Cole Graves Reflection Dear Dr. Hartman, I loved this working draft.

It was fun for me to write and I enjoyed it. It was almost like writing this took me back through the experience of skydiving. I could feel the wind again, and how cold I was. I remember the loud boom of the door opening 10,000 feet above the earth. Every word I wrote took me back t that day in May and I have never had that happen to me before. If I had to pick a narrative to continue writing and to finish it would most definitely be this one. Rubric
Criteria PROCESS As a working draft, piece shows: Exemplary Process work is present and provides robust evidence that student has participated; Clear evidence of strong idea development; Robust evidence of revision (changes in at least 2 drafts) is clearly present Writer has fulfilled the assignment beyond expectations; Exceptionally clear what topic/subject is being described; Excellent attention to audience by appealing to senses, using appropriate figurative language, etc. Proficient Process work is present and evidence of participation is clear; Evidence of idea development is present; Evidence of effective revision is clearly present in at least 2 drafts Developing Some evidence of process work; Attempts at idea development, but ideas are lacking in some way; Little evidence of revision is present (ex. Only 1 draft submitted, no daybook or other process work, etc.) Writer has fulfilled the assignment; Purpose is hard to decipher or not yet clear; Little evidence of attention to audience due to vague description, little to no sensory details or figurative language, etc. Lacking Participation in process work, development of ideas, and/or evidence of revision is incomplete or insufficient

RHETORICAL KNOWLEDGE As a working draft, piece shows:

Writer has clearly fulfilled The assignment; Clear purpose; Good attention to audience to audience by appealing to senses, using figurative language, etc.

This aspect of the piece is incomplete/ insufficient. Work shows little to no evidence of rhetorical knowledge

CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING GROWTH As a working draft, piece shows:

KNOWLEDGE OF CONVENTIONS As a working draft, piece shows:

Exceptional use of tone and voice; Robust attempts to be appealing and interesting in describing subject/topic; Writer clearly is taking risks by trying strategies discussed; Reflective letter is included and clearly addresses these aspects of piece Exceptional and adept wording and phrasing; Little to no issues in readability; Writer displays clear control over mechanics, grammar, and usage

Clear attempts to use tone and voice; Clear attempts to be appealing and interesting in describing subject/topic; Writer is taking some risks; Reflective letter is included and sufficiently addresses these aspects of piece Good wording and phrasing; Little to no issues in readability; Writer displays control over mechanics, grammar, and usage

Writer is struggling to use/understand tone and voice, to create interesting writing, and/or to take risks; and/or reflective letter is missing or does not clearly addresses these aspects of piece

Write made little to no attempts to present critical thinking or writing growth; and/or no reflective letter included

Some or repeated issues with awkward or ineffective wording/phrasing; Writer displays lack of control over mechanics, grammar, and usage, causing issues in readability

Glaring issues/errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, spelling, and other conventions; Piece is difficult to read; Little to no attention has been given to conventions of writing

On the criteria of process I give myself a proficient because I reviewed my work thoroughly and have done everything on time by the day its due. On the criteria of rhetorical knowledge I give myself another proficient being that I accurately described my experience. On the idea of critical thinking and growth I give myself a developing because I struggled with using and finding some words. On the criteria of knowledge of conventions I give myself a proficient because I believe my paper is very readable.