Artifact 2: oral exam requirements, oral exam grading rubric and one group's dialogue with corrections. For this artifact, the teacher used the dialogue to assess how well her students were doing with the oral exam assignment. The dialogues were based on the chapters and themes that we had studied and were to be performed as a skit on the last day of class.
Artifact 2: oral exam requirements, oral exam grading rubric and one group's dialogue with corrections. For this artifact, the teacher used the dialogue to assess how well her students were doing with the oral exam assignment. The dialogues were based on the chapters and themes that we had studied and were to be performed as a skit on the last day of class.
Artifact 2: oral exam requirements, oral exam grading rubric and one group's dialogue with corrections. For this artifact, the teacher used the dialogue to assess how well her students were doing with the oral exam assignment. The dialogues were based on the chapters and themes that we had studied and were to be performed as a skit on the last day of class.
The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to
engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress and to guide the teachers and learners decision making. Artifact 2 Oral exam requirements, oral exam grading rubric & one groups dialogue with corrections Class: SPA 102 National Standards for Foreign Language Learning: 1.1,1.2, 1.3, 3.1, 4.1 For my rationale of my second artifact for Standard 6, I chose to include the oral exam assignment that I gave my SPA 102 during the fall of 2014. For their oral exam, my students had to write a dialogue that they would perform as a skit on the last day of class. I have included the requirements and rubric that was designed by the coordinator, and not myself, however I tweaked the assignment according to what my students and I had been working on. As part of this artifact, I also included the dialogue written by one group of students with the corrections that I provided for them. In order to assess how my students were doing with this assignment, first of all I gave them plenty of notice as to how to go about preparing for the dialogue. The requirements, though standard for all the classes of SPA 102 that semester, revolved around what I knew my students had studied and what they were capable of. I also included an example of a dialogue that would help them get a better idea as to how to write theirs. They were required to write a dialogue based on the chapters and themes that we had studied. I gave them a due date for turning in the rough draft of their dialogue and I specifically told them not to memorize any of their lines until I had reviewed them and made any necessary corrections. Once they emailed those dialogues to me, I corrected them and emailed them back with the corrections highlighted and any questions that I had for them. The following class period after they turned in their rough drafts was dedicated to practicing the dialogues and explaining any corrections or comments that I made on their dialogues that they may not have understood. Each group practiced while I walked around the classroom and helped them with pronunciation or answered any questions. For example, in the dialogue that I provided for this artifact, my students were talking about going to Christmas on the river, but I did not understand what they were talking about because they gave no context for it in their writing. Therefore, during the class period, this was something that I addressed with them so that their dialogue would be clearer when they presented it. By walking around and listening to each groups dialogue as they practiced, I was able
to assess where they had problems and what they needed to do to correct these issues. This not only helped them with pronunciation but it also helped them feel more confident when they did their presentation.