Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARCHITECTURE
PROGRAMMING
Pieper OBrien Herr Architects (POH) is excited to be selected as one of the finalist for the State Judicial Complex.
Our approach is unique. POH delivers a combination of professional expertise as dictated by the needs of our
clients, therefore, our design will reflect your vision. Our commitment to innovative justice design, trust and client
service combined with our investment in talent and the latest technology keeps us on the cutting edge when offering
cost effective, time-saving solutions to our clients.
As mentioned in our previous submission, we have thoughtfully complimented our team with HDR as our Court
Consultant. Together, we strive for architecture that enhances an organizations function and expresses its vision by
embracing human behavior within the contextual social structure.
PLANNING
We understand the importance of establishing effective team communication and responding to your staff in a
timely manner. Our team is committed to the success of this project; delivering a project that meets your budget
requirements and exceeds your schedule goals.
POH offers GBA, GSFIC, the Judiciary and its constituents:
INTERIORS
Our A Team -- a project team with a proven track record working together; no learning curve
necessary.
The success of multiple courts projects.
Comprehensive expertise in state-of-the-art justice facilities.
Leading technology BIM, SketchUp, 3D Modeling, Real-Time Energy Modeling, etc.
Award-winning design talent responsive to the unique needs of each client, site and program.
The utilization of sustainable building practices as a firm objective.
Proven relationships with our consultants and teammates.
An established relationship with GSFIC on successful projects.
One of our design Principals sits on the GSFIC Contracts Alliance Committee; therefore, we have a
thorough understanding of the contracting process and expectations.
A trusted partner.
We cannot stress enough our commitment to deliver a high quality project the State of Georgia. All projects,
regardless of size or type, have the full attention of our Principals throughout the entire lifecycle. We look forward to
the opportunity to present our team and qualifications in person.
GRAPHICS
Sincerely,
with
Court Consultant
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Why would you choose Pieper OBrien Herr Architects (POH) for this very important State project?
Proven Team
Pieper OBrien Herr Architects (POH) and our team of consultants has a proven track record working
together. Our proposed team designed and constructed the 231,000-SF, 7-story Cobb County Superior
Court. Collectively, we have completed over 75 court projects, representing 750 courtrooms, and over 11
million square feet of court and justice related spaces.
Your primary point of contact will be Earl Smith, Assoc. AIA. He has the authority to make decisions
regarding the design team performance and construction decisions that may arise throughout the lifecycle
of the project.
Design Philosophy
POH is committed to an interactive design partnership. Our designs are a direct result of the clients
interaction and design direction. The Georgia Judicial Complex will be the most significant project on Capitol Hill (after the Capitol
itself) and it needs to represent concepts such as balance, strength, longevity, trust and order. Our team is a champion of constant
communication to understand the clients needs and to integrate
the design with the right technological dialogue during design.
We are known for having long been advocates of the charrette
process. A charrette is typically an intense design work session
in a team-building environment with owners representatives and
staff that facilitate the flow of information and the development
of solutions. Depending upon your needs and project
circumstances, our team will convene charrette workshops at
close intervals with the end-user team. POH does not utilize a
signature style. Our buildings are a direct reflection of each
client we work with and demonstrate the values and aspirations of
the individual communities in which they reside.
Innovative Technology
POHs use of computer aided design has, for many years, included the full use of
Building Information Modeling (BIM), a digital representation of the physical and functional
characteristics of a project that offers the promise of better, faster and less costly
construction results. BIM allows the entire project team to develop a project virtually
before hard construction dollars are experienced and make adjustments that improve
both the design and construction sequencing of the project. Additionally, POH utilizes
the latest real-time energy modeling software. The power of the tool allows the firm to
test various design strategies, such as building orientation, percent of glazing, daylighting
and sunshades at the very earliest stages of the design process. With this program we
can provide quantitative data that confirms the design decisions we make will reduce the
energy used and save on operational costs.
Page 2
with
Court Consultant
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Cost Effective Design
POH considers the design phase to be critical for controlling quality and construction costs, as
well as avoiding problems during construction. It is during the design phase that the crucial
decisions are made that will provide the direction, budget adherence, schedule and quality of the
project and, how the project will be best managed. We explore options for economic and quality
considerations, and make adjustments without negative impact as we work closely with the
Construction Management Team.
POH recognizes the importance of schedule management and prides itself in its ability to meet
schedules on major projects with complex design options. We utilize various methodologies to
maintain the project schedule throughout the course of the project. We meet the schedule by the
use of strong leadership, complete documentation and clear objectives at every single phase of
the project. Over the past 43 years, POH Architects has established a reputation for delivering
comprehensive professional services, based not only upon our ability to listen to what the client
wants, but to effectively respond to those wants, and to make sure that the client understands
how their requirements will impact the projects schedule. At the beginning of the project, we work
closely with the Owner and our consultants to review the proposed project schedule. Critical
milestones for each phase are established, with sufficient time allowed for reviews by the Owner.
We will coordinate our schedule with your availability. We will agree upon the schedule
and adhere to it.
We are committed to our clients in the pursuit of sustainable buildings. Over one-third of
our architectural staff are LEED Associate Professionals, and while we have designed many
LEED recognized projects, we strive to make sustainable decisions on every project. The
Cobb County Superior Courthouse is one of the first and largest LEED Gold Certified
Courthouses in the Southeast.
We understand this project is subject to the requirements of the Energy Efficiency &
Sustainable Construction Act. We are familiar with the Georgia Peach rating systems.
