Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEFINITIONS
Terminology Related to Earthquake:
Magnitude:
Earth quake are often classified into different groups based on their
magnitude. Table is given by:
GROUP MAGNITUDE
Major 7-7.9
Strong 6-6.9
Moderate 5-5.9
Light 4-4.9
Minor 3-3.9
1
Intensity:
Shaking intensity
as per MSK scale:
Intensity VIII- Destruction of buildings
1. Fright and panic. Also, persons driving motorcars are disturbed. Here and there
branches of trees break off. Even heavy furniture moves and partly overturns.
Hanging lamps are damaged in part.
2. Most buildings of type C suffer damage of Grade 2, and few of grade 3. Most
buildings of Type B suffer damage of Grade 3, and most buildings of Type A
suffer damage of Grade 4. Occasional breaking of pipe seams occurs. Memorials
and monuments move and twist. Stone walls collapse.
3. Small landslips occur in hollows and on banked roads on steep slopes, cracks
develop in ground up to widths of severals centimeters. Water in lakes becomes
2
turbid. New reservoirs come into existances. Dry wells refill and existing wells
become dry. In many cases, changes in flow and level of water are observed.
Note:
Type A - structures- rural constructions.
Type B - Ordinary masonary constructions.
Type C – Well-built structures
Single Few- about 5%
Many – about 50%
Most – about 75%
Grade 1 Damage – Slight damage
Grade 2 moderate damage
Grade 3 Heavy damage
Grade 4 Destruction
Grade 5 Total damage.
Epicenter:
The geographical point on the surface of earth vertically above the focus of the
earthquake.
Focus:
The originating source of the elastic waves inside the earth which cause shakings
of ground due to earthquake. The point of maximum shock/stress release during an
earthquake. Deeper focus earthquakes are often less damaging because the rocks absorb
more energy before the waves hit the surface.
Teleseism:
A teleseism is an earthquake recorded by a seismograph at a distance. By
international convention the distance is over 1000 Kilometers from the epicentre.
Earthquake originating near the recording station are termed as near earthquake or local
earthquake.
Microseism:
These are more or less continous disturbances in the ground recorded by
seismographs.
Micro earthquake:
Very small earthquake having magnitude less than measurable than three on
Richter scale are called Micro-earthquake. Highly sensitive seismographs are employed
to monitor these for seismological and engineering applications.
Accelerogram:
3
The ground acccleration record produced by Accelerograph is called
Accelerogram.
Accelerograph:
This is an earthquake-recording device designed to measure the ground motion in
terms of acceleration in the epicentral region of strong shaking. It writes the time wise
history of ground acceleration at a particular site.
Focal distance:
The straight-line distance between the places of recording/observation to the
hypocenter is called the focal distance.
Epicentral Distance:
Distance between epicentre and recording station in km.
Fore Shocks:
Smaller earthquake that precede the main earthquake.
After shocks:
Smaller earthquake that follow the main earthquake
Asthenosphere:
The layer of the upper mantle which is close to melting point and behaves in a
semi-plastic way. Convection currents in this layer are believed to influence the
movement of tectonic plates.
Benioff zone:
4
A region of earthquake activity inclined at an angle underneath a destructive
boundary. Deeper earthquakes occur further from the boundary.
Constructive boundary:
A part of the earth's crust where tectonic plates are moving away from each other,
constructing new crustal material where they part. Associated with basic volcanism and
frequent, shallow earthquakes.
Debris avalanche:
A sudden, large scale avalanche of rock. May be set off by heavy rain or by
earthquake activity.
Destructive boundary:
A part of the earth's crust where tectonic plates move towards one another,
resulting in the seduction of one below the other.
Direct hazard:
A threat to life or property arising from the direct action of a hazard (eg shaking
in an earthquake or blast in a volcano).
Fault:
A fracture in the rocks along which strain is occasionally released as an
earthquake. By definition, only active faults are associated with earthquakes.
5
Lithosphere:
The rigid outer shell of the earth which normally comprises crust (oceanic or
continental) and part of the upper mantle above the asthenosphere.
Liquefaction:
The process by which sediments and soil collapse, behaving like a thick liquid
when shaken by earthquake waves.
Magnitude/frequency relationship:
The observed relationship (with most hazards) that bigger scale events occur less
frequently while smaller scale events are relatively common.
Richter scale:
A measure of earthquake magnitude allowing an estimate of energy levels
involved.
Rossi-Forrel scale:
An observational scale for measuring earthquake intensity. This was improved
and expanded by Mercalli to produce the "Modified Mercalli Scale".
Seismograph:
A printout from a seismometer. Studies of seismograph traces can be used to
pinpoint both the epicentre of an earthquake and the nature of the fault movement.
6
Seismometer:
An instrument for detecting and recording earthquake waves.
Seduction zone:
A narrow region along a destructive plate boundary where one plate is consumed
underneath another.
Transform boundary:
A plate boundary where the relative movement is sideways. The classic example
of a transform boundary is in California where the San Andreas fault is a part of a
transform plate boundary.
Tsunami:
An earthquake generated sea wave. Can travel thousands of miles and reach many
metres in height when approaching shallow water.
7
SEISMIC ZONES IN INDIA
8
India being a large landmass is particularly prone to earthquakes. The Indian subcontinent
is divided into five seismic zones with respect to the severity of the earthquakes. The
classification of the zones has been done by the geologist and scientist as early as 1956
when a 3-zone (Severe, Light and Minor hazard) Seismic Zoning Map of India was
produced. Since then the issue of seismic hazard has been addressed by different experts
and agencies
The aforementioned map was based on a broad concept of earthquake distribution and
geotectonics. The severe hazard zones are roughly confined to plate boundary regions, ie,
the Himalayan frontal arc in the North, the chaman fault region in the north west and the
indo burma region in the north east. The lower hazard zone is confined to indian shield in
the south and then moderate hazard zone confined to the transitional zone in between the
two.
The bureau of Indian standards is the official agency for publishing the seismic hazard
maps and codes. It has brought out versions of seismic zoning map: a six zone map in
1962, a seven zone map in 1966, and a five zone map 1970/1984. The last of these maps is
currently valid; this map was created based on the values of maximum MM intensities
recorded in various parts of the country, in historic times.
Zone V is the most vulnerable to earthquakes, where historically some of the country's
most powerful shock have occured. This region included the Andaman & Nicobar Islands,
all of North-Eastern India, parts of north-western Bihar, eastern sections of Uttaranchal,
the Kangra Valley in Himachal Pradesh, near the Srinagar area in Jammu & Kashmir and
the Rann of Kutchh in Gujarat. Earthquakes with magnitudes in excess of 7.0 have
occured in these areas, and have had intensities higher than IX.
Much of India lies in Zone III, where a maximum intensity of VII can be expected. Four
of the major metropolitan areas lie in Zone IV, i.e. New Delhi, Mumbai and Calcutta.
Only Chennai lies in Zone II. A large section of south-central India lies in Zone I along
with a section stretching from eastern Rajasthan into northern Madhya Pradesh. Some
areas of Orissa, Jharkhand and Chhatisgarh also lie in Zone I.
In recent years india has been a host to many earthquakes of varying magnitude and
intensity. The following table gives a detailed chronology.
EPICENTER
33TE LOCATION MAGNITUDE
Lat(Deg Long(Deg
N) E)
1819
June 23.6 68.6 KUTCH,GUJARAT 8.0
16
1869 25 93 NEAR CACHAR, 7.5
9
JAN
ASSAM
10
1885
MAY 34.1 74.6 SOPOR, J&K 7.0
30
1897
SHILLONG
JUN 26 91 8.7
PLATEAU
12
1905
APR 32.3 76.3 KANGRA, H.P 8.0
04
1918
SRIMANGAL,
JUL 24.5 91.0 7.6
ASSAM
08
1930
JUL 25.8 90.2 DHUBRI, ASSAM 7.1
02
1934
BIHAR-NEPAL
JAN 26.6 86.8 8.3
BORDER
15
1941
ANDAMAN
JUN 12.4 92.5 8.1
ISLANDS
26
1943
OCT 26.8 94.0 ASSAM 7.4
23
1950 ARUNACHAL
AUG 28.5 96.7 PRADESH-CHINA 8.5
15 BORDER
1956
JUL 23.3 70.0 ANJAR, GUJARAT 7.0
21
1967
KOYNA,
DEC 17.37 73.75 6.5
MAHARASHTRA
10
10
1975
JAN 32.38 78.49 KINNAUR, HP 6.2
19
1988 MANIPUR-
AUG 25.13 95.15 MYANMAR 6.6
06 BORDER
1988
BIHAR-NEPAL
AUG 26.72 86.63 6.4
BORDER
21
1991
UTTARKASHI, UP
OCT 30.75 78.86 6.6
HILLS
20
1993 LATUR-
SEP 18.07 76.62 OSMANABAD, 6.3
30 MAHARASHTRA
1997
MAY 23.08 80.06 JABALPUR,MP 6.0
22
1999
CHAMOLI DIST,
MAR 30.41 79.42 6.8
UP
29
11
.
Seismic waves are the vibrations from earthquakes that travel through the Earth;
they are recorded on instruments called seismographs. Seismographs record a zig-zag
trace that shows the varying amplitude of ground oscillations beneath the instrument.
Sensitive seismographs, which greatly magnify these ground motions, can detect strong
earthquakes from sources anywhere in the world. The time, locations, and magnitude of
an earthquake can be determined from the data recorded by seismograph stations. The
Richter magnitude scale was developed in 1935 by Charles F. Richter of the California
Institute of Technology as a mathematical device to compare the size of earthquakes. The
magnitude of an earthquake is determined from the logarithm of the amplitude of waves
recorded by seismographs. Adjustments are included for the variation in the distance
between the various seismographs and the epicenter of the earthquakes. On the Richter
Scale, magnitude is expressed in whole numbers and decimal fractions. For example, a
magnitude 5.3 might be computed for a moderate earthquake, and a strong earthquake
might be rated as magnitude 6.3. Because of the logarithmic basis of the scale, each
whole number increase in magnitude represents a tenfold increase in measured
amplitude; as an estimate of energy, each whole number step in the magnitude scale
corresponds to the release of about 31 times more energy than the amount associated with
the preceding whole number value Earthquakes with magnitude of about 2.0 or less are
usually call micro earthquakes; they are not commonly felt by people and are generally
recorded only on local seismographs. Events with magnitudes of about 4.5 or greater -
there are several thousand such shocks annually - are strong enough to be recorded by
sensitive seismographs all over the world. Great earthquakes, such as the 1964 Good
Friday earthquake in Alaska, have magnitudes of 8.0 or higher. On the average, one
12
earthquake of such size occurs somewhere in the world each year. Although the Richter
Scale has no upper limit, the largest known shocks have had magnitudes in the 8.8 to 8.9
range. Recently, another scale called the moment magnitude scale has been devised for
more precise study of great earthquakes. The Richter Scale is not used to express damage.
An earthquake in a densely populated area which results in many deaths and
considerable damage may have the same magnitude as a shock in a remote area that does
nothing more than frighten the wildlife. Large-magnitude earthquakes that occur beneath
the oceans may not even be felt by humans.
UNIT II
EARTHQUAKE HISTORY
The observations of structural performances of buildings during earthquakes
provide volumes of information about the merits and demerits of the design and
construction practices in a region since it is based on the actual test on prototype
structures. The study helps in the elevation of strengthening measures of buildings and
modifying the provisions of the modern code of practice with minimum additional
expenditure.
Numerical techniques have made great stride in Earthquake Engineering and it is
important to critically evaluate the validity of these techniques by the experience of
instrumented buildings during actual strong motion earthquakes, which are generally
carried out experimentally using earthquake simulators.
The numerous buildings suffered severe damage in Caracas during the Venezuela
earthquake (1967) which were designed according to modern methods as reported by
Borges et al.(1969) and degenkolb et al.(1969). Similar experiences were observed in
many other earthquakes. This is the cause for great concern and there is a need for better
13
understanding of the behaviour of buildings during some important earthquakes has been
carried out. Finally, the important lessons from the damage behaviour of buildings during
earthquakes are summarized.
The indirect damages of buildings during earthquakes are some times far greater
than the damages due to earthquake itself, such as, out break of fire, rock fall, landslide,
avalanche and tsunamis. However, these damages are not due to inadequacies in the
design and planning and therefore, not discussed here.
14
liquefaction of soil. The traditional lkra type of construction of building of Assam
showed good performance.
15
severe in places where structures were built on loose alluvium and appreciably less on
firm ground.
This earthquake illustrates the great influence of ground on the intensity of
earthquake. The advantages of structural frame systems and serious shortcoming of brick
construction were clearly established. Thus, for example, out of 710 reinforced concrete
frame buildings, which were carefully investigated by Japanese specialists, 69 buildings
(9.7%) was damaged and 16 buildings (2.2%) were collapsed. Where as out of 485 brick
buildings with load bearing brick walls 47 buildings (9.7%) were completely destroyed
and 383 buildings (79%) were severely damaged. On the basis of these studies, the
maximum height of brick buildings was limited to 9m in Japan.
16
The severe damages were due to old buildings with plain brick walls, which were
apparently weakened by the previous earthquakes. Such wall construction in Chile is not
permitted by current regulations. Buildings with reinforced brick and concrete walls
behaved much better. Better earthquake resistance of reinforced concrete frame walls
with brick cladding and wood frame walls were observed.
The performance of steel framed three storeys building presented considerable
interest. In longitudinal and transverse directions provision was made for diagonal
bracing (on the first storey in both directions). During the May 22, tremor, the building
was without bracing as a result of which its rigidity was sharply reduced (The
fundamental time period changed from 0.8 to 1.06s). Despite the decrease in stiffness of
the building in horizontal direction it did not receive any damage during another stronger
earthquake. It was apparently the reduced rigidity of the building, which attract3ed less
inertia forces, and consequently survived the earthquake.
17
concrete buildings also suffered serious damage. It was observed, that in all cases
destruction and damage to Precast, prestressed structural elements were caused by poor
behaviour of joints of supports. The Precast, prestressed elements as a rule were not
destroyed.
18
The maximum MM intensity of VIII was observed. The area was considered seismically
inactive. Earthquake has damaged 40,000 houses and 177 persons lost their lives. The
peak acceleration recorded was 0.67 g[Arya, Chandrasekaran and Srivastave(1968)].
The traditional construction in the area was non seismic and had little resistance
against lateral forces. Most of the building structures in the area were single storied built
in masonry. The Koynanagar experience very heavy shocks resulting in severe damages.
The cladding wall timber framework buildings failed, whereas, modern random rubble
masonry buildings suffered heavy damage. Stone masonry was also heavily damaged
than the brick masonry. At Koyna a hundreds of failures was due to bulging out of wall
that caused the fall of stone on one face while on the other face standing intact. The
outside face many not be able to withstand the tension with the result that the stones
would get loosened and fall down. The buildings were mostly founded on murum and
there were hardly any failure of foundations.
The epicenter of the earthquake was very close to the Koyna dam. The
accelerograph installed within the dam provided the most valuable instrumental data.
19
foundation on loose soil. Partial or complete collapse of mud walls has been notice.
Dressed stone masonry building with cement mortar developed wall cracks.
20
the epicenter of the earthquake was in a remote area and possibly Assam houses (Ikra and
bamboo houses) are able to resist earthquake much better.
21
destroyed more than 28,700 houses damaging about 1,70,000 houses and killing about
9,000 people. The random rubble stone houses in mud mortar totally destroyed. The
heavy roofs and thick walls with little shear and no tensile strength were the main reasons
for the failure.
The most common construction of random rubble stone walls laid in mud mortar
are made thick (70 to 180 cm) with small openings for the doors and windows. The
foundations of these houses are taken to a depth varying from 60 to 250 cm below the top
cover of black cotton soil. The roof consists of timber rafters in two perpendicular
directions over which wooden planks and a thick layer of mud is laid. The mud layer on
roof varies between 30 to 80 cm making very heavy. The walls did not have the
interlocking stones and the houses did not have any earthquake resistant features.
22
again showed that stone houses are most vulnerable to earthquakes as it was observed in
Uttarkashi, Killari and Chamoli earthquakes.
As the prosperity of Gujarat state flourished, multistorey buildings started
mushrooming. In the last 10 years many four storey and ten storey multistorey buildings
were constructed. The multistorey buildings with out a lift were constructed up to four
storey and buildings with lift were constructed up to ten storey. Unscrupulous builders
and architects unaware of any earthquake resistant provisions have been constructing
buildings. The collapse of newly built apartments and office blocks prove this point. The
modern RCC frame construction consist of bare RCC beam column frame and the
masonry infill. The masonry infill varies from dressed stone in mud mortar, clay brick in
cement mortar, cement concrete block masonry in mud/cement mortar. Most of the
multistorey buildings in Ahmedabad and Ghandhinagar were of RCC frame constructions
with bricks / cement concrete block masonry in cement mortar as infill material. Most of
these type of construction was of Stilt type i.e., soft storey construction. In this type of
construction either very few or no infill walls are provided in the ground floor and is left
open for parking the vehicles of the residents.
The damage to multistorey buildings in Bhuj is found to be wide spread. It is
interesting to note that multi storey buildings have also damaged as far distances as
Ahmedabad, Gandhidham and Surat. Whereas well designed and well constructed RCC
framed buildings following the Indian standard code of practice have performed very
well during the earthquake. Most of the buildings constructed by CPWD, Post and
Telegraph and other government agencies have performed well.
The damage in RC framed buildings is mostly due to failure of infill, or failure of
columns or beams. The column may have damaged by cracking or buckling due to
excessive bending combined with dead load. The buckling of columns is significant when
the columns are slender and the spacing of the stirrup in the column is large. Severe crack
occurs near the rigid joints of frame due to shearing action, which may lead to complete
collapse. Most of the damage occurred at the beam column junction. Widespread damage
was also observed at the inter face of stone or brick masonry infill and RCC frame. In
most of the cases diagonal cracks appeared in the stone or brick infill. The buildings
resisting on soft ground storey columns without or with very few infill walls have
undergone severe damage and many have collapsed.
23
under ground shaking. The cracks pass through the poor joints. After the walls fail either
due to bending or shearing in combination with the compressive loads, the whole house
crashes down. Extensive damage was observed during earthquake especially if it occurs
after a rainfall, (Krishna and Chandra, 1983).
Better performance is obtained by mixing the mud with clay to provide the
cohesive strength. The mixing of straw improves the tensile strength. Coating the outer
wall with waterproof substance such as bitumen improves against weathering. The
strength of mud walls can be improved significantly by spilt bamboo or timber
reinforcement. Timber frame or horizontal timber runners at lintel level with vertical
members at corners further improves its resistance to lateral forces which has been
observed during the earthquakes.
2.Masonry buildings:
Masonry buildings of brick and stone are superior with respect to durability, fire
resistance, heat resistance and formative effects. Masonry buildings consist of various
material and sizes (i) Large block (block size >50 cm)-concrete blocks, rock blocks or
lime stones;(ii) concrete brick-solid and hollow; (iii) Natural stone masonry. Because of
its easy availability, economic reasons and the merits mentioned above this type of
construction are widely used. In very remote areas in Himalayas buildings are
constructed of stacks of random rock pieces without any mortar. The majority of new
construction use mud mortar, however, few use cement mortar also.
Causes of failure of masonry buildings:
These buildings are very heavy and attract large inertia forces. Unreinforced
masonry walls are weak against tension (Horizontal forces) and shear, and therefore,
perform rather poor during earthquakes. These buildings have large in plane rigidity and
therefore have low time periods of vibration, which results in large seismic force. These
buildings fall apart and collapsed because of lack of integrity. The lack of structural
integrity could be due to lack of ‘through’ stones, absence of bonding between cross
walls, absence of diaphragm action of roofs and lack of box light action.
24
feature. The bonding stone is found to be effective as in Jammu Kashmir earthquake of
August 24, 1980. Unreinforced dressed rubble masonry (DRM) has shown slightly better
performance than random rubble masonry. The most common damage is due to cracks in
the walls. The masonry with lower unit mass and greater bond strength shows better
performance. The unreinforced masonry as a rule should be avoided as a construction
material as far as possible in seismic area.
5.Wooden buildings:
This is also most common type of construction in areas of high seismicity. It is
also most suitable material for earthquake resistant construction due to its light weight
and shear strength across the grains as observed in 1933 Long beach, 1952 Kern country,
1963 Skopje, and 1964 Anchorage earthquake. However during off- Tokachi earthquake
(1968), more than 4,000 wooden buildings were either totally pr partially damaged. In
addition there were failure due to sliding and caving in due to softness of ground. The
main reason of failure was its low rigidity joints, which acts as a hinge. Failure is also
due to deterioration of wood with passage of time. Wood frames without walls have
almost no resistants against horizontal forces. Resistant is highest for diagonal braced
wall. Buildings with diagonal bracing in both vertical and horizontal plane perform much
better. The traditional wood frame Ikra construction of Assam and houses of Nicobars
25
founded on wooden piles separated from ground have performed very well during
earthquakes. Wood houses are generally suitable up to two storeys.
The hollow concrete block buildings with steel reinforcement in selected grout
filled cells have shown good performance. The Precast and prestressed reinforced
concrete buildings also suffered severe damage mostly because of poor behaviour of
joints or supports. The Precast and prestressed element as a rule were not destroyed as
observed in 1952 Kern country and 1964 Anchorage earthquakes.
26
7.Steel and Reinforced Concrete Composite Structures:
Steel and Reinforced Concrete Composite Structures are composed of steel
skeleton and reinforced concrete and have the dynamic characteristics of both. It is better
with respect to fire resistance and safety against buckling as compared to steel skeleton.
Whereas compared to reinforced concrete structures it has better ductility after yielding.
As these features are the properties, which are effective for making a building earthquake
resistant and are, found to perform better during earthquakes (Wiegel, 1970).
A Building frame is subjected the horizontal forces due to wind pressure and seismic
pressure and seismic effects. These horizontal forces cause axial forces in columns and
bending moment in all members of the frame. As stated earlier, a building frame is all highly
indeterminate structure. The degree of indeterminacy of the building bent (Fig1) is found by
providing a cut near mid-span of each beam. Each cut beam will thus have three unknown
reaction components: Moment (M), Shear (F) and Axial thrust (H). Each column with its cut
beams will act as a cantilever, which is statically determinate structure. Thus, if n is the number
of beams in a bent, the degree of indeterminacy will be 3n for the building bent shown in
figure1, there are 8 beams and hence the bent is statically indeterminate up to 24 th degree. An
ordinary 20 storey building with 20 storeys and 5 stacks of columns has 80 beams, thus having
the degree of indeterminacy of 240.
27
H1
F1
Fig 1
Due to this reason, suitable assumptions are made so that the frame subjected to
horizontal forces can be analysed by using simple principles of mechanics. Following
approximate methods are commonly used for the analysis of building frames subjected to
lateral forces:
i. Portal method
ii. Cantilever method.
Top storey
A2 B2 C2 D2
1st storey
28
A4 B4 C4 D4
Figure 2 shows a three storey-building frame with three spans. Let P1, P2 and P3 be the
external horizontal forces acting on the joints of the wall columns. Under the action of
horizontal forces, the frame will deflect. The point of contra flexure will lie at the middle of
each member. Only horizontal shears will act at these points of contra flexure, since bending
moment will be zero at these points.
Consider the top story having vertical members A1 A2, B1 B2, C1 C2 and D1 D2. the
horizontal shear for the outer columns A1 A2 and D1 D2 will be P each while that for the inner
columns B1 B2 and C1 C2 will be 2P each, as marked.
Similarly consider the second story, where the exterior columns A2 A3 and D2 D3 have shear Q.
the value of shear Q is found by
P1 + P2 = Q + 2Q + 2Q + Q
Q = (1/6) (P1 + P2)
Similarly for the bottom story, the shear R is given by
P1 + P2 + P3 = R + 2R + 2R + R
R = (1/6) (P1 + P2 + P3)
Knowing the horizontal shear at the point of contra flexure, the bending moment in the column
can be easily found.
A1 B1 C1 D1
P
P 2P 2P
h/2
A2 m m B2 m, m C2 m m D2+
h/2
Q 2Q 2Q Q
A3 L B3 L C3 L D3
Fig.3
Let us consider the floor A2 B2 C2 D2 between 3rd and 2nd story. The shear acting at the
point of contra flexure is as shown in figure 3. The joint A2 is subjected to clockwise moment
of Ph/2 at A2 in the column A2 A3. The beam A2 B2 is thus required to resist a clockwise
29
moment of m = (P + Q)*h/2 at A2. Similarly at the joint B, there will be a clockwise moment
equal to (2P + 2Q)*h/2. But there are two beams to resist this. Hence clockwise moment in
each beam will be (P + Q)*h/2.Thus the ends of the beam receive the same clockwise moment
of (P + Q)*h/2, with the result that the points of contra flexure will lie in the middle of the
beams.
The moment m acting at each end of the beam A2 B2, B2 C2, C2 D2 give rise to vertical
reactions in columns, if L is the span of these beams, each beam will impose an upward pull of
2m/L on wind ward column and a push of 2m/L n leeward column connected to the beam, for
each span. The vertical reactions will neutralize for any intermediate column, provided span of
beams on either side are equal. Only the end columns will experience vertical reactions. The
windward columns will have an upward pull of 2m/L and the leeward column will have a
downward push of 2m/L.
(ii)Cantilever Method:
The cantilever method is based on the following assumptions:
1) The point of contra flexure in each member lies at its mid span or mid
height.
2) The direct stresses (Axial stresses) in the columns, due to horizontal
forces, are directly to their distance from the centroidal vertical axis of the frame.
P A B C D
P’
E F G H
Fig 4a
P’’
I J K L
M N O P
Figure 4a shows a building frame subjected to horizontal forces. Figure 4b shows the
top story up to the points of contra flexure of the columns. The reactions at the point of contra-
flexure will be direct and shear forces only. Let V1, V2, V3 and V4 be the axial forces in the
columns AE, BF, CG and DF, having areas of cross sections a1, a2, a3 and a4 respectively.
P
L1 L2 L3
H1 H2 H3 H4
Fig 4b
V1 V2 V3 V4
x2 x3 Plane of section
x1 x4
Centroidal axis
30
From statics we have
P = H1 + H2 + H3 + H4 (1)
From assumption 2, we have
V1/a1 V2/a2 V3/a3 V4/a4
------ = ------ = ------ = ------ (2)
X1 X2 X3 X4
Where X1, X2, X3, X4 are the centroidal distances of the columns from vertical
centroidal axes of the frame.
By taking moments about the mid point of intersection of the vertical centroidal axes
and top beam, we get
(H1 + H2 + H3 + H4)*h/2 = V1.X1 + V2.X2 + V3.X3 + V4.X4
or V1.X1 + V2.X2 + V3.X3 + V4.X4 = P h/2 (3)
from 2 and 3, the axial forces V1, V2, V3 and V4 can be determined.
P A M1 B P A B M2 C
L1 L2/2
h /2 L1/2 Fig 5
H1 H2
V1 V1 V2
In order to determine H1, take the moments about point of contraflexure M1 in the beam AB.
(Figure 5)
H1 * h/2 = V1 * L1/2
H1 = V1.L1/h (a)
Similarly, taking moments about point of contra flexure M2 in the beam BC
H1 * h/2 + H2 *h/2 = V1 (L1 + (L2/2)) + V2 (L2/2)
H1 + H2 = 2[V1.L1 + (V1 + V2) L2/2] / h (b)
Since H1 is known from a, H2 can be determined. In the similar manner H3 and H4 can
be determined.
Example 1:
Analyse the building frame, subjected to horizontal forces, as shown in fig. Use
portal method.
120kN A B C D
180 KN E F G H
I J K L
7m 3.5m 5m
Solution
31
1. Horizontal shear
Let the horizontal shears in the exterior columns be P and in the interior columns be
2P for the top storey. Similarly, for the bottom storey, let the shears be R and 2R for the
exterior and interior columns.
32
FFE=35 KN↓
FFG =FGF =122.5+122.5/3.5=70kN
FGH=FHG=122.5+122.5/5=49 kN
FAB=FBA=35+35/7=10kN
FBC=FCB=35+35/3.5=20kN
FCD=FDC=35+35/5=14kN
Since the spans are not equal, interior columns will also have
axial forces,
Column BF=FBA—FBC=10-2=-10 KN (i.e.↑)
Column FJ= (—10) + (FFE-FFG)=(—l0)+(35—70)=-45 kN (i.e. ↑)
33
=6+(2m/L2-2m/L3)
=6+(2*122.5/3.6-2*122.5/5) =27↑
Example 2.
Re-analyze the frame of example 1 by cantilever method, assuming that all the
columns have the same area of cross-section.
120kN A B C D
X1= 8.25m X4=7.25m
M x2 X3 M
180 KN E F G H
N N
I J K L
7m 3.5m 5m
Solution
1. Location of centroidal axis of the columns
Let the centroidal axis be at a distance x from the windward column AEI. Taking
moment of areas of the columns about AEI, we get
X=(2X0)+(2X7)+(2X 10.5)+(2 X 15.5)/8= 8.25 m
X1=8.25(=X);X2=8.25-7=1.25 m
X3=3.5-1.25=2.25 m
X4=(7+3.5+5)-8.25=7.25 m
2. Axial forces in columns of first storey
Let the axial force in column EI=V1=V
Since the areas are equal, The axial forces in other columns
34
will be in proportion to their distances from the centroidal axis.
V/X1=V2/X2=V3=X3=V4/X4
V2=V.X2/X1=1.25/8.25 V=0.1515V(↑)
V3=V.X3/X1=2.25/8.25 V=0.2727 V (↑)
V4=V.X4/X1=7.25/8.25 V=0.8788 V(↑)
120kN A B C D
X1= 8.25m X4=7.25m
x2 X3
180 KN E F G H
H1 H2 H3 H4
V1 V2 V3 V4
I J K L
7m 3.5m 5m
Taking moments of all forces about the point of contraflexure N of the leeward column,
we get
(120x 5.25)+(180X1.75)-(VX15.5)—(0.1515 VX8.5)+(0.2727 VX5)=0
which gives
V—V1=61.267 kN (↓)
V2=0.1515X61.267=9.282 (↓)
V3=0.2727X61.267=16.707 (↑)
V4=0.8788X61.267=53.842 (↑)
Check: ∑V=61.267+9.282-16.707-53.842=0.
120kN A B C D
X1= 8.25m X4=7.25m
x2 X3
H1’ H2’ H3’ H4’
35
Let V1=V’=axial force in column AF
V2=0.1515 V’;V3’=0.2727 V’ and V4=0.8788 V’
Check: ∑V=13.615+2.063-3.713-11.965=0.
