Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vacci-Nation
The Future of American Vaccination Policy
Introduction
Deliberation
When people deliberate,
they carefully examine a
problem and arise a wellreasoned solution after a
period of inclusive,
respectful consideration
Vacci-Nation
Thomas Andrews
Dan Braun
Paul Chichura
Erin Ferris
Mark Hewertson
Elizabeth Hopta
Andrew Marshall
Anirudh Mylavarapu
Jeevan Prabhakar
Christine Suhr
Thanakorn Thaminkaew
Yike Zhao
universities, but is that enough? Should we not require vaccinations into adulthood as
well? Should the current system of required vaccinations in place be overhauled or
expanded?
Approach #2 Right to Choose to get Vaccinated:
Despite the seeming correlation between vaccination rates and the decline of
infectious disease, many argue that the government does not have the right to force it
on the people. Beyond religious objections and fears of the side effects of vaccines,
the prevailing argument against vaccination requirements is that it violates the
peoples right to bodily autonomy. Similarly to the way we are not told what to eat or
what medicine to take, it should be left to the individual, in the end, to decide what
goes into their body.
Vacci-Nation
Approach #3 Education:
If vaccines are not to be mandated, then people should have the information
they need to make an educated decision on whether or not to be vaccinated. Instead of
tackling the issue in courtrooms, we can solve it in the classrooms of our youth and
the centers of our community, with objective medical officials teaching both the side
effects and benefits of vaccinations. If we simply present people with the facts and
allow them to make their own informed decisions, we can avoid conflict between
radical groups that result from a lack of objectivity and understanding.
Vacci-Nation
Vacci-Nation
The government does not have the right to our health because the right to
health and health care is an individual freedom; people have the power to decide
whether or not they want to be vaccinated. The government cannot impose or force
the citizens to get vaccinated, although such vaccinations may be highly
recommended. Bodily integrity is the inviolability of the physical body and
emphasizes the importance of personal autonomy and the self-determination of
human beings over their own bodies. It considers the violation of bodily integrity as
an unethical infringement, intrusive, and possibly criminal. When the government
forces people to get vaccinated, it is a violation of these privacy rights and personal
freedoms.
According to Jane Orient, a member of the Association of American
Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), when the government forces people to get
vaccinated, it violates the doctor-patient relationship because the doctor becomes an
agent of the state. Early on, the public health policy of the U.S. only restricted the
liberty of individuals who had been exposed to any dangerous communicable
diseases; however, nowadays any individual who doesnt get immunized is faced with
certain restrictions from living normally. This is wrong because it violates bodily
integrity. As of today, there is no federal law mandating vaccinations. According to
Senator Marco Rubio, vaccinations should be made mandatory. Senator Rand Paul,
however, thinks they should be voluntary.
With the recent outbreak of measles, there is a constant debate as to whether
or not the government should pass a law to make vaccinations mandatory. As of
2014, health care employees, teachers, day care employees, and students are the
targets of the new legislation that forces the people to get the recommended vaccines
or suffer economic sanctions as well as restrictions to everyday life.
Several parents are refraining from getting their children vaccinated due to the
fear of their child becoming autistic. While public health officials strongly suggest
that vaccinations are a must and are the best way of eliminating diseases. A recent
survey found that about 51.16% of people believe that the government should have
Vacci-Nation
the right to determine whether or not people get vaccinated and 26.51 % believe that
it should be voluntary. In this situation, people who have suffered from diseases in the
past, are taking the governments side because they do not want the future generations
to suffer as they once had. On the other hand, the people who are superstitious or
anxious about vaccines refuse to take them. A lot of the time, several people have
allergic reactions to vaccinations, which affects them much more than the positive
aspects of a vaccine and can even result in death.
The government shouldnt force everyone to get vaccinated and should be
able to provide exemption to those who have other medical conditions which might
be affected due to the vaccinations. The freedoms similar to the freedom of diet and
medicines also applies to vaccines. It is the individuals right to decide what they put
inside of their own body. If they feel the need and have faith in vaccines, they may
choose to vaccinate; otherwise, the government cannot force citizens.
Aside from issues stemming from an overbearing government and violations
of body autonomy, there are issues of implementation that need to be addressed. For
one, supposing there was a mandatory assignment, there would obviously need to be
some sort of punishment associated for refusing to vaccinate. Would this punishment
be a fine? Jail time? Nothing? A fine would enable people who have the money to
just simply pay the due in order to avoid the vaccination.
Punishing someone for practicing something they strongly believe in is highly
immoral. So, do we force these people to be vaccinated? Strapping them down and
injecting them would be an example of the government clearly overstepping its
bounds. If there would be a change to the current system, what would be the
implementation? Would the government fund the vaccinations or would they be paid
for by the consumer? If the government is going to force someone to vaccinate, it
seems fair that the government would pay for it.
Vacci-Nation
Vacci-Nation
Works Cited