We are currently working on projects with GSFIC incorporating the Georgia Peach Green
Building Rating System.
In closing, we are committed to you and this monumental project for the State of Georgia. Our
experienced team brings the resources necessary to design the most efficient and functional
facility, taking into consideration the needs for the next several decades. This is a unique
building, which presents exceptional opportunities and are sensitive to the complex relationships
that exist among all of the stakeholders. It is imperative that your design partner be experienced
specifically in courthouse design and effective courts planning - We are that Partner.
Page 3
with
Court Consultant
Tim Milam, PE
Don Sheffield, PE
Jordan & Skala Engineers
MEP/FP Engineering
Page 1
with
Court Consultant
CA Phase
CD Phase
DD Phase
Conceptual
Design
100%
SD Phase
Program
Validation
Average
Weighted %
Name
Earl Smith
Company
POH
Role
Project Manager
Anthony Turpin
POH
Principal-in-Charge
75%
75%
75%
75%
75%
40%
56%
POH
Project Executive
75%
75%
75%
50%
25%
20%
35%
Chuck OBrien IV
POH
Project Designer
40%
100% 100%
50%
20%
10%
31%
Johnny Hembree
POH
Principal - Interiors
75%
75%
40%
40%
35%
10%
27%
Tom Vandeveer
HDR
Court Specialist
75%
75%
40%
40%
35%
10%
27%
Mike Brenchley
HDR
QA/QC
20%
35%
50%
65%
75%
20%
37%
David Boswick
HDR
Program Validation
100%
75%
10%
10%
10%
10%
19%
PES Engineers
Structural PIC
0%
20%
40%
40%
20%
20%
23%
Thomas Szewczyk
PES Engineers
Structural PM
0%
35%
75%
75%
75%
65%
63%
Greg Delaney
Civil Engineering
0%
20%
40%
40%
20%
20%
23%
David Patterson
Landscape Architect
0%
35%
75%
75%
75%
55%
58%
Tim Milam
Electrical Engineer
0%
35%
75%
75%
75%
65%
63%
Don Sheffield
Mech/Plumb Engineer
0%
35%
75%
75%
75%
65%
63%
Jorge Gomez
J&A Engineering
Security Consultant
0%
50%
75%
75%
75%
65%
63%
Susan Smith
0%
30%
55%
65%
75%
20%
36%
William Broadnax
Energy Ace
0%
30%
55%
65%
75%
20%
36%
45
69
76
98
141
506
934
5%
7%
8%
10%
15%
54% 100%
Sustainability Consultant
Page 2
with
Court Consultant
Earl Smith
Anthony Turpin
In order to facilitate this process, POH has designed the management of our firm
to allow for active Principal involvement in the execution of our projects, not just
as figurehead roles. We want to be your partner. Anthony Turpin and Charles
OBrien III are also very active leaders throughout the project and will support all
efforts and decisions made by Earl. He has the authority to make daily decisions
regarding the design team performance and construction decisions that may arise
during the construction phase. POH cultivates a very collaborative and teamoriented environment, giving Earl direct access to all the expertise the firm has to
offer.
Page 3
with
Court Consultant
Education
Bachelor of Science in Architecture, Ohio State University, 1973
Attended Masters Program at Ohio State University
Registrations
Registered Architect, GA, CA, CO, IL, KY, LA, MD, MA, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OH, PA, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV
Certified by NCARB
Registered Interior Designer, TX
Affiliations
American Institute of Architects (AIA)
United States Green Building Council (USGBC)
Page 4
with
Court Consultant
Education
Master of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1988
Bachelor of Science, Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1983
cole Nationale Suprieure des Beaux-Arts, 1982-83
Young Harris College, 1978-9
Registrations
Registered Architect, GA, RI, IA
Certified by NCARB
Affiliations
National Association of Court Management (NACM)
American Institute of Architects (AIA)
United States Green Building Council (USGBC)
Georgia Municipal Association (GMA)
with
Court Consultant
Education
Bachelor of Design, Architecture, University of Florida, 1983
Attended Georgia Institute of Technology Masters Program
Affiliations
American Institute of Architects (AIA)
Construction Managers Association of America (CMAA)
United States Green Building Council (USGBC)
Page 6
with
Court Consultant
Education
Bachelor of Architecture, Auburn University, 1994
Registrations
Registered Architect, State of Georgia
Certified by NCARB
LEED Accredited Professional
Page 7
with
Court Consultant
Relevant Experience
Johnny has over 20 years of architectural experience (over 17 years with POH), bringing a diverse background
in project types. He is a Principal of the firm and oversees the firms Interior Design Studio. He brings a
proven ability to manage large, technically complex projects. He directs the day-to-day progress of the design
and construction according to the budget, quality of design, and schedule and provides the Owner with a
single-point of contact throughout all phases of the project.
Education
Bachelor of Architecture, Louisiana Tech University, 1989
Structural Masonry Inspector, Alabama Masonry Institute, 1995
Registrations
Registered Architect, GA, AL, DE, FL, ID, MN
Registered Interior Designer, NCIDQ Certification #019575
Certified by NCARB
LEED Accredited Professional
Page 8
with
Court Consultant
Education
University of Southern California, Master of Business Administration, 1981
University of Southern California, Bachelor of Science, Architecture, 1975
Registrations
Registered Architect, GA, VA, CA, DC, NC, PA
LEED Accredited Professional
Page 9
with
Court Consultant
with
Court Consultant
Education
Master of Architecture, University of Illinois 1990
Bachelor of Urban Planning, University of Cincinnati 1986
Registrations
LEED Accredited Professional, United States National Registration
Registered Architect, IL
Affiliations
American Correctional Association
American Jail Association
National Sheriffs Association
Page 11
with
Court Consultant
with
Court Consultant
Tom has over 8 years of experience working on GSFIC and GBA projects.
Relevant Experience
United States Bankruptcy Court, Building #0NC2082, Greenville, NC (with POH Architects)
28,000-SF, two-story Bankruptcy Court building housing a main lobby, Bankruptcy Clerk, Bankruptcy Administration space,
Bankruptcy Judge Chambers, U.S. Marshalls office, Circuit Judge Chambers, Courtroom, and Courtroom Support. The
structure consisted of a steel frame with steel bar joist roof framing with metal deck roof sheathing, reinforced slab-on-grade
and composite steel elevated floors with concrete slab and tilt-up concrete panels with think brick supported on a shallow
foundation system.
Gwinnett County Justice and Administration Center Phase I, Lawrenceville, GA (with POH Architects)
This $70 million project consists of two phases. Phase I is the design of a 1,500 space parking deck to relieve current parking
shortages and accommodate added vehicles brought to the site due to expansion. Phase II will be the 180,000-SF Justice
wing addition with new Courtrooms, Judges suites, deliberation area, secure Judges parking, inmate holding and Jury
assembly.
Education
Bachelors of Science in Civil Engineering, 2002, North Carolina State University
Masters of Science in Civil Engineering, 2004, Georgia Institute of Technology
Registrations
Registered Professional Engineer in: GA, IL
Page 13
with
Court Consultant
Tim Milam, PE
Principal / Director of Electrical Engineering
Jordan & Skala
As managing Principal of Jordan & Skala and Director of Electrical Engineering, Tim has over 25 years of
experience managing complex electrical engineering projects. A licensed professional engineer in multiple states,
he has an extensive design background creating power, lighting, fire alarm and related systems for markets ranging
from municipal, corporate, hospitality and multi-family facilities, to manufacturing and industrial complexes. He has
been instrumental in the firms growth to a nearly 200 person firm. Tim has directly influenced the expansion of
Jordan & Skalas service offerings. In 2000, after years of being frustrated by the industrys habit of poorly coordinated low voltage services,
he developed Jordan & Skalas turnkey low voltage, security and communications practices. Keenly aware that design professionals are
stewards of their clients mission and budget, Tim leads his team to ensure designs are accurate and technically proficient, responsive to
clients performance and budget requirements and are well communicated throughout the design process.
Relevant Experience
Projects listed in Bold were completed with POH Architects
Education
Bachelor of Electrical Engineering, 1989, Georgia Institute of Technology
Registrations
Registered Professional Engineer, GA, AL, AZ, FL, ID, NJ, NC, OR, RI
Current GSFIC Projects
Gwinnett Technical College, N. Fulton Campus, Alpharetta, GA
Ogeechee Technical College, Statesboro, GA
Page 14
with
Court Consultant
Don Sheffield, PE
Principal / Senior Mechanical Engineer
Jordan & Skala
A firm Principal, registered mechanical engineer in 31 States and LEED AP, Don is the Director of Mechanical
Engineering for Jordan & Skala. With over 30 years of experience designing and managing complex
mechanical projects for the judicial, corporate, industiral, hospitality, healthcare, laboratory, retail and residential
markets, Don surmises he has worked with every type of mechanical system available. For over 20 years he
has provided leadership to an expert staff of multi-disciplined consultants and ensured a systematic approach
to coordinating multiple teams and multiple projects. Because Jordan & Skala serves multiple markets and designs for a wide variety
of project types, Don draws on his deep industry experience to connect the right staff to the right client, ensuring design solutions are
customized according to the needs of the project. A flexible and creative problem solver, he has an encyclopedic knowledge of ever
changing code requirements. Additionally, Don is well-versed in energy efficient systems and integrating sustainability goals within design
specifications.
Relevant Experience
Page 15
with
Court Consultant
State Capital Renovations (GBA) utility relocation, east stair drainage improvement, west stair renovation, Atlanta, GA
Several renovation projects at the Georgia State Capitol Building including the current project of design for removal and
rehabilitation of west stairs. Other projects completed include relocating underground utility and restoration of the Capital and
design and construction of a pedestrian thorough fare connecting the Capitol to other State buildings.
254 Washington Street (GBA) Waterproofing - Civil engineering in support of improvements to drainage control and
building waterproofing.
Mitchell Street Pedestrian Plan (GBA) - Civil engineering in support of a master plan to connect Mitchell Street into a
pedestrian connector and corridor for the GBA state office buildings.
Education
Bachelor of Science of Civil Engineering, 1973, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Registrations
Professional Civil Engineer in GA, NC, SC, AL, AK, TN, IL, IN, MS, NV, NH, TX, KS, PA, and Puerto Rico
Page 16
with
Court Consultant
Education
Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, 1993, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana
Registrations
Registered Landscape Architect in GA, AL, MS, NC
Affiliations
Member, American Society of Landscape Architecture (ASLA)
Page 17
with
Court Consultant
Relevant Experience
Since 1985, Jorge has specialized in the area of electronic systems engineering and voice and data structured
cabling design. He has worked in a variety of roles including project manager, electronic system engineer, resident
engineering inspector, and applications engineer. His experience as a designer includes the design of door control,
access control, perimeter security, fire alarm, communications, television signal distribution, and voice and data
systems.
Gwinnett County Justice and Administration Center, Lawrenceville, GA (with POH Architects)
Phase I is the design of a 1,500 space parking deck to relieve current parking shortages and accommodate added vehicles
brought to the site due to expansion. Phase II will be the 180,000-SF Justice wing addition with new Courtrooms, Judges suites,
deliberation area, secure Judges parking, inmate holding and Jury assembly.
Georgia Building Authority 180, Atlanta, GA - Complete refurbishment of a GBA owned building - J&A designed the audio visual,
CATV, and security systems throughout the building. A unique characteristic of this project was the requirement to design an audio
and video link with the Capitol Building to allow all proceeding to be broadcast throughout the GBA 180 Building.
Georgia Building Authority 181 Capitol Plaza, Atlanta, GA - J&A Engineering has been awarded the design of the security
and audio visual systems for the new Capitol Plaza project which is an outdoor assembly space that is being constructed directly
adjacent to the State of Georgia Capitol Building.
Georgia Building Authority Video Upgrade Project - J&A Engineering was awarded the design of video surveillance system
upgrades throughout 34 GBA buildings including the Capitol and Governors Mansion.
Education
Masters in Business Administration, Georgia State University
Bachelor of Industrial Engineering. Georgia Institute of Technology
Electronics Training, Chattahoochee Technical Institute
Registrations
Professional Engineer (PE): GA, AL, FL, SC, NC, TN, MS, MO
Registered Communications Distribution Designer (RCDD) No. 119813
Affiliations
Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) Associate Member - Atlanta Chapter
Building Industry Consulting Services International (BICSI) Member
Institute of Industrial Engineers (IIE)
Page 18
with
Court Consultant
Education
University of Michigan, Master of Science in Urban Planning, 2008
University of Georgia, Bachelor of Science in Landscape Architecture, Focus in Master Planning and Environmental Remediation,
2006
Registrations
LEED Accredited Professional
Green Globes Professional
Page 19
with
Court Consultant
Education
Master of Architecture, 1987, Georgia Institute of Technology
Bachelor of Science (Architecture), 1985, Georgia Institute of Technology
Registrations
Registered Architect, GA RA007453
Certified Professional Estimator (CPE), 2001
Affiliations
American Institute of Architects (AIA)
Page 20
with
Court Consultant
D4- Provide examples of your teams recent experience in similar projects, including the following information:
a. Provide detailed information on the three most recent relevant projects your firm has completed with proposed team members working together.
The same team members that completed the Cobb County Superior Courthouse
are proposed for the State of Georgia Judicial Complex.
Cobb County Superior Courthouse
Marietta, GA
with
Court Consultant
Pieper OBrien Herr Architects was very effective at bridging the usual
gaps between the expectations of the facility user: the Judicial Staff and
the operational and maintenance needs, as well as the budget of the
building owner: Cobb County. This was accomplished by working diligently
with both groups to find areas of compromise and then provide eloquent
solutions to some demanding and difficult issues. We believe our team
first attitude and clever solutions were key to this successful process. We
were able to use our 3D modeling very effectively throughout the design
process to help the user and owner fully understand the project. Both
the user and owner are very pleased with the process that we employed
and the final result: the new Superior Courthouse. The exact same
architectural team members are committed to your project, bringing
practical and elegant solutions to your new Judicial Center.
Exterior Design: The exterior design of this courthouse honors and embraces the design ideals of a former courthouse built in the 1870s
(and later demolished in the 1960s after an extensive fire) while meeting the all-encompassing security demands and the sustainability
goals for the project. The 1870s Romanesque Revival courthouse was a popular design style in the latter half of the nineteenth century for
public buildings throughout the United States. Round arches over the windows and entries, towers with steep roofs and red brick facades
with stone accents were the main features of this style. The teamed worked tirelessly to orchestrate a design aesthetic that embraced the
historical reference and acknowledgement of the 1870s courthouse as requested by the Owner while producing a facility that meets the
security demands required in this era and beyond while exceeding the original sustainability goals for the project. Many of these overlaying
and all encompassing requirements at times seemed impossible to execute, but were solved elegantly by the team.
Sustainability: This very sustainable design was awarded LEED Gold and is one
of the largest courthouses in the Southeast to achieve this distinction.
Page 22
with
Court Consultant
Page 23
with
Court Consultant
Page 24
with
Court Consultant
Page 25
with
Court Consultant
with
Court Consultant
b. Provide a reference from the Client and any other stakeholders (with current phone numbers) familiar with your performance on each
of the above projects.
Page 27
with
Court Consultant
Page 28
with
Court Consultant
Page 29
with
Court Consultant
Page 30
with
Court Consultant
c. List the individuals who served as the Principal Architect/Executive/Director, lead designers, project manager, and other key roles on
the projects. Please note whether these individuals are still employed with your firm. Identify and provide detailed information on projects
in which all or any combination of members of the proposed team has worked together on.
The same team members that completed the Cobb County Superior Courthouse
are proposed for the State of Georgia Judicial Complex.
Fairfax County Courthouse
Page 31
with
Court Consultant
D4- Provide examples of your teams recent experience in similar projects, including the following information:
d. Provide detailed information on the level of experience team members have incorporating energy efficient designs and principles into
past projects.
Pieper OBrien Herr Architects is committed to our clients in the pursuit of sustainable buildings. Over one-third of our architectural staff are
LEED Associate Professionals, and while we have designed many LEED recognized projects, we strive to make sustainable decisions on
every project. We understand this project is subject to the requirements of the Energy Efficiency & Sustainable Construction Act and that
Georgia Peach Certification is required with commissioning.
Georgia Peach Certification
We are familiar with the Georgia Peach rating systems and will incorporate into the overall project when possible.
We are currently working on two projects with GSFIC incorporating the Georgia Peach Green Building Rating System.
The Automated Manufacturing Technology Building at Georgia Northwestern Technical College is currently starting
construction and will achieve Peach certification. The Food Technology Center at the University of Georgia Griffin
Campus is currently in the Schematic Design Phase and will incorporate the Peach Rating system.
Recent POH Sustainable Project
Cobb County Superior Courthouse - LEED Gold certified
The Cobb County Superior Courthouse, completed by all team members, was awarded LEED Golf certification in April of 2011. The project
team surpassed the original goal of LEED Silver to obtain the higher certification, and is the largest LEED Gold Courthouse in the Southeast.
The project documented a 26.7% energy cost savings through the energy model, resulting in 5 LEED points.
The project employed water use reduction methods that yielded a total water savings of 47.5%, earning both WEc3.1 and WEc3.2, as
well as one Innovation and Design point.
21% of the projects materials contained post-consumer and pre-consumer recycled content.
25% of the projects materials were manufactured, harvested, and extracted within 500 miles of the project site.
The project earned an exemplary performance point for EQc4.3: Low Emitting Materials, Carpet Systems. The project met this
threshold by using NSF/ANSI 140-2007 certified carpet for all carpet products installed in the project, and by using Gold level carpet that
represented at least 2.5% of the value of the project; the total Gold value carpet used represented 2.809% of the value of the project.
Awarded - 2012 Project of the Year - Design Build Institute of America - Southeast Chapter
Awarded - First Place in Sustainability - Design Build Institute of America - Southeast Chapter
Recent HDR Sustainable Project
Carbon-Neutral Energy Solutions Laboratory
LEED Platinum certified - Net-Zero Site Energy Use
HDR completed the Carbon-Neutral Energy Solutions Laboratory at the Georgia Institute of Technology. HDR worked with Georgia Tech
on a clear mission for the Carbon-Neutral Energy Solutions Laboratory: carbon neutral net-zero site energy use. The facility sets a new
standard for sustainable design for buildings of its type by optimizing passive energy technologies, reducing electricity loads, and maximizing
the use of renewable energy. It houses a variety of energy research programs requiring large scale (high-bay) and intermediate scale (midbay) capabilities, and the design is intended to express its mission simply, directly and honestly; a no frills design. The laboratory has
achieved LEED-NC Platinum certification.
Page 32
with
Court Consultant
e. Describe the level of experience team members have in the use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) as it pertains to design, clash
detection, virtual walk through, etc.
Building Information Modeling (BIM)
The virtual building model clearly becomes a reference for better
construction. As the shared model evolves over the life of the project, all
stakeholders will benefit from the intelligent project model. The model begins
as a better communication tool. 3D visualizations and animations assist with
the sharing of ideas with the team. The model develops through the design
and construction process to the end of the project, where the model then
becomes a powerful asset for the owner and operator.
The BIM model along with other construction data can be used to support
your facility management. Post-construction information, such as in-wall
photos of systems, linked electronic documents, and electronic O&M
manuals and shop drawings, can also be a part of the model. Facilitys
managers can then use touch-pads to access the model with the goal of
revolutionizing the facility management experience.
BIM models integrate easily into Maximo. The Maximo plug-in automatically
loads the data of the BIM model, graphical backgrounds and database, into the
program to begin the process of maintaining the building. Contractors who are
BIM savvy can easily integrate submittal information and record drawing data
into the program.
Additionally, we have also begun using touch-pads on site in reviewing
construction progress, identifying RFIs, conducting CCA management, and in
some cases, doing commissioning.
The BIM model allows the team to collaborate better than ever before.
Multiple tools are used to allow the team to electronically check for potential
construction collisions. The team regularly runs single-discipline and crossdiscipline interference checks to avoid construction elements such as beams,
ductwork and piping conflicting with one another.
Our team is fully capable of providing BIM Deliverables per the recent GSFIC
guidelines. However, it is important for the entire project team, including the
owner and end-user, to establish the goals to be achieved with the model early
on in the project as the model will be tailored to those goals.
Page 33
with
Court Consultant
Parametric Modeling
We utilize parametric modeling to create an iterative framework based on project variables for studying design variations and alternatives.
Parametric models are useful digital tools for ensuring that the concept is directly related to the established inputs and outputs. A parametric
model of the court module can be used to establish the relationships, areas, and ratios of the space program. In this case, we might use the
model as a tool for a user simulating an experience in the space. The user might be a prospective juror, judge, attorney, or court employee.
As the user changes the project variables important to them, the model is able to show the real-time impacts on the space requirements.
Our team is now able to capture the results of the iterative process and provide clear visualizations demonstrating the cost and benefit of
different solutions.
Data-Driven Design
Together with GBA team members, our team can create a comprehensive strategy to identify goals and detailed, prioritized metrics of
success in order to expedite decision-making throughout the planning and design processa groundbreaking new design approach. We
believe that both qualitative and quantitative features of process and design can be modeled, tested, and validated prior to construction and/
or occupancy (the pre-occupancy evaluation) in order to optimize the goals of your organization and mitigate risk prior to live implementation.
Our team will do this by creating one model that integrates strategic growth projections and programming, parametric modeling, project
schedule, cost estimation, and operational modeling (discrete event simulation).
3-D Modeling
Pieper OBrien Herr Architects is committed to involving our clients throughout the design process using digital 3-D media to better
communicate the clients vision for their project. We find 3-D models a very effective tool for communicating to the client, as well as the entire
project team, the design intent. Starting at the beginning of schematic design, 3-D modeling software is used to study many aspects of the
project. Our 3-D models allow us to effectively communicate components of the design including building mass, scale, proportion, materials,
context, sun shade, and shadow. Through the use of 3-D software our designers are able to efficiently alter the design during schematics to
study and present multiple solutions to the client. Our in-house graphic Design Studio affords us the capability of transferring the design into
a range of visual media including live manipulation of the model, short animations, color elevations, and 3-D renderings. All of these tools are
part of our normal design methodologies and are not additional to our services.
Randy Doub, the Chief Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court stated:
By using 3D computer modeling, we were able to evaluate and
BIM Courtroom Model used for sight line studies
design the proposed courtroom layout with proper sight lines....in
years past, GSA has expended hundreds of thousands of dollars
building physical mock-ups of courtrooms to test sight lines and
courtroom layout. As a result, this Design Intent Development [DID]
workshop saved significant time and money. The DID workshop was
most successful and helpful. As a result, the architects, contractor
and GSA were able to more clearly identify and understand our
courts day to day operations and needs. Not only did this workshop
enhance communication and design but will result in a better
designed courthouse which will serve our court, our public, and
ultimately the taxpayers who foot the bill. GSA would be well advised to utilize the DID workshop concept in future projects. At the end
of the session, all parties signed off on a floor plan and design documents which are nearly complete...There is no doubt in my mind
that the 3 days spent in Atlanta with our court representatives and all involved in this project saved 6 months in planning and design,
not to mention the thousands of dollars saved that would have otherwise been spent on communication back and forth between the
parties had we not met in Atlanta.
Page 34
with
Court Consultant
E. DESIGN PLAN
E1. Provide a statement of your definition of your firms proposed overall role in this project, your anticipated level of management
responsibility and accountability for project concerns. Describe your process for efficiently resolving issues and maintaining the project
commitments while working collaboratively with the GSFIC, Using Agency, and others as applicable. Provide detailed procedures for
routine solving of complex project issues without compromising your team commitments. Provide your proposed methods and plans of
Pieper OBrien Herr Architects is responsible for overall
management of the entire project, leading the design process
through the final completion of the project. We will work
collaboratively with all parties, to develop a program and design
that is tailored specifically to the needs of the State of Georgia
and the Georgia Building Authority. It is our teams intention to
utilize the combined strengths of all our teammates to deliver a
project that exceeds your expectations.
We begin with listening to our client and then leading the team
to the optimal solutions. Our solutions will incorporate the
programmatic requirements of this project, the opportunities
the site has to offer, the desires of the staff, and the attitudes of
the users that will ultimately use this facility, while maintaining
the requirements of GSFIC and GBA. We are committing
four Principals through the entire project process, along with
a strong Project Manager. This commitment will result in a
project team that is responsible and accountable at all times
throughout the design and construction of the project.
We have instituted the use of Newforma Project Center (NPC)
as a working/management tool that reduces risks and saves
time in the management of emails, searches, mark-ups,
meeting minutes, project files, record documents, images,
files transfers, and action items. Additionally during the
construction phase, Newforma streamlines the work processes
for submittals, request for information (RFIs), document
changes, sketch logs, bulletins, addendums, supplemental
instructions, construction change directives, proposal request,
contract changes, contracts, change order proposals, change
orders and punchlists. In the close out of a project Newforma
allows us to streamline access to information via the web and
the publishing of handover and project closeout to all parties
associated with the project.
Issue Resolution Methodology
Communication is the key to successfully solving complex
project issues. We strive to maintain open lines of
with
Court Consultant
right the first time, the design for the Judicial Complex must
satisfy many clients. For the Capitol Hill area, the new Judicial
Complex can enhance the surrounding area, transforming it
to a civic place with a dignified public building, set in a welllandscaped site. Traditionally a generator of economic activity,
the new Judicial Complex can be a catalyst for growth and set
the standards for future development.
For the public and users of the court facilities, the new
courthouse must provide for greater accessibility via a building
organization with clarity of circulation, generous and open
public spaces, and user oriented courts information systems.
The associated development of the site must accommodate
effective traffic circulation and address parking needs. For
the judges and staff, the new Judicial Complex must provide
a secure, pleasant working environment with adequate space
and technology to facilitate their work both today and into the
future. For the State, the new Judicial Complex must be cost
effective in its use of resources - materials, energy, and staff in terms of initial cost as well as life cycle costs.
To successfully achieve these goals, a multitude of
requirements must be understood and many issues addressed.
Your Request for Proposal has asked us to address several
significant issues that are critical to the success any modern
courthouse.
Architectural Design
Across the national landscape, we have witnessed beautiful
courthouses performing badly. Function vs. aesthetics implies
that these are contradictory objectives. We believe this should
not be the case. For a project to be successful, its design must
address the goals and needs of all its clients - the city it resides
in, the public who use it, the staff that work in it and the owner
who pays for it and maintains it. There is a large community
with a stake in the design of all large public buildings. There
are numerous and sometimes conflicting opinions of what
the priorities are. Good urban design, appropriate building
image, high quality accommodation of functions, ability to
adapt to future needs, and cost effectiveness are all parts of a
complicated equation which must be balanced.
Page 36
with
Court Consultant
Incorporating Technology
Adoption of court automation and communications technology
has revolutionized our nations courts. Traditional court facilities
have not been designed to accommodate technology or for
the new generation of integrated building systems. The use of
technology will grow as the judicial system struggles to keep
pace with the demands of a litigious and violent constituency.
The potential efficiencies that can be realized from advances in
technology are tremendous and exciting. On every courthouse
project we have designed in the last five years, technology has
been a prominent part of our scope of services.
The Smart Courthouse Symposium that was hosted by
HDR is one example of how they explore new and emerging
technologies with our clients. They actively participate in all of
the prominent national level conference series to stay current
on new trends and developments. But what is important is how
HDR brings this knowledge to our courthouse projects. On
every courthouse they have designed in the past five years,
technology has been the most important component.
Security
Our approach is to start on day one with a comprehensive
threat assessment involving all the components of the court.
Who is at risk? What is the relative hierarchy of risk? Who
responds to each of these threats? Completion provides a
clear picture of security objectives and strategies. The teams
experience in the design of justice facilities has resulted in an
array of proven security planning principles, which include:
Concentric Planning: a series of concentric circles, each
representing a more secure zone. The outer ring encompasses
the entire site, an area often overlooked. Staff and visitors
require safe access to parking, exterior areas, and the
respective buildings. Typically, site security is best achieved via
good lighting, minimizing blind spots created by structures or
landscape elements, careful placement of sensitive areas away
from streets and unsupervised parking, and an overall site
monitoring system. Vehicular access to and from the site must
be carefully considered.
Page 37
with
Court Consultant
Daylighting Concept
with
Court Consultant
Page 39
with
Court Consultant
Page 40
with
Court Consultant
E3- Provide your proposed timeline covering the scope of design, and a detailed work plan for the project. Each milestone must include
the detailed steps describing the tasks to be done. Describe systems and procedures your firm uses to manage the design schedule.
Describe alternatives that may be explored to shorten the schedule.
The project schedule shown is preliminary, based on assumptions and previous project experiences of similar facilities. Please
understand these dates and milestones have been developed without any input from GBA, GSFIC, or the Judiciary. By accomplishing
these tasks, the CM/GC will be able to begin construction of major building components while the design team is completing
documentation of building enclosure, interior construction, and finishes.
signifies Energy & Sustainable Tasks/Milestones within the Project Timeline.
STATE OF GEORGIA JUDICIAL COMPLEX PROJECT TIMELINE
TASK
DURATION
START
Notice to Proceed
10/13/2014
Contract Negotiations
1 wk
10/13/2014
Programming
45 days
10/20/2014
Review Program
4 wks
10/20/2014
Develop Energy & Sustainable Rating Goals for the Project
1 wk
11/10/2014
Review & Approval with GSFIC/GBA/Judicial
3 wks
11/17/2014
Review Energy & Sustainable Goals Established
1 wk
12/1/2014
Project Kick-off meeting
1 day
12/8/2014
Energy & Sustainable Checklist Finalized
1 day
12/8/2014
Finalize Program Summary
4 days
12/9/2014
Program Summary Approval with GSFIC/GBA/Judicial
1 wk
12/15/2014
Conceptual Design
69 days
12/22/2014
Develop Preliminary Plans/Elevations
3 wks
12/22/2014
Preliminary Energy & Sustainable Analysis (Commissioning Log Issued)
1 wk
1/5/2015
Presentation to GSFIC/GBA/Judicial
1 day
1/12/2015
Refine Scheme
3 wks
1/13/2015
Verification of Energy & Sustainable Analysis
2 wks
1/20/2015
Preliminary Cost Reconciliation (CM/GC)
2 wks
2/3/2015
Finalize Scheme
1 wk
2/17/2015
Review & Approval from GSFIC/GBA/Judicial
3 wks
2/24/2015
Update Cost Reconciliation (CM/GC)
3 days
3/17/2015
GSFIC Backcheck Review
1 wk
3/20/2015
Schematic Design
76 days
3/27/2015
Begin SD Development
3 wks
3/27/2015
Run Preliminary Energy Modeling & Life Cycle Costs
1 wk
4/10/2015
Commissioning Log Update Issued
2 days
4/15/2015
FINISH
10/13/2014
10/17/2014
12/19/2014
11/14/2014
11/14/2014
12/5/2014
12/5/2014
12/8/2014
12/8/2014
12/12/2014
12/19/2014
3/26/2015
1/9/2015
1/9/2015
1/12/2015
2/2/2015
2/2/2015
2/16/2015
2/23/2015
3/16/2015
3/19/2015
3/26/2015
7/10/2015
4/16/2015
4/16/2015
4/16/2015
Page 41
with
Court Consultant
FINISH
4/21/2015
5/14/2015
5/14/2015
5/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/12/2015
5/19/2015
5/22/2015
5/29/2015
6/19/2015
6/26/2015
7/3/2015
7/10/2015
11/25/15
8/14/2015
8/14/2015
8/14/2015
8/17/2015
9/11/2015
9/11/2015
9/21/2015
9/21/2015
9/21/2015
10/1/2015
10/7/2015
10/14/2015
11/4/2015
11/11/2015
11/18/2015
11/25/2015
6/8/2016
1/20/2016
1/20/2016
1/20/2016
12/23/2015
12/30/2015
Page 42
with
Court Consultant
FINISH
1/6/2016
1/27/2016
1/21/2016
2/3/2016
2/10/2016
2/17/2016
1/6/2016
1/13/2016
1/20/2016
2/10/2016
2/17/2016
2/24/2016
3/2/2016
2/17/2016
3/17/2016
3/17/2016
3/17/2016
3/31/2016
4/7/2016
4/18/2016
4/18/2016
5/9/2016
5/18/2016
6/1/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
2/4/2016
1/27/2016
2/3/2016
2/4/2016
1/12/2018
2/18/2016
12/21/2017
10/26/2017
11/23/2017
12/14/2017
Page 43
with
Court Consultant
FINISH
12/14/2017
12/21/2017
1/11/2018
1/12/2018
1/12/2018
1/11/2018
1/12/2018
First is the rapid review and coordination of shop drawings. Time is scheduled in our office as well as our consultants, for shop
drawing review. Budgeting time in this manner assures that submittals proceed to the contractor and the project schedule is
maintained. Additionally, we encourage electronic submissions for easy review and transmission among the project team members
and track these submissions utilizing our Project Management Information software.
