Professional Documents
Culture Documents
describes a real-life situation faced, a decision or action taken by an individual manager or by an organization at the strategic, functional or operational levels.
MANAGEMENT CASE
n a meeting held on 11th April 1997, Mr Ramkumar, Vice President and Mr K K Paul, General Manager, Marketing, of TI Cycles of India (TI Cycles) were discussing the opportunities to increase the sales and market share of the company. This had become imperative in view of the near stagnant sales and increased competition in the standard and special bicycles. They were quite sure that the companys strength and standing could be enhanced through new product introductions. For this purpose, they reviewed the companys performance, developments in domestic bicycles market, competition and competitiveness in domestic and international markets, and the companys role in developing the Specials category of bicycles. Ramkumar, 40, was a post-graduate in management from the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad and a cost accountant. He had taken over as Vice President of TI Cycles in 1995. Earlier, he was General Manager, Finance, of TII Group, the parent holding company of TI Cycles. He had worked for 12 years in all with the Group. He had also worked as the head of finance at TI Cycles itself. Paul had been at TI Cycles in the marketing function in different capacities including exports and managing the eastern region immediately before taking over as the General Manager.
KEY WORDS
113
Since the inception of TI Cycles, the members of the Murugappa family had shown keen interest in its growth. It was a training ground for inducting younger members of the family into business. In 1996-97, Mr Vellayan, a member of the Murugappa family, was the President of Tube Investment Ltd. and Mr Subbiah, an elder member of the family, was the Chairman. The family believed in the values of fairness, truth, honesty, and human considerations in treating people in managing its businesses. The family advocated strict adherence to the laws, regulations, and rules of the land. It was also keen on making a distinct contribution to the well being of the society.
PRODUCT RANGE
The early emphasis of TI Cycles was on manufacturing quality bicycles as per the design and drawings from the collaborator. It started with the assembly of Hercules brand of Standard cycles in its plant at Ambattur. Hercules cycle was promoted as a life
companion to the consumer. It was aimed at the office goers and workers. The cycle was described as sturdy made from true temper steel to stand rigorous use. The advertisement for the product mentioned the following: Strong yet smooth to ride, Hercules is built to last you a lifetime. Made to the highest standards of quality and yet moderately priced, Hercules offers you the ideal bargain in bicycles. The product created a market for indigenous bicycles in India. Encouraged by the success of Hercules, the company introduced a cycle under the brand Phillip's for the student segment in 1955. The advertisement for the product mentioned the following: He is good at studies He is a leader in sports He is on his way up His cycle is Phillips. Phillips is handsome its sleek, powerful look expresses your taste best. A super bicycle made for young people like you. Both Hercules and Phillip's were the registered trademarks of Hercules Cycles and Motor Company of UK. TI Cycles diversified into Specials category with an eye on getting premium prices. The cycles were sleek with features like wire brakes and multiple colour options. In 1969, the company introduced the first range of cycles in this category under the brand BSA Aristocrat. The company also introduced a special cycle with cross frame that was easy to climb on to and ride by ladies. It offered its models in black and green colours. TI Cycles produced 36,000 bicycles in the year 1953. The production increased to 89,000 in 1955. A total of one million cycles were produced by 1960. The second million mark was reached in December 1963 and the third million in April 1967. Till the 70s, TI Cycles was the largest producer and marketer of bicycles in India. With the increase in the volume of cycles sold, the demand for replacement of cycle parts increased. This created an opportunity for entrepreneurs in Punjab, especially Ludhiana, to set up manufacturing units for independent parts. Over the years, some of them integrated forward to assemble and sell complete bicycles under their own brand. With a start like this, Hero Cycles, promoted by Mr B M Munjal of Ludhiana, became the largest producer of low cost, value for
TI CYCLES: NEW PRODUCT STRATEGY (A)
114
money Standard bicycles. The company not only harnessed the opportunities provided by independent cycle parts manufacturing units in Ludhiana, but also promoted dedicated units to improve its position. A nine month strike at TI cycles in 1978 paved the way for the decline of its leadership in the Standards segment. In 1989, Hero Cycles created the sub-category of Mountain Terrain bikes (MTB) and in 1990, TI Cycles responded with the introduction of Streetcat. In 1994-95, the production of cycles was 19,46,000. The production increased to 2,058 thousands in 199596 but reduced to 1,930 thousands in 1996-97. However, the number of employees had reduced from 4,216 in 1994-95 to 3,236 in 1996-97. In 1996-97, the company marketed its cycles under two brand names: Hercules and BSA. The BSA brand was more profitable than the Hercules brand. The cycles were in different ranges and had different features. A workhorse cycle was a standard cycle in black colour with horizontal handle. The sports and racing cycles had thicker tyres. The luxury cycles had multiple colours, wire breaks, thin frames, and thin tyres. The range of cycles targeted the adults, juveniles, and kids in both male and female segments separately. For example, Hercules Captain aimed at the 15 years and above male segment, was a 20 high cycle with no frills except a PVC saddle and a chain cover. Hercules MTB Jr., aimed at the 8-12 years old boys segment, had oversized tubing frame, solid deflected plate carrier, and wheel reflectors. It was in red colour. BSA Lady Bird Jr., aimed at the 8-12 years old girls segment, was a blue coloured cross-tube frame slim cycle with a specially designed wire mesh basket. The company offered many variants with subbrands under both Herculus and BSA brands. The
variants were built around alternative designs of carrier, cover chain, tyres, basket attachments, frame shapes, trainer wheels, etc. The price of Hercules brand of cycles ranged from Rs 1,450 for Hercules Kids in the 4-7 years age group to Rs 2,275 for Hercules Cannon Barrel meant for kids above nine years. The price of BSA brand of cycles ranged from Rs 1,300 for BSA Snowwhite meant for children in the 2-4 years age group (kids) to Rs 2,235 for BSA Lady Bird.
