Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dear Mr. Smith, Re: GISC9308-D2 Finlays Fabulous Fictitious Fern Please accept this letter as my formal submission of deliverable 2, Finlays Fabulous Fictitious Fern for GISC9308 Spatial Analysis. During this project a multi-criteria evaluation and fuzzy overlay analysis was completed to determine appropriate reintroduction locations of Finlays Fabulous Fictitious Fern onto the Niagara College Glendale Campus. After completing analysis it was found that there are ample land plots available with appropriate criteria to replant 110 specimens of Finlays Fern using either the multi criteria evaluation or the fuzzy overlay analysis. These land plots are 16m2 in size, and are mainly located on the escarpment which is located directly south east of the college campus. If you have any questions regarding the project please feel free to contact me by phone (647921-4930) or e-mail at your convenience. I look forward to receiving your feedback and suggestions.
Sincerely,
Shannon Graup BAH GIS GM Candidate S.G Enclosures 1) Technical Memorandum: Finlays Fern Reintroduction, Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Fuzzy Overlay Analysis for the Reintroduction of Osmunda Finlayensis Fern on Niagara College Glendale Campus.
Project: Client:
Subject: Date:
Reintroduction of Finlays Fabulous Fictitious Fern (Osmunda Finlayensis) on Niagara College Glendale Campus February 20th, 2014 GISC9308 D2
1.0 Introduction
Niagara College Glendale Campus is home to a wide variety of plant and animal species. Horticultural students at the college are constantly sampling and keeping track of plant species in the area. One particular species known locally as Finlays Fabulous Fictitious Fern which was once abundant on the Glendale Campus has been pushed out of the area over time. Horticultural students have collected samples of Finlays Fern before its extirpation from the campus. A multi criteria evaluation suitability analysis and a fuzzy overlay analysis will be completed, both guided by the project terms of reference (Smith, 2014). Using these outputs, the best locations for the reintroduction of 110 specimens of Finlays Fern on the Niagara College Glendale campus are located.
Page | 1
Page | 2
Slope
0 to 20 - no growth, 20 to 65 - sparse growth to full growth 65 to 90 - no growth.
Rank 0 1 0
The aspect of the slope or the direction the slope faces is another important criterion in the reintroduction of the fern. Finlays Fern will have heavy growth on slopes facing 247 to 360, south-west, west, north-west and north facing slopes. Table 2 lists the different aspect growth occurrences of the Osmunda Finlayensis.
Table 2: Aspect Reclassification Values, MCE
Aspect
0 to 247 no growth, 247 to 360 heavy growth,
Rank 0 2
Finlays Fern grows in areas with poor soils because of its aerial root system. This helps it to avoid competition with other plant species. Escarpment soils are best suited for Finlays Fern. Table 3 lists the growth occurrences of Finlays Fern on different soil types.
Table 3: Soil Reclassification Values, MCE
Soil
Escarpment soils are best suited, Toledo and Cashel soils are reasonably well suited, Beverley, Peel, Haldimand and Lincoln clays are not at all suited Areas not mapped are urbanized and thus not suitable.
Rank 2 1 0 0
Page | 3
Dr. Botany Bob, who first discovered the Osmunda Finlayensis, describes the plant as shy and retiring. The plant needs azimuth and altitude hillshade values of June 21, the day of the year the sun is the highest on the horizon. The azimuth value is 180, and the altitude is 65.98.
Table 4: Hillshade Reclassification Values, MCE
Hillshade
0 to 195 will not grow, 195 to 235 will thrive, 235 to 255 will not grow.
Rank 0 2 0
Aspect 1
Soil 1 1
Hillshade 1 1 0.5
Once the pairwise comparison matrix is completed scores must be given to each of the criterion, and then weights must be calculated. The weights that are calculated represent the coefficient that is used when calculating the suitability in a multi-criteria evaluation. Table 6 lists each criteria score, and their respective relative weights or coefficients.
Table 6: Scores and Weights from Pairwise Comparison Matrix
Page | 4
Multi-Criteria Evaluation = ((slopereclass) * (0.5)) + ((aspectreclass) * (0.333333333)) + ((hillreclass) * (0.083333333)) + ((soilreclass) * (0.083333333))
There are 28 appropriately sized land plots that have a suitability score of 1.5, and 230 land plots that have a suitability score of approximately 1.41. These are the highest scoring suitable 16m2 land plots located in the study area that are appropriate for reintroduction of the fern. For successful reintroduction of Finlays Fern, it is suggested that only one plant specimen be planted in each 16m2 plot. Figure 2 identifies the suitable locations to plant Finlays Fern.
Page | 5
Figure 2: Suitable Land Plots for Reintroduction of the Finlay Fern using Multi-Criteria Evaluation
Page | 6
As there are only 110 plants available to be planted 48 of the available land plots will not be used at this time.
