Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

A Case of Conscience
A Case of Conscience
A Case of Conscience
Ebook263 pages4 hours

A Case of Conscience

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A space-traveling Jesuit priest confronts a moral but godless alien race in this Hugo Award–winning novel by the author of the Cities in Flight saga.

Father Ruiz-Sanchez is a dedicated man, a Jesuit priest who is also a scientist, and a scientist who is also a human being. He doesn’t feel any genuine conflicts in his belief system—until he is sent to Lithia.
 
The reptilian inhabitants of this distant world appear to be admirable in every way. Untroubled by greed or lust, they live in peace. But they have no concept of God, no literature, and no art. They rely purely on cold reason. But something darker lies beneath the surface: Do the Lithians pose a hidden threat? The answers that unfold could affect the fate of two worlds. Will Ruiz-Sanchez, a priest driven by his deeply human understanding of good and evil, do the right thing when confronted by a race that is alien to its core?
 
The Science Fiction Encyclopedia lauds A Case of Conscience as “one of the first serious attempts to deal with religion [in science fiction], and [it] remains one of the most sophisticated. It is generally regarded as an SF classic.” Readers of Isaac Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy, Mary Doria Russell’s The Sparrow, or Walter M. Miller Jr.’s A Canticle for Leibowitz will find this award-winning novel a gripping, compelling exploration of some of the most intractable and important questions faced by the human species. Includes an introduction by Hugo and Nebula Award–winning author Greg Bear.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJan 24, 2017
ISBN9781504042444
A Case of Conscience
Author

James Blish

James Blish (1921–1975) was a novelist whose most popular works include Jack of Eagles and his Cities in Flight series, about people fleeing a declining Earth to seek new homes among the stars. He attended Rutgers University and received a bachelor of arts degree in microbiology before serving as a medical technician in World War II, and was an early member of the Futurians, a group of science fiction writers, fans, editors, and publishers. In 1959, Blish received the Hugo Award for his novel A Case of Conscience. He was also a prolific short fiction writer and a major contributor to the Star Trek saga, rewriting scripts into anthologies and producing original stories and screenplays.  

Read more from James Blish

Related to A Case of Conscience

Related ebooks

Christian Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for A Case of Conscience

Rating: 3.3573486311239193 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

347 ratings20 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Pretty good. I enjoyed the first half of the book more than the second half. The planet was interesting, the biology, etc. The religious discussions my be more interesting to Catholics. While I didn't have any objections to it, I just found it a little boring at that point.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The quality of the prose is quite good, but there are some major problems with the story structure. The book has two parts. The first is a lengthy short story, and is excellent. Four scientists, one of whom also happens to be a Jesuit, study an alien planet and the culture of its people, with the goal of deciding whether humans would be harmful to the planet (or vice versa). The second part is an extension of that story, and is kind of a mess. It's more like a sequel than the continuation you'd expect from the second half of a novel. It abandons the focus of the first part, and on top of that it has very little focus of its own.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Very interesting look at the future, from a late 1950's, early 1960's perspective. The heart of the book is a moral crisis introduced by an alien race with perfect morals but no belief in a god. Also interesting to look at as a first contact novel from a time that was less xenophobic and more nuclear disaster preoccupied.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    After reading this book I went to look at reviews and discovered why I was so confused while reading this: it seemed really sort of choppy and disjointed until I found out that this was actually 2 smaller novels in one. The first book centers on the character of Father Ramon Ruiz-Sanchez, a Jesuit priest who is part of a mission to investigate a planet called Lithia. The inhabitants of Lithia are lizardish-type aliens. They live in peace among each other, with no war, no crime, no dissension, because they live according to the principle of reason. If things don't make sense, they simply aren't done. Ruiz-Sanchez is there with 3 others who are trying to determine if Lithia should be open to inhabitants of earth. The first book is outstanding: Ruiz-Sanchez makes what he feels is a startling discovery about the population and for that he is excommunicated from the church. I won't say what, but you'll love this part of the story. On leaving Lithia, the team is given a present: one of the aliens sends the egg of his son with them to Earth. The second book focuses on the alien Egtverchi, who is born on Earth and grows up away from his culture. He has no instinctive understanding of the reason that guides his native culture, and as time progresses, becomes somewhat of a celebrity. I won't say more about this either, but suffice it to say, the book does give you a lot to think about.I loved the first part of this book, but the second part (which is also good, don't get me wrong) is not as nicely formulated and gets a little confusing at times. I definitely recommend it to all readers of sci-fi as a no-miss read.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I REALLY did not like this book. Recognizing that it was something of a fable, I could accept such characteristics as the characters being no more than "types." What I couldn't abide was that it had a pre-Copernican moral sense about it, in that it carried an attitude all in the universe was created for the purpose of earthlings (and I'd narrow it down more finely to that, to Christian earthlings).