Page 44
with
Court Consultant
Secondly, in 1981, we instituted a highly effective punch list or final project review system that provides the contractor with a detailed
set of plans indicating the specific location of the construction deficiency. This allows the subcontractor to focus his attention on
correcting the problem rather than trying to locate it. The bottom line for the contractor and the client is a significant reduction in days
required for corrective work to be accomplished.
We issue RFI responses utilizing our PIM (Project Information Management) software and track and manage these issues on a daily
basis. We provide open communication with the CM/GC with the use of cell phones and smart phone connectivity for emails and data
connectivity.
E5- Provide your plan or approach for applying energy efficient design and principles into the project or any services not specifically
mentioned herein. Explain the relevance of these services to this project and how they benefit the project.
Real Time Energy Modeling
Our Team is passionate about sustainability. To assist in this endeavor,
POH utilizes an energy modeling program called Safaira. Traditional energy
models require dozens (or even hundreds) of inputs before you see results.
Comparisons are often difficult and time consuming to create. This powerful
interactive tool allows the design team to test various design strategies, such
as building orientation, types of glass, percent of glazing and daylighting and
sunshades at the very earliest stages of the design process. The easy-toread charts and graphs assist the team with understanding which strategies
are providing the most optimal performance. In the past, validating decisions
with quantitative data early in the project has been difficult. Traditional energy
modeling is completed towards the end of the design process when changes are
more difficult and cumbersome to incorporate. However, with this program, we
have quantitative data that confirms the early design decisions we are making
will reduce the energy used and save the client operational costs.
As members of United States Green Building Council (USGBC), we believe that the best conceived sustainable facilities should not only
incorporate those green elements that help sustain the environment, but also those that help reduce the total cost of ownership. Proper
planning in the design of a sustainable facility can help an owner meet its environmental goals as well as its business goals.
Page 45
with
Court Consultant
Sustainable Approach
We will employ an Integrated Energy Design process to optimize the sustainable
and energy features of the project. This process includes the following major design
integrated tasks:
Sustainable and energy design collaboration by the project team from project
inception through design and occupancy.
Sustainable and energy program of requirements with established goals (Peach,
Comfort, Energy Target, LEED, operations and maintenance, Life-Cycle-Cost,
Daylighting, etc.)
Team effort that is Owner goal driven.
Pro-Active energy modellng and parametric evaluations of concepts/design
options, during schematic design, design development, and construction
documents.
Post Occupancy follow-up and benchmarking.
Typical energy saving concepts to be considered:
Solar orientation and daylighting optimized
Efficient envelope: optimized insulation, colors, and control and reduce infiltration
Optimized glass U and SC (new glass high light to solar gain ratio)
Energy Efficiency water harnessing and water consumption
Daylighting integration and control
Lower lighting watts per square foot (wsf) interior lighting optimized
Exterior lighting advancements (LED)
High efficiency HVAC equipment Parametric Evaluation of Alternate HVAC Systems
Lower HVAC fan kw/cfm (minimize duct runs, maximize duct sizes, i.e. low static system)
Designated Outside Air System with Heat Recovery
Enthalpy Heat Recovery
Airside economizer in appropriate climate (carefully consider in humid climate)
Optimize VAV Design with OA and Exhaust Air (Dual Maximum CFM points at boxes)
VFD controls
VRF systems
Reflective roof
Green roof
Optimized Utility Rate Schedules/Options
Life Cycle Comparisons
Establishment of Energy Target (LEED Percent Reduction or Owner Operating Target)
Commissioning
Operations and Maintenance Plan
This integrated approach will benefit the project by developing the optimum sustainable and energy saving concepts meeting the Owners
project goals. This includes the most appropriate and cost effective building systems (envelope, lighting, HVAC, etc.) and operations
parameters (controls, O&M procedures and manuals, etc.). Our goal is to provide the Owner with the best value with respect to building
function, aesthetics and comfort integrated with sustainability and building operating costs.
Page 46