Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BIBLIOGRAFA
1. Ring ME. Dentistry: An illustrated history. New York; Abrams, 1985.
2. Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ce-
ramic FPDs: Part Modes of failure and influence of various clini-
cal characteristics. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 177-182.
3. HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics.
Principles of tooth preparations. 3rd ed Chicago: Quintessence
publishing co. 1997.
4. Higuera MA, De Albornoz A, Del Ro J. Estructuras metlicas co-
ladas frente a estructuras cermicas mecanizadas: El enfoque del
clnico. Rev. Inter prtesis estomatolgica, 2006; Vol. 8, N 2.
5. Liu PR, Essig ME. A panorama of dental CAD CAM Restorative
Systems. Compendium, Oct 2008; Vol. 29, N 8.
6. Preti G, Bassi F, Carossa S, Catapano S. Rehabilitacin prot-
sica Tomo 3. Amolca 2008.
7. Valderhaug J, Birkeland JM. Periodontal conditions in patients 5
years following insertion of fixed prostheses. Pocket depth and
loss of attachment. J Oral Rehabil 1976; 3: 237-43.
8. Valderhaug J, Heloe LA. Oral hygiene in a group of supervised
patients with fixed prostheses. J Periodontol 1977; 48: 221-4.
9. Lindigkeit. J. Adis al colado? Materiales dentales sin metales
preciosos en la era CAD/CAM. Quintessence tcnica (ed. Esp.),
Jun-Jul 2007; Vol. 18, Nm. 6.).
10. Kent WA, Shillingburg HT & Duncanson MG. Taper of Clinical
Preparations for Cast Restorations. Quintessence International
1988; 5:339-345.
11. Kohorst P. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental
prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/
computer-aided manufacturing systems.
12. Duke E. The status of CAD/CAM in restorative dentistry. Compen-
dium (22) 2001.
13. Surez Garca MJ. Evaluacin del sellado marginal de las coro-
nas de titanio colado y mecanizado con dos lneas de termina-
cin. Tewsis Doctoral UCM 2004.
14. Giannetopoulos S, Van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal inte-
grity of ceramic copings with different marginal angles using two
different CAD/CAM Systems. J of dentistry 38 (2010) 980-986.
15. Beuer F, Aggstallert H, Edelhoff D, Gernet W. Effect of prepara-
tion angles on the precision of zirconia crown copings. Dent Ma-
terials Journal 2008; 27 (3): 814-820.
16. Iwai T, Komine F, Kobayashi K, Saito A, Matsumura H. Influen-
ce of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zir-
conium dioxide ceramic copings.
17. Mou SH, Chai T, Wang JS, Shiau YY. Influence of differentcon-
vergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal
adaptation of Cerec crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 248-55.
18. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in
measurement of marginal fit. J Prostet Dent. 1989; 62: 405-
408.
19. Souza R, Ozcan M, Pavanelli C y cols. Marginal and internal dis-
crepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabrica-
ted by a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthodont 2012 (21): 94-100.
20. Tsitrou E, Northeast S, van Noort R. Evaluation of the marginal fit
of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/
CAM. J of Dentistry 2007; 35: 69-73.
21. Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino M. Vertical marginal discrepan-
cy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish li-
nes, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation.
22. Krasanaki M, Pelekanos S, Andreiotelli M y cols. X-Ray Microto-
mographic evaluation of the influence of two preparation types
on the Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM alumina copings: a pilot study.
Int J Prosthet 2012; 25: 170-172.
23. Tao J, Han D. The effect of finish line curvature on marginal fit of
all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns and metal-ceramic crowns. Quin-
tessence Int 2009; 40: 745-752.
24. Azar M, Lehman K, Dietrich H y cols. Effect of preparation depth
differences on the marginal fit of zirconia crown copings: an in
vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24: 264-266.
25. Beuer F, Gernet W, Nauman M. Effect of preparation angles on
the precision of zirconia crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM
system. Dental Materials Journal 2008: 27(6): 811-820.
26. Beuer F, Agstaller H, Richter J y cols. Influence of preparation
angle on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM- fabricated zirco-
nia crown copings. Quintessence Int 2009; 40: 243-250.
27. Renne W, Mc Gill S, Forshee K, De Fee M, Mennito A. Predic-
ting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or
absence of common preparation errors. J Prosthet Dent 2012;
108: 310-315.
28. Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, y cols. Clinical marginal and
internal gaps of In-Ceram Clowns fabricated using the GN-I sys-
tem. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 753-758.
29. Knoernschild KL, Campbell SD. Periodontal tissue responses
after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J
Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 492-498.
30. McLean J, Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film by an in
vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971; 131: 107-111.
31. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, sulky WD. Considerations in
measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62(4): 405-
408].
32. Kokubo Y, Nagayama Y, Tsumita M, y cols. Clinical marginal and
internal gaps of in-Ceram Crowns fabricated using the GN-I sys-
tem. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 753-758.
33. Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L. Determination of the minimum
Lumber of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-
Vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 40-49
34. Bindl A, Bormann WH. Survival rate of mono-ceramic and cera-
mic-core CAD/CAM generated anterior Clowns over 2-5 years.
Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 197-204.
35. Mormann WH, Bindl A, Luthy H, y cols. Effects of preparation
and luting Systems on all-ceramic computer generated Clowns.
Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 333-339.
36. Vlaar S, van der Zel M. Accuracy of dental digitazers. Internatio-
nal Dental Journal (2006); 56: 301-309.
37. Pfeiffer J. Dental CAD/CAM Technologies: the optical impression
(II). Int J Comput Dent 1999; 2: 65-72.
38. Goodacre C, Campagni W, Aquilino S. Tooth Preparation for com-
plete Crowns: an art based on scientific principles. The J Prosthet
DENT 2001; 85: 363-376.
39. Wilson AH, Chan DC. The relationship between preparation con-
vergente and retention of extracoronal retainers. J Prosthodont
1994; 3: 74-8.
40. Esser C, Kerschbaum T, Winckelmann T y cols. A comparison
of the visual and technical assesment of preparations made by
dental students. Eur J Dental education 2006; 10: 157-161.
41. Nick D, Clark M, Miler J, Ordelheide C, Goodacre c, Kim J. The
ability of dental students and faculty to estimate the total oclu-
sal convergence of prepared teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101
(1).
42. Dodge WW, Weed RM, Baez RJ, Buchanan RN. The effect of con-
vergence angle on retention and resistence form. Quintessence
1985; 16: 191-4.
GACETA DENTAL 255, febrero 2014 119