Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TOC
n the United States, the gap between practice and research in the addictions field has persisted or possibly
expanded during the 1990s (Backer, David, & Soucy,
1995; Lamb, Greenlick, & McCarty, 1998). Despite
calls for new views on the nature of addiction (Leshner,
1997), broad-spectrum approaches to treatment (Institute
of Medicine, 1990), and practice based on informed eclecticism (Miller & Hester, 1995), many frontline practitioners
are presumed to hold to experiential models acquired from
their own recovery (Lamb et al., 1998). Indeed, there is a
long history of association between Alcoholics Anonymous
(AA) and the U.S. treatment system (Yalisove, 1998), and,
as a result, the research literature commonly describes the
disease model as dominant (e.g., Morgenstern, Frey,
McCrady, Labouvie, & Neighbors, 1996) and widespread
(e.g., Ogborne, Wild, Braun, & Newton-Taylor, 1998). Although these assumptions may be accurate, they have not
been extensively studied in the 1990s. This seems to be a
research need given the rapid changes in the delivery of
addiction treatment services, many of which can be traced
to managed care pressures (Morey, 1996).
Brown (1995) contended there is little incentive for the
research and the service delivery communities to collaborate. Traditionally, funding agencies have supported treatment outcome research and placed little emphasis on
investigations seeking to diffuse treatment innovations. At
the same time, treatment programs have usually selected
practices based on personal recovery experiences rather
than on criteria based on data. Thus, the federal government has assumed responsibility for facilitating collaboration. The Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (1998a)
Dennis L. Thombs is an associate professor with academic appointments in Health Promotion, and Counseling and Human Development Services, and
Cynthia J. Osborn is an assistant professor in Counseling and Human Development Services, both in the Department of Adult, Counseling, Health, and
Vocational Education at Kent State University, Kent, Ohio. Financial assistance for this research was provided by a grant from the Kent State University
Research Council. The authors thank the Ohio Credentialing Board for Chemical Dependency Professionals for their help and Jonathan Richardson for his
assistance with data entry. Correspondence regarding this article should be sent to Dennis L. Thombs, 316 White Hall, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242
(e-mail: dthombs@educ.kent.edu).
450
J O U R N A L O F C O U N S E L I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T FA L L 2 0 0 1 V O L U M E 7 9
METHOD
Sample and Procedure
In Ohio, registered candidates are practitioners with varied
academic backgrounds who work under supervision in the
substance abuse field. Current state credentialing standards
stipulate that registered candidates must obtain their chemical dependency certification within 2 years. Three levels of
certified chemical dependency counselors (CCDC) are
recognized in the state. CCDC I requires a high school
degree, a minimum of 135 clock hours of training, at least 6
J O U R N A L O F C O U N S E L I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T FA L L 2 0 0 1 V O L U M E 7 9
451
452
RESULTS
Principal Components Analyses
Principal components analyses were conducted separately on
the UAS items and the TPRQ items. These analyses were
deemed necessary because both instruments had been modified for the study. Our primary objective was not to identify
parsimonious factor structures but to produce a range of unique
factors that could serve as clustering variables in subsequent
cluster analyses. Thus, the criterion for extracting factors was
simply an eigenvalue greater than or equal to 1.00. This
approach included factors accounting for a small amount of
variance in the principal components analyses to allow for the
possibility that they could make substantial contributions to
cluster solutions in the ensuing data analytic stage.
The principal components analyses were conducted using
oblique and orthogonal rotations. Although the procedures
yielded nearly identical results for both the UAS and the
TPRQ analyses, the oblique rotations were selected because
they usually provide factor solutions that are more realistic
(Portney & Watkins, 1993). The criteria for determining the
significance of the factor loadings followed criteria outlined
by Hair, Anderson, Tatham, and Black (1998) in which items
were retained only if they loaded above .60 on the designated factor and less than .30 on all other factors (thereby
optimizing communality within factors and uniqueness
between them). The factors derived from these procedures
as well as their means and reliabilities are summarized in
Tables 1 and 2. An examination of the means and standard
deviations in these two tables reveals that the sample was
relatively heterogeneous regarding moral, disease, and psychosocial conceptions of addiction and its treatment.
