Atr 42-300 01-2004

ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42-300/-320
Work-horses for
Regional Air Transport
DC/E 2493/02
January 2004
ATR 42-300/-320 - Work-horses for Regional Air Transport - January 2004 - Page 1
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42-300/-320
Contents
ATR Program Overview ..
Worldwide success
11
ATR 42 outstanding features ...
19
Weights and Performance.
37
Cargo capability ...
51
Economics: improving the bottom line ..
57
Maintenance ..
63
Customer Support ...
73
Conclusion ..
82
EADS Group
ATR 42-300/-320
The Worlds First Transnational Aerospace Company
Airbus
Airbus
Airbus
Airbus
SCE
SCE
Military
Military Transp.
Transp.
Aircraft
Aircraft
Aeronautics
Aeronautics
Space
Space Systems
Systems
Military
Military
Aircraft
Aircraft
Airbus
Airbus
SCE
SCE
Eurocopter
Eurocopter
Defence
Defence &
&
Civil
Civil Systems
Systems
Strategic
Strategic
Coordination
Coordination
Ariane
Ariane
space
space
Socata
Socata
EADS 2002 main figures
Sogerma/EFW
Sogerma/EFW
Orders
Eur 31.0 Bn (US$ 32.20 Bn)
Orders Backlog Eur 168.3 Bn(US$ 174.70 Bn)
Revenues
Eur 29.9 Bn (US$ 31.09 Bn)
Workforce
104,000
50%
ATR
Dassault
Dassault
Aviation
Aviation
Finmeccanica Group
ATR 42-300/-320
Italys Largest Producer of High Technology
Space
Space
Weapons
Weapons
Systems
Systems
Helicopters
Helicopters
AERONAUTICA
Electronic
Underwater Transport.
Electronic Underwater
Transport.
Systems
Systems
Defence
Defence Sys.
Sys.
Energy
Energy
Combat
Combat Aircraft
Aircraft
Eurofighter
Eurofighter
19%
19%
Military
Military Transport
Transport
Aircraft
Aircraft
Finmeccanica 2002
main figures
Orders
Orders Backlog
Revenues
Workforce
Commercial
Commercial
aircraft
aircraft
Eur 8.69 Bn (US$ 9.04 Bn)

Eur 21.70 Bn (US$ 22.57 Bn)
Eur 7.81Bn (US$ 8.12 Bn)
44,960
Aerostructures
Aerostructures
Commuter
Commuter
50%
ATR
IT
IT
ATR Integrated Company
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR Shareholders
80%
50%
100%
50%
AERONAUTICA
CUSTOMERS
Design,
Design, Engineering,
Engineering, Final
Final Assembly
Assembly Line,
Line, Purchasing,
Purchasing, Marketing,
Marketing,
Sales
Sales and
and Customer
Customer Support
Support activities
activities benefit
benefit from
from the
the expertise
expertise
of
of two
two European
European leading
leading aircraft
aircraft manufacturers,
manufacturers, EADS
EADS and
and Alenia.
Alenia.
01-001/31-02
ATR 42-300/-320
Industrial Organization
ATR Family Evolution
ATR 42-300/-320
1985
ATR 42-300
PW 120
4 blades 14SF5
1987
ATR 42-320
PW 121
4 blades 14SF5
Hot & high
1995
ATR 42-500
New engine :PW 127E

New 6-blade 568F propeller
New interiors - Advanced
soundproofing techniques
Hot & high
ation
r
e
n
e
G
New
m
Maximu
ality
n
o
m
m
o
c
h
c
t
e
Str
1989
ATR 72-200
PW 124B
4 blades 14SF11
1992
ATR 72-210
PW 127
4 blades 247F
Hot & high - Short runway
1997
ATR 72-500
PW 127F
New 6-blade 568F propeller
New interiors - Advanced
soundproofing techniques
01-008/31-02
ATR 42-300/-320
The ATR Family: Unmatched Versatility
Passenger version
Rough field version
Cargo version
Corporate version
Maritime Patrol version

01-009/31-02
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42
Worldwide
Success
ATR 42-300/-320
Product Attractiveness
The annual
Investors and
Operators Poll by
Airfinance Journal,
based on large a
sample of senior
management at
airlines, lessors,
banks and other
financial investors,
ranked aircraft types
on the basis of five
criteria:
Investor appeal
Residual value
Remarketability
Value for money
Operational
success.
ATR is the only regional aircraft manufacturer

ranked in the TOP 10 Operators Poll*
* Airfinance Journal, October 2003
ATR Family:
The Reference for
Regional Air Transport
Product Attractiveness
ATR 42-300/-320
ircraft
a
t
s
e
b
d
e
t
o
V
s
by Operator
ry*
in its catego
The big surprise in the
Regional Category is the
strong showing of ATR
aircraft. () airlines like
operating them*
* Airfinance Journal, November 2003
ATR 42
ATR 72
2003 Operators Poll

Category Regional Aircraft*
ATR Family, best value for money!

The ATR Family : Worldwide Success

Total
Total ATR
ATR family
family
673
673 Ordered
Ordered a/c
a/c
from
from 87
87 Customers
Customers
Firm orders - Dec. 2003
ATR 42-300/-320
Europe
188
of
of which:
which:
83
83 ATR
ATR 42-500
42-500
114
114 ATR
ATR 72-500
72-500
282
North America
Asia Pacific
Latin
America
108
Africa & Middle-East
41
54
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR, the Majors Favorite
AMERICAN AIRLINES
ALITALIA
AIR FRANCE
BRITISH AIRWAYS
THAI AIRWAYS
AIR NEW ZEALAND
LUFTHANSA
CONTINENTAL A/L
KLM
FINNAIR
01-013/31-02
Breakdown of Orders
By Region
Latin
America
ATR 42-300/-320
Africa/Middle East
Australasia
/ Far East
By Variant
8%
6%
ATR 72
Europe
16%
42%
North
America
ATR 42
45%
55%
28%
The ATR Family: Customer Preference
ATR 42-300/-320
Sales since launch
Sales since launch
Dash 8-Q300/-Q400
308
Dash 8-Q400
101
ATR 42/72
673
ATR 72
301
Dash 8Q300/Q400
Dash 8-Q400
24%
30%
ATR 72
76%
ATR 42/72
70%
ATR
ATR :: Worldwide
Worldwide recognition
recognition as
as the
the most
most successful
successful turboprop
turboprop family
family in
in
the
the regional
regional market,
market, by
by far
far the
the leader
leader in
in the
the 40-70
40-70 seats
seats category.
category.
FEAMA 2003 Market Consensus
ATR 42-300/-320
(20 Years Regional Aircraft Delivery Forecast)
20-99
20-99 seat
seat RJs
RJs ::
5,712
5,712 a/c
a/c
15-89
15-89 seat
seat turboprops:
turboprops:
1,047
1,047 a/c
a/c
Average
Average annual
annual delivery
delivery rate
rate ::
338
338 a/c
a/c
Turboprops
Turboprops Delivery
Delivery Units
Units per
per year:
year: about
about 52
52 a/c
a/c
of
of which
which 80%
80% in
in the
the 40-70
40-70 seats
seats category
category
(44
(44 a/c
a/c per
per year)
year)
Total of 6,759 a/c in the 15-99 seats category

of which 15% (1,047 A/C) are turboprops.
Turboprops
Turboprops will
will continue
continue to
to play
play aa vital
vital role
role in
in the
the regional
regional transport
transport market.
market.
Note: The FEAMA members include all the most important European airframes, engines, systems manufacturers
and suppliers (extended as well to non-European as Bombardier and Embraer).
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42
Oustanding
Features
ATR 42
ATR 42-300/-320
The Reference in the Regional Market

Transport
Since its introduction into service in December 1985, the ATR 42 has
become a reference in the regional air transport industry for reliability and
profitability and is now a best seller in its market segment.
The ATR 42 is remarkably simple to operate and to maintain and is equipped
with efficient, low-fuel-burn engines.
Its operating costs are 15%-20% lower than those of its competitors.
The basic ATR 42-300 is fitted with two PW120 engines rated at 2,000shp
each
The ATR 42-320, fitted with two PW121 engines rated at 2,100 shp each,
has been developed to offer increased performance for hot and high
conditions and short runway operations.
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42
General Arrangement
8.10 m
( 26' 7")
Optimized
Optimized propellerpropellerfuselage
clearance
fuselage clearance
3.96 m
( 13' )
0.82 m
( 2' 8")
8.78 m
( 28' 10")
22.67 m
( 74' 5")
Perfectly
Perfectly suited
suited to
to operations
operations
on
on narrow
narrow runways
runways
7.31 m
( 24')
ATR 42-300/-320
7.59 m
( 24' 11")
Low
Low loading
loading sill
sill (1.2m)
(1.2m)
Wing
Wing area:
area:
54.5
54.5 sq.m
sq.m (586
(586 sq.ft)
sq.ft)
4.10 m
( 13' 5")
24.57 m
( 80' 7")
Dimensions
Passenger door
0.75 x 1.75 m
29.5 x 68.9 in
Forward cargo door
1.275 x 1.53 m
50.2 x 60.2 in
Overall length
22.67 m
74 ft 5 in
Wing span
24.57 m
80 ft 7 in
Height
7.59 m
24 ft 11 in
ATR 42-300/-320
Space and Efficiency
With its bi-lobed fuselage, the ATR has the largest cross-section among new
generation aircraft with four-abreast passenger seating
The cross-section is constant throughout the passenger cabin area
The wide aisle (18 - 0.457 m) and stand-up headroom of 1.91m provides
continued comfort for passengers on a regional service connecting with wide
body jets.
Large overhead luggage bins are provided allowing more carry-on bags in
response to passengers increasing desire to avoid luggage check-in.
ATR 42 Cabin
ATR 42-300/-320
Making the best use of available space
The flexible ATR interior offers a wide range of options in terms of seating capacity, galley
configurations and cargo compartments.
The different layouts enable the fleets to be adapted to the traffic, in-flight service quality and
freight transport requirements.
The standard cabin layout is 48 seats at 30 inch pitch. The dimensions of the front cargo
compartment can be adapted to accommodate 50-seat and 46-seat configurations at 30 inch
pitch.
Main features are:
A rear left door including an integrated stair for passenger embarkment/disembarkme
A rear right service door used for galley servicing and loading of the 4.8m3 (169.5 cu.ft) rear
cargo compartment
A front cargo compartment which can be easily loaded through a dedicated cargo door.
Depending on the cabin configuration, its volume can vary from 3.6 m3 (127 cu.ft) to 6m3
(212 cu.ft).
ATR 42 Cabin Cross-Section
ATR 42-300/-320
Space and Comfort
Wide
Wide floor,
floor, wide
wide aisle,
aisle, wide
wide elbow
elbow room
room
ATR 42 Cabin Layout Flexibility

with 2.4 m3 (85 cu.ft) rear cargo compartment & A type Galley*
SD
46 seats
at 30 pitch
3 m3
S G
106 cu.ft
B 2.4 m 3
85 cu.ft
ATR 42-300/-320
3 m3
106 cu.ft
CD
ED
SD
48 seats
at 30 pitch
1.8 m3
63.5 cu.ft
S G
B
A
50 seats
at 30 pitch
3 m3
106 cu.ft
CD
2.4 m 3
85 cu.ft
ED
SD
B 1.8 m3
S G
63.5 cu.ft
B 2.4 m3
85 cu.ft
A
T
1.8 m3
63.5 cu.ft
CD
ED
* The ATR 42s with MSN below 116 (except MSN 109 and 113) are fitted with a rear cargo compartment volume
of 2.4m3 (85 cu.ft).
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42 Cabin Layout Flexibility
with 4.8 m3 (169.5 cu.ft) standard rear cargo compartment & A type galley
SD
46 seats
at 30 pitch
3 m3
106 cu.ft
4.8 m3
S G
B
T
3 m3
B 106 cu.ft
ATR 42-300/-320
169.5 cu.ft
CD
ED
SD
48 seats
at 30 pitch
1.8 m3
63.5 cu.ft
S G
B
4.8 m3
A
B
3 m3
106 cu.ft
CD
169.5 cu.ft
ED
50 seats
at 30 pitch
SD
1.8 m 3
S G
63.5 cu.ft
169.5 cu.ft
A
T
1.8 m 3
63.5 cu.ft
CD
ED
4.8 m3
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42 Volumes
Baggage
Baggage
compartment
compartment
Rear
Rear Cargo
Cargo
3
m
m3
46
46 pax
pax
cu.ft
cu.ft
3
m
m3
48
48 pax
pax
cu.ft
cu.ft
3
m
m3
50
50 pax
pax
cu.ft
cu.ft
Baggage
Baggage per
per
pax
pax
Total
Total baggage
baggage Total
Total baggage
baggage
Including
Including overhead
overhead
per
per pax
pax
bins
bins &
& stowage
stowage
MSN116
==116
MSN
MSN
116
MSN=116
MSN116
MSN=116
MSN=116
MSN116
MSN=116
MSN=116
MSN116
MSN=116
MSN=116
MSN116
MSN=116
MSN=116
MSN116
MSN=116
MSN=116
MSN116
MSN=116
MSN=116
MSN116
MSN=116
10.8
10.8
8.4
8.4
0.235
0.235
0.183
0.183
12.7
12.7
10.3
10.3
0.276
0.276
0.224
0.224
381.5
381.5
296.5
296.5
8.29
8.29
6.45
6.45
448.5
448.5
363.5
363.5
9.75
9.75
7.941
7.941
9.6
9.6
7.2
7.2
0.200
0.200
0.150
0.150
11.55
11.55
9.15
9.15
0.241
0.241
0.191
0.191
339
339
254.5
254.5
7.06
7.06
5.30
5.30
408
408
323
323
8.50
8.50
6.73
6.73
8.4
8.4
66
0.168
0.168
0.120
0.120
10.4
10.4
88
0.208
0.208
0.160
0.160
296.5
296.5
212
212
5.93
5.93
4.24
4.24
367.5
367.5
282.5
282.5
7.35
7.35
5.65
5.65
ATR 42-300/-320
Basic ATR 42 A type galley (A01/11)
A type galley (A01/11)
A01/11 equipment
(basic on ATR 42)
(basic on ATR 42)
2 H/J
S
S
2 hot jugs
W aste
S/U
1/2 T
S/U
S/U
Provision for two hot jugs,

one half size trolley,
and three standard units
3 standard units each equipped

with 2 standard drawers
1 half size trolley equipped

with 6 standard drawers
ATR 42
ATR 42-300/-320
Weights and
Performance
Lower Weights for Increased Efficiency
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42 secondary structure is extensively made of composite material,

which are not subject to corrosion.
The in-service advantages of composites are numerous:
Immunity to corrosion and fatigue
Reduction of inspection
Payload gain and fuel savings.
Not including the commercial furnishing weight, the corresponding result for
the ATR 42 can be summarized as follows:
Composite
Total structure
= 14%
Weight saving 190 kg = equivalent to
2 pax
ATR 42
ATR 42-300/-320
Composite Materials
Cabin floor panels: Kevlar/Nomex sandwich

Propeller blades: Fibreglass/polyurethane foam/aluminum spar
ATR 42-300 & ATR 42-320
Weights & Loadings
ATR 42-300/-320
Basic
Basic
Option*
Option*
Maximum
Maximum Ramp
Ramp weight
weight
16,720
16,720 kg
kg
36,681
36,681 lb
lb
17,070
17,070 kg
kg
37,632
37,632 lb
lb
Maximum
Maximum take-off
take-off weight
weight
16,700
16,700 kg
kg
36,817
36,817 lb
lb
16,900
16,900 kg
kg
37,258
37,258 lb
lb
Maximum
Maximum landing
landing weight
weight
16,400
16,400 kg
kg
36,155
36,155 lb
lb
16,400
16,400 kg
kg
36,155
36,155 lb
lb
Max
Max zero
zero fuel
fuel weight
weight
15,200
15,200 kg
kg
33,510
33,510 lb
lb
15,540
15,540 kg
kg
34,260
34,260 lb
lb
OEW
OEW (at
(at spec.
spec. def)
def)
10,285
10,285 kg
kg
22,674
22,674 lb
lb
10,285
10,285 kg
kg
22,674
22,674 lb
lb
OEW
OEW (with
(with typical
typical options)
options)
10,600
10,600 kg
kg
23,369
23,369 lb
lb
10,600
10,600 kg
kg
23,369
23,369 lb
lb
Maximum
Maximum payload
payload
4,600
4,600 kg
kg
10,141
10,141 lb
lb
4,940
4,940 kg
kg
10,891
10,891 lb
lb
Maximum
Maximum fuel
fuel load
load
4,500
4,500 kg
kg
9,921
9,921 lb
lb
4,500
4,500 kg
kg
9,921
9,921 lb
lb
* In retrofit through application of Service Bulletin ATR 42-08-0003: aircraft with MSN<70 will be subject
to a VMO reduction down to 230 kt; for other aircraft the VMO remains at 250 kt.
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42 Powered by PW100 Family Engines

