You are on page 1of 216

An Illustrated Dictionary of

The Gods and Symbols of


Ancient Mexico and the Maya
M A R Y M IL L E R A N D KARL T A U B E

A n illu s tr a te d D ic tio n a r y o f

The Gods and Symbols


of Ancient Mexico
and the Maya

An Illustrated Dictionary of

The Gods and Symbols


of Ancient Mexico
and the Maya
MARY MILLER AND KARL TAUBE

W ITH

T& H

260

ILLUSTRATIONS

THAMES AND HUDSON

For Michael D. Coe

FronfMptec?.
The Aztec Calendar Stone found beneath the
centra! plaza of Mexico City. The monument is
not a fully functioning calendar, but
commemorates the Rve mythica! world-creations
(the Five Suns).
Any copy of this book issued by the publisher as
a paperback is sold subject to the condition that
it shall not by way of trade or otherwise be lent,
resold, hired out or otherwise circulated without
the publisher's prior consent in any form of
binding or cover other than that in which it is
published and without a similar condition
including these words being imposed on a
subsequent purchaser.
() 1993 Thames and Hudson Ltd, London
First paperback edition 1997
All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication
may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or
by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopy, recording or any other
information storage and retrieval system, without
prior permission in writing from the publisher.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available
from the British Library
ISBN 0-500-27928-4
Printed and bound in Singapore by C.S. Graphics

Contents

Reader's Guide
6

Acknowledgments
7
Introduction
9
Subject Index
36
THE DICTIONARY
38
Guide to Sources and Bibliography
194
Sources of Illustrations
215

Masonry baHcourts are one of the defining features of Mesoamerican civihzation. (A?oye) A baUcourt
at the Cfassic Maya site of Copn in Honduras. (Be/ow) A Ciassic period Zapotee baHcourt at Monte
A lbn ,Oaxaca.

Introduction

Mesoamerican Culture and Chronology


Archaeologists, anthropologists, and art historians use the term Mesoamerica to
describe the known world of the Aztecs in 1519. It encompasses much of modern
Mexico - as far north as the old Aztec frontier with the Chichimecs or "barbarians,"
where non-agricultural, nomadic peoples lived - and the Maya realm in eastern
Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, and the western strip of Honduras and El Salvador, and
on down through Nicaragua, incorporating the Nicoya Peninsula of Costa Rica.
Sharing a constellation of beliefs and practices, highly developed civilizations among
different cultures and ethnic groups first rose in Mesoamerica around 1000 Be and
then thrived off and on for 3000 years. What makes them all part of a Mesoamerican
tradition are such things as use of the unusual 260-day calendar, a rubber ballgame
played in an alley deSned by two parallel structures, and use of cement made by
burning limestone or shells, as well as many more subtle patterns of life and belief.
Mesoamericans never saw themselves as a unity, and indeed, no single dominant
culture ever imposed unity on them, but they were interested in each other, in their
various pasts, and even, in some cases, in leaving a record for the future.
Early Settlement
The early peopling and settlement of the Americas remains obscure. Certainly by
15,000 years ago, waves of people had crossed the Bering Strait during times of low
water, and by 10,000 years ago people were living within the bounds of Mesoamerica.
The Brst widespread reliable evidence for humans in the Western Hemisphere
comes around 12,000 years ago, with the makers of flint and other stone fluted
points called Clovis. For some 3,000 years, nomadic hunters migrated into Mesoamer
ica, perhaps in search of megafauna, and archaeologists have found human
remains with those of the long-extinct mammoth. Generations later, humans would
domesticate small animals, including the dog and turkey, but no large mammals
would be available for domestication.
Around 7000 BC, the New World began to dry out. At this point, during what is
called the Archaic, people in Mesoamerica $lowly shifted their way of life, as many
animal species vanished from the planet and humans adapted to the warmer, drier
environment. The domestication of major foodstuffs in Mesoamerica accompanied
and fueled the impulse to settled life, eventually supporting the development and
growth of civilization. A primitive but domesticated maize can be documented by
3500 B e . Waves of migration continued after the onset of sedentary life. The Nahuatlspeaking peoples of Central Mexico may have been among the latest arrivals. When
they migrated south, they left their linguistic cousins among the Uto-Aztecan
language group behind, largely within the borders of the United States and Canada.
The Aztecs spoke Nahuatl, as did their predecessors, the Toltecs, and although

INTRODUCTION

10

CENTRAL
MEXICO

1519

LATE
POSTCLASSIC

OAXACA

Mixtee
independent

G ULF COAST

WEST
MEXICO

MAYA
HIGHLANDS/
PACIFIC
COAST

Aztecs

LOWL;^ND MAYA
South
Tayasa/
(Itz)

North
Tb/um
Sfa A a

<
1200

EARLY
POSTCLASSC
900

XMncA, t/atAin

71u/a

tS
CA/cAen
(Toltee Maya)

M tb
Pa^gu/

TERMINAL
CLASSIC
Cacajrt/a

P angue,

600

LATE
CLASSIC

Albn IUb
>

1
EA RLY
Cl .ASSIC
300

Centra!
Yucatn

ne

M
A! bn 111a

7/ia/,
LrtMn d e/
Ao

/r

5
M
A!bn H

PptOTOCt^ASSIC

CAupIenaro

AD
BC

7res Zapotes

Xam/na^nyd,

Cerros

Aba/ 7aAaMr
Colima

300

R LTE
FORMATIVE
La Fen la

600

MIDDLE
F()RMATIVE

Nab^
Albn 1
77at//co
6
O

900

San

R tRLY
F(3RMATVE
Ocos
1500

A!tCHAIC

Chronological chart for Mesoamerica.

linguists disagree about the language of Teotihuacan - the single largest city in
Mesoamerica during the Erst millennium AD - it may well have been the Erst
important Nahuatl civilization.
Timescales
Archaeologists and anthropologists have divided the chronology of Mesoamerica
and assigned terminology to the various periods. During the Archaic (7000-2000 B e )

11

INTRODUCTION

people gradually domesticated plants, especially the important foodstuffs maize,


beans, squash, chili peppers, and avocados, as well as animals, particularly the
turkeys and dogs already mentioned, although others were hunted to extinction as
village life took root. The Formative period - also known as the Preclassic - is
defined as beginning with the introduction of pottery and settled life c. 2000 Be.
(Early pottery manufacture is known in Colombia and Ecuador, and even earlier
reports have now been offered from the Amazon; pottery technology may have
been slowly diffused from South America.) The Formative era ushers in the Brst
high civilizations in Mesoamerica - the Olmec and Zapotee - and ends around
100 BC.
During the Protoclassic, roughly 100 BC-AD 300, the patterns for the great Classic
cultures began to be established. The Classic, AD 300-900, roughly coincides with
the flourishing of Teotihuacan in highland Mexico and the Maya cities in lowland
Yucatan, Guatemala, and Belize, although by AD 300, Teotihuacan was a fully
blossoming culture, while the Maya were still nascent. Scholars introduced the term
Classic to describe the Maya at Tikal, Palenque, Copan and elsewhere, peoples
who were falsely believed to have dwelt in a peaceful realm under an idyllic
theocracy. Investigators also called contemporary states at Monte Alban and
Teotihuacan theocracies; the term "Classic" itself initially carried a value judgment
that equated these civilizations with the achievements of the Classical Greeks. We
use it in this book without prejudice to describe the timd period AD 300-900 and
note that it - and other periodizations - inaccurately suggest a cultural lockstep
throughout Mesoamerica. The term Terminal Classic is used here to refer to the
last century of the Classic era, when Teotihuacan had already fallen into decline
and many Maya cities faltered. New stars rose and fell quickly during the Terminal
Classic, including such significant developments as those at Cacaxtla and Xochicalco.
During the Early Postclassic, AD900-1200, the Toltecs dominated the Mesoamerican
picture. Although the Aztecs are the featured players of Mesoamerica during the
Late Postclassic (1200 to the Spanish Conquest), the Maya, Totonacs, Huastecs,
Mixtees, and Tarascans all remained important.
Topography and Trade
Rugged, high mountain chains run north to south along the eastern and western
sides of Mesoamerica and then cut across its middle, cinching it like a belt studded
with volcanoes, from the Valley of Mexico to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.
Mesoamerica offers every possible ecological niche of the tropics, from hot, dry or
wet, to cooler, drier highlands, including in between the rare cloud forest, where
tropical vegetation flourishes at 3000-4000 feet (900-1200 meters) of altitude,
offering the ideal environment for the quetzal, a bird known throughout Mesoamerica
and held precious for its brilliant blue-green plumage. Although no quetzal ever
Rew near the cool and high (7500 feet, .2300 meters) capital of the Aztecs at
Tenochtitlan, quetzal feathers formed their most prized headdresses. Some Maya
kings were known as ruAr, the Maya word for quetzal, and on the eve of the Spanish
Conquest, Quetzalcoatl, one of the greatest and oldest gods in Mesoamerica, was
known throughout the region. His very name suggests the opposition of air and
earth (giie%za/ = bird, coa%7 = snake), the duality that characterized Mesoamerican
life and religion.
Few Mesoamerican civilizations integrated the sharply varying environments of
the region, and the differing resources offered keen opportunities for trade. The

12

INTRODUCTION

^ C

i M ^

'o
o
,
O!MPiCM0r0A

ArTrEofinM^cjAi

"

. A'apocwo
M ed co a ty /^ ^ /M *
JV^//nrco
^
(%?&rj/co

Aas'BocK
Chclzlngo

J o r ^ M < 7 C 7 ^

JV eyr^ ^ ^

__A^NC/ENTErrES
*^C Km
BMODERNTOWNS

Map of Mesoamerica showing the principa! sites mentioned in the text.

Aztecs lived too high for cotton to grow, and so the cotton mantle functioned as a
standard of exchange in their dominion. On his last voyage to the New World,
Christopher Columbus encountered Maya traders plying the waters o? Honduras
in ocean-going canoes piled high with woven cottons, part of the vast web of
Mesoamerican trade and tribute about which relatively little is known. Throughout
Mesoamerica, highland obsidian from volcanic Hows commanded high values, since
all households sought blades from this "steer' of the native New World. And
wherever volcanoes erupted, they renewed and enriched the soil. Today coHee
plantations have generally replaced tracts of cacao trees and vanilla orchids that
once Hourished along the PaciHc Coast of Guatemala and Chiapas and in Veracruz,

13

INTRODUCTION

AjMqyopan

TuIum/cozuMZLi

-3 S&

$gnfgRj'fdA^_
%,-^
o%cc

G^ode^*Cz,
g5^6M$^
ThH2apoiaL3<7Mna
&05 Germs s
TtidM^^ro^Yox-,

Toning A

A%"1
A/
Aj^il^g

) !j
t

^
O
j a c 'R y y ^ ^ L . ;
Onapa&&rzoA^,^^p^g ^ar&&Kn/faoj^

a Oaxaca
A D g /g z u

OTfc<;

GUA*T t
AjVebg;

M ^

M /n ^ ^J^ o ^ /^ y u
A(f/Bggf
aSaniaLucia
Cbtzumaihuay

___

pi CALVAD
SALVADOR
tL
UK

//

but cacao beans once functioned as a near-currency throughout Mesoamerica. How


tempting to imagine such edible money! ^

Technology
By the time of the Spanish Conquest, Mesoamerican technology had progressed to
what archaeologists call '*New Stone Age/' in that some metals were worked but
played little practical role as tools. Copper axes were a relatively recent phenomenon;
stone axes and Hint knives, along with diverse obsidian blades, were the main tools
with which generations of people had quarried stone, cut flesh and hide, and brought
down the forest. The gold and silver that so astonished the European invaders

tNTHODUCflON

14

formed religious works or jewelry; the Europeans were equally astonished by the
greater value Mesoamericans attributed to jade. Blue-green, like the most precious
things of the Mesoamerican world (quetzal feathers or maize foliage or water), jade
symbolized preciousness. The hardest stone commonly known in Mesoamerica, jade
also signified permanence, and when Maya nobles died, they carried such a bead
in their mouth to enter the Underworld.
Throughout the world, the wheel often played a role in religious imagery, but in
Mesoamerica (as in the rest of the New World), no wheel was ever developed for
mundane purposes - although graves in Veracruz have yielded wheeled toy-like
objects - perhaps because of the absence of draft animals. Today, as in Prehispanic
times, in many regions men and women are the beasts of burden, and Mesoamerican
people carry heavy loads on their backs with tumplines stretched across their
foreheads.
DeSning Mesoamerican Civilization
What distinguishes civilization from what has gone before it? Is it exploitation of
new resources, or competition to control them? Is civilization initiated by new
ideological concepts or only heightened by them? Are newly expanded populations
a requirement for civilization, or its by-product? In a world so technologically simple
as Mesoamerica, does technology play a role in its "take-off"?
Anthropologists offer no single answer - although they would check yes to a
number of the queries offered above - nor do they agree on its causes. Despite their
differences, they usually agree that complex culture in Mesoamerica began to take
shape during the Formative period, in both the Olmec region and in Oaxaca, with
the development of what are usually called chiefdoms. What marks the rise of
complex culture in Mesoamerica is the emergence of recognizable shared practices
and principles at several locations and the subsequent subscription to them by others
at yet more distant locations. Through long-distance trade, early Mesoamericans
began to recognize the extent of their world. Through surpluses amassed (probably
through trade or warfare), some families began to have what we call wealth, that
is, the wherewithal to devote themselves to activities outside food production, and
the Erst surviving works of art give evidence of that leisure time. Through shared
religious practices, the efEcacy of the gods became manifest. Through both ancestor
worship and a desire to leave a record for posterity, they began to record linear
time. Once they sought permanence in the materials they transformed, they left a
record that modern people can consider evidence of a complex society, or, in ordinary
language, civilization.
At the end of the Formative period, early states developed, with special hierarchies
among administrative centers, towns, and hamlets. States gather a surplus from
tribute or tax, and they use force to back up their sanctions against reluctant
contributors. They also develop systems of notation. A surplus can support full-time
specialists who give up agricultural endeavors and devote themselves to the arts
or religion. Although anthropologists agree that state-level political organization
characterizes civilization, the charismatic complex culture of the Olmecs is more
baiSing, partly because we know so little about their political organization. They
made small cities, but we do not know whether they functioned as city-states, like
those of the later Maya. They traveled long distances, presumably to seek precious
trade goods, but did they use force?

15

INTRODUCTION

The Olmec Enigma


The CHmecs emerged about 1200 Be along the slow-moving rivers of lowland
Veracruz and Tabasco, when people first began to make a permanent record of gods
and rulers, with a standardized means of codification, in the ceremonial precincts
of their settlements. The ethnic identity of these early people now dubbed the
01 mees remains unknown (although some have speculated that they may have
spoken a Mixe-Zoquean or Mayan language), and in the absence of archaeological
data, the size and extent of their cities or sites is also a blank. Earlier Mesoamerican
peoples must surely have worshipped a complex range of gods, but it was not until
the time of the Olmecs that schematic representations came to portray specific gods
and god-complexes. Incised flame eyebrows on a small pot might cue the observer
to a powerful sky-dragon, and the symbol could reach beyond both local time and
geography. What distinguishes the Olmec civilization is its making of a permanent
record of religion and ritual that can be recognized today. The nature of Olmec
civilization remains obscured by time and lack of preservation, but it clearly offered
unifying religious principles and a model for emulation by peoples all across
Mesoamerica.
For a thousand years or so and across a broad and varied geography the Olmecs
communicated using a standard notation for symbols and gods, most of which has
so far proved impenetrable. The complexity itself suggests the rise of priests and
shamans, specialists who manipulated and interpreted the system and who could
make manifest religious experience and share it with a broader populace. One
imagines that the Olmecs had developed a systematic cosmology to explain creation,
the origins of humankind, and the movement of heavenly bodies, and they seem to
have used the human body as a metaphor of the cosmos. Living in the tropical rain
forest, the Olmecs identified with the powerful animals that, like humans, occupied
the top of the food chain - felines, eagles, caimans, and snakes - and recognized
that they shared with them the consumption of flesh. And they first gave permanence
to practices and preoccupations that endured in Mesoamerica - human sacrifice,
bloodletting, pilgrimages, quadripartite division of the world, cave rituals, the
offering of caches, and a fascination with mirrors among them - until the Spanish
Conquest, and in some cases long afterward.
Three major Olmec sites are known for the Gulf Coast lowlands: San Lorenzo,
La Venta, and Laguna de los Cerros. San Lorenzo thrived first, probably by 1200
B e , and suffered what seems to have been brutal destruction c. 900 B e , about the
time La Venta began to flourish. No certain data are available for Laguna de los
Cerros, as yet unexcavated. All three sites share layouts based on bilateral symmetry,
a preoccupation of Olmec art and symbolism as well, in which mirror images fall
along a central axis. La Venta features the Brst pyramidal form of Mesoamerican
architecture, what is perhaps a radial pyramid but which has also been interpreted
as a volcano effigy. At La Venta the Olmecs buried pavements and caches following
a pattern along the central axis; at San Lorenzo, basalt sculptures were interred
along the edges of a vast ceremonial platform. The Olmecs carved huge thrones
(dubbed "altars" by early scholars) from which lords presumably ruled; the Olmecs
commemorated their powerful lords with portraits in colossal heads. Olmec stone
sculpture achieved a high, naturalistic plasticity, yet it has no surviving prototypes,
as if this powerful ability to represent both nature and abstract concepts was a
native invention of this early civilization.

INTRODUCTION

16

Early in the 8rst millennium Be, the Olmecs forged connections across Mesoamerica, from Central America to western Mexico, perhaps in search of scarce highland
resources, particular!y jade, from which they carved precious objects. By 900 Be,
the nascent Maya civilization at Copan made imitations of Olmec ceramics and jade.
In western Mexico, the Olmecs encountered a sophisticated culture at Xochipala,
where naturalistic human Bgures had been made after 1500 Be. Later, coeval with
La Venta, the Olmecs covered the giant rock outcropping at Chalcatzingo, Morelos,
with depictions of their lords and gods. Olmec-style petroglyphs also mark the cliffs
of highland Guatemala and Chiapas, further suggesting Olmec contacts in the Maya
region. They established a highland center at Teopantecuanitlan, Guerrero; Olmec
artists also made paintings celebrating cave rituals at Cacahuazqui, Juxtlahuaca, and
Oxtotitlan. In Central Mexico, the Olmecs encountered communities with welldeveloped traditions of Sgurine manufacture at Tlatilco and elsewhere. These places
subsequently adopted Olmec forms and imagery and in modern times have yielded
the Snest Olmec ceramic sculpture, particularly large hollow "babies/'
The Early Zapotees and Their Contemporaries
By 600 Be, if not earlier, civilization also rose in Oaxaca among the Zapotees, who
began to reshape the hillside acropolis of Monte Albn into their capital. The
Zapotees early on dominated the region and commemorated their victories by
recording dates in the 260-day calendar and depicting captives with what are
probably their names and places of origin on buildings such as the so-called Temple
of the Danzantes ("Dancers ') at Monte Albn. The Zapotees probably invented
Mesoamerican writing, and they may also have devised the first systems for recording
time. At the end of the Formative era, the Zapotees constructed Mound J at Monte
Mound j at Monte Albn, Oaxaca. Possibly an observatory, the structure features walls covered with
more than 50 carved slabs describing the conquests of. the early Zapotees.

17

INTRODUCTION

Albn (and at least one other similar building at Caballito Blanco), an unusual
pointer-shaped building, possibly an observatory oriented toward the rise of the star
Capella on the night of the Brst zenith passage. These buildings probably conBrm
knowledge of a large body of star lore.
Toward the end of the Formative era, from 100 Be to AD 300 or what is also
termed the Protoclassic, many of the principles and beliefs common to Classicperiod civilization appear to have come together, particularly along the axis of the
Isthmus of Tehuantepec and ranging from Atlantic to PaciBc Coasts, at places as
far-flung as Monte Albn, Dainz, Tres Zapotes, La Mojarra, Chiapa de Corzo,
Izapa, and Kaminaljuy. Across the region, the Principal Bird Deity - probably the
same as Vucub Caquix of the PopcV VuA (the native epic of the Quiche Maya
transcribed into the Roman alphabet at the time of the Conquest) - gained
prominence; the PopoV VuA account of origins, humanity's relationship to chaos, and
the Hero Twins' harrowing of the Underworld, may have been widely subscribed to.
Tres Zapotes in the Olmec Gulf Coast heartland may have flourished about the
time of La Venta, and also exhibits some late Olmec colossal heads, but the site
experienced continued occupation into the Protoclassic, and old Olmec concepts
underlay the foundation of new Mesoamerican ones shared from Oaxaca to
Honduras. Working at Tres Zapotes in the 1930s, Matthew Stirling found part of
what seemed to him to be a date written in the place-notationa! calendar generally
called the Long Count and most prevalent among the later Maya. Although Tres
Zapotes Stela C lacked its Brst number glyph, Stirling correlated the date to 32 B e ,
and subsequent discovery of the upper fragment conBrmed his reading. Other early
Long Count dates occur at Chiapa de Corzo, on the Tuxtla Statuette, and on La
Mojarra Stela 1, which bears two dates in the second century AD and which depicts
a standing lord wearing the Principal Bird Deity headdress and adorned in regalia
like that of later Maya kings. Together, these and other examples give evidence of
the development of a new eastern Mesoamerican tradition that emphasized dynastic
rule and a method of recording time and space permanently using calendrics and
phonetic writing. In this way, linear time as well as cyclical time gained prominence.
Phonetic writing was reBned and elaborated by the Maya, but even in its earliest
appearance, it probably allowed the rough replication of speech.
The Protoclassic Maya
It is the special characteristic of their writing that sets the Maya apart from all
other Mesoamerican peoples. It is probably the technology of writing itself that
enabled them to be what they were. Had the Maya Bourished at a single center,
say, at Tikal - as Teotihuacan civilization had done at Teotihuacan or Zapotee
civilization at Monte Alban - they would not seem so extraordinary to us. But it
was their ability to communicate across distance and through time, to remember a
particular history and to write for posterity, that allowed dozens of cities and towns
to subscribe to a single reigning belief system.
At Protoclassic Izapa, the Maya broadcast their religious ideology on stelae and
on pairs of altars and stelae, presenting the Brst public conBrmation of certain gods Chac, for example - and the rich narrative of the PopoV VuA, as well as of certain
concepts, such as the World Tree. At Abaj Takalik, stelae depict single and paired
lords adorned with the regalia of rulership and accompanying texts, of which only
dates can be read. Kaminaljuy lords commissioned their portraits in the costume
of the Principal Bird Deity and received rich offerings when subsequently interred.

INTRODUCTION

18

A single Kaminaljuyu slab depicts a sequence of enthroned lords and kneeling


captives suggestive of a genealogy. Giant toad sculptures there may indicate the
incorporation of the toad in religious ritual. Perhaps aided by the new technology
of writing, Maya speakers in disparate locations a!! began to recognize shared
religious imagery and the cult of the ruler.
At sites a!! across the Maya lowlands in the Protoclassic, but especially as known
from archaeology at El Mirador, Nakb, Uaxactn, and Cerros, the Maya began to
build huge pyramidal structures and cover their main facades with stucco ornament
shaped to represent the heads of various deities. These configurations fall into no
uniform cosmogram but vary from place to place. Jaguars, probably representing
the night sun, often occur on the lowest level, with the Principal Bird Deity on top;
at Uaxactn, at least one early pyramid is conBgured as a sacred mountain, or Uitz,
from which maize issues. At the end of the Protoclassic, some Maya sites, inciuding
El Mirador and Cerros, suffered near-abandonment.
Although most known West Mexican art derives from looted tombs in the states
of Jaiisco, Colima, and Nayarit (which have given their names to related but distinct
sty!es of ceramic forms), a few careful excavations place the height of ceremonial
activity and use of the shaft tombs during the Protoclassic. Recent excavation and
survey at Ixtln del Rio, Nayarit, and highland Jalisco indicate that West Mexico
participated in Mesoamerican ceremonialism during the period, particularly in the
construction of vast platforms and round structures.
The Rise of Teotihuacan
During the Protoclassic, two large centers emerged in Central Mexico, Cuicuilco
and Teotihuacan, but the latter gained prominence after volcanic eruptions buried
Cuicuilco and its massive round platform by A D 100. Teotihuacan thrived, and by
AD 250, many of its most famous buildings, including the Pyramids of the Sun, Moon,
and Quetzalcoatl, rose from the high, arid city, following a rigid grid. Paintings of
supernatural beings and religious practices covered the walls of shrines, temples,
and dwellings. Archaeologists have supposed that Teotihuacan may have held some
200,000 souls at its peak in the Classic era, many of whom lived within the closed
apartment compounds that Blled the interstices of the grid. Although the presence
of "foreigners" - in particular, an enclave of Zapotees - can be discerned in the
archaeological record of Teotihuacan, the ethnic identity of the Teotihuacanos
remains unknown, although various Nahua speakers, Totonacs, and Otomis have all
been named as candidates.
The tradition of Teotihuacan is what we can call western Mesoamerican, and it
emphasizes community over dynastic rule, cyclical time over linear, and offers a
separate religious pantheon from that of the Maya and other peoples in eastern
Mesoamerica. In fact, an explosion of new iconography and beliefs characterizes
early Teotihuacan, developing essentially ex mAr/o. During the Early Classic, the
Maya and Teotihuacanos became keenly aware of one another and their separate
religious practices. The Maya adopted many Teotihuacan practices, particularly the
cult of war, its patrons and regalia, while ignoring others, such as its many female
deities. The Teotihuacanos surely knew of and recognized the flexibility of the Maya
writing system, but they chose not to adapt it to their own needs: in fact, they may
have banished it from their city, and the recently documented paintings from
Techinantitla that feature isolated glyphs, probably names of people and places,
may only prove the point by demonstrating how different Teotihuacan writing is.

19

INTRODUCTION

Aeria! view of the great city of Teotihuacan, with the Pyramid of the Moon in the foreground, and
the Pyramid of the Sun in the center.

Although the ceremonial precinct of Teotihuacan was ravaged by Sres c. AD 725,


the city was still occupied for many generations, and even after its abandonment it
held a place in the religious imagery of all subsequent Central Mexican civilizations.
The Aztecs conceived of it as the setting of cosmogonic events, and Motecuhzoma
II made pilgrimages there.
The Classic Zapotees arid Classic Veracruz
All Mesoamerica flourished during the Classic era. Monte Alban grew in both scale
and population: temples ringed the ceremonial precinct and a powerful nobility
inhabited adjoining palaces. Particularly important persons received interment in
underground tombs that sometimes bore elaborate paintings. Ceramic urns featuring
the Zapotee pantheon accompanied the dead, as did abundant vessels for food and
drink. Stone stelae at Monte Alban show what may be Zapotee rulers and some
examples depict Teotihuacan visitors, characterized by distinct costume. Although
never completely abandoned, Monte Alban fell into disrepair during the Postclassic,

[NTRODUCTON

20

and the Mixtees emptied out old Zapotee tombs and reused them for their own
nob!e dead.
No single city dominated the Gulf Coast during the Classic era, nor did competing
centers display a unity of belief and ritual, although modern understanding of the
region has been hampered by rampant looting and insufficient archaeology. In much
of southern Veracruz, at places like Las Remojadas, thousands of "smiling" figurines
have been exhumed; other sites have yielded life-size hollow ceramic tomb
sculptures. Dramatic paintings of bloodletting have been uncovered at Las Higueras.
To the north, El Tajin dominated the region, particularly during the Late Classic,
under the Huastecs, who spoke a Mayan language. Acres of temples and palaces
survive. The Pyramid of the Niches at El Tajin features 365 empty niches, perhaps
a calendrical reference, although other buildings use varied niche configurations.
Ballcourts and ballgame paraphernalia abound, and architectural sculpture illustrates
the playing of the game and human sacrifice.
The Classic Maya
In the 3rd c. AD, the Maya cities in the tropica! lowlands continued to thrive under
dynastic kings. As demonstrated archaeologically at Tikal, the portraits of individual
rulers were carved on stone monuments with accompanying texts that glorified their
reign, and competing Maya dynasties emerged at Uaxactn, Xultn, Ro Azul, and
elsewhere in the Petn; by AD 500, Caracol, Copn, Yaxchiln, Piedras Negras,
Bonampak, Calakmul and other cities emerged as the centers of small but ambitious
polities. Tikal may well have been the Erst dynasty to exploit the ideology and
technology of warfare promulgated by Teotihuacan when it took hold of power at
Uaxactn. Maya rulers began to record their victories, parentage, and the passage
of time itself on their monuments. Archaeologists had long used the 6th c. lapse in
hieroglyphic inscriptions at Tikal to divide Early from Late Classic; that lapse has
now been explained by the ignominious defeat of Tikal by Caracol in a six-year war,
an event proudly recorded by Caracol upon its culmination in 562. Although Tikal
recovered its economic well-being by the 8th c., its ruling family was apparently
rent by the defeat, and, after establishing themselves in the Petexbatn, one
competing branch caused Tikal plenty of trouble.
During the 8th c., the Maya nobility experienced both unparalleled wealth and
unprecedented problems. All across the region, polity fought with polity, kings
fell captive and suffered sacrifice. Populations grew rapidly and degraded the
environment in desperate attempts to cultivate sufficient food. At the end of the 8th
c. and over the course of the 9th c., ceremonial precincts fell into disrepair and
abandonment in what has been called the Classic Maya collapse; populations shrank,
although the entire region was still populated at the time of the Conquest. During
the 9th c., Maya kings at Uxmal and elsewhere in the Puuc hills commissioned
elaborate buildings before these, too, suffered abandonment.
To modern viewers, Maya cities often seem a baffling web of rambling structures
punctuated by tall pyramids, all laid out randomly across the tropical landscape.
Maya cities lack streets and later buildings overlie earlier ones, further complicating
the picture. But these buildings bear fundamental meanings and many had specific
uses. Most tall pyramidal buildings house tombs underneath them (the Temple of
Inscriptions at Palenque and Temple I at Tikal are the best-known examples),
enshrining ancestors and revealing the Maya cult of ancestor worship, which in
practice may have been the primary form of religious devotion. And, particularly

21

INTRODUCTION

(Top and above) The Temple of


the Inscriptions at Palenque
contained the tomb of the Late
Classic Maya king, Paca!. The
cutaway view illustrates the
stairway leading down to the
tomb. (Left) Temple I at Tikal in
Guatemala also housed a major
tomb, in this case of the Late
Classic Ruler A. Here, however,
as was the case with most Maya
tombs, the burial chamber lacked
a stairway.

INTRODUCTION

22

Late Classic polychrome mural from Cacaxtla, Tlaxcala. Standing on a Feathered Serpent, the figure is
clad in a bird costume and carries a ceremonial bar.

as revealed by painted ceramics of the Late Classic period and in the Bonampak
muris, a burgeoning Maya elite lived rich and abundant lives within their palaces
where they engaged in courtly arts, including writing and painting.
The Termina! Classic
The decline of both Teotihuacan and the Maya cities left a power vacuum in
Mesoamerica by the 9th c. Regional cultures flourished at Xochicalco, Cholula, and
Cacaxtla in the Mexican highlands; profoundly affected by foreign influence, the
Maya city of Seibal underwent a renewal; although El Tajin, too, went into decline
along the Gulf Coast, the Huastecs flourished, as did Zapotees south of Monte
Alban, at Mitla and Yagul. The period seems to have been a time of great
interregional interchange, and both Maya iconography and formal concepts became
part of a new Mesoamerican synthesis that may have been possible only with the
demise of Teotihuacan. By 900, however, a new force had appeared on the scene:
the Toltecs.
The Ear!y Postdassic: Tu!a and Chichen Itza
From their high, arid, cool capital of Tula (or Tollan), the Toltecs took on aspects
of the Teotihuacan heritage that served their purposes. They adopted many of their

23

INTRODUCTION

gods, left little evidence of public writing, and tike the Teotihuacanos, tived in patace
compounds. Of at! Mesoamerican traders, the Tottecs are perhaps the most
tegendary: they forayed into the far north, to what is now the American Southwest,
to trade for turquoise, but they estabtished their most profound contacts with the
Maya at Chichen Itz in northern Yucatan and capitalized on the integration of
Mesoamerica.
Around the year 900, Chichen Itz rose to new prominence and may wet! have
been the largest city in Mesoamerica. Its Sacred Cenote was one of the most
important pilgrimage destinations of the ancient Mesoamerican world. Whether
through voluntary alliance or through domination by one culture of the other, the
Toltecs and Maya developed new forms of architecture and sculpture - including
cAacmoo/s (stone sculptures of reclining human forms that received human sacrifices)
and serpent columns - that flourished at both cities. Whereas the old Maya order
invested its power in the individual ruler and his or her cult, at Chichen and Tula
it is the position and power of the warrior-king, rather than his lineage and portrait,
that holds sway. As a result, ruler portraits vanished from Chichen, to be replaced
by carved thrones, on which any suitable candidate might sit. Mayan hieroglyphic
texts nevertheless record the names of those who ruled in the period. At Tula,
perhaps initially a major receptor for Maya ideology, ruler portraits on stone slabs
were tried before the practice was abandoned. Although heart sacriSce was known
to the earlier Maya, at Chichen Itz it took on new ritual force after its introduction
in the Toltec era.
Like all centers of Mesoamerican civilizations, Chichen and Tula eventually both
fell into decline, and by no later than the 12th c., Mesoamerica entered a period
when no major city or culture exerted much influence beyond its local region. At
Mayapan, Maya lords built a walled city and reigned for almost two centuries. In

Reconstruction drawing of the Early Postclassic site of Chichen Itz, Yucatn. The Sacred Cenote,
from which the site took its name, is depicted in the foreground.

[INTRODUCTION

24

the final centuries before the Spanish Conquest, the Yucatec Maya had organized
themselves into balkanized, quarreling states, using different styles and media to
record their gods and their rituals at Santa Rita, Tulum, and elsewhere, and in the
four surviving Maya codices. In the Guatemalan highlands, Maya lords ruled from
hilltop acropolises. In 1524, the Spanish allied with the Cakchiquel at Iximche to
defeat the Quiche Maya at Utatlan. After the Conquest, a Quich nobleman used
the European alphabet to transcribe his people's sacred book, the Pqpo/ VuA. Other
important religious texts, including the Books of Chilam Balam, were transcribed
through the late 1700s.
The Postclassic Mixtees and Aztecs
In Oaxaca, the Mixtees rose to power during the Postclassic. They took over some
of the ancient places sacred to the Zapotees, and they began to inter their noble
dead in the old Zapotee tombs at Monte Alban. At the time of the Spanish Conquest,
they kept genealogies documenting both continuity and internecine strife over
generations. The Aztecs referred to great artisans as fo/feca, but the greatest resident
craft specialists in Tenochtitlan at the time of the Conquest were the Mixtees,
known for their skills in metalwork and mosaics. Alfonso Caso s discovery of a royal
Mixtee tomb at Monte Albn in 1932 offered the 20th c. the closest comparisons we
may ever have to what Aztec gold may have looked like, since so little gold from
Tenochtitlan survived the Spanish invasion.
After years of nomadic wandering, a warlike group of Nahuatl speakers founded
their capital on an island in Lake Texcoco in 1345. They called themselves the
Mexica and their city Mexico-Tenochtitlan, or Tenochtitlan. Since the 19th c., the
Mexica have usually been grouped with other Nahuatl-speakers in the Valley of
Mexico under the name Aztecs, the name we also use, but they gave the name of
their city, Mexico-Tenochtitlan, to the 16th c. capital of New Spain that grew up on
top of it and subsequently to the new republic of Mexico in 1810.
Inheritors of the rich and complex Mesoamerican past, the Aztecs shared many
gods with the civilizations that had gone before, but they honored Huitzilopochtli,
their own solar cult god, above all. In their ceremonial precinct, they built a dual
pyramid, the Hueteocalli or Temp/o Mayor, and dedicated its southern shrine to
Huitzilopochtli and the northern one to Tlaloc, a god that had come to symbolize
antiquity and legitimacy as well as rain, earth, and fertility. After they defeated the
neighboring Tepanecs in 1428, the Aztecs embarked on a campaign to exact both
trade and tribute, first, from near neighbors, and later, from places as far Rung as
Guatemala and the Veracruz coast. The pocAteca, or long-distance traders, were
the key to both economic and military success, for their preliminary missions often
led the way to Aztec imperialism. The Aztecs adopted new gods - Xipe Totee, for
example, had nourished along the Gulf and in Oaxaca before gaining a major role
among the Aztecs - and elevated old ones, while some others they humiliated by
placing their idols in a dark temple designed to be their prison. After a brutal
conquest, the Aztecs often insisted that a subject town take on Huitzilopochtli as its
god, but he was usually an unwelcome addition, for his worship required regular
human sacrifice.
The Aztecs turned their swampy island into a city whose beauty and complexity
dazzled the Spanish conquerors, who also marveled at the cuisine, the gardens, the
exotic animals kept in a zoo, and the fastidiousness of the populace. Like Venice,
Tenochtitlan was laid out along canals, and boatmen poled canoes instead of gondolas

25

INTRODUCTION

The ceremonia! precinct of the Aztec capita! city, Tenochtitian, depicted in a reconstruction painting
by Ignacio Marquina. In front of the massive Temp!o Mayor one can discern the circular wind temp!e
of Ehecatl-Quetzalcoatl and the platform supporting the fema/acaf/ dish of gladiatorial sacrifice.

along its axes. Aqueducts brought fresh water to the city from Chapultepec, a region
of hiHy springs to the west, and causeways connected the island to the mainland.
At Tlatelolco on the north side of the island, Corts described a market teeming
with goods and traders, with what he believed to be some 60,000 souls in attendance.
The Aztec ruler Motecuhzoma II and his retinue lived in a grand palace to the west
of the
Mayor. Ordinary folk, or maceAna/As, lived in clan groupings called
ca/pu/A, the essential administrative component of the city. Foreigners, including
Mixtee craftsmen, lived in their own barrios.
For years, the Aztecs had engaged in what they called xocAfyaoyot/ or "Bowery
w a r/' In these contests, the Aztecs fought neighboring cities in order to garner
sacriBcial victims but not to win outright victory. Young Aztec soldiers became
seasoned Bghters, and the demanding Huitzilopochtli received his due, but the
Aztecs earned a hatred more relentless from their enemies, particularly in Tlaxcala,
than if they had subjected them to a clear-cut defeat and death on the battleBeld.
When the Spanish invaded Mesoamerica, this sort of warfare baiHed them, for the
Aztecs sought to capture their new Spanish foe?s for subsequent sacrifice. The Spanish
cut a swath of destruction, slaughtering their Aztec enemies. And where the Aztecs
might have anticipated that a negative outcome would lead to an unfavorable tribute
arrangement, they could never have guessed that the Spanish would seek to bring
their world to an absolute end.
In 1519, Corts received Doa Marina (often known as La Malinche, but Corts
is also called Malinche in some accounts), a young multilingual noblewoman, as a
gift, after her skills as a translator had been demonstrated to him. She, along with

NTHODUCTION

Jernimo de Aguilar, a Spanish priest stranded for years among the Maya, could
transate for Corts, so that he could begin to understand the world around him.
No such informed interlocutors interpreted the Spanish world-view for the Aztecs,
or for any of the peoples of Mesoamerica, although they quickly found out what
the future had in store for them. Demographers have estimated that some 20 to 25
million people lived within the boundaries of what is now Mexico in 1519. The
Spanish surveyed the population late in the 16th c. and found a scant million souls,
the survivors of an invasion that wreaked death and destruction.
In 1521, once Cortes and his men reigned triumphant in Tenochtitlan, the Spanish
Crown and the Catholic church began to devise plans for both the administrative
control and religious conversion of the vast entity soon known as New Spain.
Disparate native groups found themselves lumped together under a new name,
Indians, an awkward term with which we still labor. Native lords often served the
new masters, keeping much administrative control in native hands in the early
Colonial period.
Artists went to work for the new regime, copying Aztec tribute lists, making maps
of the conquered world, and, from time to time, copying or transcribing a religious
document that managed to escape the torch. Some new hybrid types of books were
devised that used native artists and ideas to warn missionaries of the idolatry
they were fighting, while at the same time, some traditional forms of writing and
record-keeping went on. Mixtee lords, for example, continued to keep detailed
pictorial genealogies, and some of these manuscripts later served as evidence in civil
suits over rights to land.
Independence from Spain removed native peoples from protection that had been
offered by the Spanish Crown and in some cases led to more brutal exploitation. In
recent times, despite both oppression and the lure of urban life, many native peoples
and cultures have survived, and some have thrived.

The Conceptual Framework of Mesoamerican Religion


At the time of 8rst contact in the 16th c., Europeans were both intrigued and
horriSed by Mesoamerican religion. Certain ritual practices, such as human sacrifice
and cannibalism, suggested unholy pacts with the forces of Satan. Other aspects of
native religion, such as baptism, penance, the use of incense, and the concept of a
primordial Rood, were perhaps as disturbing, since they offered resonant parallels
with Christian ritual and belief. The early Spanish chroniclers noted the striking
similarity of the Aztec word for god, feo or feof/, with the Spanish dfos. Nonetheless,
although it is possible to find correspondences between Mesoamerican religion and
those of the Old World, these similarities are the result of independent development
rather than diffusion. Aside from the distant origins of New World peoples from
Asia, there is no evidence of any European, Asian, or African influence upon
Prehispanic peoples of Mesoamerica. The wonderful sophistication and complexity of
Mesoamerican religion derives from millennia of gradual independent development.
Early Beliefs and Rituals
Virtually nothing is known of the religious concepts of the earliest Paleoindian
inhabitants of Mesoamerica. Certain later Mesoamerican beliefs, such as a multi
layered heaven and earth, shamanic transformation, the moon as a rabbit, and the

INTRODUCTION

27

A possible Archaic period baHcourt at Cheo-Shih in Oaxaca, 5th millennium

BC.

importance of world directions and trees, suggest a distant and ancient relation to
Asia. Nonetheless, however profound or early these links may be, they are not
reflected in the scant archaeological remains of the earliest peoples. It is not until
the Archaic period (7000-2000 B e ) , in the arid highlands of southern Mexico, that
concrete evidence of complex religious activity appears. Excavations in the Tehuacan
Valley of Puebla have uncovered two groups of human burials dating to approximately
the 6th millennium B e . Wrapped in blankets and nets, the bodies were also
accompanied by baskets. Some of these individuals were burned and partly
dismembered, perhaps as an early form of ceremonial cannibalism. Although the
actual significance of this ritual mutilation remains to be established, these Tehuacan
burials clearly demonstrate an early concern and belief in the afterlife.
The site of Gheo Shih, situated in the Tlacolula Valley of highland Oaxaca, reveals
other tantalizing evidence of ceremonialism during the Archaic period. Gheo Shih
roughly dates to 5000-4000 B e , and seems to have been a seasonal site where bands
of people would gather together to collect certain wild plant foods. Archaeologists
uncovered an ancient surface Hanked by lines of stones on the two longer sides.
Some 65 feet (20 meters) long and 23 feet (7 meters) wide, the Hoor area seemed
to have been swept and was virtually devoid of debris. Although the lines of stones
may have delineated a dance Hoor, it is also possible that they marked the sides of
an early, simple ballcourt alley. The ancient Oaxacans may have imported rubber
balls for the ballgame, but it is far more likely that they were fashioned of locally
avaHable leather, wood or stone. Ritualized competitive games may have been an
important form of social interaction during seasonal gatherings in the Archaic period.

INTRODUCTION

ZB

The Earty Formative period saw major changes that were important for the !ater
development of Mesoamerica: the introduction of farming, the growth of populations
thanks to settled village life, and the production of pottery. With the appearance of
sedentary villages containing relatively large populations, greater evidence of
complex religious activities and beliefs survives. During the mid 2nd millennium B e ,
Formative villages appear widely in the southern coastal region of Chiapas, Mexico.
Known as Ocos, this Early Formative culture already displays a number of important
elements observed in later Mesoamerican religious systems. In certain Ocos burials,
mourners placed mica mirrors with the dead: obsidian;- pyrite, and other stone
mirrors continued to be revered objects of ornament and ritual until the Spanish
Conquest in the 16th c. With the appearance of pottery, ceramic figurines become
common at Ocos and other Formative sites. The function of these Formative figurines
is unknown; many examples portray youthful, full-bodied women, as if they reflect
a concern with human or agricultural fertility. Often beautifully worked, Ocos
figurines frequently represent curious blendings of human and zoomorphic traits
that have no obvious counterparts in the natural world. At times, these strange
figures are seated upon thrones. According to archaeologist John Clark, these throne
figures may portray shamanic chiefs wearing animal masks of their spirit companions.
The Olmecs and the Natural World
In contrast to Ocos, the Olmecs after 1200 BC constructed huge earthworks and
carved magnificent stone sculptures. Massive thrones, stelae, and colossal heads all
testify to both the virtuosity of Olmec artisans and the power of the early rulers
who commissioned such works. Monuments from San Lorenzo, La Venta, and other
Olmec sites frequently portray actual Olmec kings, and thus clearly these sculptures
are at least partly historical in nature. However, the power of these early kings was
by no means simply secular; instead, they carefully portrayed themselves in relation
to gods and other supernatural forces. Moreover, there are strong indications that
the Olmecs had complex concepts regarding shamanic transformation. As among
later Mesoamerican peoples, particularly powerful individuals were believed to be
able to transform themselves into jaguars.
Among the Olmecs and later peoples of Mesoamerica, certain places were
considered especially sacred. Quite often, these locations corresponded to critical
junctions between the planes of sky, earth, and Underworld. The Olmecs regarded
caves, or entrances to the netherworld, as powerful and magical places. Similarly,
at the junction of sky and earth, mountains were also considered to be particularly
sacred places, and it is probable that like later Mesoamerican peoples the Olmecs
considered pyramids to be replications of mountains. Mountains that contained
springs or caves were particularly revered, since they offered simultaneous access
to all three planes: sky, earth, and Underworld. Certain Olmec mountain sites, such
as El Manat, Chalcatzingo, and Oxtotitlan, may have served as important oracles,
a means of communicating with the powers of the heavens, earth and Underworld.
Like their successors, the Olmecs exhibited a fascination with creatures and forces
of the natural world. In their early art one can discern representations of jaguars,
harpy eagles, sharks, caimans, and other denizens of their lowland environment.
But there are also strange mergings of animal species, as if the Olmecs were
attempting to amalgamate the sky, earth, and sea into a dynamic and coherent
whole. Although little is known of the Olmec pantheon, it appears that like later
peoples they had gods of particular phenomena, such as rain, the earth, and maize.

29

INTRODUCTION

A Middle Formative
Olmec
representation o fa
figure seated inside
acave. From
Chalcatzingo,
Morelos.

In the better known religious systems of Classic and Postclassic Mesoamerica,


allusions to such gods abound. Even to this day in rural Mexico and Guatemala,
rituals are performed to gods of earth, wind, water, lightning and other natural
forces.
From Formative times to the present, agriculture has been a major focus of
Mesoamerican religion. Many of the forces of nature worshipped and evoked in
Mesoamerican mythology and ritual concern farming and maize, the primary
agricultural product. So ingrained is the importance of corn that in a number of
regions maize is explicitly or implicitly said to be the substance of human Hesh.
References to maize are widespread in the iconography of the Formative Olmecs.
Moreover, the importance of forces of water and earth in Olmec and later
Mesoamerican religions is clearly related to agricultural fertility. It is thus not
surprising that some of the oldest continuously worshipped gods, such as Tlaloc,
Cocijo, and Chac, are deities of lightning and rain. Despite centuries of European
domination, many of these rain and fertility gods survive to this day.
Although certain aspects of ancient Mesoamerican religion may appear bizarre
to the modern viewer, a great deal of native ritual and belief is based on preeminently
practical concerns. Much of the ceremonialism is focused not on the afterlife, but
on this world and such matters as health, fertility, prosperity, and the prediction
and averting of natural disasters. A central concern - today as in antiquity - is that

INTRODUCTION

30

of balance and harmony. This may be expressed in terms of the individua!, the
community, or the surrounding wor!d. Imbalance and discord can !ead to sickness,
death, socia! discord, famine, and even world destruction. In ancient Mesoamerica,
there were even gods who personiSed excess. In Postclassic Central Mexico,
the Ahuiateteo simultaneously portrayed particular vices and their consequent
punishment. Through particular forms of religious observance, the peoples of
Mesoamerica have sought to ensure harmony both with themselves and with the
greater cosmos.
Sacrifice and Replication
Among the best-known religious practices of ancient Mesoamerica is human sacrifice.
Lurid images of sacrificed maidens and virile warriors have fascinated European
imaginations since the Spanish Conquest. But for Mesoamericans human sacrifice
was a fundamental means to maintain world harmony and balance. According to
the Quiche Maya Popo/ VuA, the gods fashioned the present human race, the people
of maize, to supply nourishment in the form of prayer and sacrifice. The offering of
nourishing human substance could be in the form of penitential bloodletting, or
more dramaticalty, the sacrifice of individuals. In both cases, the act signified the
offering of the self, either by individual voluntary bloodletting, or collectively with
a human victim. The concept of retribution was closely tied to the act of sacrifice.
In exchange for life, humans needed to acknowledge and even reimburse the forces
that made life possible. The Aztecs viewed human sacrifice partly as retribution for
cosmic theft. According to Aztec belief, Ehecatl-Quetzalcoatl stole the bones out of
which people were created from the Underworld death god. Similarly, in the Popo/
VuA, the pregnant Xquic escapes from the Underworld to give birth to the Hero
Twins on the surface of the earth. In ancient Mesoamerican thought, humans survive
on not merely borrowed but stolen time.
One of the underlying organizational principles of Mesoamerican religion is
replication, in which essential patterns of everyday life and the surrounding world
are copied and incorporated as models of religious thought and action. Basic features
of the social world are often repeated on an increasingly larger scale to encompass
the world and the workings of the universe. For example, in the Maya region, the
house with its four walls and corner posts could stand for a maize Beld, the
community, and the structure of the cosmos. Grand and abstract concepts are placed
in human terms, and conversely, the ordered structure of the universe serves to
sanctify and validate human social conventions. Quite frequently, such series of
structural associations are expressed in ritual, with similar rites being performed for
the individual, the community, or the cosmos. Thus personal penitential bloodletting
could be repeated on a larger and more elaborate public scale in the form of human
sacrifice. The Aztec New Fire ceremony provides another example. In Aztec rites
of personal purification, straws or sticks used in bloodletting were bound in bundles
with a paper strip. The large bound stick bundles in the great New Fire ceremony
held once every 52 years were probably but gloriBed versions of the small bundles
used in personal bloodletting. Like the penitential bloodletting event, the rite was
also for purification, but in terms of the world rather than simply the individual.
Just as basic features can be replicated from the small to the large, the reverse
is also true. Objects or concepts of cosmic distance or size are copied into a human
scale. The sacred centers of Mesoamerican sites often copy cosmic geography. The
Aztec 7emp/o Mayor dual pyramid, situated in the center of Tenochtitlan,

INTRODUCTION

31
OMEYOCAN

. . 1 3 HEAVENS in the
CELEST1ALLEVEL

The Aztecs oriented Tenochtlan's Templo Mayor to


the four quarters, and conceived of it as the central
point between the 13 levels of heaven and the 9 steps
to the Underworld (Mictlan).

--

9 STEPS to the
UNDERWORLD LEVEL

M IC T L A N

represented two sacred mountains, Coatepec and TonacatepetL Recent epigraphic


research by David Stuart has revealed that the Classic Maya conceived of the
monumental art and architecture of their sites as a living landscape of sacred
mountains and trees.
Religious Metaphors in Art and Writing
In Mesoamerica, metaphor is an essential means of describing abstract religious
concepts. Thus, for example, Mesoamerican peoples often consider humans to be
like maize or Sowers that are planted on the surface of the earth, born to die, but
containing the seed of regeneration. Through metaphor, particular subjects are given
a vivid range of associations and meanings. At times, the similarities shared between
a subject and its metaphoric comparison reflect a real and special bond. Quite
frequently, these relationships are expressed through ritual. The magical efRcacy of
particular agricultural sacriBces, for example, depended on the fact that the victim
not only reflected processes of nature but actually embodied them during the ritual
act. However, the metaphoric substitutions should not be taken too literally or
exclusively. And the metaphors may vary according to what qualities are being
expressed. Thus among the ancient Maya, the earth was thought of in a variety of
ways, as a rectangular house or maize Beld, as a great caiman, or as the rounded
circular back of a great tortoise.
Prehispanic Mesoamerican art richly expresses these ancient metaphors. Few
regions of the ancient world used visual art so intensively to express complex
religious concepts. Fully present by the Early Formative Olmec, complex systems

[MTRODUCTION

32

of Mesoamerican iconography antedate acta! writing. Moreover, writing never


reptaced iconography. In the Classic Maya area, the complexity of the hierog!yphic
inscriptions is entirety matched by the attendant iconography, the texts and the
pictoria! images conveying different qualities of information. Unlike the specificity
of writing, the power of Mesoamerican iconography lies in its subtle ambiguity and
ability simultaneously to express different levels of meaning. In a single scene, a
richly costumed king can be regarded as a deity impersonator, an actual god, or
both. In terms of metaphoric expression, the iconography comes alive. Lightning
can appear as a burning serpent, blood as writhing snakes or gouts sprouting sweet
dowers, and a mature maize ear as a human head awaiting decapitation from the
stalk.
There is considerable debate concerning the extent of literacy in ancient
Mesoamerica. Although writing may have been widely used to record mundane
daily transactions, it also had a strongly religious component. Priests, commonly
culled from the elite, often performed as scribes in Postclassic Mesoamerica. Certain
gods were divine patrons of writing. Among the Postclassic Maya, writing was
identified with Kinich Ahau Itzamna, an aspect of the aged creator god, and scenes
in Classic Maya art also suggest that Itzamna was a god of writing. When we see
the detailed historical texts on Maya monuments, it should be borne in mind that
we are observing not simply historical but sacred writing. The phrases recorded by
this writing are not everyday talk but ritual speech, much like sacred narratives of
contemporary Mesoamerica.
The Mesoamerican Calendar and Astronomy
Calendrics served as an essential means by which Mesoamericans organized and
conceived of their world. Through wonderfully intricate calendrical cycles, they
sought to foresee particular events that could have major influence upon their lives.
Although these could include such relatively mundane occurrences as business
ventures or curing, they could also concern famine, political instability, or world
annihilation. The 260-day calendar had an especially important role in Mesoamerican
religion. In Postclassic Central Mexico, patron gods reigned over specific day names
and the 20 13-day divisions of the 260-day calendar. From at least Classic times,
each of the 20 day names was associated with a particular direction, passing in a
continual counterclockwise motion from one day to the next. Considering the central
importance of the 260-day calendar, it is entirely fitting that the earliest known
example of writing concerns a calendrical notation, found on a Zapotee monument
dating to approximately 600 B e . By the Protoclassic period (100 B C - A D 300), abundant
evidence of the 260-day calendar survives in many parts of Mesoamerica; together
with the vague solar year of 365 days, the 260-day calendar serves as one of the
essential defining traits of Mesoamerican culture.
In ancient and contemporary Mesoamerica, time is essentially cyclical. Even the
famous Maya Long Count, filled with allusions to historical events and the distant
mythical events of gods, is cyclical in nature. The great Long Count Baktun cycle,
in which the Classic Maya lived and in which we continue to dwell, began in 3114
B C and will soon end on 23 December A D 2012. In ancient Mesoamerica, temporal
cycles ran in increasingly larger units. The Maya Long Count, for example, consists
of units marking days, 20 days, 360 days, 20 x 360 days, and 400 x 360 days, and
still larger units encompassing millions of years. Similarly, in Late Postclassic Central
Mexico, there were the 365-day vague year, the 52-vague-year cycle, and a still

33

INTRODUCTION

greater cycle of 104 years. Of crucial importance in Mesoamerican ritual and thought
are period endings, during which a unit of time is terminated and another begins.
For the Postclassic Maya of Yucatn, the end of the 365-day year was a major
concern, whereas for the Aztecs, it was the completion of the 52-year cycle. The
completion of major Long Count cycles must have been of momentous significance
to the Classic Maya. There have even been suggestions, albeit unlikely, that the
completion of the tenth Baktun (10.0.0.0.0) of the Maya Long Count in AD 830 was
a major reason for the Classic Maya collapse.
The ending and renewal of calendrical periods were commonly expressed through
concepts of world creation and destruction. In fact, the New Year rites of the Yucatec
and the New Fire ceremony of the Aztecs concerned the reassertion of the ordered
world from the forces of chaos and darkness. In both regions, it was believed that
such period endings could mark the end of the present world. In Mesoamerican
thought, creation, as well as calendrics, is also cyclical. The Maya Pqpo/ Vu/?, Aztec
accounts, and contemporary mythology share common and explicit references to
multiple creations and destructions. Just as the series of previous worlds were
destroyed, it was believed that this world in which we live would also end.
One of the basic concerns of Mesoamerican calendrics was the recording and
prediction of astronomical events. The sun, moon, planets and constellations exerted
powerful influences upon people and the world. Two astronomical events that were
of supreme importance were solar eclipses and the Brst appearance of Venus as
Morning Star. The ancient Maya, with the most developed form of astronomical
notation known for Mesoamerica, had elaborate tables recording and predicting
eclipses and the cycle of Venus. It was widely believed that the world could be
destroyed by demons of darkness during solar eclipses. Moreover, the rays of the
Morning Star at heliacal rising were considered to be particularly dangerous, and
threatened speciBc people and things of the natural world. It is now knowrr that the
Classic Maya frequently scheduled battles to coincide with the movements of Venus,
especially the Brst rising of Venus as evening star.
The apparent movements of the planets and constellations were considered to be
the reenactments of cosmic mythical events. To the Aztecs, the movement of Ursa
Major into the sea may have represented Tezcatlipoca losing his foot during the
cosmic battle with the great earth monster. Recent investigations by Linda Scheie
and David Freidel suggest that the Classic Maya also observed mythological events
in the movement of the stars, probably based on an ancestral form of the PopoV VuA
creation epic.
Religion and Statecraft
The religious worlds of all classes of society were closely integrated in ancient
Mesoamerica. Agricultural fertility was a major concern of all, and through
replication, ritual acts of commoner and elite were linked. Nonetheless, the
sophistication and complexity of Mesoamerican writing, calendrics and astronomy
all point to the existence of full-time specialists, even though the oiBce of priest has
not yet been documented in Classic period writing or art. Priestly offices are well
known for the Postclassic period. Classic-period kings and other individuals of high
* ofBce were also religious experts, and the rituals and beliefs surrounding rulers were
extremely complex. Ancestor worship was a major concern of elite dynasties in
ancient Mesoamerica, and Classic Maya art is Riled with scenes of rulers and their
kin offering blood and other sacrifices to the honored dead.

[IN T R O D U C T IO N

34

Many peoples of ancient Mesoamerica lived in highly stratiBed state-level societies.


In such societies, mythology and ritual frequently served as divine charter for state
poiicies. The use of ideology in statecraft is best documented for the Aztecs. It is
known, for example, that the Aztec emperor Itzcoatl destroyed historical accounts
in order to rewrite the legendary past of his people. A number of Aztec myths
describe the necessity of political expansion and human sacriBce. The myth of the
birth of Huitzilopochtli at Coatepec is also a description of the political ascendancy
of the Aztecs and their defeat of other city states. Both this mythical event and the
creation of the Bfth sun at Teotihuacan stress the importance of human sacriBce for
world balance and survival.
Following the fall of Tenochtitlan to the Spanish in 1521, Mesoamerican religion
was rapidly transformed. Many of the more elaborate manifestations associated
with the elite, such as hieroglyphic writing and iconography, virtually ceased to exist
by the end of the 16th c. Native temples, sculptures, and books were systematically
destroyed. The Spanish conquerors vigorously suppressed native religious ceremon
ies, particularly those involving human sacriBce. The rituals, mythology, and gods

This scene from the Yanhuitian Codex depicts two


Mixtee noMes standing behind a Dominican priest.

35

INTRODUCTION

pertaining to rulership and other high ofEces were likewise suppressed, not only
because of their chaMenge to Christian doctrine but a!so because of their essentially
political nature, which could serve as catalysts for rebellion. However, the eradication
of native Mesoamerican customs was by no means total. Many of the more profound
and lasting religious beliefs continue to the present day. Rich oral traditions
encompassing ritual speech, songs, and mythology are contained in Nahuatl, Mayan,
Mixtee, and other modern native languages. Forms of the 260-day and vague 365day calendar are still used in southeastern Mesoamerica. Ceremonies to ensure
agricultural fertility are widely performed in Mesoamerica, and copa/ incense,
Sowers, and prepared foods are among the offerings still presented to the gods and
ancestors. Although this volume specifically concerns Preconquest Mesoamerican
religion, it should be remembered that we are describing but the ancient origins
and history of a still living and vibrant culture.

Subject Index

1.

C ods, goddesses

X ip e T o te e

T E O T IH U A C A N

and o th er

X iu hco atl

F a t C od

supernatura! beings

X iu h te c u h tli

H u e h u e te o tl

ancestral couple
celestial b ird

X o c h ip illi
X o ch iq u etzal

Jaguar gods
Jagu ar-ser p e n t-b ird

death gods

X o lo tl

P u lqu e gods
Q u e tza lc o a tl

MAYA
A x T E C A N D P oS T C L A S S iC

B icephalic M o n s te r

C E N T R A L M E X IC O

C hac
D iv in g God
F a t C od

A h uiateteo
C h alch iu h tlicu e
C hicom ecoatl
C ihuacoatl
C ih u ateteo
C in te o tl
C oatlicue
Coyolxauhqui
E hecatl
H uehuecoyot!
H u eh u ete o tl
H u itzilo p o ch tli
H am atecuhtli
Itzp a p a lo tl
Itztla c o liu h q u i-Ix q u im illi
Jaguar gods
M acu ilxoch itl
M a ize gods
M a y ah u el
M ic tla n te c u h tli
M ixco atl
O m eteo tl
Pulque gods
Q u etzalcoatl
Scribal gods
Sky Bearers
Tezcatlipoca
T lah u izcalp an tecu h tli
T lalo c
T la lte c u h tli
T la zo lte o tl
Toci
Tonacatecuhtli
T o n atiu h
T zitzim im e

T eo tih u ac an gods
T la lo c
W a r S erpent
ZAPOTEC

C ocijo

H u n H u nah p u
Itza m n a
P rin cip al B ird D e ity
Ixchel
Jaguar gods
Jester C od
K in ic h A h a u
Long-nosed and
L o n g-lipp ed deities
M a ize gods
M a n ik in scepter
P ad d ler Cods
P alenque T ria d Cods
Pauahtun
Q u etzalcoatl
Schellhas gods
Scribal gods
Sky B earers
T o h il
Vision Serpent
Vucub C aquix
W a te r L ily S erpent
M lX T E C

M ix te e gods
X ip e Totee
Yahui
OLM EC

Jaguar gods
M a iz e gods
O lm ec gods
Q u etzalcoatl
W ere-jag u ars

H u e h u e te o tl
Jaguar gods
M a iz e gods
P rin cip a l B ird D e ity
X ip e T o tee
2.

F lo ra and fau n a

am aran th
bats
b u tte r Ay
cacao
caim an
ceiba
celestial b ird
cotton
d eer
dog
eagle
Rowers
hallucinogens
hu m m in g b ird
ja g u ar
ja g u a r-s e rp e n t-b ird
m aguey
m aize
m onkey
m uan ow l
owls
parrots and m acaws
peccary
q uetzal
ra b b it

SUBJECT INDEJt

37
serpent
shark
spiders
toad
tobacco
tu rtle
vu ltu re
w a te r lily
&

Sacred places

A ztian
caves
cenote
Chicom oztoc
C oatepec
pyram id
springs
Tam oanchan
tem ple
Teotihuacan
Tlalocan
T o lla n
U n d erw o rld
4. O bjects, symbols,
and m aterials
a lta r
a tl-tla c h in o lli
blood
bundle
canoe
cerem onial bar
chacmoo!
cinnabar and h em atite
cloth
coatepantli
codex
colors
colossal heads
costum e
crossroads
cuauhxicalli
d en tistry
directions
excrem ent
fan
Hint
goM
hacha
hearts
incense
^

ja d e
je w e lry
litters
m at
M exican year sign

nahual
nam es and titles
night
num bers
omens
Popol Vuh
S tirlin g hypothesis
tonal
trecena
tw ins

m irrors
m o rtu ary bundles
obsidian
palm a
paper
pulque
re p tile eye
ru b b er
shell
sky bands

uay
U n d erw o rld
vein ten a

sm iling Bgures
sw eatbath
tem alacatl
throne

w orld trees
w ritin g

tombs
trophy heads
tuerto

year bearers
7.

turquoise
tzom pantli
w eaponry
yoke
5. N a tu ra l phenom ena
daw n
earth
eclipse
ligh tn in g and thunder
M ilk y W ay
moon
m ountains
night
rain
sea
sky
springs
stars and planets
sun
Venus
w a te r
w ind
6.

Concepts and ideas

a fte rlife
calendar
creation
death
d efo rm ity
deification
disease
d u ality
excrem ent
Hre
F iv e Suns
gods
hearts
m ilp a

R itu a lp ra c tic e s

and th e ir participants

accession
autosacriiice
ballgam e
baptism
b irth
bloodletting
cannibalism
captives
cargo
C ihuacoatl
clowns
confession
curing
dance
death
d eity im personation
d ivin atio n
dw arves and hunchbacks
enemas
execution
hum an sacriHce
m arriage
m erchants
music
p ato lli
pilgrim age
priests
puriH cation
sacrifice
shamans
term in atio n rituals
tlato an i
uay
uayeb
vein ten a
w a rrio r orders

38

ACCESSION

in h ig h lan d G u a te m ala described a tim e deep


in the past w hen th e ir rulers had gone to
TOLLAN w h e re leg itim acy was con ferred upon
them .

accession Accession is the E nglish w o rd gen


e ra lly given to the process by w hich a ru le r
was in stalled fo rm ally in ofBce. Accession
ritu als am ong the M ixtees, A ztecs, and M a y a
are know n to have been e lab o ra te events,
fre q u e n tly lasting fo r days. P rob ab ly m ost
M esoam erican cultures engaged in this p ro
cedure by w hich a m ere m o rtal becam e a
le ad e r often perceived by the w o rld around
him (and occasionally h e r) to be d iv in e.
Am ong the A ztecs, the ru le r, know n as the
TLATOAN! (lite ra lly "h e w ho speaks") acceded
to p o w er over a series o f days, even w eeks,
beginning w ith his selection a fte r the death
o f the previous ru le r. R anking nobles chose
from a poo! o f candidates, som etim es n u m b er
ing in the hundreds, o f younger m en, the sons,
nephew s, grandsons and great-grandsons o f
fo rm er rulers. T h e candidate w ould then
prove h im self in b a ttle and proudly lead
CAPWES, livin g trophies o f his prowess, back
to the A ztec cap ital.
O fficial accession celebrations began w ith
the ordering o f new robes fo r a ll nobles to be
in attendance, and invitations w e re sent fa r
and w id e, even including tra d itio n a l enem ies,
w ho w ere to be im pressed (and perhaps
cow ed) by the display o f A ztec pow er. O nce
the cerem onies had begun, fou r or five days
o f feasting and dancing culm inated in a royal
procession to five sites w ith in the sacred
precinct and environs o f T en o ch titlan , a t each
o f w hich the candidate offered IN C E N S E , q u ail,
and his ow n B L O O D . T o the Aztecs, the i/afo am
transcended m ere m o rtality and was recog
nized as d ivin e. W ith such status, the A ztec
king M otecuhzom a I I , fo r exam ple, was
n e ith e r touched nor gazed upon by his sub
jects, and according to the accounts w ritte n
by the Spanish a t the tim e o f the C onquest,
the /afean? rep elled efforts by C ortes to
shake his hand or m eet his gaze.
A key fe a tu re o f the M ix te e accession
cerem ony was the ofRcial insertion o f a nose
plug; the M ix te e lord 8 D e e r m ay have
jo u rn eyed to a PILGRIMAGE site to receive the
nose plug from a PRIEST. T h e notion o f trav el
in o rd er to receive sanction fo r accession was
com m on in ancien t M esoam erica. A t the tim e
o f the Spanish Conquest, fo r exam ple, M a y a
kings o f the Q uich and C akchique! peoples

C lassic M a y a h iero g lyp h ic texts usually


state sim ply the accession v erb , roughly, "to
be seated as c/?'u/ a h a u ," th a t is, seated as
the sacred lo rd , b u t th e range o f associated
depictions offers clues to the various com
ponents o f accession ritu a ls , w h ich , lik e the
A ztec ones, m ay have re q u ired th a t sacrificial
victim s had p revio u sly been tak en , and w hich
p ro b ab ly fo llo w e d a fa m ilia r sequence. M o n u
m ents com m em orating accession a t P iedras
N egras, fo r exam ple, fe a tu re n e w ly seated
lords on cushions w ith in niches, high above
sacrificial victim s w ho rest a t th e base o f
c lo th -d rap ed la ttic e d scaffolding, th e ir p ro b
able place o f SACRIFICE. B loody foo tp rin ts spot
the clo th , m arkin g the steps o f the n ew ru le r
from th e sacrifice site to the

THRONE.

Some

m onum ents in clu d e visitors, im p ly in g th a t lik e th e ir A ztec cou n terp arts - M a y a acces
sion ritu als m ay have d ra w n the atten d ance
o f n o b ility throughout the region. A ltho u g h
succession am ong th e M a y a could fo llo w from
one b ro th e r to a n o th er, p rim o g e n itu re was a
g en eral ru le .
In no M eso am erican c iv iliza tio n is th e re
any evidence o f re tire m e n t or abd icatio n fro m
ru lership. O nce a king acceded to ofRce,
he a p p a ren tly served u n til D E A T H , and no
successor acceded u n til p ro p er arrangem ents
could be m ade, a process th a t g en e rally took
an yw h ere from a fe w w eeks to a year. T h e
te n -ye ar in terreg n u m (AD 7 4 2 -5 2 ) b etw e en
the reigns o f M a y a kings Shield Jaguar and
B ird Jaguar th e G re a t a t Y axchilan is anom a
lous.
acrobats In 16th c. M eso am erica, acrobats
and contortionists form ed an im p o rta n t class
o f ritu a l en te rta in ers. In his triu m p h a l re tu rn
to Spain in 1528, H e rn n C orts included
n ative acrobats in his entourage. In th a t
year, C h risto p h er W e id itz illu s tra te d one o f
these acrobats, ju g g lin g a beam o f w ood w ith
his fe e t. S im ilar acrobats are know n fo r both
the L a te Postclassic M ixtees as w e ll as Aztecs.
C o n to rted acrobats also app ear in Classic
M a y a a rt, fre q u e n tly w ith th e ir legs arching
over th e ir heads. A t tim es they are supplied
w ith snake m arkings, as if allu d in g to the
alm ost m iraculous, sinuous contortions o f the
SERPENT. T h is fascination w ith acrobatic con
tortionists appears as e a rly as th e Olm ecs. A

39

AFTERLIFE

fine representation o f a contortionist grasping


his feet appears on a la te O lm ec re lie f re p o rt
edly from the south coast o f G u atem ala.
a fte rlife M esoam erican beliefs o f a fte rlife
varied w ith region and tim e , b u t fo r fe w
people was th ere any sense th a t hum an
m o rality affected the a fte rlife . F o r the Aztecs,
the key to one s a fte rlife was the m anner o f
DEATH itself; for the M a y a , one was tested
a fte r death by the gods o f the U N D E R W O R L D .
A lthough no texts survive from the F o rm a
tive era, rich offerings placed in TO M B S reveal
b e lie f in an a fte rlife . A t L a V e n ta , JADE
treasures accom panied deceased O lm ec
nobles la id to rest in basalt sarcophagi. In
W est M exico, ancien t residents o f the states
o f Jalisco, N a y a rit, and C o lim a dug shaft
tombs deep into the earth and offered b u rn
ished ceram ics. Both real and ceram ic D o c s
fre q u e n tly accom panied the dead, suggesting
th a t an a nim al com panion m ay have been
necessary for a jo u rn e y in the a fte rlife .
T h e M a y a conceived the a fte rlife to be a
jo u rn e y, a harro w in g th a t one m ight success
fu lly overcom e. B u rial rituals included the
in te rm e n t o f useful goods for the deceased's
jo u rn e y, and noble tombs h eld the richest
offerings: pots o f a chocolate beverage,
hum an attendants, even dogs, and freq u en tly
g reat piles o f ja d e , C L O T H , and rope. B ut even
a com m oner w ould be bu ried w ith a jad e
bead in his m outh, a b it o f currency he m ight
need in the a fte rlife . T h e best record o f the
jo u rn ey its e lf is recorded in the 16th c. Q uiche
epic, the PO PO L v u H , b u t the M a y a had prob
ably believed in a sim ilar quest a fte r death
for about tw o m illen n ia , if not longer.
T h e e n try in to the M a y a U n derw o rld
began w ith passage through still W A T E R , some
tim es ren dered in Classic M a y a a rt as a
passage by C A N O E . Subsequently, the a fte rlife
jo u rn e y led through various levels o f the
U n d e rw o rld (know n in Q uiche as X ib alb a , or
place o f frig h t), m any o f w hich w ere hot and
steam y sites o f decom position and decay and
in h a b ite d by foul-sm elling gods o f d eath. A
M a y a overcam e death by o u tw ittin g these
old gods, as the H e ro T w in s do in the P opo/
VuA. O nce the re p e lle n t beings w ere
d efe ated , the victors rose in the night SKY as
heaven ly bodies. T h e M a y a liken ed the cycle
o f death and reg en eratio n to the life cycle o f
M A IZ E .