Cluster Analyses
SPSS (1988) cluster procedures were used to group the
chemical dependency counselors according to their responses to the 28 extracted UAS and TPRQ factors. Three
of the most widely used cluster algorithms (k-means, Wards,
and complete linkage) were used to conduct the analyses
(Hair et al., 1998). In each analysis, squared Euclidean distance coefficients were used as the measure of proximity.
Because there was no theoretical rationale for assigning differential weights to the factor scores, the variables resulting from the different UAS and TPRQ measurement scales
were transformed to Z scores. This procedure standardized
the factor scores so that each was equally weighted in the
analyses (Hair et al., 1998).
Because there were 63 cases with missing values, 343 cases
were used in the three cluster analyses. There was correspondence between the cluster solutions generated by the k-means
and complete linkage methods; each analysis identified a
simple, two-group solution that differentiated disease model
practitioners from non-disease-model practitioners. In contrast, the agglomeration coefficients and dendrogram generated from the Wards algorithm clearly indicated that a
three-group solution accounted for clustering in the data.
J O U R N A L O F C O U N S E L I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T FA L L 2 0 0 1 V O L U M E 7 9
TABLE 1
Principal Components of the Understanding of Addiction ScaleRevised (UAS; Oblique Rotation)
Factor
Number of
Loadings
Range of
Scores
SD
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
3
28
14
14
312
28
14
14
14
14
28
14
14
14
14
28
14
14
28
14
14
312
2.5
2.8
4.7
4.4
2.9
3.0
3.1
2.8
5.8
2.3
2.1
2.3
2.1
5.6
3.4
2.3
5.8
3.0
2.8
7.7
0.7
0.7
1.5
1.2
0.8
0.5
0.6
0.5
1.2
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.7
1.2
0.6
0.7
1.2
0.7
0.6
1.8
Percentage
of Variance
13.3
5.8
4.8
3.6
2.9
2.6
2.5
2.3
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
58.6
.71
.71
Note. UAS = Understanding of Addiction Scale. Factor names are abbreviated labels for questionnaire items or composite factor scores. Items
loaded > .60 of the designated factor and < .30 on all other factors. The UAS responses range from strongly disagree (scored as 1) to strongly
agree (scored as 4).
TABLE 2
Principal Components of the Treatment Processes Rating Questionnaire (TPRQ; Oblique Rotation)
Factor
Clients need help developing better relationships
Some clients benefit from alternative therapies
Cravings can be reduced with conditioning strategies
Counseling should increase client self-efficacy
Client must accept disease concept and commit to AA/NA
Clients are responsible for change and maintenance of
recovery
Psychotropic medication is useful
Teaching coping skills is important
Total number of TPRQ factors
Number of
Loadings
Range of
Scores
SD
Percentage
of Variance
1
3
2
1
2
17
321
214
17
214
5.6
9.7
8.3
6.5
12.0
1.2
3.8
3.5
1.0
2.0
21.4
9.1
6.2
5.2
4.1
2
1
2
14
214
17
214
12.8
5.2
12.4
1.6
1.7
1.6
3.5
3.0
2.6
55.1
.80
Note. See Table 2 Note. The TPRQ responses range from detrimental (scored as 1) to essential (scored as 7).
