Date started: June 7, 2013 Pages 1-16 deadline: June 14 (Friday) Pages 17-33 deadline: June 21 (Friday) Pages

34-50 deadline: June 28 (Friday) 1. Alfonzo 2. Macam 3. Mahinay 4. Mangrobang 5. Recto 6. Sandoval 7. Servito A. When law takes effect to H. Duty to render judgment - EXCLUDED I. Presumption and Applicability of Custom NCC 11 - 12 cf. 1987 Constitution, Art. XII Sec. 5 Rules of Court Rule 129 (2), (3) 1. Martinez v. Van Buskirk, 18 Phil. 79 J. Legal periods NCC 13 cf. Rules of Court (ROC) Rule 22 EO 292, RAC Sec. 31 2 Commr. v Primetown, GR 162155, August 28, 2007 3 Montajes v People, G.R. No. 183449, March 12, 2012 III. CONFLICT OF LAWS NCC 14 Art. 2, Revised Penal Code 4 Rayray vs. Chae Kyung Lee, G.R. No. 18176, October 26, 1966

NCC 15 cf. FC 26 par. 2 5 ATCI Overseas Corp vs. Echin, G.R. No. 178551, Oct. 11, 2010 6 Tuna Processing v Phi. Kingford, GR 185582, February 29, 2012 NCC 16 7 Amos v Bellis, 20 SCRA 358 1 Tayag v Benguet Consolidated, GR L-23145, Nov. 29, 1968 NCC 17 2 Kazuhiro Hasegawa vs. Kitamura, G.R. No. 149177, November 23, 2007 3 Raytheon v Rouzie, GR 162894, February 26, 2008 NCC 18 4 Tamano v Ortiz, G.R. No. 126603, June 29, 1998 5 Zamoranos v People, G.R. No. 193902, June 1, 2011 IV. HUMAN RELATIONS NCC 19 22, vis--vis Breach of Promise to Marry 6 Wassmer v. Velez 12 SCRA 648 7 Tanjanco v. CA 18 SCRA 994 1 Baksh v. CA, 219 SCRA 115 2 Abanag v Mabute, AM P-11-2922, April 4, 2011 PERSONS V. CAPACITY TO ACT NCC 37 - 39 Classes of persons and their distinctions Elements of civil capacity Juridical capacity v. personality Juridical capacity v. capacity to act 1. Presumption of capacity

3 Catalan vs. Basa, G.R. No. 159567, July 31, 2007 2. Restrictions on capacity to act NCC 38 - 39, cf. NCC 1327 (a) Minority, R.A. 6809, FC 5; 45 (1); cf. R.A. 6809, NCC 1327, NCC 1390 (par. 1), 1403 (par. 3), NCC 1397, 1399, NCC 1489, NCC 1426 - 1427 4 Mercado v. Espiritu 37 Phil 215 5 Atizado vs People, GR No. 173822, October 13, 2010 (b) Insanity, FC 45 (2), NCC 1327 (1), 1328 6 Hernandez vs Santos, G.R. No. 169217, August 7, 2009 7 People v Bulagao, GR 184757, Oct. 5, 2011 1 Oropesa v Oropesa, GR 184528, April 25, 2012 2 Crewlink v Teringtering, GR 166803, October 14, 2012 3 People v Boaquina, G.R. No. 188978, June 13, 2012 (c) Deaf-Mutism, NCC 1327 (2), 807 & 820 (d) Prodigality, ROC Rule 92 Sec. 2 (e) Civil Interdiction, RPC 31, 34, 41 4 Jalosjos v COMELEC, G.R. No. 193237, October 9, 2012 (f) Family Relations, FC 150-151; cf. FC 87, NCC 1490, NCC 2035, cf. NCC 963-967 (g) Alienage, cf. Art. IV, Secs. 1-5, 1987 Constitution (h) Absence, NCC 381 396, FC 41 5 Olaguer v Purugganan, GR 158907, February 12, 2007
(i) Insolvency and Trusteeship, NCC 1381, 1491, 2236

6 Umale v ASB Realty, GR 181126, June 15, 2011

(j) Gender, Art. II, Sec. 14, 1987 Constitution; cf. NCC 403

See also: Rule 3 Section 4, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure

A. NATURAL PERSONS NCC 40 - 41 7 Geluz v. CA 2 SCRA 801 1 Continental Steel vs. Montano, GR 182836, October 13, 2009 Quimiging v Icao, 34 SCRA 134 2 De Jesus v Syquia, 1933 NCC 42 3 Limjoco v. Intestate Estate of Pio Fragante 80 Phil 776 4 Dumlao v. Quality Plastics 70 SCRA 472 5 Eugenio v. Velez 185 SCRA 425 NCC 43, Rule 131, Sec. 33, ROC 6 Joaquin v. Navarro 93 Phil 257 B. Juridical Persons excluded from Bar coverage II. CITIZENSHIP AND DOMICILE Art. IV, Sec. 1, 1987 Constitution NCC 50 FC 68-69, cf. NCC 110, cf. FC 55, 101, 152 7 Romualdez-Marcos vs COMELEC, 248 SCRA 300 1 Vilando v HRET, August 23, 2011 2 Republic v Sagun, Feb. 15, 2012 3 Jalosjos v COMELEC, GR 191970, April 24, 2012 4 Republic v Sagun, February 15, 2012 5 Sabili vs Librea, G. R. No. 193261, April 24, 2012 III. SURNAMES NCC 364-380, RA 9255, FC 176 6 Yasin v. Hon. Judge Sharia Court G.R. No. 94986 (1995)

7 In the Matter of the Adoption of Stephanie Nathy Astorga Garcia, G.R. No. 148311, March 31, 2005. 1 Remo v DFA, March 5, 2010 2 Gonzaludo v People, 2006 IV. EMANCIPATION RA 6809 A. Cause of emancipation, FC 234 as amended B. Effect of emancipation, FC 236 as amended cf. FC 15, NCC 2180 V. RULES GOVERNING PERSONS WHO ARE ABSENT NCC 381-383, 384-389, FC 96, 101, 124, NCC 390-396, FC 41 3 Reyes v. Alejandro, 141 SCRA 65 4 Eastern Shipping v. Lucero, 124 SCRA 425 5 Manuel vs. People, G.R. No. 165842, Nov. 29, 2005 6 Pantollano v Korphil, GR 169575, March 30, 2011 7 Rep. v Granada, GR 187512, June 13, 2012 VI. FUNERALS NCC 305-310, FC 195 VII. ENTRIES IN THE CIVIL REGISTER NCC 407-413 RA 9048 Rule 108, Rules of Court 1 Dela Cruz v Gracia, G.R. No. 177728, July 31, 2009 2 Braza v Registrar, G.R. No. 181174, December 4, 2009 3 Baldos vs. CA, G.R. No. 170645, July 9, 2010 4 Corpus v Sto. Tomas, GR 18671, Aug. 11, 2010 5 Republic v Magpayo, GR 189476, Feb. 2, 2011

FAMILY RELATIONS Tolentino, Persons and Family Relations in the Civil Code I. MARRIAGE A. The concept of and nature of marriage, FC 1 cf. NCC 52, FC 149 1 Estrada v Escritor, A.M. No. P-02-1651. August 4, 2003 2 Goitia vs Campos-Rueda, 35 Phils 252 3 Silverio vs Republic, October 22, 2007 4 People v De La Cruz, G.R. No.187683,February 11, 2010 5 De Santis v Jalandoni, GR 178221, December 1, 2010 6 Espinosa v Omana, AC No. 9081, October 12, 2011 B. Requisites, FC 2-3; FC 5; FC 45 cf. NCC 53 . 1. Essential requisites 2. Formal Requisites DISCUSSION: A. Difference in Sex FC 2 (1), 4 (1), 39. 7 Silverio v Republic B. Some Form of Ceremony FC 3 (3), 4 (1), 6, 8 1 Martinez v. Tan 12 Phil 731 COMPARE TO: Morigo v People, 422 SCRA C. Legal Capacity Art. 2(1)
1. Age (Articles 5, 35(1), 39, 45(1), 37(1)) 2. Relationship (Articles37, 38 (1-8), 39)

