Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5/12/2009
5/12/2009
5/12/2009
5/12/2009
Khi ng SPSS
Cch c in
nht.
2. Bn c th
chuyn sang
destop m d
dng hn.
1.
5/12/2009
Giao din
Ca s chun
ca SPSS
Ma trn d liu
nh ngha bin
Nhp liu
Nhp vo ct Name ba
bin s age, marital,
income.
SPSS mc nh l dng
s (Numeric)
5/12/2009
nh ngha bin
1.
2.
3.
4.
Name: Tn bin
Type: Kiu d liu
With: rng
Decimal: lng s thp phn
nh ngha bin
Name: cc k t lin
tc, khng c khong
cch
2. Type: Numeric (s),
string (ch),
3. With: rng, tng s
lng nu cn thit
4. Decimal: V s 0 nu
l s nguyn
1.
Lable: L tn y
ca bin, l phn s
hin th trong bo co
thng k v biu
6. Value: Phn m ha d
liu. SPSS s hin th
phn ny, khng hin
th phn m ha
7. Measure: Nominal
(nh danh, Ordinal
(th bc), scale (t l)
5.
10
5/12/2009
Nguyn Duy Tm
11
12
5/12/2009
DNG CU HI
Cu hi m
Cu hi ng
Cu hi phn i (Dichotomous)
Cu hi lit k mt la chn (Single response)
Cu hi lit k nhiu la chn (Multiple respenses)
Cu hi xp hng (Ranking)
Cu hi phn mc (Scale)
Cu hi chm im
13
hoac 1
Khong
2
Ban co bao gi s dung kem dng da cha?
Roi
hoac 1
Cha
2
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
Norminal
14
5/12/2009
1
Pepsi-Cola
2
Sprite
3
7-Up
4
Fanta
15
Ban a tng uong qua cac nhan hieu nc ngot co gaz nao
trong cac nhanhieu sau ay?
Coca-Cola
1
Pepsi-Cola
2
Sprite
3
7-Up
4
Fanta
16
5/12/2009
CU HI XP HNG
Quan trong
Bnh thng
Khong quan
trong
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
17
CC DNG CU HI PHN MC
18
5/12/2009
CC DNG CU HI PHN MC
Q. i vi mi cu ni sau, bn lm n ch ra
mc ng ca bn nh th no v vn
X?
Hon ton ng
1
ng
2
Ordinal
Y kin trung dung
3
Khng ng
4
Hon ton khng ng
5
19
20
10
5/12/2009
CC DNG CU HI CHM IM
Ordinal
21
22
11
5/12/2009
TM LI: TO DATABASE
23
1
Pepsi-Cola
2
Sprite
3
7-Up
4
Fanta
24
12
5/12/2009
nh ngha bin
H v tn
Tui
Gii tnh
Nganh
Vic lm thi
gian rnh
Nguyn vn
A
22
Nam
KTPT
c sch
Nguyn th B
20
KTKT
Xem phim
Trn nh C
19
Nam
QTKD
c sch
Tng minh D
18
Nam
NH
Nghe nhc
25
c file t Excel
26
13
5/12/2009
c file t Excel
c tn bin
t dng u
tin
Vng d liu
cn import
vo
Ok nu bn
xong
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
27
c file t Excel
Hay w
28
14
5/12/2009
5/12/2009
29
29
(Frequencies)
o bang cheo (Phan tch hai bien): Bang Crosstabs
oi vi bien nhieu tra li: trc khi o bang ta phai tien hanh
nhom cac bien cha ng cac gia tr tra li co c (multiple
responses/define groups) trc khi tien hanh o bang
(frequencies hoac crosstabs)
5/12/2009
30
30
15
5/12/2009
databtap5statistic.SAV
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
5/12/2009
31
31
Valid
Da c o gia dinh
Goa bua
Da ly di
Da ly than
Chua co gia dinh
Total
Frequency
525
16
148
29
205
923
Perc ent
56.9
1.7
16.0
3.1
22.2
100.0
Valid Percent
56.9
1.7
16.0
3.1
22.2
100.0
Cumulative
Perc ent
56.9
58.6
74.6
77.8
100.0
5/12/2009
32
32
16
5/12/2009
Valid
Frequency
85
498
Perc ent
9.2
54.0
Valid Percent
9.2
54.0
Cumulative
Perc ent
9.2
63.2
70
7.6
7.6
70.7
180
90
923
19.5
9.8
100.0
19.5
9.8
100.0
90.2
100.0
5/12/2009
33
33
Vng
thng
tin kt
qu
Vng hin
th kt qu,
biu
34
17
5/12/2009
Hin th kt qu
Tn s
Tn sut
hp l
