Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
Zacharys Anger Gundu. Ph.D.
Department of Archaeology
Ahmadu Bello University
Zaria. Nigeria.
Abstract.
The Middle Benue Valley first came into archaeological limelight in 1951. This was the
year typical Nok styled terracotta were discovered accidentally while digging a hockey
pitch at the then, Government Middle School, Katsina Ala. Though, follow up
excavation was conducted on the Katsina Ala site, the Middle Benue Valley is better
the University of Ibadan, in 1975. This paper is an attempt to review archaeological work
done in the valley since the accidental finds at the Middle School grounds in Katsina Ala.
It highlights the outline of archaeological work done in the valley especially in the Tiv
Key Words.
The Middle Benue Valley came into archaeological prominence in 1951. This was the
year Nok styled terracotta were discovered by chance while constructing a hockey pitch
for the then Government Middle School Katsina Ala. In 1954, two more terracotta pieces
were discovered on the school grounds, prompting excavation of the site by Robert Soper
who was then a staff of the Nigerian Department of Antiquities. The Katsina Ala finds
are a total of six terracotta pieces (see Fagg 1969, Shaw 1981 and Jemkur 1992). While
some of these are human heads, others are fragments of human figures seated on stools.
The uniqueness of these finds lie in the fact that they represent the first non alluvial
discovery of Nok styled terracotta outside the tin mining areas of the Jos Plateau. A
lone mid 16th century AD date associated with the finds is today rejected as having come
work on Katsina Ala , we are yet to place the significance of the site beyond suggestions
groups in the Middle Benue valley, including the Tiv (see Gundu 1980).
After Robert Soper’s 1954 salvage excavation of the Katsina Ala Middle School grounds,
there was no archaeological investigation of any part of the Middle Benue Valley until
1975. This is the year, Professor Bassey Andah leading a team from the University of
2
mainly from linguistic evidence regarding the
At the level of interpretation, the investigation was concerned with five main issues.
These are:
i. The determination of material culture, physical and linguistic identity of the first
people responsible for the production of food and iron in the area.
iii. The form(s) and context of early agriculture and iron working in the area.
iv. The ecological and sociological effects of agriculture and the production of iron in
The initial outing of this investigation comprising, Professor Bassey Andah (team
leader), Danlami Walu, Stephen Tilleh and Sunday Ozegbe was a reconnaissance of the
Katsina Ala Basin and the Otupko area. More than 10 archaeological sites were
discovered during this outing (see Andah et al 1981). One of these, Tse Dura, five
kilometers south- east of Ushongo town1 was chosen for further investigation including
excavations. The site of Tse Dura consists of four rock shelters (designated RS1-4) and
five open settlements ( designated KA4S1-5) . Though the first test excavation at Tse
Dura was done in 1975 on the first rock shelter of the site (RS1), the main excavation on
the site and other neighboring sites on Ushongo hills commenced in 1980. The main
1
Ushongo town is in Mbayegh ward of Ushongo Local Government Area. It is by the Ushongo hill which
is the site of the historic battle between the Tiv and the Ugenyi (Chamba) at which the Tiv were victorious.
3
excavation covered two rock shelters (RS1 and RS2) and five open settlements.
(KA4S1-5).
At the first rock shelter, three cultural levels were revealed during the excavation. The
first layer of dark grey top soil (5-8 cm thick) comprised pottery, slag, stone tools and
clay smoking pipe fragments. The second cultural level measuring 25-35 cm thick,
contained pottery, iron slag, bone and iron points, while the third layer, (40 cm thick)
was characterized by quartz, cores, flakes and a few bones. There was also less pottery in
this layer than in the first two layers.( see Walu 1979 and Andah 1983b). In addition to
these cultural materials, a west-east oriented skeleton and two human burials were
unearthed in RS1. The four radio carbon dates (2330±850BP; 2350±80BP; 2320± 800BP;
2330±70BP) associated with the excavation here, suggest a date of about 2300BP for the
The excavation of the second rock shelter which started in 1980, was completed in 1983
after three seasons of field work. The excavation revealed a top soil cultural level, an
upper sterile layer as well as a lower cultural layer comprising grindstones, hammer
stones, pottery, iron slag, hearths as well as animal bones of horse, donkey (or giraffe),
bovidae, goat or deer and a basal sterile layer of disintegrating rocks containing
potsherds. (Andah 1983b). Two Carbon 14 dates (1110±80BP and 2210±150 BP ) are
Outside the excavation of the two rock shelters at Tse Dura, the open air sites have been
studied through surface mapping and collections including test pitting of KA4S1 and
KA4S2. Particle size analysis of soil samples on the site together with field observations
4
of the stratigraphies of the area indicate two climatic phases associated with four
possible cultural levels on the site (Tubosun and Andah 1983 and Andah 1983b).