3. Prior Marriage (Articles 35 (4), 35 (6), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 52, 53 &

39,

NCC 390-391, FC 55 (9), FC 101, ) 2. Wiegel v. Sempio-Diy, 143 SCRA 499 (1986) 3 Republic vs. Nolasco, 220 SCRA 20, March 17, 1993 4 Garcia vs. Recio, 365 SCRA 437 5 Bobis v Bobis, GR 139509, July 31, 2000 6 Te vs. Choa, G.R. No. 126446, Nov. 29, 2000 7 Mercado vs Tan, 337 SCRA 122 1 SSS vs Jarque vda. De Bailon, G.R. No. 165545, March 24, 2006 2 Morigo vs Morigo, 422 SCRA 3 Tenebro vs. CA, G.R. No. 150758. February 18, 2004 4 Republic v Granada, GR 187512, June 13, 2012 5 Montanez vs Cipriano, GR 181089, October 22, 2012 See: Abbas vs Abbas, G.R. No. 183896, January 30, 2013 4. Article 53, 52 5. Crime FC 38 (9) 6. Physical Incapacity FC 45 (5), 47 (5) 6 Jimenez v. Caizares 109 Phil 27 7 Alcazar v Alcazar, G.R. No. 174451, October 13, 7. Psychological Incapacity - FC 36, 68-73 1 Santos v. CA 240 SCRA 20 2 Chi Ming Tsoi v. CA G.R. No. 119190, Jan. 16, 1997 3 Republic v. Olaviano Molina (1997) 4 Antonio vs.Reyes, G.R. No. 155800, Mar. 10,2005 5 Te vs Te, GR No. 161793, Feb. 13, 2009 6 Azcueta vs RP, G.R. No. 180668, May 26, 2009 7 Halili v Halili, GR 165424, June 9, 2009 (Motion for Recon) 1 Najera v Najera, July 3, 2009 2 Camacho v Reyes, G.R. No. 185286, August 18, 2010 3 Republic v CA, G.R. No. 159594, November 12, 2012 2009

4 Mendoza v Republic, GR 157854, November 12, 2012 5 Republic v Encelan, G.R. No. 170022, Jan. 9, 2013

D. Consent - FC 45, 35 (5), 39 a. Insanity (Articles 45(2), 47(2)) 6 People v Bulagao, 184757, Oct. 5, 2011 b. Fraud (Articles 45 (3), 46) 7 Anaya vs Palaroan, Nov. 26, 1970 Villanueva vs CA, 505 Scra 564 1 Almelor v RTC, Aug. 26, 2008 c. Duress force, intimidation or undue influence (Articles 45 (4), 47 (4)) 2 Villanueva vs CA, 505 Scra 564 d. Mistake as to Identity (Articles 35 (5), 39) e. Disease FC 45 (6), 47 (5) E. Authority of the Solemnizing Officer (Articles 3 (1), 4 (1), 7, 10, 31, 32, 35 (2), R.A. 7160 (1991 Local Government Code), Secs. 444(b)(1)(xviii), 445 (b)(1) (xviii) 3 Aranes vs Occiano, 380 SCRA 402 4 Navarro v. DomagtoyS.C. A.M. MTJ-96-1088, July 19, 1996 F. Marriage License(Articles 3 (2), 4 (1), 4 (3), 35 (3), 9 21[refers to the administrative requirements], 27 34) 5 Sy vs. CA, G.R. No. 127263, April 12, 2000 6 Alcantara vs. Alcantara, G.R. No. 167746, Aug. 28, 2007 7 Nial vs. Bayadog, G.R. 133778, Mar. 14, 2000

1 De Castro v De Castro, G.R. No. 160172, February 13, 2008 2 Republic v Dayot, G.R. No. 175581, March 28, 2008 3 Abbas vs Abbas, G.R. No. 183896, January 30, 2013 II. EFFECT OF DEFECTIVE MARRIAGES ON THE STATUS OF CHILDREN A. If marriage is voidable FC 164, 178 B. If marriage is terminated FC 143 C. If marriage is void FC 165, 54 (i) Exceptions: FC 36, 53 III. MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE (ARTICLES 22 AND 23) IV. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNULMENT OR DECLARATION OF NULLITY FC48, 53 4 Enrico vs. Medinaceli, G.R. No. 173614, September 28, 2007 5 Carlos v Sandoval, GR 179922, December 16, 2008 6 Ablaza v Republic, G.R. No. 158298, August 11, 2010 7 Aurelio v Aurelio, GR 175367, June 6, 2011 1 Republic v CA, G.R. No. 159594, November 12, 2012 2 Mendoza v Republic, GR 157854, November 12, 2012 V. FOREIGN MARRIAGES AND FOREIGN DIVORCES (a) As to form, NCC 17 (1) and (2) (b) As to substantive requirements, NCC 15 & 17 (3) FC 26; FC 21, FC 10, FC 35(1), 35(4), 35(5), 36, 37 & 38

3 Arca vs Javier, July 31, 1954 4 Tenchavez v. Escao, 15 SCRA 355 5 Van Dorn v. Romillo, 139 SCRA 139 6 Somera v. Pilapil, 174 SCRA 663 7 Quita vs CA, 300 SCRA 406 1 Llorente vs CA, 345 SCRA 592 2 Garcia vs. Recio, 366 SCRA 437 3 RP vs. Orbecido, G.R.No. 154380, Oct. 5, 2005 4 Corpus v Sto Tomas, G.R. No. 186571, August 11, 2010 5 Llave v Republic, GR 169766, March 30, 2011 VI. EFFECTS OF DEFECTIVE MARRIAGE FC 52, 53, 50, 147, 148, 63 VII. RULES ON FORFEITURE OF THE SHARE OF THE GUILTY SPOUSE FC 43 (2), 50 (1), 63 (2), 147, 148 VIII. WHEN THERE IS DELIVERY OF PRESUMTPIVE LEGITIMES

FC 102 (5), 43 (2), 50 (2), 51, 102 (5), 63 (2), 102, 129, 135 6 Dino v Dino, GR 178044, January 19, 2011 7 Yu v Reyes-Carpio, GR 189207, June 15, 2011 IX. LEGAL SEPARATION 1. Grounds for legal separation Art. 55 FC, RA 9262 1 Kalaw v Fernandez, GR 166357, September 19, 2011 2. Defenses in actions for legal separation FC 56, 60 2 Lapuz v. Eufemio 43 SCRA 177 3 Matubis v. Praxedes 109 Phil 789

(a) Consent FC 56(2); NCC 100 4 Matubis v. Praxedes, supra 5 People v. Sansano 50 Phil 73 6 People v. Schneckenberger 73 Phil 413 (b) Condonation FC 56(1) 7 Ginez v. Bugayong 100 Phil 616 (c) Recrimination FC 56(4) 1 Brown v. Yambao 102 Phil 168 (d) Collusion/Mutual Consent FC 60 FC 56(3), (5), compare with NCC 101 and 221(3) Brown v. Yambao, supra 1 Ocampo v. Florenciano 107 Phil 35 2 Mendoza v Republic, GR 157854, November 12, 2012 3. Court procedure in legal separation FC 58-60; Sec 19, RA 9262 No confession of judgment, FC 48; cf. NCC 2035

4. Effect of pendency of the petition

(a) (b) (c) (d)

cooling-off period, FC 58 right of consortium, FC 61 par. 1 administration of property, FC 61 par. 2 Support and custody pendente lite

5. Effects of decree of legal separation (a) On personal relations, FC 63 (b) On the custody of children, FC 63(3); FC 213 (c) On property relations, FC 63(2), FC 64, FC Art. 102 (4), 129 (7) (d) On support, FC 198 (e) On the use of surname, NCC 372 (f) On hereditary rights, FC 63(4) 8. Reconciliation, FC 65-67 9. Effects of reconciliation, FC 65, 66 X. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SPOUSES 1. General rule and exceptions - FC 68 71; FC 72, 100; 127; 101, NCC 921 (4) 3 Goitia v. Campos-Rueda, supra 4 Arroyo v. Vasques-Arroyo 42 Phil 54 5 Ilusorio vs. Bildner, G.R. No. 139789. May 12, 2000. 2. Designation of domicile - FC 69 3. Joint management of family life - FC 70, 94 (last par.), 122, 146

