Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A n illu s tr a te d D ic tio n a r y o f
An Illustrated Dictionary of
W ITH
T& H
260
ILLUSTRATIONS
FronfMptec?.
The Aztec Calendar Stone found beneath the
centra! plaza of Mexico City. The monument is
not a fully functioning calendar, but
commemorates the Rve mythica! world-creations
(the Five Suns).
Any copy of this book issued by the publisher as
a paperback is sold subject to the condition that
it shall not by way of trade or otherwise be lent,
resold, hired out or otherwise circulated without
the publisher's prior consent in any form of
binding or cover other than that in which it is
published and without a similar condition
including these words being imposed on a
subsequent purchaser.
() 1993 Thames and Hudson Ltd, London
First paperback edition 1997
All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication
may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or
by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopy, recording or any other
information storage and retrieval system, without
prior permission in writing from the publisher.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available
from the British Library
ISBN 0-500-27928-4
Printed and bound in Singapore by C.S. Graphics
Contents
Reader's Guide
6
Acknowledgments
7
Introduction
9
Subject Index
36
THE DICTIONARY
38
Guide to Sources and Bibliography
194
Sources of Illustrations
215
Masonry baHcourts are one of the defining features of Mesoamerican civihzation. (A?oye) A baUcourt
at the Cfassic Maya site of Copn in Honduras. (Be/ow) A Ciassic period Zapotee baHcourt at Monte
A lbn ,Oaxaca.
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
10
CENTRAL
MEXICO
1519
LATE
POSTCLASSIC
OAXACA
Mixtee
independent
G ULF COAST
WEST
MEXICO
MAYA
HIGHLANDS/
PACIFIC
COAST
Aztecs
LOWL;^ND MAYA
South
Tayasa/
(Itz)
North
Tb/um
Sfa A a
<
1200
EARLY
POSTCLASSC
900
XMncA, t/atAin
71u/a
tS
CA/cAen
(Toltee Maya)
M tb
Pa^gu/
TERMINAL
CLASSIC
Cacajrt/a
P angue,
600
LATE
CLASSIC
Albn IUb
>
1
EA RLY
Cl .ASSIC
300
Centra!
Yucatn
ne
M
A! bn 111a
7/ia/,
LrtMn d e/
Ao
/r
5
M
A!bn H
PptOTOCt^ASSIC
CAupIenaro
AD
BC
7res Zapotes
Xam/na^nyd,
Cerros
Aba/ 7aAaMr
Colima
300
R LTE
FORMATIVE
La Fen la
600
MIDDLE
F()RMATIVE
Nab^
Albn 1
77at//co
6
O
900
San
R tRLY
F(3RMATVE
Ocos
1500
A!tCHAIC
linguists disagree about the language of Teotihuacan - the single largest city in
Mesoamerica during the Erst millennium AD - it may well have been the Erst
important Nahuatl civilization.
Timescales
Archaeologists and anthropologists have divided the chronology of Mesoamerica
and assigned terminology to the various periods. During the Archaic (7000-2000 B e )
11
INTRODUCTION
12
INTRODUCTION
^ C
i M ^
'o
o
,
O!MPiCM0r0A
ArTrEofinM^cjAi
"
. A'apocwo
M ed co a ty /^ ^ /M *
JV^//nrco
^
(%?&rj/co
Aas'BocK
Chclzlngo
J o r ^ M < 7 C 7 ^
JV eyr^ ^ ^
__A^NC/ENTErrES
*^C Km
BMODERNTOWNS
Aztecs lived too high for cotton to grow, and so the cotton mantle functioned as a
standard of exchange in their dominion. On his last voyage to the New World,
Christopher Columbus encountered Maya traders plying the waters o? Honduras
in ocean-going canoes piled high with woven cottons, part of the vast web of
Mesoamerican trade and tribute about which relatively little is known. Throughout
Mesoamerica, highland obsidian from volcanic Hows commanded high values, since
all households sought blades from this "steer' of the native New World. And
wherever volcanoes erupted, they renewed and enriched the soil. Today coHee
plantations have generally replaced tracts of cacao trees and vanilla orchids that
once Hourished along the PaciHc Coast of Guatemala and Chiapas and in Veracruz,
13
INTRODUCTION
AjMqyopan
TuIum/cozuMZLi
-3 S&
$gnfgRj'fdA^_
%,-^
o%cc
G^ode^*Cz,
g5^6M$^
ThH2apoiaL3<7Mna
&05 Germs s
TtidM^^ro^Yox-,
Toning A
A%"1
A/
Aj^il^g
) !j
t
^
O
j a c 'R y y ^ ^ L . ;
Onapa&&rzoA^,^^p^g ^ar&&Kn/faoj^
a Oaxaca
A D g /g z u
OTfc<;
GUA*T t
AjVebg;
M ^
M /n ^ ^J^ o ^ /^ y u
A(f/Bggf
aSaniaLucia
Cbtzumaihuay
___
pi CALVAD
SALVADOR
tL
UK
//
Technology
By the time of the Spanish Conquest, Mesoamerican technology had progressed to
what archaeologists call '*New Stone Age/' in that some metals were worked but
played little practical role as tools. Copper axes were a relatively recent phenomenon;
stone axes and Hint knives, along with diverse obsidian blades, were the main tools
with which generations of people had quarried stone, cut flesh and hide, and brought
down the forest. The gold and silver that so astonished the European invaders
tNTHODUCflON
14
formed religious works or jewelry; the Europeans were equally astonished by the
greater value Mesoamericans attributed to jade. Blue-green, like the most precious
things of the Mesoamerican world (quetzal feathers or maize foliage or water), jade
symbolized preciousness. The hardest stone commonly known in Mesoamerica, jade
also signified permanence, and when Maya nobles died, they carried such a bead
in their mouth to enter the Underworld.
Throughout the world, the wheel often played a role in religious imagery, but in
Mesoamerica (as in the rest of the New World), no wheel was ever developed for
mundane purposes - although graves in Veracruz have yielded wheeled toy-like
objects - perhaps because of the absence of draft animals. Today, as in Prehispanic
times, in many regions men and women are the beasts of burden, and Mesoamerican
people carry heavy loads on their backs with tumplines stretched across their
foreheads.
DeSning Mesoamerican Civilization
What distinguishes civilization from what has gone before it? Is it exploitation of
new resources, or competition to control them? Is civilization initiated by new
ideological concepts or only heightened by them? Are newly expanded populations
a requirement for civilization, or its by-product? In a world so technologically simple
as Mesoamerica, does technology play a role in its "take-off"?
Anthropologists offer no single answer - although they would check yes to a
number of the queries offered above - nor do they agree on its causes. Despite their
differences, they usually agree that complex culture in Mesoamerica began to take
shape during the Formative period, in both the Olmec region and in Oaxaca, with
the development of what are usually called chiefdoms. What marks the rise of
complex culture in Mesoamerica is the emergence of recognizable shared practices
and principles at several locations and the subsequent subscription to them by others
at yet more distant locations. Through long-distance trade, early Mesoamericans
began to recognize the extent of their world. Through surpluses amassed (probably
through trade or warfare), some families began to have what we call wealth, that
is, the wherewithal to devote themselves to activities outside food production, and
the Erst surviving works of art give evidence of that leisure time. Through shared
religious practices, the efEcacy of the gods became manifest. Through both ancestor
worship and a desire to leave a record for posterity, they began to record linear
time. Once they sought permanence in the materials they transformed, they left a
record that modern people can consider evidence of a complex society, or, in ordinary
language, civilization.
At the end of the Formative period, early states developed, with special hierarchies
among administrative centers, towns, and hamlets. States gather a surplus from
tribute or tax, and they use force to back up their sanctions against reluctant
contributors. They also develop systems of notation. A surplus can support full-time
specialists who give up agricultural endeavors and devote themselves to the arts
or religion. Although anthropologists agree that state-level political organization
characterizes civilization, the charismatic complex culture of the Olmecs is more
baiSing, partly because we know so little about their political organization. They
made small cities, but we do not know whether they functioned as city-states, like
those of the later Maya. They traveled long distances, presumably to seek precious
trade goods, but did they use force?
15
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
16
Early in the 8rst millennium Be, the Olmecs forged connections across Mesoamerica, from Central America to western Mexico, perhaps in search of scarce highland
resources, particular!y jade, from which they carved precious objects. By 900 Be,
the nascent Maya civilization at Copan made imitations of Olmec ceramics and jade.
In western Mexico, the Olmecs encountered a sophisticated culture at Xochipala,
where naturalistic human Bgures had been made after 1500 Be. Later, coeval with
La Venta, the Olmecs covered the giant rock outcropping at Chalcatzingo, Morelos,
with depictions of their lords and gods. Olmec-style petroglyphs also mark the cliffs
of highland Guatemala and Chiapas, further suggesting Olmec contacts in the Maya
region. They established a highland center at Teopantecuanitlan, Guerrero; Olmec
artists also made paintings celebrating cave rituals at Cacahuazqui, Juxtlahuaca, and
Oxtotitlan. In Central Mexico, the Olmecs encountered communities with welldeveloped traditions of Sgurine manufacture at Tlatilco and elsewhere. These places
subsequently adopted Olmec forms and imagery and in modern times have yielded
the Snest Olmec ceramic sculpture, particularly large hollow "babies/'
The Early Zapotees and Their Contemporaries
By 600 Be, if not earlier, civilization also rose in Oaxaca among the Zapotees, who
began to reshape the hillside acropolis of Monte Albn into their capital. The
Zapotees early on dominated the region and commemorated their victories by
recording dates in the 260-day calendar and depicting captives with what are
probably their names and places of origin on buildings such as the so-called Temple
of the Danzantes ("Dancers ') at Monte Albn. The Zapotees probably invented
Mesoamerican writing, and they may also have devised the first systems for recording
time. At the end of the Formative era, the Zapotees constructed Mound J at Monte
Mound j at Monte Albn, Oaxaca. Possibly an observatory, the structure features walls covered with
more than 50 carved slabs describing the conquests of. the early Zapotees.
17
INTRODUCTION
Albn (and at least one other similar building at Caballito Blanco), an unusual
pointer-shaped building, possibly an observatory oriented toward the rise of the star
Capella on the night of the Brst zenith passage. These buildings probably conBrm
knowledge of a large body of star lore.
Toward the end of the Formative era, from 100 Be to AD 300 or what is also
termed the Protoclassic, many of the principles and beliefs common to Classicperiod civilization appear to have come together, particularly along the axis of the
Isthmus of Tehuantepec and ranging from Atlantic to PaciBc Coasts, at places as
far-flung as Monte Albn, Dainz, Tres Zapotes, La Mojarra, Chiapa de Corzo,
Izapa, and Kaminaljuy. Across the region, the Principal Bird Deity - probably the
same as Vucub Caquix of the PopcV VuA (the native epic of the Quiche Maya
transcribed into the Roman alphabet at the time of the Conquest) - gained
prominence; the PopoV VuA account of origins, humanity's relationship to chaos, and
the Hero Twins' harrowing of the Underworld, may have been widely subscribed to.
Tres Zapotes in the Olmec Gulf Coast heartland may have flourished about the
time of La Venta, and also exhibits some late Olmec colossal heads, but the site
experienced continued occupation into the Protoclassic, and old Olmec concepts
underlay the foundation of new Mesoamerican ones shared from Oaxaca to
Honduras. Working at Tres Zapotes in the 1930s, Matthew Stirling found part of
what seemed to him to be a date written in the place-notationa! calendar generally
called the Long Count and most prevalent among the later Maya. Although Tres
Zapotes Stela C lacked its Brst number glyph, Stirling correlated the date to 32 B e ,
and subsequent discovery of the upper fragment conBrmed his reading. Other early
Long Count dates occur at Chiapa de Corzo, on the Tuxtla Statuette, and on La
Mojarra Stela 1, which bears two dates in the second century AD and which depicts
a standing lord wearing the Principal Bird Deity headdress and adorned in regalia
like that of later Maya kings. Together, these and other examples give evidence of
the development of a new eastern Mesoamerican tradition that emphasized dynastic
rule and a method of recording time and space permanently using calendrics and
phonetic writing. In this way, linear time as well as cyclical time gained prominence.
Phonetic writing was reBned and elaborated by the Maya, but even in its earliest
appearance, it probably allowed the rough replication of speech.
The Protoclassic Maya
It is the special characteristic of their writing that sets the Maya apart from all
other Mesoamerican peoples. It is probably the technology of writing itself that
enabled them to be what they were. Had the Maya Bourished at a single center,
say, at Tikal - as Teotihuacan civilization had done at Teotihuacan or Zapotee
civilization at Monte Alban - they would not seem so extraordinary to us. But it
was their ability to communicate across distance and through time, to remember a
particular history and to write for posterity, that allowed dozens of cities and towns
to subscribe to a single reigning belief system.
At Protoclassic Izapa, the Maya broadcast their religious ideology on stelae and
on pairs of altars and stelae, presenting the Brst public conBrmation of certain gods Chac, for example - and the rich narrative of the PopoV VuA, as well as of certain
concepts, such as the World Tree. At Abaj Takalik, stelae depict single and paired
lords adorned with the regalia of rulership and accompanying texts, of which only
dates can be read. Kaminaljuy lords commissioned their portraits in the costume
of the Principal Bird Deity and received rich offerings when subsequently interred.
INTRODUCTION
18
19
INTRODUCTION
Aeria! view of the great city of Teotihuacan, with the Pyramid of the Moon in the foreground, and
the Pyramid of the Sun in the center.
[NTRODUCTON
20
and the Mixtees emptied out old Zapotee tombs and reused them for their own
nob!e dead.
No single city dominated the Gulf Coast during the Classic era, nor did competing
centers display a unity of belief and ritual, although modern understanding of the
region has been hampered by rampant looting and insufficient archaeology. In much
of southern Veracruz, at places like Las Remojadas, thousands of "smiling" figurines
have been exhumed; other sites have yielded life-size hollow ceramic tomb
sculptures. Dramatic paintings of bloodletting have been uncovered at Las Higueras.
To the north, El Tajin dominated the region, particularly during the Late Classic,
under the Huastecs, who spoke a Mayan language. Acres of temples and palaces
survive. The Pyramid of the Niches at El Tajin features 365 empty niches, perhaps
a calendrical reference, although other buildings use varied niche configurations.
Ballcourts and ballgame paraphernalia abound, and architectural sculpture illustrates
the playing of the game and human sacrifice.
The Classic Maya
In the 3rd c. AD, the Maya cities in the tropica! lowlands continued to thrive under
dynastic kings. As demonstrated archaeologically at Tikal, the portraits of individual
rulers were carved on stone monuments with accompanying texts that glorified their
reign, and competing Maya dynasties emerged at Uaxactn, Xultn, Ro Azul, and
elsewhere in the Petn; by AD 500, Caracol, Copn, Yaxchiln, Piedras Negras,
Bonampak, Calakmul and other cities emerged as the centers of small but ambitious
polities. Tikal may well have been the Erst dynasty to exploit the ideology and
technology of warfare promulgated by Teotihuacan when it took hold of power at
Uaxactn. Maya rulers began to record their victories, parentage, and the passage
of time itself on their monuments. Archaeologists had long used the 6th c. lapse in
hieroglyphic inscriptions at Tikal to divide Early from Late Classic; that lapse has
now been explained by the ignominious defeat of Tikal by Caracol in a six-year war,
an event proudly recorded by Caracol upon its culmination in 562. Although Tikal
recovered its economic well-being by the 8th c., its ruling family was apparently
rent by the defeat, and, after establishing themselves in the Petexbatn, one
competing branch caused Tikal plenty of trouble.
During the 8th c., the Maya nobility experienced both unparalleled wealth and
unprecedented problems. All across the region, polity fought with polity, kings
fell captive and suffered sacrifice. Populations grew rapidly and degraded the
environment in desperate attempts to cultivate sufficient food. At the end of the 8th
c. and over the course of the 9th c., ceremonial precincts fell into disrepair and
abandonment in what has been called the Classic Maya collapse; populations shrank,
although the entire region was still populated at the time of the Conquest. During
the 9th c., Maya kings at Uxmal and elsewhere in the Puuc hills commissioned
elaborate buildings before these, too, suffered abandonment.
To modern viewers, Maya cities often seem a baffling web of rambling structures
punctuated by tall pyramids, all laid out randomly across the tropical landscape.
Maya cities lack streets and later buildings overlie earlier ones, further complicating
the picture. But these buildings bear fundamental meanings and many had specific
uses. Most tall pyramidal buildings house tombs underneath them (the Temple of
Inscriptions at Palenque and Temple I at Tikal are the best-known examples),
enshrining ancestors and revealing the Maya cult of ancestor worship, which in
practice may have been the primary form of religious devotion. And, particularly
21
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
22
Late Classic polychrome mural from Cacaxtla, Tlaxcala. Standing on a Feathered Serpent, the figure is
clad in a bird costume and carries a ceremonial bar.
as revealed by painted ceramics of the Late Classic period and in the Bonampak
muris, a burgeoning Maya elite lived rich and abundant lives within their palaces
where they engaged in courtly arts, including writing and painting.
The Termina! Classic
The decline of both Teotihuacan and the Maya cities left a power vacuum in
Mesoamerica by the 9th c. Regional cultures flourished at Xochicalco, Cholula, and
Cacaxtla in the Mexican highlands; profoundly affected by foreign influence, the
Maya city of Seibal underwent a renewal; although El Tajin, too, went into decline
along the Gulf Coast, the Huastecs flourished, as did Zapotees south of Monte
Alban, at Mitla and Yagul. The period seems to have been a time of great
interregional interchange, and both Maya iconography and formal concepts became
part of a new Mesoamerican synthesis that may have been possible only with the
demise of Teotihuacan. By 900, however, a new force had appeared on the scene:
the Toltecs.
The Ear!y Postdassic: Tu!a and Chichen Itza
From their high, arid, cool capital of Tula (or Tollan), the Toltecs took on aspects
of the Teotihuacan heritage that served their purposes. They adopted many of their
23
INTRODUCTION
gods, left little evidence of public writing, and tike the Teotihuacanos, tived in patace
compounds. Of at! Mesoamerican traders, the Tottecs are perhaps the most
tegendary: they forayed into the far north, to what is now the American Southwest,
to trade for turquoise, but they estabtished their most profound contacts with the
Maya at Chichen Itz in northern Yucatan and capitalized on the integration of
Mesoamerica.
Around the year 900, Chichen Itz rose to new prominence and may wet! have
been the largest city in Mesoamerica. Its Sacred Cenote was one of the most
important pilgrimage destinations of the ancient Mesoamerican world. Whether
through voluntary alliance or through domination by one culture of the other, the
Toltecs and Maya developed new forms of architecture and sculpture - including
cAacmoo/s (stone sculptures of reclining human forms that received human sacrifices)
and serpent columns - that flourished at both cities. Whereas the old Maya order
invested its power in the individual ruler and his or her cult, at Chichen and Tula
it is the position and power of the warrior-king, rather than his lineage and portrait,
that holds sway. As a result, ruler portraits vanished from Chichen, to be replaced
by carved thrones, on which any suitable candidate might sit. Mayan hieroglyphic
texts nevertheless record the names of those who ruled in the period. At Tula,
perhaps initially a major receptor for Maya ideology, ruler portraits on stone slabs
were tried before the practice was abandoned. Although heart sacriSce was known
to the earlier Maya, at Chichen Itz it took on new ritual force after its introduction
in the Toltec era.
Like all centers of Mesoamerican civilizations, Chichen and Tula eventually both
fell into decline, and by no later than the 12th c., Mesoamerica entered a period
when no major city or culture exerted much influence beyond its local region. At
Mayapan, Maya lords built a walled city and reigned for almost two centuries. In
Reconstruction drawing of the Early Postclassic site of Chichen Itz, Yucatn. The Sacred Cenote,
from which the site took its name, is depicted in the foreground.
[INTRODUCTION
24
the final centuries before the Spanish Conquest, the Yucatec Maya had organized
themselves into balkanized, quarreling states, using different styles and media to
record their gods and their rituals at Santa Rita, Tulum, and elsewhere, and in the
four surviving Maya codices. In the Guatemalan highlands, Maya lords ruled from
hilltop acropolises. In 1524, the Spanish allied with the Cakchiquel at Iximche to
defeat the Quiche Maya at Utatlan. After the Conquest, a Quich nobleman used
the European alphabet to transcribe his people's sacred book, the Pqpo/ VuA. Other
important religious texts, including the Books of Chilam Balam, were transcribed
through the late 1700s.
The Postclassic Mixtees and Aztecs
In Oaxaca, the Mixtees rose to power during the Postclassic. They took over some
of the ancient places sacred to the Zapotees, and they began to inter their noble
dead in the old Zapotee tombs at Monte Alban. At the time of the Spanish Conquest,
they kept genealogies documenting both continuity and internecine strife over
generations. The Aztecs referred to great artisans as fo/feca, but the greatest resident
craft specialists in Tenochtitlan at the time of the Conquest were the Mixtees,
known for their skills in metalwork and mosaics. Alfonso Caso s discovery of a royal
Mixtee tomb at Monte Albn in 1932 offered the 20th c. the closest comparisons we
may ever have to what Aztec gold may have looked like, since so little gold from
Tenochtitlan survived the Spanish invasion.
After years of nomadic wandering, a warlike group of Nahuatl speakers founded
their capital on an island in Lake Texcoco in 1345. They called themselves the
Mexica and their city Mexico-Tenochtitlan, or Tenochtitlan. Since the 19th c., the
Mexica have usually been grouped with other Nahuatl-speakers in the Valley of
Mexico under the name Aztecs, the name we also use, but they gave the name of
their city, Mexico-Tenochtitlan, to the 16th c. capital of New Spain that grew up on
top of it and subsequently to the new republic of Mexico in 1810.
Inheritors of the rich and complex Mesoamerican past, the Aztecs shared many
gods with the civilizations that had gone before, but they honored Huitzilopochtli,
their own solar cult god, above all. In their ceremonial precinct, they built a dual
pyramid, the Hueteocalli or Temp/o Mayor, and dedicated its southern shrine to
Huitzilopochtli and the northern one to Tlaloc, a god that had come to symbolize
antiquity and legitimacy as well as rain, earth, and fertility. After they defeated the
neighboring Tepanecs in 1428, the Aztecs embarked on a campaign to exact both
trade and tribute, first, from near neighbors, and later, from places as far Rung as
Guatemala and the Veracruz coast. The pocAteca, or long-distance traders, were
the key to both economic and military success, for their preliminary missions often
led the way to Aztec imperialism. The Aztecs adopted new gods - Xipe Totee, for
example, had nourished along the Gulf and in Oaxaca before gaining a major role
among the Aztecs - and elevated old ones, while some others they humiliated by
placing their idols in a dark temple designed to be their prison. After a brutal
conquest, the Aztecs often insisted that a subject town take on Huitzilopochtli as its
god, but he was usually an unwelcome addition, for his worship required regular
human sacrifice.
The Aztecs turned their swampy island into a city whose beauty and complexity
dazzled the Spanish conquerors, who also marveled at the cuisine, the gardens, the
exotic animals kept in a zoo, and the fastidiousness of the populace. Like Venice,
Tenochtitlan was laid out along canals, and boatmen poled canoes instead of gondolas
25
INTRODUCTION
The ceremonia! precinct of the Aztec capita! city, Tenochtitian, depicted in a reconstruction painting
by Ignacio Marquina. In front of the massive Temp!o Mayor one can discern the circular wind temp!e
of Ehecatl-Quetzalcoatl and the platform supporting the fema/acaf/ dish of gladiatorial sacrifice.
along its axes. Aqueducts brought fresh water to the city from Chapultepec, a region
of hiHy springs to the west, and causeways connected the island to the mainland.
At Tlatelolco on the north side of the island, Corts described a market teeming
with goods and traders, with what he believed to be some 60,000 souls in attendance.
The Aztec ruler Motecuhzoma II and his retinue lived in a grand palace to the west
of the
Mayor. Ordinary folk, or maceAna/As, lived in clan groupings called
ca/pu/A, the essential administrative component of the city. Foreigners, including
Mixtee craftsmen, lived in their own barrios.
For years, the Aztecs had engaged in what they called xocAfyaoyot/ or "Bowery
w a r/' In these contests, the Aztecs fought neighboring cities in order to garner
sacriBcial victims but not to win outright victory. Young Aztec soldiers became
seasoned Bghters, and the demanding Huitzilopochtli received his due, but the
Aztecs earned a hatred more relentless from their enemies, particularly in Tlaxcala,
than if they had subjected them to a clear-cut defeat and death on the battleBeld.
When the Spanish invaded Mesoamerica, this sort of warfare baiHed them, for the
Aztecs sought to capture their new Spanish foe?s for subsequent sacrifice. The Spanish
cut a swath of destruction, slaughtering their Aztec enemies. And where the Aztecs
might have anticipated that a negative outcome would lead to an unfavorable tribute
arrangement, they could never have guessed that the Spanish would seek to bring
their world to an absolute end.
In 1519, Corts received Doa Marina (often known as La Malinche, but Corts
is also called Malinche in some accounts), a young multilingual noblewoman, as a
gift, after her skills as a translator had been demonstrated to him. She, along with
NTHODUCTION
Jernimo de Aguilar, a Spanish priest stranded for years among the Maya, could
transate for Corts, so that he could begin to understand the world around him.
No such informed interlocutors interpreted the Spanish world-view for the Aztecs,
or for any of the peoples of Mesoamerica, although they quickly found out what
the future had in store for them. Demographers have estimated that some 20 to 25
million people lived within the boundaries of what is now Mexico in 1519. The
Spanish surveyed the population late in the 16th c. and found a scant million souls,
the survivors of an invasion that wreaked death and destruction.
