INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Division:
Rating Period:

___
SEPS (PLANNING & RESEARCH)

Name of Rater: .
Position:
Assistant Sch. Division Superintendent
Date of Review: December, 2015

JANUARY DECEMBER 2015

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFO

Educational
Services

Q
U
A

KRAs

OBJECTIVES/ MAJOR
TASKS

TIMELINE

Weight
per KRA

5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
4
3
2
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
3.500 4.499
2.500 3 .499
1.500 2.499

1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499

(35%)
PLANNING
FRAME,
Provide technical inputs
SYSTEMS,
and support to the
and PLANS
crafting of the first
draft of the School
Divisions Strategic
and Operational
Plans (6-year DEDP
and SDO annual
work and financial
plans) to facilitate the
crafting of the plan
for the Schools
Division.

Tracking Sources or
MOVs

Expected MOV:

Apr-Aug

3%

Technical inputs
provided; First
draft of DEDP
crafted then
submitted and
approved for
minor revision

First draft of DEDP

submitted and
approved for major
revision

First draft of
DEDP completed
but no action
taken

Drafting of DEDP
is still in the initial
phase

Drafting of the DEDP

is not yet started

Inputs to the first draft of the

School Divisions Strategic and
Operational Plans (6-year
DEDP and SDO annual work
and financial plans)

Aug-Sep

3%

Final draft of the

DEDP reviewed
by the Chief of
the SGOD and
approved by the
SDS

Final draft of the

DEDP still being
reviewed by the
Chief of the SGOD

Final draft of the

DEDP is in its
final review by
the Division
Planning Team

Final draft of the

DEDP is still at
least 50% ready for
consolidation as
output of the
Division Planning
Team

Final draft of the

DEDP is still at least
30% ready for
consolidation as
output of the Division
Planning Team

Expected MOV:

L
I
T
Y

Prepare the final draft of

the school divisions
strategic plan
(DEDP) based on
output of the Division
Planning Team for
review of the Chief of
Governance and
Operation and
approval of the SDS.

Final Draft of Division

Education development plan

ACTUAL
RESULTS

RATING

SCORE

IPCRF of Noel G. Solis, RN, MEM

MFO

Educational
Services

KRAs

PLANNING
FRAME,
SYSTEMS,
and
PLANS

OBJECTIVES/
MAJOR TASKS

TIMELINE

Prepare the final draft

of the Division ICT
Integration Plan for
review of the Chief
Governance and
Operation and
approval of the SDS.

May-Jun
2015

Process data gathered

on the pledge of
support of
stakeholders towards
the Senior High School
Program.

May-Jul
2015

Process data on dropout rate from EBEIS

across Region IX and
all regions in the last
five years

Apr-May
2015

Production of Action
research outputs by
classroom teachers
based on the three
thematic areas: (1)
Quality of Education;
(2) Access to
Education; and (3)
Governance of

May-Dec
2015

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Weight
per
KRA

10%

3%

3%

5%

3
Satisfactory
2.500 3 .499

2
Unsatisfactory
1.500 2.499

Tracking Sources or
MOVs

5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000

4
Very Satisfactory
3.500 4.499

Final draft of the

Division ICT
Integration Plan
successfully
defended by
SDO

Final Draft of the

Division ICT
Integration Plan is
in the process of
final review by the
Chief of SGOD

Final Draft if at
least 80%
completed

Final Draft if at
least 70%
completed

Final Draft if at least

60% completed

Portfolio with
Summary of
schools which
returned their
pledge of
support to the K
to 12 and SHS
Program in
portfolio
successfully
presented by
SDS to DepEd
Secretary

Portfolio with
Summary of
schools which
returned their
pledge of support
to the K to 12 and
SHS Program
successfully
submitted to the
SDS

Portfolio with
Summary of
schools which
returned their
pledge of
support to the K
to 12 and SHS
Program
successfully
submitted to the
Chief of SDO

Portfolio with
Summary of
schools which
returned their
pledge of support
to the K to 12 and
SHS Program
drafted

Portfolio with
Summary of schools
which returned their
pledge of support to
the K to 12 and SHS
Program is
incomplete and did
not meet the
deadline for
presentation to
DepEd Secretary

Expected MOV:

Processed data
accepted by
SDS and used in
fact-based
decision-making

Processed data
returned by SDS
for minor revision

Processed data
are almost 90%
done

Processed data
are still 80% done

Data on drop-out rate

are still being
retrieved from EBEIS
System

Expected MOV:

Classroom
teachers
successfully
presented action
research entries
during the First
Regional
Research
Congress

Classroom
teachers
successfully
presented t least
two (2) action
research or
research proposal
entries presented

At least one (1)

action research
or research
proposal entry
presented

At least two (2)

action research
proposals or
research
proposals
submitted by
classroom
teachers

At least one (1)

action research
proposal or research
proposal submitted
by classroom
teachers

Expected MOV:

ACTUAL
RESULTS

1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499
Expected MOV:
Final Draft
of the Division ICT
Integration Plan

Summary Table of all schools which

returned their respective stakeholders
resolutions relevant to the
implementation of the Senior High
School Program; data provided were
submitted by SDS to DepED Secretary
during their conference in Cagayan de
Oro City

Graphical presentations of drop-out

rates in the last five years

Abstracts of research conducted/

certificate of recognition/ photos of
contestants during the Congress

Education.

RATING

SCORE

IPCRF of Noel G. Solis, RN, MEM

MFO

Educational
Services

E
F
F

KRAs

OBJECTIVES/ MAJOR TASKS

Conduct feasibility studies on

PLANNING
the merger of Miputak East
FRAME,
Central School and Miputak
SYSTEMS, and
West Elementary School to
PLANS
Miputak Central School;
also, assist CID in the
feasibility study for the
establishment of Miputak
National High School,
Turno National High School
and Tubod Integrated
School

TIMELINE

Jul-Aug
2015

I
C
I
E
N

BASIC
EDUCATION
INFORMATION
SYSTEM (EBEIS)
MAINTENANCE
AND REPORT
GENERATION

8%

5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000

4
Very Satisfactory
3.500 4.499

3
Satisfactory
2.500 3 .499

2
Unsatisfactory
1.500 2.499

Final Report on
Merger and/or
Establishment of
schools submitted
to the SDO and
endorsed to the
Regional
Implementing Unit

Final Report on
Merger and/or
Establishment of
schools submitted
to the SDO for
review and
endorsement to the
RIU

Final Report on
Merger and/or
Establishment of
schools submitted to
the Chief of SGOD
for review and
approval by the SDS

Final Report on Merger

and/or Establishment of
schools submitted to
the EPS for SGOD for
review and
endorsement to the
Chief of SGOD

School Form-7
(SF-7) template
completed and
data were used as
basis for division
plotting of school
heads and
assignment of new
teacher-entrants

School Form-7
(SF-7) template is
at least 90%
completed and
data were used as
basis for division
plotting of school
heads and
assignment of new
teacher-entrants

School Form-7 (SF7) template is at

least 85% completed
and data were used
as basis for division
plotting of school
heads and
assignment of new
teacher-entrants

At least 90% of the

requirements of
schools as basis
for reliable and
accurate resource
allocation were
consolidated,
analyzed, and
validated

At least 80% of the

requirements of
schools as basis for
reliable and accurate
resource allocation
were
consolidated,
analyzed, and
validated

Tracking
Sources or
MOVs

Prepare descriptive and

analytical reports of
School Form-7 (SF-7)
and its implications, to be
used as basis for factsbased and data driven
planning and decision
making.

Apr-Jun;
Jul-Aug
2015

Consolidate, analyze, and

validate requirements of
schools as basis for
reliable and accurate
resource allocation.

Jul-Dec
2015

5%

10%

ACTUAL
RESULTS

1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499
Final Report on
Merger and/or
Establishment of
schools is ready for
printing

(35%)

C
Y

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Weight per
KRA

Expected MOV:
Feasibility
studies
certification

Expected MOV:

Reliable and
accurate resource
allocation for all
schools were made

School Form-7 (SF-7)

template is at least 80%
completed

At least 70% of the

requirements of schools
as basis for reliable and
accurate resource
allocation were
consolidated, analyzed,
and validated

School Form-7 (SF-7)

template is still 75%
completed and data
did not meet the
deadline as basis for
division plotting of
school heads and
assignment of new
teacher-entrants
At least 60% of the
requirements of
schools as basis for
reliable and accurate
resource allocation
were
consolidated,
analyzed, and
validated