4. Joint Obligation to Support - FC 70,194, 94 (1), 122, 146 6 SSS v De los Santos, G.R. No. 164790, August 29, 2008 5. The right to exercise a profession or calling, FC 73 6. Related rights/obligations 7 Rep. v Molina, G.R. No. 108763 February 13, 1997 XI. PROPERTY RELATIONS OF THE SPOUSES A. Marriage settlements, FC 74, 75, 130 (3); 103 (3) 1. Form & registration requirement, FC 77, NCC 1357, 1358, NCC 709 1 Valencia v Loquiao, GR 122134, October 3, 2003 2. Donations propter nuptias, FC 81 cf. Art. 86 (1), FC 82 87, NCC Arts. 748-749, NCC 761, NCC 765; FC Art. 50; 43 (3), FC 48; 44; 61 2 Solis vs Solis, 53 Phil 912 [1928] 3 Mateo vs Lagua, 29 SCRA 864 3. Parties to a marriage settlement - FC 78, NCC Art. 38, 39, FC 79, RPC 34, FC 135 (1) 4. Which law governs property relations - FC 80, NCC 16 and 17. 5. Void donations by the spouses, FC 87 4 Matabuena v. Cervantes 38 SCRA 284 5 Bienvenido v. Court of Appeals, 237 SCRA 676

6 Sumbad vs CA, 308 CRA 575 7 SSS v Davac, G.R. No. L-21642. July 30, 1966 1 Arcaba vs. Tabancura, G.R. No. 146683. Nov. 22, 2001 2 Ching v Goyanko, GR 165879, November 10, 2006 B. Absolute community of property (ACP) FC 88, 91, 92, 93 1. When applicable, FC 75, 103 (3); 130 (3); 92 (3) 2. Commencement, FC 88 3. Waiver during marriage, FC 89 4. Waiver after marriage, FC 89 par. 2 cf NCC Art. 168 5. Suppletory rules: Co-ownership, FC 90; of NCC 484-501 6. What constitutes ACP, FC 91 Memorize! (a) (b) (c) (d) All property at time of marriage Property acquired subsequently Winnings from gambling, FC as of NCC 164 Presumption of ACP, FC 93 of NCC 160 3 Muller v Muller, G.R. NO. 149615, August 29, 2006 4 Pacific Ace v Yanagisawa, G.R. No. 175303, April 11, 2012 5 Beumer v Amores, GR 195670, December 3, 2012 7. What is excluded from ACP, FC 92; FC 95 6 Abrenica v Abrenica, G.R. No. 180572, June 18, 2012 8. Charges upon ACP, FC 94

(a) Family expenses cf. FC 100 (3), FC 121(5) and FC 94 (4), (5) (b) Debts of spouses, Art. 94 (2) and (3) (c) Subsidiary liabilities, Art. 94 (9) 7 Buado vs. CA, G.R. No. 145222, April 24, 2009 (d) Sole obligations of a spouse, Art. 94 (e) Gambling losses, FC 95 (f) Other charges, Art. 94 10. Administration and enjoyment of ACP (a) Joint administration, FC 96; FC 90 1 Dar v Legasto, G.R. No. 143016, August 30, 2000 (b) Sole administration (1) (2) (3) (5) incapacity, FC 96 (2) no court order separation in fact FC 100 (3) with court abandonment, FC 101 with court order pendency of legal separation proceeding, FC 61 with court order

(c) Disposition and encumbrance, FC 96-98 2 Matthews vs. Taylor, GR 164584, June 22, 2009 11. Effect of separation de facto, FC 100; 101; cf. FC 239 summary proceedings for court authority to dispose 12. Effect of abandonment, FC 101, FC 72 damages, rescission/nullity of a contract

13. Dissolution of ACP, FC 99, 102, 43 (2); FC 63(2), 104 (a) Death, FC 103 cf. Rule 73 Sec. 12 ROC 3 Heirs of Go v Servacio, GR 157537, Sept. 7, 2011 (b) Legal separation, FC 63(2); FC 66 (c) Annulment and declaration of nullity, FC 50 in rel. to FC 43 (2) (d) Judicial separation of property, FC 134-138 4 Ugalde v Ysasi, GR 130623, February 29, 2008 14. Effects of dissolution (a) Liquidation procedure, FC 102 5 Quiao v Quiao, G. R. No. 183622, July 4, 2012 (b) For cause other than death, FC 43 (2); FC 63(2); 147; 148 (c) Termination due to death, FC 104 6 Dino v Dino, GR 178044, January 19, 2011 7 Yu v Reyes-Carpio, GR 189207, June 15, 2011 C. Conjugal partnership of gains 1 Quiao v Quiao, G. R. No. 183622, July 4, 2012 2 Orpiano vs Tomas, G.R. No. 178611, Jan. 14, 2013 1. When CPG commences and applies (a) Marriages under FC, FC 107 cf. FC 88, FC 89 (b) Marriages before FC, FC 105(2) of FC 256 (c) Suppletory rules, FC 108 cf. NCC 1767-1768 2. What is included in the CPG, FC Art. 106

a. Presumption of CPG, FC 116 3 Titan v David, G.R. No. 169548, March 15, 2010 4 Imani vs. Metrobank, G.R. No. 187023, November 17, 2010. 5 Dewara v Lamela, GR 179010, April 11, 2011 b. What are included in CPG, FC 106, 117, 115, 118, 119, 120 6 Villanueva vs CA, 427 SCRA 439 7 Mendoza v. Reyes 124 SCRA 154 1 Canete v PNB, April 2011 2 De La Pena v Avila, Feb. 2012 3. What is excluded from CPG, FC 109 3 Laperal v. Katigbak, 10 SCRA 493 4 Veloso v. Martinez, 28 Phil 255 5 Berciles v. GSIS,128 SCRA 53, cf. FC 115 6 Plata v. Yatco, 12 SCRA 718 7 Francisco v CA, 1998 4. Administration of exclusive property (a) By the spouse-owner, FC 110 (b) By the other spouse, FC 110 2nd par; FC 142, 75, 227 1 Veloso v. Martinez, supra 5. Encumbrance/disposition of exclusive property FC 111-112, of FC 236, amended by RA 6809 2 Wong et al. v. IAC 200 SCRA 792 6. If property bought by installments, FC Art. 118, 119

3 Jovellanos v CA, G.R. No. 100728 June 18, 1992 4 Tarrosa vs. De Leon, GR 185063, July 23, 2009 7. Improvements on CPG property, FC 120 5 Munoz, Jr. v Ramirez, GR 156125, August 25, 2010 8. Charges upon and obligations of CPG, FC 121, 122, 123 6 Ayala vs CA, 286 SCRA 272 7 Ching vs CA, 423 SCRA 356 1 Homeowners vs. Dailo, G.R. 153802, Mar.11, 2005 2 Ando v Campo, GR 184007, February 16, 2011 3 Security Bank vs. Mar Tiera Corp., G.R. No. 143382, Nov. 29, 2006 4 Ravina v Villa-Abrille, GR No. 160708, Oct. 16, 2009 5 Hernandez v Mingoa, G.R. No. 146548, Dec. 18, 2009 6 Fuentes v Roca, GR No. 178902, April 21, 2010 7 Aguete v PNB, GR 170166, April 6, 2011 9. Ownership, administration and enjoyment (a) Joint administration, FC 124 cf. FC 96, 142 1 Homeowners vs. Dailo, G.R. No. 153802, Mar. 11, 2005 2 Alinas vs Alinas, GR No. 158040, April 14, 2008 3 Docena vs. Lapesura, 355 SCRA 658 4 Aggabao vs. Parulan, G.R. No. 165803, Sept. 1, 2010 (b) Sole administration (1) Incapacity, FC 124, 253 5 Uy vs. CA, 346 SCRA 246 (2) Separation in fact, FC 100 (3), 127(3) (3) Abandonment, FC 101, 128 (4) Pendency of legal separation proceedings, FC 61

