Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction...........................................................................................................................4
Qualifying Emissions.....................................................................................................4
Quantifying Emissions...................................................................................................5
Calculations and Emission Limits from MDEQ Rules...................................................5
Particulate Matter ...................................................................................................6
Sulfur-Bearing Compounds....................................................................................6
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) ....................................................................7
Air Toxics................................................................................................................8
References.........................................................................................................................78
There are at least three activities that require a facility to calculate the emissions of air
contaminants: applying for and complying with an air permit, determining applicability to
the Renewable Operating Permit program, and complying with the Michigan Air
Emissions Reporting System (MAERS). The methods of calculating emissions are
common to all three activities. Therefore, the emission calculation examples and
discussions found under the MAERS section of this tab are pertinent to air permitting and
ROP applicability.
An estimate of actual emissions is the first step in evaluating the impact of the proposed
installation or modification of a process. A source must first qualify and quantify the
emissions to determine which federal and/or state regulations might apply. When
emissions are characterized, control and pollution prevention techniques can be planned
for compliance with the appropriate emission standards. The permitting agency, the
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), establishes the allowable limits
for air emissions in the special conditions of the permit to install.
Qualifying Emissions
Qualifying emissions means identifying what compounds, elements or particles are being
released from the given source or process. The emitted materials are process or industry
specific. A reference for understanding various types of sources is the Air Pollution
Engineering Manual (AP-40). Frequently, industry-specific trade organizations can
provide information about sources.
• Outlining the physical, chemical or biological changes that occur to those raw
materials.
• Determining which of the raw materials pass through unchanged and also have
the potential to be emitted to the atmosphere.
• Determining what by-products are produced as a result of the process and have
the potential to be emitted to the atmosphere.
• Combining the raw materials and by-products for an overall list of the type of
emissions which could be released from the source.
Quantifying Emissions
Once the emissions have been identified, the next step is quantifying them. This means
determining how much of each chemical is being released to the atmosphere.
Regulations are based on quantified emissions expressed in units such as pounds per
hour and tons per year. Emissions are quantified based on one or a combination of
several factors. These include sampling, emission factors, equipment data and
information from chemical MSDS sheets, and the mass balance approach.
Specific guidance for calculation of air releases and information regarding emission limits
can be found in the Michigan Administrative Rules for Air Pollution Control. Certain
sources and pollutants are also specifically addressed in federal regulations for National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs), New Source Performance
Standards (NSPS) provisions, and the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
program.
Some of the major sections of the Rules are devoted to provisions for sources of
Particulate Matter (Part 3), Sulfur-bearing compounds (Parts 4 and 5), and Volatile
In some cases, specific methods for source emission testing are referenced in the Rules.
These methods which are based largely on the provisions of 40 CFR part 60 (1989) are
listed in Part 10, Intermittent Testing and Sampling, Rule 1004 (R 336.2004). A complete
copy of Part 10 is available from the MDEQ Air Quality Division.
Particulate Matter
Sulfur-Bearing Compounds
Parts 4 and 5 of the Rules provide information on emission limitations and prohibitions for
sulfur-bearing compounds. Part 5 rules are essentially obsolete at this point. Power
plants are the subject of Rule 401. Table 41 presents the amount of sulfur in fuel
limitations for fuel-burning equipment and Table 42 lists equivalent emission rates.
Guidance for fuel burning sources other than power plants is found in Rule 402. Oil- and
natural gas-producing or transporting facilities and natural gas-processing facilities are
regulated under Rule 403. Sulfuric acid plants are addressed in Rule 404.
Emission limitations for existing volatile organic compound (VOC) sources are found in
Part 6 of the Rules with VOC limitations for new sources in Part 7. However, new
sources will need to reference Part 6 Rules for emission rates. There are presently
revisions and additions to these rules that may come into effect in the future.
The purpose of the Part 6 and 7 Rules is to reduce emissions of VOCs, specifically in
ozone nonattainment areas so that attainment with National Ambient Air Quality
Standards can be achieved. Table 1 lists the current Part 6 rules.
Reference to the Rules for your specific industry prior to performing calculations can
provide guidance as to the type of calculation that needs to be done. For instance,
surface coating emission rates are frequently expressed in pounds of volatile organic
compounds minus water as applied or pounds of VOCs per gallon of applied coating
solids (Tables 62, 63, 65, 66, 67 of the Rules). Applications such as graphic arts may
express limits in pounds VOC per pound of solids (Table 64), and flat wood paneling
coating line VOCs are given in pounds per 1,000 square feet of product.
For Automobile and Light Duty Truck painting, you may have to calculate VOC
emissions for surface coating operations in units of pounds of VOC per gallon of
applied coating solids (lb VOC/gal coating applied). To complete this calculation,
additional information is needed on the solids content by volume of the coating and the
application equipment transfer efficiency.
Coating A
VOC Content of Coating = 3.2 lbs. VOC/gal of coating
Solids Content (by volume) = 54%
Transfer Efficiency = 55% (i.e., solids applied; varies with spray gun type)
Air Toxics
The current Michigan air toxics program applies to new or modified sources of toxic air
contaminants. A discussion of the Michigan air toxics program is found in Part 2, Rules
224 through 232. The Michigan toxic air contaminants go beyond the 188 hazardous air
pollutants listed in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. All known substances can be
regulated as toxic air contaminants with the exception of some specifically listed
substances. Amounts of toxic air contaminants (TACs) are calculated on a pound per
hour basis for maximum allowable emission rates. Information is also needed to
calculate micrograms of TAC per cubic meter for various screening levels.
601 Definitions.
602 General provisions for existing sources of volatile organic compound emissions.
603 Rescinded.
604 Storage of organic compounds having a true vapor pressure of more than 1.5 psia, but
less than 11 psia, in existing fixed roof stationary vessels of more than 40,000-gallon capacity.
605 Storage of organic compounds having a true vapor pressure of 11 or more psia in existing
stationary vessels of more than 40,000-gallon capacity.
606 Loading gasoline into existing stationary vessels of more than 2,000-gallon capacity at dispensing
facilities handling 250,000 or more gallons per year.
607 Loading gasoline into existing stationary vessels of more than 2,000-gallon capacity at loading
facilities.
608 Loading gasoline into delivery vessels at existing loading facilities handling less than 5,000,000 gallons
per year.
609 Loading delivery vessels with organic compounds having true vapor pressure of more than
1.5 psia at existing loading facilities handling 5,000,000 or more gallons of such compounds per
year.
610 Existing coating lines; emission of volatile organic compounds from existing automobile, light-duty
truck, and other product and material coatings.
620 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing flat wood paneling coating lines.
621 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing metallic surface coating lines.
622 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing components petroleum refineries; refinery
monitoring program.
623 Storage of petroleum liquids having a true vapor pressure of more than 1.0 psia, but less than
11.0 psia, in existing external floating roof stationary vessels of more than 40,000-gallon capacity.
624 Emission of volatile organic compound from an existing graphic arts line.
625 Emission of volatile organic compound from existing equipment utilized in the manufacturing of
synthesized pharmaceutical products.
626 Rescinded
628 Emission of volatile organic compounds from components of existing process equipment used in
manufacturing synthetic organic chemicals and polymers; monitoring program.
629 Emission of volatile organic compounds from components of existing process equipment used in
processing natural gas; monitoring program.
630 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing paint manufacturing processes.
631 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing process equipment utilized in manufacture of
polystyrene or other organic resins.
632 Emission of volatile organic compounds from existing automobile, truck, and business machine
plastic part coating lines.
One of the first steps in evaluating the potential impacts of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
Amendments of 1990 is to develop an accurate inventory of all actual and potential
the maximum capacity of a stationary source to emit a pollutant under its physical
and operational design. Any physical or operational limitation on the capacity of the
source to emit a pollutant, including air pollution control equipment and restrictions
on hours of operation or on the type or amount of material combusted, stored, or
processed, shall be treated as part of its design only if the limitation or the effect it
would have on emissions is federally enforceable (emphasis added) (40 CFR part
70).
Potential emissions differ from actual emissions in the following two ways:
• Potential emissions are calculated using maximum allowable hourly emissions,
based on an enforceable permit or regulatory limit, whereas actual emissions
use average hourly emissions. If no maximum allowable hourly emissions limit
exists, then potential emissions must be calculated using maximum hourly
emissions. The maximum hourly emission rates will either be 1) maximum
allowable hourly emission rates or 2) the maximum hourly capacity or design rate
of the unit.
• Potential emissions must take into account potential hours of operation,
assumed to be 24 hours per day, 365 days per year (equal to 8,760 hours per
year), unless a facility's federally enforceable permit constrains it to some lesser
number of annual hours of operation. Actual emissions are calculated according
to the hours an emissions unit was actually emitting over a given year.
State construction or preconstruction permits were historically the prevalent means for
obtaining a federally enforceable limit on an emissions unit. Existing (pre-Title V) state
operating permit programs have varying degrees of federal enforceability.