36
BBC==MCB=15.678X3.5/2=27.4
MCD=MDC=11.965X5/2=29.9
37
The method - of determining horizontal shears have been explained in 27.7.
For example,
H1’=V1’L1/h =l3.6l5X7/3.5=27’23
H2’=2[V1’.L1+(V1’+V2’)L2/2/h-H1’
=2[13.615X7+(13.615+2.063)+3.5/2]/3.5-27.23
=42.908
∴ MAE=H1’Xh/2=27.23X3.5/2X47.65
MBF=H2’Xh/2=42.908X3.5/2=75
In the earlier chapters, considerably emphasis has been placed on the design of
structural members for compression, bending, shear, development of reinforcement and
torsion. A beam-column joint is a very critical element in reinforced concrete
construction where the elements intersect in all the three directions. Floor slab has been
removed for convenience. Quite often in design the details of joint are simply ignored.
Joints are most critical because they ensure continuity of a structure and transfer forces
that are present at the ends of the members into and through the joint. Frequently joints
are points of weakness due to lack of adequate anchorage for bars entering the joint from
the columns and beams.
The code is silent regarding the design of beam – column joints. A joint should
maintain its integrity and should be designed so that it is stronger than the members
framing into it. Failure should not occur within the joint. In fact, failure due to over
38
loading should occur in beams through large flexural cracking and plastic hinging and not
in columns.
The forces acting on an exterior beam – column joint are shown in Figs. 1a and 1b
during reversal of the seismic force. The nature of stress in steel will change with the
change in the direction of the seismic force. The points of inflection are assumed at the
mid-height of the columns. The shear in the joint is equal to:
Vj = σ yAs – Vcol
Where,Vj = shear in the joint
As = area of tension steel in the beam
Vcol = shear in the column
The joint shear causes diagonal tension and compression in the joint. With each
reversal of seismic loading, the joint shear changes sign causing cracks due to diagonal
tension in both directions. Moreover, the nature of bond stress also changes in the joint
around the beam and column reinforcement. It causes splitting stresses in the concrete
around the bar. It is essential to maintain integrity of the concrete core within the joint
for a smoother transfer of forces, and that ultimate moment capacities of the members
meeting at the joint may be developed.
The forces acting on an interior beam – column joint are shown in Fig. 1c. The
shear in the joint is equal to
Vj = σ yAt1 + σ sAt2 + C’ - Vcol
Where,At1 = area of tension steel in beam
At2 = area of compression steel in beam
C’ = compression in concrete = k σ ckbx
σs = stress in the compression steel
b = breadth of the beam
k, x = stress block parameters
39
By selecting little larger concrete area and lower reinforcement percentage, it is possible
to avoid congestion of steel.
Corner joints
In planar frames, industrial bents, retaining walls or other similar structures,
corner joints pose a specific problem. The corner may be subjected to opening or closing
forces. Diagonal tension cracking may be the cause of failure in opening corners,
whereas, in closing corners, the anchorage of reinforcement may cause a serious problem.
The detailing of reinforcement in corner joints may be done as shown in Figs. 4a and b.
1. The structural layout should be simple and regular avoiding offsets of beams
to columns, or offsets of columns from floor to floor. Changes in stiffness
should be gradual from floor to floor.
2. The amount of tensile reinforcement in beams should be restricted and more
compression reinforcement should be provided. Stirrups to prevent it from
buckling should enclose the latter.
3. Beams and columns in a reinforced concrete frame should be designed in
such a manner that inelasticity is confined to beams only and the columns
should remain elastic. To ensure this, sum of the moment capacity of the
columns for the design axial loads at a beam-column joint should be greater
than the moment capacities of the beams along each principal plane
40
M pl + M p2
Va = + 0.5wL c
Lc
M pl + M p2
Vb = − 0.5wL c
Lc
ii. For sway to left
M pl + M p2
Va = − 0.5wL c
Lc
M pl + M p2
Vb = + 0.5wL c
Lc
Where,
Mpl = hogging or sagging probable moment capacity at the left end of
the beam = 1.4 times the yield moment capacity at each end of
the beam
Mp2 = sagging or hogging probable moment capacity at the right end of
the beam
w = factored gravity load = 1.2 (DL + LL)
Lc = clear span of beam
The design shear at each and A and B shall be the absolute maximum of the
corresponding two values of Va and Vb.
41
Detailing for Ductility
The following recommendations are based on the provisions of IS: 4326 – 1993,
IS : 13920 – 1933 and ACI 318 and lessons learnt from the failure of concrete structures
during past earthquakes.
A. Girders
(1) At any section of a flexural member and for the top as well as for the bottom
reinforcement:
1. The reinforcement ratio p should each be greater than
0.24 σck
IS: 13920 – 1993 p>
σy
1.4
ACI 318-1999 p> σ
y
As
Where, p = for flanged sections
bw d
As = area of steel on either face
2. the reinforcement ratio p should not exceed 0.025.
(2) At least two bars should be provided continuously both at top and bottom.
(3) The positive moment resistance at the face of a joint should not be less than
one-half of the negative moment resistance provided at that face of the joint.
Design Tables 20.2 and 20.3 similar to Tables 5.4 and 6.2 have been
generated using the above recommendations and may be used for the design
of beam sections for ductility.
(4) Neither the negative nor the positive moment resistance at any section along
the member length should be less than one-fourth of the maximum moment
resistance provided at the face of either joint.
(5) When a beam frames into a column, both the top and bottom bars of the beam
should be anchored into the column so as to develop their fully strength in
bond beyond the section of the beam at the face of the column. Where beams
exist on both sides of the column, both face bars of beams must be taken
continuously through the column as shown in Fig. 5. To avoid congestion of
steel in a column in which the beam frames on one side only, the use of hair
pin type of bars spliced outside the column instead of anchoring the bars in
the column is suggested.
(6) The spacing of the vertical stirrups should not exceed 0.25 d in a length
equal to 2nd near each end of the beam and 0.5 d in the remaining length of the
beam as shown in Fig.6.
B. Columns
1. If average axial stress P/A on a column under earthquake condition is
less than 0.1 σ ck, the column reinforcement will be designed according to the
requirement of girders discussed earlier. But, if P/A > 0.1 σ ck, special
confining reinforcement is required at the column ends:
42
i. The cross-sectional area of bars forming circular hoops or
spirals used for confinement of concrete is given by:
Ag σ
asp = 0.09 p Dc −1 ck .
Ac σsp
ii. In the case of rectangular closed stirrups used in rectangular
sections the area of bars is given by:
Ag σ
asp = 0.18 p h −1 ck
Ac σsp
Where, h = longer dimension of the rectangular confining stirrup as shown in
Fig. 7
Pu = axial load in N
Ag = gross area of the concrete section in mm2
τ c = shear strength of concrete as given in I.S 456
The spacing of shear reinforcement should not exceed 0.5 d, where d is the
effective depth of column measured from compression fibre to the tension
steel.
4. Spiral columns should be used wherever possible especially if Pu >
0.4 Pb
Where,
Pb = balance axial load
Figure 20.13 shows that spiral columns are much more ductile as compared
with columns with lateral ties.
C. Beam – Column Connections
The beam-column joints are generally the weakest links in a structure. To avoid
frame failure due to inadequate joints, the joint details must be carefully considered as
discussed in section above. The following points need special attention:
43
1. Anchorage of beam reinforcement in the joint.
2. The ties as required at the end of the column must be provided through the
connection as well as, provided that if the connection is confined by beams
from all the four sides, the amount of this reinforcement will be reduced to
half of this value. This reinforcement known as joint hoops is shown in Fig.
6.
Example:
Consider an inner beam-column joint in the ground floor roof of an eight storey
building in Noida, UP. The data are as follows:
Check if the joint satisfies weak girder-strong column proportion. Also check the shear
in beam and column.
Solution
a. Let us first examine the beam-column joint in bending
Bending of column about weak axis
From SP-16, chart for doubly reinforced sections, for a given amount of reinforcement,
Mu
Hogging moment capacity of beam = = 4.45
bd 2
Or, Mu = 4.45 x 230 x 500 x 500 = 255.87 kNm
44
From SP-16 chart for singly reinforced sections, for a given amount of reinforcement,
Mu
Sagging moment capacity of the beam = = 2.50
bd 2
Or, Mu = 2.50 x 230 x 500 x 500 = 143.75 kNm
From SP-16 chart
Pu 1.2 x 900 x 1000
= = 0.29
σ ck bD 25 x 650 x 230
pσ ck = 3.46 / 25 = 0.138
Mu
Therefore, = 0.225 or, Mu = 193.4 kNm
σ ck bD 2
Σ Mg = 255.87 + 143.75 = 399.60 kNm
Σ Mc = 2 x 193.4 = 386.8 kNm
Σ Mc = < 1.2 Σ Mg
Hence, the beam column joint is not based on weak girder-strong column proportions.
There is a need to increase width of column.
(b) Let us now examine the shear capacity of beam on left side of the joint.
Dead load intensity on beam = 28.5 kN/m
Live load intensity on beam = 7 kN/m
Factored shear due to gravity = 1.2 (28.5 + 7) x 4.5/2 = 95.85 kN
Shear due to formation of plastic hinge in beam =1.4x 399/6/4.5=124.32 kN
Total Vu = 220 kN
Nominal shear stress τ v = 220 x 1000/230 x 500 = 1.91 Mpa
Shear strength of concrete τ c= 0.72 Mpa for 1.5% tension steel
Provide 10 mm – 2 legged stirrups @ 150 mm c/c OK
Increased shear strength of concrete = 1.87 x 0.77 = 1.43 Mpa > 1.15 Mpa OK
45
Shear walls are specially designed structural walls incorporated in buildings to
resist lateral forces that are produced in the plane of the wall due to wind, earthquake and
other forces. Shear walls are usually provided in tall buildings and have been found of
immense use to avoid total collapse of buildings under seismic forces. It is always
advisable to incorporate them in buildings built in regions likely to experience earthquake
of large intensity or high winds. Shear walls for wind are designed as simple concrete
walls. The design of these walls for seismic forces required special considerations, as
they should be saf3e under repeated loads. Shear walls for wind or earthquakes are
generally made of concrete or masonry. They are usually provided between columns, in
stairwells,
Toilets, utility shafts, etc. Initially shear walls were used in RCC buildings to resist wind
forces. These came into general practice only as slate as 1940. With the introduction of
shear walls, concrete construction can be used for tall buildings. Earlier tall buildings
were made only of steel, as bracings to take lateral load could be easily provided in steel
constructions. However, since recent observations as shown consistently the excellent
performance of buildings with shear walls even under seismic forces, such walls is now
extensively used for all earthquake resistant design.
1. Simple rectangular types and the flanged walls (called the bar bell type walls with
boundary elements)
2. Coupled shear walls
3. Rigid frame shear walls
4. Framed walls with in filled frames
5. Column supported shear walls
6. Core type shear walls
IS 13920-1993 clause 9(7) deals with requirements and design of simple free standings
shear walls.
2.1General Dimensions:
The following factors determine the general dimensions of the wall.
1. The thickness of the wall (t) should not be less than 150mm
2. If it is flanged wall, the effective extension of the flange width beyond the face of
web to be considered in design, is to be lee of the following
(a) ½ distance to an adjacent shear wall web
(b) 1/10th of the total wall height
(c) Actual width
3. Where the extreme fiber compressive stresses in the wall due to all loads (the
gravity loads and the lateral forces) exceed 0.2 fck boundary elements are to be
provided along the vertical boundaries of the walls. Boundary elements are
portions along the wall edges specially enlarged and strengthened by longitudinal
and transverse steel as in columns. These elements can be discontinued when the
compressive stresses are less than 0.15 fck. Boundary elements are also not
46
required if the entire wall section is provided with special confirming steel
reinforcements.
2.2 Reinforcements
The following rules are to be observed for detailing of steel:
1. Walls are to be provided with reinforcement in two orthogonal directions in the
plane of the wall. The minimum steel ratios for each of the vertical and horizontal
directions should be 0.0025.
PROBLEM 1.
(Design of simple shear wall with enlarged ends)
Design a shear wall of length 4.16m and thickness 250mm is subjected to the following
forces. Assume fck = 25 and fy =415N/mm2 and the wall is a high wall with the following
loadings:
Loading Axial force (KN) Moment (KN-m) Shear (KN)
1. DL+LL 1950 600 20
2. Seismic load 250 4800 700
47
Step 2. Check whether boundary elements are required
(Extreme stresses are more than 4N/mm2 boundary elements are to be provided)
Assuming uniform thickness L=4160mm; t=250mm
I=1.5x1012 mm4
A= 4160x250=1.04x106mm2
fc=[P/A]± [My/I]
=[(2.64)106/(1.04)106]± [(6.48)109*4160/2(1.5)1012]
0.2fck=0.2*25=5N/mm2
As extreme stresses are high, boundary elements are needed. Also there is tension in one
end due to bending moment.
V=V/bd=864x103/(250x3780)=0.92N/mm2
0.25√ fck =0.25√20=1.11N/mm2
b) Thickness of 250 is more than 200mm
Use two layers of steel with suitable cover.
Step 5.Determine steel required
Let us put min-required steel and check the safety of wall (p=0.0025)
As (min)=0.0025*250*1000 per meter length=625mm2 is two layers
Provide 10φ @250mm,provide the same vertical and horizontal steel.
Step 6. Calculate Vs to be taken by steel
V=0.92N/mm2
τ c (for 0.25% steel and fck=20)=0.36 N/mm2
Maximum shear allowed=3.1 N/mm2
Designed steel is necessary for Vs
Vs=(0.92-0.36) bd=0.56*250*3780=529.2KN
Step7. Calculate steel necessary to take Vs
As the wall is high, horizontal steel is more effective. Therefore
Vs/d =0.87fy(Asv/Sv), d=3780mm
Required Asv/Sv = [(529.2*103)/(0.87*415*3780)] = 0.3888
Consider 1m height = Sv
Horizontal steel area = 628mm2 = Asv
Available Asv/Sv = 628/1000=0.628
The nominal steel provided will satisfy shear requirements.
Step 7(a). Find flexural strength of web part of wall
Vertical load on wall (case 1 load) P=1860KN
48
Assuming it as a UDL over the area the axial load for the central part beams =Pw
β =0.516
Step 10. Calculate compression and tension in the boundary elements due to M1
Distance between boundary elements=3480+380=3.86m=c
Axial load=M1/c=4110/3.86=1065KN
This load acts as tension at one end and compression at the other end.
Step 13. Design the reinforcement around openings, if any, of the wall
Openings are provided in the main body of the wall. Assume opening size as 1200x1200
Area of reinforcement cut off by the opening
=1200 (thickness)% of steel/100=1200*250*0.0025=750mm2
4no’s of 16mm bar area=804mm2
Provide 2no’s of 16mm dia one each face of the wall, on all the sides of the hole to
compensate for the steel cut off by the hole.