Service
115
were generally either MBAs and/or experienced company personnel who had worked in sales and/or marketing. A Manager who was assisted by three Product Designers/Engineers headed the Product Development Department. Product Designers were engineering and/or design graduates with design/ manufacturing/quality experience. The Product Management Department, as a part of its task of preparing marketing plans, regularly collected sales and marketing data about the company as well as its competitors and the industry. The data were collected through in-company sources and other secondary sources. For managing the products, the Product Managers also designed and collected primary information about bicycle buying, competitive positioning, product and communication testing, etc. The primary data were mostly collected through reputed marketing research agencies. On the basis of relevant market information, the Product Managers generated new product concepts for specific target segments. The concepts were tested with target consumers before being handed over to the Product Development Department for specifications and prototype development. Prototypes were tested along with the Product Manager with target consumers and selected dealers. During this phase, the Product Development Department constantly interacted with the Manufacturing and Purchase Departments for checking out and planning of production and sourcing requirements. Adequate samples of selected models were then produced and tested with target customers. The product testing also provided some idea about the likely demand which helped in planning the production. The Marketing Department identified some schools in Chennai whose student profile was similar to that of its target customers. The company also identified some of its dealers for getting feedback about new products and other marketing initiatives and policies. Besides, it had prepared a cycle testing track (MGM stadium) where new models were kept for children and others to ride. This move attracted lot of children and adults who visited the stadium daily and had bicycle rides. Thus, the company used all the three methods (the schools, the dealers, and the track) at various stages of new product design and development to test new concepts, prototypes, and samples.
116
We realized that roadside mechanics were not able to repair the new bikes like MTB. Also, genuine spare parts were important for proper repair of the bikes. The concept of an authorized sales-cum-service showroom (like that for motorcycles and scooters) was therefore conceived. The concept was designed and tested in Chennai from 10 November 1995. We had apprehensions that the conservative cycle buyer might view the showroom as the one where only costly bikes were available. However, the customer walk-in was pretty good and in fact better than expectations. This prompted other dealers to ask for implementing the concept at their premises.
designed in the first and second phases with more emphasis on branding backed by manufacturing (mostly assembly) in Europe. In the last phase, TI Cycles was to become a truly international player. The company initiated measures to develop an international mindset and capabilities and achieve the above mentioned strategic goals through overseas exposure, training, and participation in trade fair. It improved the product through technology upgradation, and global sourcing, and set up a dedicated Export Oriented Unit (EOU) of 300,000 units for catering to the volumes anticipated. Also it set up an international subsidiary, Perry Overseas Ltd, Virgin Islands, to manage the operation. The company made export division as a separate profit centre and attached product development to marketing. The exports became a significant part of its business in the mid-90s (Table 2). However, by 199697, increased production costs at home, tariff changes in EC, and currency fluctuations made exports an unsustainable proposition. Exports declined in 199697. The EOU incurred a loss of Rs 1.22 crore.
117
Exports, and v) Rim. The first four were grouped according to bicycle models having similarities in features, technology of joining the metal frames, and requirements of colour and design changes. The Rim module was a common support module for the rest. The company created a Dispatch module to take care of dispatches of domestic bicycles. A module was expected to be a ownership responsibility centre for buying out components, maintenance, stores of raw materials and intermediate production planning, assembly in batches of 500 cycles, and dispatch to the dispatching module. The company centralized the remaining functions and grouped them under the following departments: Marketing, Sourcing (procurement in modules), Product Development, Maintenance, Quality, Production Engineering, Central Planning, and Personnel.
production people only. An executive described the work culture, till 1995, as easy going. Each one did the task that was assigned to him. The supervisor and managers focused on problems relating to their areas of operations. For example, competition and dealer s complaints were to be addressed by the marketing executives only. Similarly, industrial relation was the concern of HR executives. Quality was the problem of production executives. Hierarchy was respected. Everyone waited for initiatives and instructions to emanate from the higher ups. One of the executives described the culture as risk averse. However, the atmosphere was very informal.