Tn sut
Gender
Valid
Female
Male
Total
Frequency
3179
3221
6400
Percent
49.7
50.3
100.0
Valid Percent
49.7
50.3
100.0
Tn sut
tch ly
Cumulative
Percent
49.7
100.0
ngha ca bng tn s
Cch c tn s, tn sut
35
36
18
5/12/2009
37
Nhng g hin
th
Ch phn c
chn
38
19
5/12/2009
3%
16%
2%
22%
Analyze/
descriptive
statistics
/frequencies/CH
ARTS
Make up for
charts
57%
Da co gia dinh
5/12/2009
Goa bua
Da ly di
Da ly than
39
39
40
20
5/12/2009
5/12/2009
41
Con ngi
Trinh do hoc van * Gioi tinh nguoi tra loi Crosstabulation
41
Tm nhn mi
Count
Trinh
do
hoc
van
Total
Total
84
497
33
37
70
88
55
450
91
35
470
179
90
920
5/12/2009
42
42
21
5/12/2009
Trinh
do
hoc
van
Total
Total
9.1%
54.0%
7.3%
7.9%
7.6%
19.6%
12.2%
100.0%
19.4%
7.4%
100.0%
19.5%
9.8%
100.0%
43
43
o th cua bang
cheo. Chon Display
cluster bar chart
60%
54%
50%
50%
40%
30%
20%
20%
11%
10%
7%
19%
19%
12%
7%
8%
7%
9%
8%
10%
0%
Nam
Nu
Tong cong
Dai hoc
44
44
22
5/12/2009
Trinh do hoc van * Gioi tinh nguoi tra loi Crosstabula tion
% within Trinh do hoc van
Trinh
do
hoc
van
Total
Total
100.0%
100.0%
47.1%
52.9%
100.0%
49.2%
61.1%
48.9%
50.8%
38.9%
51.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Nhan
nh
tra loi
Nu
41.7%
54.7%
45
45
58%
50%
42%
55%
45%
61%
53%
47%
49%51%
49%51%
39%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Duoi bat
PTTH
Pho thong
trung hoc
Cao
dang/trung
hoc chuyen
nghiep
Nam
5/12/2009
Dai hoc
Tong cong
Nu
46
46
23
5/12/2009
Thc hanh: Lap cac bang cheo theo cac cap bien sau
va nhan xet cho cac bang
1.
2.
3.
databtap5statistic.SAV
47
5/12/2009
48
48
24
5/12/2009
databta
p5statistic.
SAV
5/12/2009
49
49
Descriptive Statistics
N
Age of Respondent
Valid N (listwise)
923
923
Minimum
18
Maximum
60
Mean
38.72
Std. Deviation
10.30
Descriptive Statistics
N
Heavy Metal Music
Valid N (listwise)
5/12/2009
902
902
Minimum
1
Maximum
5
Mean
3.98
Std. Deviation
1.16
50
50
25
5/12/2009
5/12/2009
910
902
905
886
887
867
903
902
815
Minimum
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Maximum
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Mean
Std. Deviation
2.33
1.06
2.43
.99
2.50
1.06
2.61
1.20
2.77
1.02
3.57
1.09
3.87
1.12
3.98
1.16
51
51
Muc do ua thich
Blues or R & B Music
2.43
2.61
Classical Music
Country Western Music
2.33
2.77
Folk Music
Heavy Metal Music
3.98
2.50
Jazz Music
Opera
3.57
3.87
Rap Music
0.00
5/12/2009
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
52
52
26
5/12/2009
Muc do ua thich
Country Western Music
2.33
2.43
2.50
Classical Music
2.61
Folk Music
2.77
3.57
Opera
Rap Music
3.87
3.98
1
Rat thich
5/12/2009
Rat ghet
53
53
Analyze/descriptive statistic/frequency/[chon
bien]/statistics
Chn cc ch tiu cn tm:
1. Cc ch tiu o lng mc tp trung [central
tedency]
2. Cc ch tiu o lng mc phn tn [Dispersion]
3. Cc phn v (t phn v, thp phn v, bch phn v)
[percentile value]
VD: Tm cc ch tiu thng k m ta cho hai bin age
v educ
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
54
27
5/12/2009
55
55
5/12/2009
Classical
Music
3.24
2.78
Rap Music
3.64
3.84
2.62
3.93
2.23
1.93
2.61
3.90
4.14
3.87
56
56
28
5/12/2009
1.
