If all religions are founded on immunity and unscathedness, then in order to advance this immunity requires the conceptualization

of absolute or immortal life. It thus follows that deconstruction, which takes as central the necessity of temporal and spatial alteration, cannot endorse the possibility of such immunities. This is because alteration implies fi nitude and, thus, mortalism rather than immortalism. Thus deconstruction is always a form of radical atheism, since the possibilities of totalization, absolute immunity and self-suffi ciency are ruled out from their inception since they always undergo transformation and cannot existentially give immortal life.