Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module Name
Module No.
Module Director
Village Study
10
Mohammad Mamun
Submitted to
Mohammad Mamun
Submitted By
Participants of P-61st Foundation Training Course
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All praise goes to the Almighty, the merciful and supreme authority of the universe for his
immense blessings on us so that we have been able to complete this research work of field
attachment program successfully.
Thanks and best regards to the honorable course adviser Md. Zaydul Hoque Molla, ndc and
respected course director Md. A. Razzaque Sarker along with total course management
team of P-61st FTC Mr. from the core of the heart.
Our sincere gratitude goes to the Module Director of Module-10, Mohammad Mamun for
his precious guidance with proper focus on the assigned task. Were also thankful to the
Module Director of Module-18, Md. Abul Basher for describing the formulation and facts
of conducting social research work in a true reasonable manner.
Our heartfelt thanks to the authorities of field attachment program namely the Deputy
Commissioner of Naogaon District, the Focal Point, Upazila Chairman, Upazila Nirbahi
Officer of Raninagar and Atrai Upazila, Upazila Officer about Women affairs of Raninagar
Upazila and Upazila Election Officer of Atrai Upazila, Naogaon. The district administration
and focal point selected the appropriate upazilas to conduct the study while the Upazila
Chairman and the UNO assisted us on the social safety net programs running locally and
supported with vehicle to assess the proper regions containing the target group. To reach the
places where govt. services are difficult to provide the Upazila Officer about women affairs
accompanied us and helped tremendously on the spot to assess and sort the ultra poor
families. Were also grateful to the local community leader for his generous sharing of facts
on causes of poverty, govt. grants, micro credit facility and economic status of the selected
locality.
Lastly, our thanks and gratitude to the local people for their kind support to maintain
constructive environment while collecting necessary information of the selected persons and
their families.
Abstract
Purpose of this study and report is to learn about the social safety net programs (SSNP) of
the govt., living status of ultra poor people, causes of their social fall back, sort out the way
out of the problem with possible linkage under SSNP. Marginal people living at remote
rural areas are often lacking in terms of food availability, standard living, health and
education facility, earning opportunity and social security. To mitigate the sufferings of
extreme poor people Bangladesh govt. runs social safety net programs in various aspects.
The target group of SSNPs is the people living with some sort of disabilities or be support
less. This SSNPs have already achieved reasonable success at field level and some
recognition at international level. This study report will help the authority to know and take
active steps on the poverty situation of four disadvantaged families of Dakkhin Rajapur,
Raninagar Upazila and Railway Colony of Atrai Upazila, Naogaon District and their
possible linkages to bring under SSNP for an effective and systematic withdrawal of the
ultra poor state for them.
ii
Table of Contents
Page
List of Tables
List of Figures
1.0 Introduction:
There are a number of poor families at marginal level struggling with less than minimum
facilities to survive. This disadvantaged condition gradually separates away the victim
families from mainstream life standard leading to social problems like illiteracy, social
insecurity, unhealthy life finally burden to the society. All these features make poverty a
deep problem but a little support from the community may be the reinforcement all they
needed to pick the way of gradual improvement.
1.1 Objective:
The research aimed to dig out the depth of struggle of those ultra poor and its consequences
in terms of social indiscipline. In addition to that our target was to identify the pinpoints to
be hit leading to break the cycle of poverty and sort the possible aid to bring them from
inability to some sort of capability.
1.2 Scope:
The study was conducted based on the questions on; standard of living (in terms of
availability of basic needs), source of income, family history, causes of migration (if any),
points of incapability, availability of govt. grant, microcredit opportunity, access to health
and education. Under the curriculum of P-61st FTC, the administration of our concerned
attached district selected Raninagar and Atrai Upazila of Naogaon district for us (ten
participants) to conduct the research. With the help of Upazila administration weve picked
four disadvantaged families (poorest of the poor) of Dakkhin Rajapur village, Raninagar
Upazila and four disadvantaged families (poorest of the poor) of Railway Colony, Atrai
Upazila to carry the study. Total field work (study of local SSNP, poverty situation,
preparation of questionnaire, location selection, picking families, data collection and
processing, analysis and report submission in terms of suggestions for the local
administration) has been performed during 21-03-2016 to 24-03-2016.
Literature review contains the link of previous work relevant to this study,
Methodology contains the detail strategy to address research questions through
systematic approach of data collection and justifications behind recommended solutions,
Data Analysis contains the presentation of core findings of the field data in an
understandable way,
Recommendations contains the specific suggestion against each of the cases relating
to the SSNPs and
Conclusion contains the summary of the findings, its significance for poverty
alleviation and further scope of study on it.
specified that is to act as the missing link between those unaddressed underprivileged
community and appropriate safety net schemes.