Besides Tse Dura, considerable work has been done around the hills of Ushongo, Mata
and the Gboko area. (see Folorunso 1981, 1983 and 1989, Gundu 1984, Igirgi 1984 ,
1986, 1987 and Ogundele 1983 ). At the Ushongo hills, a very extensive settlement ruin
delineated by a complex dry walling system has been mapped on top of the ranges of the
hill. Though, rock shelters have also been discovered around the lower inselbergs of the
hill, only one of these, (KA3RS1) has been properly investigated. The investigation
involving excavation by Folorunso (1983) and test pitting by Ogundele (1983) revealed
two cultural phases. The first of these, about 13-15 cm thick, had potsherds , hammer
stones, grinding stones, iron slag and clay smoking pipe fragments. This is separated by
a 20-25 cm thick sterile unit from a 30-35 thick second phase comprising pottery, spindle
whorls, snail shells, bones, ash and charcoal ( also see Igirgi 1986).
In the Gboko area, reconnaissance survey carried out by Gundu (1984) has identified
Mkar (GB1), Ikyuen (Atanyi) (GB2), Gar-Alaa (GB3) and Gboko hills(GB4) as
abandoned historic settlements. Seven settlement clusters were counted on Mkar, while
four were counted on Ikyuen. In 1994, an iron smelting furnace exposed by erosion on
following a report by Emmanuel Tyoumbur Ihembeato who was then, a staff of the
Limited archaeological work involving general reconnaissance of the hills further south
east of Tse Dura has also been carried out. One of these, Ibinda Ihya has been studied
between 1986 and 1987 (see Ogundele 1993) revealing four fortified enclosures
5
separated from each other by open spaces. Round huts were identified in and out of these
enclosures. Limited test excavations were also carried out on parts of the site. The
reconnaissance and excavation of sites in the Ushongo and Ibinda axis has been
farming systems and pottery production (see Akinade 1984, Ogundele 1993, Folorunso
2005 and 2007). These studies have been used to establish continuity and change in the
archaeological record and extant Tiv culture (Folorunso 2005). The ethno-archaeological
studies on extant settlements were focused on the compounds of Sar, Ayila and Tse Dura
(all around the Tse Dura settlement site). Other extant settlements that have been studied
include the compounds of Wombo, Tse Gbashanam, Lukposu, Adzege and Alumuku
located around Ibinda hill. These settlements and other domestic structures were studied
abandoned hill tops(see Folorunso 2005, 2007 and Ogundele 2004). According to
Folorunso (2007), extant Tiv settlements comprise five distinct domestic structures.
These are sleeping huts, kitchen huts, reception huts, store huts and chicken huts. The
arrangements of these structures is circular with the reception hut in the centre and the
store huts and chicken huts smaller in size and normally outside the main circle of the
compound.
A comparative partial analysis of the hill top settlements and extant Tiv settlements in the
plains (see Folorunso 2007) indicates that the abandoned hilltop settlements were not
only smaller in size but were also more compact in arrangement. ‘The diameter of the
huts on the archaeological sites range from 1.80 to 5.80 metres with an average of 3.82
2
The first ethno- archaeological study in the Benue Valley was however carried out independent of the
Bantu Homeland Studies Project by Zacharys Anger Gundu on Tiv Burials (see Gundu 1980).
6
metres and the nearest neighbour distance (NND) between huts ranges from 20 cm to
8.40 metres, while the huts in the present day compounds present diameters ranging from
1.80 to 6.80 metres with an average of 4.35 metres and the NND range from 60 cm to
1993) have confirmed earlier works on the Tiv by Abraham (1933), Bohannan and
Boahannan (1965) and Bohannan (1969) showing that the Tiv area allows for both grain
and tuber based economies in a year round agricultural practice. The major plants of the
area including yams( Dioscoria spp), bulrush millet (Pennisetum sp) and guinea
maize (Zea mays), cassava (Manihot esculenta) and groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea).
Other plants identified by these studies as growing in the Tiv area include, the locust
bean tree (Parkia sp), peppers, beniseed (Sesasum indicum), varieties of beans, citrus,
These studies outline different practices and relationships with crops , domestic animals
and the land during the course of the farming year. Also included in the outline are
The study of extant pottery manufacture in the Tiv area from the ethno-archaeological
perspective shows a range of pot forms distinguished by shape, size and function. The
major ones include gbande (a shallow bowl) with a diameter of 6-8 cm, tsua (a small pot)
with a diameter of 6-12 cm and height of 12-25 cm, used for cooking soup. Ityegh (a big
pot) with a height varying between 55-62 cm and a mouth diameter depending on the
3
The list of plants characteristic of the Tiv farming systems provided in these studies is not exhaustive.