10. Disposition and encumbrance, FC 124-125; FC 97, 121, 6 Cheeseman v. IAC 193 SCRA 93 7 Frenzel vs. Catito, G.R. No. 143958, July 11, 2003 1 Alinas vs. Alinas, G.R. No. 158040, April 14, 2008 2 Siochi v Gozon, G.R. No. 169900, March 18, 2010 3 Ravina v Abrille, GR 160708, Oct. 16, 2009 4 Fuentes v Roca, GR 178902, April 21, 2010 5 Aguete v PNB, GR 170166, April 6, 2011 6 Flores v Lindo, GR 183984, April 13, 2011 11. Effect of separation de facto, FC 127, FC 100 cf. FC 239 12. Effect of abandonment, FC 128 cf. FC 101 7 Partosa-Jo v. CA 216 SCRA 693 13. Dissolution of CPG, FC 126, 129 1 Tarrosa vs De Leon, GR 185063, July 23, 2009 2 Cabreza v Cabreza, GR 171260, September 11, 2009 3 Heirs of Go v Servacio, GR 157537, Sept. 7, 2011 4 Ugalde v Ysasi, GR 130623, February 29, 2008 5 Dino v Dino, GR 178044, January 19, 2011 6 Yu v Carpio, GR 189207, June 15, 2011 7 Quiao v Quiao, G. R. No. 183622, July 4, 2012 D. Regime of separation of property (a) In the marriage settlements, FC 143-146 (b) When mandatory, FC 103 & FC 130 (c) Reconciliation in legal separation, FC 66(2) (d) Judicial separation of property, 134 - 146 1 Ugalde v Ysasi, GR 130623, February 29, 2008 E. Property regime of unions without marriage 1. Unions under FC 147, 6, 35, 36, 53 2 Valdes v. QC RTC, G.R. No. 122749, July 31, 1996 3 Carino vs. Carino, GR 132539, February 3, 2001

Gonzales vs Gonzales, 478 SCRA 327 4 Dio v Dio, GR 178004, January 19, 2011 2. Unions under FC 148, 35, 37, 38, cf FC 50 in rel. to FC 43(2) 5 Belcodero v. CA 227 SCRA 303 6 Agapay vs Agapay, 276 SCRA 340 7 Tumlos vs. Sps. Fernandez, G.R. No. 137650, Apr 12, 2000 1 Atienza vs.de Castro,G.R. No. 1695698, Nov. 29, 2006 2 Signey v SSS, GR No. 173582, Jan. 28, 2008 3 Borromeo vs Descallar, GR No. 159310, Feb. 24, 2009 4 Heirs of Maramag vs De Guzman, GR 181132, June 5, 2009 5 Labayan v Samoy, GR 165427, March 21, 2011 XII. THE FAMILY, FC 149 15, NCC 2035 6 Tribiana vs.Tribiana, G.R. No. 137359, Sept. 13, 2004 7 Hiyas Savings vs. Acua, G.R. NO. 154132, August 31, 2006 XIII. FAMILY HOME, FC 152-162 [exclude FC 157, 161, 162] 1 Patricio vs. Dario, G.R. No. 170829, November 20, 2006 2 Arriola v Arriola, GR 177703, January 28, 2008 3 Modequillo v. Breva, 185 SCRA 766 4 Cabang vs Basay, GR No. 180587, March 20, 2009 5 Ramos v Pangilinan, GR 185920, July 20, 2010 6 Equitable v OJ Mark, G.R. No. 165950, August 11, 2010 7 De Mesa v Acero, Jan. 16, 2011 1 Fortaleza v Lapitan, GR 178288, August 15, 2012 XIV. PATERNITY AND FILIATION A. Concept of paternity, filiation and legitimacy, FC 163 2 Arbolario v CA, G.R. No. 129163, April 22, 2003

B. LEGITIMATE CHILDREN, FC 164 3 Tan v. Trocio, 191 SCRA 764 4 Angeles vs Maglaya, 469 SCRA 363 5 SSS vs. Aguas, G.R. 165546, Feb. 27, 2006 6 Rivera vs Villanueva, GR No. 141501, July 21, 2006 7 Suntay v Suntay, GR 183053, October 10, 2012 1. Who are considered legitimate children A. LEGITIMATE PROPER, FC 164 (a) Conceived during marriage cf. ROC Rule 131 Sec. 3(dd) FC Art. 168 1. valid marriage 2. terminated marriage under FC 42 in rel. to FC 43(1) 3. void marriages under FC 53, 36 4. voidable marriages, FC 45 1 Suntay v Suntay, GR 132524, Dec. 29, 1998 (b) Born during marriage (c) Conceived by artificial insemination cf. NCC 40, FC 164 2. Proof of Filiation Of legitimate children, FC 172-173 2 Trinidad vs. Court of Appeals, 289 SCRA 188, April 20, 1998 3 De Jesus vs. Estate of Juan Gamboa Dizon, 366 SCRA 499 4 Ong vs. Diaz, December 17, 2007 5 Lee v CA, GR No. 177861, July 13, 2010 6 Makati Shangrila v Harper, GR 189998, August 29, 2012

3. Rights of legitimate children, FC 173-174, NCC 364, 374, 376, NCC 888, NCC 979 4. Action to impugn legitimacy 7 Reyes vs. Mauricio, G.R. No. 175080, November 24, 2010 1 Republic v Magpayo, GR 189476, Feb. 2, 2011 5. Groundsto impugn legitimacy, FC 166 (a) Physical impossibility of access 2 Andal v. Macaraig, 89 Phil 165 3Concepcion vs. CA, G.R. No. 123450, Aug. 31, 2005 (b) Biological or other scientific grounds, FC 170, 171 4 Estate of Rogelio Ong v. Minor Joanne 5 Diaz, G.R. No. 171713, Dec. 17, 2007 6 Lucas v Lucas, GR No. 190710, June 6, 2011 (c.) FC 166(3) 6. Effect of a mothers declaration, FC 167 7. In subsequent marriages, FC 168, 169 7 People v Quitoriano, January 20, 1997 8. Presumptions, FC 170, 171 4. ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN 1. Who are considered illegitimate, FC 165 1 Joanie Surposa Uy v Jose Ngo Chua, G.R. No. 183965, September 18, 2009

2. Rights of illegitimate children, FC 173, 172, 175-176 2 Montefalcon v Vasquez, GR No. 165016, June 17, 2008 3 Maramag vs De Guzman, GR 181132, June 5, 2009 4 De la Cruz vs Gracia, G.R. No. 177728, July 31, 2009 5 Uy v Chua, G.R. No. 183965, September 18, 2009 6 Manungas v Loreto, GR 193161, August 22, 2011 7 Gotardo v Buling, GR 165166, August 15, 2012 3. Proof of filiation, FC 175 1 Jison vs. CA, 286 SCRA 495 2 Rivero v CA, G.R. NO. 141273, May 17, 2005 3 Intestate Estate Delgado v Heirs of Rustia G.R. NO. 155733, January 27, 2006 4 Heirs of Gabatan vs CA, GR 150206, March 13, 2009 5 Jenie San Juan Dela Cruz , et al vs. Ronald Paul S. 6 Gracia, G.R. No. 177728, July 31, 2009 7 Lucas v Lucas, G.R. No. 190710, June 6, 2011 1 Gotardo v Buling, GR 165166, August 15, 2012 2 Perla v Baring, GR 172471, November 12, 2012 4. Compulsory recognition, cf. RPC 345 3 People vs. Magtibay, G.R. No. 142985. Aug. 6, 2002 4 People v Abella, G.R. No. 177295, January 6, 2010 5. LEGITIMATED CHILDREN 1. Who may be legitimated, FC 177, RA 9858 5 Abadilla vs Tabiliran, 249 SCRA 447 2. How legitimation takes place, FC 178, FC 180 3. Retroactivity and effects, FC 180-181 4. Action to impugn legitimation, FC 182

5. Rights of legitimated children, FC 179 5. ADOPTED CHILDREN 6 Lazatin v. Campos, 92 SCRA 250 7 Cervantes v. Fajardo, 169 SCRA 575 R.A. 8552 (Domestic Adoption Law) R.A. 8043 (Inter-Country Adoption Law) 1. Who may adopt Sec. 7, 8552 1 Michelle Lim, GR 168992, May 21, 2009 2 Republic v. Toledano, 233 SCRA 9 2. Who may be adopted Sec. 8 3. Need for consent Sec. 9 3 Landingin vs. RP, G.R. No. 164948, June 27, 2006 4. Effects of a decree of adoption, Secs. 13, 16, 17 and 18 4 Tamargo v. CA, 209 SCRA 518 5 Cervantes v. Fajardo, 169 SCRA 575 6 Stephanie Garcia, 454 SCRA 541 5. Rescission of adoption, Sec. 19, 20 7 Lahom vs. Sibulo, G.R. No. 143989, July 14, 2003 XV. SUPPORT A. What comprises support, FC 194 B. Who are obliged to provide support, FC 195, 196, 199 1 Pelayo v. Lauron, 12 Phil 453 2 Sanchez v. Zulueta, 68 Phil 110