A complete emission inventory will include actual and potential emissions from all
emissions units, including point sources and fugitive emissions at your facility. Point
sources are emissions units with a discrete emission point, such as stacks, chimneys,
vents, or other functionally-equivalent openings. Fugitive emissions are those that do
not arise from a discrete emission point, such as solvent releases in a paint mix room,
or oil mist emissions from metal working equipment released into the building and then
eventually into the atmosphere through plant windows and doors. Most facilities are
more familiar with point source emissions.
• Quantifying emissions
The first step in conducting an emissions inventory is to identify and gather background
data and information that will be used throughout the inventory process. Sources of
information, such as those listed below, should be assembled from plant and corporate
files to help identify and characterize the facility's air emissions:
• Toxic chemical release reporting forms prepared for SARA Title III, Section 313
The next step in the emissions inventory process involves the systematic identification
of all emissions units (both point and fugitive) at your facility. For the inventory to be
complete, we recommend that you include any piece of equipment involved in
operations or support of operations that could release pollutants to the atmosphere.
You should include units even if they have been exempt from state permitting or are
considered "grandfathered" from permitting requirements. You generally do not need to
include equipment associated with office activities (such as "white out" fluid, paint spray
cans for office use, or cleaners for office lavatories). You should include seemingly
insignificant activities, such as use of paint spray cans for marking items being
manufactured at your facility, if the equipment or activity is part of, or supports
operations. Some items that should be included, but that are often overlooked include:
• product, raw material, and waste material storage and handling operations
• storm water run-off, sewage and process wastewater treatment plants
• laboratories
• cooling towers
• CFC sources
Point and fugitive emission units can be initially identified by reviewing plant flow and
design drawings, prior or current air pollution and other environmental permits, emission
reports made to regulatory agencies, and other information describing the plant that has
been collected. In addition, emission units can be identified through discussions with
plant operations and maintenance personnel.
Your list of identified emissions units should be visually verified during a plant walk-
through by personnel that are familiar with the plant and its operations. This plant walk-
through should be thorough to identify any emissions units that have not previously
been included in existing inventories. Care should be taken to identify emissions units
that are not operating at the time of the walk-through, but may be operated at other
times during the year.
All identified emissions units should be given a unique designation or identification number
to facilitate record keeping and data entry into a database. This designation can be as
simple as a unit number or a code that designates the building, facility, or process. The
designations should be consistent with any other designations that may
Note again that you need to address emissions from units that may seem insignificant
and that you may not have had to address in the past. It may eventually turn out that
you will not need to address these units in your Title V permit beyond identifying them;
however, you cannot adequately calculate your facility-wide potential to emit regulated
pollutants unless you include all emissions units in your inventory.
After identifying emissions units at your facility, you will need to identify the regulated
pollutants emitted from each unit. These pollutants can be identified from the information
sources mentioned previously, as well as from your general knowledge of the
manufacturing processes and operations that take place at your facility.
Compounds regulated under the CAA are: the six criteria pollutants for which the
USEPA has promulgated National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), the 188
chemicals to be regulated as HAPs, Title VI stratospheric ozone depletion pollutants,
and pollutants regulated under the NESHAP and NSPS regulations.
These compounds constitute the universe of federally regulated air pollutants, and are
the pollutants you must address under the Title V operating permit program.
Table from the Title V Operating Permit Workbook prepared for the
American Automobile Manufacturers Association is an example of
how to organize emission inventory information
Plant:
Date:
Criteria Pollutants Potential Emissions Actual Emissions
SO2
PM-10
VOC
CO
NOx
Lead
Hazardous Air Pollutants Potential Emissions Actual Emissions
(HAPs) List each HAP*: (tpy) (tpy)
*
Lists of HAPs and other regulated pollutants are found in Appendices A and B.
Facilities, under Rule 2 (R336.202) of the Michigan Administrative Rules for Air
Pollution Control are required to report their annual emissions of air pollutants to the Air
Quality Division of the MDEQ. Operational Memorandum No. 13 (see Tab 16 – AQD
Guidance) provides information on which facilities must report. The AQD has a set of
forms and instructions facilities must use and follow to report their emissions. In 1999,
AQD replaced the Michigan Air Pollution Reporting (MAPR) forms with an entirely new
set, including an electronic version. This new reporting mechanism is referred to as the
Michigan Air Emissions Reporting System (MAERS). For more information about
MAERS, see Tab 10 – Complying with Permit and Reporting Requirements.
Some of the information contained in this section was taken from the emission factor
publications found in the USEPA, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards’
Technology Transfer Network (TTN). The TTN is a collection of technical Web sites
containing information about many areas of air pollution, including emission estimation.
The TTN can be accessed directly from the Internet via the World Wide Web. The
Internet address is www.epa.gov/ttn.
• Ammonia
• Carbon monoxide (CO);
• Nitrogen oxides (NOx) expressed as NO2;
• Particulate matter (PM);
• Particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM-10);
• Particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM-2.5)
• Sulfur oxides (SOx) expressed as SO2
• Volatile organic compounds (VOC); and
• Lead (Pb).
However, if the emission of one of the above pollutants from a source classification
code (SCC) is less than 0.01 tons (20 pounds) per year, the emission does not have to
be reported. Additional discussion of pollutant terminology and conventions begins on
page 55.
Under MAERS, the reporting of approximately 240 toxic pollutants is optional. MDEQ,
AQD will analyze the emissions data submitted by each company and estimate the
toxic air pollutant emissions from the information provided for the criteria pollutants.
This includes activity information such as source classification codes and material
throughput. Facilities submitting their MAERS report electronically will be able to view
the estimation of toxics prior to submitting their report. The MAERS software is
Section 313 of the federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
(EPCRA) of 1986, also known as Title III of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act, requires certain facilities to report Toxic Chemical Release
Inventory (TRI) information for any listed chemicals manufactured, processed, or
otherwise used by the facility above specific thresholds.
Otherwise use - use of a listed toxic chemical that is not covered by the terms
“manufacture” or process.” EPCRA Section 313 chemicals are otherwise used as
chemical processing or manufacturing aids, or for ancillary or other use.
Example: using Freon 113 as a coolant in a closed-loop refrigerant system to
cool process streams.
There are about 650 toxic chemical categories covered by Section 313. A small number
of these are identified as persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT). Activity
thresholds for non-PBT chemicals are more than 25,000 pounds manufactured, or
more than 25,000 pounds processed, or more than 10,000 pounds otherwise used.
PBT chemical thresholds are significantly lower regardless of the activity - more than 10
pounds or 100 pounds, depending on the chemical; for dioxin and dioxin-like
compounds the activity threshold is more than 0.1 grams.
The USEPA can add, remove, or modify the list of toxic chemicals that must be
reported. Facilities should check each year for any changes to the Section 313
chemicals and chemical categories and reporting requirements.
Michigan has over 900 TRI facilities and almost 2,000 MAERS facilities. Although the
MDEQ does not have an exact knowledge of how many facilities are filing both reports,
it is estimated that well over half of the TRI facilities report under MAERS.
y The reporting period for both MAERS and TRI is the calendar year. The initial
submittal dates of the reports differ. MAERS forms are due March 15. TRI forms
are due July 1.
y Under MAERS, facilities must estimate and report their releases of seven criteria air
contaminants and may report an additional 240 toxic pollutants (80 requested by the
Great Lakes Commission and 160 requested by the Toxics Unit of the Air Quality
Division). All 188 Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) are included in the list of 240
toxic pollutants. A majority of the MAERS toxic pollutants are included in one form or
another on the list of TRI chemicals. Under EPCRA Section 313, facilities must
estimate and report releases (including disposal) and other waste management
activities for approximately 650 chemicals and chemical compound categories.
A facility should consider developing an effective emission estimation system that can
adequately address MAERS and EPCRA Section 313 TRI reporting requirements.
Source: Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42) Fifth Edition, Volume 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina.
The most accurate way of estimating emissions from a source is directly measuring the
concentration of air pollutants in the stack gas. Stack tests and continuous emission
monitoring systems (CEMS) are two methods of collecting actual emission data. This
section explains how source testing data from stack tests and CEMS can be used in the
completion of a facility’s Michigan Air Emission Reporting System (MAERS) submittal.
The discussion will focus on the methodology to follow in converting data collected
during source testing into a pollutant mass emission rate, i.e., tons of pollutant emitted
per year. Albeit very important for compliance demonstration purposes, this discussion
will not include comparison of stack testing and CEMS results, or all of the various air
pollutant concentration limits contained within the state and federal air quality
regulations.
The use of source test data reduces the number of assumptions regarding the
applicability of emissions data to a source (a common consideration when emission
factors are used); as well as the control device efficiency, equipment variations, and
fuel characteristics. Even then, the results will be applicable only to the conditions
existing at the time of the testing or monitoring. To provide the best estimate of longer-
term (e.g., yearly or typical day) emissions, these operating conditions should be
representative of the source's routine operations.
Stack Tests
Stack tests and CEMS directly measure two important values: the concentration of a
specific air pollutant ([air pollutant]) in the stack gas and stack gas flow rate. Multiplying
these two values together will equal a mass emission rate typically expressed as
pounds of air pollutant per hour (see Equation 1 and Step 1). Once the hourly mass
emission rate is calculated, it can be easily converted to a source specific emission
factor by dividing the hourly mass emission rate by the hourly activity (i.e., hourly
material throughput during the stack test or CEMS measurement, such as ton of coal
combusted per hour [see Equation 2 and Step 2]). The annual emission rate of the air
contaminant is simply the product of the source specific emission factor and annual
activity (i.e., annual material throughput, such as tons of coal combusted during the
year) (see Equation 3 and Step 3).
Eq (1) [air pollutant] * stack gas flow rate = hourly mass emission rate
Eq (2) hourly mass emission rate / hourly activity = source specific emission factor
Eq (3) source specific emission factor * annual activity = annual emission rate of
air pollutant
According to Equation 1, the hourly mass emission rate is the concentration of air
pollutant multiplied by the stack gas flow rate. The concentration of air pollutants and
stack gas flow rate can be reported in a number of different ways or units, such as
milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) or pounds per standard cubic foot (lbs/scf). To
correctly calculate the hourly emission rate, the concentration and gas flow rate must be
in units that are compatible with each other.
The concentration of an air pollutant is calculated by dividing the mass of the air
pollutant collected by the volume or mass of stack gas sampled (see Equation 4).
During a stack test, most air pollutants are collected on some type of media. The
Combustion Sources: The stack gas leaving a combustion device (e.g. incinerator or
boiler) contains certain levels of air pollutants which can be made to appear smaller if
the total stack gas quantity is increased by adding non-pollutant gas to the stream. The
volume fraction of any gas present in the stack gas can be reduced by dilution, i.e.,
adding air. It is for this reason that combustion equipment concentration emission
standards are written with a specified amount of excess air (e.g., 0.08 grains/dscf
corrected to 12% carbon dioxide). These excess air corrections are important when
comparing stack test results to the emission standards but not when calculating the
mass emission rate. No matter how much the stack gas is diluted, the mass emission
rate will not change because the decrease in concentration will be offset by the
increase in stack gas flow rate.
If concentrations from stack tests are corrected to 50% excess air, 7% CO2, or 7% O2,
make sure the stack flow rate is in the same units when calculating the mass emission
rate.
The second piece of information needed to calculate the hourly mass emission rate is
the stack gas flow rate (see Equation 1). As one can see in Table 4, the concentrations
are based upon volumes of air at actual or standard pressure and temperature, and dry
or wet conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to know how to convert acfm to scfm and
scfm to dscfm.
Flow rates can be determined using continuous volume flow rate monitor, stack
sampling data or, for combustion sources, can be estimated based on heat input using
fuel factors.
The volume of a gas varies with changes in pressure and temperature. In order to
simplify comparison of gases, chemists adopted a set of standard conditions of
temperature and pressure. Accordingly, Rule 119(m) of the Michigan Administrative
o
Rule for Air Pollution Control defines standard conditions as a gas temperature of 70
Fahrenheit (460 + 70o F = 530o R) and a gas pressure of 1 atmosphere (29.92 inches
of mercury absolute).
Where:
Qstd = gas flow rate at standard temperature and pressure
Qo = gas flow rate at actual conditions
Pstd = pressure at standard conditions is 29.92 inches Hg or 1 atmosphere
Tstd = temperature at standard conditions is 70o F
Po = pressure at actual conditions (inches Hg)
o
To = temperature at actual conditions ( F)
o
Eq (6) Qscfm = Qacfm * (460 + 70 F ) * Po
(460 + To) * Ps
This approach can only be used for exhaust flows < 5% moisture
For Combustion Sources: When direct measurements of stack gas flow rate are not
available, Q can be calculated using fuel factors (Fd factors):
Where:
Fd = fuel factor, dry basis
%O2 = measured oxygen concentration, dry basis expressed as a percentage
Hin = heat input rate in MMBtu/hr
The average Fd factors are provided in EPA Reference Test Method 19 for different
fuels and are shown in Table 7. Also in Table 7 are the higher heating values (HHV) of
fuel.
EXAMPLE #2:
According to Equation 1 (see page 22), calculating the mass emission rate might
appear to be quite simple; just multiply the stack gas concentration of air pollutant by
the stack gas flow rate to get a mass emission rate. The trick in making this calculation
is being sure the units of concentration of air pollutants are compatible with the units of
the stack gas flow rate. The following equations will explain how the air pollutant
concentrations reported in stack tests and CEMS data (see Table 4) can be converted
to the hourly mass emission rate expressed in units of pounds per hour (lbs/hr).
EXAMPLE #3:
Company B operates a boiler equipped with a CEMS for SO2. According to the CEMS,
the in-stack concentration of SO2 is 33 ppmvd. The stack gas flow rate Qdscfm is
155,087. What is the emission rate of SO2 in lbs/hr?
Using Equation (10) and the molecular weight of SO2 is 64 (i.e., 32+(16 * 2)):
The hourly mass emission rate determined from CEMS or stack test data (see Step 1)
can be converted into a source specific emission factor. An emission factor is the
amount of pollutant emitted per activity. Activities are typically expressed in
EXAMPLE #4:
Company B operates a boiler that has an SO2 emission rate (ER) of 51 lbs/hr. During
the stack test, the coal firing rate (A) was 6.7 tons/hr. Calculate the SO2 emission factor
(EF).
For Combustion Sources: Often a stack test may report emissions in units of
lbs/MMBtu. This is calculated by taking the lbs of pollutant/hr emission rate from the
test and dividing by the heat input rate Hin (see Step 1 below). To convert lbs/MMBtu to
an annual emission rate, use the fuel throughput and heating value of fuel (see Step 2
below).
The annual emission rate is the product of the source specific emission factor
(determined in Step 2) multiplied by an annual activity rate. Some examples of an
annual activity rate are tons of coal combusted per year or gallons of paint applied per
year.
EXAMPLE #5:
Company B burns 41,000 tons of coal during the year. What is the annual mass
emission rate (ER) of SO2?
ER annual = 7.612 lbs SO2/ton of coal * 41,000 tons coal/yr * 1 ton/2000 lbs
One final key point to consider when deriving an annual mass emission rate from
source test data: stack tests are generally only conducted over several hours or days
at most. It’s a snap shot of the emission unit’s emissions. Over time, changes to the
emission unit may occur that could result in emission rates that are different than those
taken during the stack test. The facility may then have to conduct a new test to reflect
these new operating conditions.
M A SS BA LA NCE A PPROACH
air em issio n s
ra w m a te ria ls p ro d u c t
E M IS S IO N U N IT
A mass balance approach can provide reliable average emission estimates for specific
emission units. For some emission units, a mass balance may provide a better
estimate of emissions than an emission test would. In general, mass balances are
appropriate for use in situations where a high percentage of material is lost to the
atmosphere (e. g., sulfur in fuel, or solvent loss in an uncontrolled coating process).
The use of mass balance involves the examination of a process to determine whether
emissions can be estimated solely on knowledge of operating parameters, material
compositions, and total material usage. The simplest mass balance assumes that all
solvent used in a process will evaporate to become air emissions somewhere at the
facility. For instance, for many surface coating operations, it can be assumed that all of
the solvent in the coating evaporates to the atmosphere during the application and
drying processes. In such cases, emissions equal the amount of solvent contained in
the surface coating plus any added thinners.
Below are some examples of using the mass balance approach of estimating
emissions. The processes included in the examples are surface coating operations,
laboratory hoods, and combustion sources.
Surface coating operations, including preparation of the articles to be coated, can involve
a variety of emissions such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulates from
painting, metals from grinding, metals and VOCs from foundry operations, and other
criteria pollutants from fuel. Emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from
surface coating operations are a result of evaporation of thinners and solvents found in
the coating. The main factor affecting VOC emission rates is the percent of volatile
matter in the coating being applied. Most Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) indicate
the percent weight or volume of volatile matter in the coating. The MSDS may also
indicate the density of the coating, usually in units of pounds per gallon (lb/gal). The
density of the coating can also be calculated, if it is not specified on the MSDS, by
multiplying the specific gravity of the coating by 8.34 lb/gal, which is the density of water.
(This is assuming that the coating is being applied at close to atmospheric conditions.)
1. Identify the coating and amount used for a designated time period.
2. Locate the MSDS to identify the percent volatile by weight and the density of the
coating.
If so, you can estimate HAP emissions by assuming that the HAP is emitted into the
atmosphere at the same percentage as it is found in the coating. For example using the
previous example:
Coating A
In one process, Company C uses a solvent bath to clean its product, widgets. The
solvent density is 7.7 pounds per gallon. (The density of the solvent is used to convert
from gallons of solvent to pounds of solvent in the emission calculation). Xylene is the
only substance in the solvent for which emissions must be quantified, and it constitutes
87% of the solvent by weight. At the beginning of the year, Company C had 7,500
pounds of this solvent in storage and purchased another 9 tons over the year. At the
end of the year, the facility had 10,000 pounds in storage.
Because emissions equal the amount of xylene used, emissions (ER) are determined
using the following equation:
Where:
ER = Annual emissions of xylene (lb/yr)
SB = Amount of solvent in storage at the beginning of the year (lb)
SI = Amount of solvent purchased during the year (lb)
SE = Amount of solvent left in storage at the end of the year (lb)
F = Fraction of xylene in the solvent, lb xylene/lb
The VOC content of coating can be expressed in a number of different ways. Examples
are: lbs of VOC/ gallon of coating or lbs of VOC/ gallon of coating minus water and
exempt organic solvents. When calculating your annual emissions of VOC, make
certain that the total gallons of coating used in a year is compatible with what is in the
denominator of the VOC content of the coating.