    A group of Earth scientists spends time evaluating an inhabited planet 50 light-years away. Since the planet lacks iron, its technology has been prevented from becoming too sophisticated, but what is evident is that its culture is very well-integrated and peaceful. It displays little distrust and is even welcoming and accepting of the Earth visitors. So polite is everyone that one of the scientists who is also a Jesuit likens it to Eden.

    But therein, he argues to his colleagues, lies the trap. Such a seductive culture could only be the product of Satan.

    Say what?!

    The Jesuit provides an argument on the basis of natural law--at least the theology of natural law as laid down by the medieval clerics--but this then presupposes that all in the universe exists (and God created it) only to conform to a specifically Earth/medieval Christian understanding of how the universe works. The Jesuit-scientist is obviously a Jesuit first and a scientist only distantly second, because rather than taking the data from his new experience with this gentle society to reconsider his dogma, he feels he must judge the situation according to his ingrained dogmatic position.

    And the dogma is just crazy. What a wonderful society these other beings have! Of course, it must be the Devil's work! The logical contortions that must be taken reach this conclusion probably do conform to pre-Vatican II Catholic theology (the book was written in 1957). But that only indicates how contorted such theology was.

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A novel in which a Jesuit confronts a planet without any belief in any deity. He's finally forced by his Catholicism to cast an exorcism, which may have destroyed it. While he has qualms, he conforms to his order's rules. It passes an evening, and isn't comforting to Catholics.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I saw this on a sci-fi "must read" list, and thinking, "I liked Blish when I was a teen...", gave it a shot.

    Well....I can overlook a lot as it was published in 1958, but I had a few problems with an early main character slurring the primary species of the other planet...dates the vision to a racist U.S. ...; the story was uneven (and a very weird segment in part two was just...weird); the end sections all over the map; a character who should have known better using "light-year" as a unit of time (not sure that Blish did that deliberately, but if so, it didn't fit with the character); and the religious element just seemed silly, to put a finger on a few. And the ending far too contrived for the intelligent writer I thought I remembered.