49
A coupled shear wall consists of two solid wall elements jointed together by deep
floor beams, giving openings for corridors in buildings. The vertical load (p) is shared
equally by the two solid elements if equal; otherwise each wall element will have its own
vertical load like P1 and P2. The overturning moment M causes a compression C in one
wall and a tension in other wall,
C = T = M/a
a = (L + l’)/2
The reversal of overturning moment will interchange these actions. The solid wall
elements can be designed as columns. The connecting beam is to be designed for a shear
equal in magnitude to C and T and moment equal to T.l’/2.
a = (L + l’)/2
= (10 + 3)/2
= 6.50 m
C/T = M/a
= 2000/6.5
= 307.70 kN
Max.Compression = P/2 + C
= 2000/2 + 307.7
= 1307.70 kN
50
= 40.54 kN.m
Pu/(fckbD) = (1.2x1307.7x1000)/(15x3500x300)
= 0.0996
= 0.1
Mu/(fckbD2) = (1.2x66.74x1000)/(15x3500x3002)
= 0.017
= 0.2
In tension side,
Maximum load = 1000.00 – 310.00
= 610.00 kN
Therefore provide the same reinforcement for the tension side also.
Shear = 310.00 kN
Moment = 310.00 x 3.0 / 2
= 465.00 kN
Vertical load w = 7.0+15.0
= 22.00 kN/m
51
Moment M = 22 x 3.02 /12
= 16.50 kN.m
Shear S = 22 x 3.0 /2
= 33.00 kN
k = (1.2x482x106)/(300x8502)
= 2.7 N/mm2
d’/d = 50/850
= 0.05
Ast = 0.9 x 300 x 850 /100
= 2295.00 mm2
Provide 3# 32mm Ф bars at top.
Ast provided is 2413.00mm2
Drift:
L = 6.00 m
Number of storey n = 13
52
Number of bay m = 4
Height of each storey h = 3.65 m
Wind pressure P = 1.50 N/mm2
B = 6.00 m
W = Pxbxh
= 1.5 x 6000 x 3650
= 32850 kN
β = l x I1 / (h x I2)
= (6000 x 5400x106)/(3650x8964x106)
= 0.99
= 1.00
E = 2 x 105 N/mm2
___
Drift Δf = Wh3____ x ( n2 + β (1 + 2n.n-1)
` (24 (m+1)E I1)
___
3 3 2
= (32850x10 x 3650 ) (13 + 1(1+2 x 13 x 13-1)
24 (4+1)(2x105)x 5400x106
= 5941mm
53
UNIT III
54
Development of response spectrum from earthquake records:
The generation of a response spectrum curve can be idealized by subjecting a
series damped SDOF mass spring system with continuously varying natural periods to a
given ground excitation. The absolute value of the peak displacement response (relative
to the ground) occurring during the excitation for each system is represented by a point
on the relative-displacement spectrum curve. In fig 2.1 the generation of the response
spectrum for El Centro 1940 earthquake is illustrated.
Using the ground acceleration records as input, (fig 2.1(a)) a family of response spectrum
curves can be generated for various levels of damping (fig 2.1(b)) where higher damping
values generally resulting lower spectral response. The response spectrum curves may
also be represented in terms of pseudo-velocity or pseudo acceleration where these
pseudo-values are based on the relative displacements as follows.
Sd = spectral relative displacement.
Sv = ω . Sd = spectral pseudo-velocity
Sa = ω . Sv = ω2 . Sd = spectral pseudo-accelerations
Where ω = natural frequency (rad/sec).
The pseudo velocity and pseudo acceleration spectra do not reflect true maximum
values of velocity and accelerations but rather provide a direct means of evaluating the
true relative displacement. The pseudo velocity and pseudo accelerations may be viewed
as approximations to the true maxima for relative velocity and absolute accelerations.
Spectra for the true maxima for relative velocity and absolute acceleration can be
calculated in addition to the true displacement curve. However
For the purpose of structural design, spectra based on true relative displacement are of
most interest because these spectral displacements control the force levels induced in the
structure. Response spectra are often represented showing Sv , Sd, and Sa ordinates on a
single tripartite logarithmic plot. In fig 2.2 a tripartite plot of the El Centro 1940 response
spectrum for 5% critical damping is shown.
Spectra curves developed from actual earthquake records are quite jagged, being
characterized by sharp peaks and troughs (fig 2.1(b)). Because the magnitude and
locations of these peaks and troughs can vary significantly for different earth quake
records and because of the uncertainties inherent in predicting future seismic ground
motions, it is wise to consider several possible earth quake spectra in the evaluation of
structural response for design purposes.
55
the American Petroleum Institute (API), the veterans Administration (VA), the Applied
Technology Council (ATC), and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) have
incorporated recommendations for the development of design response spectra in their
respective regulation (2,48,5,46) for construction and design practices. (Note that ATC
guidelines have not yet been adopted by actual building codes.) To illustrate this general
approach for developing response spectra, refer again to Figure 2.2, where the values of
maximum ground acceleration, velocity and displacement for the E1 Centro 1940 record
are plotted along with the spectrum curve. Comparison of the spectrum profile with the
lines of ground motion maxiama reflect the following important characteristics,
1.In the very low period range, the spectrum curve approaches the line of
maximum ground acceleration, becoming virtually coincident for periods
less than about 0.03 secs.
2.In the low period range between 0.10 and 0.50 seconds, the variations of
the spectrum curve tends to show correlation with the line of maximum
ground accelerations.
3.In the medium period range between 0.50 and 3.0 seconds, the variation
of the spectrum curve tends to show correlation with the line of maximum
ground velocity.
4.In the higher period range between 3.0 and 10.0 seconds, the variation of
the spectrum curve tends to show correlation with the line of maximum
ground displacement.
5.In the very high period range (>10 secs), the spectrum curve gradually
approaches the line of maximum ground displacement.( not shown in fig .
2.2).
The EPA & EPV thus obtained are related to beak acceleration and peak
ground velocity but are not necessarily the same as or even proportional to peak
accelerations and velocity.
56
Thus EPA & EPV for a motion may be either greater or
smaller than peak acceleration and velocity, although generally the EPA will be smaller
than the peak acceleration while the EPV will be larger than the peak velocity. Despite
the lack of precise, the EPA &EPV are valuable tools for taking into consideration the
important factors relating ground shaking to the performance of a building.
Since smoothed design spectra are generally normalized to peak ground motion values,
the engineer may be misled to believe that there is a direct theoretical correspondence
between peak ground motions and overall spectral magnitude.
Response spectra may be viewed as being composed of four parts
spanning different period ranges shown as zones A,B,C,D in figures 2.3 & 2.4 .Most
design spectra use the following general relationship to represent the variation of spectral
acceleration with period ,
Sa = (1/T) p
Where the value of p will vary depending upon the design spectrum used when the
various zones of the curve .In general, the characteristics of the spectral acceleration
curves (fig 2.3) for the various zones as follows,
57
In figure 2.5, the Newmark (26), Blume (9), API (9), VA (48), ATC (5)
and NRC (46) recommended smoothed design spectra are plotted for 0,4g peak
acceleration and 5% critical damping. In table 2.1, p values used in the various spectrum
zones are shown for these spectra.
Response spectrum may be plotted for any two independent variables with respect to
other variables. (E.g.. Time Vs wavelength with respect to different frequencies)
•In this topics we are discussing about response spectrum for ground motion
(earthquake), such as acceleration, velocity, displacement.
•Response spectrum is a plot of maximum response (e.g.: acceleration, velocity,
displacement) of SDOF system to a given input Vs some system parameter, generally the
undamped natural frequency. Simply say that it is a function of dynamic input and period
of vibration of system.
•It also defined as representation of the maximum response of a idealized SDOF systems
having certain period and damping during earthquake ground motion.
•The maximum response is plotted against undamped natural period and for various
damping values, and it can be expressed in terms of maximum relative acceleration,
maximum relative velocity and displacement.
58
•The response spectrum may also be plotted for soil mass, which is below the
superstructure (e.g.: multistory building, dam structures etc…).
•Acceleration response spectrum (Sa) is plotted against natural period of vibration (T) Vs
acceleration (a) with respect to different damping ratios.
•This spectrum is most commonly used for describe the seismic event.
(E.g. El Centro earthquake California May 18
1940.)
•Velocity response spectrum (Sv) is plotted against natural period of vibration (T) Vs
velocity (V) with respect to different damping ratios.
•This spectrum is also used for describe the seismic event next to the acceleration
response spectrum (Sa).
(E.g. El Centro earthquake California May 18 1940).
•Displacement response spectrum (Sd) is plotted against natural period of vibration (T)
Vs displacement (d) with respect to different damping ratios.
•
•This spectrum is also used for describe the seismic event next to the Velocity response
spectrum (Sv).
(E.g. El Centro earthquake California May 18 1940.)
59
•In this type response spectrum the structure is considered as elastic and it has constant
viscous damping is assumed.
•The solution of equation of motion of a linear elastic SDOF system can be written by
assuming the difference between damped and undamped period of vibration.
d(t) =1/ ów a g (t ) -wz(t-t)sinw (t- t)dt
Where d(t) system relative displacement
w - Angular frequency.
a g - Ground acceleration
z - Damping ratio,
t- time
•In this spectrum structural system subjected to earthquake excitation is behave as non-
linear fashion.
•The initial period of vibration and elastic equivalent viscous damping of the system are
not sufficient to obtain maximum response, which will depend on the actual
shape of the force-displacement curve of the system.
•To overcome this difficulty the structure is assumed as linear elastic-perfectly plastic
response being equal to the actual response of the system. But need to incorporate the
some significant parameters.
SDOF SYSTEM
60
•By using Duhamel’s integral, we can obtain maximum relative displacement and
maximum absolute acceleration.
ω (t, ωn, ξ) = (1/ωn) W(t)
Where W (t) = Z (τ) exp (– ξ ωn (t- τ)) sin ωn (t- τ) d
•The maximum value of relative displacement occurs at time ‘tm’. This is customarily
given the symbol ‘Sd’ and is called spectral displacement.
Sd (T, ξ) = ωmax = (1/ ωn) W(tm)
• A plot of ‘Sd’ Vs natural period vibration (T = 2 P/ ωn) is called displacement response
spectrum.
•The above equation has the dimension of velocity .The maximum value of this integral
is called spectral pseudo velocity ‘Sv’. The plot of ‘Sv’ vs. ‘T’ is called the pseudo
velocity spectrum.
Sv (T, ξ) = W(Tm) = ωn. Sd
Similarly pseudo -velocity & acceleration spectrum we can formulate.
u(t)=p0/k{sinωn.t[sinωn.t-(t/td) sinωn.t-(cos ωn.t/ ωn.td)+(1/ ωn.td)] - cos ωn.t[-
cos ωn.t+1+(t/td) cos ωn.t – (1/ωn.td)(sinωn.t)t]}
For undamped system maximum absolute acceleration is given by
ü(max)= (ωn**2)* ωmax
SEISMOGRAPHIC INSTRUMENTS
Accelerograph/ accelerograms:
61
induced forces or deformations in structure has developed to a considerable extent, as a
consequence of earthquake ground motions / structural response recorded in the form of
accelerograms by strong-motion accelerographs. The time-history record of acceleration
is recorded in optical/digital form. Integration of acceleration records enables velocities
and displacement to be estimated.
NATURE OF ACCELEROGRAMS:-
1.Single shock motions (e.g.. Port Huechem, 1957;Libya 1963;Skopje 1963;San Salvador
1986).
2.Moderately long & extremely irregular motions (e.g. El Centro 1940; Chile 1945;Loma
pieta 1989;North ridge 1994).
3.Long ground motions exhibiting pronounced prevailing periods of vibration (e.g.
Mexico 1964;Bucharest 1947; Mexico 1985).
4.Ground motions involving large-scale permanent deformations of ground (e.g.
Anchorage 1964;Niigata 1964.
CAUSES:
62
•Intermediate signal modification system (Amplifier).
•Display system (Oscilloscope).
•Vibrometers & Accelerometers are called seismic transducers.
PURPOSE:
To detect the desired motion quantity and in most cases.
To produce an output that is proportional to the input motion but of different form.
•Most widely used transducer is accelerometer&Vibrometer.
ACCELEROMETER
•It is a device that senses acceleration and produce output voltage proportional to the
input acceleration.
•This relative motion instrument (RMI) measures, as a function of time, the relative
motion between the moving mass (a) and the base point ‘b’.
•It provides an electrical signal as its output, the signal being proportional to the relative
displacement of ‘a’.
VIBROMETER
•It is the seismic instrument whose output is to be proportional to the displacement of the
base
•This instrument is not widely used because of its low natural frequency.
•Peak modal responses cannot be directly to find the peak value of total response,
because modal responses attain their peaks at different time instants.
•So, some approximations for combining the peak modal responses are given by
scientists with some restrictions, these approximation rules are called modal
combination rules.
•Most commonly used rules
SRSS (Square-Root-of –Sum –of –Squares)
CQC (Complete Quadratic Combination)
ABSSUM (Absolute Sum)
SRSS
•This rule is given by Dr E.Rosenblueth (1951).
r0 » (Srn02 )½
Where r0 ------ Peak value of ‘n’th mode contribution.
•The peak response in each mode is squared
•Squared modal peaks are summed.
•Square root of the sum provides estimates of the peak modal response.
•This combination rule provides excellent response estimates of structures with well-
separated natural frequencies.
•It cannot be used unsymmetrical plan buildings have pairs (triplets) of closely spaced
natural frequencies.
63
NATURE OF DYNAMIC LOADING IN STRUCTURES DUE
TO EARTHQUAKES
Important considerations in earth quake resistant design:
Earth quake excitations are highly random and erratic
Analysis is to be made for the displaced position of the structure rather than the
forces acting on the structure.
Normal analysis involving equivalent lateral static forces is based on the peak
acceleration only, where as the preceding undulating accelerations of lower
amplitudes may cause structures’ failure, as the behavior of the structure during
the action of the undulating excitations become softer.
64
Model for simulating soil characteristics:
From the topsoil layer the excitations are transferred to the structure based on the
time period of the structure.
65
Apart from the structural components, in actual case the non-structural
components play a vital role in deciding on the fundamental period of the
structure. The presence of the non-structural components reduces the time period
of the structure and hence the assumption of a longer period based on the lateral
force resisting systems alone will result in a non-conservative estimation of the
earthquake forces.
But in the range of larger amplitudes of displacements that cause non-linearities in
the structure, most of the non-structural components fail and the period is
increased. Hence it would be judicial to select certain components alone, like rigid
stair walls, bending interaction of slab and girder etc apart from the lateral force
resisting components and omit other trivial components like plumbing, piping etc
in the calculation of natural period to be considered for the analysis.
The other reasons for the incremental increase in the time period would be due to
the softening effects in the structure due to reduction in effective section
properties in case of cracked concrete, residual stress development in case of steel
structures and loosening up of foundation due to non linear soil behavior.
The mode shapes would not undergo considerable changes in the non-linear
region and the same mode shapes are considered even in the non-linear region for
the calculation of lateral forces.
The natural periods and the mode shapes which are the primary properties
governing the structural response are related to the mass and stiffness matrices of
the structure and the designer, by varying the mass and stiffness properties and by
selecting appropriate design spectrum for the region may design a optimal
structure.
Single degree of freedom systems involves simple structures like water tanks,
pergolas etc that can be easily idealized as a single mass concentrated at the top of
a mass less stiffness system (column).
66
The response involves determination of displacements in the structure and then
the member forces and moments from the displaced configuration of the structure.
In case of single storey systems, it is considered as a single DOF system by taking
in to account, only the horizontal DOF and eliminating the other DOFs by
condensation methods in which the rotational and the vertical components are
condensed out.