J O U R N A L O F C O U N S E L I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T FA L L 2 0 0 1 V O L U M E 7 9
453
TABLE 3
Variable Profiles for a Three-Cluster Solution
Mean Z Scores
Cluster Variable
Cravings can be reduced with conditioning strategies
There exists an addictive personality type
Clients need humility in recovery
Clients lie about their substance use
Clients must accept disease concept and commit to AA/NA
Teaching coping skills is important
It is necessary to treat clients families
Clients need help developing better relationships
Recovering addicts are the best counselors
Some clients wind up using without problems
Best way to help clients is to listen
Coexisting psychological problems should be treated
Clients are immoral
Lack of spirituality causes addiction
Greater use increases probability of dependence
Client compliance increases likelihood of recovery
Social environment is a determinant of addiction
Counseling should increase client self-efficacy
Clients are responsible for change and maintenance of recovery
Blackouts indicate substance dependence
Psychotropic medication is useful
Abuse can be differentiated from dependence
Some clients benefit from alternative therapies
Addicts have a physiological susceptibility
Most clients relapse after treatment
Client motivation depends on counselor skill
Most clients recover and live normal lives
Treatment should be individualized
F Test
Uniform
Counselors
(n = 192)
Multiform
Counselors
(n = 100)
Client-Directed
Counselors
(n = 51)
F Value
0.30
0.09
0.02
0.13
0.02
0.22
0.23
0.26
0.10
0.18
0.18
0.12
0.04
0.10
0.04
0.01
0.13
0.20
0.14
0.15
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.14
0.09
0.06
0.09
0.04
0.73
0.46
0.36
0.23
0.33
0.55
0.49
0.43
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.34
0.16
0.33
0.24
0.36
0.26
0.27
0.02
0.16
0.31
0.20
0.01
0.16
0.18
0.09
0.11
0.20
0.73
0.87
0.88
0.80
0.13
0.05
0.21
0.70
0.65
0.57
0.62
0.39
0.56
0.41
0.52
0.18
0.17
0.03
0.40
0.41
0.11
0.31
0.29
0.00
0.01
0.16
0.17
49.38
31.65
29.66
27.96
26.81
26.07
19.71
17.98
14.90
14.63
12.51
12.37
10.94
10.84
10.83
10.61
10.14
8.74
6.70
6.37
6.16
5.14
4.78
4.41
1.99
1.96
1.87
1.36
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.0001
.001
.002
.002
.003
.01
.01
.02
ns
ns
ns
ns
Note. Positive Z scores indicate values above the total sample mean. Variable names are abbreviated labels for questionnaire items or composite
factor scores.
454
to agree that (1) Some clients wind up using without problems, (2) The best way to help clients is to listen, and (3)
Coexisting psychological problems should be treated. This
group strongly rejects the addictive personality concept and
moralistic notions (e.g., Clients lie about substance use).
Client-directed counselors also reported that they do not
insist that clients accept the disease concept and commit to
AA. Overall, client-directed counselors seemed more focused
on clients needs than on specific treatment modalities.
Validation of the Three-Cluster Solution
According to Aldenderfer and Blashfield (1984), a sound
method for validating a cluster solution is to conduct significance tests that compare clusters on variables not used in
the clustering procedure. Thus, we performed a multiple
discriminant function analysis of the three cluster groups to
determine how these groups differed on a variety of measures assessing professional credentials, employment, reliance
on specific psychotherapies, and demographic characteristics.
After a listwise deletion of 114 cases with missing values,
292 cases were used in the analysis. A total of 27 discriminating variables were entered simultaneously into the analysis.
As Table 4 shows, two statistically significant functions
J O U R N A L O F C O U N S E L I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T FA L L 2 0 0 1 V O L U M E 7 9
TABLE 4
Multiple Discriminant Analysis of Three Chemical Dependency Counselor Groups
Means and Structure Coefficients
Discriminating Variable (Range)
CCDC certification level (13)
Caucasian (versus other)
Confidence in DSM-IV knowledge (15)
African American (versus other)
Academic attainment (15)
Provider of outpatient services (no/yes)
Intention to seek degree or working on degree (no/yes)
Counselor license/certification (no/yes)
Reliance on existential/humanistic concepts (110)
Work exclusively with dual diagnosis clients (no/yes)
Uniform M
Multiform M
Client-Directed M
Function 1
Function 2
2.36
1.94
2.66
3.77
3.46
4.34
3.26
3.03
3.85
7.16
6.39
5.57
.543
.506
.477
.474
.452
.362
.346
.324
.111
.025
.141
.203
.106
.081
.181
.014
.173
.052
.509
.332
10.29
64.98
0.47
0.67
110.72
54
.001
20.16
35.02
0.37
0.86
40.22
26
.04
Function Characteristics
Eigenvalue
Canonical correlation
Wilkss lambda
Percentage of variance
Chi-square
df
p
Note. CCDC = certified chemical dependency counselor. The following discriminating variables had structure coefficients < .248 on both functions: 1 = years of work experience in the field; 2 = status as clinical supervisor or director/administrator; 3 = employed in nonmedical residential
setting; 4 = employed in medical residential setting; 5 = employed in corrections setting; 6 = employed in other settings; 7 = age; 8 = sex; 9 =
recovery status; 10 = annual salary; 11 = licensed as a social worker; 12 = licensed as a psychologist; 13 = reliance on Adlerian concepts; 14
= reliance on disease and model concepts; 15 = reliance on cognitive-behavioral concepts; 16 = reliance on solution-focused concepts; 17 =
reliance on other therapy concepts.