F o r the Aztecs, the w o rld o f the a fte rlife


was s tra tified , w ith 13 layers o f heavens and

A noble figure is surrounded by a contorted


acrobat, Shook Panel, Late Formative period,
Guatemala.

This scene describes the afterlife journey of a


sacrificial victim. At the upper right, he is first
swallowed by the caiman earth. The center of
the scene depicts the victim being greeted by
Mictlantecuhtli in the dark interior of the earth
Codex Borgia, p. 42, Late Postclassic period.

40

AHUIATETEO
n in e o f the U n d e rw o rld . T h e m eans o f d ea th

according to specific M ix te e place nam es, ^ee

d ete rm in ed one s fa te a fte r d ea th , and m ost

a /m

D E F O R M IT Y .

o f those w ho w e n t to heaven d ied v io len t


deaths. Suicides, fo r exam ple, d w e lt in a

alcohol see PULQUE

single stratu m . O n e la y e r o f th e heavens was


reserved fo r sacrificial victim s, those w ho

a lta r T y p ic a lly , in M eso am erica an a lta r is a

d ied in com bat, and fo r w om en w ho d ied in

larg e stone, w ith a fla t surface suitable for

c h ild b irth (w ho w e re recognized as w a rrio rs

th e m aking, o ffe rin g , or b u rn in g o f SACRIFICES.

a n o th er

M a n y carved an cien t stones o f M exico and

heavenly la ye r, d ed icated to the RAIN and

G u a te m a la , h o w ever, w e re in cluded in this

EARTH god TLALOC, received those struck by

category long b efo re th e ir function had been

who fe ll to the

b a ttlin g in fa n t);

ucHTNiNC, or w ho d ro w n ed, or w ho fe ll p re y

d e te rm in e d . Some larg e so-called tab le -to p

to the DISEASES dispatched by the ra in gods.

alta rs o f th e O lm ecs w e re p ro b ab ly

B u t m ost A ztec souls, and a ll those w ho

A t m any M a y a cities, com m em orative stelae

died o rd in ary deaths, en te red M ic tla n , the

p a ir w ith a ltars in w h a t has o ften been term ed

THRONES.

U n d e rw o rld , w h e re they, lik e th e ir M a y a

the stelae " c u lt" : in fac t th e p ractice was not

counterparts, faced a series o f trials d u rin g

a c u lt b u t ra th e r a p a tte rn o f com m em orating

th e ir jo u rn e y.

ru le r p o rtraits on stelae and offerings (som e

A h u iatcteo Am ong the Postclassic peoples o f


C en tra! M exico , m any form s o f pleasure,

la te r M a y a , Toltecs, and A ztecs, CHACMOOLs


fre q u e n tly fun ctio ned as receptacles fo r sacri

w hen in excess, w ere considered to be causes


o f DISEASE and m isfortune. A series o f five

w e re sim ply p la in stones.

tim es sacrificial victim s) on alta rs . A m ong the

gods, the A h u iateteo , em bodied the dangers


and punishm ents o f excessive d rin kin g , gam b
ling , sex, and o th er pleasures. Each o f these
five gods bore a calendrical nam e w ith the
coefficient o f 5, m acui/, a num ber allu d in g to
excess. Thus according to the Aztecs, the fifth
cup o f PULQUE denoted drunkenness and loss
c f control. T h e five gods w e re nam ed M a c u ilcuetzpalin (5 L iza rd ), M acuilcozcacuauhtli (5
V u ltu re ), M a c u ilto c h tli (5 R a b b it), M A C U IL x o c m T L (5 F lo w e r) and M a c u ilm a lin a lli (5
Crass). These gods w ere clea rly associated
w ith the DIRECTION south: th e ir five day nam es
constitute the five days o f the south and
d erive from the five southern TR EC ENA S o f 1
X ch itl, 1 M a lin a lli, 1 C u etzp alin , 1 Cozcacuau h tli and 1 T o ch tli.
T h e Vaticanus B and Borgia codices contain
passages representing the Eve A h u iateteo and
th e ir accom panying trecena dates. A lthough
the tw o passages d iffe r, in both cases the
figures display characteristics o f T E Z C A T L iP O C A .
M o reo v er, in both codices, the A h u iateteo
can be rendered w ith a hum an hand across
the m outh, clearly a reference to the five
digits, and by extension, the num ber five. In
the Borgia and Vaticanus B passages, the
A h uiateteo p a ir w ith the five fem ale c iH U A T ETEO, the dem on goddesses o f the w est. T h e
Prehispanic Fons M exicains 20 contains the
m ost am bitious p airin g o f the C ih u ateteo w ith
the A h u iateteo . In this single scene, the
five A h u iateteo and C ih u ateteo are placed

fices. Some A zte c altars fo r

H U M A N S A C R IF IC E

am aran th A fa m ily o f plants rich in both


p ro te in and starch, various am aranths (A m a ranf/m s spp.) w e re c u ltiv a te d in M eso am erica
befo re the C onquest. T h e Aztecs called this
p la n t fa m ily A u a l/i, and id e n tifie d some I I
specific varie ties . L ik e m any o th e r foodstuffs,
am aran th was tre a te d w ith reveren ce, b u t it
was especially im p o rta n t fo r the seeds w e re
m ixed w ith hum an B L O O D , fo rm in g a dough
called tzoa/A, and then shaped in to figures
and w orshipped. D u rin g th e m onth o f P anq u e tza liztli, such dough figures w e re set high
atop the jrccoV//, a ritu a l tre e , and th e n subse
q u en tly consum ed by p articip an ts in a ritu a l
th a t the Spanish liken ed to C h ris tia n
C om m union.
A t the tim e o f the C onquest, th e A ztecs
collected some 200,000 bushels o f am ara n th
ann u ally in trib u te , only slig h tly less than
th e y took in o f M A IZ E and beans. B u t because
o f its close association w ith ritu a l, a m aran th
consum ption was d riv e n underground by the
Spanish, and the n u tritio u s foodstuff ceased
to be a significant p a rt o f the n a tiv e d ie t.
T o d ay a m ara n th is m ixed w ith a honey paste
and sold as a snack called " a le g ria ," or jo y ,
on the s treet corners o f M exico.
ancestral couple N a tiv e creation accounts
fre q u e n tly re fe r to the m yth ical first hum an
couple, w ho, because o f th e ir o rig in in rem ote
a n tiq u ity , are often p o rtrayed to be o f g reat

41

ATL-TLACHINOLLI

age. As was the case w ith m any aged people


o f ancient M esoam erica, this p a ir possessed
powers o f D iviN A TiO N and CURING. Because o f
the im portance o f the 260-day CALENDAR in
d ivin atio n , the p rim o rd ial couple can also be
id e n tifie d w ith the origin o f the calendar.
A lthough know n as Oxomoco and C ipactonal
am ong the N ahuatl-spealdng peoples o f C e n
tra l M exico , there is no c e rta in ty as to w hich
o f the tw o figures these nam es re fe r to. T h e
term C ipactonal is surely a referen ce to the
day nam e C ip a c tli in the 260-day fona/poAuaVA calendar. In C e n tra l M exican thought,
the day nam e C ip a c tli, m eaning " C A IM A N ," is
freq u e n tly associated w ith beginnings and
creation episodes.
In th e ir id en tificatio n w ith the p o w erfu l,
sacred arts o f curing and d iv in atio n , the aged
ancestral couple m erges in to the o riginal p air
o f m ale and fem ale creator gods. T h e Q uiche
M a y a p o p o L v u H m entions a sim ilar p a ir of
aged diviners w ho, although not described as
the first hum ans, are re fe rre d to as grand
parents. This aged p air, Xpiyacoc and his

Macuilcuetzpalin, one of the Uve Ahuiateteo


gods, Codex Borgia, p. 47.

consort, X m ucane, play an active role in the


creation o f people. By d ivin in g w ith cast tz/fe
seeds, this couple instruct the creator gods
how to fashion hum ankind. Xm ucane grinds
the corn from w hich the first tru e people are
m ade. 5ee a/so CREATION ACCOUNTS: D iviN A TiO N .
a tl-tla c h in o lli A w idespread characteristic in
ancient A ztec thought is the use o f p aired
term s to re fe r m etap h orically to a single
concept. O ne o f the best know n exam ples o f
this is the N a h u a tl term at/-t%acAio/A.
Com posed o f the term s fo r WATER (a i/) and
FIRE (t/acAAioAi), this phrase refers to w a r,
and the words fo r fire and w a te r them selves
are a p a ir o f b a ttlin g oppositions. In A ztec
WRITING and a rt, this phrase is usually ren d
ered as a p a ir o f in te rtw in e d bands, one
d elin ea tin g fire , the other, w a te r. T h e use o f
Ere and w a te r to describe w a r also appears
in m anuscripts o f non-A ztec origin, such as
the Codex B orgia. T h e use o f w a te r and Ere
to a llu d e to w a r m ay be as old as E a rly Classic
TEOTiHUACAN. In T eo tih u acan a rt, symbols o f
w a te r and Ere o ften app ear together in con

The aged ancestral couple, Cipactonal and


Oxomoco, portrayed as priests letting blood and
casting lots, detail of Codex Borbonicus, p. 21,
16th c. Aztec.

texts o f w a r. D u rin g the Postclassic p eriod,


the use o f w a te r and Ere to d elin ea te w a r
appears to be especially strong am ong the
^ N ah u atl-speakin g peoples o f C e n tra l M exico .
T h e E re -a n d -w a te r m o tif does not appear in
the Prehispanic m anuscripts o f the Postclassic
M ixtees or M a y a .

Fire and water, or atltlachinolli, the Aztec sign


for war, detail of wooden
drum from Malinalco.

42

AUTOSACRIFICE

seif, autosacriRce in the form o f BLOODLETTING

burned. In th e sm oke fro m the burned o ffe r


ings, M a y a n o b ility com m unicated w ith th e ir

p layed a ro le in an cien t ritu a l fro m a t least

ancestors, as w as recorded a t Y axchiln.

autosacriRce L ite ra lly the sacriBcing o f one-

O lm ec tim es u n til the Spanish C onquest. T h e

A lth o u g h no e x p lic it depictions o f O lm ec

very act o f such self-sacriRce was recorded

autosacriRce su rvive, sharp JADE perfo rato rs

w id e ly in M eso am erican a rt, and q u an tities

and stingray spines in d ic ate such a practice

o f ritu a l p a ra p h e rn a lia survive th a t w e re

a t an e a rly d a te , as do terraco tta sculptures

designed specifically fo r sacrifice on the p a rt

fro m W e s t M exico th a t v iv id ly d ep ict cheek

o f the n o b ility .
A ccording to A ztec accounts, the gods

p e rfo ra tio n .

g ath ered a t TAMOANCHAN fo llo w in g previous

a x is m u n d i

destructions o f the

EARTH.

T h e y d re w

s e . W O R L D TR E E

BLO O D

from th e ir ow n bodies to g en erate a n ew

A ztla n "P la ce o f w h iteness" or "p lac e o f

race o f hum ans;

h eron s," A ztla n w as the m yth ical p o in t o f

QUETZALCO ATL,

in p a rtic u la r,

sprinkled blood from his penis on an cien t

d e p a rtu re fo r th e M e x ic a (A ztecs). T h e m y th

bones he stole from the

ical A ztla n w as an island in a lake whose

U NDERW ORLD.

Then,
the

rep lica th e M e x ic a sought in T e n o c h titla n ,

god N an a h u a tzin im m olated h im self on a

th e ir Rna! hom e in C e n tra l M ex ico , also an

bonRre to c reate the SUN, and T ecu ciztecatl

island in a lake. Scholars have a tte m p te d to

follow ed suit, becom ing the M O O N . T h e story


o f such d iv in e sacriRce survives only from

Southw est to points ju s t n o rth o f the V a lle y

in an act o f autosacriRce a t

T E O T iH U A C A N ,

id e n tify A ztla n a n y w h e re from the A m erican

th e A ztec trad itio n , but probably a ll ancien t

o f M ex ico , b u t such efforts have been in vain .

M esoam erican peoples w ere held in the th ra ll


o f this ' blood d e b t/' in w hich hum ans end
lessly ow ed gods hum an blood and Resh. In
the M a y a epic, the POPOL vun,
the gods
destroy successive generations o f livin g beings
u n til a race o f hum ans learns to praise th e ir
m akers and nourish them through p rayer and

A ltho u g h A ztla n m ay have been a m yth ic

blood S A C R IF IC E .
A ztec lords d re w blood from th e ir ears,
elbow s, and shins w ith sharp M A C U E Y spines
or Rled bones. A tw isted grass b all held the
spines w hen not in use, and the em blem o f
the b all and spines was carved on dozens o f
m ajor A ztec sculptures to signify th e responsi
b ilities o f A ztec n o b ility.
O f a ll M esoam erican d eities, Q u etzalcoatl
most em bodied the burden o f sacriRce. O n a
H uastec re lie f, Q uetzalcoatl pierces his
tongue w ith a huge p erfo ra to r, and STARS and
other precious elem ents stream from the
w ound, as if given b irth from his offering.
Both M a y a m en and w om en p erfo rm ed
b loodletting as autosacriRce. M e n character
istically d re w blood from the penis. T h e act
is g raphically recorded on a num ber o f Classic
M a y a pain ted pots, b u t even in the years
a fte r the Spanish Conquest, Bishop D iego de
L an d a saw such autosacriRce p erform ed in
Y ucatan, and a M a d rid Codex illu stratio n
shows several gods linked together by a rope
th a t runs through a ll th e ir penises. W om en
d re w blood fro m the tongue or ear, as m en
also did upon occasion, and both collected
the blood offerings on PAPER, w hich was then

location, fu rth e r in q u iry in to islands in L a k e


Patzcuaro and M excal tit n in a lagoon along
the PaciRc coast o f N a y a rit m ay p ro ve useful.
A ccording to A ztec trad itio n s, th e ir ancestors
d ep a rted A ztla n and w e n t to C H IC O M O Z T O C ,
the "seven caves," a t th e b eg inning o f th e ir
long p ereg rin a tio n .
T h e w ord A ztec m eans "p e o p le o f A z tla n ,"
although they ra re ly c alled them selves by
such a term . T h e y w e re u sually know n am ong
them selves and th e ir neighbors as th e M ex ica ,
or som etim es the C u lh u a -M e x ic a , to em phas
ize th e ir connection to the old T o lte c lineages
established a t C ulh u acan . H o w e v e r, W illia m
Prescott's C onquest o M exico , published in
1843, p o p ularized th e te rm A ztec (in tro d u ced
by A lexan d er von H u m b o ld t e a rlie r in th e
19th c.) as a catch -all re feren ce to a ll N a h u a tlspeakers in C e n tra l M exico a t the tim e o f the
C onquest.

ballgam e A ll over Prehispanic M exico and


C e n tra l A m erica, fo r some th ree m illen n ia ,
gam es w e re played w ith a RUBBER b a ll, and in
parts o f no rth w estern M exico an indigenous
ballgam e is s till p layed . B allgam es m ay have
developed along th e G u lf C oast, w h ere the
re s ilie n t p roperties o f la te x w e re probably
Rrst observed. T y p ic a lly , the best-know n

43

BALLGAME

games w e re played in a "baH co u rt," usually


an alley form ed by tw o p a ra lle l structures,
som etimes w ith c lea rly defined end zones
that gave the e n tire a rea the shape o f a
capital le tte r 1. Points w e re scored by strikin g
a solid ru b b er b all, aim ing it tow ard a ring
or m arkers set along the alle y or in end zones.
T h e rules v aried , b u t the gam e was played
betw een tw o team s composed o f tw o or th ree
team m em bers each, giving a total o f fou r or
six players. In the most w idespread version
of the gam e, the b allp layers controlled the
ball by h ittin g it w ith the upper arm and
thigh; touching it w ith the hands was fo rb id
den, except to p u t the b all into play.
A n oth er ballgam e was played w ith in stru
m ents resem bling field hockey sticks and a
sm all b a ll. In th a t gam e, found m ainly in
C e n tra l M exico and depicted in paintings at
TBOTtHUACAN, goals and courts w e re defined
by freestanding m arkers o f round disks atop
posts.

The departure from Aztlan in the year 1 Flint,


detail of Codex Boturini, 16th c. Aztec.

Such sport w as reserved for m en and gods.


O nly at th e M aya site o f Yaxchiln are w om en
d ep icted in association w ith the gam e; there,
they sit b esid e a staircase on w h ich a ball
bou nces. In the C odex Borbonicus, in the
TRECENA 1 E agle, the A ztec godd ess xocHiQUETZAL presides over gam es in general, including
the b allgam e and PATOLLi.
T h e ballgam e had m any levels o f m eaning,
and could be played fo r m any reasons, from
sandlot sport to court ritu a l. A t the tim e of
the Spanish C onquest, am ateurs and pro
fessionals alike engaged in the gam e, and
heavy gam bling fre q u e n tly accom panied the
com petition. Spectators w agered th e ir finely
w oven m antles, leaving a tra il o f garm ents
behind them w hen they lost.
M a n y M esoam erican peoples saw in the
ballgam e a m etaphor fo r the m ovem ents o f
heaven ly bodies, p a rtic u la rly the S U N , M O O N ,
and V E N u s ; the b a ll its e lf m ay have been
understood as the sun jo u rn eyin g in and out
o f the U N D E R W O R L D , seen as the n arro w alley
o f the b allco u rt. Round baHcourt m arkers
in alleys o f M a y a courts fre q u e n tly bear a
q u a tre fo il cartouche, in d icatin g an opening
to the U n d e rw o rld . In the P O P O L V U H , the H ero
T w in s descend to the U n d e rw o rld to p lay b all
against U n d e rw o rld gods; the gam e becomes
the m etaphor o f life , D E A T H , and reg en eratio n ,
and they resurrect th e ir fa th e r, the

M A IZ E C O D ,

from the court o f d eath.


T h e ballgam e also served as p u b lic reen act
m ent o f w a rfa re and in corporated

HUMAN

The ballgame: (above) ballplayers, sketch by


Karl Weiditz, 1528; (be/ow) Aztec ballcourt,
Codex Magliabechiano.

44

BAPTISM
SACRIFICE. In som e instances, victorious b a ll

d ren o f a p p ro x im a te ly th ree years o f age w ith

players

WATER from a s e rp e n t-ta ile d asp ergillu m . In

d ec ap itated

skullracks

fo r

ballcourts

(see

the

th e

d e fe a te d

trophies

o fte n

ones;
adjo in

a d d itio n , one o f the p rin c ip a l citizens o f the

the

com m unity a no inted the ch ild ren w ith w a te r

C lassic M a y a , a ritu a l p a ra lle le d th e b allg am e

fro m a m oistened bone. L an d a notes th a t this

T Z O M P A N T L i).

A m ong

in w hich d efe ated p layers, usually CAPTIVES o f

rite cleansed and puriB ed th e c h ild ren , an

w a r, w e re bound and trussed in o rd er to be

im p o rta n t fu n ctio n o f baptism .

used as the b a ll its e lf. In this Bnal act o f the

Book 6 o f th e F lo re n tin e C odex provides

gam e, the cap tive-as-b al! w as bounced dow n

d e ta ile d

a Bight o f stairs.
T h e e q u ip m en t fo r the b allg am e v a rie d

and rites associated w ith A zte c baptism . In

descriptions o f th e

ritu a l speech

contrast to th e Y u catec cerem ony, baptism

through tim e and space, b u t g en e rally con

took place soon a fte r

sisted o f a ru b b e r b a ll and, fo r the p layers,

A zte c rite w as also associated w ith PURiFi

B IR T H .

H o w e v e r, the

to rem ove any p o llu tio n acq u ired from

heavy padding. Solid ru b b er balls a re heavy

C A T IO N ,

and dense: m o d em -d ay ballgam es in n o rth

the parents. D u rin g th e ritu a l b ath in g , the

ern M exico use balls th a t are 10cm or 4

in fa n t w as nam ed and p resented w ith the

inches in d ia m e te r and w eig h 5 0 0 g o r li b .


Some very larg e balls are d ep icted in M a y a

tools necessary fo r a d u lt life .


T h is cru cial episode o f A zte c b irth rites is

and W est M exico a rt; a solid b all 3 0c m or


12 inches in d ia m eter w ould w eigh 3 .5 kg or

w h e re th e m id w ife p repares to b ath e the

7.5 lb and could have m aim ed or k ille d an

in fa n t in a vessel o f w a te r placed on a reed

illu s tra te d in the 16th c. C odex M en d o za,

Im m e d ia te ly above and b elo w th e m at

o lf-b alance p layer. A t C hichen Itz , carvings

M AT.

o f the ballgam e show a skull on the surface

ap p ear th e articles rep resen tin g the occu

o f the large b a ll, and skulls - perhaps o f


previously d efeated ballplayers - m ay have
been im bedded in such balls to create a
ho llo w center.
Vast q u an tities o f ballgam e p arap h ern a lia
survive, m ostly from the C u lf Coast o f M exico
and the PaciBc Coast o f G u atem ala. C arved
from hard stone, the YOKES, handstones,
H A C H A S , and PA LM A S (both o f w hich a re know n
by th e ir m odern Spanish appellations) m ay
have been m ade as com m em orative trophies
for successful players or fo r occasional cere
m onial w e ar. Stone yokes, for exam ple, can
be w orn snugly across an adu lt's hips, bu t
w eigh about 13.5 kg or 30 lb . F o r actual pro
tection in the gam e, the equ ipm en t m ay have
been m ade o f w ood, w icker, or cotton b attin g .
N achas and pa/m as Bt into yokes and offer
some protection fo r the chest; handstones
m ay have been used to p u t the b all in to play
or to a llo w for use o f the hands in com petition.
N achas m ay also have adorned the court or
m arked locations fo r scoring. Stone ballgam e
trophies w ere p rized fu n e ra ry offerings and
m ay have been req u ired by the in te rre d in
order to face the U n d erw o rld gods.

pations o f m en and w om en. A b ove, one can


discern the m asculine tools o f th e sculptor,

baptism W h en the Brst Spanish priests


arriv ed in N e w Spain, they w e re surprised to
Bnd n ative form s o f baptism , in this case the
ritu a l bathing o f infants and child ren . In
Yucatn, according to D iego de L an d a, a
n ative PRIEST sprinkled m ale and fem ale c h il

fe a th e rw o rk e r, p a in te r, and goldsm ith, along


w ith the a ll-im p o rta n t fe a th e r and shield o f
the w a rrio r. C le a rly , the lo t o f the fe m a le
child is less e n v ia b le , as she is supplied
only w ith the d re a ry tools fo r sw eeping and
spinning cotton.
bats As a n octurnal c re a tu re , th e b a t is com
m only id en tiB ed w ith th e forces o f d ea th
and darkness in M eso am erican thought. T h e
beh avior o f the vam p ire b a t also c o n trib u ted
to the association o f bats w ith D E A T H and
bloody S A C R IF IC E , and th e M a y a m ay w e ll have
been a w are th a t the v a m p ire b a t does not
suck the B L O O D o f its victim s b u t m akes an
incision and then laps the blood. H o w e v e r,
the n a tu ra l tra it o f bats snatching fru it fro m
trees m ay have c o n trib u ted to the w idespread
identiB cation o f bats w ith d ecap itation .
A m ong th e Classic and Postclassic M a y a , bats
w e re id en tiB ed w ith death and sacriBce. In
th e Q uich P O P O L V U H , the U n d e rw o rld C am a zotz, or "d e a th b a t," cuts o ff th e head o f the
H e ro T w in , H u n ah p u . In Classic M a y a vessel
scenes, bats a re com m only re n d e re d w ith
d eath m arkings, such as extruded eyeballs
and crossed bones.
In Postclassic C e n tra l M exico , bats w e re
s im ila rly associated w ith d eath and sacriBce.
In a num ber o f scenes, the b a t carries a
severed hum an head to id e n tify it as a beast

45

BIRTH

of decapitation. In a d d itio n , FLINT blades probably denoting sacriAce - can app ear on
the snout or w ings o f the creatu re.
T h e bat plays a p ro m in e n t ro le in the
art o f the Classic Zapotees, and com m only
appears on ceram ic fu n e ra ry urns. L ik e the
la te r exam ples o f Postclassic C e n tra l M exico ,
the Zapotee b at is often dep icted w ith chipped
stone blades, p robably an allusion to sacrifice.
Supplied w ith large claw s, round ears, and a
toothy m uzzle, the Zapotee b at figure
resem bles the JAGUAR save for one curious
convention: a large crest projecting from
the top o f the forehead. A fine JADE mosaic
exam ple o f a b at head was discovered d uring
excavations a t the Zapotee site o f M o n te
A lban. D a tin g to approxim ately the beginning
o f the C h ristian era, this Agure displays the
forehead crest as w e ll as the rounded ears

The baptism of Aztec


infants, tools for males
above and females below
the central bowl of water;
detail from Codex
Mendoza.

and fanged snout. T h e three p endant CELTlik e stones id e n tify this rem arkab le mask as
a pectoral or b e lt piece. In ancient M esoam erica, such masks seem to have been m odeled
on TROPHY HEADS, again suggesting the associ
atio n w ith d ecapitation.

Jade mosaic bat image,


Protoclassic Zapotee,
Monte Alban. This object
was probably worn as a
pectoral.

B icephalic M o n ster L ite ra lly , a tw o-headed


m onster, o f w hich there are a num ber in
M a y a a rt, and specifically, the tw o-headed
m onster also know n as the C eles tia l M on ster
or Cosm ic M on ster.
T h is p a rtic u la r supernatural creatu re usu
a lly has e ith e r a crocodilian or SKY BAND body,
b u t in a t least one exam ple, cloud scrolls form
the body. T h e fro n t head g en erally bears
e ith e r a VENUS sign o r crossed bands in the
eye, DEER hooves or d eer ears and is fu lly
Aeshed w h ile the re a r head is characterist
ically skeletal and ren dered upside dow n.
T h e fro n t head also functions as the head
v a ria n t fo r the day sign L a m a t and as the
patro n o f the m onth Yax. T h e re ar head bears
on its forehead a q u a d rip a rtite sign: a stingray
spine, spondylus shell, and crossed bands
inside a cache vessel. B oth heads m ay spew
BLOOD scrolls. T h e CELESTIAL BIRD m ay be re p

Bicephalic Monster, Copn


Altar 41, Late Classic
Maya.

resented a t the cen ter o f the m onster's body.


M o st com m only, the B icephalic M on ster
fram es scenes o f ACCESSION or ru lersh ip fo r the
M a y a , b u t its in trin sic m eaning m ay be to
represent the arc o f the heavens, the fro n t
head being identiA ed w ith Venus, p u lling
behind it the Aeshless head o f the

SUN

in the

UNDERWORLD.

b irth T h e creation o f life by hum an b irth

Birth of Tezcatlipoca from


the navel of Tlaltecuhtli,
the earth deity, Aztec,
Late Postclassic period.

B LO O D
was a source o f g re at fascination in an cien t

stream s -

M eso am erica. N o t only was b irth


an
im p o rta n t eve n t o f g re a t concern in e ve ryd ay

fresh w ounds - a re o fte n configured as live


SERPENTS. T h e C lassic M a y a fre q u e n tly show

p a rtic u la rly w hen spurting from

life , b u t it also p layed a m a jo r ro le in the

blood as a series o f d ro p lets, p a rtic u la rly in

CREATION ACCOUNTS o f th e gods. I t was com m on

scenes o f scatterin g or sprin klin g, in w hich

fo r an in fa n t a t the tim e o f b irth to be ritu a lly

kings hold th e ir hands near the groin and

in tro d uced in to some o f the m ost essential

show er the ground w ith th e ir blood. B lood

tru th s o f hum an existence, such as th e origins,

stream s can be re n d e re d as stream s o f Rowing

n atu re , and fa te o f m ankind.


T h e m ysteries o f gestation and b irth w e re

precious things or th e ir sym bols edged w ith

the dom ain o f a p a rtic u la r class o f curers, the

series o f la zy S-scrolls, although such im ag ery

m id w ives, w ho tended

m ore com m only re fers to clouds.

to be aged, post

beads or dots. Blood m ay also ap p ear as a

m enopausal w om en w ell-ve rs ed in plants,


D iv iN A T iO N ,

and o th e r esoteric lo re . T h e m ost

b lo o d le ttin g T h e act o f d ra w in g

BLO O D

from

Yucatec M a y a ixcHEL, was honored a t a m ajo r

th e hum an body w as p racticed ro u tin e ly


throu g h o u t M eso am erica fo r ritu a l purposes.

piLCRiMAGE shrine on the island o f C o zum el,

Because th e

situated o ff the no rth ern coast o f Q u in ta n a

to crea te h u m a n ity , hum an blood was the

fam ous sup ern atu ral p atro n o f m id w ives, the

G O DS

had shed th e ir ow n blood

Roo, M exico . A lthough Ixchel is o ften id e n t

single m ost im p o rta n t o ffe rin g th a t could be

ifie d as the you th fu l Goddess I o f the M a y a

m ade in re tu rn . In this state o f blood " d e b t,"

codices, she is alm ost c e rta in ly

the aged

Goddess O , w ho is nam ed ep ig rap h ically cAac


c h e /in the ancient M a y a books (seescHELLHAS
coos).
In the a rt o f L a te Postclassic C e n tra l M e x
ico, goddesses are freq u e n tly shown in the
posture o f b irth know n as h e e le r, from the
G erm an w ord signifying a squatting position,
hfocher figures typ ically have th e ir arm s
upraised, as if m irro rin g the crouching squat
o f the lo w er lim bs. B ut although these figures
squat in the b irth posture, ra re ly do they give
b irth from the loins. In stead , in a num ber o f
instances, individuals em erge from a JADE
placed on the navel, representing the cen ter
o f conception and gestation.
blood M o st M esoam erican peoples id e n tifie d
blood w ith o th er substances, p a rtic u la rly
M A IZ E , JA D E , FLO W E R S , and the sap o f trees.
A ccording to some M a y a accounts, the gods
offered th e ir ow n blood on ground m aize,
yieldin g a doughy paste fro m w hich hum ans
could be form ed. N a tiv e m aize was red , blue,
and y ello w in color; likew ise hum an blood
appears blue in the veins w hen seen through
the yellow ish tones o f skin, b u t w hen cut is
red (see COLORS).
Blood was understood in M esoam erica to
m ean kinship, or bloodlines, as w e ll as the
actual substance th a t courses through veins
and arteries.
In M ix te e and A ztec m anuscripts, hum an
blood is som etim es ren dered as a jagged red
stream tipped w ith ja d e beads; in the a rt o f
Classic V eracru z and C hichen Itz , blood

CAPTIVES o f b a ttle w e re taken a liv e , th e ir blood


shed la te r in

TEM PLES

and shrines to honor the

pact w ith th e gods. T h e nobles, and perhaps


a ll people, p erfo rm e d

A U T O S A C R IF IC E .

Jade versions o f the sharp spines fro m the


stingray survive fro m O lm ec tim es, in d ic atin g
th a t
d u rin g
th e
firs t
m ille n n iu m
BC
M eso am erican peoples w e re fa m ilia r w ith
the serrated bony spine th a t arm s th e ta il o f
this SEA crea tu re . Because o f th e acute angle
o f the serrations, once a stin g ray spine has
p ierced the skin it cannot be rem oved w ith o u t
causing p a in fu l dam age: it is easier in fa c t to
p u ll the spine co m p letely through a p e rfo r
atio n . T h e M a y a b u rie d th e ir noble m ale dead
w ith stingray spines - perhaps in pouches long
decayed - over th e g ro in , and these spines
w e re th e perfo rato rs used to d ra w blood fro m
the penis.
T h e M a y a also p ierced th e ir Resh w ith
O B S ID IA N blo o d letters and carved bones. T h e y
collected th e d rip p in g blood on strips o f
PAPER w hich they then placed in broad, R atbottom ed
bow ls
and
set
aRre.
The
im p lem en ts, as w e ll as the bow ls, w e re fre
q u en tly p rize d fu n e ra ry offerings; nobles
w rap p ed b lo o d lettin g eq u ip m en t in th e ir
sacred B U N D L E S . Y axchilan w om en o ften w o re
headdresses lik e those o f w a rrio rs w hen
undergoing autosacriRce and it was not
uncom m on fo r m en to adopt the m u tila te d ,
shredded a ttire o f captives, as i f id e n tify in g
th e ir ow n b lo o d lettin g w ith th a t o f sacriRcial
victim s. C aptives them selves m ay have been
forced to p erfo rm autosacriRce; some bear
the necessary spines and p ap er in ancient

47

BUNDLE
Blood serpents
emanating from the
neck of a decapitated
ballplayer, El Aparicio,
Veracruz, Late Classic
period.

depictions. In o th er cases, victors fo rcib ly


d rew the blood o f captives, as shown in the
Bonam pak m urals, w h ere w arrio rs p u ll out
the Engernails o f th e ir prisoners.
M a y a bloodletters and o th er things associ
ated w ith blo o d lettin g often bear the trip le
"bow tie ," probably a rep resen tatio n o f kno t
ted paper. T h e m o tif turns up a t T u la (see
T O L L A N ) and T e n o c h titla n , w h ere it is fea tu re d
on the body o f the x iu H C O A T L , lin kin g it to
blood and sacriEce.
M ost C e n tra l M exican peoples used the
spines o f the MAGUEY p lan t to d ra w blood, and
to keep these spines sharp and a t hand they
stored them in a b a ll o f tw isted grass, much
as a seamstress keeps h er needles and pins
in a cushion. T h e grass b all w ith spines
becam e an im p o rtan t sym bol o f A ztec n o b il
ity , in d icatin g both th e ir p riv ile g e and th e ir
responsibility to le t blood. In A ztec represen
tations of b loodletting, lords and gods d raw
blood from the ear, shin, knee, and elbow .

Figure engaged in
bloodletting from his
penis, detail of Huastec
conch shell pendant,
Postclassic period.

5 e e a / s o HU M A N SACRIFICE.

bundle Sacred bundles w e re an im p o rtan t


p a rt o f M esoam erican history and ritu a l.
In contrast to MERCHANT bundles, w hich are
oblong and w rap p ed w ith rope and m attin g ,
sacred bundles are usually round w ith prom i
nent, large knots. C le a r exam ples occur in
the a rt o f the Classic M a y a as w e ll as o f the
Postclassic Aztecs and M ixtees.
Sacred bundles often play an im p o rtan t
role in the jo u rn e y and m igrations o f a people
to th e ir chosen place. In the POPOLVUH account
o f the legendary m igrations o f the Q uiche
M a y a , the Pizom G agal bundle represents
the deceased ancestor B alam Q u itze. In its
account o f the A ztec jo u rn e y from A ztlan ,
the Codex B o tu rin i care fu lly represents four
bundle-bearers. T h e most im p o rtan t o f these
bundles belonged to H U iTziLO P O C H TLi, the
patro n god o f the Aztecs. As la te as 1539, 18
years a fte r the fa ll o f T en o c h titla n , Spanish
oEScials accused an in d iv id u al nam ed D on
M ig u e l o f caring for A ztec god bundles,
including th a t o f H u itzilo p o ch tli.
A ccording to one 16th c. account from the
V a lle y o f M exico , the Erst god bundles w ere
fashioned from the rem ains o f gods sacriEced
a fte r the creation o f the SUN a t TEOTiHUACAN.
M asked d eity bundles resem bling fu n e ra ry
bundles occur in M a y a iconography as e arly
as the 4th c. AD. O n T ik a l Stela 4, the ru le r
C u r! Snout holds a m asked TLALOC bundle
ren dered in the fashion o f T eo tih u acan . A side

(Be/ow) Grass ball containing


maguey spine bloodletters, detail
from Codex Borbonicus, p. 18,
Late Postclassic Aztec.

(Be/ow) Sacred bundles: (left to right) bundle


with icatz glyph, Yaxchiln Lintel 1, Late Classic
Maya; smoking bundle, Codex Borgia, p. 35, Late
Postclassic; bundle with Hint blade of 9 Wind,
Codex Nuttall, p. 15, Late Postclassic Mixtee.

BUTTERFLY
from m asked god bundles, ro u n d , kno tted
bundles com m only a p p e ar in Classic M a y a

as th e trunks o f trees, presum ably to re p


resent the axis m o o d /, g en e rally considered

scenes. In a n u m b er o f instances, th e y a re

as th e CEIBA (C erh a spp ). W ith its thorny,

e p ig rap h ically la b ele d ic atz, m ean in g

sw ellin g tru n k , the ceiba does in d eed bear

bund

le " or "b u rd e n " in several h ig h lan d M a y a n

som e resem blance to th e rough back o f the

languages. .See a/so MORTUARY BUNDLES.

caim an. In N a h u a tl, th e term fo r caim an is


cipacfA, m eaning "sp in y o n e."

b u tte rfly A lthough re la tiv e ly ra re in an cien t


M a y a a rt, b u tte rflie s com m only ap p e ar in the

B oth

th e

M aya

and

C e n tra l M exicans

id e n tifie d th e caim an w ith aged c reato r gods.

iconography o f h ighland M ex ico , p a rtic u la rly

In C e n tra l M .exico, the aged TONACATECUHTLi,

a t the g re at cen ter o f TEonHUACAN, w h e re

or L o rd o f O u r Sustenance, presided o ver the

they o ften display w ings, antenn ae, fe a th e re d

Erst o f th e 20 day nam es, C ip a c tli, or C aim an ,

proboscises

as w e ll as the 13-day TRECENA o f 1 C ip a c tli

and

fe a th e r-rim m e d

eyes.

ad d itio n , they m ay be d epicted w ith


toothy m aw o f the

JAG UA R .

In
the

T h e b u tte rfly -

(see

CA LEN DA R).

A m ong the M a y a , this aged

creato r god w as know n as rrzA M N A, q u ite

ja g u a r also appears am ong the Classic p erio d

possibly th e p aram o u n t god o f the M a y a

Zapotees and M a y a , fre q u e n tly in contexts o f

p antheon. In a n u m b er o f instances, Itza m n a

Postclassic C e n tra l M exico ,

is p o rtray ed w ith in the body o f the caim an,

b u tterflies sym bolized both FIRE and the souls

p ro b ab ly Itz a m n a as Itz a m C a b A in , m eaning

o f dead w arrio rs. Seen in the fig h t o f the


m ilita ris tic b u tte rfly -ja g u a r and the w id e

Itz a m E a rth C aim an .

spread appearance o f b u tterflies on T e o tih u acan INCENSE burners, the Teo tih u acan b u tte r

calen d ar M eso am erican

fly can also be id e n tifie d w ith

o th er p erce iva b le phenom ena as w e ll as


su p ern atu ral and ritu a l cycles w hose fu n d a

w a r. In

L a te

FIR E

and w ar.

calendars

tracked

the solar y ea r, lu n a r y e a r, Venus cycle, and

m en tal bases re m ain unknow n. T h e c alen d ar


was essential to the arts o f p re d ictio n and

cacao W h e th e r consumed as an esteem ed


d rin k or exchanged as m oney, cacao (71heobronia cacao) was one o f the most im p o rtan t
p lan t products o f ancien t M esoam erica. T h e
seeds d erived from the pod o f the cacao tree
w ere w id e ly used as currency and John Llo yd
Stephens reported the use o f cacao currency
as la te as the m id -19th c. in Yucatan. W h en
ground in to pow der, the seeds w e re m ixed
w ith w a te r and flavoring agents to create a
fro th y beverage g reatly favored by the n ative
e lite . R ecent epigraphic research has estab
lished th a t the w ord cacao was fu lly present
among the Classic M a y a - in fact, m any o f
the fine Classic M a y a polychrom e vases are
g lyphically lab eled as cacao d rin kin g vessels.
caim an O ne o f the m ost ven erated carnivores
o f M esoam erica was the caim an (C arm an
crocodi/us). Because o f its aquatic h a b ita t,
g reat size, and spiny back, the caim an was a
com m on m etaphor fo r the m ountainous EARTH
Boating upon the SEA. E x p lic it portrayals o f
the caim an appear as e a rly as the F o rm ative
O lm ec, w h ere it is ren dered both in p o rtab le
a rt and m onum ental sculpture. In the a rt o f
L a te Preclassic Iza p a , caim ans are depicted

D iv iN A T iO N as w e ll as to the c eleb ratio n o f


religious festivals. T h e m ost sophisticated
calen d rical observations in a n c ie n t M exico
and G u a te m ala w e re m ade b y the Classic
M a y a , A D 3 0 0 -9 0 0 , b u t w ritte n evidence fo r
use o f a calen d ar goes back to th e 6 th c. B e .

J2#0-c%ay aAnanac
Com m on to a ll M eso am erica, th e 2 60-d ay
cycle, the oldest and m ost im p o rta n t calen d ar,
rem ains in use am ong a fe w groups o f h ig h
lan d M a y a in G u a te m ala and am ong some
O axacan peoples. (Som e h ig h lan d M a y a s till
keep a 365-d ay calendar as w e ll.) In this
calendar, a re p ea tin g cycle o f 20 d ay nam es
pairs w ith 13 day num bers, y ield in g a count
o f 260 days, a n um ber th a t bears no re latio n
e ith e r to astronom ical or to a g ric u ltu ra l phen
om ena. I t w as p robably devised by m idw ives
to calculate b irth d ates, w o rkin g fro m Erst
m issed m enstrual p erio d to BIRTH, approxim at
ing the 9-m o n th hum an gestation p eriod. In
m any parts o f M exico , hum ans and gods took
th e ir nam es fro m th e ir d ate o f b irth in this
calen d ar, and w e re reg ard ed as having com
p le te d one 260-d ay cycle a t b irth .
This calen d ar took a special nam e in every
n ativ e language, although m any o f the nam es
are now lost, and archaeologists have some-

CALENDAR

49
(Le/t) Butterdy warrior
with shield and
spearthrower, Xelha,
Quintana Roo, Early
Classic period. Although
found in the Maya area,
this mural painting is in
typical Teotihuacan style.

tim es in ven ted term s lik e the pseudo-Yuca tec


M a y a tzo/Ain to re fe r to the count o f 260
days. T h e Aztecs called it the fona^poAua///,
and the book in w hich it was recorded the
fonalam af/. N o o th er book in M esoam erica
was so im p o rtan t to the d iv in e r, fo r the 260day alm anac was the fun d am en tal guide to
the fu tu re , and every day and num ber oRered
clues for in te rp re ta tio n . G ifts and short
comings w e re bestow ed by one's d ate o f
b irth , and those bom on troublesom e days
w e re o ften renam ed on m ore auspicious ones.
Each one o f the 20 day nam es had a specidc
association w ith a supernatural patron, and
m any had associations w ith n atu ra l phen
om ena. T h e M a y a and A ztec associations are
as follow s:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Maya glyph to be read


cacao, from cacao vessel
excavated at Ro Azul,
Guatemala, Early Classic
period.
Caiman tree, detail of
Izapa Stela 25, Protoclassic
Maya. This tree probably
refers to the great ceiba,
which has a green spiny
trunk reminiscent of the

M a y a , Yucatec nam e

A ztec nam e

m eaning, association

Im ix (w a te rlily )
Ik (w in d )
A kb a l (darkness)
K an (m aize)
C hicchan (celestial snake)
C im i (d eath )
M a n ik (d e e r)
L a m a t (Venus)
M u lu c (jad e, w a te r)
O c (dog)
C huen (m onkey)
E b (e v il rain?)
B en (green m aize)
lx (jag u ar)

C ip a c tli (caim an)


E hecatl (w in d )
C a lli (house)
C u etzp allin (liza rd )
C o at (snake)
M iq u iz tli (death )
M a za tl (d eer)
T o ch tli (ra b b it)
A tl (w a te r)
Itz c u in tli (dog)
O zo m atli (m onkey)
M a lin a lli (grass)

surface o f the earth


w ind
night, darkness, ja g u ar
m aize, abundance
snake
death
deer
Venus, ra b b it
w a te r
dog
m onkey

A catl (reed )
O celotl (jag u ar)

ja g u ar
eagle

15
16

M e n (eag le)

C u a u h tli (eagle)

C ib (w ax)

C ozcacuauhtli
(king v u ltu re )

17

C aban (e a rth )

18
19
20

Edznab (d in t)
C auac (storm )

O llin (m ovem ent)


T e c p a tl (d in t)

e a rth , earth q uake


d in t

Q u ia h u itl (ra in )
X ch itl (d o w er)

ra in , storm
sun

A hau (lo rd )

50

CALENDAR
Tibe trecena
In the ton a/am at/, the p erio d o f 260 days was

n ew 3 65-d ay y ea r. A m ong some groups, the

d ivid ed in to TRECENAS (th e N a b u a t! w ord is no


!onger know n, and M esoam ericanists use th e

tic u la rly dangerous, and it was considered ill


fo rtu n e fo r a child to be b om at that tim e.

6ve nam eless days w e re thought to be par

Spanish te rm ), or periods o f 13 days, counted


1 -1 3 , w ith each new trecena beginning w ith

Tibe c ale n d a r ro u n d o r 5 2 -y e a r cyc/e

the num era! 1. T h e 6rst day o f the trecena

W hen

and its auguries reigned over the e n tire 13-

calen d ar w e re set in m otion w ith one ano th er,

day p erio d , as d id one o r tw o gods. A ccording

it took exactly 52 years o f 365 days, a to tal of

the 260 -d a y calen d ar and 365-day

to the C odex Borbonicus, fo r exam pie, those

18,980 days, fo r a given d ate to re p ea t. T h is

born in the trecena 1 A t! w ou!d be im p o ver

p erio d is called a calen d ar round, and any

ished, and the e n tire 13-day perio d begun on

hum an com pletin g a cale n d ar round w ould

th a t p a rtic u ia r day was in genera! a bad one.

have

been

old

in d eed .

The

Aztecs

re p

resented th e c ale n d ar round as the xiu b m o /71be so/ar y e a r


In conjunction w ith the 260-d ay alm anac a

pj7b, or " y e a r b u n d le ," and carved sculptures


o f 52 sticks bound to g eth er to sym bolize it.

365-d ay calen d ar was used. C orresponding

A m ong th e A ztecs, th e com pletion o f 52

roughly to the solar year b u t lacking the leap

years - and the b eg inning o f a n ew calen d ar

days necessary fo r long-term accuracy o f the

round - com m anded w idesp read p re p a ra tio n .

tru e tropica! year, this calen d ar was d ivid ed

T o in itia te a n ew cale n d ar round, the Aztecs

into

c eleb rated the ritu a l o f N e w F ire . T h e last


N e w F ire cerem ony w as cele b rated d u rin g

18 periods o f 20 days each, plus 5

"nam eless" and unlucky days at the end o f


the year. In C en tra! M exico, each 20-d ay
period was called a VEINTENA, lite ra lly a " u n it
o f tw e n ty " in Spanish. Each group o f 20 days
had its own "m o n th " nam e and was linked
w ith a num ber from 1 to 20 or 0 to 19,
depending on the region. Am ong the Classic
M a y a , each o f the m onths had a supernatural
p atron; the W a te r L ily Jaguar, for exam ple,
oversaw the first m onth, Pop.
Each A ztec year bore the nam e o f the 260day alm anac th a t occurred on the last day o f
the 18th m onth. This works out to be one o f
fou r possible day nam es (w ith its n um ber).
T h e M a y a and most other peoples nam ed
th e ir years for the first day o f the n ew year
in the 260-day alm anac. These days w ere
called YEARBEAREHS and historical dates from
the A ztec reign are g en erally know n by the
y earb earer nam e. T h e Spanish, fo r exam ple,
began th e ir m arch to the A ztec capita! in the
year 1 A catl (1 R eed). W ith o u t leap days,
the calendar slow ly w an d ered through the
seasons, req u irin g m ovable feasts or periodic
reconfiguration o f agricu ltu ral festivals.
Archaeologists call this year the "V ag u e
Y e a r," and, in the M a y a region, re fe r to it as
the baab.
Tibe veintena
Less im p o rtan t than the trecena
to the
Aztecs was the VEINTENA, the 20-day p erio d ,
or "m o n th ." T h e 18 A ztec veintenas w e re
succeeded by the nem ontem i, or nam eless
days, a fte r T ititl, before the beginning o f a

the m onth o f P a n q u e tza liztli, a fe w m onths


a fte r the n ew y ea r o f 2 A ca tl (2 R eed) had
begun in

AD

1507. bee a/so

EIRE.

T b e Long^ C o u n an/ TnitiaV .Servas


C h a rtin g longer periods o f tim e re q u ired a
d iffe re n t kind o f calen d ar. T o w a rd th e end
o f the L a te Preclassic, in a ll likelih o o d som e
w h ere along th e Isthm us o f T eh u a n te p ec ,
w h a t is know n as the Long C o u n t was in tro
duced, to be p erfe cted by the M a y a in Classic
tim es. Long C o u n t dates record th e to ta l
num ber o f days elapsed since a m ythological
zero d ate th a t can be co rrela ted to 2 A ugust
3114 Be in E uropean n o tatio n. L ik e a ll
M esoam erican counts, the Long C o u n t used
the vigesim al (i.e . based on th e n u m b er
2 0 ), ra th e r than decim al, system . T h e m ost
fu n d am en tal u n it was the day, or Am, to
fo llo w the Yucatec M a y a term in olo gy from
the tim e o f th e C onquest. Periods o f tim e
w e re counted by days, periods o f 20 days (th e
u in a l), years - som etim es called "co m p u tin g
years" by archaeologists - o f 360 days (th e
tun ), 2 0-ye ar periods o f 360 days each (th e
Aa tun ), and 400 -y ea r periods (th e baAtun).
E ven la rg er periods o f tim e w e re c a lib ra te d ,
and a t the tim e o f th e C onquest, w ords w ere
s till know n fo r 8000 tuns (th e p ic tu n ) and
160,000 tuns (th e caTabtun). Long C o u n t dates
w e re inscribed in place n o tatio n, beginning
w ith the largest u n it, usually the baAfun, and
m oving in o rd er to th e sm allest one, the Ain,
in a p a tte rn th a t has also com e to be called

A!1 Mesoamerica observed the ca/endar round or 52-year cyc/e, created by the intermeshing of the
260-day calendar (left) and the 365-day calendar (right). It is drawn here as a system of interlocking
cog wheels and follows standard Maya notation, although the days and months had different names
and symbols in each culture.
The 260-day calendar is composed of 20 day names (outer wheel) and 13 day numbers (inner
wheel), both of which rotate endlessly. It takes 260 days for all the combinations to occur.
The 365-day calendar comprises 18 months, each of which has only 20 days, numbered 0-19 or
1-20 depending on the region, and the 5 unlucky days. In this larger wheel, the end of the month of
Cumku and the 5 unlucky days are shown - other month glyphs are at the right.
Here, 13 Ahau (left) and 18 Cumku interlock. It will take 52 x 365 days (or 52 years) before the
cycles will all reach this point again.
(Below) Calendar wheel representing the 52 years of the yearbearer cycle, Manuscrit Tovar, 16th c.
Central Mexico.

52

CALENDAR
the

In itia l Series. T h is cale n d ar bore

no

re la tio n to the solar y e a r and w as usually


used in conjunction w ith dates in both the
3 65-d ay calen d ar and the 260 -d a y alm anac.
Long C o u n t or In itia l Series dates can be
easily recognized:

they usually begin M a y a

inscriptions and a re in d icated by la rg e in tro

called th e S u p p lem en tary Series, and in the


series o f lunations counted in the Postclassic
D resd en C odex. In th e S u p p lem en tary Series,
ages o f lu n atio n s on a given d ate a re g en e rally
reckoned from th e Rrst appearance o f the
n ew

MOON,

counted by th e ir position in the

six-m onth lu n a r h a lf-y e a r, and ta llie d for to ta l

ductory glyphs called " In itia l Series In tro d u c

days, e ith e r 2 9 or 30. E v e n tu a lly , the M a y a

ing G lyp h s."

T h e coefficients to th e glyphs

cam e to recognize th a t 149 lunations = 4,400

re fe rrin g to the periods o f tim e a re fre q u e n tly

days, or 2 9 .5 30 20 days p e r m onth in decim al

recorded in b a r-a n d -d o t n u m eratio n in w hich

term s, a n u m b er v e ry close to the 29.53059

Rve dots equal one bar.


T o hold open Riled places, this calen d ar

used by m o d ern astronom ers.

requires a n u ll cip h er, a p laceh old er s im ila r

In and o f its e lf, a lu n a r calen d ar m ay have


been o f in trin s ic in te re s t, b u t c a re fu l lu n a r

to our zero, although in the M a y a conception

calculations w e re also necessary in o rd er to

the place is fu ll, or com pleted, ra th e r than

produce

em p ty. T h e in te lle c tu a l develo pm en t o f the

b eliev ed to th re a te n disaster fo r M es o am e ri

idea o f zero took place only tw ice in h istory once in ancien t In d ia , am ong the H in d u s, and

been o f g re a t use. Solar eclipses take place

once in M esoam erica. T h e Postclassic M a y a


represented the sym bol for com pletion as a
SHELL,

probably because they used such shells

in w orking out th e ir a rith m etic. T h e Classic


M a y a used an abstract cruciform sym bol
som ew hat resem bling the E uropean M a lte s e
cross, possibly a schema d erived from an
outstretched hum an body, the 20 digits o f
Rngers and toes in dicating a fu ll vigesim al
place. T h e head v a ria n t o f the com pletion
sign is the head o f a death god.
T h e M a y a celebrated p eriod-ending dates,
th a t is, dates o f com pletion o f periods o f
tim e, fre q u e n tly Aafuns o r half-A a funs. T h e
com pletion o f 13 Aafuns in the ten th AaAiun
(th a t is, a fte r the com pletion o f the n in th and
w h ile the tenth was ongoing) was m uch
celebrated by the M a y a and w ould be tra n
scribed in A rab ic num bers as 9.13 .0 .0.0.
T h e tro p ica / y e a r
D esp ite the fact th a t M esoam erican calendars
included no mechanism s for tracking tru e
tropical years and the leap days they re q u ire ,
the p a tte rn o f anniversaries celeb rated a t
some M a y a cities and recorded in the Long
C ount indicates th a t those w ho counted the
solar years w e re w e ll aw are o f the problem .
A t Piedras N egras, tru e tro pical year a n n ive r
saries w e re calculated over periods o f a t least
200 years.
The A m ar ca/en d ar a n d Fo/ar ecApses
A lthough lu n a r calendars m ay w e ll have been
kep t across M esoam erica, the only recorded
ones survive in M a y a inscriptions, appended
to the In itia l Series as p a rt o f w h a t has been

E C LIP S E

w a rn in g dates. Eclipses w e re

can p eo p le, so th e ir p re d ictio n w o u ld have


only d u rin g th e d ark o f the m oon, and w ith in
18 days o f w h en the m oon's p ath crosses the
a p p a re n t p ath o f th e s u N . T h e lu n a r tables o f
the D resd en C odex c a lib ra te d such coinci
dences in o rd er to g en e rate eclipse w a rn in g
dates. L a te in th e 8 th c., a to ta l eclipse d id
occur d u rin g the d ry season in th e M a y a
low lands, and the phenom enon w as recorded
in the S u p p lem en tary Series o f a stela a t
Santa E len a Poco U in ic .

iRipp/emen/ary Series
T h e calen d rical d ata th a t fo llo w the In itia l
Series in M a y a inscriptions a re know n as
the S u p p lem en tary Series, or L u n a r Series,
because m ost o f the in fo rm a tio n c arried th e re
deals w ith the m oon. T h e glyphs have been
given a lp h ab et labels by m odern scholars and
ru n in reverse o rd er, s tartin g w ith th e le tte r
G and continuing on through A . G lyp h C
com prises the n in e various M a y a Lords o f
th e N ig h t (see b elo w ). G lyp h F refers to
G lyp h C and p ro b ab ly signiRes its seating.
G lyphs E and D record the age o f the c u rren t
m oon. G lyp h C records the n u m b er o f moons
com pleted in th e c u rre n t lu n a r h a lf-y e a r, and
so it usually bears a coefRcient. A fte r the
le tte rs had alrea d y been designated, scholars
noticed th a t a glyph fo llo w in g C v arie d
depending on the coefRcient o f G lyp h C , and
it w as lab eled X , w ith varian ts X 1 -X 6 . G lyp h
B features a ro d en t head; it links G lyphs X
and A in d icatin g only th a t X nam es A . G lyp h
A conRrms th a t the c u rre n t lu n a r m onth is o f
29 or 30 days. G lyphs Y and Z occasionally
app ear b etw e en G lyphs F and E ; th e ir m ean
ing is obscure.

53

CALENDAR

& /9-d ay count


T h e M a y a h eld the num bers 7, 9, and 13 to
be sacred. M u ltip lie d , they y ield 819, the
num ber o f days counted in a never-en din g
cycle th a t occasionally exists as a separate
clause inserted in the Supplem entary Series
follow ing an In itia l Series. (O n ly 13 exam ples
are know n.) N o beginning d ate is know n
for the cycle, b u t days are alw ays counted
backw ard from the In itia l Series in o rd er to
reach the last date on w hich the cycle was
com pleted. These 819-day references have
four d iffe re n t stations, each associated w ith
one o f the fou r card in al DIRECTIONS and its
associated COLOR.
Lords o f the N ig h t
M o st M esoam erican calendars included a
separate count o f the N in e Lords o f the N ig h t,
w ho ru le d over the n ig h ttim e hours. T h e
M a y a N in e Lords are know n as the " G "
series o f the Supplem entary Series. Some o f
the M a y a N in e Lords have been id e n tifie d
w ith specific gods: G 7, for exam ple, m ay w e ll
be the ja g u ar-p aw e d patron o f the m onth
Pax; G 9 is a PAUAHTUN. T h e M a y a Lords o f
the N ig h t ran continuously through the Long
C ount. Since the 360 days o f the M a y a tun
are p erfe ctly d ivisib le by nine, every period
ending d ate o f the Long C o un t o f a tun or
la rg e r included G 9.
T h e A ztec Lords o f the N ig h t w ere
inscribed in the d iv in ato ry ton a/am at/section
o f m any o f the C onquest-era m anuscripts
th a t survive - som etim es w ith notations in
E uropean script, w hich fa c ilita te th e ir id e n ti
fication. A lthough th e re was some variatio n
depending on tim e and region, m any o f the
N in e Lords w e re standard, and the cycle
g en erally ran: x iu H T E C U H T L i, Itz tli or T ec p atl,
P iltzin te c u h tli, CINTEO TL,
M IC TLA N TE C U H TH ,
C H A LC H IU H TLIC U E ,
TLAZOLTEOTL,
T e p e yo llo tl,
and TLALO C. Each one o f these nine gods
p ro b ab ly h eld an association w ith one o f the
nine levels o f the UNDERWORLD. U n lik e the
M a y a series, the A ztec series d id not alw ays
run continuously and som etim es began anew

A Long Count date from Burial 48 at the Maya


site of Tikal, Guatemala. The date given reading from top to bottom - is 9.1.1.10.10 4 Oc,
or 9 baktuns, 1 katun, 1 tun, 10 uinals and 10
kins, with the day name 4 Oc at the bottom. In
modern terms this is 19 March AD 457.

w ith each trecena.

Ards o/ the Day


Associated w ith the 13 levels o f the heavens,
13 birds served as patrons o f the daytim e
* hours. T h e y re p ea t in o rd er, fo llo w in g the
day num bers o f the trecena, or 13-day "w e e k "
o f the Aztecs. Jonathan K en d all has recently
revised A lfonso Caso's identifications.

Glyph G of the Supplementary Series, referring


to the nine Lords o f the MgAt, Late Classic
Maya.

54

CAMAXTLI
A !though o fte n re fe rre d to as B irds o f the

w h a t the A ztecs considered a "g re a t c ycle,"

D a y , these creatures a re m ore a p p ro p ria te ly

the Venus, 260 -d a y, and 3 65-d ay cycles a ll

called

BUTTERFLY. M o s t are creatures o f th e d a y tim e ,

lin e d up. Such n u m erical coincidences of


in te rlo c k in g cycles app ealed to M eso am eri-

b u t a t least tw o OWLS occur in th e series. T h e y

can calen d ar keepers and fa c ilita te d calcu

can be id e n tife d as the fo llo w in g , in English

lations.
In both M ex ica n and M a y a records, Venus

vo latiles,

since one is specifically a

and N a h u a tl, w ith possible zoological id e n ti-

w as recorded to ap p e ar fo r 236 days as the

Acations:
1. H u m m in g b ird , p ro b ab ly x iu h u itzilin

m orning star, then to disappear fo r 90 days

2. H u m m in g b ird , p ro b ab ly q u e tza lh u itzilin ,

d u rin g S uperior C o nju nctio n , re ap p ea r as the

C a /y p fe costae
3. D o ve, cocotli, 5carc/aie//a inca
4. Q u a il, tecuzolin, C yrto n yx m o n iezu m ae

in to In fe rio r C o nju nctio n fo r 8 days befo re

5. R aven or Black

im possible to reconstruct, these calculations

H a w k -e a g le , possibly

observed by the naked eye: roughly equal

7. B u tte rfly , p ap alo tl


8. E agle, cu au h tli, A q u /ia cArysaetos
9. T u rk e y , toto lin , M e/ea^ g risg a//o p avo
G re a t H o rn ed O w l, tecolotl, B ubo vngn?-

ianns
11. Scarlet
macao
12. Q u e tza l,

re ap p ea rin g as the m o rn in g star. F o r reasons


ignore the p a tte rn o f Venus th a t can be

itz tlh o tli


6. O w l, ch icu atli, 7 y fo aiba

10

evening star fo r 250 days, then b rie fly vanish

periods o f 263 days fo r both m orning and


evening star, d iv id ed by disappearances o f
50 and 8 days.
Because o f the extrem e m alevo lence associ
ated w ith Venus, its d ra m a tic m ovem ents

M ac aw ,

A ra

o ften assured b a le fu l events, p a rtic u la rly w a r


fare . In the Venus c ale n d ar, special a tte n tio n

Pbarom acbrus

was given to the risings o f the m orning and


evening star im m e d ia te ly fo llo w in g conjunc

chiconcuetzali,

q u etzalto to tl,

m ocinno
13. P arro t, toznene, A m azona orairr
Lords o f tbe D a y
T h irte e n Lords o f the D ay accom panied each
day o f the trecena, rep eatin g anew and in
o rder for each trecena. A ccording to m ost
A ztec sources, these gods ran as follow s:
1. X iu h te cu h tli
2. T la lte c u h tli
3. C h alchiuhtlicue
4. T o n atiu h
5. T la zo lte o tl
6. M ic tla n te c u h tli
7. C in te o tl
8. T lalo c
9. Q uetzalcoatl
10. Tezcatlipoca
11. C halm ecatecuhtli, a god o f sacrifice
12. T lah u izcalp an tecu h tli
13. C itlalin cu e , goddess o f the heavens
Penns cycie
Throughout M esoam erica, VENUS was the
m ost keenly observed p lan et, and its cycle o f
$84 days was c arefu lly charted and inscribed
alongside
other
calendrical
reckonings.
A lthough the synodic period o f the p la n et
varies from 580 to 587 days, any Eve cycles
average out to 584 days fo r a to ta l o f 2920
days, also the m u ltip le o f 8 x 365. W h en
considered in term s o f tw o 5 2-ye ar cycles, or

tion, as w e ll as to points o f m axim um b rig h t


ness, m axim um elongation, and to station ary
points.
C am a xtli

s e e M ix c o A T L

cannibalism In re ce n t years, the subject o f


M esoam erican cannibalism has been h o tly
d ebated. Some scholars have suggested th a t
cannibalism d id not occur; others have argued
th a t hum an Aesh form ed an essential com pon
e n t o f the A ztec d ie t. I t is u n lik e ly th a t e ith e r
assertion is tru e . R eports o f cannibalism a re
not sim ply a product o f E u ro p ean bias or
propaganda fo r th e re is a b u n d an t evidence
o f cannibalism in e arly C o lo n ial n a tiv e docu
m ents. H o w e v e r, the e atin g o f hum an Aesh
was n e ith e r com m on n o r casual; it was a
religious act im bued w ith sacred signiAcance.
P robably o f considerable a n tiq u ity in
M eso am erica, cannibalism is suggested by
fra c tu re d hum an bone in E a rly F o rm a tiv e
household refuse deposits a t th e O lm ec site
o f San L orenzo. H o w e v e r, the best docum ent
atio n o f cannibalism p ertain s to the L a te
Postclassic p erio d . A m ong the Tarascans o f
M ich o acn , the bodies o f hum an victim s w e re
d ivid ed am ong the c h ie f PRIESTS, w ho, a fte r
offerin g th e Aesh to the gods, w ould consume
the rem ains. A ccording to D ie g o de Landa
and o th er C o lo n ial sources, th e Yucatec M a y a

55

CAPTIVES

also considered the Hesh o f HUMAN SACRIFICE


to be sacred food. T h e hoiy q u a lity o f hum an
Hesh is most fu lly docum ented fo r th e Aztecs.
They com m only offered - as food fo r the
gods - hum an HEARTS, Hesh, and BLOOD. Thus,
believing the Spanish to be gods, the Aztecs
in itia lly presented them w ith food soaked in
hum an blood. B u t although hum an Hesh was
used to sustain the gods, it also served as a
vehicle for consum ing d iv in ity , th at is, as a
form o f com m union. Thus DEITY IMPERSONATION
was a freq u e n t com ponent o f A ztec sacriHcia!
rites. W h en the victim em bodied the d eity ,
then one partook o f the d ivin e being through
the consum ption o f hum an Hesh.
canoe T h e dugout canoe was the most com
mon form o f boat in ancient M esoam erica
and was used by long-distance seafarers as
w e ll as by m ore conventional travelers on
lakes and rivers. N e ith e r sails nor oarlocks
w e re know n in the Precolum bian w o rld;
skilled paddlers p ro p elled the c ra ft. C h ris
topher C olum bus, on his fo u rth and Hnal
voyage in 1502, encountered a huge M a y a
canoe o ff the coast o f H onduras, "as long as
a g alley and eig h t fe e t w id e ," m anned by at
least tw o dozen crew , a cap tain , and assorted
w om en and ch ild ren , and w ith some sort o f
cabin am idships. A trad in g vessel, this canoe
carried cotton m antles, w eapons, m etalw o rk,
p o ttery, and CACAO. M esoam erican canoes are
usually show n, h o w ever, as m uch sm aller
c ra ft, w ith gunw hales near the w a te r. In a rt
and WRITING, M a y a canoes som etim es bear
the glyph for w ood, to indicate w h a t m a te ria l
they w e re m ade of.
In M a y a iconography, canoes carry the
dead through the precarious passage from
the w o rld o f the livin g to the w o rld o f the
dead. L ik e th e ir hum an counterparts, gods
also tra v e l by canoe. T h e CHACS (ra in gods)
Bsh from canoes, and the PADDLER CODS escort
characters in to the UNDERWORLD. In the M ixte e
codices, M ix te e kings fre q u e n tly jo u rn ey
by canoe.
G iven
the
broad, slow -

Cannibalism: the cooking and consumption of


human Hesh, Florentine Codex, Book 4, 16th c.
Central Mexico.

A rain god (Chac) paddling a canoe


containing the headdress and merchant
bundle of God L, Dresden Codex,
p. 43, Postclassic Maya.

m oving w aterw ays th a t cut across the O lm ec


region o f the G u lf Coast, canoes w ere prob
ably o f g re at signiHcance to th a t e a rly c iv iliz
atio n , and a num ber o f m in iatu re canoes
carved o f translucent b lu e-g reen JADE have
been recovered from O lm ec Ends.
captives In M esoam erican com bat, w arrio rs
sought not to k ill opponents b u t to take
captives a liv e on the Held fo r subsequent

Bas-relief of a
captive
("Danzante") at
Monte Albn,
Oaxaca, Middle
Formative
period.

56

CARDINAL POINTS
SACRIFICE or slavery. A ltho u g h m any captives
w e re slain shortly a fte r c ap tu re, others m ay

the c iv il and religious responsibilities o f the


com m unity. Q u ite o fte n , the in d iv id u a l pro*

have been kep t fo r years. A cap tive king - o f

vides both econom ic support and com m unity

w hich th e re w e re m any am ong the M a y a -

service in th e form o f w o rk tasks and ritu a l

w ould have m ade an id e al hostage and could

observances, in positions o f ro tatin g a u th o rity

have ensured larg e trib u te paym ents. A m ong

fre q u e n tly h eld one y e a r at a tim e.

the A ztecs, and perhaps am ong th e ir p re d e

A ltho u g h th e n a tiv e and Spanish origins of

cessors, captives w e re som etim es engaged to

m odern M eso am erican cargo systems a re still

p!ay g la d ia to ria l gam es, in w hich th e y p layed

a source o f som e d e b a te , th e concept o f pu b lic

w ith handicaps in o rd er to be d efe ated (see

ofhee as a b u rd en or "ca rg o " is o f g re at


a n tiq u ity in M eso am erica. A m ong the T aras -

T E M A L A C A T L ).

P rio r to

A C C E S S IO N ,

kings needed to take

cans o f M ich o a c n , one typ e o f n a tiv e p riest,

captives to dem onstrate th e ir prowess in

the C u ritie c h a , w as said to c a rry the burden

b a ttle , and some captives w ould be slain a t

o f the p eo p le upon his back. In the ritu a l

the in au gu ratio n its e lf. A ccording to D u ra n ,

address a t the

captives w ere offered and slain at e very m ajo r

A uey

festival o f the ag ricu ltu ra l cycle.


T h e O lm ecs m ade the e arlies t depictions

described as a b u rd en to be passed from one

o f captives and they a re shown bound by


ropes on the sides o f altars or thrones a t

b u rd en m ay be also seen in both O lm ec and


M a y a representations o f a tla n te a n figures

T L A T O A N i,

A CC ESSIO N

o f the A ztec king, or

th e office o f ru lersh ip was

king to ano th er. T h is id ea o f ru le rsh ip as a

L a V en ta. A t M o n te A lb n , Zapotee lords

supporting thrones. A m ong the L a te Post

proclaim ed th e ir victories in the first m ille n


nium BC w ith a series o f carved slabs w hich
are m isnam ed ' D a n za n te s /* or "dancers'*

classic Yucatec M a y a the concept o f p u b lic

(see DANCE), but w hich actu ally d ep ict h u m ili


ated captives, some w ith th e ir g e n ita lia cut
aw ay.
C aptives appear trodden under the fe e t on
some o f the earliest M a y a m onum ents, a
trad itio n th a t continued d u rin g the L a te
Classic, w hen they a re also freq u e n tly re p
resented on both treads and risers o f stairs,
w h ere th e ir depictions w ould be rep eated ly
stepped on. M a y a captives usually display
signs o f h u m iliatio n ; they are often naked,
som etim es w ith exposed and exaggerated
g en ita lia , and they b ear nam e glyphs on th e ir
bodies. C aptives, as w e ll as lords p erfo rm ing
A U T O S A C R IF IC E , donned strips o f PAPER or shred
ded and punched cloth. As recorded in a rt,
they m ake gestures o f abject obeisance,
touching broken parasols to the earth , placing
hands on the forehead or in the m outh, or
crossing one arm across th e body to the
opposite shoulder.
A m ong the Aztecs and M ixtees, captives in
p rep aratio n for sacrifice b ear paper banners;
others w e ar tufts o f dow n on th e ir heads.
T h e Aztecs p ainted other captives in the red
candy-cane striping o f the god M ix c o A T L .
card in al points

F e e D IR E C T IO N S

cargo In m any regions o f contem porary


M esoam erica, a ritu a l system know n as the
cargo defines the m eans o f p artic ip a tin g in

office as a b u rd en w as d e fin ite ly present.


H e re it was know n as cucA, th e Yucatec
M a y a n w ord fo r b u rd en . In L a te Postclassic
Y ucatn, w e a lth y com m oners, ra th e r than
nobles, served in the office o f aA cucA caA, o r
" b e a re r o f the c o m m u n ity ." A ccording to one
16th c. Spanish source, the aA cucA caA
oversaw the p aym en t o f trib u te and organized
his tow n w a rd fo r w a r and p u b lic cerem onies.
C auac M o n s te r

F e e M O U N T A IN S

caves In tra d itio n a l M eso am erica, caves a re


g en e rally regarded w ith a c e rtain degree o f
am bivalence. Sources o f fe rtility and riches,
they also open in to th e U N D E R W O R L D and the
d ark, unw holesom e w o rld o f the dead. In
L a te Postclassic C e n tra l M e x ic a n a rt, openm outhed SERPENTS rep resen ted caves, as if
the convoluted passageways constituted the
entrails o f the snake.
C ave w orship extends back to a t least
O lm ec tim es. O lm ec thrones com m only d ep ict
in d ivid u als em erging out o f c ircu lar niches
th a t p ro b ab ly rep resen t caves. A t O x to titla n ,
Juxtlahuaca, and o th e r caves o f h ighland
G u e rrero , paintings in p u re O lm ec style adorn
entrances and w alls deep w ith in , strongly
suggesting th a t these isolated caves w ere
im p o rta n t PILGRIMAGE sites. T h e q u a tre fo il
fre q u e n tly sym bolized the cave in O lm ec a rt.
Rock carvings a t C halcatzingo d ep ict the
q u a tre fo il in p ro file and ezi face as a m onstrous
face sprouting M A IZ E foliage.

57

CELESTIAL BIRD

T h e ritu a l use o f caves was com m on d u rin g


the Classic p eriod. Excavations in 1971
revealed th a t a q u a tre fo il cave lies d ire ctly
underneath the massive P yram id o f the Sun
at TEOTiHUACAN. M u c h lik e the la te r C H i c o M O Z Toc o f L a te Postclassic C e n tra l M exico , this
cave m ay have represented a place o f em erg
ence. C ave sites are w idespread in the karstic
terra in o f the M a y a low lands. T h e cave o f
N a j T u n ich , G u atem ala, contains L a te Classic
paintings and h ieroglyphic texts o f excep
tio n al reB nem ent and beauty.
ceiba Sacred to the M a y a , the ceiba tree was
freq u e n tly recognized as a liv in g axis m undi
th a t p en e trated the navel o f the EARTH, reach
ing from the UNDERWORLD to the heavens. T h e
M a y a called th e ceiba yaxcA, m eaning Erst
or green tree . I t is lik e ly th a t one w ould
have been found a t the cen ter o f m ost p re C onquest cities or villages, b u t ceibas m ay
also have been found a t the outskirts, one to
m ark each o f the fou r card in al DIRECTIONS.
Young ceiba trees are spiny, and some
spiked M a y a braziers m ay have been form ed
in th e ir im age. T h e fu lly grow n ceiba shoots
up ta ll and straig h t, w ith fe w or no branches
u n til the le v e l o f ra in forest canopy. T h e re ,
the m ajor branches m ay be lim ite d to four,
and thus the ceiba m ay also have served as
the m odel fo r the cross m o tif in Classic M a y a
a rt. T h e fo u r-p eta led Row er o f the ceiba m ay
play a role in M a y a iconography.
A t the tim e o f the Conquest, the Yucatec
M a y a believed th a t the ceiba tree shaded
the d iv in e paradise, offering refuge to those
fo rtu n ate enough to ascend th ere. A ccording
to some accounts, the ceiba was also the Rrst
tree o f the w o rld. A t Iza p a , in a depiction o f
w h a t is p ro b ab ly a creation story, the ceiba
arises fro m a CA IM A N .
As a m em ber o f the bom bax (Bom bacacae)
fa m ily , ceiba tre e pods hold kapok, or silkcotton, a Rber w ith lo w specific g ra vity and
com plete w a te r resistance th a t is now com

A captive incised on bone from Burial 116,


Temple 1, Tikal, Late Classic Maya. According
to the text, this individual was a captive from the
site of Calakmul.

m only used to 611 life jackets.


celestial b ird C elestial birds are associated
w ith the card in al points in M esoam erican
re lig io n . O n the 6rst page o f the Codex
F je rv ry -M a y e r, celestial birds perch atop
each o f the fo u r trees associated w ith the
tfo u r DIRECTIONS. T h e Aztecs also assigned 13
"v o la tile s ," o f w hich 12 a re birds and 1 is a
BUTTERFLY,

to the 13 num bers o f th e calen d rical

TRECENA; because th e re a re 13, they m ay bear

An Olmec representation of a cave, Middle


Formative period. Probably from Chalcatzingo,
Morelos, this relief possesses a quatrefoil mouth
that may have served as an entrance to an actual
cave in its original context.

association w ith th e 13 levels o f the heavens,

C o n te m p o rary

M esoam erican

peoples

reg ard P rehispanic celts discovered in fields

giving them some celestial significance.


A m ong the M a y a , v u c u B C A Q u i x o f th e P O P O L

as spent

vuH is a celestial b ird , fo r he rose as a false

such a b e lie f was also p resent am ong the

sun p rio r to the d aw n in g o f the e ra in w h ich

an c ie n t O lm ecs.

L i C H T N iN C .

I t is unknow n w h e th e r

hum ans po p ulated the e a rth . T h e H e ro T w in s


shoot o u t his ja w w ith th e ir blow guns, causing

cenote K n ow n by a w o rd corru pted fro m the

his dem ise. T h is Vucub C aq u ix o f the Q uiche

Y ucatec M a y a n c&onof, cenotes, or n atu ra l

M a y a is the sam e celestial b ird id e n tifie d as

sinkholes, a re th e p rin c ip a l sources o f w a te r

the PRINCIPAL BIRD DEITY in Classic and L a te

in the n o rth e rn low lands o f Y ucatn, w h ere

Preclassic a rt. A t P iedras N egras, the P rin c i

th e re a re n e ith e r rivers

p al B ird D e ity presides over the niche scenes

cenotes served p rim a rily as sources o f fresh

nor lakes. M a n y

o f royal inaugurations; a t P alen qu e, it sits

w a te r, b u t others, m ost n o ta b ly the Sacred

atop cruciform im ages. T h e P rin cip a l B ird

C en o te a t C h ich en

D e ity som etim es w ears costum e elem ents o f

destinations and places fo r offerings. Some

rrz A M N A ,

and m ay the re fo re be an aspect o f

th a t god.

Itz , w e re

cenotes occur d eep w ith in

PILGRIMAGE

CAVES,

such as

B alankanche, w h e re John L lo y d Stephens


and F re d e ric k C ath erw o o d v is ite d and docu

celt A celt is a ground stone axe head. D u rin g

m ented an a ctive p ra ctice o f w orship in the

the E a rly and M id d le F o rm a tiv e eras, w hen

1840s. M a n y cenotes th a t served as foci o f

stone celts played an im p o rtan t role in O lm ec


ritu a l and b e lie f, ground and polished celts
o f fine ja d e ite w ere freq u e n tly placed in
caches. In m any instances, these ja d e ite celts
are incised w ith fine designs, and associated
iconography suggests th a t they m ay have
sym bolized ears o f M AIZE. A lthough this m ay
be p a rtly due to th e ir form and verd a n t color,
the association o f celts w ith a g ricu ltu re and
m aize m ay also d erive from th e ir use as axe
blades. D u rin g the F o rm ative p eriod, the
im portance o f m aize and farm in g g rew
explosively, and farm ers depended upon
ground stone axes for clearing forests for
plan tin g . A sim ilar situation p revailed in
N eo lith ic Europe, w h ere - du rin g the in itia l
period o f farm in g and forest clearing - ground
stone celts took on a significance fa r beyond
th a t o f sim ple tools. T h e m any celt represen
tations in N eo lith ic a rt together w ith actual
exam ples in precious stone reveal th a t they
also w e re h eld in g reat reverence.
T h e Olm ecs deposited and b u ried vast
pavem ents o f celts a t L a V e n ta , p a rt o f a ritu a l
whose m eaning has never been d eterm in ed .
Im ages o f O lm ec deities, such as the WERE
JAGUAR o f the K unz A xe, w e re som etim es
form ed as celts them selves, and th e K unz
Axe d e ity clasps a celt in his hands.
T h e L a te Preclassic and Classic Zapotees
and M a y a also m ade and used celts. B oth
M a y a and Zapotee nobles w ore h ead-andc elt assemblages, typ ically w ith th ree thin
celts dangling from a large head ornam ent,
and exam ples have been found in M a y a and
Zapotee tombs.

w orship w e re d ed icated to th e

CHACS,

the

M a y a R A IN gods.
T h e Sacred C en o te a t C h ich en Itz m ay
have been th e single m ost im p o rta n t d esti
nation fo r p ilg rim s in p re -C o n q u e st Y ucatn.
As C lem en cy Coggins has suggested, the
g re at round surface o f W A T E R m ay have been
p erceived as a g ia n t M IR R O R fo r D iv iN A T iO N and
auguring. F o r generations, offerings w e re
h u rled in to the w a te r, in clu d in g JADES, gold
disks and hum ans. T h e re is no evidence th a t
virgins in p a rtic u la r w e re selected as cenote
offerings, b u t m uch o f the ske letal m a te ria l
recovered a t the C h ich en cenote was o f
p re-pubescent boys and girls. A ccording to
ethnohistorical accounts, some cenote victim s
a p p a re n tly flo ated up fro m the w e ll a liv e ,
w ith auguries g arnered u n d er w a te r.
In 1536, d u rin g a p erio d in w h ich the
Spanish w ith d re w from Y u catn , th e ru le r o f
the X iu fa m ily , A h D zu n X iu , sought to
appease th e M a y a gods by m aking a p ilg rim
age to th e Sacred C en o te a t C hichen Itz .
H e and his entourage w e re g u aran teed safe
passage through Cocom te rrito ry , w h e re they
w o u ld need to pass en ro u te to C hichen.
R em em bering old grievances, h o w ever, the
Cocoms set upon th e ir visitors a t a celeb rato ry
ban q u et, slaughtering them a ll. N o offerings
w e re m ade to the cenote, c iv il w a r ensued,
and the Spanish re tu rn e d in 1540 to com plete
th e ir conquest o f Y ucatn.
cerem onial b a r C erem o n ial bars a re staffs
h eld by M a y a ru lers, g en erally across the
body in both arm s. T h e y w e re fre q u e n tly

59

CHAC

used on the occasions o f period en d in gs (s e e


CALENDAR). In its m ost con ven tion al form , a
cerem onial bar en d s in tw o op en SERPENT
m ouths, from w h ich e m erg e d eities, including
God K (se e scHELLHAS coDs), CHAC, th e Jaguar
God o f the U nderw orld (seejACUARCODs), and
God N, am ong others. T h e body o f th e bar
may b e com posed o f crossed ban ds, the M A T
m otif, a SKY BAND, BLOODLETTING knots, or other
motifs. T h e bar m ay w ell sym b olize th e SKY
itself, as if to sh ow that the ruler holds
the sky in his arms. T h e cerem on ial bar
sym bolizes the role th e M aya ruler plays in
supporting th e cosm os and nurturing the gods.
Found on the earliest d ated M a y a stela
w ith archaeological context - T ik a l Stela 29
w ith a date o f AD 292 - the cerem onial b ar
persists as an em blem o f ru lersh ip and d ivin e
sanction u n til the end o f Classic tim es. A
b lack-p ain ted M a y a lord in a b ird costum e
bears one in the T e rm in a l Classic paintings
a t C acaxtla, T laxcala. T h e cerem onial bar
m ay have evolved from O lm ec prototypes.
E a rly M a y a depictions o f the cerem onial bar
are sinew y and snake-like, perhaps because
o f the hom ophony b etw een sky and snake in
M a y a n languages, w h ile la te r cerem onial
bars are depicted as rig id objects.

The Kunz Axe, a


personified jadeite
celt, Middle
Formative Olmec,
originally owned by
the famed
gemologist Frederick
Kunz. Weighing
over 15 lb (7 kg), it
is among the largest
carved jades known
for Mesoamerica.

C hac T h e M a y a god o f RAIN and LIG H TN IN G ,


C hac is one o f the longest continuously w o r
shipped gods o f ancient M esoam erica. F irs t
know n from the Protoclassic M a y a sites,
C hac continues to be w orshipped among
M a y a peoples to this day. Iza p a Stela 1
depicts C hac fishing w ith a n et and carrying
a creel upon his back; sim ilar scenes o f him
fishing are know n from the la te r Classic
period. D u rin g the Classic period, he m ay be
recognized by his catsh-like w hiskers, b lu n t
re p tilia n snout, and body scales. In a dd itio n ,
he fre q u e n tly has a p ro m in en t bound shank
o f h a ir and a spondylus shell earpiece. T h e
Postclassic form o f C hac in M a y a codices
g en erally appears m ore hum an than his
Classic antecedent. W h ile this la te r Chac,
designated God B by Paul Schellhas, lacks
the serpentine body scales, his most striking
tra it is a long, pendulous nose w hich, although
grotesque, appears m ore hum an than rep
tilia n .
In Classic and Postclassic M a y a scenes,
*C h a c often w ields his lig h tn in g w eapons,
som etim es a h afted stone axe or a SERPENT, a
w idespread
m etaphor fo r lig h tn in g
in
M esoam erica and the A m erican Southw est.

Protoclassic representations of Chac: a, Izapa


Stela 1; b, Kaminaljuy Stela 4; c, El Bal Stela
1; cf, carved stone vase; e, incised limestone
disk; stucco sculpture, Uaxactn.

CHACMOOL
Flam es o r torches o fte n a llu d e to th e Sery

im p o rta n t a ttrib u te is th e p a ir o f one o r tw o

n atu re o f C h ac s lig h tn in g .
Because C hac presides o ver WATER and ra in

short H a c k lines ru n n in g v e rtic a lly dow n h er


lo w e r cheeks.

be

aVso

W A TER.

as w e ll as lig h tn in g , h e com m only appears


in stream s o f fa llin g w a te r o r w a te r-H lle d

C hicom ecoatl In h ig h lan d M e x ic o , both gods

CENOTES, and serves as a p atro n o f a g ric u ltu re .

and hum ans com m only took nam es d erived

C o lo n ial and contem porary M a y a m ythology

fro m the 2 60 -d a y CALENDAR. T h e nam e C h ic

credits C hac w ith b reakin g open a g re a t

o m ecoatl, or 7 S erp en t, is an exam ple o f such

rock containing th e o rig in a l life -g iv in g

M A IZ E .

a c ale n d rica l nam e. C hicom ecoatl is an A ztec

Scenes in m onum ental a rt and p o tte ry re ve al

goddess o f food and produce, especially

th a t this m yth w as present am ong th e Classic

In A zte c a rt, she appears w ith a ttrib u te s o f

M a y a over 1000 years ago. 5 ee a/so cocijo;

C H A L C H IU H T L IC U E ,

M A IZ E .

in c lu d in g th e short, v e rtic a l

fa c ia l lines and headdress. H o w e v e r, she can

S C H E L LH A S C O D S ; TLAJLOC.

u su ally be distinguished b y ears o f m aize


chacm ool A

term

coined

by

th e

19th

c.

c arried e ith e r in h e r hands or on h e r back.

explorer Augustus L e Plongeon, cAacmooV


lite ra lly m eans red or g re at ja g u a r p a w in
Yucatec M a y a n , b u t L e Plongeon used the

C hicom oztoc L ite ra lly

" th e

seven caves,"

this w as a legendary m ountain p erfo rated by

th ree-d im en sio nal,

a single cave or by seven caves, and was

reclining figures found atop the T E M P L E S a t


C hichen Itz . C h ara cteristic ally, the head o f

considered a sacred p lace by the A ztecs


and m ost o th e r N ah u a tl-s p e ak in g people o f

a cAacm oo/ is turned 90 degrees fro m the


fro n t o f the body, and the figure supports

C e n tra ! M ex ico a t th e tim e o f th e C onquest.

h im self on his elbow s. T h e bowls or disks


held on the chests o f cAacmoo/s w e re recep
tacles fo r offerings; in one A ztec exam ple,
the vessel held by the reclin in g figure is
specifically a C U A U H X IC A L U , or receptacle fo r
the HEARTS o f sacrificial victim s. CAacmoo/s
m ay sym bolize fa lle n w arriors w ho d e liv e r

o f o rig in fro m w h ich m an kin d em erg ed ; the

w ord

to

describe

the

offerings to the gods.


K now n from T e rm in a l Classic tim es on
through the Spanish Conquest, cAaemooTs
have been found across M esoam erica, fro m
E l Salvador to M ichoacn, although m ost o f
the know n exam ples come from C hichen Itz
or T u la . M a n y w e re set in association w ith
TH R O N E S or sacrificial stones.
C halchiuhtlicue or She o f the Jade S kirt is
the C e n tra l M exican goddess o f lakes and
stream s. Patron o f the day Serpent, she also
presides over the TRECENA o f 1 Reed. In the
N a h u a tl m yth o f the F IV E SUNS, she is the
reg en t o f N ah u i A tl, or 4 W a te r, the previous
w o rld destroyed by Hooding. T h e w a te ry
n atu re o f the hum an w om b thus ensures th a t
C h alchiuhtlicue plays an im p o rtan t p a rt in
C e n tra l M exican b irth cerem onies, p artic u
la rly B A P T IS M . In codical representations o f
C h alch iu h tlicu e, a p a ir o f m ale and fem ale
infants m ay be seen in a stream issuing
from the goddess. Q u ite clearly, these scenes
illu s tra te C h alch iu h tlicu e as a goddess o f
B IR T H . In the codices, C h alch iu h tlicu e usually
w ears a JADE ornam ented skirt. A n especially

F o r m any groups, C hicom oztoc w as th e place


Aztecs b eliev ed th a t th e y had sojourned th e re
some tim e a fte r th e ir in itia l d e p a rtu re fro m
the leg en d ary A2TLA N. In th e m id -1 5 th c.,
M otecu h zo m a I sent 60 w ise m en to seek out
C hicom oztoc, to le a rn m ore a bo u t M o te cuhzom a's ancestors, and to Hnd o u t if the
m o ther o f H u iT z iL O P O C H T L i w as s till a liv e .
A t the tim e o f th e C onquest, m ost M a y a
peoples o f h ig h lan d G u a te m a la also recog
nized a u th o rity issued by a p lace th a t the
Q uich called T u la n Z u yu a , or "seven caves."
In the P O P O L v u H the trib a l lineag e heads
jo u rn e y to T u la n Z u yu a to receive th e ir gods;
T O H i L , fo r exam ple, w as loaded in to the pack
o f B alam Q u itze to be carried back hom e.
In 1971, d u rin g excavations to in s ta ll sound
and lig h tin g eq u ip m en t a t T E O T iH U A C A N , a C A V E
was found u n d er th e P y ra m id o f the Sun.
T h e cave featu res several sm all cham bers,
alm ost in a c lo v e r-le a f a rran g em en t, sim ilar
to the ra d ia tin g caves d ep icted in the p ictu re
o f Chicom oztoc in th e H is to ria To/feca-C A icA im eca, and w as used as a re tre a t fo r ritu a l.
Caves have been found a t o th e r an cien t sites,
and a num ber m ay have been reg ard ed a t
one tim e as a Chicom oztoc.
chocolate

s e e CACAO

C ihuacoat! L ite ra lly "w om an-snake," C ih u acoatl is one o f a num ber o f re la te d m other and
E A R T H goddesses w orshipped in Postclassic

61

CIHUATETEO

C entra! M exico. C ih u aco ati overlaps w ith


Teteoinnan, T o c i, TLAZOLTEOTL, and perhaps
most closely, iL A M A T E c u H T L i. She is one o f the
goddesses o f m id w ife ry , and through th a t
association, o f the swEATBATH as weH. She
freq u ently has a w a rlik e aspect and m ay

Chacmool, Tula,
Early Postclassic period.

bear spears and a shield. M id w iv e s exhorted


wom en to call out to h e r in c h ild b irth and to
be as w arriors in the v io le n t expelling o f the
child from the w om b. A lthough fre q u e n tly
depicted as a skeletal hag, she can also
overlap w ith x o c H iQ U E T Z A L , a young and
b ea u tifu l goddess.
In the addresses o f m id w ives, C ihuacoati
is alw ays paired w ith Q u ila z tli. According to
the song o f C ih u aco ati in Sahagun, she was
the p ro tecto r o f the C halm eca and the patron
o f C ulhuacan.
CTbuacoat/ w as also the title borne by
a secondary ru le r in the A ztec c ap ital o f
T en o c h titla n . U n lik e the g re at TLA TO ANi, or
speaker, the cihuacoaf/ handled in te rn a l
affairs in the city. In the 15th c., T la ca ele l
served as cfhuacoaf/ u nder fou r sequential
foams: M otecuhzom a the E ld e r, A xayacatl, T izo c, and A h u itzo tl; he com m anded
the arm y, d irected SACRIFICES, and served as
senior counselor to the suprem e ru le r. In the
title crhuacoaf/ w e Rnd em bodied the very
n atu re o f d u a lity th a t pervades the A ztec
w o rld -v ie w : m ale versus fem ale and in tern a l
versus external.
C ih u atete o T h e Aztecs b elieved th a t tw o
groups o f supernaturals accom panied the SUN
on its passage from east to w est. In the east,
souls o f w arrio rs w ho died in com bat exhorted
and accom panied the sun as it rose to m idday
ze n ith . In the corresponding w estern sky (th e
place o f solar descent) w ere the C ih u ateteo,
or W om en Gods. T h e C ih u ateteo w e re fem ale
w arrio rs, the m ocm aguezgue, w om en w ho
died in c h ild b irth . T h e Aztecs likened the act
o f BIRTH to th a t o f obtaining a CAPTIVE in w a r,
w om en w ho d ied in the a tte m p t w e re v a lia n t
w arrio rs slain in b a ttle . A ztec w arrio rs fought
vigorously over the bodily rem ains o f m ocjuaquefzgue, w hich w e re kep t as talism ans to
ensure b ra ve ry and success in b a ttle . N o
b enevolent m others, the C ih u ateteo w reaked
havoc, and it was b elieved th a t they haunted
^ CROSSROADS a t NiCHT to steal child ren and to
cause seizures and insanity. In ad d itio n , these
nig h t dem ons could seduce m en and cause
them to com m it a d u lte ry and other sexual
transgressions.

Chicomoztoc, the seven caves of emergence,


Historia Tolteca-Chichimeca, 16th c. Centra!
Mexico.

eg

CINNABAR AND HEMATITE


P rob ab le form s o f the C ih u a te te o ap p e ar

y e llo w body colo ratio n . A long w ith the fre

in the B orgia and V aticanus B codices, corres

q u e n t presence o f m aize in his headdress,

ponding to the days 1 M a z a tl, 1 Q u ia h u itl, 1

one o f his m ost characteristic traits is the

O zo m a tli, 1 C a lli, and I C u a u h tli. As w e ll as

jogged b lack lin e passing dow n the brow ,

being the days on w hich th e five w estern

across th e cheek, and then dow n again to the

TRECENAS begin, these om inous days m arked

base o f the ja w . P recisely the sam e fac ial

the descent o f the C ih u a te te o dem ons to the

m arkin g com m only appears w ith the L a te

e a rth . A group o f A ztec stone sculptures o f

Postclassic M a y a

M A IZ E C O D .

kneeling w om en w ith s keletalized faces and


talo n ed hands have also been id e n tifie d as

cloth C lo th had in trin s ic valu e in ancient

C ih u atete o . L ik e the w om en illu s tra te d in

M eso am erica, and m any aspects o f its m an

the B orgia and Vaticanus B passages, these

u fa c tu re and

figures are also la b ele d w ith the days nam ing

associations. A m ong the

the five w estern irecenas.

peoples o f C e n tra l M e x ic o ,
x o c H iQ U E T Z A L

use had p a rtic u la r religious


N ah u a tl-s p e ak in g
TLAZO LTEO TL

and

w e re patrons o f w eavers, and

cinnabar and h em atite C in n ab ar and hem a

in survivin g depictions, T la zo lte o tl fre q u e n tly

tite are n atu rally occurring m in eral ores. T h e y

w ears spools o f spun cotton in h e r h a ir. In

are both a b rillia n t, lasting red color and w e re

the VEMTENA o f O c h p a n iztli, the im personator

app lied to ritu a l objects throughout ancien t

of

M esoam erica.
H e m a tite , or iron ore, occurs in diverse

ritu a l sacrifice.
In one A zte c h ym n, X o c h iq u etzal is said to

geological

com e fro m

configurations

of

sedim entary

rocks; its most desirable form was "sp ec u la r,"


a sparkling, crystalline h em atite form ed by
masses o f com pact p latelets. I t was often
m ixed w ith w h ite stucco to m ake red stucco
p ain t, w ith w hich, for exam ple, the tem ples
and palaces o f P alenque w ere p ain ted . T h in
plates o f crystalline h em atite could also be
assem bled to form MIRRORS and mosaics.
C in n ab a r, a red m ercuric su!6de and the
ore from w hich m ercury (H g ) is extracted, is
m ined today in northern M exico. In geological
term s, how ever, it occurs in any volcanic
environm ent, and so m ay have been ava ila b le
a t a num ber o f sites in M exico and G u a te
m ala. I t is a soft red ore also know n as "n a tive
v e rm ilio n ," and som etim es yields m ercury
n atu ra lly . G e n era lly , though, in ord er to pro
duce m ercury, the ore m ust be h eated and
the fum es then condensed. A t C opan, K am in alju yu , and sites in B elize, liq u id m ercury
has been recovered archaeologically. M o re
typ ically, h ow ever, the ore its e lf was used.
F ro m O lm ec tim es onw ard, cinnabar was
rubbed in to ritu a l objects. T h e skeletal
rem ains o f m any M a y a royal burials reveal
th a t the bodies w e re lib e ra lly coated w ith
cinnabar a fte r D E A T H .
C in te o tl Also know n as C enteotl, this d eity is
the m asculine C e n tra l M exican god o f M A IZ E ,
em f/i (Z e a m ays). According to the F lo re n tin e
Codex, C in te o tl is the son o f the aged earth
goddess Toci, O u r G ran d m o th er. In the codi
ces, he is p o rtrayed as a young m an w ith

TO C!

w as forced to w e av e as p a rt o f the

TAM O A N CH AN ,

a leg en d ary place

th a t m ay lie in the rich tro p ical G u lf C oast


or M a y a region. O n e o f T la zo lte o tl's nam es
is Ix cu in a , a H u astec nam e fro m the G u lf
C oast. Since m uch P reh isp an ic C O T T O N w as
c u ltiv a te d along th e G u lf C oast, these patrons
o f w eavin g m ay have been coastal goddesses
b efo re they w e re in co rp o rated in to th e A ztec
pantheon. A m ong the M a y a , the old goddess
nam ed as C hac C h e l in th e D resd en C odex
is also a p atro n o f w eavers.
U nspun cotton was m ade in to th rea d by
seated w om en w ho p u lle d dow n th e fibers
resting on th e ir heads or h eld loose on th e ir
shoulders, g ivin g them a tw is t w ith one hand
and then p u llin g o u t th e th re a d w ith the
other. O nce spun, cotton th rea d - o r occasion
a lly MACUEY fib e r - was w oven on backstrap
looms in to long strips o f cloth, fre q u e n tly w ith
elab o rate designs, some o f w h ich can be
seen in the B onam pak m urals o r the Codex
M ag liab ech ian o . H an d -lo o m ed cloth was
alm ost never cut, b u t in scenes o f M a y a
SACRIFICE and in depictions o f CAPTIVES, rip p ed ,
shredded, or punched-out clo th is som etim es
depicted as a visual m etap h or o f the c uttin g
and b leed in g d u rin g sacrifice.
Because the n ativ e cotton p la n t (Co&syp iu m h irsu ftn n ) o f M eso am erica w ill not grow
a t the high a ltitu d e o f th e V a lle y o f M exico,
the Aztecs dem anded cotton clo th fro m m ost
o f the 371 tow ns th a t p aid them trib u te ;
according to the Codex M e n d o za , it was the
single m ost im p o rta n t ite m o f trib u te . C otton
m antles functioned as a m eans o f com mon

63

COATEPANTLI

exchange in a society w ith o u t coinage.


Sahagun said th a t one large m an tle equaled
the value o f one canoe; 30 larg e cotton
m antles equaled a slave, and 40 w e re w o rth
a slave who could sing and dance! .See a/so
COSTUME.

Cloud Serpent see MexcoATL


clowns R itu a l clowns are w id e ly know n in
both C o lo n ial and contem porary M eso am erica. L ik e the m odern Pueblo clowns o f the
A m erican Southw est, these perform ers pro
vide both e n te rta in m e n t and b itin g social
com m entary. T h e fo llo w in g is a Spanish
description o f the e a rly C olonial Yucatec
clowns know n as ba/dzam : ' T h e y are clever
in th e ir m ottoes and jokes, th a t they say to
th e ir m ayor and judges: if they are too rigor
ous, am bitious, or greedy, they po rtray the
events th a t occurred and even w h a t concerns
the ofhcial's ow n duties, these are said in
fro n t o f h im , and at tim es w ith a single w o rd /*
B ut along w ith being am using social com
m entators, the n ative ritu a l clowns tend to
be endow ed w ith considerable supernatural
pow er. D u rin g th e ir perform ances, the
clowns a re freq u e n tly b elieved to become
p a rtic u la r gods, dem ons, and other super
n atu ra l e ntities. In a dd itio n , through role
reversal and inversion, they often seem to
em body the chaotic tim eless powers from
before creation. In M esoam erica, sacred
clowns com m only appear a t critica l junctures
du rin g rites o f passage, such as ACCESSION to
ofhce, or new year celebrations and other
calendrical events.
R itu a l clowns a re com m only depicted in
Classic M a y a a rt. R ath er than appearing
in m onum ental sculpture, they are usually
ren dered on sm all p o rtab le objects, such as
Hgurines or vases. T h e y tend to be aged
and grotesquely ugly characters, often w ith
a nim al attrib u te s . In a dd itio n , they often
app ear dancing w ith FANS and rattles - signs
o f perform ers. S till e a rlie r ritu a l clowns
app ear in the ceram ic a rt o f C olim a. D a tin g
to the Protoclassic period (100 B C -A D 300),
these W est M exican sculptures p o rtray
rotund ith y p h a llic characters, anim al-m asked
dancers, and o th er probable clowns. .See a/so
FAT GOD.

co atep an tli T h e coafepanfA was a com m on


a rch itectu ral fe a tu re o f L a te Postclassic C en
tra! M exico. A w a ll o f SERPENTS, the coafepanfb

Cinteotl, the Central Mexican god of maize,


Codex Borgia, p. 14, Late Postclassic period.

A Late Classic Maya clown with dancing fan and


rattlh, detail from a Maya vase.

(W

COATEPEC
was used to dem arcate sacred enc!osures
w ith in a cerem onia! precinct. A t T e n o c h tit-

D u r n , the Aztecs p erfo rm ed a festival in


honor o f C o atlic u e a t C oatepec.

!an, such a serpent w a ll fram e d p a rt o f the

D ep ictio n s o f C o atlic u e a re fa irly ra re in

T em p !o M a y o r, and some o f th e m onum enta!

A ztec a rt. T h e m ost fam ous rep resen tatio n ,

xiUHCOATL serpent heads discovered

and one o f th e m ost p o w e rfu l A ztec sculp

th e re

w e re probab!y parts o f coafepaniZ/ w alls. A n

tures, is the colossal figure discovered in 1790

in tac t coatepantZi o f X iu h co atl serpents can

alongside th e cath ed ra! o f M exico . Standing

be seen surrounding a tw in p yram id a t the

on huge taloned fe e t, C o atlic u e w ears a dress

site o f T en ayu ca.


T h e c o a fe p a n fi/is not know n a t the Classic

o f w oven rattlesnakes. H e r pendulous breasts

site o f TEOTiHUACAN, and m ay have been first

lace o f severed HEARTS and hands. W rith in g


coral snakes ap p e ar in place o f h e r head and

devised a t the E a r!y Postclassic site o f T u la ,


H id alg o (see

T O L L A N ),

w h ere a c o a fe p a n t//

Hanks P yram id B , one o f the m ajor structures.

a re p a rtia lly obscured b eh ind a grisly neck

hands, d en o tin g gouts o f

BLOOD

gushing from

h er severed th ro a t and w rists. T h e tw o g re at

T h e w a ll o f this c o afep an t/i displays p a rtly

snakes em erg in g fro m

skeletalized hum an Hgures being devoured

a n o th er, c rea tin g a face o f liv in g blood. A


m onum ent o f cosmic te rro r, C o atlic u e stands

by rattlesnakes. T h e serpents have Barnes

h e r neck face one

th a t they are fire serpents, th a t is, form s o f

vio late d and m u tila te d , h e r w ounds m u tely


dem an d in g revenge against h er enem ies.

the X iuhcoatl.

A ltho u g h

em anating from th e ir bodies and it is p ro b ab le

stupendous

m o num ent,

this

C o atlicu e scu lp tu re is n o t u n iq u e; tw o very


C oatcpec or Serpent M o u n tain was one o f

s im ila r b u t p o o rly p reserved exam ples have

the m ore im p o rtan t places o f A ztec m yth o l


ogy. This sacred MOUNTAIN constituted the
b irth p lace o f n u rrziL O P O C H T L i, and it was th ere
that
the
n ew ly
born
god
defeated

also been discovered in M exico C ity .

coYOLXAUHQm and h er 400 brothers, the


C entzon H u itzn a h u a. A lthough the actual
Coa tepee m ountain is located close to the
T o ltec site o f T u la , H id alg o (see T O LLA N ), this
sacred place was rep licated in the h e a rt o f
the A ztec cap ital o f T en o c h titla n , w h ere it
was long thought by archaeologists th a t the
H u itzilo p o ch tli side o f the g reat dual T em p lo
M a y o r represented M o u n t Coatepec. S triking
physical corroboration o f this b e lie f occurred
in 1978 w ith the discovery o f the dism em b
ered Coyolxauhqui sculpture a t the base
o f the H u itzilo p o ch tli tem ple stairw ay. This
sculpture corresponds p erfe ctly to the A ztec
m yth w hich describes the severed rem ains o f
Coyolxauhqui tum bling to the base o f M o u n t
C oatepec.
C oatlicue According to A ztec b e lie f, the
m o ther o f H u rrziL O P O C H T L i was C oatlicue, She
o f the Serpent S kirt. In A ztec accounts, C o at
licue was m iraculously im pregnated w ith a
b a ll o f dow n w h ile sw eeping a t COATEPEC.
H e r child ren , COYOLXAUHQUI and the C entzon
H u itzn a h u a, w e re furious a t h er condition
and decided to k ill h er. A t the m om ent o f h er
DEATH, C oatlicue gave BIRTH to the fu lly arm ed
H u itzilo p o c h tli, w ho then d efeated and slew
C oyolxauhqui and the C entzon H u itzn a h u a.
According to a 16th c. account by D iego

C ocijo In Z ap o tee, th e term cocyo signifies


both

L iC H T N iN C

and the god o f lig h tn in g and

RAIN. T h e god C ocijo is com m only found


on Zapotee ceram ic urns fro m the M id d le
F o rm a tiv e p erio d o f M o n te A lb n i to the
end o f the L a te C lassic p erio d . L ik e the
Classic M a y a C H AC , C ocijo usually has a
zoom orphic face w ith a th ick , b lu n t snout.
O n e o f his oldest and m ost consistent charac
teristics is his long b ifu rc a te d serp entin e
tongue. A lth o u g h not occurring w ith the
M a y a ra in god C hac, s im ila r tongues are
found w ith ja g u a r form s o f the ra in god TLALOC
a t Classic perio d TEOTiH U A C A N .
Q u ite fre q u e n tly , C ocijo appears w ith a
p a rtic u la r sign - Zap o tee G ly p h C - in his
headdress. In the Postclassic M ix te e codices,
a s im ila r g lyph serves as a sign fo r th e day
nam e W a te r. I t is p ro b ab le, th e re fo re , th a t
Z apotee G lyp h C represents th e day nam e
W a te r, an a p p ro p riate em b lem fo r the god
o f ra in and lig h tn in g .
T h e Postclassic Zapotees term e d the fo u r
65-day divisions o f the 260-d ay calen d ar
"C o cijo s," suggesting th a t th e re w e re fou r
Cocijos o rie n te d to th e w o rld DIRECTIONS.
BLOODLETTING and o th er religious observations
w e re p erfo rm ed to the Cocijos o f the fou r
calen d rical periods. Passages in the C e n tra l
M e x ica n Vaticanus B and B orgia codices also
illu s tra te this fo u r fo ld division o f th e 260day calendar. T h e re , h o w ever, T la lo c - ra th e r

65

COLORS

than Cocijo - is p o rtrayed in each o f the fo u r


divisions.
codex T h e term codex g en e rally refers to a
rare m anuscript. In M esoam erican research,
it is freq u e n tly used to denote n ativ e screenfold books form ed o f strips o f pounded b ark
PAPER or DEER h id e p ain ted on both sides w ith
a fine coating o f w h ite lim e gesso. These

The serpent
wall, or
coatepantli,
surrounding the
Aztec Templo
Mayor, Codex
Durn, 16th c.
Central Mexico.

strips w e re c are fu lly folded in to equal w idths,


w ith each fold creating tw o pages on opposite
sides o f the m anuscript. O nce fold ed , in tric a te
scenes w e re first c a re fu lly o u tlin ed and then
freq u e n tly fille d in w ith b rillia n t colors. Both
sides o f the m anuscript w e re usually p ain ted ,
w ith the pages tending to run le ft to rig h t
across one side, and then retu rn in g le ft to
rig h t across the other.
Scenes on Classic M a y a vases and the
archaeological discovery o f stucco rem ains o f
actual books reveal th at screenfold codices
w e re fu lly present am ong the Classic M a y a .
H o w e v e r, a ll the in tac t screenfolds th a t have
survived d ate to the Postclassic and early
C o lo n ial periods. These contain a w e alth of
in fo rm atio n about gods and ritu als, m ythol
ogy, history, flo ra, fauna, and even trad e and

Giant statue of
Coatlicue, She of
the Serpent Skirt,
mother of
Huitzilopochtli, Late
Postclassic Aztec.
Her head is
composed of blood
serpents pouring
from her severed
throat.

trib u te . U n fo rtu n a te ly , due to centuries o f


intolerance and neglect, only a sm all portion
o f these books survive to this day. Some
25 Postclassic and e a rly C olonial screenfold
codices a re know n, w ith 18 o f these being in
pure p re-C onquest style.
colors In M esoam erican cosmology, colors
a re fre q u e n tly associated w ith p artic u la r
DIRECTIONS. T h e id e n tific atio n o f colors w ith
directions is m ost fu lly docum ented among
the an cien t M a y a , w ho had specific glyphs
fo r the colors red , w h ite , black, yellow , and
green. In the Yucatec M a y a codices, these
colors are associated w ith east, north, w est,
south and c en ter, respectively. M on u m en tal
texts describing the 819-day cycle (see CALEN
re ve al th a t the Classic M a y a also id e n t
ifie d red , w h ite , black, and y ello w w ith the
DAR)

sam e directions.
In C o lo n ial accounts from C e n tra l M exico,
th e re is fre q u e n t m ention o f fo u r basic colors.
H o w e v e r, not only are the colors ra re ly o ri
ented w ith regard to specific directions, bu t
th e re is also considerable varia tio n as to
w hich are the fo u r p rim a ry colors. According
*to one source, the d ire ctio n al colors w ere
g reen, b lu e, red and y ello w . H o w e v e r, o th e r
accounts suggest th a t the fou r card in al colors

Cocijo, the Zapotee


god of rain and
lightning, ceramic
urn, Classic period.

(M

COLOSSAL HEADS
w e re the same as those o f th e M a y a . M o re

transgression. F ra y Burgoa recorded th a t d u r

over, lik e th e M a y a , C e n tra ! M exicans ap p e ar

in g the m id -1 7 th c. the Zapotees o f Oaxaca

to have id e n tih e d w h ite w ith the north and

also p erfo rm e d BLOODLETTING in conjunction


w ith a confession to a n a tiv e p riest. T h e blood

y ello w w ith th e south.

was d rip p e d upon strips o f MAize husk w hich


colossal heads A fte r 1200

B e,

the Ohnecs

w rought colossal heads from huge boulders

w e re taken and presented by the priest to a


stone id o l.

o f basait from the T u x tla M o u n tain s th a t they


m ust have Boated on baisa rafts along th e
slow -m oving rivers o f the G u lf C oast.
n e ith e r

contem porary

texts

nor

c o r o n a tio n

w e

A CC ESSIO N

W ith

re le v a n t

ethnohistory, the heads have been the subject

c o s tu m e

M eso am erican

costum e

g en e rally

encodes a w id e v a rie ty o f in fo rm atio n in the

o f specu!ation, and they have been id e n tifie d

case o f bo th hum an and d iv in e protagonists.

a t one tim e or ano th er as b allp la ye rs, gods,

A m ong the A ztecs, fo r exam p le, costum e and

or hum ans. M ost scholars now b eliev e th a t

facia!

the heads com m em orate actual rulers. T h e

re la te d d eities fro m one a n o th er m ore effec

rep resen tatio n s

tiv e ly

m ent; a t the very east d im p led depressions

C ostum e in dicates th e status and ro le o f a

w e re ground into them . R ecent d etective


w e re

given in d iv id u a l; even today in M exico and


G u a te m ala, costum e is the key to e th n ic ity ,

recarved into co!ossa! heads. A ccording to


such a theory, the place o f seated p o w er

com m on te x tile designs, styles o f dress, and

THHONES

o th e r

physical

closely

m a jo rity o f them suffered some ritu a l d eface

w ork has proposed th a t some

than

d iffe re n tia te

characteristics.

and v illa g e id e n tity is re in fo rc ed

through

w ould be extinguished and converted to a

headgear. A t M itla , the facades o f T e rm in a l

m ore n eu tral hum an m em orial.


A t L a V en ta, four colossal heads w e re set

Classic palaces b ea r various g eom etric p a t


terns and designs, perhaps references to u n i

as if to guard the cerem onial core o f the site,


three to the south and one to the north, a ll
w ith th e ir backs to the arch itectu re. W ith
th e ir stern, solemn expressions, such heads
m ay have em bodied livin g rulers, and they
w ould have been seen from a distance. A fte r
the death o f a ru le r, the colossal heads m ay
have been the focus o f ancestor w orship.

fication o f reg io n al id e n tity , both Zap o tee and


M ix te e , through p u b lic display o f costum e

c o m p l e t i o n s ig n

s e e CALENDAR

confession Confession constituted an im


p o rtan t form o f ritu a l PURIFICATION. F o r the
Yucatec M a y a , confession was p erform ed
during the B APTISM o f children. Am ong the
M a y a o f Yucatan and A lta V erapaz, con
fession was com m on a t tim es o f grave illness
or approaching D E A T H . According to Tom s
Lpez M e d e l, M a y a com m unities in G u a te
m ala perform ed confession by selecting an
old w om an as a scapegoat. Forced to h ea r
the confessions o f a ll o f the com m unity, this
w om an was then stoned. I t was b elieved th a t
by h e r death, the w hole tow n was p u rifie d .
F o r the Aztecs, T L A Z O L T E O T L was the god
dess o f confessions. In the com pany o f a
calendar p riest, the in d ivid u al w ould confess
in fro n t o f an im age o f T la zo lteo tl. A long w ith
the confession, the p e n ite n t in d iv id u al passed
pieces o f grass through the tongue or phallus,
each piece corresponding to a p a rtic u la r

and cloth.
M e n and w om en, both hum an and d iv in e ,
w o re d istin ct garm ents. Some A ztec sculp
tures w e re m ean t to be dressed; n ow , w ith o u t
th e ir costum es, th e ir id e n tity as specific
d eities is lost. M eso am erican garm ents w e re
g en e rally fashioned by d rap in g C L O T H around
the body or sew ing strips o f fa b ric tog eth er
b u t ra re ly c u ttin g and ta ilo rin g cloth. Basic
a ttire fo r m en was the lo in clo th (th e N a h u a tl
m axt/afV); w om en w o re skirts w ith draped
blouses (th e N a h u a tl g u ec A g u e m it/a n d M a y a
A uipj'/). W a rrio rs and priests donned sleeve
less jackets (N a h u a tl xico/A). C e n tra l M ex ica n
lords a t th e tim e o f th e C onquest w o re the
&7znafA, a to g a-like g arm en t the w e arin g o f
w hich was governed by s trict sum ptuary
law s. T h e m ost prestigious #AnatAs w e re the
longest ones w ith the m ost e lab o rate w oven
designs; th e ir w e a r was lim ite d to th e u pper
classes and to m en w ho had scarred th e ir
bodies in b a ttle . T h e im p o rtan ce o f these
cloaks is em phasized by th e pages devoted to
th e ir m otifs in the C odex M ag liab ech ian o .
Com m oners w e re g en e rally restricted to
coarse #AnatAs w oven o f MAGUEY fib er. F in e
ra im e n t re w ard e d victorious w arrio rs, and
the m ore CAPTIVES they took, th e fan c ier the
a ttire they w ore.

67

COTTON

T h e headdress is the m ost significant p a rt


of any costum e. In depictions in the codices,
M ixte e nobles and d eities o ften w e a r th e ir
names in th e ir headdresses, as do occasionally
M ay a n o b ility. I t was not only hum ans and
deities w ho bore insignia on th e ir heads: the
affiliations o f TE M P L E S w e re o ften presented

M a y a directional color glyphs


derived from the Dresden Codex.

Red (chac), east

by a b illb o a rd -lik e display on th e roofeom b,


or even by the shape o f th e roofeom b, resem
bling headgear. T h e tem p le to Q U E T Z A L C O A T L
in the sacred precinct o f T e n o c h titla n had a
conical roof, akin to Q u etzalcoatl's conical
headdress. A n um ber o f A ztec goddesses
w e ar a headdress th a t looks lik e a tem ple
doorw ay, conflating the analogy betw een
headdress, d eity , and insignia.

White (zac), north

B)ack (ek), west

A m ong the n o b ility , specific costumes w e re


w orn for p a rtic u la r ritu als. D u ra n describes
elab o rate costumes d istrib u ted to a ll p a rtic
ipants and observers o f A ztec sacrificial rites,
including crowns o f feathers, gold arm sheathing, ja g u ar p e lt sandals, fancy m antles and
loincloths, and JADE nose plugs. In b a ttle ,
A ztec w arrio rs dressed as p redatory anim als:
EA G LES, JAGUARS, pum as, and coyotes. T h e
m antles o f a b rid e and groom w e re tied
together to sym bolize th e ir M A R R IA G E . In a ll
cultures, b allp layers donned thick padding at
the w aist, knee, and elbow . O nce Corts
began his m arch to T en o c h titla n , M o te cuhzom a I I , according to some sources, sent
fou r d e ity costumes to him to see if he w ould
don one and reveal h im self to be a god.
Am ong the M a y a , a num ber o f specific ritu al
costumes
have
been
recognized.
A
beaded cape and skirt, w o rn w ith an open
spondylus shell w aist ornam ent th a t m ay
sym bolize the fem ale w om b, is a costume w orn
by noble w om en, b u t it also id entifies the
M A IZ E G O D ; m en don the costum e to em body
the god and his fe rtility . In the depictions o f
ACCESSIO N to ofRce a t Piedras N egras, kings
w e ar sim ple a ttire , w ith a headdress that
sprouts MAIZE and m aize foliage, as if to
rein fo rce connections to com m unity and
a g ricu ltu re ; w h en those sam e kings conduct
b attles outside the im m ed iate com m unity,
b u t against o th e r M a y a , they w e ar a costum e
based on foreig n m otifs from T E O T IH U A C A N .
cotton A lthough the cotton used in ancient
M esoam erica was g en e rally o f a single species
(C<Ms%vu/n A /rsufum ), th e re w e re m any v a r
ie t ie s distinguished by grow ing cycles and
fib er color. W oven cotton
functioned

CLOTH

as clothing, b u t was

not only
also

an

Yeow (kan), south

Green (yax), center

Colossal head from L a Venta, Tabasco,


M id d le Form ative Olmec. These colossal
heads constitute some of the earliest
portraiture known for the N ew W orld.

Trib ute sign referring to 400 bales of


cotton, M atrcula de Tributos, 16th c.
Aztec.

88

COYOLXAUHQUI
im p o rta n t a rtic!e o f trib u te . I t served too as
religious offerings, as TEMPLE hangings or

th ro w n dow n th e steps o f the H u itxilop o ch th


tem p le re p lic a te d th e b a ttle a t C oatepec.

aw nings, as vestm ents fo r god im ages, and as

A side fro m the n ew ly discovered reliefs

w rappings fo r sacred BUNDLES and MORTUARY

fro m the T e m p lo M a y o r, a n o th er m onum en


ta l C o yolxauhqui sculpture survives. In this

B U N D LE S .

of

case, she is rep resen ted as a lifeless severed

cotton was p rim a rily a fe m a le task, goddesses

head. As in th e case o f the in ta c t disk from

Since

the

p re p a ra tio n

and

w eavin g

as spinners and

th e T e m p lo M a y o r, she displays on h er cheeks

w eavers. In the Yucatec M a y a codices, both

th e m e ta l cqyo/Ii bells fo r w h ich she is nam ed.

the you th fu l Goddess I and the aged Goddess

In a d d itio n , she also w ears the sam e m e ta l


y e a r sign e ar ornam ents and c irc u la r elem ents

a re fre q u e n tly p o rtrayed

0 (see scHELLHAs coDs) a re p o rtray ed as w e a


is closely

o f eagle dow n in h e r h a ir. M u c h o f the

id e n tih e d w ith w eaving, and w ears a h ead -

costum e and iconography o f C oyolxauhqui

vers. In C e n tra l M exico ,

TLAZO LTEO TL

band o f unspun cotton w ith a p a ir o f cotton

seems to d e riv e fro m C h an tico , goddess o f the

spindles as h er headdress. O n e o f h e r com

h ea rth and p atro n o f X ochim ilco. A ltho u g h it

mon epithets was Ixcu in a, a H uastec term

has been

signifying C otton W om an.

represents the M O O N , th e re is no exp lic it


evidence fo r this id e n tific a tio n . A ccording to

C oyolxauhqui T h e evil o ld er sister o f H u rrz iLOPOCHTLJ and the C entzon H u itzn a h u a ,

one recen t study, C oyo lxau h q u i m ay a ctu ally

o ften

stated

be a goddess o f the

th a t C oyolxauhqui

M IL K Y W A Y .

C oyolxauhqui was one o f the m ajor goddesses


o f A ztec m ythology. Furious over the p reg
nancy o f C0 ATL!CUE, C oyolxauhqui slew her
m other w ith the aid o f h er 400 brothers, the
C entzon H u itzn a h u a. T h e dying C oatlicue
gave b irth to H u itzilo p o c h tli, w ho, arm ed
w ith his xiuHcoATL w eapon, dism em bered
Coyolxauhqui and routed the C entzon H u itz
nahua a t the h ill o f C O A TE P E C . According to
the F lo re n tin e Codex account o f this b a ttle ,
the severed
rem ains
o f Coyolxauhqui
tum bled to the base o f Coatepec.
In 1978, a massive representation o f
Coyolxauhqui was discovered a t the base o f
the H u itzilo p o ch tli side o f the T em plo M a y o r
in Ten o ch tlan . As in the cited A ztec text,
she is depicted w ith h er head and lim bs
severed from h er torso, as if tum bling dow n
the h ill o f C oatepec. A t least tw o o th er
Coyolxauhqui m onum ents w ere found a t the
T em plo M a y o r. T h e stucco rem ains o f an
e a rlie r nude and dism em bered Coyolxauhqui
lay d ire ctly under the stone sculpture. In
addition to this stucco sculpture, fragm ents
o f another stone C oyolxauhqui disk w ere also
discovered. A lthough sim ilar in scale, style,
and com position, this frag m en tary sculpture
does not appear to represent C oyolxauhqui
w ith severed lim bs. N onetheless, it contains
an especially im p o rtan t d e ta il, fo r the ta il and
segm ented body o f the X iu hco atl can a ctu ally
be seen p en etratin g the chest o f C oyol
xauhqui. This re lie f portrays the m ythic
ch a rter fo r the ritu a l o f h e a rt sacrifice th a t
was p racticed on a massive scale a t the
T em plo M a y o r (see H E A R T S ). Each v ictim

creatio n accounts T h e origins o f the gods,


the w o rld , and its in h a b ita n ts fo rm the basis
o f M eso am erican m ythology. U n fo rtu n a te ly ,
our u n derstanding o f n a tiv e crea tio n m yth o
logy is only p a rtia l, and is best docum ented
fo r C e n tra l M exico and the M a y a region.
N onetheless, com m on p attern s can be dis
cerned. Q u ite fre q u e n tly , the act o f c reatio n
begins in darkness w ith th e p rim o rd ia l SEA.
T h e Q uiche M a y a P O P O L v u H contains a m ov
ing description o f this o rig in a l c re a tiv e event.
Surrounded by th e s till w aters o f th e sea, the
gods T ep e u and G ucum atz engage in dialogue
and thus begin th e act o f creatio n . T h ro u gh
th e ir speech, the E A R T H and M O U N T A IN S a re
raised ou t o f th e W A T E R .
A ltho u g h th e PopoV Muh creators place
anim als upon the e a rth , these creatures lack
the voices and understan d in g to w orship and
nourish th e gods. T h e C O D S thus decide to
create people. In th e ir Erst a tte m p t, th e y
fashion people fro m m ud; b eing soft and
w eak, h o w ever, th e p eo p le a re soon des
troyed. In th e ir second a tte m p t, the gods
consult th e d ivin ers X piyacoc and X m ucane,
w ho suggest th a t m en be fashioned fro m
w ood and w om en fro m rushes. A lthough this
n ew race o f people can speak and m u ltip ly ,
they s till lack u n derstanding o f th e ir w o rld
and th e ir m akers, so the gods send dow n a
g re at Rood and a ra in o f p itch to destroy
them . F ie rc e dem ons, anim als, and th e ir ow n
household utensils jo in in the attack. Those
people th a t escape becam e the MONKEYS seen
today.

69

CREATION ACCOUNTS

F o llow ing the destruction o f the w ood and


rush people, T ep eu and G ucum atz decide to
fashion hum ans from M A tZ E . B rought by fo u r
anim als from the m ountain o f P axil, this
m aize is ground in to nine drinks from w hich
the first fo u r m en are m ade. B u t although
these people o f m aize w orship and nourish
the gods, they are too know ledgeable and
w ise, too lik e the gods w ho m ade them . F o r
this reason, the gods cloud th e ir eyes, lim itin g
the vision o f the present hum an race, the
people o f corn, to w h a t is im m ed iate and
close. F o llo w in g the creation o f the first fou r
m en and th e ir w ives, the first d aw ning takes
place and some anim als and gods tu rn to
stone.
In the Popo/ VuA, the destruction o f the
w ooden m en and the creation o f the people
o f corn is separated by a long and extrem ely
im p o rtan t account describing the doings o f
tw o sets o f tw ins. T h e older p a ir, H U N H U N A H P U
and Vucub H u nah p u , are sum m oned to play
b a ll w ith the lords o f the UNDERWORLD, X ib alb a ,
w ho then d e fe a t and sacrifice the tw ins,
placing the head o f H u n H u nah p u in a gourd
tree . T his m iraculous head im pregnates an
u n d erw o rld m aiden, X quic, w ho escapes to
the surface o f the earth . H e re she gives b irth
to the second p a ir o f tw ins, the sons of
H u n H u n ah p u . K now n as the H e ro T w in s,
H u nah p u and X b alanq u e a re g reat m onsterslayers and b allp layers. W h en they in turn
a re sum m oned to p lay b all in the U n d erw o rld ,
they eve n tu ally d efe at the lords o f X ib alb a
and re trie v e the rem ains o f th e ir fa th e r and
uncle.
T h e p lacem ent o f the H e ro Tw ins episode
befo re the creation o f the m aize people is not
fortuitous. T h e abundant Classic M a y a scenes
illu s tra tin g H u n H u nah p u and his sons
H u nah p u and X b alanq u e reveal th a t H u n
H u nah p u is a ctu ally the god o f corn. Thus
the descent o f H u nah p u and X balanque to
rescue th e ir fa th e r also signifies the search for
corn, th e m a te ria l from w hich m ankind is
m ade. In a num ber o f L a te Classic M a y a

Giant Coyolxauhqui stone, Aztec Tempio Mayor,


Tenochtitlan.

vessel scenes, H u n H u n ah p u is flanked by


his sons as he rises out o f the earth as grow ing
m aize. This Classic episode o f H u n H u nah p u ,
the ancestor o f people, rising out o f the earth
constitutes a form o f the em ergence m yth
found w id e ly over M esoam erica and the
A m erican Southw est.
T h e concept o f m u ltip le creations is found
am ong o th er contact period and contem por
a ry M a y a peoples. A ccording to a 16th c.

Maya creation accounts: Hun Hunahpu, the


Tonsured Maize God, rising out of the tortoise
earth; spotted Hunahpu at left, and Xbalanque
with jaguar skin markings to the right. Scene
from the interior of a Late Classic Maya bowl.

70

CREATION ACCOUNTS
account from th e C ak ch iq u e l, neighbors o f

strongly

the Q u ich e, p eo p le w e re Erst fashioned o f


m ud. F o llo w in g th e ir d estru ctio n , th e p resent

Classic M a y a m ythology, Q u etzalco atl and

resem bling

XOLOTL

race o f m ankind was created fro m ground

the rem ains o f th e people destroyed in the

m aize m ixed w ith th e blood o f ta p ir and

Hood. In o rd e r to o b ta in the precious bones,

descend to the

the

Popo/

UNDER W O R LD

Fu/?

and

to re trie v e

SERPENT. T h e Rood m yth is know n fo r the

th e y tric k th e w ily god o f d ea th , MicTLANTB

C olonia! Yuca tec M a y a , fo r in c e rta in o f the

c u H T L i.

Books o f C h ila m B alam th e re is m en tio n o f

CHAN,

T h e bones a re then taken to

TAM OAN

w h e re th e gods g rin d them lik e com

a race o f in d ivid u als destroyed in th e Rood.

in to a Rne m e al. U pon this ground m eal, the

These accounts also describe the erectio n o f

gods le t th e ir

WORLD TREES fo llo w in g the Rood. A ltho u g h


the C o lo n ial Yucatec sources p ro vid e only

o f th e p resent race o f people.


A fte r the creation o f people,

tan g en tial references to previous creations,

convene in darkness a t

these a re e xp lic itly recorded in m odern Yuca

decided th a t in o rd er to crea te th e Hfth sun,

BLOO D,

thus crea tin g th e Resh


the gods

T E O T n ru A C A N .

I t is

tec texts, w hich describe th re e d istinct w orlds

N a h u i O llin , one o f th e gods m ust th ro w

and

present

h im s e lf in to a g re a t p yre. T w o v o lu n te e r, the

creation .
H ig h ly developed in C e n tra l M exico , this

lo w ly N a n a h u a tzin . T ec u cizte ca tl is frig h t

races

o f people

b efo re

the

hau g h ty T e c u cizte ca tl and th e diseased and

notion o f m u ltip le creation reaches its highest

ened by the Rames, b u t N a n a h u a tzin b ravely

com plexity in the g reat cosmogonic m yth o f

hurls h im s e lf in to th e p yre and is transform ed

the nvKSUNs. A lthough there is some v ariatio n

in to th e suN. T e c u cizte ca tl follow s to becom e


the M O O N . T h e gods then sacriEce them selves

in the know n accounts, the basic p attern is


q u ite sim ilar to the Q uich P opo/ Fuh. W ith
the Erst acts o f creation, the creato r couple
prepared the w ay for the Erst o f the fou r suns,
or w orlds, previous to the present creation.
N am ed a fte r the days on w hich they end, the
fou r suns usually occur in the follo w in g o rd er,
N ah u i O celot! (4 Jaguar), N ah u i E h ecatl (4
W in d ), N ah u i Q u ia h u itl (4 R ain ), and N ah u i
A tl (4 W a te r). Each sun is presided over by
a d eity and race o f people w ho are e ith e r
destroyed o r transform ed into a p a rtic u la r
creatu re. TEZCATHPOCA is the god o f the Erst
sun, N ah u i O celotl. T h e people o f this w o rld
are giants, and a re devoured by JAGUARS.
Presided over by the w ind god E H E C A T L , the
second sun o f N ah u i E hecatl is destroyed by
w in d and its people becom e M O N K E Y S . T h e
R A IN and L IG H T N IN G d e ity T L A L O c is th e god o f
N ah u i Q u ia h u itl, w hich is consumed by Eery
ra in - possibly an allusion to volcanic eru p
tion - w h ile its people turn in to B U T T E R F L IE S ,
Docs, and turkeys. T h e w a te r goddess C H A L C H i
uHTLicuE presides over the fo u rth sun, N a h u i
A tl; the Rood ending this sun transform s the
hum an inhabitants in to Rsh.
F o llo w in g the Rood ending the fo u rth sun,
Tezcatlipoca and Q U E T Z A L C O A T L raise the hea
vens by transform ing them selves in to tw o
g reat trees. In several accounts, these tw o
gods create the earth by slaying a huge earth
m onster described e ith e r as a C A IM A N or as
the earth d e ity T L A L T E C U H T L i.
A lthough the earth is created a t this p o in t,
no people in h a b it its surface. In a jo u rn e y

a t T eo tih u ac an

and

fro m

th e ir

rem ains,

sacred B U N D LE S o r f/a g u n j/o //i a re fashioned.


A n o the r com m on C e n tra l M e x ic a n creation
m o tif is the em ergence o f people from the
earth. In essence, this differs little fro m the
taking o f the bones out o f th e U n d e rw o rld ,
although in this instance, actual living hum ans
em erge out o f the earth . O n e o f the most
famous versions o f the em ergence m yth con
cerns cmcoMOZTOc, the seven CAVES o f em erg
ence. In the P&sfor/a 7b/feca-C/uc/un?eca
account o f this episode, the MOUNTAIN contain
ing the seven caves was struck open w ith a
lightning staff. In an o th e r version o f the
em ergence, the Erst people cam e out a fte r
the sun shot an a rro w into the House o f
M irro rs .
O f M ix te e c rea tio n m ythology little is
know n in com parison w ith th a t o f the M a y a
and peoples o f C e n tra l M exico . O n e b rie f b u t
im p o rta n t account derives fro m an e a rly 18th
c. w o rk o f F ra y G reg o rio G a rca. D u rin g the
tim e o f darkness, in th e p rim o rd ia l SEA, a
creato r couple sharing th e sam e calen d rical
am e o f 1 D e e r c rea te a m assive stony
m o untain upon w h ich they fashion th e ir
sum ptuous palace. A t th e peak o f the m oun
ta in , a g re at copper axe b lad e supports the
heavens. T h is creato r couple has tw o m ale
ch ild ren , one nam ed W in d o f N in e Snakes,
the o th er, W in d o f N in e Caves. T h e e ld er o f
th e sons has the p o w er to transform h im s elf
in to an E A G L E , w hereas th e younger son can
becom e a w inged SER PENT th a t can Ry through

71

CUAUHXICALLI

stone as w e ll as a ir. These tw o sons create a


garden Blled w ith fru it trees, FLOWERS, and
herbs. F o llo w in g the creation o f the stony
m ountain and the brothers and th e ir garden,
heaven and earth are fashioned and hum ans
are restored to life . A lthough only a tan g en tial
reference, the m ention o f hum ans being
restored to life strongly suggests the m u ltip le
creations and destructions m entioned in
M aya
and
C e n tra l
M exican
creation
accounts. T h e M ix te e creato r couple are re p
resented in tw o o f the ancien t M ix te e screenfolds,

the

Codex

Vindobonensis

and

the

Selden R oll, com plete w ith the calendrical


nam e o f 1 D e e r.
According to a la te 16th c. w o rk o f F ray
A ntonio

de

los

Reyes,

the

first

M ixtees

em erged from the cen ter o f the e arth , w h ile


la te r gods and rulers w e re born from trees
near the sacred tow n o f A poala. In the ancient
M ixte e codices, the people em erging from
the earth are freq u e n tly depicted as stone
m en. This probably refers to an ancient p re
daw n era as, am ong the M ixtees and other
M esoam erican peoples, gods and legendary
figures w ere turned to stone a t the first
daw ning. T h e m o tif o f tree b irth , still present
in contem porary M ix te e m ythology, is also
illu strate d in both the Vindobonensis and
Selden codices. .See a/so ANCESTRAL COUPLE.
crossroads In n ative M esoam erica, cross
roads w e re w id e ly regarded as dangerous
places in h a b ite d by dem ons and illness. T h e
Aztecs b elieved th a t they w ere the favored
place o f the fearsom e cmuATETEO, and shrines
to these dem onic w om en w ere freq u e n tly
placed on m ajor crossroads. I t was w id ely
believed th a t crossroads w ere an im p o rtan t
place to leave dangerous contam inants such
as item s associated w ith social m isdeeds or
DISEASE. Crass broom s, a sign o f PURIFICATION,
are com m only seen w ith C e n tra l M exican
representations o f crossroads.
cuauhxicaHi L ite ra lly ' eagle g o u rd ," the
cuauAxTca/A was the vessel in w hich the
Aztecs m ade th e ir most sacred offerings,
hum an HEARTS. R eal gourds, as w e ll as fin ely

A cave sign, a bowl with brooms and copa/, and


the body of a probable executed criminal placed
with crossroads, Codex Laud, Late Postclassic
period. In Mesoamerican thought, crossroads
wete widely considered to be dangerous places
that provided access to the Underworld.

carved stone objects, m ay have been used fo r


cMauAx/ca/&y a t the tim e o f the Conquest.
T h e very oldest representations have been
^ found a t C hichen Itz , so th e tra d itio n m ay
d ate to the T o ltec era or e a rlie r. In the POPOL
vuH , th e m essenger owls a re told to sacrifice

Blood

W om an,

p reg n an t

w ith

the

H e ro

Eagle-plumed cuauhxicaHi
bowl containing hearts and
blood, Codex Borbonicus,
p. 14, 16th c. Aztec.

72

CURING
T w in s , and to b rin g back h e r h e a rt in a gourd

D8

bow !, perhaps a cuauAx/caZL


T h e largest know n cuauhxicaRf is th e h ea v
ily m aned Jaguar C u au h xicalli o f T e n o c h titla n
in whose back is carved a deep basin o rn a

dance D an c e p la ye d an im p o rta n t ro le in

m ented w ith the m otifs o f JADE, fea th e rs, and

an c ie n t

hearts typ ical o f h e a rt vessels. A t th e base o f

Sahagn, fo r e xam p le, describes some sort of

the vessel are the depictions o f HurrziLO-

dance - som etim es o f m en, som etim es of


w om en, and som etim es o f m en and w om en

pocHTLi and TEZCATUPOCA, both o f w hom d ra w

M eso am erican

religious

ritu a l.

BLOOD from th e ir ears. A d id actic message is

to g e th e r -

rein fo rced : as the gods have o ffered th e ir

e b ra tio n o f th e A ztecs, w ith dancing fre

fo r alm ost eve ry VEINTENA cel

ow n blood, so hum ans m ust m ake offerings

q u e n tly c a rrie d on a t the base o f the PYRAMID

in the cuauAx/caA/.

o f th e god honored on th a t occasion. T h e

curing Illness was b elieved to have a nu m b er

fe s tiv a l, as w e ll as a t rite s o f passage. A n

M ixte es , too, danced to c ele b rate e very m ajo r


o f causes, including the hostile actions o f

e lab o ra te

s u p e rn a tu ra l

deficiencies, and excesses such as d ru n ken

d ep icted in the C odex Selden.


D an cin g fre q u e n tly preceded

ness or w anton sexuality. A

FICE.

or

sorcerers,

accidents,
m ajo r cause

M ARRIAGE

D u rin g

d ie

dance, fo r exam ple, is


H U M A N SACRi-

v ein ten a celebrations o f

o f sickness was im balance and disharm ony,

T itid , a slave w om an was fu lly a rra y e d as

e ith e r w ith society, the gods and ancestors,


or the surrounding w o rld . In o rd er to cure
the p a tie n t, it was necessary fo r the curer to

iL A M A T E C U H T L i.

d ivin e the p a rtic u la r source o f an illness.


H an d casting w ith the 260-day CALENDAR was
often used for this purpose, as it s till is today
in highland G u atem ala. Am ong the com mon
cures was PURIFICATION, such as by CONFESSION
or bathing in stream s or swEATBATHS. Along
w ith diviners, im p o rtan t m edical specialists
included m idw ives, surgeons and herbalists.
Some o f the m ore com mon form s o f surgery
included DENTISTRY, the rem oval o f foreign
bodies, closing wounds, setting fractures,
am putation, and bleeding w ith obsidian la n
cets. H o w ev er, surgery was fa r less developed
than the n ative know ledge o f plants, w hich
appear in an astonishing a rray o f d iffe re n t
m edical uses.
In the Q uiche POPOL vuH, an aged couple
pose as curers o f broken bones, eyes and teeth
in order to tric k and destroy the w ounded
m onster b ird , vucuB CAQuix. In Postclassic
Yucatan tw o aged deities w e re especially
id e n tifie d w ith curing. O ne o f these was the
old goddess ixcHEL, know n as Goddess O
or cAac cAe/ in the codices. Yucatec curers
perform ed a festival in h er honor during the
20-d ay m onth o f Z ip . T h e other aged d eity
was the creator god, iTZAMNA, w ho was also
invoked du rin g the Z ip rites. In L a te Post
classic C e n tra l M exico, TLAZOLTEOTL seems to
have been an especially im p o rtan t goddess
o f curing, being closely id en tified w ith both
confession and the sw eatbath.

"A n d

b efo re she d ie d , she

danced. T h e old m en b ea t th e drum s fo r h er;


the singers sang fo r h e r - th e y in to ned h er
song. A nd w h en she danced, she w e p t m uch,
and she sighed; she fe lt anguish. F o r tim e
was b u t short; the span w as b u t b rie f b efo re
she w ould suffer, w h en she w o u ld reach h er
end on e a rth ." (F C : 11)
A ccording to the A zte c 2 60 -d a y auguries,
those born in the trecena o f 1 M o n k e y w ould
be dancers, singers, or scribes. Those born
on 1 W in d w o u ld be necrom ancers w ho
danced w ith the fo re a rm o f a w om an w ho
had d ied in c h ild b irth ; th e y w o u ld be e v il
people, perhaps even thieves. In g en eral the
dancer was a skilled p e rfo rm e r, and dance
alm ost alw ays occurred w ith singing and
Music. HUEHUECOYOTL and MACuiLxocHiTL w e re
the patrons o f m usic and dance. A ccording
to surviving depictions, m ost L a te Postclassic
C e n tra l M e x ica n dance follow s a cou n ter
clockw ise m ovem ent.
T h e re ad in g o f a lo n g -u n d ecip h ered v erb
in M a y a h iero g lyp h ic w ritin g reveals th a t the
M a y a n o b ility p erfo rm e d a w id e range o f
dances: a snake dance p erfo rm e d w ith liv e
boa constrictors, dances w ith b ird staffs, God
K staffs, basket staffs, and a fe a th e r dance
p erfo rm ed by rulers and th e ir attendants in
g re at fe a th e r backracks. As p a rt o f a p ublic
perform ance o f ritu a l BLOO DLETTING , M a y a
lords p e rfo ra te d th e ir p h a lli w ith long, color
fu l pairs o f "dan cer's w ings" - or w h a t m ay
be p ain te d PAPER o r cloth strips stretched over
w ooden supports - and then danced, blood
stream ing across the "w in g s ."

73
O th er M a y a lords donned the costum e o f
the M A IZ E C O D , or w h a t has also been called
the H o lm u l D an cer costum e, and danced
w ith DWARVES or hunchbacks, fre q u e n tly w ith
arms and hands w aving a t m id-body, as if in
im itatio n o f w aving MAIZE foliage. UNDERWORLD
deities fre q u e n tly dance in procession, usu
a lly in a clockwise m otion. D ancers m ay
accom pany m usicians, and som etim es they
bear rattles and FANS. Some M a y a dance
scenes are hum orous spoofs. In the P O P O L V U H ,
w hen com m anded to p erfo rm in the court o f
the lords o f d eath, the H e ro T w in s dance the
W easel, the P o o rw ill, and the A rm a d illo .
M a n y "sMiLiNC FicuREs" o f Classic V eracru z
m ay be dancers, w ith th e ir hands raised in a
praying position. M usicians and dancers

Curing: person with fever, Fiorentine Codex,


Book 10, 16th e. Aztec.

occur in the a rt o f W est M exico, and the


anecdotal groupings include scenes o f a cheek
p erfo ratio n dance, in w hich a stick m ay pierce
tw o d iffe re n t p erfo rm ers' cheeks, binding
dancers tog eth er in pain and bloodletting.
T h e so-called T em p le o f D anzantes, or
dancers, a t M o n te A lb an probably depicts
sacrificial victim s and not dancers at a ll.
d aw n T o the n ative peoples o f M esoam erica
the appearance o f the daw n m arked m ore
than sim ply the beginning o f day: it consti
tuted the re b irth o f the SUN out o f the h arro w
ing depths o f the d eathly U N D E R W O R L D . It was
b elieved th a t a fte r the sun set in the w est, it
trav eled a t m id n ig h t to the n ad ir o f the
U n d e rw o rld and then gradu ally m ade its re
ascent to a rriv e a t the east. T h e Aztecs
b elieved th a t w hereas the fem ale c iH U A T E T E O
p u lled the noonday sun from ze n ith in to the
U n d e rw o rld , the you th fu l souls o f w arriors
slain in b a ttle accom panied the sun in its
eastern ascent. T h e Aztecs also b elieved th a t
fo llo w in g its passage through the U n d erw o rld
the sun re q u ired sustenance in the form o f
hum an B LO O D and H EARTS to begin its arduous
ascent in to the SKY.
C R E A T IO N A C C O U N TS o f the first daw ning con
tain profound insights in to M esoam erican
conceptions o f th e sun and the day. A t the first
d aw ning a t T E O T iH U A C A N , the gods sacrificed
them selves fo r the n ew ly created sun.
A lthough this clea rly constitutes a C e n tra l
M exican ch a rter fo r

H U M A N S A C R IF IC E

in o rd er

to nourish the sun, it also describes the end


o f m ythic tim e. N o longer m oving, livin g
*beings upon the e a rth , the gods are now
represented by th e ir m um m y-like f/a g m n iiV0 //7

B U N D LE S .

The

now passive and in e rt

A scene of Aztec dance, Manuscrit Tovar, 16th c.

A probable Maya
sign of dawn: the
head of the sun god
between signs for
earth and sky, detail
of a hieroglyphic
bench, Copn, Late
Classic period.

74

DEATH
n atu re o f the gods is re ite ra te d in a curious

celeb ratio n s a re c le a rly o f P rehispanic o rigin.

episode m en tio n ed in th e L ey en d a d e so/es.

In ancien t M ex ico , the ArrERLifK destination


o f an in d iv id u a l v a rie d according to his or h e r

TLAHLBCALPAKTECUHTLJ, th e god o f d aw n and


the m orning star, attacked the sun as it
hovered over T eo tih u ac an . T h e sun, in tu rn ,

status and th e m ode o f d eath . M o st souls,


h o w e ve r, had to p erfo rm an arduous jo u rn e y

ing star, w ho becam e the god o f co!d. K n ow n

to th e UNDERWORLD, fo r w hich th e y w ere


fre q u e n tly supplied w ith food and clothing.

as iTZTLACouuHQL-MQUMLU, he is a!so the

I t w as also b eliev ed th a t Docs knew the w ay

shot an a rro w in to the fo reh ead o f th e m o rn

god o f stone. H e com m only displays the

through the U n d e rw o rld , and thus they too

d a rt o f the sun transExed through his stony

fre q u e n tly accom panied th e dead. F o r the

headdress. T h e tran sfo rm atio n o f gods in to

A ztecs, th e re , a re d e ta ile d

in e rt stone is g rap h ically described in the

the U n d e rw o rld hazards faced by the soul.

descriptions o f

POPOL vuH account o f the Erst d aw n . C o n tem

A m ong these dangers a re clashing h ills and

p orary m yths o f the Zapotees and M ixtees o f

obsidian-edged w inds. T h e

O axaca also m ention an e arly race o f people

POPOL v u H

turned to stone a t the Erst appearance o f the


sun. T h e Erst daw n in g m arks the beginning

the H e ro T w in s in th e ir jo u rn e y through
the U n d e rw o rld , in c lu d in g k ille r BATS, Eerce

o f everyday re a lity , in w hich the gods are

JAGUARS,

represented by re la tiv e ly passive bundles or

b eliev ed th a t th e soul w as a t last extinguished

stone sculptures. B ut if the daw n and day


constitute present ordered re a lity , the NIGHT

fou r years a fte r d ea th .

by contrast represents the supernatural tim e


o f DREAMS and livin g gods re-enacted in the
a pp aren t m ovem ents o f the starry sky. 5ee

d eath gods In a n c ie n t M eso am erica, th e re is


com m only a m ix tu re o f fe a r and derision

a / s o C R E A T IO N A C C O U N TS .

Q u ich e

M aya

describes s im ila r hazards faced by

and

num b in g

cold.

The

A ztecs

tow ard th e gods o f d ea th . A ltho u g h w id e ly


thought to be ruthless and cunning, they
are fre q u e n tly o u tw itte d and d efe ated in

death In M esoam erican thought death was


closely in teg rated in to the w o rld o f the livin g .
L ife and death w ere b elieved to exist in
dynam ic and com plem entary opposition. It
was w id e ly recognized th a t because o f the
basic need for nourishm ent, k illin g and SACRi
FICE was a necessary aspect o f life . M o reo v er,
deceased ancestors exerted p o w erfu l inR uences upon the livin g . N o t only could they
send punishing DISEASES, b u t they could serve
as in term ed iaries b etw een the livin g and the
gods. D u rin g certain o f the 20-day V E IN T E N A S ,
m ajor festivals honored the dead; the livin g
com m unicated w ith th e ir ancestors by means
o f food, Rowers, and o th er offerings. A ccord
ing to the 16th c. D om inican, F ra y D iego
D u ra n , the Aztecs perfo rm ed festivals fo r
dead children du rin g the 20-day m onth o f
Tlaxochim aco, and fo r adults in the fo llo w in g
m onth o f X ocotlhuetzi. W ith considerable
concern, D u ra n noted th a t although o rig in a lly
perform ed in August, m any aspects o f these
n ativ e rites w e re being perform ed during th e
C ath o lic celebrations o f A ll Saints' D a y and
A ll Souls' D a y . This festival event, now w id e ly
re fe rre d to as the D a y o f the D ea d , is usually
observed during the several days m arking
the end o f O ctober and the beginning o f
N ovem ber. M arigolds and other offerings
s till used today in the D a y o f the D ea d

m ythological accounts. Th u s Q U E T Z A L C O A T L
successfully steals the m akings o f people fro m
the c ra fty M iC T L A N T E C U H T L i. In th e P O P O L v u H ,
the H e ro T w in s X b a la n q u e and H u n ah p u
tric k the gods o f d eath in to vo lu n te erin g
them selves to be sacriRced. Thus the lords o f
X ib a lb a a re d efe ated and th e tw in s re trie v e
the rem ains o f th e ir fa th e r and uncle. O u r
very presence is lite ra lly a liv in g testim ony
to (he u ltim a te d e fe a t o f th e d ea th gods.
In C e n tra l M exico , the p re e m in e n t god o f
d eath was M ic tla n te c u h tli, o r lo rd o f M ic tla n ,
the U N D E R W O R L D . H e is u sually dep icted as a
skeleton w e arin g vestm ents o f PAPER, a com
mon o fferin g to the dead. S keletal d eath gods
are also know n fo r Protoclassic and Classic
V eracru z. A t tim es, th e ir a n im ated p o rtray al
suggests a fa m ilia rity b o rd erin g on affection.
T h e skeletal M a y a e q u iv a le n t o f M ic tla n te
c u h tli is today know n as G od A (see scHELLHAS
G O D s ), and com m only appears in Classic M a y a
a rt as w e ll as in the Postclassic codices. In one
text fro m th e M a d rid C odex, he is re fe rre d to
as cizm , or "R a tu le n t one. " CYzm is s till the
nam e fo r the d eath god am ong both the
Yucatec and Lacandon M a y a .
d eer T w o types o f d ee r a re n ativ e to
M eso am erica, the w h ite -ta ile d d eer (Ocfoccf/ens am ericana), and the sm aller brocket

75

DEFORMITY

d e e r (A fa z a m a

a m e ric a n a ).

O f these,

th e

w h ite -ta ile d d e e r seem s to h a v e h a d a fa r


m o re im p o rta n t ro le in n a tiv e ec o n o m y an d
re lig io n . D e e r m e a t w a s a n e s te e m e d food
o fferin g , a n d th e skins c o u ld b e used as th e
w ra p p in g s o f sacred

a n d as th e lea ves

B U N D LE S ,

o f screenfo ld codices (s ee coDEx). A s o n e o f


th e larg e st g a m e a n im a ls , th e w h ite -ta ile d
d e e r plays a fa irly passive ro le in M e s o a m e r
ican m y th o lo g y a n d is clo sely id e n tifie d w it h
gods o f th e h u n t. H o w e v e r , in C lassic M a y a
scenes, th e d e e r a p p ea rs in a n im p o rta n t

Death: a mortuary bundle


placed in the mouth
of a cave. Codex Laud,
Late Postclassic period.

m y th ic a l ep iso de in w h ic h th e yo u n g M o o n
G oddess Rees h e r a tta c k e rs on th e b a c k o f a
d e e r. In c e rta in scenes, this ep iso de seems to
h a v e e ro tic overto n es a n d it is lik e ly th a t
a m o n g th e M a y a , th e stag w as id e n tiR e d w ith
se xu a lity.
I n m a n y M e s o a m e ric a n fo rm s o f th e 2 0 d a y
n am es, in c lu d in g C e n tr a l M e x ic a n , Z a p o te e ,
M ix te e a n d M a y a versions, th e te rm or g ly p h
fo r d e e r serves as th e s e ven th d a y n a m e .
In Postclassic C e n tra l M e x ic o , this d a y w as
M a z a tl, w ith TLALoc as its p re s id in g god. In
C e n tr a l M e x ic a n sources, a tw o -h e a d e d d e e r
is shot b y

M D (C 0 A T L ,

god o f th e

M IL K Y W A Y

and

th e h u n t. T ra n s fo rm e d in to a w o m a n , th e
d e e r w as im p re g n a te d b y M ix c o a tl, a n d gave
b irth to th e c u ltu re h e ro

QUETZALCO ATL.

d e fo r m ity Since a t le a s t th e E a r ly F o rm a tiv e


p e rio d th e re w as a fa scin atio n w ith physical
a b n o rm a litie s . I n O lm e c a r t, rep re s e n ta tio n s
o f DWARVES a n d hunchbacks ab o u n d . R a th e r

Mictlantecuhtli, the
Central Mexican
death god. A stone
vessel excavated at
the Templo Mayor,
Tenochtitlan, Late
Postclassic Aztec.

th a n b e in g o bjects o f d e ris io n , these in d iv id u


als a re o fte n p o rtra y e d w it h g re a t s u p e rn a tu
r a l p o w e rs . I n
re p re s e n te d

on e in stan ce, d w a rv e s a re

s u p p o rtin g

th e

SKY,

w h ile

in

a n o th e r, a chinless d w a r f displays heads o f


th e g r e a t h a rp y

E A G LE

u p o n his b ro w . R e p

res e n ta tio n s o f d e fo rm itie s

a b o u n d in

th e

P rotoclassic c e ra m ic to m b a r t o f W e s t M e x ic o .
A lo n g w it h d w a rv e s a n d hunchbacks, d o u b le
headed
m o tifs.

DOGS

a re a m o n g th e m o re co m m o n

D u r in g

th e

Protoclassic

p e rio d ,

a n o th e r ty p e o f d e fo r m ity a p p ea rs w id e ly in
M e s o a m e ric a n a rt. C o m m o n ly r e fe r r e d to b y
th e S pan ish te rm o f

TUERTO ,

this fo rm a p p ea rs

as a g ro te s q u e ly tw is te d fa ce, w it h o n e ey e
shut, a b e n t nose, a n d a fr e q u e n tly e x te n d e d ,
s id e w a y s -c u rv in g to ng ue.
I n L a te Postclassic C e n tr a l M e x ic o , ph ys^ ic a l d e fo rm itie s w e r e id e n tiR e d w it h th e AnuiA TETEO ,

C e r ta in

gods o f p le a s u re a n d ph ysical excess.


ph ysical d e fo rm itie s

and

illnesses

w e r e p r o b a b ly c o n sid ered to b e p u n is h m e n ts

Xochipilli wearing a deer skin marked with the


20 day names, Codex Borgia, p. 53, Late
Postclassic period.

76

DEiF!CATfON
sent

by

the

A h u ia te te o

fo r

im m o d e rate

sonation, a hum an could becom e one w ith

b eh avior. H o w e v e r, the id e n tific a tio n o f the

the gods. B y h avin g a liv in g b ein g p erform

A h u ia te te o w ith d efo rm itie s p ro b ab ly goes

as th e god, in d iv id u als p layed out a collective

fu rth e r, as it is lik e ly th a t jesters, m usicians

h istory and a shared m ythic past. T hrough

and

fre q u e n tly

tran ce and tran s fo rm a tio n , the perform ance

defo rm ed or handicapped. T h e p rin cip a!


A h u ia te te o was MACUimocHiTL, o r 5 F lo w e r.

p o w e r and ensured the re p eated efficacy o f

o th e r

e n te rta in ers

w e re

In the F lo re n tin e C odex he is described as a


god o f the palace fo lk , w hich w o u ld have
included

m usicians, dw arves, jesters, and

o th er en te rta in ers.

o f hum ans

as d eities

d is trib u te d

m agical

th e gods.
A m ong th e A ztecs, the d eities celeb rated in
e ve ry VEINTENA o f the y e a r w e re im personated,
som etim es only fo r the ritu a l its e lf, som etim es
fo r days b efo re th e c u lm in atin g fes tiva l. In

ded icatio n M o s t ancien t kings o f M ex ico and

th e m ost e lab o ra te case, fo r th e feast o f

the M a y a region w e re recognized as d iv in e ,

T o xcatl, a young m an liv e d as TEZCATLIPOCA

if not in th e ir life tim es , then upon th e ir


deaths. According to A ztec accounts, M o te -

fo r a yea r. In this ro le , he w as m uch honored,


and M otecu h zo m a h im s e lf adorned h im . H e

cuhzom a 11 surely live d as d iv in e , his fe e t

was accom panied by e ig h t young m en and

never touching the e a rth , avoiding eye con

then , 20 days b efo re his sacrifice, he was

tact, and never eatin g in fro n t o f any o th er

m a rrie d to fo u r w om en, w h o them selves


personified x o c H i Q U E T Z A L , X ilo n e n , A tla to n a n ,

person. W hen M otecuhzom a and C ortes m et


on the road from C holula to T e n o c h titla n ,
C orts sought to g reet him as if he w e re a
European m ortal and to touch h im , an act
rep ellen t to the A ztec king.
T izo c, one
o f M otecuhzom a's predecessors (A ztec ru le r
1481-6), com m em orated his victories in b a ttle
w ith a m onum ent th a t depicts him as a
conflation o f tw o m ain d eities, the A ztec
god o f w a r, HurrziLOPOCHTU, and TEZCATLIPOCA,
w ith whose serpent foot Tizoc appears.
M a y a rulers held d ivin e status a fte r d eath,
and in a ll likelih o o d , in life too. D eiH ed
ancestors freq u e n tly occupy the upper m argin
o f carved stone m onum ents. A t T ik a l, Storm y
Sky's fa th e r and predecessor as king, C u rl
Snout, looks dow n on him from above as the
sun god. B ird Jaguar o f Yaxchiln had his
m other and fa th e r rendered in the heavens
on his m onum ents, w ith in cartouches o f the
sun and the moon. K ing Pacal o f P alenque,
fo r exam ple, is rendered in the conflated
a ttire o f tw o gods upon his death: C od K and
the Tonsured M a ize G od, w ith w hom he is
app aren tly conjoined. A 7th c. Bonam pak
king, C han-m uan i, is depicted posthum
ously as G od L ; K an X u l o f P alenque appears
as C H A C , again posthum ously, on the D u m b a r
ton Oaks panel. E ven the erection o f m onu
m en tal PYRAMIDS over the tombs o f dead kings
suggests th e ir apotheosis and a practice o f
ancestor w orship am ong the ancien t M a y a .
D u rin g th e ir ow n lifetim es, M a y a kings o ften
appear in the guise o f the MAIZE GOD, w ith
w hom they w ere identiH ed.
d eity im personation Through d e ity im p e r

and U ix to c ih u atl.
A ccording to Sahagun, the im personator o f
T ezcatlip o ca had to have a specific physical
appearance: " H e w ho w as chosen w as o f
fa ir countenance, o f good und erstan d in g and
quick, o f clean body - slender lik e a reed ;
long and th in lik e a stout cane; w e ll-b u ilt;
not o f o verfed body, not corp u len t, and
n e ith e r v ery sm all nor exceedingly ta ll . . .
[H e w as] lik e som ething sm oothed, lik e a
tom ato, o r lik e a p eb b le , as i f h ew n o f w ood
. . . no scabs, pustules, o r boils on th e foreh ead
. . . not p ro tru d in g or long ears, nor w ith
torpid neck, nor hunch backed, n o r s tiff
necked, nor w ith neck elongated . . . not
em aciated, nor fa t . . . H e w ho w as thus,
w ith o u t Haws, w ho had no d efects" w o u ld
liv e as T ezcatlip o ca fo r a y e a r (F C : u).
In the m onth o f T la c a x ip e h u a liztli, the
im personator o f xiPE T O T E C , O u r L o rd the
F la ye d O n e , took on th e specific c h aracter
istics o f th a t god. F o r the fe s tiv a l, a X ip e
im personator took on th e ro le 40 days b efo re
hand, and he was gloriH ed and re ve red as if
he w e re the god him self. O n th e d aw n o f the
day o f c eleb ratio n h e, along w ith im person
ators o f e ig h t o th e r gods, am ong them Hurrzi
L O P O C H T L I, Q U E T Z A L C O A T L , M A C U IL X O C H IT L , and
M A Y A H U E L , had th e ir hearts sacriHced and
then , im m e d ia te ly , th e ir skins Hayed. O th e r
m en then donned these Hayed skins and the
re g alia o f the various d eities in a cerem ony
D u r n calls N e te o to q u iliztli, w h ich he trans
lates as "Im p ers o n atio n o f a C o d ." A fte r a
ritu a l com bat and m ore sacriHces, fu rth e r
m en b o rrow ed th e Hayed skins and, adorned

77

DIRECTIONS

as X ip e, begged fo r 20 days in the streets o f


Ten o ch titlan . A t the end o f the 20 days,
the foul-sm elling, p u tre fied X ip e skins w e re
buried w ith in the X ip e tem p le. These im p e r
sonations and sacrifices o f A ztec deities
served constantly to re n ew the v ita lity o f the
god him self.
In m any cases in ancien t M esoam erica,
d eity im personation m ay have been a sham anic transform ation, in w h ich individuals
had a "com panion self" or TONAL in to w hich
they changed un d er c ertain conditions. T h e
M a y a hieroglyph read UAY links the nam es o f
hum ans w ith th e ir com panion selves, usually
anim als, and most fre q u e n tly the JAG UAR. A

Deliberate mutilation of teeth: examples of


dentistry from Uaxactun, Late Classic Maya.

num ber o f O lm ec sculptures show stages o f


the transform ation from hum an to ja g u ar
form and are in a ll likelih o o d sham anic trans
form ations.
In th e ir royal costumes, M a y a kings fre
q u en tly im personated th e ir gods, most often
the M A K E C O D , b u t also the JAG UAR G O D o f the
U n d e rw o rld , C H A C , and G i o f the
Fee a/so S H A M A N IS M .

P A LE N Q U E

T R IA D .

d en tistry A lthough little is know n o f the


practice or m ethod o f M esoam erican dentis
try , surviving noble skulls fre q u e n tly reveal
Rled or in la id teeth , from 1000 Be on u n til
the Spanish Conquest. Both filin g and d rillin g
often le ft exposed nerves in the teeth and
m ust freq u e n tly have resulted in excruciating
p ain, in fectio n , and even d eath. Using la p i
dary skills and techniques, ancien t M esoam ericans d rille d and inserted into teeth ja d e
beads, bits o f turquoise and iron pyrites am ong o th er m aterials. D e n ta l in lay app ar
e n tly alw ays functioned cosm etically and not
to re p a ir cavities.
Am ong the M a y a , upper incisors w ere
som etim es filed to the T-shape o f the sun
god, and in this w ay, a hum an s visage could
be p erm an e n tly transform ed in to th a t o f a
m ajor d eity . T h e ja d e mosaic mask con
structed d ire c tly on K in g Pacal o f Palenque s
face a fte r d eath also fe a tu re d tesserae that
form ed a T o f u pper incisors.

east (/a/Mn)

north (xaman)

west (c/rMn)

directions T h e fo u r card in al directions con


s titu te one o f the u n d erlyin g fram ew orks o f
M esoam erican relig io n and cosmology. T h e
O lm ecs w ere c lea rly fascinated b y them , and
a t th e M id d le F o rm a tiv e O lm ec site o f L a
*V en ta, Tabasco, caches o f JADE and serpentine
form crosses o rien ted to the fo u r d irec
tions. T h e placem ent o f fou r c le ft celts across

CELTS

south (no/io/)
Comparison of Early Classic and Postclassic
Maya direction glyphs: left column, Ro Azul,
Early Classic; right column, Dresden Codex,
Postclassic.

7$

DISEASE

also be an allusion to the fo u r d irectio n s. O n e

depicts a d iffe re n t d ire c tio n a l god, tem pfe,


and tre e . S im ila r d ire ctio n al passages app ear

la te O lm ec carvin g , the H u m b o ld t C e lt, m ay

in th e F e j rv ry -M a y e r, V atican us B, and

possibly rep resen t p a rtic u la r signs o f th e fo u r

Cospi codices. C o n ta in in g references to d ire c

the headband or b ro w o f O lm ec heads m ay

d irections, o rie n te d around a c e n tra l disk

tio n al gods, tem p les, and trees, a very s im ila r

containing a cross.
By the E a rly Classic p erio d am ong the

sequence appears in the n ew y ea r pages o f


the M a y a D resd en C odex.

M a y a , th ere is clea r epig rap h ic evidence o f


d ire ctio n al glyphs. E a rly Classic form s o f the

disease

fou r d ire ctio n al glyphs a re d isplayed upon

M eso am erica,

In

an cien t

the w alls o f To m b 12 a t R io A zu l, G u a te m a la ,

reg ard in g illness. W h ereas disease m arks an

th e re

and
is

an

contem porary
am bivalence

w h e re they correspond to the correct c ard in a l

im b alanced and dangerous state, it can also

directions, confirm ing the w e ll-k n o w n d ire c

den o te a special relatio n s h ip to sup ern atu ral

the Postclassic

pow ers. F re q u e n tly a person e xh ib itin g a

M a y a codices. A side from the still undeciph

p a rtic u la r illness is b e liev ed to have received

tio n al glyphs app earin g in

ered glyph fo r south, the Classic and Post

a s u p ern atu ral sum m ons. Q u ite o fte n , people

classic d irectio n al glyphs p rovide p honetic


values corresponding to Yucatec M a y a n d irec

cured o f a disease becom e p o w e rfu l curers

tional term s o f /a M m (east), tram an (n o rth ),

m ost g raphic p o rtrayals o f disease app ear

and c M rin (w est).


By the L a te Classic period, there is re lia b le
epigraphic evidence for day nam es and coLons
o rien ted tow ard the four directions. Thus in

in the Protoclassic tom b sculpture o f W est

the Classic M a y a 819-day cycle, the 20 day


nam es are consistently associated w ith p a r
ticu lar colors and directions. B eginning w ith
the first day nam e o f Im ix, the directions and
colors shift through the 20 day nam es in a
counter-clockw ise m otion from east and red
to north and w h ite , w est and black, south
and yellow . T h e same o rien tatio n o f day
names to colors and directions is w e ll docu
m ented for the Postclassic Yucatec M a y a .
A lthough there are no know n signs for
directions or colors in the w ritin g systems o f
C e n tra l M exico, directions are freq u e n tly
indicated by the use o f the 20 day nam es. As
in the case o f the Classic and Postclassic
M a y a , the day nam es pass in counter-clock
wise succession, w ith the first day, C ip a c tli corresponding to the M a y a Im ix - beginning
in the east. In o th er w ords, both the M a y a
and C e n tra l M exican versions o f the 20 day
nam es are o rien ted to precisely the same
directions. Since the fou r directions pass Uve
tim es evenly through the 20 days, each d irec
tion has five p a rtic u la r days. F o r exam ple, the
first, fifth , n in th , th irte e n th , and seventeenth
day names o f C ip a c tli, C o at, A tl, A catl, and
O llin a ll correspond to the east.
In the C e n tra l M exican codices, these fou r
five-day groups are often used to designate
the cardinal directions. Thus pages 49 to 52
o f the Codex Borgia contain elab o rate scenes
corresponding to the fo u r d irectio n al grou
pings o f day nam es. Each o f the fou r pages

and SHAMANS. Som e o f the e a rlie s t as w e ll as

M exico , especially th a t o f th e Ix tla n d el R io


style o f N a y a rit.
Diseases a re com m only b eliev ed to d e riv e
from CAVES and th e UNDERWORLD. T h e Q uich
M a y a P O P O L v u H describes p a rtic u la r diseases
caused by the U n d e rw o rld lords o f X ib a lb a .
A m ong these d eath gods a re A h alp u h and
A h alg an , w ho cause sw ellin g , pus, and ja u n
dice, C h am iab ac and C h am iah o lo m , m akers
o f extrem e w asting and em aciatio n , and X ic
and P a tan , bringers o f blood vo m it. I t is
p robable th a t m any o f the U n d e rw o rld gods
and dem ons in Classic M a y a vessel scenes a re
also personifications o f p a rtic u la r diseases. In
the Yucatec M a y a
o f the
the lo rd o f the U n d e rw o rld , H u n A h au ,
is fre q u e n tly evoked. In this C o lo n ial tex t,
diseases are tre a te d as p ersonified sen tien t
beings th a t can be addressed by the curer.
A m ong th e m aladies m en tio n ed a re p a rtic u la r
seizures, asthm a, and skin eruptions. A m ong
contem porary Yucatec M a y a , c e rta in diseases
a re b eliev ed to be caused by insects sent from
the U n d e rw o rld by e v il sorcerers.
In m any parts o f M eso am erica, diseases
a re thought to be caused b y sorcery. In the
e a rly C o lo n ial Yucatec d ictio n aries, th e re are
term s describing sorcerers w ho can cause
blood or pus in u rin e , in te s tin a l w orm s,
d ia rrh e a , and o th e r u n pleasant com plaints.
Sorcerers are w id e ly b eliev ed to attack the
souls or sup ern atu ral a lte r egos o f in d ivid u als,
th e re b y causing illness and d eath . A p a rtic u
la rly fea red form o f sorcerer is the in d iv id u al
w ho can transform in to an an im al. T o the
Aztecs, this in d iv id u a l was know n as f/ac afe -

79

DIVINATION

co/od, o r " o w l person. " T h e A z te c F lo r e n tin e


C od ex describes th e d e eds p e rfo r m e d b y this
in d iv id u a l:

"H e

is a h a te r , a d e s tro y e r o f

p eop le; an im p la n te r o f sickness, w h o bleed s


h im s e lf

over

potions -

oth ers,

who

w h o m akes th e m

kills

th e m

by

d r in k po tio ns;

w h o bu rn s w o o d e n figures o f o th e rs ."
Im p u ritie s caused b y excessive se x u a lity
an d drun ken n e ss a re a n o th e r cause o f d is
ease. P ro stitu te s, a d u lte re rs a n d d ru n k a rd s
th e re fo re

a c te d

as vectors

C e n tra l M e x ic o , th e

o f disease.

In

w e r e s im u l

A H U iA T E T E O

tan eo u sly th e gods o f excess a n d p u n is h m e n t,


fr e q u e n tly

in

th e

fo rm

th e

M A C U iL X O C H iT L ,

o f sickness.

p rin c ip a l

Thus

A h u ia te te o ,

b ro u g h t diseases o f th e g e n itals to those w h o


c o p u la te d w h ile u n d e r fast. Im m o d e r a tio n
re p re s e n te d a dang ero us im b a la n c e b e tw e e n
th e p e o p le a n d th e s u rro u n d in g n a tu ra l an d
s u p e rn a tu ra l w o rld s a n d , fo r this reaso n, th e
te rr ib le ep id e m ic s o f th e 16 th c. w e r e w id e ly
co n sid ered to b e signs o f d iv in e p u n is h m e n t
a n d re tr ib u tio n . T o th e n a tiv e su fferers, these
plagu es

w e re

o fte n

re g a rd e d

as signs o f

p ro fo u n d s p iritu a l as w e ll as ph ysical illness.


S e e a i s o C U R IN G ; D E F O R M IT Y .

Part of a passage describing temples, gods, and


day names of the four directions, Codex
Fejrvry-Mayer, p. 33, Late Postclassic period.
In the lower portion of the scene, the five
eastern day names are placed below the sun god,
Tonatiuh, who stands before his temple.

d iv in a tio n D iv in a tio n is a n essen tial e le m e n t


o f M e s o a m e ric a n

relig iou s life . As a sign

o f its im p o rta n c e , th e p rim o rd ia l

A NC ESTR A L

COUPLE a n d e v e n th e creato rs th em selves are


o fte n d e scrib e d as d iv in e rs . T h u s th e A z te c
g e n e trix

Toci

w as re g a rd e d as th e goddess o f

d iv in e rs as w e ll as th e m o th e r o f th e gods. I t
is q u ite lik e ly th a t th e ag ed Goddess O o f
th e M a y a (s ee

S C H E L LH A S c o o s )

w as s im ila rly

re g a rd e d as a d iv in e r as w e ll as an ag ed
c re a to r goddess. I n C e n tra l M e x ic o , th e p r i
m o rd ia l co u p le k n o w n as O xo m o co a n d C ip a c to n a l a r e d e scrib e d as d iv in e rs . A cco rd in g to
th e Q u ic h e M a y a

POPO L v u n ,

th e ag ed co u p le

X p iy a c o c a n d X m u c a n e p e rfo rm e d d iv in a to ry
h a n d casting d u rin g th e c re a tio n o f p e o p le.
N o t o n ly do d iv in e rs p la y a ro le in
ACCOUNTS,

C R E A T IO N

b u t th e a c tu a l p ra c titio n e rs fr e

q u e n tly c o m p a re th e ir r itu a l acts to th a t o f


c re a tio n .

Thus

th e

d iv in e r

co m m o n ly

describes a n d in vokes th e im ages a n d forces


p re s e n t a t th e tim e o f c re a tio n . T h is m a y
b e seen in a p o rtio n o f a re c e n t M a z a te c
d iv in a to ry p r a y e r b y M a r ia S abina:

From out o the mghf and darkness, says


71ben the trees grew, the mountains and
^rtc^es were /brmed, says,
H e on/y thought about it and iooied into it
to the bottom, says,

Woman performing divination by handcasting to


determine the outcome of a disease, Codex
Magliabechiano, 16th c. Aztec. The starry night
symbol behind the diviner indicates that this was
a nocturnal rite.

DfVINC GOD

TAen fAe p/a/ns anc/ Ao//owy AarJenet/, ^ayy


7Aat Is wAat we are gom^ fo do, too, says.

M a y a p a n and o th e r la te site* o f the n o rthern

fEy^rada and Mum? 19^2. 742^

M a y a low lands. In scholarly lite ra tu re , this


b ein g is o fte n re fe rre d to as a bee god hut

T h e M esoam ehcan id e n tiEca tion o f d iv in

th e re is little iconographic support for this


id e n tific a tio n . T h e vast m a jo rity o f d iv in g god

ation w ith creatio n is p ro b ab ly because it is,

figures ap p e ar to rep resen t th e M a y a MAizH

by its n a tu re , a m iraculous act. T h ro u g h ritu a l

coD ,

and p ra y e r, the d iv in e r sum mons the godly

SCHELLHAS CODS).

com m only re fe rre d to as God E (see

pow ers o f creation to m an ifest them selves


again in a physical and tan g ib le m ed iu m . In

dog T h e te n th d ay sign in the C e n tra l M e x i

contrast to the casting o f lots d u rin g gam bling

can c ale n d ar rep resen ted th e dog, know n as

gam es, d iv in a tio n

Itz c u in tli in N a h u a tl; in the Yucatec M a y a

was not recreatio n

but

c ale n d ar, the ten th d ay sign, O c, p ro b ab ly

re -creat/o n .
In an cien t M eso am erica, d iv in atio n took

also re fers

m any form s. T h e 260-d ay CALENDAR, so c en tral

re ad in g is know n fo r the w o rd its e lf. xiPE

to M esoam erican life , served p rim a rily as a

TOTEC and QUETZALCOATL presided o ver the

d iv in ato ry alm anac, and p ro b ab ly had its


origins in d iv in ato ry rites p e rta in in g to m id

trecena 1 Itz c u in tli.


T h e n a tiv e M eso am erican dog w as a h a ir

w ives and the hum an gestation p erio d . I t was

less c re a tu re , p rin c ip a lly raised as a foodstuff.

to the dog, although

no such

often used in conjunction w ith sortilage, or

M a le s w e re o ften castrated and fo rce -fed . In

the d iv in ato ry casting o f !ots, w hich was often

C e n tra l M ex ico , a person born on the d ay 4

p erform ed w ith seeds th a t w e re random ly


cast and then counted for the augury. I t is

D og in the trecena I D e e r w o u ld be a g ifte d


b re ed er o f dogs and w o u ld n ev er lack fo r

probable th a t the vast num ber o f d iv in ato ry


alm anacs in the ancient screenfold books
w ere used w ith hand casting. Scrying w ith
MIRRORS or pools o f w a te r was another form

food.

o f M esoam erican d ivin atio n . Am ong the


Tarascans o f M ichoacn, the SHAMANS o f the
king could see a ll past and fu tu re events
through bowls o f w a te r or m irrors. T h e events
w itnessed by these seers could be used as
evidence in court cases.
Aside
from
sortilage
and
scrying,
M esoam erican diviners com m only used th e ir
ow n bodies fo r prognostications. Thus d iv
iners could receive messages through muscle
tw itchings or the pulsing o f blood. In C e n tra l
M exico, d ivin atio n was also p erfo rm ed by
hand spans. H e re the d iv in er m easured the
le ft arm o f the p a tie n t w ith the outstretched
span o f the rig h t hand. Visions d erived from
H A L L U C IN O G E N S are another im p o rtan t form o f
d ivin atio n , and are still w id e ly used am ong
contem porary diviners o f M exico. Am ong the
m ore common hallucinogenic plants used in
d ivin atio n are m orning glory, jinsom w eed,
and peyote.
D iv in g C od O ne o f the m ore com m on sculp
tu ra l m otifs o f L a te Postclassic Yucatn is a
you th fu l figure th a t appears to be diving
headfirst from the sky. A lthough the most
elab o rate and best-know n exam ples occur in
the arch itecture o f T u lu m , Q u in tan a Roo, the
d ivin g god also appears in the sculpture o f

XOLOTL, a C e n tra l M e x ic a n god w ith in ti

m ate ties to the UNDERWORLD, som etim es has


the head o f a dog. In both A ztec and M a y a
b e lie f dogs, perhaps em bodying the ro le o f
X o lo tl, guided th e ir m asters in to the U n d e r
w o rld a fte r DEATH and w e re o f p a rtic u la r use
in crossing bodies o f WATER. T h a t this b e lie f
is o f some a n tiq u ity is borne o u t by c a re fu lly
b u ried skeletons o f dogs in te rre d w ith
hum ans a t L a te F o rm a tiv e C h up icu aro . Dogs
also accom panied th e ir m asters in E a rly
Classic M a y a TOMBS, and fre q u e n tly ap p ear
in U n d e rw o rld scenes on p ain te d Classic
M a y a pots. In the POPOL vuH, w h en they
p erfo rm ed in th e court o f th e lords o f d eath ,
the H e ro T w in s sacriSced a dog and then
brought it back to life ; th e g ra te fu l dog
w agged his ta il.
Dogs a re a fre q u e n t subject o f W est M e x
ican, p a rtic u la rly C o lim a , a rt. W h ile m any
app ear sim ply to be n atu ra lis tic represen
tations o f the fa t, hairless dog, others w e a r
masks and belong to a su p ern atu ral realm .
dream s M eso am erican peoples recognized
dream s as special tim es o f com m unication
b etw een hum ans and the su p ern atu ral w o rld.
In dream s, hum ans can contact com panion
spirits, or w h a t a re called UAYS or T O N A L S , and
e n te r dialogues w ith ancestors and gods.
A ccording to D u r n , a t the tim e o f the
lan d in g o f the Spanish invaders in V eracru z,

81

DUALITY

M otecuhzom a n grew preoccupied w ith


omens and dream s; he com m anded his peo
ple to come fo rw ard and re la te th e ir dream s,
even if they w e re u n favo rab le. A n old m an
reported th a t he had seen the tem p le o f
Hum ziLO PO C H TLi on fire and fa lle n ; an old
wom an told o f a dream in w hich a riv e r
ripped through the royal palace, destroying
it. M otecuhzom a cast the dream ers in to ja il
and le ft them to die.
A m o n g th e m o d e rn h ig h la n d M a y a , a d o le
scents - o r pre-ad o lesc en ts -

m a y b e c a lle d

as SHAMANS o r c a le n d a r k e ep e rs th ro u g h illness
an d d rea m s. In Z in a c a n ta n , a 10- o r 1 2 -y e a rold b o y o r g irl receives th re e d re a m s w h e n

Effigy vessel in the form of a dog wearing a


human mask, Colima, Protoclassic period.

ca lle d as a sh am an.
d u a lity O n e o f th e basic s tru c tu ra l p rin c ip le s
o f M e s o a m e ric a n relig iou s th o u g h t is th e use
o f p a ire d oppositions. In th ese p a irin g s , th e re
is a re c o g n itio n o f th e es sen tial
d e n ce

of

opposites.

T h is

in te r d e p e n

c o m p le m e n ta ry

op p o sitio n is m ost c le a rly re p re s e n te d in th e


sexual p a irin g o f m a le a n d fe m a le . T o th e
A ztec s, th e s u p re m e c re a tiv e p rin c ip le w as
OM ETEO TL, th e god o f d u a lity . I n

this single

s e lf-g e n e ra tin g b e in g , th e m a le a n d fe m a le
p rin c ip le s w e r e jo in e d . T h e o m n ip o te n t god
co uld also b e r e fe r r e d

to b y its m a le an d

fe m a le aspects, O m e te c u h tli a n d O m e c ih u a tl.


S im ila rly , th e M ix te e s an d o th e r M e s o a m e r
ica n c u ltu re s co n sid ered c re a tio n to b e th e
w o rk o f a s e xu a lly p a ire d coup le.
A s id e fro m th e m a le an d fe m a le p rin cip les,
co m m o n o p p o sitio n a l p a irin g s in c lu d e life an d
d e a th , sky a n d e a rth , z e n ith a n d n a d ir, d a y
a n d n ig h t, sun a n d m oon , fire a n d w a te r . I t
can re a d ily b e seen th a t such series o f p a irin g s
c o u ld b e ea sily lin k e d in to a la rg e r g ro u p o f
oppositions. T h u s , fo r e x a m p le , on e side could
e n ta il m a le , life , sky, z e n ith , d a y , sun, a n d
fire , w h e re a s

th e o th e r w o u ld b e fe m a le ,

d e a th , e a rth , n a d ir, n ig h t, m oon , a n d w a te r .


Such la rg e r s tru c tu ra l oppositions a re e v id e n t
in

b o th c o n ta c t p e rio d a n d

c o n te m p o ra ry

M e s o a m e ric a n relig io u s system s.


T h e co n ce p t o f d u a lity can b e tra c e d as fa r
b a ck as th e E a r ly F o rm a tiv e a r t o f h ig h la n d
M e x ic o , w h e r e som e c e ra m ic m asks fro m th e
site o f T la tilc o a r e c le ft d o w n th e m id d le fro m
b r o w to ch in , a liv in g fa c e on o n e sid e a n d a
Aeshless skull on th e o th e r. In C lassic M a y a
^ w ritin g , d is ta n c e n u m b e rs used in c a le n d ric a l
re fe re n c e s a re occasion ally in tro d u c e d w it h
p a ire d couplets. O n th e L a te C lassic T a b le t
o f th e 9 6 G ly p h s fro m P a le n q u e , th e p a ire d

Two examples of duality.


(AgAf) Split mask
representing living and
eshless face, Tlatilco,
Early Formative period.
(Be/ow) The death god,
Mictlantecuhtli (left), with
the life-giving god of wind,
Ehecatl-Quetzalcoatl; Codex
Borgia, p. 56, Late
Postclassic period.

nz

DWARVES AND HUNCHBACKS

e d ib le fungus know n today in C e n tra ! M exico

glyphs fo r sun and darkness, Venus and


m oon, and w in d and w a te r precede distance

as Au/dbcocAe, w hich invades and distorts an

num bers. T h e significance o f such coup!ets in

e a r o f m aize. A t Y axchiln, tw o d w arves w ith

M a y a c ale n d rica l expressions rem ains to be

star m arkings on th e ir backs atten d K ing B ird

exp iain ed . Perhaps the m ost advanced lite r

Jaguar in a BALLCAME scene and m ay re fe r to

a ry

use o f p a ire d

expressions appears in

N a h u a tl ritu a l speech, w h e re a p a ir o f w ords


is used to re fe r to a th ird concept. K n ow n by

the con stellatio n C e m in i, know n as the TURTLE


or d w a rf star am ong th e M a y a .
A m ong the A ztecs,

TLALO c,

lik e the M a y a

its Spanish nam e, d t/ras/sino, this lite ra ry

ra in god

device

N a h u a tl.

hunchbacks, and d efo rm itie s. T h e king o f

A m ong the b e tte r know n exam ples a re Rre

C haleo o ffe red a hunchback to the T la lo q u e

is

re la tiv e ly

com m on

and w a te r to a llu d e to w a r (see


O L L i) ,

in

A T L T L A C H iN

red and black fo r w ritin g , and stone

and w ood fo r punishm ent.

CHAC,

w as associated w ith dw arves,

(gods o f ra in and lig h tn in g ); he had him


c arried to a cave in a d o rm a n t volcano, w h e re
th e T la lo q u e w elcom ed him to th e ir palace.
W h e n the king la te r found h im a liv e , he took

dw arves and hunchbacks A t the tim e o f the

it as an om en th a t C haleo w o u ld fa ll, as

Spanish C onquest, M otecuhzom a I I , lord o f

it d id th a t y e a r, to the M e x ica . See a/yo

the Aztecs, kept a troop o f dw arves to e n te r

A H U IA T E T E O ; D E F O R M IT Y ; T U E R T O S .

tain him and som etim es to advise h im on


m atters o f state and relig io n . B u t the im p o rt
ance o f dw arves - and hunchbacks, w ith
w hom they are often paired - in M eso am erican religion goes back to the e arlies t tim es,
w hen the O lm ecs paid special atten tio n to
dw arves. O n P otrero N uevo A lta r I , dw arves
support the sym bol for sky, and so m ay
w e ll have been understood to be SKYBEAHERS,
perhaps akin to the M a y a bacabs. M a n y
sm all, p o rtab le
O lm ec objects fe a tu re
dw arves and hunchbacks, some occasionally
w ith wings. These im ages m ay w e ll be linked
to concepts in the G u lf Coast a rea th a t have
survived in to m odern tim es o f the cAaneAey,
m ischievous dw arves and spirits w ho p lay
unpleasant tricks on hum ankind.
T h e M a y a believed th a t dw arves w e re
child ren o f the Chacs (rain gods), and that
they could bring rain . Some contem porary
highland M exico M a y a peoples b elieve th a t
dw arves d w e ll under the surface o f the earth .
In Yucatec, dw arves are also know n as ciz
Amm, or "e a rth f a r te r /' presum ably because
o f th e ir proxim ity to the ground. O n some
Classic M a y a pots and m onum ents, dw arves
are nam ed as such, and the w ord fo r d w a rf,
cA a f is w ritte n phonetically. T h e Zapotees
believed th a t m ountain gods w e re dw arves.
From abundant Classic M a y a depictions o f
dw arves, it is clear th a t most suffered shortlim b dw arfism , or w h a t is som etim es know n
as acAondrop/asia. T h e MAIZE GOD is o ften
shown dancing w ith a d w a rf or a hunchback
on pain ted vases from the N a ra n jo -H o lm u l
region; perhaps the d w a rf is an allusion to
the sm aller second ear o f m aize freq u e n tly
issued by the m aize p lan t, or perhaps to the

eagle T h e re a re tw o im p o rta n t species o f


eagle n a tiv e to M eso am erica, th e h arp y eagle
(.Ha^p/a A arp y/a) and the golden eagle
(A g tn /a cA/y-saefay). N a tiv e to the hum id
low lands, the h arp y eagle is the g reatest
avian p re d a to r o f M eso am erica. W ith its
m assive, razo r-sh arp talons, it is capable o f
k illin g a d u lt m onkeys. Thus it is n o t surprising
th a t th e h arp y eagle plays a m ajo r ro le in
F o rm a tiv e O lm ec iconography. In O lm ec a rt,
the h arp y can be re a d ily id e n tifie d by its
sharply d o w n tu rn ed ra p to ria l b eak and its
p ro m in en t, fo rw ard -s w ee p in g fe a th e r crest.
T h e " am e eyebrow s ' ap p earin g in O lm ec
iconography a re a form o f th e h arp y eagle
crest. T h e O lm ec sym bolism o f the h arp y was
und ou b ted ly com plex. I t o ften appears on
O lm ec ja d e ite "spoons," w h ich w e re q u ite
possibly receptacles fo r blood d u rin g penis
p erfo ra tio n .
A m ong the Classic M a y a , a b ird , q u ite
p ro b ab ly th e h arp y eagle, serves as the p e r
sonified fo rm o f the roughly 2 0 -y e a r Aatun.
T h e same b ird also serves fo r the AaAfun
tim e p erio d , although h ere it is distinguished
by having a hum an hand serving as th e lo w e r
ja w . A long w ith a th ick ra p to ria l beak, the
b ird displays a p ro m in e n t fe a th e r crest upon
the b ro w . T h e Aafun b ird also serves as a
sym bol fo r the sky, and in M a y a w ritin g can
provide th e phonetic v alu e o f can or cAan,
the M a y a n term fo r "sky. " T h e b ird head
appearing as the Classic form o f the day M e n

83

EARTH

is p ro b a b ly also a n e a g le , as th e Postclassic
C e n tra l M e x ic a n fo rm o f this d a y n a m e is
C u a u h tli,

m e a n in g

" e a g le ."

In

th e

" h in t

(Le/t) Enthroned hunchback, detail


of Chenes capstone, Late Classic
Maya.

s h ield " w a r expression o f C lassic M a y a ico n


og raph y, a n e a g le h e a d c a n b e s u b s titu te d
fo r th e sign fo r

In

F L IN T .

L a te

Postclassic

C e n tra l M e x ic o th e e a g le w as s im ila rly id e n t i

(Center) Aztec eagle warrior


sculpture, Templo
Mayor,Tenochtitlan, Late
Postclassic period.

fied w ith h in t.
T h e e a g le plays a n e s p e c ia lly p r o m in e n t
role in th e

re lig io n o f Postclassic C e n tr a l

M e x ic o . In b o th C e n tr a l M e x ic a n a n d M ix te e
w ritin g , it ap p e a rs as th e 1 5 th d a y n a m e ,
co rresp on din g to th e M a y a d a y M e n . R e n d
e re d w it h a la rg e fe a th e r crest, it is p ro b a b ly
th e h a rp y r a th e r th a n th e g o ld e n ea g le. In
b o th w r itin g a n d a rt, it is fr e q u e n tly frin g e d
w ith A in t b lades. I n L a te Postclassic C e n tra l
M e x ic o , th e ea g le w as a sym b ol o f th e sun.
T h u s in N a h u a tl, th e te rm s fo r ascen din g
ea g le (c u a u h f7 e h u a n if/) a n d d e s ce n d in g ea g le
( c u a u h fe m o c ) w e r e used to r e fe r to th e risin g
a n d s e ttin g o f th e

F o r th e A ztec s, th e

S U N.

e a g le s y m b o liz e d o n e o f th e

tw o m ilita ry

ord e rs d e d ic a te d to th e sun, th e o th e r b e in g
th e

JAG UAR

(s ee

W A R R IO R O R D E R S ).

also id e n tiA e d w it h

E agles w e r e

H U M A N S A C R IF IC E ,

one o f

th e p r im a r y m ean s o f n o u ris h in g th e sun.


Thus

e a g le fe a th e r d o w n w as a co m m o n

sym b ol o f sacriAce in C e n tr a l M e x ic o . H u m a n
HEARTS o ffe re d to th e sun w e r e k n o w n as
cu au h n o ch fh , o r " e a g le cactus f r u it ." T h e s e
h e a rts w e r e

fre q u e n tly

vessel k n o w n as th e

p la c e d in a stone
th e " e a g le

c u A U H X iC A L L i,

g o u rd ve ssel."
T h e g o ld e n ea g le h a d a sp ecial ro le in th e
le g e n d a ry fo u n d in g o f th e A z te c c a p ita l o f
T e n o c h titla n . A c c o rd in g to m y th , th e A ztecs
fo u n d e d

th e ir c a p ita l w h e re a n ea g le fe d

up o n a n o p a l cactus. T h is p la c e corresponds
to T e n o c h titla n , o r " p la c e o f th e n o p a l cactus
ro c k ."
e a rth T h e su rface o f th e e a rth w as consid
e re d

in

v a rie ty

M e s o a m e ric a . Q u ite

of

w ays

in

a n c ie n t

fr e q u e n tly , th e e a rth

w as re g a rd e d as a liv in g e n tity . T h u s in b o th
C e n tr a l M e x ic a n a n d Y u c a te c M a y a th o u g h t,
th e e a rth c o u ld b e v ie w e d as a g r e a t CAIMAN
B o a tin g u p o n th e

SEA.

T h e A ztec s co n sid ered

it too as a m onstrous d e v o u rin g b e in g , w it h


a h u g e g a p in g m a w , talons, a n d gn ash ing
m o u th s p la c e d on jo in ts o f th e lim b s . K n o w n
as

T L A L T E C U H T L i,

or " e a r th lo r d ," this b e in g is

a c tu a lly d u a lly sexed, a n d possesses a stro ngly


fe m in in e

c o m p o n e n t.

The

e a rth

w as

also

re g a rd e d as a A at fo u r-s id e d Aeld, w it h th e

(Be/ow) Ancestor rising out of the


earth as a fruit-bearing tree,
sarcophagus of Pacal, Temple of
the Inscriptions, Paienque, Late
Classic Maya.

ECLPSE
fo u r omEcnoMS corresponding to each o f th e

The

A ztecs

h eld

strong

b eliefs

about

sides. F o r the M a y a , this m ode! is m e ta p h o ricaHy com pared to the q u ad ra n g u lar m aize

eclipses. T h e d read ed TzrrziMiMK star dem ons

Held. in

b e lie f, the c reatio n o f the w o rld is com pared

to EARTH, and consum ed h u m an ity . A ccording


to Sahagn, the people sought ou t those o f

both Y ucatec and Q u ich e

M aya

becam e v isib le d u rin g an eclipse, descended

to the m aking o f the m aize h eld . F o r the

fa ir face and h a ir fo r sacrifice to the sun and

Q uiche POPOL vuH, this cou!d be v ie w e d as a

d re w

p re p a ra tio n fo r the c reatio n o f the p resent

th a t th e sun w o u ld n o t re tu rn and th a t the

blood fro m

th e ir ow n ears, in fe a r

hum an race, th e p eople o f corn. A m ong the

tzitziyn im e w o u ld be unleashed on the e arth .

m odern S ierra N a h u a t o f P u e b la, the e a rth

T o fo re s ta ll the e v il p o w e r o f an eclipse they

is seen as a m aize Held, w ith people being

raised a g re a t d in , shouting and p layin g

born or 'p la n te d " upon its surface.


A long w ith the q u ad ran g u lar m odel, the

m usical in stru m en ts. Since the tim e o f the


C onquest it has been know n th a t th e M a y a

e a rth was considered to be a round disk. Thus

also m ake g re a t am ounts o f noise to try to

the Aztecs re fe rre d to it as A n a h u a tl, a disk

stop an eclipse. In 1991, w h e n a to ta l eclipse

surrounded by a rin g o f w a te r. In C o lo n ial

was v isib le in m uch o f C e n tra l and N o rth e rn

Yucatec M a y a w ritin g and m aps, a s im ila r

M ex ico , n a tiv e peoples in m any parts o f the

conception o f the e arth

country m ad e a com m otion to stave o ff any

appears.

H o w ev er,

the

as a round disk
an cien t

M aya

b a le fu l effects.

regarded the c ircu lar earth not only as a Hat


disk, bu t also as a m ore rounded b a ll-lik e
form . T h e re is re lia b le evidence th a t the
Classic and Postclassic M a y a saw the e arth
as a g re at tortoise, m uch lik e peoples o f
eastern N o rth A m erica and Asia,
a/so
C R E A T IO N A C C O U N TS .

eclipse Eclipses w ere dreaded throughout


ancient M exico and G u atem ala. A n eclipse
occurs w hen th ree celestial bodies a re aligned
in such a w ay th a t one body passes b etw een
the o th er tw o. As fa r as is know n, eclipses in
M esoam erica w e re universally seen as the
b itin g o f the SUN or the b itin g o f the M O O N . In
Yucatec M a y a n , eclipses w e re called c A tM
Ain, or the "b itin g o f the sun." Solar eclipses
w ere thought to be fa r m ore dangerous than
lu n a r ones.
T h e developm ent o f an accurate lu n a r
C A L E N D A R am ong the M a y a guided calculations
fo r solar and lu n a r eclipses, allo w in g them to
develop eclipse w arn in g dates, although they
could not p re d ict w h e th e r or not it w ould be
visible. T h e D resden Codex eclipse w arn in g
tables could have been used to a le rt PRIESTS
and rulers to eclipse possibilities. In this
codex, an eclipse o f the sun was often pictured
as the eating o f the Ain glyph by a sky serpent.
T h e m odern M a y a - specifically the
M o p a n , T zo tzil, Yucatec, and C hoi - believe
th a t eclipses occur w hen the sun and moon
fight. In o th er M a y a accounts, the sun is
attacked by ants during a solar eclipse. T h e
M a y a and o th er contem porary n ative peoples
b elieve th a t pregnant w om en should not
w itness an eclipse, lest the fetus be deform ed.

E h e ca tl A lso re fe rre d to as E h e c a tl-Q u e tza lcoatl, this god represents

Q UETZALCO ATL

in his

aspect as god o f W IN D . In the iconography o f


L a te Postclassic h ig h lan d M ex ico , he is usu
a lly black, w ith a strikin g red m ask resem bling
a beak. A lth o u g h this m ask p ro b ab ly derives
from a duck b ill, th e corners o f th e m outh
a re usually p ro vid ed w ith a long p a ir o f
curving canines. In a d d itio n , E h ecatl w ears a
g re a t d eal o f shell J E W E LR Y , th e m ost im p o rta n t
piece being his cut conch p ec to ral o r ehecaf/acacozcatA T h e shell je w e lry and o th e r e le
m ents o f his costum e suggest th a t E h e ca tl
o rg in a lly d erive d fro m the H u astec a re a o f
n o rth ern V eracru z. H o w e v e r, tw o la te 9 th c.
m onum ents fro m th e M a y a site o f S eibal
p o rtray possible e a rly form s o f th e beaked
E h ecatl. A ltho u g h both o f these stelae e xh ib it
strong C e n tra l M e x ica n influences, th e re are
no know n exam ples o f E h ecatl in h ighland
M exico p rio r to th e L a te Postclassic.
In N a h u a tl, eA ecat/ signifies " w in d ," and
this d e ity was c red ited w ith "sw eep ing the
w a y " fo r th e T la lo q u e , the gods o f RAIN and
L iC H T N iN C . H e appears as th e p atro n o f W in d ,
the second o f th e 20 day nam es, and o f the
second T R E C E N A o f 1 Jaguar. H o w e v e r, E h ecatl
is best know n fo r his m ajo r ro le in C en tra!
M ex ica n C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S w h e re he figures
as a m ajor creator god and cu ltu re hero. A long
w ith creating the e arth and heavens w ith T E Z C A T L iP O C A , E hecatl also rescued the bones o f
people from the U N D E R W O R L D , thereb y creating
the present race o f hum ankind. According to
various accounts he also obtained M A iz E , P U L Q U E ,
and M u s ic w ith w hich to w orship the gods.

85

ENEMAS

T h e specific te m p le o f E h e c a tl w as a c irc u
lar b u ild in g w ith a co nical ro o f; q u ite fr e
q u e n tly a g re a t s e rp e n t m a w serves as th e
d o o rw ay , as i f th e te m p le w as a sy m b o lic
CAVE p ro v id in g e n tra n c e to th e w in d in g d e p th s
o f th e U n d e r w o r ld . D u e to th e c o m m o n b u t
strik in g co n d itio n o f " b r e a th in g c a v e s ," w in d
is co m m o n ly

b e lie v e d

in

M e s o a m e r ic a

to

Maya representation of a solar


eclipse, Dresden Codex, p. 57,
Postclassic period.

d e riv e fro m th e U n d e r w o r ld .
Am ong

th e

L a te

Postclassic

M ix te e ,

E h e c a tl w as k n o w n as 9 W in d . I n th e P re hispanic C o d e x V in d o b o n e n s is , this M ix te e

(Be/ow) Aztec sculpture of


Ehecatl with his characteristic
beak-like mask, Late Postclassic
period.

god w as b o rn fro m a H in t on th e d a y 9 W in d
in th e y e a r o f 10 H o u s e . A c c o rd in g to th e
C o lo n ia l

Te/Z e rja n o -R em e n sis, 9 W in d w as

also a n A z te c b irth d a te o f E h e c a tl. T h e d e ity


9 W in d plays a n im p o rta n t ro le in th e M ix te e
codices fo r, lik e his A z te c c o u n te rp a rt, h e
a p p ea rs as a m a jo r c u ltu re h e ro . I n se veral
scenes, h e is re p re s e n te d re c e iv in g his a t t r i
b u tes fro m a n ag ed p a ir o f c re a to r gods. T h e
C o d e x V in d o b o n e n sis also d e p ic ts 9 W in d
raisin g th e SKY, an ep iso de c re d ite d to E h e c a tl
in

C e n tr a l

M e x ic a n

c re a tio n

accounts.

In

a n o th e r scene, 9 W in d o b tain s h a llu c in o g e n ic


m ush ro om s fo r th e gods. I t ap p e a rs

th a t,

m u ch lik e Q u e tz a lc o a tl o f le g e n d a ry TOLLAN,
9 W in d w as co n sid ered as a n ancestor o f
im p o rta n t M ix te e ru lin g fa m ilie s .
e n em as O n e o f th e m o re cu rio us th em es in
C lassic M a y a a r t is th e use o f g o u rd en em as
d u rin g r itu a l d rin k in g bouts. A lth o u g h it has
o fte n b e e n suggested th a t th ese en em as w e r e
used fo r co nsu m ing HALLUCINOGENS, it is fa r
m o re lik e ly th a t th e y co n ta in e d a n alcoh olic
b e v e ra g e , such as b a lc h o r PULQUE. A t tim es,
th e en em as a re d e p ic te d in association w it h
a vessel g ly p h ic a lly la b e le d c /o r cAi, a M a y a n
te rm

s ig n ify in g

p u lq u e

or

o th e r

alcoh olic

drin ks. A c c o rd in g to on e 16 th c. accou nt, th e


H u a s te c M a y a

o f n o rth e rn V e ra c ru z used

en em as d u rin g tim es o f e x tre m e in to x icatio n .


In

fa ct, m a n y o f th e C lassic M a y a scenes

re p re s e n t in d iv id u a ls c a v o rtin g , fa llin g , an d
e v e n v o m itin g . G iv e n th e su b je ct m a tte r, it
is n o t s u rp ris in g th a t m ost o f th e e n e m a
scenes a re

n o t on p u b lic m o n u m e n ts b u t

r a th e r on c e ra m ic vessels fo r p e rs o n a l use.
O n e n o te w o rth y ex cep tio n occurs a t th e P u u c
ruin s

o f R an cho

San D ie g o , close

to

th e

site o f U x m a l. H e r e o n e s tru c tu re o rig in a lly


d is p la y e d a t le a s t 14 b a s -r e lie f ca rvings p e r
ta in in g to en em as a n d r itu a l in to x icatio n .
F o r h ig h la n d M e x ic o , th e r e is no c o n crete
e v id e n c e fo r th e use o f a lc o h o lic en em as.

Male selfadministering an
enema, stone
panel from
Rancho San
Diego, Yucatn,
Terminal Classic
Maya.

EXCREMENT
H o w e v e r, enem as do a p p e a r to h ave been
used fo r cmuNC and ritu a l PURIFICATION. R u iz

8F8

de A larco n records th e fo llo w in g cure fro m


th e 17th c. N a h u a tl in h a b ita n ts o f G u e rre ro :
if a d iR icu lt c h ild b irth w as b eliev ed to be due
to a d u lte ry , th e w om an w o u ld b e ad m in is
te re d an enem a con tain in g h e r ow n saliva.

fa n M a d e o f fea th e rs or cloth stretched over


a bram e, o r o f w o ven re e d , p alm , o r fold ed
p a p e r, fans w e re long th o u g h t to be speciRc

excrem ent In C e n tra ! M ex ico , hu m an excre

id e n tify in g m arkers o f

m en t sym bolized the p o llu tio n and Rlth th a t

n o w recognized th a t tra v e le rs , dancers, and

occurred from sexual transgressions and o th e r

occasionally others also b e a r them . B oth

MERCHANTS,

b u t it is

m isdeeds. Cm t/afV, the N a h u a tl te rm fo r excre

M a y a and A zte c dancers hold fans, and on

m en t, also bore connotations o f im m o ral


and disgusting b eh avior. Thus the te rm c u ii/a -

C lassic M a y a

p o tte ry , G od

som etim es

dances w ith a fa n . In th e B onam pak m urals,

coya signiRed to be covered w ith excrem ent

a M a y a no b lew o m an holds a fan o f e ith e r

or to have one's re p u ta tio n stained. In the

fea th e rs o r fo ld ed p a p e r w h ile she w atches a

C e n tra l M exican codices, th e re are scenes o f

scene o f b lo o d le ttin g ; dancers w ith blood

d efecatin g m en eatin g th e ir ow n excrem ent

stream in g fro m th e ir groins in Room 3 o f the

w hich sim ultaneously represent both th e p o l

m urals c a rry fans w ith bloody h an d p rin ts.

lu tin g in d iv id u al and his self-PumFiCATiON. T h e


p rim a ry C e n tra l M exican goddess o f ritu a l

F a t C o d T h e Rgure know n as th e F a t G od is

p u rificatio n was TLAZOLTEOTL, whose nam e

am ong th e m o re curious and least understood

can be glossed as "e a te r o f R lth ."


Fecal m a tte r w as not only identiR ed w ith
pollution and Rlth. I t is iro n ic th a t c o m , so
com m only considered as in co rru p tib le and
pure in W estern thought, was described as
excrem ent. Thus the N a h u a tl term fo r gold
was feo c u ii/a f/, or "godly excrem en t." T h e
Yucatec M a y a n term fo r gold was q u ite
sim ilar: la M in , or "excrem en t o f the sun."
This term has continued today as the com m on
Yucatec w ord fo r m oney.
execution Execution constituted a public
ritu a l even t distinct from H U M A N S A C R IF IC E .
In stead o f serving as an o ffering, it was a
means o f punishm ent and P U R IF IC A T IO N . Thus
there was little interest in extracting B LO O D or
H EARTS as offerings and the popular form s
o f execution w e re clubbing, stoning, and
strangulation. Am ong the m ore common
causes o f execution w ere a d u ltery, d runken
ness, th iev ery , and treason. Am ong the T arascans o f M ichoacn, the conventional m eans
o f execution was by b rain in g w ith a large
w ooden club; the parents and relatives o f the
g u ilty p arty w e re fre q u e n tly also k ille d . In
N a h u a tl, the phrase fo r punishm ent was fe t/or "w ood and stone." In fac t, stoning
was an especially com m on form o f execution
in M esoam erica, and was fre q u e n tly used
in cases o f a d u ltery. A t tim es, the C e n tra l
M exican god o f stone and castigation, r r z T L A C O L IU H Q U I-IX Q U IM IL L I, is shown w ith a p a ir o f
adu lterers k ille d by stoning.

d eities o f a n c ie n t M eso am erica. T h is strange


b eing is fou n d in th e Classic p erio d a rt o f
T eo tih u ac an , V e ra c ru z, and th e M a y a region.
H e is Rrst know n in L a te F o rm a tiv e m on
u m en tal stone sculpture fro m th e p ied m o n t
o f G u a te m ala. A p p e a rin g a t such e a rly sites
as M o n te A lto and Santa L e tic ia , th e F a t C o d
is rep resen ted as e ith e r a huge p o tb e llie d
Rgure o r sim ply a m assive head. In both
cases, he appears m uch lik e a b lo ated corpse
w ith heavy, sw ollen lids covering his eyes. In
th e case o f p o tb e lly sculptures, th e n avel too
is o ften la rg e and sw ollen. T h e F a t G od is
a com m on c h a ra cter am ong L a te Classic
M a y a Rgurines, occasionally occurring also
on ceram ic vessels w h e re , lik e the e a rly
p ied m o nt sculptures, he is show n w ith shut
eyes and a sw ollen b e lly a n d n avel. In tw o
cases, he is accom panied b y a h iero g lyp h ic
com pound re a d s id a T h e te rm
signiRes
g lu tto n y in C h oi and excessive desire o r
g lu tto n y in Yucatec. T h is possible m eaning o f
the F a t G od as an in te m p e ra te g lu tto n m ay
explain his fre q u e n t ro le as a dancer or
e n te rta in e r in L a te Classic M a y a a rt. H e
m ay have been lam pooned as a ritu a l clow n
character personifying g lu tto n y and greed,
m ajo r subjects o f derision and social condem
nation in M esoam erica. See a/so C L O W N S .
Rre A ccording to C e n tra l M e x ica n sources,
QUETZALCOATL, the g re a t c reato r god, and HurrziLOPOCHTLi, th e A ztec c u lt god, m ade Rre
along w ith a fe e b le "h a lf-s u n " th a t shone

87

FIRE

be fo re th e

DAW N

o f th e e r a in w h ic h h u m a n s

live. A cco rd in g to o th e r sources it w a s


UPOCA w h o ,

h a v in g c h a n g e d his

TEZCAT-

nam e

to

w as th e Erst to m a k e E re w ith

MMCOATL,

FLLNTs, o r w ith a E re d riH , y ie ld in g a a m e


w h ich th en w as c a rrie d to m a k e g r e a t Eres.
To

in itia te

new

CALENDAR ro u n d ,

Aztecs c e le b ra te d th e r itu a l o f N e w

th e
F ir e ,

perhaps in e m u la tio n o f th ese Erst d rillin g s


o f Ere

by

th e

gods.

The

las t

N ew

F ir e

ce rem o n y w as c e le b ra te d d u rin g th e m o n th
o f P a n q u e tz a liz tli, a fe w

m o n th s a f te r th e

n e w y e a r o f 2 A c a tl h a d b e g u n in

AD

Penitent devouring his own excrement: note the


excrementa! stream pouring towards the moon
sign; Codex Borgia, p. 10, Late Postclassic period.

1507. As

p a rt o f w h a t an th ro p o lo g is ts c a ll a TERMINATION
RITUAL, a ll pots w e r e sm ash ed a n d n e w ones

w e re p re p a re d fo r th e n e w e ra . A ll Eres w e r e
ex tin g u is h ed a n d th e la n d la y in darkness,
a w a itin g th e N e w F ir e c e re m o n y th a t conE rm ed an d r e n e w e d
co uid

not be

th e n e w y e a r. I f E re

d raw n ,

th e n

th e

TZiTziMiME

w o u ld descend fro m th e h e ave n s to consum e


h u m a n k in d . P re g n a n t w o m e n , th o u g h t to b e
c o n ta m in a te d , w e r e h id d e n fro m v ie w b e h in d
stu ffed sacks o r in sid e g ra n a rie s , a c co rd in g to
th e C o d e x B o rbo nicus;

a n y c h ild b o rn in

this p e rio d w o u ld b e s tig m a tiz e d , a n d a ll


co m m o n ers s h ie ld e d th e ir faces w it h b lu e
m asks.

A t m id n ig h t b e fo re th e Erst d a y o f

Aduiterers suffering execution, one strangled, one


stoned; Codex Telleriano-Remensis, 16th c. Aztec.

th e n e w y e a r, on a n e a rb y m o u n ta in c a lle d
C itla lte p e c

(" H ill

of

th e

S ta r " ),

PRIESTS

w a tc h e d th e m o v e m e n t o f th e STARS w e cal!
th e P le ia d e s a n d w h ic h th e A ztec s k n e w as
th e T ia n q u iz tli, or M a r k e t. I f th e y passed
o v e rh e a d a t m id n ig h t, th e n th e E re priests
p ro c e e d e d : th e y rip p e d o u t th e HEART o f a
sacriEcia! v ic tim , u s u ally a c a p tiv e w a r r io r ,
a n d s ta rte d a E am e w it h a E re d r ill in his
o p en

ch est ca v ity .

Y ear

BUNDLES

o f sticks

s y m b o liz in g th e old 5 2 years w e r e th e n set

Late Classic version of the Fat Cod, termed s/dz


Mime, or "glutton" in accompanying text; detail
of polychrome vase.

a E re. T h e n e w E re g u a ra n te e d th e a r riv a l o f
th e m o rn in g suN a n d th e in itia tio n o f a n e w
y e a r.
x iU H T E C U H T L i

w as th e god o f te rre s tria l Ere.

H is ro le in th e A z te c p a n th e o n m a y h a v e
b e e n d im in is h e d b y th e in tro d u c tio n o f H u it zilo p o c h tli, w h ose c u lt en com passed sun an d
E re.

HUEHUETEO TL

w as th e o ld god o f E re,

u s u ally o f th e h e a rth . B asic a lly a dom estic


god a n d k e p t in ho u s eh o ld sh rin es, h e - a lo n g
w ith

TLALOC

- is a god o f g re a t a n tiq u ity , an d

his im a g e w as m a d e w it h lit tle ch an g e fro m


E a r ly C lassic to L a te

Postclassic tim es in

C e n tra ! M e x ic o . H e w e a rs a E re b ra z ie r on
his h e a d ,

w h ose

rim

is m a rk e d w it h

rh o m b o id sym bol fo r E re used a t


The

x iU H C O A T L ,

th e

T E O T iH U A C A N .

o r E re s e rp e n t, be ars th e sun

The drilling of new Ere upon the navel of


Xiuhtecuhtli, Codex Borgia, p. 46, Late Postclassic
period. During the Aztec New Fire ceremonies,
Ere was drilled on the chest of a sacriEced
captive who had the word jaTund in his actual name.

on

FIVE SUNS
through th e SKY; it is also the w eapon c a rrie d

lan d ed in cmcoMozToc, yield in g 1600 terres

by H u itziio p o c h th . A m ong th e M a y a , TOHiL

tria l gods. C h ac usually carries a personiBed

is the god o f Bre in the POPOL vuH. G od K

B in t in his h an d , b u t som etim es he is h im self

(P alen q u e T ria d C II; see PALENQUE TRIAD coos)

a personiB ed B int. A m ong the A ztecs, Bint

m ay have been a Classic god o f Ere.


M eso am erican peoples recognized Bre as

blades a re also personiB ed, fre q u e n tly w ith


an open, g n aw in g m o u th , in d ic atin g th e ir

the

fu n d am en tal catalyst o f change. T h e

a b ility to te a r Besh. rrzTLACOLiUHQUi-ixQUiMiLLi,

Aztecs b eliev ed th a t th e c u rre n t sun and

god o f castig atio n, m ay be a personiBed B int.

MOON cam e in to existence w h en tw o gods,

F lin t w as w id e ly recognized as a day sign:

T ecu ciztecat! and N a n a h u a tzin , im m o lated

as T e c p a tl am ong the A ztecs and E d zn ab

them selves in a g re at Bre a t T eo tih u ac an .

am ong th e M a y a , fo r exam ple. T e c p a tl was

F o r the M a y a , as fo r o th e r M eso am erican

one o f th e fo u r A zte c

peoples, Bre was a w ay to com m unicate

corresponding to the n o rth , and th e TRECENA 1

Y EAHBEARER

day signs,

w ith gods and ancestors. O fferin g s, fre q u e n tly

T e c p a tl w as p resided o ver by C h a lc h iu to to lin ,

b lo od-spattered

T E Z C A T L iP O C A

PAPER,

w e re set on Bre in

b raziers, and in the b illo w in g sm oke, the


M a y a conjured up th e ir gods and ancestors.
T h e Aztecs also used the m etap h or w a te r-

in

th e fo rm

o f a b lu e -g re en

tu rk e y . T h e usual, iconic fo rm o f th e M a y a
day

sign

bears

the

sam e

B int

m arkings

d ep icted on M a y a w eap o n ry.

Bre, ATL-TLACHfNOLLi, to m ean w a rfa re .


Bowers

F lo w e rs

F iv e Suns T h e F iv e Suns constitute the Bve

m eaning

eras or w orlds o f A ztec m ythology, including


the present sun o f N ah u i O llin , or 4 M o tio n .
Each o f the four previous suns is identiB ed

A ztec

w ith a p a rtic u la r god and race o f people, the


gen erally accepted ord er o f the fou r e a rlie r
suns running as follow s: N ah u i O celo tl (4
Jaguar), N ah u i E hecatl (4 W in d ), N ah u i Q u ia h u itl (4 R ain) and N ah u i A tl (4 W a te r).
F o llo w in g the m aking o f the present people
and th e ir corn, the Bfth sun was created a t
T E O T IH U A C A N . ^ e e a / s o C R E A T IO N A C C O U N TS .

Bint Tougher and m ore du rab le than O B SiD Bint was universally used to strike F IR E in
the N e w W o rld . I t easily yields sparks, and
the rock its e lf sm ells o f smoke a fte r use. I t is
a B ne-granular q u artz w hich abounds in the
M a y a low lands.
As the p rim a ry means o f striking Bre, B int
was o f in estim able use to hum ankind and
was thus personiBed and deiEed; it was also
a sym bol o f H U M A N S A C R IF IC E and the d eb t
ow ed by hu m an ity to the C O D S. SacriBcial
blades everyw h ere w e re m ade o f B int and
obsidian, and are often depicted a t the joints o f
A ztec deities. Gods and PRIESTS bear Bint knives
in hand, freq u e n tly p ain ted w h ite and red.
In M esoam erican thought, B int and obsid
ian w e re both created w h ere ligh tn in g strikes.
C H A C and T L A L O C , respectively the M a y a and
C e n tra l M exican hurlers o f thunderbolts,
w e re thus the creators o f these valued
m aterials. According to one A ztec version,
C itla lic u e (She o f the Star S kirt) gave b irth
to B int, and then h u rled it to e arth , w h ere it
IA N ,

w ith

in

deities
them :

h eld

an c ie n t
h ave

ric h

m etap h orical

M eso am erica.

T h re e

p a rtic u la r connections

xocHiPiLH,

MACuiLXOCHiTL,

and

xocHiQUETZAL, a ll o f w hom serve as patrons o f

b eau ty, p leasu re, and th e arts. F lo w e rs w e re


v iew ed as sacriB cial o fferings, and according
to some stories, QUETZALCOATL le d his people
to oBer Bowers and BUTTERFLIES in lie u o f
hum an Besh. F lo w ers w e re o ffe red on m any
occasions: a t th e b eg inning o f the cele b ratio n
o f th e VEINTENA T la c a x ip e h u a liztli, fo r exam
p le , a fe s tiv a l o f Brst Bowers w as h eld in
honor o f xiPE TOTEC.
in jro c /u i/ n i cuica w as a N a h u a tl c%&asfsmo, or m etap h orical lin k in g o f tw o p h en
om ena in C e n tra l M e x ic a n h ie rarc h ic and
p rie stly address, lite ra lly m eaning Bowers
and song b u t re fe rrin g to a ll a rtis tic endeavors
and p a rtic u la rly p o etry. A n o th e r A zte c term
in co rp oratin g Bowers was xociuyacyof/, lite r
a lly " w a r o f B o w e rs /* it refers to th e p ractice
o f a p a rtic u la r typ e o f w a r in C e n tra l M exico
carried out by th e A ztecs fro m m id -1 5 th c. on,
in w h ich b a ttle w as c arried o u t speciBcally
to cap ture sacriBcial victim s fro m nearby,
in d ep en d en t p o lities.
Cem poahroc/Mt/, or m arigolds, w e re ancien t
offerings to the dead and a re s till a p rim a ry
o fferin g on the D a y o f the D e a d , 1 N ovem ber,
A ll Souls* D a y . Some b eliev e th a t the C en tra!
M exican goddess C O Y O L X A U H Q U I w ears a large
m arigold on h e r head, and d u rin g the vein
tena celebrations o f T e c u ilh u ito n tli, w om en
danced tog eth er, hold in g m arigolds. In the
PO PO L v u H , m arigolds and y a rro w a re burned
together, as a sim ple o ffering. OVo/mhgui,

89

CODS

m orning glories, w e re valu ed fo r the h a llu c i


nogenic properties o f th e ir seeds, and D u ra n
describes th e ir consum ption d u rin g feasts to
(see HALLU CINO GENS). In th e a rt o f
Classic TEOTiHUACAN m any v arie ties o f Rowers
are depicted.
TEZCATLIPOCA

Dancers in celeb ratio n o f vein ten a festivals


freq u ently c arried or w o re Rowers and som e
times d istrib uted them to o th e r p articip ants
or observers. In th e celeb ratio n o f T o xcatl,
the Tezcatlipoca im personator c a rrie d Rowers
in his hand. In palace scenes w ith o u t obvious
sacriRcial overtones, M a y a kings and nobles
also carry sm all bouquets o f Rowers for
sniRing. M a y a JADES, p a rtic u la rly those w orn
as h a ir ornam ents, w e re o fte n m ade in the
fo u r-p etal shape ch aracteristic o f Rowers.

The Aztec Calendar Stone with the Bve suns of


creation, Late Postclassic period.
gods T h e re has been considerable debate
concerning th e concept o f gods and d iv in ity
in ancien t M esoam erica. T h e 16th c. Spanish
chronicles m ake fre q u e n t and d ire c t re fe r
ences to dioses, or "gods." H o w ev er, it has
been ju s tly noted th a t E uropean term inology
m ay have grossly sim pliRed com plex concepts
o f sacredness and d iv in ity . Am ong the 16th
c. Zapotees, the term p ee, signifying "b re a th ,
s p irit, or w iN D , " expressed the concept o f
d iv in ity . T h is anim istic force caused m ove
m en t - a ll phenom ena or m a te rn al things th a t
expresed m otion w e re a ttrib u te d a certain
degree o f sacredness. Am ong the A ztecs, the
term fo r sacredness was feo d w hich, lik e the
Zapotee p ee, re fe rre d to an im m a te ria l energy
or force sim ilar to the Polynesian concept o f
m ana. In M a y a n languages, An or cA'u m eans
sacredness.
A ltho u g h M esoam erican peoples d id pos
sess concepts o f anim istic forces, they also
b elieved in speciRc gods, th a t is, an im ate,
personiRed beings w ith th e ir ow n d istinct
m yth ical cycles. Thus in M a y a n languages
and the N a h u a tl tongue o f the Aztecs the
term s fo r sacredness could also re fe r to spec
iRc gods. In the case o f th e Classic period
Zapotees, anthropom orphic gods a re com
m only ren dered on ceram ic urns. A lthough it
^ has been recen tly argued th a t these im ages
rep resen t ancestors ra th e r than gods, this is
u n lik ely. T h e w idespread n atu re and continu
ity o f certain o f the characters, some lasting
over a 1000 years, m ake it u n lik e ly th a t these

Eccentric Rint from Quirigu, Guatem ala, Late


Classic M aya.

90

COLD
a re o n ly h isto rical Bgures. N onetheless, it

this E a rly C o lo n ial cache contained roughly

does a p p ear th a t, lik e th e M ix te e gods, Z ap o

6 kilos o f gold, m uch o f it in the form o f


P reh isp an ic A zte c je w e lry .

tee gods a re o fte n id e n tiS ed as th e id e a lize d


ancestors o f p a rtic u la rly im p o rta n t lineages,
gold C o ld , o r feo e m t/a i/, lite ra lly EXCREMENT
o f th e gods, was a precious m a te ria l to the
A ztecs, although not so im p o rta n t as JADE
o r tro p ica l b ird feath ers. M o tecu h zo m a n
collected ab o u t tw o tons o f gold a y e a r in

hacha AfacAa, th e

trib u te . So little w o rked gold survived th e

g e n e ra lly re fers in M eso am erican ritu a l to a

Spanish

w ord

fo r axe,

C onquest th a t it is now d iiB cu lt to reconstruct

piece o f BALLCAME e q u ip m en t, ra th e r th an an

exactly fo r w hich ritu a l objects it w as m ost

axe. D a tin g fro m th e C lassic p erio d , m ost

used, b u t w hen A lb re c h t D re r v ie w e d in

com e fro m V e ra c ru z and the P acific slopes

Brussels the objects th a t C orts had shipped

o f G u a te m a la . E a rly AacAas a re fre q u e n tly

back to K in g C harles V in 1520, he described

heads, perhaps

a SUN m ade e n tire ly o f gold, a fath o m w id e ,

n a rro w e r and o ften in c o rp o rate b ird feath ers.

TROPHY HEADS;

la te r ones are

and a MOON o f silver, o f the sam e size. Because

M o s t AacAa.shave a ten o n ; although g e n e ra lly

gold was recognized to be a product o f the

thought o f as e q u ip m en t fo r p la y, som e m ay

sun, solar gods w ere associated w ith

the

have been designed fo r a rc h ite c tu ra l p lace

m a te ria !,

the

m en t.

p articu !ar!y

H u r r z iL O P O C H T L i,

A ztec sun god, w ho w ore a gold headband.


C o ld was also fashioned in to JEWELRY fo r the
n o b ility , p a rtic u la rly for nose ornam ents and

hallucinogens H allu cin o g ens p layed and con

lip labrets.
G oldw orkers, or feocm f/aA uague, honored
X !P E T O T E C as th e ir patron and m ade offerings
a t his tem p le, Yopico. G oldsm iths held high
status and w e re recognized as craftspeople,
or fo/feca, a term th a t had lost its ethnic
associations w ith T u la , H id alg o , by the tim e
o f the Conquest.
G o ldw orking arriv ed la te in M exico and
C e n tra l A m erica. In v e n te d m illen n ia before
in South A m erica, w orked objects o f gold turn
up in the M a y a region no e a rlie r than the
8th c. A D . M e ta llu rg y took hold du rin g the
T o ltec e ra in M esoam erica, and dozens o f
gold objects w e re th row n in to the Sacred
C E N O T E a t C hichen Itz . D u rin g the L a te
Postclassic, the M ixtees c arried out th e m ost
sophisticated m etallu rg y in M esoam erica,
p erfectin g the techniques o f lost-w ax casting
and filig re e, w h ile continuing also to use the
sim pler ham m ering and repouss.
In 1932, M exican archaeologist Alfonso
Caso excavated T om b 7 a t M o n te A lb n
and found th a t the M ixtees had reused old
Zapotee TO M B S to b ury th e ir kings in the
centuries before the Spanish Conquest. T om b
7 contained the largest surviving single depo
sit o f P recolum bian gold, along w ith rock
crystal, cave onyx, TU R Q U O IS E , and bone. In
1975, a m ajor cache was discovered by a
fisherm an n ear the m odern c ity o f V eracru z.
K now n as the T reasure o f the F isherm an,

ican religious life . T h e y have been used fo r


com m union w ith th e C O D S and ancestors,

tin u e to p lay an im p o rta n t ro le in M es o am e r

D iv iN A T iO N ,

personal visions and self-kn o w

ledge, and as a source o f p leasure and e n te r


tain m e n t. Some scholars have suggested th a t
the F o rm a tiv e O lm ec used b u fo ten in e , a
hallucinogen d e riv e d fro m
m a r in e , a
large lo w lan d T O A D . A lth o u g h this is s till
u n certain , representations o f toads a re w id e
spread in the F o rm a tiv e and L a te Preclassic
a rt o f southern M eso am erica, and th e p aro toid glands fro m w h ich b u fo ten in e is excreted
a re p ro m in e n tly fe a tu re d on them .
Psilocybin m ushroom s (A^f/ocyAe m exi
cana) m ay also have been used d u rin g the
L a te Preclassic p erio d . Sm all stone sculptures
in the fo rm o f m ushroom s have been found
a t K am in alju y and o th e r L a te Preclassic sites
o f th e M a y a highlands and Pacific p iedm ont.
A ltho u g h the resem blance o f these carvings
to mushroom s m ay be fo rtu ito u s, th ey are
fre q u e n tly found in association w ith sm all
g rin d in g stones - am ong contem porary M ix
tees o f O axaca, the hallucinogenic mushroom s
a re firs t p u lv erize d on g rin d in g stones before
being ingested.
T h e use o f psilocybin m ushroom s is w e ll
docum ented fo r L a te Postclassic highland
M exico . Page 24 o f th e Prehispanic M ix te e
Codex Vindobonensis contains a scene illu s
tra tin g the o rig in and use o f th e sacred
m ushroom : 9 W in d , th e M ix te e form o f

91

HEARTS

EHECATL, is shown brin g in g th e mushroom s to


the gods, and 7 F lo w e r, the m ost p ro m in en t o f
them , weeps. T h e mushroom s are personified
b y two supernatural w om en, 4 L iza rd and 11
L izard . D u rin g the night banquets sponsored
b y successful A ztec M E R C H A N T S , p articip ants
ate psilocybin w ith honey. T h e m erchants

w ould freq u e n tly cry from the h allucinations,


which w ere regarded as portents o f fu tu re
events.
A nother im p o rtan t hallucinogen was m orn
ing glory seed (T u rb in a corym bosa), know n
as o/obubqruj in N a h u a tl. D e ta ile d accounts
of o/obubqtn and its use in d iv in atio n appear
in the C o lo n ial treatise o f R uiz de A larcon.
T aken a t n ight by special p ractitio n ers, the
seeds w e re used to d ete rm in e sources o f
sickness, find thieves, and discover lost objects
or people. T h e o/obubgui was considered to
be an actual god th a t could com m unicate
w ith the p ractitio n er through visions. As a
god, the o/obuhgtn was trea te d w ith trem en d
ous ven eratio n and respect, and was cared
for in sm all baskets passed dow n through
generations o f diviners.

The preparation of gold, Florentine Codex, Book


9, 16th c. Aztec.

A sm all, spineless cactus, peyote (Lo p b o pbora wiVbamsn) is n ative to the deserts o f
n o rthern M exico, b u t was w id e ly trad ed in
ancient tim es. R uiz de A larcon notes its use
in 17th c. G u e rrero , a region fa r rem oved
from its n atu ra l environm ent. A N ah u a tl
term , peyote is w e ll docum ented fo r the 16th
c. Aztecs. A long w ith psilocybin and the
p o ten t jim son w eed (D a fu ra spp.), it is
described as a fev er m edicine in the A ztec
F lo re n tin e Codex. E a rly representations m ay
appear in the Protoclassic ceram ic a rt o f W est
M exico. I t is still used am ong the H u ich o l,
C o ra, T arah u m ara, and other peoples o f
n o rthw est M exico.
hearts M esoam erican peoples valued hearts
as sacrificial offerings. T h e y recognized the
h e a rt as the v ita l organ o f the body and as
such, it was food fo r the C O D S. A t the tim e o f
the Conquest, the s till-b e a tin g hum an h eart
was the suprem e o ffering, p a rtic u la rly to the

Stone hachas commonly appear in the form of heads,


suggesting a possible symbolic origin as trophy heads
associated with the ballgame, Classic Veracruz.

God 7 Flower eating hallucinogenic mushrooms


while listening to music played by 9 Wind;
Codex Vindobonensis, p. 24, Late Postclassic Mixtee.

SUN and to solar deities. A lthough long thought


to have been a p u rely Postclassic C en tra!
M exican phenom enon, h e a rt sacrifice can
now be id e n tifie d to have taken place w id e ly
in M esoam erica from Classic tim es onw ard
#and perhaps even e a rlie r, although there is
no clear O lm ec evidence.
T h e hum an h e a rt is o fte n depicted in
M esoam erican a rt as a trilo b e d organ, fre -

Pumas tearing the heart out of a deer, mural


from Techinantitla, Teotihuacan, Late Classic
period. Sacrificial hearts are commonly depicted
in the art of Teotihuacan.

wz

HERO TWINS
q u e n tly w ith d ro p lets fa llin g fro m it. T h e

H u eh u ec o yo tl T h e A zte c god o f DAMcn, M in e ,

m ost e x p lic it evid en ce th a t th e trilo b e /s the

and c a rn a lity , H u eh u eco yo tl ("o ld coyo te")

hum an h e a rt comes fro m th e b a ttle p a in tin g

w as a p atro n d e ity o f fe a th e rw o rk ers and

a t C acaxtla, w h e re the trilo b e d sym bol its e lf

p resided o ver th e TRECENA 1 F lo w e r, a 13-day

oozes fro m the chest cavity o f a fa lle n w a rrio r.

p erio d d ed icated to th e a rtis t and artisan.

A t TEoriHUACAN, w h e re th e sym bol appears

M e n born in this p erio d w ould be singers,

fro m

E a rly C lassic tim es o n w a rd , p a in te d

s to ry te lle rs, and craftsm en, b u t they w ould

friezes o f a lte rn a tin g JAGUARS and coyotes

also be p ro n e to overin d u lg ence - and thus

d ep ict hearts in fro n t o f th e ir open m ouths.

to a decayin g o f the genitals and a w asting

In the T e c h in a n titla paintings a t T eo tih u ac an ,

o f th e Resh. W o m en b o m

felin es te a r out th e h e a rt o f a DEER. W a rrio rs

w o u ld m ake- Rne e m b ro id ery , b u t if they

in the trecena

w ith goggle masks b ear trilo b e d hearts on the

fa ile d to b e p e n ite n t, th e y w o u ld easily fa ll

ends o f staffs and w e a r them , usually in row s

p re y to th e ir ow n sexual a llu re and becom e

o f th ree , above the b rim o f th e ir headdresses.

h arlots o r courtesans. A lth o u g h in fre q u e n tly

A ltho u g h most representations o f Classic

d ep icted , w h en H u eh u eco yo tl is rep resen ted ,

M a y a HUMAN SACRIFICE fe a tu re d ec ap ita tio n ,

he u su ally appears w ith th e body o f a hum an

h e a rt extrusion is fe a tu re d from tim e to tim e ,

and th e head o f a coyote.

as in the B onam pak m urals. In V eracru z,


h e a rt sacrifice follow s p lay o f the BALLCAME,

H u e h u e te o tl w as the O ld G od o f the Aztecs,

am ong o th e r occasions. L a te r, a t C hichen

and in d eed he w as o f g re a t a n tiq u ity , w ith a

ltz , hearts w ere the fea tu re d offerings, and

stan dard ized re p res en tatio n con tin u in g w ith

it m ay have been in T o ltec tim es th a t hearts

little change fro m M id d le F o rm a tiv e tim es

becam e the single most im p o rtan t hum an

on. A sim ple version o f a H u e h u e te o tl INCENSE

sacrifice. As depicted on a ham m ered COLD


disk from the Sacred CENOTE a t C hichen, fo u r
assistants hold dow n the extrem ities o f a
victim w h ile a PRIEST or w a rrio r rem oves the
h e a rt w ith a hafted H int blade under the
w a tc h fu l eye o f a cloud serpent, to w hom
the offering m ay be m ade. T h e WARRIOR ORDERS
o f the T o ltec era, id e n tifie d w ith EACLEs,
jaguars, and coyotes, a ll took on associations
w ith h e a rt sacrifice.
In no ancient c iviliza tio n o f the N e w W o rld
w e re hearts so im p o rtan t as am ong the
Aztecs. Special receptacles fo r hum an hearts,
know n as c u A U H x i C A L L i s , w e re m ade on a large
and som etim es colossal scale, and incorpor
ated in to o th er sacrificial sculptures, such as
C H A C M O O L S . H earts w e re w o rn as necklaces
or skirts by earth goddesses, p a rtic u la rly
c o A T L ic u E
and T L A L T E C U H T L i , w ho in some
representations w ore necklaces o f a lte rn atin g
hum an hands and hearts. M o st A ztec agricu l
tu ra l festivals fea tu re d hum an sacrifice by
h e a rt extrusion including, fo r exam ple, rituals
in honor o f x i P E T O T E C , the Rayed god, w h ere
h e a rt sacriRce preceded th e actual Raying.
T h e Aztecs re fe rre d to sacriRced hearts
m etaphorically as "precious eagle-cactus
fru it," and cactus fru its m ay som etim es be
d epicted as a visual m etaphor w hen hum an
hearts are the reference.
H e ro T w in s see CREATION ACCOUNTS; POPOL vuH ;
TWINS

b u rn e r has re c e n tly been found in a M id d le


F o rm a tiv e context in T la xc ala .
A ltho u g h m ost re v e re d and honored in
C e n tra l M ex ico , H u e h u e te o tl im ages have
been recovered fro m W e s t M ex ico , V e ra cru z,
Protoclassic K am in a lju y u and L a te Post
classic Y ucatn; no rep res en tatio n o f h im has
been found a t a C lassic M a y a site. A t M o n te
A lb n , a re la te d old god bore the Z apotee
calen d rical nam e 2 T ig e r, b u t no clea r id e n tiRcation can be m ade w ith any aged M a y a
gods. U n lik e m ost o th e r gods o f M eso am erica,
H u e h u e te o tl seems to h ave been p rim a rily a
household d e ity , and as th e fu n d a m en tal god
o f the h e a rth , his im ages usually tu rn up in
re sid e n tial q u arters ra th e r than in TEMPLE
precincts.
In his standard re p res en tatio n as a stone
sculpture, H u e h u e te o tl is a seated Rgure, legs
crossed in fro n t o f h im , w ith both hands
resting on his knees. H is rig h t hand is palm
up and his le ft is clenched as if it once h eld
a ban n er. H e hunches o ver, w ith the curved
spine o f age, and his face is usually h eavily
w rin k le d . H um ans a re not com m only shown
to age in M eso am erican a rt and v ery fe w
gods a re d epicted as aged e ith e r. A lthough
ra re ly toothless, H u e h u e te o tl is o fte n reduced
to only tw o lo w e r tee th . O n his head he
usually w ears a huge b ra zie r, its rim m arked
w ith rhom boid lozenges, sym bolic o f FIRE at
TEOTIHUACAN. T h e b ra zie r its e lf m ay have held
sm oldering coals or incense. A fe w ceram ic

93

HU1TZILOPOCHTLP

exam pies a re k n o w n , m o st n o ta b ly th e E a r ly
Classic H u e h u e te o tl fro m C e r ro d e las M e s a s .
A n A z te c e x a m p le co n flates TLALOC, th e ra in
god, w ith H u e h u e te o tl, p e rh a p s in re p re s e n
tation o f th e A z te c m e ta p h o r fo r w a r a n d
co nflagration, ATL-TLACHINOLLI.
H u itz ilo p o c h tli w as th e s u p re m e d e ity o f th e
A ztecs, th e ir c h ie f c u lt god. A sso cia ted w ith
suN an d

FIRE a n d

in tro d u c tio n

to

th e

C e n tra l

ru lin g

lin e a g e ,

M e x ic o

his

d is ru p te d

o th e r es tab lish ed solar gods a n d p a tro n s o f


lo n g -sta n d in g

lin eag es,

cuH Tu a n d TONATiuH. I n

p a rtic u la rly

xiUHTE-

som e sources h e

is also id e n tifie d as th e B lu e TEZCATLiPOCA.


L ite r a lly ,

H u itz ilo p o c h tli m e a n s "HUMMING

BIRD on th e le ft* ' o r " h u m m in g b ir d o f th e


s o u th ." T h e S p an iard s c a lle d h im H u ic h ilo b o s
an d s a w h im as th e d e v il in c a rn a te , th e cause
o f h e a r t sacrifice (s ee HEARTS), th e source o f
p e rv e rs io n in th e N e w W o r ld . U n lik e m ost
A z te c gods, H u itz ilo p o c h tli's im a g e w as g e n
e ra lly re n d e re d o f w o o d , r a th e r th a n stone,
an d

no

s u rv iv e -

m o n u m e n ta l

ex am p les

of

h im

in d e e d , fe w exam p les s u rv ive in

a n y m e d iu m . T h e m a in s c u lp tu re o f H u it z ilo
p o c h tli w as p ro b a b ly re m o v e d fro m his TEMPLE
in 1520 a n d sm ug gled o u t o f T e n o c h titla n .
A

d o c u m e n t o f 15 39 depicts th e b u n d le d

H u itz ilo p o c h tli s c u lp tu re a fte r it w a s r e p u t


e d ly re m o v e d .
W h a t d id H u itz ilo p o c h tli lo ok like? A c c o rd
in g to m ost accounts a n d to a n e a rly postC o n q u e s t illu s tra tio n , h e w o re on his h e a d a
b lu e -g re e n h u m m in g b ird h e add ress, a go ld e n
tia ra , w h ite h e ro n fe a th e rs , a n d th e sm oking
m irr o r m o re c o m m o n ly associated w it h T e z c a tlip o c a a n d p ro b a b ly a d o p te d fro m h im as is th e s e rp e n t fo o t th a t th e A z te c TLATOANi
in co rp o ra tes in to his H u itz ilo p o c h tli costum e
on th e S ton e o f T iz o c . H is fa c e o fte n bears
y e llo w a n d b lu e s trip e d p a in t, a n d a black
m ask d o tte d w it h STARS surrounds his eyes.
F r e q u e n tly a d o rn e d w it h PAPER b a n n ers an d
so m e tim es w it h sh ield a n d d a rts in h a n d , h e
u s u a lly ca rries th e xiUHCOATL, o r fire se rp en t.
As

th e c h ie f A z te c god,

H u itz ilo p o c h tli

o ccup ied th e m ost p r o m in e n t site w ith in th e


te m p le p re c in c t o f T e n o c h titla n . H is te m p le ,
to g e th e r w it h th a t o f TLALOC, fo rm e d w h a t
th e A ztec s c a lle d th e H u e te o c a lli, th e G r e a t
T e m p le , a d o u b le p y ra m id . A c c o rd in g to one
^account, T la lo c h a d risen fro m a s p rin g to
w e lc o m e H u itz ilo p o c h tli w h e n th e A ztecs Red
th e m a in la n d a n d a r riv e d o n th e islan d in th e
m id d le o f L a k e T e xco co in

1345. P e rh a p s

Huehuecoyotl dancing, Codex Borbonicus, p. 4,


16th c. Aztec.
Huehueteot!, the Aztec Old God, stone sculpture
from the Templo Mayor, Tenochtitlan.

HUITZLOPOCHTL!
the very oldest god in the C e n tra l M e x ic a n

pregnancy becam e a source o f h u m iliatio n tr

p an th eo n , T la lo c o ffe red le g itim ac y and his

h e r c h ild re n , and th e y p lo tte d to kit! her.

tory to H u itzilo p o c h tli. T o g e th e r, th e y also

B u t fro m w ith in th e w om b, H u itzilo p o c h tli

suggested ATL TLACHrsoLU, o r E re -a n d -w a te r,

com fo rted h er. T h e C en tzo n H u itzn a h u a and

the A ztec m etap h or fo r w a r. H u itzilo p o c h tli

C o yolxauhqui charged C oatepec, slicing o fl

led the A ztecs in w a r and in

C o atlic u e's h ead . O u t o f h e r tru n cated body

H u itzilo p o c h tli's

H U M A N S A C R IF IC E .

geographical

origins

rem ain obscure, b u t according to A zte c m ig ra

le a p t

H u itzilo p o c h tli,

dressed,

b rand ish in g

fu lly
his

form ed

and

X iu h c o atl,

w ith

tion legends, he led his p eople on a jo u rn e y

w h ich h e in tu rn dism em bered his sister

for generations, com m anding them Erst to

C o yo lxau h q u i, w hose body parts tum bled to

leave th e ir island hom e,

AZTLAN,

in th e e a rly

th e foo t o f C oatepec. H u itzilo p o c h tli then

12th c. and to seek out a n ew island in a lake.

a ttacked his h a lf-b ro th e rs , only a fe w

D iv id e d in to seven trib es, the Aztecs soon

w hom m anaged to Eee.


G en eratio n s la te r, the A ztecs w ould re p ro

g ath ered

at

C H icoM O Zioc,

the

legendary

of

fo r a ll C e n tra ! M ex ica n

duce C o atep ec in the T e m p le o f H u itz ilo

peoples, and w h e re th ey, too, sojourned a

p o ch tli a t T e n o c h titla n . G re a t serpents Bowed

w h ile , b efo re beginning th e ir w anderings


again. H e re a t C hicom oztoc, H u itzilo p o c h tli's

dow n

source o f o rigin

th e

balustrades

w h ile

th e

w ooden

sculpture o f H u itzilo p o c h tli reig n ed from the

sister, M a iin a lx o c h itl (w hose pow ers over

shrine a t the top - p ro b ab ly in the com pany

SPIDERS,

o f th e im age o f his d ec ap ita te d m o th e r - and

scorpions,

and

snakes

recall

the

pow ers held by the p rin cip al fem ale goddess

the d ism em b ered C o yolxauhqui la y a t the

o f TEOTinuACAN) had gained follow ers, and


m any Aztecs had grow n accustom ed to c iv i

base o f the p y ra m id , h er im ag e carved on the

lized life . W hen a tree sp lit in tw o H u itz ilo


pochtli in te rp re te d it as a sign to lead the
virtuous aw ay, leaving the rest behind. A t
this p oint, religion and history in te rtw in e ,
and the story o f a schism am ong the tribes
probably reflects a historical re a lity in w hich
the group did d ivid e. Those le ft w ith M a linalxochitl eventu ally cam e to settle a t M a linalco, to the w est o f T en o c h titla n , and M a linalxochitl's son, C o pil, w ould la te r a tte m p t
to avenge his m other's abandonm ent.
H u itzilo p o c h tli m ean w h ile led his people
on to C O A TE P E C , H ill o f the Serpent, w h ere his
m iraculous b irth - or w h a t w e should call a
re b irth - then took place. I t m ay also have
been a t this ju n c tu re th a t a livin g ru le r,
H u itzilo p o c h tli, was transform ed into the new
cult d eity. O ne o f the g re at m ountains o f
A ztec legend, C oatepec was near T u la (see
TOLLAN); the Aztecs celeb rated a N e w F ire
C erem ony there in 1163, ju s t about the tim e
o f the dem ise and abandonm ent o f T u la - a
coincidence suggesting th a t the nom adic and
aggressive Aztecs m ay have played a role in
its d o w n fall.
A t C oatepec, the goddess coATucuE kep t
and sw ept the tem ple. O ne day, as she sw ept,
she tucked a tu ft o f feathers in h er breast,
b u t w hen she had com pleted h er task, the
feathers w ere gone and she knew she had
becom e pregnant. A lre ad y the m other o f 400
sons (know n as the C entzon H u itzn a h u a) and
a d aughter, c o Y O L X A U H Q U i, C oatlicue and h er

surface o f a round stone. W h e n bodies w ere


tum bled dow n the steps, e ve ry hum an sacri
fice recre ated C o yolxauhqui s fa ll and p ublic
h u m ilia tio n .
C oyolxauhqui m ay w e ll h ave belonged to
a group o f o ld e r fe rtility goddesses in C e n tra l
M ex ico , and h er destru ctio n reveals th e rise
o f H u itzilo p o c h tli's c u lt. O fte n id e n tifie d w ith
the M O O N , C oyolxauhqui is in this aspect also
destroyed b y the solar H u itzilo p o c h tli; in fac t,
the round C o yolxauhqui stone a t the T e m p le
o f H u itzilo p o c h tli is p e rio d ic a lly sliced by
the sun, as if to re p lic a te ongoing solar
dom inance. T h e C en tzo n H u itzn a h u a can be
id e n tifie d w ith in n u m e rab le stars, also chased
to the south b y th e solar H u itzilo p o c h tli.
A lthough o fte n considered to be one o f the
y o u th fu l goddesses, a t th e T e m p le o f H u itz ilo
p ochtli, C oyolxauhqui is ren d e re d as an o ld er
w om an, w ith sagging breasts and stretched
stom ach; th e g re a t C o atlicu e sculpture
(w h ich m ay o r m ay n o t have been in the
shrine o f H u itzilo p o c h tli above), has also lost
a ll trace o f fe m in in e b eau ty. In H u itzilo p o ch
tli's com pany, fem a le goddesses becom e h id
eous, subjects fo r d ism em berm ent.
In th e story o f A ztec p e reg rin a tio n , H u itz i
lopochtli led his people on fro m C oatepec
in to the V a lle y o f M exico , w h e re they w ere
settled a t C h ap u ltep ec by the end o f the
13th c. G e n e ra lly unw elcom ed in th e V a lle y ,
H u itzilo p o c h tli's p eople soon found them
selves a t w a r w ith th e ir neighbors, led by
C o p il, th e son o f M a iin a lx o c h itl, the b etrayed

95

HUITZILOPOCHTH

sister o f H u itzilo p o ch tli ie ft b eh ind a t C h icomoztoc. C opil's troops w on the b a ttle , b u t


Copil him self fe ll and w as sacrificed by H u itzilopochtli, w ho then took C o p il's h e a rt and
hurled it onto a rock in L a k e Texcoco, giving
rise to the very island on w hich the Aztecs
would la te r found th e ir city.
W ith in a fe w years, the Aztecs w e re forced
to leave C hapultepec, and H u itzilo p o c h tli led
them on to C ulhuacan, on the o th er side o f
the lake, w h ere they w e re little m ore than
slaves to the old T o ltec n o b ility th a t ru led
there. C om pelled to liv e on th e desolate
lava beds a t T iza p a n , the Aztecs w orked as
m ercenaries fo r the lords o f C ulhuacan and,
against the odds, th rive d . H u itzilo p o c h tli saw
that his people had not y e t a rriv e d a t the
prom ised destination, and th a t th e ir success
in T iza p an offered them too m uch com fort.
H e told the trib a l leaders th e re fo re to ask the
lords o f C ulhuacan fo r a noble b rid e ; fearin g
the Aztecs, the lords com plied. W h e n the
princess was d elive re d , the Aztecs im m ed i
ate ly Hayed h er, and a p riest p u t on h e r skin.
W h en the C u lh u a cam e to celeb rate the
a rriv a l o f a new goddess am ong the Aztecs,
they found instead the p riest w earin g the
princess's skin.
W ild ly incensed by this
barbarism , the C u lh u a set upon the Aztecs,
k illin g some and d rivin g others in to the lake.
T h e survivors took refuge on the island th e re ,
w h e re they found an eagle sitting on a cactus
grow ing from a rock, the very im age H u itz ilo
pochtli had told them to seek generations
before. T h e w anderings o f H u itzilo p o ch tli
and his people cam e to an end, according to
m ost sources, in 1345 w ith the founding o f
T en o c h titla n .
C elebrations in honor o f H u itzilo p o ch tli
dom inated the religious cerem onies o f T e
n o ch titlan , and he fre q u e n tly took a role in
festivities dedicated to o th er gods. O utside
T e n o c h titla n , T ezcatlipoca m ay have been
the most im p o rtan t god, and the tw o w ere
often honored together in T en o c h titla n . Thus,
d u ring To xcatl, the VEINTENA d edicated to
T ezcatlipo ca, H u itzilo p o c h tli played a p ro m i
nen t ro le, and during P a n q u e tza liztli, the

Huitzilopochtli wielding the Xiuhcoatl Hre


serpent, Codex Borbonicus, p. 34, 16th c. Aztec

veinfena dedicated to H u itzilo p o c h tli, T e zc a t


lipoca was also p ro p itiate d . U n lik e most A ztec
gods, H u itzilo p o c h tli had a stan d-in , not ju s t
an im personator, du rin g m any actual fe s tivi
ties. K now n as P ain al, the substitute w ore
H u itzilo p o ch tli's attrib u te s and m ay be seen
as ano th er aspect o f his ow n num en.
D u rin g T o xcatl, a g re at AMARANTH dough

Huitzilopochtli in his temple, Codex Azcatitlan,


16th c. Aztec.

HUMAN SACRIFICE
was o u tB tted w ith H u itz ilo -

exaggerated its p re va len c e in o rd er to Justify

p o ch tli's a ttire , c a rrie d to his te m p le , and


e v e n tu a lly eaten . Supplicants o ffe red him

students o f an c ie n t M ex ico , th e re fo re , have

q u a il, in p a rtic u la r, and w om en g arlan d ed

w o n d ered w h e th e r hum an sacriBce re a lly d id

Bgure, or

th e ir ow n violence in the N e w W o rld . Some

w ith Rowers danced the serp ent dance fo r

take p lace a t a ll, and , if so, on w h a t sort o f

h im . S everal veintenas o f p re p a ra tio n le d up

scale. D u ra n expressed his ow n in c re d u lity at

to P a n q u e tza liztli, w h en th e an n iversary o f

the 8 0,4 00 victim s supposedly sacriBced for

H u itzilo p o c h tli's m iraculous b irth a t C o a te -

th e re d ed ic atio n o f the T e m p le o f nuiiziLO

pec on the day 1 F lin t in the y e a r 2 A c a tl

pocHTLi in 1487 - b u t he also rep o rted th a t

was c ele b rated , again w ith a dough Bgure o f

c lo tted

H u itzilo p o c h tli.

w ith in th e te m p le p re cin c t, and th a t a n ew

PMEST b earin g a

Bgure

hum an

blood

fo rm ed

g re at

pools

o f P a in a l led a g re a t procession through

skullrack (see TZOMPANTu) had to be b u ilt to

T e n o c h titla n and neighboring tow ns b efo re

accom m odate th e thousands o f n ew offerings.

re tu rn in g to the cerem o n ial p recin ct in T e n

T h e T ellerian o -R e m e n s is , a n a tiv e post-C on-

o ch titla n . F o u r victim s w e re sacriRced in the

quest account,

b allco u rt, then m any m ore on the T e m p le

20,0 00 fo r th a t sam e eve n t.


A rch aeo lo g ically, a fe w la rg e deposits o f

o f H u itzilo p o c h tli. (H u itzilo p o c h tli w as also

speciBes

th e

slau g h ter o f

celeb rated d u rin g P ach to n tli and T laxo ch i-

hum an skeletons h ave been recovered: 42

m aco.)

ch ild ren w e re sim ultaneously sacriBced to


TLALOC and in te rre d on th e T la lo c side o f the

hum an sacriBce H u m an sacriBce p layed a

C re a t T e m p le in T e n o c h titla n ; m ore re ce n tly ,

vita! role in M eso am erica, p robably from


e arly tim es onw ard, although it is d iffic u lt to

a larg e n u m b er o f w a rrio rs w e re recovered

docum ent before the L a te Preclassic period.

ACAN, p ro b ab ly a single sacriB cial o ffe rin g fo r

According to most n ative w o rldview s, the


coos had o ffered th e ir ow n B LO O D in o rd er to
g enerate hum ankind, and the sacriBce most
sought by the gods in re tu rn was hum an Besh
and blood. A fte r Corts's a rriv a l in the N e w
W o rld , the Aztecs sent him tam ales (ground
m aize cakes) soaked in blood, a foodstuff
a pp ro p riate for a god. H u m a n ity live d in the
th ra ll o f this blood deb t, and hum an sacriBcial
victim s w e re offered rep eated ly to forestall
the dem ise o f the w o rld and to seal the
com pact m ade w ith the gods. T h e Aztecs, fo r
exam ple, b elieved th a t they w e re livin g in
the Bfth sun, the gods having created and
destroyed fou r previous eras, and th a t hum an
sacriBce h elped to keep the gods a t bay.
M o s t M esoam erican peoples probably also
recognized th a t hum an sacriBce was a w ay
to extinguish enem ies, dim inish the num ber
o f young m en in an enem y's arm y, and
to h u m iliate p ublicly one's opposition (see
C A P T IV E S ). Slaves w e re purchased fo r sacriBce,
and parents did ap p aren tly sell th e ir c hild ren
fo r the purpose, b u t there w ere p ro b ab ly fe w
w illin g volunteers, despite the b e lie f th a t
sacriBcial victim s ascended d ire c tly to
heaven. H u m an sacriBce was not used as a
punishm ent w ith in society fo r crim es; and
E X E C U T IO N and hum an sacriBce w e re not con
fused.
T ru ly horriB ed by the hum an sacriBce
they saw, the Spanish conquerors m ay have

from the T e m p le o f Q u e tza lc o a tl a t TEOTiHUa tem p le d ed icatio n e ven t. A m p le evidence


o f hum an sacriBce survives fro m Prehispanic
a rt. T h a t th e p ractice existed is irre fu ta b le .
W h a t w ill p ro b ab ly alw ays re m ain a m ystery
is its scale, p a rtic u la rly am ong th e A ztecs.
A t M o n te A lb n , the T e m p le o f the D a n z
antes m ay be a clue to F o rm a tiv e perio d
p u b lic hum an sacriBce am ong th e Zapotees.
M a n y panels th e re p o rtra y w h a t seem to
be sacriBced victim s, lim p and m u tila te d ,
pro b ab ly displayed as a p u b lic m em o rial o f
victory.
As d ep icted in L a te C lassic a rt, the M a y a
g en e rally d ec ap ita te d th e ir victim s, som e
tim es o nly a fte r agonizing to rtu re . Some w e re
scalped, others b u rn t o r disem bow eled and
some b eaten . Some captives w e re dressed
and th en bound as DEER, perhaps as p a rt o f a
scapedeer ritu a l; others w e re trussed up and
bounced as if balls in the ritu a l BALLCAME.
SacriBcial victim s m ay have been p arad ed in
litte rs b efo re sacriBce on scaffolding. M a n y
depictions o f hum an sacriBcial victim s w e re
carved on the treads or risers o f steps, and
such a rc h ite c tu ra l featu res p ro b ab ly served
as th e sites o f rep eated sacriBces. M a y a lords
sought to cap ture o th e r h ig h -ran kin g lords in
b a ttle , and th e ir subsequent sacriBce offered
prestige - and possibly trib u te and pow er to the victor. N o mass in term en ts o f M a y a
sacriBcial victim s have been recovered
archaeologically. O n e M a y a king, B ird Jaguar

97

HUMAN SACRIFICE

of Yaxchilan, claim ed 21 captives over the


course o f his life tim e, and i f he sacrificed
that m any over the course o f his career,
archaeological evidence w ould be elusive.
The M a y a often carved hum an bones, possi
bly those o f sacrificed captives.
D is a rtic u la te d skeletons a c c o m p a n y in g p r i
m a ry in te rm e n ts m a y re p re s e n t sla u g h te re d
captives. A fe w b u ria l co nH gu ratio ns h a v e
suggested th a t liv in g offerin g s a c c o m p a n ie d
th e n o b le d e a d : a t P a le n q u e , th e d o o r to th e
to m b o f T e m p le

18a w as se a le d fro m

th e

inside. A 2 5 -y e a r-o ld w o m a n le f t h e r h a n d
prin ts in th e c o n ta in e r o f p la s te r th a t she h a d
used; th e n , ta k in g a tib ia fro m th e Heshless
sk eleton h o n o re d b y th e TO M B , she sat d o w n
in a co rn e r to a w a it h e r DEATH.
A lth o u g h de p ic tio n s o f h u m a n sacrifices do
no t s u rv ive a t T e o tih u a c a n , th e p resence o f
hum an

HEARTS on

staffs a n d

on costum es

argu es fo r th e p ra c tic e th e re . In V e ra c ru z ,
sacrifice b y

H aying

took

p lace

fro m

Human sacriHce, Codex Laud, Late Postclassic


period.

L a te

F o rm a tiv e tim es o n w a rd . A t C lassic E l T a jin ,


h u m a n sacrifice b y h e a r t ex tru sio n is d e p ic te d
as ta k in g p lace in th e b a llc o u rt, b u t m a y no t
h a v e b e e n lim ite d to th e b a llg a m e . In th e
T o lte c e ra , h e a r t sacrifice p re v a ile d a t b o th
T u la

an d

C h ic h e n

Itz a , a n d

th e C h ic h e n

exam p les a re th e m ost e x p lic it p re -C o n q u e s t


de p ic tio n s o f th e sacrifice. G iv e n th e p ro m i
n e n t s k u llrack (iz o m p a n f/t) a t C h ic h e n Itz a ,
d e c a p ita tio n p ro b a b ly fo llo w e d , o r m a y h a v e
b e e n an in d e p e n d e n t m ean s o f sacrifice.
H um an

sacrifice o c cu rred w ith

th e ce l

e b ra tio n o f m ost A z te c VEINTENA festivals. T h e


la rg e s t n u m b e r

of hum an

sacrifices w e r e

m a d e in h o n o r o f H u itz ilo p o c h tli a n d TEZCATLi


POCA, as w e ll as a t tim es o f d e d ic a tio n . H e a r t

sacrifice d o m in a te d th e p ra c tic e , a n d m ost


Hayings took place a fte r th e h e a r t h a d a lre a d y
b e e n e x tru d e d .

M o d ern

students o f h e a rt

sacriHce b e lie v e it to h a v e b e e n a q u ic k m eans


o f d e a th , p a rtic u la rly w h e n c a rrie d o u t by
sk illed p ra c titio n e rs w ith FLINT blades. H e a d s
w e r e o fte n se vered a fte r d e a th a n d d isp la yed
on th e skullrack.

H u m a n im itation o f natural events pro


p itiated nature and this mimesis o f agricul
tural phenom ena was m ade sacred through
hum an sacriHce. D u rin g O chpaniztli, in cel
ebration o f harvest and cmcoMECOATL (the
Aztec MAIZE goddess), a w om an was Hayed,
^ in this case the Hayed hum an skin represent
ing the ripening husk o f corn. F o r Tlacaxipeh ualiztli, the x iP E TOTEC im personator w ore
the Hayed Hesh o f another hum an: as the old

Aztec human sacriHce, Florentine Codex, Book 2.

W!

H U M M IN G B IR D
Resh ro tte d a w a y , th e im p erso n ato r w as lik e

o f the Q u ic h e M a y a is H u n H u n a h p u , fa th e r

a fresh sprout g ro w in g from th e ro tte n h u ll

o f th e H e ro T w in s X b a la n q u e and H u nah p u

o f a seed. ,See aiso AUTOSACRiFiCE, CREATION

as w e ll as th e MONKEY artisans H u n B atz and

A C C O U N T S ; D E A T H ; S A C R IF IC E .

H u n C h u en . In the F o p o / VuA, H u n H u nah p u


and

h u m m in g b ird W ith its d im in u tiv e size, b rilli

his

b ro th e r,

V ucub

H unahpu,

are

d e fe a te d and sacriRced in the U n d e rw o rld .

a n t plum age and ra p id and e rra tic R ight, th e

T h e severed head o f H u n H u n a h p u is placed

hu m m in g b ird is one o f the m ore strikin g birds

in a tre e w h ic h then m ag ically becom es a

o f M eso am erica. B u t alth o u g h to the W e s te rn

gourd. Im p re g n a te d b y the s p ittle fro m this

m ind the h u m m in g b ird m ay be seen p rim a rily

m iraculous gourd, th e m aid en X q u ic gives

as a p re tty and d im in u tiv e c re a tu re , in a n cien t

b irth to X b a la n q u e and H u n a h p u . A fte r a

M ex ico it was o ften id e n tifie d w ith BLOOD and

series o f tria ls , the H e ro T w in s d e fe a t the

w a r. T h e peoples o f an cien t M eso am erica

gods o f d ea th and re trie v e th e rem ains o f

took special note o f its p ro c liv ity to suck

H u n H u n a h p u and V u cu b H u n a h p u .

FLOWERS w ith its long n e e d le -lik e b eak. Thus

R epresentations

L a te

Hun
C lassic

H unahpu
M aya

a re

w idesp read

m only d ep ict the h u m m in g b ird w ith a p e rfo r

scenes. Q u ite com m only he is fou n d w ith the

ated Row er m id w ay dow n the beak.

m onkey artisans o r th e C lassic versions o f

In ancient M eso am erica, the act o f sacriR-

in

of

both the Classic and Postclassic M a y a com

vessel

H u n a h p u and X b a la n q u e . O n one vessel, his

cia! BLOODLETTiNC was com m only com pared

head appears on th e tru n k o f a

to the hum m ingbird sucking n ectar from a


Row er. Am ong
the
M id d !e
F o rm a tiv e

In th e u p p er branches o f the sam e tre e , his

O lm ecs, Rne ja d e ite p erforators w e re fre


q u en cy carved in the form o f a hu m m in g b ird ,
w ith the !ong beak serving as the p erfo ra to r
blade. A t E a rly Postclassic C hichen Itz , the
hum m ingbird is represented in the context o f
HUM A N SACRIFICE; in the L o w e r T e m p le o f the
Jaguars, a hum m ingbird pierces the HEART o f
a m an em erging from a Rower. In L a te
Postclassic C e n tra l M exico , both hum m ing
birds and Rowers are w id e ly id e n tifie d w ith
blood and bloodletting. O n page 44 o f the
Codex B orgia, QUETZALCOATL in the guise o f a
hum m ingbird stands in a cascade o f blood
m arked by JADE and Rowers. A ztec represen
tations o f bone bloodletters com m only p o r
tra y a Row er a t the b lu n t condyle end o f the
instrum ent. In m any instances, hum m ing
birds are ren dered sucking the nectar o f these
b lo o d letter Rowers.
T h e hum m ingbird is also q u ite an aggress
ive and fearless b ird th a t has been know n to
attack creatures m any tim es its size. Possibly
fo r this reason, it was identiR ed w ith one o f
the fiercest and most bellicose gods o f L a te
Postclassic C e n tra l M exico, H u rrz iL O P O C H T L i,
the p atron god o f the Aztecs. In N a h u a tl,
H u itzilo p o c h tli signifies "hu m m in g bird on the
le f t /' or "hu m m in g bird o f the south." In the
fe w know n A ztec portrayals o f H u itz ilo
p ochtli, he is usually shown w earin g a longbeaked hum m ingbird headdress.
H u n H u n ah p u O ne o f the m ost im p o rtan t
characters in the POPOL v u H creation account

CACAO

tree .

head m ay be seen tu rn in g in to a cacao pod.


Q u ite c le a rly this is a C lassic fo rm o f the
episode in w h ich the h ead o f H u n H u n ah p u
is placed in th e gourd tree . I t is also now
e v id e n t th a t the C lassic H u n H u n a h p u is a
form o f the

M A IZ E C O D .

In m any vessel scenes

he em erges fro m th e e a rth , m uch lik e p la n te d


com sprouting o u t o f the soil.
H unahpu

see

C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S ;

POPOL v u H ;

T W IN S

Ila m a te c u h tli Also re fe rre d to as c iH U A C O A T L


and Q u ila z tli, Ila m a te c u h tli was an A ztec
goddess o f th e E A R T H , D E A T H , and th e M IL K Y
WAY. P o rtra ye d as an aged w om an w ith a
Reshless m outh containing larg e b ared te e th ,
she dressed e n tire ly in w h ite and w o re a skirt
edged w ith shells term e d th e c /i/a M /cue, or
star skirt, a referen ce to the M ilk y W a y .
H e r tem p le w as know n as T lilla n , m eaning
"darkness" and h e r co n tin u ally d arkened
cham ber h eld cap tive im ages o f C O D S fro m a ll
regions o f the A ztec e m p ire. O n e o f h er
m ore im p o rta n t festivals occurred d u rin g the
VEINTENA m onth o f T ititl; d u rin g the N e w F ire
cerem onies p erfo rm ed in th e y e a r o f 2 Reed,
Ila m a te c u h tli appears to have p layed a m ajor
ro le in th e T ititl b u ria l o f th e jauAmoAp/Mi
B U N D LE S
m arking the com pletion o f a
52-ye ar cycle, ee a/so C A L E N D A R ; F IR E .

99
incense T h e o fferin g o f incense was consid
ered an act o f p u rific atio n th a t lin k e d a
sacrificial object or person to th e C O D S , thus
allow ing its acceptance by them . T h e most
common native incense, w id e ly called copaV from the N ah u a tl copa/A - and also know n
as pom am ong the M a y a , is the resin from
trees o f the /2ursera genus, though gums and
resins o f o th er trees a re also used as incense.

ITZAMNA
The head of Hun
Hunahpu as an ear of
mature maize, detail of
a mural from Cacaxtla,
Tlaxcala, Late Classic
period. Although
appearing in a Central
Mexican mural, this is
a clear representation
of a Classic Maya god.

W hen b u rn t, copa/ yields abu n d ant sm oke,


and in this smoke could be seen ancestors as
w e ll as the gods to w hom an offering was
being m ade. R UBBER, as w e ll as some other
saps - regarded as the B LO O D and life forces
of trees - m ade clouds o f smoke in w hich
deities m ight be conjured. M o d e rn Z in acanteco M a y a collect tw o kinds o f pom , one
nodules o f resin and the o th er chips o f w ood,
from tw o trees o f the B ursera genus; the

Ilamatecuhtli with
shield and baton,
Codex Borbonicus,
p. 36, 16th c. Aztec.

nodules are considered the b e tte r incense.


In the PO PO L v u H , the Q uiche M a y a lineages
offer specialized blends o f copa/ to the four
D IR E C T IO N S . In the story o f the H e ro T w in s in
the Popo/ V u/i, the U N D E R W O R L D lords w ho
dem and the h e a rt o f X quic are tricked into
accepting red nodules o f tree sap instead. In
the D resden Codex, gods o ffer and receive
pom . In this century, the Lacandon M a y a have
collected gums and saps for incense and
form ed it into w hat they consider m ale and
fem ale nodules on a board fo r offering to
the gods.
T h e Aztecs freq u e n tly censed w ith a lad le
w ith rattles and p ro ffered the smoke to the
fou r directions. In the VEINTENA A te m o ztli,
A ztec priests m ade a special offering o f abun
d an t incense to T L A L O C , possibly in mimesis
o f the clouds associated w ith T laloc's R A IN .
A rchaeologically, incense has been recovered
from the C hichen Itz C E N O T E and the N evado
de Toluca.
Itza m n a According to C olonial Yucatec
accounts, Itza m n a was the high god o f the
M a y a . F ittin g his role as param ount king, he
o ften bears the title o f aA au///, or " lo rd ," in
the Postclassic Yucatec codices. S im ilarly,
Classic M a y a vessel scenes fre q u e n tly depict
Itza m n a as an enthroned king presiding over
lesser coos. H o w ev er, in Postclassic C O D IC E S
he fre q u e n tly appears w earin g p riestly accou
trem ents. In Postclassic Yucatan he was con
sidered as the Rrst PRIEST and the in ven to r o f
D u rin g the m onth o f U o, priests
presented th e ir screenfold books in fro n t o f
an im age o f the god. H is identiB cation w ith
W R IT IN G .

Copa/ incense placed upon a board, Lacandon


Maya, early 20th c.

00

rrZPAPALOTL
the scribal arts was also p resent d u rin g the

th rea te n ed

Ctassic p erio d . In L a te C lassic vessel scenes,

ECLIPSES. She w as a goddess o f the paradise

he is o fte n p o rtrayed as a scribe (see

re a lm o f TAMOANCHAN, a place identiA ed w ith

S C R IB A L

to d evo u r people d u rin g solar

o f X c a lu m k in , he bears the scribal title o f ah

the b ird o f th e gods and hu m an kin d .


T h e e a rlie s t know n rep resen tatio n o f Itz p a

d z/b , or H e o f th e W ritin g . As w ith

p a lo tl appears on a fra g m e n ta ry re lie f from

c o o s ).

M o re o v e r, a t the T e rm in a l C lassic site

probab!e consort

o tc H E L ,

ifie d w ith the pow ers o f

his

Itza m n a w as id e n t

E a rly Postclassic T u la , w h e re she appears

Thus d u rin g

w ith a ske letalize d head and b u tterA y w ings

C U R IN G .

the Yucatec m onth o f Z ip , he was invoked as

supplied w ith

a god o f m edicine.
In the Postclassic Yucatec codices, Itza m n a

id e n tity rem ains to be p ro ven , the Z apotee

stone blades. A ltho u g h

the

d e ity called Goddess 2 ) by A lfonso Caso and

appears as the aged d e ity know n as G od D

Ig n a cio B ern a l found on ceram ic urns m ay

(see scHELLHAS coos). D u rin g both the Classic

w e ll tu rn out to be a C lassic Z ap o tee form o f

and Postc!assic periods, he w ears a p ro m in e n t

Itz p a p a lo tl. In a n u m b er o f instances, this

beaded disk upon his b ro w . A diagnostic

Z ap o tee goddess is c le a rly identiA ed w ith the

e lem e n t o f Itza m n a ,

bat.

the

sam e disk also

appears in his nam e glyph. Q u ite fre q u e n tly ,


this disk contains the A kbal sign denoting

Itz tla c o liu h q u i-Ix q u im illi

darkness or blackness, and it is p robable th a t

M exican s, stone and castigation w e re closely

the device represents an

O B S ID IA N M IR R O R ,

as was used in d iv in ato ry scrying (see

such
D iv iN

To

th e

ancien t

re la te d concepts, since m iscreants w e re fre


q u en tly punished by stoning. Thus the N h u

ATtoN). D u rin g the Postclassic p erio d , C od D

a tl expression fo r p u nishm ent w as fef/-cua/?u-

can appear in CAIMAN guise and in fact,


signifies CA!MAN, lizard or large Ash in M a y a n
languages. It is probable th a t this caim an

M exican d e ity o f castigation, Itz tla c o liu h q u i-

aspect o f Itzam n a is id en tical to the C o lo n ial


Yucatec being know n as Itza m C ab A in , the
great earth caim an associated w ith the flood.
Itza m n a is also closely id e n tifie d w ith the
PRINCIPAL BIRD DEITY, the Classic M a y a form o f
v u c u B C A Q U ix , the m onster b ird o f PO PO L v u n
fam e. T h e P rincipal B ird D e ity appears to
be none other than the celestial aspect o f
Itzam n a .
Itzp a p a lo tl O ne o f the m ore fearsom e god
desses o f the C e n tra l M exican pantheon,
Itzp a p a lo tl is com m only rendered as a skeletal
being w ith )A C U A R talons and kn ife -tip p e d
w ings. T h e term iizp a p a /o d c a n signify e ith e r
O B S ID IA N b u tte rfly or claw ed B U T T E R F L Y , b u t it
is lik e ly th a t the second m eaning is in ten d ed.
R ath er than obsidian, the w ing blades are
c learly ren dered as F L IN T , or feepad. I t is
q u ite possible th a t the concept o f a claw ed
butterA y refers to the B A T , and in fac t, in a
num ber o f instances Itzp a p a lo tl appears w ith
b at wings. H o w ever, she can also appear w ith
clear b utterA y and E A G LE attrib u tes.
Itzp a p a lo tl is patron o f the day Cozcacuau h tli and the TRECENA 1 House; the day 1
House is also one o f the Ave w estern trecena
dates dedicated to the ciHUATETEO, the
dem onic w om en w ho died in c h ild b irth .
Itzp a p a lo tl was not only a c/A uafeot/, b u t
also one o f the tzitz/fn im e, star dem ons th a t

m eaning "w o o d and stone.

T h e C e n tra l

Ix q u im illi is also th e god o f stone and coldness.


H e fre q u e n tly appears w ith a face and curv
ing foreh ead o f banded stone, m uch lik e
varieties o f FLINT or agate. In som ething lik e
the W estern concept o f "ju stic e is b lin d ," he
is usually b lin d fo ld ed o r sightless. In m any
cases, he blends w ith the b lack T E Z C A T H P O C A
and in this form appears as a god o f the n orth
and p atro n o f the day A c a tl. In a d d itio n , he
serves as the god o f th e T R E C E N A 1 C u e tzp a lin .
In m any instances, Itz tla c o liu h q u i-Ix q u im illi is ren dered w ith a sto n e-tip p ed d a rt in
his b ro w . T h is p ro b ab ly concerns an episode
fro m the L ey en d a d e Aw so/es account o f the
creation o f th e A fth sun a t T E O T iH U A C A N . As
the god o f the DAWN and the m orning star,
TLAHUIZCALPANTECUHTLI shot a d a rt a t th e SUN
w ho, in tu rn , transAxed T la h u izc a lp a n te c u h tli
w ith a d a rt through the foreh ead . T h e account
states th a t once p ierced by this d a rt, T la h u iz
calp an tecu h tli becam e th e god o f cold, th a t
is, Itz tla c o liu h q u i-Ix q u im illi. T h e C e n tra l
M exican god o f stone, cold, and castigation
also appears in the Venus pages o f the M a y a
D resden Codex. O n D resden page 50, he is
ren dered not only w ith th e b lin d fo ld b u t also
w ith a A int p o in t p rojecting fro m the top o f
his headdress. I t is possible th a t th e codical
C o d Q (see scHELLHAS G O D s ) is a Postclassic
M a y a version o f Itztla c o liu h q u i-Ix q u im illi.
Ixch el A t the tim e o f the Spanish Conquest,

101
Ixchel was a p ro m in e n t M a y a goddess,
patroness o f c h ild b irth , pregnancy, and fe r til
ity. W om en from a ll over Y ucatan m ade long
pilgrim ages to seek h e r a tte n tio n a t shrines
on C ozum el and Is la M u je re s , and the shrines
w ere rep utedly Blled w ith sculptures o f h er
im age, although none survive. T h e nam e
Ixchel can be tran slated as "L a d y R ain b o w ."
In the D resden C odex, she bears the nam e
Chac C h el, and is depicted as an old lad y
w ith snakes in h er h a ir, som etim es w ith
AGUAR claws and eyes, and occasionally
dressed in a skirt p attern e d w ith a skulland-bones m o tif. She also appears to be a
patroness o f w eaving, D iv iN A T iO N , and m id w if
ery, although she is probably not the b e a u tifu l
young w eaving w om an given form in a num
ber o f Jaina figurines. N o r is th e re reason to
think th a t she is the b e a u tifu l young MOON
goddess o f Classic M a y a a rt w ith w hom h er
nam e has been w id e ly id e n tifie d : th a t young
w om an, som etim es depicted w ith in the cres
cent o f the m oon, does not b ear the nam e

The aged god Itzamna with a bow! of maize


tamales, detail from a Late Classic Maya vase.

Ixchel or C hac C h el. Ixchel's closest associ


ations are w ith certain C e n tra l M exican god
desses, p a rtic u la rly those re la te d to Toci and
TLAMATECUHTLl. S e e / s o BIRTH; SCHELLHASCODS.

ja d e T h e general term ja d e refers to both


ja d e ite and n ep h rite. Both are rocks, or m in
e ral aggregates, and both are found in the
O ld and N e w W orlds. In M esoam erica, only
ja d e ite is found, som etim es occurring in lodes
o f serpentine, a lesser greenstone, and its
m olecules are ra re ly pure. A lb ite and diopside, also greenstones, occur w ith ja d e ite and
w e re used fo r the same precious objects
in the ancien t N e w W o rld . M esoam erican
ja d e ite is a sodium and alum inum silicate,
and it is h ard, b etw een 6.0 and 7.0 on the
M ohs* scale, and so u n yield in g th a t tools to
w o rk ja d e w ere o ften them selves m ade o f
ja d e . In the M esoam erican w o rld w ith o u t
m etal tools, ja d e was w orked w ith string
saws, tu b u lar d rills, and ja d e tools, b u t w ith
ja d e pow der or q u artz sand as the abrasive.
Jade occurs as rocks and boulders, usually
along rivers. A field o f ja d e boulders w ith in
30 m iles o f the M o tag u a R iv er in G u atem ala
now supplies a m odern ja d e industry.
K now n gen erically as ch a /c h /h u ff/ in C en
tra l M exico , ja d e was the most precious rock

Itztlacoliuhqui-Ixquimilli, the god of stone, cold,


and castigation, Codex Borbonicus, p. 12, 16th c.
Aztec.

102

JAG UAR
or m in e ra! in M eso am erica. Perhaps because

ra in forest bu t w e re sought In trib u te and

o f its d o m in an t green and b !u e-g reen colors,

tra d e by a ll h ig h lan d civiliza tio n s in M exico.


C a lle d o ce/o d in N a h u a tl, the ja g u a r is not (o

it w as id e n tifie d w ith

M A IZ E , W A T E R ,

s rr, vege

ta tio n , even life its e lf. As such, it w as som e

be confused in English w ith ocelot (P a n fAera

tim es in la id as th e HEART in sculptures and in

pardaA s), th e sm aller cat o f s im ila r pelage.

the m ouths o f the dead as m oney - and as a

U n lik e its m ore a d a p ta b le and silent cousin

sign o f the re n e w a l o f life .


T h e O lm ecs w e re the Erst M eso am erican

th e p u m a (PantAena conco/or), jaguars w ill

people to locate and carve ja d e . T h e y p re

agoutis, MONKEYS, w a te rb ird s , Esh, TURTLES,

fe rre d the b lu e-g reen v a rie ty now g en e rally

and even CAIMANS, and the cat is p a rtic u la rly

ro a r or g ru n t. A ja g u a r's d ie t includes OEEH,

thought to have com e fro m C osta R ica and

fond o f restin g on branches th a t extend out

used the m a te ria l fo r th e ir m ost precious

over w a te r.

objects: p o rtra it masks, incised depictions o f


gods, and utensils used in religious ritu als.

JAG UA R C O D S

w e re p resent in e very m ajor

M eso am erican c iv iliza tio n , b u t jag u ars w e re

From O lm ec tim es o n w ard , ja d e had g re at

also

value

SHAMAN), and in states o f ritu a l tran sfo rm atio n ,

as an

h eirlo o m , and ju d g in g

from

im p o rta n t

creatures

them selves

(see

m aterials dredged from the Sacred CENOTE a t

hum ans

C hichen Itzd , ja d e was the m ost im p o rtan t

from a t least O lm ec tim es o n w a rd . T h e M a y a

o ffering. It held g re at in trin sic valu e in every

h iero g lyp h th a t is read U A Y , m ean in g a nim al


com panion o r T O N A L , is its e lf an aAau glyph

M esoam erican c u ltu re , and the Aztecs m ay

changed

sham anic

in to jaguars

have sacked ancien t buildings ju s t to re trie v e

h alf-co vered w ith ja g u a r p e lt. A ccording to

old ja d e .
T h e Spanish w ere interested in cAa/cAiAu/f/
only insofar as they w ere able to prom ote
green and blue glass beads in th e ir trad in g
arrangem ents. W hen the Aztecs told them

Sahagun, A zte c 'c o n ju re rs w e n t abo u t c a rry

th a t the stones cured in te rn a l ailm ents, p a r


ticu larly o f the spleen, liv e r and kidney, they
called it loin-stone, or p /e d ra de /ada in
Spanish. Sir W a lte r R aleigh com m ented on
these m iraculous CURINC stones o f the loins in
the 1580s, b u t the w ord ja d e , a corruption o f
jf/ada, only cam e into the English language
la te r. W hen it was catalogued and given a
L a tin nam e by Europeans, they called it /apis
nepAr/t/cus, from the L a tin w ord fo r kidney,
nepArus, yieldin g the w ord n ep h rite, w hich
they then a pp lied to A sian ja d e. T h e con
fusion was com pounded in m odern tim es,
w hen tw o distinct compounds w e re id e n tiE ed, n ep h rite and ja d e ite .
ja g u a r Probably the most feared and revered
beast in M esoam erica, the ja g u ar (.PaatAera
onca) played a pro m in en t religious role. L ik e
hum ankind, the ja g u ar occupies the top level
o f the food chain, and people sought to
id e n tify them selves w ith the big cat. G e n er
a lly nocturnal, the jag u ar's eyes are lum inous
gold disks a t night, and a ja g u ar skull exca
vated a t K am in aljuyu bears gold p y rite eyes.
D is tin c tive black rosettes characterize ja g u ar
pelage, and they are present even on the
ra re r a ll-b lac k ja g u ar although they can be
seen only in raking ligh t. Fishers as w e ll as
hunters, jaguars liv e exclusively in the tropical

ing its h id e - the h id e o f its foreh ead and o f


its chest, and its ta il, its nose, and its claw s,
and its h e a rt, and its fangs, and its snout. I t
is said th a t they w e n t ab o u t th e ir tasks w ith
them - th a t w ith them th e y d id d arin g deeds,
th a t because o f them they w e re fe a re d "
(F C :x i).
T o assert lo rd ly p o w e r, chiefs and
w ore ja g u a r p elts, ja g u a r sandals,
dresses fashioned o f ja g u a r heads, and
laces m ade o f ja g u a r te e th - and even

kings
h ead
neck
neck

laces o f JADE beads carved as ja g u a r teeth .


A long w ith the M A T , ja g u a r pelts and cushions
w e re the sym bol o f th e enth ro n ed lo rd , and
m any stone thrones, p a rtic u la rly am ong the
M a y a , took the shape o f jag u ars, som etim es
double-headed.
Jaguar offerings w e re m ade on im p o rta n t
ritu a l occasions. A t C opan, 16 jaguars w e re
sacriEced in conjunction w ith th e in s ta lla tio n
o f th e 16th ru le r o f the dynasty. T o be
sacriEced, a ja g u a r m ig h t w e ll have had to
be drugged! A t least th re e ja g u a r p elts, along
w ith pelts o f th ree sm aller cats, w e re draped
w ith in the so-called Sun G od's T o m b a t A ltu n
H a . In the G re a t T e m p le o f T e n o c h titla n ,
m any jaguars w e re in te rre d , perhaps to sym
b olize the P Y R A M ID as a m o u n tain w ith CAVES,
the p re fe rre d d w e llin g o f the ja g u a r.
SacriEced jaguars w e re o ften beheaded,
and a headless ja g u a r glyph in M a y a WRrrtNG
rem ains undeciphered. O n a series o f w e llknow n b u t poorly understood codex-style
M a y a pots, C H A C sacriEces a baby ja g u ar,

103

JAGUAR GODS

sometimes pictured n a tu ra lis tic a lly and o th er


times given hum an characteristics, in the
presence o f G od A (see scHELLHAS coos). Such
a repeated religious im age m ig h t re fe r to a
calendrica! or astral m yth.
jaguar gods Jaguar gods played a p ro m in en t
roie in M esoam erican relig io n . L ik e JAGUARS
them selves, these gods w e re associated w ith
N IG HT, CAVES, the UNDERWORLD, h u n tin g , and
stealth. T h ey are also related to transform
ation Bgures, and some are know n as aspects
of other deities.
T h e Olm ecs w e re long thought to have only
one m ajor d eity , the W ERE-jACUAR, supposedly
derived from the m ating o f a hum an and a
jag u ar. R ecent studies have dem onstrated
that m any o th er anim als, including birds and
SERPENTS,

lie a t the root o f

O LM EC CODS,

Jaguar with a jade ball in its mouth, found as an


offering in the Templo. Mayor, Tenochtitlan, Late

but

O lm ec sham anic transform ation Bgures p ri


m a rily fe a tu re the ja g u ar. Am ong O lm ec
d eities, the crouching RAIN god fre q u e n tly has
the body o f a ja g u a r, and he m ay be the m ost
characteristic w ere-jag u ar.
A t TEO TIHU AC AN, there are num erous ja g u a r
sculptures - some functioning as ritu a l recep
tacles - b u t am ong the supernatural ones, the
N e tte d Jaguar is probably the most prom i
nent. C h aracterized by a ja g u ar body covered
in a re ticu la te d in terlac e, the N e tte d Jaguar
usually features a great panache o f trim m ed
feathers a t the back o f the head and m ay
have a fe a th e r trim along the back, ta il, and
legs. In depictions o f processions w h ere he
altern ates w ith coyotes, a hum an HEART hangs
in fro n t o f his lo llin g tongue, suggesting a
sacriBcia! ro le, and presaging the WARRIOR
ORDERS dedicated to totem ic anim als in A ztec
tim es. T h e N e tte d Jaguar often bears MIRRORS
and rattles, perhaps because o f a relatio n he
m ay b ear to D iviN A TiO N , and he m ay travel
along a path m arked by hum an footprints.
A three-dim ensional fea th e red ja g u a r w ith
its back carved as a receptacle m ay have once
received hum an hearts, lik e the la te r A ztec
cuAUHXicALLis. T h e Teo tih u acan TLALOC fre
q u en tly has a ja g u a r association, p a rtic u la rly
in the form atio n o f the T la lo c A m outh.
A t M o n te A lb an , ja g u a r urns are featu red
from an early d ate. As am ong the M a y a ,
n atu ralistic jaguars som etim es b ear hum an
scarves, as if to in d icate a supernatural associ
ation. T h e ja g u ar god lab eled 1 T ig e r by
Alfonso Caso and Ignacio B ern al freq u e n tly
w ears a hum an h e a rt as a pectoral. T h e ir god
lab eled O ld God 5 F bears the same tw isted

In a state of shamanic transformation, a Maya


lord would take on an animal self or uay, most
commonly the jaguar; from a Late Classic Maya
vase, Altar de Sacrificios.

Hill of the Jaguar, Codex


Vindobonensis, p. 9, Late
Postclassic Mixtee.

104

J A G U A R -S E R P E N T B IR D
" c ru lle r" (so nam ed because it resem bles th e

p a rtn e r, th e Stingray P a d d ler, the Jaguar

tw isted p as try) b etw e en th e nose and u n d er

P a d d le r is an old god, w ith sunken cheeks.


O th e r M a y a

th e eyes th a t characterizes the M a y a Jaguar

sup ern atu rals w e a r ja g u a r

G od o f th e U n d e rw o rld and is c le a rly re la te d

p elag e or a re jag u ars. T h e patro n o f the

to th a t d e ity .
Perhaps because the M a y a and th e ja g u a r

ja w and w ho occurs in th e com pany o f the

shared dom inion o ver the tro p ica l ra in fo rest,

Jaguar C o d o f th e U n d e rw o rld on p ain te d

m onth Pax is a ja g u a r god w ho lacks a lo w e r

the M a y a had m ore ja g u a r d eities and d eities

ceram ics, fre q u e n tly in the context o f HUMAN

w ith

S A C R IF IC E .

ja g u a r

associations

than

any

o th e r

X b a la n q u e , one o f the H e ro T w in s ,

M eso am erican peoples. T h e M a y a p a rtic u

o ften has ja g u a r p e lt on his face, arm s, and

la rly id e n tifie d the suN w ith the ja g u a r. T h e

legs, and is th e p atro n o f th e n u m b er 9.

d ay tim e sun, o ften rep resen ted as p atro n o f

In C e n tra ! M exico , T e p e y o llo tl was the

the n u m b er 4, can be rep resen ted w ith ja g u a r

m ost im p o rta n t ja g u a r god, and as a d e ity

featu res, b u t the n ig h ttim e sun, the Jaguar

re la te d

C od o f the U n d e rw o rld , p atro n o f the nu m b er

p lace in th e A zte c p an th eo n . T e p e y o llo tl,

to

TEZCA TH PO C A ,

h eld a significant

7 , is c le a rly a ja g u a r in his fu ll-b o d y depictions

" h e a rt o f th e m o u n ta in ," d w e lt in m ountain

and g en e rally has ja g u a r ears in a ll rep resen

CAVES,

tations. H e m ay also app ear as an anth ro p o

in

m orphic

p recin ct suggests th a t the A ztecs p erceived

form , w ith ja g u a r characteristics

and the v ery o ffe rin g o f so m any jaguars

the G re a t T e m p le o f th e ir cerem onial

lim ite d to the face. T h e Jaguar G od o f the

this tem p le com pound, d ed ica te d to

U n d e rw o rld usually has a hank o f tw isted h a ir

and

over his forehead, and a " c ru lle r" b etw een his
nose th a t m ay continue un d er the eyes. In
this form , the Jaguar God o f the U n d e rw o rld

yollot! p resided over the T R E C E N A 1 M a za t!


and was the eig h th L o rd o f the N ig h t (see

is the sun in the U n d e rw o rld , trav elin g from


w est to east, som etim es atop a g re at C A IM A N .
T h e Jaguar God o f the U n d erw o rld is p a rtic u
la rly associated w ith T ik a l, o f w hich he m ay
be the patro n , p a rtic u la rly in the E a rly
Classic; the toponym for T ik a l is incorporated
into his headdress in some depictions a t T ik a l
and most form a! p o rtra itu re o f T ik a l kings
incorporates the head o f the Jaguar C od o f
the U n d erw o rld .
O th e r M a y a ja g u a r gods include the W a te r
L ily Jaguar, the Jaguar B aby, and the Jaguar
P ad d ler (see P A D D LE R coos). A lw ays a zoom orphic form , the W a te r L ily Jaguar w ears
a w a te r lily on his head and usually a collar
o f extruded eyeballs around the neck or a
scarf. T h e W a te r L ily Jaguar serves as a
throne, m arches in U n d erw o rld processions,
appears occasionally w ith a STAR sign on his
back (perhaps to te ll us th a t he is also a
constellation), serves as the patron o f the
m onth Pop, and functions as an overarching
brame fo r one o f the g ian t T ik a l litte rs . T h e
Jaguar B aby is usually shown as a chubby
zoom orphic or anthropom orphic ja g u ar,
alm ost alw ays set in opposition to C H A C in
scenes o f S A C R IF IC E . C hac w ields an axe, and
the Jaguar Baby usually reclines on a stone
A L T A R . O ne o f the p a ir o f P A D D LE R CODS th a t
guide the M A IZ E G O D and others through the
w aters o f the U n d e rw o rld , the Jaguar P addler
usually handles the fore o f the craft. L ik e his

ii u iT Z iL O P O C H T L i ,

TLALOC

to be the h e a rt o f the

m o untain w h e re T e p e y o llo tl d w e lt. T e p e -

C A L E N D A R ). * e e a / s O K IN IC H A H A U ; T E O T IH U A C A N
CODS.

ja g u a r-s e rp e n t-b ird

T erm in o lo g y

th a t

has

been used to describe a fro n ta l m onster from


w hich a hum an head p ro trud es, th e "ja g u a rs e rp e n t-b ird " is a fro n ta l version o f the WAR
SERPENT. S eler lin k ed th e im ag ery to V E N US
and the m orning star and suggested a
relatio n sh ip to Q U E T Z A L C O A T L and T L A L H U IZ C A L P A N T E C U H T L i th a t can no longer be supported.
R are a t T E O T IH U A C A N its e lf, th e fro n ta l w a r
serpent is m ost com m on am ong th e M a y a , a t
Piedras N egras and C h ich en Itz , and a t
T u la . T h e p rim a ry association o f this com
posite im age is w a rfa re .
Jester C o d T h e Jester G od takes his nam e
from the head o rn am en t th a t dangles over
his foreh ead lik e th a t o f a court je s te r. U sually
trilo b e d and d epicted o n ly as a head (except
a t P alenque, w h e re a body is in clu d ed ), the
d istinctive Jester G od head o rn am en t makes
its Erst appearance d u rin g O lm ec tim es - as
a head o rn am en t a t L a V e n ta and on braziers
from M o n te A lb an - although th e Jester God
occurs m a in ly am ong the Classic M a y a , and
m akes no Postclassic appearances. D u rin g the
E a rly Classic p erio d , some M a y a Jester Gods
have the characteristics o f a S H AR K . G e n era lly ,
the Jester G od functions as a head ornam ent
o f kings and was m ade o f JA D E , b u t lesser

105
nobles w ear Jester Gods o f various colors in
the Bonam pak m urals, so it was not the
exclusive p u rview o f kingship. T h e ja d e Jester
God depicted on Pacal's headband on the
Palenque O val Palace T a b le t is p ro b ab ly the
very one recovered from Pacal's tom b.

JEWELRY
Crouching JaguarSerpent-Bird, a
version of the War
Serpent; Chichen
Itz, Yucatn,
Early Postclassic
period.

je w e lry M e n and w om en, CODS and hum ans


all w ore je w e lry in ancien t M esoam erica.
In general, je w e lry was m ade o f the most
precious m aterials: JADE, serp entin e, and
other greenstones, along w ith am ber, pearls,
SHELL, q u artz, and OBSIDIAN in the F o rm a tiv e
and Classic eras, and COLD, silver, TURQUOISE,
obsidian, shell, q u artz and greenstones in
Postclassic tim es. A lthough some mosaic w ork
is know n am ong Classic je w e lry , it becam e
m ore com mon in the Postclassic era.

In the h a ir, diadem s, tiaras, and headbands


o f in d ivid u al carved beads som etim es
accom pany or supplant headdresses; h ead
dresses them selves, if they include fu ll heads,
m ig h t b ear ear hares and o th er ornam ents.
H a ir was also pulled through fancy beads,
p a rtic u la rly a t the fro n t o f the head, and tiny
beads w ere w orked into long strands o f h air
am ong some 8th c. M a y a . E a r hares g en erally
w ere assemblages in w hich the larg e hange
a t fro n t was anchored to a counterw eight
behind by a cord th a t pierced the ear. Nose
ornam ents, p a rtic u la rly b u tterh y ornam ents,
w e re know n at TEonmjACAN, T u la , Chichen
Itz , and T en o ch titlan . Noses w ere pierced
to receive nose beads: lords jo u rn eyed to
C h olu la to have th e ir noses pierced and to
receive the adornm ent h ttin g a king. C e n tra l
M exican nobles pierced the lo w e r lip in order
to insert a la b re t, m any o f w hich took the
form o f snakes or birds.
Necklaces w e re som etim es suspended in
m u ltip le strands, form ing beaded collars.
B eaded w ristlets and anklets w e re additional
adornm ents. A lthough ra rely depicted in a rt,
rings have been found archaeologically, p ar
tic u la rly am ong the M a y a . D u rin g the P roto
classic and Classic, b e lt assemblages, com
posed o f a head w ith th ree thin dangling
plaques, w e re w orn by kings at e ith e r the
fro n t or back o f the w aist.
Perhaps because o f the green foliage o f
MAIZE, the M a y a m aize god HUN HUNAHPU
w ears abundant je w e lry , probably o f ja d e . In
p reparatio n fo r SACRIFICE, M a y a captives w ere
often bedecked w ith je w e ls and fin ery. T h e ir

sacrifice m ay have been liken ed to the harvest


o f the M a iz e C od.

c
Protoclassic and Classic forms of the shark Jester
Cod. a, As worn by Protoclassic ruler, Loltun
Cave, Yucatn. 6, Shark Jester God of ruler
Stormy Sky, Stela 31, Tikal, Early Classic period,
c, Shark Jester God of ruler Pacal, Oval Palace
Tablet, Palenque, Late Classic period.

toa

K !N !C H A H A U

K in ic h A h au D u rin g both the C lassic and

lig h tn in g

Postclassic periods the M a y a

p o te n t and d ra m a tic n a tu ra l phenom ena o f

suN

god was

and

th u n d e r

A m ong

the

most

term ed K in ich A h au , m ean in g sun-faced or

M ex ico a re lig h tn in g storm s w h ich lig h t up

sun-eyed lo rd . In proE le, the sun god appears

th e

m uch lik e a younger version o f ITZAMNA. T h e

p a rtic u la r, lig h tn in g is reg ard ed w ith special

and shake th e

SKY

EARTH

w ith th u n d er. In

s im ila ritie s a re not co in cid e n ta l; am ong the

in te re s t. R a th e r than b ein g o n ly a dangerous

contact period Y ucatec, one aspect o f the

p o w e r, lig h tn in g is considered

aged c rea to r god was K in ich A h au Itza m n a .

g ivin g and eng en d erin g . Because o f the basic

to be life

F o r the Postclassic codices, the sun god is

association o f lig h tn in g w ith ra in , the gods o f

com m only re fe rre d to as C od G

lig h tn in g a re u su ally also the gods o f

(s e e s c H E L L H A S

coos). In contrast to Itza m n a , the codical sun

R A IN .

H o w e v e r, lig h tn in g its e lf was c le a rly consid

god is usually bearded and has sn ake-like

ered as a m a n ifestatio n o f p o w e rfu l fe rtiliz in g

elem ents curving out from the corners o f the

energ y, as, fo r exam p le, in the w idespread

m outh. H o w e v e r, one o f the most d istin ctive

m yth o f the o rig in o f

traits o f K inich A hau, is the fo u r-p e ta le d Am

splits open th e rock co n tain in g the hidden

often placed upon his brow o r body. W h en

seed.
In M eso am erica, the alm ost instantaneous

view ed face on, it m ay be seen th a t the M a y a

M A IZ E ,

w h e re lig h tn in g

sun god is cross-eyed and has his u p p er

Hash o f lig h tn in g is rep resen ted in a n u m b er

incisors hied into the form o f a " T ." D u rin g


both the Classic and Postclassic periods, the
sun god is closely id e n tifie d w ith JAGUARS, and
a t tim es appears w ith a ja g u a r ear. In Classic
period inscriptions, he serves as the head
v a ria n t o f the num ber 4, and patron o f the
m onth Yaxkin. It is clear th a t the patron o f
the m onth Pax is again the sun god, although
w ith o u t his lo w er ja w . A long w ith the M o n
key Scribe, the head o f the sun god can also
denote the Long C ount position o f K in , or
day (see CALENDAR).
T h e sun god appears in s till ano th er e p igraphic context, C I I I o f the P A L E N Q U E T R IA D ,
w h ere he bears an im p o rtan t title shared
w ith M a y a kings. A lthough this title has
been com m only read as maA AmaA, recent
epigraphic research indicates th a t it is pro
bably to be read AimcA, a title recorded
for the 16th c. highland M a y a . T h e M a y a
id en tificatio n o f kings w ith the sun god can
be traced to a t least as early as the m id -5th
c. A D . In the upper portion o f T ik a l Stela
31, the deceased ru le r C u rl Snout appears
apotheosized as K inich A hau. M o reo v er, a t
both L a te Classic P alenque and Yaxchiln,
ancesters are depicted w ith in solar cartouches. ^eea/so D E IF IC A T IO N ; JAGUAR CO D S ; S UN.

o f w ays. Q u ite com m only, th e sinuous aspect

K ukulcan .see QUETZALCOATL

o f lig h tn in g bolts takes the form o f u n d u latin g


G ive n the igneous n atu re o f lig h t
ning, these lig h tn in g snakes a re o fte n re p

SERPENTS.

resented as b u rn in g F iH E serpents. T h e stone


axe, usually o f F L IN T , is a n o th er w idespread
sym bol o f lig h tn in g . E v en today, stone axes
found in the Helds a re com m only reg ard ed as
spent lig h tn in g .
A m ong th e Classic M a y a , th e so-called
M A N IK IN SCEPTER refers
to lig h tn in g sim u l
taneously as a serp ent, Hre, and axe. T h e
M a n ik in Scepter takes the fo rm o f a deiHed
axe, w ith one o f the legs te rm in a tin g in a
bu rn in g serpent foot, and is sim ply an aspect
o f the d e ity com m only know n as C o d K (see
S C H E L LH A S coDs), or Aau/Z in the Classic M a y a
script. C H A C , the M a y a god o f ra in and lig h t
ning usually w ield s th e C o d K serp ent axe.
I n C e n tr a l M e x ic o , th e lig h tn in g g o d o f th e
A ztec s a n d o th e r p e o p le s is th e jAGUAR-fanged
TLALO C .

The

e a rlie s t k n o w n

d e p ic tio n s

of

T la lo c fr o m P rotoclassic T la p a c o y a p o rtra y
th e

d e ity

H anked

by

s e rp e n tin e

lig h tn in g

bolts. A m o n g th e Z a p o te e s o f O a x a c a , th e
god o f lig h tn in g is c o cijo , a w o rd w h ic h m ean s
lig h tn in g . T h e T o to n a c go d o f lig h tn in g , T a jin ,
is also n a m e d b y th e n a tiv e w o rd fo r lig h tn in g .

T h e sym bolism o f th u n d er is less evid en t


and developed than th a t fo r ligh tn in g .
A ccording to one A zte c account, thu n d er is
caused by the b reakin g o f g re at w a te r jars
containing ra in . A m ong the contem porary

107

LONG NOSED AND LONG-LIPPED DEITIES

highland M a y a , there is a contrast b etw e en


vigorous and you th fu l lig h tn in g gods and gods
of thunder, w ho tend to be aged gods o f the
earth and m ountains. T h e aged th u n d e r god
is freq u ently re fe rre d to as M a m , and it is
probable th a t the ancien t M a y a god know n
as PAUAHTUN or C od N is the P rehispanic form
of this being. T h e m odern H uastec M a y a o f
northern V eracruz and n eighboring San Luis
Potos also possess an aged th u n d er god
known as M a m . H e is said to app ear b en t over
his w alking stick, and num erous Prehispanic
Huastec sculptures s im ila rly p o rtray the old
M am stooped over his staff.
litters N obles, d e ity im personators, sacrificial
victim s, and im ages o f GODS w e re o ften carried
in litte rs , as w e re w e alth y persons w ho could
afford to h ire bearers to keep th e ir fe e t
from touching the ground. P resum ably it was
ennobling to be borne alo ft. O n long journeys,
both A ztec MERCHANTS and ranking A ztec
w arriors m ight be carried in litte rs . T h e
earliest depiction o f a litte r occurs a t Iza p a,
w h ere a d eity w atches from a litte r w h ile a
d ecapitation takes place. M a y a kings w ere
borne in litte rs , o ften m ade o f sim ple rushes
and carried by ju s t tw o bearers. A t T ik a l,
g raiE ti scratched on palace and tem ple w alls
record extrem ely elaborate litte rs in the form
o f g ian t W a te r L ily Jaguars and W A R SERPENTS.
T h e Aztecs fre q u e n tly carried th e ir sacri
ficial victim s about in litte rs p rio r to S A C R IF IC E .
Some A ztec child sacrifices to T L A L O C w ere
thus paraded, as w ere the d eity im person
ators dressed as MOUNTAINS during the VEINTENA
o f T e p e ilh u itl. D u rin g th a t festival, fou r o f the
five m ountain im personators w ere w om en,
including one dedicated to M A Y A H U E L , and a ll
the bearers w ere w om en. 5ee a/so D E IT Y

Early Classic (left) and Late Classic


representations of Kinich Ahau, the Maya sun
god.

(Left) Late Classic form of Chac, the Maya god


of rain and lightning, wielding a serpent-footed
lightning axe; detail from a Maya vase. (jRigAf)
The aged Mam, the Huastec god of thunder,
Veracruz, Postclassic period. The staff is in the
form of a serpent, probably an allusion to
lightning.

IM P E R S O N A T IO N ; J A C U A R C O D S .

long-nosed and lo ng-lipped deities A lthough


these term s have long been in use fo r Classic
M a y a and e a rlie r d eities, they are confusing
and do not allo w fo r discrim ination am ong
M a y a C O D S. s c H E L L H A S first used the term "god
w ith long nose" to describe C H A C , but since
his day, g re at num bers o f gods have been
called long nosed. T h e m ore recent term ,
"lo n g -lip p ed d e ity ," has been used to
describe m ore accurately the extended upper
t lip o f m any M a y a and Iza p a gods, b u t this
term also tends to group a ll such deities
together w ith o u t distinction. W h a t can be
said about the shape o f the lo w e r face - or
w h a t can m ore g en erally be called the snout -

Litter topped by a smoking jaguar, Izapa Stela


21, Protoclassic period.

IMP

MACUILXOCHiTL
is th a t it m ay revea! a zoom orphic o rig in .

p erio d , m a ize (Z e a m ays) has been the most

U p w a rd -tu rn in g snouts, lik e th a t o f the JESTER

im p o rta n t food crop o f M exico . T h e

coo, in d ic ate a SERPENT o rig in . D o w n w a rd -

know n dom estic m aize appears d u rin g the

curvin g snouts, lik e th a t o f the

A rch a ic p erio d o f th e Teh u acan V a lle y in

P R IN C IP A L B tR D

first

DEITY, suggest the beaks o f birds. B !u n t or

P u eb la a t around 3500 Be. H o w e v e r, fa r

square snouts g e n e ra lly re v e a l a jACL AR o rig in .

la rg e r and m ore p ro d u ctiv e form s o f m aize


developed
M any

d u rin g

researchers

the

F o rm a tiv e

c u rre n tly

period.

b eliev e

th a t

a n cien t p eople dom esticated m aize from a


closely re la te d grass know n as eosm fe (Z e a
m exicana). T h e etym ology o f feaw n fe reveals
M ac u ilx o c h itl is nam ed fo r a specihc d ate in

th a t th e n a tiv e peoples o f h ig h lan d M exico

the 260-d ay CALENDAR, 5 F !o w e r. H e is the

also recognized th e im p o rtan ce and relevance

p rin c ip a l god o f the

o f this p la n t to m aize. T h e term derives from

A H U iA T E T E O ,

w ho a re

nam ed a fte r the five southern day nam es

th e N a h u a tl w ords tee, sig n ifyin g "g o d " or

app earin g w ith the coefficient o f 5 and w ho

"s a c re d ," and c m f/i, m eaning " m a iz e ." Thus

are gods sim ultaneously o f excess pleasure

a s u itab le gloss fo r feosm fe is "g o d ly c o rn ."

and o f consequent punishm ent. O n pages 47

R epresentations o f m aize d ate fro m as e a rly

and 48 o f the Codex B orgia, they ap p ear w ith

as the F o rm a tiv e O lm ec and abound in the

a hum an hand across the m outh, an im p o rtan t

la te r iconography o f Classic and Postclassic

tra it o f M ac u ilx o c h itl. T h e patron god o f

M exico . T h e C lassic M a y a seem to have had

palace folk as w e ll as o f gam es and gam bling -

an especially close re latio n s h ip w ith m aize,

in p a rtic u la r, the gam e o f

- M a c u il-

and cran ia! d efo rm a tio n m ay have been p e r

xochit! is closely related to and freq u e n tly


overlaps w ith ano th er you th fu l god, xocmP!LL!, the 'flo w e r p rin c e."

m aize e ar. T h e C lassic and Postclassic M a y a

PATOLLi

m aguey N a tiv e to highland M exico, m aguey


(A g ave spp.) is a p la n t o f m any diverse uses.
In ancient M exico, the thorns tip p in g the
leaves w e re w id e ly used as BLOODLETTING
instrum ents. T h e thick fleshy leaves yield
tough fib er for rope or coarse C L O T H . H o w ev er,
the m ost renow ned product o f m aguey is
PULQUE, know n as o cf/i in N a h u a tl. T h e fe r
m ented sw eet sap, or aguam ie/, o f the m aguey
p la n t, pulque is the most im p o rtan t alcoholic
d rin k o f n ative M exico.
M ag u ey was freq u e n tly personified as a
you th fu l goddess. F o r the ancient M ixtees,
the m aguey goddess is re fe rre d to as 11
Serpent, and appears w ith h er severed head
fa llin g fro m her bleeding throat. This m ay
re fe r to the severing o f the cen tral stalk o f
the m aguey p la n t, a basic process in the
production o f pulque. T o the inhabitants o f
C e n tra l M exico, MAYAHUEL was the young
goddess o f m aguey. In a 17th c. N a h u a tl
chant recorded by R uiz de A larcon, m aguey
is re fe rre d to by the calendrical nam e o f 8
F lin t. T h e same d ate o f 8 F lin t appears on
the rim o f the A ztec B ilim ek Vessel, a P rehispanic stone vase covered w ith allusions to
m aguey and pulque.
m aize Since the beginning o f the F o rm ative

form ed to m im ic th e elongated form o f the


also fre q u e n tly d e p ict m aize ears as hum an
heads, as if corn was a s en tien t being. In the
M ix te c a -P u e b la style o f Postclassic highland
M exico , m aize ears a re also d ep icted w ith
teeth and open eyes. E n tire ly d ep en d en t
upon hum ans fo r pro p ag ation , m aize was
considered as a frie n d and a lly o f people. In
fac t, in M a y a m ythology o f hig h lan d G u a te
m ala, th e p resent race o f hum ans are the
people o f m aize, and w e re firs t fashioned
from ground corn and p e n ite n tia l BLOOD.
A m ong C o lo n ial and contem porary h ig h lan d
M aya
o f G u a te m ala
and
neighboring
C hiapas, th e u m b ilica l cord o f the new born
child is cut over a m a tu re m aize ear. T h e
bloodied seed is saved and becom es the
special crop o f th e child . E ven a t the m om ent
o f BIRTH, the in d iv id u a l becom es a v irtu a l
blood a lly o f m aize. <See aVso ciNTEOL; CREATION
ACCOUNTS; HUN HUNAHPU; MAIZE GODS.

m aize gods A lthough representations o f


MAIZE a re know n fro m th e F o rm a tiv e p erio d ,
the id e n tific atio n o f O lm ec m aize gods is fa r
from clear. G od I I o f the Joralem on O lm ec
god classification (see O L M E C G O D s ) displays
m aize sprouting fro m his or h e r c le ft head.
H o w e v e r, it is not certain w h e th e r this d eity
is a personification o f m aize o r perhaps the
e arth or m ountain from w hich m aize o rig i
nates. Several O lm ec representations o f chin-

109

MAIZE CODS

ess DWARVES display m aize signs on th e ir


bodies. A lthough it is possible th a t these
dwarves represent m aize, they also could
refer to ucHTNiNC, RAJN, or o th e r forces th a t
create corn. Am ong the Classic period Z ap o
tees, one e n tity com m only form ed on Zapotee
urns - the C od o f G lyp h L o ften appears
w ith ears o f m aize. F o r this reason, he has
been identiB ed as the Classic form o f the
Zapotee m aize god, know n as P ito C ozobi
during the e a rly C o lo n ial period. H o w e v e r,
the God o f G lyp h L shares m any characterist
ics w ith the Classic form o f cocijo, th e Zapotee
god o f rain and ligh tn in g . In fac t, C ocijo also
generally bears m aize ears in his hands or
headdress.
T h e e arliest id en tiB ab le M esoam erican
m aize god appears in E a rly Classic M a y a a rt
as a you th fu l m ale w ith stylized m aize placed
at the top o f the head. D u rin g the L a te Classic
period, tw o d istinct b u t overlapping form s o f
this d e ity develop. O ne o f these, the Tonsured
M a ize G od, appears w ith a m arked ly elon
gated hum an head often shaved in zones
across the B attened b row ; he is the Classic
M a y a prototype o f HUN HUNAHPU o f the Q uiche
M a y a P O P O L v u n . R ecently discovered m urals
at C acaxtla, T laxcala, po rtray heads o f the
Tonsured M a ize God as rip en ed ears o f
yello w corn. H e thus represents m atu re and
fe rtile m aize; the other L a te Classic m aize
d eity , h ow ever, depicts ten d er grow ing
m aize. This Bgure, the F o lia te d M a iz e G od, is
p o rtrayed w ith a stylized m aize ear sprouting
from the top o f the head. T h e M a y a m aize
god continues in this form through the L ate
Postclassic period. In the codices, he is com
m only re fe rre d to as God E, follow ing the
Schellhas system o f d eity classiBcation (see
S C H E L LH A S C O D S ).

Aside from the notable appearance o f the


Tonsured M a ize God a t C acaxtla, th ere are
no clear representations o f m aize deities in
C e n tra l M exico u n til the L a te Postclassic
period. T h e most im p o rtan t o f these is ciNTEOTL, w ho is closely re late d to tw o other
you th fu l m ale gods, xocmpiLLi and MACUiLxocmTL. L ik e the Postclassic C od E o f the
M a y a codices, C in te o tl typ ic ally has a p air
o f th in , broken, v ertic al lines passing down
across the brow and cheeks. T h e Aztecs
t also had fem ale personiBcations o f m aize, in
p a rtic u la r, cmcoMECOATL, or 7 S erpent. T o the
Postclassic M ixtees, m aize was com m only
conceived o f as a w om an. In the Codex
Vindobonensis, th ree m aize goddesses are

Macuilxochitl, the Central Mexican god of


gaming and pleasure, Florentine Codex, Book 1,
16th c. Aztec.

(Above) Depictions of maize


in ancient Mesoamerica. a,
Olmec, incised jade, Middle
Formative, b, State of Mexico,
Late Classic, c, Maya,
Palenque, Late Classic, d,
Codex Borgia, p. 27, Late
Postclassic.

(Left) Foliated maize god in


dancing pose, Copn, Late
Classic Maya.

!1(

M A N IK t N SCEPTER
m en tio n ed , 5 F lin t, 7 F lin t, and 7 C rass. .See

fre q u e n tly a rran g ed through aged arbitrator!!

a / f O CREATION ACCOUNTS.

or m atchm akers. R itu a l banquets o ften fo rm


ed an essential p a rt o f the m arriag e cere

M a n ik in

S cepter T h e

M a n ik in

S cepter, a

te rm coined by H . Spinden, is th e p a rtic u la r

m onies;

am ong both

the Aztecs and

the

Yucatec M a y a , th e fe e d in g o f the groom by

m an ifestatio n o f a M a y a god also know n as

th e b rid e w as an im p o rta n t rite d u rin g the

C od K or C II o f the PALENQUETRiAD. H is nam e

fe s tiv itie s . T h an ks to the F lo re n tin e Codex

was B olon D zacab in C onquest p erio d Yuca

and th e C odex M e n d o za , w e know a consider

tn and he was p ro b ab ly know n as K a u il in

a b le a m o un t re g ard in g A ztec m a rria g e cere

Classic tim es. T h is sam e d e ity m ay h ave been

m onies. T h e F lo re n tin e C odex provides p a rt

called T o h i! am ong the Q u ich e.


In g en e ral, th e M a n ik in S cepter is a fu ll-

o f th e speech d ire cted to the fu tu re b rid e :

Hgure b u t d im in u tiv e re p res en tatio n o f this


god designed to be held in the hand o f a ru le r
as a sym bol o f ru lersh ip its e lf. W h e n

CHAC

carries the M a n ik in Scepter, it sym bolizes


ucHTUHNc. T h e god is ch aracterized by an axe
or sm oking tube th a t pierces his fo reh e ad , an
u p w a rd -tu rn in g

snout, and,

m ost d istinc

tive ly , one leg th a t turns in to a SERPENT, like


the C e n tra l M exican d e ity TEZCATUPOCA, to
w hom some scholars have lin k ed h im . H is
first clear appearance is on E a rly Classic
m onum ents, b u t the M a n ik in Scepter rem ains
an im p o rtan t a ttrib u te o f ru lersh ip rig h t
through the Postclassic a t C hichen Itz and
is probably the object held by the p atria rc h
depicted in the 1557 X iu fam ily tree . T h e
form m ay w e ll be based on an axe or C E L T .
m arriage T h e in stitu tio n o f m arriage was not
lim ite d in M esoam erica to the hum an plane
b u t was present am ong the CODS as w e ll.
In C en tra! M exico , gods w e re fre q u e n tly
described as having both fem ale and m ale
aspects, as if they w ere m arried couples.
Exam ples include O m etecu h tli and O m ecihua tl (see O M E T E O T L ), M IC T L A N T E C U H T L I and M ic tecacihuatl, and TONACATECUHTH and Tonacacih u atl. M a rria g e also describes p a rtic u la r
relationships betw een deities. Thus fo r exam
p le, C H A L c m u H T L i c u E - the goddess o f standing
WATER and rivers - is the w ife o f th e RAIN and
L IG H T N IN G god T L A L O C . O r there is the goddess
o f M A G U E Y , M A Y A H U E L , w ho S the SpOUSe o f
Patecatl, a P U L Q U E C O D . In the M a y a area, the
M O O N goddess is fre q u e n tly described as the
w ife o f the SUN. Pages 57 to 60 o f the C e n tra l
M exican Codex Borgia contain a rem arkab le
series o f 31 god couples, perhaps composed
fo r m arriage prognostications. I t is possible
th a t the p airin g o f the you th fu l Goddess I
(see S C H E LLH A S GODs) w ith p artic u la r gods in
th e M a y a D resden Codex m ay s im ila rly have
served to d ete rm in e m arriag e partners.
In ancien t M esoam erica, m arriages w ere

O m y d au g h ter, tbou a r t h ere. F o r th y sake


th y m others, th y t th e rs h a v e becom e o /d
m en, o /d w om en. N o w thou approaches? the
o /d w om en, a /re a d y thou commences? the
/d e o an o /d w om an. F o re v e r n o w /e av e
cABcbsAnesy, g irh sh n ess... B e m ost consider
a te o f one; re g a rd one w ith respect; speak
w e //, g re e t one w e //. B y m g h t /o o k to, take
care o f th e sw eeping; th e /a y in g o f th e t?re.
A ris e in the d eep o f n ight. D o n o t re /e c t us,
do n o t em barrass us as o /d m en, do n o t re /e c t
th y m others as o /d w om en. (Fe: V I)
A m ong th e A ztecs, the b rid e was c a rrie d at
dusk to the house o f th e groom . Seated on a
M A T b efo re th e household h e a rth , the couple
w e re presented w ith gifts. T h e union o f

m arriag e was ritu a lly expressed b y the old


m atchm akers tyin g tog eth er the couple's
clothing in a knot.
In h ighland M ex ico , m a rria g e was com
m only rep resen ted by th e couple seated upon
a m at or ly in g tog eth er u n d er a single b la n ke t.
A m ong M eso am erican n o b ility , m arriag e
cem ented alliances and le g itim ize d blood
lines. O n e o f the m ost d e ta ile d scenes o f an
e lite n a tiv e m arriag e cerem ony appears in
the C odex Selden o f th e Postclassic M ixtees.
H e re L a d y 6 M o n k e y o f Jaltepec m arries a
lo rd nam ed 11 W in d . DANCING and cerem onial
b ath in g by the couple form p a rt o f the m a r
riage rites. A m ong th e Classic M a y a e lite
m arriag e o ften served to re in fo rc e alliances
b etw een cities and re v ita lize dynasties. T h e
w ife o f th e C opn king Sm oke Shell cam e
fro m th e d istan t site o f P alenque. K in g F lin tSky-G od K o f Dos P ilas m a rrie d a w om an
from the site o f Itz n , and la te r sent a
d au g h ter to be m a rrie d to a N a ra n jo lord. O ne
o f the greatest kings o f N ara n jo , Sm okingS q u irrel, w as born o f this union.
m at H e o f the M a t was an eponym o f ru le r
ship am ong m ost people o f an cien t M exico.
N o t every m a t, h o w ever, was a key to a ru ling

I ll

MAYAHUEL

lord or high PRIEST h im self, fo r even assistants


slept on finely w oven m ats, according to
Burgoa's description o f the palaces a t M itla ,
where m ats w oven o f reed and rush w e re
im portant furnishings o f a ll noble and p rie stly
dwellings.
M ats, nevertheless, w e re th e settings fo r
many im p o rtan t ritu a l events. Kings sat on
them on the ground or d raped them over
stone THRONES. In the C odex M en d o za, M o te cuhzoma h im self is shown in his palace on a
m at, or /cpa/A. A m ong th e A ztecs, th e p re
cious skins th a t draped thrones w e re also
referred to as special types o f m at. M ats w ere
im portant places for D iv iN A T iO N and the casting
of lots. W eddings w e re som etim es conse
crated on mats (see MARRIAGE).
T h e M a y a called th e ir ru lin g lo rd the ah
pop, or H e o f the M a t, and the term was
synonymous w ith aAau, or lo rd , itse lf. In
Yucatn the p o p o / na, or m at house, was the
young m en's com m unity house fo r DANCE and
perform ance, as w e ll as a place fo r the
com m unity council to m eet. M a n y Puuc M a y a
buildings have w oven m a t-lik e m otifs on th e ir
exteriors, as do the palaces a t M itla , perhaps
because they once served as com m unity coun
cil houses. T h e p o p o L v u H , th e surviving
Q uiche epic, is usually translated as the Book
o f C ouncil, b u t the root o f p o p o / is m at,
lin k in g a com m unity council and the m ats on
w hich they w ould sit.
T w o Classic M a y a stelae bear texts in te r
w oven in the m at design, perhaps a d irect
referen ce to ah pop, or ru le r.
M a y a h u e l T h e C e n tra l M exican goddess o f
MAGUEY, M a y a h u e l is usually depicted as a
b e a u tifu l young w om an w ith a flow ering
m aguey p lan t. H e r earliest know n represen
tatio n occurs in the To ltec-style E a rly Post
classic rock p ain tin g a t Ixtapantongo, in the
State o f M exico. Dressed in a guecA guem /f/
(a draped blouse - see COSTUME), the goddess
appears w ith in a m aguey p la n t holding tw o
cups probably containing PULQUE. T h e L a te
Postclassic M a y a h u e l fre q u e n tly displays
attrib u te s o f the W A TE R goddess, C H A L C H iU H TLicuE, and, like that goddess, personifies fec
un d ity and fe rtility . In one account, she is
described as "th e w om an o f fo u r hundred
, breasts," q u ite probably a referen ce to the
rich, m ilky agu am fe/ sap o f th e m aguey p la n t
from w hich the alcoholic pu lq u e is m ade.
T h e /ZYsfoyre cfu m ecA /gue provides an
account o f the origin o f M a y a h u e l and

Detail of Aztec marriage scene, the garments of


bride and groom symbolically tied, Codex
Mendoza, 16th c.

!11

M ERCHANTS
m aguey. !n this m y th , EMECATLQUETZALCOATL

o f TOBACCO and th e o ffe rin g o f fto w E M , fol

takes M a y a h u e ! fro m h e r g ran d m o th er and

lo w e d by various courses o f food, and ending

star

w ith h o t chocolate and som etim es the con

dem ons. Pursued by th e fz/zn iA n e , E h e c a tl-

sum ption o f h allu cino g en ic mushroom s (see

com panions,

the

fearsom e

T z r r z iM iM E

Q u e tza lc o a tl and M a y a h u e ! disguise th e m

HALLuemocENs). T h e pocA feca gave a w ay th e ir

selves as branches o f a tre e . T h e fz/fz/m A ne,

m erchandise

h o w ever, recognize the branch o f M a y a h u e !,

capes, m a n tle s, and loincloths. Such exchange

and te a r it to bits. E h e c a tl-Q u e tza lc o a tl buries

fu e le d th e A zte c econom y.
Because o f the ro le m erchants played in

h e r rem ains, and from h e r body, the first

in

abundance,

p a rtic u la rly

m aguey sprouts fo rth . In th e C e n tra ! M ex ica n

th e expansion and m e rc a n tile d o m in atio n o f

CALENDAR, M a y a h u e ! is the p atro n o f the day

th e A zte c re a lm , th e y received special honors.

T o ch th , or R ab b it, and

the TRECENA o f I

M ote cu h zo m a I I b ro u g ht the pocAfeca in to

M ah n aU i.

his cou rt and tre a te d them as if th e y w e re

m erchants In

m erchants b ath ed slaves and w e re able to

n o b ility . In th e VEINTENA o f P a n q u e tza liztli,


A ztec society m erchants, or

pocAfeca as they w e re caHed in N a h u a t!, he!d

o ffe r them to H u itzilo p o c h tli along w ith the

a very specia! niche in w hich they functioned


as em issaries, am bassadors, spies, and w a r

CAPTIVES o f w a r o ffered b y g re at w arrio rs.


W h e n a m erch a n t d ied on a m ission, he was

riors -

gloriously a do rn ed , p laced on a

not m ere!y as traders. T h e richest

L IT T E R ,

and

pocAleca !ived in T!ate!o!co, ju s t north o f

borne to a m o u n tain top, w h e re the body was

T en o c h titla n and on the sam e is!and. D u rin g

crem ated . I t was understood, th en , th a t he

the 15th c., T en o c h titla n g rew jea!ous o f the

had d ied as a w a rrio r fo r th e state, and he

w ea!th o f h er sister city and in 1473, sm ote

proceeded d ire c tly to the fo u rth h eaven , th a t

T!ate!o!co, essentiay u n itin g the tw o cities


and com m anding g reat q u an tities o f trib u te

belonging to th e S U N.
A m ong the Classic

from the w e alth y T!ate!o!cans.


C en tra! M exican m erchants had th e ir ow n
patron god, Y acatecuhdi, and the auspicious
days for em barking on a trad in g expedition
w ere 1 C oat! or 1 O zom adi. L ik e the m erch
ants, Y acatecuhdi bears a w a!king staff, w hich
its e !f was an object o f reverence. Y acatecuhdi
rose to g reat prom inence in the !ast 30 years
o f Prehispanic !ife , bu t the n atu re o f this god

scH ELLH A s

rem ains obscure.


In m aking th e ir in itia ! forays in to n ew
country, m erchants usuaHy trave!ed in dis
guise, adopting !oca! dress and m anners w h ite
they sized up the avai!ab!e !uxury goods th a t
they m ost sought, such as b ird feathers,
anim a! pe!ts, and precious stones. I f discov
ered and attacked, they retu rn e d to inform
th e ir ow n ru ie r, w hereupon w a r was fre
q u en tly declared upon the hostile region. I f
the Aztecs w on - and they usuaHy did - they
im posed unfavorable trad e conditions on the
losers. W o rkin g in this fashion, the m erchants
professed them selves the allies o f H u r r z i L O p o c H T L i, in whose service they claim ed lan d ,
goods, and trib u te .
D esp ite th e ir w e alth , m erchants behaved
hum bly, if not h yp o critically, in o rder not to
d ra w excessive a tten tio n to th e ir success.
T h e y practiced self-abasem ent, and sim ul
taneously offered g reat feasts w ith lavish
luxuries, usually beginning w ith the smoking

M a y a , C od

(see

GODs) w as th e p atro n o f m erchants,

and in some o f his depictions he carries a


m erch an t pack lad en w ith rich goods. A t the
tim e o f the C onquest, E k C h u a h was the
patro n o f travelers and, by extension, m erch
ants, in Y ucatn. Professional m erchants
am ong the M a y a w e re know n as p b /o m , and
they bu rn ed cop a/ to X am an E k , the n orth
star, to ensure th e ir safe jo u rn e y . T h e Z ap o
tees nam ed th ree gods, P ito p eeze, P ito
q u ille , and P itoyge, as patrons o f riches
and m erchants.
M exican y ea r sign In L a te Postclassic h ig h
land M exico , the YEARBEARER days nam ing
p a rtic u la r years a re fre q u e n tly m arked w ith
a specific device, o fte n called the A O sign,
or the tra p e ze-an d -ray sign. D u e to its p re va
lence in M ix te e w ritin g , it is also fre q u e n tly
term ed th e M ix te e y e a r sign. T h e Postclassic
y ear sign is typ ic ally com posed o f tw o in te r
tw in e d elem ents, a p o in ted device id e n tic al
to th e solar ray sign, and a squat form
resem bling a R attened " O ." A t tim es, the
sign is personified as a fro n ta l face, probably
th a t o f the x iu H C O A T L Rre serpent. In A ztec
iconography, the year sign is o fte n placed on
the bodies o f X iu hco atl serpents.
T h e id e n tific atio n o f the X iu hco atl w ith the
year sign has a phonetic basis. In N ah u a tl,
the term x iA u ii/ denotes year, T U R Q U O IS E , or

H3

MILKY WAY

grass.

In

som e instan ces,

th e

A z te c

year

sign appears w ith grass BUNDLES, p r o b a b ly a


reference to jd A u ii/. A m o n g th e C las sic M a y a ,
the y e ar sign also a p p e a rs w it h tu fts o f grass.
T h e id e n tific a tio n o f th e y e a r sign w it h grass
m ay w e ll h a v e b e g u n a t th e g r e a t C lassic site
o f TEOTiHUACAN. In T e o tih u a c a n ic o n o g ra p h y ,
grass b u nd les a re b o u n d w it h a p a rtic u la r
tria n g u la r kn ot. T h is sa m e k n o t a p p e a rs as
the p o in ted " r a y " p o rtio n o f e a rly y e a r signs
at T e o tih u a c a n , a n d it is q u ite lik e ly th a t th e
M e x ic a n y e a r sign d e riv e s fro m this b o u n d
grass b u n d le . T h is id e n tih c a tio n o f grass w it h
the y e a r sign a t T e o tih u a c a n su pp orts th e
possibility th a t its in h a b ita n ts spoke a n a n
cestral fo rm o f N a h u a tl. $ e e a/so CALENDAR.
M ic tla n .see UNDERWORLD
M ic tla n te c u h tli T h e C e n tr a l M e x ic a n god o f
DEATH,

M ic tla n te c u h tli ru le d o v e r M ic tla n ,

place o f th e d e a d (s ee UNDERW ORLD), alo ng


w ith his w ife , M ic te c a c ih u a tl. S om etim es also
re fe r r e d to b y th e n a m e T z o n te m o c , M ic t la n
te c u h tli

u s u ally

a p p ea rs

as a

sk eleto n

of

b le a c h e d w h ite bones w ith re d , b lo o d y spots.


He

is o fte n

PAPER h e a d

festo oned

w it h

o w l fe a th e rs ,

o rn a m e n ts

an d

b a n n ers ,

an d

w e a rs a co lla r o f e x tru d e d e y eb a lls. D u r in g


th e

VEINTENA o f T i t it l,

th e

M ic tla n te c u h tli

im p e rs o n a to r w as sacrificed a t n ig h t a t th e
te m p le n a m e d T la lx ic c o , m e a n in g n a v e l o f
th e w o rld . B ecause o f th e U n d e r w o r ld associ
ation s o f DOGS, M ic tla n te c u h tli was th e p a tro n
o f th e d a y Itz c u in tli, or dog; h e also re ig n e d
o v e r th e TRECENA 1 T e c p a tl. W h e n th e im p e r
sonator o f M ic tla n te c u h tli d ie d , INCENSE w as
o ffe re d o n ly a t n ig h t a t T lilla n , th e te m p le o f
CIHUACOATL.

L ik e

o th e r

M e s o a m e ric a n

M ic tla n te c u h tli

w as

DEATH

fu n d a m e n ta lly

(Top) Merchants
traveling with their packs
along a road. In
Mesoamerica, a tumpline
strung across the brow
serves as an essential
means of carrying loads.
(Aboye) Merchants and
their goods; along with
the carrying pack and
frame, one can discern a
live bird, a feather
bundle, and a string of
jade beads; Florentine.
Codex, Book 9, 16th c.

Aztec sign for


marketplace, Matrcula de
Huexotzinco, 16th c.

CODS,

stupid

an d v u ln e ra b le to th e tricks o f s m a rte r gods.


In

th e

fin al a c t o f c re a tio n , QUETZALCOATL

jo u rn e y e d to M ic tla n to re tr ie v e th e bones o f
p rev io u s

eras

o f m a n k in d

g e n e ra te a n e w

fro m

w h ic h

to

race o f pe o p le. A lth o u g h

M ic tla n te c u h tli first g ra n te d th e re q u e s t fo r


bones, h e th e n ch an g ed his m in d . H e g ave
chase, b u t Q u e tz a lc o a tl escaped w ith
stolen

bones,

u n fo rtu n a te ly

d ro p p in g

th e
an d

b re a k in g som e o f th e m , a n d thus y ie ld in g a
t race o f h u m a n s o f m ix e d

sizes.

S ee a/so

CALENDAR; CREATION ACCOUNTS.

M il k y W a y T h e g re a t b a n d o f STARS kn o w n
as th e M ilk y W a y w as c o n ce ived o f in a

Year 1 Rabbit
marked with
Mexican year
sign, stone
tablet, Late
Postclassic
Mexico.

114

MiLPA
v a rie ty o f w ays in an c ie n t
In

M eso am erica.

C e n tra ! M ex ico , tw o im p o rta n t d eities

m irro rs A n cie n t M esoam ericana used m ir


rors fashioned o f stone in a v a rie ty o f ways

p ersonified th e M ilk y W a y . D ressed in g a r

T h e y could fun ctio n as ornam ents o f dress,

m ents o f w h ite , the aged goddess

cosm etic accessories, or as instrum ents o f

iL A M A T E -

cuHTLJ w o re a star s k irt, o r c rf/a ii /cu e, an

DiviNATiON. O n e o f the m ost w idespread uses

A zte c term fo r the M ilk y W a y . A n o th e r M ilk y

o f stone m irro rs was fo r d iv in a to ry scrying.

W a y d e ity was

A m ong m any contact p erio d M esoam erican

M IX C O A T L ,

a god o f the h u n t

w hose face is fre q u e n tly p a in te d w ith a black

peoples, in clu d in g th e Yucatec M a y a , Aztecs,

Held surrounded by stars. T h e term M ix c o a tl

and

signiEes "clo u d s e rp e n t," and could w e ll re fe r

bow ls E lled w ith w a te r w e re also used fo r

to the cloudy s trip o f the M ilk y W a y .


L ik e the Rom ans (w h o Erst gave us the

esp ecially o ld tra d itio n , perhaps even d atin g

Tarascans,

the

reE ective

surfaces o f

d iv in a tio n , and it is possible th a t this is an

term V ia L ac tea , or M ilk y W a y ), th e C e n tra l

from b efo re the m a n u fa ctu re o f stone m irrors.

M exicans considered this band o f stars to be a

In M eso am erica, stone m irro rs a re know n at

road. A ccording to th e A&yfona J e Vos m e j

least as e a rly as th e m id -2n d m ille n n iu m

icanos p o r sus p in tu ras , this becam e th e road o f

th a t is, b efo re

TEZCATUPOCA and

c iv iliza tio n . O lm ec m irro rs o f the E a rly and

QUETZALCOATL a fte r

th e ir

B e,

the app earan ce o f O lm ec

creation o f the e a rth . In the M a y a region, the

M id d le

M ilk y W a y is conceptualized as the road to

fashioned o f pieces o f iro n

F o rm a tiv e

perio d

w e re

usually

o re, such as

X ib a lb a , the UMDEnwoHLD, and the e n tire n ig h t

m a g n e tite , ilm e n ite and h e m a tite (.see

SKY m ay re p lic ate the U n d e rw o rld and the

BAR A N D H E M A T IT E ) .

c iN N A

Since these m irro rs w e re

m ovem ents o f its denizens. In Yucatec, it is

created from

term ed zac be/?, or " w h ite ro a d ." A n o th er


Yucatec M ay an w ord for it was lam caz, a

a re fa irly sm all, ra re ly m ore than 15 cm or

curious term th a t also signiEes seizures.

6 inches in to ta l w id th . M o s t O lm ec m irrors
a re concave, g ivin g them m any unique
p ro p erties.

m ilpa T h e m odern M esoam erican term for


MAtZE held, m ilpa derives from the N ah u at! m/Vpan, "in the cultivated E eld ." As the source o f
m aize, beans, squash, and o th er plants o f v ita l
necessity, the m ilpa Eeld is o f cen tral concern.
I t is thus not surprising th a t m any n ative
peoples are profoundly linked to th e ir Eelds.
T h e term s fo r tw o related M a y a peoples, the
C hoi and C h o rti, d erive from th e ir n ative
words fo r m ilp a, cAo/and cAor. T h e y are tru ly
the "peo p le o f the m ilp a ." In m any instances,
the m ilp a represents order and balance, as
opposed to the threaten in g chaos o f the sur
rounding w ild bush. In M a y a m ythology, the
cosmic act o f creation is com pared w ith m aking
m ilpa: in the Q uiche PO PO L v u H , the m easuring
and the m aking o f the w o rld is cast in term s o f
preparin g the m ilp a fo r the present race o f
hum ans, the people o f corn. L ik e the m ilpa
farm e r, the GODS are supported and nourished
by th e ir crop - the people w ho in h a b it the sur
face o f the E A R T H . T h e conceptualization o f the
e arth as a rectan g u lar m ilp a is also found
am ong other M a y a groups, such as the C h o rti
and Yucatec. In highland M exico, contem por
ary N ahuat-speakers in the S ierra de P uebla
also describe the w o rld as a m ilp a. M o reo v er,
the S ierra N a h u a t also com pare hum ans to
plants th a t are born or "p la n te d " upon the
earth .

single pieces o f stone, they

The

reE ected

im age

appears

in v e rte d as w e ll as reversed, and the la rg e r


concave m irrors a re capable o f sta rtin g F IR E .
In O lm ec a rt, concave m irro rs com m only
app ear as pectorals w o rn on the chest.
In Classic M eso am erica, th e favo red
m a te ria l fo r stone m irro rs was iro n p y rite . In
this case, artisans la id cut iro n p y rite upon a
slate backing, c reatin g a reE ective surface o f
Enely E tted m osaic. T h e slate backing is
usually c ircu lar and is o fte n b e a u tifu lly
carved. Since th e p y rite m irro rs w e re
fashioned o f m osaic ra th e r than o f a single
stone, they could be o f g re a t size, and certain
p icto rial Classic scenes suggest th a t there w ere
m irrors m easuring 30 cm (12 inches) or m ore
in d iam eter. H o w ev er, u n like the ores used
fo r the concave O lm ec m irrors, iro n p y rite is
not a stable m in eral and quickly oxidizes.
F o r this reason, th e surfaces o f ancient p yrite
m irrors ten d to be poorly p reserved, and now
o ften app ear no m ore than a reddish or y ello w
coloration upon th e slate backing. D u rin g the
Classic p eriod, nobles w o re c ircu lar p y rite
m irrors on the sm all o f the back, and m irrors
have been found so placed in E a rly Classic
burials fro m T E O T iH U A C A N and K am in alju yu .
Back m irrors continued to be w orn in
Postclassic C e n tra l M exico ; am ong the Aztecs
they w e re re fe rre d to as fezcacu/t/api/A . O ne
form o f back m irro r, a c en tral p y rite disk

115

MIXCOATL

surrounded by a TURQUOISE mosaic containing


representations o f xiUHCOATL serpents, was
especially com m on a t E a rly Postclassic T u la .
This T o ltec form had an unusually broad
distribution during the E a rly Postclassic, and
examples have been found a t C hichen Itz ,
Yucatan, and as fa r n o rth as d istan t Casas
Grandes in C hih u ah u a.
The black volcanic glass know n as OBSIDIAN
was a favored m irro r stone in L a te Postclassic
C entral M exico. A lthough it is lik e ly th a t
smooth surfaces o f frac tu re d obsidian w ere
used in Classic and F o rm a tiv e M esoam erica,
ground and polished obsidian m irrors are not
common u n til the L a te Postclassic. T h e g re at
C e n tra l M exican god TEZCATLiPOCA, H e o f the
Sm oking M irro r, appears to have been a
personification o f the polished obsidian
m irro r. Q u ite freq u e n tly , a sm oking obsidian
m irro r appears a t the back o f the head and
as one o f the fe e t o f T ezcatlipo ca.
In ancien t M esoam erica, m irrors o ften re p
resented objects and concepts occurring in
n atu re and society. By representing a w o rld
th a t could be looked in to b u t not passed
through, m irrors could be considered as CAVES
or passageways for the supernatural. Because
o f th e ir b rig h t, re flective surfaces, they w ere
also com pared to fiery hearths or shining
pools o f WATER. Q u ite fre q u e n tly , they are
id e n tifie d w ith the suN , and this is probably
also the case w ith the turquoise-rim m ed
p y rite m irrors o f the E a rly Postclassic T o ltec.
A t T eo tih u acan , circu lar m irrors w e re sym
b o lically linked to eyes, faces, shields, and
FLOWERS. C onsiderable n ative m irro r lo re sur
vives am ong the m odern H u ich o l o f N a y a rit.
H e re circu lar glass m irrors are considered to
be supernatural passageways, as w e ll as being
conceptually related to the sun, M OO N, faces
eyes, and Rowers.

Carved slate backing of pyrite mosaic mirror,


Teotihuacan, Early Classic period. This image
appears to represent a fire goddess holding broad
torches.

M ixc o atl L ite ra lly "cloud s erp en t," M ixco atl


m ay have been physically id e n tifie d as the
MILKY WAY and the very heavens. P rim a rily a
hun tin g god, he was the patron god o f the
O to m i and the C hichim ecs, and o f m any
com m unities in C e n tra l M exico th a t claim ed
descent from the Chichim ecs. H e was also
w orshipped as the p rin cip al god o f H u e jo tzingo and T laxcala, g en erally under the nam e
C am axtli. H e m ay o rig in a lly have been a
legendary h u n ter and w a rrio r, d eified and
sanctified, whose tra d itio n a l role was then
displaced by the intro d uctio n am ong the
Aztecs o f H u rrziL O P O C H T L i. W hereas H u itz ilo -

Mixcoatl, god of the hunt, whose name means


cloud serpent, signifying the Milky Way; Codex
Borgia, p. 25, Late Postclassic period.

no

M X T E C C O D S
pochth is id en tiB ed w ith the s u \, h o w ever,

e n tire ly d istinct calen d rlca! nam es, and m ore

M ixc o atl is c!ear!y associated w ith the

o ve r, c e rta in M ix te e d eities a p p ear but rare!y

STARS.

M ix c o a tl s most d is tin c tive physical charac

o r n ev er in C e n tra ! M exican iconography

teristic is the red and w h ite "ca n d y -c a n e "

Exam ples a re th e fanged stone beings often

striped body p a in t he w ears. H e shares this

re fe rre d to by th e in a p p ro p ria te C e n tra ! M e x i-

ch aracteristic

can term o f

w ith

TLAHUtzcALPANTECUHTLi,

an o th er star god, and they both w e a r black

" x o L O T L ."

I t is now know n that

these beings w e re re fe rre d to as nuAu by the

masks over the eyes, som etim es trim m e d w ith

M ixte es , and w e re gods o f the

stars. M ix c o a tl, u n lik e T la h u izc a lp a n te c u h tli,

v eg etatio n . In C e n tra l M exican m anuscripts,

EARTH

and

m ay carry h u n tin g g ear, p a rtic u la rly a bow

th e y a p p ear o n ly in th e B orgia and Vaticanus

and a rro w and a n etted basket fo r c arryin g

B codices. S till an o th er im p o rta n t M ix te e

siaughtered gam e.

d e ity is a Hying fig u re fre q u e n tly w e arin g a

M ix c o a tl plays a n um ber o f im p o rta n t roles

Bre serp ent headdress and a TURTLE carapace

in scattered references, m a in ly iocated in the

upon his back. H e com m only holds FLINT

H is to ria d e /os m exicanos p o r sus prn turas.

blades in his hands, and it is possible th a t he

O n e o f the fou r child ren o f

is a LIGHTNING god. T o the M ixte es , this figure

TO NACATECUHTLi

and T o n acacih u atl, he was a!so id e n tifie d as

was know n as

the Red Tezcatlipo ca. In a n o th er ch a p te r o f


the account, TEXCATLiPOCA transform ed h im self

the n eig hb o ring Zapotees as ear!y as the


Protoclassic p erio d , o r M o n te A lb n n. F o r

in to M ixco at! in o rd er to o ffer a c eleb ratio n

the M ixtees, this b eing m ay be id n tica! to

to the o th er gods; w ith his in ven tio n o f the

one o f the sons o f the m ythica! c rea to r coup!e

Y A H u i,

and appears am ong

(ire d ri!!, this T ezcad ip o ca-M ixco at! brought

1 D e e r recorded by th e D o m in ican G reg o rio

HUE to m ankind. T h e first to use FLINT to strike


fire, M ixcoat! took on fire associations along

C a rc i . In the Selden RoH, th e y a /m i figure

w ith those o f w a r and the hunt. H e was a!so


the fa th e r o f the 400 sons (th e C entzon
H u itzn a h u a ) and five w om en created to feed
the sun. A fte r the sun had consum ed the
HEARTS o f the 400, one o f the surviving w om en
gave BIRTH to M ixcoat!'s most fam ous progeny,
QUETZALCOATL.

T h e 14th VEINTENA, Q uechoi, was d ed i


cated to M ixco at!. T h e feast was ce!ebrated
by one or tw o days o f hunting and feasting
in the countryside during w hich the hunters
adorned them selves lik e M ixco atl him self
and kindled new fire to roast the gam e.
Subsequently, a m an and a w om an w ere
sacrificed to M ixc o atl in his T E M P L E . T h e
fem ale victim was slain like a w ild anim al:
h er head was struck fou r tim es against a rock
u n til she was half-conscious; then h e r th ro at
was s lit and the head decapitated. T h e m ale
victim displayed the head to the assem bled
crowds before he him self was sacrificed by
h e a rt extrusion.
M ix te e gods D u rin g the pioneering in vesti
gations o f the 19th and e arly 20th c., the gods
o f the Postclassic M ix te e screenfolds w ere
thought to be essentially id en tical to those
appearing in A ztec and Borgia groups o f
codices. H o w ev er, it has becom e increasingly
a p p a ren t th a t the M ix te e pantheon was dis
tin c t from th a t o f L a te Postclassic C e n tra l
M exico. Thus the M ix te e gods tend to have

is nam ed I Jaguar.
T h e m ost im p o rta n t p ic to ria! source fo r
M ix te e gods is the obverse side o f the screen
e d know n as the Vindobonensis o r V ien n a
Codex. T y p ic a lly , the M ix te e gods b ea r nam es
from the 260 -d a y C A L E N D A R , presum ab!y re fe r
rin g to dates o f b irth . T h e crea to r couple w ho
are both nam ed 1 D e e r in the crea tio n account
m entioned by C a rc i ap p e ar on page 51
o f the Codex Vindobonensis w ith skeletal
m ouths and w e a rin g the headdress o f the
cu ltu re hero 9 W in d . T h is sam e c a le n d rica lly
nam ed couple is also illu s tra te d in the Selden
R oll, w h e re they a re show n sim ply as an old
m an and w om an. O n e o f the m ost im p o rta n t
goddesses o f th e M ix te e pantheon was L ad y
9 Crass. U su ally d epicted w ith a s keletalized
face, she seems to have been a goddess o f
DEATH and th e fe rtile e arth . In th e Selden
RoH, L a d y 6 M o n k e y o f Jaltepec m akes p ilg ri
mages to th e oracle o f 9 Crass a t C halcatongo.
In the Codex Vindobonensis, an old m an
nam ed 2 D og is p o rtray ed as a PRIEST, and
o ften appears w ith the TOBACCO gourd o f the
p rie stly ofBce. A n o th er aged being, L ad y 1
E ag le, is goddess o f the sw E A TB A T H , and by
extension, m ay also have been a goddess o f
m idw ives and CURING.
A m ong th e M ixtees, personifications o f p a r
tic u la r plants or th e ir products are often
po rtrayed as goddesses. Thus in the Codex
Vindobonensis, the goddess o f MACUEY is Lady
11 Serpent, w h ile PULQUE is personified by tw o

117

MONKEY

goddesses n a m e d 2 F lo w e r a n d 3 A llig a to r.
Young te n d e r MAIZE seem s to b e e m b o d ie d b y
two goddesses n a m e d 5 F lin t a n d 7 F lin t.
M a tu r e m aize, h o w e v e r, seem s to b e id e n ti
fied w ith a goddess n a m e d 7 C rass. In th e
Codex

V in d o b o n e n sis,

psilocybin m ush ro o m

th e

h a llu c in o g e n ic

is p o rtra y e d

by

tw o

s e rp en t-m o u th ed goddesses n a m e d 4 L iz a rd

Creator coupie 1 Deer

and 11 L iz a rd .
A lth o u g h

th e re lig io n o f th e

9 Wind

Postclassic

M ixtees w as b y no m ean s id e n tic a l to th a t o f


C e n tra l M e x ic o , a n u m b e r o f M ix te e gods
have c le a r analo gues w it h C e n tr a l M e x ic a n
deities. T h u s th e M ix te e c u ltu re h e ro 9 W in d
is v e ry s im ila r to th e C e n tr a l M e x ic a n WIND
god, EHECATL-QUETZALCOATL. T h e solar god 1
D e a th is th e M ix te e fo rm o f TONATiuH, th e
C e n tra l M e x ic a n SUN god. L ik e T o n a tiu h , 1
D e a th is u s u ally re d a n d w e a rs a JADE b r o w

2 Dog

1 Death

piece an d a n EAGLE fe a th e r h eadd ress. T h e


M ix te e god 7 F lo w e r a p p ea rs to b e re la te d
to th e y o u th fu l solar d e ity k n o w n in C e n tra l
M e x ic o as xocHiPiLLi. T h e M ix te e fo rm o f xiPE
TOTEC is n a m e d 7 R a in , a n d lik e his C e n tra l
M e x ic a n

c o u n te rp a rt,

c o m m o n ly

w e a rs

H ayed h u m a n skin a n d re d an d w h ite v e s t


m ents. F in a lly , th e Postclassic M ix te e s h a d a
fo rm o f th e RAIN a n d lig h tn in g god TLALOC. O n
pa g e 5 o f th e C o d ex N u t ta ll, h e a p p ea rs w ith

7 Rain

11 Serpent

th e fa n g e d m o u th , goggle eyes, a n d u p w a r d ly
tu rn in g lip o f th e Postclassic T la lo c . In his
hands, h e w ie ld s a b u rn in g lig h tn in g b o lt an d

Mixtee gods appearing in the Codex


Vindobonensis, Late Postclassic period.

ju g o f o u tp o u rin g WATER, c le a rly a p o rtra y a l


o f ra in . O n pa g e 28 o f th e C o d e x V in d o
bonensis, a s im ila r T la lo c is n a m e d 5 W in d .
.See a / y o

CREATION ACCOUNTS; HALLUCINOGENS;

M AIZE CODS.

m o n k e y T h r e e species o f m onkeys once liv e d


in th e tro p ic a l lo w lan d s o f M e x ic o a n d G u a te
m a la : sp id e r, h o w le r, an d c a p u c h in (alth o u g h
o n ly sp id e r a n d h o w le r m onkeys a re fo u n d
th e re to d a y ). C a p u c h in m onkeys a re p a rtic u
la r ly fr ie n d ly an d a d e p t w it h th e ir hands, an d
m a y h a v e b e en m ost co m m o n ly ad o p te d as
pets in a n c ie n t tim es. H o w le rs b e llo w an d
ro a r w h e n th e y v ib ra te a b o n e in th e la ry n x ,
an d th e ir calls can b e h e a rd fo r m iles. S p id er
m onkeys, social a n im a ls th a t p r e fe r to liv e in
groups o f 4 0 or 5 0 , ra n g e fa r th e r n o rth th a n

Stone sculpture of a spider monkey,


Late Postclassic Aztec.

a n y o th e r N e w W o r ld m o n k e y .
In C e n tr a l M e x ic o , th e m o n k e y w as k n o w n
as o z o rn a i// an d w as th e 1 1 th d a y sign; am o n g
th e M a y a , th e Y u c a te c d a y n a m e w as C h u e n .
G e n e r a lly those b o rn on th e d a y O z o m a tli
w e r e th o u g h t to b e lu c k y a n d h a p p y persons.

Spider monkey serving as the day


name Monkey, Codex Borgia, p. 13,
Late Postclassic period. In the Borgia
Group of codices, monkeys frequently
appear wearing suits of grass.

9 Grass

MERCHANTS considered a m onkey s h an d to be

Scribes a re o fte n

a talism an o f good luck.


Sahagn describes w h a t is p ro b a b ly

industrious.

d ep icted

a/so

as g ifte d

and

C R E A T IO N A c c o u w r s .

spider m onkey: " A n d as to its actions: it is a

m oon T h e second b rig h test h eaven ly body,

shouter, a s h rill w h is tle r, m akin g gestures

th e m oon w as u n ifo rm ly associated w ith the

to w ard one. I t stones one, it hurls sticks a t

ra b b it in

one. I t has a face w hich is a little hum an.

surface o f a fu ll m oon, th e ra b b it is v isib le in

(F C : xi)
T h e m onkey is re la te d to

p ro file , and various m yths account fo r its

his guise as

EHECATL.

Q UETZALCO ATL

A ccording to th e

in

F IV E SUNS

M eso am erican tho u g h t. O n

the

presence. S ilv e r was considered to be an


excretion o f th e m oon (see EXCREMENT).

cosmogonic accounts, Q u e tza lc o a tl presided

A ccording to C e n tra l M ex ica n theology,

over the second sun, eAecafonatm A, the sun

th e SUN and th e m oon w e re crea te d together

o f w i N D , u n til it w as destroyed by g re a t w inds.

a t TEOTiHUACAN, in th e d aw n in g o f the c u rren t

T h e people o f th a t e ra w e re tu rn e d in to

e ra. N a n a h u a tzin and T e c u cizte ca tl p rep ared

m onkeys. W h e n the M a y a gods destroyed

to im m o late them selves b efo re the assem bled

the people form ed o f w ood in the POPOL vuH,

gods. W h e n T ec u cizte ca tl h es itated , N a n a h u

they too tu rn ed them in to m onkeys.


Because they had m ore m onkeys close by

T e c u cizte ca tl fo llo w e d , m aking an o th er sun,

in the tropica! rain forest, the M a y a tended

b u t the gods d arken ed his face, h u rlin g ashes

to m ake m ore distinctions b etw e en the spider

or a ra b b it a t h im to d im his rad ian ce.

m onkey (cAuen) and

the h o w le r m onkey

(A atz). In Classic a rt, the spider m onkey


fre q u e n tly personifies licentiousness and sex
ual abandon; M a y a clowns a t highland fe s ti
vals today often im personate m onkeys w hen
they act out im m oral and in a p p ro p riate
behavior. T h e presence o f g reat num bers o f
m onkey figures in the a rt o f Classic V eracru z
m ay re flec t a sim ilar association o f the m on
key and sexual license.
In the P opo/ VuA, H u n B atz (1 H o w le r
M o n k ey ) and H u n C huen (1 Spider M o n k ey )
w e re the tw in h a lf brothers o f the H e ro
T w in s. G ifte d in a ll the arts, p a rtic u la rly song,
D A N C E , W R IT IN G , and carving, H u n B atz and
H u n C huen w e re not beyond jealousy o f th e ir
younger brothers, and trie d hard to subdue
them , leaving them w hen young to perish
on an a n th ill and in bram bles and la te r
dem anding th a t the younger brothers do th e ir
h u nting fo r them . As usual, th e H e ro T w in s
had the last laugh: they convinced th e ir tw in
h a lf brothers to scale a tree to b ring dow n
birds stunned by a blow gun. W h en H u n B atz
and H u n C huen reached the birds, they found
th a t the tree had grow n, liftin g them so high
th a t they could no longer descend. T h e H e ro
T w in s advised them to u n tie th e ir loincloths to
tra il behind them w hereupon these suddenly
becam e tails - H u n B atz and H u n C huen had
tu rn ed in to monkeys.
These m onkey tw ins occur w id e ly in Classic
M a y a a rt as the patron gods o f a rt, w ritin g ,
and calculating. Som etim es rendered as
actual m onkeys, a t o th er tim es as hum ans
w ith certain m onkey a ttrib u tes, the M o n k ey

a tzin w e n t firs t, becom ing th e sun, and then

T h e 400 rab b its (C e n izo n

fofocA&n) o f

C e n tra l M e x ic a n lo re w e re d ru n kard s, associ


ate d

w ith

MAYAHUEL,

goddess

of

PULQUE.

W ith in the TEMPLE p re cin c t o f T e n o c h titla n ,


the 44th tem p le , th e C en izo n fofocA #n in
fecpan, w as d ed icated to these rab bits.
R ab b it, or T o c h tli, w as the 8 th day sign in
the C e n tra l M e x ica n CALENDAR and one o f the
fo u r YEARBEARERS. In th e TRECENA 1 M a z a tl, the
day sign 2 R a b b it was p a rtic u la rly u n fo rtu
n ate: those born on this d ay and fo r several
th e re a fte r w e re given to drunkenness.
COYOLXAUHQUI, HUITZILOPOCHTLl's sister, was
id e n tifie d by E d u ard Seler as a m oon goddess,
h er ow n lig h t shattered and d im inish ed by
H u itzilo p o c h tli, although th e re is no textu al
confirm ation o f the id e n tific a tio n . In tw o
separate im ages a t th e sacred p re cin c t o f
T e n o c h titla n , C oyolxauhqui's d ism em bered
tw o-dim ensional im age was carved on a
round stone a t th e base o f H u itzilo p o c h tli's
p yram id , and h e r la rg e, lifeless, th re e -d im e n
sional head p ro b ab ly rested on the tem p le
steps, both possibly references to th e m oon.
Am ong the Classic M a y a , a young, b e a u ti
fu l w om an was th e m oon goddess, and she
fre q u e n tly sits on th e crescent o f th e M a y a
glyph fo r m oon, b earin g a ra b b it in h er arm s.
Am ong the M a y a , although the m oon was
also id e n tifie d w ith the ra b b it, the fu ll moon
in p a rtic u la r - as opposed to any o th er phase m ay have been associated w ith the moon
goddess. T h e nam e o f this goddess is not
know n, b u t she is not ixcHEL, as is often
alleged; Ixch el is an old goddess.
M a n y m odern M a y a b elieve th a t the

119

M OUNTAINS

fem ale moon was dim m ed a fte r a squabble


w ith her husband the sun, and th a t she m ay
have lost an eye in the q u a rre l. In a m odem
Zapotee story, a p a ir o f orphan ch ild ren w ho
later become the sun and m oon escape from
a sweathouse before th e ir apotheosis. See
a /s o CREATION ACCOUNTS.

m ortuary

bundles

In

m any

parts

of

M esoam erica, the rem ains o f im p o rta n t in d i


viduals w ere not b u ried a t the tim e o f DEATH ,
but w ere ra th e r placed in BUNDLES - a form
of the sacred bundle. A ccording to A ztec
b elief, the sacred god bundles a re sim ply the
funerary bundles o f those CODS w ho w ere
sacrificed fo llo w in g the creation o f the Bfth
sun a t TEOTiHUACAN. Both d e ity and fu n e ra ry
bundles took a som ew hat hum an form and

Mixtee moon sign


containing a rabbit,
Stone of Tlaxiaco,
Oaxaca, Late
Postclassic period.

w ore masks; am ong these w e re possibly


included the fam ous stone masks o f T e o tihuacan. O n Stela 4 o f T ik a l, the E a rly Classic
ru ler C u rl Snout holds a sacred bundle bear
ing the mask o f TLALOC. A t T ik a l, m asked
m ortuary bundles appear as e arly as the
Protoclassic period. B u ria l 85, datin g to 50
B e , contained the rem ains o f a m o rtu ary
bundle accom panied by a fuchsite mask.
F o r the Postclassic perio d m o rtu ary
bundles are w e ll docum ented. Am ong the
M ixtees, it was usual fo r kings to be preserved
a fte r death in m asked fu n e ra ry bundles; a
CAVE a t Chalcatongo served as the repository
for the bundles o f M ixte e kings from the g reat
dynasty o f T ila n tongo. F o r the Tarascans o f
M ichoacn, a m ortuary bundle was m ade
from the crem ated rem ains o f the king.
A dorned w ith a TURQUOISE m ask, this bundle
was b u ried in a TOMB placed a t the base o f
the TEMPLE dedicated to the god C u ric av eri.
T h e Tarascans also fashioned bundles from
the heads o f w arrio rs slain in com bat. A fte r
perfo rm ing a night vig il w ith offerings, the
Tarascans burned the w a rrio r bundles, w ith
the crem ated rem ains being placed in ceram ic
vessels. This Tarascan rite relates to the A ztec
custom o f m aking bundles from the bodies o f
slain w arriors. B edecked w ith PAPER orna
m ents, these bundles received hom age in the
form o f Music and offerings before being
burned. See a/so CREATION ACCOUNTS.
t m ountains M a n y m ountains in ancient M e x
ico and G u atem ala w e re h eld to be sacred.
Some o f these w e re active volcanoes, some
d orm ant, w h ile others w e re not volcanic a t
a ll, b u t ra th e r m ountains in p ro m in en t and

Aztec. The bundle is portrayed as


Mixcoatl (left), wearing turquoise
regalia.

M O U NTAINS
d ra m a tic

!ZI)
locations, fre q u e n tly w ith

CAVES.

and v isit them in cuwNC ritu als. A t each m oun

A m ong the M a y a , M ixte es , and A ztecs, com

ta in cross, fresh p in e boughs and fin w o w are

m u n ities w e re nam ed a fte r th e ir m ountains;

o ffe red , candles lit, prayers said, and c u rer and

in d e ed the v ery N a h u a tl w o rd fo r com m u nity,

p a tie n t d rin k rounds o f hom em ade sugar cane

a/fepefV,

m eans

ru m . Ancestors liv e in the sacred m ountains

M ex ica n

p lace-nam es

w a te r-m o u n ta in .

C e n tra l
th e

th a t rin g Z in a c a n ta n , and each is classiEed as

m o untain g lyp h , re flec tin g th e g re a t n u m b er

m ale or fe m a le . Each m o untain has speciEc

o f places nam ed in this w ay.

associations; one can b rin g RAIN, fo r exam ple,

o ften

in clu d e

F ro m e a rly tim es, m ountains fre q u e n tly

and a n o th er h ea t. In th e 20th c., the K ekchi

d e te rm in e d the siting o f com m unities. T h e

practiced continence and fasted b efo re m aking

O lm ec s e ttlem e n t a t C h alcatzin g o lies in the

PILGRIMAGES to CAVES on m o u n tain tops.

shadow o f a d ra m atic igneous plug o f a

M esoam erican peoples fre q u e n tly b u ilt th e ir


in the form o f sym bolic m ountains.

m o u n tain , and M o n te A lb an is a m ountain

TEM PLES

its e lf, flatten e d and shaped by generations o f

M a y a tem ples in the Chenes region are entered

people to accom m odate hum an settlem e n t.

through g reat m onster m ouths th a t lead sym

T h e unusual flu te d shape o f the Erst O lm ec

b o lically to the h e a rt o f th e

PYRAMID, a t L a V e n ta , suggests an a tte m p t a t

o f the m ountain. C opn T e m p le 22 is such a

m aking an a rtific ia l "vo lcan o " along the non-

sym bolic m ountain w ith a m onster m outh fo r

EARTH,

o r the in te rio r

volcanic G u lf C oast, although some scholars

m ing a cave en tra n ce ; the

b eliev e that tim e and w e a th e r have sim ply

from its cornices suggest th a t it m ay have sym

eroded w h at was a four-sided p yram id .

HUACAN s north-south axis leads d ire c tly north

bolized the m ountain w h e re m aize originated.


E p ig rap h ic research by D a v id S tu art and

to C e rro G ordo; tra d itio n a lly know n also as

Stephen Houston re ve ale d th a t the C lassic and

T en a m , M o th e r o f Stone, this dead volcano


gurgles from w a te r trapped inside, the very

m ountains, or u/tz. T h e so-called C auac M o n

T E O T i-

im age o f the a /fe p e f/. T h e M a y a c ity o f


A guateca is positioned beside a deep fissure,
and this c le ft m ountain is the actual sym bol
o f th a t city's toponym in M a y a hieroglyphic
W R IT IN C .

T h e tw in p yram id dedicated to TLALOC


and H u rrziL O P O C T L ! in the sacred p recin ct o f
T en o c h titla n was positioned against the tw o
sm oldering volcanoes to the east - Popoca
tep e tl (Sm oking M o u n ta in ) and Ixtaccih u atl
(W h ite W om an) - w hom the Aztecs id e n tifie d
as a m arried couple, d eified and revered .
L iv e rock shrines w e re carved a t M a lin a lc o
and Texcotzingo, and, in e a rlie r tim es, at
D ain zu . Shrines w e re fre q u e n tly erected a t
the peaks o f m ountains.
T o the east o f T en o c h titla n , the T lalo q u e
w e re thought to re tre a t w ith th e ir th u n d er
bolts to the T lalo c M ountains. QUETZALCOATL
jo u rn eyed
to T o n acatep etl (Sustenance
M o u n ta in ) to End the origin o f MAIZE; in
o rder to obtain m aize fo r hum ankind, he
transform ed h im self in to an a n t and stole
some kernels. S im ilar accounts o f the origin
o f m aize are know n am ong the M a y a , and
the Q uiche called the m ountain o f o rigin
P axil.
M o u n ta in shrines are com m on today
am ong tra d itio n a l peoples in M exico and
G u atem ala. T h e M a y a Zinacantecos, fo r
exam ple, erect crosses a t m ountain shrines

M A izE C O D s

Postclassic M a y a re fe rre d

Eourishing

to pyram ids as

ster, nam ed a fte r the stony cauac m arkings


app earin g on this beast, is a c tu a lly a M a y a re n
d erin g o f a zoom orphic m o u n tain . In the sacred
p recin ct o f the A ztecs, the tw in p y ra m id d e d i
cated to T la lo c and H u itzilo p o c h tli sym bol
ic ally recreated COATEPEC, H ill o f the S erpent,
w h ere H u itzilo p o c h tli's m iraculous BIRTH took
place. T o d rill N e w F ire , th e A ztecs re tre a te d
to C itla lte p e c , H ill o f th e Star. C H ic o M O Z T O C , the
Seven C aves, th e place o f o rig in fo r m ost C e n
tra l M exicans, is usually d ep icted w ith in a
m ountain, and C u lh u acan , C u rv e d M o u n ta in ,
was a tra d itio n a l p lace o f ancestors.
In the 13th V E IN T E N A , T e p e ilh u itl, th e Aztecs
celeb rated w h a t w as know n as the M o u n ta in
Feast. D ed ic ate d to P opocatepetl and Izta c c ih u atl by the A ztecs, the cele b ratio n was
w id e ly c arried out by C e n tra l M exican
peoples in honor o f various m ountains. Dough
im ages in the shape o f m ountains w e re
fashioned o f ground A M A R A N T H seeds to honor
the dead, p a rtic u la rly those w ho had d ied a
DEATH associated w ith the T la lo q u e - by
Hood, d row ning, or L IG H T N IN G - rein fo rcin g the
connection b etw een T la lo c , m ountain, and
W A T E R . F iv e sacriHcial victim s, fo u r w om en
and one m an, then im personated m ountains,
w e re slain by h e a rt extrusion and then decapi
tated . T h e dough m ountains, E nally, w ere
also d ecap itated and c a re fu lly consumed in a
ritu a l com m union. T h e la m e and crip p led ,

121

MUSIC

whose deform ities w e re thought to have been


sent by T lalo c (see DEFORMITY), sought a cure
in the consum ption o f the a m aran th dough,
ee a/so C A LE N D A R ; C R E A T IO N A C C O U N TS ; T E R M
[ \ A T I 0 N R ITU A LS .

muan ow! T h e screech ow l (O fu s as/o) occu


pies an im portant role in Classic and Postclassic
M aya iconography. T h e M a y a m onth o f
M uan is nam ed a fte r the Yucatec term fo r
this b ird . T h e glyph fo r this m onth, th e head
of the m uan o w l, is fre q u e n tly accom panied
by phonetic elem ents suggesting th a t the
term m uan is o f considerable a n tiq u ity . T h e
muan ow l can be id e n tifie d by its broad and
sharply tipped beak and spotted feathers.
Q u ite o ften, a p air of large spotted feathers
appear on the brow and the back o f the head,
probably re fe rrin g to the h o rn -like fe a th e r
tufts o f the screech ow l.
In M a y a iconography, the m uan is id e n ti
fied w ith R A IN , M A IZ E and the U N D E R W O R L D . In
Yucatec, the term m uan also bears conno
tations o f clouds, rain and m ist. I t is probably
for this reason th a t the ra in god C H A C is
freq u en tly associated w ith the m uan ow l in
Classic and Postclassic M a y a a rt. O n page
78 o f the M a d rid Codex, Chac paints the
blackened ta il feathers o f the b ird . In Classic
iconography,
m aize
grow th
com m only
appears w ith the m uan o w l, possibly to show
the rain b ird as a m aize-b rin g er. T h e m uan
ow l is also id e n tifie d w ith the m ajor M a y a
d eity re fe rre d to as God L in the Schellhas
system o f d eity classification. A god o f the
U n d erw o rld and o f M E R C H A N T S , God L usually
w ears a broad h at topped by the m uan ow l.

(Aboye) Priest presenting an offering


to a cleft mountain, Nochistlan Vase,
Late Postclassic Mixtee, Oaxaca.

(AgAf) Maya glyph for mountain, or


u/fz, Copan Stela 1, Late Classic
period.

The Muan Owl, Dresden


Codex, p. 7, Postclassic
Yucatn. In Maya
iconography, the Muan
Owl frequently appears
with maize foliage upon
its head.

3 e e a / s o OW LS; S C H E LLH A S CODS.

music R itu a l often included the perform ance


o f m usic. Since there is no Precolum bian
m usical n otation, the exact natu re of
M esoam erican music rem ains unknow n;
w h a t is know n is reconstructed from descrip
tions, depictions, and surviving instrum ents
them selves. Singing accom panied in stru
m ents, and both singers and players trained
rigorously.
T h e M esoam erican ensem ble encom
passed a standard range o f instrum ents, going
back a t least to Classic tim es: flutes, ocarinas,
gourd rattles, bone rasps, tu rtle shells struck
w ith d eer antlers, a larg e, u p rig h t drum
(called the
in N a h u a tl, the p a x in
M a y a ), a slit gong (called the feponaztA in
N a h u a tl, the funA u/ in M a y a ), a hand drum

Old man and woman playing music with rattles


and drums. While the man beats a Aue/mef/
drum between his legs, the woman strikes a
turtle shell with a deer antler, Codex Laud,
p. 34, Late Postclassic period.

1Z2

MAHUAL

instrum ents b efo re the C onquest, nor fo r the

avaricious, indigent, envious, absconding He


grunts, sounds AusAy, maAes one s ears ring,
Ae is resfiess, /brgetiu/, vio/enf, indigent; Ae
absconds, Ae brags; Ae is presumptuous, vain

m arim b a

F C ;

held in the crook o f th e a rm , beHs, and


trum pets m ade o f conch shells, w ood, or
gourds. T h e re is no evidence o f a n y stringed

duced

(xylophone). T h e

stringed

Spanish in tro

instrum ents

and

A fric a n

slaves brought th e m arim b a.


B one rasps have been excavated from E a rly
F o rm a tiv e sites, b u t the Brst depictions o f
m usicians ap p ear tow ard

th e end o f the

F o rm a tiv e e ra, in W est M exico . T h e 8th c.


M a y a fre q u e n tly show a ll o r some o f the
instrum ents o f the M eso am erican ensem ble

S u rvivin g A zte c m usical instrum ents, p ar


tic u la rly

th e larg e drum s, h ea r the icon

ography o f w a r and

S A C R IF IC E ,

and w e re pro

b ab ly used m ost o ften in sacrificial rituals.


V ictim s them selves fre q u e n tly m ade music:
th e

T E Z C A T L tP O C A

im p erso n ato r liv e d fo r a year

in th a t ro le and le arn e d to p lay the flu te and


w h is tle. T h e fes tivitie s fo r th e VEINTENA of

and confirm th a t they w e re p layed on a w id e

Toxcat! in clu d ed constant song and DANCE,

v a rie ty o f occasions, in clu d in g both HUMAN

b u t - as if to sym bolize his ow n DEATH - w hen

SACRIFICE and ACCESSION, and by UNDERWORLD

anim als as w e ll as hum ans. T h e m usicians


usuaBy ap p ear in a fixed o rd er, w ith flutes,
rattles and tu rtle shells app earin g b efo re the
large drum ; trum pets and the hand drum
b ring up the rear. A n ab b re viated b u t s im ila r
m usical group played a t the w edding c ere

the im p erso n ato r ascended the T ezcatlipo ca


tem p le fo r sacrifice, he broke his flu te and
w h istle and le ft th e sh a tte red pieces on the
steps.
A m ong the A ztecs, the gods MACUiLxocHiTL
and

x o c H iP iL L i

supervised

the

dom ain

of

m usic.

mony o f the M ix te e princess 6 M on key.


M esoam erican music was larg ely percussive,
and nothing like a European scale was know n.
T h e Spanish described A ztec music as d o le
ful and tuneless, b u t they w ere nevertheless
m oved by it, and they recognized the achieve
m ents o f court perform ers over the less
skilled ru ra l players. A ztec m usicians p e rfo r
m ed a w id e rep erto ry o f m usic, a ll o f it by
h ea rt, b u t in ven tio n was also considered
noble. Just as they credited the Toltecs w ith
the in ven tio n o f WRiTiNC and counting, the
Aztecs a ttrib u te d the inven tio n o f m any songs
to the Toltecs. E xp licit characteristics in fo r
m ed th e ir notions o f good and bad music:

TAe good singer /is/ o sound voice. Good,


sound /is/ Ais voice; weZ/ rounded /are/
Ais words. /He is/ of good sAarp memory,
keeping Ae songs in mind; refen dve, nof
ibrgedu/. He sings, cries ouf, enunciates
cZear/y; /Ae sings/ wiiA wed-rounded voice,
in fud voice, in iaiseffo. /H e sings/ soif/y; Ae
tempers Ais voice, accompanies /udicicusiy,
gives fAe pifcA, iowers /Ae voice/, raises
if. He reduces if to medium; Ae uses if
moJenafeZy. He practices; Ae improves Ais
voice. He composes, sets to music, originates
/songs/. He sings songs, sings others' songs,
provides music for others, instructs others.
The had singer /is/ hoarse, AusAy, coarse
voiced; crude, dud, Aeari/ess, uninfe/Agenf.
He revo/ts me; Ae is fraudulent, vaing/orious,
arrogant. /H e is/ haughty, fboAsh, oAstrnafe,

nahua! A com m on w o rd in th e ethnographic


lite ra tu re o f M exico , naAuaZ derives from
the N ah u a t! term nauaZA, sig n ifyin g a fo rm
changing sorcerer or w itc h . T o th e e a rly
C o lo n ial priests, these form -changers w e re
not considered sim ply to be baseless super
stitio n , b u t w e re a source o f m uch concern.
W ritin g in 1600, F ra y Juan B au tista w a rn ed o f
n ative sorcerers th a t tran sfo rm ed them selves
in to D ocs, w easels, O W L S , chickens, and JACUARS. T h e 17th c. parish p rie s t R u iz de A larco n
m entioned specific cases o f n a tiv e fo rm changers and explained th e ir pow ers by claim
in g th e y had pacts w ith Satan. A ltho u g h the
concept o f naAuaZ recalls E uropean concepts
o f w itc h c ra ft, it is c le a rly o f n a tiv e o rigin and
is closely tie d to n a tiv e concepts o f sham anic
p o w er and tran sfo rm atio n . T E Z C A T L IP O C A , the
sorcerer p a r exceZ/ence o f L a te Postclassic
C e n tra l M exico , was b eliev ed to be able to
transform h im s elf in to a ja g u a r. T h e concept
o f ja g u a r form -changers also appears am ong
the F o rm a tiv e O lm ecs in the form o f "tra n s
form atio n fig u res," stone sculptures th a t dis
p lay a kneelin g m an being tu rn e d in to a
ja g u ar. A long w ith th e a n im al alter-egos, the
naAuaZ could be transform ed in to a n atu ral
force, such as LIGHTNING. A lthough naAuaZ
sorcerers w e re fre q u e n tly fea red fo r th e ir

123

NAMES AND TITLES

ability to com m it m alig n an t acts, they could


also serve as protectors o f the com m unity.
D uring the C o lo n ial e ra , m any n ativistic
movem ents w ere led by n a h u a / sorcerers.
T h e nahuaV is g en e rally id e n tic al to the
M aya concept o f the UAY. R ecent epigraphic
advances reveal the presence o f u ay a lte regos am ong the Classic M a y a e lite . H o w e v e r,
it is uncertain w h e th e r these Classic texts
refer to actual form -changers or to s p irit
com panions. .See a/so SHAMANISM ; TONAL.
names and titles In m any parts o f M eso am erica, individuals w e re nam ed fo r the day in
the 260-day CALENDAR on w hich they w e re
born or bap tized . Because the 260-d ay calen
dar was a d ivin in g calendar, these nam es a ll
had very specific auguries: in the TRECENA 1
D e e r, the day 5 M on key was a good day (" H e
who was then born was lik e the w orkings and
qualities o f the day: the te llin g o f tales, and
jesting . . . th e re was no a n g e r"), b u t next
day, 6 Grass, was evil ( " . . . he w ho was then
born lived only in torm en t on e arth , suffered
pain and tro u b le, and found afflictio n s").
C alen d rical nam ing p re va ile d in C e n tra l
M exico, O axaca, and in parts o f the G u lf
region. T h e M ix te e c u ltu ra l hero 9 W in d , for
exam ple, is know n g en erally by his calend
rical nam e, although he is also id e n tifie d w ith
QUETZALCOATL. In no region o f the M a y a w ere
calendrical names used (although divinations
for birthdays w ere calculated from the 260day calen d ar), and no one knows w h eth er
they w ere used at TEOTiHUACAN.
In d ivid u als carried other nam es as w e ll as
th e ir calendrical ones, and these som etim es
ran in fam ilies. T h e M otecuhzom a (H e W ho
is A ngry L ik e a L o rd ) w ho ru led at the tim e
o f the Conquest bore the same nam e as his
g ran d fath er, w ho then becam e know n as
H ueh u e M otecuhzom a, th a t is, O ld M o te
cuhzom a, or M otecuhzom a the E ld er. T h e
M ixte e king and hero 8 D e e r was also know n
as T ig e r C la w ; Princess 6 M o n k ey was given
a new nam e or title , S erpent Q u ech q u em itl,
a fte r h er v a lia n t victory over h e r enem ies.
M ixte e deities and oracles g en erally bore
calendrical nam es too: 6 M o n k ey was given
h er n ew nam e by 9 Grass, a fem a le oracle.
A t the tim e o f the C onquest, the M a y a o f
Yucatan bore fa m ily lineag e nam es. Am ong
the ru ling fam ily nam es, m any o f w hom
dom inated in d iv id u al provinces, w e re the
Cocom, the X iu , th e C u p u l, and the C h e l. In
the case o f the Classic M a y a , nam es w e re often

Aztec musicians and dancers,


Florentine Codex, Book 4, 16th c.

The Aztec /mehuef/, or upright


wooden drum, used in music
making, from Toluca.

1Z4

NEW FIRE CEREMONY


ch aracteristic o f a p a rtic u la r lin eag e: B ird
Jaguar the G re a t (reig n ed AD 7 5 2 -c . 7 7 0 ), as
he has been dubbed by m odem investigators
(his nam e glyphs are p ro b ab ly to be read

o r the d au b in g ). W h ile an a rtis t m ight sign


as m aker, th e o w n e r too m ight proclaim
possession, e g. "m y cacao p o t" or "m y e arspool" o r "m y te m p le ."

Yaxom B alam ) was the fou rth king o f Yax


chilan to b ear th a t nam e, and both his fa th e r

N e w F ire cerem ony .see CALENDAR; EIRE

and his son had the nam e Shield Jaguar (again,

know n as C hac C h el. A com pletely distinctive

n ig h t In tra d itio n a l M eso am erican thought,


th e n ig h t was w id e ly reg ard ed w ith a certain
am o un t o f d re ad and fe a r. A t n ig h t, form -

set o f nam es characterized the Palenque ru lin g

changers and .dem ons from the perim eters of

fam ily, and the same can be said o f most

th e social w o rld could w re ak havoc upon


hum ans. D u rin g th e tim e o f darkness, spooks

a m odem nicknam e: the glyphs m ay have


been read Itz B alam ), though his son was also

M a y a cities and th e ir ru lin g fam ilies. T h e


evidence

from

P alenque

shows

too

th a t

w om en in d iffe re n t generations m ight have


the same nam e. M a y a nam es freq u e n tly incor
porated the significant anim als o f th e ir n atu ral
w orld: the jACUAH, SNAKE, QUETZAL, BAT, ta p ir
and PECCARY for exam ple. O fte n , am ong the
glyphic symbols used for w u rriN C th e ir ow n
nam es, M a y a kings nam ed th e ir parents as
w e ll.
M ay a hieroglyphic w ritin g also reveals that
the M ay a n o b ility held a great m any titles,
only some o f w hich can now be deciphered.
Specific rankings w ere spelled out, such as
lord (aJiau), sacred lord (ch'uJ aAau, applied
only to a king), or sun lord (m aA A?na or
chiFna or Avn/ch). A secondary stratum o f
rulers, probably regional governors, w ere
known by the title saha/, to w hich they could
be eith e r born or appointed. Both a saA a/and
a c h u /a h a u could append CAPTIVES' nam es to
th e ir own (e g. "captor o f F lin t B a t") as w e ll
as a count o f captives. K ing B ird Jaguar
the G re a t o f Yaxchiln counted h im self the
"capto r o f 20 captives" most o f his life , b u t
on one o f his last m onum ents, his count w e n t
up to 21.
Some captives m ay have been given new
nam es upon th e ir d efeat: a t Y axchiln, some
cap tive nam es re fe r to the day nam e on w hich
they w e re taken: both " M o l" and "C h u e n ,"
fo r exam ple, w e re captured on those p a rtic
u la r days. A fam ous captive lik e the Palenque
king K an X u l was p u b licly nam ed and p o r
trayed a t T o n in a a fte r his d efeat. C ap tives'
nam es often appear on th e ir thighs, up p er
arm s, or clothing - perhaps as signs o f
h u m iliatio n or because they w ere indeed
tattooed or em blazoned fo r p ublic recognition.
Specific titles distinguish o th er noble m em
bers o f society: scribes and artists signed not
only th e ir nam es to w orks o f a rt b u t also th e ir
titles (ah dzib: he o f the w ritin g ; id za f: a rtis t
or w ise m an; ah naah: he o f the w a te r lily

and dem ons o f th e UNDERWORLD rose to the


surface o f th e EARTH and the heavens. I t was
com m only b e liev ed th a t the sou! traveled
about w h ile one slep t, exposing the in d iv id u a l
to g re a t danger. D ream s w e re o ften consid
ered to be m em ories o f the soul's nocturnal
journeys and exploits. Thus in most M a y a n lan
guages, the term UAY o ften bears connotations
o f sleep, d re am , fo rm -ch an g er, or s p irit com
panion. T h e forces o f the night often d ia m e tri
cally oppose the o rd ered w o rld o f the SUN and
d ay lig h t. Thus fo r exam ple, d u rin g the N e w
F ire v ig il (see FIRE), the A ztecs g re a tly fea red
th a t the s te lla r dem ons o f darkness, the
TZiTZiM iM E, w o u ld plunge the e n tire w o rld
in to darkness and chaos, ^ee a/so CREATION
ACCOUNTS; DAWN.

num bers A ll M e s o a m e r ic a n p e o p le s used a


v ig e s im a l, o r base 2 0 , system fo r co u n tin g ,
r a th e r th a n th e d e c im a l, o r b ase 10, system
d e v e lo p e d fo r A ra b ic n u m e ra ls . T h e M ix te e s
a n d A ztec s, a m o n g o th ers, used dots to re c o rd
n u m b e rs : 12 dots w o u ld m e a n 12 th ing s o r
th e co efB cient 12, w h ile th e M a y a used b a ra n d -d o t n u m e ra tio n : th e b a r eq u als E ve, so
tw o ba rs a n d tw o dots w o u ld m e a n 12 things
o r th e co efB cien t 12. I n C e n tr a l M e x ic o , th e
te rm c e a iz o n lit e r a lly m e a n t 400, p a rtic u la rly
in counts o f tr ib u te , b u t i t c o u ld also be
used fig u ra tiv e ly to m e a n a la rg e q u a n tity
o f u n s p e c ifie d a m o u n t, as in

th e

C e n tz o n

# u itz n a h M a , th e 400 sons o f coATLicuE, p e r


sonifications o f th e m a n y STARS o f th e h e ave n s.

T h e Classic M a y a could configure any


n um ber not only in b a r-a n d -d o t n u m eratio n
b u t by a head or fu ll-fig u re v a ria n t. In this
m ore e lab o rate fo rm at, th e num bers 1 to 12
are a ll d istinct, b u t the num bers 14 to 19
re p e a t the heads o f 4 to 9, w ith the a dd itio n
o f a skeletal ja w or a skeletal hand over the
ja w . This skeletal ad d itio n m ust have had
m uch th e sam e m eaning as the " te e n " th a t
English speakers add to the num bers 13 to 19.

125

OLMEC GODS

N um ber 13 could be represented by a distinct


head (see WATER LELYSERPENT) or as a "te e n ." T h e
head variants o f 1 to 13 represent various deit
ies : 4, for exam ple, is the sun god, 8 is the MAIZE
G o o , and 9isX b alan q u e, o n eo f the H e ro T w in s who functioned as the patrons o f the num bers.
In A ztec n um eration, dots in d icate num
bers up to 20. A banner equals 20, a fe a th e r
or le a f represents 400, and a copa/ bag
indicates 8000. W h en the au th o r o f th e Codex

The Aztec sign for the starry night, Codex Mendoza, 16th c.

T elleriano-R em ensis w a n te d to in d ic ate th a t


20,000 captives had been k ille d in 1487 AD a t
the rededication o f the T em p lo M a y o r, he
used 2 copa/ bags and 10 feathers.
C e rta in num bers also h eld m etap h orical
m eaning: 1 m eant the beginning o f things; 9
re fe rre d to the levels o f the UNDERW ORLD; and
13 em bodied the strata o f th e heavens.

ww

10

20

400

40

*. +*

* 6

8000

SB
19

Aztec (top row) and Maya (second row) numbers.

obsidian A dark volcanic glass, obsidian was


g reatly p rized for its razor-sharp edge and
lustrous sheen. F ro m E a rly F o rm a tiv e tim es
on, it was trad ed w id e ly in ancient M esoam erica. P a rticu lar obsidian sources w ere
held in high regard, especially Pachuca, near
T u la , w hich yielded a fine o live green v arie ty.
Q u ite freq u e n tly , obsidian was p repared in
the form o f polyhedral cores, w hich resem ble
Hu ted cones. T h e prism atic blades obtained
from these cores are razor sharp, and served
as one o f the m ore com mon B L O O D L E T T IN G
instrum ents in ancient M esoam erica. Am ong
the Postclassic inhabitants o f highland M e x
ico, the blades w ere set along the edge o f a
w ooden club, the m acua/m /f/.
Because o f its black, lustrous surface, obsid
ian was also used as a M IR R O R stone. D u rin g
the Protoclassic and Classic periods, a sim ple
fractu red plane form ed the reHective surface.
H o w ev er, during the L a te Postclassic period,
ground and polished obsidian m irrors w ere
also present. T h e C e n tra l M exican d eity TEZ
C A T L iP O C A probably personified such a m irro r.
T h e 16th c. C akchique! M a y a com m unicated
w ith the C hay A bah, the sacred obsidian
stone. This stone seems to have had oracular
powers and spoke d ire ctly to the C akchiquel.
Q u ite possibly, the C h ay A b ah was a sacred
obsidian m irro r. See a/so

D iv iN A T iO N .

O lm ec gods T h e Olm ecs w e re the first people


in M esoam erica to create a codified religious

Late Classic Maya


head variants for
selected numbers,
showing how 14, 15
and 16 are skeletal
adaptations of 4, 5
and 6.
4, can

14,cantahun

5. ho

15, ho!ahun

6, uac

16, uadahun

The Aztec sign for Itzteyocan,


composed of an obsidian core and
blade atop a stone and the sign for
a road; Matrcula de Tributos,
16th c. Central Mexico.

!ZH

OLMEC CODS
universe th a t w e can recognize today through
th e surviving a rt. in fact, it was th e existence
o i a standard

sym bolic code th a t forced

archaeologists, beginning in the 1930s, to face


the fa c t th a t some c u ltu re had preceded th a t

lin g , o pen-m outhed and uauaMy toothlewg face


o f an in fa n t; this is the O lm ec d e ity moat
com m only h eld in th e arm s by an a d u lt. C le ft h ead ed , he w ears a headband and w avy PAPER
adornm ents th a t c rin k le along the side o f his

o f the Classic M a y a . B efo re this c u ltu re had

face, in fro n t o f th e ears. C rin k le d paper

been docum ented archaeologicaU y o r its d ate

ornam ents distinguish th e rain god o f C e n tra l

p ro ven , the term "c u ltu ra m a d re ," o r m o ther

M ex ico m any g enerations la te r and m ay


d e riv e fro m this e a rly ch ara cterizatio n .

c u ltu re , had been in tro d uced. T h e O lm ecs


are now recognized to have developed high

T h e m ost im p o rta n t characteristic o f Jorale

c iv iliza tio n in M eso am erica, w ith a charis

m on G od n is the foliage th a t sprouts from

m atic cast o f d eities , some o f w hom w e re to

the c le ft in his h ead, possibly in d ic atin g a

survive, a lb e it in a changed fo rm , fo r 2500

MAIZE god. T h e nose o f this c re a tu re seems to

years, u n til the Spanish C onquest in the 16th

be anth ro p o m o rp hic; the m outh is usually

c. T h e term "O lm e c " its e lf is sim ply the nam e

toothless and open, lik e th a t o f th e R ain B aby,

used by the A ztecs to re fe r to the "ru b b e r

b u t in som e cases it has b ird characteristics.

p e o p le ," m eaning the people o f the G u lf

A fu ll body is ra re ly d ep icted . T h is ch aracter

C oast; th ere is no clue o f the nam e this

m ay also sym bolize the fe rtile e a rth or MOUN

c iv iliza tio n m ay have used to describe itse lf.

TAIN fro m w hich m aize grow s.


T h e P ersonified E a rth C av e (Joralem on

A ccording to the sunuNC HYPOTHESIS, the


W E R E -jA C U A R ,

G od i-B) sym bolizes the e a rth and e n try in to

brought to life by the m ating o f a fem ale

the e a rth . I t occurs as a ctu al CAVE entrances


and also as fram es fo r seated ru lers, both on

O lm ecs' p rin cip al d e ity was a

hum an and a m ale JAG UA R , or a m ale hum an


and a fem ale ja g u a r. T h e "c u ltu ra m a d re "
theory proposed th a t w ere-jag u ars w ere
essentially RAIN gods, and from O lm ec rain
gods one could see the evolution o f a ll m ajor
M a y a , C en tra! M ex ica n , and Zapotee deities.
M o re recen tly (and w ith fa r m ore exam ples
o f O lm ec a rt than w ere a v a ila b le to an e a rlie r
g en eratio n ) scholars, p a rtic u la rly D a v id Joralem on, have begun to sort out a rich p an
theon o f O lm ec deities as w e ll as to recognize
the beginnings o f a cosmic structure th a t
endured in to la te r c u ltu ra l florescences.
G iven the nascent state o f studies o f O lm ec
relig io n , the follo w in g guide to O lm ec gods
can be n eith e r d e fin itiv e nor com prehensive.
O lm ec deities take the form s o f the p o w e r
fu l anim als o f the tropical ra in forest, w h ere
the c u ltu re its e lf arose. P rin cip al d eities
include th e S N AK E , h arpy eagle (see E A G L E ),
SH A R K , C A IM A N , and JAG UA R , and m any com bi
nations th ereo f. N o ne has specific sexual
characteristics to indicate gender. T h e cosmic
structure o f the O lm ecs included a SKY dragon,
an EARTH caim an, and the id ea th a t fou r
DW ARVES held the sky in place, p robably
aligned w ith the card in al points (see D IR E C
T IO N S ) and COLO RS.
O ne o f the most enduring o f O lm ec d eities
is the R ain B aby. O rig in a lly id e n tifie d as a
w e re -jaguar, he certain ly has ja g u a r charac
teristics, p a rtic u la rly in term s o f posture.
Joralem on term ed this figure G od iv. T h e
R ain B aby has a hum an nose and the squal

O lm ec

A LTA R S

and on R e lie f 1, C h alcatzin g o .

A lw ays o p en -m aw ed , th e im age is usually


toothless. T h e eyes have crossed bands; fo li
age sprouts fro m the e x te rio r o f th e m aw .
T h e O lm ec D rag o n , the p rin c ip a l sky god,
p ro b ab ly derives zo o m orphically fro m the
crested h arp y eagle. O n e o f the m ost p re va
le n t im ages o f O lm ec iconography (Joralem on
C od i - A ) , the O lm ec D rag o n includes m any
symbols th a t the O lm ecs o fte n chose to re p
resent schem atically and in d e p e n d en tly, such
as the p a w -w in g m o tif or flam e eyebrow s.
These symbols o fte n ap p e ar as th e m otifs on
ceram ic seals, and th e y com m only occur on
p o ttery found fa r fro m the O lm ec h e a rtla n d
along th e C u lf Coast.
T h e Shark C od (Joralem on G od vni) occurs
ra re ly , b u t has a c le a rly d efin ed shark tooth
w hen represented. T h is m ay be a SEA god.
T h e F e a th e re d S erpent (Joralem on C od
vn) o ften has a crest o f fea th e rs, the rattle s
o f a ra ttlesn ake, a forked SER PENT tongue, and
m ay flo at in cloud sym bols, perhaps linkin g
him to the la te r cloud serpents o f the M a y a ,
Toltecs, and Aztecs. T h e presence o f QUETZALS
and crossed bands over th e head o f the
hum an w ho rests against the serpent's body
on L a V e n ta M o n u m e n t 19 suggests a read
ing, if w ritte n in a M a y a n language, o f
kukulcan (q u e tza l = kuk; crossed bands =
can or chan), or Q U E T Z A L C O A T L .
A n o th er characteristic O lm ec d e ity w ith
c le ft head bears a stripe dow n the m id d le o f

127
the face, usually through the eye (Joralem on
God vi). Such face p a in t characterizes the
ia te r god o f the G u lf Coast and C e n tra l
M exico, x iP E T O T E c , b u t the O lm ec creatu re
has the d o w n tu m ed beak o f a b ird , and is
probably not re late d to X ip e .
O th er O lm ec deities a w a it fu rth e r id e n tifi
cation. Some are basic w ere-jag u ars, m any
have c le ft heads; some have in terlo ckin g
teeth , lik e those o f a caim an, w h ile others
have only upper fangs and y et others are
toothless. See a/so INTRODUCTION.
omens T h e peoples o f ancien t M esoam erica
keenly observed strange b eh avior and events
in the n atu ra l w o rld , signs th a t could p ortend
events o f everyday life or even w o rld destruc
tion. Because they regarded the h eavenly
bodies as especially im p o rtan t, these signs
constitute one o f the m ore com m on subjects
in the Prehispanic m anuscripts. Possibly
because o f th e ir proxim ity to the heavens and
th e ir speech-like qu alities, birds w e re w id e ly
regarded as omens. Even today, OWLS are
considered to be harbingers o f D E A T H . T h e
Yucatec M a y a n term m u f signifies both b ird
and augury. In the Postclassic D resden
Codex, this term appears in scenes illu stratin g
the y ou th fu l Goddess I (see SC H E LLH A S G O D s )
w ith the M U A N o w L , the Q U E T Z A L , and other
birds, here re fe rrin g to "good" or "b a d "
auguries.
M a n y n ative peoples noted strange, disturb
ing omens ju s t before the com ing o f the
Spaniards; for the Aztecs, Sahagun records
eig h t e v il signs. Am ong these omens w ere
tw o probable com ets, LIGHTNING striking the
TEMPLE o f xiuH TECU H TLi, the sound o f a crying
wom an during m any nights, and a strange
b ird w ith a d ivin ato ry MIRROR in its forehead.
T h e Tarascans o f M ichoacn noted evil
omens fo re te llin g the Spanish Conquest.
T h e y also described tw o com ets, and added
th at th e ir tem ples w ere con tin u ally being
destroyed. W h en re b u ilt, these structures
w ould only catch FIRE again, and th e ir w alls
tum ble to the ground. See a/sc DiviNATiON.
O m eteo tl L ite ra lly the "tw o go d ," O m eteo tl
em bodies the C e n tra l M exican p rin cip le o f
This d u al, bisexual god ru led over
the highest heaven o f the N a h u a tl schem e,
O m eyocan, "P lace o f D u a lity ," in the form
o f O m etecu h tli and his consort O m ecih u atl.

D U A L IT Y .

T o g eth er, O m e tec u h tli and O m e cih u a tl w e re


the ever-p resen t progenitors, fo r they sent

OMETEOTL
Olmec gods: (right) a
probable depiction of the
Olmec rain baby, San Lorenzo
Monument 52, Early
Formative period. A deep
trough is cut down the back of
this sculpture, and it is
possible that it served as part
of the stone drainage systems
used at San Lorenzo.

(Below) Joralemon Cod VI,


incised pottery vessel,
Tlapacoya, Middle Formative
Olmec.

OMEYOCAN

iz a

th e souis o f those a bo u t to be born to the


surface o f the EARTH. O m e te c u h tli and O m e ci-

the d ark and d e a th ly U n d e rw o rld . In the


C e n tra ! M ex ica n B orgia G ro u p o f codice*,

h u at! m ay also be id e n tifie d w ith C ipactona!

the ow l can a p p e ar w ith a hum an skull for a

and O xom oco, aged progenitors and perhaps

head. T h e o w l also o ften occupies the bone-

d iv in e g randparents (see

A N C E S TR A L C O U P L E ).

G e n e ra lly not a subject o f a rtis tic rep resen

festooned

TEM PLE

of

M 1 C T L A N T E C U H T L !,

the

d eath god, w ho fre q u e n tly w ears an o w l-

tatio n , O m eteo t! had no specific TEMPLE d e d i

fe a th e r crest. T h e A ztecs c le a rly regarded

cated to him in the sacred p recin ct nor an

ow ls w ith a certain am ount o f fe a r; thus the

active c u lt cele b rated a t one o f the annua!

d read ed n o ctu rn al form -ch an g in g sorcerer


w as term e d /acafecoVo/, or ' ow l m a n /*

vEiKTE\As, but this being was the subject to


w hom a m u ltitu d e o f form a! prayers w e re
addressed.

Some authors

have

sought to

T h e a n cien t M a y a seem to have had an


a m b iv a le n t a ttitu d e tow ard ow ls, id e n tify in g

id e n tify an evo lu tio n through the w orship o f

them

O m eteo t! tow ard m onotheism in la te C e n tra !

horned

M exican

and MAIZE and had associations o f d eath and

thought.

w ith

both

M UAN OW L,

fe rtility

and

DEATH.

fo r exam ple, brought

The
R A IN

th e U n d e rw o rld . T h is d u al n atu re can he


O m eyocan see OMETEOTL; sxv; TONACATECUHTLi

seen also fo r the o w l messengers o f the

opossum W ith its gray fu r, sham bling g a it,

and messengers fo r th e d eath gods o f X ib a lb a ,

Q u ich e M a y a
and

snaggle-toothed

m outh,

the

opossum

(D x /e /p /u s /narstvp/a/is) was id e n tifie d w ith


old age in M esoam erica. T h e opossum figures

PO PO LVUH.

A lthough assistants

th e ow ls also assisted X q u ic, the p regn an t


w ife o f

HUN HUNAHPU,

surface o f th e

in h e r escape to the

EARTH.

p ro m in en tly in the new year pages o f the


M a y a D resden Codex corresponding to the
end o f the o!d year. In these scenes, the
opossum is !abe!ed m am , a term signifying
both an aged g ra n d fath er and the god o f the
old year. In Classic M a y a iconography, the
opossum appears w ith attrib u te s o f the aged
d e ity know n as P A U A H T U N , w ho is probably
none o th er than the god o f the dying year.
In the M ix te e codices, the opossum is
closely id e n tifie d w ith the intoxicating b ev er
age P U L Q U E . In the Vindobonensis and N u tta ll
codices, depictions o f the d ecap itated pulque
goddess L ad y 11 S erpent are accom panied by
an opossum holding cups fille d w ith pulque.
owls As a nocturnal b ird th a t fre q u e n tly
resides in CAVES and underground burrow s,
the ow l is w id e ly id e n tifie d w ith th e N IG H T
and the UNDERWORLD. A bove the entrance to
O x to titla n C ave, G u errero , th e re is a M id d le
F o rm a tiv e O lm ec p ain tin g o f a m an dressed
as a green horned ow l. G reen owls com m only
occur in the a rt o f T E O T iH U A C A N , and are
q u ite fre q u e n tly placed atop M IR R O R S , symbols
them selves o f supernatural caves or passage
w ays. A n E a rly Postclassic cache fro m the
T e m p le o f C hac M o o l a t C hichen Itz con
tain e d a finch and a b u rro w in g pygm y o w l
placed atop a p y rite m irro r.
L ik e o th er birds, owls w e re considered as
O M E N S or messengers b etw een hum ans and
the d iv in e. Because o f th e ir n a tu ra l affin ities
to n ig h t and caves, owls h eld special ties to

P a d d le r Cods Because one o f th e ir p rim a ry


actions is to p ad d le a C A N O E , tw o Classic M a y a
deities have been nam ed the Paddlers. T h e y
app ear in Classic p erio d a rt and in d ic ate a
specific p a ir o f oppositions, day and N IG H T ,
a p p a ren t through the hieroglyphs th a t re p
resent them , a^b a/, darkness or n ig h t, and
Ain, or day. U n lik e m ost M a y a hieroglyphs,
those id e n tify in g the P addlers a re d ra w n
w ith in id e n tify in g cartouches th a t w ould
seem to rep resen t th e ir canoe, as seen fro m
above.
T h e O ld Jaguar P a d d ler (n ig h t) usually
paddles the bow o f the canoe w h ile the O ld
Stingray P ad d ler (d a y ) handles the stern.
A lthough alw ays anthropom orphic, the O ld
Jaguar P ad d ler shares characteristics w ith a
num ber o f aged JAG UA R C O D S , in clu d in g the
Jaguar G od o f th e U n d e rw o rld ; he is tooth
less, w ears a ja g u a r headdress, and usually
carries a p addle. T h e O ld Stingray P addler
also has an aged, sagging face, and a p e rfo r
ato r, e ith e r bone o r stingray spine, pierces
the septum o f his nose. B oth P addlers w ear
the kno tted w aist o rn am en t o f C l o f the
P A L E N Q U E T R IA D .

A ccording to M a y a h ieroglyphic texts, the


Paddlers are created or born w hen a M a y a
king lets B L O O D . In scenes o f B L O O D L E T T IN G ,

129

PALENQUE TRIAD

they freq u e n tly occur in sw irls o f clouds


created w hen blood is le t on PAPER and then
set afire. T h e ir presence is m ost lik e ly to be
invoked on period ending dates.
W h en they paddle th e ir canoe, the P addlers are o ften ushering the M A IZ E C O D to his
next engagem ent. T h e canoe its e lf m ay have
a relationship w ith bowls used fo r SACRmcE
and offerings, ap p ro p riate fo r e ith e r MAIZE or
blood.
P ainal

s e e H u r r z iL O P O C H T L i

P alenque T ria d Based on h ieroglyphic texts


a t Palenque, H e in ric h B e rlin id e n tifie d a
trio o f gods in 1963. O ne o f the striking
characteristics o f these gods is th a t a ll three
appear a t other M a y a cities in d iv id u a lly and
over a long period o f tim e, b u t only a t
P alenque do they occur as a hieroglyphic
tria d . K now n as G I, G II, and G U I, for Gods
1, 2, and 3, they function as special patron
deities for P alenque.
T h e three births w ere not a ctu ally recorded
u n til C han B ahlum (reigned AD 6 8 4 -7 0 2 )
b u ilt a group o f tem ples know n as the G roup
o f the Cross a t the end o f the 7th c., b u t the
T ria d was re fe rre d to by most Palenque kings,
from Pacal onw ard (ru led AD 6 1 5 -6 8 3 ), and
offerings w ere m ade to them . O n the G roup
o f the Cross, each In itia l Series text begins
w ith a d ate calculated 3000 to 4000 years
before it was inscribed. T h e b irth o f G I is
recorded in the T em p le o f the Cross, G II in
the T e m p le o f the F o lia te d Cross, and G U I
in the T em p le o f the Sun. I t m ight even be
best to consider them trip lets for, according
to the texts, these gods w e re a ll bom in 2360
Be over a three -w ee k period. Each b irth is
accom panied by an 819-day D iv iN A T iO N , and an
ancestral goddess is nam ed as th e ir collective
m other. G I is the first born, follow ed four
days la te r by G U I, and then 14 days la te r by
G II.
Since B erlin 's id en tificatio n o f the T ria d in
1963, G I's id e n tity has been scram bled w ith
th at o f CHAC - whose zoom orphic form , some
tim es called the R ain Beast, shares character
istics w ith G I - and the relationship b etw een
the tw o o f them has not been sorted out
satisfactorily. G I's M a y a nam e rem ains
unknow n; h iero g lyp h ically he is represented
by his ow n distinctive head, w hereas C hac's
nam e, som etim es ren dered C hac-xib-chac, is
w e ll know n. G I's

B IR T H

is the m ost confused,

for he is nam ed as both fa th e r (b o m in 3122

The Paddler Cods at fore and aft of a canoe


containing the Tonsured Maize God and animal
passengers (complete canoe shown together with
two details); incised bone, Burial 116, Tikal, Late
Classic Maya.

G!!

The Palenque Triad, gods GI, GII, and G ill

G!t)

136

PALMA
Be) and son (b o m in 2360

B e)

on th e T e m p le

his head has no anth ro p o m o rp hic fo rm , his

o f the Cross, possibly because th e sam e nam e

body, w ith th e exception o f th e serpent leg,

was h eld in tw o generations.


W h ereas C has a m a tu re ,

anth ro p o

is hu m an . H is foreh ead is usually punctured


b y an axe o r sm oking tube o r M!RHOR. In one

m orphic face, th e anth ro p o m o rp hic C hac is

p a rtic u la rly unusual re p resen tatio n on the

young. G Is

piers

squared eye has a c u rl th a t

turns in w a rd from th e e x te rio r c o m er; his

of

th e

T e m p le

of

Inscriptions

at

P alen q u e, an a d u lt carries a large b u t in fa n tile

"b a rb e ls " o r Bsh 6ns a re a t th e c o m er o f the

G II as i f it w e re a hum an c h ild ; w ith the

m outh, and his only tooth m ay be a p ro m in e n t

a d u lt p ro b ab ly in ten d e d to rep resen t C han

SHARK tooth. L ik e C hac, h e w ears la rg e spon-

B ahlum

dylus (spiny oyster) shells as e ar Hares. U n lik e

shows the ru lin g fa m ily to he d iv in e in th e ir

h im s elf, such a stucco ren d erin g

C hac, he fre q u e n tly w ears the sam e q u a d ri


p a rtite headdress w orn by th e re a r head

ow n life tim e .
On M aya

o f the BiCEPHALic MONSTER: a stingray spine,

q u e n tly , u su ally in passive ra th e r than active

ceram ics,

G II

appears

fre

spondylus shell, and crossed bands inside a

situations, and ra re ly in n a rra tiv e . O n some

cache vessel, im agery th a t m ay be conHated

codex-style pots, his serp ent leg is a visiON

w ith a heron w hen w orn by G I. H is im age,

SERPENT. C IT s nam e glyph is a com m on com

usually w ith the q u a d rip a rtite headdress, is

p o n en t o f ru le rs ' nam es. H e can sym bolize

one o f the most com m on on E a rly Classic

LIGHTNING, and his re p res en tatio n overlaps

censers from the P etn, and he was a p rin cip al

w ith th a t o f C hac, lin k in g RAIN and lig h tn in g .

re cip ien t o f M a y a oTerings. M a y a kings a t


Copn

and

T ik a !

w e re

rendered

in

the

costum e o f G l. H e ra rely appears as an actor


on M a y a polychrom e vessels.
G II is one m ore nam e for the M a y a d eity
also know n as God K in the Schellhas system
(see S C H E L LH A S C O D S ) and the M A N IK IN SCEPTER.
T his is a very an cien t being, and m ay be seen
on A b aj T a k a lik Stela 5, a m onum ent dating
to the early second century A D . C a lle d Bolon
D zacab a t the tim e o f the C onquest, G od K
was probably know n as K au il du rin g the
Classic era, and as T o h il am ong the Post
classic Q uich. H is nam es suggest bounty
and abundance (Bolon D zacab means nine
generations; K a u il, abundance; T o h il, very
roughly, storm ), and the T e m p le o f the F o li
ated Cross, w h ere his b irth is recorded,
depicts abundant MAIZE rising up fro m a
personiHed kern el. C han B ahlum , w ho has
a ttire d h im s elf as the M A IZ E C O D , stands on a
personiHed m ountain in the T e m p le o f the
F o lia te d Cross, in whose eyes are glyphs th a t
read L%z naV, o r H ill o f M a ize , probably
analogous to the Sustenance M o u n ta in w h ere
Q U E T Z A L C O A T L sought the source o f m aize. G II
h im self does not appear on the T a b le t o f the
F o liated Cross, although he is held in the hands
o f C han B ahlum on the T a b le t o f the Sun.
In his various form s, as the M a n ik in Scepter
or an elongated staff, em erging fro m a C E RE
M O N IA L BAR, or as a h an d -h eld object, G II is
usually shown to be m uch sm aller than
hum ans. H is zoom orphic head has a long
snout, p robably SERPENT in o rig in , and one o f
his legs g en erally turns in to a snake. A lthough

G U I is p ro b ab ly the SUN god, KiNiCH AHAU


(lo rd sun), b u t G U I is th e m ost obscure
m em b er o f the P alen qu e T ria d . P ro b ab ly to
be idendH ed w ith the G od o f N u m b e r 4,
G U I appears as the head th a t fram es the
e arth b an d on the base o f the T a b le t o f
the Sun. T h e c en tral im age o f th a t p an el,
h o w ever, is the Jaguar C od o f the U n d e r
w o rld (^ee JAGUAR cops), the SUN a t NIGHT and
a p rin c ip al Classic M a y a im age o f w a rfa re .
T h e relad o n ship o f G U I to the Jaguar G od
o f the UNDERWORLD is not clea r, b u t C I I I
m ay encompass both d iu rn a l and no ctu rn al
aspects o f the sun.
B orn only fo u r days a p a rt, G I and G U I
have som edm es been idendH ed w ith the
H e ro T w in s o f the POPOL vuH. These pairings
occur p a rd c u la rly on codex-style vessels o f the
8th c., and suggest the a lte rn a d n g SACRIFICES
p erfo rm ed by th e H e ro T w in s . T h e re is every
reason, h o w ever, to disdnguish G I and G U I,
as w e ll as C hac and th e Jaguar B aby, fro m the
H e ro T w in s. P a ire d opposidons (Fee DUALITY),
TWINS, and brothers, h o w ever, a re a ll com m on
in M a y a and M ex ica n m ythology, and struc
tu ra l p arallels w ith th e H e ro T w in s m ay w e ll
be expected.
p alm a T h e ta ll, p alm ate stone called the
paAna is one o f several standard elem ents o f
BALLCAME e qu ipm en t th a t survive in stone
fo rm , p ro b ab ly as trophies. PaAnaF w ere w orn
a t the fro n t o f the body and inserted in to the
YOKE. M a n y take th e form s o f hum an arm s
and hands, standing b allp layers, or fa n -ta ile d
birds. I f a ctu ally w o rn a t the w aist, some

131

PARROTS AND MACAWS


A

examples w ould block the vision o f the p la ye r.


U n like other item s o f b allg am e equ ip m en t,
few pa/m as have been recovered aw ay from
the G u lf Coast, b u t they a re dep icted in the
sculpture a t C hichen Itz and C o tzu m a lhuapa.

- Q

paper T h e peoples o f ancien t M esoam erica


prepared p ap er from the pounded in n e r bark
o f trees, p a rtic u la rly species o f strangler figs,
such as FYcns co& ni/o/ia and jFYcus padi/o/za.
Paper was probably present in M esoam erica
by the E a rly F o rm a tiv e p erio d . M o n u m e n t
52 from the O lm ec site o f San Lorenzo
portrays a figure w earin g e ar pennants o f
folded paper. D u rin g the Protoclassic period,
people a ll over M esoam erica used stone b arkbeaters to m anufacture p ap er, and these
stone tools m ay have succeeded w ooden b arkbeaters, lik e those o f Southeast Asia and
O ceania. A lthough it has been suggested th a t
the M esoam erican m ode o f p ap er m anufac
ture m ay have orig in ated in Southeast A sia,
this paper technology m ay w e ll have been an
ind epen d en t N e w W o rld innovation.
In ancient and contem porary M esoam er
ica, supplicants splash and daub pap er strips
w ith B L O O D , copa/, RUBBER, or other liquid
substances and then burn them as sacrificial
offerings. I t is perhaps because the RAIN and
LIGHTNING gods often receive these offerings
th at they commonly w ea r paper ornaments.
Paper was also w id ely used as an offering to
the dead. In the iconography o f both C e ntral
M exico and the M a y a region, paper often
appears in DEATH-related scenes. MiCTLANTE
c u H T L i , the skeletal death god o f C e ntral
M exico, is usually depicted w earing a pointed
cap and other apparel fashioned from paper.
In addition to its uses as offerings and
ritu a l clothing, paper served as an im p o rtan t
m a te ria l fo r screenfold books. T h e M a y a
seem to have especially favored paper screenfold codices (see coDEx) and a ll fou r o f the
know n Prehispanic M a y a codices w ere
fashioned
from
pounded
bark
paper.
A lthough the surviving Prehispanic m anu
scripts o f the M ixtees and peoples o f C e n tra l
M exico are m ade o f DEER h id e ra th e r than
paper, codices o f paper w e re p robably also
com m on. N ahuatl-speakers called d iv in ato ry
books fan a/am af/, a w ord containing the term
^ fo r p ap er, am af/.
parrots and m acaws B oth parrots (A m azona
sp.) and the re la te d la rg e r m acaws (A ra ra

The Palenque Triad. (Right) GI, detail from


Early Classic carved vessel. (Left) GII, or Cod K,
detail from Abaj Takalik Stela 5, Protoclassic
Maya.

Often elaborately carved, stone palmas can also


display a subtle elegance of form; from Classic
Veracruz.

132

PATOLLI
sp.) w e re m uch esteem ed fo r th e ir b rillia n t

M eso am erica, and o ften a p p e a r a t Classic

and m u ltih u e d p lu m ag e. Perhaps the m ost

and Postclassic sites o f both h ighland M exico

im p o rta n t o f these b irds o f th e p a rro t fa m ily

and th e M a y a region. A p a to lli course, along

w e re th e lo n g -ta ile d m acaw s, especially the

w ith p ro b ab le stick, b ean , and bone dice, is

scarlet m acaw (A ra m acao) and th e m ilita ry

illu s tra te d on page 20 o f th e M ix te e Codex

m acaw (A ra /n r/ifa rts ). In M eso am erican a rt,

Vindobonensis. In th e C e n tra l M ex ica n cod

m acaw s can o ften be id e n tifie d not only by

ices, this p a to lli p a tte rn also occurs in scenes

th e ir thick beak and long ta il, b u t also by a

illu s tra tin g the TRECENA I C u a u h tli, dedicated

beaded rin g en circlin g th e eye. B irds o f the

to th e goddess xocHiQUETZAL. T h e m odern

p a rro t fa m ily a re com m only d ep icted in the

Tarascans o f'M ic h o a c n s till use th e cross

Protoclassic TOMB a rt o f W e s t M ex ico , and it

and square p a to lli course; the T a rah u m ara

is p ro b ab le th a t m any o f these birds are

o f C h ih u ah u a and P ueblo peoples o f the

tro pical m acaw s th a t w e re trad ed in to this

A m erica n Southw est also p lay a m o d em form

region. A t the g re a t E a rly Postclassic site o f

o f the gam e.
In a n c ie n t M eso am erica, p a to lli is best

Casas G randes, C h ih u ah u a, m ilita ry m acaw s


(A ra m iZ/ar/s) w e re raised in specially p re

docum ented fo r the A ztecs. H e re the course

p ared pens.

w as o fte n p a in te d on MATS and com m only

ancient M eso am erica, m acaws w e re

took th e fo rm o f a cross w ith o u t the encircling

often id e n tifie d w ith FtRE. T h e Aztecs called

square. P layers g am bled on the p a to lli gam e

m acaw

and, a t tim es, people even sold them selves

In

ta il

feathers

cueza/in,

signifying

' fla m e ." In the M a y a D resden and M a d rid

in to slavery as a fin a l d esp erate w a g er. T h e

codices, m acaws hold flam ing torches. F ra y

p atro n o f this gam e w as

D iego dc L an d a records th a t the m ost massive


structure a t the site o f Iza m a l, Yucatn, was

m ost im p o rta n t o f the AHUiATETEO gods o f

dedicated to K inich K akm o, or "S u n -fad ed


F ire M a c a w ," a fiery e n tity th a t descended
a t noon to burn and consum e sacrificial o ffe r
ings. T h e Q uich M a y a called the m acaw
C aquix, m eaning " fie ry fe a th e r." In the POPOL
v u H , the H e ro T w in s tric k the gods o f DEATH
by placing m acaw feathers on the tips o f th e ir
u n lit cigars to suggest burning em bers. T h e
m onster b ird slain by the H e ro T w in s was
v u c u B C A Q u ix , or 7 M a c a w . H o w e v e r, although
this im p o rtan t episode is w id e ly depicted in
Classic M a y a a rt, the m onster b ird in this
instance bears no d ire c t resem blance to a
m acaw .
p a to lli P a to lli is a M esoam erican gam e o f
chance in w hich gam e piece m arkers m ove
through a set course depending upon the ro le
o f the dice, m uch lik e a m odern board gam e.
T h e 19th c. anthropologist E d w ard B. T y lo r
noted th a t p a to lli is m arked ly sim ilar to the
In d ia n parchesi, and suggested th a t p a to lli
o rig in ated in A sia. H o w ev er, although the
sim ilarities are indeed striking, th e re is no
evidence th a t p a to lli is h istorically re late d to
parchesi.
Q u ite com m only, the p a to lli gam e course
resem bles a cross enclosed w ith in a square.
T h e y are not discrete units, h o w ever, b u t are
in terw o ven in to a single contiguous course.
C arv ed onto Hat stones or p laster Aoors,
p a to lli designs o f this form are w idespread in

M A C U iL X O C H iT L ,

the

excess. A ccording to D ie g o D u ra n , O m eto ch tli, a n o th er bein g o f vice and excess and


god o f the in to xicatin g P U L Q U E , also presided
over the p a to lli gam e. Thus, as in W e s te rn
society, d rin k in g and g am blin g w e re closely
re la te d am ong the a n cien t A ztecs.
P au ah tu n A n cie n t M eso am erican peoples
w id e ly b eliev ed th a t th e cosmic balance o f
the w o rld rested on th e shoulders o f fo u r
gods situ ated a t the fo u r q u arters. F o r the
an cien t M a y a , this SKYBEARER was g lyp h ically
nam ed as P auahtun. H e corresponds to the
w o rld D IR E C T IO N S , and appears in both single
and q u a d rip a rtite fo rm . Iro n ic a lly , although
he bears th e w e ig h ty office o f supporting the
s x Y , he is fre q u e n tly p o rtray ed as a d ru n ken
and lecherous old m an, h ard ly a paragon o f
security and resp o n sibility. A long w ith his
d istinctive n etted cloth headdress, he often
appears w ith in a conch or tortoise shell. A t
tim es, he w ears a spider's w e b ra th e r than
the conch or carapace. As w e ll as being a
skybearer, P auahtun seems to be a god o f
th u n d e r, M O U N T A IN S , and the in te rio r o f the
E A R T H , m uch lik e the m odern M a m god o f
hig h lan d G u atem ala. In th e Postclassic codi
ces, he appears as C o d N in th e Schellhas
system o f d e ity classification. See a/so L iC H T N IN C A N D T H U N D E R ; S C H E L L H A S GO DS.

peccary Peccaries, sm elly, blunt-snouted


w ild pigs, g en erally roam th e tropical rain

133

PILGRIMAGE

forest o f M esoam erica in sm all herds; they


are om nivores w ith a keen sense o f sm ell and
hearing. T w o peccary species a re n a tiv e to
M esoam erica: the co llared (Tayassu angu/afus) and the w h ite -lip p e d (7ayassu pecar?).
Peccaries w ere o f in tere st m a in ly to the
M a y a insofar as religious iconography is con
cerned. A num ber o f M a y a nobles included
the peccary in th e ir nam es. In the th ree
b rig h t STARS th a t m odern skyw atchers read as
the b e lt o f O rio n , the M a y a saw m ating
peccaries. In some exam ples, the M a y a god
rrzAMNA rides the peccary. Snout-dow n pec
cary heads form the legs o f E a rly Classic
quadrupod bowls and m ay b ea r cahan curls,
or EARTH signs, perhaps in some referen ce to
the p illars o f the cosmos. M a y a artists m ay
have used sharp peccary tusks to carve stone
m onum ents.
According to one 19th c. account, the
peccary was also the e arth god o f the H u ich o l.
pilgrim age C e rta in MOUNTAINS, shrines, and
cities becam e objects o f M esoam erican
religious pilgrim ages. M otecuhzom a I I h im
self rep u ted ly w alked to TEOTMUACAN regu
la rly to w orship there. As the setting for
the creation o f the fifth sun (see FIVE s u N s ) ,
T eotihuacan held g reat p o w er for the Aztecs,
and they le ft testim ony o f th e ir visits there
in the form o f broken A ztec p o ttery. T h ey
trea te d T u la , H id alg o, as a site o f pilgrim age
too, b u t they also rem oved m any o f its visible
sculp tures and hauled them back to Tenochtitla n . As the trad itio n a l refuge o f QUETZAL
COATL, C h olu la was also an im p o rtan t p ilg rim
age destination.
A fte r the Zapotees abandoned M o n te
A lb an , the M ixtees treated the m ountain w ith
reverence and as a place o f pilgrim age. T h ey
honored it by placing th e ir ow n dead in
ancient Zapotee TOMBS (w hich they first
em p tied and presum ably desecrated).
Pilgrim ages w ere c arried out to sanctify
ru lership, to seek advice, and to change
one's fo rtu n e. A M ix te e princess, 6 M o n key,
jo u rn eyed w ith the w e ll-kn o w n lord 10 W in d
to seek the advice o f 9 Grass, a priestess or
goddess w ho guarded an im p o rtan t oracle,

Parrots and macaws: macaw ballcourt marker,


Xochicalco, Morelos, Late Classic period. Macaw
head ballcourt markers are also known for Late
Classic Copn, and it appears that the macaw
had a special association with the ballgame.

Macuilxochitl presiding over a patolli game,


Codex Magliabechiano, 16th c. Aztec.

probably a t C halcatongo.
L ittle is know n o f Classic M a y a p ilg rim
ages, although there is evidence fo r royal
visits. A t the tim e o f the Spanish Conquest,
L an d a noted th a t 'th e y held C ozum el and the
w e ll o f C hichen Itz a in the sam e ven eratio n as
w e have fo r pilgrim ages to Jerusalem and

Two Pauahtun skybearers, detail from a carved


bench, Copn, Late Classic Maya.

134

POPOL VUH
Rom e, and so th ey used to go to visit these
places and to o ffe r presents th e re , especially

been tran slated m any tim es and In to m any


languages.

to C o zum el, as w e do to holy places; and if

T h e P o p o / Vuh has essentially th re e parts:

they d id not go them selves, th e y alw ays sent

6rst, th e creatio n o f the EARTH and its Brat

th e ir offerings, and those w ho w e n t th e re

in h a b ita n ts ; second, th e story o f the H ero

w e re in the h a b it o f e n te rin g th e abandoned

T w in s and th e ir foreb ears; and th ird , the

tem ples also, as they passed by th em , to o ffe r

leg en d ary h istory o f the founding o f the

prayers th e re and to b u rn c o p a l/'

Q u ich dynasties, con tin u in g up to the years

In the Postclassic p erio d , b eginning w ith


the fa ll o f Classic cities, the Sacred CENOTE
a t C hichen

Itz

was the m ost im p o rta n t

fo llo w in g the Spanish C onquest. T h e m id d le


section o f th e P o p o / Vuh, tre a tin g not only o f
the H e ro T w in s b u t also o f th e ir fa th e r, uuN
is the m ost an c ie n t, app earin g in a rt

p ilg rim ag e d estin atio n fo r the M a y a , and

HUNAHPU,

so it rem ained u n til 1539. A ltho u g h L an d a

from L a te F o rm a tiv e tim es o n w ard . From

considered C ozum el the g re a te r p ilg rim ag e

th a t p o in t on, M a y a

d estin atio n , it was p ro b ab ly in fa c t th e lesser.

em u lated th e H e ro T w in s and th e ir exploits.

kings seem to have

txcHEL's c u lt was celeb rated th e re , as it was

T h e tales a re not re la te d in a lin e a r fashion

on the neighboring island, Is la M u je re s , and

and presum e a fa m ilia rity w ith the characters

m any pilgrim s to these islands w e re w om en


w ho sought fe rtility and guidance from the

on th e p a rt o f the audience.
U n lik e the c reatio n a t th e beg inn ing o f the

goddess. A ccording to L an d a , p ilgrim s cam e

B ib le , the M a y a c reatio n in the P o p o / Vuh

from g reat distances - som etim es from as fa r

takes p lace in g re a t q u ie t. C u g u m a tz, the

aw ay as the Putun M a y a region, or w h a t is

Q uich

the m odern M exican state o f Tabasco.

H u ru ca n , p ro b ab ly to be id e n tifie d w ith Town./

Religious pilgrim ages rem ain im p o rtan t in


M exico and G u atem ala today, based on p rac
tices coincident both from the past in the N e w
W o rld and from E urope. T h e shrine o f the
V irg in o f G u adalupe a t the h ill o f Tepeyac,
the most im p o rtan t p ilgrim age destination for
M exican C atholics today, was once the site
o f w orship to T o n an tzin , a C e n tra l M exican
goddess re late d to Toci. C h alm a, a tow n once
know n fo r its ancient CAVE shrine, now houses
w ith in its C ath o lic church a black C h rist
claim ed to w o rk m iracles, and an adjacent
sacred a h u e h u e f/ tree receives m odern o ffe r
ings from the pilgrim s w ho Rock to the tow n.

