Bluefield State College

Shelia Sargent-Martin (as private and confidential)

Course Evaluation Results

Dear Dr. Sargent-Martin, This email contains evaluation results for Instruction and Technology / SEEQDE: The global indicators are listed first, followed by the individual average values, consisting of the following scales: - LEARNING - ENTHUSIASM - ORGANIZATION - GROUP INTERACTION - INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT - BREADTH - EXAMINATIONS - ASSIGNMENTS - OVERALL In the second part of the analysis the average values of all individual questions are listed. Your Class Climate Administrator

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

Shelia Sargent-Martin
Instruction and Technology (F11101161) No. of responses = 9

Overall indicators

Global Index
1. LEARNING ( = 0.96) 2. ENTHUSIASM ( = 0.94) 3. ORGANIZATION ( = 0.88) 4. GROUP INTERACTION ( = 0.92) 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT ( = 0.97) 6. BREADTH ( = 0.97) 7. EXAMINATIONS ( = 0.97) 8. ASSIGNMENTS ( = 0.66) 9. OVERALL ( = 0.84)

av.=4.35 dev.=0.75 av.=4.36 dev.=0.71 av.=4.28 dev.=0.76 av.=4.28 dev.=0.81 av.=4.33 dev.=0.74 av.=4.39 dev.=0.72 av.=4.29 dev.=0.75 av.=4.38 dev.=0.72 av.=4.28 dev.=0.77 av.=4.52 dev.=0.77

Legend
Question text

Relative Frequencies of answers

Left pole

Std. Dev. 25%

Mean 0% 50%

Median 0%

Quantile 25%
Right pole

1 Scale

4 Histogram

n=No. of responses av.=Mean md=Median dev.=Std. Dev. ab.=Abstention

1. LEARNING
1.1)

You found the course intellectually challenging and stimulating

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

11.1%

33.3%

55.6%
Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
1.2)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

You have learned something which you consider valuable

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 1

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

1.3)

Your interest in the subject has increased as a consequence of this course

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

11.1%

44.4%

44.4%
Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
1.4)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

2. ENTHUSIASM
2.1)

Instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

22.2%

44.4%

33.3%
Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.11 md=4 dev.=0.78

1
2.2)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 33.3%

5 55.6%
Strongly agree

Instructor was dynamic and energetic in conducting the course

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
2.3)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor enhanced presentations with the use of humor

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
2.4)

2 0%

3 22.2%

4 33.3%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor's style of presentation held your interest during class

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.22 md=4 dev.=0.83

3. ORGANIZATION
3.1)

Instructor's explanations were clear

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

11.1%

44.4%

44.4%
Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
3.2)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Course materials were well prepared and carefully explained

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
3.3)

2 0%

3 22.2%

4 44.4%

5 33.3%
Strongly agree

Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.11 md=4 dev.=0.78

1
3.4)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 33.3%

5 55.6%
Strongly agree

Instructor responded to me in a timely fashion

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
3.5)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 55.6%

5 33.3%
Strongly agree

Instructor had a well-organized course

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.22 md=4 dev.=0.67

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 2

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

3.6)

Instructor used announcements area for student conversations regarding course material

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

25%

37.5%

37.5%
Strongly agree

1
3.7)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 33.3%

5 55.6%
Strongly agree

n=8 av.=4.13 md=4 dev.=0.83 ab.=1 n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

Instructor used discussion board for student conversations regarding course materials

0%
Strongly disagree

1
3.8)

2 0%

3 0%

4 33.3%

5 55.6%
Strongly agree

Instructor graded assignments promptly

11.1%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.22 md=5 dev.=1.3

4. GROUP INTERACTION
4.1)

Students were encouraged to participate in class discussions

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

11.1%

44.4%

44.4%
Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
4.2)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
4.3)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 33.3%

5 55.6%
Strongly agree

Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
4.4)

2 0%

3 22.2%

4 33.3%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.22 md=4 dev.=0.83

5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT
5.1)

Instructor was friendly toward individual students

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

11.1%

44.4%

44.4%
Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
5.2)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 33.3%

5 55.6%
Strongly agree

Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/advice

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
5.3)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 33.3%

5 55.6%
Strongly agree

Instructor had genuine interest in individual students

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
5.4)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 3

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

6. BREADTH
6.1)

Instructor contrasted the implications of various theories

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

11.1%

44.4%

44.4%
Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
6.2)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor presented the background or origin of ideas/concepts developed in class

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
6.3)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor presented points of view other than his/ her own when appropriate

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
6.4)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor adequately discussed current developments in the field

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

1
6.5)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 33.3%

5 55.6%
Strongly agree

Instructor provided a means to discuss class theories and topics

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
6.6)

2 0%

3 22.2%

4 33.3%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor used supplementary materials to enhance lecture notes and concepts

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.22 md=4 dev.=0.83

1
6.7)

2 0%

3 22.2%

4 33.3%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Instructor offered feedback on student thoughts

