in New England. Most people in Massachusetts were Puritanscolonists who had left England seeking religious tolerance. ut the strict Puritan code was far fro! tolerant. "t was against the law not to attend churchwhere !en and wo!en sat on opposite sides through long ser#ices. $he Puritan lifestyle was restrained and rigid% People were e&pected to work hard and repress their e!otions or opinions. "ndi#idual di'erences were frowned upon. E#en the dark( so!)er Puritan dress was dictated )y the church. *ince Puritans were e&pected to li#e )y a rigid !oral code( they )elie#ed that all sinsfro! sleeping in church to stealing foodshould )e punished. $hey also )elie#ed +od would punish sinful )eha#ior. When a neigh)or would su'er !isfortune( such as a sick child or a failed crop( Puritans saw it as +od,s Will and did not help. Puritans also )elie#ed the -e#il was as real as +od. E#eryone was faced with the struggle )etween the powers of good and e#il( )ut *atan would select the weakest indi#idualswo!en( children( the insaneto carry out his work. $hose who followed *atan were considered witches. Witchcraft was one of the greatest cri!es a person could co!!it( punisha)le )y death. "n keeping with the Puritan code of confor!ity( the .rst wo!en to )e accused of witchcraft in *ale! were seen as di'erent and as social outcasts% $itu)a( a sla#e/ *arah +ood( a ho!eless )eggar/ and *arah 0s)orne( a sickly old wo!an who !arried her ser#ant. 1ear of !agic and witchcraft was co!!on in New England( as it had )een in Europe for centuries. 0#er 122 alleged witches had )een tried and hanged in New England during the 1322s. ut the hangings in 1345 *ale! would )e the last ones in 6!erica. Econo!ic 7 *ocial -i#isions "n 1345( *ale! was di#ided into two distinct parts% *ale! $own and *ale! 8illage. *ale! 8illage 9also referred to as *ale! 1ar!s: was actually part of *ale! $own )ut was set apart )y its econo!y( class( and character. Residents of *ale! 8illage were !ostly poor far!ers who !ade their li#ing culti#ating crops in the rocky terrain. *ale! $own( on the other hand( was a prosperous port town at the center of trade with ;ondon. Most of those li#ing in *ale! $own were wealthy !erchants. 1or !any years( *ale! 8illage tried to gain independence fro! *ale! $own. $he town( which depended on the far!ers for food( deter!ined crop prices and collected ta&es fro! the #illage. -espite the three<hour walk )etween the two co!!unities( *ale! 8illage did not ha#e its own church and !inister until 137=. ut there was also a di#ision within *ale! 8illage. $hose who li#ed near "pswich Road( close to the co!!erce of *ale! $own( )eca!e !erchants( such as )lacks!iths( carpenters( and innkeepers. $hey prospered and supported the econo!ic changes taking place. ut !any of the far!ers who li#ed far fro! this prosperity )elie#ed the worldliness and a>uence of *ale! $own threatened their Puritan #alues. 0ne of the !ain fa!ilies to denounce the econo!ic changes was the Putna!sa strong and in?uential force )ehind the witchcraft accusations. $ensions )eca!e worse when *ale! 8illage selected Re#erend *a!uel Parris as their new !inister. Parris was a stern Puritan who denounced the worldly ways and econo!ic prosperity of *ale! $own as the in?uence of the -e#il. @is rhetoric further separated the two factions within *ale! 8illage. "t is likely that the Aealousies and hostilities )etween these two factions played a !aAor role in the witch trials. Most of the #illagers accused of witchcraft li#ed near "pswich Road( whereas the accusers li#ed in the distant far!s of *ale! 8illage. "t is not surprising that Re#erend Parris was a #igorous supporter of the witch trials( and his i!passioned ser!ons helped fan the ?a!es of the hysteria. Puritan Children "n 1345( children were e&pected to )eha#e under the sa!e strict code as the adultsdoing chores( attending church ser#ices( and repressing indi#idual di'erences. 6ny show of e!otion( such as e&cite!ent( fear( or anger( was discouraged( and diso)edience was se#erely punished. Children rarely played( as toys and ga!es were scarce. Puritans saw these acti#ities as sinful distractions.
ut unlike young girls( )oys had a few outlets for their i!agination. $hey often worked as apprentices outside the ho!e( practicing such skills as carpentry or crafts. oys were also allowed to e&plore the outdoors( hunting and .shing. 0n the other hand( girls were e&pected to tend to the house( helping their !others cook( wash( clean( and sew.
Many children learned to read( )ut !ost households owned only the i)le and other religious worksincluding a few that descri)ed e#il spirits and witchcraft in great detail. $here were a few )ooks written for children( )ut these often warned against )ad )eha#ior and descri)ed the punish!ent that children would su'er for sinful acts.
*uch was the world of 6)igail Willia!s and etty Parris during the long( dark winter of 1345. $here was little to feed their i!agination that did not warn of sin and eternal punish!ent. "t is no wonder that the young girls were so capti#ated )y $itu)a,s !agical stories and fortune<telling ga!es. $hese acti#ities were strictly for)idden( which !ust ha#e .lled the! with fear and guilt. $his !ay ha#e )een one reason for their hysterical )eha#ior. 6nd at a ti!e when young girls were for)idden to act out or e&press the!sel#es( it is easy to see why they were so enraptured )y the attention they recei#ed when they )eca!e B)ewitched.C
0f course( there were pro)a)ly !any factors )ehind the girls, actions. ut what is !ore surprising than the accusations fro! these i!aginati#e young girls is the reaction fro! the co!!unity. $he girls !ay ha#e sparked the witch hunt( )ut it was the adults who set the wheels into !otion.