Main technical characteristics
Two centrifugal compressors

Free turbine, three concentric shafts
Electronic and hydromechanical controls
Advantages
Simple, economic, easy to maintain

Low specific fuel consumption
Compliance with todays and future noise levels regulations
Perfectly adapted
to commuter requirements
ATR 42-300/320
ATR 42-300/-320
Powerplant
PW 120/121
Take-off Power (one engine out)
Propeller (Hamilton Standard) - 4 blades
2,000/2,100 SHP
14SF5
ATR 42-300/-320
Propeller Brake Principle
The ATR aircraft benefit from an economic

and efficient concept: the Hotel Mode.
The right hand engine is equipped with a
propeller brake installed on the reduction
gear box.
Used only on the ground, this brake locks
the propeller while, thanks to the threeconcentric shaft design of the engine, the
LP/HP spools continue to run providing
the aircraft with electrical DC power and
bleed air for the air conditioning system.
Hotel Mode
Hotel
Hotel Mode
Mode provides
provides all
all the
the facilities
facilities and
and all
all the
the benefits
benefits of
of an
an APU
APU at
at aa fraction
fraction of
of the
the
cost
cost and
and with
with less
less weight,
weight, offering
offering to
to the
the operators
operators aa greater
greater operational
operational flexibility.
flexibility.
62-001/31-02
ATR 42-300/-320
Hotel Mode/APU Comparison
The propeller brake represents the best compromise for the

operators because:
It is lighter than the APU.
It is economic
It can be maintained at low cost.
It has no effect on the engine life at ground idle.
It is installed as basic fit on the ATR 42 and ATR 72.
Propeller Brake vs APU
ATR 42-300/-320
Savings with a Propeller Brake
Propeller
Propeller Brake
Brake
ground
ground idle
idle utilization
utilization
APU
APU (rear
(rear mounted)
mounted)
Weight
Weight
22
22 lb
lb (basic
(basic on
on ATR)
ATR)
330
330 to
to 400
400 lb
lb
No
No effect
effect
Loading
Loading constraints
constraints
Basic
Basic on
on ATR
ATR
275,000
275,000 US
US $$
Fuel
Fuel consumption
consumption
240
240 lb/hr
lb/hr
210
210 lb/hr
lb/hr
Maintenance
Maintenance cost
cost
1.6
1.6 $/cycle
$/cycle
4.87
4.87 $/cycle(*)
$/cycle(*)
Yearly
Yearly cost
cost
11,800
11,800 US$
US$
43,000
43,000 US$
US$
C.G.
C.G.
Acquisition
Acquisition cost
cost
Savings
Savings with
with a
a propeller
propeller brake:
brake: -31,200
-31,200 US$
US$ annually/aircraft
annually/aircraft
Assumptions
- 1500 cycles per year, average cycle 15 min
- Fuel price 0.7$ per US gal.
- APU amortization: 10 years, no residual value
- No allowance for APU weight induced extra fuel consumption or payload reduction
ATR 42
ATR 42-300/-320
Performance
ATR
ATR 42-300
42-300 (PW120)
(PW120)
ATR
ATR 42-320
42-320 (PW121)
(PW121)
Balanced
Balanced take-off
take-off F.L.
F.L.
1,090
1,090 m
m
3,575
3,575 ftft
1,040
1,040 m
m
3,410
3,410 ftft
Balanced
Balanced take-off
take-off F.L.
F.L.
1,300
1,300 m
m
4,265
4,265 ftft
1,235
1,235 m
m
4,050
4,050 ftft
Landing
Landing Field
Field Length
Length
1,030
1,030 m
m
3,380
3,380 ftft
1,030
1,030 m
m
3,380
3,380 ftft
Gross
Gross single
single engine
engine ceiling
ceiling
4,280
4,280 m
m
14,040
14,040 ftft
4,880
4,880 m
m
16,015
16,015 ftft
ISA
ISA -- Sea
Sea level
level -- MTOW*
MTOW*
ISA
ISA ++ 10
10 -- 3000
3000 ftft -- MTOW*
MTOW*
Sea
Sea level
level -- MLW
MLW
97%
97% MTOW*
MTOW* -- ISA
ISA +10C
+10C
Max
Max cruise
cruise speed
speed
97%
97% MTOW*
MTOW* -- ISA
ISA -- 17,000
17,000 ftft
265
265 kt
kt
269
269 kt
kt
* MTOW = 16,700 kg ( 36,817 lb )
ATR 42-300/ATR 42-320
Payload/Range Capability
ISA Conditions
Reserves:
Alternate:
87 NM
Holding
45 Continued cruise
Pass. & baggage 95 kg (209 lb)
ATR 42-300/-320
Payload (kg)
5000
ATR 42-300/320
48 pax & baggage

4000
MTOW 16,900 kg (37,258 lb)

MZFW 15,540 kg (34,260 lb)
3000
ATR 42-300/320
MTOW 16,700 kg (36,817 lb)
MZFW 15,200 kg (33,510 lb)
2000
1000
630 NM
0
0
500
Range (NM)
1000
1500
2000
2500
ATR 42-500 - PW127E
ATR 42-300/-320
Block Fuel & Block Time on typical sectors
100
100 NM
NM Stage
Stage
295 kg (650 lb)

32 min
200
200 NM
NM Stage
Stage
497 kg (1,095 lb)

56 min
The
The most
most efficient
efficient compromise
compromise
between
between low
low fuel
fuel consumption
consumption and
and speed
speed
ATR 42-300/-320
The ATR Family: Unrestricted Operations
ETOPS capability
Operations from airfields located at up to