In 1521, once Cortes and his men reigned triumphant in Tenochtitlan, the Spanish
Crown and the Catholic church began to devise plans for both the administrative
control and religious conversion of the vast entity soon known as New Spain.
Disparate native groups found themselves lumped together under a new name,
Indians, an awkward term with which we still labor. Native lords often served the
new masters, keeping much administrative control in native hands in the early
Colonial period.
Artists went to work for the new regime, copying Aztec tribute lists, making maps
of the conquered world, and, from time to time, copying or transcribing a religious
document that managed to escape the torch. Some new hybrid types of books were
devised that used native artists and ideas to warn missionaries of the idolatry
they were fighting, while at the same time, some traditional forms of writing and
record-keeping went on. Mixtee lords, for example, continued to keep detailed
pictorial genealogies, and some of these manuscripts later served as evidence in civil
suits over rights to land.
Independence from Spain removed native peoples from protection that had been
offered by the Spanish Crown and in some cases led to more brutal exploitation. In
recent times, despite both oppression and the lure of urban life, many native peoples
and cultures have survived, and some have thrived.
INTRODUCTION
27
BC.
importance of world directions and trees, suggest a distant and ancient relation to
Asia. Nonetheless, however profound or early these links may be, they are not
reflected in the scant archaeological remains of the earliest peoples. It is not until
the Archaic period (7000-2000 B e ) , in the arid highlands of southern Mexico, that
concrete evidence of complex religious activity appears. Excavations in the Tehuacan
Valley of Puebla have uncovered two groups of human burials dating to approximately
the 6th millennium B e . Wrapped in blankets and nets, the bodies were also
accompanied by baskets. Some of these individuals were burned and partly
dismembered, perhaps as an early form of ceremonial cannibalism. Although the
actual significance of this ritual mutilation remains to be established, these Tehuacan
burials clearly demonstrate an early concern and belief in the afterlife.
The site of Gheo Shih, situated in the Tlacolula Valley of highland Oaxaca, reveals
other tantalizing evidence of ceremonialism during the Archaic period. Gheo Shih
roughly dates to 5000-4000 B e , and seems to have been a seasonal site where bands
of people would gather together to collect certain wild plant foods. Archaeologists
uncovered an ancient surface Hanked by lines of stones on the two longer sides.
Some 65 feet (20 meters) long and 23 feet (7 meters) wide, the Hoor area seemed
to have been swept and was virtually devoid of debris. Although the lines of stones
may have delineated a dance Hoor, it is also possible that they marked the sides of
an early, simple ballcourt alley. The ancient Oaxacans may have imported rubber
balls for the ballgame, but it is far more likely that they were fashioned of locally
avaHable leather, wood or stone. Ritualized competitive games may have been an
important form of social interaction during seasonal gatherings in the Archaic period.
INTRODUCTION
ZB
The Earty Formative period saw major changes that were important for the !ater
development of Mesoamerica: the introduction of farming, the growth of populations
thanks to settled village life, and the production of pottery. With the appearance of
sedentary villages containing relatively large populations, greater evidence of
complex religious activities and beliefs survives. During the mid 2nd millennium B e ,
Formative villages appear widely in the southern coastal region of Chiapas, Mexico.
Known as Ocos, this Early Formative culture already displays a number of important
elements observed in later Mesoamerican religious systems. In certain Ocos burials,
mourners placed mica mirrors with the dead: obsidian;- pyrite, and other stone
mirrors continued to be revered objects of ornament and ritual until the Spanish
Conquest in the 16th c. With the appearance of pottery, ceramic figurines become
common at Ocos and other Formative sites. The function of these Formative figurines
is unknown; many examples portray youthful, full-bodied women, as if they reflect
a concern with human or agricultural fertility. Often beautifully worked, Ocos
figurines frequently represent curious blendings of human and zoomorphic traits
that have no obvious counterparts in the natural world. At times, these strange
figures are seated upon thrones. According to archaeologist John Clark, these throne
figures may portray shamanic chiefs wearing animal masks of their spirit companions.
The Olmecs and the Natural World
In contrast to Ocos, the Olmecs after 1200 BC constructed huge earthworks and
carved magnificent stone sculptures. Massive thrones, stelae, and colossal heads all
testify to both the virtuosity of Olmec artisans and the power of the early rulers
who commissioned such works. Monuments from San Lorenzo, La Venta, and other
Olmec sites frequently portray actual Olmec kings, and thus clearly these sculptures
are at least partly historical in nature. However, the power of these early kings was
by no means simply secular; instead, they carefully portrayed themselves in relation
to gods and other supernatural forces. Moreover, there are strong indications that
the Olmecs had complex concepts regarding shamanic transformation. As among
later Mesoamerican peoples, particularly powerful individuals were believed to be
able to transform themselves into jaguars.
Among the Olmecs and later peoples of Mesoamerica, certain places were
considered especially sacred. Quite often, these locations corresponded to critical
junctions between the planes of sky, earth, and Underworld. The Olmecs regarded
caves, or entrances to the netherworld, as powerful and magical places. Similarly,
at the junction of sky and earth, mountains were also considered to be particularly
sacred places, and it is probable that like later Mesoamerican peoples the Olmecs
considered pyramids to be replications of mountains. Mountains that contained
springs or caves were particularly revered, since they offered simultaneous access
to all three planes: sky, earth, and Underworld. Certain Olmec mountain sites, such
as El Manat, Chalcatzingo, and Oxtotitlan, may have served as important oracles,
a means of communicating with the powers of the heavens, earth and Underworld.
Like their successors, the Olmecs exhibited a fascination with creatures and forces
of the natural world. In their early art one can discern representations of jaguars,
harpy eagles, sharks, caimans, and other denizens of their lowland environment.
But there are also strange mergings of animal species, as if the Olmecs were
attempting to amalgamate the sky, earth, and sea into a dynamic and coherent
whole. Although little is known of the Olmec pantheon, it appears that like later
peoples they had gods of particular phenomena, such as rain, the earth, and maize.
29
INTRODUCTION
A Middle Formative
Olmec
representation o fa
figure seated inside
acave. From
Chalcatzingo,
Morelos.
INTRODUCTION
30
of balance and harmony. This may be expressed in terms of the individua!, the
community, or the surrounding wor!d. Imbalance and discord can !ead to sickness,
death, socia! discord, famine, and even world destruction. In ancient Mesoamerica,
there were even gods who personiSed excess. In Postclassic Central Mexico,
the Ahuiateteo simultaneously portrayed particular vices and their consequent
punishment. Through particular forms of religious observance, the peoples of
Mesoamerica have sought to ensure harmony both with themselves and with the
greater cosmos.
Sacrifice and Replication
Among the best-known religious practices of ancient Mesoamerica is human sacrifice.
Lurid images of sacrificed maidens and virile warriors have fascinated European
imaginations since the Spanish Conquest. But for Mesoamericans human sacrifice
was a fundamental means to maintain world harmony and balance. According to
the Quiche Maya Popo/ VuA, the gods fashioned the present human race, the people
of maize, to supply nourishment in the form of prayer and sacrifice. The offering of
nourishing human substance could be in the form of penitential bloodletting, or
more dramaticalty, the sacrifice of individuals. In both cases, the act signified the
offering of the self, either by individual voluntary bloodletting, or collectively with
a human victim. The concept of retribution was closely tied to the act of sacrifice.
In exchange for life, humans needed to acknowledge and even reimburse the forces
that made life possible. The Aztecs viewed human sacrifice partly as retribution for
cosmic theft. According to Aztec belief, Ehecatl-Quetzalcoatl stole the bones out of
which people were created from the Underworld death god. Similarly, in the Popo/
VuA, the pregnant Xquic escapes from the Underworld to give birth to the Hero
Twins on the surface of the earth. In ancient Mesoamerican thought, humans survive
on not merely borrowed but stolen time.
One of the underlying organizational principles of Mesoamerican religion is
replication, in which essential patterns of everyday life and the surrounding world
are copied and incorporated as models of religious thought and action. Basic features
of the social world are often repeated on an increasingly larger scale to encompass
the world and the workings of the universe. For example, in the Maya region, the
house with its four walls and corner posts could stand for a maize Beld, the
community, and the structure of the cosmos. Grand and abstract concepts are placed
in human terms, and conversely, the ordered structure of the universe serves to
sanctify and validate human social conventions. Quite frequently, such series of
structural associations are expressed in ritual, with similar rites being performed for
the individual, the community, or the cosmos. Thus personal penitential bloodletting
could be repeated on a larger and more elaborate public scale in the form of human
sacrifice. The Aztec New Fire ceremony provides another example. In Aztec rites
of personal purification, straws or sticks used in bloodletting were bound in bundles
with a paper strip. The large bound stick bundles in the great New Fire ceremony
held once every 52 years were probably but gloriBed versions of the small bundles
used in personal bloodletting. Like the penitential bloodletting event, the rite was
also for purification, but in terms of the world rather than simply the individual.
Just as basic features can be replicated from the small to the large, the reverse
is also true. Objects or concepts of cosmic distance or size are copied into a human
scale. The sacred centers of Mesoamerican sites often copy cosmic geography. The
Aztec 7emp/o Mayor dual pyramid, situated in the center of Tenochtitlan,
INTRODUCTION
31
OMEYOCAN
. . 1 3 HEAVENS in the
CELEST1ALLEVEL
--
9 STEPS to the
UNDERWORLD LEVEL
M IC T L A N
[MTRODUCTION
32
33
INTRODUCTION
greater cycle of 104 years. Of crucial importance in Mesoamerican ritual and thought
are period endings, during which a unit of time is terminated and another begins.
For the Postclassic Maya of Yucatn, the end of the 365-day year was a major
concern, whereas for the Aztecs, it was the completion of the 52-year cycle. The
completion of major Long Count cycles must have been of momentous significance
to the Classic Maya. There have even been suggestions, albeit unlikely, that the
completion of the tenth Baktun (10.0.0.0.0) of the Maya Long Count in AD 830 was
a major reason for the Classic Maya collapse.
The ending and renewal of calendrical periods were commonly expressed through
concepts of world creation and destruction. In fact, the New Year rites of the Yucatec
and the New Fire ceremony of the Aztecs concerned the reassertion of the ordered
world from the forces of chaos and darkness. In both regions, it was believed that
such period endings could mark the end of the present world. In Mesoamerican
thought, creation, as well as calendrics, is also cyclical. The Maya Pqpo/ Vu/?, Aztec
accounts, and contemporary mythology share common and explicit references to
multiple creations and destructions. Just as the series of previous worlds were
destroyed, it was believed that this world in which we live would also end.
One of the basic concerns of Mesoamerican calendrics was the recording and
prediction of astronomical events. The sun, moon, planets and constellations exerted
powerful influences upon people and the world. Two astronomical events that were
of supreme importance were solar eclipses and the Brst appearance of Venus as
Morning Star. The ancient Maya, with the most developed form of astronomical
notation known for Mesoamerica, had elaborate tables recording and predicting
eclipses and the cycle of Venus. It was widely believed that the world could be
destroyed by demons of darkness during solar eclipses. Moreover, the rays of the
Morning Star at heliacal rising were considered to be particularly dangerous, and
threatened speciBc people and things of the natural world. It is now knowrr that the
Classic Maya frequently scheduled battles to coincide with the movements of Venus,
especially the Brst rising of Venus as evening star.
The apparent movements of the planets and constellations were considered to be
the reenactments of cosmic mythical events. To the Aztecs, the movement of Ursa
Major into the sea may have represented Tezcatlipoca losing his foot during the
cosmic battle with the great earth monster. Recent investigations by Linda Scheie
and David Freidel suggest that the Classic Maya also observed mythological events
in the movement of the stars, probably based on an ancestral form of the PopoV VuA
creation epic.
Religion and Statecraft
The religious worlds of all classes of society were closely integrated in ancient
Mesoamerica. Agricultural fertility was a major concern of all, and through
replication, ritual acts of commoner and elite were linked. Nonetheless, the
sophistication and complexity of Mesoamerican writing, calendrics and astronomy
all point to the existence of full-time specialists, even though the oiBce of priest has
not yet been documented in Classic period writing or art. Priestly offices are well
known for the Postclassic period. Classic-period kings and other individuals of high
* ofBce were also religious experts, and the rituals and beliefs surrounding rulers were
extremely complex. Ancestor worship was a major concern of elite dynasties in
ancient Mesoamerica, and Classic Maya art is Riled with scenes of rulers and their
kin offering blood and other sacrifices to the honored dead.
[IN T R O D U C T IO N
34
35
INTRODUCTION
pertaining to rulership and other high ofEces were likewise suppressed, not only
because of their chaMenge to Christian doctrine but a!so because of their essentially
political nature, which could serve as catalysts for rebellion. However, the eradication
of native Mesoamerican customs was by no means total. Many of the more profound
and lasting religious beliefs continue to the present day. Rich oral traditions
encompassing ritual speech, songs, and mythology are contained in Nahuatl, Mayan,
Mixtee, and other modern native languages. Forms of the 260-day and vague 365day calendar are still used in southeastern Mesoamerica. Ceremonies to ensure
agricultural fertility are widely performed in Mesoamerica, and copa/ incense,
Sowers, and prepared foods are among the offerings still presented to the gods and
ancestors. Although this volume specifically concerns Preconquest Mesoamerican
religion, it should be remembered that we are describing but the ancient origins
and history of a still living and vibrant culture.
Subject Index
1.
C ods, goddesses
X ip e T o te e
T E O T IH U A C A N
and o th er
X iu hco atl
F a t C od
supernatura! beings
X iu h te c u h tli
H u e h u e te o tl
ancestral couple
celestial b ird
X o c h ip illi
X o ch iq u etzal
Jaguar gods
Jagu ar-ser p e n t-b ird
death gods
X o lo tl
P u lqu e gods
Q u e tza lc o a tl
MAYA
A x T E C A N D P oS T C L A S S iC
B icephalic M o n s te r
C E N T R A L M E X IC O
C hac
D iv in g God
F a t C od
A h uiateteo
C h alch iu h tlicu e
C hicom ecoatl
C ihuacoatl
C ih u ateteo
C in te o tl
C oatlicue
Coyolxauhqui
E hecatl
H uehuecoyot!
H u eh u ete o tl
H u itzilo p o ch tli
H am atecuhtli
Itzp a p a lo tl
Itztla c o liu h q u i-Ix q u im illi
Jaguar gods
M acu ilxoch itl
M a ize gods
M a y ah u el
M ic tla n te c u h tli
M ixco atl
O m eteo tl
Pulque gods
Q u etzalcoatl
Scribal gods
Sky Bearers
Tezcatlipoca
T lah u izcalp an tecu h tli
T lalo c
T la lte c u h tli
T la zo lte o tl
Toci
Tonacatecuhtli
T o n atiu h
T zitzim im e
T eo tih u ac an gods
T la lo c
W a r S erpent
ZAPOTEC
C ocijo
H u n H u nah p u
Itza m n a
P rin cip al B ird D e ity
Ixchel
Jaguar gods
Jester C od
K in ic h A h a u
Long-nosed and
L o n g-lipp ed deities
M a ize gods
M a n ik in scepter
P ad d ler Cods
P alenque T ria d Cods
Pauahtun
Q u etzalcoatl
Schellhas gods
Scribal gods
Sky B earers
T o h il
Vision Serpent
Vucub C aquix
W a te r L ily S erpent
M lX T E C
M ix te e gods
X ip e Totee
Yahui
OLM EC
Jaguar gods
M a iz e gods
O lm ec gods
Q u etzalcoatl
W ere-jag u ars
H u e h u e te o tl
Jaguar gods
M a iz e gods
P rin cip a l B ird D e ity
X ip e T o tee
2.
F lo ra and fau n a
am aran th
bats
b u tte r Ay
cacao
caim an
ceiba
celestial b ird
cotton
d eer
dog
eagle
Rowers
hallucinogens
hu m m in g b ird
ja g u ar
ja g u a r-s e rp e n t-b ird
m aguey
m aize
m onkey
m uan ow l
owls
parrots and m acaws
peccary
q uetzal
ra b b it
SUBJECT INDEJt
37
serpent
shark
spiders
toad
tobacco
tu rtle
vu ltu re
w a te r lily
&
Sacred places
A ztian
caves
cenote
Chicom oztoc
C oatepec
pyram id
springs
Tam oanchan
tem ple
Teotihuacan
Tlalocan
T o lla n
U n d erw o rld
4. O bjects, symbols,
and m aterials
a lta r
a tl-tla c h in o lli
blood
bundle
canoe
cerem onial bar
chacmoo!
cinnabar and h em atite
cloth
coatepantli
codex
colors
colossal heads
costum e
crossroads
cuauhxicalli
d en tistry
directions
excrem ent
fan
Hint
goM
hacha
hearts
incense
^
ja d e
je w e lry
litters
m at
M exican year sign
nahual
nam es and titles
night
num bers
omens
Popol Vuh
S tirlin g hypothesis
tonal
trecena
tw ins
m irrors
m o rtu ary bundles
obsidian
palm a
paper
pulque
re p tile eye
ru b b er
shell
sky bands
uay
U n d erw o rld
vein ten a
sm iling Bgures
sw eatbath
tem alacatl
throne
w orld trees
w ritin g
tombs
trophy heads
tuerto
year bearers
7.
turquoise
tzom pantli
w eaponry
yoke
5. N a tu ra l phenom ena
daw n
earth
eclipse
ligh tn in g and thunder
M ilk y W ay
moon
m ountains
night
rain
sea
sky
springs
stars and planets
sun
Venus
w a te r
w ind
6.
a fte rlife
calendar
creation
death
d efo rm ity
deification
disease
d u ality
excrem ent
Hre
F iv e Suns
gods
hearts
m ilp a
R itu a lp ra c tic e s
and th e ir participants
accession
autosacriiice
ballgam e
baptism
b irth
bloodletting
cannibalism
captives
cargo
C ihuacoatl
clowns
confession
curing
dance
death
d eity im personation
d ivin atio n
dw arves and hunchbacks
enemas
execution
hum an sacriHce
m arriage
m erchants
music
p ato lli
pilgrim age
priests
puriH cation
sacrifice
shamans
term in atio n rituals
tlato an i
uay
uayeb
vein ten a
w a rrio r orders
38
ACCESSION
THRONE.
Some
m onum ents in clu d e visitors, im p ly in g th a t lik e th e ir A ztec cou n terp arts - M a y a acces
sion ritu als m ay have d ra w n the atten d ance
o f n o b ility throughout the region. A ltho u g h
succession am ong th e M a y a could fo llo w from
one b ro th e r to a n o th er, p rim o g e n itu re was a
g en eral ru le .
In no M eso am erican c iv iliza tio n is th e re
any evidence o f re tire m e n t or abd icatio n fro m
ru lership. O nce a king acceded to ofRce,
he a p p a ren tly served u n til D E A T H , and no
successor acceded u n til p ro p er arrangem ents
could be m ade, a process th a t g en e rally took
an yw h ere from a fe w w eeks to a year. T h e
te n -ye ar in terreg n u m (AD 7 4 2 -5 2 ) b etw e en
the reigns o f M a y a kings Shield Jaguar and
B ird Jaguar th e G re a t a t Y axchilan is anom a
lous.
acrobats In 16th c. M eso am erica, acrobats
and contortionists form ed an im p o rta n t class
o f ritu a l en te rta in ers. In his triu m p h a l re tu rn
to Spain in 1528, H e rn n C orts included
n ative acrobats in his entourage. In th a t
year, C h risto p h er W e id itz illu s tra te d one o f
these acrobats, ju g g lin g a beam o f w ood w ith
his fe e t. S im ilar acrobats are know n fo r both
the L a te Postclassic M ixtees as w e ll as Aztecs.
C o n to rted acrobats also app ear in Classic
M a y a a rt, fre q u e n tly w ith th e ir legs arching
over th e ir heads. A t tim es they are supplied
w ith snake m arkings, as if allu d in g to the
alm ost m iraculous, sinuous contortions o f the
SERPENT. T h is fascination w ith acrobatic con
tortionists appears as e a rly as th e Olm ecs. A
39
AFTERLIFE
40
AHUIATETEO
n in e o f the U n d e rw o rld . T h e m eans o f d ea th
a /m
D E F O R M IT Y .
a n o th er
who fe ll to the
b a ttlin g in fa n t);
ucHTNiNC, or w ho d ro w n ed, or w ho fe ll p re y
alta rs o f th e O lm ecs w e re p ro b ab ly
THRONES.
th e ir jo u rn e y.
H U M A N S A C R IF IC E
41
ATL-TLACHINOLLI
42
AUTOSACRIFICE
o f the n o b ility .
A ccording to A ztec accounts, the gods
p e rfo ra tio n .
a x is m u n d i
destructions o f the
EARTH.
T h e y d re w
s e . W O R L D TR E E
BLO O D
QUETZALCO ATL,
in p a rtic u la r,
d e p a rtu re fo r th e M e x ic a (A ztecs). T h e m y th
U NDERW ORLD.
Then,
the
in an act o f autosacriRce a t
T E O T iH U A C A N ,
blood S A C R IF IC E .
A ztec lords d re w blood from th e ir ears,
elbow s, and shins w ith sharp M A C U E Y spines
or Rled bones. A tw isted grass b all held the
spines w hen not in use, and the em blem o f
the b all and spines was carved on dozens o f
m ajor A ztec sculptures to signify th e responsi
b ilities o f A ztec n o b ility.
O f a ll M esoam erican d eities, Q u etzalcoatl
most em bodied the burden o f sacriRce. O n a
H uastec re lie f, Q uetzalcoatl pierces his
tongue w ith a huge p erfo ra to r, and STARS and
other precious elem ents stream from the
w ound, as if given b irth from his offering.
Both M a y a m en and w om en p erfo rm ed
b loodletting as autosacriRce. M e n character
istically d re w blood from the penis. T h e act
is g raphically recorded on a num ber o f Classic
M a y a pain ted pots, b u t even in the years
a fte r the Spanish Conquest, Bishop D iego de
L an d a saw such autosacriRce p erform ed in
Y ucatan, and a M a d rid Codex illu stratio n
shows several gods linked together by a rope
th a t runs through a ll th e ir penises. W om en
d re w blood fro m the tongue or ear, as m en
also did upon occasion, and both collected
the blood offerings on PAPER, w hich was then
43
BALLGAME
M A IZ E C O D ,
HUMAN
44
BAPTISM
SACRIFICE. In som e instances, victorious b a ll
players
d ec ap itated
skullracks
fo r
ballcourts
(see
the
th e
d e fe a te d
trophies
o fte n
ones;
adjo in
the
T Z O M P A N T L i).
A m ong
d e ta ile d
a Bight o f stairs.
T h e e q u ip m en t fo r the b allg am e v a rie d
descriptions o f th e
ritu a l speech
B IR T H .
H o w e v e r, the
C A T IO N ,
M AT.
45
BIRTH
of decapitation. In a d d itio n , FLINT blades probably denoting sacriAce - can app ear on
the snout or w ings o f the creatu re.
T h e bat plays a p ro m in e n t ro le in the
art o f the Classic Zapotees, and com m only
appears on ceram ic fu n e ra ry urns. L ik e the
la te r exam ples o f Postclassic C e n tra l M exico ,
the Zapotee b at is often dep icted w ith chipped
stone blades, p robably an allusion to sacrifice.
Supplied w ith large claw s, round ears, and a
toothy m uzzle, the Zapotee b at figure
resem bles the JAGUAR save for one curious
convention: a large crest projecting from
the top o f the forehead. A fine JADE mosaic
exam ple o f a b at head was discovered d uring
excavations a t the Zapotee site o f M o n te
A lban. D a tin g to approxim ately the beginning
o f the C h ristian era, this Agure displays the
forehead crest as w e ll as the rounded ears
and fanged snout. T h e three p endant CELTlik e stones id e n tify this rem arkab le mask as
a pectoral or b e lt piece. In ancient M esoam erica, such masks seem to have been m odeled
on TROPHY HEADS, again suggesting the associ
atio n w ith d ecapitation.
SUN
in the
UNDERWORLD.
B LO O D
was a source o f g re at fascination in an cien t
stream s -
m id w ives, w ho tended
to be aged, post
b lo o d le ttin g T h e act o f d ra w in g
BLO O D
from
Because th e
G O DS
the aged
TEM PLES
A U T O S A C R IF IC E .
47
BUNDLE
Blood serpents
emanating from the
neck of a decapitated
ballplayer, El Aparicio,
Veracruz, Late Classic
period.
Figure engaged in
bloodletting from his
penis, detail of Huastec
conch shell pendant,
Postclassic period.
5 e e a / s o HU M A N SACRIFICE.
BUTTERFLY
from m asked god bundles, ro u n d , kno tted
bundles com m only a p p e ar in Classic M a y a
scenes. In a n u m b er o f instances, th e y a re
bund
B oth
th e
M aya
and
C e n tra l M exicans
proboscises
and
fe a th e r-rim m e d
eyes.
JAG UA R .
In
the
T h e b u tte rfly -
(see
CA LEN DA R).
spread appearance o f b u tterflies on T e o tih u acan INCENSE burners, the Teo tih u acan b u tte r
w a r. In
L a te
FIR E
and w ar.
calendars
tracked
J2#0-c%ay aAnanac
Com m on to a ll M eso am erica, th e 2 60-d ay
cycle, the oldest and m ost im p o rta n t calen d ar,
rem ains in use am ong a fe w groups o f h ig h
lan d M a y a in G u a te m ala and am ong some
O axacan peoples. (Som e h ig h lan d M a y a s till
keep a 365-d ay calendar as w e ll.) In this
calendar, a re p ea tin g cycle o f 20 d ay nam es
pairs w ith 13 day num bers, y ield in g a count
o f 260 days, a n um ber th a t bears no re latio n
e ith e r to astronom ical or to a g ric u ltu ra l phen
om ena. I t w as p robably devised by m idw ives
to calculate b irth d ates, w o rkin g fro m Erst
m issed m enstrual p erio d to BIRTH, approxim at
ing the 9-m o n th hum an gestation p eriod. In
m any parts o f M exico , hum ans and gods took
th e ir nam es fro m th e ir d ate o f b irth in this
calen d ar, and w e re reg ard ed as having com
p le te d one 260-d ay cycle a t b irth .
This calen d ar took a special nam e in every
n ativ e language, although m any o f the nam es
are now lost, and archaeologists have some-
CALENDAR
49
(Le/t) Butterdy warrior
with shield and
spearthrower, Xelha,
Quintana Roo, Early
Classic period. Although
found in the Maya area,
this mural painting is in
typical Teotihuacan style.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
M a y a , Yucatec nam e
A ztec nam e
m eaning, association
Im ix (w a te rlily )
Ik (w in d )
A kb a l (darkness)
K an (m aize)
C hicchan (celestial snake)
C im i (d eath )
M a n ik (d e e r)
L a m a t (Venus)
M u lu c (jad e, w a te r)
O c (dog)
C huen (m onkey)
E b (e v il rain?)
B en (green m aize)
lx (jag u ar)
A catl (reed )
O celotl (jag u ar)
ja g u ar
eagle
15
16
M e n (eag le)
C u a u h tli (eagle)
C ib (w ax)
C ozcacuauhtli
(king v u ltu re )
17
C aban (e a rth )
18
19
20
Edznab (d in t)
C auac (storm )
Q u ia h u itl (ra in )
X ch itl (d o w er)
ra in , storm
sun
A hau (lo rd )
50
CALENDAR
Tibe trecena
In the ton a/am at/, the p erio d o f 260 days was
W hen
have
been
old
in d eed .
The
Aztecs
re p
into
AD
EIRE.
A!1 Mesoamerica observed the ca/endar round or 52-year cyc/e, created by the intermeshing of the
260-day calendar (left) and the 365-day calendar (right). It is drawn here as a system of interlocking
cog wheels and follows standard Maya notation, although the days and months had different names
and symbols in each culture.
The 260-day calendar is composed of 20 day names (outer wheel) and 13 day numbers (inner
wheel), both of which rotate endlessly. It takes 260 days for all the combinations to occur.
The 365-day calendar comprises 18 months, each of which has only 20 days, numbered 0-19 or
1-20 depending on the region, and the 5 unlucky days. In this larger wheel, the end of the month of
Cumku and the 5 unlucky days are shown - other month glyphs are at the right.
Here, 13 Ahau (left) and 18 Cumku interlock. It will take 52 x 365 days (or 52 years) before the
cycles will all reach this point again.
(Below) Calendar wheel representing the 52 years of the yearbearer cycle, Manuscrit Tovar, 16th c.
Central Mexico.
52
CALENDAR
the
no
MOON,
T h e coefficients to th e glyphs
produce
b eliev ed to th re a te n disaster fo r M es o am e ri
idea o f zero took place only tw ice in h istory once in ancien t In d ia , am ong the H in d u s, and
E C LIP S E
w a rn in g dates. Eclipses w e re
iRipp/emen/ary Series
T h e calen d rical d ata th a t fo llo w the In itia l
Series in M a y a inscriptions a re know n as
the S u p p lem en tary Series, or L u n a r Series,
because m ost o f the in fo rm a tio n c arried th e re
deals w ith the m oon. T h e glyphs have been
given a lp h ab et labels by m odern scholars and
ru n in reverse o rd er, s tartin g w ith th e le tte r
G and continuing on through A . G lyp h C
com prises the n in e various M a y a Lords o f
th e N ig h t (see b elo w ). G lyp h F refers to
G lyp h C and p ro b ab ly signiRes its seating.
G lyphs E and D record the age o f the c u rren t
m oon. G lyp h C records the n u m b er o f moons
com pleted in th e c u rre n t lu n a r h a lf-y e a r, and
so it usually bears a coefRcient. A fte r the
le tte rs had alrea d y been designated, scholars
noticed th a t a glyph fo llo w in g C v arie d
depending on the coefRcient o f G lyp h C , and
it w as lab eled X , w ith varian ts X 1 -X 6 . G lyp h
B features a ro d en t head; it links G lyphs X
and A in d icatin g only th a t X nam es A . G lyp h
A conRrms th a t the c u rre n t lu n a r m onth is o f
29 or 30 days. G lyphs Y and Z occasionally
app ear b etw e en G lyphs F and E ; th e ir m ean
ing is obscure.
53
CALENDAR
54
CAMAXTLI
A !though o fte n re fe rre d to as B irds o f the
called
lations.
In both M ex ica n and M a y a records, Venus
vo latiles,
Acations:
1. H u m m in g b ird , p ro b ab ly x iu h u itzilin
C a /y p fe costae
3. D o ve, cocotli, 5carc/aie//a inca
4. Q u a il, tecuzolin, C yrto n yx m o n iezu m ae
5. R aven or Black
H a w k -e a g le , possibly
ianns
11. Scarlet
macao
12. Q u e tza l,
10
M ac aw ,
A ra
Pbarom acbrus
chiconcuetzali,
q u etzalto to tl,
m ocinno
13. P arro t, toznene, A m azona orairr
Lords o f tbe D a y
T h irte e n Lords o f the D ay accom panied each
day o f the trecena, rep eatin g anew and in
o rder for each trecena. A ccording to m ost
A ztec sources, these gods ran as follow s:
1. X iu h te cu h tli
2. T la lte c u h tli
3. C h alchiuhtlicue
4. T o n atiu h
5. T la zo lte o tl
6. M ic tla n te c u h tli
7. C in te o tl
8. T lalo c
9. Q uetzalcoatl
10. Tezcatlipoca
11. C halm ecatecuhtli, a god o f sacrifice
12. T lah u izcalp an tecu h tli
13. C itlalin cu e , goddess o f the heavens
Penns cycie
Throughout M esoam erica, VENUS was the
m ost keenly observed p lan et, and its cycle o f
$84 days was c arefu lly charted and inscribed
alongside
other
calendrical
reckonings.
A lthough the synodic period o f the p la n et
varies from 580 to 587 days, any Eve cycles
average out to 584 days fo r a to ta l o f 2920
days, also the m u ltip le o f 8 x 365. W h en
considered in term s o f tw o 5 2-ye ar cycles, or
s e e M ix c o A T L
55
CAPTIVES
Bas-relief of a
captive
("Danzante") at
Monte Albn,
Oaxaca, Middle
Formative
period.
56
CARDINAL POINTS
SACRIFICE or slavery. A ltho u g h m any captives
w e re slain shortly a fte r c ap tu re, others m ay
T E M A L A C A T L ).
P rio r to
A C C E S S IO N ,
address a t the
A uey
T L A T O A N i,
A CC ESSIO N
F e e D IR E C T IO N S
F e e M O U N T A IN S
57
CELESTIAL BIRD
C o n te m p o rary
M esoam erican
peoples
as spent
an c ie n t O lm ecs.
L i C H T N iN C .
I t is unknow n w h e th e r
th e re a re n e ith e r rivers
nor lakes. M a n y
C en o te a t C h ich en
rrz A M N A ,
th a t god.
Itz , w e re
PILGRIMAGE
CAVES,
such as
w orship w e re d ed icated to th e
CHACS,
the
M a y a R A IN gods.
T h e Sacred C en o te a t C h ich en Itz m ay
have been th e single m ost im p o rta n t d esti
nation fo r p ilg rim s in p re -C o n q u e st Y ucatn.
As C lem en cy Coggins has suggested, the
g re at round surface o f W A T E R m ay have been
p erceived as a g ia n t M IR R O R fo r D iv iN A T iO N and
auguring. F o r generations, offerings w e re
h u rled in to the w a te r, in clu d in g JADES, gold
disks and hum ans. T h e re is no evidence th a t
virgins in p a rtic u la r w e re selected as cenote
offerings, b u t m uch o f the ske letal m a te ria l
recovered a t the C h ich en cenote was o f
p re-pubescent boys and girls. A ccording to
ethnohistorical accounts, some cenote victim s
a p p a re n tly flo ated up fro m the w e ll a liv e ,
w ith auguries g arnered u n d er w a te r.
In 1536, d u rin g a p erio d in w h ich the
Spanish w ith d re w from Y u catn , th e ru le r o f
the X iu fa m ily , A h D zu n X iu , sought to
appease th e M a y a gods by m aking a p ilg rim
age to th e Sacred C en o te a t C hichen Itz .
H e and his entourage w e re g u aran teed safe
passage through Cocom te rrito ry , w h e re they
w o u ld need to pass en ro u te to C hichen.
R em em bering old grievances, h o w ever, the
Cocoms set upon th e ir visitors a t a celeb rato ry
ban q u et, slaughtering them a ll. N o offerings
w e re m ade to the cenote, c iv il w a r ensued,
and the Spanish re tu rn e d in 1540 to com plete
th e ir conquest o f Y ucatn.
cerem onial b a r C erem o n ial bars a re staffs
h eld by M a y a ru lers, g en erally across the
body in both arm s. T h e y w e re fre q u e n tly
59
CHAC
CHACMOOL
Flam es o r torches o fte n a llu d e to th e Sery
n atu re o f C h ac s lig h tn in g .
Because C hac presides o ver WATER and ra in
be
aVso
W A TER.
M A IZ E .
C H A L C H IU H T L IC U E ,
M A IZ E .
in c lu d in g th e short, v e rtic a l
S C H E L LH A S C O D S ; TLAJLOC.
term
coined
by
th e
19th
c.
" th e
seven caves,"
w ord
to
describe
the
s e e CACAO
C ihuacoat! L ite ra lly "w om an-snake," C ih u acoatl is one o f a num ber o f re la te d m other and
E A R T H goddesses w orshipped in Postclassic
61
CIHUATETEO
Chacmool, Tula,
Early Postclassic period.
eg
Postclassic M a y a
M A IZ E C O D .
u fa c tu re and
peoples o f C e n tra l M e x ic o ,
x o c H iQ U E T Z A L
and
of
M esoam erica.
H e m a tite , or iron ore, occurs in diverse
ritu a l sacrifice.
In one A zte c h ym n, X o c h iq u etzal is said to
geological
com e fro m
configurations
of
sedim entary
TO C!
w as forced to w e av e as p a rt o f the
TAM O A N CH AN ,
63
COATEPANTLI
(W
COATEPEC
was used to dem arcate sacred enc!osures
w ith in a cerem onia! precinct. A t T e n o c h tit-
th e re
T O L L A N ),
w h ere a c o a fe p a n t//
BLOOD
gushing from
the X iuhcoatl.
A ltho u g h
stupendous
m o num ent,
this
L iC H T N iN C
65
COLORS
The serpent
wall, or
coatepantli,
surrounding the
Aztec Templo
Mayor, Codex
Durn, 16th c.
Central Mexico.
Giant statue of
Coatlicue, She of
the Serpent Skirt,
mother of
Huitzilopochtli, Late
Postclassic Aztec.
Her head is
composed of blood
serpents pouring
from her severed
throat.
sam e directions.
In C o lo n ial accounts from C e n tra l M exico,
th e re is fre q u e n t m ention o f fo u r basic colors.
H o w e v e r, not only are the colors ra re ly o ri
ented w ith regard to specific directions, bu t
th e re is also considerable varia tio n as to
w hich are the fo u r p rim a ry colors. According
*to one source, the d ire ctio n al colors w ere
g reen, b lu e, red and y ello w . H o w e v e r, o th e r
accounts suggest th a t the fou r card in al colors
(M
COLOSSAL HEADS
w e re the same as those o f th e M a y a . M o re
B e,
the Ohnecs
contem porary
texts
nor
c o r o n a tio n
w e
A CC ESSIO N
W ith
re le v a n t
c o s tu m e
M eso am erican
costum e
g en e rally
facia!
tiv e ly
THHONES
o th e r
physical
closely
than
d iffe re n tia te
characteristics.
through
c o m p l e t i o n s ig n
s e e CALENDAR
and cloth.
M e n and w om en, both hum an and d iv in e ,
w o re d istin ct garm ents. Some A ztec sculp
tures w e re m ean t to be dressed; n ow , w ith o u t
th e ir costum es, th e ir id e n tity as specific
d eities is lost. M eso am erican garm ents w e re
g en e rally fashioned by d rap in g C L O T H around
the body or sew ing strips o f fa b ric tog eth er
b u t ra re ly c u ttin g and ta ilo rin g cloth. Basic
a ttire fo r m en was the lo in clo th (th e N a h u a tl
m axt/afV); w om en w o re skirts w ith draped
blouses (th e N a h u a tl g u ec A g u e m it/a n d M a y a
A uipj'/). W a rrio rs and priests donned sleeve
less jackets (N a h u a tl xico/A). C e n tra l M ex ica n
lords a t th e tim e o f th e C onquest w o re the
&7znafA, a to g a-like g arm en t the w e arin g o f
w hich was governed by s trict sum ptuary
law s. T h e m ost prestigious #AnatAs w e re the
longest ones w ith the m ost e lab o rate w oven
designs; th e ir w e a r was lim ite d to th e u pper
classes and to m en w ho had scarred th e ir
bodies in b a ttle . T h e im p o rtan ce o f these
cloaks is em phasized by th e pages devoted to
th e ir m otifs in the C odex M ag liab ech ian o .
Com m oners w e re g en e rally restricted to
coarse #AnatAs w oven o f MAGUEY fib er. F in e
ra im e n t re w ard e d victorious w arrio rs, and
the m ore CAPTIVES they took, th e fan c ier the
a ttire they w ore.
67
COTTON
CLOTH
as clothing, b u t was
not only
also
an
88
COYOLXAUHQUI
im p o rta n t a rtic!e o f trib u te . I t served too as
religious offerings, as TEMPLE hangings or
B U N D LE S .
of
Since
the
p re p a ra tio n
and
w eavin g
as spinners and
TLAZO LTEO TL
has been
o ften
stated
be a goddess o f the
th a t C oyolxauhqui
M IL K Y W A Y .
69
CREATION ACCOUNTS
70
CREATION ACCOUNTS
account from th e C ak ch iq u e l, neighbors o f
strongly
resem bling
XOLOTL
descend to the
the
Popo/
UNDER W O R LD
Fu/?
and
to re trie v e
c u H T L i.
CHAN,
TAM OAN
gods le t th e ir
convene in darkness a t
BLOO D,
T E O T n ru A C A N .
I t is
and
present
h im s e lf in to a g re a t p yre. T w o v o lu n te e r, the
creation .
H ig h ly developed in C e n tra l M exico , this
races
o f people
b efo re
the
a t T eo tih u ac an
and
fro m
th e ir
rem ains,
71
CUAUHXICALLI
the
Codex
Vindobonensis
and
the
de
los
Reyes,
the
first
M ixtees
Blood
W om an,
p reg n an t
w ith
the
H e ro
Eagle-plumed cuauhxicaHi
bowl containing hearts and
blood, Codex Borbonicus,
p. 14, 16th c. Aztec.
72
CURING
T w in s , and to b rin g back h e r h e a rt in a gourd
D8
dance D an c e p la ye d an im p o rta n t ro le in
an c ie n t
M eso am erican
religious
ritu a l.
to g e th e r -
in the cuauAx/caA/.
e lab o ra te
s u p e rn a tu ra l
FICE.
or
sorcerers,
accidents,
m ajo r cause
M ARRIAGE
D u rin g
d ie
iL A M A T E C U H T L i.
"A n d
73
O th er M a y a lords donned the costum e o f
the M A IZ E C O D , or w h a t has also been called
the H o lm u l D an cer costum e, and danced
w ith DWARVES or hunchbacks, fre q u e n tly w ith
arms and hands w aving a t m id-body, as if in
im itatio n o f w aving MAIZE foliage. UNDERWORLD
deities fre q u e n tly dance in procession, usu
a lly in a clockwise m otion. D ancers m ay
accom pany m usicians, and som etim es they
bear rattles and FANS. Some M a y a dance
scenes are hum orous spoofs. In the P O P O L V U H ,
w hen com m anded to p erfo rm in the court o f
the lords o f d eath, the H e ro T w in s dance the
W easel, the P o o rw ill, and the A rm a d illo .
M a n y "sMiLiNC FicuREs" o f Classic V eracru z
m ay be dancers, w ith th e ir hands raised in a
praying position. M usicians and dancers
H U M A N S A C R IF IC E
in o rd er
B U N D LE S .
The
A probable Maya
sign of dawn: the
head of the sun god
between signs for
earth and sky, detail
of a hieroglyphic
bench, Copn, Late
Classic period.
74
DEATH
n atu re o f the gods is re ite ra te d in a curious
A ztecs, th e re , a re d e ta ile d
descriptions o f
obsidian-edged w inds. T h e
POPOL v u H
the H e ro T w in s in th e ir jo u rn e y through
the U n d e rw o rld , in c lu d in g k ille r BATS, Eerce
JAGUARS,
a / s o C R E A T IO N A C C O U N TS .
Q u ich e
M aya
and
num b in g
cold.
The
A ztecs
m ythological accounts. Th u s Q U E T Z A L C O A T L
successfully steals the m akings o f people fro m
the c ra fty M iC T L A N T E C U H T L i. In th e P O P O L v u H ,
the H e ro T w in s X b a la n q u e and H u n ah p u
tric k the gods o f d eath in to vo lu n te erin g
them selves to be sacriRced. Thus the lords o f
X ib a lb a a re d efe ated and th e tw in s re trie v e
the rem ains o f th e ir fa th e r and uncle. O u r
very presence is lite ra lly a liv in g testim ony
to (he u ltim a te d e fe a t o f th e d ea th gods.
In C e n tra l M exico , the p re e m in e n t god o f
d eath was M ic tla n te c u h tli, o r lo rd o f M ic tla n ,
the U N D E R W O R L D . H e is u sually dep icted as a
skeleton w e arin g vestm ents o f PAPER, a com
mon o fferin g to the dead. S keletal d eath gods
are also know n fo r Protoclassic and Classic
V eracru z. A t tim es, th e ir a n im ated p o rtray al
suggests a fa m ilia rity b o rd erin g on affection.
T h e skeletal M a y a e q u iv a le n t o f M ic tla n te
c u h tli is today know n as G od A (see scHELLHAS
G O D s ), and com m only appears in Classic M a y a
a rt as w e ll as in the Postclassic codices. In one
text fro m th e M a d rid C odex, he is re fe rre d to
as cizm , or "R a tu le n t one. " CYzm is s till the
nam e fo r the d eath god am ong both the
Yucatec and Lacandon M a y a .
d eer T w o types o f d ee r a re n ativ e to
M eso am erica, the w h ite -ta ile d d eer (Ocfoccf/ens am ericana), and the sm aller brocket
75
DEFORMITY
d e e r (A fa z a m a
a m e ric a n a ).
O f these,
th e
a n d as th e lea ves
B U N D LE S ,
m y th ic a l ep iso de in w h ic h th e yo u n g M o o n
G oddess Rees h e r a tta c k e rs on th e b a c k o f a
d e e r. In c e rta in scenes, this ep iso de seems to
h a v e e ro tic overto n es a n d it is lik e ly th a t
a m o n g th e M a y a , th e stag w as id e n tiR e d w ith
se xu a lity.
I n m a n y M e s o a m e ric a n fo rm s o f th e 2 0 d a y
n am es, in c lu d in g C e n tr a l M e x ic a n , Z a p o te e ,
M ix te e a n d M a y a versions, th e te rm or g ly p h
fo r d e e r serves as th e s e ven th d a y n a m e .
In Postclassic C e n tra l M e x ic o , this d a y w as
M a z a tl, w ith TLALoc as its p re s id in g god. In
C e n tr a l M e x ic a n sources, a tw o -h e a d e d d e e r
is shot b y
M D (C 0 A T L ,
god o f th e
M IL K Y W A Y
and
th e h u n t. T ra n s fo rm e d in to a w o m a n , th e
d e e r w as im p re g n a te d b y M ix c o a tl, a n d gave
b irth to th e c u ltu re h e ro
QUETZALCO ATL.
Mictlantecuhtli, the
Central Mexican
death god. A stone
vessel excavated at
the Templo Mayor,
Tenochtitlan, Late
Postclassic Aztec.
on e in stan ce, d w a rv e s a re
s u p p o rtin g
th e
SKY,
w h ile
in
E A G LE
u p o n his b ro w . R e p
a b o u n d in
th e
P rotoclassic c e ra m ic to m b a r t o f W e s t M e x ic o .
A lo n g w it h d w a rv e s a n d hunchbacks, d o u b le
headed
m o tifs.
DOGS
a re a m o n g th e m o re co m m o n
D u r in g
th e
Protoclassic
p e rio d ,
a n o th e r ty p e o f d e fo r m ity a p p ea rs w id e ly in
M e s o a m e ric a n a rt. C o m m o n ly r e fe r r e d to b y
th e S pan ish te rm o f
TUERTO ,
this fo rm a p p ea rs
as a g ro te s q u e ly tw is te d fa ce, w it h o n e ey e
shut, a b e n t nose, a n d a fr e q u e n tly e x te n d e d ,
s id e w a y s -c u rv in g to ng ue.
I n L a te Postclassic C e n tr a l M e x ic o , ph ys^ ic a l d e fo rm itie s w e r e id e n tiR e d w it h th e AnuiA TETEO ,
C e r ta in
and
illnesses
w e r e p r o b a b ly c o n sid ered to b e p u n is h m e n ts
76
DEiF!CATfON
sent
by
the
A h u ia te te o
fo r
im m o d e rate
and
fre q u e n tly
o th e r
e n te rta in ers
w e re
o th er en te rta in ers.
o f hum ans
as d eities
d is trib u te d
m agical
th e gods.
A m ong th e A ztecs, the d eities celeb rated in
e ve ry VEINTENA o f the y e a r w e re im personated,
som etim es only fo r the ritu a l its e lf, som etim es
fo r days b efo re th e c u lm in atin g fes tiva l. In
and U ix to c ih u atl.
A ccording to Sahagun, the im personator o f
T ezcatlip o ca had to have a specific physical
appearance: " H e w ho w as chosen w as o f
fa ir countenance, o f good und erstan d in g and
quick, o f clean body - slender lik e a reed ;
long and th in lik e a stout cane; w e ll-b u ilt;
not o f o verfed body, not corp u len t, and
n e ith e r v ery sm all nor exceedingly ta ll . . .
[H e w as] lik e som ething sm oothed, lik e a
tom ato, o r lik e a p eb b le , as i f h ew n o f w ood
. . . no scabs, pustules, o r boils on th e foreh ead
. . . not p ro tru d in g or long ears, nor w ith
torpid neck, nor hunch backed, n o r s tiff
necked, nor w ith neck elongated . . . not
em aciated, nor fa t . . . H e w ho w as thus,
w ith o u t Haws, w ho had no d efects" w o u ld
liv e as T ezcatlip o ca fo r a y e a r (F C : u).
In the m onth o f T la c a x ip e h u a liztli, the
im personator o f xiPE T O T E C , O u r L o rd the
F la ye d O n e , took on th e specific c h aracter
istics o f th a t god. F o r the fe s tiv a l, a X ip e
im personator took on th e ro le 40 days b efo re
hand, and he was gloriH ed and re ve red as if
he w e re the god him self. O n th e d aw n o f the
day o f c eleb ratio n h e, along w ith im person
ators o f e ig h t o th e r gods, am ong them Hurrzi
L O P O C H T L I, Q U E T Z A L C O A T L , M A C U IL X O C H IT L , and
M A Y A H U E L , had th e ir hearts sacriHced and
then , im m e d ia te ly , th e ir skins Hayed. O th e r
m en then donned these Hayed skins and the
re g alia o f the various d eities in a cerem ony
D u r n calls N e te o to q u iliztli, w h ich he trans
lates as "Im p ers o n atio n o f a C o d ." A fte r a
ritu a l com bat and m ore sacriHces, fu rth e r
m en b o rrow ed th e Hayed skins and, adorned
77
DIRECTIONS
P A LE N Q U E
T R IA D .
east (/a/Mn)
north (xaman)
west (c/rMn)
CELTS
south (no/io/)
Comparison of Early Classic and Postclassic
Maya direction glyphs: left column, Ro Azul,
Early Classic; right column, Dresden Codex,
Postclassic.
7$
DISEASE
in th e F e j rv ry -M a y e r, V atican us B, and
containing a cross.
By the E a rly Classic p erio d am ong the
disease
M eso am erica,
In
an cien t
the w alls o f To m b 12 a t R io A zu l, G u a te m a la ,
th e re
and
is
an
contem porary
am bivalence
the Postclassic
79
DIVINATION
"H e
is a h a te r , a d e s tro y e r o f
over
potions -
oth ers,
who
w h o m akes th e m
kills
th e m
by
d r in k po tio ns;
w h o bu rn s w o o d e n figures o f o th e rs ."
Im p u ritie s caused b y excessive se x u a lity
an d drun ken n e ss a re a n o th e r cause o f d is
ease. P ro stitu te s, a d u lte re rs a n d d ru n k a rd s
th e re fo re
a c te d
as vectors
C e n tra l M e x ic o , th e
o f disease.