COMPETITIVENESS OF TI CYCLES
The company had established a name and reputation for quality. Its brands Hercules and BSA were recognized across the country. Till the early 70s, being a dealer of Hercules cycles was a symbol of prestige. It lost its exclusivity when competitors from the North entered the industry and built leadership positions on the basis of lower price. The entry of competitors was
TI CYCLES: NEW PRODUCT STRATEGY (A)
118
facilitated by the growth of independent parts manufacturers in Ludhiana in particular and Punjab state in general. The new entrants did not have to set up integrated facilities like TI Cycles. They made a few core parts like frames and forks, did the painting, bought complementary parts from independent manufacturers, and prepared the ready-to-assemble kits. They promoted their own brands like Atlas and Avon. At the end of 1996-97, TI Cycles faced competition from Hero Cycles, Atlas Cycles, and Avon Cycles, all located in North India. They competed on price in both Standard, and Special categories. Studies had shown that there was a cost differential of about 10 per cent between TI Cycles and the other key competitors. This was primarily because of the integrated nature of manufacturing and the higher wage costs at TI cycles. The company was considering ways of cutting costs by outsourcing, but the extent of cost reduction needed to make a significant increase in its contributions in Standards, was not likely to materialize soon. Exhibit 3 provides the details of competitors profiles. The sales of various players in the industry in different categories of bicycles were as provided in Table 3. TI Cycles was a leader in the southern region of India closely followed by Hero (Table 4). Population strata-wise, the company was second in towns with a population more than 10 Table 3: Bicycle Industry 1996-97
(Figures in # 000s) Type of Cycles TI Total Bicycles Of these Standards Specials 1605 787 818 317 240 107 149 Hero 4210 3437 773 103 223 165 276 Company Atlas 1996 1685 311 38 60 36 175 Avon 968 745 223 17 59 71 76 Total 8780 6654 2126 475 582 379 675
lakh and third in towns with less than one lakh population and in rural areas (Table 5). Nowhere was it number one.
Of Specials
SLRs MTBs Kids Juveniles
119
Table 7 for an overview. The detailed mix of bicycle types in the Indian market in 1996-97 is given in Table 8. Among durable products, bicycles were owned by 80 per cent of households and were the second most owned durable in 1996. The ownership of bicycles among households (rural and urban) and by income categories is provided in Table 9. The projected number of households in different income groups in urban and rural areas up to 2006-07 is given in Table 10. International Market Opportunities A review of the European Union market by the company management in 1996-97 revealed that the demand for bicycles in EU as a whole as well as in each of the key countries had declined over the last three years. The key countries, accounting for 75 per cent of EU demand, faced falling demand and imports during 1993-94 to 1996-97. Total imports to EU countries dropped by 20 per cent (Exhibit 4). During the sixmonth period (January-December 1996), EUs import from India went down to 3,83,000 from 6,26,000 a year ago, a drop of 40 per cent. The companys volume also went down to 1,71,000 from 365,000 over the same period, a drop of 52 per cent. Further, the companys share of Indian exports to EU fell from 57 per cent to 45 per cent. This was primarily due to its failure to compete on prices. Its early starter lead was neutralized by other domestic competitors. Some key findings of the review of world bicycle market were as follows: The US and Europe were the two largest importers followed by Japan. China was the largest manufacturer and exporter of low cost bikes and was upgrading through Taiwanese technology. The major producers in China were China Bicycle Company, Forever, and Pheonix. Chinese producers with their low production costs were likely to pose a major threat in kids (roughly Table 7: Industry Trends Mix of Standards vs. Specials
(in %)
Mid-80s Industry Standards Specials Total Sales >90 <10 100 TI 75 25 100 Early 90s Industry 90 10 100 TI 60 40 100 Mid-90s Industry 76 24 100 TI 50 50 100
40 % price compared to that of Indian producers), 26 MTB (roughly 60% of Indian price), and standard bikes (roughly 90% of Indian price). Most bicycles preferred in the developed countries were geared and were meant for fun, exercise, etc. (as opposed to their use as workhorse in developing countries). Among the model types, the major ones were ATB/MTB, BMX, Roadster, etc. The newer designs were towards use of lighter materials (special alloys) and of folding type. TI Cycles did not have design and manufacturing capabilities to produce the middle and upper end of bikes required by these markets. The export operation and international thrust helped TI Cycles in acquiring technologies and attitudes to produce international quality products, particularly in the EOU. Specifically, the experience helped in improved learning of welding, assembling of bikes, and painting. Learning of order tracking of a variety of mix of bicycles was another new skill that was developed which triggered the restructuring of the shop-floor. The export supplies/rejects were marketed in the domestic market. While the initial acceptance was better, the customers found the maintenance and the servicing of geared bikes a serious problem. This was because the dealers and their mechanics did not know the product and its servicing requirements. TI cycles learnt to procure high quality components from Japan for assembly into export cycles. For example, it learnt that the best gear systems were designed and manufactured by Shimano of Japan. Export demand was for cycles fitted with Shimano gears.
