Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2015-2016
Felicia Walker
Role of a Principal EDAD 6308_Online
Dr. Julie Fernandez
June 25, 2015
Page 2 of 9
Page 3 of 9
and teacher and family's activities are more important. Theyre more important than race,
parents' education, family size, marital status and even the degree of determination if the
parents continue to be part of their children education (Mircea, 2007). Additional studies of
families show, that what the family does with the children is more important to student success
than family income or the education level of the parents. Parental participation improves
student learning whether the child is in preschool or in an upper grade, a familys struggling
economically or affluent, a high school graduate or college degree holder (Murphy et. al, 2011).
The benefits for students when parents are actively involved in schools include higher grades
and test scores, better attendance, more homework completed, fewer placements in special
education, more positive attitudes and behaviors, higher graduation rates, and greater
enrollment in post-secondary education. John Hopkins University, with over 15 years of
research and educational practice has focused on school, family and community partnerships.
Based on the theory of overlapping spheres of influence, a framework was developed about
how family and community engagement can become a sustainable aspect of school
organization and culture. These principles have been shown to work with schools and districts
to make family and community engagement a more integrated aspect of schooling
(www.communityschools.org). Harvard Family Research Project, a worlds leading institution
that promotes parental involvement in schools, bring attention to crucial points. Firstly,
parental involvement in schools should be a high priority and be explicitly acknowledged at the
university level for initial teacher training. Secondly, rather than a series of disconnected
projects focused on parental involvement, this important factor of school life should be
Page 4 of 9
Page 5 of 9
Once the team is established, assess the current situation. Data can be collected by
assigning various tasks to the team. Analyze both past and existing school partnership efforts.
Review the characteristics of the families in the school community by asking questions such as,
Is this a school with a high percentage of single-parent family homes? Does the school have
many English language learners? Does the school have a high mobility rate? What
educational goals do the families have for their children? The team should also collectively
review the schools achievement data. The data should be made reader-friendly to all
stakeholders. Finally, disseminate the information to the parents and community members and
inquire their feedback of what the school is doing well, where improvements are needed, and
what contributions they feel they can do to help the students succeed.
Next, identify the priority areas, assign tasks, and make plans to evaluate progress over
time should be put into place. The collected data about the school can be used to answer the
following questions: What are the goals for improving our school, family, and community
partnerships over the next three years? How can we effectively involve the families and
community in the decision making process? Do the decision makers have the appropriate
research and training to make informed decisions? Do the materials need to be translated? Do
translators need to be provided at the meetings? Does childcare need to be provided while
parents attend meetings or volunteer at school? How can family and community outreach link
to the academic needs of the school? What kind of support do teachers need? What are the
achievement trends? What do parents say about past successful events? What activities do
parents feel would be most beneficial? How can we most effectively use community
resources? Once priorities have been set, the team can write the schools partnership plan.
Page 6 of 9
Page 7 of 9
Page 8 of 9
References
Baldwin, M., Ferguson C., Jordan, C. (2010). Working Systemically in Action: Engaging Family &
Community. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org
Community & Family Engagement Principals Share what works.(nd) Retrieved June 25, 20015
from Coalition for Community School: www.communityschools.org
Blitz L., Murray C., Thompson T., Yull D., (nd) Can We Talk? Using CommunityBased
Participatory Action Research to Build Family and School Partnerships with Families of
Color. School Community Journal
Epstein, J., Salinas, K. (2004, May). Partnering with Families and Communities. Educational
Leadership. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educationalleadership
Fajardo, I., Salvador, J., Torres, K., Tran, C., Williams, D. (2014). Charting a Course to Equitable
Collaboration: Learning from Parent Engagement Initiatives in the Road Map Project.
Retrieved from http://education.uw.edu
Page 9 of 9
Kingston, A., Mleczko A. (2013). The Impact of School Leadership on Parental Engagement: A
Study of Inclusion and Cohesion Macro Think International Research in Education.
Retrieved from http://www.macrothink.org/journal
Kinney, S. (2007). Engaging Parents in Education: Lessons From Five Parental Information And
Resource Centers. Retrieved from http://www.isbe.net
Lopez M., Rosenberg H., Weiss H. (2010). National Policy Forum for Family, School, &
Community Engagement Beyond Random Acts- Family, School, and Community
Engagement as an Integral Part of Education Reform.
Mircea, A. (2007). Relationships Between School and Family: The Adolescents' Perspective
Qualitative Social Research
Murphy M., Redding S., Sheley P. (2011). Handbook on Family and Community Engagement.
Retrieved from www.families-schools.org