In
w e r e s im u l
A H U iA T E T E O
in
th e
fo rm
th e
M A C U iL X O C H iT L ,
o f sickness.
p rin c ip a l
Thus
A h u ia te te o ,
w e re
o fte n
re g a rd e d
as signs o f
A NC ESTR A L
Toci
w as re g a rd e d as th e goddess o f
d iv in e rs as w e ll as th e m o th e r o f th e gods. I t
is q u ite lik e ly th a t th e ag ed Goddess O o f
th e M a y a (s ee
S C H E L LH A S c o o s )
w as s im ila rly
re g a rd e d as a d iv in e r as w e ll as an ag ed
c re a to r goddess. I n C e n tra l M e x ic o , th e p r i
m o rd ia l co u p le k n o w n as O xo m o co a n d C ip a c to n a l a r e d e scrib e d as d iv in e rs . A cco rd in g to
th e Q u ic h e M a y a
POPO L v u n ,
th e ag ed co u p le
X p iy a c o c a n d X m u c a n e p e rfo rm e d d iv in a to ry
h a n d casting d u rin g th e c re a tio n o f p e o p le.
N o t o n ly do d iv in e rs p la y a ro le in
ACCOUNTS,
C R E A T IO N
b u t th e a c tu a l p ra c titio n e rs fr e
Thus
th e
d iv in e r
co m m o n ly
DfVINC GOD
coD ,
SCHELLHAS CODS).
but
re -creat/o n .
In an cien t M eso am erica, d iv in atio n took
also re fers
no such
food.
81
DUALITY
m a y b e c a lle d
as SHAMANS o r c a le n d a r k e ep e rs th ro u g h illness
an d d rea m s. In Z in a c a n ta n , a 10- o r 1 2 -y e a rold b o y o r g irl receives th re e d re a m s w h e n
ca lle d as a sh am an.
d u a lity O n e o f th e basic s tru c tu ra l p rin c ip le s
o f M e s o a m e ric a n relig iou s th o u g h t is th e use
o f p a ire d oppositions. In th ese p a irin g s , th e re
is a re c o g n itio n o f th e es sen tial
d e n ce
of
opposites.
T h is
in te r d e p e n
c o m p le m e n ta ry
this single
s e lf-g e n e ra tin g b e in g , th e m a le a n d fe m a le
p rin c ip le s w e r e jo in e d . T h e o m n ip o te n t god
co uld also b e r e fe r r e d
to b y its m a le an d
th e o th e r w o u ld b e fe m a le ,
b o th c o n ta c t p e rio d a n d
c o n te m p o ra ry
nz
a ry
use o f p a ire d
expressions appears in
TLALO c,
lik e the M a y a
ra in god
device
N a h u a tl.
is
re la tiv e ly
com m on
in
A T L T L A C H iN
CHAC,
it as an om en th a t C haleo w o u ld fa ll, as
A H U IA T E T E O ; D E F O R M IT Y ; T U E R T O S .
83
EARTH
is p ro b a b ly also a n e a g le , as th e Postclassic
C e n tra l M e x ic a n fo rm o f this d a y n a m e is
C u a u h tli,
m e a n in g
" e a g le ."
In
th e
" h in t
In
F L IN T .
L a te
Postclassic
fied w ith h in t.
T h e e a g le plays a n e s p e c ia lly p r o m in e n t
role in th e
re lig io n o f Postclassic C e n tr a l
M e x ic o . In b o th C e n tr a l M e x ic a n a n d M ix te e
w ritin g , it ap p e a rs as th e 1 5 th d a y n a m e ,
co rresp on din g to th e M a y a d a y M e n . R e n d
e re d w it h a la rg e fe a th e r crest, it is p ro b a b ly
th e h a rp y r a th e r th a n th e g o ld e n ea g le. In
b o th w r itin g a n d a rt, it is fr e q u e n tly frin g e d
w ith A in t b lades. I n L a te Postclassic C e n tra l
M e x ic o , th e ea g le w as a sym b ol o f th e sun.
T h u s in N a h u a tl, th e te rm s fo r ascen din g
ea g le (c u a u h f7 e h u a n if/) a n d d e s ce n d in g ea g le
( c u a u h fe m o c ) w e r e used to r e fe r to th e risin g
a n d s e ttin g o f th e
F o r th e A ztec s, th e
S U N.
e a g le s y m b o liz e d o n e o f th e
tw o m ilita ry
ord e rs d e d ic a te d to th e sun, th e o th e r b e in g
th e
JAG UAR
(s ee
W A R R IO R O R D E R S ).
also id e n tiA e d w it h
E agles w e r e
H U M A N S A C R IF IC E ,
one o f
e a g le fe a th e r d o w n w as a co m m o n
sym b ol o f sacriAce in C e n tr a l M e x ic o . H u m a n
HEARTS o ffe re d to th e sun w e r e k n o w n as
cu au h n o ch fh , o r " e a g le cactus f r u it ." T h e s e
h e a rts w e r e
fre q u e n tly
vessel k n o w n as th e
p la c e d in a stone
th e " e a g le
c u A U H X iC A L L i,
g o u rd ve ssel."
T h e g o ld e n ea g le h a d a sp ecial ro le in th e
le g e n d a ry fo u n d in g o f th e A z te c c a p ita l o f
T e n o c h titla n . A c c o rd in g to m y th , th e A ztecs
fo u n d e d
th e ir c a p ita l w h e re a n ea g le fe d
up o n a n o p a l cactus. T h is p la c e corresponds
to T e n o c h titla n , o r " p la c e o f th e n o p a l cactus
ro c k ."
e a rth T h e su rface o f th e e a rth w as consid
e re d
in
v a rie ty
M e s o a m e ric a . Q u ite
of
w ays
in
a n c ie n t
fr e q u e n tly , th e e a rth
w as re g a rd e d as a liv in g e n tity . T h u s in b o th
C e n tr a l M e x ic a n a n d Y u c a te c M a y a th o u g h t,
th e e a rth c o u ld b e v ie w e d as a g r e a t CAIMAN
B o a tin g u p o n th e
SEA.
T L A L T E C U H T L i,
c o m p o n e n t.
The
e a rth
w as
also
re g a rd e d as a A at fo u r-s id e d Aeld, w it h th e
ECLPSE
fo u r omEcnoMS corresponding to each o f th e
The
A ztecs
h eld
strong
b eliefs
about
sides. F o r the M a y a , this m ode! is m e ta p h o ricaHy com pared to the q u ad ra n g u lar m aize
Held. in
M aya
d re w
blood fro m
th e ir ow n ears, in fe a r
appears.
H o w ev er,
the
as a round disk
an cien t
M aya
b a le fu l effects.
Q UETZALCO ATL
in his
85
ENEMAS
T h e specific te m p le o f E h e c a tl w as a c irc u
lar b u ild in g w ith a co nical ro o f; q u ite fr e
q u e n tly a g re a t s e rp e n t m a w serves as th e
d o o rw ay , as i f th e te m p le w as a sy m b o lic
CAVE p ro v id in g e n tra n c e to th e w in d in g d e p th s
o f th e U n d e r w o r ld . D u e to th e c o m m o n b u t
strik in g co n d itio n o f " b r e a th in g c a v e s ," w in d
is co m m o n ly
b e lie v e d
in
M e s o a m e r ic a
to
d e riv e fro m th e U n d e r w o r ld .
Am ong
th e
L a te
Postclassic
M ix te e ,
E h e c a tl w as k n o w n as 9 W in d . I n th e P re hispanic C o d e x V in d o b o n e n s is , this M ix te e
god w as b o rn fro m a H in t on th e d a y 9 W in d
in th e y e a r o f 10 H o u s e . A c c o rd in g to th e
C o lo n ia l
C e n tr a l
M e x ic a n
c re a tio n
accounts.
In
th a t,
m u ch lik e Q u e tz a lc o a tl o f le g e n d a ry TOLLAN,
9 W in d w as co n sid ered as a n ancestor o f
im p o rta n t M ix te e ru lin g fa m ilie s .
e n em as O n e o f th e m o re cu rio us th em es in
C lassic M a y a a r t is th e use o f g o u rd en em as
d u rin g r itu a l d rin k in g bouts. A lth o u g h it has
o fte n b e e n suggested th a t th ese en em as w e r e
used fo r co nsu m ing HALLUCINOGENS, it is fa r
m o re lik e ly th a t th e y co n ta in e d a n alcoh olic
b e v e ra g e , such as b a lc h o r PULQUE. A t tim es,
th e en em as a re d e p ic te d in association w it h
a vessel g ly p h ic a lly la b e le d c /o r cAi, a M a y a n
te rm
s ig n ify in g
p u lq u e
or
o th e r
alcoh olic
o f n o rth e rn V e ra c ru z used
re p re s e n t in d iv id u a ls c a v o rtin g , fa llin g , an d
e v e n v o m itin g . G iv e n th e su b je ct m a tte r, it
is n o t s u rp ris in g th a t m ost o f th e e n e m a
scenes a re
n o t on p u b lic m o n u m e n ts b u t
r a th e r on c e ra m ic vessels fo r p e rs o n a l use.
O n e n o te w o rth y ex cep tio n occurs a t th e P u u c
ruin s
o f R an cho
San D ie g o , close
to
th e
Male selfadministering an
enema, stone
panel from
Rancho San
Diego, Yucatn,
Terminal Classic
Maya.
EXCREMENT
H o w e v e r, enem as do a p p e a r to h ave been
used fo r cmuNC and ritu a l PURIFICATION. R u iz
8F8
id e n tify in g m arkers o f
MERCHANTS,
b u t it is
C lassic M a y a
p o tte ry , G od
som etim es
F a t C o d T h e Rgure know n as th e F a t G od is
87
FIRE
be fo re th e
DAW N
o f th e e r a in w h ic h h u m a n s
h a v in g c h a n g e d his
TEZCAT-
nam e
to
w as th e Erst to m a k e E re w ith
MMCOATL,
in itia te
new
CALENDAR ro u n d ,
Aztecs c e le b ra te d th e r itu a l o f N e w
th e
F ir e ,
by
th e
gods.
The
las t
N ew
F ir e
ce rem o n y w as c e le b ra te d d u rin g th e m o n th
o f P a n q u e tz a liz tli, a fe w
m o n th s a f te r th e
n e w y e a r o f 2 A c a tl h a d b e g u n in
AD
1507. As
p a rt o f w h a t an th ro p o lo g is ts c a ll a TERMINATION
RITUAL, a ll pots w e r e sm ash ed a n d n e w ones
w e re p re p a re d fo r th e n e w e ra . A ll Eres w e r e
ex tin g u is h ed a n d th e la n d la y in darkness,
a w a itin g th e N e w F ir e c e re m o n y th a t conE rm ed an d r e n e w e d
co uid
not be
th e n e w y e a r. I f E re
d raw n ,
th e n
th e
TZiTziMiME
a n y c h ild b o rn in
A t m id n ig h t b e fo re th e Erst d a y o f
th e n e w y e a r, on a n e a rb y m o u n ta in c a lle d
C itla lte p e c
(" H ill
of
th e
S ta r " ),
PRIESTS
w a tc h e d th e m o v e m e n t o f th e STARS w e cal!
th e P le ia d e s a n d w h ic h th e A ztec s k n e w as
th e T ia n q u iz tli, or M a r k e t. I f th e y passed
o v e rh e a d a t m id n ig h t, th e n th e E re priests
p ro c e e d e d : th e y rip p e d o u t th e HEART o f a
sacriEcia! v ic tim , u s u ally a c a p tiv e w a r r io r ,
a n d s ta rte d a E am e w it h a E re d r ill in his
o p en
ch est ca v ity .
Y ear
BUNDLES
o f sticks
a E re. T h e n e w E re g u a ra n te e d th e a r riv a l o f
th e m o rn in g suN a n d th e in itia tio n o f a n e w
y e a r.
x iU H T E C U H T L i
H is ro le in th e A z te c p a n th e o n m a y h a v e
b e e n d im in is h e d b y th e in tro d u c tio n o f H u it zilo p o c h tli, w h ose c u lt en com passed sun an d
E re.
HUEHUETEO TL
w as th e o ld god o f E re,
TLALOC
Postclassic tim es in
C e n tra ! M e x ic o . H e w e a rs a E re b ra z ie r on
his h e a d ,
w h ose
rim
is m a rk e d w it h
x iU H C O A T L ,
th e
T E O T iH U A C A N .
o r E re s e rp e n t, be ars th e sun
on
FIVE SUNS
through th e SKY; it is also the w eapon c a rrie d
the
one o f th e fo u r A zte c
Y EAHBEARER
day signs,
b lo od-spattered
T E Z C A T L iP O C A
PAPER,
w e re set on Bre in
in
th e fo rm
o f a b lu e -g re en
tu rk e y . T h e usual, iconic fo rm o f th e M a y a
day
sign
bears
the
sam e
B int
m arkings
F lo w e rs
m eaning
A ztec
Bint Tougher and m ore du rab le than O B SiD Bint was universally used to strike F IR E in
the N e w W o rld . I t easily yields sparks, and
the rock its e lf sm ells o f smoke a fte r use. I t is
a B ne-granular q u artz w hich abounds in the
M a y a low lands.
As the p rim a ry means o f striking Bre, B int
was o f in estim able use to hum ankind and
was thus personiBed and deiEed; it was also
a sym bol o f H U M A N S A C R IF IC E and the d eb t
ow ed by hu m an ity to the C O D S. SacriBcial
blades everyw h ere w e re m ade o f B int and
obsidian, and are often depicted a t the joints o f
A ztec deities. Gods and PRIESTS bear Bint knives
in hand, freq u e n tly p ain ted w h ite and red.
In M esoam erican thought, B int and obsid
ian w e re both created w h ere ligh tn in g strikes.
C H A C and T L A L O C , respectively the M a y a and
C e n tra l M exican hurlers o f thunderbolts,
w e re thus the creators o f these valued
m aterials. According to one A ztec version,
C itla lic u e (She o f the Star S kirt) gave b irth
to B int, and then h u rled it to e arth , w h ere it
IA N ,
w ith
in
deities
them :
h eld
an c ie n t
h ave
ric h
m etap h orical
M eso am erica.
T h re e
p a rtic u la r connections
xocHiPiLH,
MACuiLXOCHiTL,
and
89
CODS
90
COLD
a re o n ly h isto rical Bgures. N onetheless, it
hacha AfacAa, th e
Spanish
w ord
fo r axe,
piece o f BALLCAME e q u ip m en t, ra th e r th an an
used, b u t w hen A lb re c h t D re r v ie w e d in
heads, perhaps
TROPHY HEADS;
la te r ones are
thought o f as e q u ip m en t fo r p la y, som e m ay
the
m a te ria !,
the
m en t.
p articu !ar!y
H u r r z iL O P O C H T L i,
lip labrets.
G oldw orkers, or feocm f/aA uague, honored
X !P E T O T E C as th e ir patron and m ade offerings
a t his tem p le, Yopico. G oldsm iths held high
status and w e re recognized as craftspeople,
or fo/feca, a term th a t had lost its ethnic
associations w ith T u la , H id alg o , by the tim e
o f the Conquest.
G o ldw orking arriv ed la te in M exico and
C e n tra l A m erica. In v e n te d m illen n ia before
in South A m erica, w orked objects o f gold turn
up in the M a y a region no e a rlie r than the
8th c. A D . M e ta llu rg y took hold du rin g the
T o ltec e ra in M esoam erica, and dozens o f
gold objects w e re th row n in to the Sacred
C E N O T E a t C hichen Itz . D u rin g the L a te
Postclassic, the M ixtees c arried out th e m ost
sophisticated m etallu rg y in M esoam erica,
p erfectin g the techniques o f lost-w ax casting
and filig re e, w h ile continuing also to use the
sim pler ham m ering and repouss.
In 1932, M exican archaeologist Alfonso
Caso excavated T om b 7 a t M o n te A lb n
and found th a t the M ixtees had reused old
Zapotee TO M B S to b ury th e ir kings in the
centuries before the Spanish Conquest. T om b
7 contained the largest surviving single depo
sit o f P recolum bian gold, along w ith rock
crystal, cave onyx, TU R Q U O IS E , and bone. In
1975, a m ajor cache was discovered by a
fisherm an n ear the m odern c ity o f V eracru z.
K now n as the T reasure o f the F isherm an,
D iv iN A T iO N ,
91
HEARTS
A sm all, spineless cactus, peyote (Lo p b o pbora wiVbamsn) is n ative to the deserts o f
n o rthern M exico, b u t was w id e ly trad ed in
ancient tim es. R uiz de A larcon notes its use
in 17th c. G u e rrero , a region fa r rem oved
from its n atu ra l environm ent. A N ah u a tl
term , peyote is w e ll docum ented fo r the 16th
c. Aztecs. A long w ith psilocybin and the
p o ten t jim son w eed (D a fu ra spp.), it is
described as a fev er m edicine in the A ztec
F lo re n tin e Codex. E a rly representations m ay
appear in the Protoclassic ceram ic a rt o f W est
M exico. I t is still used am ong the H u ich o l,
C o ra, T arah u m ara, and other peoples o f
n o rthw est M exico.
hearts M esoam erican peoples valued hearts
as sacrificial offerings. T h e y recognized the
h e a rt as the v ita l organ o f the body and as
such, it was food fo r the C O D S. A t the tim e o f
the Conquest, the s till-b e a tin g hum an h eart
was the suprem e o ffering, p a rtic u la rly to the
wz
HERO TWINS
q u e n tly w ith d ro p lets fa llin g fro m it. T h e
fro m
o f th e Resh. W o m en b o m
in the trecena
93
HU1TZILOPOCHTLP
exam pies a re k n o w n , m o st n o ta b ly th e E a r ly
Classic H u e h u e te o tl fro m C e r ro d e las M e s a s .
A n A z te c e x a m p le co n flates TLALOC, th e ra in
god, w ith H u e h u e te o tl, p e rh a p s in re p re s e n
tation o f th e A z te c m e ta p h o r fo r w a r a n d
co nflagration, ATL-TLACHINOLLI.
H u itz ilo p o c h tli w as th e s u p re m e d e ity o f th e
A ztecs, th e ir c h ie f c u lt god. A sso cia ted w ith
suN an d
FIRE a n d
in tro d u c tio n
to
th e
C e n tra l
ru lin g
lin e a g e ,
M e x ic o
his
d is ru p te d
cuH Tu a n d TONATiuH. I n
p a rtic u la rly
xiUHTE-
som e sources h e
no
s u rv iv e -
m o n u m e n ta l
ex am p les
of
h im
a n y m e d iu m . T h e m a in s c u lp tu re o f H u it z ilo
p o c h tli w as p ro b a b ly re m o v e d fro m his TEMPLE
in 1520 a n d sm ug gled o u t o f T e n o c h titla n .
A
d o c u m e n t o f 15 39 depicts th e b u n d le d
th e c h ie f A z te c god,
1345. P e rh a p s
HUITZLOPOCHTL!
the very oldest god in the C e n tra l M e x ic a n
H u itzilo p o c h tli's
H U M A N S A C R IF IC E .
geographical
origins
le a p t
H u itzilo p o c h tli,
dressed,
b rand ish in g
fu lly
his
form ed
and
X iu h c o atl,
w ith
AZTLAN,
in th e e a rly
g ath ered
at
C H icoM O Zioc,
the
legendary
of
fo r a ll C e n tra ! M ex ica n
dow n
source o f o rigin
th e
balustrades
w h ile
th e
w ooden
SPIDERS,
scorpions,
and
snakes
recall
the
95
HUITZILOPOCHTH
HUMAN SACRIFICE
was o u tB tted w ith H u itz ilo -
Bgure, or
c lo tted
H u itzilo p o c h tli.
PMEST b earin g a
Bgure
hum an
blood
fo rm ed
g re at
pools
quest account,
speciBes
th e
slau g h ter o f
m aco.)
97
HUMAN SACRIFICE
18a w as se a le d fro m
th e
inside. A 2 5 -y e a r-o ld w o m a n le f t h e r h a n d
prin ts in th e c o n ta in e r o f p la s te r th a t she h a d
used; th e n , ta k in g a tib ia fro m th e Heshless
sk eleton h o n o re d b y th e TO M B , she sat d o w n
in a co rn e r to a w a it h e r DEATH.
A lth o u g h de p ic tio n s o f h u m a n sacrifices do
no t s u rv ive a t T e o tih u a c a n , th e p resence o f
hum an
HEARTS on
staffs a n d
on costum es
argu es fo r th e p ra c tic e th e re . In V e ra c ru z ,
sacrifice b y
H aying
took
p lace
fro m
L a te
an d
C h ic h e n
Itz a , a n d
th e C h ic h e n
th e ce l
of hum an
sacrifices w e r e
M o d ern
students o f h e a rt
W!
H U M M IN G B IR D
Resh ro tte d a w a y , th e im p erso n ato r w as lik e
o f the Q u ic h e M a y a is H u n H u n a h p u , fa th e r
o f th e H e ro T w in s X b a la n q u e and H u nah p u
A C C O U N T S ; D E A T H ; S A C R IF IC E .
his
b ro th e r,
V ucub
H unahpu,
are
H u n H u n a h p u and V u cu b H u n a h p u .
R epresentations
L a te
Hun
C lassic
H unahpu
M aya
a re
w idesp read
in
of
vessel
CACAO
tree .
M A IZ E C O D .
see
C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S ;
POPOL v u H ;
T W IN S
99
incense T h e o fferin g o f incense was consid
ered an act o f p u rific atio n th a t lin k e d a
sacrificial object or person to th e C O D S , thus
allow ing its acceptance by them . T h e most
common native incense, w id e ly called copaV from the N ah u a tl copa/A - and also know n
as pom am ong the M a y a , is the resin from
trees o f the /2ursera genus, though gums and
resins o f o th er trees a re also used as incense.
ITZAMNA
The head of Hun
Hunahpu as an ear of
mature maize, detail of
a mural from Cacaxtla,
Tlaxcala, Late Classic
period. Although
appearing in a Central
Mexican mural, this is
a clear representation
of a Classic Maya god.
Ilamatecuhtli with
shield and baton,
Codex Borbonicus,
p. 36, 16th c. Aztec.
00
rrZPAPALOTL
the scribal arts was also p resent d u rin g the
th rea te n ed
S C R IB A L
c o o s ).
probab!e consort
o tc H E L ,
his
Itza m n a w as id e n t
Thus d u rin g
C U R IN G .
supplied w ith
a god o f m edicine.
In the Postclassic Yucatec codices, Itza m n a
the
e lem e n t o f Itza m n a ,
bat.
the
O B S ID IA N M IR R O R ,
such
D iv iN
To
th e
ancien t
T h e C e n tra l
101
Ixchel was a p ro m in e n t M a y a goddess,
patroness o f c h ild b irth , pregnancy, and fe r til
ity. W om en from a ll over Y ucatan m ade long
pilgrim ages to seek h e r a tte n tio n a t shrines
on C ozum el and Is la M u je re s , and the shrines
w ere rep utedly Blled w ith sculptures o f h er
im age, although none survive. T h e nam e
Ixchel can be tran slated as "L a d y R ain b o w ."
In the D resden C odex, she bears the nam e
Chac C h el, and is depicted as an old lad y
w ith snakes in h er h a ir, som etim es w ith
AGUAR claws and eyes, and occasionally
dressed in a skirt p attern e d w ith a skulland-bones m o tif. She also appears to be a
patroness o f w eaving, D iv iN A T iO N , and m id w if
ery, although she is probably not the b e a u tifu l
young w eaving w om an given form in a num
ber o f Jaina figurines. N o r is th e re reason to
think th a t she is the b e a u tifu l young MOON
goddess o f Classic M a y a a rt w ith w hom h er
nam e has been w id e ly id e n tifie d : th a t young
w om an, som etim es depicted w ith in the cres
cent o f the m oon, does not b ear the nam e
102
JAG UAR
or m in e ra! in M eso am erica. Perhaps because
it w as id e n tifie d w ith
M A IZ E , W A T E R ,
s rr, vege
over w a te r.
JAG UA R C O D S
also
value
as an
h eirlo o m , and ju d g in g
from
im p o rta n t
creatures
them selves
(see
hum ans
changed
sham anic
in to jaguars
old ja d e .
T h e Spanish w ere interested in cAa/cAiAu/f/
only insofar as they w ere able to prom ote
green and blue glass beads in th e ir trad in g
arrangem ents. W hen the Aztecs told them
kings
h ead
neck
neck
103
JAGUAR GODS
O LM EC CODS,
but
104
J A G U A R -S E R P E N T B IR D
" c ru lle r" (so nam ed because it resem bles th e
to th a t d e ity .
Perhaps because the M a y a and th e ja g u a r
w ith
S A C R IF IC E .
ja g u a r
associations
than
any
o th e r
X b a la n q u e , one o f the H e ro T w in s ,
re la te d
to
TEZCA TH PO C A ,
h eld a significant
CAVES,
in
m orphic
and
over his forehead, and a " c ru lle r" b etw een his
nose th a t m ay continue un d er the eyes. In
this form , the Jaguar God o f the U n d e rw o rld
ii u iT Z iL O P O C H T L i ,
TLALOC
to be the h e a rt o f the
C A L E N D A R ). * e e a / s O K IN IC H A H A U ; T E O T IH U A C A N
CODS.
T erm in o lo g y
th a t
has
105
nobles w ear Jester Gods o f various colors in
the Bonam pak m urals, so it was not the
exclusive p u rview o f kingship. T h e ja d e Jester
God depicted on Pacal's headband on the
Palenque O val Palace T a b le t is p ro b ab ly the
very one recovered from Pacal's tom b.