Further studies are required to update this list and clarify the role of hunting and fishing in extant Tiv
economy.
7
function. When its used for storage (of water and grains), it has a narrower mouth than
when its used for cooking. Another pot form called buufu (perforated on the body) is used
for processing food (like fermentation of beans and drying of meat). Chenge (a giant
bowl) is also used for processing food especially garri, ground nuts and beniseed. (see
Ndera 2006). Another product of note here is zwar , the biggest pot form known to the
Tiv. Given its size, its mainly used for storage. The manufacture of pottery in Tivland has
been identified (see Folorunso 2003) as the exclusive preserve of women who carry out
the manufacture on a part time basis.4 The mat impression decorative motif (earlier
identified in the archaeological record here as reticulate is a dominant motif on extant Tiv
pottery and ‘an important element in the discussion of Tiv pottery and for making
Between 1994 and 1995, an extensive reconnaissance of south eastern Tivland was
carried out as part of the general inquiry in the Middle Benue Valley. The reconnaissance
the area.
iii. Delineation of resource zones of historic sites, including their classification and
description.
4
This exclusiveness needs to be qualified because boys tend to help their mothers in related pottery
making chores especially those around clay mining, processing and pottery firing.
8
The reconnaissance identified seven settlement localities each of which is around a major
relief area, comprising hills, hillocks and ringdykes. Three of these localities, Ibinda,
Ngokugh and Akovurwo are identified in history (see Bohannan and Bohannan 1954)
Makar 1975 and 1995, Orkar 1979, Gbor1974 and 1978, and Akiga 1933) as sites settled
by the Tiv people in their spread over the Middle Benue Valley. The remaining four
(Ikyo Dajo, Ikyookembe, Akoo and Abande) were been identified for the first time as
major relief areas of historic significance accounted for in Tiv oral traditions. The
archaeological evidence including pottery scatter, upper and lower grinding stones, house
and granary foundations marked by stone circles, dry stone walls and terraces on the
Two resources zones (see Gundu 1999) have been identified in relation to each of the
settlement localities while four activity areas including earth walls, ruins of fortified
settlements, slag scatter and dye pits have been identified in the plains indicating their
historic use. Another aspect of the reconnaissance was the study of place names. This was
movement in the valley in addition to giving us clues to the identities of the cultural
groups responsible for the archaeological landscape here’. (Gundu 1999: 67). The names
for hills for example, fall into three categories. The first category including hills like
Ibinda Akura, Gar Zwabo and Ikyo Dajo take their names after the leaders of the groups
that initially settled on them. In the second category are hills like Ibinda Ihya named
after the main group (Ihyarev) that settled on it, while the third category are hills whose
names are a description of their physical appearance . In this category are Ityough-ki-
9
Orough in tar Ikyurav Ya (whose highest point has the appearance of a human head),
Vande Ander (also in tar Ikyurav Ya) so named because of the presence of ‘rock drums’
on the hill5 and Akovurwo in tar Turan so named because of its folded appearance.6
Following the reconnaissance, we chose the first of these settlement localities closest to
the Nigerian- Cameroon border (Akoo), for a more detailed study involving excavations
which were conducted on Akoo, (KA (MO)S4), Torkwan (KA(MO) S2) and Agondo
(KA (MO)S5).
reconnaissance efforts.
locality could be placed to enable us relate the sites to traditions and other
iii. Collating materials to enable a more integrated analysis of the locality (see
Three pits (EU1, EU2 and TP1) were excavated on Akoo7. EU1 is a circular feature
represented by six standing stones with a diameter of 3.2 meters on the first platform to
the south eastern side of the site. It was excavated in spits showing six different levels
determined by soil colour 8 . Major finds from the pit include potsherds, an iron point, a
piece of bone, charcoal, an upper grinding stone and a fragment of clay smoking pipe.
5
Onov Azan, personal communication , 5th January 1995 at Ikyogen.
6
Akovurwo is also referred to as Kunalifu by the Jukun who have a history of having settled there at some
point in the past.
7
Akoo is a walled abandoned settlement with an area of 12,715.225 square meters.
8
Soil colour was determined using a Munsell Soil Chart.
