Civil Engineering Design (CE 4813-001) Spring 2014
100% Submittal
Prepared By Travis W. Miller Austin Porlier Jacob Wilson Nathan Foote Stefan Garza
Submitted to Dr. Alberto Arroyo
Table of Contents
I. Project Summary
II. Environmental
III. Transportation
IV. Utilities
V. Drainage
VI. Geotechnical and Foundation
VII. Structural
VIII. Costs
I. Project Summary
a. Duc-ees Convenience Store and Gas Station is located at the intersection of Highway 37 South and Loop 1604, on the northeast corner. The property is owned by DGS Land Development. The property is 8.24 acres with low vegetation and has a gravel driveway and pad existing on the property from the previous use of the property. New development will consist of the convenience store which is 49,500 square feet. The gas station will have an estimated 50 pumping stations. Design will be carried out by High Tower, LLC.
II. Environmental
a. Notice of Intent (NOI) for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity under TPDES General Permit (TRX150000)
b. Notice of Termination (NOT) for Authorization under TPDES General Permit TRX150000
c. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Underground and Aboveground Storage Tank Construction Notification Form
d. Utility Installation Request for through Texas Department of Transportation
III. Transportation
a. TIA (Traffic Impact Analysis)
IV. Utilities
a. Existing Conditions i. A 12-inch water line currently runs in front of our property. The nearest gravity main for sewage disposal is at Loop 1604 south of our property, 12-inches.
ii. Two different routes have been analyzed to determine the best and most efficient way to run our sanitary sewer. Due to the elevation changes it is almost near impossible to run a gravity main to the nearest existing one. Running it south to Loop 1604 is not feasible because of the elevation differences. Running it west and boring under two access roads and Highway 37 is also not possible due to the elevation; it would not meet the minimum cover requirements. Only other possibility is installing a lift station.
iii. Water Consumption totals to 30 EDU which requires a 3-inch meter. Impact fees totals to $93,690.
iv. Sewage Consumption totals to 30 EDU which would also require a 3-inch meter. Impact fees total to $33,528.
1. 8-inch gravity main at 1.3% slope
v. Lift Station
1. Wet Well Diameter - 6 feet 2. Wet Well Depth 12 feet a. 5 feet of emergency storage b. 4 feet of on/off storage c. 3 feet of submersible storage 3. 4-inch force main at 888 feet 4. Pump size less than 500 gpm but greater than 133.33 gpm vi. Fire Flow 1. Pressure Zone 2 2. Minimum of 2000 gpm 3. From the International Fire Code Table B105.1 2500 gpm 4. Install 8-inch fire line
V. Drainage
a. Existing Contours
b. Drainage Path
i. From elevation changes our run-off drains into the ditch in front of our property and drains north to a 100-year flood plain.
c. Rational Method i. Time of Concentration 1. 38.37 minutes ii. Existing Flow 1. 14 cfs iii. Proposed 1. Drainage Area 1 a. 7.63 minutes b. 65 cfs 2. Drainage Area 2 a. 5.00 minutes b. 27 cfs
d. Floodplain Analysis i. Was carried out using Hec-Ras and Flowmaster
VI. Geotechnical and Foundation a. Geotechnical Report b. Future potential considerations for preliminary pavement and foundation design c. Cross-sections of Canopy Foundation, Building Foundation and Parking Pavement
VII. Structural a. Summary i. Concrete and Concrete-Steel Hybrid ii. Steel Option 1 iii. Steel Option 2 iv. Steel Option 3 b. Loadings for Steel Member Design i. Beam ii. Girders c. Steel Member Design i. Beam Design-Option 1 &3 ii. Beam Design-Option 2 iii. Girder Design-Option 1 iv. Girder Design-Option 2 v. Girder Design-Option 3 d. Weight Comparison e. Frame Loadings i. Snow Loads ii. Wind Loads iii. Seismic Loads f. SAP2000 Results i. Transverse Frames ii. Longitudinal Frames g. Strength Checks of Members Against SAP2000 i. Flexural Strength ii. Shear Strength h. Connection Design i. Beam-to-Girder Connection ii. Beam-to-Column Connection iii. Girder-to-Column Connection i. Column Design j. Bracing Design i. Braces ii. Connection
k. Dead Load Calculations for Beams, Girders, and Columns i. Gas Pump Canopy 1. Deck -5psf 2. Faade -5psf 3. Steel Self weight
l. Live Load Calculations for Beams, Girders, and Columns i. Gas Pump Canopy 1. Roof Live -30
m. Wind Load Calculations i. Gas Pump Canopy 1. Lateral -25psf 2. Uplift -20psf