Company D uses a coating that has a VOC content of 5.27 lb VOC /gal of coating
minus water and exempt organic solvent. The company used 5,452 gallons of coating
in the year. The percent by volume of water and exempt organic solvents in the coating
is 5 % and 15 %, respectively. Calculate their annual emissions of VOCs.
5,452 gallons coating * (5% + 15%) = 1,090 gallons of water and exempt organic
solvents
Step 2 - Determine gallons of coating minus water and exempt organic solvents
5,452 - 1,090 = 4,362 gallons of coating minus water and exempt organic solvents
Laboratory Hoods
There are no specific emission factors for calculating releases from laboratory hoods. The
most common approach to estimating releases is the use of a combination of material
balance and engineering calculations. In general, unless there is some information to the
contrary, you can conservatively assume that 100 percent of the volatile materials
collected by the hood are released to the atmosphere.
Assume that in 1993 you consumed 3,800 lb of a volatile material at a laboratory hood
and operated 6240 hours/year. Total potential VOC emissions could be calculated as:
lb 1 year hours lb
Potential amount per year: 3800 x x 8760 = 5335
year 6240 actual hr year max year
Combustion Sources
Fuel analysis can be used to predict emissions based on the application of mass
balance. The presence of certain elements in fuels may be used to predict their
presence in emission streams. These include toxic elements such as metals found in
coal; as well as other elements such as sulfur, that may be converted to other
compounds during the combustion process.
Where:
ER = pollutant emission rate
R = fuel flow rate (lb/hr)
PC = pollutant concentration in fuel ( %/100)
MW p = molecular weight of pollutant emitted (lb/lb-mole)
MW f = molecular weight of pollutant in fuel (lb/lb-mole)
For example, SO2 emissions from oil combustion can be calculated based on the
Calculate the SO2 emissions from the combustion of oil based on fuel analysis results
and the fuel flow information.
ER = R * PC * (MW p/MW f)
= (46,000) * (1.17/100) * (64/32)
The general equation for calculating uncontrolled emissions using an emission factor is:
Where:
ERA = emissions of pollutant A
EFA = emission factor of pollutant A
CF = 1 or more conversion factors (if necessary)
A = 1 or more activity values
EC = overall emission control efficiency (%) (if controlled).
• Calculation for fuel combustion requiring a single conversion factor and a single
activity value:
Below are some examples of using emission factors to estimate emissions. The
processes included in the examples are grinding operations, foundries, boilers,
incinerators, and open top cleaners.
Grinding Operations
Assume a grinding operations processes 50,000 tons of metal per year. The potential
particulate emissions from the grinding operations would be:
Foundry Emissions
Steel and gray iron foundries use the same basic processes to produce castings. Thus,
the emission factors and estimating techniques are similar for both types of foundry
operations. The main emissions from foundries occur during the metal melting step.
Table 9, taken from AP-42 Section 12.13-6, lists the emission factors for steel foundry
metal melting procedures. Emission factors for gray iron foundry metal melting can be
found in AP-42 section 12.10.
An example potential emission estimate for a steel foundry using an electric arc furnace
which processed 50 tons of metal a day would be:
lb PM tons metal 13 lb PM lb PM
Potential Emissions = 50 x = 650
day day ton metal day
Other foundry operations with the potential to emit pollutants include materials handling,
mold and core production, and casting and finishing. Particulate matter emission factors
that have been developed for other gray iron (uncontrolled) foundry processes are
summarized in Table 10, taken from AP-42 Section 12.10.
Consider an industrial boiler with a rated heat capacity of 100 million Btu/hr. The
USEPA’s AP-42 emission factor document in a Table entitled "Uncontrolled Emission
Factors for Fuel Oil Combustion" indicates that the particulate matter emission factor
for distillate oil is 2 lb/1000 gal of oil burned.
(1) Assuming the oil has a heat content of 140,000 Btu/gal, the maximum oil firing
rate of the boiler would be
Typical representative fuel heating values you may find useful are shown in Table 11.
To determine actual emissions, the actual quantity of fuel oil burned in a particular
period of time in the boiler is used in the calculation. Assume that your facility burned
1,000,000 gallons of #2 fuel oil in a year and the boiler was run at a 85% of the year
(310 days). Then the calculated actual emissions would be as follows:
Other tables found in AP-42 provide uncontrolled emission factors for natural gas
combustion and subbituminous coal combustion, respectively.
Thermal incinerators that are used to control volatile organic compounds (VOCs) not only
have VOC emissions, but as with any combustion source, they also have fuel-related
emissions. These fuel-related emissions are calculated similarly to emissions from fuel
burning equipment. Thus, if you have an incinerator with a rated heat input capacity of 25
MMBtu/hr that burns natural gas, the potential NOx emissions would be calculated in the
following manner:
lb NO x MMBtu 1 ft 3 140 lb NO x lb NO x
Potential Emissions = 25 x x 6 3
= 3.5
hr hr 1000 Btu 10 ft hr
Assume that in 1993 the incinerator only operated for 7,000 hours. The actual
emissions would then be:
3.5 lb NO x hr 1 ton ton NO x
Actual Emissions = x 7000 x = 12.25
hr year 2000 lb year
There are three significant emission sources from open top vapor cleaners (OTVCs): 1)
idling losses associated with the air/solvent vapor interface; 2) working losses caused
from the introduction and extraction of parts and spraying; and 3) other losses such as
filling and draining losses, downtime losses, and leaks.
Emissions data from idling OTVCs are presented in Table 12. A summary of some
available data on emission rates for working OTVCs using electric (not manual) hoists is
presented in Table 13.
Notes: Assumes a cleaner size of 0.9 m2, a freeboard ratio of 0.7, an uncovered machine with no refrigerated freeboard devices or
lip exhausts, and an AutoSonics device.
Source: USEPA - 450/3-89-030; August 1989, Alternative Control Technology Document - Halogenated Solvent Cleaners
Primary
Cleaner Cleaner Condenser Emission
Size Manufact- Air Speed Temperature Freeboard Ratea
Solvent (m2) urer (ft/min) (Fq) Ratio (lb/ft2/hr)
Notes: a Working emissions include diffusion, convection, and workload losses, but not leaks, solvent transfer losses, or
downtime losses.
b Information unknown or not available
c Constant cycling or parts into and out of machine and use of perforated metal basket that retained significant solvent
upon exit from machine account for elevated emission number.
d MC stands for Methylene Chloride
Source: USEPA - 450/3-89-030; August 1989, Alternative Control Technology Document - Halogenated Solvent Cleaners.
Relative Evaporation
Solvent Rate
(CCL4 = 100)
TCE 84
PCE 39
1,1,1-TCA 100
Methylene Chloride 147
CFC-113 170
Data from source-specific stack tests or continuous emission monitoring systems are
usually preferred for estimating a source’s emissions because those data provide the
best representation of the tested source’s emissions. However, test data from
individual sources are not always available and, even then, they may not reflect the
variability of actual emissions over time. Thus, emission factors are frequently the best
or only method available for estimating emissions, in spite of their limitations.
Average emissions differ significantly from source to source and, therefore, emission
factors frequently may not provide adequate estimates of the average emissions for a
specific source. The extent of between-source variability that exists, even among
similar individual sources, can be large depending on process, control system, and
pollutant. Although the causes of this variability are considered in emission factor
development, this type of information is seldom included in emission test reports used
to develop emission factors. As a result, some emission factors are derived from tests
that may vary by an order of magnitude or more. Even when the major process
variables are accounted for, the
Air pollution control devices also may cause differing emission characteristics. The
design criteria of air pollution control equipment affect the resulting emissions. Design
criteria include such items as the type of wet scrubber used, the pressure drop across a
scrubber, the plate area of an electrostatic precipitator, and the alkali feed rate to an
acid gas scrubber. Often, design criteria are not included in emission test reports (at
least not in a form conducive to detailed analysis of how varying process parameters
can affect emissions) and therefore may not be accounted for in the resulting factors.
Before simply applying emission factors to predict emissions from new or proposed
sources, or to make other source-specific emission assessments, the user should
review the latest literature and technology to be aware of circumstances that might
cause such sources to exhibit emission characteristics different from those of other,
typical existing sources. Care should be taken to assure that the subject source type
and design, controls, and raw material input are those of the source(s) analyzed to
produce the emission factor. This fact should be considered, as well as the age of the
information and the user’s knowledge of technology advances.
The MAERS software includes a look-up table of emission factors that may be used in
completing the report. The emission factors contained in the table are based upon
those listed in the Factor Information REtrieval (FIRE) Data System. The AQD, in
developing the look-up table of emission factors, edited and removed certain emission
factors from FIRE. See the discussion beginning on page 65 on how the MAERS look-
up table differs from the emission factors contained in FIRE.
The emission factors contained in the MAERS look-up table are provided to make it
easy for the user to estimate their annual emissions and report them to the state in
order to meet the annual reporting requirements. It must be understood, however, that
a general emission factor such as is found in the MAERS table is a default value. As
such, it may not be the best factor to represent emissions for the process being
evaluated. It is important to have an understanding of who develops emission factors
and what other emission estimation tools are available.
Emission Factor and Inventory Group is part of the Emissions, Modeling, and Analysis
Division of the USEPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. The program is
located at the USEPA's facility in Research Triangle Park, North
The Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) is a jointly sponsored effort of the
State and Territorial Air Pollution Program Administrators/Association of Local Air
Pollution Control Officials (STAPPA/ALAPCO) and EPA. The EIIP Steering Committee
and technical committees are composed of state, local, industry, and EPA
representatives. The goal of EIIP is to provide cost-effective, reliable emission
inventories which are an aggregation of emission data from specific sources of air
pollution. State regulatory agencies use emission inventories in tracking trends in air
releases and the development of new regulations. Since reliable emission inventories
must be built upon the latest emission factors, the EIIP has developed some important
emission factor tools that facilities subject to MAERS should consult. Methods for
estimating air emissions from various industrial processes are available at
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume02/index.html and
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume03/index.html.
All of the latest information on air emission inventories and factors developed by the
EFIG and EIIP are organized on the CHIEF web site which is one of 16 web sites of the
Technology Transfer Network (TTN) (see Figure 3). The TTN Web is a computer
system administered by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS),
USEPA consisting of a collection of air quality related web sites. Each web site focuses
on a different aspect of air quality or the Clean Air Act. The various sites contain on-line
data bases, downloadable computer programs, bulletins, regulatory information, and
public forums for exchange of ideas. Because of the available functionality, the TTN Web
is being touted as a primary communication and outreach vehicle by the OAQPS. Many
of the reports and information found in the TTN are in Adobe® Acrobat® Reader 3.0
which can be viewed or printed.
In addition to CHIEF, there is one other TTN web site containing emission factor
information: Clean Air Technology Center (CATC). The web site (www.epa.gov/ttn/catc)
offers free engineering assistance, a hotline, and technical guidance to state and local air
pollution control agencies in implementing air pollution control programs.
CHIEF
Fax
Brochures National Technical AP-42
CHIEF
Emissions Document FIRE PM CALC
Inventory-US Series
Conferences
L&E SPECIATE
TANKS
Technical 3.2
North
Newsletters American Committees
LANDFILL
Emissions MOBILE 6
2.01
Systems -
Listserver Mexico
ACA
WATER 9
Interactive
Contacts General
Emission ASEM 1.0
AIR Data
Inventory Beta
Resource
OTAQE
CATC Emission
Emissions
SCRAM Modeling
MDI
Emissions
Estimator
There are three major publications containing criteria and toxic air pollutant emission
factor information:
y Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors
AP-42, Fifth Edition, Volume I: Stationary Point and Area Sources and
Supplements A, B, C, D, E & F,
y EIIP Technical Report Series, Volumes I - Point Sources and Volume II - Area
Sources, and
y Locating and Estimating (L&E) Air Toxic Emissions Document Series.
The fact that an emission factor for a pollutant or process is not available from the
USEPA does not imply that the Agency believes the source does not emit that pollutant
or that the source should not be inventoried, it is only that the USEPA does not have
enough data to provide any advice.
The Fifth Edition of the “Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42)”, Volume
I, compiles emission factors and descriptions of activities that produce criteria and toxic
pollutant emissions for most stationary point and area sources. The emissions data in
the AP-42 document have been gathered from source tests, material balance studies,
and engineering estimates. AP-42 is divided into an introduction, 14 chapters and 5
appendices (see Appendix D). Each chapter covers a different major industry or source
category, and contains at least one section describing a specific operation with common
products or similar process methodologies. Volume II of AP-42 deals with mobile
sources.
Since the February 1995 release of the Fifth Edition of AP-42, additions and changes to
the emission factors have been placed in supplements. For the latest updates of the
AP-42 emission factors, Supplements A-F should be reviewed in their entirety. The
supplements are found in CHIEF at www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42supp.html.
Figure 6. AP-42
The need for clearly and precisely defined terms in AP-42 should be evident to all. The
factors in this document represent units of pollutants (or for ozone, precursors) for
which there are National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). These are often
referred to as "criteria" pollutants. Factors may be presented also for hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs) designated in the Clean Air Act and for other regulated and
unregulated air pollutants. If the pollutants are volatile organic compounds or particulate
matter, additional analytical information may be needed for specific applications.
Many pollutants are defined by their chemical names, which often may have synonyms
and trade names. Trade names are often given to mixtures to obscure proprietary
information, and the same components may have several trade names. For assurance
of the use of the proper chemical identification, the Chemical Abstract Service (CAS)
number for the chemical should be consulted along with the list of synonyms. The
pollutant terminology and conventions currently used in AP-42 are discussed below.
Particulate Matter
There are a number of terms commonly associated with the general pollutant,
"particulate matter" (PM). They include three different particle size forms, and four
different composition forms:
Composition Forms
y PRIMARY (sum of filterable particulate and condensable particulate
y TOTAL (same as PRIMARY, but both form names are currently being used)
y FILTERABLE (that portion of the particulate which is collected on a filter)
y CONDENSABLE (that portion of the particulate which is collected in impingers after
passing through a filter)
Within a stack sampling train there are two locations where particulate matter is
collected. In the front half of the train, particulate matter is collected on a filter. USEPA
Method 5 is used to determine the mass of this filterable particulate. In the back half of
the sampling train, particulate matter is condensed in the sampling train impingers.
USEPA Method 202 is used to determine this condensable particulate.
For MAERS reporting, the particulate matter form and AMMONIA, if present, are
required to be reported and are shown with their emission factors, in the color blue at
the bottom of the E-101 Emissions form within the software.
Organic Compounds
Hazardous Air Pollutants are defined for EPA regulatory purposes in Title III of the
Clean Air Act Amendment (CAAA). However, many states and other authorities
designate additional toxic or hazardous compounds, organic or inorganic, that can exist
in gaseous or particulate form. Also, as mentioned, compounds emitted as VOCs may
be of interest for their participation in photochemical reactivity. Few EPA Reference
Test Methods exist for these compounds, which may come from the myriad of sources
covered in this document. However, test methods are available to allow reasonable
reliable quantification of many compounds, and adequate test results are available to
yield estimates of sufficient quality to be included in this document. Where such
compounds are quantified herein with emission factors, they represent the actual mass
of that compound emitted. Totals for PM or VOC, as appropriate, are inclusive of the
component species unless otherwise noted. There are a limited number of gaseous
hazardous or toxic compounds that may not be VOCs, and whenever they occur they
will be identified separately.
The Emission Inventory and Improvement Group (EIIP) produces a separate series of
reports that focus on a number of the more significant HAPs and related sources. The
title of these documents begin with “Locating And Estimating Emissions From Sources
of . . . (Substance).”
Each AP-42 emission factor is given a rating from A through E and U, with A being the
best. The factor's rating is a general indication of its reliability. This rating is based on
the estimated validity of the tests used to develop the factor and on both the amount
and the representative characteristics of those data. In general, factors based on many
observations, or on more widely accepted test procedures, are assigned higher
rankings. The factors are determined by AP-42 authors and reviewers. Because
emission factors can be based on source tests, modeling, mass balance, or other
information, factor ratings can vary greatly.
The AP-42 emission factor rating is an overall assessment of the reliability of a factor. It
is based on both the quality of the test(s) or information that is the source of the factor
and on how well the factor represents the emission source. Higher ratings are for
factors based on many unbiased observations, or on widely accepted test procedures.
For example, ten or more source tests on different randomly selected plants would
likely be assigned an "A" rating if all tests are conducted using a single valid reference
measurement method. Likewise, a single observation based on questionable methods
of testing would be assigned an "E," and a factor extrapolated from higher-rated factors
for similar processes would be assigned a "D" or an "E".
A (Excellent) Factor is developed from A- and B-rated source test data taken from
many randomly chosen facilities in the industry population. The source category
population is sufficiently specific to minimize variability.
In addition to downloading all or part of AP-42 from the CHIEF web site or Fax CHIEF,
the emission factors in the AP-42 are in the Air CHIEF CD (see page 80) and in the
Factor Information REtrieval System (FIRE) (see page 67).
Paper copies of AP-42 Volume I and four supplements are available from the
Government Printing Office (GPO):
http://bookstore.gpo.gov
EIIP focuses on producing documents that maximize the use of existing emission
estimation information. EIIP documents present “preferred” and alternative methods for
collecting data and calculating emissions from point, area, mobile, and biogenic source
categories. For each document, EIIP assembles all available emissions and source
activity data information for a specific source category. A committee of technical experts
(from USEPA, state and local agencies, and industry) then chooses the most
appropriate procedures, standardizes their presentation, and describes the
circumstances in which to best use the information.
The EIIP guidance development process does not develop new emission factors, nor
will EIIP documents replace AP-42. EIIP relies on emission factors from AP-42. Users
of EIIP documents are referred to the appropriate sections(s) of AP-42 for selection of
emission factors or for more detailed process information. EIIP guidance and AP-42
have a complementary relationship. The following Table 15 contains the table of
contents.
