Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARCHITECTS
GUIDELINES
STANDARDS OF
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
METHODSOF COMPENSATION
& SCHEDULE OF FEES
UAP DOC. 208-A
ARCHITECTS
GUIDELINES
STANDARDS OF
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
& SCHEDULE OF FEES
(UAP DOC. 208-A)
ON THE FOLLOWING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
(1) Pre-Design Services
(2) Regular Design Services
(3)
(4)
Full-Time Supervision
(5)
Construction Management
(6)
Post-Construction Services
(7)
Comprehensive Architectural
Services
(8)
Design-Build Services
First Edition
Philippine Copyright @ 2012 by the
United Architects of the Philippines, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
No part of this book may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, without written
permission from the publisher. All should be
addressed to
United Architects of the Philippines, Inc.
53 Scout Rallos St. Brgy. LagingHanda, Diliman, Quezon City
1103 Philippines
www.united-architects.org
CONTENTS
The Virtues of an Architect
UAP-IAPOA Purpose and Objectives
Code of Ethics
PRBoA Resolution
Preface
Acknowledgements
Foreword
Archt. Rozanno C. Rosal, FUAP
UAP National President 2012- 2013
Introduction
Rule I Title, Rationale, Objectives, Policy Statement
and Definition of Terms
Section 1: Title
Section 2: Rationale
Section 3: Objectives
Section 4: Policy Statement
Section 5: Definition of Terms
Rule IIMethods of Compensation
Section 1: Criteria
Section 2: Methods of Compensation
Rule III Schedule of Fees onTypes of Architectural Services
(Matrix of Services)
Section 1: Pre-Design Services
(UAPDoc.201)
Section 2: Regular Design Services
(UAPDoc.202)
Section 3: Specialized Architectural Services (UAP Doc.203)
Section 4: Full-Time Supervision
(UAP Doc.204-A)
Section 6: Construction Management
(UAP Doc. 204-B)
Section 5: Post-Construction Services
(UAPDoc.205)
Section 7: Comprehensive Architectural
(UAP Doc.206)
Services
Section 8: Design-Build Services
(UAPDoc.207)
Section 9: Architectural Design Competition (UAP Doc. 208)
Section 10: Professional Architectural
(UAP Doc.209)
Consulting Services
Rule IV - Regulating and Implementing Body
Section 1: Regulating Board
UAP-IAPOA
Purpose and Objectives
As the Integrated and Accredited Professional Organization of Architects (IAPOA)
under the Architecture Act of 2004 (R.A. 9266), the United Architects of the Philippines
(UAP) has the following purpose and objectives:
a) To cooperate with the Board of Architecture (BOA), Professional Regulation
Commission (PRC) and other government agencies in discharging its
functions, duties and responsibilities as the Integrated and Accredited
Professional Organization of Architects(IAPOA) as follows:
1) Nomination to the vacant positions to the Board of Architecture (BOA);
2) Responsibility of preparing the program of Continuing Professional
Development (CPD);
3) Endorsement of practice of foreign nationals to be issued temporary
special permit;
4) Recommendation of compliance with liability insurance under a temporary
special permit;
5) Monitoring compliance and endorsing to/filing a complaint with the Board
of Architecture (BOA) and /or Professional Regulation Commission (PRC)
for violation of the R.A. 9266 and its Implementing Rules and Regulations
(IRR), code of ethics, standards of professional practice and other policies
of the Board and of the Commission and with other agencies for violations
of other relevant laws, regulations and the like; and
6) Some other functions, duties and responsibilities as may be prescribed by
the Board of Architecture (BOA).
b) To establish an appropriate organizational structure that will serve best the
interest of its individual members and providing for among others a
democratic process of election;
c) To ensure good governance in all matters pertaining to the organization;
d) To ensure active participation of all PRC-BOA registered architects in this
Integrated and Accredited Professional Organization of architects (IAPOA);
e) To establish and promote the highest standards of ethical conduct and
professional excellence in the practice and service of architecture, through
strict adherence with the laws and codes that protect and govern it;
f) To maintain the highest standards of architectural education and practice,
through the conduct research in architecture and architecture related
subjects for the academic curricula in architecture and the continuing
professional development program;
g) To cooperate and coordinate with other local/national and international
organizations in the field of architecture, environmental design and other field
of arts, science and technology to ensure participation of UAP global
concerns; and
h) To cooperate and coordinate with other allied professions, trade and industry
in developing progressive ideas in architecture and environmental concerns
as well as their practical application for the welfare of the community and
country.
UAP Articles of Incorporation as amended and improved by SEC on Jan. 12,
2006.
CODE OF ETHICS
I shall work with the general objective that my duty is not only to myself, but also to
my country and God.
I shall uphold the ideas and follow the norms of conduct of a noble profession and
endlessly endeavour to further its just ends.
I shall humbly seek success not through the measure of solicited personal publicity, but
by industrious application to my work, strive to merit a reputation for quality of service
and for fair dealing.
I shall ask from all, fair remuneration for my service while respecting and asking no
profits from any other source.
I shall hold the interest of my Client over and above any self-interest for financial
returns.
I shall exercise
disinterestedness.
my
professional
prerogatives
always
with
impartiality
and
I shall avoid any private business investments or venture which may tend to influence
my professional judgment to the detriment of the trust placed upon me.
I shall inspire by my behaviour the loyalty of my associates and subordinates and take
upon me the mentorship of the aspirants to the profession.
I shall confine my criticisms and praises within constructive and inspirational limits and
never resort to these means to further malicious motives.
I shall dedicated myself to the pursuits of creative endeavour towards the goal of
enlightened Art and Science, generously sharing with colleagues, friends and strangers
alike the benefits of my experience and expertise.
PREFACE
On October 25, 1965, the Architects National Code was approved and adopted by the
three (3) architectural organizations existing at that time, namely; the Philippine Institute
of Architects (PIA), the League of Philippine Architects (LPA) and the Association of
Philippine Government Architects (APGA).
On January 15, 1975, the three (3) architectural organizations were integrated intoone
association called the United Architects of the Philippines (UAP).
The UAP, in response to the need to review and update the documents in order to be
more responsive to the practice of the Profession in the Philippines prepared and
divided the Architects National Code into two divisions namely:
1. Code of Ethical Conduct
and
2. Standards of Professional Practice
On July 21, 1979, the Architects National Code was approved by the UAP National
Board of Directors and on September 24, 1979, the Professional Regulation
Commission (PRC) through the Board of Architecture (BOA), adopted the Architects
National Code as part of the Rules and Regulations to which all practicing architects
shall conform in the performance of their duties and obligations.
After 28 years on August 18, 2007, the UAP National Board of Directors headed by
Archt. Medeliano T. Roldan, Jr., FUAP then UAP National Presidentpassed a Board
Resolution approving the UAP Proposal No.04 with the intent of creating a Special
Committee to handle all matters relating to the compilation, review, evaluation,
amendments and revision of the Documents on Standards on Professional Practice
and related UAP Documents including Guidelines on Corporate Practice of
Architecture. Subsequently on August 21, 2007, Executive Order No. 0708-006 was
passed creating and establishing a Special Committee on Standards of Professional
Practice to comply with the provisions of Republic Act 9266 (the Architecture Act of
2004) and Batas PambansaBlg. 68 (the Corporate Code of the Philippines) and other
related rules, regulations and codes, and to respond to the increasing public and users
demand, the evaluation of new standards of regulated professional practice, the
advancement of technology and the enactment of new laws.
The Ad-Hoc Committees on Standards of Professional Practice during one of their
meetings unanimously agreed to consolidate all the Architects Compensations and
Schedule of Fees into one (1) document, then UAP National President Archt. Ana S.
Mangalino-Ling, FUAP, Apec Architect mandated and tasked the committee headed by
Archt. Norberto M. Nuke, FUAP, LIKHA, Apec Architect to prepare the document to be
presented to the UAP National Board of Directors for approval.
The title ARCHITECTS GUIDELINES on Standards of Professional Practice,
METHODS OF COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE OF FEES UAP DOC. 208-A was
adopted from the documents on Standards of Professional Practice, the 1979 UAP
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Committee on Standards of Professional Practice, METHODS OF COMPENSATION & SCHEDULE
OF FEES UAP DOC. 208-A would like to acknowledge the following persons for their contribution in
making the ARCHITECTS GUIDELINES possible:
Committee on Professional Practice 1979
Chairman
Felipe M. Mendoza, FUAP, LIKHA, Apec Architect
Vice Chairman
Froilan L. Hong, CUAP, Apec Architect
Members
Otilio A. Arellano, FUAP
Cesar V. Canchela, FUAP, LIKHA, Apec Architect
Antonio S. Dimalanta, FUAP
Cristina R. Fugoso, FUAP
Geronimo V. Manahan, CUAP, LIKHA, Apec Architect
Norberto M. Nuke, FUAP, LIKHA, Apec Architect
Rebecca V. Tobia, CUAP
Professional Regulation Commission 1979
Commissioner
Eric C. Nubla, FUAP
Ass.Comm.
Atty. NumerianoTanopo Jr.
PRC-Board of Architecture 1979
Chairman
Anastacio R. Bernal, FUAP
Members
Norberto M. Nuke, FUAP, LIKHA, Apec Architect
Cresenciano C. De Castro, FUAP
UAP Document 202 Group 2004
Chairperson
Corazon F. Tandoc, FUAP
Members
Maria Elena C. Cayanan, FUAP
Daniel C. Go, FUAP, Apec Architect
Jose Siao Ling, FUAP, Apec Architect
Raul R. Locsin, FUAP
Simeon C. Tan, FUAP
Domingo LL. Tablizo, Jr. FUAP
Committee on Standards of Professional Practice (SPP) 2005-2007
Honorary Chairman Edric Marco C. Florentino, FUAP, Apec Architect
Chairman
ProsperidadC. Luis, FUAP, Apec Architect
Members
Norberto M. Nuke, FUAP, LIKHA, Apec Architect
Edilberto F. Florentino, FUAP, LIKHA, Apec Architect
Froilan L. Hong, FUAP, Apec Architect
Yolanda D. Reyes FUAP, Apec Architect, HAIA
Emmanuel P. Cuntapay, FUAP
Maria Cristina V. Turalba, FUAP
Corazon F. Tandoc, FUAP
Maria Elena C. Cayanan, FUAP
Daniel C. Go, FUAP, Apec Architect
Jose Siao Ling, FUAP, Apec Architect
Angeline T. Chua Chiaco, FUAP, Apec Architect
PRC- Board of Architecture Chairman
EugeneG.Gan, FUAP
Members
Fernando L. Santos, FUAP
Miguel R. Caluza, FUAP
UAP National Board of Directors 2009 2010
Executive Committee
National President
Ana S. Mangalino-Ling, FUAP, Apec Architect
National Executive Vice-President Michael T. Ang, FUAP, Apec Architect
Vice President Area A
EdithaP.De Vera, UAP
National Treasurer
Armando Eugene C. De Guzman III, UAP
National Auditor
Angelito S. Soriano, UAP
Immediate Past National President Ana S. Mangalino-Ling, FUAP, Apec Architect
Chancellor, College of Fellows
Edric Marco C. Florentino, FUAP, ApecArchitect
Regional District Directors
District Director A1a Claudio O. Rillera, Jr., UAP
District Director A1b
Jose P. Gonzaga, UAP
District Director A2a
Reynaldo DC. Abad, UAP
District Director A2b
Melencio D. Manalo, UAP
District Director A3
Alfred Geoffrey C. Carandang, UAP
District Director A4
Donato B. Magcale, UAP
District Director A5
Felicisimo A. Tejuco, Jr., UAP
District Director B1
Annie Corpuz-Pugeda, UAP
District Director B2
Junar P. Tablan, UAP
District Director B3
Jaime A. Pua, UAP
District Director B4
Jaime A. Patalud, UAP
District Director B5
Rommel R. Alanis, UAP
District Director C1
Emmanuel Jesus DR. Avila, UAP
District Director C2
Gil V. Juesna, Jr., UAP
District Director C3
Danilo M. Fuentebella, FUAP
District Director C4
Rony P. De Juan, UAP
District Director D1
Ramonito G. Octaviano, UAP
District Director D2
Noel DS.Querijero, UAP
District Director D3
Ferdinand A. Dumpa, UAP
District Director D4
Trinidad G. Saligumba, UAP
Executive Directors
Commission on Professional Practice
Commission on Education
Commission on Governmental
& External Affairs
Commission on Internal Affairs
Center for Filipino Architecture
Professional Development Commission
Commission on Conventions,
Exhibits & Area Assemblies
PotencianoC.Estanislao,FUAP
INTRODUCTION
There are architects all over the Philippines practising in the seventeen (17) regions of
the country. However, at this point in time, they are uncertain and confused as to what
standards of fees and what manner of payments would apply to the various types of
projects they undertake. To complicate the situation, technology has evolved so fast
that the classification of types of buildings has becomecomplex, and numerous types of
structures have made their appearance in the planning, design and construction scene,
which makes the calculation of charges for professional fees more complicated.
In general, professional fees are project-based, with basic fees computed as a
percentage of construction cost of materials and labor plus incidentals. However, there
are various types of projects and various levels of complexity, and so, guidelines for
computation of professional fees must be produced for such variations in the projects
undertaken by Architects.
Thus, the United Architects of the Philippines is publishing this document entitled UAP
Doc. 208-A: Architects Guidelines on Standards of Professional Practice,
Methods of Compensation and Schedule of Fees, on how Architects would charge
their Clients for services rendered, in order to provide a convenient consolidated
reference for the use of Architects. This document consolidates in onereferencethe
methods of compensation of services found and discussed in the other UAP
documents.
RULE I
SECTION 1: TITLE
This Document shall be known asARCHITECTSGUIDELINES ONMETHODS
OF COMPENSATION AND SCHEDULE OF FEES, UAP DOC.208-A (replacing the
1979 DOC. 208-b)METHODS OF COMPENSATION &THE CONSOLIDATION ON
METHODS OF COMPENSATION & SCHEDULE OF FEES ON ALL TYPES OF
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES.
SECTION 2: RATIONALE
2.1 The urgent need to set the parameters on Architects Guidelines on Methods of
Compensation and Schedule of Fees is paramount to the Architect in the
practice of his profession. This will standardize the ranges for which the Client
will compensate an Architect in direct relation to the value of services that the
Architect provides.
2.2 The professional competence of the Architect must be well established and
adequate to meet the Clients needs and requirements.In order to grow and
progress in his career the Architect must possess the appropriate knowledge
and skills needed to be proactive,he must gained the training, exposure and
relevant experience in order to deliver the project at par to the satisfaction of the
Client.
2.3The purpose of the Architects Guidelines is to complement existing professional
regulatorylaws governing the practice State-regulated, specifically architecture
as governed by R.A. 9266 (The Architecture Act of 2004) and its derivative
regulations, the Code of Ethical Standard, Standards of Professional Practice
and other related laws, policies, rules and regulations approved and
implemented by the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) and/or other
concerned government entities. Therefore nothing in the Guidelinesmust unduly
affect the said laws, policies, rules and regulations, and Architects National
Code (ANC) specifically Codes of Ethical Conduct and Standards of Professional
Practice.
SECTION 3: OBJECTIVES
3.1By law, the Architect must first belicensed and registered by the PRC and UAPIAPOA respectively. As such, the standards andparameters, to which the
Architect who offer and/or make his services available, are adhered to in order to
develop and nurture the competencies, credibility and integrity of the Architect in
the practice of his profession.
3.2 The common practice of the Architect to determine his compensation on a
project-based fee structures were often estimated through the percentage of the
project cost as indicated on theSchedule on Minimum Basic Fees under the
Regular Design Services, UAP Doc. 202. However, with the evolvement of new
technology, the complexity andlarge scale development projects and uniqueness
of many building projects, the most common practice is lump sum fee based on
the project cost, complexity and deliverables, and also had led to the use of
several trends in calculating compensation for architectural services in order to
meet changing Client expectations and improve the economic performance of
the Architect.
3.3Integrity, good performance and deliveryof the project on time to the satisfaction
of the Client maintains a long-term Architect-Client relationships that will lead to
the success of the Architect in the practice of his profession.
2. Direct
orReimbursable
Expenses
6. Project Cost
7. Salary Cost
RULE II
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SECTION 1: CRITERIA
The criteria for computing the Architects compensation should be based on mutual
evaluation of the amount of the Architectural firms talents, skill, experience,
imagination, effort and time available for, and required by the project.
1.1 The method of compensation should:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
Be fair to the Architect in that it should permit him to recover his costs and
net him an adequate profit, provided he is reasonably efficient.
Be fair to the Client and the Architect by reflecting the value of the
Architects services.
Be flexible to protect the Architect from cost increases because of changes
or the scope of the commission.
Not create legal problems for the Architect.
Encourage the Client to be cooperative and supportive.
Provide incentive for the Architect to produce the highest design quality.
Be easy to understand and simple use.
Provide a basis for the Client to pre-determine his costs for architectural
services, and be otherwise acceptable to him.
Encourage the Architect to develop a solution which will result in the lowest
possible construction cost consistent with the Clients requirements.
Not focus the Clients attention on price, but rather on the quality and
performance of the Architects services.
Protect the Architect against the rising costs of providing services during the
course of a commission.
1.2. The computation of the compensation of fees shall depend on the type of
services to be rendered and the conditions under which they are to be
performed. Compensation for services that require only one kind of expertise or
related types of expertise shall be treated differently from those services that
require the use of more than one type of expertise.
1.3 Compensation of an Architect may be computed based on one or a
combination of the following methods, with modifications applicable to the types
of services and/ or specific cases, if and when needed.
This method is based on the total rate cost of Architect, Consultantand his
staff multiplied by a factor from 1.5 to 3.0 as a multiplier plus cost of
certain items that are reimbursable to the Architect classified under
Direct Cost or Reimbursable Expenses.
The following formula is used to compute the total fee:
Assume:
A=
C=
T=
Rate per hour of Technical Staff, Researchers and other involved in the
Project
N=
No. of hours
AN, CN, TN =
Multiplier - from 1.5 to 3.0 depending on office set-up of Architect and complexity
of the Project.Multiplier to take care of overhead and reasonable profit.
Reimbursable Expenses - such as transportation, housing and living
allowance of Consultant, transportation, per diem, housing and living
allowance of local consultants and technical staff if assigned to place over
100km. from area of operation of the Architect.
Cost of printing of extra set of drawings, reports, maps, contract
documents, etc. over the seven (7) copies submitted to the Client;
overseas and long distance calls; technical and laboratory tests, licenses,
fees and taxes, needed by the Project.
(d) Professional Fee plus reimbursable expenses - This method of
compensation is frequently used where there is continuing relationship on
a series of Projects. It establishes an agreed lump sum over and above
the reimbursement for the Architects technical time and overhead. An
agreement on the general scope of the work is necessary in order to set
an equitable fee.
However, unit cost estimating requires accurate and timely data on the
cost of providing services for each unit and renovation of unit requires
more service effort than those new unit.
NOTES:
1) It is important that prior to the start of any project or commission, a
Professional Service Agreement is necessarily be approved mutually by
Architect and the Owner/Client. The standard practice for rendering Regular
Design Services is to request for a five percent (5%) Mobilization Fee of the
agreed amount upon signing of the Professional Service Agreement.
2) Owner/Client shall make payments upon request of the Architect within seven
(7) calendar days from the submission of the statement of the account.
3) Should the Owner/Client prefers to engage the Architect for Architectural
Services only and separately hire the services of Allied Professional and/or
Specialist Consultant their professional fees shall be for the account of the
Client. In such case, the fee of the Architect for coordinating and relating the
work of the Allied Professional and/or Specialist Consultant to the design
concept of the Architect will be five percent (5%) of the Allied Professional
and/or Specialist Consultants feeaside from his fees from Regular Design
Services.
4)
The Architect is the prime professional for having a contract directly with the
Client/Owner for professional services and responsible for directing the team
of the Allied Professional/ Specialist Consultants.
RULE III
Pre-Design Services
Regular Design Services
Specialized Architectural Services
Full-Time Supervision
Construction Management
Post-Construction Services
Comprehensive Architectural
Services
8) Design-Build Services
9) Architectural Design Competition
10) Professional Architectural Consulting
Services
Each of these ten (10) major services can be contracted separately to the
Architect depending upon the desire and needs of the Client.The terms and
conditions for the delivery of theseArchitects Services are stipulatedon each
Architects Guidelines on Standards of Professional Practice Documents.
MATRIX OF SERVICES
SECTION 1. PRE-DESIGN
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 201)
1.1 Consultation
1.2 Pre-Feasibility Studies
1.3 Feasibility Studies
1.4 Site Selection and Analysis
1.5 Site Utilization and Analysis
1.6 Architectural Research
1.7 Architectural Programming
1.8 Space Planning
1.9 Space Management Studies
1.10 Value Management
1.11 Design Brief Preparation
1.12 Promotional Services
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
Different
Methods of
Compensation are being
applied on the PreDesign Services as the
volume and range of
works varies on each
services.
Client
shall
make
payments upon request
of the Architect within
seven (7) calendar days
from the submission of
the statement of the
account.
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
Refer to Schedule of
Regular Basic Fees (RBF)
2.6)Remaining 15% of
RBF is broken as
follows:
a. 10% for Architects
Liability under the
Civil Code and
b. 5% for Periodic
visit
during
construction
Parking Structures
Bakeries
Printing Plants
Public Markets
Freight Facilities
Service Garages
Hangars
Industrial Buildings
Warehouses
Manufacturing/Industrial Plants
Statement
of
Probable
Project Construction Cost
(SPPCC)
6 % of PPCC
3.6% of PPCC
P3,000,000 plus 5%
excess of P 50.0 million
P5,500,000 plus 4%
excess of P100.0 million
P9,500,000 plus 3%
excess of P200.0 million
P18,500,000 plus 2%
excess of P500 million
of
P28,500,000 plus 1%
excess of P1.0 billion
of
P100.0 million
Over P100.0 million to
P200.0 million
Over P200.0 million to
P500.0 million
Over 500.0 million to
P1.0 billion
Over P1.0 billion
Group 2
Buildings of moderate complexity of plan/design requiring a moderate amount of research and
of engineering and allied architectural design:
Art Galleries
Nursing Homes
Financial Institutions
Bowlodromes
Recreational Facilities
Call Centers
Residential Condominiums
Postal Facilities
College Buildings
Private Clubs
Publishing Plants
Race Tracks
Restaurants/Fastfoods
Dormitories
Retail/Wholesale Stores
Fire Stations
Shopping Centers
Specialty Shops
Libraries
Supermarkets/Hypermarts
Malls/Mall Complexes
Serviced Apartments
Motels &Apartels
Welfare Buildings
Multi-storey Apartments
Showrooms/Service Centers
Statement
of
Probable
Project Construction Cost
(SPPCC)
7 % of PPCC
4.2% of PPCC
of
of
of
of
of
Group 3
Buildings of exceptional character and complexity of plan/design or requiring comparatively
large amounts of research and of engineering and allied architectural design:
Aquariums
Laboratories/Testing Facilities
Nuclear Facilities
Auditoriums
Mental Institutions
Breweries
Mortuaries
Observatories
Telecommunication Buildings
Convention Facilities
Research Facilities
Gymnasiums
Stadia
Hotels
Veterinary Hospitals
Statement
of
Probable
Project Construction Cost
(SPPCC)
8 % of PPCC
4.8% of PPCC
of
of
of
of
of
Group 4
Residences (single-detached, single-attached or duplex; row-houses or shop-houses), small
apartment houses and townhouses.
Statement
of
Probable
Project Construction Cost
(SPPCC)
10% of PPCC
6% of PPCC
Group 5
Monumental buildings and other facilities requiring consummate design skill and much precise
detailing.
Exposition & Fair Buildings
Mausoleums, Memorials,
Museums
& Monuments
Buildings of similar nature or use
Statement
of
Probable
Project Construction Cost
(SPPCC)
12% of PPCC
7.5% of PPCC
Group 6
When the plan/design and related Contract Documents are re-used for the repetitive
construction of similar buildings without amending the drawing and the specifications, the
Architects fee is computed as follows:
Building Number
Recommended Repetitive
Fee (RRF)
(Integrated Architectural &
Engineering Services in
One Contract)
Succeeding Buildings
Recommended Repetitive
Fee (RRF)
Group 7
When the Architect is engaged to undertake a Housing Project involving the construction of
several residential units on a single site with the use of one (1) set of plans/design,
specifications and related documents, the Architects Fee chargeable shall conform with the
following:
Unit Number
Recommended Housing
Project Fee (RHPF)
(Integrated Architectural &
Engineering Services in One
Contract)
Recommended Housing
Project Fee (RHPF)
6% of PPCC
Fee for one unit plus 60% of Fee for one unit plus 36% of
basic fee for each additional unit basic fee for each additional
unit
Fee for 10 units plus 30% of Fee for 10 units plus 18% of
basic fee for each additional unit basic fee for each additional
unit
Group 8
Projects involving extensive detail such as designs for built-in components or elements, built-in
equipment, special fittings, screens, counters, architectural interiors, and development planning
and/or design.
Recommended Basic Fee
(RBF)
15% of the SPPCC
Group 9
For alterations, renovations, rehabilitations, retrofit and expansion/additions to existing
buildings belonging to Groups 1 to 5 enumerated above, the compensation of services should
be increased by fiftypercent (50%) or a total of one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the RBF.
Group 10
Where the Architect is engaged to render opinion or give advice, clarifications or explanation on
technical matters pertaining to his profession, (also refer to Pre-Design ServicesUAP Doc.201
under Consultation) the chargeable RBF shall not be less than One thousand Pesos
(P1,0000.00) per hour (at June 2010 price levels) subject to increase depending on the extent
and coverage of service required and the location where the Architect shall render his services.
When rendering services as an expert witness, the Architects fee shall notbe less than Five
Thousand Pesos (P5,000.00) per appearance (at June 2010 price levels) regardless as to
whether the scheduled hearing took place or not.
All references to fixed amount shall refer to the value of the Philippine Peso as of June 2010.
Adjustment of the price shall be made at the time of the signing of the Architects contract of
service. The amount excludes the cost of transportation and accommodations when and where
required. Another sixty percent (60%) of the amount (at June 2010 price levels) shall be
charged for the travel period in case of locations that are in excess of fiftykilometers (50.0 km,
air, straight line or radial distance) of the Architects office (as stated in his letterhead).
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
SECTION 3. SPECIALIZED
ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 203)
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
a) Framework Development
Plan (FRDP). The
professional fee shall be
30% of RPAF.
b) Conceptual Master
Development Plan (CMDP).
The professional fee shall be
30% of RPAF.
c) Preliminary Master
Development Plan (PMDP).
The professional fee shall be
20% of RPAF.
d) Detailed Master
Development Plan (DMDP).
The professional fee shall be
20% of RPAF.
Note: The above services pertain
only to architectural outputs and
do not include engineering
services and other allied services.
e.g. landscape design,
transportation planning,
environmental investigations
and other services.
The rate stipulated above is based
on the assumption that the land to
be developed is moderately flat.