3 De Asis vs. CA, G.R. No. 127578, Feb. 15, 1999 4 Rondina v People, GR 179059, June 13, 2012 5 Gotardo v Buling, GR 165166, August 15, 2012 6 Perla v Baring, GR 172471, November 12, 2012 7 Calderon vs Roxas, G.R. No. 185595, Jan. 09, 2013 C. Source of support, FC 197-198, cf. FC 49, 70, 94, 121, 122 1Lerma v. CA, 61 SCRA 440 2 Reyes vs Ines-Luciano, 88 SCRA 803 D. Order of support, FC 199, 200, 204 3 Mangonon vs. CA, G.R. No. 125041, June 30, 2006 4 Spouses Lim v Lim, G.R. No. 163209, October 30, 2009 E. Manner and time of payment, FC 200-208 F. Renunciation and Termination, NCC 2035; FC 194 G. Support pendente lite, FC 198 XVI. PARENTAL AUTHORITY & CUSTODY OF CHILDREN A. Concept of parental authority, FC 209, 211 1 Medina vs. Makabali, 27 SCRA 502, March 28, 1969 2 Unson vs. Navarro, 101 SCRA 183, November 17, 1980 B. Transfer of PA, FC 210 cf. FC 223-224, FC 234 3 Eslao vs CA, 266 SCRA 317 C. Who exercises PA, FC 211-213 cf. FC 49, 102(6). 129 (9)and 63(2), Art. 176 4 Unson v. Navarro 101 SCRA 183

5 Espiritu & Layug v. CA, G.R. No. 115640 (1995) 6 Santos Sr. v. C.A., G.R. No. 113054 (1995) 7 David vs. Court of Appeals, 250 SCRA 82, November 16, 1995 1 Briones vs. Miguel, G.R. No. 156343, October 18, 2004 2 Gualberto vs. Gualberto, G.R. No. 154994. June 28, 2005 3 Salientes vs Salientes, 500 SCRA 128 4 People v Marquez, April 13, 2011 D. Substitute PA, FC 212-214, 216, FC 233 5 Vancil vs Belmes, 358 SCRA 707 E. Special PA, FC 218-219, FC 233, cf. FC 221 in rel. to NCC 2180 6 St. Marys vs. Carpitanos, G.R. No. 143363, February 6, 2002 7 Child Learning Centre vs. Tagario, GR 150920, Nov. 25, 2005 1 Holy Spirit vs. Taguiam, GR 165565, July 14, 2008 2 AquinasSchool v Inton, GR 184202, January 26, 2011 F. Effects of PA over the childs person, FC 220-222, FC 223-224 3 Cuadra v. Monfort, 35 SCRA 160 4 Republic v Sagun, GR 187567, February 15, 2012 G. Filial privilege, FC 215 H. Effects of PA over the childs property, FC 225-227 RA 9231, Secs. 12-B and 12-C 5 Hebron vs. Loyola, G.R. No. 168960, July 5, 2010 6 Neri v Heirs, GR 194366, October 10, 2012 7 Lindain v. CA, 212 SCRA 725 I. Suspension or termination of PA, FC 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, cf 193 cf. RA 6809

XV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS, FC 356 363 XVI. SUMMARY JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS, FC 238-252

PROPERTY I. Classification of property, NCC 414 A. Immovable or real, 415 B. Movable, 416, 417 1 Lopez v Orosa, 103 Phil. 98 2 Associated Insurance v Iya, 103 SCRA 3 Tumalad v Vicencio, 41 SCRA 143 4 Board of Assessments v Meralco, 10 SCRA 68 5 Berkenkotter c Cu Unjieng, 61 Phil 663 6 Davao Sawmill v Castillo, 61 Phil. 709 II. Character of Ownership, NCC 419-425 A. Public domain 7 Government v Cabangis, 53 Phil. 112 1 MIAA v City of Pasay, April 2, 2009, G.R. No. 163072 2 MIAA v CA, et al., July 20, 2006, G.R. No. 155650 3 Republic v Vega, GR 177790, January 17, 2011 4 Victoria v Republic, G.R. No. 179673, June 8, 2011 B. Patrimonial property of the State 5 Laurel v Garcia, 187 SCRA 797 6 Rep. v Rizalvo, GR 172011, March 7, 2011 C. Private ownership, NCC 421 7 Tan Toco v Muni. Of Iloilo, GR 24950, 25 March 1926 1 Zamboanga v Zamboanga, G.R. No. L-24440, June 30, 1969 2 Casimiro v Mateo, GR 175845, July 27, 2011

III. Essential Form IV. Designation V. Susceptibility to Substitution VI. Aptitude for repeated use, NCC 418 VII. Susceptibility to Division VIII. Existence in Time IX. Dependence 3 Arriola v Arriola, GR 177703, January 28, 2008 BUNDLE OF RIGHTS A. Ownership, NCC 427 - 439 4 Lunod v Meneses, G.R. No. 4223, August 19, 1908 5 NAPOCOR v Ibrahim, GR No. 168732, June 29, 2007 6 Aneco Realty v Landex, 560 SCRA 182 7 Padilla v Velasco, et al, GR No. 169956, January 19, 2009 1 Datu v Lantud, GR 162551, July 18, 2011 2 Corpuz v Agustin, GR 183822, Jan. 18, 2012 3 Edralin v PVB, 2011 4 Ermitano v Paglas, GR 174436, Jan. 2013 5 Isip v Quintos, G.R. No. 172008, AUG-20126 Villondo v Quijano, C.R No. 173606, December 3, 2012 7 Top Management v Fajardo, June 15, 2011 1 Mananquil v Moico, G.R. No. 180076, Nov, 21, 2012 2 Chung v Mondragon, 179754, Nov. 21, 2012 B. Right of Accession, NCC 440 474 3 Bachrach v Siefert, 87 Phil. 117 4 Bachrach v Talisay-Silay, 56 Phil. 117 5 Tuatis v Escol, Oct. 27, 2009, GR No. 175399

6 Vda. De Roxas v Our Lady, GR 182378, March 2013 7 Ortiz v Kayanan, 92 SCRA 146 1 Narvaez v Alciso, July 27, 2009, GR No. 165907 2 New Regent v Tanjautco, April 16, 2009, GR No. 168800 3 Fernando v Acuna, Sept. 14, 2011 4 Republic v Santos, November 12, 2012 C. Co-Ownership, NCC 484 494 NOTE: Condominium Law, RA 4762 as amended by RA 7899. EXCLUDED 5 Pardell v Bartolome, G.R. No. L-4656, November 18, 1912 6 Dailisan v CA, 560 SCRA 351 7 Cruz v Catapang, GR No. 164110, Feb. 12, 2008 1 Plasabas v CA, March 31, 2009, GR No. 168139 2 Republic v Heirs, 549 SCRA 58 3 Monteroso v CA, 533 SCRA 66 (2008) 4 Quimpo v Abad, 545 SCRA 174 (2008) 5 Lacbayan v Samoy, GR 165427, March 21, 2011 6 Tecson v Francisco, GR 180683, June 1, 2011 7 Ampil v Manahan, 11 October 2012 1 Figuracion v Gerilla, February 13, 2013 D. Possession 1. Possession in the concept of a holder, NCC 525, 554, 561, 552, 1128, 526 2 Aranda v Republic, GR 172331, August 24, 2011 2. Concept of Owner, NCC 540 3 Decaleng v Bishop, G.R. No. 171209, June 27, 2012 4 Abobon v Abobon, GR 155830, August 12, 2012 a. Presumption of just title, NCC 541 5 Casimiro Development v Mateo, GR 175485, July 27, 2011

b. Good Faith, NCC 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 1132, 1134, 552 6 Cabigas v Limbaco, GR 175291, July 27, 2011 c. Bad faith, NCC549, 1132, 1137, 552 d. Applicable presumptions, NCC 541, 527, 559, 1505, 1132, 1518, 528, 529, 554, 561, 542, 426 7 Luga v Arciaga, GR 175343, July 27, 2011 3. Acquisition and loss of possession, NCC 531, 532, 555, 1125, 1189, 1120-1124 1 Republic v Aldana, 175578, August 11, 2010 E. Usufruct 1. Objects of Usufruct 2. Elements in a Usufruct 3. Classes of Usufruct - NCC 563, 563, FC 226, NCC 564, 756, 863, 869, 564, 574, 573, 564, 598-599, 758-759 4. Rights of Usufructuary NCC 566-569, 438, 570, 571-572, 590, 578-579, 594, 580 5. As to the Legal Right of Usufruct Itself NCC 580, 572 6. Obligations of the Usufructuary NCC 583, 586, 599, 585, 584, 587, FC 226, NCC 584 7. During the Usufruct NCC 589, 610, 590, 591, 592, 593,594, 595, 596-597, 610, 602 8. At the Time of the Termination of the Usufruct NCC 612