Volume I: Introduction
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume01/index.html
Volumes I through VII were printed in July 1997. In addition to being printed from the
web site, they are available in hardcopy by calling the Info CHIEF Help Desk. The
phone number is (919) 541-1000, the fax is (919)541-5680.
The L&E documents are the result of a USEPA program to compile and publish
information on specific toxic air pollutants and the source categories from which these
emissions are expected. These documents are pollutant, or source-specific. Each of
the L&Es identifies and quantifies emissions from specific source categories and
includes general process descriptions, potential release points, and emission factors.
L&Es are hazardous air pollutant (HAP) specific reports that present emission factors
and process flow diagrams. Emission factors from the L&Es are not subject to the
same strict development guidelines required for AP-42 and consequently, may be of
lower quality.
Emission models have been developed by the USEPA to estimate emissions for a
limited number of processes. These models are generally more accurate than an
emission factor used in a linear equation. All of the models may be downloaded from
the TNN Web (See Figure 7).
Emission factors are available from the Factor Information REtrieval (FIRE) Data
System (see Figure 8). FIRE is a database management system containing over
18,500 emission factors to estimate the emission of criteria and hazardous air
pollutants from stationary, area, and mobile sources. FIRE allows easy access to
criteria and hazardous air pollutant emission factors obtained from the “Compilation of
Air Pollutant Emission Factors (AP-42)”, “Locating and Estimating (L&E)” series
documents, factors derived from state-reported test data, and factors taken from
literature searches.
Figure 8. FIRE
Some of the emission factor data in the air toxics module of the FIRE tool come from a
number of emissions source testing reports developed under the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) air regulatory initiative (AB-2588). Some of these CARB data
are of particularly high quality because they are derived from pooled source tests of
similar sources within an industry in California. Sources in the CARB pooled emissions
source testing include oil and gas production, asphalt production, petroleum refining,
and fuel combustion.
How the MAERS Look-up Emission Factor Table and FIRE Differ
The Air Quality Division has installed an edited version of FIRE 6.23 in the MAERS
software referred to as the look-up table of emission factors. Below is an explanation of
how FIRE was edited.
y All FIRE emission factors that are identified as “less than or equal to” or as a “range”
have been changed to “equal to” or “mean” factors. Emission ranges are not
accepted by MAERS.
y When FIRE identifies more than one emission factor for a pollutant for one SCC
code, only one emission factor appears in the MAERS look-up table. For example,
a SCC code in FIRE may display emission factors for SO2 and SOx. Only one of
these emission factors will appear in MAERS.
y Some FIRE emission factors have been replaced with Michigan emission factors.
They primarily involve surface coating operations and were part of the old Michigan
Air Pollution Reporting (MAPR) system.
As a reminder, the emission factors contained in the MAERS look-up table are provided
for reference and should not be used if more accurate information is available.
TANKS uses chemical, meteorological, roof fitting, and rim seal data to generate
emissions estimates for several types of storage tanks, including: vertical and horizontal
fixed roof tanks, internal and external floating roof tanks, dome external floating roof
tanks, and underground storage tanks. To use the program, enter specific information
about storage tank construction and the stored liquid. The TANKS program then
estimates the annual or seasonal emissions of VOC and produces a report. The
emissions can be separated into breathing and working losses. A batch mode of
operation is available to generate a single report for multiple tanks.
The TANKS program employs a chemical database of over 100 organic liquids, and a
meteorological database of over 240 cities in the United States. The program allows
the addition of more chemicals and cities, if desired. TANKS is capable of calculating
individual component emissions from known mixtures and estimating emissions from
crude oils and selected refined petroleum products using liquid concentration HAP
profiles supplied with the program.
Emissions associated with the storage of organic liquids are due to the evaporation of
liquid, as well as changes in the liquid level during filling or unloading. The two types of
emissions associated with storage tanks are classified as standing storage and working
losses. Standing storage losses result from vapor expansion and contraction within the
tank due to fluctuations in temperature and pressure. Working losses result from
continual filling and emptying of tank contents.
There are five basic tank designs that are used for liquid storage vessels: fixed roof,
external floating roof, internal floating roof, variable vapor space, and pressure (low and
high). The following example illustrates the procedures for calculating working and
standing storage losses for a fixed roof vessel. The procedures for other tank types are
included in section 7 of the USEPA’s AP-42 document.
Assume that a facility in Delaware stores acetonitrile in a fixed roof tank with a dome roof.
The tank has a diameter of 20 feet and a height of 10 feet, with a liquid capacity of
10,000 gallons. The following procedure may be used to estimate potential emissions
from this fixed roof storage tank.
LT = L S + LW
Where:
LT = Total losses (lb/yr)
LS = Standing storage losses (lb/hr)
LW = Working losses (lb/hr)
Where:
MV = Vapor molecular weight (lb/lb-mole)
= 40.05 lb/lb-mole (from Table 12.3-3)
R = Ideal gas constant (10.731 (psia-ft3)/(lb-mole-°R))
PVA = Vapor pressure at average liquid surface temperature (psia)
= 0.96 psia @ 54°F (Interpolated from Table 12.3-3)
TLA = Daily average liquid surface temperature (°R)
= 514°R (from Table 12.3-6 for Wilmington, DE)
41.05 x 0.96 lb
WV = = 0.007 3
10.731 x 514 ft
The vapor space expansion factor is calculated using the following equation:
∆ TV ∆ PV - ∆ P B
KE = +
T LA P A - PVA
Where:
∆TV = Daily vapor temperature range (°R)
∆PV = Daily Vapor pressure range (psi)
∆PB = Breather vent pressure setting rang (psi)
PA = Atmospheric pressure (14.7 psia)
∆ T V = 0.72 x ∆ T A + 0.028 x K P x I
Where:
PVX = Vapor pressure at daily maximum liquid surface temp. (psia)
= 1.20 psia (Interpolated from Table 12.3-3)
PVN = Vapor pressure at daily minimum liquid surface temp. (psia)
= 0.735 psia (Interpolated from Table 12.3-3)
∆ PV = 1.20 - 0.735 = 0.465 psia
∆ P B = P BP - P BV
Where:
PBP = Breather vent pressure setting (psig)
= assumed to be 0.03 psig
PBV = Breather vent vacuum setting (psig)
KS = 1
(1 + 0.053 x PVA x HVO)
KS = 1 = 0.755
(1 + 0.053 x 0.96 x 6.37)
LW = 0.0010 x M V x PVA x Q x K N x K P
lb
LT = 471 + 131 = 784
yr
The Landfill Gas Emission Model was developed by the Clean Air Technology Center
(CATC), and can be used to estimate emission rates for methane, carbon dioxide,
nonmethane organic compounds, and individual HAPs from landfills. The program can
also be used by landfill owners and operators to determine if a landfill is subject to the
control requirements of the federal New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) for new
municipal solid waste landfills (40 CFR 60 Subpart WWW) or the emission guidelines for
existing municipal solid waste landfills (40 CFR 60 Subpart CC).
PM Calculator
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/pmcalc/index.html
PM Calculator is applicable to point sources only, and requires the user to input
uncontrolled emissions (either total filterable particulate or filterable PM-10) for each
source, the source category classification (SCC) and the control device, if any. The
program will then calculate controlled emissions for filterable PM-2.5 and filterable PM-10
for each point source.
SPECIATE 3.2
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/speciate
The SPECIATE database contains organic compound and particulate matter speciation
profiles for more than 300 source types. The profiles attempt to break the total VOC or
particulate matter (PM) emissions from a particular source into the individual compounds
(in the case of VOC) or elements (for PM).
WATER9
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/water
There is no one technique for estimating air emissions from an entire wastewater treatment
facility. One commonly employed technique is the use of a combination of engineering
calculations and mass transfer equations to model potential air emissions. This type of
modeling uses information on the chemical and physical characteristics of constituents of
the wastewater to predict rates at which volatile compounds in the water are released to
air. To use this technique, you must have detailed information on a variety of parameters,
including chemical and physical characteristics of the wastewater (e.g., concentration of
VOCs, Henry’s Law constants for constituents, volatility, diffusivity, vapor pressures, etc.),
physical characteristics of the treatment facility (liquid surface area, volume, etc.) and other
information, such as meteorological
There are a number of factors to keep in mind when using these predictive models for
estimating air releases from wastewater treatment plants. Obviously, the model can only be
as good as the data available as input. Further, these models were developed based on a
certain set of circumstances and are intended to be used only in certain situations.
Therefore, the models may not be able to accommodate all the characteristics of the
treatment facility. These and other factors are outlined in the USEPA document and should
be considered carefully before applying the models to your facility.
Additional methods for estimating VOC emissions from wastewater treatment facilities can
be found in the Chemical Manufacturers’ Association (1990) A Guide to Estimating
Secondary Emissions. In this volume, the use of mass balance equations and fields tracer
studies are discussed. The following is a simple example of the calculation of maximum
potential VOC emissions generated form a wastewater treatment facility.