JEWELRY
Crouching JaguarSerpent-Bird, a
version of the War
Serpent; Chichen
Itz, Yucatn,
Early Postclassic
period.
c
Protoclassic and Classic forms of the shark Jester
Cod. a, As worn by Protoclassic ruler, Loltun
Cave, Yucatn. 6, Shark Jester God of ruler
Stormy Sky, Stela 31, Tikal, Early Classic period,
c, Shark Jester God of ruler Pacal, Oval Palace
Tablet, Palenque, Late Classic period.
toa
K !N !C H A H A U
lig h tn in g
suN
god was
and
th u n d e r
A m ong
the
most
th e
and shake th e
SKY
EARTH
w ith th u n d er. In
p o w e r, lig h tn in g is considered
to be life
(s e e s c H E L L H A S
R A IN .
seed.
In M eso am erica, the alm ost instantaneous
M A IZ E ,
w h e re lig h tn in g
SERPENTS.
The
e a rlie s t k n o w n
d e p ic tio n s
of
T la lo c fr o m P rotoclassic T la p a c o y a p o rtra y
th e
d e ity
H anked
by
s e rp e n tin e
lig h tn in g
bolts. A m o n g th e Z a p o te e s o f O a x a c a , th e
god o f lig h tn in g is c o cijo , a w o rd w h ic h m ean s
lig h tn in g . T h e T o to n a c go d o f lig h tn in g , T a jin ,
is also n a m e d b y th e n a tiv e w o rd fo r lig h tn in g .
107
IM P E R S O N A T IO N ; J A C U A R C O D S .
IMP
MACUILXOCHiTL
is th a t it m ay revea! a zoom orphic o rig in .
P R IN C IP A L B tR D
first
d u rin g
researchers
the
F o rm a tiv e
c u rre n tly
period.
b eliev e
th a t
A H U iA T E T E O ,
w ho a re
- M a c u il-
PATOLLi
109
MAIZE CODS
!1(
M A N IK t N SCEPTER
m en tio n ed , 5 F lin t, 7 F lin t, and 7 C rass. .See
a / f O CREATION ACCOUNTS.
M a n ik in
S cepter T h e
M a n ik in
S cepter, a
m onies;
am ong both
the
CHAC
snout, and,
m ost d istinc
I ll
MAYAHUEL
!11
M ERCHANTS
m aguey. !n this m y th , EMECATLQUETZALCOATL
star
com panions,
the
fearsom e
T z r r z iM iM E
m erchandise
fu e le d th e A zte c econom y.
Because o f the ro le m erchants played in
in
abundance,
p a rtic u la rly
T o ch th , or R ab b it, and
the TRECENA o f I
M ah n aU i.
m erchants In
riors -
gloriously a do rn ed , p laced on a
L IT T E R ,
and
belonging to th e S U N.
A m ong the Classic
scH ELLH A s
M a y a , C od
(see
H3
MILKY WAY
grass.
In
th e
A z te c
year
u s u ally
a p p ea rs
as a
sk eleto n
of
is o fte n
PAPER h e a d
festo oned
w it h
o w l fe a th e rs ,
o rn a m e n ts
an d
b a n n ers ,
an d
VEINTENA o f T i t it l,
th e
M ic tla n te c u h tli
im p e rs o n a to r w as sacrificed a t n ig h t a t th e
te m p le n a m e d T la lx ic c o , m e a n in g n a v e l o f
th e w o rld . B ecause o f th e U n d e r w o r ld associ
ation s o f DOGS, M ic tla n te c u h tli was th e p a tro n
o f th e d a y Itz c u in tli, or dog; h e also re ig n e d
o v e r th e TRECENA 1 T e c p a tl. W h e n th e im p e r
sonator o f M ic tla n te c u h tli d ie d , INCENSE w as
o ffe re d o n ly a t n ig h t a t T lilla n , th e te m p le o f
CIHUACOATL.
L ik e
o th e r
M e s o a m e ric a n
M ic tla n te c u h tli
w as
DEATH
fu n d a m e n ta lly
(Top) Merchants
traveling with their packs
along a road. In
Mesoamerica, a tumpline
strung across the brow
serves as an essential
means of carrying loads.
(Aboye) Merchants and
their goods; along with
the carrying pack and
frame, one can discern a
live bird, a feather
bundle, and a string of
jade beads; Florentine.
Codex, Book 9, 16th c.
CODS,
stupid
th e
jo u rn e y e d to M ic tla n to re tr ie v e th e bones o f
p rev io u s
eras
o f m a n k in d
g e n e ra te a n e w
fro m
w h ic h
to
bones,
u n fo rtu n a te ly
d ro p p in g
th e
an d
b re a k in g som e o f th e m , a n d thus y ie ld in g a
t race o f h u m a n s o f m ix e d
sizes.
S ee a/so
M il k y W a y T h e g re a t b a n d o f STARS kn o w n
as th e M ilk y W a y w as c o n ce ived o f in a
Year 1 Rabbit
marked with
Mexican year
sign, stone
tablet, Late
Postclassic
Mexico.
114
MiLPA
v a rie ty o f w ays in an c ie n t
In
M eso am erica.
iL A M A T E -
W a y d e ity was
M IX C O A T L ,
a god o f the h u n t
and
Tarascans,
the
reE ective
surfaces o f
th a t is, b efo re
TEZCATUPOCA and
QUETZALCOATL a fte r
th e ir
B e,
M id d le
F o rm a tiv e
perio d
w e re
usually
o re, such as
BAR A N D H E M A T IT E ) .
c iN N A
created from
6 inches in to ta l w id th . M o s t O lm ec m irrors
a re concave, g ivin g them m any unique
p ro p erties.
The
reE ected
im age
appears
115
MIXCOATL
no
M X T E C C O D S
pochth is id en tiB ed w ith the s u \, h o w ever,
STARS.
ch aracteristic
can term o f
w ith
TLAHUtzcALPANTECUHTLi,
" x o L O T L ."
EARTH
and
siaughtered gam e.
TO NACATECUHTLi
was know n as
Y A H u i,
is nam ed I Jaguar.
T h e m ost im p o rta n t p ic to ria! source fo r
M ix te e gods is the obverse side o f the screen
e d know n as the Vindobonensis o r V ien n a
Codex. T y p ic a lly , the M ix te e gods b ea r nam es
from the 260 -d a y C A L E N D A R , presum ab!y re fe r
rin g to dates o f b irth . T h e crea to r couple w ho
are both nam ed 1 D e e r in the crea tio n account
m entioned by C a rc i ap p e ar on page 51
o f the Codex Vindobonensis w ith skeletal
m ouths and w e a rin g the headdress o f the
cu ltu re hero 9 W in d . T h is sam e c a le n d rica lly
nam ed couple is also illu s tra te d in the Selden
R oll, w h e re they a re show n sim ply as an old
m an and w om an. O n e o f the m ost im p o rta n t
goddesses o f th e M ix te e pantheon was L ad y
9 Crass. U su ally d epicted w ith a s keletalized
face, she seems to have been a goddess o f
DEATH and th e fe rtile e arth . In th e Selden
RoH, L a d y 6 M o n k e y o f Jaltepec m akes p ilg ri
mages to th e oracle o f 9 Crass a t C halcatongo.
In the Codex Vindobonensis, an old m an
nam ed 2 D og is p o rtray ed as a PRIEST, and
o ften appears w ith the TOBACCO gourd o f the
p rie stly ofBce. A n o th er aged being, L ad y 1
E ag le, is goddess o f the sw E A TB A T H , and by
extension, m ay also have been a goddess o f
m idw ives and CURING.
A m ong th e M ixtees, personifications o f p a r
tic u la r plants or th e ir products are often
po rtrayed as goddesses. Thus in the Codex
Vindobonensis, the goddess o f MACUEY is Lady
11 Serpent, w h ile PULQUE is personified by tw o
117
MONKEY
goddesses n a m e d 2 F lo w e r a n d 3 A llig a to r.
Young te n d e r MAIZE seem s to b e e m b o d ie d b y
two goddesses n a m e d 5 F lin t a n d 7 F lin t.
M a tu r e m aize, h o w e v e r, seem s to b e id e n ti
fied w ith a goddess n a m e d 7 C rass. In th e
Codex
V in d o b o n e n sis,
psilocybin m ush ro o m
th e
h a llu c in o g e n ic
is p o rtra y e d
by
tw o
s e rp en t-m o u th ed goddesses n a m e d 4 L iz a rd
and 11 L iz a rd .
A lth o u g h
th e re lig io n o f th e
9 Wind
Postclassic
2 Dog
1 Death
c o u n te rp a rt,
c o m m o n ly
w e a rs
7 Rain
11 Serpent
th e fa n g e d m o u th , goggle eyes, a n d u p w a r d ly
tu rn in g lip o f th e Postclassic T la lo c . In his
hands, h e w ie ld s a b u rn in g lig h tn in g b o lt an d
M AIZE CODS.
a n y o th e r N e w W o r ld m o n k e y .
In C e n tr a l M e x ic o , th e m o n k e y w as k n o w n
as o z o rn a i// an d w as th e 1 1 th d a y sign; am o n g
th e M a y a , th e Y u c a te c d a y n a m e w as C h u e n .
G e n e r a lly those b o rn on th e d a y O z o m a tli
w e r e th o u g h t to b e lu c k y a n d h a p p y persons.
9 Grass
Scribes a re o fte n
industrious.
d ep icted
a/so
as g ifte d
and
C R E A T IO N A c c o u w r s .
ra b b it in
(F C : xi)
T h e m onkey is re la te d to
his guise as
EHECATL.
Q UETZALCO ATL
A ccording to th e
in
F IV E SUNS
the
T h e people o f th a t e ra w e re tu rn e d in to
the h o w le r m onkey
fofocA&n) o f
w ith
MAYAHUEL,
goddess
of
PULQUE.
119
M OUNTAINS
m ortuary
bundles
In
m any
parts
of
M O U NTAINS
d ra m a tic
!ZI)
locations, fre q u e n tly w ith
CAVES.
a/fepefV,
m eans
M ex ica n
p lace-nam es
w a te r-m o u n ta in .
C e n tra l
th e
o ften
in clu d e
TEM PLES
b o lically to the h e a rt o f th e
EARTH,
o r the in te rio r
T E O T i-
M A izE C O D s
Postclassic M a y a re fe rre d
Eourishing
to pyram ids as
121
MUSIC
1Z2
MAHUAL
m arim b a
F C ;
duced
(xylophone). T h e
stringed
Spanish in tro
instrum ents
and
A fric a n
th e end o f the
ography o f w a r and
S A C R IF IC E ,
and w e re pro
T E Z C A T L tP O C A
x o c H iP iL L i
supervised
the
dom ain
of
m usic.
123
1Z4
from
P alenque
shows
too
th a t
th e
C e n tz o n
125
OLMEC GODS
The Aztec sign for the starry night, Codex Mendoza, 16th c.
ww
10
20
400
40
*. +*
* 6
8000
SB
19
D iv iN A T iO N .
14,cantahun
5. ho
15, ho!ahun
6, uac
16, uadahun
!ZH
OLMEC CODS
universe th a t w e can recognize today through
th e surviving a rt. in fact, it was th e existence
o i a standard
O lm ec
A LTA R S
127
the face, usually through the eye (Joralem on
God vi). Such face p a in t characterizes the
ia te r god o f the G u lf Coast and C e n tra l
M exico, x iP E T O T E c , b u t the O lm ec creatu re
has the d o w n tu m ed beak o f a b ird , and is
probably not re late d to X ip e .
O th er O lm ec deities a w a it fu rth e r id e n tifi
cation. Some are basic w ere-jag u ars, m any
have c le ft heads; some have in terlo ckin g
teeth , lik e those o f a caim an, w h ile others
have only upper fangs and y et others are
toothless. See a/so INTRODUCTION.
omens T h e peoples o f ancien t M esoam erica
keenly observed strange b eh avior and events
in the n atu ra l w o rld , signs th a t could p ortend
events o f everyday life or even w o rld destruc
tion. Because they regarded the h eavenly
bodies as especially im p o rtan t, these signs
constitute one o f the m ore com m on subjects
in the Prehispanic m anuscripts. Possibly
because o f th e ir proxim ity to the heavens and
th e ir speech-like qu alities, birds w e re w id e ly
regarded as omens. Even today, OWLS are
considered to be harbingers o f D E A T H . T h e
Yucatec M a y a n term m u f signifies both b ird
and augury. In the Postclassic D resden
Codex, this term appears in scenes illu stratin g
the y ou th fu l Goddess I (see SC H E LLH A S G O D s )
w ith the M U A N o w L , the Q U E T Z A L , and other
birds, here re fe rrin g to "good" or "b a d "
auguries.
M a n y n ative peoples noted strange, disturb
ing omens ju s t before the com ing o f the
Spaniards; for the Aztecs, Sahagun records
eig h t e v il signs. Am ong these omens w ere
tw o probable com ets, LIGHTNING striking the
TEMPLE o f xiuH TECU H TLi, the sound o f a crying
wom an during m any nights, and a strange
b ird w ith a d ivin ato ry MIRROR in its forehead.
T h e Tarascans o f M ichoacn noted evil
omens fo re te llin g the Spanish Conquest.
T h e y also described tw o com ets, and added
th at th e ir tem ples w ere con tin u ally being
destroyed. W h en re b u ilt, these structures
w ould only catch FIRE again, and th e ir w alls
tum ble to the ground. See a/sc DiviNATiON.
O m eteo tl L ite ra lly the "tw o go d ," O m eteo tl
em bodies the C e n tra l M exican p rin cip le o f
This d u al, bisexual god ru led over
the highest heaven o f the N a h u a tl schem e,
O m eyocan, "P lace o f D u a lity ," in the form
o f O m etecu h tli and his consort O m ecih u atl.
D U A L IT Y .
OMETEOTL
Olmec gods: (right) a
probable depiction of the
Olmec rain baby, San Lorenzo
Monument 52, Early
Formative period. A deep
trough is cut down the back of
this sculpture, and it is
possible that it served as part
of the stone drainage systems
used at San Lorenzo.
OMEYOCAN
iz a
d iv in e g randparents (see
A N C E S TR A L C O U P L E ).
festooned
TEM PLE
of
M 1 C T L A N T E C U H T L !,
the
Some authors
have
sought to
them
horned
M exican
thought.
w ith
both
M UAN OW L,
fe rtility
and
DEATH.
The
R A IN
Q u ich e M a y a
and
snaggle-toothed
m outh,
the
opossum
PO PO LVUH.
A lthough assistants
HUN HUNAHPU,
surface o f th e
in h e r escape to the
EARTH.
129
PALENQUE TRIAD
s e e H u r r z iL O P O C H T L i
B IR T H
G!!
G!t)
136
PALMA
Be) and son (b o m in 2360
B e)
on th e T e m p le
anth ro p o
young. G Is
piers
of
th e
T e m p le
of
Inscriptions
at
B ahlum
ow n life tim e .
On M aya
ceram ics,
G II
appears
fre
and
T ik a !
w e re
rendered
in
the
131
- Q
132
PATOLLI
sp.) w e re m uch esteem ed fo r th e ir b rillia n t
o f the gam e.
In a n c ie n t M eso am erica, p a to lli is best
p ared pens.
m acaw
In
ta il
feathers
cueza/in,
signifying
M A C U iL X O C H iT L ,
the
133
PILGRIMAGE
probably a t C halcatongo.
L ittle is know n o f Classic M a y a p ilg rim
ages, although there is evidence fo r royal
visits. A t the tim e o f the Spanish Conquest,
L an d a noted th a t 'th e y held C ozum el and the
w e ll o f C hichen Itz a in the sam e ven eratio n as
w e have fo r pilgrim ages to Jerusalem and
134
POPOL VUH
Rom e, and so th ey used to go to visit these
places and to o ffe r presents th e re , especially
Itz
HUNAHPU,
th a t p o in t on, M a y a
on th e p a rt o f the audience.
U n lik e the c reatio n a t th e beg inn ing o f the
Q uich
tran slatio n
of
Q UETZALCO ATL,
and
135
POPOL VUH
116
PRIESTS
H ouse, the T w in s d rove th e cold a w a y ; w h en
priests T h e
p rie st h eld
one o f th e
most
T w in s . In th e B a t H ouse, h o w e ve r, although
as calendhcs,
W R IT IN G ,
SHAM ANS,
G O DS.
137
priestly
UAY,
or
M A Y A H U E L ; PU LQ U E CODS.
a h o V U C U B C A Q U !X .
139
PYRAMID
m ysterious,
pyram ids
had
q u ite
!4H
QUADRiPARTiTE MONSTER
th a t had th e ir ow n raised tem ples in th e
The
e a rlie s t
p yram id
in
M exico ,
the
in d iv id u a l
p la tfo rm ,
tw o
staircases,
and
e a rlie r
M eso am erican
civilizatio n s
assurance.
such
A tT E O T iH U A C A N ,
the p rin c ip a l p y ra
as
th e
T e m p le
of
Inscriptions
at
and this m ay w e ll be
to the
SUN
and
MOON,
MOUNTAINS,
p a r
Q u a d rip a rtite
STER;
PALENQUE
MON
TRIAD
q u etzal K n ow n as th e quetza/Zi in N a h u a tl
and
in M a y a , the resp len d en t trogon,
.Rharom acArus m ocm no, was p rize d fo r its
extrao rd in a ry feath ers. T h e q u etzal lives in
cloud forest, th a t ra re and v u ln e ra b le ecologi
cal niche o f tropical ra in forest b etw e en 3000
and 4000 fe e t (ab o u t 900 m and 1200 m ) in
a ltitu d e . S o litary creatures th a t a re ra re ly
glim psed o th er than a t DAWN or dusk, quetzals
feed on the w in g and o ften h o ver w h ile eatin g
fru its , bugs, tre e frogs, o r snails. A lthough
both m ale and fe m a le o f th e species a re
b rillia n tly colored, w ith b lu e -g re en feath ers
on w ings, ta il, and crest, and scarlet ones on
th e breast, it is th e iridescence and unusual
len g th o f the m ale ta il feath ers - o ften about
a yard in len g th - th a t m ade the b ird th e
m ost desired in a ll M esoam erica.
Because o f th e ir ro le in e lite and ritu a l
costum es, q u etzal feathers w e re an im p o rtan t
e lem en t in M esoam erican trib u te . T h e fam
ous headdress housed in V ien n a th a t is often
called M otecuhzom a's headdress (b u t w hich
he p ro b ab ly n ever w o re ) includes 500 q u etzal
feath ers. H u n ters w e re fo rb id d e n to k ill the
birds; ra th e r, they stunned th em w ith a
blow gun, rem oved the feath ers, and set them
fre e . T h e m ales a re best spotted d uring the
141
QUETZALCOATL
l i f e O n EARTH.
s p irit or d e ity o f w a te r.
M o d e rn Pueblo peoples o f the A m erican
Southw est id e n tify a plum ed serpent w ith
w a te r. L ik e Q u etzalco atl, th e Z u n i K olow isi
and the H o p i P alulukong plum ed w a te r ser
pents can b rin g abundance and fe rtility .
A lthough the fe a th e red serpent appears a t
142
RABBIT
such C lassic sites as T e o tih u ac an , X ochicalco,
d u rin g
as
q u etzal
heads.
C o m b in ed
w ith
the
th e
L a te
Postclassic
p erio d .
Fee
C O D S ; P U L Q U E ; T E O T IH U A C A N C O D S .
to
Q u e tza lc o a tl.
An
especially
F re
a /s o
C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S ;
EHECATL;
M IX T E C
im p o rta n t
ra b b it A lo n g w ith the
cap, the
w iN O
je w e l, and o th e r shell
JEW ELR Y.
DEER,
the ra b b it (3y/v-
In L ate Postclassic C en tra! M exico , Q u e tzalcoat! often takes the form o f the god o f
w in d , E h e ca tl-Q u e tzalc o atl. In this context,
Q u etzalcoatl appears as the life -g iv in g aspect
o f w ind . A ccording to the A ztec F lo re n tin e
Codex, Q u etzalcoatl was the roadsw eeper o f
the T la lo q u e rain gods, th a t is, the w ind that
brings the rain clouds. A long w ith the conical
h at and shell je w e lry , E h ecatl-Q u etzalco atl
typ ically w ears a red buccal mask resem bling
a duck beak. Patron o f the day E hecatl and
the TRECENA 1 O celotl, E h ecatl-Q uetzalcoatl was
the great culture hero, and plays an im por
tan t role in C en tra! M exican C R E A T IO N A C C O U N TS .
Am ong the M ixtees o f Oaxaca, this figure
was know n by the calendrica! nam e 9 W in d .
In the ethnohistorical docum ents o f 16th c.
M exico , the ancient d eity know n as Q u e tza l
coatl is confused w ith the historical figure
C e A catl T o p iltzin Q u etzalcoatl, the king o f
legendary T O L L A N , now know n to be the site
o f T u la . A ccording to A ztec b e lie f, C e A catl
T o p iltzin Q u etzalcoatl d ep arted TOLLAN fo r
th e red lands o f the east, an even t corrobor
ate d by C o lo n ial docum ents from Yucatn
w hich m ention the com ing o f an in d iv id u al
nam ed K ukulcan, the Yucatec term fo r qu etzal
serpent. In these accounts, K ukulcan is said
to have come to C hichen Itz a , a site w ith
striking sim ilarities to T u la . A t C hichen Itz a ,
depictions o f a m asked in d iv id u al backed by
a green -plu m ed fea th e red serpent m ay re fe r
to the actual historical in d iv id u al. H o w e v e r,
the historical figure m ay have been apotheo
sized a t D E A T H as his nam esake, thus fu rth e r
b lu rrin g the distinction b etw een the m an and
the god.
M ix c o A T L .
VEINTENA
o f Q u ech -
M O O N.
M a n y peoples
143
REPTILE EYE
JADE
RUBBER
144
p ro b ab ly
N a h u a tl
term
o/An,
or m o tio n ,
m en t
A ccording to
M eso am erican
BALLCAM E,
know n as o/^ama or
of
the
vio len ce
o f creation
the version
itself.
o f the creation
took
Q UETZALCO ATL
in to
the balls a re p a rt o f
SERPENTS,
and
th en , each
TLALTE
B e,
tw o
TEZCATHPOCA
taking
SPRING. It
SKY
and o f the o th er
ing region.
In a dd itio n to its use in the M esoam erican
ballgam e, ru b b er also served m edicinal
purposes. According to the F lo re n tin e Codex,
the latex was drunk w ith chocolate to re lie ve
stomach and in testin al upset. As a sap, ru b b er
was also treated as an INCENSE much lik e copa/.
In the offerings recovered from the Sacred
C enote o f C hichen Itz , ru b b er was fre
q u en tly m ixed w ith copa/. T h e ru b b er latex
was o fte n burned as a b a ll, in efBgy form , or
as drops sprinkled upon PAPER. Because o f the
thick clo u d-like sm oke, ru b b er was a favored
offerin g to the R A IN gods.
and
fountains
145
SACRIFICE
SCHELLHAS CO DS
146
im age o f
m o untain
H U iT Z iL O P O C H T L i
w ooden fra m e ;
efEgies
w e re
m ade.
U su ally
in
broke
a p a rt
the
tzoa/A
and
a te
CHAC,
C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S ; C U A U H X IC A L U .
M a y a god o f
R A IN
and
on S tela
L IG H T N IN G ,
1 from
C hac is
Protoclassic
sacredness.
C o d D : O n e o f the g re a t gods o f the M a y a
W R IT IN G .
147
SCHELLHAS CODS
MYTHOLOGICAL A N IM A IS .
SCRIBAL CODS
146
tim e ke ep in g ,
M ex ico . G od M
h o w ever,
a re
th e
m onkey
hold an in k p o t, p en , or
coDEx;
the face m ay
p rim o rd ia l
WATER
upon
w h ich
the
EARTH
God
th e
w e ig h ty
149
SERPENT
and
often
SERPENT
and tran s fo rm a tio n , fo r g re a t superna tu ra!
serpents fre q u e n tly belch a n o th er c re a tu re
god, or a skeleton.
phenom enon.
la tte r concept:
the
M eso am erican
d eities ,
in clu d in g
serpent
bars.
h eld th e sky.
W ith his u p tu rn e d snout and serp ent leg,
fe e t.
In states o f ecstasy and u su ally fo llo w in g
151
WAY.
Bolon M a y e l -
know n in
C onquest-era Yucatan.
T h e 7 and 9 zoom orphic heads m ay be
carried in the hand, rest on CEREMONIAL BARS,
or set Boating in space, in cised obsidians m ay
d ep ict the heads, as m ay the e xterio r surfaces
o f cache vessels. T h e m eaning o f these heads
SHAMAN
is not d e a r,
152
b u t th ey
m ig h t fun ctio n as
n atu ral through ecstatic trance and s p iritpossession. D u rin g ecstatic trances -
often
th e
expertise. A lthough
c rea tu re
w as
fa m ilia r
not
only
to
n ative
to
153
and the pearls from such tho rn y oysters w e re
w om as je w e lry by the M a y a e lite . M a n y
spondylus shells w e re scraped to re ve al a
b rig h t red or orange concavity; w h en thus
carved, the shells w ere sew n onto cloaks,
w orn as necklaces or w o rn a t the w aist. T h e
MAIZE GOD, for exam ple, o fte n w ears such a
shell a t the w aist, as do m any w om en who
SKY
SKY BANOS
!M
w e re
especially
fre q u e n tly
placed
ato p
PYRAMIDS.
M aya
e n tity know n as E / A v e de
A ncho, the
sky bands a re
usually represented
S U N , M O O N , STARS,
scutes o f the
SER P E NT.