10
EU2 on the other hand is a house foundation (with a diameter of 3.80 meters) marked by
a scatter of four lower and six upper grinding stones. It is south west of EU1 and outside
the main walling system on the site. The unit was also excavated in six levels
distinguished by changes in soil colour. The unit was excavated by isolating two living
floors marked by grinding stones. Finds here include potsherds, charcoal and piece of
clay smoking pipe. The third unit of excavation, TP1 is a one by one meter pit within a
house foundation in the middle platform. The excavation went down by 22cm cutting
through a thin topsoil and three levels in which were recovered potsherds. The
stratigraphy of the pit shows a first layer of ‘loose ashy silty topsoil’ , a second layer of
sandy silt deposit resting discomformably on the third layer of very compact stony and
Wende Gbajur, the patriarch of Tyuluv ordered us to stop excavating the site insisting
that the down pour which coincided with our excavation of the site was a bad omen.
on the site. In deference to Wender Gbajur and the traditions and customs of the local
people, we stopped the excavation of the site. An the alternative site (Agondo),
KA(MO)S5, was pointed to us by Wende Gbajur, about one and a half kilometers north
east of Akoo, where we sunk a one by one meter test pit inside a house foundation with a
diameter of 2.60 meters. The test pit showed a shallow stratigraphic depth of 12cm at the
9
This was on the instruction of Wende Gbajur who ‘gave’ us an alternative site to excavate.
11
Besides the above, work has been done on the north eastern side of the Katsina Ala
river10 especially amongst the Shitire. (see Ndera 1991 and 2009). Following an initial
reconnaissance focusing on Gar-u Mbamo and Dikpo hill where four abandoned
settlements were identified, Ndera (2008:4) using ‘the historical approach’ attempted to
critically evaluate and compare ‘the archaeological evidence for the abandoned
settlements on the hill and the plains with a view to knowing their role or roles in the
settlement history of the Shitire and other Tiv groups in the Benue valley’. A
comprehensive survey of the hill identified five settlement sites enclosed by a dry stone
wall on top of the hill and another on the northern foot of the hill. A rock shelter was also
identified on the hill. Five excavations were done on the site over two seasons of field
work. Finds from the excavations include potsherds, smoking pipe fragments, spindle
Archaeologists working in the Middle Benue Valley have had to contend with three
methodological challenges and dissemination challenges. The first few years of the Bantu
Research Grant) and the National Commission for Museums and Monuments. Support
from the National Commission for Museums and Monuments dried up soon after
Professor Ekpo Eyo left the Commission as Director General and by 1987, support
from the University of Ibadan Senate Research Grant also dried up, leaving Ogundele
10
Dr. Jonathan Ndera’s work amongst the Shitire represents the first major archaeological work across the
eastern side of the Katsina Ala river after the salvage work on the Government Middle School ground
following the accidental discovery of Nok styled terracotta in the school.
12
communication) . The then Kwande Local Government Council also supported the
like Gundu (1984 and 1999 ) and Ndera (2009) had to source for private funding for
their work here. While Gundu was funded by CODESRIA, the Benue State University
and private contributions12, Ndera on the other hand was funded by the Ahmadu Bello
University Board of Research and other private contributors including the Katsina Ala
Local Government and MacArthur Foundation. While severely ‘restricting’ the scope of
work here, funding challenges are also responsible for the inability to produce more
chronometric dates in the valley despite the many excavations carried out.13 Lack of
communication) reports having used his Volkswagen Beetle car from Ibadan to Benue (a
distance in excess of 700 kilometers ) on several occasions for his field work. Human
skeletal remains recovered from Tse Dura have also not been analyzed because of
financial challenges. These have also affected environmental studies (and other specialist
analysis) as well as follow up studies which could have given ‘student scholars’ in the
valley the opportunity to pursue and investigate other perspectives arising from their
initial studies.
11
This gesture of the Local Government was open and continued for as long as Bassey Andah was alive.
12
Private contributors to Gundu’s work in the Middle Benue Valley include Prof. David Iornem, Steve
Andzenge, Terna Agor, Silas McIkpah, Polycarp Asongo, Tom Miachi, David Igirgi, Benjamin Achiatar,
Ismaila Mohamed, Azenda Sombo, Yiman Abunku, Terkaa Gemade, Kwaghpenda Vihishima, Moses
Atagher, Vihive Ikpah, Tyoumbur Ihembeato, Robert Orya, H. Nembativ, Commander Jonathan Afeah,
Professor Dick Andzenge and Terhemen Andzenge.