TI CYCLES: NEW PRODUCT STRATEGY (A)
120
BICYCLE USER
Research by TI Cycles had revealed that the Standard and Special bicycles had distinct user groups. The Standard bicycle was a functional, lower priced, and semi-urban or rural market bicycle. It was used as a workhorse to travel to workplace or carry loads (like milk cans by milk vendors). The user typically belonged to 20 years plus age, lower to lower-middle income group, blue collar/farmer/semi-skilled labour, belonging to Social Economic Classification (SEC) C or D. The brands favoured were Hercules Popular (TI), Hero Royal (Hero), Atlas Goldline (Atlas), and Avon. Invariably, the user purchased the bicycle on his own from the dealers. The Special bicycles were aesthetically (looks and design) superior, trendy, fetched higher price, and used primarily for recreational purposes. The user group consisted of students, both boys and girls, of 6 to 16 years of age, belonging to mid to upper income groups in SEC A and B. The MTBs which were introduced much later than SLRs had caught the fancy of boys and constituted the premium range of Specials. The SLR users were mostly girls. Leading brands in Specials were BSA SLR (TI), BSA Mach (TI), Hero Impact (Hero), and Rockshock (TI). The parents or elder relatives of the users bought these bicycles for the users. A TI marketing executive mentioned that the pestering
121
power of the children played a key role in influencing the purchase decision. The youth segment looked for something different every time. Cycle manufacturers differentiated their offerings by unconventional brand names like devil, rebel, etc., multiple colour schemes, designs of handles, tyres, carriers, stand, and overall shape of the cycle and tried to give my bike is different image. Company research had shown that the youth segment was expected to grow by more than 20,000 per month and it constituted about 35 per cent of the total cycle market. TI Cycles led the segment with 50 per cent market share followed by Hero Cycles (35%) and Atlas (10%). Atlas was expected to take its market share from 10 per cent to 20 per cent of the segment in the near future.
and size of opportunities available to TI Cycles. They were aware of the lack of technical competencies in the company to cater to the export market. Growth opportunities existed in penetrating the different regions, in extending the coverage to smaller towns, and in expanding the product ranges. They had concluded that the geared bikes were the major chunk of the market in the developed countries. However, the introduction of geared bikes as export surplus had not succeeded at both the consumer and the trade level in India. In addition, the SLR and the MTB range had reached a stage of almost no growth in the market. The key issue of concern for them was: Having turned around the unit from a lossmaking one to a profit-making one in the last two years, how do we chart out a path for sustained and profitable growth, to take TI Cycles to number two position in the near future and number one in the long term?
The new features added to BSA SLR over the years were:
1987 1988 1989 New chain cover - New levers - Black plastic pedals Chrome-plated carrier - Centre pull brakes - New carrier Centre stand - Opening of BSA shop Sticker redesign
* This section draws on a case by Mr S Ramachandar, Consultant to TI Cycles for a class at IIM, Ahmedabad.
122
The launch of Street Cat in 1995 resulted in: excellent launch response bikes sold at premium price built the segment as well as the TI Cycles share in the segment introduced the dimension of fashion in ATB segment distinct from the dimension of tough, the traditional platform of ATBs.
* This section is based on a presentation by Mr Suresh Kumar from TI Cycles to students of Post-Graduate Programme of IIM, Ahmedabad in 1995.
123
Mukund R Dixit is Professor in the Business Policy Area of Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad. A Ph.D. from IIT, Kanpur, he has specialized in strategic management and has published cases and papers in this field. His research interests include public policy and corporate strategy, competition and competitive advantage, and innovations in management. email: dixit@iimahd.ernet.in
Abhinandan K Jain is Professor in the Marketing Area of Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad. A .ellow from IIMA, his specialization is in the field of quantitative models in marketing, strategic marketing, and international marketing. His publications include a book on marketing management, several articles on media planning and case method, and a large number of cases. email: akjain@iimahd.ernet.in
I am more of a sponge than an inventor. I absorb ideas from every source. My principal business is giving commercial value to the brilliant but misdirected ideas of others. Thomas Edison
124