    I've wanted to re-read The Seedling Stars for some time, but I'm afraid a 40 year old memory fragment might disappoint me. I can't recommend this book, even taking its age into consideration.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Winner of the Hugo Award in 1958, this book presents a moral dilemma confronting the four main characters.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I found this novel frustrating. The main character is a Jesuit priest who spends the novel trying to decide the theological implications of the first intelligent extraterrestrial species found by humans. Unfortunately, I never really connected with him, so I never really cared about the results.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A very original novel that uses the sci-fi to ask unashamedly big questions about religion & ethics. At times the level of scientific & theological learning can be so expert it is bewildering & can loose the reader. feb 08
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This novel consists of two parts. The first was originally a stand alone novella. In it, a Jesuit priest, faced with a highly rational, intelligent, alien species, tries to decide whether they are endowed with souls. The second part was tacked on to extend the novella to a novel. There, an offspring of the same alien race grows up on earth, without contact with his own planet. The fact that he, Egtverchi, is an alien no longer matters, as the main focus becomes the dystopian society created by unintended consequences of the nuclear arms race. Egtverchi serves as the lightning rod for society's discontent.The main theme of the first part, and the only substantial thread connecting it to the second is the priest's point of view. He is a trained biologist and is faced with the same empirical data as three other scientists exploring the alien planet. Yet, his judgment is perpetually colored by the need to attribute creation to divine origins. As a consequence, he sees evil and danger to humanity where his colleagues see potential peaceful and mutually beneficial coexistence. In short, it reads as a very interesting exercise in a personal rationalization of the all too common conclusion that different is bad. I give it a thumbs up.The second part of the novel is much less remarkable. It is one of many extrapolations of the harm that the cold war mentality and policies can lead to in the future. Unfortunately, the writing and characterizations fall flat on their faces compared to the preceding half of the book. Unfortunately, I must give it a thumbs down.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An apparent Eden is discovered and a group of scientists and a priest must come to grips with it. A good book with some thought-provoking ideas.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    An excellent study of the relationship between science and the supernatural, in the same vein as The Exorcism of Emily Rose, although this obviously came well before that film. When an event has a scientific explanation, does that negate the possibility that the event was brought about through supernatural means? What of the case where the event was unpredictable in a natural sense, but supernaturally predicted?
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This was a fascinating novel about an alien species with a remarkable life-history, spoiled by a cop-out ending that catered to religious concepts.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Very interesting story premise. It makes you think alot about morality and God. This book is great for people who are familiar with Catholicism and have questions about the nature of good and evil.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Intensely idiotic. This BS won the Hugo award? A Jesuit biologist, in a first contact team, learns a new language and culture in the space of a few weeks or months, and promptly judges that planet, biology, and culture to be a fake from the pit of hell because he doesn't understand it, because a non human intelligent species has a morality he can't penetrate and because the process of growth their young go through somehow reminds him of the fact of evolution. Which as a Jesuit, he categorically Debbie's, even though he's a biologist - not any biologist, but one chosen for a first contact mission! No curiosity, just superstitious fear and hatred. The physicist, because what first contact team is worth its salt without a physicist, doesn't know that you can't ship iron from earth or lithium from 50 light years away to make a profit. The geologist doesn't have any opinions or punt in the story at all, except as a conversational foil. I never did figure out what the fourth scientist was doing.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I loved the first half of this book. The second half I found unreadable. I have since heard that the first half is essentially the original novella and the second half was added later to bump it to a novel. This makes sense as the style and quality is wildly different.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    A solid and interesting first half is seriously weakened by a disjointed second half whose flow makes little sense, and whose ending leaves much to be desired. This is easier to understand when you learn that "A Case of Conscience" was originally a novella expanded into a novel later on. The first half of the book, the much stronger half, stands on its own as a interesting look at how three vastly different perspectives can interpret evidence that contradicts all existing presuppositions. The second half drags into theological debate and the inconsistencies inherent in Catholic dogma set over top a vague background of social unrest about inequality. While several of this book's weak points can be attributed to the age of the book (62 years at the time this review was written), they cannot all be explained away by mere circumstance of time.The first half of the book sees 4 scientists sent to observe and study an alien world to determine if it is fit for human development and/or colonization. 3 of the scientists all reach different conclusions with vastly different implications, while the fourth listens to be swayed to one side. The debate does drag a bit as it is written very much in the style of a lot of science fiction writing from the 1950s and 1960s: long speeches from "men of intellect" who will break down their every argument into small bits so that even the most inexperienced reader can understand the ultimate conclusions. While that may be helpful for developing the arguments in the book, it does get burdensome to read page after page of philosophical/ethical/theological debate with little break for story or character development through action.The arguments made are at least interesting to see discussed. While ultimately, Father Ruiz-Sanchez's theological argument becomes the focus of the remainder of the book, Michaelis's argument is the far more interesting one to myself and I suspect most modern readers. His arguments remain relevant today to discussions of de-colonial attitudes and efforts, examinations of the role of force in development and cultural/technological advancement, and the insistence on Western views of "progress" being the only valid measure of civilization.The geologist Cleaver's ultimate argument reflects many of the attitudes prevalent in the Cold War era in which Blish wrote the novel. The ideas of an arms race remains his most steadfast conviction, even against a people who have no concept of war or weapons. As well, in an era in which many of the European colonies were gaining independence, Cleaver revives old colonial tropes and attitudes, much to the horror of most (I would hope) modern readers. While his arguments remain quite unpersuasive today, they serve as an excellent examination of the danger of colonial attitudes should mankind ever take to the stars for the purposes of expansion.The second half of the book attempts to do some world building for the far off future of 2050, but it remains vague and unconvincing as a dystopian vision. The idea of social inequity is attempted to be presented as a major brewing crisis, but it never feels like a real danger until the moment is has to erupt to move the plot along. The provocateur of this social unrest comes across as entirely unbelievable at being a charismatic messiah to the masses, instead seeming aloof and entitled/condescending. His being of another world is used to reflect a mirror back onto human society, but it doesn't have the contrast that I think Blish hoped for.Perhaps it is simply that this book comes from another era with themes and styles that aren't evergreen, but I do find this book to be the weakest of the Hugo Best Novel winners I have read so far.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I found things to like about this celebrated and ambitious books, especially in its first half. It gives us characters, aliens, planetary ecology, and future Earth, which are all intriguing and reasonably plausible. It gives us an eerie prediction of something horribly similar to reality television. It gives us serious questions about science and religion, clearly written in a cold war setting in which scientists dig deep into things they don’t understand and said things ultimately go boom in unanticipated and hazardous ways. Having said all that, the second half of the book thoroughly failed to deliver on the promise of the beginning. The inherently interesting above-mentioned things spiral out of control in generally superficial ways, and in the end we’re left with something about as profound as a reasonably decent Star Trek episode. Engtverchi’s saga initially offered much promise but quickly degenerated into silliness. Similarly, I found Father Ruiz-Sanchez’ struggles to reconcile his faith with (alien) reality compelling, but as this storyline moved towards its final resolution it became increasingly juvenile. The climactic lunar scene felt like something out of a comic book. To the extent this book has a message it has to be something like “75% of even the best of humanity is screwed up in irredeemable ways” (of the original quartet of explorers only Michelis remains sympathetic and admirable). And perhaps that people who put faith ahead of common sense should be excluded from space exploration teams. All in all, the first half of this book is clearly a huge step forward from the last thing I read by Blish (the “Cities in Flight” tetrology). But while I admired the questions asked by this book, I found the answers awfully disappointing.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    This is not literature, this is incomprehensible theology. This does not make sense.