2.
3.
k.
Multiple
57
KVKTP
CT
5/12/2009
58
58
29
5/12/2009
Chuyen bien
can phan tch
vao
59
Valid
N
$mucdich a
Percent
100.0%
Cases
Missing
N
Percent
0
.0%
Total
N
6
Percent
100.0%
a. Group
$mucdich Frequencies
N
$mucdich a
Khong
Co
Total
Responses
Percent
11
30.6%
25
69.4%
36
100.0%
Percent of
Cases
183.3%
416.7%
600.0%
Giai thch
y ngha
a. Group
60
30
5/12/2009
nh ngha la chon
61
Total
Khong tim
duoc viec
Khong muon
le thuoc
Noi nghe
truyen thon
Tan dung vi
tri thua
Mong muon
on dinh ki
Goi y cua
nguoi than
tan dung thoi
gian n
Khac
Total
Count
158
185
343
62
71
133
27
38
65
57
82
139
117
160
277
65
105
170
26
36
62
22
254
20
337
42
591
62
31
5/12/2009
Ten bang
Tan suat
63
Layers
64
32
5/12/2009
Nguyn Duy Tm
65
CC PHP BiN I
2.
M ha li (recode)
Cng c t ng m ha li (automatic recode)
3.
4.
5.
1.
66
33
5/12/2009
M ha li (recode)
67
Valid
Frequency
58
759
272
11
1100
Percent
5.3
69.0
24.7
1.0
100.0
Valid Percent
5.3
69.0
24.7
1.0
100.0
Cumulative
Percent
5.3
74.3
99.0
100.0
Universal of florida
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
68
34
5/12/2009
Chuyn bin
cn M Ha
Chuyn gi
tr c thnh
gi tr mi
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
69
M ha
1: Di 1 triu
2: T 1-3 triu
3: T 3 5 triu
4: 5 10 triu
5: 10 30 triu
6: 30 50 triu
7: trn 50 triu
New
Value
Old value
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
70
35
5/12/2009
mi
M ha
bin
71
M ha c iu kin
M ha
c iu
kin
72
36
5/12/2009
M ha c iu kin
Khng iu
kin
iu
kin
73
ngi Tm nhn mi
Cng c t ng m ha li Con
(automatic
recode)
Universal of florida
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
74
37
5/12/2009
Cng c t ng m ha li (automatic
recode)
Transform/Automatic Recode
Bin cn m ha
Tn bin mi
75
76
38
5/12/2009
Tha iu
kin
Ngu nhin
theo xc
xut
T quan st
k n K
77
random
sample of
cases
Base
range
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
78
39
5/12/2009
Employee data.sav
79
Transform/compute
Current salary beginning salary
Tn bin
mi
80
40
5/12/2009
VD: xa 2 gi tr trong
Lng khi im v thay
Th bng gi tr khc
Employee data
Nguyen Duy Tam - http://sites.google.com/site/tam0505/
81
82
41
5/12/2009
83
84
42
5/12/2009
Vung bac bo Ho
0,025
Vung bac bo Ho
0,025
Z = -1,96
Z =1,96
Z= 0
= 368
Xac nh gia tr ti han: 0,5 0,025 = 0,475. Tra bang phan phoi Z
gia tr ti han la 1,96 (va -1,96)
Tnh Z theo cong thc:
x
S/ n
P-value
(sig.)>0,025
P-value (sig.)
<0,025
Vung bac bo Ho
0,025
- t (/2,n-1)
t/2,n-1
Gia tr t tnh c
nho hn iem ti han
Gia tr t tnh c
ln hn iem ti han
86
43
5/12/2009
0
87
Mean
$34,419.57
474
Std. Deviation
$17,075.661
Std. Error
Mean
$784.311
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 30000
t
5.622
Sig. < H1
df
472
Sig. (2-tailed)
.000
Mean
Difference
$4,418.446
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Upper
$2,874.01 $5,962.88
Bc hai
88
44
5/12/2009
89
Bin phn
nhm (bin
nh tnh)
Thay
i
tin cy
90
45
5/12/2009
nh (Levenes test).