13
10 dates have so far come from the archaeology of the Valley. The first of these is a lone date from
Katsina Ala which has been disputed. 2 TL dates are from the Tse Dura-Ushongo complex, 2 Radio
Carbon dates come from Tse Dura, 2 from Ushongo, 1 from Ibinda and 2 others from Akoo. The Akoo
dates were with the kind support of Prof. Marek E Jansinski of the Institute of Archaeology,
Vitenskapsmuseet(Norway) who was introduced to us courtesy of Profs. Peter Ucko (Institute of
Archaeology, London ) and Bayo Folorunso (of the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology,
University of Ibadan).
13
The archaeological investigation of the valley has also been affected by methodological
anthropology, historical linguistics and environmental sciences. This was with the
resolve the Bantu Question. Though reports on archaeological work in the valley have
far from the correct position. Archaeologists have dominated the investigations without
and physical anthropologists. This has impoverished and distorted the multidisciplinary
perspective forcing archaeologists to enter into very contentious positions in the attempt
to draw data from different disciplines in the study of the valley. This lapse is
responsible for the continued use of re circled linguistic data to embellish the
archaeological narrative even when there is serious doubt as to whether language can
form the basis of archaeological research into the Bantu Question articulated in the
context of origin and movement over parts of Africa (see Chami 2006, Robertson and
Another level of the methodological challenge is centred on the migration and ethnic
question. Though archaeologists have bought into the migration model in the study of the
Middle Benue Valley to advance diverse speculations (see Folorunso 2005, Gundu 1999,
Andah 1983b, Ndera 2000 and Ogundele 2004 ), no significant attempt has been made
in the valley. There is also no attempt to validate migrations in the archaeology of the
14
valley beyond what (Tiv) traditions claim as a way of disambiguating it from other
forms of dispersal especially trade and diffusion. This point is pertinent because its only
(Anthony 1992:174). Thus, when Folorunso (2005:179) argues in respect of the Early
Iron Age (EIA) sequence at Tse Dura that ‘it is possible that these iron using populations
migrated mainly from the north west from the area of the Nok culture, where early
evidence of iron manufacturing has been documented in West Africa’, there is hardly any
made totally oblivious of other iron working evidence especially that from the Nsukka
area, south west of the Valley where work by Okafor (see Okafor and Phillips 1992) has
confirmed earlier dates (than those of Nok) for iron working in Nigeria. Between the
Katsina Ala and the Nsukka area, there are also significant traces of iron working in
Gboko, Konshisha, Oju, Otukpo (Akpachi), Okpokwu (Edumoga), and Ado (Utonkon).
(see Gundu 1994, Gundu and Igirgi 1992 and Anebi, personal communication). Unless
concerted efforts are made at an archaeological study and dating of the early iron
evidence in these other parts of the valley, it will be premature to argue the migrations of
early iron age populations into the Benue valley from the Nok area(or elsewhere for that
themselves and their investigations in the Benue valley as ‘specialists’ much like
European scholars in Africa who according to Andah (1996:158) ‘occupy the driver’s
seat rather than the learner’s seat, guarding and shaping what informants, living or
15
dead(e.g., sites and artifacts) reveal.’ While criticizing this tendency, Andah (1996)
argues that it gives scholars the latitude to determine what is valid and what should be
discarded when their ways of knowing clashes with those of their informants, since these
and nonsense’ with the ‘sense’ standing ‘for the usable historical truths about the Tiv
as following ‘objective scientific tradition’ with the right to speak on the past of the Tiv
while his informants merely ‘abuse’ and ‘misuse’ oral traditions. This is precisely the
worldview that makes it impossible for the involvement of host communities beyond
being mere informants, guides, porters and labourers in the study of their heritage. Good
archaeological practice entails that the people whose past we study are actively drawn
into our studies as ‘colleagues’ and ‘consultants’ with the objective of encouraging them
and engaging with their ways of knowing and interpreting the past.
The third challenge is related to the issue of dissemination. Though quite a lot has been
done in the Middle Benue Valley, the archaeology of the valley is not properly and
widely known. Dissemination has been limited to a few conferences including those of
the Archaeological Association of Nigeria (see Gundu 1987, Igirgi 1987, Ndera 2000),
Ibadan (see Gundu and Igirgi 1992 ) and , The World Archaeological Congress(see
Folorunso and Ogundele 1993 ). Dissemination has also been in form of articles in the
16
West African Journal of Archaeology (see Andah et al 1981, Andah 1983b, Gundu and
Igirgi 1992, Ogundele 1993, Tubosun 1997, Tubosun and Andah 1983 ), Journal of
Environment and Culture(see Ogundele 2004 and 2007 and Gundu 2007 ) and Middle
Belt Perspective (see Gundu 2003). There is also a chapter in the book ‘Pre colonial
2007), ‘Interrogating the Evidence: The Nigerian Cultural Landscape’ was principally
based on his work in the Middle Benue Valley. Considering the amount of
archaeological work done in the Middle Benue Valley which has produced close to 10
M.Sc and 5 Ph.D. theses, one would have expected more published reports, monographs
and other technical and non technical disseminations. This lapse is arguably tied to lack
research publications ‘or even regard scholarly publication as something that ought to be
Though we know more about the archaeology of the Middle Benue Valley following
skewed. First is the fact that virtually all sites covered by the project so far are confined
to the Katsina Ala river Basin (see Map below) and are without exception, sites in the Tiv
speaking parts of the valley. In the initial archaeological survey of parts of the valley,
(see Andah et al 1981:101) Professor Bassey Andah reports the ‘discovery and location
of several archaeological sites’ in the ‘Katsina Ala and Oturkpo divisions of Benue
State’. The report also identifies ‘the more important’ sites in the Kastsina Ala area with
17
18
knowledge of the valley is therefore a concentration on the Katsina Ala basin thus raising
the extent to which what we know is representative of the entire valley. The situation is
further compounded by limited funding which restricted even the extent of research in the
Katsina Ala basin ‘to little more than test stripping and vertically controlled excavations
of rather small portions of sites in question’ (Andah 1998: 217). Our archaeological
knowledge of the valley is also limited in the context of the Bantu Question initially
doubts exists as to the extent to which results of research in the valley have added value
to the resolution of the Bantu Question. According to Andah (1998:214), the Middle
Benue Valley ‘has not so far turned up any evidence starling or otherwise, to support the
idea that this area was an early centre for development of food production and iron
working much less for the thesis that it was part of the possible cradle area of the early
Bantu language and Bantu cultural and for some physical evolution’ While in agreement
with Andah on the above, it is not clear whether if this project had included other parts
of the Middle Benue Valley, the Cross River Basin and the Cameroon initially conceived
as the focus of the project, we would still have arrived at the same conclusion.
Though limited, our current knowledge of the archaeology of the valley has confirmed
continuity between sites of the valley (on the hills) and extant Tiv settlements in the
plains at the level of pottery ‘where striking similarities have been noted between
contemporary Tiv pottery and archaeological examples on the basis of the knitted mat
motif’(Gundu 1999:184) . Other settlement evidence, including the circle and the
conceptual pattern of archaeological settlements are also arguably ancestral to extant Tiv
settlements in the Middle Benue Valley. Following from this confirmation, two specific
19
inferences and interpretations have been made from the body of archaeological data from
the valley. One of these is the inference of slavery. Folorunso (2007) and Ogundele
(2004) have argued that the abandoned hill top settlements of the Katsina Ala Basin
represent an unstable phase in the settlement history of the Tiv when they were forced
uphill as a response to incessant slave raids. Chronometric dates for the archaeological
settlements of the valley fall within the slave trade era and are used to reinforce the
interpretation. According to Folorunso (2007:15) , ‘from the dates of the 15th century
obtained for the sites, it is obvious that the Tiv were forced into the hills by the Jukun
whose empire got to its zenith during the 16th and 17th centuries and were involved in
raiding for slaves in the Benue valley’. The altitude of these hills and the elaborate
walling systems surrounding the settlements on them also point to the fact that security
could have been of the essence here. The hills could therefore have been refuge zones for
their settlers.
The second inference and interpretation relates to the antiquity of the Tiv in the Middle
Benue Valley. Oral traditions (see Abraham 1933, Bohannan 1952 and Orkar 1979) have
put the antiquity of the Tiv in the valley to between 200 and 500 years ago. The
chronometric dates of the valley made up of 8 radio carbon dates and two TL dates all
cluster around 15th century thus ‘agreeing’ with these traditions. At the moment, two
alternate views on Tiv antiquity in the Middle Benue Valley have been propounded. One
places the Tiv antiquity in the Benue Valley around 15th century while the other
predicated on the Tse Dura evidence, sees the Tiv presence in the Benue Valley as
20
Though these two inferences and interpretations are getting wise currency, it is important
to note that they are not grounded archaeologically. One of the earliest references to
slavery on the Tiv in the Benue Valley is from Koelle’s Polyglotta Africana where two
freed slaves of Tiv extraction (Disele and Yapenda) were interviewed. (see Koelle 1963).