Book preview

A Case of Conscience - James Blish

BOOK ONE

ONE

The stone door slammed. It was Cleaver’s trade-mark: there had never been a door too heavy, complex, or cleverly tracked to prevent him from closing it with a sound like a clap of doom. And no planet in the universe could possess an air sufficiently thick and curtained with damp to muffle that sound—not even Lithia.

Father Ramon Ruiz-Sanchez, late of Peru, and always Clerk Regular of the Society of Jesus, professed father of the four vows, continued to read. It would take Paul Cleaver’s impatient fingers quite a while to free him from his jungle suit, and in the meantime the problem remained. It was a century-old problem, first propounded in 1939, but the Church had never cracked it. And it was diabolically complex (that adverb was official, precisely chosen, and intended to be taken literally). Even the novel which had proposed the case was on the Index Expurgatorius, and Father Ruiz-Sanchez had spiritual access to it only by virtue of his Order.

He turned the page, scarcely hearing the stamping and muttering in the hall. On and on the text ran, becoming more tangled, more evil, more insoluble with every word:

… Magravius threatens to have Anita molested by Sulla, an orthodox savage (and leader of a band of twelve mercenaries, the Sullivani), who desires to procure Felicia for Gregorius, Leo Vitellius and Macdugalius, four excavators, if she will not yield to him and also deceive Honuphrius by rendering conjugal duty when demanded. Anita who claims to have discovered incestuous temptations from Jeremias and Eugenius—