Idealisation:
67
Here the total displacement (ut) of the structure can be given as the sum of relative
(ur) and the base displacement (ub).
i.e. ut = ur + ub -------- 1
The equilibrium equation can be given as:
Mut’’ + Cur’ + kur = 0 --------- 2
Substituting 1 in 2 gives
M (ur’’ + ub’’) + Cu’ + Ku = 0
=> Mur’’ + Cur’ + kur = - Mub’’ ---------- 3
(u’’ and u’ represents the time based differentials of the time function)
68
If the function is of a sort that can be integrated easily, the Duhamel’s integral can
be used in which the function is assumed to act a sequence of infinitesimally small
impulses. The displacement solution using Duhamel’s integral method can be given as:
Where שrepresents the natural frequency, and τ, the time instant considered.
In case of transform methods either the Fourier or Laplace transform is used, in
which the given differential equation in terms of variable t is converted into an algebraic
function in terms of i שso that the operations on the equation can be performed easily,
after which inverse transformation is performed to get the solution.
The solution of the Fourier transform, F[P(t)] = ∫ e –i שt p(t) dt, can be given as,
U = (ao) / (2k) + Σ (an cos (nωt) + bn sin (nωt)) / (k) (0 to n)
Where,
ao = (2/τ) ∫ f(t) dt (limits 0 to τ)
an = (2/τ) ∫ f(t) cos (nωt) dt (limits 0 to τ)
bn = (2/τ) ∫ f(t) sin (nωt) dt (limits 0 to τ)
Where τ is a time instant considered.
The numerical methods are involved if the excitations are too complex to be
integrated or in case of non linear systems which can be performed either as numerical
solution for duhamel’s integral or using finite difference or finite element approach.
In case of code based design for earthquakes the structure is allowed to deform in
the inelastic range and provisions are given for required ductility in the structure. Thus
the study of the structure in inelastic range is important in case of earthquake excitation.
The force deformation behavior can be as such taken as variations given by hysteresis
curves or can be idealized as elasto-plastic systems. Here up to linear range the initial
stiffness value has to be used after which the a trace has to made on the history of loading
at each time instant and based on the load deformation curve the stiffness at each
infinitesimal time instant is determined as the tangent modulus of the curve at that
instant. Hence the stiffness can be given as a function of force and velocity.
Various numerical time stepping procedures can be used for the solution of the above
problem. The different procedures are:
1) Those based on interpolation of excitation
2) Based on finite difference expressions and
69
3) Based on assumed variation of acceleration
In these methods, the time domain is divided in to a lot of infinitesimal time instants
Δt, and for each variation the variation in response Δu is determined and is added to
the displacement u up to the time considered for getting the response at time t + Δt.
The force value is linearly interpolated between the times t and t + Δt, the stiffness
values are taken as per the load deformation variation and a constant damping value
as per the linear system is considered.
For the above system the deflection at the top end of the two columns is the same,
and equal to U which is obtained from the normal procedures of SDOF analysis by
considering the mass of the system to be lumped at the center of the beam and
considering only the horizontal Degree of Freedom.
Knowing the end displacement of both the columns, the story shears of the
columns are determined as (k1*U) & (k2*U) respectively. After determination of story
shear the story moment is calculated at the end of each column by multiplying the story
shear of the column with corresponding length of the column.
Thus the story moments at the column ends would be (k1*U*L1) and (k2*U*L2)
respectively.
70
Where M is the mass matrix of the structure elements of which are obtained as the mass
required at each i th DOF to counteract an unit acceleration at the j th DOF, K is the
stiffness matrix and C is the damping coefficient matrix obtained as the damping required
at each i th DOF to counteract an unit velocity at the j th DOF.
The total deformation response can be given as a sum of the rigid body
deformation of the structure to the earthquake excitation and the deformation of the
structure due to its flexibility. ‘ι’ represents the rigid body deformation matrix of each
DOF and will be unity if all the DOFS of the structure undergoes the same rigid body
deformation.
[ K – Mω]Φ = 0
where Φ represents the modal matrix of the structure and from the above equation the
mode shapes and natural frequencies are determined.
The orthogonality conditions of the modes can be given as, ΦnT k Φr = 0 and
ΦnT m Φr = 0. This implies that, if a modal mass or a modal stiffness matrix M = ΦT m Φ
or K = ΦT k Φ respectively are formed, they would be diagonal matrices. Further it can be
implied that [(fI)nT ur = 0] ((fI)n = inertia force in nth DOF, ur = rth mode displacement)
and [(fs)nT ur = 0] where fs represents the static force, thus proving that work done by nth
mode forces in going through rth mode displacements (where r not = n) is zero. Thus it
implies that the forces due to displacements in any mode will not affect the displacements
in any other mode.
71
Modal analysis for MDOF systems:
The classical solution for the linear differential equation Mu’’ + Ku = p(t) (1)
for MDOF system will not be efficient for systems with more DOFS, nor is it feasible for
systems excited by other types of forces. Consequently, it is advantageous to transform
these equations to modal coordinates.
The system displacement can be expanded in terms of modal contributions and
the dynamic response of a system can be expressed as
U(t) = Σ Φr qr (t) (r = 1 to n) = Φ.q(t) (2)
Substituting 2 in 1 and pre multiplying each term by ΦT and applying orthogonal
relation, thereby eliminating all terms of the summation except when r = n, the relation
reduces to
Mnq’’(t) + K qn(t) = pn(t)
Where M, K and pn are the modal matrices formed by pre and post multiplication by the
modal matrix.
From the above equation ‘q’ is determined knowing the mass, stiffness matrices,
time periods and the modal matrix from which the solution is determined as explained in
the model problem.
Given Data:
Ω = 0, 0.5 ω1 & 1.3 ω2
k1 = k2 = 160 kN / mm, k3 = 240 kN / mm
m = 20000 kg
Solution:
72
[m] = 2 X 104 (from the figure)
From the given mass and stiffness matrices the natural periods and frequencies can be
determined as:
Φ=
73
Consideration of 1st term alone implies 1st mode shape alone, and as per the number of
mode shapes to be used corresponding number of terms are utilized and solution is
attained for different Ω values.
From the results it can be implied that the initial fewer modes will have more effect
than the higher modes on the result and hence, it would be sufficient to consider only few
initial modes in case of multi story buildings.
The forces and moments, from the displacement result, can be obtained either by
equivalent static method or by determining the storey shears of each story from the
corresponding inter story drifts in case of shear frames, by multiplying them with the
corresponding story stiffness values and for moment frames, from the condensation
equations or by reverse engineering.
1. Importance factor(I):
It is a factor used to obtain the design seismic force depending on the functional
uses of the structures, characterized by hazards consequences of its failure, its post-
earthquake functional needs historic value, or economic importance.
2. Zone factor(Z):
It is a factor to obtain the design spectrum depending on the perceived maximum
seismic risk characterized by Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) in the zone in which
the structure is located. The basic zone factors included in these standards are reasonable
estimate of effective peak ground acceleration given in Annex E of IS-1893 (part1)-2002
3. Structural response factor (Sa/g):
It is a factor denoting the acceleration response spectrum of the structures subjected to
earthquake ground vibrations, and depends on natural period of vibration and damping of the
structures.
4. Response reduction factor(R):
It is the factor by which the actual base shear force, that would be generated if the
structures were to remain elastic during its response to the Design Basis Earthquake (DBE)
shaking, shall be reduced to obtain design lateral forces.
SEISMIC WEIGHT( W ):
74
Imposed uniformity distributed floor Percentage of imposed load
loads( kN/m2)
Up to & including 3 25
Above 3 50
The seismic weight of the whole building is the sum of the seismic weights of the
all the floors.
Type of building Ta
Moment resisting frame without brick in fill panels
1- for RC Frame building 0.075 h 0.75
2- for Steel Frame building 0.085 h 0.75
All other buildings moment resisting frame with brick infill 0.09h / d0.5
Panels
Where h = Height of the building in m. This excludes the basement storeys, where
basement walls are connected with the ground floor deck or fitted between building
columns. But, it includes the basement storeys, when they are not so connected.
d=Base dimension of the building at the plinth level in m. along the considered
direction of lateral forces
Damping % 0 2 5 7 10 15 20 25 30
Factors 3.2 1.4 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.55 0.5
75
DESIGN SEISMIC BASE SHEAR:
The total design lateral force or design seismic base shear( VB )along any principal
directions shall be determined by the following expression.
VB =Ah*W
Where, Ah =Design horizontal acceleration spectrum
W = Seismic weight of the buildings
Example:
A Four story RC office building shown in figure is located in shillong. The
foundation soil is medium stiff and the entire building is supported on raft foundation.
The lumped weight due to dead load is 12 kN / m 2 on floors and 10 kN/m2 on roof. The
floors carry a live load of 4 kN/m2 and the roof is designed for 1.5 kN/m2. Determine the
design seismic on the structure.
PLAN
6m
4.5m
4.5m
3.2m
3.2m
3.2m
4.2m
4@5m ELEVATION
Solution:
76
VB = Ah*W
Ah = (Z/2)*(I/R)*(Sa/g)
Ta=. 0.09h/d0.5
H=13.8
D=20 in X direction
D=15 in Y direction
Ta in X direction
Ta = 0.09*13.8/200.5 = 0.28 sec
Ta in Y Direction
Ta= 0.09*13.8/150.5 = 0.32sec
77
Storey Wi hi Wi * hi2 (Wi * hi2) Lateral force @
level kN m. x 103 ----------------- floor level, kN
Σ Wi * hi2
4 3000 13.8 571.3 0.424 992
3 4200 10.6 471.9 0.350 819
2 4200 7.4 230 0.171 400
1 4200 4.2 74.1 0.055 129
Total = 2340
The term dynamic refers to loads, which suddenly change in time, with variations
in magnitude, direction, and point of application taking place either jointly or separately.
Dynamic loads imparts accelerations to the bodies on which they are imposed, thereby
giving rise to inertia forces and causing the system to vibrate
CYCLIC LOADS
The term impact refers to loads that are applied suddenly and act for a short time.
Impact load may be either single or multiple.
MOVING LOADS
78
Seismic loads are of kinematic origin. They owe their existence to vibrations
caused in structures by the movement of the earth’s surface during an earthquake.
Seismic forces or loads are random in character, though they are usually regarded as
deterministic in practical calculations to simplify the design model.
VIBRATION
GENERAL
79
All accelograms reflect non-periodic vibrations of varying amplitude and
period. Here the term period refers to twice the time interval between two
adjacent accelerations of zero amplitude.
The accelerations within the initial portion of the record have relatively
low amplitudes. The duration of the initial portion depends on the
epicentral distance, ranging from 1s to 4s when the epicentral distance is
small.
The accelerations within the middle portion characterizing the effect of
transverse waves have the largest amplitudes, the respective periods being
slightly longer than are equal to those within the initial portion.
The accelerations within the end portion have long periods and gradually
decreasing amplitudes, which, however, do not follow any steady pattern
as they die down. There is no well-defined boundary between the middle
and the end portions.
The total duration of vibration varies from event to event, increasing with
increasing intensity and epicentral distance. Approximately, vibrations
continue for 10 to 40s, often giving more than hundred peaks per record.
The vertical acceleration is usually 60% to 70% of the horizontal
component.
Unfortunately, no other data for classification have yet been obtained. What
complicates the situation further is the absence of a single theory of strength of materials
under static and, which is of particular importance in earthquake-resistant design,
dynamic loads. As long as we do not for sure what actually causes structural material to
fail, we cannot decide which techniques would be comprehensively reliable in
experimental investigations. By the same token, the amount of experimental work to be
done appreciably increases. In fact, instead of solving a general strength problem once,
the investigator has to tackle its numerous particular cases, which happen to present
themselves in the course of analysis and design. As a result, only after a sufficiently large
number of alternatives have been investigated is he able to establish empirical
relationships of more or less common character. Also, in solving experimental problems,
the investigator has to make too much effort to represent the actual loading system, which
can never be achieved in full measure, thereby further distorting the picture.
METALS
80
change in section at a sharp angle. As regards dynamic strength, stress concentration is
especially undesirable in members made of brittle materials.
Tests on metals suggest that the dynamic behaviour of members markedly
depends on the type of joint and weld. The best results have been obtained with lap joints
formed by front fillet welds at a leg ratio of 1:2 for which the endurance limit is same as
for a solid member. It has also been observed that the endurance limit rises when both
front and side fillet welds are used to form a lap joint.
Based on the tests on welded joints some suggestions are given for method
of connection to resist dynamic loads. They are as follows:
The skill of welders, which generally has little effect on the load bearing capacity
of the structural members under static loading, becomes a matter of primary importance
where the dynamic strength is a factor. The thing is that poor workmanship may entail
additional stress raisers because of lack of penetration, non-uniform throat thickness, and
other defects inevitable where unskilled welders are allowed to do the job.
In another test a cantilever beam was subjected to cyclic loading. In the
course of loading, with the displacements maintained at a sufficiently high level, the steel
was found to grow softer, as it were. In fact, as the number of cycles increased, the same
displacements were produced by ever decreasing imposed loads. The Hysteresis loop
obtained seems that it gets wider as the maximum stress developed during the cyclic
loading increases.
Based on various test over steel, an empirical formula for dynamic strength was
formulated
Where,
α = dynamic strength/ static strength.
n= number of cycles.
CONCRETE
81
Many experiments were carried out in the TsNIISK institute to find the dynamic
strength of heavy concrete in compression. Experiments show that long-time
compression, in which structures are believed to work before earthquakes, make mortar
and concrete stiffer and limit their ductility. It is, therefore, assumed that long-time
compression prior to seismic loading may adversely affect the dynamic strength of
materials. Earthquakes make mortar and concrete stiffer and limit their ductility. It is,
therefore, assumed that long-time compression prior to seismic loading may adversely
affect the dynamic strength of materials. Based on experimental work by Yu. Kotov an
empirical formula was given for the dynamic strength of heavy cement concrete of
compressive strength 20mPa and 30 mPa. It is given by
Where,
T is the time period.
As can be seen from the above table, the dynamic moduli are larger than
the static moduli, although the difference is insignificant. During the tensile test of
concrete it was found that the ultimate tensile strength of concrete depends on the
duration of loading.
REINFORCED CONCRETE
The manner of cracking and the shearing force V that caused the cracking
were practically independent of the amount of lateral reinforcement and
the number of load cycles applied.
82
For beams with no stirrups, the shearing force at which failure occurred
was practically the same as the shearing force at the onset of cracking. For
laterally reinforced beams, shearing force was much greater, being 1.5 to 2
times or 2 to 3 times as large as that for beams with no stirrups.
The repeated manner of loading had little effect on the shearing force.
Where,
Subscript
SH represents shearing strength
T represents tensile strength
C represents compressive strength
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
WOOD
83
Wood is one of the most attractive materials as regards its earthquake resistance.
As compared with concrete and masonry, it offers a far greater resistance to tension and
spalling, while having a much smaller weight. Also, it is a good deal lighter than,
although not as strong as, steel. Nevertheless, wood has been finding few applications in
earthquake-proof load-bearing structures, because it cannot serve for a long time and has
to be protected against fire.
Design objectives
Nothing within the power of structural engineer can make a badly conceived
building into a good earthquake resistant structure. Decisions made at the conceptual
stage are extremely important.