Slope
0 to 20 - no growth, 20 to 35 - sparse growth, 35 to 45 - moderate growth, 45 to 55 - heavy growth, 55 to 65 - sparse growth, 65 to 90 - no growth.
Table 8 lists the reclassification values for the aspect criterion. Once aspect was reclassified a fuzzy membership was completed using the near membership type. This function is similar to Gaussian fuzzy membership type but has a more narrow spread (ESRI, 2013).
Table 8: Aspect Reclassification Values, Fuzzy Overlay
Aspect
0 to 247 no growth 247 to 292.5 very sparse growth, 292.5 to 337.5 heavy growth, 337.5 to 360 very sparse growth.
Rank NoData 1 3 1
Page | 7
Soil reclassification values for the fuzzy overlay can be seen in Table 9. Once the soil criterion was reclassified it was put into a fuzzy membership using the linear function. This function defines fuzzy membership based on a linear transformation (ESRI, 2013). The minimum of 0 tells the membership that anything below 0 will have a value of 0 membership. The maximum of 2 tells the membership that anything of 2 or above will be given a value of 1 for membership.
Table 9: Soil Reclassification Values, Fuzzy Overlay
Soil
Escarpment soils are best suited, Toledo and Cashel soils are reasonably well suited, Beverley and Peel soils are very poorly suited, Haldimand and Lincoln clays are not at all suited, Areas not mapped are urbanized and thus not suitable.
Table 10 lists the hillshade criterion reclassification values. This criterion was put into fuzzy membership using the Gaussian type, which assumes the data is normally distributed.
Table 10: Hillshade Reclassification Values, Fuzzy Overlay
Hillshade
0 to 180 will not grow, 180 to 195 will grow but wont thrive, 195 to 220 will thrive, 220 to 235 will grow but will not thrive, 235 to 255 will not grow.
Page | 8
Page | 9
As there are 275 land plots that have an appropriate fuzzy membership score of 1, 65 land plots will be unused at this time as there are only 110 plants available for reintroduction.
Page | 10
Raster surfaces are needed for each of the four criteria before any reclassification can be completed. The initial soil feature class had to be edited because there was an error in the data. It was shifted down so that the actual escarpment soil plot lined up with the escarpment soil in the IKONOS imagery. The soil feature class was then converted into a raster based on the soil names. The raster surface created in the first model located in Figure 4 is used to create a slope surface. From the slope surface both aspect and hillshade rasters were created. Aspect and hillshade used the slope raster as the input because slope direction (aspect) should be derived from the slope raster, and the hillshade which looks at the illumination source angle and shadows which are derived from the slope of the land. The processes of creating a raster for each of the four criteria can be seen in Figure 5.
Page | 11
After creating the four criteria raster surfaces, each surface was reclassified based on the values listed in tables 1 through 4, the reclassification values for the multi-criteria evaluation. Once the reclassified raster surfaces were created they were put into an equation in the raster calculator. The model outlining the reclassification of surfaces and the raster calculator can be seen in Figure 6.
The raster calculator equation can also be found located at the bottom of Figure 6. The final output map showing possible land plots for reintroduction of Finlays Fern can be seen in Figure 2.
Page | 12
Figure 7 refers to the fuzzy overlay analysis completed at the end of the project.
For this analysis each raster surface was reclassified using the values found in tables 7 through 10. Once raster surfaces were reclassified for each of the criteria, they were transformed into fuzzy membership surfaces based on the membership types of Gaussian, near or linear. Finally the four criteria membership surfaces were put into the fuzzy overlay analysis tool to create the final output surface identifying land plots that are suited for Finlays Fern reintroduction. Suitable 4m by 4m land plots appropriate for reintroduction of Finlays Fern using the fuzzy overlay analysis can be seen in detail in Figure 3.
Page | 13
6.0 Conclusion
During this analysis, 4m by 4m land plots located near the Niagara College Glendale Campus were identified for possible reintroduction sites of the Osmunda Finlayensis commonly known as Finlays Fabulous Fictitious Fern. Other important criteria for reintroduction of Finlays Fern are the slope of the land, slope direction (aspect), hillshade and soil type. Using ArcGIS Desktop 10.1 spatial analyst extension suitable locations were identified using both a multi criteria evaluation and a fuzzy overlay analysis. Suitable locations for Finlays Fern using the multi criteria evaluation can be seen in Figure 2, and suitable locations using the fuzzy overlay analysis can be seen in Figure 3. Using either of these final output maps, there is an ample amount of land plots available for planting 110 Finlays Fern specimen.
References
Botany, R. J. (2011). The Life Cycle of Osmunda Finlayensis and associated fern assemblages. The Endangered Fictitious Fern Review, 19 - 31. ESRI. (2013). ArcGIS Help 10.1. Retrieved February 2014, from ArcGIS Resources: http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/ Smith, I. (2014). Terms of Reference - GISC9308 D2 Finlay's Fabulous Fictitious Fern.
Page | 14