Food transfer
Price subsidy
Job generating
Others
Old Age
Allowances
Vulnerable
Group Feeding
Agricultural
inputs Subsidy
Vulnerable
Group
Development
Maternity
Allowance for
Retard/Disable
Person
Test Relief,
Food for Works
Subsidy for
Marginal
Farmers to
cope with the
Fuel Price
Hike
Rural
Employment
Opportunities
for Public
Assets
Efficiency
Development
Fund for
Expatriate
Workers
Allowance to
the Widowed
Gratuitous
Relief
Food Subsidy
100 days
Employment
Generation
Program
Honorarium for
the Insolvent
Freedom
Fighters
Primary
education
Stipend Project
Power Subsidy
Employment
Project for
Beggers
Microcredit
Female
Secondary
School
Assistance
Community
Nutrition
Program
health care
National
Service
Free schooling
3.0 Methodology:
3.1 Local Feature:
The main feature of the selected locality is all the families living here are landless and
displaced. They live on the riverside protecting dam by hand to mouth earning. They dont
have fixed source of income. Health and sanitation facility is very limited. Access to
education is difficult due to poverty and unavailability of Govt. grant. At this point four
families are selected from the community based on extreme level of poverty and physical
inability.
3.2 Research Questions:
What is the level of poverty in terms of living standard?
What is/are the specific problem(s) of the disadvantaged families?
What is/are root cause(s) acting behind the ultra poverty state?
What is the way out with linkage to the govt. SSNPs?
3.3 Field Data Collection:
To identify appropriate ultra poor families and to get answer to the research questions both
primary and secondary data sources are accessed and used. With consultation of UNO,
Raninagar Upazila riverbank dam of Dakkhin Rajapur village and Atrai Upazila Railway
Colony of Pachupur Union were selected to be surveyed for ultra poor families. Under the
guidance of local public representatives, upazila officer about women affairs of Raninagar
Upazila and upazila election officer of Atrai Upazila the spots were visited by the team and
a sample questionnaire form containing 20 questions was filled by question answer with 8
families. Among those two extremely struggling families were selected to bring under the
domain of local social safety net programs. As per the upazila administration and other
relevant govt. offices that dam region was the place where govt. facilities are not available
at all and the people residing there are extremely helpless. In addition to that the people
living at Railway Colony of Atrai Upazila are also being ignored from govt. services. That
is why we selected them for our study and found it appropriate while conducting discussion
session with the local people and those poor families in person. Most of the family members
were illiterate, thats why the questionnaire session was like an informal discussion and we
wrote down the collected information according to the set questions. From the set questions
(Appendix: B) our research questions were tried to be answered properly.
4
Family-1:
Name: Mst. Aduri Khatun
Address: Dakkhin Rajapur, Raninagar Upazila
Summary Findings:
No coverage of SSNP.
Family-2:
Name: Jinnah Poramanik
Address: Railway Colony, Bihari Pur, Pachupur Union, Atrai Upazila
Summary Findings:
Home condition very poor beside rail line with unhygienic and open latrine
facility.
Jinnah is old and physically unable for any hard work but has to maintain a
large family.
No coverage of SSNP.
5.0 Recommendations:
Table -2: Recommendations and Action Plan for individual disadvantaged Families
Serial
No.
Family-1
Family-2
Name
Mst.
Aduri
Khatun
Jinnah
Poramanik
Recommended Action
1. Sewing training for
Aduri with some
grant as capital for
small
entrepreneurship.
2. Grant for buying net
and fishing
instruments for poor
fishermen.
1. Provide VGD card.
2. Assist his daughters
by giving a technical
training and financial
support.
Time
Frame
3
months
6
months
3
months
6
months
Focal
Authority
Upazila
Officer
about
Women
Affairs
Upazila
Fisheries
Officer
Remarks
Women
empowerment
SSNP
UNO
SSNP
UNO &
Concerned
govt.
departments
SSNP
6.0 Conclusion:
In order to define the ultra-poor criteria included land ownership, begging activities,
domestic work and child labor, different wealth categories for households are judged by
themes of land ownership, occupation, shelter, vulnerability to seasonality, non-land assets,
food security, cash flow, schooling etc. There are some limitations regarding the research
work. Statistical data on the target group wasnt available; Upazila database on positive
impact assessment/success statistics regarding SSNPs wasnt in complete form. Due to
shortage of time we couldnt study more vulnerable communities of the locality and field
data based on personal interview couldnt be verified duly. As the task assigned we got the
opportunity to study the poverty condition and the limitations of underprivileged families in
reality to learn pragmatically about the Dakkhin Rajapur village of Raninagar Upazila and
Railway Colony of Atrai Upazila of Naogaon District. We felt our responsibilities to
support them for development of their socio-economic status. Among the factors of poverty
we can mitigate few with the help of proper SSNPs and as public servant we have a prime
responsibility of ensuring success of those social safety schemes through activities. Still
there is scope of incorporating vigorous study on this social issue in relation with SSNPs
achievements and our effort may be the little step of that bigger process.
