You are on page 1of 7

, -

,
DOI 10.5937/kultura1444295D
17 .
17 . .
17.03:161/164196/...



:
,

.
: , , ,
,

,
,
,
.1 ,

,
, .
, ,

, , , ,
, , .
,
, , .
, .

, , ,
.

1 . 43007 . 41004,
,
.

295



( ),
, ,
,
.


, , , ,

,
, ,
, ,
,
, ,
, .

, , ,
.
,
( ,
), , ,
.
,
, , ,
,
. , ,
.
,
.
.
, ,
, ,
(case studies) ,

( ,
)
,
,
, , .
,
,
,
. ,
,
,
,

296


.
, ,

. ,
,
, ,
( ).

( ,
),


( ).
, , ,
,
,

, :
, Ph. Foot, R. Hare
A. J. Ayer.
,

.
,

!.2 ,
.
,
,
. .
?
,
. (Stephen Toulmin),
(Richard Brandt), (Phillipa Foot),
, ,
,
,
, ,
()
(). ,
.
, ,
2 , . (2002) (
),
21, : ,
. 146.

297


,

.

,

. ,
, ,
, .
,

.

.
. ,
, ,
.
, .
,
, .
,
,

Language of Morals, Universalizability,

,
.
,
, , ,
(
, ,
, , , ).
(
), ,
, ,
.
,

.
,

,
(
).

. ,

298


, , ,
,
,
, , .
, ,

,

. :
.
( , , , , , .,
, .) ,
. ,
... .
,
(entailment-relations).
,
X X,
,
.3
,
.
(
)
?
, , ,
, ,
, . ,

,
. : ...

, ,4
.
.
, , . ,
,
,
,
,
.

3 , . (1991) , :
, . 187.
4 , . 189.

299


:
,
, ,
? ,
, ( )
,

? , ,

?
,
. , ,
,
.
.
(),
, ,
, .5
,
,
,
,

,
.
, .
?
(,
)
; ,
,
, , ,
.

.
, .
,
. ,
. ,
,

. ,
5 ,
; : , . (2006),
: . , :
, . 20.

300


.
,
. ,

, ( ),
,
,

().
:
, . (2006) :
. , :
.
, . (1991) , :
.
, . (2002)
( ),
21, :
, . 137162.

Aleksandar Dobrijevi

University in Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade

STOJANOVIS INTERPRETATION OF RICHARD HARE


Abstract
In this paper the author critically examines one aspect of Stojanovis
reception of Richard Hares metaethics, claiming that the reception
represents an unused or overlooked epistemological chance.
Key words: Svetozar Stojanovi, Richard Hare, metaethics, epistemo
logical chance, sincerity

301

You might also like