Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    Confessions of a Terrorist (The Declassified Document)
    Unavailable
    Confessions of a Terrorist (The Declassified Document)
    Unavailable
    Confessions of a Terrorist (The Declassified Document)
    Ebook69 pages47 minutes

    Confessions of a Terrorist (The Declassified Document)

    By Professor Richard Jackson

    3.5/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this ebook

    P: Who is the real terrorist in this room?

    M: What're you saying?

    In a claustrophobic concrete cell, two men face each other across a bare table. One is a wanted terrorist, the other a British intelligence officer. But this is no ordinary interrogation, and as they talk deep into the night and violent secrets are revealed, the line between interrogator and confessor begins inextricably to blur. Who, then, is the real terrorist? And will they pay for their guilt in blood?
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherZed Books
    Release dateJun 11, 2015
    ISBN9781783606672
    Unavailable
    Confessions of a Terrorist (The Declassified Document)
    Author

    Professor Richard Jackson

    Richard Jackson is one of the world's leading experts on terrorism and Professor of Peace Studies at the University of Otago, New Zealand. He is a regular media commentator and maintains a popular blog at https://richardjacksonterrorismblog.wordpress.com.

    Related to Confessions of a Terrorist (The Declassified Document)

    Related ebooks

    Thrillers For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Hatred And Healing

      Apr 1, 2019

      With an attack on a peaceful nation at the bottom of the world, white supremacists widen their violence

      10 min read

    • Article

      Experts Studied Al-Qaeda And Isis For Years, Now They Are Turning Their Attention To Extremists Closer To Home

      Feb 17, 2021

      In the years after the 11 September terror attacks, national security strategy in the US came to be dominated by an almost singular focus on Islamist extremism. Efforts to counter the threat of jihadist violence created a cottage industry of experts

      5 min read

    • Article

      Pankaj Mishra: We Committed Intellectual Suicide After 9/11

      Mar 20, 2017

      Historian and intellectual Pankaj Mishra’s latest book Age of Anger: A History of the Present, published earlier this month, presents what Mishra calls “an emotional history” at a time of “worldwide emergency” when rage fills the global political sph

      6 min read

    • Article

      Christchurch Brings Global White Supremacist Threat Into Sharp Relief

      Mar 22, 2019

      White supremacist terrorism is on the rise around the world. The attack in Christchurch, New Zealand, has brought new awareness of the long-underestimated threat.

      10 min read

    • Article

      State-sponsored Assassination: New Tools, Old Questions

      Dec 10, 2020

      Some 150 years ago, great powers moved to ban assassination, used by insurgents. Will such concerns curb their current predilection for the tactic?

      6 min read

    • Article

      Anti-Terror In a Tangle?

      Nov 4, 2021

      This year marks the 20th anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attacks that triggered the American “war on terror,” a blanket term for all preemptive military strikes intended to reduce the threat terrorism posed to the U.S. homeland. It was fore

      3 min read

    • Article

      Do You Condemn?

      Dec 27, 2023

      Do You Condemn?
      4 min read

    • Article

      ‘Anything Goes’: How 9/11 Led To A Global Security Clampdown

      Sep 10, 2021

      The moment Wahid Sheikh’s life changed forever was broadcast on television to a global audience of millions, including him. At the time, it appeared to be happening entirely to others, a long way from his Mumbai home. “I watched the buildings collaps

      9 min read

    • Article

      Target: New York

      Sep 10, 2019

      Target: New York
      6 min read

    • Article

      New York’s Response to a Truck Terrorist

      Nov 1, 2017

      The attack on a city bike path was meant to instill fear. Instead, the city rallied with calm and aplomb to thwart ISIS’s aim of defeating people through fear.

      1 min read

    Reviews for Confessions of a Terrorist (The Declassified Document)