7
Appendices:
Appendix-A
Table-3: Naogaon District Poverty level comparison among Upazilas
Upazila
% Extreme Poor
(Lower Poverty Line)
ATRAI
BADALGACHHI
DHAMOIRHAT
MANDA
MAHADEBPUR
NAOGAON SADAR
NIAMATPUR
PATNITALA
PORSHA
RANINAGAR
SAPAHAR
Data Source: www.bbs.gov.bd
5.0
5.7
7.7
5.4
6.1
8.3
8.4
8.1
9.4
4.9
9.0
% Poor
(Upper Poverty Line)
13.5
15.0
17.9
14.7
15.6
17.4
19.4
18.6
21.7
13.3
21.4
Appendix-B
Questionnaire Form
* This is for collection of field data for study on status of disadvantaged people and to
identify best suited SSNP coverage for them.
**These information will be used only for academic research purpose and proper care
will be taken to secure it from any sort of misuse.
Location: Dakkhin Rajapur, Raninagar Upazila, Naogaon District.
1. Name:
2. Age:
3. Gender:
Male
Female
4. Husband/Wifes Name:
5. Educational Qualification:
6. Family Members (describe shortly on number of earning members & dependents):
7. Source of Income:
8. Average Monthly Income:
9. Illness/Disabilities/Problems (if any):
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Appendix-C
Case Studies
Family-1:
Name: Mst. Razia, Female, 55 years, not literate.
Husband: Late Hafizar Rahman
Summary Findings:
Among 4 children (2 sons, 2 daughters) 2 daughters are married, elder son lives
separately with his wife and younger son lives with his mother.
Razia is widow unable to work due to illness with no earning source, dependent
on younger son whose monthly income 2500 Tk.
Migrated from other place due to lose of land and properties for treatment of
husbands heart disease.
Poor household with threat of damage due to monsoon flood each year.
Under threat of leaving away by younger son like the elder one after marriage.
10
Family-2:
Name: Mst. Abeda Bibi, Female, 50 years, not literate.
Husbands Name: Md. Abed Ali Pk.
Summary Findings:
Abeda and her husband cant work due to disabilities and illness with no source
of income generation.
Theyre dependent on sons earning (van drivers) but theyre separated with
their own wives and children.
No govt. grant except blanket, no micro credit, no coverage of VGF card or any
other SSNPs.
Family-3:
Name: Mst. Aduri Khatun, Female, 18 years, education up to class-V.
Husbands Name: Rafikul
Summary Findings:
Husband is fishermen but has no fishing boat or net with monthly income of
1500 Tk.
Family-4:
Son reading in class-10 works as daily labor and earns livelihood for the four
member family (monthly income 1200 Tk).
Family-5:
The youngest son and daughter are school going children live.
Family-6:
After the river erosion settled in Railway Colony and got married with a widow.
No Child.
12
Figure-4: Survey Team with Asia Begum and other poor families
Family-7:
Cant maintain cattle and poultry due risk of accident in rail line.
Family-8:
Her husband earns around 3000 tk. per month which is insufficient for their
livelihood and childrens education.
13
14
Bibliography/References:
1.
2.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2010, Zila Level Povmaps Estimates 2010, viewed
03-04-2016.<http://www.bbs.gov.bd>
3.
4.
5.
Ahmed, I, Jahan, N & Zohora, F T, 2014, Social Safety Net Programme as a Mean to
Alleviate Poverty in Bangladesh, Developing Country Studies, Vol. 04, No.17, Page
46-54.
6.
7.
Dr. Ahmed, R U & Prof. Islam, S S, 2011, People's Perception on Safety Net
Programmes: A Qualitative Analysis of Social Protection in Bangladesh, Development
Consultant and Global Compliance Initiative (DCGCI) for Social Protection Group in
Bangladesh.
8.
9.
Bangladesh Safety Nets to Protect the Poor, 2014, The World Bank, viewed 02-042016. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2014/03/27/bangladesh-safety-netsto-protect-the-poor
10. Rahman, H Z, Choudhury, L A & Ali, K S, 2011, Social Safety Nets in Bangladesh,
Volume-1: Review of Issues and Analytical Inventory, PPRC-UNDP, viewed 04-042016.
<http://www.undp.org/content/dam/bangladesh/docs/Publications/Social%20Safety%2
0Nets%20in%20Bangladesh%20Vol%201.pdf>
11. Rahman, H Z & Choudhury, L A, 2012, Social Safety Nets in Bangladesh, Volume-2:
Ground Realities and Policy Challenges, PPRC-UNDP, viewed 04-04-2016.
<http://www.undp.org>
15