9. Special Cases of Usufruct NCC 570, 582, 591, 575-576, 578, 600, 598, 573, 574 2 Fabie v David, 75 Phil. 536 3 Baluran v Navarro, 79 SCRA 309 4 Gaboya v Cui, 38 SCRA 85 10.Rights of the Naked Owner NCC 574, 581 11. Extinguishment of the usufruct, NCC 603, 611, 606, 605, 607, 608, 1381, 709 5 Calingasan v Rivera, GR 171555, April 17, 2013 12.Conditions Not Affecting Usufruct NCC 609, 610, 607, 608 6 Albar v Carandang, 106 Phil. 855 F. Easements 1. Characteristics, NCC 613, 617, 618 7 Privatization v Legaspi Towers, July 22, 2009, GR No. 174957 1 Velasco v Cui, 105 SCRA 616 2 Valisno v Adriano, 161 SCRA 398 2. Kinds of easements, NCC 613, 615, 616, 619 3 La Vista v CA, 278 SCRA 498 4 Liwag v Happy Glen, July 4, 2012 3. Modes of acquiring easements, NCC 623, 624 4. Effects of Easement, NCC 625, 641, 626, 627, 628 5 Valderrama v North Negros, G.R. No. L-23810, December 18, 1925 6 Goldcrest v Cypress, GR No. 171072, April 7, 2009 7 NPC v Heirs of Makabangit, GR 165828, August 24, 2011 1 Cabahug v Napocor, January 30, 2013

5. Legal Easements - Water Code, Arts. 31-52, NCC 640-641, 642-646, 647, 649-657, 658-666, 667-673 2 Valdez v Tabisula, 560 SCRA 332 92008 3 St. Michael v Masaito, GR 166301, Feb. 29, 2008 4 Quintanilla v Abangan, 544 SCRA 494 5 Obra v Sps Badua, GR 149125, Aug. 9, 2007 6 Dichoso v Marcos, GR 180282, April 11, 2011 7 Regala v Carin, GR 188715, April 6, 2011 1 Fabie v Lichauco, 11 Phil. 15 6. Other easements NCC 674-676, 677-681, 682-683,667-673 2 Calma v CA, 176 SCRA 556 3 Gancayco v QC, GR 177807, October 11, 2011 4 Unisource Commercial v Chung, July 17, 2009, GR No. 73252 7. Extinguishment of Easements NCC 631, 655 DIFFERENT MODES OF ACQUIRING OWNERSHIP A. In general, NCC 712 5 Acap v CA, 251 SCRA 30 B. Modes of Acquiring Ownership 1. Intellectual Creation * Now governed by the Intellectual Property Code and the TRIPS Agreement. 2. Occupation, NCC 713-720 6 Palero-Tan v Urdaneta, A.M. P-07-2399, June 18, 2008 3. Law, NCC 681, 1434, 1456 4. Tradition, NCC 1496-1501

5. Donation, NCC 725 769 a. Features Seventh Day Adventist v. Northeastern Mindanao, 496 SCRA 215 b. Classifications 7 Del Rosario v Ferrer, 630 SCRA 683 c. Form 1 Pajarillo v IAC, 176 SCRA 340 2 Echavez v Dozen, GR 192916, October 11, 2010 d. Distinctions between inter vivos and mortis causa 3 Del Rosario v Ferrer, 630 SCRA 683 e. Limitations a. Who may donate, NCC 735, 41, 1390 (1) b. Who may be a donee, NCC 738 c. Void donations, 739 (1), 736 4 Insular Life v Ebrado, L-44059, Oct. 28, 1977 5 Republic v AFP, citing Tayato v Heirs of Kusop, Jan. 16, 2013 d. Others, NCC 740, 1027, 1028, 1027 (ex par. 4), 741 744, 1544, 745, 746 6. Reduction and revocation, NCC 760-773 6 CentralPhilippinesUniversity v CA, 246 SCRA 511 7 Lazaro v CA, 287 SCRA 18 1 Imperial v CA, GR 112483, October 8, 1999

7. Prescription NCC 1106-1155 2 Solis v CA, 176 SCRA 678 3 Republic v Rizalvo, GR 172011, March 7, 2011 (a) Distinctions between Acquisitive and Extinctive Prescription Rule 9, Sec. 1 (1997) 4 Sunga v De Guzman, June 19, 1979 5 Overseas Bank v Geraldez, December 28, 1979 6 Ledesma v CA, 224 SCRA 174 7 Tanyag v Gabriel, April 11, 2012 1 Mercado v Espenocilla, February 1, 2012 (b) Distinctions between Extinctive Prescription and Laches 2 Miguel v Catalino, November 29, 1968 3 Lola v CA, 145 SCRA 439 (c ) Special Cases 4 Espiritu v CFI, October 31, 1972 5 Solidarios v Alampay, January 28, 1975 6 Jalandoni v PNB, October 9, 1981 7 Republic v CFI, January 27, 1983 8. Succession C. Modes of Extinguishing Ownership SUCCESSION I. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. Definition and Concept, NCC 774, 776, 712, 1311 1 Estate of Hemady v Luzon Surety, 2 Alvarez v IAC, G.R. No. L-68053 May 7, 1990

3 National Housing Authority v Almeida, 525 SCRA 383 4 Nazareno v Court of Appeals, 343 SCRA 637 B. Subjects of Succession, NCC 775, 902, 782, 887, 1003 1. Who are the subjects? NCC 775, 782 2. Relationship, NCC 963-969 3. Capacity to succeed a. Determination, NCC 1034, 1039, 16 (2) 5 Cayetano v Leonides, 129 SCRA 522 b. Who may succeed? NCC 1024-26, 1029-30 6 Parish Priest of Victoria v Rigor, 89 SCRA 493 c. Who are incapable of succeeding? NCC 1027-28, 1031-33 d. Effect of alienations by the excluded heir, NCC 1038 e. Prescription of Action, NCC 1040 C. Object of Succession, NCC 776, 781, 1311, 1429, 1178, 1347 Art. 108, RPC 7 Reyes v Dimagiba, L-5620, July 31, 1954 1 Estate of Hemady v Luzon Surety, G.R. No. L-8437. November 28, 1956. 2 Guinto v Medina, 50 O.G., #1 3 Nazareno v CA, October 18, 2000 4 Heirs of Ureta v Ureta, September 14, 2011 D. Opening of Succession NCC 777, 781, 2263, 2253, 533, 1347, 1461, 130, 132, 390, 391, FC 84, 86 Requisites for the transmission of successional rights 1. Express will of the testator or provision of law

2. Death of the person whose property is the subject of succession 3. Acceptance of the inheritance NCC 1041-1057 5 Uson v del Rosario, No. L-4693, 29 January 1953 6 Pacio v Billon, No. L-15088, 31 January 1961 7 Butte v Manuel Uy & Sons, Inc., No. L-15499, 18 February 1962 1 Salvador v Sta. Maria, No. L-25952, 30 June 1967 2 Reganon v Imperial, No. L-24434, 17 January 1968 3 Ramirez v Baltazar, No. L-25049, 30 August 1968 4 De Borja v Vda. de Borja, No. L-28040, 18 August 1972 5 Bonilla v Barcena, No. L-41715, 18 June 1976 6 Go Ong v Court of Appeals, No. L-75884, 24 September 1987 7 Heirs of Spouses Sandejas v Lina, G.R. No. 141634, 5 February 2001 1 Santos v Lumbao, G.R. No. 169129, 28 March 2007 2 Reyes v RTC, G.R. No. 165744, 11 August 2008 3 Puno v Puno Enterprises, Inc., G.R. No. 177066, 11 September 2009 4 Cabalu v Tabu, G.R. No. 188417, September 24, 2012 E. Kinds of succession, NCC 778 1. Testamentary, NCC 779 2. Legal or intestate, NCC 960 3. Mixed, NCC 780 4. Contractual, NCC 130, 1347, 752, FC 84 5 Blas v Santos, No. L-14070, 29 March 1961 6 Balus v Balus, G.R. No. 168970, January 15, 2010 7 Santos v Lumbao, 519 SCRA 408 1 Union Bank vs. Santibaez, G.R. No. 149926, February 23, 2005 2 Estate of Carungcong vs. People, G.R. No. 181409, February 11, 2010

TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION II. WILLS A. Definition, NCC 783 3 Vitug v CA, G.R. No. 82027 March 29, 1990 B. Characteristics, NCC 783, 839 (3) and (4), 828, 796-798, 777, 818, 784 - 787. C. Interpretation of Wills, NCC 788, 789, 790-794, 930 4 Solla v Ascueta, 49 Phil. 333 5 Dizon-Rivera v Dizon, No. L-24561, 30 June 1970 6 Vda. De Villaflor v Juico, No. L-15737, 28 February 1962 D. Law governing form 1. Time of execution, NCC 795 2. Place of execution, NCC 17, 810, 815-819 7 In re Will of Rev. Abadia, 50 O.G. #9, p. 4185 1 Fleumer v Hix, 54 Phil 610 2 Estate of Giberson, 48 O.G. #7, 2657 3 Dela Cerna v Potot, 12 SCRA 576 E. Law governing content 1. Time NC 2263 2. Successional rights, etc NCC 16 4 Estate of Christensen, 61 O.G. #46, p. 7302 5 Estate of Amos Bellis, 20 SCRA 358 6 Cayetano v Leonides, 129 SCRA 524

III. TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY AND INTENT

A. Who may make a will? - NCC 796-803 B. Supervening incapacity NCC 801 7 Torres v Lopez, 48 Phil., 77 1 Baltazar v Laxa, G.R. No. 174489, April 11, 2012 IV SOLEMNITIES OF WILLS A. Kinds of Wills NCC 804, 810 B. Notarial Wills 1. General requirements NCC 804 2 Abangan v Abangan, G.R. No. L-13431, November 12, 1919 3 Suroza v Honrado, 110 SCRA 388 2. Specific requirements NCC 805, 806 4 Barut v Cabacungan, G.R. No. L-6285, February 15, 1912 5 Nera v Rimando, 18 Phil. 450 6 Payad v Tolentino, G.R. No. L-42258, January 15, 1936 7 Garcia v Lacuesta, 90 Phil. 489 1 Lopez v Liboro, No. L-1787, 27 August 1948 2 Reyes v Vda. De Vidal, No. L-2867, 21 April 1952 3 Matias v Salud, GR L-10907, Jan. 29, 1957 4 Javellana v Ledesma, 97 Phil. 258 5 Balonan v Abellana, 109 Phil. 358 6 Icasiano v Icasiano, 11 SCRA 422 7Garcia v Gatchalian, No. L-20357, 25 November 1967 1 Vda. De Ramos v CA, No. L-40804, 31 January 1978 2 Cruz v Villasor, 54 SCRA 31 3 Gabucan v Manta, 95 SCRA 752 4 Taboada v Rosal, 118 SCRA 195 5 Estate Of Abada v Abaja, G.R. No. 147145, 31 January 2005 6 Azuela v CA, G.R. No. 122880, 12 April 2006 7 Guerrero v. Bihis, G.R. No. 174144, 17 April 2007 1 Lee v Tambago, A.C. No. 5281, 12 February 2008

2 Samaniego v Abena, G. R. No. 145545,30 June 2008 3 Echavez v Dozen, 2010 4 Baltazar v Laxa, G.R. No. 174489, April 11, 2012 5 Lopez v Lopez, G.R. No. 189984, Nov. 12, 2012 a. Witnesses to a will (i) Who are competent? NCC 820, 821, 824 6 Gonzales v CA, 90 SCRA 183 7 Nera v Rimando, 18 Phil. 450 1 Icasiano v Icasiano, 11 SCRA 422 2 Cagro v Cagro, G.R. No, L-5826, April 29, 1953 (ii) Supervening incompetency NCC 822 (iii) Competency of interested witnesses 823 3. Special requirements for deaf, etc. NCC 807-808 3 Garcia v Vasquez, 32 SCRA 489 4 Alvarado v Gaviola, G.R. No. 74695 September 14, 1993 4. Substantial compliance NCC 809 5 Gil v Murciano, No. L-3362, 1 March 1951 6 Caneda v CA, G.R. No. 103554, 28 May 1993 C. Holographic Wills 1. General requirements NCC 804 2. Specific requirements NCC 810, 812, 813 3. Probate NCC 811, 814 7 Roxas v De Jesus, 134 SCRA 245 1 Labrador v CA, L-83843, April 15, 1990 2 Kalaw v Relova, 132 SCRA 237 3 Azaola v Singson, G.R. No. L-14003, August 5, 1960 4 Codoy v Calugay, G.R. No. 123486. August 12, 1999 5 Gan v Yap, 104 Phil 509

6 Rodelas v Aranza, 119 SCRA 16 7 Rivera v IAC, No. L-75005-06, 15 February 1990 1 Ajero v CA, No. 106720, 15 September 1994 2 Baltazar v Laxa, 11 April 2012 3 Cabalu v Tadu, G.R. No. 188417 , Sept. 24, 2012 V. INCORPORATION OF DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE NCC 827 VI. CODICILS A, Definition NCC 825 B. Solemnities NCC 826 VII. REVOCATION OF WILLS AND TESTAMENTARY DISPOSITIONS A. Definition of revocation B. When may revocation be effected, NCC 828 C. Law governing revocation, NCC 829 D. Modes of revocation, NCC 830 4 Gago v Mamuyac, 49 Phil. 902 5 Casiano v CA, 158 SCRA 451 E. Effect of revocation, NCC 831-834 F. Doctrine of Dependent Relative Revocation 6 Diaz v de Leon, GR 17714, May 31, 1922 7 Molo v Molo, 90 Phil. 37 VIII. REPUBLICATION AND REVIVAL OF WILLS NCC 835-837 IX. ALLOWANCE OF WILLS NCC 838 1 Guevara v Guevara, December 29, 1943 2 De La Cerna v Potot, December 23, 1964 3 Gallonosa v Arcangel, 83 SCRA 676

4 Baltazar v Laxa, G.R. No. 174489, April 11, 2012 A. Concept of probate 5 Rodriguez v Rodriguez, G.R. No. 175720, 11 September 2007 6 Heirs Lasam v Umengan, G.R. No. 168156, 6 December 2006 7 Maninang v CA, No. L-57848, 19 June 1982 1 Pastor, Jr. v CA, No. L-56340, 24 June 1983 2 Quasha Law v LCN Construction, G.R. No. 174873, 26 August 2008 3 Jimenez v IAC, G.R. No. L-75773, 17 April 1990 4 Ozaeta v Cuartero, No. L-5597, 31 May 1956 5 Coso v Fernandez Deza, No. 16763, 22 December 1921 6 Nepomuceno v CA, 139 SCRA 206 7 Ortega v Valmonte, G.R. No. 157451, 16 December 2005 1 Dorotheo v CA, G.R. No. 108581, 8 December 1999 2 Palaganas v Palaganas, GR No. 169144, January 26, 2011 3 Agtarap v Agtarap, G.R. No. 177099, June 8, 2011 B. Necessity of probate 4 De Borja v De Borja, 46 SCRA 577 C. Modes of probate 5 Guevara v Guevara, December 29, 1943 D. Requirements for probate of a holographic will NCC 811 6 Gan v Yap, 104 Phil 509 7 Rodelas v Aranza, 119 SCRA 16 1 Azaola v Singson, 109 Phil 102 2 Codoy v Calugay, 312 SCRA 333 3 Nepomuceno v CA, 139 SCRA 206 E. Effect of allowance of wills 4 Gallonosa v Arcangel, 83 SCRA 676 5 Roberts v Leonides, 129 SCRA 33