Anatomy of building
The vertical division of the building primarily poses problems, making it difficult
to avoid irregularities in mass or stiffness. However, the service cores and exterior
cladding provide an opportunity to incorporate shear walls and braced panels. One of the
main objectives in early planning is to establish the optimum location for service core and
stiff structural elements that will be continuous to the foundation
It is not unusual to find that structural and architectural requirements are in
conflict at the concept planning stage but it is essential that a satisfactory compromise is
reached at this time.
Overall form
84
The desirable aspects of building form are simplicity, regularity and symmetry in
both plan and elevation. These properties all contribute to a more even and more
predictable distribution of earthquake forces in the structural system. Any irregularity in
the distribution of stiffness or mass is likely to increase d dynamic response.
Torsional forces from ground motion are not commonly of great concern unless
the building has an inherently low torsional strength. However, the torsion also arises
from eccentricity in the building layout. The effective force exerted by lateral ground
movement acts at the center of gravity of each floor creating a torsional moment about
the center of structural resistance and this will have to be dealt with in addition to
torsional component of ground motion.
Buildings, which are tall in relation to their base width, will generate high forces
at the base due to the overturning moment. Buildings with a height to width ratios of
about 4 are common, whereas those with a height to width ratio of 6 are rare. It is
probably within range 4-6 that the problems arising from overturning forces become
critical. The high problems arising from overturning forces become critical. The high
forces may lead to foundation uplift or to unduly high tensile or compressive forces I
columns.
The effect of out of step vibration also occurs in any building founded on subsoil
where there is a marked discontinuity. As an extreme example, a structure founded partly
on rock and partly on alluvium would be severely stressed at the interface between the
two, each material tending to vibrate differently.
The solution to many of the problems arising form buildings of irregular form is
to divide them into regular shapes by means of joints. Such joints are required to be
sufficiently wide to avoid damage by impact during earthquakes.
Buildings on sloping ground tend to pose torsional problems as shown in fig. 1.
The solution to this is to provide additional stiffening elements at the low end of the site
to bring center of resistance as close to center of mass.
Framing systems
85
Consideration of the overall concept and of the detailed framing system are not
independent, and at the planning stage some consideration will need to be given to the
framing layout
Bi-directional egg crate system is suitable for tall buildings but unsuited to office
buildings, which need large unobstructed areas. The structural core and frame can be
used for buildings up to about 40 storeys and above this height the single framed tube
should be used with the tube in tube system being used for highest buildings.
The shear walls are much stiffer than frame elements. Within the basic category
of frame shear wall systems, many hybrid systems can be produced to suit the particular
needs of a project.
In planning the framed structure the relationship between members at beam
column junctions become critical. Fig shows possible failure modes under lateral loads
and it is clear from this that yielding in the major earthquake must occur in the beams and
not in the columns
86
Considering single beam column connection such as that in Fig. It follows that
Mb1+Mb2=Mc1+Mc2
The problem posed by the above equation increases as beam spans increase
leading to a need for greater continuity reinforcement at the support and consequently a
greater ultimate moment. Another case posing difficulty is the spandrel beam, which is
oversized for architectural reason and may have an unnecessarily high yield moment. So
in the planning stage itself due consideration has to be given to all these aspects.
DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
The following philosophy is widely accepted in national and state building codes.
Structures should be able to
a) Resist minor earthquake without damage
b) Resist moderate earthquakes without structural damage
c) Resist major earthquakes of severity equal to the strongest that could be
experienced in the area without collapse but with some structural and
nonstructural damage.
Elastic design
Ductile design
Xy = displacement at yield
Xu = Ultimate displacement
Xu Xy
From the above philosophy we can understand that the earthquake design does permits
substantial damage whereas it is not acceptable for other environmental loadings. The
fundamental reason for this lies in the costs of seismic design provisions, which would be
excessive if the maximum design earthquake were to be resisted without damage. Hence
the acceptance of survival as the aim in a major earthquake means that design objective
becomes that of preserving the lives of the building occupants.
87
The factors that are taken into account for assessing lateral loads are as follows
a) Zoning factor
b) Importance factor
c) Subsoil factor
d) Structural type factor
e) Natural period of vibration
f) The applicable building mass
Zoning factor: -
Seismic zoning assesses the maximum severity of shaking that is expected in a
region. For E.g. UBC uses Z values of 1,0.75,0.375,0.188. Normally zoning will be laid
down by the code. In a nutshell zoning status will be based on the assessment of seismic
hazard.
Importance factor: -
It is customary to recognize that certain categories of building used should be
designed for greater levels of safety and this is achieved by specifying higher design
lateral forces. Such categories are
a) Buildings that are essential after an earthquake –hospitals, fireplaces, power
stations etc
b) Places of assembly-schools, theatres
c) Structures whose collapse would endanger the population-nuclear plant,
dangerous chemical storage vessels, large dams etc
Typically the value of I varies from 1.0 to1.5 but values 2.0 and 4.0 are used in U.S.S.R.
Structures in category c) are designed on a different design basis, concentrating on
reducing the risk of serious accident to an acceptable level.
Subsoil Factor: -
The effect of subsoil may be both to magnify ground motion and to lengthen he
characteristic period of motion. The soil factor takes into account of both the
magnification and the interaction between building response and soil response. If the
natural period of vibration of the building and soil are close, resonance will occur.
The soil factor is typically in the range of 1.5-2 for soft soil compared with the
value of 1 for rock. An interesting development is that the Structural Engineers
Association of California (1985) omits any resonance between buildings and soil from its
recommended S values and proposes three values.
a) S=1, for rock like material having a shear wave velocity greater than 2500 ft/sec or a
stiff/dense soil condition where the soil depth is less than 200 ft
b) S=1.2, for dense/soil where soil depth exceeds 200 ft
d) S=1.5, for soft to firm clays or loose sands 30 ft or more in depth.
e)
Structural Type Factor (K): -
The inherent ductile nature, redundancy and damping of a building structure are
of great importance to its good performance in an earthquake. Factors contributing to this
are material and member ductility, a high degree of redundancy with respect to all failure
modes, regular form, low eccentricity, good construction quality control and high
damping.
88
Customarily K factors for buildings as a whole vary so that the highest value is
twice the lowest, but parts of buildings such as parapets, towers, tanks, chimneys and
other appendages may be assigned much higher values.
Weight W: -
The weight is normally the total dead load plus an estimate of the possible live
load that could be reasonably be expected.
Period T: -
Because the design loading depends on the building period and the period cannot
be calculated until a design has been prepared, most codes provide formulae from which
T may be calculated. The International Conference of Building Officials (1985) gives the
building period T in seconds for moment frames as
T=0.1N
And for stiff buildings (shear wall, braced frame) as
T=0.5h/√D (feet units) or T=0.9h/√D (metric units)
Distribution Of Lateral Forces
Qi=VB Wihi2
∑W h 2
j j
2Rg
89
The use of reinforced concrete as a ductile material began in the early 1960s with
the publication of Blume, New mark & Corning (1961) which established that properly
detailed reinforced concrete beams and columns would respond to dynamic forces in a
ductile manner and would sustain a number of cycles of stress reversal. The same
conclusion was drawn for shear walls, principally the work of Prof R.Park and Paulay at
the university of Canterbury in New Zealand during the 1970s
Design codes for reinforced concrete in seismic zones are well established and
when properly applied provide a sound basis for design and detailing.
Principles
90
a) An increase in tension steel content.
b) An increase in steel yield strength.
c) An increase in axial load.
The effect of confining concrete with stirrups or spiral reinforcement is to
increase the ultimate concrete strain, thereby increasing the ductile capacity.
There is a further advantage in practice as shear resistance is increased and additional
lateral support is given to the main reinforcement. Practical values of stirrups or spiral
reinforcement, which will provide effective containment are substantially larger than
those customarily used for reinforced concrete design in non-seismic conditions. Fig
illustrates the effect of axial load and confinement on rotational ductile capacity.
Confined Section
Unconfined section
91
Anchorage Of Beam Bars In An External Joint
Splicing: -
The longitudinal bars shall be spliced, only if hoops are provided over the entire
splice length, at spacing not exceeding 150-mm. The lap length shall not be less than the
bar development length in tension.
Lap splices shall not be provided within a distance of 2d from joint face and
within quarter length of the member where flexural yielding is likely under the effect of
earthquake forces. Use of welded splice and mechanical connections may also be made as
per IS 456 2000. However, not more than half the reinforcement shall be spliced at a
section where flexural yielding may take place.
Web reinforcement
Web reinforcement shall consist of vertical hoops. A vertical hoop is a closed
stirrup having a 135° hoop with a 10-diameter extension (but not < 75
mm) at each end that is embedded in the confined core. The min diameter
of the bar forming a hoop shall be 6 mm. However, in beams with a clear
span exceeding 5 m, the minimum bar diameter shall be 8-mm.
The shear force to be resisted by the vertical hoops shall be the maximum of
92
a) Calculated factored shear force as per analysis
b) Shear force due to formation of plastic hinged at both the ends of the beam
plus the factored gravity load on the span.
The contribution of bent up bars and inclined hoops to shear resistance of the section
shall not be considered.
The spacing of the bars shall not exceed d/4 or 8 times the diameter of smallest
longitudinal bar. However it need not be less than 100 –mm. The first hoop shall be at a
distance not exceeding 50 –mm from the joint face. Vertical hoops at the same spacing as
above shall be provided over a length equal to 2d on either side of a section where
flexural yielding is likely under the effect of an earthquake.
Columns
Dimension
The minimum dimension of the member shall not be less than 2. However in
frames, which have beams with center-to-center span exceeding 5 m or columns of
unsupported length exceeding 4, the shortest dimension of the column shall not be less
than 300 mm & limiting ratio of column face dimension 0.4
Longitudinal Reinforcement
Lap splices shall be provided only in the central half of the member length. It
should be proportioned as a tension splice. Hoops shall be provided over the entire splice
length at spacing not exceeding 150 mm center to center. Not more than 50% of the bars
shall be spliced at one section.
93
Transverse Reinforcement
Spiral or circular hoops or rectangular hoops
1. Spacing of parallel legs shall not exceed 300mm
2. Else provide cross ties (fig)
3. If more transverse reinforcement is needed to take care of shear,
Special confining reinforcement is necessary
Ash = 0.09 SDk fck Ag - 1.0
fyAk Ak
94
Shear walls
For Years shear walls were regarded as brittle elements. It was assumed that they would
behave elastically only for moderate earthquakes. In order to resist major earthquakes, they
were combined with frame that was intended to survive after major damage has been inflicted
on frames.
95
The area enclosed by the loops is a measure of the energy dissipated through the
plasticity. Since concrete is brittle, the plasticity is due to the reinforcing steel
96
UNIT IV
CHARACTERISTICS OF EARTQUAKE
INTRODUCTION:
India has a huge earthquake problem. More than 50% of the country is prone to
disastrous earthquake. During 1897 to 1950, the country witnessed four great earthquakes
of magnitude 8.4 to 8.7; fortunately, no earthquakes of comparable size have been taken
place since 1950. However, the experience in moderate earthquakes (Magnitude 6– 6.5)of
Bihar(1988),Uttarkashi(1991), Latur(1993), Jabalpur(1997),and Chamoli (1999) and in
the more recent M7.7 Bhuj (2001) earthquake clearly underline the human misery
associated with disasters.
A large collection of materials and masses were coalesced to form the earth.
Large amount of heat was generated by this fusion, and slowly as the Earth cooled down,
97
the heavier and denser materials sank to the center and the lighter ones rose to the top.
The differentiated earth consist of the following
• Inner core ( Radius 1290 km.) – Solid, Heavy metals.
• Outer core ( Thick 2200 km.) – Liquid
• Mantle ( Thick 2900 km.) – ability to flow
• Crust ( Thick 5 to 42 km.) – Light materials.
SEISMIC WAVES:
Large strain energy released during earthquake travel as seismic waves in all
directions through the earth’s layers, reflecting at each interface. These waves are two
types - Body waves (P-wave & S-wave) and Surface waves (Love wave& Rayleigh
wave)
BODY WAVES:
Primary waves ( P Wave):
Material particles undergo extensional & compressional strains along the
direction of energy transmission. It is a fastest wave; for example, in granites its speed is
4.8km/sec.
The velocity at which a P wave propagates in an elastic medium may be found as
98
Surface waves:
Love waves:
It will cause surface motions similar to S-wave but no vertical moment.
Rayleigh waves:
Makes a material particle oscillate in an elliptic path in the vertical plane. The
velocity at which a Rayleigh wave propagates in a elastic medium may be found as
VR = 0.914 VS or 0.547VP
99
Table(1) shows the degree of damage
Actual Degree of damage, d, to buildings designed to resist earthquakes
earthquake of intensities
intensity Up to 7 7 8 9
6 ≤1.3 ≤ 1.2 ≤1.1 ≤1
7 1.8 - 2.2 1.5 – 1.8 1.3 - 1.5 1.1 - 1.3
8 2.2 - 3.2 1.8 - 2.2 1.5 - 1.8 1.3 - 1.5
9 3.2 - 4.5 2.2 - 3.2 1.8 - 2.2 1.5 - 1.8
d = (1/n) Σ di
di - Degree of damage of individual buildings.
100
Where no local seismic risk maps are available, the site seismicity should be
assessed on the basis of general engineering geological conditions and approximate
recommendations.
The effect that the reduced bearing capacity and considerable deformity of the soil
foundation may have on the stability of buildings can be well illustrated by extensive
settlement and tilting of buildings.
Ex - Nigata earthquake in Japan
Buildings with shallow foundation not only tilted but also experienced some
overturning
101
shakes randomly back and forth (-,+) along each of these x,y and z directions. All
structures are primarily designed to carry the gravity loads,i.e.,they are designed for the
force equal to the mass(this includes mass due to self weight and imposed loads) times
the acceleration due to gravity g acting in the downward direction(-z). This downward
force Mg is called the gravity load. The vertical acceleration during ground shaking either
adds to or subtracts from the acceleration due to gravity. Since factors of safety are used
in the design of structures to resist the gravity loads, usually most structures tend to be
adequate against vertical shaking. However, horizontal shaking along x and y directions
remains a concern. Structures designed for gravity loads, in general, may not be able to
safely sustain the effect of horizontal earthquake shaking. Hence it is necessary to ensure
adequacy of the structures against horizontal earthquake effects.
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES:
Both shape and structural system work together to make the structure a marvel.
102
Buildings that are fewer columns or walls in a particular storey or with unusually tall
storey tend to damage or collapse which is initiated in that storey. Many buildings with
an open ground storey intended for parking collapsed or were severely damaged.
Buildings on sloppy ground having unequal height of columns along the slope, which
causes ill effects like twisting and damage in shorter columns.
4. Adjacency of buildings:
When two buildings are too close to each other, they may pound on each other
during strong shaking. With increase in building height, the collision can be a greater
problem. When the building height does not match the roof of shorter building may found
at the mid height of the column of the taller one, this can be very dangerous.
TWISTING OF BUILDING:
The walls and columns are like ropes, and the floor is like cradle. Building
vibrates back and forth during earthquake. Buildings with more than one storey are like
rope swing with more than one cradle.
If the mass on the floor on the building is more on one side, then that side of the
building moves more under ground movement. This building moves such that its floors
displace horizontally as well as rotate. Buildings with unequal vertical members also the
floors twist about a vertical axis, and displace horizontally.
103
The capacity design concept in earthquake –resistant design of buildings will fail
if the strength of the brittle links fall below their minimum assured values. The strength
of brittle construction materials, workmanship, supervision and construction methods.
Similarly, special care is needed in construction to ensure that the elements meant to be
ductile are indeed provided with features that give adequate ductility. Thus, strict
adherents to prescribed standards of construction materials and construction processes is
essential in assuring an earthquake-resistant buildings. Regular testing of construction
materials at qualified laboratories, periodic training of workman at professional training
houses and on-site evaluation of technical work or elements of good quality control.
Since, the most severe probable earthquake motion characteristics at a site can
only be estimated approximately and its chances of occurring during the useful life time
of a structure is very uncertain therefore, an elastic design for such uncertain forces will
lead to very uneconomical design. In such situations, elastic design is neither possible nor
justifiable. It is obvious that where large ground movements occur, it may not be possible
to save structures from destruction or damage. Here, the basic philosophy and principle
of earthquake resistant design irrespective of any specific type of structure are discussed.
Although, some passing references have been made to building for better explanation.
104
Earthquake prediction is uncertain and can only be possible partially for certain
faults. Successful earthquake prediction cannot eliminate earthquake event. As
earthquakes cannot be predicted accurately, magnitude, intensity and duration of
earthquake must be estimated on the basis of available seismic history and geological
information. Assuming successful prediction, even if all the population is evacuated
safely, the structures cannot be saved from earthquakes. Therefore, earthquake resistant
design of a structure is the only answer in minimizing the damaging effects of
earthquakes on structures. For ordinary structures it is not feasible to undertake a special
development of earthquake criteria for each structure, instead, general design criteria are
presented in the code which are applicable to regular structures of more or less uniform
configurations. The design philosophy is developed on the basis of lessons learnt from
the past earthquakes and analytical studies.
Structure based special design criteria are also used besides the use of basic
design criteria such as dams, nuclear power plants etc. In addition to taking into account
the probability of occurrence of earthquakes and expected severity of shaking, these
criteria are also based on considerations of allowable stresses, permissible inelastic strain,
desired factor of safety against collapse, acceptable dam etc.
Basically, the earthquake resistant design and construction is based on (i) the
philosophy of estimation of earthquake loading on a structure and (ii) the philosophy for
earthquake resistant design.
105
a given magnitude) and regional geology and seismotectonic maps (showing stratigraphy
and structural trends, and faults and evidences of movement along faults in recent
geological times, data on soil properties at the site, depth of water-table.
The regional area around the site is sub-divided into tectonic provinces. A
tectonic province is a continuous geological region characterized by relative consistency
of geological structure and seismo-tectonic characteristics. All the seismogenic faults and
tectonic structures should be identified. As many earthquakes as possible will be
associated with the seismogenic faults and tectonic structures. Occurrence rates (in time
and space) of earthquakes of different magnitudes associated with each tectonic structure
and fault will be estimated. A maximum earthquake potential will be assigned to each
known fault and tectonic structure. Earthquakes, which cannot be associated with, know
faults and. structures should be identified. These earthquakes will be known as Floating
earthquake Maximum earthquake potential associated with each tectonic unit/fault or
tectonic province is assigned. The maximum earthquake potential associated with a
tectonic unit should be moved to a point on the tectonic structure closest to the site. For
the tectonic province adjacent to that in which the site lies, the maximum earthquake
potential should be moved to a point nearest to the site on the boundary of the tectonic
province.
Estimation of earthquake density
Earthquakes release suddenly large energy in a very short time and makes the
ground to vibrate caused by several waves originating from a source of disturbance inside
the earth. The intensity of vibration normally decreases with the increase in distance from
the epicenter.
The earthquake parameters, which influence the earthquake intensity at a site, are
the magnitude of earthquake, epicentral distance and focal depth. The source mechanism
also affects the intensity.
For design purpose the intensity of ground motion is estimated in terms of peak
ground acceleration and its frequency contents. The frequency contents are estimated
based on the predominant periods of ground motion expected at the site. The estimation
of earthquake intensity in the form of peak ground acceleration (PGA) is worked out
from the estimated earthquake parameters for the design earthquake magnitude, focal
depth and epicentral distance using a empirical relationship. The PGA is also defined as
zero period acceleration (ZPA).
106
i. Structures are designed to remain elastic during more frequent moderate size
earthquakes by permitting the increase in permissible stresses, then check
ii. Structures are designed to resist infrequent most severe earthquake allowing
limited damage without collapse, which may occur once in its useful lifetime.
If the following measures are taken to increase the resistance, a structure will
withstand earthquakes more effectively.
i. Integrity of structure: The whole structure should be tied together by earthquake
bands, earthquake framing etc. so as to act as one unit. Proper distribution and
continuity of load bearing structural elements are essential for an integral action
of a structure. The most vulnerable places in various type of construction are its
joints where due to shear and tension, the joints fails. Designing the connections
and details of a structure to be earthquake resistant is almost as important as
checking the overall behaviour of structure. If the strength and ductility of the
connections are not adequate and if the details are not properly made, the structure
as a whole is not likely to display effective seismic performance.
ii. Seismic lateral force-strength ratio: A structure should have a minimum level of
strength and stiffness, smoothly increasing from top to bottom of a structure and
evenly distributed in plan. This distribution is such that the seismic lateral force to
strength ratio is everywhere approximately constant.
iii. Safe construction (no collapse or failure of structure): Brittle structures without
any reinforcement or structures having no seismic resistance provisions fail
suddenly when the seismic force exceeds the strength of the structure. On the
other hand, the steel structure or the reinforced structures do not fail on reaching
the yield level but undergo plastic deformation. Ductile behaviour of structure
should therefore be ensured so that the structure is able to absorb the damaging
earthquake energy without resulting in complete or partial collapse. In weak
column-strong beam structure will result collapse of entire structure because
hinges will form in the columns, which also carry large axial loads. See Fig. I.
Failure of structure may also result from foundation failure and poor structural
design. In general safe construction can be achieved by using
• Strong column-weak girder/beam design.
• The walls must be tied together effectively to avoid separation at the vertical
joints. The roof and trusses must be firmly fixed to the perimeter walls.
• Lateral resisting elements should be present along both the principal axes of the
structure.
• Introducing ductility by providing reinforcements at critical locations / junctions.
107
Fig.1 Failure modes of different beam column arrangement
Therefore construction of a tall flexible structure at a soft soil site where expected
ground motion is of predominantly low frequency is not advisable since a quasi-
resonance situation may arise. At such a site construction of small stiff structure is
advisable. However, cons of tall flexible structures are advisable on rocky sites where
high frequency ground motion is expected.
108
structure itself (i.e. natural frequency of the structure) unlike the forces due to wind,
gravity etc. and therefore the forces generated can be reduced by proper arrangement of
mass and stiffness.
iii. Diverting or absorbing the earthquake energy: Non-conventional design methods
have been evolved to either deflect part of the earthquake force from the structure
or to absorb a part of the earthquake energy in specially designed devices
introduced in the structure so as the remaining earthquake force can be withstood
by the structure without any damage. These are achieved by
a) Base isolation technique, or
b) Introducing energy dissipating devices in a structure or
c) Introducing a combined isol2tion and energy absorbing devices.
This concept of reducing the earthquake forces is based on the above theory of
avoiding quasi resonance where the time period of structure is elongated by introducing a
base isolation system between a structure and foundation. This deflects the earthquake
energy from the structure and only part of it is transmitted to the structure, which can be
resisted by the structure without or with minimum earthquake resistant provisions.
iv. Neutralizing the earthquake forces: In this the building itself respond actively
against earthquakes and tries to control the vibrations. Such buildings are also
known as Dynamic Intelligent Building (DIB). This is achieved by Active Control
System, which consists of sensors to measure structural response, computer
hardware and software to compute control forces on the basis of observed
response and actuators to provide the necessary control forces.
Planning considerations
In the very early stage of planning the type of structure the configuration, basic
materials, and the framing of the structure have to be carefully chosen. These selections
109
result in greatly improved and economical design of a structure and increase the seismic
safety. Following should he taken care as far as possible at the planning stage of a
structure [Code 4326(1976)].
• Proper selection of site : Considerable advantage can be gained by choosing the
best site/spot from the earthquake hazard point of view or the best type of
structure for that site. The local geological structures, active faults and the soil
characteristics together with the economic and social consequences of destructive
earthquakes determine the suitable location. Building located on soft soil and near
the steep vertical slope is liable to more damage and such sites should therefore be
avoided.
• Use of proper material properties: Structural materials have their own
performance characteristics and should be selected according to the location and
functions of structure. The earthquake force is proportional to mass and therefore
the building should be as light as possible consistent with structural safety and
fundamental requirements. Roof and upper stories of buildings should be
designed as light as possible. The material selected should have high strength to
weight ratio, high deformability, and high strength in compression, high tension
and shear strength and reasonable cost. The mortar used should have sufficient
strength. Good quality of construction is insurance for good performance of
building during earthquake.
• Configuration of structure: Irregular configured buildings usually develop
torsion due to seismic forces. Hence, the structural configuration should be as
simple as possible and symmetrical with respect to mass and rigidity so that the
centers of mass and center of rigidity of the structure coincide with each other.
Due to functional change etc. some accidental eccentricity should be considered.
If functional requirements dictate adoption of geometrical asymmetry in the plan
of building, then adjust moments of inertia of shear walls so that the center of
mass and center of stiffness of building coincides. If not, provision should be
made for extra shear due to torsion.
• Stiffness distribution:
Strength in various directions
110
The structure should be capable of resisting earthquake forces about both the
principal directions. This can be achieved by providing shear wall system and/or bracings
to complement the frame’s strength and stiffness along both the axes of the building.
Roof and floor systems should be firmly tied or integrally cast to the perimeter
walls. The floor slabs should be continuous throughout the structure as far, as possible.
Concrete slabs arid support beam should be cast together. The roof trusses should be held
down to walls by bolts. The r.c.c. Rigid slabs should be made continuous with the
perimeter walls.
111
Separation of adjoining structures is required to avoid damage during an
earthquake due to collision when they have different total heights or storey height at
intermediate levels and different dynamic characteristics. Separation or gap should be
more than the sum of dynamic deflection of the two buildings.
• Ductility provision
To avoid sudden collapse of the structures during earthquake and enable them to
absorb energy beyond yield point, the main structural elements and their connections
should be so designed such that the failure is of ductile nature. Ductility enables them to
absorb energy by deformation.
• Damage to nonstructural elements
The nonstructural elements such as partitions, staircase, cladding, door-window
frames etc., which are generally ignored in the analysis, provide much strength to the
structure. Because of damage to these elements lot of energy is absorbed and is the reason
of survival of many structures during earthquakes.
Suitable details have to be planned out for connecting the nonstructural parts with
the structural framing so that the deformation of the structural frame leads to minimum
damage of the non-structural elements.
Infill structure makes the structure rigid, and therefore attracts large force. This
may cause damage in the brittle infill. If it is desired that panel or infill wall should not
act as bracing element, it should be connected to main structure in such a manner so as to
minimize their damage during an earthquake since the repair of these parts is quite costly.
The above arrangements of infill wall will permit considerable deflection of frame
.yet it will be held by the top beam from overturning.
• Projecting parts
Projecting parts such as parapets, cornices, balconies, canopies and chajjas be
avoided as far as possible. Ceiling plaster should not be thicker than 6.0 mm for
reinforced concrete and 12 mm for reinforced brickwork.
• Foundation
Avoid damage to the structure due to foundation failure for buildings founded on
soils liable to liquefy by suitable design considerations. Sandy sand with high water table
has high liquefaction potential. Liquefaction may result tilting, overturning and even
sinking of structures unless they are founded properly taking such an eventualities into
account.
Loose fine sand, silt and expansive clays may give rise to large differential
settlements causing damage to the structures, which they support and should generally be
avoided. Raft foundation in such soil is less vulnerable. The hard ground is suitable to all
types of structures. The entire building should be founded on same type of soil in order to
avoid differential settlement. Avoid construction of buildings on filled in soil or weak
soil, which will consolidate during earthquake resulting in large differential settlements.
112
To avoid large differential settlement of building, ties to the cap/columns should
connect all the individual footings or pile caps in soft soil. The ties and cap should be
designed to take up these forces.
While analyzing for earthquake forces, the structure-soil-foundation interaction
should be considered which might influence significantly the response of structure due to
the deformation of soil-foundation system. The transfer of overturning moments and
forces to foundations requires special attention.
• Other planning considerations
Fire generally follows an earthquake and therefore, buildings shall be constructed
to make them fire resistant in accordance with the provisions of relevant Codes for fire
safety. Equipments should be properly anchored to the floor.
Design considerations
Earthquake load is an occasional load unlike the permanent loads due to self-
weight of (including the fixtures, furniture etc.) and live loads. A fraction of live load is
taken for design depending upon the probability of its presence at the time of earthquake.
For design purposes, it is assumed that the maximum earthquake will not simultaneously
occur with maximum of other occasional forces like wind, floods etc.
The design of less important structure is therefore carried out for self weight etc. and then
the design is checked for infrequent earthquake loads by permitting the increase in
permissible stresses.
The code specifies the use of elastic design (working stress method) permitting an
increase of 33- %% in the normal working stresses in material (concrete, steel, wood etc.)
when effects of earthquake load are combined with other normal dead and live loads.
Allowable bearing pressure in soil is increased whenever the earthquake forces are
considered along with normal design forces. In the ultimate load method of analysis, the
factor for reinforced concrete and steel structures for earthquake condition is taken 1.4
instead of 1.85 under normal condition.
A seismic design of a structure to remain elastic during a future maximum
earthquake, which may or may not occur within the useful life of a structure would be
highly uneconomical. A limited damage due to such an event is therefore allowed without
permitting the collapse of the structure thus ensuring safety against loss of live and
property. It may turnout to be less expensive to repair while allowing limited damage
when hit by an earthquake rather than making the structure earthquake damage proof.
The design shall be safe considering the reversible nature of earthquake forces.
For preliminary design of important structures and for routine structures,
empirical coefficients are used to evaluate the earthquake forces.
The computed eccentricity should be increased by some percentage of the
dimension of structure to take into account the accidental eccentricity. Overturning effect
of horizontal load causing tension and compression at the extreme ends should be
adequately considered. Nonlinear dynamic analysis in time domain is carried to establish
the inelastic deformation.
113
Emergency structures such as hospitals, fire stations, water supply, military
Stations and other services such as power houses, broadcasting stations, telephone and
telegraph buildings, cultural treasures, museums and monuments must be designed for
higher safety. Special attention is needed for nursery schools, kinder gardens, primary
schools and lunatic asylums. The community hails, assembly hails, places of worship and
cinema halls should be adequately designed. Other important structures need special
attention are nuclear power plants, gas and oil tanks, chemical factories, gasoline stations
etc. and detailed dynamic analysis should be carried out. For detailed dynamic analysis
the following procedure is adopted.
i. Estimate the design response spectra and its compatible ground motion.
ii. Establish a mathematical model of structure representing its dynamic behaviour
under the earthquake excitations. Interaction between the structure, foundation
and the supporting soil should be considered in the model. Generally spring-mass-
dashpot system is used to represent a structure. Model should be as simple as
possible. Finite element modeling of structures is found to be suitable for many
problems. In deriving a mathematical model, masses are generally lumped at
convenient locations. Stiffness properties are worked out from the effective length
of members, moment f inertia, area of cross section, modulus of elasticity. The
damping values are selected based on experimental values and judgment. The
damping is assumed to be viscous. This assumption is due to the convenience in
tile solution of differential equations.
iii. Determine the first few natural frequencies and mode shapes of vibration.
iv. Determine the time history response either by direct integration or time wise
mode superposition of first few modes.