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.22 md=4 dev.=0.83

1
6.8)

2 0%

3 22.2%

4 44.4%

5 33.3%
Strongly agree

Instructor included access to other resources when possible

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.11 md=4 dev.=0.78

7. EXAMINATIONS
7.1)

Feedback on examinations/graded materials was valuable

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

11.1%

33.3%

55.6%
Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
7.2)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 33.3%

5 55.6%
Strongly agree

Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.44 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
7.3)

2 0%

3 12.5%

4 50%

5 37.5%
Strongly agree

Examinations/graded materials tested course content as emphasized by the intructor

0%
Strongly disagree

n=8 av.=4.25 md=4 dev.=0.71 ab.=1

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 4

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

8. ASSIGNMENTS
8.1)

Required readings/texts were valuable

0%
Strongly disagree

0%

22.2%

33.3%

44.4%
Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.22 md=4 dev.=0.83

1
8.2)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 44.4%

5 44.4%
Strongly agree

Readings, homework, etc. contributed to appreciation and understanding of subject

0%
Strongly disagree

n=9 av.=4.33 md=4 dev.=0.71

9. OVERALL
9.1)

Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...

0%
Very poor

0%

11.1%

22.2%

66.7%
Very good

n=9 av.=4.56 md=5 dev.=0.73

1
9.2)

2 0%

3 11.1%

4 11.1%

5 77.8%
Very good

Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...

0%
Very poor

n=9 av.=4.67 md=5 dev.=0.71

1
9.3)

2 0%

3 22.2%

4 22.2%

5 55.6%
Very good

Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...

0%
Very poor

n=9 av.=4.33 md=5 dev.=0.87

10. OPEN ENDED COMMENTS

10.1)

Students' evaluation is one of the methods used for improving the quality of teaching at the college. This survey will provide your instructor with valuable feedback about teaching effectiveness. You should base your responses on this instructor's teaching in this unit. All information is confidential. (Please keep written responses inside the box)

Class was good Dr. Sargent-Martin is simply one of the best teachers at Bluefield State. She encouraged me to take the Praxis I by telling me she believed in my abilities as a student. I cannot say enough about how great of a teacher she is. j

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 5

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

Histogram for scaled questions

You found the course intellectually challenging and stimulating
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

You have learned something which you consider valuable

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Your interest in the subject has increased as a consequence of this course

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

50% 25%
11% 33%

56%

50%
44% 44%

50%
44% 44%

n=9

25%
11%

n=9

25%
11%

n=9

You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor was dynamic and energetic in conducting the course

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%

av. = 4.11 dev. = 0.78

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

50%
44% 44%

50%
44%

50%
33% 22%

56% 33% 11%

25%
11%

n=9

25%

n=9

25%

n=9

Instructor enhanced presentations with the use of humor

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor's style of presentation held your interest during class

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor's explanations were clear

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%

av. = 4.22 dev. = 0.83

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

50%
44% 44%

50%
44%

50%
44% 44% 33% 22%

25%
11%

n=9

25%

n=9

25%
11%

n=9

Course materials were well prepared and carefully explained

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor responded to me in a timely fashion

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%

av. = 4.11 dev. = 0.78

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

50%
44% 44%

50%
44%

50%
33% 22%

56% 33% 11%

25%
11%

n=9

25%

n=9

25%

n=9

Instructor had a well-organized course

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor used announcements area for student conversations regarding course material
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor used discussion board for student conversations regarding course materials
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.22 dev. = 0.67

100% 75%

av. = 4.13 dev. = 0.83

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

50% 25%
11%

56% 33%

50%

50%
38% 38%

56% 33% 11%

n=9

25%

25%

n=8

25%

n=9

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 6

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology Instructor graded assignments promptly

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Students were encouraged to participate in class discussions

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.22 dev. = 1.3

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

50% 25%
11% 33%

56%

50%
44% 44%

50%
44% 44%

n=9

25%
11%

n=9

25%
11%

n=9

Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor was friendly toward individual students

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

100% 75%

av. = 4.22 dev. = 0.83

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

50% 25%
11% 33%

56%

50%
44%

50%
44% 44% 33% 22% 11%

n=9

25%

n=9

25%

n=9

Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/ advice

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor had genuine interest in individual students

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

50% 25%
11% 33%

56%

50%

56% 33% 11%

50%
44% 44%

n=9

25%

n=9

25%
11%

n=9

Instructor contrasted the implications of various theories

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor presented the background or origin of ideas/ concepts developed in class

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

50%
44% 44%

50%
44% 44%

50%
44% 44%

25%
11%

n=9

25%
11%

n=9

25%
11%

n=9

Instructor adequately discussed current developments in the field

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor provided a means to discuss class theories and topics

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor used supplementary materials to enhance lecture notes and concepts

