You are on page 1of 10

In Situ Seismic Methods

Non-Invasive (Surface)

Seismic refraction
(ASTM D5777)
High
- resolution seismic
reflection
Surface wave methods

Invasive (Borehole)

Crosshole
(ASTM D4428
- M
)
Downhole
Geophysical logging

112

Crosshole Method
10 to 15 ft

Source

Shear and
Compression
Waves

V=

Triaxial
Receivers

x
t

113

Crosshole Method


Number of boreholes

3 (ASTM preferred
2 (ASTM optional

Borehole spacing




Physical coupling of
source and receivers
Orientation of source
and receivers

x = 10 ft
for Vs < 1500 ft/sec
x = 15 ft
for Vs > 1500 ft/sec


Borehole verticality

114

Crosshole Method


Advantages

Simple concept and


calculations
Resolution independent of
penetration (i.e., depth)
ASTM D4428 Standard
Method

Disadvantages

Expensive
Borehole verticality
measurements required

115

Downhole Method
5 to 10 ft

Source

t1
Triaxial
Receiver

Shear and
Compression
Waves
t2

V=

z
z
=
t2 t1 tint erval

116

Downhole Method


Advantages

Only one borehole/probe


Simple concept and
calculations
Easily implemented using
seismic cone test
Verticality is less
important

Disadvantages

Limited to depths less


than about 60 m

117

Borehole Logging Methods

Fluid-Filled
Borehole

Compression
Shear
Stoneley

Triaxial
Receivers

Pseudo-Rayleigh

z
Shear and
Compression
Waves

Source

118

Borehole Logging Methods




Geophysical Service Companies

Schlumberger
Baker Atlas
Robertson GeoLogging
Reeves Wireline, Inc.
etc.

Geotechnical Testing

OYO Suspension Logger


GEOVision Geophysical Services, Inc.

119

Borehole Logging Example


Compression Wave Velocity (m/sec)
1000
0
100
200

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Wilson 2-14 Well


Mississippi County, AR
3 to 5-ft Compensated Sonic Log

Depth (m)

300
400
500
600
700
800
900

120

Borehole Logging Methods




Advantages

Ideal for deep profiling


Widely used in resource
exploration
Interpretation ?

Disadvantages

Limited geotechnical
experience

121

You might also like