeting her first great-grandchild. We profile a man who fasted to death rather than suffer a slow, torturous decline, and a man who endured years of brutal cancer treatments to buy every bit of extra time.

Part Three, The Survivors, looks at one of the most underappreciated aspects of hospice care: the help it gives families not only while a loved one is dying, but also afterward. How do survivors look back on the time in hospice? How does hospice help them get on with their lives? What have they learned about dying, living, and the choices we all will face?

Part Four, The Providers, goes inside the rapidly changing hospice universe. How does hospice help people find meaning or face death if they don’t believe in God or an afterlife? Why do some doctors choose to work with patients they cannot cure? And what about patients who can be cured—shouldn’t modern medicine work to ease their suffering too? How did Wall Street discover hospice and alter hospice? Will hospice survive?

Although making the choices that hospice affords is never easy, perhaps it’s easier when a loved one is old and failing, like our fathers. We begin with a man named Rusty Hammer, who faced the choices in the prime of life.

PART ONE

The Choice

chapter one

What Do You Want to Do with the Rest of Your Life?

Oh no, he’s giving up. He’s just going to die.

ALL ALONG, DOCTORS DIFFERED ON RUSTY HAMMER’S prognosis. One told his wife, Pamela, If he lasts five years, he’ll be lucky. Another kept reassuring Rusty, You never know. You’re doing fine. Just get more rest.

He did last five years, but Pamela will always wonder whether the treatment was worth the torment.

Rusty was diagnosed with acute myelogenous leukemia, a rare and aggressive blood cancer. By the time he died, on Monday, January 28, 2008, he had taken more than 250 medications, received more than 350 blood transfusions, had a stem cell transplant, and spent nearly 600 nights in six different hospitals. He developed severe diabetes and osteoporosis, heart and lung failure. He needed an oxygen tank for breathing and a shunt in his brain to relieve the pain. Visiting the doctor took all day, with the wheelchair, the drive, managing a hospital bed on the other end. It left them both exhausted, and hopeless that their family’s suffering would ever end.

But hospice care brought them comfort and calm. In the last six months of his life, Rusty enjoyed the company of family and friends. He explored his religious heritage. He wrote a book, and in a strange way he also became the author of his own experience—a person again, not a medical record number or an object to be handed from one specialist to another for yet another debilitating treatment. The hospice team listened to him. Pamela found herself becoming a better listener too.

This was not how Rusty thought of hospice when a friend first suggested it. He did not imagine an opportunity to reclaim his life, let alone do something new or grow. He thought of hospice as a place you go to die, and he was appalled.

THE BEST MEDICINE

Rusty’s fear is common, as is the desire not to die in a hospital. By better than two to one, Americans consistently say they want to die at home, without pain, among the people they love. As they tell pollsters: no breathing tube down the throat, electrodes plastered to the chest, IV lines snaking from arms. In a March 2011 poll of 1,000 adults by the Regence Foundation and National Journal, 71 percent said it is more important to improve the quality of life of a seriously ill patient than to extend life through every medical intervention conceivable.

Hospice delivers on these wishes. It is the best medicine for dying patients and their families when quality of life, however a person defines that, is the goal. Nothing else in health care matches it for breadth of services or compassion. If you are sixty-five or over, Medicare pays. Medicaid does too, and many private insurance plans.

In medical literature, where just about every treatment, innovation, and guideline seem to stir controversy and confuse rather than clarify the best choices, there is no dispute about the benefits of hospice. And, in an economy where every expense is on the table, the cost-effectiveness of hospice cannot be ignored.

The rapid growth of hospice speaks to its appeal and to the depth of our collective desire for a better way of dying. The first hospice in the United States, in New Haven, Connecticut, began caring for patients in 1974. Four years later, fifty-nine hospice programs served patients (though only a handful in most cases). The 1981 directory of the fledgling National Hospice Organization listed 464 hospices in operation and 353 trying to get off the ground. Just about all these groups ran on the sweat and dreams of volunteer nurses, clergy, doctors, and social workers. Today there are more than 5,000 programs. A cadre of end-of-life experts is developing ever more refined techniques to control pain and other symptoms. Medical schools do a better job of teaching students about the once unmentionable subject of dying. Fellowship programs train hundreds of young physicians a year in hospice care and palliative medicine.

Yet, even as hospice gains ground, the use of aggressive last-gasp medical interventions is increasing. From 2000 to 2009, hospice use among Medicare patients nearly doubled, to 42 percent. But more patients enrolled in hospice only after aggressive treatment in intensive care units in the final weeks and months of their lives. Nearly one in six patients was moved from one setting to another in the last three days—from home to a hospital, for instance, or from the hospital back to the nursing home. For too many patients, hospice was just another quick stop in a chaotic journey through a fragmented health care system.

The fear of death and the resistance of the medical profession prevent many of us from embracing the opportunities hospice affords to live the end of our lives in a way we find meaningful and to

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1