There now, he was lost again. Jeremias and Eugenius were—? Oh, yes, the philadelphians or brotherly lovers (another crime hidden there, no doubt) at the beginning of the case, consanguineous to the lowest degree with both Felicia and Honuphrius—the latter the apparent prime villain and husband of Anita. It was Magravius, who seemed to admire Honuphrius, who had been urged by the slave Mauritius to solicit Anita, seemingly under the aegis of Honuphrius himself. This, however, had come to Anita through her tirewoman Fortissa, who was or at one time had been the common-law wife of Mauritius and had borne him children—so that the whole story had to be weighed with the utmost caution. And that entire initial confession of Honuphrius had come out under torture—voluntarily consented to, to be sure, but still torture. The Fortissa-Mauritius relationship was even more dubious, really only a supposition of the commentator Father Ware—

Ramon, give me a hand, will you? Cleaver shouted suddenly. I’m stuck, and—and I don’t feel well.

The Jesuit biologist arose in alarm, putting the novel aside. Such an admission from Cleaver was unprecedented.

The physicist was sitting on a pouf of woven rushes, stuffed with a sphagnumlike moss, which was bulging at the equator under his weight. He was halfway out of his glass-fiber jungle suit, and his face was white and beaded with sweat, although his helmet was already off. His uncertain, stubby fingers tore at a jammed zipper.

Paul! Why didn’t you say you were ill in the first place? Here, let go of that; you’re only making things worse. What happened?

Don’t know exactly, Cleaver said, breathing heavily but relinquishing the zipper. Ruiz-Sanchez knelt beside him and began to work it carefully back onto its tracks. Went a ways into the jungle to see if I could spot more pegmatite lies. It’s been in the back of my mind that a pilot-plant for turning out tritium might locate here eventually—ought to be able to produce on a prodigious scale.

God forbid, Ruiz-Sanchez said under his breath.

Hm? Anyhow, I didn’t see anything. A few lizards, hoppers, the usual thing. Then I ran up against a plant that looked a little like a pineapple, and one of the spines jabbed right through my suit and nicked me. Didn’t seem serious, but—

But we don’t have the suits for nothing. Let’s look at it. Here, put up your feet and we’ll haul those boots off. Where did you get the—oh. Well, it’s angry-looking, I’ll give it that. Any other symptoms?

My mouth feels raw, Cleaver complained.

Open up, the Jesuit commanded. When Cleaver complied, it became evident that his complaint had been the understatement of the year. The mucosa inside his mouth was nearly covered with ugly and undoubtedly painful ulcers, their edges as sharply defined as though they had been cut with a cookie punch.

Ruiz-Sanchez made no comment, however, and deliberately changed his expression to one of carefully calculated dismissal. If the physicist needed to minimize his ailments, that was all right with Ruiz-Sanchez. An alien planet is not a good place to strip a man of his inner defenses.

Come into the lab, he said. You’ve got some inflammation in there.

Cleaver arose, a little unsteadily, and followed the Jesuit into the laboratory. There Ruiz-Sanchez took smears from several of the ulcers onto microscope slides, and Gram-stained them. He filled the time consumed by the staining process with the ritual of aiming the microscope’s substage mirror out the window at a brilliant white cloud. When the timer’s alarm went off, he rinsed and flame-dried the first slide and slipped it under the clips.

As he had half-feared, he saw few of the mixed bacilli and spirochetes which would have indicated a case of ordinary, Earthly, Vincent’s angina—trench mouth, which the clinical picture certainly suggested, and which he could have cured overnight with a spectrosigmin pastille. Cleaver’s oral flora were normal, though on the increase because of all the exposed tissue.

I’m going to give you a shot, Ruiz-Sanchez said gently. And then I think you’d better go to bed.

The hell with that, Cleaver said. I’ve got nine times as much work to do as I can hope to clean up now, without any additional handicaps.

Illness is never convenient, Ruiz-Sanchez agreed. But why worry about losing a day or so, since you’re in over your head anyhow?

What have I got? Cleaver asked suspiciously.

"You haven’t got anything, Ruiz-Sanchez said, almost regretfully. That is, you aren’t infected. But your ‘pineapple’ did you a bad turn. Most plants of that family on Lithia bear thorns or leaves coated with polysaccharides that are poisonous to us. The particular glucoside you ran up against today was evidently squill, or something closely related to it. It produces symptoms like those of trench mouth, but a lot harder to clear up."

How long will that take? Cleaver said. He was still balking, but he was on the defensive now.

Several days at least—until you’ve built up an immunity. The shot I’m going to give you is a gamma globulin specific against squill, and it ought to moderate the symptoms until you’ve developed a high antibody titer of your own. But in the process you’re going to run quite a fever, Paul; and I’ll have to keep you well stuffed with antipyretics, because even a little fever is dangerous in this climate.

I know it, Cleaver said, mollified. The more I learn about this place, the less disposed I am to vote ‘aye’ when the time comes. Well, bring on your shot—and your aspirin. I suppose I ought to be glad it isn’t bacterial infection, or the Snakes would be jabbing me full of antibiotics.

Small chance of that, Ruiz-Sanchez said. I don’t doubt that the Lithians have at least a hundred different drugs we’ll be able to use eventually, but—there, that’s all there is to it; you can relax now—but we’ll have to study their pharmacology from the ground up, first. All right, Paul, hit the hammock. In about ten minutes you’re going to be wishing you’d been born dead, that I promise you.

Cleaver grinned. His sweaty face under its thatch of dirty blond hair was craggy and powerful even in illness. He stood up and deliberately rolled down his sleeve.

Not much doubt about how you’ll vote, either, he said. You like this planet, don’t you, Ramon? It’s a biologist’s paradise, as far as I can see.

I do like it, the priest said, smiling back. He followed Cleaver into the small room which served them both as sleeping quarters. Except for the window, it strongly resembled the inside of a jug. The walls were curving and continuous, and were made of some ceramic material which never beaded or felt wet, but never seemed to be quite dry, either. The hammocks were slung from hooks which projected smoothly from the walls, as though they had been baked from clay along with the rest of the house. I wish my colleague Dr. Meid were able to see it. She would be even more delighted with it than I am.

I don’t hold with women in the sciences, Cleaver said, with abstract, irrelevant irritation. Get their emotions all mixed up with their hypotheses. Meid—what kind of name is that, anyhow?

Japanese, Ruiz-Sanchez said. Her first name is Liu—the family follows the Western custom of putting the family name last.

Oh, Cleaver said, losing interest. We were talking about Lithia.

Well, don’t forget that Lithia is my first extrasolar planet, Ruiz-Sanchez said. "I think I’d find any new, habitable world fascinating. The infinite mutability of life-forms, and the cunning inherent in each of them … It’s all amazing, and quite delightful."

Why shouldn’t that be sufficient? Cleaver said. Why do you have to have the God bit too? It doesn’t make sense.

On the contrary, it’s what gives everything else meaning, Ruiz-Sanchez said. "Belief and science aren’t mutually exclusive—quite the contrary. But if you place scientific standards first, and exclude belief, admit nothing that’s not proven, then what you have is a series of empty gestures. For me, biology is an act of religion, because I know that all creatures are God’s—each new planet, with all its manifestations, is an affirmation of God’s power."

A dedicated man, Cleaver said. "All right. So am I. To the greater glory of man, that’s what I say."

He sprawled heavily in his hammock. After a decent interval, Ruiz-Sanchez took the liberty of heaving up after him the foot he seemed to have forgotten. Cleaver didn’t notice. The reaction was setting in.

Exactly so, Ruiz-Sanchez said. But that’s only half the story. The other half reads, ‘… and to the greater glory of God.’

Read me no tracts, Father, Cleaver said. Then: I didn’t mean that. I’m sorry.… But for a physicist, this place is hell.… You’d better get me that aspirin. I’m cold.

Surely, Paul.

