"Plagiarisms, authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty" by Rebecca Howard. The author explains different examples of plagiarism and how they affect the educational system. She advocates for policies that review cases of plagiarism to determine the student's intent.
"Plagiarisms, authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty" by Rebecca Howard. The author explains different examples of plagiarism and how they affect the educational system. She advocates for policies that review cases of plagiarism to determine the student's intent.
"Plagiarisms, authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty" by Rebecca Howard. The author explains different examples of plagiarism and how they affect the educational system. She advocates for policies that review cases of plagiarism to determine the student's intent.
Dr. Serviss CTW 1 5 October, 2015 Plagiarism and the Pursuit of Happiness On the notion of intellectual property Rebecca Howard analyzes the consequences of crimes committed with this newfound idea of authorship in her work Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty. As a professor at Colgate University (About) she published this work in 1995 for a peer reviewed collective of english experts. Now she is an undergraduate and graduate professor at Syracuse University (About) and has since gotten her PhD. Howards main focus of analysis is plagiarism and the policies that educational institutions uphold for crimes of plagiarism. Howard firmly believes that students should be able to use already known information and publications as resources without fear of academic penalty. Ever since the printing press authorship has become lucrative. Before authorship became an industry, ideas flew freely throughout cultures without much care for intellectual property. Howard explains throughout her work different examples of plagiarism and how they affect the educational system. The three most common forms of plagiarism are patchwriting, not citing sources correctly and what is most obvious, copy and paste. Howard is credited with coining the term patchwriting, a type of plagiarism (Howard 788), as well as many other terms. She also addresses the question, how do you determine if something is plagiarism and how do you punish those who have committed
Ahlers and Norelius 2
plagiarism? The modern education system uniformly punishes the act of
plagiarism severely by failure of the assignment, the course, or even suspension from school. Howard argues against this, she advocates for policies that review cases of plagiarism to determine the student's intent and based on the kind of plagiarism used determines the punishment. We all know copy and paste to be complete plagiarism but what about patchwriting? Howard argues that patchwriting is an educational tool but should not be used as the submitted work of the student. Most institutions are adamant that plagiarism should be punished no matter what. Howard agrees that there should be consequences for those who plagiarise but she knows there to be value in the sharing of communal ideas and information. There are examples throughout history of plagiarism but instead of being punished for these actions many are revered. One of the most well known cases of plagiarism that led to great inspiration and success was that of Martin Luther King. Through the use of plagiarism King was able to spark a social movement by utilizing previous works from others in his community. One of Howard's most frequently mentioned metaphors was that of the dwarf on the shoulders of a giant (Howard 790). The metaphor is an interpretation of all literary ideas that have been established in previous works and how one can observe and take these works further by using them as a foundation. Basically people who plagiarize are not more or less intellectual than those they gained information from, instead these so called plagiarizers are able to take the subject slightly further than those previous. Howard explains the dwarf on the shoulders of a giant metaphor by saying always already. This does not excuse copying and pasting this values being able to use previously published works to further the education of a community (Howard 792-793).
Ahlers and Norelius 3
Plagiarism is ironic. Educational institutions want you to use the
resources at your disposal but they limit students in their ability to. Just as crimes are given a fair trial by a judge, educational crimes such as plagiarism should also be given a fair trial by an academic advisor. Reviewing cases for plagiarism should be based on students previous activities such as cheating on tests or academic misconducts. This will allow the punishment to be more specific and fitting on a case by case basis. Plagiarism policies of today allow for broad misinterpretations and unfitting punishments that can lead to the hindering of students education in the classroom. Bibliography "About." Rebecca Moore Howard RSS. The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2015. Web. 30 Sept. 2015. Howard, Rebecca Moore. "Plagiarisms, Authorships, and the Academic Death Penalty." College English 57.7 (1995): 788. Web.