B2: Kiem nh gia thiet ca bi ton
91
PS
khong
oi
PS thay oi
92
46
5/12/2009
93
94
47
5/12/2009
Paired Differences
Pair 1
Luong hien tai Luong khoi diem
$17,409.197
$10,825.353
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
$497.750
Lower
Upper
$16,431.116
$18,387.277
34.976
472
.000
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Trc va sau QC
95
Kiem nh ANOVA
Kiem nh trung bnh hai mau ch co the thc hien cho hai
la chon (Ex: gii tnh). ANOVA co the kiem nh cho
nhieu la chon.
Bai toan: Lng khi iem. Lng hien tai
Anh ch vui long cho biet co phai mc lng theo nganh
nghe trong cong ty la nh nhau?
Analyze/compare means/one way ANOVA
96
48
5/12/2009
Kiem nh ANOVA
97
Kiem nh ANOVA
Nhap bien can
kiem nh
Bin phn
bit
Pht hin khc
bit. Kim nh
su
98
49
5/12/2009
Kiem nh ANOVA
df1
df2
470
Sig.
.000
Kim nh ANOVA
Test of Homogeneity of Variances
Chn H1
Kim nh su
df1
2
df2
470
Sig.
.000
99
Kiem nh ANOVA
Phng
sai khng
i
Phng
sai thay i
100
50
5/12/2009
Kiem nh ANOVA
(*)Co s khac biet
gia van phong va
cong nhan
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Luong hien tai
LSD
Tamhane
Van phong
Cong nhan
Quan ly
Mean
Difference
(I-J)
Std. Error
-$3,119.994
*********
-$36158.90*
*********
$3,119.994
*********
-$33038.91*
*********
***********
*********
***********
*********
-$3,119.994* $569.106
-$36158.90*
*********
$3,119.994* $569.106
-$33038.91*
*********
***********
*********
***********
*********
Sig.
.124
.000
.124
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
101
samples t test)
Kiem nghiem Students t cho cap mau (paired samples t
test)
Phan tch phng sai mot yeu to (one-way ANOVA)
102
51
5/12/2009
X 2
(Oij Eij ) 2
Eij
i 1 j 1
So sanh X2 vi X2df, : Bac bo H0 khi X2< X2df, , hay
103
Bao lau
doc bao
mot lan
Moi ngay
Vai lan mot tuan
Mot lan mot tuan
It hon mot lan mot tuan
Khong bao gio doc
Total
Duoi bat
PTTH
16.9%
35.6%
18.6%
13.6%
15.3%
100.0%
Pho thong
trung hoc
38.7%
33.4%
13.5%
11.4%
2.9%
100.0%
100.0%
Total
41.8%
31.9%
13.2%
9.6%
3.5%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Ass ociation
N of Valid Cases
Value
62.771 a
63.044
29.721
16
16
.000
df
627
104
52
5/12/2009
Bao lau
doc bao
mot lan
Moi ngay
Vai lan mot tuan
Mot lan mot tuan
It hon mot lan mot tuan
Khong bao gio doc
Total
Total
42.8%
31.6%
13.3%
8.8%
3.6%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear
Ass ociation
N of Valid Cases
Value
7.043a
6.869
2.193
8
8
.139
df
580
105
Tm nhn mi
PHAN TCH VA DIEN ACon
T ngi
DLIE
U
NGHIEN CU
Nhn vao 2 logo sau, hay cho biet y kien oi vi cac ca u noi sau. Vi mc o ong y
nh sau:
1: Hoan toan khong ong y va mc o ong y tang dan ti 5: hoan toan ong y
Hoan toan
ong y
ong
y
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Khong
ong y
khong
phan oi
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Khong
ong y
Hoan toan
khong
ong y
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
106
53
5/12/2009
107
Kiem nghiem F
Cong thc tnh F:
F( n1 1, n2 1)
S 12
S 22
108
54
5/12/2009
109
Kiem nghiem t
Cong thc tnh t
Gia thuyet phng sai ngang bang c chap nhan
t
x1 x 2
1 1
S p2
n1 n2
S P2
(n1 1) S12 (n 2 1) S 22
n1 n 2 2
Vi bat t do df
(n1 + n2 2)
110
55
5/12/2009
S12 S 22
n1 n2
Vi bat t do df
df
S12
(S12