T h is p ro b ab ly derives
was
In
ancien t
M esoam erica,
the
sky
155
T h e M ix te e form o f E h e ca tl-Q u e tzalc o atl,
9 W in d , was also regarded as a skybearer.
Thus on page 47 o f the Codex Vindobonensis,
9 W in d supports the sky. H o w e v e r, in this
instance, the SEA Elled w ith m arin e SHELLS is
depicted lying above the sky. W h a t p a rtic u la r
cosmic event this scene refers to is still
unknow n.
T h e ancient M a y a had h ig h ly developed
concepts regarding the skybearers. According
to D iego de L an d a, the Postclassic Yuca tec
M a y a had fou r skybearers know n as the
bacabs. As in C e n tra l M exico , each o f the
four bacabs was associated w ith a p a rtic u la r
SMILING FIGURES
../?=a
'--- =3__cm .
e
Examples of sky bands, a, Potrero Nuevo
Monument 2, Early Formative Olmec. A La
Venta Stela 1, Middle Formative Olmec, c,
Alvarado Stela, Late Formative, d, Izapa Stela
12, Protoclassic Maya, e, Sarcophagus lid of
Pacal, Palenque, Late Classic Maya.
SNAKE
HM
L iv e ly MONKEYS jo in hum ans, and a fe w o th e r
O lm ec
site
of El
M a n a t,
V e ra cru z,
has
M eso am erica.
th e BLOOD fro m
and
planets
A n c ie n t
skyw atchers
157
equinoxes, once an n u ally a t the T ro p ic o f
Cancer and the T ro p ic o f C ap rico rn , a t th e ir
respective sum m er solstices, and tw ice ann u
ally in b etw een , ranging according to la ti
tude.)
A lthough n e ith e r the Erst nor last astron
omers in M esoam erica, th e Classic M a y a
becam e the most s k illfu l skyw atchers w e
know of. R ecent investigations in to Classic
texts have revealed a high le v e l o f sophistic
ation in M a y a observations, p a rtic u la rly o f
planets. T h e M a y a v iew ed the M ilk y W a y as
the road to X ib a lb a and saw in the seasonal
m ovem ents o f constellations along the ecliptic
th e ir fun d am en tal CREATION story. T h e y tim ed
events o f w a r and SACRIFICE to coincide w ith
the m ovem ents o f Venus and Jup iter. A ccord
ing to his inscriptions, C h an B ahlum , a la te
7th c. P alenque king, not only live d by the
m ovem ents o f Jupiter, b u t the m ajor events
o f his life dovetailed w ith the m ovem ents o f
th a t p la n et deep in the past.
stela M esoam erican peoples erected p ris
m atic stone slabs called stelas or stelae to
celeb rate the reigns and ritu a l passages o f
the ru lin g e lite , and usually o f the suprem e
ru le r h im self. T h e im petus to erect stelae Erst
cam e in the M id d le F o rm a tiv e am ong the
O lm ec, w hen other efforts to record history
also developed. Stelae a t L a V e n ta depict
historical rulers a ttire d in re g alia th a t sym bol
ized and reinforced the oiRce and p o w er o f
an e a rly king.
T h e custom o f erecting stelae subsequently
took root in the Isth m ian region during the
L a te F o rm a tiv e and Protoclassic, p a rt o f the
constellation o f traditions characterizing east
ern M esoam erica. A t C h iap a de C orzo and
Tres Zapotes, M esoam ericans began to
inscribe long count dates (CALENDAR) on stelae,
Exing them in tim e. A t A b aj T a k a lik and
Iza p a , altars w ere p aired w ith stelae, a p a t
tern th a t continued a t most Classic M a y a
sites. Iza p a stelae featu re m ythical scenes
and g en erally lack dates; the A baj T a k a lik
m onum ents depict rulers in E a rly Classic
M a y a poses, and the hum an Egures are
accom panied by dates and long texts.
Classic M a y a stelae h ear texts th a t reveal
some ancient perceptions o f the m onum ents.
F o llo w in g the katu n ending d ate , the glyphs
on Stela 9 a t L am an ai can be read dzapah fe
un or The setting o f the stone tr e e /' as
recently deciphered by D av id Stuart and N iko
lai G rube. These stelae, then, w e re in d ivid u al
STELA
(AgAf) Spider
descending from the
starry sky as a iz/tzKcut/;
note the web at the
tip of its abdomen.
Detail from a stone
copy of a year bundle,
Late Postclassic Aztec.
(Be/ow) Stela D,
Quirigu, Late
Classic Maya.
t!M
STHLNC HYPOTHESIS
trees; as tim e passed and dozens o f m onu
m ed w h a t L in d a Scheie and D a v id F re id e l
have called a "fo re s t o f kings."
OLMEC CODS.
concerned
w ith
the collective
com m unity
Spanish C onquest.
m any
a disk w ith
"wKRHjACUAn"
figures
app earin g
in
ra d ia tin g
159
SWEATBATH
C O N FESSIO NS
w e re
TAMOANCHAN
T h e C odex M a g liab ec h ia n o also inform s us
th a t
160
in illu stratio n s fo r the iRBcm** o f 1 C a lli.
T h e goddess p residing over this frecen# is
rrzpAPALOTL, one o f th e p rin c ip al zt&r/m/fne
dem ons.
T e c p a tl see
C A L E N D A R ; F L IN T ; YEARBEARERS
the fe m a /a c a f/ and
161
TEOTIHUACAN
(Re/ow) Gladiatorial
sacrifice: an Aztec
warrior attacks a
prisoner tethered to
the temalacatl, or
sacrificial stone,
Codex Magliabechiano,
16th c. Aztec.
AD,
T H O T iH U A C A N C O D S
tea
o f T la lo c. O n e fo rm , T la lo c A , displays a
p ro m in en t set o f JAGUAR canines; q u ite fre
q u e n tly , a WATER ULY is placed in the m outh.
T h e o th e r aspect, T la lo c B , has a sei o f
the
long
from
AZTLAN
th a t
T laxcala.
Q u e & a /c o a f/. O n e o f the e a rlie s t appearances
o f the plu m ed SERPENT a t T eo tih u ac an occurs
upon the o rig in al facade o f the T e m p le o f
Q u etzalco atl. H e re fe a th e re d serpents pass
through fe a th e re d m irro r rim s and sw im in a
S H E LL-filled SEA. A t T eo tih u ac an , th e fe a th e re d
serpent is usually dep icted w ith symbols o f
ra in and standing WATER. T h e T eo tih u acan
plum ed serpent is ty p ic a lly rep resen ted w ith
a c an in e -like m uzzle and a ra ttlesn ake body
covered w ith the green plum es o f th e QUETZAL.
A lthough anthropom orphic form s o f Q u e tza lcoat! are v irtu a lly unknow n a t T eo tih u acan ,
th e p lum ed serpent can ap p ear upon a w oven
MAT, a w idespread
163
TERMINATION RITUALS
T!a!oc A
a /S 0
F A T C O D ; H U E H U E T E O T L ; P U L Q U E CODS;
Putque God
TEXTILES
!64
m onum ent in
S tru ctu re
33
subject o f S tela
31,
K in g
C e n tra ! M exican
un
cerem o n ial
covered
m iddens
o f sm ashed
fig u rin e
through conflict.
was re fe rre d
"h e
whose
slaves
we
a re ,"
y a c /,
"th e
t e x t i l e s s e e CLOTH; COTTON
165
THRONE
(Be/ow) Tezcatlipoca
with the twenty
trecena periods, Codex
Fejrvry-Mayer, Late
Postclassic period.
T L A L T E C U H T L i,
the A ztec
EARTH
rLAHUIZCALPAKTECLHTH
166
too,
reig n ed
SUN
in th e ir p ro p er
thrones,
and
IT Z A M N A ,
cheeks, and
chin. T la h u izc a lp a n te c u h tli
appears as one o f the fo u r sxYBEARERs, in
o th e r gods.
take
the
form
L a te
Postclassic
C en tra!
M exican
m anu
serp entin e
167
TLALTECUHTLI
the
rem aining,
TLATOANI
KM
and spools o f
COTTON
in h e r headdress. She
th e
TRECENA
I O llin .
SUN.
obscure.
" W E R E -J A C U A R "
ad m in istra tive
th e ir
tra d itio n a l
trib a l
169
TO CI
Tem ple a t C acaxtla, a toad displays th e blackspotted yello w coloration o f the ja g u ar.
tobacco Tobacco (M co R an a sp.), one o f the
most im p o rtan t ritu a l plants o f ancien t
M esoam erica, was consum ed in tw o p rin c ip al
ways, e ith e r chew ed w ith p ow dered lim e or
smoked. In m any regions o f M esoam erica,
dried tobacco was ground and m ixed w ith
lim e to increase the stim ulatin g effects o f
nicotine. T h e discovery o f lim e -E lle d pits in
the cen ter o f T ie rra s Largas phase public
buildings a t San Jose M o g o te, O axaca,
suggests th a t the practice o f chew ing tobacco
w ith lim e m ay have been present d uring the
E a rly F o rm ative period. D u rin g the Post
classic period, b o ttle gourds fille d w ith
tobacco and lim e served as insignia fo r PRIESTS.
T h e tobacco was chew ed to re lie ve fatig u e
d uring long vigils and o th er cerem onies and
possibly to induce visions as w e ll. T h e
H u ich o l, T z e lta l M a y a , and o th er contem por
a ry peoples o f M esoam erica continue to carry
ground tobacco in b o ttle gourd containers.
Am ong the ancient M a y a , cigars seem to
have been the p re fe rre d m eans o f consum ing
tobacco. In fact, P ierre V e n tu r has noted th a t
our w ord cigar derives from the highland
M a y a n siAar, signifying cigar or tobacco.
Classic and Postclassic M a y a a rt contains
abundant scenes o f actual people and gods
sm oking cigars. O n e d eity in p artic u la r, the
aged God L (see S C H E LLH A S c o D s ) , is com m only
shown sm oking a large cigar. Am ong the
Postclassic Tarascans o f M ichoacn, tobacco
was usually smoked in long-stem m ed ceram ic
pipes. E lbow -shaped pipes seem to have been
the p re fe rre d means o f sm oking tobacco over
much o f Postclassic W est M exico.
According to M e n d ie ta , the Aztecs consid
ered tobacco to be the em bodim ent o f ciHUA
coATL, an aspect o f iLAMATECUHTLi, the great
goddess o f the M ILK Y WAY. In the early 17th c.
treatise o f R uiz de A larcn, tobacco was said
to have been born o f the S tar-S kirted O ne,
th a t is, the M ilk y W ay.
T o ch tli
MOTECUHZOMA t
1440-1469
s e e C A L E N D A R ; M A Y A H U E L ; R A B B IT; YEAR-
BEARERS
EARTH
god
MOTECUHZOMA t!
1502-1520
fem ases/,
or
swEATBATH.
A ccording
to
TLAZOLTEOTL,
this T o lla n
F lo re n tin e
fact, the
171
TOMBS
throughout
m ost
of
the
rest
of
TONACATECUHTLi
172
in O axaca, they w e n t to an c ie n t M o n te A lb a n ,
b u rie d
th e ir ow n
noble dead
in
th e old
the
largest
single
deposit
of
contem poraries
in
E cuador, a fa c t w hich
of
O ur
Sustenance,
173
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TROPHY HEADS
trecena
1 C ip ac tli
1 O celotl
T onacatecuhdi
Q u etzalcoat!
1 M a za tl
1 Xchitl
1 Acad
1 M iq u iz tli
1 Q u ia h u id
8
9
10
1 M a lin a lli
1 C oad
1 T ec p atl
11
12
13
1 C u etzp allin
1 O llin
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1 O zo m atli
1 Itz c u in tli
1 C a lli
1 Cozcacuauhdi
1 A tl
1 E hecatl
1 C u a u h tli
1 T o ch tli
TUERTO
174
C e n tra l
M ex ica n
w a rrio rs
w e re
s im ila rly
bechiano illustrates a
MORTUARY B U N D LE
p rio r to
T la lo c side o f the T em p lo M a y o r, th a t is
ified w ith
R A!N
p o in ted
crow n,
F IR E
nose
piece,
and
in L a te Postclassic C e n tra l
x iU H T E C U H T L i,
or
the
L a te
Postclassic
mosaic.
p erio d ,
the
175
M ixtees and Zapotees fre q u e n tly w ears a
tu rtle carapace, possibly as an allusion to th e
rum ble o f thu n d er. T h e tu rtle shell o ften
w orn by the M a y a d eity PAUAHTUN m ay also
be a reference to th u n d er. O n one L a te
Classic vessel, fo u r Pauahtuns are accom
panied by fou r C H A C S , the gods o f R A m and
LIGHTNING. T h re e o f the Chacs a re p layin g
m usic, one w ith a tu rtle carapace and a n tle r.
F o r the ancient M a y a , the tu rtle shell
described the circu lar and rounded E A R T H . A
num ber o f L a te Classic ALTARS are carved in
the form o f turtles. O n e such m onum ent,
Itz im te A lta r 1, depicts C aban curls - a w e llknow n earth sign - upon the shell. T h e
Tonsured M a ize God is o ften represented
rising out o f the tu rtle shell e arth . In L a te
Postclassic Yucatn, sm all stone turtles served
as the locus for penis p erfo ratio n . Page 19 o f
the Codex M a d rid illu s tra te Eve gods engaged
in B L O O D L E T T IN G around a tu rtle a lta r. Q u ite
possibly, this rite was to fe rtiliz e the earth
w ith blood d u rin g calen d rical perio d -en din g
celebrations. A t M a y ap a n , some stone turtles
b ear probable Aafun ending dates. In one
instance, an e n tire round o f 13 Aafuns is
represented on the rim o f the shell, m aking
this sculpture a P rehispanic K atu n W h eel.
rXiTZMMK
176
@U
uay In M a y a n languages, the term n ay com
177
UNDERWORLD
w hen the UNDERWORLD is open. T h e Prehispanic g!yph for the U ayeb p erio d is the 360day fun sign topped by a U -shaped skeletal
m aw , q u ite probably the cav e-lik e entrance
A tzitzimitl demon,
Codex Magliabechiano,
16th c. Aztec.
(AgAf) A
tzompantli
skullrack, Codex
Durn, 16th c.
Aztec
(Re/ow) A water
jaguar described
as the uay of a
Seibal lord, detail
from a Late
Classic Maya
vase.
U n d e rw o rld in
CAVE,
or
VEINTENA
176
w h e re v e r one
m ay be w h y th e islands o ff C am peche, in c lu d
in g Jaina, received so m any b u ria ls: th e y
th e
POPOL vuH,
th e
N ah u at!
U n d e rw o rld , a M a y a steeled h im s e lf to be
lik e a H e ro T w in , th a t is, to b e a b le to
each
them
M ic tla n , w h e re
M ic r L A N T E -
179
VEINTENA
vein ten a nam e
p rin c ip al deities
Izc a lli
T la lo c, X iu h te c u h tli
ffu a uAqufVfarnaVcMa/tz/
(m eal
of
am aranth
tam ales);
feast
for
X iu h te cu h tli every four
years
T la lo q u e
C u au h u itleh u a (liftin g o f
posts, p lan tin g o f trees,
stretching
of
lim bs);
young m aize
T la ca xip e h u aliztli
X ip e Totee
Feast o f X ip e , god o f
spring; Haying o f cap
tives
T o zo zto n tli
T la lo q u e, T la lte c u h tli,
X ip e T o tee
H u ey to zo ztli
B loodletting;
feasts
to
T lalo c, m aize gods; first
Toxcatl, T epopochtli
7
8
E tza lc u a liztli
T e c u ilh u ito n tli
9
10
12
H u e y te c u ih u itl
Tlaxochim aco, M ic c a ilh u ito n tli
X o co tlhu etzi, H u eym icc a ilh u itl
O ch p an iztli
13
T eotleco or P achtontli
14
15
Q uecholli
M ixcoat! or C am axtli
16
P a n q u etzaliztli
H u itzilo p o ch tli
17
18
A te m o ztli
T itit!
T lalo q u e
Ila m a te c u h tli.
11
fruits
Feasts to Tezcatlipoca and
H u itzilo p o ch tli
Feasts to young crops
Feast to goddess o f salt,
H u ixto cih uatl; exchange
o f noble clothing and
Rowers
Feast o f X ilonen
Feast o f m erchants; sm all
feast fo r the dead
Feast o f the xocot/ pole
Mamfena o f sw eeping and
bathing; feast o f T la zo l teo tl, Toci; scaffold sacri
fice; harvest feasts
B loodletting;
feast
of
H u itzilo p o ch tli
M o u n tain feasts to T lalo c;
sacrifice o f X ochiquetzal
im personator
Feasts o f M ixco atl; ritu a l
hunts
M a in festival to H u itz ilo
pochtli; banners
Feasts to w a te r deities
Feasts to Ila m a te c u h tli,
old people
Tarascans
abo
c ele b rated
veintenas,
Johanna
B roda
has in vestigated
C uingo
A tlcah u alo
T la c a x ip e h u a liztli
U n isperacuaro
T o zo zto n tli
n /a
H u e y to zo ztli
6
7
n /a
T oxcatl
M azcu to
E tza lc u a liztli
U azcata cnscuaro
C a h e ri cnscuaro
H u ey te cu ih u it!
H anciscuaro
Tlaxochim aco
X o co tihu etzi
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
H ic u a n d iro
S icuindiro
C h arap u zapi
U apnscuaro
C a h e ri uapnscuaro
n /a
Peunscuaro
C u rin d aro
P achtontli
H u eyp ach tii
Q u ech o lli
P a n q u etzaliztli
A te m o ztli
T ititl
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
A n thudoeni
A buoentaxi
A n ttzayo h
A tzhotho
A n ta tzh o n i
A tzib ip h i
A neguoeni
A nttzengohm uh
A ntangohm uh
A nttzengotu
11
A ntangotu
12
A m baxi
A nttzenboxegui
Iz c a lli
X ilo m a n a liztli
T la c a x ip e h u a liztli
T o zo zto n tli
H u eyto zo ztli
Toxcatl
E tza lc u a liztli
T e c u ilh u ito n tli
H u ey te cu ih u it!
M ic c a ilh u ito n tli,
Tlaxochim aco
H u ey m ic ca ilh u itl,
X o co tlhu etzi
O c h p an iztli
P ach to n tli
H u ey p ac h tli
Q u ech o lli
P a n q u e tza liztli
A te m o ztli
T ititl
18
A ncandehe
A m bue
O to m i vein ten a
A tam axegui
A n tzh o n i
A nthaxm e
O c h p an iztli
13
14
15
16
17
181
VISION SERPENT
B U T T E R F L IE S , T L A L O C
SER PENT,
and the
faces,
O W LS ,
the
WAR
M E X IC A N YEAR S IG N .
BLO O DLET-
o f rearin g
SERPENTS
the burning
asssM;
(Above) A section from the
Venus pages of the Dresden
Codex, Postclassic Yucatn.
V U C U B C A Q U fX
!M
m ay u n d u la te , although th e y ra re ly a p p ear
fe a th e r crests.
cloud
m arkings along th e ir
bodies. Some
v u ltu re T h e
(c.
1200 m ),
king
and
v u ltu re
so was
(Sarcoram phus
best know n
to
183
WATER
WATEH LJLY
164
CHAC,
the
th e
cHiUHTLicuE, She
o f th e
Jade
S k irt,
is a
W A T E R L IL Y S E R P E N T ,
id e n tifie d by its
SERPENT
W a te r
L ily
jA C U A H C O D S .
the
M aya
of
W ATER.
SERPENT,
185
WERE-JACUAR
illustrates
sham anic
transform ation.
resem bling
th e
L a tin
a lp h ab et, in
le tte r
"T "
o f th e
region.
as the god o f w in d .
Perhaps
ancien t
CO ATL,
the
best-know n
M eso am erica
is
of
EHECATL QUETZAL
w in d
god
god o f w in d .
In
L a te
Postclassic C en tra!
fifth ,
M tX T E C C O D S .
187
WRITING
KBALAKQLE
!M
ing g la d ia to ria l com bat, o f w hich X ip e was
also a p atro n . V ictorious w arrio rs donned the
gx
X h a la n q u e see cREATioNACCOL\Ts;popoLvm;
TWINS
X ib a lb a see UNDERWORLD
X ip e T o te e X ip e T o te e , O u r L o rd the F la ye d
CAVE,
or by others in to
hole.
le ttin g
the n ew
shoot em erge. T h e X ip e
w ith a Hery
SERPENT
189
XIUHTECUHTL]
Fragment of a
monument depicting
a Xiuhcoatl serpent
tearing open the chest
of Coyolxauhqui,
Templo Mayor,
Tenochtitlan.
Xiuhtecuhtli, the
Central Mexican
god of Ere and
time, Florentine
Codex, Book 1,
16th c. Aztec.
XOCHIPILLI
190
TRECENA
I C o a t.
X o c h ip illi
m eans
X o c h ip illi,
w hose
nam e
A H u iA T E -
boils to those w ho
FLOW ERS,
Q u e tza lc o a tl.
A ltho u g h the fa ith fu l assistant and com
191
YEARBEARERS
TURTLE
another
in
the
5 2 -ye ar
CALENDAR,
YEAKBEAHEHS
1M
as if th e y e a r w e re a burden to be supported.
the
260 -d a y
(1 3 x 20)
and
365-d ay
carryin g
193
YO KE
a/so CARCO.
The reader may well wonder how the authors have come to the contusions
presented in this book. The sources for the Precolumbian past in Mesoamerica are
many and diverse, and the piecing together of gods, iconography, and meaning
rare!y depends on just a single source but rather on the more convincing evidence
that comes from Ending patterns that are reflected in archaeology or ethnohistory.
In genera), we have made direct citations in this book on)y from 16th c. sources,
and we have tried to attribute important post-1950 discoveries to those responsible.
The following discussion and bibhography are by no means exhaustive or complete
(and the reader is advised to look etsewhere for a history of Mesoamerican
archaeology*) but what follows is a description of sources, how they have come
down to us, and how scholars have come to understand them.
Prehispanic Books
Despite the concerted effort by religious and civil authorities to destroy any native
manifestation of "idolatry" after the Conquest, a number of Prehispanic books screenfolds of deerskin or Eg paper painted with Ene brushes - have survived. Some
were shipped to Europe before the zeal to destroy overcame the conquerors, while
others were hidden for generations and came to tight in the 19th c. Of primary
importance for studying gods and symbols is the Borgia group of manuscripts, named
after the largest and Enest among them. Although it may have been painted in
Puebla or Cholula or perhaps even in Veracruz, the Codex Borgia is the best
surviving example of a Centra! Mexican book, containing a divinatory 260-day
calendar, sections on yearbearers and Venus, and a long, poorly understood section
("middle pages") that depicts the journey of Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca to the
nadir of the Underworld. Other manuscripts in the Borgia group lack these middle
pages, but all share a similar style and a similar constellation of gods. Most are
named for their original collector and all reside in European libraries: Borgia, Laud,
Fejrvry-Mayer, Cospi, and the Vaticanus B. Donald Robertson demonstrated that
the Codex Borbonicus, long thought to be a Prehispanic book, was made after the
Conquest, but probably before 1530; its Erst part, a tonalamatl, or 260-day calendar,
replicates a luxurious Aztec model. Because of the size and detail of the Borbonicus,
it offers one of the best guides to trecena patrons and veintena festivals.
Several Mixtee Prehispanic codices have survived, perhaps because of their
predominantly historical and genealogical content, or it may simply be that
* For histones of Mesoamerican archaeology, the reader should consult Bernal 1962, Adams 1969, Bernal 1960, and
Willey and Sablolf 1980. The history of the recognition of art in the New World is treated in Kubler 1990. See Keen
1971 and Boone 1987 for a consideration of Aztec historiography; for the Maya, see Scheie and Miller 1986, Miller
1989. Coe 1992 and Stuart 1992.
195
!M
Sahagun and a troop of Nahuatl-speaking nobles, and the text is written in parallel
columns of Nahuat! and Spanish. The work treats the gods, rehgion, history, temples
and cities, ceremonies, omens, auguries, natura! history, cosmography, mora! rhetoric,
calendar; describes different ethnic groups; and relates the Conquest itse!f, as to!d
from the native point of view. A separate Spanish-only text a!so survives. Despite
the !ens of the Spanish Conquest, the Florentine Codex is the single greatest source
for understanding the native New World.
Anonymous authors, including friars and natives, also made other early records probably in the Brst generation after the Conquest - of Aztec gods and religion that
survive only as fragments: i&sfor/a c/e /os mexicanos por sus pmfuras, Leyenda de
/os so/es, and Zd/sfoyre du meciuque. These extremely important texts recount the
deities, religion, and cosmography and describe now-lost manuscripts, probably as
presented to the friars by Aztec interlocutors. Many other friars wrote important
documents for understanding the Conquest and the social environment of the 16th
c., but they offered only a few insights into the religious iconography of the past.
The well-known Dominican, Bartolom de Las Casas, for example, wrote lengthy
tracts describing indigenous conditions and advocating social reform, but offers little
information on Mesoamerican gods not expounded more explicitly elsewhere.
Toward the end of the century, two major efforts at documentation were
completed. First, in 1577 Philip II conducted a census of New Spain, demanding
that each province answer 50 questions about its people, wealth, geography, local
administration, religious practices, and provide a map. Six years later, most of these
re/ac/onesgeogr/?cas were completed, many with the assistance of native informants.
