Mr. C's Forgery.

txt[5/12/2014 4:36:52 PM]

<blockquote>Mr. C.
"Vogt makes a big point that the "06" number in my reconstructed certificate is just like the off-baseline number in real
certificates
from that month, oblivious to the fact that I was just following the published Nordyke certificate, which I listed as one
of my sources
in the article."</blockquote>
Mr. is being intentionally vague about the source of his "6".
I had long ago determined that Mr. C. had actually alterred the Alan LFCOLB PDF to produce his
"RECONSTRUCTED" Obama
LFCOLB. I had also determined that much of the typed text on his "RECONSTRUCTION" is verbatim the original
typed text on
Alan's LFCOLB.
Mr. C. only erased and replaced the minimum text to convert Alan's LFCOLB to Obama's "RECONSTRUCTION".
Consequently, the Obama LFCOLB "RECONSTRUCTION" is actually an alterred version of the Alan redacted
LFCOLB.
For example the "6" in "61" on Mr. C's Obama "RECONSTRUCTION" is identical (down to the individual pixel) to the
"6" in "63"
on the Alan LFCOLB.
Many entire words are also identical.
Too bad that I couldn't check the "6" in Mr. C's "06" because Alan's BC number is redacted on the Alan LFCOLB.
So let's see a show of Obot hands of those who already knew that Mr. C had re-used much of the original typed text on
the Alan
certificate and erased (and replaced) only the minimum text to convert Alan's certificate to the Obama
"RECONSTRUCTION".
Where I come from we call this shady activity rather than "well-sourced research".