However, if the land is rugged with
steep terrain the fee shall increase
by 20% to 30%.
Detailed Master Development Plan (DMDP) means the outline footprint of the buildings,
developed surroundings and site topography
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
SECTION 4. FULL-TIME
SUPERVISION
(UAP DOC. 204-A)
The services of the Architect
as Full-Time Supervisor can
be compensated by any of the
following methods:
Recommended
Percentage
Fee of 1% to 1-1/2% of the
Project Construction Cost or
Rate Cost times a multiplier
plus reimbursable expenses
4.1Full-Time Supervision
(UAP Doc. 204-A)
MANAGEMENT
a. Firm Fixed Price The Owner will pay the Construction Manager a
fixed fee. The fee will be unaffected
by
variations between the estimate and the bids or by
change orders during the construction phase
unless the Owner initiates an increase in scope.
b. Fixed Price Incentive The Owner will pay the Construction Manager a
fixed fee which is adjusted according to the
difference between the final allowable costs and
the target costs.
c. Cost plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) or Cost plus
Adjusted Fee (CPAF) Cost reimbursement type contracts will provisions
for a fee that is adjusted by sharing formulas
applied to the difference between the final
allowable costs and the target costs.
a) Cost Plus Fixed Fee The Owner will pay the construction management
a fixed fee plus reimbursement of certain
expenses incurred in the performance of basis
services.
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
SECTION 5. CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
(UAP DOC. 204-B)
The
services
of
the
Architect as Construction
manager
can
be
compensated
by
recommended Percentage
Fee of 1-1/2% to 3% of the
Project construction Cost
MIXED METHOD
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
PERCENTAGE FEE
PROFESSIONAL FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SECTION 6. POST
CONSTRUCTION
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 205)
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
SECTION 7. COMPREHENSIVE
ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 206)
7.1 Pre-Design Services
(UAP DOC. 201)
7.3Specialized Architectural
Services (UAP DOC. 203)
Normally,
the
Architect
enters into a contract with
the Owner to perform
comprehensive architectural
services. By the very nature
of the services, he assumes
the role of the Project
Manager
or
overall
coordinator.
He may expand his staff by
hiring the experts needed or
form a professional team
consisting of the following:
(Architects, Engineers
Market Analyst Accountants
General
Contractors,
Real
Estate
Consultants,
Sociologists, Planners,
Bankers and Lawyers)
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
SECTION 8. DESIGN-BUILD
SERVICES
(UAP DOC. 207)
The services of the
Architect
can
be
compensated
by
recommended
Percentage Fee of 7% of
the Project construction
Cost in addition to the
Architects Fee for the
Regular Design Services
SECTION 9: ARCHITECTURAL
DESIGN COMPETITION
9.2 Consultants
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
a.Monthly Basis
b. Weekly Allowance + Transportation &
Food
c. Lump Sum based on volume of works
Monthly Basis
9.4 Juror
9.5 Winner/s
MIXED METHOD
PERCENTAGE FEE
RATE COST
RETAINER
PER DIEM
SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL FEE
METHODS OF COMPENSATION
SCHEDULE OF
FEES
The computation of
the compensation of
fees for Consulting
Services
depends
on the type of
services
to
be
rendered and the
conditions
under
which they are to be
performed
as
indicated
in the
Methods
of
Compensation
a) Project//Construction
Management and Administration
10.6 Post-Construction Services
(UAP DOC. 205)
a) Post-construction evaluation
10.7 Comprehensive Architectural
Services (UAP DOC. 206)
RULE IV
RULEV
GENERAL PROVISIONS
The Architect shall be entitled to interest at the prevailing rate set by the
BangkoSentralngPilipinas (BSP) in additional to a percentage as may be
determine by the UAP-IAPOA unless otherwise mutually agreed upon by
the Architect and his client, on all fees, other charges and reimbursements
due and not paid within thirty (30) days from receipt of billing.
SECTION 5:
Payment Schedules
6.3 The Owner shall make partial payments during each of the various stages of
the Architects work, upon request of the Architect, provided that such
payments are within the framework of the manner of payments outlined
above.
SECTION 6: Clients Responsibilities
This also applies to 3-D Model and Animation of the final approved
designfor presentation and exhibition, the Client shall pay for the cost of
production. Such services shall be subject to a coordination fee payable to
the Architect.
The Architect will also be compensated on CAD files requested by the
Client at a rate per 1 MB of data agreed by both Architect and the Client.
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.7
for the conduct and performance of his services to their clients, whether in
the government, private sector or civil society.
10.2 Where applicable,Architectmay secure locally their professional liability
insurance or malpractice insurance or their acceptable equivalent in bond
commensurate with the nature and magnitude of their project involvement
and their compensation. Such cost shall form part of the total project cost
chargeable to the Client.