emerged from the analysis. An examination of the group centroids (not shown) revealed that Function 1 clearly separated
the multiform counselors from the client-directed counselors, whereas Function 2 distinguished the uniform counselors from the client-directed counselors.
The cluster group means and structure coefficients of the
10 effective discriminating variables appear in Table 4. The
remaining 17 variables had structure coefficients less than
.248 and thus were judged to be relatively unimportant to
the discriminant solution (a list of these variables appears
in Table 4). An examination of the structure coefficients
shows that 8 variables accounted for a substantial amount
of the variance in Function 1. Thus, compared with the
multiform counselors, the client-directed counselors (1)
were more likely to possess a higher CCDC certification,
(2) were more likely to be Caucasian, (3) had greater confidence in their knowledge of DSM-IV criteria, (4) were
less likely to be African American, (5) were more likely to
hold a higher academic degree, (6) were more likely to provide outpatient services, (7) were less likely to intend to
seek a higher degree or to be working on a degree, and (8)
were more likely to be a state licensed or nationally certified
counselor. There were only 2 variables that had substantial
associations with Function 2. These structure coefficients
indicated that client-directed counselors were (1) more likely
to rely on existential and humanistic concepts and (2) less
likely to work exclusively with dual diagnosis clients, compared with the uniform counselors.
Overall, the 27 discriminating variables correctly classified 64.4% of the respondents into the three cluster groups.
DISCUSSION
Interpretation of the findings must be qualified by the limitations of the data collection procedures. The investigation
relied on a self-report mail survey in one state that yielded
a 32.2% response rate. Therefore, there is some uncertainty
about the representativeness of the sample. However, as
noted earlier, the rate of response compares favorably with
other mail surveys of this population (Morgenstern &
McCrady, 1992; Moyers & Miller, 1993), and the demo-
J O U R N A L O F C O U N S E L I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T FA L L 2 0 0 1 V O L U M E 7 9
455
456
J O U R N A L O F C O U N S E L I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T FA L L 2 0 0 1 V O L U M E 7 9
REFERENCES
Aldenderfer, M., & Blashfield, R. (1984). Cluster analysis (Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences
#07-044). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical
manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Backer, T. E., David, S. L., & Soucy, G. (1995). Reviewing the behavioral
science knowledgebase on technology transfer, NIDA Research Monograph 155 (NIH Publication No. 95-4035). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Brickman, P., Rabinowitz, V. C., Karuza, J., Coates, D., Cohn, E., & Kidder,
L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37,
368384.
Brown, B. S. (1995). Reducing impediments to technology transfer in
drug abuse programming. In T. E. Backer, S. L. David, & G. Soucy
(Eds.), Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology
transfer, NIDA Research Monograph 155 (pp. 169185) (NIH Publication No. 95-4035). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services.
Brown, B. S. (1998). Making a difference: Is journal publication enough?
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15, 8788.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1997). The national treatment
improvement evaluation study (DHHS Publication No. SMA 97-3154).
Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1998a). Addiction counseling
competencies: The knowledge, skills, and attitudes of professional practice, Technical Assistance Publication Series 21 (DHHS Publication
No. SMA 98-3171). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1998b, September 18). Alcohol
and other drug abuse cost the U.S. an estimated $246 billion in 1992
(CSAT by Fax, Vol. 3, Issue 18). College Park, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Research.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (1999). Enhancing motivation
for change in substance abuse treatment, Treatment Improvement Protocol Series 35 (DHHS Publication No. SMA 99-3354). Rockville,
MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Culbreth, J. R., & Borders, L. D. (1999). Perceptions of the supervisory
relationship: Recovering and nonrecovering substance abuse counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77, 330338.
Deitch, D. A., & Carleton, S. A. (1997). Education and training of
personnel. In J. H. Lowinson, P. Ruiz, R. B. Millman, & J. C. Langrod
(Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook (pp. 801811).
Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Erickson, P. A., Riley, D. M., Cheung, Y. W., & OHare, P. A. (1997). Harm
reduction: A new direction for drug policies and programs. Toronto,
Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Gassman, R. A. (1997). Social work student characteristics and their
views of alcoholic clients: Designing educational interventions. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 42, 1931.
Glassman, A. M. (1995). Rethinking organization stability as a determinant for innovation adoption and diffusion. In T. E. Backer, S. L. David,
& G. Soucy (Eds.), Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on
technology transfer. NIDA Research Monograph 155 (NIH Publication No. 95-4035, pp. 169185). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Humphreys, K., Greenbaum, M. A., Noke, J. M., & Finney, J. W. (1996).
Reliability, validity, and normative data for a short version of the
Understanding of Alcoholism Scale. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,
10, 3844.
J O U R N A L O F C O U N S E L I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T FA L L 2 0 0 1 V O L U M E 7 9
457
458
Morgenstern, J., Frey, R. M., McCrady, B. S., Labouvie, E., & Neighbors, C. J. (1996). Examining mediators of change in traditional
chemical dependency treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57,
5364.
Morgenstern, J., & McCrady, B. S. (1992). Curative factors in alcohol and
drug treatment: Behavioral and disease model perspectives. British
Journal of Addiction, 87, 901912.
Moyers, T. B., & Miller, W. R. (1993). Therapists conceptualizations of
alcoholism: Measurement and implications for treatment decisions.
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 7, 238245.
Mulligan, D. H., McCarty, D., Potter, D., & Krakow, M. (1989). Counselors in public and private alcoholism and drug abuse treatment programs. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 6, 7589.
Ogborne, A. C., Wild, T. C., Braun, K., & Newton-Taylor, B. (1998).
Measuring treatment process beliefs among staff of specialized addiction treatment services. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,
15, 301312.
Osborn, C. J. (1997). Does disease matter? Incorporating SolutionFocused Brief Therapy in alcoholism treatment. Journal of Alcohol
and Drug Education, 43, 1830.
Page, R. C., Bailey, J. B., Barker, S., & Clawson, T. W. (1995). The development of a knowledge-based content area for the examination of
masters level addiction counselors. Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling, 16, 213.
Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (1993). Foundations of clinical research.
Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of
how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American
Psychologist, 47, 11021114.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The
Free Press.
Shaffer, H. J., & Robbins, M. (1991). Manufacturing multiple meanings
of addiction: Time limited realities. Contemporary Family Therapy,
13, 387404.
SPSS. (1988). SPSS-X Users guide (3rd ed.) [Computer software].
Chicago: Author.
Stein, D. M., & Lambert, M. J. (1995). Graduate training in psychotherapy: Are therapy outcomes enhanced? Journal of Counseling
and Clinical Psychology, 63, 182196.
Wells-Parker, E., Anderson, B., Pang, M., & Timken, D. (1993). An
examination of cluster-based classification schemes for DUI offenders. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 54, 209218.
Worthington, R. L., & Atkinson, D. R. (1993). Counselors responsibility and etiology attributions, theoretical orientations,
and counseling strategies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40,
295302.
Yalisove, D. (1998). The origins and evolution of the disease concept
of treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 469476.
J O U R N A L O F C O U N S E L I N G & D E V E L O P M E N T FA L L 2 0 0 1 V O L U M E 7 9