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

100% 75%

av. = 4.22 dev. = 0.83

50%
44% 44%

50%

56% 33% 11%

50%
44%

25%
11%

n=9

25%

n=9

25%
22%

33%

n=9

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 7

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology Instructor offered feedback on student thoughts
Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Instructor included access to other resources when possible

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Feedback on examinations/graded materials was valuable

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.22 dev. = 0.83

100% 75%

av. = 4.11 dev. = 0.78

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

50%
44%

50%
44% 33% 22%

50%
33% 22% 11%

56% 33%

25%

n=9

25%

n=9

25%

n=9

Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Examinations/graded materials tested course content as emphasized by the intructor

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Required readings/texts were valuable

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

100% 75%

av. = 4.44 dev. = 0.73

100% 75%

av. = 4.25 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%

av. = 4.22 dev. = 0.83

50% 25%
11% 33%

56%

50%

50% 38%

50%
44%

n=9

25%
13%

n=8

25%
22%

33%

n=9

Readings, homework, etc. contributed to appreciation and understanding of subject

Strongly disagree Strongly agree

Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...
Very poor Very good

Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.71

100% 75%
67%

av. = 4.56 dev. = 0.73

100% 75% 50%

78%

av. = 4.67 dev. = 0.71 n=9

11% 11%

50%
44% 44%

50%

25%
11%

n=9

25%
22% 11%

n=9

25%

Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good

100% 75%

av. = 4.33 dev. = 0.87

50% 25%
22% 22%

56%

n=9

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 8

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin Instruction and Technology

1. LEARNING
n=9 av.=4.44 n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.33

1.1)

You found the course intellectually challenging and stimulating You have learned something which you consider valuable Your interest in the subject has increased as a consequence of this course You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

1.2)

1.3)

1.4)

2. ENTHUSIASM
n=9 av.=4.11 n=9 av.=4.44 n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.22

2.1)

Instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course Instructor was dynamic and energetic in conducting the course Instructor enhanced presentations with the use of humor Instructor's style of presentation held your interest during class

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

2.2)

2.3)

2.4)

3. ORGANIZATION
n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.11 n=9 av.=4.44 n=9 av.=4.22 n=8 av.=4.13 n=9 av.=4.44 n=9 av.=4.22

3.1)

Instructor's explanations were clear Course materials were well prepared and carefully explained Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going Instructor responded to me in a timely fashion Instructor had a well-organized course Instructor used announcements area for student conversations regarding course material Instructor used discussion board for student conversations regarding course materials Instructor graded assignments promptly

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

3.2)

3.3)

3.4)

3.5)

3.6)

3.7)

3.8)

4. GROUP INTERACTION
n=9 av.=4.33
Page 9

4.1)

Students were encouraged to participate in class discussions

Strongly disagree

Strongly agree

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

4.2)

Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.44 n=9 av.=4.22

4.3)

4.4)

5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT
n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.44 n=9 av.=4.44 n=9 av.=4.33

5.1)

Instructor was friendly toward individual students Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/advice Instructor had genuine interest in individual students Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

5.2)

5.3)

5.4)

6. BREADTH
n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.33 n=9 av.=4.44 n=9 av.=4.22 n=9 av.=4.22 n=9 av.=4.11

6.1)

Instructor contrasted the implications of various theories Instructor presented the background or origin of ideas/concepts developed in class Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate Instructor adequately discussed current developments in the field Instructor provided a means to discuss class theories and topics Instructor used supplementary materials to enhance lecture notes and concepts Instructor offered feedback on student thoughts Instructor included access to other resources when possible

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

6.2)

6.3)

6.4)

6.5)

6.6)

6.7)

6.8)

7. EXAMINATIONS
n=9 av.=4.44 n=9 av.=4.44 n=8 av.=4.25

7.1)

Feedback on examinations/graded materials was valuable Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate Examinations/graded materials tested course content as emphasized by the intructor

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree Strongly agree

7.2)

7.3)

8. ASSIGNMENTS
n=9 av.=4.22 n=9 av.=4.33

8.1)

Required readings/texts were valuable Readings, homework, etc. contributed to appreciation and understanding of subject

Strongly disagree Strongly disagree

Strongly agree Strongly agree

8.2)

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 10

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

9. OVERALL
n=9 av.=4.56 n=9 av.=4.67 n=9 av.=4.33

9.1)

Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was... Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was... Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...

Very poor Very poor Very poor

Very good Very good Very good

9.2)

9.3)

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 11

Shelia Sargent-Martin, Instruction and Technology

Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin Instruction and Technology

1. LEARNING 2. ENTHUSIASM 3. ORGANIZATION 4. GROUP INTERACTION 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT 6. BREADTH 7. EXAMINATIONS 8. ASSIGNMENTS 9. OVERALL

+ + + + + + + + +

av.=4.36 av.=4.28 av.=4.28 av.=4.33 av.=4.39 av.=4.29 av.=4.38 av.=4.28 av.=4.52

01/10/2012

Class Climate evaluation

Page 12