11,000 ft altitude
Stretcher transportation capability
Extreme cold weather certification (-52C)
Steep approach capability with performance credit

for operations on very short runways (800 1,000m)
Unpaved runways certification (laterite, soil,

gravel, grass)
Narrow runways operations, down to 14m width.
32-012/31-02
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42-300/-320
Cargo Capability
ATR: The Best Cargo Platform
ATR 42-300/-320
The ATR 42 is well suited to perform freight

transport missions through its basic flexibility
as illustrated by:
Standard cargo door: 1.275 x 1.53 m
(50.2 x 60.2), openable either from inside or
outside
Low loading sill (1.12 m)
Quick change option available:
- Class E compartment capability
- Total reinforced floor (400 kg/m)
- Passenger seats easily removable
- Forward partition easily removable
- Smoke detection extension in cabin
The ATR platform is suitable for containerized
or bulk freight
Quick
Quick change
change capability
capability =
= Additional
Additional profit
profit opportunities
opportunities
CAR-001/31-02
ATR: Container Transport Option

ATR Container Definition
ATR 42 Container Installation

Ball mat
423"
10.75 m
Lo cks
43"
1.09 m
1"
0.025 m
32"
0.81 m
83"
2.10m
S G
50 "
1 .2 7 m
ATR 42-300/-320
4 3"
1. 0 9
m
4.8 m
169.5 cu.ft
B
T
50.2"
1.27 m
455"
11.56 m
Total containerized volume: 25.2 m3 (891 cu.ft)

+ bulk freight in the aft cargo zone (4.8 m3)
"
8 3 .5
m
2 .1 2
Volume: 2.8 m3 (99 cu.ft)

Max gross weight: 500 kg (1,102 lb)
Tare weight: 76 kg (168 lb)
Complies with Class I of NAS 3610 (9g type)
Notes
- The basic attendant seat is not usable during container
transport operations
- This type of operations requires the option 03-0011 (Container
Transport Capability)
- The Container Transport option requires that the cabin be, as
far as the fire protection system is concerned, class E. Class E
mainly leads to extension of the existing smoke detection system
and installation of isolating valves in the air-conditioning system.
This classification does not allow the use of the attendant seat
during cargo operations.
ATR QC Freighter
ATR 42-300/-320
Reference Weights
Engines
Engines
ATR
ATR 42-300/-320
42-300/-320
ATR
ATR 72-200/-210
72-200/-210
PW
PW 120/121
120/121
PW
PW 124B/127
124B/127
MTOW
MTOW Standard
Standard
MTOW
MTOW Optional
Optional
MLW
MLW
21,500
21,500 kg
kg
(1)
16,900
16,900 kg
kg (1)
(2)
22,000
22,000 kg
kg (2)
16,400
16,400 kg
kg
21,350
21,350 kg
kg
MZFW
MZFW Standard
Standard
19,700
19,700 kg
kg
MZFW
MZFW Optional
Optional
(1)
15,540
15,540 kg
kg (1)
(2)
20,000
20,000 kg
kg (2)
(3)
OEW
OEW (typical)
(typical) (3)
10,100
10,100 kg
kg
12,050
12,050 kg
kg
4,500
4,500 kg
kg
5,000
5,000 kg
kg
Max
Max Fuel
Fuel
1 : For MSN < 70, VMO limited at 240 kt

2 : Not applicable on the 17 first ATR 72 (up to MSN 195)
3: Typical weights according to second hand aircraft statistics, with overhead bins and galley
and without galley equipment.
ATR QC Freighter
Typical Max Payload Summary

(Optional weights)
ATR 42-300/-320
QC
QC Freighter
Freighter Max
Max P/L
P/L
ATR
ATR 42-300/-320
42-300/-320
ATR
ATR 72-200/-210
72-200/-210
MZFW
MZFW limited
limited gross
gross payload
payload
5,440
5,440 kg
kg
7,950
7,950 kg
kg
Bulk
Bulk -- Limit
Limit of
of cabin
cabin nets
nets
4,800
4,800 kg
kg
7,200
7,200 kg
kg
Bulk
Bulk -- Limit
Limit of
of aft
aft cargo
cargo hold
hold
768
768 kg
kg **
768
768 kg
kg
Maximum
Maximum net
net bulk
bulk payload
payload **
**
5,395
5,395 kg
kg
7,882
7,882 kg
kg
Containers
Containers (net
(net payload)
payload)
3,816
3,816 kg
kg
5,512
5,512 kg
kg
Bulk
Bulk -- Limit
Limit of
of aft
aft cargo
cargo hold
hold
++ 768
768 kg*
kg*
+768
+768 kg
kg
* : 384 kg por MSN<116 (small rear hold)

** : Assumes SIREN kit
ATR 42-300/-320
Payload/Range Characteristics
(9 ATR Containers)
ATR 42-300/-320
Kg
5000
Conditions
- ISA
- No wind
4500
4000
Optional weights
3500
3000
2500
Basic weights
2000
Reserves
- 45 min continued
cruise
- 87 Nm alternate
Taxi: 4 min
OEW: 10,950 kg
1500
1000
OEW includes the

Container Transport
System and the
container weights.
500
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Nm
ATR Full Freighter
ATR 42-300/-320
First delivery: Farnair, Switzerland, August 2002
Full Cargo Version

The New Standard in Regional and Feeder Cargo
Transport
Cargo Capability
ATR 42-300/-320
New Opportunities - Full Freighters

