You are on page 1of 2

Mizera v. Google Doc.

32
Case 5:05-cv-02885-RMW Document 32 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 1 of 2

1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP


DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825
2 DAVID J. SILBERT - #173128
710 Sansome Street
3 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
Telephone: (415) 391-5400
4 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
Email: ddurie@kvn.com
5 dsilbert@kvn.com

6 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE, INC.

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
ADVANCED INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES, Case No. C 05 02579 RMW
12 INC., a North Carolina corporation,
Individually and on behalf of all others Consolidated with
13 similarly situated, Case No. C 05 02885 RMW

14 Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER VACATING


CLASS CERTIFICATION DATES
15 v.
Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
16 GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, Date Comp. Filed: June 24, 2005
17
Defendants. Trial Date: None set
18
STEVE MIZERA, an Individual, individually
19 and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
20 Plaintiff,
21 v.
22 GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation; and
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
23
Defendants.
24

25

26

27

28

370059.01 [Proposed] Order Vacating Dates


Case No. C 05 02579 RMW Consolidated with C 05 02885 RMW
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 5:05-cv-02885-RMW Document 32 Filed 03/29/2006 Page 2 of 2

1 The Court has reviewed Google’s Ex Parte Motion to Vacate Briefing Schedule Pending

2 Ruling on Motion to Stay, as well as the parties’ filings in support of, and in opposition to,

3 Google’s motion to stay. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the existing

4 briefing and hearing dates on AIT’s Motion for Class Certification are VACATED. A hearing

5 on Google’s motion to stay is set for __________________________. If AIT wishes to file

6 additional pleadings in opposition to the motion to stay, it may do so by ___________________.

7 If AIT files such additional pleadings, Google may file a response by ____________________.

8 If the Court denies Google’s motion to stay, it will set new dates for AIT’s motion for

9 class certification.

10 IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 Dated:

12

13 By: ______________________
Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
14 United States District Judge
15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
1
[Proposed] Order Vacating Dates
370059.01 Case No. C 05 02579 RMW Consolidated with C 05 02885 RMW

You might also like