Besides giving distinct Tiv vocabulary, these also gave account of where they were
captured. While this indicates that the Tiv area might have also been ravaged by the
international slave trade, the suggestion of the Jukun involvement here is rather far
fetched. The idea of a Jukun empire in the Benue Valley (and elsewhere in Nigeria) at
colonial enterprise. (see Ndera 2008 ). Our understanding of the institution of slavery in
the Tiv area and many parts of the Middle Benue Valley from oral traditions is that it
strived into the 19th century even after Tiv settlements had spilled over from the hills into
the plains.
While agreeing that the chronometric dates of the Middle Benue Valley cluster around
15th Century AD and ‘agree’ with oral traditions on the antiquity of the Tiv in the valley,
it is important to note that these dates are too few hence ‘its quite obvious that we need
more dates from a wider spread of sites before any meaningful inference can be made’
(Andah 1998:217). It is also doubtful whether the hill top sites in the Ushongo –Ibinda
axis even if properly dated can provide a key to the earliest Tiv settlements in the Benue
Valley. Elsewhere, Gundu(1999:186) has pointed out the difficulties of accepting ‘this
cluster as representing the date for the initial Tiv settlements of the valley because aside
from the lone date from Ibinda the remaining 6 dates are from one locality and its
doubtful whether they can account for the evidence of other parts of the valley especially
21
those further south east which are evidently ancestral to other parts of the valley
including the Ushongo area’. It has also been pointed out by Gundu(1999) that if the
hilltops settlements were refuge sites (as a result of slavery or other unstable
circumstances) the plains rather than the hills maybe key to the earliest settlements of the
valley. At the moment our archaeological knowledge of the plains as separate from the
Tiv Oral traditions used to corroborate the archaeology of the Middle Benue Valley also
conceptualize the Ushongo-Binda axis as later settlement locales in the Tiv spread over
the valley. Though Swem identified in Tiv traditions as their earliest point of settlement
is yet to be located14 , the Tiv are argued to have ‘entered’ the Middle Benue Valley from
the south –east through a ‘crescent whose prominent points are Nuange (to the south
west) and Moanawuha river(to the north east’ (Gundu 1999: 209). This crescent cuts
Tivland(Benue State) and south western parts of Taraba State. Though poorly known
archaeologically, the crescent is key to the earliest Tiv settlements of the Benue valley.
contemporaneous(or even later) and not ancestral to the Ushongo area. Since these are
just two dates, an acceptable demonstration of the ancestral status of sites here would
await further research focusing on the crescent and aimed at producing more C14 and
14
A recent study by Akpenpuun Dzurgba a Professor of Christian Ethics and Sociology of Religion has
‘located Swem at the source of Katsina Ala River in south western Cameroon’. Though he admits that this
is a large area inhabited by 14 different ‘ethnic nations’, he is emphatic that Swem is the highest range of
mountain in the Akwaya sub division of South Western Cameroon.
15
These dates from Beta Analytic Inc (Florida) are two sigma calibrations.
22
Conclusion.
Our discussion and the challenges of the archaeological work in the valley indicate
some need to review the direction and focus of work in the years ahead for increased
comprehension of the archaeology of the valley. Such a review can be achieved at six
critical levels.
The first level is the need to recast goals that will guide future work. The initial suite of
disciplines especially historical linguistics, oral historians, earth sciences and physical
archaeological goals in the valley is significant not only because it will clarify the exact
role of each discipline in the archaeology of the valley but also clarify the limitations of
each discipline and how these disciplines can interface with each other to study the
archaeology of the valley and its extant nationalities. Initial goals for example, were
limited to the extent to which the Tiv concept can be validly used historically and
archaeologically, the question of Tiv antiquity in the valley and the nature of the
relationship between Tiv language, its speakers and Tiv culture and the extent to which
such relationships are susceptible to historical and archaeological studies. (see Andah
Bradley (2000), archaeologists interested in the valley would need to engage with
linguists familiar with languages extant in the valley to recast hypotheses to explore
relationships between the languages of the valley, their speakers and their cultures and
23
demonstrate the extent to which such relationships are susceptible to historical and
archaeological study. Archaeologists must begin to decentralize their role in the valley
Closely related to this is also the need to partner with the extant inhabitants
(nationalities) of the valley in the archaeological study of the region. At the moment,
there is hardly any partnership between the archaeologist and extant communities in the
valley. Members of the community are merely used as guides, labourers, porters and
informants in the archaeological investigation of their heritage. This has created a power
imbalance between the archaeologist and the local people in the valley and denied them
the opportunity to take a visible partnership role in the study of their heritage. According
to Atalay (2007:264) ‘Indigenous people have , for several decades, critiqued the ways
that research and what has been termed by indigenous activists as the ‘scientific
imperative’ has impacted them and their communities negatively. They have called for
greater involvement in the decision making process-and in the case of archaeology, for
greater control over their own heritage resources.’ Good archaeological practice requires
knowledge is shared in a two way process of education and collaboration between local
people and archaeologists’.( Ataley 2007:265). Doing this in the Middle Benue Valley
requires a structured entry strategy in which archaeologists and other specialists prior to
the investigation of any site, must seek engagement with local communities to determine
their descendant status, their awareness levels on archaeology and heritage issues and the
24
extent of community sources (knowledge) on local histories and the cultural landscape.
Such entry will guide the formulation of inclusive archaeological approaches in which
Refocusing will also mean broader ethno archeological studies. At the moment, ethno
archaeological studies are limited to extant Tiv settlements in the Katsina Ala Basin. Tiv
communities elsewhere in the valley as well as other groups sharing the valley with the
Tiv are not covered. Considering the fact that the Middle Benue Valley (just like many
cultural group on the archaeological landscape as a basis for a fuller understanding of the
ethnographic and material culture level, the different ethnic groups in the valley are
The accidental discovery of Nok styled terracotta in Katsina Ala would also need to be
further explored. Follow up salvage excavations of the site were not only limited, the lone
date associated with the site has been disputed. There is need to explore the Katsina Ala
Basin and adjoining areas more thoroughly for Nok related finds including the different
iron working evidence in the different parts of the valley. If this is done, positions
arguing that iron working in the valley was derived from ‘Nok communities’ from the
north can be tested as propositions. We may also be in a better position to understand the
relationship between the iron working evidence in the Benue valley and similar evidence
25
A last need is to build a more solid chronological framework for the Middle Benue
Valley. Considering the complexity and nature of the archaeological goals in the valley,
the 10 chronometric dates can hardly support any meaningful interpretation of the
archaeological evidence. Further research must focus on getting dates for different sites
of the valley including hill top sites, sites in the plains, rock shelters and caves as well as
iron smelting sites. Considering the many challenges of radio carbon dates (see Killick
1987 and Alspern 2005 ) , concerted attempts must aim at the use of other dating methods
especially TL and Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) which attempts to date iron
more directly.
It is our hope that archaeology will take the lead in restructuring the study of human
26
Bibliography.
Library, Ibadan.
Ibadan.
Alpern S.B (2005) Did they or didn’t they invent it? Iron in Sub
22.
27
Archaeology and History in Non Western
Plc. Ibadan.
315.
Bohannan P and Bohannan L (1954) The Migration and Expansion of the Tiv. Africa.
XX1V.
Bohannan P and Boahannan L(1965) The Tiv of Central Nigeria. Oxford .London.
Tanzania.
28
Dzurgba A. (2007) On the Tiv of Central Nigeria: A Cultural
Nigeria.
Folorunso C.A. (1981) The Prehistoric Settlements of the Tse Dura and
Publications. Ibadan.
Sorbonne. France.
29
Towns. Edited by Thurstan Shaw et al pp274-288.
Rutledge. London.
Folorunso C.A. (1998) ‘The Compound of the Tiv of Benue State, Nigeria:
30
Folorunso C.A. and
Gbor J.W.T (1978) Mdugh u Tiv man Mnyer ve hen Benue. Gaskiya.
Zaria.
University, Zaria.
31
Gundu Z.A. (1999) Historical Archaeology of Ancient Settlements in
Gundu Z.A. and Igirgi A. D (1992) Oral Traditions and Archaeology in the Middle
96.
University of Ibadan.
Nigeria. Jos.
University press.
32
Killik D (1987) ‘On the Dating of African Metallurgical Sites’
Verlagsanstalt . Austria.
Zaria.
Press. Enugu.
9:pp74-81.
33
Ndera J.D.(2008) Report of Archaeological Investigations on the
Zaria.
Ibadan.
91.
34
Tiv of Benue State, Nigeria’ Journal of
Okafor E & Phillips P(1992) New 14 Carbon Ages from Nsukka, Nigeria, and
66(252) pp 686-688.
Canada.
Robertson H & Bradley R (2000) A New Paradigm: The African Early Iron Age
Vol.27. pp 287-323.
244. pp154-166.
Ibadan.
Tubosun B (1997) Off site Archaeology in the Katsina Ala River Basin
35
Tubosun B & Andah B.W(1983) Sedimentological Analysis of Deposits from Tse
22.
University of Ibadan.
36