Ruiz-Sanchez went quickly back into the lab, made up a salicylate-barbiturate paste in one of the Lithians’ superb mortars, and pressed it into a set of pills. (Storing such pills was impossible in Lithia’s humid atmosphere; they were too hygroscopic.) He wished he could stamp each pill Bayer before it set—if Cleaver’s personal cure-all was aspirin, it would have been just as well to let him think he was taking aspirin—but of course he had no dies for the purpose. He took two of the pills back to Cleaver, with a mug and a carafe of Berkefeld-filtered water.

The big man was already asleep; Ruiz-Sanchez woke him, more or less. Cleaver would sleep longer, and awaken farther along the road to recovery, for having been done that small unkindness now. As it was, he hardly noticed when the pills were put down him, and soon resumed his heavy, troubled breathing.

That done, Ruiz-Sanchez returned to the front room of the house, sat down, and began to inspect the jungle suit. The tear which the plant spine had made was not difficult to find, and would be easy to repair. It would be much harder to repair Cleaver’s notion that the defenses of Earthmen on Lithia were invulnerable, and that plant spines could be blundered against with impunity. Ruiz-Sanchez wondered whether either of the other two members of the Lithian Review Commission still shared that notion.

Cleaver had called the thing which had brought him low a pineapple. Any biologist could have told Cleaver that even on Earth the pineapple is a prolific and dangerous weed, edible only by a happy and irrelevant accident. In Hawaii, as Ruiz-Sanchez remembered, the tropical forest was quite impassable to anyone not wearing heavy boots and tough trousers. Even inside the Dole plantations, the close-packed irrepressible pineapples could tear unprotected legs to ribbons.

The Jesuit turned the suit over. The zipper that Cleaver had jammed was made of a plastic into the molecule of which had been incorporated radicals from various terrestrial anti-fungal substances, chiefly the protoplasmic poison thiolutin. The fungi of Lithia respected these, all right, but the elaborate molecule of the plastic itself had a tendency, under Lithian humidities and heats, to undergo polymerization more or less spontaneously. That was what had happened here. One of the teeth of the zipper had changed into something resembling a kernel of popped corn.

The air grew dark as Ruiz-Sanchez worked. There was a muted puff of sound, and the room was illuminated with small, soft yellow flames from recesses in every wall. The burning substance was natural gas, of which Lithia had an inexhaustible and constantly renewed supply. The flames were lit by adsorption against a catalyst, as soon as the gas came on from the system. A lime mantle, which worked on a rack and pinion of heatproof glass, could be moved into the flame to provide a brighter light; but the priest liked the yellow light the Lithians themselves preferred, and used the limelight only in the laboratory.

For some purposes, of course, the Earthmen had to have electricity, for which they had been forced to supply their own generators. The Lithians had a far more advanced science of electrostatics than Earth had, but of electrodynamics they knew comparatively little. They had discovered magnetism only a few years before the Commission had arrived, since natural magnets were unknown on the planet. They had first observed the phenomenon, not in iron, of which they had next to none, but in liquid oxygen—a difficult substance from which to make generator cores!

The results in terms of Lithian civilization were peculiar, to an Earthman. The twelve-foot-tall, reptilian people had built several huge electrostatic generators and scores of little ones, but had nothing even vaguely resembling telephones. They knew a great deal on the practical level about electrolysis, but carrying a current over a long distance—say a mile—was regarded by them as a technical triumph. They had no electric motors as an Earthman would understand the term, but made fast intercontinental flights in jet aircraft powered by static electricity. Cleaver said he understood this feat, but Ruiz-Sanchez certainly did not (and after Cleaver’s description of electron-ion plasmas heated by radio-frequency induction, he felt more in the dark than ever).

They had a completely marvelous radio network, which among other things provided a live navigational grid for the whole planet, zeroed on (and here perhaps was the epitome of the Lithian genius for paradox) a tree. Yet they had never produced a standardized vacuum tube, and their atomic theory was not much more sophisticated than Democritus’ had been!