10.3 Legal liabilities of the Architect shall be based on the Civil Code of the
Philippines.
SECTION 11: Arbitration Clause
11.1 In case of any dispute arising from the implementation of these guidelines,
the same shall be resolved by a Board of Arbitration. The Decisions Board
shall be formed with the Architect and the Client each appoints one
member and these members shall appoint a third member to act as the
chairman. No one with financial interest in the subject under arbitration will
be permitted to serve on this board. This board may engage experts to act
in an advisory capacity. Minutes shall be kept of all the meetings and
signed by all members of this board. Decisions of the board shall require
only a simple majority and all interested parties shall be informed thereof.
Expenses of the board shall be paid in accordance with the agreement set
forth before the proceedings of the board.
SECTION 12: Penalty Clause and Sanction
12.1 Any individual, partner, firm/corporation/consortium who engages in
architectural services, but are not qualified in accordance with the
provisions by laws, particularly under R.A. No. 9266 (The Architecture Act
of 2004) and its IRR shall be subject to sanction/s by the appropriate
public or private entities, without prejudice to the filing of appropriate
criminal, civil or other administrative or cases pursuant to existing laws.
SECTION 13: Effectivity
13.1 This Architects Guidelines on Standards of Professional Practice, Methods
of Compensation & Schedule of FeesUAP Doc. 208-A shall be effective
after approval of the United Architects of the Philippines (UAP) National
Board of Directors and ratified by the General Membership.
ANNEXES:
Comparative Estimates between Percentage on Regular Basic Fee and Basic Fee on per
sq. meter basis
Example: A Client wants to build a Shopping Center(commercial building) in the amount of
P 100 million (Project Construction Cost)
Schedule of Regular Basic Fee (Integrated
Architectural & Engineering Services - A&E)
This will fall under Group 2 7% of Probable Project
Construction Cost (PPCC).
Based on current valuation of Project Construction Cost
the amount is P20,000.00 per sq. meter. Thus the area
of the building with a Project Construction Cost of P100
million will be 5,000 sq.meters.
Particular:
100,000,000.00 = 5,000 sq.meters
20,000.00
Statement
of
Probable
Project
Construction
Cost (SPPCC)
Basic Fee
(Integrated
Architectural &
Engineering
Services)
Amount
P 50 million and
less
Over P50 million
to 100 million
7%
P3,500,000.00
6% of excess of
P50 million
P3,000,000,00
P6,500,000.00
NOTES:
The Comparative Estimates between the Percentage on Regular Basic Fee is within the range on the
Basic Fee per sq. meter basis as shown.
However the computation of Basic Fee per sq.meter is possible only on the current valuation of Project
Construction Cost of the Buildingas of 2011. Thus the increase on Project Construction Cost must be
proportional to the amount ofBasic Fee per sq. meter.
Comparative Estimates between Percentage on Regular Basic Fee and Basic Fee on per
sq. meter basis
Example: A Client wants to build a Shopping Center(commercial building) in the amount of
P 20 million (Project Construction Cost)
Schedule of Regular Basic Fee (Integrated
Architectural & Engineering Services - A&E)
This will fall under Group 2 7% of Probable Project
Construction Cost (PPCC).
Based on current valuation of Project Construction Cost
the amount is P20,000.00 per sq. meter. Thus the area
of the building with a Project Construction Cost of P20
million will be 1,000 sq.meters.
Basic Fee
(Integrated
Architectural &
Engineering
Services)
P 50 million and
less
P20
million
Project
Const.
Cost
7%
7%
Particular:
20,000,000.00 = 1,000 sq.meters
20,000.00
Statement
of
Probable
Project
Construction
Cost (SPPCC)
Amount
P1,400,000,00
P1,400,000.00
NOTES:
The Comparative Estimates between the Percentage on Regular Basic Fee is within the range on the
Basic Fee per sq. meter basis as shown.
However the computation of Basic Fee per sq. meter is possible only on the current valuation of Project
Construction Cost of the Building as of 2011. Thus the increase on Project Construction Cost must be
proportional to theamount of Basic Fee per sq. meter.
Basic Fee
(Architectural
only)
Amount
Fee
Over 5 hectares up
to 10 hectares
Over 10 hectares
up to 50 hectares
Over 50 hectares
and above
Planning)
P50,000.00
P250,000.00 +
P40,000.00 per
hectare
in
excess of 5
hectares
P450,000.00 +
P30,000.00 per
hectare
in
excess of 10
hectares
P1,650,000.00
+ P15,000.00
per hectare in
excess of 50
hectares
FOREWORD