n1
2
S 22
n2
)2
( S 22
n1 )
n2 ) 2
n1 1
n2 1
111
V du:
Co s khac biet hay khong gia hai khu vc nghien cu (Ha Noi
TP.HCM) trong quan iem cho rang Sony la Sang tao va Thiet
ke ep
Group Sta tistics
N
200
200
200
200
Mean
4.81
4.92
4.66
4.72
Std. Deviation
.48
.30
.61
.55
Std. Error
Mean
3.38E-02
2.10E-02
4.28E-02
3.89E-02
112
56
5/12/2009
Equal
variances
assumed
F
Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
.006
.300
-.11
-6.00E-02
3.98E-02
5.79E-02
-.19
-3.18E-02
-2.766
332.890
-.17
5.37E-02
-1.037
394.492
Mean Difference
Std. Error Differenc e
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Equal
variances not
assumed
Lower
Upper
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
.006
.300
-.11
-6.00E-02
3.98E-02
5.79E-02
-.19
-3.18E-02
-.17
5.37E-02
Mean Difference
Std. Error Differenc e
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Lower
Upper
113
Khao sat cac gia tr khac biet gia hai gia tr trung bnh trong
hai bien khao sat trong tng quan sat va tien hanh kiem
nghiem gia tr trung bnh cac khac biet o co bang 0 hay
khong
Do kiem nghiem nay dung cho hai bien (2 mau) co moi quan
he vi nhau nen trong kiem nghiem nay co phan kiem nghiem
mi tng quan gia 2 bien (correlation)
Neu 2 bien quan sat khong co tng quan th cac kiem
nghiem t so sanh gia tr trung bnh gia 2 bien nay la khong
ang tin cay
114
57
5/12/2009
(x
I 1
yI )
n
SD
n
115
Kiem nghiem so sanh gia tr trung bnh gia hai bien quan he (paired
samples t test)
V du:
Lieu co s khac biet ve quan iem cua ngi tieu dung ve hai nhan
hieu sony va jvc khong (v du ch khao sat thuoc tnh Chat lng
cao va gia ca hp ly)
Paired Samples Statistics
Pair
1
Pair
2
Mean
4.86
4.30
4.05
3.92
N
395
395
395
395
Std. Deviation
.40
.78
.93
.90
Std. Error
Mean
2.03E-02
3.91E-02
4.65E-02
4.55E-02
116
58
5/12/2009
Correlation
Sig.
395
.183
.000
395
.250
.000
Std. Deviation
.56
.81
4.07E-02
.48
.64
13.824
394
.000
.12
1.12
5.63E-02
1.07E-02
.23
2.157
394
.032
Mean
Pair
1
Pair
2
95% Confidence
Interval of the
Difference
Lower
Upper
Std. Error
Mean
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
117
118
59
5/12/2009
119
120
60
5/12/2009
121
V du:
Y kien cho rang Sony la Chat lng cao va Thiet ke ep co
khac biet hay khong nhng nhom tieu dung co o tuoi khac
nhau
Report
Mean
TUOI TUOI
1 Duoi 20 t uoi
2 Tu 20 - 29 tuoi
3 Tu 30 - 39 tuoi
4 Tu 40 - 49 tuoi
5 Tu 50 tuoi tro len
Total
SONY1 Chat
luong cao
4.80
4.84
4.86
4.89
4.93
4.86
SONY2
Thiet ke dep
4.52
4.65
4.73
4.73
4.84
4.69
122
61
5/12/2009
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares
.654
63.506
64.160
3.991
129.569
133.560
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
Between Groups
Within Groups
Total
df
4
395
399
4
395
399
Mean Square
.163
.161
F
1.017
Sig.
.398
.998
.328
3.042
.017
df1
4
df2
395
Sig.
.000
123
2 Tu 20 - 29 tuoi
3 Tu 30 - 39 tuoi
4 Tu 40 - 49 tuoi
Mean
Difference
(I-J)
-.13
-.22
-.21
-.32*
.13
-8.79E-02
-8.18E-02
-.19
.22
8.79E-02
6.06E-03
-.10
.21
8.18E-02
-6.06E-03
-.11
.32*
.19
.10
.11
Std. Error
8.92E-02
9.28E-02
9.97E-02
9.90E-02
8.92E-02
8.14E-02
8.92E-02
8.84E-02
9.28E-02
8.14E-02
9.28E-02
9.20E-02
9.97E-02
8.92E-02
9.28E-02
9.90E-02
9.90E-02
8.84E-02
9.20E-02
9.90E-02
Sig.
