The Santa Clara County Counsel rejects my claim against Dr. Crapo because they would accept the fact that the injuries caused by his lie mount every day that he fails to treat me. Had I specified 8/18/2015 as the date of the lie, they would had to have investigated the matter more fully.
The remedy for the "error" is a non-sensical one: to file leave for a late claim. The claim is not late, nor will it be until six months after August. Submitting a new claim with the date specified as described was not acceptable to them.
The Santa Clara County Counsel rejects my claim against Dr. Crapo because they would accept the fact that the injuries caused by his lie mount every day that he fails to treat me. Had I specified 8/18/2015 as the date of the lie, they would had to have investigated the matter more fully.
The remedy for the "error" is a non-sensical one: to file leave for a late claim. The claim is not late, nor will it be until six months after August. Submitting a new claim with the date specified as described was not acceptable to them.
The Santa Clara County Counsel rejects my claim against Dr. Crapo because they would accept the fact that the injuries caused by his lie mount every day that he fails to treat me. Had I specified 8/18/2015 as the date of the lie, they would had to have investigated the matter more fully.
The remedy for the "error" is a non-sensical one: to file leave for a late claim. The claim is not late, nor will it be until six months after August. Submitting a new claim with the date specified as described was not acceptable to them.