Descriptive and
analytical report
of SF-7
(Template)

Expected MOV:
Reports on
consolidated
requirements of
schools and
learning
centers/ 2015
NAT Report

RATING

SCORE

IPCRF of Noel G. Solis, RN, MEM

MFO

Educational
Services

KRAs

BASIC
EDUCATION
INFORMATION
SYSTEM (EBEIS)
MAINTENANCE
AND REPORT
GENERATION

T
I
M
E
L
I
N
E
S
S

TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE

OBJECTIVES/ MAJOR
TASKS

TIMELINE

20%

Conduct Data
Management and
Information
Technology
Workshop for
DepEd and nonDepEd Elementary
and Secondary
schools and ALS
ICT Coordinators

Provide Technical
Assistance on these
key areas:
a. responding to the
identified needs of
both DepEd and NonDepEd schools in
relation to LIS/EBEIS
matters;
b. SMME activities and
other matters on
governance and
operations;
c. preparation of the
Locator Map for City
Division City Personnel
and Staff;
d. simplifying certificate of
appearance form for
SGOD monitoring;
e. writeshop on action
research;

(20%)
June 2015

May-Dec
April

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Weight
per KRA
5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000

4
Very Satisfactory
3.500 4.499

All ICT Coordinators

were trained on Data
Management and
Information
Technology for the
LIS resulting to
100% of them have
updated their LIS as
scheduled

All ICT Coordinators

were trained on Data
Management and
Information
Technology for the
LIS resulting to at
least 90% of them
have updated their
LIS as scheduled

All 6 key areas of

technical assistance
were provided to
different clients

5 of the 6 key areas

of technical
assistance were
provided to different
clients

3
Satisfactory
2.500 3 .499
All ICT
Coordinators were
trained on Data
Management and
Information
Technology for the
LIS resulting to at
least 85% of them
have updated their
LIS as scheduled

At least 4 of the 6
key areas of
technical
assistance were
provided to
different clients

Tracking Sources
or
MOVs
2
Unsatisfactory
1.500 2.499

1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499

All ICT Coordinators

were trained on Data
Management and
Information
Technology for the
LIS resulting to at
least 75% of them
have updated their
LIS as scheduled

All ICT
Coordinators
were trained on
Data
Management and
Information
Technology for
the LIS resulting
to at least70% of
them have
updated their LIS
as scheduled

At least 3 of the 6
key areas of
technical assistance
were provided to
different clients

Only 1-2 of the 6

key areas of
technical

assistance were
provided to
different clients

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Expected MOV:

LIS status of
all schools

Expected MOV:
Completed
questionnaire;
monitoring
checklist for
SMME; Locator
Map; certificate of
appearance form;
certificate of
appreciation;; data
on teachers major
and IPs

Jul
Jun-Dec
Jun-Dec

RATING

SCORE

IPCRF of Noel G. Solis, RN, MEM

f. data processing for CID
operation

MFO

KRAs

OBJECTIVES/ MAJOR
TASKS

TIMELINE

OTHERS
1. Division
Testing
Coordinator

Weight
per KRA

5
Outstanding
4.500 5 .000

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
4
3
2
Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
3.500 4.499
2.500 3 .499
1.500 2.499

1
Poor
1.00 - 1.499

Tracking Sources
or
MOVs

ACTUAL
RESULTS

10%
Administer national
examinations of BEA
formerly NETRC

June
November
2015

10%

Successfully
administered exams
without major errors
committed

TOTAL

100%

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

1. TEPT-PST
2. NCAE
3. PEPT

Conformed:

NOEL G. SOLIS, RN, MEM

Ratee

Administered exams
with one error
committed/noted/
observed either by
DTC or field
personnel

Recommending Approval:

MAJARANI M. JACINTO, Ed.D.

Rater

Administered
exams with two
errors
committed/noted/
observed either by
DTC or field
personnel

Administered exams
with three errors
committed/noted/
observed either by
DTC or field
personnel

Administered
exams with more
than three errors
committed/noted/
observed either
by DTC or field
personnel

Narrative
report
submitted to BEA

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

APPROVED:

VICTORINA G. PEREZ, CEO VI

Approving Authority

RATING

SCORE*