MDI Emissions Estimator Software is a tool that provides a fast and convenient method
to estimate MDI emissions from typical process applications and activities. The software
program is based upon the methodology outlined in the MDI/ Polymeric MDI Emissions
Reporting Guidelines for the Polyurethane Industry. The program has built-in calculation
modules to estimate emissions for the following activities:
• Working and breathing losses from storage tanks
• Enclosed processes based upon cavity size
• Fugitive Emissions from process areas
• Enclosed processes based upon foam density
• Open continuous processes
• Filling/Blending operations
• Open processes involving adhesive/coating operations
• Spills
Included in the software are 18 illustrated examples based upon real-life applications.
Illustrated examples include:
Adhesives Boats Particleboard
Air Filter Doors Rebond
Appliance- Refrigerator Filling/Blending Recreation
Appliance -Truck Laminator Boardstock Spills
Automotive Mobile Homes Spray Foam
Boardstock Packaging Water heater
Assume that using data from your Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR) (required under your National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit), you estimate the presence of waste materials at the
concentrations listed in Table 16. Assume that 100% of the VOCs are released to the atmosphere.
Assume the facility routinely discharges at 50 gpm for 24 hour per day, but could handle 75 gpm.
Actual VOC emissions may be calculated as follows:
µg g
170 = 1.7 x 10 -4
l l
lb hr days lb
4.3 x 10 -3 x 24 x 365 = 37.7 VOCs
hr day year year
lb 1 ton tons
37.7 x = 0.019 VOCs
year 2000 lb year
Using maximum concentration and design flow rates the potential VOC emissions may be calculated
as follows:
g gal min 1000 l 1 lb lb
7.35 x 10 -4 x 75 x 60 x x = 2.8 x 10 -2
l min hr 264.17 gal 453.6 g hr
lb hr days lb
2.8 x 10 -2 x 24 x 365 = 245 VOCs
hr day year year
lb 1 to n to n s
245 x = 0 .1 2 VOCs
year 2 0 0 0 lb year
AIR CHIEF
www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/software/airchief/index.html
As a part of its commitment to protecting global air quality, the USEPA is working to
provide current emissions data in convenient, easy-to-access formats to federal, state,
and local regulatory agencies, businesses, and the general public. An important tool in
this effort is the Air ClearingHouse For Inventories And Emission Factors (Air CHIEF) in
CD-ROM format.
The Air CHIEF CD-ROM gives the public and private sector users access to air
emission data specific to estimating the types and quantities of pollutants that may be
emitted from a wide variety of sources. Updated annually, Air CHIEF offers on one disc
literally thousands of pages contained in some of the USEPA’s most widely used and
requested documents. Included are the USEPA Emission Factor and Inventory Group’s
most popular emission estimation tools.
Air CHIEF is published annually.
Air CHIEF version 9.0 has been developed in Adobe Acrobat® format and is now
available for distribution by the Government Printing Office. This version of Air CHIEF
contains many features, such as linking between related documents, web links directly
to the CHIEF web site for easy access to the most recent updates, and enhanced full-
CD searching. Included on Air CHIEF version 9.0 are:
Also included on Air CHIEF are the installable copies of these software programs:
• BEIS • PMCALC
• CHEM9 • SPECIATE
• FIRE • WATER8
• Landfill Model • WATER9
The minimum requirements to run Air CHIEF are an IBM-compatible PC with a 486
processor running at 33 megahertz or better (a 486 or Pentium processor is
recommended), with at least 4 MB RAM, 5 MB hard disk space, plus 7 MB additional
temporary disk space available during installation. Air CHIEF requires a CD-ROM drive
and must be used with Windows 95, Windows 98 or Windows NT to utilize all features.
For viewing PDF files inside of a Web browser, Netscape Navigator versions 3.0 or later
or Microsoft Internet Explorer or later are recommended (Data on the CD-ROM can be
retrieved using other operating systems with the appropriate Acrobat Reader.)
The Air CHIEF CD-ROM Version 9.0 is available by calling the Info Chief Help Desk at
(919) 541-1000 or send e-mail to info.chief@epa.gov.
For information or assistance regarding the availability or use of any of the CHIEF tools
and services, contact the Info CHIEF help desk:
By e-mail: info.chief@.epa.gov
Source-specific emission factor data are similar to and are used in the same manner as
generic emission factor data, except that they are applicable to a specific
source/device/process. Source-specific emission factors can be developed from fuel
analyses, source tests, and laboratory analysis. These data are often available as a
part of the information developed for permitting and enforcement purposes; sometimes
the facility operator will have the required data as a result of monitoring and analysis
performed by the facility operator for purposes of quality control and process
optimization. Inquiries of the facility operator are necessary to determine the existence
and extent of the data available for use in developing emission factors for a specific
source/device/process.
Source-specific emission factors may also be available in the form of emissions per
hour that a process creates at a device. These data are often developed as a result of
permit processing and may be used as an allowable emission rate for the
device/process. Emission rate data can be used if it is representative of the actual
operating conditions and is not simply an upper limit that is seldom achieved.
The Environmental Science and Services Division and the Air Quality Division of the
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality are working closely with trade
associations to develop industry specific guidance on estimating annual air pollution
emissions from facilities. The guidance includes the SCC codes that should be
reported, along with emission factors, emission models, and other factors that sources
should consider when submitting their report. Currently, fact sheets have been
developed for the following nine industries:
Coating
Electroplating
Foundries
Hot Mix Asphalt Plants
Landfills
Mineral Product Processes
Oil And Gas Industry
Petroleum Bulk Plant Sand Terminals
Plastic Manufacturing
AP-40: Air Pollution Engineering Manual, 2nd Edition. USEPA, Los Angeles County Air
Pollution Control District, May 1973. Reprinted and updated by the Air & Waste
Management Association, 1992.
AP-42: Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 1: Stationary Point and
Area Sources, 4th Edition. USEPA. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,
Research Triangle Park, N.C., September 1985.
AP-42: Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume 2: Mobile Sources, 4th
Edition. US EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park,
N.C., September 1985.
Protocol for determining the daily volatile organic compound emission rate of
automobile and light-duty truck topcoat operations. EPA-450/3-88-018, December
1988.
Chemical Abstract
Services (CAS)
Number Chemical Name
75-07-0 Acetaldehyde
60-35-5 Acetamide
75-05-8 Acetonitrile
98-86-2 Acetophenone
53-96-32 2-Acetylaminofluorene
107-02-8 Acrolein
79-06-1 Acrylamide
79-10-7 Acrylic acid
107-13-1 Acrylonitrile
107-05-1 Allyl chloride
92-67-1 4-Aminobiphenyl
62-53-3 Aniline
90-04-0 o-Anisidine
1332-21-4 Asbestos
71-43-2 Benzene (including benzene from gasoline)
92-87-5 Benzidine
98-07-7 Benzotrichloride
100-44-7 Benzyl chloride
92-52-4 Biphenyl
117-81-7 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)
542-88-1 Bis(chloromethyl)ether
75-25-2 Bromoform
106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene
156-62-7 Calcium cyanamide
[105-60-2 Caprolactam - Removed 6/18/96 61 Federal Register 30816
133-06-2 Captan
63-25-2 Carbaryl
75-15-0 Carbon disulfide
56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride
463-58-1 Carbonyl sulfide
120-80-9 Catechol
133-90-4 Chloramben
57-74-9 Chlordane
7782-50-5 Chlorine
79-11-8 Chloracetic acid
532-27-4 2-Chloracetophenone
108-90-7 Chlorobenzene
510-15-6 Chlorobenzilate
67-66-3 Chloroform
107-30-2 Chloromethyl methyl ether
126-99-8 Chloroprene
1319-77-3 Cresols/Cresylic acid (isomers and mixture)
95-48-7 o-Cresol
108-39-4 m-Cresol
106-44-5 p-Cresol
98-82-8 Cumene 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, including salts and
esters
72-55-9 DDE
334-88-3 Diazomethane
132-64-9 Dibenzofurans
96-12-8 1,2,-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
84-74-2 Dibutyl phthalate
106-46-7 1,4,-Dichlorobenzene(p)
91-94-1 3,3-Dichlorobenzidene
111-44-4 Dichloroethyl ether (Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether)
542-75-6 1,3-Dichloropropene
62-73-7 Dichlorvos
111-42-2 Diethanolamine
64-67-5 Diethyl sulfate
119-90-4 3,3-Dimethoxybenzidine
60-11-7 4-Dimethyl aminoazobenzene
121-69-7 N,N-Diethyl aniline (N,N-Dimethylaniline)
119-93-7 3,3-Dimethyl benzidine
79-44-7 Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride
68-12-2 N,N-Dimethyl formamide
57-14-7 1,1-Dimethyl hydrazine
131-11-3 Dimethyl phthalate
77-78-1 Dimethyl sulfate
534-52-1 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol, and salts
51-28-5 2,4-Dinitrophenol
121-14-2 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide)
122-66-7 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
106-89-8 Epichlorohydrin (1-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane)
106-88-7 1,2-Epoxybutane
140-88-5 Ethyl acrylate
100-41-4 Ethyl benzene
51-79-6 Ethyl carbamate (Urethane)
75-00-3 Ethyl chloride (Chlorethane)
92-93-3 4-Nitrobiphenyl
100-02-7 4-Nitrophenol
79-46-9 2-Nitropropane
684-93-5 N-Nitroso-N-methylurea
62-75-9 N-Nitrosodimethylamine
59-89-2 N-Nitrosomorpholine
56-38-2 Parathion
82-68-8 Pentachloronitrobenzene (Quintobenzene)
87-86-5 Pentachlorophenol
108-95-2 Phenol
106-50-3 p-Phenylenediamine
75-44-5 Phosgene
7803-51-2 Phosphine
7723-14-0 Phosphorus
85-44-9 Phthalic anhydride
1336-36-3 Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors)
1120-71-4 1,3-Propane sultone
57-57-8 beta-Propiolactone
123-38-6 Propionaldehyde
114-26-1 Propoxur (Baygon)
78-87-5 Propylene dichloride (1,2-Dichloropropane)
75-56-9 Propylene oxide
75-55-8 1,2-Propylenimine (2-Methyl aziridine)
91-22-5 Quinoline
106-51-4 Quinone
100-42-5 Styrene
96-09-3 Styrene oxide
1746-01-6 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene)
7550-45-0 Titanium tetrachloride
108-88-3 Toluene
95-80-7 2,4-Toluene diamine
584-84-9 2,4-Toluene diisocyanate
95-53-4 o-Toluidine
8001-35-2 Toxaphene (chlorinated camphene)
120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-01-6 Trichloroethylene
95-95-4 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
121-44-8 Triethylamine
1582-09-8 Trifluralin
540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane
108-05-4 Vinyl acetate
593-60-2 Vinyl bromide
75-01-4 Vinyl chloride
75-35-4 Vinylidene chloride (1,1-Dichloroethylene)
1330-20-7 Xylenes (isomers and mixture)
95-47-6 o-Xylenes
108-38-3 m-Xylenes
106-42-3 p-Xylenes
• Antimony Compounds
• Arsenic Compounds (inorganic including arsine)
• Beryllium Compounds
• Cadmium Compounds
• Chromium Compounds
• Cobalt Compounds
• Coke Oven Emissions
• Cyanide Compounds1
2
• Glycol ethers
• Lead Compounds
• Manganese Compounds
• Mercury Compounds
• Fine mineral fibers3
• Nickel Compounds
• Polycyclic Organic Matter4
5
• Radionuclides (including radon)
• Selenium Compounds
Note: For all listings above which contain the word "compounds" and for glycol ethers, the following applies: Unless otherwise
specified, these listings are defined as including any unique chemical substance that contains the named chemical (i.e., antimony
compound, arsenic, etc.) as part of that chemical’s infrastructure.