6 Nepomuceno v CA, 139 SCRA 206 7 De la Cerna v Potot, December 23, 1964 X. DISALLOWANCE OF WILLS NCC 839, 1335, 1337, 1338 1 Pascual v de la Cruz, 28 SCRA 421 XI. LEGITIME A. Concept - NCC 886 B. Who are entitled to legitimes: Compulsory heirs NCC 782, 887, 902 2 Nuguid v Nuguid, 17 SCRA 449 3 Balanay v Martinez, 64 SCRA 452 4 Solano v CA, 126 SCRA 122 5 Rosales v Rosales, 148 SCRA 69 6 Acain v CA, 155 SCRA 100 7 Seangio v Reyes, G.R. No. 140372-72, 27 November 2006 1 J.L.T. Agro v. Balansag, 453 SCRA 211 2 Rep. v Manotoc, G. R. No. 171701, February 8, 2012 3 Neri v Heirs of Uy, G.R. No. 194366, Oct. 10, 2012 C. Concurrence of compulsory heirs and their corresponding legitimes. NCC 888-890, 892-901, 903, Article 39, P.D. 603, Sec. 18, Rep. Act 8552, FC 189-190 4 Baritua v CA, 82233, March 22, 1990 5 In re Petition for Adoption of Michelle Lim, 1689921, May 21, 2009 6 In the Matter of the Adoption of Stephanie Garcia, 148311, March 31, 2005 7 In the Matter of the Intestate Estate of Suntay, 183053, June 16, 2010 1 Suntay vs. Suntay, GR 183053, October 10, 2012

D. Restrictions regarding the legitime NCC 904, 872, 905-907, 1347 2 Ureta v Ureta, 165748, Sept. 14, 2011 E. Determination or computation NCC 908-913 COLLATION NCC 1061-1077 3 Dizon-Rivera v Dizon, 33 SCRA 554 4 De Roma v CA, 152 SCRA 205 5 Locsin v CA, 206 SCRA 383 6 Vizconde v CA, 118449, Feb. 11, 1998 7 Arellano v Pascual, 189776, Dec. 15, 2010 F. Freedom to dispose free portion NCC 914 Principles Affecting Legitime XII. PRETERITION NCC 854, 906, 855, 918 1 Escuin v Escuin, 11 Phil 332 2 Aznar v Duncan, 17 SCRA 590 3 Nuguid v Nuguid, 17 SCRA 449 4 Reyes v Barreto-Datu, 19 SCRA 85 5 Balanay v Martinez, 64 SCRA 452 6 Solano v CA, 126 SCRA 122 7 Acain v CA, 155 SCRA 100 1 Ureta v Ureta, Sept. 14, 2011 XIII. RESERVA TRONCAL NCC 891 2 Edroso v Sablan, 25 Phil 295 3 Sienes v Esparcia, 1 SCRA 750 4 Florentino v Florentino, 40 Phil 480 5 Padura v Baldovino, 104 Phil 1065 6 Chua v CFI, 78 SCRA 406 7 Gonzales v CFI, 104 SCRA 161 1 De Papa v Camacho, 144 SCRA 281

2 Mendoza v De los Santos, GR 176422, March 20, 2013 XIV. RESERVA ADOPTIVA Article 39 of PD 603 repealed by Article 254 of the Family Code 3 Banawa v Mirano, 87 SCRA 517 4 Teotico v del Val, 13 SCRA 406 XV. DISINHERITANCE NCC 915-923 5 Ching v Hon. Rodriguez, Nov. 28, 2011

Principles Affecting the Freely Disposable Portion XVI. INSTITUTION OF HEIRS A. In General 1. Definition, NCC 840 2. Requisites for valid institution of heirs. See NCC 785, 787 3. Effect if will institutes no heir, NCC 841 4. Freedom of disposition, NCC 842 6 Ureta v Ureta, Sept. 14, 2011 5. Manner of designating an heir, NCC 843-844 in rel to 789 6. Disposition in favor of an unknown person, NCC 845 7. Disposition in favor of a definite class, NCC 845 in rel to 786 8. Equality of heirs, NCC 846, 848 9. Individuality of institution, NCC 847 10. Simultaneity of institution, NCC 849 11. Institution based on a false cause, NCC 850 7 Austria v Reyes, 31 SCRA 754 12. Shares in the institution, NCC 851-853

13. Predecease of heirs, NCC 856 B. Kinds of Institution 1. Simple or Pure, NCC 777 2. Conditional, NCC 871 a. Kinds 1 Vda de Kilayko v Tengco, 207 SCRA 600 b. Inoperative Conditions, NCC 872-874, rel to 1183 c. Disposition Captatoria, NCC 875 d. Compliance, NCC 876-877, 2nd par. e. Effect, NCC 1034 3rd par., 879, 880, 881, 884 3. Institution with a Term a. Kinds NCC 885 1st par. b. Effect NCC 878, 885 2nd par. in rel 880 4. Modal Institution, NCC 882-883 XVII. SUBSTITUTION OF HEIRS A. Concept NCC 857 B. Kinds NCC 858 1. Simple or common 859 2. Brief or compendious 860 3. Reciprocal 860 4. Fideicommisary 863-869 2 Palacios v Ramirez, 111 SCRA 704 3 Crisologo v Singson, 49 SCRA 491 C. Time-limitation on inalienability NCC 870 XVIII. LEGACIES AND DEVISES NCC 924-959

4 Fernandez v Dimagiba, 21 SCRA 428 5 Belen v BPI, L-14474, Oct. 31, 1960 6 Villanueva v Branoco, GR 172804, January 24, 2011 LEGAL OR INTESTATE SUCCESSION XIX. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. In general 1. When does it take place? NCC 960 2. Who are the intestate heirs? NCC 961 7 Rosales v Rosales, 148 SCRA 69 3. Order and share in the intestate succession 962 1 De los Santos v De la Cruz, 37 SCRA 555 2 Bagunu v Piedad, 347 SCRA 571 3 Heirs of Uriarte v CA, 284 SCRA 511 B. Right of representation 970-977, 982, 902, 992, 1005-8 4 Teotico v Del Val, supra 5 Diaz v IAC, 150 SCRA 645 6 Abellana v Ferraris-Borromeo, 14 SCRA 986 7 Corpus v Corpus, 85 SCRA 567 1 Delgado v Rustia, 480 SCRA 334 XX. ORDER OF INTESTATE SUCCESSION A. Descending Direct Line 1. Estate of a legitimate decedent a. Illegitimate descendants, 983, 895, 988-992

2 Corpus v Corpus, 85 SCRA 567 3 Leonardo v CA, 120 SCRA 890 4 Diaz v IAC, 150 SCRA 645 5 Manuel v Ferrer, August 21, 1995 6 Bolanos v Bernarte, G.R. No. 180997, Nov. 17, 2010 2. Estate of an illegitimate decedent a. Legitimate children and descendants, 903, 987-994 b. Illegitimate children and descendants, 990, 992 7 Diaz v IAC, 150 SCRA 645 1 De la Puerta v CA, 181 SCRA 861 2 Suntay v Cojuangco, 621 SCRA 142 B. Surviving Spouse 995-1002 3 Santillon v Miranda, 14 SCRA 563 C. Ascending direct line 1. Legitimate parents and ascendants 985-987 2. Illegitimate parents 993 D. Collateral line 1003-1010 4 Bicomong v Almanza, 80 SCRA 421 5 Abellana v Borromeo, 14 SCRA 986 E. The State 1011-1014

PROVISIONS COMMON TO TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSION XXI. Right of Accretion A. Concept - 1015-1017, 1019-1020 B. In legal succession 1018

C. Testamentary - 1022-1023 XXII. PARTITION AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ESTATE A. Partition 1078-1090 [exclude NCC 1058-1060] 6 Legasto v Verzosa, G.R. No. L-32344, March 31, 1930 7 Fajardov Fajardo,G.R. No. L-32195, August 19, 1930 1 Tuason v Tuason, GR L-3404, April 2, 1951 2 Raquel Chavez v IAC, L-68282, Nov. 8, 1990 3 Alsua Betts v CA, 92 SCRA 332 4 Doromal v CA, L-36083, Sept. 2, 1975 5 Alonzo v IAC, 150 SCRA 517 6 Bautista v Grio-Aquino, 166 SCRA 760 7 De los Santos v De la Cruz, 37 SCRA 555 1 Ureta v Ureta, Sept. 14, 2011 2 Notarte v Notarte, G.R. No. 180614, Aug. 9, 2012 3 Neri vs Uy, GR 194366, October 10, 2012 4 Casilang v Casilang-Dizon, GR 180269, Feb. 20, 2013

*Exclude: Executors and administrators (Arts. 1058-1060, Civil Code), which will becovered under Remedial Law