Name:

SOC Import Code:

Jack Garner

17765803

Project #2: Using Technology for

Formative Assessment
For this project you will use technology tools for assessing and
providing students with immediate feedback on learning outcomes.
Steps:
1. Begin by creating three objectives from your content area that are
measureable.
2. Come up with 2 test items for each objective, provide correct
responses for those items, and feedback that you would provide your
students for incorrect responses.
3. Using socrative to create your assessment.
4. Share SOC import code at the top of this page.
5. Upload this template to Edmodo Project #2.

Assessment Planning Document:

Objective #1:
Question 1: Where was the majority of immigrants from?

Answer: Europe

Feedback: Some of the countries that they came from were Ireland,
Poland, England, Germany, and Italy.
Question 2: What Asian country had a large population in California?

Answer: China

Feedback: California had a large Chinese population because of the taiping

rebellion.
Objective #2:
Question 1: What is nativism?

Answer: hostility towards immigrants by locals

Feedback:

Question 2: What is an ethnic group?

Answer: a group of immigrants from one place that congregate together in

living places.

Feedback: This was very popular among immigrant people to congregate

and live among people with similar backgrounds.
Objective #3:
Question 1: What was the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882?

Answer: Kept out immigrants from China for 10 years and prevented
Chinese residents from getting citizenship.

Feedback:

Question 2: What was the Immigration Act of 1882?

Answer: imposed a head tax on immigrants that came to America

Feedback: This head tax was 50 cents.

How and when will students receive feedback on how well they
did on the formative assessment?

We will go over the answers after the quiz. This way I can see
how they did and they can learn why the correct answer is
correct.

REFLECTION:
Pleaseshareyourexperienceswiththetopicsofthismodule(e.g.,
extensionideas,successes,challenges),andhowyouplanto
integratetheideasofthismoduleintoyourownteaching.Would
integratingthistoolintoyourinstructionenhancelearningornot?
Explainyourreasoning(100200words)

I will most certainly use this program in my classroom. This is a great

way to utilize technology in the classroom because it allows the
students to use computers or phones. The students in my class get
really excited when the lesson or review is something other than the
usual paper handout. My students would also enjoy this because it
gets them to be competitive. This tool if used would increase learning
because it is something that kids today are familiar with. If you use
something like technology that they know quite well, they will be able
to remember things better because of their familiarity.

Project #2 Rubrics
Assessment Rubric:
Criteria
Objectives

Satisfactory
(3 Points)
Objectives are clear
and measurable

Unacceptable
(0-2.5 Points)
Objectives are not
measureable
Objectives are vague

Assessment

(5-7 Points)
Assessment items
align with the
objectives and can
be used to gauge
whether students
have met objectives
Correct responses
for assessment
items provided. If
open ended, TC
provides multiple
possible correct
responses or rubric
Assessment created
using Socrative or
Google form and
shared
Feedback for
incorrect responses

(0-4.5 Points)
Assessment items not
clearly aligned with
the objectives
Correct responses
provided for
assessment items not
provided or vague. If
open ended, TC does
not provide multiple
possible correct
responses or rubric.
Assessment not
created Socrative or
Google form.
Students receive well
designed feedback for
incorrect responses
Feedback for incorrect
responses not

effective and timely

effective or timely

Reflection Rubric:
Criteria
Reflection

Satisfactory
(3 Points)
Reflection clearly
and thoroughly
discussed personal
experiences,
successes,
challenges, and
provided
multiple ideas on
how to integrate
into the classroom
Reflection met word
requirements

Unacceptable
(0-2.5 Points)
Reflection was not
included or was
more than 3 days
late
Word requirements
were not met
Reflection lacked
clarity and was
not thorough.
Reflection did not
address all 3