1. X’CN where X=H’ or any other group where a formal dissociation may occur. For example, KCN or Ca(CN)2
2. On January 12, 1999 (64FR1780), the EPA proposed to modify the definition of glycol ethers to exclude surfactant alcohol
ethoxylates and their derivatives (SAED). On August 2, 2000 (65FR47342), the EPA published the inal action. This action
deletes each individual compound in a group called the surfactant alcohol ethoxylates and their derivatives (SAED) from the
glycol ethers category in the list of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) established by section 112(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
EPA also made conforming changes in the definition of glycol ethers with respect to the designation of hazardous substances
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
"The following definition of the glycol ethers category of hazardous air pollutants applies instead of the definition set forth in 42
U.S.C. 7412(b)(1), footnote 2: Glycol ethers include mono- and di-ethers of ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, and triethylene
glycol R-(OCH2CH2)n-OR’
Where: n= 1, 2, or 3
R= alkyl C7 or less, or phenyl or alkyl substituted phenyl
R’= H, or alkyl C7 or less, or carboxylic acid ester, sulfate, phosphate, nitrate, or sulfonate..
3. Under Review
4. Under Review
5. A type of atom which spontaneously undergoes radioactive decay.
Appendix B.
List of Federal Regulated Air Pollutants
As defined in 40 CFR 51.100(s), the term VOC includes any compound of carbon (excluding carbon monoxide,
carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate) which participates in
atmospheric photochemical reactions.
The following organic compounds are excluded from the federal definition of VOC because of they have been
determined to have negligible photochemical reactivity:
The USEPA revised it’s definition of VOC, and this revision added the following list of compounds
excluded from the definition of VOC:
32 difluoromethane (HFC-32)
33 ethylfluoride (HFC-161)
1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropane (HFC-236fa)
1,1,2,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ca)
1,1,2,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ea)
1,1,1,2,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245eb)
1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa)
1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoropropane (HFC-236ea)
1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (HFC-365mfe)
chlorofluoromethan (HCFC-31)
1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a)
1-chloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC-151a)
1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4-nonafluoro-4-methoxybutane (C4F90CH3)
2-(difluoromethoxymethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane [(CF3) 2CFCF20CH3]
1-ethoxy-1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4,-nonafluorobutane (C4F9OCH2H5)
2-(ethoxydifluoromethyl)-1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane [(CF3) 2CFCF20C2H5]
methyl acetate
Cadmium
Dioxin/furan (defined in 40 CFR 60.53a to mean total tetra through octachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
*
and dibenzofurans)
Fluorides
*
Hydrogen chloride
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S)
Mercury
Nonmethane organic compounds
Sulfuric acid mist
Total reduced sulfur
Reduced sulfur compounds
Total organic compounds
Total particulate matter
The new source performance standard (NSPS) for municipal waste combustors (MWC) controls
emissions of dioxin/furans and hydrogen chloride gas (40 CFR 60.53a and 60.54a) as surrogates for
controlling emissions of organic compounds and acid gases which are emitted in the exhaust gases from
MWC units. Thus, the indicated dioxin/furan compounds and hydrogen chloride are regulated pollutants.
Class II Substances
hydrochlorofluorocarbon-21 (HCFC-21)
hydrochlorofluorocarbon-22 (HCFC-22)
Pollutants for which national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP’s) have been
established:
Arsenic
Asbestos
Beryllium
Benzene
Mercury
Radionuclides
Vinyl chloride
Most of the 188 listed pollutants became regulated when EPA promulgated the Hazardous Organic
NESHAP (HON) which is discussed below. The remaining pollutants will become regulated: (1) when
EPA promulgates a Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standard for the pollutant under
section 112(d), (2) for a particular source, when case-by-case MACT determinations are made under
section 112(g) for the source, or (3) the later of June 15, 1994 or 18 months after EPA fails to issue
emissions standards for categories of sources in compliance with the timetable promulgated pursuant to
section 112(e) as mandated by Section 112(j).
As part of the effort to regulate pollutants listed in section 112(b), the EPA has developed the Hazardous
Organic NESHAP (HON) which applies to the synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry and
controls emissions of 149 volatile hazardous air pollutants (HAP’s). All of the pollutants listed in the HON
are among the 188 HAP’s listed in section 112(b). Pollutants addressed by the HON became regulated on
the effective date specified in the HON.
Section 112(r)(3) requires that EPA promulgate an initial list of at least 100 substances with threshold
quantities which would cause or may reasonably be anticipated to cause death, injury, or serious adverse
effects to human health or the environment if accidentally released. The EPA’s proposed rule to
implement 112(r)(3) was published in the Federal Register on January 19, 1993 (58 FR 5102). The
finalized list of substances includes 77 acutely toxic substances, 63 flammable gases and volatile
flammable liquids. At present, commercial explosives (classified by the Department of Transportation in
Division 1.1) are included in the finalized list, but EPA has recently proposed the deletion of Division 1.1
explosives from the list of regulated substances.
For more information regarding air contaminants, get a copy of the Clean Air Assistance Program’s “What
is an Air Contaminant/Pollutant” fact sheet. See Tab 18 – Clean Air Assistance Program Publications.
Fugitive emissions are included in emission calculations for the following sources.
AP-42 Contents
Fifth Edition
CONTENTS
Page
Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1
1. External Combustion Sources .................................................................................. 1.0-1
1.1 Bituminous And Subbituminous Coal Combustion ............................. 1.1-1
1.2 Anthracite Coal Combustion .............................................................. 1.2-1
1.3 Fuel Oil Combustion .......................................................................... 1.3-1
1.4 Natural Gas Combustion ................................................................... 1.4-1
1.5 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Combustion ............................................... 1.5-1
1.6 Wood Waste Combustion In Boilers .................................................. 1.6-1
1.7 Lignite Combustion............................................................................ 1.7-1
1.8 Bagasse Combustion In Sugar Mills .................................................. 1.8-1
1.9 Residential Fireplaces ....................................................................... 1.9-1
1.10 Residential Wood Stoves................................................................. 1.10-1
1.11 Waste Oil Combustion..................................................................... 1.11-1
Appendix A
Miscellaneous Data And Conversion Factors...............................................................A-1
Appendix B.1
Particle Size Distribution Data And Sized Emission Factors
For Selected Sources ..............................................................................................B.1-1
Appendix C.1
Procedures For Sampling Surface/Bulk Dust Loading ..............................................C.1-1
Appendix C.2
Procedures For Laboratory Analysis Of Surface/Bulk Dust Loading Samples ..........C.2-1