    3.5/5

    5 ratings7 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      This book was very interesting! I personally enjoyed the layout of the book. It was written in a dialogue form. This book really makes you question who the real terrorists are... Everyone had their different views on that. The British officer has done bad things and so has the so called terrorist. Both men interrogate one another in a dark room realizing that they aren't that different after all.
    • 4/5
      This was a very interesting book. The story itself, made you really think. There are two sides to every coin and the world isn't black and white. Also, the way was made was really cool. It was written as if it were a conversation. And things are blacked out and added in pencil. It is a very interesting book.
    • 5/5
      A profoundly important and totally unputdownable book that should be read by anyone with the slightest interest in understanding how terrorism happens in our world.
    • 4/5
      DISCLAIMER: I received an advance readers copy of "Confessions of a Terrorist: A Novel" by Richard Jackson through a LibraryThing.com Early Reviewers Program.THINGS I LIKED:1) Unusual format.The book is written like an official transcript of an interrogation. It even has an official's comments written in cursive and certain parts of the text, which contain information related to the national security, are blacked out. These unique features create a feeling that you actually got your hands on some raw material which was not meant for the general public. In addition, a dialogue style makes the reading easy and entertaining, as there are no elaborate descriptions and fancy words used just in written English.2) Good writing.It's not an easy job to write an entire book as a dialogue between a terrorist and a British intelligence officer without making it sound artificial, but the author completed this task flawlessly. Each of the characters came alive in this novel through their speeches, their distinctive languages and speaking manners, even pauses or sounds made. The author successfully conveyed each character's message as well as their emotions and personalities.3) Interesting perspective.Instead of trying to understand the motives of terrorists, Western societies depict them as "insane, fanatical, psychologically damaged, cruel, immoral, essentially 'evil,' and most importantly, quite inhuman." In this novel, however, a terrorist has a chance to explain his actions and motives. I was actually shocked to realize that I agree with a lot of his points. Obviously, none of them can justify the awful killings of the innocent civilians but I do agree that the Western governments are not innocent either, yet none of them are perceived as insane or inhuman. So who is the real terrorist in this room?COULD BE BETTER:1) Repetitiveness.I read the first half of this book very fast but then my pace slowed down quite a bit... The arguments made by each character and supporting examples started coming back. Although repeating some points might help to emphasize them, it makes the novel less exciting. By the end of the interrogation, both characters felt tired, and so did I.VERDICT: "Confessions of a Terrorist" is an educational, well written novel, presented in a dialogue format. It is a thought provoking read which offers an unusual point of view on terrorism. Although sometimes a little bit repetitive, this book is definitely worth reading.
    • 3/5
      Confessions of a Terrorist is a uniquely written perspective of what is and isn't a terrorist. When I first started reading this book I was very interested in the argument given for being a terrorist, although I thought the argument was very one sided, and then I realized about half way through the book, that who I thought was the captured terrorist is actually the person interrogating the prisoner who is supposed to be the good guy. This makes for a very interesting plot.The idea of who and what becomes a terrorist is unique based on where and how you were raised and there is truth in the arguments used. I also think that the arguments that only certain governments were wrong is based on the perspective of where you were raised. All in all a very well written book, enjoyable, and entertaining.
    • 2/5
      I was given this book through LibraryThing in exchange for my honest review.I found Confessions of a Terrorist: A Novel difficult to read. It is not written like a Novel at all. It is written like a transcript taken from an interrogation with a terrorist. Although the terrorist in question makes some good points about the interviewer being just as much a terrorist as he is, it did not grab my attention as I hoped it would. I believe, if changed to the format of a screenplay, I would have enjoyed it more. A movie in which the entire length takes place in an interrogation room perhaps even with flashbacks, would have made this more interesting for me. One thing that annoyed me throughout was the handwritten notes in the margins that keep suggesting a recording malfunction in order to cover up the discussion that took place. Once or twice might have been ok, but I found this very distracting.
    • 5/5
      An Advanced Reader Copy Review: The night I began reading Richard Jackson's Confessions of a Terrorist: A Novel, I didn't stop before finishing a third of it, it was difficult to put it down. Part of this is the style, it is written in the format of a Top Secret transcription of an audio or video recording of an interrogation of a MI5 agent and a terrorist/militant. There are no chapter breaks, so it's easy to just keep right on reading and the content makes it hard to simply close it and put it down. Jackson, with this novel, seeks to shake up his readers' preconceptions and notions concerning those labeled as terrorists by the media. That seems to be one of his few aims: to show that those so quickly tagged as terrorists are human beings, having people they love, who love them; and who want people to hear them. Jackson writes: “I have rarely found artistic or media depictions of terrorists that seemed authentic or which corresponded to the completely normal, often intelligent, complex and committed people I had personally spoken to” (319). He presents the terrorist in this light; i.e. the opposite of the way they are usually presented in films and the media. The author wants to put the readers in the room during the interrogation, to help them ask tough questions. Jackson lives up to his goal, stated on the jacket copy, to blur the line between the interrogator and the terrorist. There are passages that could catch readers nodding their heads in agreement and then, catch them feeling a twinge of guilt for doing so.I read that it is in the style of Mohsin Hamid's The Reluctant Fundamentalist. I agree with that in that it is a story that takes place in an intense conversation between two characters: one a Westerner, the other a suspected terrorist. There the similarity breaks down. Jackson's novel is presented as a trascript (as I've already stated), with anotations by those higher up the chain of command; annotations that the fictional authority writes to convince others to expunge parts of the recording and the transcription to cover their collective backsides. Jackson recommends those who are inclined, should try to find as much information as they can, and to talk to militants, if possible. If you enjoyed The Reluctant Fundamentalist, or are interested in a different perspective view on the issue of terrorists and their behavior, I highly recommend this novel. The author writes, “A novel like this is a small step, but a necessary one, to tearing down the veil of ignorance which currently lies over most of what we currently say and do about terrorism” (322). He also includes a suggested reading list for those interested in knocking down that “veil of ignorance.” I plan to re-read this novel, and to work my way through Jackson's "Recommended Reading" list on terrorism and terrorists.