In order to address the growing requirements of cargo
operators for new generation, efficient regional
freighters, ATR has launched optimized derivatives of
the standard passenger models.
Bulk Freighter derivative (Tube version) : This
version is an optimized solution for small parcels
transportation (best volume and payload, quick and
efficient loading).
Large Cargo Door (116) conversion
In order to provide operators with standard ULD
compatibility (notably LD3 containers and 88 width
containers or pallets), a large 116 x 71 front cargo
door is now available, replacing the standard front door.
Combined as required with equipment from the Tube
concept, this version is a multi-purpose freighter
capable of:
- Bulk Freight transportation with improved loading
efficiency
- Standard or specific pallets or containers
transportation,
- Carriage of oversize loads.
ATR 42-300/-320 ATR Full Freighters (Tube + LCD)

MTOW
16,900 kg (37,257 lb)
OEW (typical, including nets)
9,927 kg (21,885 lb)
Max net P/L
5,613 kg (12,374 lb)
Gross usable volume

Max linear load
56 m3 (1,978 cu.ft)
510 kg/m (28 lb/inch)
Cabin cross-section with 116 door

ULD compatibility
88" x 108" ULD
88 x 62 ULD
LD3
Capabilities - Light Tube
ATR 42-300/-320
Payload optimization for dense Bulk transportation - Spider nets
Bulk freight with BFE

spider nets
Maximize the
payload for dense
bulk transportation
ATR 42 maximum
payload:
5,753 kg (12,683 lb)
ATR 72 maximum
payload:
8,604 kg (18,968 lb)
The lightest and lowest cost solution

Capabilities - Large Cargo Door

Loading capability
5
5 LD3
LD3 containers
containers
ATR
ATR 42
42
ATR 42-300/-320
3
3 88x
88x 108
108 pallets
pallets
6
6 88x
88x 62
62 pallets
pallets
+ aft bulk load
7
7 LD3
LD3 containers
containers
ATR
ATR 72
72
5
5 88x
88x 108
108 pallets
pallets
9
9 88x
88x 62
62 pallets
pallets
+ aft bulk load
ATR family, more and more environment friendly

Cumulative noise margin (EPNdB)
ATR
42-300
EPNdB
ATR
42-320
ATR
42-400
ATR
42-500
ATR
72-200
ATR
72-210
ATR
72-500
ATR 42-300/-320
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
EIS
EIS 1989
1985
Qu
iet
er
EIS: Entry into service
Qu
iete
r
EIS 1995
EIS 1997
ATR family is fully compliant with Chapter III regulations and more stringent airport restrictions.
EIS: Entry into Service
All
All ATR
ATR models
models have
have large
large margins
margins to
to comply
comply
with
with Chapter
Chapter IV
IV limits
limits
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42-300/-320
Economics:
Improving the Bottom Line
ATR 42-300/-320
Cost Effectiveness
Operators worldwide unanimously associate ATR 42 with

profitability.
Thanks to its low operating costs and high reliability, ATR
aircraft have played a major role in the development of many
Airlines.
Advanced technology has been the key factor in reducing
operating costs to a minimum:
Low fuel consumption

High maintainability
Maximum commonality, as part of a family of aircraft.
Assumptions
200 Nm sector
ATR 42-300/-320
European
European groundrules
groundrules
US
US groundrules
groundrules
Block
(min)
Block time
time (min)
56.0
56.0
Block
(kg)
Block fuel
fuel (kg)
497
497
Time
(min)*
Time allowances
allowances (min)*
7.3
7.3
2,200
2,200
Utilization
(BH/year)
Utilization (BH/year)
2,400
2,400
Pax
Pax
48
48
0.80
0.80
0.70
0.70
(navigation,
(navigation, landing,
landing, parking)
parking)
(landing,
(landing, parking)
parking)
35
35
20
20
statistical
statistical
statistical
statistical
Fuel
($/US gal)
gal)
Fuel price
price ($/US
Charges
Charges
Crew
Crew costs
costs ($/BH)
($/BH)
-- Cabin
Cabin
-- Cockpit
Cockpit
Line:
Line: 25
25 -- Shop:
Shop: 63
63
Labour
($/MH)
Labour costs
costs ($/MH)
** Start,
Start, taxi,
taxi, take-off,
take-off, approach
approach and
and landing
landing
ATR 42
Cash DOC/Trip
ATR 42-300/-320
200 Nm sector
US
US groundrules
groundrules
Maintenance
Maintenance
-- Airframe
Airframe
-- Engine
Engine
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
European
European groundrules
groundrules
122
122
94
94
Maintenance
Maintenance
-- Airframe
Airframe
-- Engine
Engine
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
122
122
94
94
Crew
Crew
-- Cockpit
Cockpit
-- Cabin
Cabin
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
207
207
33
33
Navigation
Navigation charges
charges
Landing/parking
Landing/parking charges
charges
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
174
174
220
220
Crew
Crew
-- Cockpit
Cockpit
-- Cabin
Cabin
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
$/trip
94
94
19
19
Landing/parking
Landing/parking charges
charges
$/trip
$/trip
86
86
Fuel
Fuel
$/trip
$/trip
115
115
Fuel
Fuel
$/trip
$/trip
132
132
Cash
Cash DOC/trip
DOC/trip
$/trip
$/trip
531
531
Cash
Cash DOC/trip
DOC/trip
$/trip
$/trip
982
982
Cash
Cash DOC/ASM
DOC/ASM
/ASM
/ASM
5.53
5.53
Cash
Cash DOC/ASM
DOC/ASM
/ASM
/ASM
10.2
10.2
Cash
Cash DOC
DOC is
is 53%
53% of
of the
the total
total DOC/trip.
DOC/trip.
47%
are
investment
related
costs.
47% are investment related costs.
Cash
Cash DOC
DOC is
is 66%
66% of
of the
the total
total DOC/trip.
DOC/trip.
34%
are
investment
related
costs.
34% are investment related costs.
ATR 42-300/-320
Maintenance
ATR 42-300/-320
ATR 42: Designed to Ease Customer Operation
Excellent accessibility of main

