IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[Order XXI Rule 3(1)(a)]

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.

OF 2015

[WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF]

BETWEEN
To

POSITION OF PARTIES
(All are Contesting Respondents)

THE HONBLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS

COMPANION HONBLE JUDGES OF HONBLE SUPREME
COURT OF INDIA.
THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE
PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

Whether the Honble High Court has not kept the

parameters of Sec. 34 in mind while adjudicating the
matter?

Whether the Honble High Court has substituted its own

view for the award, which is not permissible under the
law?

Whether the findings of the Honble High Court are

liable to be set aside in as much as such findings will
prejudice any enquiry to be made against the
Petitioner?

Whether the findings of the Honble High Court has

erred in giving a finding regarding black marketing of
gas cylinders, which was not even the case setup
against Petitioner?

Whether the Honble High Court has erred in deciding

the matter on merits, when only the suspension order
was impugned, being contrary to the MDG Guidelines,
and only loss of profit was claimed in addition?

Whether the Honble High Court was completely

mistaken in taking into consideration 400 cylinders,
whereas the DSO found only 306 cylinders?

Whether the Honble High Court erred by misreading

the statements of DW-2, DW-3, DW-4; who rather
supported the case of the Petitioner by admitting that
not the entire report of 400 cylinders but only part
thereof was made in their presence?

Whether the Honble Court erred in relying on the

investigation report, where no opportunity was given to
the Petitioner, and it was prepared behind his back and
thus could not be looked into?

(a) Pass such other and further Order(s) as this Honble Court
may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of this Case.

AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE PETITIONER AS IN

DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY.