style

Autocratic

Laissez- faire

Democratic

Bureaucratic

Monarchy

Communism

Characteristics

When effective

When ineffective

-Tells others what to do

-Limits discussion on ideas
and new ways of doing things
-Group does not experience
feeling of teamwork.

-Time is limited
-Individuals/group lack skill
and knowledge
-Group does not know each
other

-Developing a strong sense of

team is the gal
-Members have some degree
of skill/knowledge
-Group wants an element of
spontaneity in their work

-Involves group members in

planning and carrying out
activities
-Asks, rather than tells
-Promotes a sense of
teamwork

-Time is available
-Group is motivated and/or
a sense of team exists
-Members of the group have
some degree of
skill/knowledge

-Group is unmotivated
-Members have little skill or
knowledge
-High degree of conflict present

-Gives little or no direction to

group/individuals
-Opinion is offered only when
requested
-A person does not seem to
be in charge

-High degree of skill and

motivation
-A sense of team exists
-Routine is familiar to
participants

-Low sense of
team/interdependence
-Members have low degree of
skill/knowledge
-Group expects to be told what
to do

-A group of workers
-Bureaucracy also has an
informal usage
-They have a clear hierarchy
-Everyone has a specific job
-Theres a specific set of
formal rules

-Bureaucratic
organizational structures
take a great deal of control
over organizational strategy
decisions
-Strategic decision making
can be made shorter

-It can discourage creativity

and innovation throughout the
organization
-Front-line employees can
receive less satisfaction then
others
-Organizations find themselves
less able to adapt to changing
conditions in the marketplace

-A form of government
-They have benefits
-There is demerits that
hamper with its functioning
-Ruled by one person
-They have complete control
over the whole country
-Power is passed on

-There is only one person

who is in charge and has
total control
-Law process is much
simpler
-The monarchs government
has less corruption

-Bad leader can mess up a

nation
- Its to Difficult to change
internally
-Theres a Higher chance of
rebellion
-The masses do not have the
power to remove the leader
from their leadership role

-They are very peculiar

-They are a form of
government
-They are a abolition of
private property
-They have the ownership of
means and production
- Its a provision of
necessaries of life

-Theres a efficient
distribution of resources
- Theres also an Equal
Establishment of stronger
communities
-Almost Every citizen has a
job with an Internally stable
economic system
-And theres No competition!

-Central state authority holds

all of the productions
-Materialists start to approach
-There is no individual freedom
-And workers are being treated
like machines/slaves