systems and controls
Systems simplicity and maximum
interchangeability of parts and
mechanisms (extensive use of LRUs)
Reliability (built-in test equipments,
maintenance panels in the cockpit)
Reduced maintenance working hours
The
The Design
Design to
to Maintain
Maintain philosophy,
philosophy, leading
leading to
to the
the lowest
lowest
maintenance
maintenance costs
costs per
per flight
flight hour
hour in
in the
the market.
market.
ATR 42-300/-320
Excellent Accessibility
Access
Access to
to flight
flight
controls
controls from
from cabin
cabin
(hinged,
(hinged, quick
quick release
release
hat-racks)
hat-racks)
Avionics,
Avionics, electrics
electrics
and
and batteries
batteries in
in racks
racks
behind
behind pilots
pilots
Large
Large butterfly
butterfly doors
doors
for
for engine
engine access
access
Air
Air conditioning
conditioning
packs
packs
Hydraulic
Hydraulic bay
bay
r
o
f
d
e
n
Desig
e
c
n
a
n
e
Maint
Rear
Rear bay
bay (CVR,
(CVR,
DFDR,
DFDR, flight
flight controls)
controls)
Dispatch Reliability
World fleet (15 mn WATOG)
ATR 42-300/-320
99,8
99,6
99,4
99,2
99,0
98,8
98,6
98,4
1998
1999
ATR 42
2000
ATR 42-500
2001
ATR 72
2002
2003
ATR 72-500
ATR 42
Basic Inspection Frame
ATR 42-300/-320
Line
- Line check (2 calendar days)

- Weekly check (7 days)
Tasks performed: zonal visual inspections, operational checks and servicing.
A checks - Every 500 FH

Tasks performed: zonal visual inspections, B.I.T.E. checks, operational checks
lubrication and servicing
C checks - Every 4000 FH
Tasks performed: zonal visual inspections, operational and functional checks of
aircraft and powerplant systems
Structural inspections
- Environmental damage
- Fatigue damage
Tasks performed: general and detailed visual inspections, special detailed inspections
ATR 42
ATR 42-300/-320
Structural Inspections
Environmental damage (corrosion)

- Thresholds: 2, 4 and 8 years
- Repeat intervals: 2, 4 and 8 years
Fatigue damage
- Thresholds: 18,000, 24,000 and 36,000 flights
- Repeat intervals: 3,000, 6,000, 9,000, 12,000, 18,000 and 24,000 flights
ATR A Checks
Zonal visual checks, bite checks, lubrication, servicing, operational tests
2,000 FH/Year
2,000 FL/Year
ATR 42-300/-320
120MH
100MH
80MH
60MH
40MH
20MH
0MH
1A
2A
3A
4A
5A
6A
7A
8A
Manhours quoted account for unscheduled work.
ATR C Checks
Zonal visual inspections, operational and functional test of

aircraft and powerplant systems
2,000 FH/Year
2,000 FL/Year
ATR 42-300/-320
250MH
200MH
150MH
100MH
50MH
0MH
1C
2C
3C
4C
5C
6C
7C
8C
Manhours quoted accunt for unscheduled work.
ATR 42-300/-320
Engine Maintenance Programme
On condition
No scheduled HSI / OVH.

Engine removal for refurbishment driven by on
wing tasks and ECTM (Trend Monitoring)
ATR 42-300/-320
Major Inspection Intervals
The following Majors Inspection Intervals have been approved

for the ATR 42-300/-320:
PW 120/121 engine TBO
8,000 FH
14SF-5 propeller TBO
10,000 FH (10,500 FH objective)
Landing gear TBO
18,000 cycles or 8 years provided

that six SB are incorporated
Aircraft structure
8 years and 36,000 cycles
ATR 42-300
Direct Maintenance Cost
ATR 42-300/-320
2,000 FH/year, 1 H flight

A checks
500 FH interval
C checks
4,000 FH
interval
PW 120 engine, on-condition

maintenance
14SF5 prop.,10,000 FH TBO
Labour rates :
In-house
Subcontracted
Line Checks
A checks
C checks
Struct. Insp.
On-Aircraft Total
$ 25
$ 63
100 % rotables subcont.

Economic conditions Jan 03
Budgetary figures
Note :
DMC figures are only related to costs of parts
and labour necessary to maintain the aircraft
and its components in a serviceable
condition. DMC figures exclude capital
investment in facilities, spares inventory and
the associated financial burden.
Wheels, Brakes & Tyres

Rotables
Landing Gear
Engines
Propellers
Labour
MH/FH
Material
$/FH
Total
$/FH
0.1255
0.1666
0.0394
0.1268
$0.41
$9.28
$5.28
$7.47
$3.54
$13.44
$6.27
$10.64
0.4583
$22.44
$33.90
0.0534
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$8.53
$65.62
$11.80
$112.82
$6.53
$9.87
$65.62
$11.80
$112.82
$6.53
Off-Aircraft Total
TOTAL
$206.64
$240.54
ATR 42-320
Direct Maintenance Cost
ATR 42-300/-320
2,000 FH/year, 1 H flight

A checks
500 FH interval
C checks
4,000 FH
interval
PW 120 engine, on-condition

maintenance
14SF5 prop.,10,000 FH TBO
Labour rates :
In-house
Subcontracted
$ 25
$ 63
100 % rotables subcont.