In this same period, Diego Duran, a Berce Dominican priest who both loved Mexico
and lamented the tenacity of native religion, completed a series of important studies
known today as 77?e Boo/r of f/?e Cods and
77?e Anc/enf Ca/endar, and 77?e
L&sfory of f/?e /hd/es; the last is the most comprehensive history of the Aztec state.
The friars concentrated on the Valley of Mexico, so it is little wonder that few
records survive for other regions. Diego de Landa wrote his Z?e/ac/dn de /as cosas
de Fucafan in the 1560s while awaiting trial in Spain for his overenthusiastic
enforcement of the Inquisition. Although this document is extremely useful - Landa,
for example, wrote down the 30 characters in Maya phonetic, syllabic script that
led eventually to the phonetic decipherment of Maya hieroglyphic writing - it lacks
the richness of detail that characterizes the Centra! Mexican documents. In the 17th
c., Father Francisco de Burgoa made an important record of the Zapotees, although
nothing comparable survives for the Mixtees.
Native Documents after the Conquest
After the Spanish Conquest, native scribes worked for their new masters and made
dozens of manuscripts that survive, even though far more were lost. Some books
took on new content to suit the audience: religious iconography was spelled out in
order that a priest recognize his enemy; histories recounted peregrinations of
different ethnic groups, partly in order to express grievances regarding land
distribution or privileges; and native books turned up in Colonial legal proceedings.
The Spanish commissioned tribute records to assess the wealth of their colony and
maps to guide them to its sources. Many books required a hybrid effort: native
scribes painted the illustrations and Europeans added interpretive glosses. Where
Mesoamericans learned to represent their languages in the European alphabet, they
began to write books of their own in this new system, occasionally transcribing an
197
ancient picture book, as in the case of the Popo/ VuA. As the 16th c. progressed, the
Spanish Crown passed from Charles V to Philip II, who had less desire to understand
Mesoamerica and less patience with the eclectic sort of books made there: his
subordinates must have destroyed the missing copies of Sahagun's encyclopedia,
although he did commission the Pe/aciones geogrFcas, completed in 1583. After
the English defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588, Spain wanted little from her
colonies but precious minerals. By the end of the 16th c., 90 percent of the indigenous
population had died; the generation that had known Preconquest life was gone, and
sympathetic friars had generally given way to less educated priests dependent on
local Colonial patronage. The Crown forbade foreigners (i.e. non-Spanish born) to
visit the colonies. The Precolumbian past was passively abandoned or actively
destroyed.
The major groups of 16th c. native or hybrid works can be roughly classiBed as
follows (some are written on native paper, others on European paper; a /lenzo is
painted on cloth; the catalogue in the Handbook o Afidd/e American indians,
particularly Glass 1975, should be consulted):
MAPs: including Plano en Papel de Maguey, Mapa de Coatlinchan, Mapas de
Cuauhtinchan, Mapa Quinatzin, Mapa de Santa Cruz, among others
H iSTO RiCAL/R EUG ious CHRONICLES: including Relacin de Michoacn, Codex Boturini,
Codex Mendoza, part 1, Lienzo de Tlaxcala (orig. lost), Historia ToltecaChichimeca, the Popol Vuh
TRIBUTE LiSTs: Codex Mendoza, part 2 , and Matricula de Tributos
D E S C R I P T I O N S O F F E S T I V A L S A N D CUSTOMS: including the Codex Magliabechiano and
its group; the paired manuscripts Codex Telleriano-Remensis and Codex Rios, or
Vaticanus A; the Tovar Calendar; and Codex Mendoza, part 3
Other manuscripts, including an herbal, Codex Badianus, written in Latin by a
learned Nahuatl speaker, survive from the 16th c., but few have played a seminal
role in the decipherment of Mesoamerican gods and symbols. Some later Colonial
sources, including Tezozmoc's Crnica mexicana (c. 1600), Torquemada's MonarcAia indiana (c. 1613), Chimalpahin's Pe/aciones (c. 1625), Ixtlilxochitl's .Relaciones
and Historia cAicAimeca, and the various Mayan Books of Chilam Balam (all 18th
c.) include information not available from other sources.
The End of the Spanish Colonial Era
Perhaps in response to the general intellectual climate of the Enlightenment, Charles
III of Spain took a renewed scientiBc interest in the Americas and the Prehispanic
past, and so inaugurated the modern era in Mesoamerican studies. In 1786, he sent
out explorers to document Palenque, Chiapas, and at the beginning of the 19th c.,
his son, Charles IV, commissioned further study of abandoned archaeological sites,
their merit and contents, including Monte Alban and Mitla. The Mexican scholar
Jos Antonio Alzate published drawings and commentary on El Taj in and Xochicalco.
The German nobleman and scholar Alexander von Humboldt was granted leave to
carry out scientiBc study in the Spanish colonies, resulting in his 1810 Vues des
cordd/res et monuments des peup/e indigenes de /Amenge. By the time of
Mexican independence, the regional styles of Mesoamerican art and the presence
of different gods and religious practices began to be recognized.
In 1790 and 1791, when workmen uncovered three Aztec monoliths, the Stone of
Tizoc, the Calendar Stone, and the large Coatlicue, they were preserved rather than
destroyed, and the scholar Antonio Lon y Gama began deciphering their meaning
He was the Erst student to puMish accurate, measured drawings of Aztec religious
art. Although he thought the Calender Stone to be a true calendar, recording hours,
days, weeks, months, years, and other cycles, a reading no longer tenable, he
nevertheless correctly identified many symbols and gods (while misidentifying
others), and we may consider Lon y Gama s efforts as the first scientific study of
Mesoamerican iconography.
Following the Mexican declaration of independence in 1810 and the withdrawal
of Spanish authority in 1821 (and the independence oL Centra! America in 1825,
opening up yet more lands), European, North American, and Mexican investigators
surged across the countryside, exploring, studying, and collecting evidence of the
past. And when the Spanish left, they took with them quantities of documents,
including, for example, the works of Diego Durn.
The Precolumbian past and the sophisticated cultures whose wreckage lay on and
under the ground puzzled its 19th c. students and many offered fantastic explanations,
some of which the Spanish had already put forth, such as the notion that
Mesoamerican civilization was founded by the Lost Tribes of Israel or by strayed
Egyptians (see Wauchope 1962). Soon Atlantis, India, China, and Africa were added
to the stew; the Mormons saw Mesoamerican civilization as the locus for a separate
resurrection of Christ. Authors argued about the possibility for high civilization to
have flourished at all in Mesoamerica, but by the end of the century there was
near-universal consensus among scholars that it had, that there was more time depth
and antiquity than previously thought, and more diversity of cultures; among
competing explanations, the idea that these cultures had grown up in the New
World without Old World stimuli began to take root.
John Lloyd Stephens and Frederick Catherwood explored what are now Guatem
ala, Belize, Honduras, and the Mexican states of Chiapas, Yucatn, Campeche, and
Quintana Roo in 1839-42, documenting dozens of Maya cities with lively descriptions
and generally accurate illustrations. Unlike most of their contemporaries, they
believed that the living Maya descended from the city-builders, and they recognized
the uniformity of Maya writing across the vast geographic realm they traveled. They
had no reason to believe that the cities had been abandoned any earlier than the
time of the Conquest and so knew nothing of the antiquity of Maya cities. Stephens'
four volumes were bestsellers; they went through dozens of editions and printings,
perhaps creating the Erst large audience of armchair archaeologists in history, and
they undoubtedly sparked interest in those who would later be scholars of ancient
Mesoamerica.
Between 1831 and 1846, Edward King, Lord Kingsborough, drove himself into
bankruptcy by bankrolling and publishing nine elephantine folios of facsimile
reproductions of Precolumbian and Postconquest Mesoamerican codices and manu
scripts known in European collections. Despite some serious handicaps - the copyist
Agostino Aglio misinterpreted unfamiliar imagery and inevitably changed details in
his interpretations of the manuscripts, and the enormous volumes could be bought
only by major libraries or by the very wealthy - for the Erst time, the rich iconography
in these books could be consulted widely, and dozens of Precolumbian sculptures
were also illustrated. With this documentation, scholars could assemble and study
the temples, books and gods of Mesoamerica, from Teotihuacan and Tenochtitlan
in the north, on through Xochicalco, El Tajin, Monte Albn, and Mitla, to the Maya
sites in the south.
199
Aztec history had been described many times by the 19th c., but the American
historian William H. Prescott wrote what we might call the first "modern" history
of the Aztecs, a 3-volume study published in 1843, using voluminous sources,
particularly Precolumbian and early Postconquest manuscripts, to build a picture of
the Aztecs that included their religious life. Sahagun's works began to be rediscovered,
and a 3-volume Spanish edition of the Genera/ ARsfory text was published in 182930. And as museums around the world were founded, Mesoamerican antiquities
began to receive a permanent, stable home; Founded in 1825, the Mexican National
Museum has always housed the world s largest collection of Aztec antiquities. By
the end of the century, the Trocadero, British Museum, American Museum of
Natural History, and Smithsonian Institution, among others, would all amass
signiBcant collections of Mesoamerican materials.
At mid-century, several scholars competed to collect Precolumbian and Colonial
manuscripts, prying them loose from archives, churches, and small towns. In the
18th c., Lorenzo Boturini had bought some 500 manuscripts before xenophobic
Spanish ofBcals deported him, confiscated the collection and then let it be dismantled.
J. M. A. Aubin spent a decade collecting manuscripts around Mexico City and
succeeded in reassembling many pieces of the Boturini corpus, which he then took
to Paris in 1840 and spent the rest of his life studying. In Mexico, despite
his antipathy for the Aztecs, Joaqun Garcia Icazbalceta assembled previously
unpublished documents relating to Mexico's history and began publishing them in
1858. Considering himself Aubin's heir, Abb Charles-Etienne Brasseur de Bourbourg traveled among the Maya and sought out manuscripts and documents that
he hoped would unravel their past. His perserverance and luck led him to make
several important discoveries: first, in Guatemala, he came upon the 18th c. copy
of the 16th c. Popo/ FuA, translated it into French and published it; then, back in
Spain, he found the Madrid Codex and a copy of Landa's Pe/ac/on and published
them as well.
Brasseur's discoveries ushered in a new phase of study, in which 16th c.
commentaries were used to decipher Precolumbian books and art. Using the variety
of sources now available to them, scholars in Mexico, the United States, and Europe
began to identify gods, symbols, and iconography. Books and journals proliferated,
fueling greater interest; national governments, academic institutions and private
backers sponsored campaigns of exploration, and eventually, of excavation.
During the long, stable reign of Porfirio Daz in Mexico (1876-1911), Mexican
scholars began to study the Aztecs and their predecessors with care. Because of
their identification with the despised Porfirio Daz regime, however, some of their
works have been unjustly neglected, or even condemned. Manuel Orozco y Berra,
Jess Snchez, Alfredo Chavero, Justo Sierra, Jos Fernando Ramrez, Cecilio
Robelo, and Jess Calindo y Villa, among others, read manuscripts, published
previously unknown documents, and began interpreting Aztec art, life and religion.
Robelo published his 2-volume D/cc/onar/o <Ze M/fo/qgia NaAuaf/ in 1905, a
compendium of Centra! Mexican religion that was rarely cited by his contemporaries
(and even less frequently today) but which must have been heavily consulted by
his contemporaries and successors. Based on the sources unearthed or published by
his learned colleagues, Robelo's dictionary is useful for any student of Aztec
gods and symbols today and has remained surprisingly current. Of his Mexican
contemporaries, Francisco Paso y Troncoso made the greatest contribution. A skilled
naAuaf/afo, or Nahuatl-speaker and translator, Paso y Troncoso dedicated much of
200
his tife to rediscovering the works of Bernardino de Sahagn and making them
available to scholars, although his vast project of translation and publication was
teft unhnished upon his death in Europe in 1916.
Leopold Batres carried out excavations at Mida, Teotihuacan, and Tenochtitlan,
and although the following generation of archaeologists harshly criticized Batres'
techniques and results, his efforts laid the groundwork for modern archaeology in
Mexico. After the Mexican Revolution, Manuel Camio carried out the first strati
graphic excavations in Mexico, at Atzcapotzalco, opening up the possibility of
documenting civilized life in the first millennium BC.
in France, E.-T. Hamy studied and separated Aztec from non-Aztec works in
Paris museums, publishing dozens of articles in his journal Decades amer/caines,
identifying gods and relating Teotihuacan representations to Aztec deities in useful
investigations, although he shared with Brasseur a passion for theories of non-native
origins of Mesoamerican civilization. He published the first edition of the Codex
Borbonicus in 1899. Desire Charnay had visited Mexico in 1857, but his 1880 trip
produced his most important observations, the identiheation of Tula, Hidalgo, with
the home of the Toltecs, and the linking of it culturally and temporally to Chichen
tx, but unfortunately he then went on to attribute all civilization in Mesoamerica
to Toltec genius.
Several German scholars made important contributions to the deciphering of
Mesoamerican religious imagery at the end of the 19th c., but the wide-ranging
efforts of Eduard Seler remain the most important today, perhaps because his
commentaries are almost always rooted in an object or corpus: only rarely did Seler
begin with an idea that he sought to prove, rather than starting with a text, an
object, or a building. Sponsored by the Due de Loubat, a wealthy New Yorker, from
1887 onward, Seler wrote commentaries to new facsimile editions of many codices
in which he identified the gods, explicated the calendrics and related patterns to
ethnohistoric documents. Although more skilled in his manipulation of Central
Mexican materials, Seler was the hrst to compare Maya and Mexican materials
systematically; more profoundly than any of his contemporaries, Seler drew
his interpretations from the widest possible range of sources, including history,
ethnohistory, and archaeological remains. Seler's writings began to be collected in
the 5-volume Cesamme/fe AAAant#ungan in 1902, and the final volume was issued
posthumously in 1923. Seler's vast corpus remains the point of departure for most
modern iconographic inquiries.
Once Ernst Forstemann, Royal Librarian in Dresden, began to prepare a facsimile
edition of the Dresden Codex (pub. 1880), he worked with the manuscript until he
had broken the code of the Maya calendar and mathematics, making possible the
decipherment of the Long Count of the monuments and its correlation to the
Christian calendar, as later propounded by the American journalist J. T. Goodman
in 1905. From that point on, the antiquity of the Maya monuments later attributed
to the "Classic" period was known, and the dichotomy of "Maya: Creeks of the
New World" vs. "Aztecs: Romans of the New World" took root. The sudden
cessation of Maya monuments with Long Count dates in the 9th c. came to be called
the "collapse," a problem for scholars from that time onward. In 1897, Paul ScheHhas
inaugurated modern Maya iconographic studies with his investigation of the deities
of the Maya codices in which he carefully isolated separate iconographic entities,
recognized their name glyphs, and assigned neutral letters of the alphabet to
individual gods.
201
In the United States, Daniel Brinton translated Nahuatl poetry into English (1887)
and reacted against the excesses of enthusiasts like Chamay with skeptical attacks
on the very existence of the Toltecs, invoking, in turn, the wrath of Seler. Zelia
Nuttall, the Erst woman scholar to study Mesoamerica, published commentaries on
Precolumbian manuscripts, correctly identiEed the large piece of featherwork in the
Vienna Museum as a headdress, perhaps Motecuhzoma's, rather than a standard,
and offered hypotheses for the meanings of some Mesoamerican calendrical cycles
that her male colleagues found laughable, although some have been shown to be
probable today. She correctly proposed that a Mixtee codex (like her contemporaries,
she thought the Mixtee books were Aztec) depicted largely historical, not religious,
iconography; in her honor, the book, the Codex Nuttall, was given her name.
Probably inspired by the writings of Stephens, scholars in the United States and
England focused their attention on the Maya, particularly the discovery and
exploration of archaeological sites. Alfred P. Maudslay made extensive Maya art
available to study through publication of drawings of monuments at Copan, Quirigu,
Palenque, Yaxchiln, and Chichen Itz. Despite efforts by Cyrus Thomas and others
to use the Landa "alphabet" to decipher Maya texts, the nature of the script
remained unknown until Yuri Knorosov tackled it after World War II. J. T. Goodman
recognized the head and fu!!-Sgure variants for numbers and period glyphs, some
of which turned out to be gods. Herbert Spinden built on Schellhas's 1897 list of
Postclassic Maya gods by identifying some of them and isolating yet others in the
earlier Classic art for his 1909 Harvard dissertation, later published as A
of
Maya Art in 1913. George Vaillant established the basic chronological sequence for
Maya ceramics still in use today. Harvard sponsored campaigns of archaeological
exploration and documentation, and the Carnegie Institution of Washington domi
nated Maya archaeology between the World Wars, publishing vast quantities of
material for later iconographic exegesis.
The Problems of Early 20th c. Mesoamerican Studies
With the correlation of the Maya and European calendars settled, the Maya were
seen by many as the inventors of the calendar and gods. But problems remained
with such a construct, particularly as evidenced by the corpus of art that came to
be called "Olmec." Non-Mayanist Mesoamericanists, among them Marshall Saville,
George Vaillant, Matthew Stirling, Alfonso Caso, and Miguel Covarrubias believed
that the Olmec aesthetic and iconographic enigma, present both in Central Mexico
and in Veracruz, predated the Maya. Covarrubias earned the wrath of Mayanists
when he drew a now-famous how chart (see illustration under WERE-jACUAR, p. 185)
to show how what he called Olmec were-jaguars preceded all other rain gods in
Mesoamerica, and he called the Olmec the cu/fura madre. After World War II,
radiocarbon dating would prove the chronological primacy of the Olmec as
Mesoamerica's Erst complex culture and the Gulf Coast as its hearth.
Alfonso Caso excavated Monte Albn for several seasons in the 1930s, establishing
a stratigraphically based chronology for Oaxaca and vastly amplifying the corpus of
religious art. Caso and Ignacio Bernal studied Zapotee ceramic urns, isolating deity
complexes and relating them to both Colonial god lists made by Francisco de Burgoa
and to known Aztec gods. Unlike his predecessors, including Seler and Nuttall, Caso
recognized that the Mixtee codices were distinct from Aztec ones, and he unraveled
the major genealogies, identifying them with, known places, although scholars now
believe that he pushed the antiquity of these lineages back too far into the past.
BM
Knowledgeable in all aspects of Mesoamerica except the Maya, Caso explored Aztec
religion and iconography and offered what until recently were the most explicit
studies of Mesoamerican calendars, and many of his interpretations have remained
in favor.
Unlike many other Mesoamerican sites, Teotihuacan was never lost from view.
But although Charnay had idenBed Tula, Hidalgo, as the historical home of the
Toltecs, Teotihuacan had come to be considered Tula for most of the century. The
discovery in the late 1930s of Teotihuacan-style pottery in contexts with datable
Early Classic Maya pottery at Kaminaljuy pushed Teotihuacan back into the first
millennium AD and opened a place for Tula, confirmed as the Toltec capital by
Wigberto Jimenez-Moreno at the first round table of the Sociedad mexicana de
antropologa in 1941.
As professor of anthropology at the National Autonomous University of Mexico
in the 1920s, Seler's student Hermann Beyer carried on Mesoamerican iconographic
studies, particularly of Aztec art, as did Walter Lehmann in Germany. Angel Maria
Garibay offered the first comprehensive translations of Nahuat! texts. Ignacio
Marquina explored the iconography of Mesoamerican architecture. Ignacio Bernal
carried on Caso and Covarrubias's Olmec studies.
After World War H, scholars sought unified terminologies to refer to both time
and place. Spinden and Morley's notion of Old and New Empires for the Maya, for
example, had never applied to other parts of Mesoamerica, and evidence for early
occupation of Yucatn made it impossible to believe the Maya collapse to have been
a wholesale movement of peoples. A. V. Kidder and Tatiana Proskouriakoff of the
Carnegie Institution of Washington began to refer in published works to what had
also been called the "Initial Series Period" as the Classic era, roughly AD 300-900,
and they used the term to refer to other contemporaneous cultures at Monte Alban
and Teotihuacan. The Postclassic era, then, began with the rise of the Toltecs at
Tula; the Olmec and other early developments were Preclassic, and fell in the Brst
millennium Be. Such terms implied a value judgment that the "Classic" era achieved
some ideal, a notion now out of favor, and so other terms have been proposed, but
only the substitution of "Formative" for Preclassic has taken hold.
In 1943, Paul Kirchhoff suggested the name Mesoamerica to refer to an area of
shared cultural traditions from 14 to 21 degrees north latitude, encompassing much
of Mexico, all of Guatemala and Belize, and the northern strip of Honduras and El
Salvador. This term has successfully replaced "Middle America," "Nuclear Amer
ica," or the names of modern nation-states in scholarly discussion of the region.
Later 20th c. Studies: Maya
Sir Eric Thompson dominated studies of Maya religion and iconography for most of
the 20th c. as surely as Eduard Seler had reigned over the Mesoamerican scene at
the turn of the century. (Thompson's prominent colleague Sylvanus G. Morley
operated more in the archaeological realm and ultimately followed many of
Thompson's views in his synthetic writings.) Thompson sprinkled his writings with
quotations from English literature which he used to idealize Maya gods and religion,
heightening differences between what he characterized as the peaceful Classic
period and the warlike Postclassic era. Based on his knowledge of Central Mexican
iconography - a knowledge vastly expanded by his supervision of a translation of
Seler's collected works during World War II - Thompson wrote Maya ARerogTypAic
Wr/Rng^ (1950), a compendium of iconography as well as of Maya writing. In Maya
203
History and PeAgion (1970) he offered a new model of Maya religion, with many
gods subsumed under Itzamna.
The Carnegie Institution of Washington began to phase out its program of Maya
research after World War II, and Maya archaeologists turned away from the
excavation of major ceremonial architecture and the documentation of stone
monuments. In the held, archaeologists sought to determine the nature of Maya
settlement, without any special consideration of the elite and their art, yielding few
studies of religion, gods, and iconography, intellectual territory they had ceded to
Thompson. The contributions of Gunter Zimmermann (1956) and Ferdinand Anders
(1963), updating the works of Schellhas and other German scholars, were among
only a very few such studies of the period.
Since 1970, however, studies of Maya religion have flourished, dependent in part
on the decipherment of Maya hieroglyphic writing that began with Yuri Knorosov
(Brst comprehensively published in English in 1967), Heinrich Berlin (1958), Tatiana
Proskouriakoff (1960, 1963, 1964), David Kelley (1962, 1976) and continued on with
Victoria Bricker, Federico Fahsen, Nikolai Grube, Stephen Houston, John Justeson,
Floyd Lounsbury, Berthold Riese, Linda Scheie, and David Stuart, among others.
It took hieroglyphic decipherment, for example, for Proskouriakoff to prove that
Maya depictions represented named nobility, including women (1960), or to see
that the Classic Maya were a warlike people (e.g. Miller 1986). The 8 volumes
issued to date of the Palenque Round Table have been a forum for discussions of
Maya art and writing (1974-). Linda Scheie has tackled dozens of iconographic
problems, with many of the results published in The P/ood of Kmgy (1986) and A
Foresf of Kings (1990), and she initiated Copan Notes and Texas No fes, privately
published iconographic and epigraphic commentaries. Research jReporfs on Anc/enf
Maya Wb&ng, published by George Stuart, also treat religion and iconography. Karl
Taube has made a systematic reassessment of Postclassic Maya deities (1992).
Decipherment of Maya writing has meant not only the idenBcation of deity names
but also the recognition of verbs marking religious events, among them bloodletting,
war, sacriBce, dreaming, dancing, death, and burial. Stephen Houston and David
Stuart recently cracked the pattern of naming places in Maya script and found the
names of supernatural places along with those of the mundane world.
iconographic studies have also grown because of a near-explosion of new materials
for study from both archaeology and looting. Michael Coe has studied the new
corpus of Classic Maya ceramics and used the Popo/ VnA to decipher iconography
and identify gods (1973, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1982); Clemency Coggins analyzed the
Tikal corpus (1975), while Francis Robicsek and Donald Hales considered others
without provenience (1981, 1982). Karl Herbert Mayer has assembled photographs
of looted monuments (1980, 1991). Since 1970, Nicholas Hellmuth has been
photographing Maya vessels, building a photographic archive kept at the University
of Texas at San Antonio (e.g. Quirarte 1979) and several museums; using the archive,
Hellmuth has analyzed Early Classic iconography (1987). Justin Kerr is publishing
the corpus of Maya vessels he has photographed with his rollout camera (1989,
1990, 1992). New editions and translations of the Popo/ VuA have been useful
(Edmonson 1971; Tedlock 1985), as are new facsimile editions of the Maya codices
and the identiBcation of a fourth Preconquest book, the Grolier Codex (Coe 1973).
Archaeological exploration has promoted study of gods and iconography, particularly
with the careful line drawings of monuments now considered obligatory for any
archaeological project (Jones and Satterthwaite 1982; Beetz and Satterthwaite 1981),
2M
and the Corpus project directed by tan Craham has set a high standard for at! other
)ine drawings (Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions 1975-). The tomb paintings
at Rio Azu! have ampliBed an understanding of the Maya iconography of death and
the cave paintings at Naj Tunich have revealed the world of cave rituals. Ongoing
projects at Copan and Dos Pilas continue to yield iconographic materials without
precedent.
Some archaeological discoveries also reshaped fundamental thinking about Maya
gods and religion, and discoveries at Cerros, El Mirador, and Kohunlich have shown
that those gods were known by at least 100 BC; some of th$ Postconquest Popo/ VuA
narrative appears to be explicit on highland monuments and at Izapa by no later
than AD 100. The murals of Bonampak and the discovery of the secret tomb within
the Temple of Inscriptions at Palenque both suggested persona! aggrandizement
rather than paeans to Maya gods; the subsequent discovery of a major tomb at the
base of Tikal Temple I conBrmed the pattern of tombs within temples, ultimately
leading Mayanists to recognize the role of ancestor worship in religion. Settlement
studies have revealed the complexity of urban and rural life for the Maya; ecological
archaeology has frequently resonated with iconographic patterns (Puleston 1976).