These paradoxes, of course, could be explained in part by the things that Lithia lacked. Like any large rotating mass, Lithia had a magnetic field of its own, but a planet which almost entirely lacks iron provides its people with no easy way to discover magnetism. Radioactivity had been entirely unknown on the surface of Lithia, at least until the Earthmen had arrived, which explained the hazy atomic theory. Like the Greeks, the Lithians had discovered that friction between silk and glass produces one kind of energy or charge, and between silk and amber another; they had gone on from there to van de Graaf generators, electrochemistry, and the static jet—but without suitable metals they were unable to make heavy-duty batteries, or to do more than begin to study electricity in motion.

In the fields where they had been given fair clues, they had made enormous progress. Despite the constant cloudiness and endemic drizzle, their descriptive astronomy was excellent, thanks to the fortunate presence of a small moon which had drawn their attention outward early. This in turn made for basic advances in optics, and thence for a downright staggering versatility in the working of glass. Their chemistry took full advantage of both the seas and the jungles. From the one they took such vital and diversified products as agar, iodine, salt, trace metals, and foods of many kinds. The other provided nearly everything else that they needed: resins, rubbers, woods of all degrees of hardness, edible and essential oils, vegetable butters, rope and other fibers, fruits and nuts, tannins, dyes, drugs, cork, paper. Indeed, the sole forest product which they did not take was game, and the reason for this neglect was hard to find. It seemed to the Jesuit to be religious—yet the Lithians had no religion, and they certainly ate many of the creatures of the sea without qualms of conscience.

He dropped the jungle suit into his lap with a sigh, though the popcorned tooth still was not completely trimmed back into shape. Outside, in the humid darkness, Lithia was in full concert. It was a vital, somehow fresh, new-sounding drone, covering most of the sound spectrum audible to an Earthman. It came from the myriad insects of Lithia. Many of these had wiry, trilling songs, almost like birds, in addition to the scrapes and chirrups and wing-case buzzes of the insects of Earth. In a way this was lucky, for there were no birds on Lithia.

Had Eden sounded like that, before evil had come into the world? Ruiz-Sanchez wondered. Certainly his native Peru sang no such song …

Qualms of conscience—these were, in the long run, his essential business, rather than the taxonomical mazes of biology, which had already become tangled into near-hopelessness on Earth before space flight had come along to add whole new layers of labyrinths for each planet, new dimensions of labryrinths for each star. It was only interesting that the Lithians were bipedal, evolved from reptiles, with marsupial-like pouches and pteropsid circulatory systems. But it was vital that they had qualms of conscience—if they did.

The calendar caught his eye. It was an art calendar Cleaver had produced from his luggage back in the beginning; the girl on it was now unintentionally modest beneath large patches of brilliant orange mold. The date was April 19, 2049. Almost Easter—the most pointed of reminders that to the inner life, the body was only a garment. To Ruiz-Sanchez personally, however, the year date was almost equally significant, for 2050 was to be a Holy Year.

The Church had returned to the ancient custom, first recognized officially in 1300 by Boniface VIII, of proclaiming the great pardon only once every half-century. If Ruiz-Sanchez was not in Rome next year when the Holy Door was opened, it would never be opened again in his lifetime.

Hurry, hurry! some personal demon whispered inside his brain. Or was it the voice of his own conscience? Were his sins already so burdensome—unknown to himself—as to put him in mortal need of the pilgrimage? Or was that, in turn, only a minor temptation, to the sin of pride?

In any event, the work could not be hurried. He and the other three men were on Lithia to decide whether or not the planet would be suitable as a port of call for Earth, without risk of damage either to Earthmen or to Lithians. The other three men on the commission were primarily scientists, as was Ruiz-Sanchez; but he knew that his own recommendation would in the long run depend upon conscience, not upon taxonomy.

And conscience, like creation, cannot be hurried. It cannot even be scheduled.

He looked down at the still-imperfect jungle suit with a troubled face until he heard Cleaver moan. Then he arose and left the room to the softly hissing flames.

TWO

From the oval front window of the house to which Cleaver and Ruiz-Sanchez had been assigned, the land slanted away with insidious gentleness toward the ill-defined south edge of Lower Bay, a part of the Gulf of Sfath. Most of the area was salt marsh, as was the seaside nearly everywhere on

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1