Economic conditions Jan 03
Budgetary figures
Note :
DMC figures are only related to costs of parts
and labour necessary to maintain the aircraft
and its components in a serviceable
condition. DMC figures exclude capital
investment in facilities, spares inventory and
the associated financial burden.
Line Checks
A checks
C checks
Struct. Insp.
On-Aircraft Total
Wheels, Brakes & Tyres
Rotables
Landing Gear
Engines
Propellers
Labour
MH/FH
Material
$/FH
Total
$/FH
0.1255
0.1666
0.0394
0.1268
$0.41
$9.28
$5.28
$7.47
$3.54
$13.44
$6.27
$10.64
0.4583
$22.44
$33.90
0.0534
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$8.53
$65.62
$11.80
$115.59
$6.53
$9.87
$65.62
$11.80
$115.59
$6.53
Off-Aircraft Total
TOTAL
$209.41
$243.31
ATR 42-300/-320
Customer Support
Customer Support
ATR 42-300/-320
Toulouse
Washington
Head Office
Spares Logistic Centre
ATR Training Centre
Singapore
ATR 42-300/-320
Training Centres
Flight Safety
Britair
Finnair
Atlanta
1 FFS
Morlaix
1 FFS
Helsinki
1 FFS
Orbit
Bangkok
1 FFS
AMR Eagle
Dallas
1 FFS
Flight Safety
ATR
Olympic
Houston
2 FFS
Toulouse
3 FFS
Thessalonica
1 FFS
ATR 42-300/-320
Technical Support Engineering
Permanent, 24 hours a day Service
Integrated
Integrated Engineering
Engineering Environment
Environment
at
at no
no cost
cost for
for the
the Operators
Operators
Composed by Systems, Structural, Technical

Publications & Maintenance Engineers.
World-wide Around the Clock
ATR 42-300/-320
Capability to ship any part, anywhere, immediately 24 hours a day
Toulouse
Toulouse
Washington
Washington
Singapore
Singapore
Spares specialists available 24 hours a day in three locations (Toulouse, Washington, Singapore)
GMA : Global Maintenance Agreement
ATR 42-300/-320
Advantages
Availability of parts with a minimum spares investment.

Guaranteed price
Simplicity through a single channel service.
GMA
actual
actual fleet
fleet coverage
coverage
83 a/c among 20 operators
Single Channel with a GMA
ATR 42-300/-320
HIGH FLEXIBILITY TO COMPOSE THE GMA PACKAGE

Rotable On-Site Stock
Rotable Pool Access
Rotable repairs & overhauls
Engines maintenance
Propellers maintenance
Landing Gears maintenance
On-call technical assistance
Other specific services...
MAKE YOUR OWN CHOICE...
TO COMPLEMENT YOUR OWN

RESOURCES
LRU Repair & Pool Service
ATR 42-300/-320
1
Airline
2
3
ATR
Pool store
4
Approved
Repair Station
Spares Pool Service gives access to

exchange services for IMMEDIATE
replenishment of the airline stock.
Over 240 P/Ns can be covered.
ATR 42-300/-320
Conclusion
With 15 years of in-service experience, the ATR 42 has proved to be a

very reliable, and cost efficient aircraft.
Its 65% market share in the 40-50 seat turboprop market makes the
ATR 42 the number 1 in its category and the increasingly large
customer base is the best evidence of how well the aircraft is
appreciated around the world.
When operating used ATR 42 aircraft, airlines benefit from the wide
range of customized Support services developed by the Customer
Support Centers in Toulouse, Washington and Singapore, with a
special attention being offered to new ATR operators.
Buying or leasing used ATR 42 aircraft is also joining a whole family
concept with proven solutions for long term airline development,
towards larger capacity with the ATR 72, or higher performance and
comfort with the new -500 series.
ATR 42-300/-320

Atr 42-300 01-2004

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Atr 42-300 01-2004

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ATR 42-300/-320

ATR Program Overview ..

ATR 42 outstanding features ...

Weights and Performance.

Cargo capability ...

Economics: improving the bottom line ..

Customer Support ...

The Worlds First Transnational Aerospace Company

EADS 2002 main figures

Italys Largest Producer of High Technology

Eur 8.69 Bn (US$ 9.04 Bn)

ATR Integrated Company

ATR Family Evolution

New engine :PW 127E

Hot & high

The ATR Family: Unmatched Versatility

Rough field version

Maritime Patrol version

Value for money

ATR is the only regional aircraft manufacturer

* Airfinance Journal, October 2003

2003 Operators Poll

ATR Family, best value for money!

The ATR Family : Worldwide Success

Firm orders - Dec. 2003

ATR, the Majors Favorite

AIR NEW ZEALAND

The ATR Family: Customer Preference

Sales since launch

Sales since launch

FEAMA 2003 Market Consensus

(20 Years Regional Aircraft Delivery Forecast)

Total of 6,759 a/c in the 15-99 seats category

The Reference in the Regional Market

Forward cargo door

Space and Efficiency

Making the best use of available space

Main features are:

A rear left door including an integrated stair for passenger embarkment/disembarkme

ATR 42 Cabin Cross-Section

Space and Comfort

ATR 42 Cabin Layout Flexibility

ATR 42 Cabin Layout Flexibility

Basic ATR 42 A type galley (A01/11)

A type galley (A01/11)

(basic on ATR 42)

(basic on ATR 42)

Provision for two hot jugs,

3 standard units each equipped

1 half size trolley equipped

Lower Weights for Increased Efficiency

ATR 42 secondary structure is extensively made of composite material,

Weight saving 190 kg = equivalent to

Cabin floor panels: Kevlar/Nomex sandwich

ATR 42-300 & ATR 42-320

Weights & Loadings

ATR 42 Powered by PW100 Family Engines

Two centrifugal compressors

Simple, economic, easy to maintain

Propeller Brake Principle

The ATR aircraft benefit from an economic

Hotel Mode/APU Comparison