Recognition of war iconography among the Classic Maya (Riese 1984, Scheie and
Miller 1986; Scheie and Freidel 1990) has narrowed the perceived intellectual and
moral rift between the Classic Maya and the Maya at Chichen Itz, raising questions
of dating, provoking new iconographic studies of Postclassic Yucatn, and forcing a
reevaluation of the role played by Tula at Chichen Itz (Coggins and Shane 1984;
Lincoln 1990).
Later 20th c. Studies: Centra! Mexico
In 1978, excavations began again at the Templo Mayor compound, the Aztec sacred
precinct within Tenochtitlan, initiating a new era of Aztec archaeological and
iconographic studies under Eduardo Matos Moctezuma. New major monuments
such as the Coyolxauhqui stone came to light, as did abundant caches and offerings,
allowing new understandings of Aztec religious practice and meaning (Boone 1987;
Broda, Carrasco, and Matos Moctezuma 1987; Matos Moctezuma 1988), and the
provincial Aztec record has also received incisive documentation (Solis 1981).
Although buoyed by the new archaeological discoveries, Aztec textual and icono
graphic studies had long flourished, particularly in Mexico under the stewardship
of Miguel Leon-Portilla, Alfredo Lpez Austin, and Eduardo Matos Moctezuma; in
the United States led by H.B. Nicholson; and in Germany, most recently headed
by Karl Nowotny and Ferdinand Anders. Nicholson s 1971 synthesis remains a
mode! of understatement, the single best guide to Aztec gods and religious complexes.
Other contributors to the study of Aztec iconography and religion include Carmen
Aguilera, Patricia Anawalt, Johanna Broda, Jacqueline de Durand-Forest, Doris
Heyden, Cecilia Klein, Esther Pasztory, Hanns Prem, Bodo Spranz, Richard
Townsend, and Emily Umberger. Arthur J. O. Anderson and Charles Dibble have
systematically translated the Nahuatl Florentine Codex into English (Sahagun 19501982); Thelma Sullivan also translated selections of the corpus of Sahagun and his
contemporaries. In Aztecs, Inga Clendinnen (1991) paints a rich picture of the Aztec
religious world.
New facsimile editions, particularly those published by the Akademische Druckund Verlaganstalt in Graz, Austria, of Central Mexican Prehispanic and Postconquest
books have increased their availability for study, as have accompanying iconographic
205
RM
Abaj Takalik, despite its importance in this era and to the later Classic Maya. The
art and religion of this period and place may be better represented in recent
discoveries at La Mojarra, discovered in 1986 (Winfield Capitaine 1988). Bearing
dates in AD 143 and 156, the La Mojarra stela shows the sophisticated development
of writing, advanced calendrical notation, iconography and ideology that encompasses
and includes the Olmec while pointing the way to the Classic Maya.
Later 20th c. Studies: Classic Veracruz
Much of the art and iconography of Classic Veracruz remains a mystery, plagued
by centuries of looting, insufficient documentation of both archaeological works and
those without provenience, and uncertainty about fundamental cultural associations
between place and ethnicity. Excavations at El Zapota! have yielded life-sized tomb
figures of deities; paintings at Las Higueras depict lords festooned with paper
strips carrying out sacrificial rituals. Catalogues of Huastec and El Tajin sculptures have
improved access to materials (de la Fuente and Gutirrez Solana 1980; Kampen 1972).
Later 20th c. Studies: West Mexico
Although long thought to be anecdotal and free of the religious meaning of the
Aztecs or Maya, the art of West Mexico has been studied for its iconographic
complexity in recent years (Furst 1965; Von Winning 1974; Gallagher 1983; Graham
n.d ), following publication of quantities of looted material, some of which has
suggested patterns of meaning and a highly stratified society. Recent excavation and
reconnaissance has revealed intersections with the rest of Mesoamerica (Foster and
Weigand 1985; Schondube and Galvn 1978).
Later 20th c. Studies: Other Problems
Anthony Aveni, Horst Hartung, and John Carlson have all demonstrated the
importance of geomancy and astronomy for ancient America (Aveni 1980; Aveni
1988; Aveni and Brotherston, eds. 1983). Johanna Broda has published a useful
synthesis and commentary of comparative Mesoamerican calendars (1969). New
journals, including Mexican,
Latin Amer/can Antiquity and Ancient Mesoamer
ica, have increased the ability of specialists to communicate their findings to one
another. Major dictionary and linguistic projects have drawn upon both modern and
Colonial sources, yielding in some cases new dictionaries (Barrera Vsquez 1980,
Laughlin 1975, Kartunnen 1983, Summer Institute of Linguistics 1974, 1985) and
new guides to older dictionaries (e.g. Campbell 1985). Ethnographers and linguists
have worked all across Mesoamerica (Bricker and Gossen 1989, Fought 1972, Furst
1965, Girard 1966, Gossen 1974 and 1986, Ichon 1973, Jansen, van der Loo, and
Manning, eds., 1988, Mendelson 1959, Sandstrom 1991, Taggart 1983, Tedlock 1982,
and Vogt 1968, among many others), and ethnohistorians have worked through
documents to offer a new view of native Mesoamerica in the years following the
Conquest (Burkhart 1989, Klor de Alva 1981, Carmack 1981).
Sources of Quotations
Direct citations from the Florentine Codex in Cods and SymAoVs of Ancient Mexico
and fAe Maya are labelled FC in the main entries and come from the A. J. O.
Anderson and C. E. Dibble translations, 1950-1982 (listed under Sahagun in the
Bibliography).
Direct citations of the Fopo/ VnA are from the Dennis Tedlock translation, 1985.
207
Abbreviations
BAE Bureau of American Ethnology
CiW Carnegie institution of Washington
DOS Dumbarton Oaks Studies in Pre-Columbian
Art and Archaeology
ECM Estudios de Cultura Maya
ECN Estudios de Cultura Nhuatl
HM A/ Handbook of Middle American Indians
fCA
Proceedings of the International Congress
of Americanists
IMS Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, SUNY
Albany
MAI
208
Carmack, Robert, 1981, 7Ae Quiche Maya# o
Ltat/an, Norman, Okla
Carrasco, David, 1990. PeAg/ons o Mesaamcrira.
New York
------ , ed., 1991, To CAapge P/ace. Aztec Ceremon
ia/ Landscapes, Niwot, Colo
Carrasco, Pedro, and Broda, Johanna, eds , 1978,
Economa po/ftica e ideo/ogia en e/ Mexico preAispanico, Mexico City
Caso, Alfonso, 1942, "El paraso terrenal en Teotihuacan," Cuadernos Americanos. 6, 127-38
------ , 1967, Losca^eni/ar/ospreA/sp^/ucos, Mexico
City
------ , 1969, E/ tesoro de Monte A/hn, Mexico City
------ , and Ignacio Bernal, 1952, Ernas de Oaxaca,
INAH Memorias 2
Charnay, Dsir, 1885, Les anciennes vi//es du
Nouveau Monde, Paris
Chimalpahin Cuauhtlehuanitzin, Domingo, 1965,
Pe/aciones origina/es de CAa/co Amaquemecan,
Mexico City
Clarkson, Persis, B 1978, "Classic Maya Pictorial
Ceramics: A Survey of Content and Theme," in
R. Sidrys, ed., Papers on the Economy and
Architecture o tAe Ancient Maya, Los Angeles,
86-141
Clcndinncn, Inga, 1990 "Ways to the Sacred:
Reconstructing Religion' in Sixteenth-Century
Mexico," /fistovyani/AntAropo/qgy, 5, 105-141
------ , 1991, Aztecs. An interpretation, Cambridge
and New York
Codex Aubin (Codex of 1576), 1903, Mexico City
Codex Aubin: Historia de la nacin mexicana, 1963,
ed. C. E. Dibble, Madrid
Codex Bodley, 1960, ed. A. Caso, Mexico City
Codex Borbonicus, 1974, ed. K. Nowotny, Graz
Codex Borgia, 1978, ed. K. Nowotny, Graz
Codex Boturini, 1944, Mexico City
Codex Colombino, 1966, ed. A. Caso and M. E.
Smith, Mexico City
Codex Cospi, 1968, ed. K. Nowotny, Graz
Codex Fjervry-Mayer, 1971, ed. C. Burland,
Graz
Codex Ixtlilxochitl, 1976, ed. J. de Durand-Forest,
Graz
Codex Laud, 1966, ed. C. Burland, Graz
Codex Magliabechiano, 1970, ed. F. Anders and
Jacqueline de Durand-Forest, Graz
Codex Mendoza, 1938, ed. and commentary by
James Cooper Clark, London
Codex Mendoza, 1992, ed. Frances Berdan and
Patricia Rie# Anawalt, Los Angeles
Codex Nuttall, A Picture Manuscript from Ancient
Mexico, 1975, New York
Codex Rios (Vaticanus A), 1900, Rome
Codex Selden, 1964, ed. A. Caso and M. E. Smith,
Mexico City
Codex Vaticanus Nr. 3773 (Vaticanus B), 1902, ed.
E. Seler, Berlin
Codex Vaticanus B, 1972, ed. F. Anders, Graz
Codex Vindobonensis, 1974, ed. O. Adelhofer,
Craz
Cdice Borgia, 1963, ed. and commentary by
Eduard Seler, 3 vols, Mexico City
Codice Chimalpopoca: anales de Cuauhtitlan y
209
eyenda de 0 $ so!es, 1945, trans. and ed. Primo
Feliciano Velazquez, Mexico City
Coe, Michael D., 1968, Amenca s First C/wAzaiJon.
Discovering the Olmec, New York
------, 1973, The Maya 5cribe and His World, New
York
------ , 1975, Classic Maya Pottery at Dumbarton
Oaks, Washington, D C.
------, 1977, "Supernatural Patrons of Maya Scribes
and Artists," Social Process in Maya Prehistory,
ed. N. Hammond, New York, 327-47
------ , 1978, Lords o f the Underworld, Princeton
------ , 1982, Old Cody and Young Heroes, Jerusalem
------ , 1984, Mexico, 3rd edn, London and New
York
------ , 1987, The Maya, 4th edn, London and New
York
------ , 1990, "The Hero Twins: Myth and Image,"
in J. Kerr, ed., Maya Pase Book f New York
161-84
------ , 1992, Breaking the Maya Code, London and
New York
------ , and Diehl, Richard, 1980, Vh the Land o f the
Olmec, 2 vols, Austin
Coggins, Clemency Chase, 1975, Painting and
Drawing Styles atTikal: An Historical and Iconographic Reconstruction, Ph D. Diss. Harvard
------ , and Orrin Shane HI, eds., 1984, Cenote o f
Sacrihce/ Maya Treasures /rom the Sacred We//
at Chichn ftza, Austin
Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions, 1975-,
Drawings and maps by Ian Graham, Eric Von
Euw, Peter Mathews. Vols. 1-6, Peabody
Museum, Harvard Univ.
Cortes, Hernn, 1986, Letters /ron? Mexico, trans.
and ed. Anthony Pagden, New Haven
Cortez, Constance, 1986, The Principal Bird Deity
in Preclassic and Early Classic Maya Art, M.A.
thesis, The Univ. of Texas
Couch, N. C. C., 1985, The festiva/ Cycle o f the
Aztec Codex Borbonicus, Oxford
Covarrubias, Miguel, 1957, Indian Art o f Mexico
and Centra/ America, New York
Cresson, F. M., 1938, "Maya and Mexican Sweat
Houses," American Anthropologist, N.S. 40,
88-102
210
Dwarfs, in J. Kerr ed.. The Maya Vase Booh,
vol. 3, New York, 526-31
------ . and Stuart, David, 1989, The way C/yph
Evidence /or "Co-essences" among the C/astic
Maya. RRAMW 29
Humboldt, Alexander Von. 1810, Vues des cordi//
eres et monuments des peup/es indigenes de
/lAmerique, Paris
Hvidtfeldt, Arild, 1958, Teot/ and Zxtpt/ath. Some
Centra/ Conceptions in Ancient Mexican
Rehgion, Copenhagen
Hunt, Eva, 1977, The Trans/brmation o the ZZumminghird, Ithaca
Ichon, Alain, 1973, La rehgidn de /os Totonacos de
/a sierra, Mexico City
Iconography of Middle American Sculpture (essays
by 1. Bernal et a!.), 1973, New York
Ixtlilxochitl, Fernando de Alva, 1982, Ohras Z/istdricas, 2 vols, Mexico City
Jansen, Maarten, van der Loo, P., and Manning,
R., eds., 1988, Continuity and identity in Native
America. Essays in Z/onor o Benedict Z/artmann, Leiden
Jimnez Moreno, Wigberto, 1941, "Tula y los
toltecas segn las fuentas," RMEA, 5, 79-83
Jones, Christopher, and Linton Satterthwaite Jr.,
1982, The Monuments and /r?scr/ptions o Trha/.
The Carved Monuments, TR 33a
Jones, Tom, 1985, "The Xoc, the Sharke, and the
Sea Dogs: An Historical Encounter," in TYRh
PRT 1983, San Francisco, 211-22
------ , 1991, "Jaws II: Return of the Xoc," in Sixth
PRT1 1986, Norman, Okla, 246-54
Joralcmon, P. David, 1971, A Study o O/mec
iconography, DOS 7
------ , 1974, "Ritual Blood-SacriHce Among the
Ancient Maya, Part I," i*rrst Z%T vol 2, 59-74
------ , 1976, "The Olmec Dragon: A Study in
Precolumbian Iconography," in H. B. Nicholson,
ed., The Or/gins o Rehgrous Art and icono
graphy in Prec/assic Mesoamerica, Los Angeles,
27-72
Josserand, J. Kathryn, and Dakin, Karen, eds.,
1988, Smohe and Mist. Mesoamerican Studies
in Memory o The/ma D. Su/hvan, 2 vols, Oxford
Justeson, John S., and Lyle Campbell, eds., 1984,
Zhoneticism in Mayan ZLerog/yphic Writing
IMS 9
Kampen, Michael, 1972, The Sculptures oiE/Ta/rh,
Veracruz; Mexico, Gainesville
Karttunen, Frances, 1983, An Ana/ytica/Dictionary
o Nahuat/, Austin
Keen, Benjamin, 1971, The Aztec image, New
Brunswick
Kelley, David H., 1962, "Glyphic Evidence for a
Dynastic Sequence at Quirigua, Guatemala,"
American Antiquity, 27, 323-35
------ , 1976, Deciphering the Maya Script, Austin
Kendall, Jonathan, 1991, "The Thirteen Volatiles:
Representation and Symbolism," senior essay,
Yale Univ.
Kerr, Justin, 1989-92, The Maya Vase Booh, 3 vols,
New York
Kidder, Alfred V., Jennings, Jesse D. and Shook,
Edwin M., 1946, Excavations at Xamina//uyu,
211
212
Stone Sculpture ofKaminai/uyd, Cuatemaia, and
tAe SdutAern BaciBc Coast, DOS 28
Pasztory, Esther, 1974, TAe iconograpAy o f tAe
Tec&Auacan T/aioc, DOS 15
------ . 1976, TAeM uraEof Tepantitia, TeotiAuacan,
New York
------ . ed, 1978. Middie Classic Meosamerica AD
460-700. New York
------ , 1983, Aztec Art, New York
Paxton, Merideth D , 1986, Codex Dresden: Stylis
tic and Iconographic Analysis of a Maya Manu
script, Ph D. diss., Univ. of New Mexico
Paz, Octavio, et al, 1990, Mexico; Spiendors o f
77nrty Centones, New York
Pendergast, David M., 1969, A/tun Ha, BritisA
Honduras (Beiize/. tAe Sun C od s Tom A, Royal
Ontario Museum Occ. Paper 19
Pohl, John, 1984, The Earth Lords: Politics and
Symbolism of the Mixtee Codices, Ph D. thesis,
UCLA
------ , and Byland, Bruce, 1990, "Mixtee Landscape
Perception and Archaeological Settlement Pat
terns, Ancient Mesoamenca 1:1, 113-31
Pohordenko, Anatole, 1990, Structure and periodiz
ation of the Olmec Representational System,
Ph D. diss., Tulane
Porter, James, 1989 "Olmec Colossal Heads as
Rccarved Thrones," BES, 17/18, 22-29
Prescott, William, 1843, TAe Conquest o f Mexico,
3 vols, New York
Proskouriakoff, Tatiana, 1946, An AiAum o f Maya
ArcAitecture, CIW Pub. 558
------ , 1950, Classic Maya Acuipture, CIW Pub. 593
------ , 1960, "Historical Implications of a Pattern of
Dates at Piedras Negras," American Antiquity,
25, 454-75
------ , 1963, "Historical Data in the Inscriptions of
Yaxchilan, Part I," Estudios de Cuitura Maya,
3, 149-67
------ , 1964, "Historical Data in the Inscriptions of
Yaxchilan, Part II," Estudios de Cuitura Maya,
4,178-201
Puleston, Dennis, 1976, "The People of the
Cayman/Crocodile: Riparian Agriculture and the
Origins of Aquatic Motifs in Ancient Maya
Iconography," in F -A . de Montequin, ed.,
Aspects o f Ancient Maya Ciw'A'zatron, Saint Paul
Quirarte, Jacinto, 1979, "Representation of Place,
Location, and Direction," in TAirdBBT 99-110
Reilly, F. Kent, 1990, "The Shaman in Transfor
mation Pose: A Study of the Theme of Rulership
in Olmec Art," Becord of The Art Museum of
Princeton University, 48:2, 4-21
Relacin de Michoacn, 1970, trans. and ed
Eugene Craine and Reginald Reindorp, Norman,
Okla
Riese, Berthold, 1984, "Kriegsberichte der klassichen Maya," Baessier-ArcAiv, Beitrge zur
VoZAerAunde, 30:2, 225-321
Ringle, William M ., 1988, O f M ice and MonAeys.
TAe Vaiue and Meaning o f T767A, tAe Cod C
HierogiypA, BBA M W 18
Robelo, Cecilio A., [reprinted] 1980, Diccionario
de mitoZogia naAuat/, 2 vols, Mexico City
Robertson, Donald, 1959, Mexican Manuscript
213
Painting o tbe Ear/y Co/onia/ Period. The
A/etropo/itar? ScbooE, New Haven
Robertson, Merle Greene, 1983-92, Tibe Scu/pture
o Pa/enque, 4 vols, Princeton
Robicsek, Francis, 1978, Tibe Smohing Cods.
Tobacco 777 Maya Art, &sfOTy and Bebgion,
Norman, Okla
------, and Hales, Donald, 1981, The Maya Boob o
tbe Dead. tbe Cera777/c Codex, Norman, Okla
------ and ------ , 1982 Maya CeraTn/cs /rom tbe
Late C/assic Period. tbe November Co//econ,
Charlottesville
Rosny, Leon de, 1864, "Les documents crits de
'antiquit amricaine," Memoires de /a Societ
d'Etbnograpbie, N.S. 1:1, 57-100
Roys, Ra!ph L., 1933, Tbe Boob o Cbv/am Ba/am
oCbumaye/, CIW Pub. 438
------ , 1965, Tbe Bitua/ o tbe Bacabs, Norman,
Okla
Ruiz de Aarcn, Hernando, 1982, Aztec Sorcerers
in /7th Ce7?tt77y Mexico, tbe Treatise 0 7 7 Superstiti077s, ed. and trans. Michael Coe and Cordon
W hittaker, IMS Pub. 7
214
-------, 1971, M aya Hieroglyphic Writing; 3rd edl
tion, Norman, Okla
-------, 1972, A Commentary on the Dresden Codex.
Philadelphia
Torquemada, Juan de, 1975-83, Monarqua indi
ana, ed. M . Leon-Portilla, 7 vols, Mexico City
Tovar Calendar, 1951, ed. G. K ublerandC. Gibson,
New Haven
Townsend, Richard, F ., 1979, State and Cosmos in
the A rt o f Tenochtitlan, D O # 20
-------, 1992, 7he Aztecs, London and New York
Tozzer, A. M ., 1907, A Comparative Study o f the
M ayas and the Lacandones, London
-------, 1957, Chichen ftz and its Cenote o f Sacrihce,
2 vols, P M M 12
Trejo, Silvia, 1989, Escultura huaxteca de Alo
Tamurh, Mexico City
Troike, Nancy P. 1978, "Fundam ental Changes
in the Interpretations of the Mixtee Codices,"
American Antiquity, 43:4, 553-68
Umberger, Em ily, 1981, Aztec Sculptures, Hiero
glyphs, and History, Ph D. diss, Columbia Univ.
-------, 1984, "E l trono de M octezum a," ECN, 17,
63-87
Urcid, Javier, 1992, Zapotee Hieroglyphic W riting,
Ph D. diss, Yale Univ.
Vaillant, Ceorge C ., 1927, The Chronological Sig
nificance of M aya Ceramics, Ph D. diss. Harvard
Univ.
Villacorta, J. A ., and C. A. Villacorta, 1930, Cddices
M aya, Guatemala C ity
Villela F ., Samuel, 1989, "Cacahuazqui: nuevo
testamonio rupestre olmeca en el oriente de
Guerrero, Arqueologa, 2, 37-48
Vogt, Evon Z., 1968, Zinacantan. A M aya Com
m unity in the Highlands o f Chiapas, New York
-------, 1976, Tortillas lo r the Cods. A Symbolic
Analysis o f Zihacanteco Aituals, Cambridge,
Mass
Von W inning, Hasso, 1974, The Shalt Tomh Figures
o f West Mexico, Los Angeles
-------, 1987, La IconograAa de Teotihuacan, 2 vols,
Mexico City
-------, and Olga Hammer, 1972, Anecdotal Sculp
ture o f West Mexico, Los Angeles
W aldeck, Frederick de, 1838, Voyage pittoresque
et archeologique dans la province d Tuca tan
pendant les anndes 1#34 e t 1##3 Paris
W ard, Fred, 1987, "Jade: Stone of Heaven,"
National Geographic Magazine, 172:3, 282-315
Wauchope, Robert, 1962, Lost Tribes and SunJren
Continents, London
Wilkerson, S. Jeffrey K ., 1980, "M an's Eighty
Centuries in Veracruz," National Geographic
Magazine, 1<5#.\2, fP S -S l
W illey, Cordon R., and Jeremy A. Sabloff, 1980, A
H lstoiy o f American Archaeology, San Francisco
WinReld Capitaine, Fernando, 1988, La Estela 1
de La M o/arra, Veracruz, Mexico, RRAM W 16
Zimmermann, Gunter, 1956, D ie Hiercglyphen der
M aya -Handschriften, Hamburg
Sources of Illustrations
UL HCES OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Ethnolog), Harvard University; 149a Drawing
Stephen Houston, from S. Houston 1989: 149b Photo
Salvador GuilRem. courtesv Great Temple Project;
151a, 151c Photos Trustees of the British Museum;
151b Drawing Linda Scheie: 153b Vatican Libran,
Rome: 155c Photo courtesy Matthew Stirling and the
National Geographic Society: 155b Photo Irmgard
Croth-Kimbaii; 157b Photo A. P Maudslav. courtesv
American Museum of Natural History: 159a After M.
D. Coe and Richard Diehl, /n the
the O/urec.
1980 (drawing Felipe Dvalos); 159c From Codex
Borgia: 159b From Codex Magliabechiano, facsimile
edition (1904); 161c Akademische Druck-u.
Verlagsanstalt; 161b Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris:
165c Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt; 165b
Museo Nacional de Antropologa, Mexico; 167a
Theodor-Wilhelm Dnzek Mexico 7, 1923; 167c
Bodleian Librar), Oxford; 167b Photo Salvador
Culliem, courtesy Great Temple Project; 169a From
Richard F. Townsend, The A^ecy, 1992 (drawing
2m
Annick Peterson); 171a Akademische Dnrek u
Verlagsanstalt; 171b Photo Alberti) Ruz !, !73a
From Codex Borgia: 173b Drawing Linda Sf he!*
177a Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt; 177ca
From Matos Moctezuma. Crrat Tbwp/r. 1988; !77cb
Drawing David Stuart; 178 Akademische Dmek u
Verlagsanstalt; 181a From Dresden Codex; 185c
Drawing lan Graham, from Coe. The Ahu/n 1987:
186b After Miguel Covarrubias, 'Ll arte Olmeca o
de La Venta." Cuar/emoA Americanos, 1946; 187c
Courtesy Merseyside County Museums: 187b After
M. D. Coe, Breaking the Mar/a Code, 1992; 189al
Archivo General de la Nacin. Mexico; 189ar Photo
lrmg;u*d Groth-Kimball; 189b Archivo General de la
Nacin, Mexico; 191a Museo Nacional de
Antropologa, Mexico; 191ca Akademische Druck-u.
Verlagsanstalt; 191cb MzticanM.? No. 3773. 1902-3;
193b After Miguel Covarrubias, Indian Art r^Afexico
and Centra/ Aexico, 1957: Rg. 72.
A
]
-R .
to this
AAzyzTUyiAy.
Well-written and comprehensive . . . the book has not left my desk'
A unique compendium of terms and their explanations . . .
the erudition here is unmatched' ScAwf
)SBN 0 -5 0 0 -2 7 9 2 8 -4
TH A M ES AND H U D SO N
30 Bloomsbury Street, London WCiB 3 QP
Printed in Singapore
7 8 0 5 0 0 279281