.920
.303
.488
.030
.920
.941
.990
.173
.303
.941
1.000
.845
.488
.990
1.000
.921
.030
.173
.845
.921
124
62
5/12/2009
o lng moi tng quan tuyen tnh gia 1 bien phu thuoc va
mot (hoac nhieu) bien oc lap (Linear Regression)
125
126
63
5/12/2009
127
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
SONY15 La
nhan hieu ua
SONY1 Chat
SONY2
SONY4 Gia
SONY8
thich cua toi
luong cao
Thiet ke dep
ca hop ly
Dan dau
1.000
.446**
.287**
.203**
.220**
.
.000
.000
.000
.000
400
400
400
400
400
.446**
1.000
.461**
.281**
.333**
.000
.
.000
.000
.000
400
400
400
400
400
.287**
.461**
1.000
.317**
.236**
.000
.000
.
.000
.000
400
400
400
400
400
.203**
.281**
.317**
1.000
.226**
.000
.000
.000
.
.000
400
400
400
400
400
.220**
.333**
.236**
.226**
1.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.
400
400
400
400
400
128
64
5/12/2009
Phng trnh hoi qui tuyen tnh d bao xu hng tang (hay
giam) cua mot bien phu thuoc trong s bien ong (tang hoac
giam) cua nhieu bien oc lap khac
129
130
65
5/12/2009
131
Kiem nghiem F
Giong nh kiem nghiem F s dung trong phan tch ANOVA
nham kiem nh gia thuyet ve s ton tai moi lien he tuyen tnh
gia cac bien X va bien Y
Gia thuyet:
H0: 1 = 2 = = k = 0
H1: Co t nhat mot i <> 0
Bac bo H0 khi Sig (p-value) <
132
66
5/12/2009
Kiem nghiem moi quan he hoi qui tuyen tnh cua tng bien
Xi vi Y
Khac vi kiem nghiem F cho biet moi quan he tuyen tnh cua
tat ca cac bien oc lap vi bien phu thuoc. Kiem nghiem t
cho biet co hay khong mot moi quan he hoi qui tuyen tnh
gia mot bien oc lap cu the vi bien phu thuoc.
133
toi
Vi cac bien phu thuoc la cac y kien cho rang Sony la:
Chat lng cao
Thiet ke ep
ang tin cay
Sang tao
Dan au
Nhan hieu toan cau
134
67
5/12/2009
Model
1
2
3
Variables
Removed
Variables Entered
SONY1 Chat luong cao
Method
Stepwise (Criteria: Probability-of-F-to-enter
<= .050, Probability-of-F-to-remove >= .100).
Stepwise (Criteria: Probability-of-F-to-enter
<= .050, Probability-of-F-to-remove >= .100).
Stepwise (Criteria: Probability-of-F-to-enter
<= .050, Probability-of-F-to-remove >= .100).
Model
1
2
3
R
.446 a
.477 b
.486 c
R Square
.199
.228
.237
Adjusted
R Square
.197
.224
.231
Std. Error of
the Estimate
.65
.63
.63
Model
1
Regression
Res idual
Total
Regression
Res idual
Total
Regression
Res idual
Total
Sum of
Squares
41.146
165. 632
206. 778
47.097
159. 680
206. 778
48.904
157. 874
206. 778
df
1
398
399
2
397
399
3
396
399
Mean Square
41.146
.416
F
98.870
Sig.
.000 a
23.549
.402
58.547
.000 b
16.301
.399
40.889
.000 c
136
68
5/12/2009
Model
1
2
Uns tandardized
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
(Constant)
.776
.393
SONY1 Chat luong cao
.801
.081
(Constant)
.540
.391
SONY1 Chat luong cao
.619
.092
SONY3 Dang tin c ay
.238
.062
(Constant)
.448
.392
SONY1 Chat luong cao
.587
.093
SONY3 Dang tin c ay
.206
.063
SONY7 Tinh sao
9.116E-02
.043
Standardi
zed
Coefficien
ts
Beta
.446
.345
.198
.327
.171
.101
t
1.975
9.943
1.381
6.706
3.847
1.143
6.311
3.247
2.129
Sig.
.049
.000
.168
.000
.000
.254
.000
.001
.034
137
1.
2.
138
69