A detailed design criterion for multistorey building is presented elsewhere [6].
Construction detail
In construction all those features as discussed in planning considerations have to
be taken care as far as possible for improved performance. Strict supervision during
construction should be made
• To ensure use of good quality material, good construction, improved
workmanship and proper curing;
• To ensure certain details particularly at critical sections and junctions in seismic
areas;
• To ensure the ties in the column should be properly hooked. Beam reinforcement
is taken well inside the columns and the beam-column reinforcement is laid
carefully since the detail is very critical;
• To take care that the concrete is well compacted so that there is no honey
combing;
• To see that the end of reinforcement should not be left in any joint and the
overlapping of rein is made at the point of maximum shear;
114
• To ensure that adequate gap is provided at the crumple section;
• To see that the plinth beams or foundation beams are provided;
• To ensure that the tiles or other loose roofing unit are tied properly.
• To ensure that the bricks should be thoroughly wet before laying in good quality
of mortar (not less than 1:6) and the vertical joints in brick masonry are properly
filled up.
• It is desirable to provide sliding joint at one end of the flight of a stair case so as
to permit relative movement and avoid strut action.
115
e) The concept of response reduction due to ductile deformation, or frictional
energy dissipation in the cracks is brought in to the code explicitly by introducing
the response reductions factor in place of the earlier performance factor.
f) Lower bound is specified for the design base shear of buildings based on
empirical estimate of the fundamental natural period Ta.
g) The soil foundation factor is dropped instead a clause introduced to restrict the
one of foundation vulnerable to differential settlements in severe seismic zone.
h) Tensional eccentricity values have been revised upwards in a view of serious
damages observed in building with irregular plan.
i) Modal combination rule in dynamic analysis of building has been revised.
j) Other clauses have been redrafted where necessary for more effective
implementation.
This standard (part 1) deals with the assessment of seismic loads on various structures
and earthquake resistant design of buildings. Its basic provisions are applicable to
buildings; elevated structures; bridges concrete masonry and earth dams; embankments
and retaining wall and other structures
General principles and design criteria is given by the clause 6 of page 12 of the code
1893
6.1.1 Ground motion: The characteristics (intensity duration, etc) of seismic
ground vibrations expected at any location depends upon the magnitude of
earthquake, its depth of focus, distance from epicenter, characteristics of the
path through which the waves travel, and the soil strata on which cause the
structure to vibrate, can be resolved in any three mutually perpendicular
directions.
Earthquake –generated vertical inertia forces are to be considered in
design unless checked and proven by specimen calculations to be significant.
Vertical acceleration should be considered in structures with large spans,
those in which stability is a criterion for design, or for over all stability
analysis of the structures.
6.1.2 The response of the structures to ground vibrations is a function of the
nature of foundation soil; materials form size and mode of construction of
structures and the durations and the characteristics of ground motion. This
standard specifies design forces for structures standing on rocks soils, which
do not settle, liquefy or slide due to loss of strength during ground vibrations.
6.1.3 The design approaches adopted in this standard is to ensure that the
structure posses at least a maximum strength
1. To with stand minor earthquakes which occur frequently, with out damage;
2. To resist moderate earthquake without significant structural damage though
some non structural damage may occur; and
3. Aim that structures withstand major earthquakes without collapse of the
structures
6.1.4 Soil structure interaction: The soil-structure interaction refers to the effects
of the supporting foundation medium on the motion of structure. The soil
116
structures interaction may not be considered in the seismic analysis for the
structures supported on rock or rock -like material.
6.1.5 The design lateral force specified in this standard shall be considered in each
of the two orthogonal horizontal directions of the structures.
6.1.7 Addition to existing structure: Addition shall be made to existing structures
only as follows
An addition that is structurally independent from existing structures shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the seismic requirement for new
structures.
6.3.1.1 Load factors for plastic design of steel structures the following load
combination can be accounted for
1) 1.7(DL+LL)
2) 1.7(DL+EL)
3) 1.3(DL+LL+EL)
6.3.1.2 Partial safety factors for limit state design of prestressed concrete and RCC
structures
1) 1.5(DL+LL)
2) 1.2(DL+LL+EL)
3) 1.5(DL+EL)
4) 0.9DL+1.5EL
117
a) Regular buildings: Those greater than 40m in height in zones IV and V, and those
greater than 90m in height in zone II and III.
b) Irregular buildings: All framed buildings higher than 12m in zone IV and V, and
those greater than 40m in height in zones II and III.
7.8.2 the dynamic analysis can be carried out in the following methods
7.8.3 Time history method: Time history method of analysis, when used, shall be based
on an appropriate ground motion and shall be performed using accepted principles of
dynamics.
7.8.4 Response spectrum method: Response spectrum method of analysis shall be
performed using the design spectrum or by site- specific design spectrum.
7.8.4.1 Free vibration analysis: Undamped Free vibration analysis of the entire building
shall be performed as per established methods of mechanics using the appropriate masses
and elastic stiffness of the structural systems, to obtain natural periods (T) and mode
shapes (φ) of those of its modes of vibration that need to be considered.
4. GENERAL PRINCIPLES:
4.1 Lightness: Since EQ force is a function of a mass; the building shall be as light as
possible.
118
4.5 Strength in various directions: The structure shall be designed to have a adequate
strength against EQ effects along both the horizontal axes.
4.6 Foundations: The structure shall not be founded on such loose soils, which will
subside or liquefy during an EQ, resulting in a large differential settlement.
4.7 Ductility: The main structure elements and their connection shall be designed to have
a ductile failure.
4.8 Damage to nonstructural parts: Suitable details shall be worked out to connect the
non-structural parts with structural framing.
4.9 Fire safety: Fire frequently follows an EQ and therefore, building shall be
constructed to make them fire resistant in accordance with provisions of the following
Indian standards for the fire safety , as relevant: IS 1641; 1988, IS1642;1989, IS
1643;1988, IS 1644:1988, and IS 1646:1986.
5 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FEATURES:
5.3 FOUNDATIONS:
5.3.2 The sub grade below the entire area of the building shall preferable be of the same
type of soil.
5.3.3 loose fine sand, soft silt and expansive clays should be avoided. Or raft foundation,
pile taken to the hard stratum can be used.
Sand piling, soil stabilization
5.3.4 Isolated footings for columns
5.4 Roofs and floors: Corrugated iron or asbestos sheets shall be preferable
5.4.2 Pent roofs: all roof trusses shall be supported on RCC or reinforced brick works
band.
119
TYPES OF CONSTRUCTIONS
8.5 Framing of thin load bearing walls: Load bearing walls can be made thinner than
200 mm say 150 mm inclusive of plastering on both sides.
9.1 Precast RCC roof/floor: The nominal width varies from 300mm to 600mm, its
height from 100mm to 200mm
9.1.1 Precast RCC cored unit roof or floor: the unit is a RCC component having a
nominal width of 300mm to 600mm and thickness of 130mm to 150mm having to
circular core of 90mm dia throughout the length of the unit.
9.1.2 Precast RC plank and joint scheme for roof/floor: max 1.5m and 300mm width.
120
9.1.5 Precast RCC waffle unit roof/floor: lateral dimension up to 1.25m and depth
depending upon the span of the roof / floor to be covered, the min thickness shall be
35mm
10 Timber constructions:
10.1 Timber has a higher strength per unit weight and is therefore very suitable for E.Q.
resistant construction.
10.2 Timber construction shall be restricted to two storeys
10.3 Safety against fire should be considered mainly.
10.5 Foundations:
10.5.1 Timber construction preferably starts above the plinth level, the portion below
being in masonry.
It can be connected to foundation in two ways. (As shown in Fig 31)
121
Loading in nature is not truly periodic.Also,the magnitude of the loads in
subsequent cycles may not be the same. Further, purely dynamic loads do not occur in
nature, only combinations of static and dynamic loads occur.
Some soils increase in strength under rapid cyclic loading while saturated sands or
sensitive clays may lose strength with vibration. The behavior of soils in earthquake will
discussed under the following 3 sub-headings
1. Settlement of dry sands
2. Liquefaction of saturated cohesionless soils
3. Dynamic design parameters of soil (shear modulus damping coefficient)
122
has been developed for liquefaction potential. If liquefaction is likely to be a hazard the
use of deep foundations or piling may be necessary in order to avoid unacceptable
settlement or foundation failure during an earthquake. In most cases specialist advice on
liquefaction should be taken.
Laboratory techniques:-
i. Resonant column test
ii. Ultrasonic pulse test
iii. Cyclic simple shear test
iv. Cyclic torsional simple shear test, and
v. Cyclic triaxial compression test.
123
a) Fixed – free:
b) Free– free:
c) Fixed –partially restrained:
(ii) Ultra sonic pulse test:
The theory of ultrasound is similar to that of audiable sound. Sound is the result
of mechanical disturbance of a material that is a vibration. Ultrasonic pulsars of either
compression or shear waves can be generated and received by suitable piezoelectric
crystals. Using elastic theory, a relationship between the speed of propagation and wave
amplitude of these waves and certain properties of the media through which they are
traveling can be determined as follows.
E=ρ v2c (1+ μ)(1-2 μ)/(1- μ);
G= ρv2s;
μ=(1-0.5(vc / vs)2) / (1-(vc / vs)2);
δ=(2.302/n) * log10(A0/An);
Where
E = young’s modulus;
ρ =mass density;
vc =velocity of compression wave;
μ =Poisson’s ratio;
G =shear modulus;
vs =velocity of shear wave;
δ = logarithmic decrement
A0= initial value of amplitude;
An= amplitude after n oscillations;
124
Relative density in case of cohesion less soils; consistency limits, water content
and state of disturbance in cohesive soils.
Initial static stress level i.e sustained stress
Magnitude of dynamic stress
No. of pulses of dynamic load
Frequency of loading
Shape of wave and form of loading
One directional or two directional loading
All the factors listed above can be studied lucidly on a triaxial setup.
FIELD TESTS:-
Field methods generally depend on the measurement of velocity of waves
propagating through the soil or on the response of soil structure systems to dynamic
excitation. The following methods are in use for determining dynamic properties of soil.
i. Seismic cross-borehole survey
ii. Seismic up-hole survey
iii. Seismic down-hole survey
iv. Vertical block resonance test
v. Horizontal block resonance test
vi. Cyclic plate load test
vii. Standard penetration test
In this method, the receiver is placed at the surface, and shear waves are generated
at different depths within the borehole. The major disadvantage in seismic up-hole survey
is that it is more difficult to generate waves of the desired type.
In this method , seismic waves are generated at the surface of the ground near the
top of the borehole , and travel times of the body waves between the source and the
receivers which have been clamped to the bore hole wall at predetermined depths are
obtained. The main advantage of this method is that low velocity layers can be detected
125
even if trapped between the layers of greater velocity provided geophone spacing are
close enough.
This test is used for the determining the values of coefficient of elastic uniform
compression, young’s modulus and damping ratio of the soil. According to IS-5249:
1984, a test block size 1.50 x 0.75 x 0.70 m is cast in M15 concrete in a pit of plan
dimensions 4.50 x 2.75 m and depth equal to the proposed depth of foundation.
Foundation bolts should be embedded in to the concrete block at the time of casting for
fixing the oscillator assembly. The line of action of the vibrating force should pass
through the center of gravity of the block. Two acceleration displacement pickups are
mounted on the top of the block such that they sense the vertical motion of the block.
The cyclic plate load test is performed in a test pit dug up to the proposed base
level of foundation. The equipment is same as used in static plate load test. Circular or
square bearing plates of mild steel not less than 25mm thickness and varying in size from
300 to 750mm with chequred or grooved bottom are used. The test pit should be at least
five times the width of the plate.
To commence the test , a seating pressure of about 7Kpa is first applied to the
plate. It is then removed and dial gauges are set to read zero. Load is then applied in
equal cumulative increments of not more than 100Kpa or of not more than one fifth of the
estimated allowable bearing pressure. In cyclic plate load test ,each incremental load is
maintained constant till the settlement of the plate is completed .The load is then released
to zero and the plate is allowed to rebound . The reading of final settlement is taken . The
load is increased to next higher magnitude of loading and maintained constant till the
settlement is complete , which again is recorded . The load is then reduced to zero and the
settlement reading is taken . The next increment of load is then applied . The cycles of
unloading and reloading are continued till the required final load is reached. From these
data ,the load intensity versus elastic rebound is plotted ,and the slope of the line is co-
efficient of elastic uniform compression.
Cu = P / Se (in KN/m3)
Where,
P = Load intensity ,(KN/m2)
Se = Elastic rebound corresponding to P. (in m)
126
The SPT is the most extensively used in-situ test in India and many other
countries. These test is carried in a bore hole using a split spoon sampler as per IS :2131-
1981.
In the seismic zones, the retaining walls are subjected to dynamic earth
pressure, the magnitude of which is more than the static earth pressure due to ground
motion. Since a dynamic load is repetitive in nature there is a need to determine the
displacement of the walls due to earthquakes and their damage potential. This becomes
essential if the frequency of dynamic load is likely to be closed to the natural frequency
of the wall –backfill-foundations- base soil systems. This essentially consists in writing
down the equation, motion of the system under free and forced vibrations. This requires
the information on the distribution of back fill soil mass and base soil mass participating
in vibrations .It is often difficult to assess these. Therefore, more often, pseudo-static
analysis is carried out for getting dynamic earth pressure. In this method, an equivalent
static force replaces the dynamic force.
PSEUDO-STATIC METHOD:
127
caused by the earthquake in the wedge ABC1 .The corresponding inertial forces are
W1.ah/g horizontally and W1.av/g vertically , W1 being the weight of wedge . During the
worst condition W1.ah/g acts towards the fill and W1.av/g acts vertically over either in the
downward or upward directions. Therefore the direction that gives the maximum
increasing earth pressure is adopted in practice.
Weight W1 and the inertia forces W1 .αh and ± W1 . αv can be combined to give a
resultant W ,where
The direction of all the three forces W, P & R are known at the magnitude of only one
force W is known .The magnitude of the other forces can be obtained by considering the
force polygon.
Mononobe & okabe (1929) gave the following relation for the computation of dynamic
active earth pressure.
Where - (KA) dyn is co-efficient of dynamic active earth pressure and given by
Mononobe & Okabe (1929) gave the following relation for the computation of
dynamic Passive earth pressure .
Where - (KP) dyn is co-efficient of dynamic passive earth pressure and given by
128
Bearing failure ≥2.0 ≥3.0
Slip failure ≥1.3 ≥1.5
Problem:
A 6m height retaining wall with back face inclined 20o with vertical retains
cohessionless backfill (Φ = 33o,γ=18 kN/m3,δ = 20o).The backfill surface is sloping at an
angle 10o to the horizontal ,if the retaining wall is located in a seismic region(αh=0.1)
determine the total static and dynamic active earth pressure.
Solution:
Static active earth pressure:
=168.42KN/m
=5.440(+αv) or 60 (-αv)
(PA) dyn = 0.5 γ H2 {(1± αv) cos2 (Φ-Ψ –α)/(cosΨ. Cos2α.cos (δ + α +Ψ)}*
For Ψ=5.440
For Ψ=60
129
130