C od K (see S C H E L L H A S coos), first shape the


earth and its fea tu re s, and then raise the SKY

Popol V uh T h e most im p o rtan t surviving


sacred book o f the Q uiche M a y a is called the
P opo/ Vuh, or "council book." As the D ennis
T ed lock tran slatio n o f the text tells us, "th e re
is the o rig in al book and ancien t w ritin g , b u t
he w ho reads and ponders it hides his fa c e ,"
so e a rly in the era o f C h ris tia n ity , some tim e
in the m id -16 th c., a Q uiche noblem an sat
dow n w ith w h a t m ust have been a h ie ro
glyphic book and w ro te a transcription in
the Rom an alp h ab et. A t the beginning o f
the 18th c., a Q uich-speaking Spanish fria r,
Francisco X im en ez, learn ed o f the m anuscript
in Chichicastenango. H e copied the Q uiche
text and w ro te a p a ra lle l Spanish text:
his is the e arliest surviving version o f the
P o p o / VuA, and it is preserved today in the
N e w b e rry L ib ra ry in C hicago. T h e book has

tran slatio n

of

Q UETZALCO ATL,

and

overhead. T h e SUN does no t rise u n til m uch


la te r. T h e gods then p o p ulated the e a rth w ith
a ll its anim als, b u t w h en th e y fou n d th a t the
anim als w e re u n ab le to speak and praise th e ir
m akers, they condem ned them fo re v e r to
being the food o f h ig h er beings.
In a second a tte m p t to crea te a being th a t
w ould praise its m akers, th e gods shaped a
hum an o f m ud, b u t it dissolved in fro n t o f
them . F o r a th ird a tte m p t, H u ru c a n and
C u gu m atz called on ancestral d ivin ers, X p iacoc and Xm ucane, to g en e rate m an kin d .
This tim e hum ans w e re carved o f w ood, and
although they q u ickly p o p ulated the e a rth ,
they forgot th e ir m akers and w e re destroyed
by the gods, w ho sent various destructions
fro m the sky and w ho tu rn e d the pots, the
griddles, th e g rin d in g stones, and even the
DOGS, against the people o f w ood.
A fte r this destruction, the P o p o / Vuh begins
to re la te stories o f the H e ro T w in s , H u nah p u
and X b alanq u e. D em igods, th e H e ro T w in s
d e fe a t the false sun and vanquish the gods
o f the X ib a lb a , o r UNDERWORLD, setting the
stage fo r the gen eratio n o f tru e hum ans la te r
in th e P opo/ Vuh.
H u n ah p u and X b alan q u e took on vucuB
CAQUD( (7 M a c a w ), w ho had set h im s e lf up as
a false sun w ith the support o f his sons
Z ip acn a and C abracan. G re a t blow gunners,
the T w in s took th e ir weapons and struck the

135

POPOL VUH

bejew eled tee th o f V ucub C aq u ix, and then


tricked him into accepting ground corn as the
replacem ent. U n ab le to e a t and d ep rived o f
the jew els th a t gave him his false radiance,
Vucub C aquix was d efe ated , and his sons
w ere defeated th e re a fte r.
T h e story then Bashes back to the g en er
ation o f H u n H u nah p u and his b ro th e r Vucub
H u nah p u , such s k illfu l b allp layers (see
BALLGAME) th a t th e ir constant p lay disturbed
the lords o f X ib a lb a , w ho com m anded th a t
they com e to X ib a lb a for a contest. M essenger
OWLS from X ib a lb a guided the brothers into
the U n d e rw o rld , w h e re they fa ile d one test
a fte r another. T h e day a fte r they a rriv e d ,
they w ere sacrihced by the lords o f X ib a lb a
and b u rie d in the b allco u rt, w ith the exception
o f the head o f H u n H u n a h p u , w hich was
stuck in a calabash tree , as if it w e re a
skullrack, or TZOMPANTLi.
W h en X q u ic, a young X ib a lb a goddess,
le arn e d o f the strange fru it o f this tre e , she
visited it, and H u n H unahpu's head spat in to
h er hand, im p reg n atin g h er w ith w h a t w ould
be H u nah p u and X balanque. W h en h er con
d itio n becam e ap p aren t, she was d riven out of
X ib alb a and w e n t to liv e w ith H u n H unahpu's
m other, w ho tested h er before allo w in g h er
to stay and d e liv e r the T w in s. H u n H unahpu
had a lread y fath ered another p a ir o f tw ins,
H u n B atz and H u n C huen, g re at artists and
m usicians, w ho resented, abused, and took
advantage o f th e ir baby brothers. B u t w hen
they g rew old enough, the H e ro T w in s out
sm arted th e ir brothers and lu red them into
a tre e , w h ere, unable to get dow n, they
becam e MONKEYS.
T h e ir grandm other h id th e ir fath er's
ballgam e equ ipm en t from the H ero T w in s,
bu t they tricked her and becam e even m ore
p ro ficien t ballplayers than th e ir fa th e r and
uncle. Once again, the lords o f X ib alb a sum
m oned the ballplayers to the U n d e rw o rld ,
b u t the H e ro T w in s w ere not defeated by
the tests and traps set fo r them . In stead , the
gods fe ll in to the T w in s ' traps. T h e y used a
m osquito to b ite each god in sequence, and
so the gods revealed th e ir nam es, p a rt o f
th e ir d efe at. Each day, the H e ro T w in s played
the X ib a lb a lords on the b allco u rt; each n ight,
they w ere sent to a d iffe re n t house to be
tested. W h en told to keep th e ir cigars lit for
a n ight, they com plied by using fireflies on
the ends; w hen told to p ro vid e cut FLOWERS,
the T w in s sum m oned c u tter ants to cut the
Rowers o f the X ib a lb a . W h en sent to the C old

Head of Hun Hunahpu, father of the Popol Vuh


Hero Twins, placed in a fruit-laden tree, detail
from a Late Classic Maya vase. Although the
Popol Vuh states that the head of Hun Hunahpu
was placed in a gourd tree, this image clearly
represents a cacao tree. A cacao pod with human
features can be seen in an upper branch, which
probably refers to the transformation of Hun
Hunahpu's head into the fruit.

A monkey scribe dancing with a mirror, detail


from a Late Classic Maya vase. The monkey
scribes appearing in Classic Maya iconography
are now known to be early forms of Hun Batz
and Hun Chuen of the Popol Vuh. Although
widely recognized to be gods of the scribal arts,
Hun Batz and Hun Chuen were also identified
with music and dance.

116

PRIESTS
H ouse, the T w in s d rove th e cold a w a y ; w h en

16th c. ee aA?o CREATION ACCOUNT*.

sent to the Jaguar H ouse, th e T w in s o ffered


the fACUARs th e Hesh o f a il o th e r anim als. In

priests T h e

th e F ire H ouse, FmE d id not consum e th e

im p o rta n t p u b lic offices in an cien t M eso am er-

p rie st h eld

one o f th e

most

T w in s . In th e B a t H ouse, h o w e ve r, although

ican society. In te rm e d ia rie s b etw e en hum ans

the T w in s slept inside th e ir blow guns, w h en

and th e su p e rn atu ral, priests w e re fu lltim e

H u n a b p u stuck his head o u t e a rly in the

specialists w ho possessed a vast am ount o f

m o rning, a k ille r BAT sliced o ff his head.

esoteric know ledge concerning such subjects

X b a la n q u e called the anim als to h e lp h im ,

as calendhcs,

W R IT IN G ,

ritu als and m ythology.

and they fashioned a n ew head fo r H u n a h p u

T y p ic a lly , priests w e re m ales culled from the

from a p u m p kin, b u t w h en th ey got to th e

e lite ranks o f society. T h e y endured a life o f

b allco u rt, the lords o f X ib a lb a in tro d uced the

p en iten ce and fasting , and ra re ly cohabited

head o f H u n a h p u as the b a ll. X b a la n q u e

w ith w o m en . A ccording to B urgoa, the Z ap o

struck the head o u t o f th e court, and a RABBIT

tees castrated the e lite ch ild ren to becom e

c u rled up and bounced aw ay as if it w e re th e

neophyte priests know n as prana. U n lik e


w ho fre q u e n tly engaged in trances

b a ll, lead in g the X ib alb an s on a w ild chase

SHAM ANS,

and g ivin g X b alan q u e tim e to restore H u n a h -

and s p irit possession, priests u sually served

pu's head. B u t the T w in s then le t them selves

in the m ore detached position o f a m e d iato r

be d e fe a te d , cooked in an oven, and th e ir

or spokesperson b etw e en hum ans and the

bones ground and tossed in to the riv e r.


F iv e days la te r the T w in s reap p eared from

was th a t o f p resentin g sacrificial offerings to

G O DS.

Thus one o f th e ir m ore im p o rta n t roles

the riv e r, first as catfish, then disguised as

the gods. H o w e v e r, the d istinctio n b etw een

w an d erin g m agicians and p erform ers. T h e

p riest and sham an w as fa r fro m fast: the

lords o f X ib a lb a sum m oned them to th e ir


court, w h e re the T w in s p erfo rm ed g re at

Z apotee high p rie s t o f M itla fo r exam ple,

feats: they danced, they sacrificed a dog and


brought him back to life , they sacrificed a

sup ern atu ral through ecstatic tran ce.


A ltho u g h priests w e re u n d o u b ted ly present

hum an and brought him back to life , and


X b alanq u e sacrificed H u nah p u and brought
him back to life . T h e lords o f X ib a lb a g rew
ecstatic a t the sight and begged to be sacri
ficed them selves. T h e T w in s obliged, o f
course, b u t did not re vive the D E A T H gods.
T h ey dug up the bodies o f H u n H unahpu and
Vucub H unahpu and revived them before w a lk
ing into the sky to reign as the sun and M O O N .
T h e fin a l and longest section o f the PopoV
Vuh begins w ith
the A N C E S TR A L C O U P L E
attem p tin g once again to m ake a c reatu re
th a t w ould praise the gods. This tim e , the
fo u r founders o f the Q uiche lineages w e re
form ed o f M A IZ E . T h e y praised th e ir m akers
and Hourished. In th e ir n ear p erfectio n , these
m en o f m aize alarm ed th e gods, w ho cu rta ile d
th e ir vision to only w h a t was nearby. A ll this
took place b efo re the tru e sun rose.
T h e fou r founders jo u rn eyed to T u la n
Z u yu a, the M O U N T A IN o f the seven CAVES, and
th e re th ey received th e gods, w hom they then
c arried hom e in B U N D LE S on th e ir backs. B alam
Q u itze received T O H iL , w ho gave hum ans fire ,
b u t only a fte r HUMAN SACRIFICE to h im had
begun. A t last the tru e sun rose in the east.
T h e P o p o / Vuh closes by listing the lineage
heads in each g eneration, 14 fro m B alam
Q u itze to his descendants in the m iddle o f the

the U ija T ao , w o u ld com m unicate w ith the

in F o rm a tiv e and C lassic M eso am erica, it is


d iffic u lt to id e n tify th e ir offices in th e ancien t
w ritin g and a rt, even in the n a tu ra lis tic a rt
and d e ta ile d w ritin g o f the M a y a . As it
c u rre n tly stands, th e re is no know n glyph or
read in g fo r the office o f p rie s t in an cien t
M a y a script. N onetheless, it is q u ite possible
th a t priests, religious experts fu lly versed in
cou rtly esoteric know ledge, crea te d a g re a t
d eal o f the fin e e lite a rt.
Priests are w e ll docum ented fo r th e L a te
Postclassic perio d in d e ta ile d e a rly C o lo n ial
accounts. A m ong th e A ztecs and o th er
peoples o f C e n tra l M exico , as w e ll as am ong
the M ixtees o f O axaca and the Tarascans o f
M ichoacn, priests com m only w o re gourds
fille d w ith TO B A C C O upon th e ir backs. T o d ay,
th e tobacco gourd is s till an im p o rta n t acces
sory o f the H u ich o l m a ra a A a m e sham an
p riest. A long w ith the tobacco gourd, A ztec
priests usually w o re a w h ite JHcoJVi ja c k e t and
a kno tted cotton INCENSE bag. In a d d itio n , the
A ztec p rie st is o fte n rep resen ted w ith B LO O D
in the a rea o f his tem ples, in d icatin g his role
as p e n ite n tia l b lo o d le tter. T h e ethnohistorical
accounts reveal th a t am ong the A ztecs, Zapo
tees, Tarascans, and Yucatec M a y a , com plex
hierarchies o f p riestly offices specified p articu
la r roles and responsibilities.

137

PRINCIPAL BIRD DEIT1

In Postclassic M esoam erica, p artic u la r gods


w ere id en tified w ith the office o f priest. F o r
the Aztecs, QUETZALCOATL w as the param ount
god of priests, and the ca/m ecac school o f noble
youths and neophyte priests was dedicated to
him . In addition, the tw o highest priests o f
the Aztecs bore the title o f Q uetzalcoatl.
Among the M ixtees, the d e ity know n as 2 Dog
appears as an aged priest w earin g a prom inent
tobacco gourd upon his back. F o r the Post
classic Yuca tec M a y a , rrzAMNA freq u e n tly
serves as a priest, com plete w ith

priestly

accoutrem ents as m entioned by the early


C olonial chroniclers. H o w e v e r, the Yucatec
priests w ere also id e n tifie d w ith the SUN, and
bore the title o f A h K in , or H e o f the Sun.
Possibly, this is a referen ce to the aspect
o f Itza m n a know n as KiNiCH AHAU Itza m n a ,
m eaning "sun-faced lord Itz a m n a ."
p rim o rd ial couple see ANCESTRAL COUPLE
P rin cip al B ird D e ity A t the beginning o f
M a y a c iv iliza tio n , one o f the first deities to
take consistent, public form is the P rin cip al
B ird D e ity , a g reat avian creatu re th a t m ay
be based on the king v u ltu re . In a ll likelih o o d ,
this god is to be id en tih ed w ith vucuB C A Q U ix
o f the POPOLvuH, a b ird god w ho sets h im self
up as a false suN b efore the DAWN o f tim e. In
the P opo/ Vuh, the H ero T w in s shoot dow n
Vucub C aquix w ith blow guns, and his dem ise
sets the stage for the rising o f the tru e sun at
the daw n o f the era o f the c u rren t race
o f h u m an ity. T h e M a y a did not v ie w the
P rin cip al B ird as an un m itig ated evil pow er,
h ow ever, and p a rtic u la rly in early represen
tations, the P rin cip al B ird is presented in a
positive lig h t. In fact, there m ay w e ll have
been a sh ift in the perception o f this god over
tim e.
V e ry early versions o f the P rin cip al B ird
D e ity form ed huge stucco sculptures on the
exteriors o f pyram ids a t C erros and N akb e,
perhaps by as early as 300 B e . E a rly portrayals
em phasize a long, d o w n w ard -cu rving beak
and wings bordered by serpent faces.
A lthough the P rin cip al B ird is considered a
M a y a d eity , the p o w e rfu l lord on L a M o ja rra
Stela 1, from outside the M a y a area, w ears
a large head o f the P rin cip al B ird as his
headdress and a sm aller version as his pec
to ral. E a rly M a y a kings a t K am in alju y u also
adopted the P rin cip al B ird as an im p o rtan t
sym bol o f p ow er. L a te r lords ra re ly include
the P rin cip al B ird D e ity in th e ir reg alia.

An Aztec priest with his tobacco gourd, copa/


incense pouch, and long-handled censer, Codex
Mendoza, 16th c.

The Principal Bird Deity was one of the major


gods of the Protoclassic Maya; in many scenes,
such as the one here, the bird is represented
holding a snake in its mouth, possibly a reference
to storms and lightning; El Mirador Stela 2,
Guatemala, Protoclassic Maya.

El Ave de Pico Ancho, the Zapotee form of the


Maya Principal Bird Deity, is common in Proto
classic and Classic period Zapotee iconography;
detail from a Classic Zapotee urn, Oaxaca.

D u rin g th e Classic period, th e Principa!


Bird often bears aspects o f rrzAMNA. A lthough
the relationship b etw ee n th e tw o gods is not
d e a r , the Principa! B ird m ay be the

UAY,

or

Panuco. T h e ancien t M a y a o f southeastern


M eso am erica p ro b ab ly also had pulque In a
n u m b er o f C o lo n ial M a y a n d iction aries, form s
o f the term c / or cA/ a re glossed as m aguey

spirit com panion, o f Itza m n a .


O n p a in te d p o tte ry , the P rin c ip a l B ird

and p u lq u e. In C lassic M a y a vessel scenes of

D e ity appears w ith th e H e ro T w in s in scenes

glyph d en o tin g the p h o netic valu e c / or c/u.

c!ose!y p a ra lle lin g th e m u c h -la te r tex t o f the

M o re o v e r, recen t excavations have revealed

d rin k in g , pots a re fre q u e n tly lab eled w ith a

P o p o / Huh. T h e m onster b ird o f the P o p o /

th a t m aguey w as c u ltiv a te d in Classic tim es

Huh also appears on tw o stelae fro m Iza p a .

a t the site o f C e r n , E l S alvador. 5 ee a/so

T h e P rin cip al B ird D e ity like w is e appears

M A Y A H U E L ; PU LQ U E CODS.

in ancien t Zap o tee a rt, w h e re it has been


lab eled E / A v e d e P ico A ncho, or ' the b ird
w ith the broad b e a k ." T h e Z ap o tee m o tif

p u lq u e gods T h e Rrst know n personiRcation


o f PULQUE in M eso am erica appears a t the

know n as the Planees d e CYe/o, or "jaws o f

Classic site o f TEOTiHUACAN. H e re a n u m b er o f

h e a ve n ," is form ed by tw o proR le faces o f

scenes d ep ict a m asked in d iv id u a l w ith w h ite

this b ird jo in e d a t the eye. A ltho u g h the

gouts o f m ilk y p u lq u e. In one instance, the

Zapotee e n tity is v irtu a lly id e n tic a l in form

head o f this Rgure is surrounded by the long

to the M a y a one it is not know n w h e th e r

p o in ted leaves, o r pencas, o f the MAGUEY p la n t.

the P rin cip al B ird D e ity p layed the sam e

A m ong th e Postclassic M ixtees, the p ulque

m ythological role am ong the Zapotees. See

deities ap p e ar to have been distinguished from

a h o V U C U B C A Q U !X .

the goddess o f m aguey: thus w h ile m aguey is


represented by the goddess 11 S erpent, pulque

pulque A n alcoholic beverage d erive d from


the ferm en ted sap o f the MAGUEY (A g a ve sp.),
pulque played an im p o rtan t role in p ublic
cerem onies and festivities. T h e peoples o f
C en tra! M exico fre q u e n tly fortiR ed the re la
tive ly m ild pulque w ith certain roots to
increase its potency.
Pulque was a v itam in -rich m ilky liqu id, and
was identiRed w ith m other s m ilk in C en tral
M exico. O n the stone A ztec B ilim ek Pulque
Vessel, pulque is represented cascading into a
pulque pot from the breasts o f a fearsom e
EARTH goddess. T h e Aztecs clearly had an
am bivalent a ttitu d e concerning pulque, for
although a fe rtile and intoxicating Ruid, it
also caused drunkenness and social discord.
According to A ztec legend, Q U E T Z A L C O A T L slept
w ith his sister w h ile in a drunken stupor.
Thus sham ed, he le ft his cap ital o f T O L L A N .
P ulque p layed a m ajor cerem onial ro le
am ong the ancien t M ixtees and Zapotees o f
O axaca. O n page 25 o f the M ix te e Codex
Vindobonensis, a series o f 12 deities d rin k
p ulque from sm all cups. Am ong the neighbor
ing Zapotees, pulque appears in e lite MARRIAGE
scenes d epicted on m onum ents d atin g from
roughly A D 800 to 1000. T h e Aztecs considered
the H uastec M a y a o f northern Veracruz to be
g reat drinkers o f pulque. Thus according to
the F lo ren tin e Codex, the king o f the Huastecs
becam e so d ru n k w ith pulque th a t he cast ofF
his loincloth. Because o f this, the Huastecs
m oved in disgrace to the present region o f

is personiRed by goddesses 2 F lo w e r and 3


A llig a to r. In C e n tra ! M e x ica n iconography,
the p u lq u e gods a re s im ila ry distinguished
from m aguey: MAYAHUEL is the fe m a le d iv in ity
o f m aguey w h ile the p u lq u e gods a re g en er
a lly m ale. A n o te w o rth y exception is the
aged EARTH goddess upon the B ilim e k P ulque
Vessel, w ho has p u lq u e s q u irtin g fro m her
p en d en t breasts.
T h e concept o f pu lq u e gods w as v ery h ig h ly
developed am ong the A ztecs. C o lle c tiv e ly
know n as the C en tzo n T o to c h tin , o r "4 0 0
R ab b its," these beings took a g re at m any
form s and perm u tation s. A n u m b er o f pu lq u e
gods w e re b u ried a t the base o f an e arly phase
o f the T em plo M a y o r, on the HurrziLOPOCHTLi
side o f the TEMPLE, la id out lik e victim s, possibly
id en tifyin g the C entzon T o to ch tin as the
C entzon H u itzn a h u a, the 400 youths slain by
H u itzilo p o c h tli.
M a n y o f these p u lq u e gods a re illu s tra te d
in the C o lo n ial A ztec Codex M ag liab ec h ia n o .
C e rta in p u lq u e gods reig n ed o ver p a rtic u la r
regions: T ep o ztec atl, fo r exam ple, was the
god o f T e p o ztla n , and the rem ains o f his
tem p le s till survive above th e contem porary
tow n. T h e pulque gods w e re represented
collectively by the d e ity O m e T o c h tli, or
2 R ab b it. A n o th er im p o rta n t pu lq u e god,
P a tec atl, presided over the day M a lin a lli and
the TRECENA 1 O zo m atli.
p u rificatio n M u c h lik e the English adage o f

139

PYRAMID

"cleanliness is next to godliness," p u rificatio n


was a m ajor concern in M esoam erican ritu a l.
The success o f m any cerem onies depended
on physical and m oral cleanliness. In m any
cases, th e re w e re restrictions on sexual
behavior during im p o rtan t cerem onies, p a r
ticu larly for PRIESTS, w ho usually abstained
from contact w ith w om en. B u t the concern
for p u rity was by no means lim ite d to ritu a l
events; p u rificatio n was also necessary to
achieve a h ealth y and successful life . M is
deeds, fre q u e n tly o f a sexual n atu re , pos
sessed an alm ost p alp ab le form th a t could
accrue like filth around the in d iv id u a l, the
household, and even the e n tire com m unity.
F o r this reason, calen d rically tim e d events
ensured the puriR cation

and harm ony of

com m unities. Am ong the L a te Postclassic


Yucatec M a y a , the new year was m arked
by the casting out o f sweepings and old
household utensils. T h e Aztecs o f T e n o c h titlan rep eated this p u rificatio n event on a
massive scale: a ll household debris was
rem oved d uring the N e w F ire cerem onies
perform ed a t the com pletion o f a 5 2-year
cycle (see CALENDAR; FIRE).

Pulque pouring from the breasts of an earth


goddess, detail of Bilimek Pulque Vessel, Late
Postclassic Aztec.

In M esoam erica, m oral im p u rity was con


sidered much lik e contam inating d irt or dust.
F o r this reason, brooms and sw eeping w ere
symbols o f cerem onial p u rificatio n . In the
C e n tra l M exican codices, grass brooms are
often placed by CROSSROADS, popular places
fo r depositing dangerous and contam inating
im p u rities. WATER also sym bolized p u rifi
cation, and w ashing or aspersing (sprinkling
w ith w a te r) w ere com mon ritu a l form s o f
cleansing. swEATBATHS w e re w id e ly used for
s p iritu al as w e ll as physical pu rificatio n . F ire ,
an im p o rtan t com ponent o f the sw eatbath,
could also p u rify : the burning o f sw eet
sm elling INCENSE was often used to cleanse
and p u rify. In d ivid u als fre q u e n tly perform ed
personal acts o f p u rificatio n , such as sexual
abstention, fasting, p e n ite n tia l BLOODLETTING,
and CONFESSION. See a/yo TLAZOLTEOTL.
pyram id M esoam erican pyram ids are stable
form s th a t resist destruction in a land prone
to earthquakes. G e n era lly rising as a fo u r
sided form w ith stairs only on one side, a
p yram id usually supports a TEMPLE on its
broad, fla t sum m it. A lthough o ften now con
sidered

m ysterious,

pyram ids

had

q u ite

specific religious functions.


M a n y pyram ids w e re dedicated to p artic u
la r cu lt d eities. Sahagun lists over 70 deities

Pulque god, Codex Magliabechiano, 16th c.


Aztec.

!4H

QUADRiPARTiTE MONSTER
th a t had th e ir ow n raised tem ples in th e

th e h ill o f H u itzilo p o c h tli's b irth , w h ile at the

sacred p recin ct a t T e n o c h titla n , and am ong

sam e tim e the offerings deposited in the


tw o tem ples suggest th a t the tem ples w ere

these w e re QUETZALCOATL, TEZCATLIPOCA, XIPE


TOTEc, HumnLOPOCHTLi, and TLALOC. S urviving

conceived o f as one o f the m ountains d ed i

illu stratio n s o f A zte c p yram ids show th a t

cated to T la lo c . T h e deposit o f crem ated

the iconography o f th e roofcom bs re ve ale d


p a rtic u la r associations: T la lo c's p y ram id , fo r

ashes o f n oble predecessors dem onstrates


th a t such p yram ids w e re also centers of

exam ple, had a b lu e roofcom b w ith aq u atic

ancestor w orship fo r p o w e rfu l lineages.

m otifs. D u a l pyram ids, such as the T em p lo


M a y o r o f T e n o c h tla n , had a single g re at

The

e a rlie s t

p yram id

in

M exico ,

the

e arth en m ound a t L a V e n ta from c. 800 Be,

in d iv id u a l

is ro ughly in th e form a flu te d cupcake and

shrines a t the top, and w e re g en e rally d e d i

m ay w e ll be an efHgy o f a volcano, although

p la tfo rm ,

tw o

staircases,

and

its unusual contours m ay sim ply be the result

cated to tw o d istinct cults.


For

e a rlie r

M eso am erican

civilizatio n s

o f n a tu ra l erosion o f a four-sided structure.

such specific associations a re not know n w ith

N a tu ra l rises a re used to e le v a te pyram ids,

assurance.

such

A tT E O T iH U A C A N ,

the p rin c ip a l p y ra

m ids w e re said by the Aztecs to be d ed icated

as

th e

T e m p le

of

Inscriptions

at

P alen q u e, and in the ro llin g p la in o f the

and this m ay w e ll be

P eten , th e g re a t pyram ids o f T ik a l ap p ear

tru e. Because o f its association w ith the long

lik e m an -m ad e m ountains, cresting above the

d o rm ant, gurgling volcano w hich fram es it,

canopy o f th e tro p ical ra in forest.

to the

SUN

and

MOON,

the Pyram id o f the M oon a t T eo tih u acan was


q u ite possibly dedicated to a WATER or fe rtility
cult. A t M o n te A lb n , little elu cid atin g icono
graphy survives to id e n tify any pyram id o th er
than the D anzantes, w hich, w ith its icono
graphy o f sacrificial victim s and h u m iliatio n ,
m ay w e ll have been dedicated to a cult o f
w ar.
Some M a y a pyram ids w e re d edicated to
specific d eity cults, for exam ple, the G roup
o f the Cross a t Palenque, w ith its d edicatory
links b etw een the BIRTH o f the PALENQUETRIAD
gods and the ru lersh ip o f C han B ahlum . M o re
c h aracteristically, though, M a y a pyram ids
w e re dedicated to ancestor w orship. W hen
kings and o th er h igh-ranking nobles d ied ,
pyram ids w e re raised over th e ir TOMBS. T e m
p le I a t T ik a l housed R u ler A and the T em p le
o f Inscriptions a t P alenque h eld the rem ains
o f Pacal: fro m the tim e these pyram ids w ere
com pleted, they em bodied g re at kings and
acted as the cen ter o f th e ir w orship.
A lthough m ost M a y a pyram ids h eld the
tom bs o f ancestors, some w e re dedicated to
o th er purposes. R ad ial pyram ids, such as E V H -su b a t U axactun or the C astillo (T e m p le
o f K ukulcan) a t C hichen Itz , w ere places o f
celeb ratio n for the com pletion o f periods o f
tim e. Pyram ids w ith surrounding colonnades
a t C hichen Itz , such as the T e m p le o f
the W a rrio rs, m ay have been dedicated to
ru lersh ip and w a rfa re .
Pyram ids o ften re p lic ate

MOUNTAINS,

p a r

tic u la rly sacred m ountains. T h e dual pyram id


d edicated to H u itzilo p o c h tli and T lalo c a t
T en o c h titla n sym bolically recreates COATEPEC,

Q u a d rip a rtite

STER;

PALENQUE

m onster see BiCEPHALic

MON

TRIAD

q u etzal K n ow n as th e quetza/Zi in N a h u a tl
and
in M a y a , the resp len d en t trogon,
.Rharom acArus m ocm no, was p rize d fo r its
extrao rd in a ry feath ers. T h e q u etzal lives in
cloud forest, th a t ra re and v u ln e ra b le ecologi
cal niche o f tropical ra in forest b etw e en 3000
and 4000 fe e t (ab o u t 900 m and 1200 m ) in
a ltitu d e . S o litary creatures th a t a re ra re ly
glim psed o th er than a t DAWN or dusk, quetzals
feed on the w in g and o ften h o ver w h ile eatin g
fru its , bugs, tre e frogs, o r snails. A lthough
both m ale and fe m a le o f th e species a re
b rillia n tly colored, w ith b lu e -g re en feath ers
on w ings, ta il, and crest, and scarlet ones on
th e breast, it is th e iridescence and unusual
len g th o f the m ale ta il feath ers - o ften about
a yard in len g th - th a t m ade the b ird th e
m ost desired in a ll M esoam erica.
Because o f th e ir ro le in e lite and ritu a l
costum es, q u etzal feathers w e re an im p o rtan t
e lem en t in M esoam erican trib u te . T h e fam
ous headdress housed in V ien n a th a t is often
called M otecuhzom a's headdress (b u t w hich
he p ro b ab ly n ever w o re ) includes 500 q u etzal
feath ers. H u n ters w e re fo rb id d e n to k ill the
birds; ra th e r, they stunned th em w ith a
blow gun, rem oved the feath ers, and set them
fre e . T h e m ales a re best spotted d uring the

141

QUETZALCOATL

nesting season: the birds nest in holes in tree


trunks and w hen th e m ale sits on th e eggs,
his !ong ta il feathers tra il out o f the nest.
A lthough few M exican or M a y a ancien t
cities w ere in q u etzal h a b ita t (th e M a y a city
of C h in k u ltik is an exception), the b ird and
its distinctive crest and feath ers w e re w e ll
know n throughout M esoam erica. B ern al D ia z
reported seeing quetzals in M otecu h zo m a II's
zoo. XuTr was included in the nam e o f a
num ber o f M a y a kings, and q u efza/, o f course,
form ed p a rt o f QUETZALCOATL. In N ah u a tl
poetry, the q u etzal fe a th e r was o ften m en
tioned m etap h orically, and the idea o f its
tearin g or decay re fe rre d to the transience o f

(Above) Disguised Aztec


merchants obtaining
quetzal plumes from
Zinacantan, Chiapas,
Florentine Codex, Book 9.

l i f e O n EARTH.

Q u etzalcoatl O n e o f the g re at gods o f ancient


M esoam erica, Q u etzalcoatl is a m iraculous
synthesis o f SERPENT and b ird . T h e Postclassic
N a h u a tl nam e Q u etzalcoatl derives from the
N a h u a tl term s fo r the em erald plum ed QUET
ZAL ( P h a r m n a c h r M F m oc/nno) and the SERPENT,
or coa 7. Thus the term could be glossed as
"q u e tza l s erp en t," although the serpent is
specifically a rattlesnake. T h e earliest know n
representations o f this avian serpent appear
am ong the F o rm ative O lm ecs. M o n u m e n t 19
from L a V e n ta portrays a rattlesn ake w ith an
avian beak and fea th e r crest. N e x t to this
snake, tw o q u etzal birds Hank a SKY BAND.
A lthough the language o f the Olm ecs is s till
unknow n, in M ay an languages the words for
snake and SKY are id en tical. Thus it is possible
th a t this sign is a reference to q u etzal sky or
q uetzal snake.
T h e earliest know n appearance o f the q u et
zal serpent in C e n tra l M exico occurs a t the
T em p le o f Q uetzalcoatl atT E O T iH U A C A N , dating
to the 3rd c. A D . R epresentations o f plum ed
serpents a lte rn a tin g w ith the mosaic head
dress o f the WAR SERPENT - a probable ancestor
o f the xiuH C O A T L Hre serpent - cover this
rem arkab le structure. In the m urals o f T e o tihuacan and the la te r site o f C acaxtla, Q u e tza l
coatl is ren dered as a snake covered w ith
q uetzal plum es. A t both sites, this being
appears w ith both drops o f RAIN and standing
WATER,

(Above) Quetzalcoatl atop a


pyramid, Codex TellerianoRemensis, 16th c. Aztec.

suggesting th at it was considered a

s p irit or d e ity o f w a te r.
M o d e rn Pueblo peoples o f the A m erican
Southw est id e n tify a plum ed serpent w ith
w a te r. L ik e Q u etzalco atl, th e Z u n i K olow isi
and the H o p i P alulukong plum ed w a te r ser
pents can b rin g abundance and fe rtility .
A lthough the fe a th e red serpent appears a t

(Agbf) Quetzalcoatl with


bicephalic serpents, cut conch
pectoral and hands in the form
of quetzal heads, detail of a
Late Classic pa/ma, Veracruz.

142

RABBIT
such C lassic sites as T e o tih u ac an , X ochicalco,

Q u e tza lc o a tl w as closely id e n tifie d w ith

and C acaxtla, fe w hum an form s o f this b eing

the site o f C h o lu la w hich becam e the great

occur d u rin g the C lassic p erio d . O n e n o te w o r

PILGRIMAGE c en ter fo r devotees o f Q u etzalco atl

thy exam ple appears on a stone PALMA from

d u rin g

L a te C lassic V e ra cru z, w h e re Q u e tza lc o a tl is

q u e n tly th e patron o f ru le rsh ip , Q u etzalco atl

show n w ith hum an hands c le v e rly ren d ered

w as also considered to be a god o f PRIESTS and

as

q u etzal

heads.

C o m b in ed

w ith

the

th e

L a te

Postclassic

p erio d .

MERCHANTS in L a te Postclassic C e n tra l M exico.

b icep h alic serpents covering the body, these

Fee

q u etzal heads p ro vid e an e x p lic it re fe ren c e

C O D S ; P U L Q U E ; T E O T IH U A C A N C O D S .

to

Q u e tza lc o a tl.

An

especially

F re

a /s o

C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S ;

EHECATL;

M IX T E C

im p o rta n t

d e ta il is the sectioned conch w h o rl w orn on


the chest o f the fig u re. T h is is id e n tic a l to the
cut conch "w in d je w e l," o r eA ecai/acacozcaf/
o f the Postclassic Q u e tza lc o a tl. D u rin g the
L a te Postclassic p erio d , Q u e tza lc o a tl usually

ra b b it A lo n g w ith the

appears in hum an form , o fte n w ith a conical

/agus spp.) w as one o f the favo red creatures


o f the h u n t. F o r this reason, the Aztecs often

cap, the

w iN O

je w e l, and o th e r shell

JEW ELR Y.

DEER,

the ra b b it (3y/v-

A ra re M a y a form o f Q u etzalco atl m ay be

id e n tifie d rab bits w ith the h u n te r-g a th e re r

found on page 4a o f the D resden Codex.

Chichim ecs and th e ir p atro n h u n tin g god,

In L ate Postclassic C en tra! M exico , Q u e tzalcoat! often takes the form o f the god o f
w in d , E h e ca tl-Q u e tzalc o atl. In this context,
Q u etzalcoatl appears as the life -g iv in g aspect
o f w ind . A ccording to the A ztec F lo re n tin e
Codex, Q u etzalcoatl was the roadsw eeper o f
the T la lo q u e rain gods, th a t is, the w ind that
brings the rain clouds. A long w ith the conical
h at and shell je w e lry , E h ecatl-Q u etzalco atl
typ ically w ears a red buccal mask resem bling
a duck beak. Patron o f the day E hecatl and
the TRECENA 1 O celotl, E h ecatl-Q uetzalcoatl was
the great culture hero, and plays an im por
tan t role in C en tra! M exican C R E A T IO N A C C O U N TS .
Am ong the M ixtees o f Oaxaca, this figure
was know n by the calendrica! nam e 9 W in d .
In the ethnohistorical docum ents o f 16th c.
M exico , the ancient d eity know n as Q u e tza l
coatl is confused w ith the historical figure
C e A catl T o p iltzin Q u etzalcoatl, the king o f
legendary T O L L A N , now know n to be the site
o f T u la . A ccording to A ztec b e lie f, C e A catl
T o p iltzin Q u etzalcoatl d ep arted TOLLAN fo r
th e red lands o f the east, an even t corrobor
ate d by C o lo n ial docum ents from Yucatn
w hich m ention the com ing o f an in d iv id u al
nam ed K ukulcan, the Yucatec term fo r qu etzal
serpent. In these accounts, K ukulcan is said
to have come to C hichen Itz a , a site w ith
striking sim ilarities to T u la . A t C hichen Itz a ,
depictions o f a m asked in d iv id u al backed by
a green -plu m ed fea th e red serpent m ay re fe r
to the actual historical in d iv id u al. H o w e v e r,
the historical figure m ay have been apotheo
sized a t D E A T H as his nam esake, thus fu rth e r
b lu rrin g the distinction b etw een the m an and
the god.

M ix c o A T L .

D u rin g the A zte c

VEINTENA

o f Q u ech -

o lli, d ed icated to M ix c o a tl, th e re w as a c ere


m onial h u n t d u rin g w h ich d ee r, rab b its, and
o th e r anim als w e re ro u ted and k ille d on
Z ac ate p e tl M O U N T A IN . H o w e v e r, in an cien t
M esoam erican re lig io n , the ra b b it is best
know n as a sym bol o f the

M O O N.

M a n y peoples

o f the N e w W o rld and A sia observe the


p a tte rn o f a ra b b it upon th e face o f the moon.
D epictions o f the lu n a r ra b b it m ay be seen
in P rehispanic C e n tra l M ex ico , the Classic
M a y a a rea , and th e ceram ic M im b re s a rt o f
the A m erican Southw est.
In Postclassic C e n tra ! M exico , th e ra b b it
was also closely id e n tifie d w ith the in to xic at
ing d rin k P U L Q U E . T h is association is w e ll
docum ented in the d ay nam e T o c h tli, m ean
ing ra b b it in N a h u a tl. T h e p atro n o f T o c h tli
was M A Y A H U E L , the goddess o f M A G U E Y and
by extension its p rin c ip a l product, pulque.
M o re o v e r, the m any P U L Q U E CODS w e re know n
collectively as the cenzon fofccAtm , m eaning
400 rab bits, or by the calen d rical nam e O m e
T o c h tli, or 2 R ab b it.
In Classic M a y a a rt, th e ra b b it steals the
broad h a t and o th er re g alia o f G od L . T h e
significance o f this m ythological episode is
now unknow n.
ra in T o th e farm in g peoples o f ancient
M esoam erica, ra in was o f g re a t im portance.
A t C halcatzingo, M orelo s, e xp lic it portrayals
o f ra in occur as e a rly as the M id d le F o rm a tiv e
p eriod, w h e re an O lm ec-style rock carving
shows ra in fa llin g fro m clouds above young
grow ing MAIZE and a m is t-fille d zoom orphic
C A V E . F u rth e rm o re , the gods o f ra in and

143

REPTILE EYE

LIGHTNING are am ong the m ost continuously


w orshipped deities in an cien t M esoam erica,
and TLALOC o f C en tra! M exico , the Zapotee
coeijo, and the M a y a CHAC can ai! be easily
traced to the beginnings o f the Postclassic
period. In the M a y a region, offerings continue
to be m ade to C hac to this day.
Auguries for ra in w ere o f g re at im portance.
On page 28 o f the Codex B orgia, five T la lo q u e
rain gods w a te r m aize Reids w ith various
types o f rain . B eneficia! ra in is m arked w ith
Rowery

JADE

signs, b u t the fou r o th er form s

are depicted as destroyers o f corn, specifically


fiery rain (possibly dro u g ht), fungus ra in ,
w ind ra in , and flin t blade ra in , the last
probably a referen ce to cutting h ail. T h e la te r
pages o f the M a y a D resden codex are Riled
w ith alm anacs concerning the Chacs and rain .
In the C olonial Yucatec Books o f C h ilam

A rabbit holding the headdress and staff of Cod


L, detail of a Late Classic Maya vase.

B alam , auguries describe speciRc types o f


ra in ; in the C M a m B a/am o f C hum aye/,
RABBIT sky rains, parched sky rains, w ood
pecker sky rains, v u ltu re sky rains and DEER
rains, are a ll set in re latio n to K atun 3 A hau.
re p tile eye T h e re p tile eye sign is both an
iconographic elem en t and a day nam e. In
both cases, its m eaning is still unknow n. A t
TEOTiHUACAN, the probable place o f origin for
this sign, the re p tile eye appears p rim a rily as
an iconographic device. C om m only occurring
w ith in circu lar m edallions a t Teotihuacan, it
tends to have a large curl placed against an
eye -like elem en t a t the lo w e r portion o f the
device. Because o f this sem icircular lo w er
elem en t, the sign has been w idely in terp re ted
as a re p tile 's eye. H o w ev er, ra th e r than
re fe rrin g p rim a rily to an eye, the device m ay
represent b rillia n c e or FIRE. In T eotihuacan
iconography, eyes are freq u e n tly used to
depict shining or reRective surfaces, such as
MIRRORS or WATER. In add itio n , the Teotihuacan
sign is often accom panied by secondary
devices denoting Rre.
D u rin g the L a te Classic period in highland
M exico , the re p tile eye sign is w id e ly used
as one o f the 20 day nam es o f the 260-day
CALENDAR. As a day nam e, it appears at
such sites as Teotenango, Xochicalco, and
C acaxtla. A t Xochicalco and P ied ra L ab ra d a,
V eracru z, the day glyph is depicted w ith
Ram ing Rre elem ents. A lthough present at
the E a rly Postclassic site o f T u la , the re p tile
eye day glyph was no longer used du rin g the
L a te Postclassic period. F o r this reason, the
day sign cannot be re a d ily correlated w ith

A rabbit in the moon, Florentine Codex, 16th c.


Aztec.

The reptile eye glyph, detail from a Teotihuacan


vessel, Early Classic period.

RUBBER

144

the know n day glyphs o f the contact perio d

the lin eag e heads: " f t rem ains fo r you to give

ru b b e r O b ta in e d fro m th e latex sap o f th e


ru b b e r tre e (GastMa e /as#ca), ru b b er had a

b le ed in g your ears and passing a cord through


your elbow s. You m ust w orship. T h is is your

v a rie ty o f uses in an cien t M eso am erica. T o

w ay o f g ivin g thanks b efo re your god. "

thanks, since you have y e t to take care of

the A ztecs, ru b b e r was know n as c/%i, from

A t th e tim e o f the C onquest, HUMAN sAcm

w hich the Spanish w ord fo r ru b b e r, h u /e ,

FiCE was seen as the fa ir exchange for the

derives. T h e w o rd o/A c le a rly relates to the

sacrifices th a t the gods had m ade to create

p ro b ab ly

the EARTH and h u m an ity . T h e violence o f

because o f the re m a rk a b le bouncing and

hum an sacrifice w as also p a rt o f the appease

N a h u a tl

term

o/An,

or m o tio n ,

elastic q u alities o f ru b b e r. T h e b est-know n

m en t

use o f ru b b er was as the b a ll p layed in the

A ccording to

M eso am erican

BALLCAM E,

know n as o/^ama or

of

the

vio len ce

o f creation

the version

itself.

o f the creation

o f th e e a rth in the ZV/yfoyre t/u m cA/gue,


and

took

u /ia /n a in N a h u a tl. R ecent excavations a t the

Q UETZALCO ATL

O lm ec site o f E l M a n a t have y ield e d the first

cuHTLi fro m the heavens, turned them selves

know n ru b b er balls in M eso am erica. D a tin g

in to

a hand and opposite foo t o f the goddess,

the balls a re p a rt o f

SERPENTS,

and

th en , each

TLALTE

roughly to the 9th c.

B e,

tw o

TEZCATHPOCA

taking

a rich assem blage o f offerings placed in a

squeezed h er u n til she s p lit in h a lf. O f one

SPRING. It

h a lf, they form ed the

is e n tire ly ap p ro p riate th a t the

SKY

and o f the o th er

whose nam e (given to them by the A ztecs)

h a lf, the e a rth . A ll the gods then descended


to console h e r, "an d they o rd ain ed th a t from

can be tra n s ite d as

h er w ould spring a ll the fru it necessary fo r

first know n ru b b er derives from the O lm ecs,


'th e ru b b er p e o p le ."

T h e hum id O fm ec h eartfand o f the southern

the life o f m an. A n d in o rd e r to do this, they

G u lf Coast was a w ell-kn o w n ru b b er produc

m ade o f h e r h a ir trees and Rowers and


grasses, o f h e r skin m any com m on and sm all

ing region.
In a dd itio n to its use in the M esoam erican
ballgam e, ru b b er also served m edicinal
purposes. According to the F lo re n tin e Codex,
the latex was drunk w ith chocolate to re lie ve
stomach and in testin al upset. As a sap, ru b b er
was also treated as an INCENSE much lik e copa/.
In the offerings recovered from the Sacred
C enote o f C hichen Itz , ru b b er was fre
q u en tly m ixed w ith copa/. T h e ru b b er latex
was o fte n burned as a b a ll, in efBgy form , or
as drops sprinkled upon PAPER. Because o f the
thick clo u d-like sm oke, ru b b er was a favored
offerin g to the R A IN gods.

sacrifice M esoam erican CO DS re q u ired sacri


fice. A ccording to the PO PO L v u H o f the Q uiche
M a y a , the gods re q u ired praise from th e ir
subjects, w hom they had m ade; w hen praise
was not forthcom ing, they destroyed them .
O nce the gods had created hum ans w ho d id
praise them , these people w e re given th e ir
ow n god B U N D L E S , and the c h ie f Q uiche lineage
received T O H iL , w ho dem anded the sacrifice
o f HEAR TS in exchange for his g ift o f F IR E . T h e
trib a l leaders offered precious m e ta l, but
T o h il insisted on costlier sacrifice: hum an
flesh. T o h il then m ade fu rth e r dem ands o f

flow ers, o f h e r eyes w ells

and

fountains

and little caverns, o f h e r nose valleys and


m ountains, and o f h er shoulders m ountains.
A n d this goddess c ried m any tim es in the
n ig h t d esiring the hearts o f m en to e a t. A n d
she w ould not be q u ie t ju s t w ith those th a t
w e re given h er, nor w o u ld she take fru it
unless it was sprin kled w ith the blood o f
m e n ." H um ans liv e d in the d e b t of, and a t
the grace of, the gods: th e ravaged body
o f T la lte c u h tli p ro vid ed the sustenance fo r
h u m an ity, and she h o w led a t N IG H T unless
offered hum an B L O O D .
M esoam erican gods could see through
insincerity. In the A ztec account o f the creation
o f th e fifth sun (see F IV E s u N s ) , the gods sought
volunteers to becom e the S U N . T ecu ciztecat!
p u t h im s elf fo rw a rd , and th en , m ore hesi
ta n tly , N a n a h u a tzin cam e fo rw a rd w hen
called to do so. As a p re p a ra to ry sacrifice,
the tw o fasted fo r fo u r days and p erfo rm ed
penance. A ccording to Sahagun, " th a t w ith
w hich [T e c u c izte c a tl] d id penance was a ll
costly. H is fir branches [w e re ] q u etzal fea th
ers, and his grass balls o f gold; his m aguey
spines o f green stone; the red den ed , bloodied
spines o f coral. A n d his incense was very
good incense. A nd [as fo r] N an a h u a tzin , his
fir branches w e re m ade only o f green w a te r
rushes - green reeds bound in threes . . . A nd
his grass balls [w e re ] only d rie d p ine needles.

145

SACRIFICE

And his m aguey spines w e re these same


m aguey spines. A nd the M ood w ith w hich
they w ere covered [w as] his ow n M ood. A nd
[fo r] his incense, he used only the scabs from
his sores . . ." (F C : vn)
N an ah uatzin 's spines to pierce the Resh,
then, w e re red w ith his ow n M ood, w h ile T ecu ciztecatl's w e re o f a precious red coral. Even
N anahuatzin's incense was o f his ow n Resh.
T h e fou r days o f penance com pleted, these tw o
w ere to becom e gods by im m olatin g th e m
selves in the bonRre m ade by the gods. F o u r
tim es T ecu ciztecatl ran up to the Rre b u t le ap t
back. O n ly w hen N an a h u a tzin took his turn
and h u rled h im self in to the Rre d id T ecu cizte
catl fo llo w . N an ah uatzin rose as the sun. W h en
Tecu ciztecatl rose w ith equal b rillia n c e , one o f
the gods darkened the face o f T ecu ciztecatl
w ith a RABBIT, and he was m ade the lesser heav
enly body, the M OO N. In this story, the sincerity,
generosity, and im m ediacy o f sacrifice a re the
keys to N an ah uatzin 's transform ation.
G e n era lly the m ost im p o rtan t form s o f
sacrifice w ere the most precious: hum an Resh
and M ood, w h e th e r d raw n from one's ow n
body or from a sacrificial victim . Such o ffe r
ings could be m ade through anointm ent o f
sculptures o f gods or through offerings in
special vessels, or through th e ir transfor
m ation into Rre and smoke. AUTOSACRiFiCE in
p artic u la r was freq u e n tly collected on strips
o f bark PAPER and then set aRre. In the
resulting sm oke, a supplicant w ould see the
ancestor or god to w hom the sacriRce was
m ade. A n offering o f INCENSE or TOBACCO also
generated copious smoke and often accom
panied other sacriRces.
O th e r offerings w ere also im p o rtan t as
sacriRces, and a t tim es, m ay have preem pted
hum an blood. W h en Q uetzalcoatl cam e to
T u la , he supposedly com m anded only a p e r
fect devotion and the offering o f serpents
and BUTTERFLIES. In both C e n tra l M exico and
am ong the M a y a , Docs, q u ail, and turkeys
w e re a ll reg ular offerings, as w ere foodstuffs.
T h e offerings recovered from the Sacred
C enote at C hichen Itz a reveal the im portance
o f precious m etals and JADE as sacriRcial
offerings, and the abundant vessels offered
th e re and in o th er places o f sacriRcial deposit,
such as CAVES, dedication caches, and m ountaintop shrines, surely held varie d offerings,
including balls o f incense and foodstuffs.
T h e offering o f dough im ages form ed
another means o f sacriRce to th e gods. K now n
as tzoaZ/i, these dough im ages w e re m ade o f

SacriRce: Lady Xoc kneels before the ruler of


Yaxchiln, Shield Jaguar, and performs a
bloodletting ritual by passing a spiny chord
through her tongue. Whereas ancient Maya men
commonly performed bloodletting from the penis,
the tongue appears to have been the favored
organ for Maya women. Yaxchiln Lintel 24,
Late Classic Maya.

Penitent priest in the act of self-sacriHce, Codex


Borgia, p. 10, Late Postclassic period. In the
Borgia Group of codices, the act of piercing the
eye serves as a symbol of penance.

SCHELLHAS CO DS

146

ground AMARANTH m ixed w ith hum an b!ood

C o d A A lth o u g h not isolated by Schelthsa,

and a sticky sw ee te n er, o fte n honey, to b in d

C od A ' is a d istin ct d ea th god w ho usually

th e m ix tu re tog eth er. D u rin g ce!ebrations fo r

has a h o rizo n tal black band across the eyes

the VEINTENA o f P a n q u e tza liztli, a la rg e dough

and th e A k b a l sign o f darkness upon his

im age o f
m o untain

was m ade o ver a

b ro w . T h is god is o f considerable a n tiq u ity ,

d u rin g T e p e ilh u itl, dough

ap p e arin g in E a rly C lassic M a y a a rt as w e ll

H U iT Z iL O P O C H T L i

w ooden fra m e ;

efEgies

w e re

m ade.

U su ally

in

conjunction w ith hum an sacrifice, celeb ran ts


ritu a lly

broke

a p a rt

the

tzoa/A

and

a te

as in th e Postclassic codices. C o d A ' is a d eity


o f v io le n t SACRIFICE, such as d ecap itatio n .
C o d F : T h is d e ity is the Postclassic form o f
one o f the m ost continuously w o r

them to com m une w ith the gods. See a/so

CHAC,

C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S ; C U A U H X IC A L U .

shipped gods- o f an c ie n t M eso am erica. T h e

Schellhas gods D u rin g th e p io n eerin g eRorts

rep resen ted

M a y a god o f

R A IN

and

on S tela

L IG H T N IN G ,

1 from

C hac is

Protoclassic

o f the ate 19th c., researchers faced a com pex

Iza p a . M a y a ep ig rap h y reveals th a t during

and poorly understood a rra y o f su p ern atu ral

both th e Classic and Postclassic periods, this

beings in th e th ree ancien t M a y a screenfblds

d e ity w as a c tu a lly nam ed C hac.

know n as the D resd en , Paris, and M a d rid

C o d C : A ltho u g h fre q u e n tly and erroneously

codices. Paul Schellhas, the first to id e n tify

id e n tifie d as the god o f the north star, Cod

system atically the various gods and accom

C is a c tu a lly a personiH cation o f the concept

panying nam e glyphs occurring in these Post

o f sacredness. Thus d u rin g both the Classic

classic screen folds, organized and lab eled the

and Postclassic periods, the p o rtra it o f this

various gods according to the L a tin alp h ab et.

god p ro vid ed th e ph o netic valu e o f Au or

B eginning w ith A , each isolated god was thus

ch'u, a p a n -M a y a n term s ig n ifyin g d e ity or

provided w ith a le tte r designation.

sacredness.
C o d D : O n e o f the g re a t gods o f the M a y a

T h e Schellhas system o f le tte r designation


has proven to be o f g re at use for several
reasons. F o r one, the poorly understood
id e n titie s o f p artic u la r gods can be re fe rre d
to by non-com m ittal letters, ra th e r than by a
tenuous or uncertain m eaning, such as WIND
C od, or EARTH G od. F u rth e rm o re , le tte r desig
nations avoid the use o f w h o lly in ap p ro p riate
M a y a n term s. A lthough the M A IZ E C O D , C od
E, is freq u e n tly re fe rre d to as Yum Kaax in
m odern lite ra tu re , this term sim ply means
'lo r d o f the forest bush" and bears no d ire ct
re latio n to m aize or even the corn Held. In
add itio n , the Yucatec M a y a o ften called a
p a rtic u la r god by a num ber o f epithets, and
it is fre q u e n tly d ilE cu lt to select w hich term is
the m ost ap p ro p riate. A g ain , recen t research
indicates th a t the m a jo rity o f Postclassic codical gods isolated by Schellhas also appear in
the Classic p erio d , and it is u n w a rran ted to
assume th a t the Yucatec d e ity term s recorded
for the e a rly C o lo n ial period w e re also p re
sent du rin g th e Classic era. A side from a fe w
em endations and additions, the Schellhas god
lis t continues to be w id e ly used in M a y a
studies.
C o d A : T h e skeletal god o f D E A T H , G od A
is eq u iva len t to M iC T L A N T E C U H T L i o f C e n tra l
M exico. O n page 77 o f the M a d rid Codex,
he is p h o netically nam ed C izin , or "fla tu le n t
o n e," a com m on term fo r the d ev il in contem
p o rary Yucatec.

pantheon, G od D appears to be the M a y a


form o f the aged c rea to r god, m uch lik e
T O N A C A T E C U H T L i o f C e n tra ! M exico . D u rin g
both the Classic and
D was re fe rre d to
to be a god closely
p rie stly know ledge,

Postclassic periods, God


as iTZAMNA. H e seems
id en tiH ed w ith esoteric
such as D iv iN A T iO N and

W R IT IN G .

C o d F : T h e M a y a god o f MAIZE, th e Postclassic


G od E usually has a hum an head th a t m erges
in to a grow ing m aize e ar. D u rin g th e Classic
p eriod, th e re w e re tw o re la te d form s o f the
m aize god. O n e o f these, the F o lia te d M a iz e
C od, is essentially id e n tic a l in fo rm to the
Postclassic G od E . T h e o th e r Classic form ,
the Tonsured M a iz e G od, has a hum an head
fla tte n e d by c ran ia l d efo rm a tio n to resem ble
a m a tu re m aize ear. T h e Tonsured M a iz e
G od is th e Classic p ro to typ e o f H U N H U N A H P U ,
the fa th e r o f the Q uiche H e ro T w in s.
Cocf F : U n fo rtu n a te ly , w ith this le tte r desig
n atio n Schellhas conflated and confused three
distinct gods. O n e o f these w as th e afo rem en
tioned G od A ', w hereas th e o th er tw o w e re
coined C od Q and C o d R by J. E ric S.
Thom pson. Thus in contem porary usage,
th e re is no speciHc d e ity c o rrela tin g to C od
F.
C<x/ C : T h e SUN god o f th e M a y a , G od C
com m only appears w ith th e solar Am glyph
upon his head or body. In the codices, he

147

SCHELLHAS CODS

seems be nam ed K iN iC H A H AU , or "sun-faced


lo rd /* D u rin g the Classic p erio d , this being
appears as the head coeiE cient o f the num era!
4.
Cods i f a n d C H : U n d e r th e le tte r H ,
Schellhas conflated tw o d istinct gods. O n e
of these is a poorly understood yo u th fu l m ale
d eity th a t m ay be a M a y a version o f the w in d
god. A lthough this being is s till know n as C od
H , the o th er figure has been term ed G od C H
by G . Z im m erm an n. E rroneously called the
"C hicchan G o d /' God C H is the Postclassic
codical form o f the Classic H ead b an d T w in
w ith JAGUAR p e lt m arkings. T h is being is the
Prehispanic form o f X b alan q u e, one o f the
H ero T w in s o f the Q uiche POPOLvuH.
Goddess f: A lthough Schellhas id e n tifie d this
goddess as an old w om an, subsequent schol
ars have considered Goddess I to be a d iffe r
e n t being, a you th fu l and b e a u tifu l w om an.
A lthough this y ou th fu l goddess has often
been id e n tifie d as ixcHEL and the M OON god
dess, th ere is no concrete evidence th a t she
was e ith e r. In fact, Ixch el appears to have
been the aged Goddess O , not Goddess 1. In
the codices, the lo vely Goddess I is often
coupled w ith various m ale gods, and it is like ly
th a t she is id e n tifie d w ith hum an fe rtility and
sensual love.
C od
D u rin g the Postclassic period, God K
appears w ith a large u p w ard ly turned snout.
T h e Classic form o f God K displays a sim ilar
uptu rn ed nose, although in this case the d eity
typ ically has a burning torch or CELT in his
forehead and a sm oking SERPENT foot. T h e
Classic God K also occurs as the MANIKIN
SCEPTER held by Chac and M a y a rulers. I t
appears th a t God K was id e n tifie d w ith
ligh tn in g , FIRE, and dynastic descent. E p igraphic evidence indicates th a t God K was
ancien tly know n as K au il, a d eity nam e also
appearing in e arly C olonial Yucatec texts.
C o d L : A n aged and fre q u e n tly black JAGUAR
GOD, God L com m only w ears an ornam ented
back cape and a larg e, b road-brim m ed h ead
dress topped by the MUAN OW L. An im p o rtan t
god o f the UNDERWORLD, God L was also a
m erchant god. Thus during the Classic period,
God L com m only appears w ith a m erchant
bundle (see MERCHANTS). R ecent excavations
a t the L a te Classic site o f C acaxtla, T laxcala,
have uncovered a m u ral d ep ictin g God L
w ith a m erchant bundle com plete w ith
feathers and o th er trad in g goods.
C o d M : O ne o f the m ost strikin g gods o f the
M a y a codices, C od M is a black d e ity w ith a

MYTHOLOGICAL A N IM A IS .

The Schellhas god list published in 1904.

SCRIBAL CODS

146

pendulous lo w e r lip and long P in occh io-like

com m only d ep icted patrons o f w ritin g and

nose. T h is d e ity is a M a y a form o f Y acate-

tim e ke ep in g ,

c u h tli, th e long-nosed m e rch an t god o f C e n tra l

scribes and artists o f th e POPOLVUH, H u n B atz


and H u n C h uen (see MONKEY). T h e y usually

M ex ico . G od M

is p rim a rily a Postclassic

h o w ever,

a re

th e

m onkey

M a y a god th a t appears to have g ra d u a lly

have a DEER e ar o ver the hum an one, and

eclipsed th e e a rlie r M a y a m erch an t d e ity ,

hold an in k p o t, p en , or

C o d L . T h e contact perio d nam e o f this god

be a m onkey grotesque o r th a t o f a b e a u tifu l

was E k C h u a h , eHr b eing th e M a y a n w o rd fo r


black.

be attach ed to the body.

coDEx;

the face m ay

young hu m an , and a s trip o f " p rin t-o u t" m ay

C o J JV: In th e codices and C lassic M a y a a rt,


the aged G od N com m only appears w e arin g

sea T h e sea w as w id e ly b elieved to be the

a TURTLE carapace or conch upon his back.

p rim o rd ia l

D u rin g both the Classic and Postclassic p e r

flo ated . Since this w a te r lay u n d ern eath the

WATER

upon

w h ich

the

EARTH

iods, the nam e o f this god was p h o n e tica lly

e a rth , sub terran ean and surface bodies o f

w ritte n as PAUAHTUN. Q u a d rip a rtite in n a tu re ,

fresh w a te r w e re also id e n tifie d w ith th e sea.

God

seems to have had

th e

w e ig h ty

responsibility o f supporting th e SKY.

In an e a rly Classic m u ral from th e T e m p le o f


A g ric u ltu re a t TEOTiHUACAN, fre s h w a te r WATER

C o& fess O : A n aged and fearsom e goddess,

HUES flo a t atop w aves con tain in g sea SHELLS.

Goddess O usually has ja g u a r claw s as hands

M a rin e shells fro m both the G u lf C oast and

and w ears a serpent in h er headdress. In the

th e P acific abound in T eo tih u acan represen

codices she is p h o netically nam ed C hac C h el.

tations. A t the T eo tih u ac an a p a rtm e n t com

Goddess O appears to be an aged gen etrix,


much lik e the A ztec rLAMATECUiiTLi-ciHUACOATL.

Coc/ P: A lthough term ed a frog god by


Schellhas, C od P m ay not be a d istinct d eity .
A p pearin g only in the M a d rid Codex, this
being m ay sim ply be a version o f C od N .
scribal gods A num ber o f M esoam erican gods
served as the patrons o f WRITING and the arts.
T h e Aztecs a ttrib u te d a ll such lo re g en erically
to the Toltecs: They w ere thinkers, fo r they
o rig in ated the yea r count, the day count; they
established the w ay in w hich the n ig h t, the
day, w ould w o rk; w hich sign was good, fav o r
a ble; and w hich was e v il, the day sign o f w ild
beasts. A ll th e ir discoveries form ed the book
fo r in te rp re tin g d re am s /* (F C : x) Those born
d u rin g the TRECENA 1 M o n k ey w e re m ost lik e ly
to be artists and scribes. As patro n o f the
trecena 1 M o n k ey , xocm riLLi m ay be the
C e n tra l M exican p atro n o f scribes and WRIT
ING.

F o r the M a y a , scribal gods are both m ore


exp lic it and m ore num erous. A ccording to
various sources, rrzAMNA invented w ritin g ,
and he appears as a scribe on Classic M a y a
pots; occasionally he teaches o th er scribes
and instructs them in th e ir counting. A super
n a tu ra l RABBIT scribe sits as if he w e re a
stenographer and records a scene on a M a y a
pot. In the M a d rid Codex, CHAC w rite s, paints,
and spews a stream o f "p rin t-o u t,** as M a y a n ists have term ed num bered strips o f p ap er
th a t scribal gods occasionally b ear. T h e most

pound o f T e titla , a p a ir o f m urals illu strates


divers c ollectin g shells in n etted bags.
T h e C lassic M a y a c le a rly id e n tifie d th e sea
w ith fresh w a te r and the w a te ry UNDERWORLD.
As a t T eo tih u ac an , the w a te r lily is id e n tifie d
w ith the p rim o rd ia l sea. T h e M a y a n w o rd fo r
w a te r lily , na6, can also d en o te th e sea and
o th er standing bodies o f w a te r. O n e head
v a ria n t o f the n u m eral 13, th e WATER LILY
SERPENT, ty p ic a lly appears w ith a bound w a te r

lily pad headdress. A n e lab o ra te stucco frie ze


a t the T e m p le o f the Seven D o lls a t D z ib ilchaltu n depicts this w a te r lily serp ent w ith
w a te r signs and m a rin e life ; accom panying
caches contained ab u n d a n t rem ains o f m a rin e
shell. I t is q u ite possible th a t this b eing is a
sea god.
T h e A zte c T em p lo M a y o r contains one o f
th e clearest id en tificatio n s o f the sea w ith
fresh w a te r and a g ric u ltu ra l fe rtility . O n the
TLALOC side o f the te m p le , corresponding to
th e w a te ry m o untain o f fe rtility and susten
ance, e lab o rate caches contained sea shells,
coral, and even m arin e fish.
serpent In religious term s, serpents m ay
have been the m ost im p o rta n t fau n a o f
M esoam erica. N o single o th er type o f crea
tu re receives such e lab o ra te tre a tm e n t in
Sahagun*s F lo re n tin e C odex, fo r exam ple,
in term s o f e ith e r text or illu stratio n . A nd
although m any p o w e rfu l anim als - JAGUARS
and EAGLES, m ost n o tab ly - p lay an im p o rta n t
ro le in iconography, snakes, perhaps because
o f th e ir num ber and v a rie ty in the n atu ral

149

SERPENT

w orld, have the broadest and m ost v arie d


roles in relig io n and religious sym bolism : in
states o f ecstasy, lords dance a serpent DANCE;
great descending rattlesnakes adorn and sup
port buildings from C hichen Itz to T e n o c h titlan, and the N a h u a tl w ord coat/, m eaning
serpent or tw in , form s p a rt o f th e nam es o f
prim ary deities such as MDtcoATL, QUETZAL
COATL, and COATLICUE.
Am ong the most im p o rta n t snakes in
M esoam erica are the boa constrictor, the fe rde-lance, the rattlesn ake, and the bushm aster. T h e harm less boa constrictor (C b n stn cfo r
constrictor), called c/ncchan by the M a y a and
m azacoat/ by the Aztecs, m ade d p rized
costum e elem en t, as evidenced by the stuffed
boa skins w orn by M a y a lords in the B onam pak m urals. T h e fe r-d e-la n ce (B othrops
a tro z), silen tly coils befo re striking, u n like its
fe llo w p it v ip er, the rattlesn ake (C ro fa/u s
durissus), w hich gives a w arn in g w ith its
tw itch in g rattles. T h e deadly bushm aster o f

The monkey scribal gods painting a codex, detail


from a Late Classic Maya vase.

C e n tra l A m erica (LecAesis m u ta) is second


in size only to the In d ia n king cobra am ong
the w orld's poisonous snakes
reaches 10' (3 m ) in length.

and

often

T h e Aztecs m ade a large num ber o f sculp


tures o f rattlesnakes, m any o f them extrem ely
n atu ralistic, and they are characteristically
carved on a ll sides, including the underside.
In both C e n tra l M exican and M a y a day
counts, the fifth day is snake. Snakeskin,
w ith its d ram atic geom etric p attern in g , is
fre q u e n tly em ulated in textiles and architec
tu ral ornam ent. E xp licit rattlesnakes are rare
in Classic M a y a a rt b u t occur w ith g reat
frequency in the a rt o f C hichen Itz . A lthough
serpents com bine w ith other creatures to
m ake m any fantastic anim als found in no
zoological guide, the open snake m outh is the
fe a tu re on w hich m any deities, g en erally
those w ith upturned snouts, are based. T h e
forked tongue is a characteristic unique to
serpents; it is not to be confused w ith the
long, curling proboscis o f the BUTTERFLY.
T w o features o f serpentine behavior w ere
probably o f p aram ount in terest to M eso am erican peoples: first, snakes sw allow th e ir prey
w hole, le ttin g it decompose inside th e ir bod
ies; and second, snakes shed th e ir skins. T h e
skins split along th e ir backs, allo w in g the
snake to slith er out, leaving behind the old
skin, and in the case o f rattlesnakes, even the
rattle s. Both these features o f snake behavior
m ay have supported the p an -M esoam erican
notion th a t snakes w e re vehicles o f re b irth

Coral, shell, and other sea offerings deposited in


a cache on the Tlaloc side of the Templo Mayor,
Tenochtitlan, Late Postclassic Aztec.

SERPENT
and tran s fo rm a tio n , fo r g re a t superna tu ra!
serpents fre q u e n tly belch a n o th er c re a tu re

ucHTM Nc bolts they hurt from the wouwTAma


w h e re RAIN gods m ake th e ir re tre a t. A lthough

from th e ir m ouths - a w a rrio r, a h u m an , a

E uropeans g en e rally see lig h tn in g as jagged

god, or a skeleton.

ra th e r than u n d u latin g lik e a serpent, w hen


lig h tn in g strikes sand it can form an u n d u lat

T h re e fu n d a m en tal notions accom pany the


M eso am erican serpent: one, th a t th e serp ent
is WATER, the con d u it o f w a te r, or th e b e a re r

in g solid strand o f glass, and M esoam erican


peoples m ay have been fa m ilia r w ith this

o f w a te r; tw o , th a t its m outh opens to a CAVE;

phenom enon.

and th re e , th a t the serpent is th e SKY. A m ong

T h e serp ent w as the body fo r m any speci-

the M a y a , linguistic support survives fo r the

Hcally M a y a gods and deiHed objects. T h e

la tte r concept:

e a rlie s t versions o f the CEREMONIAL BAR are

the

w ords snake and sky

a re hom ophones, g e n e ra lly caan or chan,

Hoppy d o u ble-h ead ed serpents from w hich

dep en d in g on the language, and th e sam e

em erge th e heads o f gods and ancestors; la te r

w o rd is usually the n u m b er 4 as w e ll. M a n y

exam ples a re g e n e ra lly s tiff stylized

M eso am erican

O ccasionally b ea rin g iconography o f th e sky

d eities ,

in clu d in g

serpent

bars.

d eities, a re considered to exist as fours, o r as

b an d , th e cerem o n ial b ar p ro b ab ly sym bol

fo u r-in -o n e , o ften w ith separate color and

ized the sky its e lf. T h e ru le r w ho held it thus

d ire c tio n a l associations.


M esoam erican people b elieved in serpent

h eld th e sky.
W ith his u p tu rn e d snout and serp ent leg,

d eities from e arliest tim es. T h e fea th e red

C I I o f the PALENQUE TRiAD gods is based on the

serpent occurs from O lm ec tim es on, and

serpent. T h e serp ent leg form s th e s ta ff to be

although it is rare am ong the Classic M a y a ,

h eld by rulers w h en C I I is in the form o f the

it is com m on a t contem porary TEOTmuACAN.

MANIKIN SCEPTER. T h e only analogous fe a tu re

A t Postclassic T u la , C hichen Itz , and T e n -

o f any C e n tra l M e x ica n god is th e serp ent foot

o ch titla n , the feath ered serpent was g en erally


know n as Q u etzalco atl, and u n til the Spanish
C onquest, was g en erally conHgured as a
rattlesn ake w ith b rig h t green p arro t or Q U E T

fe e t.
In states o f ecstasy and u su ally fo llo w in g

feath ers, ra th e r than as a hum an. T h e


fea th e red serpents ra re ly hold another crea
tu re in th e ir m ouths; w hen they do, it is often
the hum an im personator o f Q u etzalcoatl. In
various A ztec accounts, Q u etzalcoatl turns
h im self in to a serpent and then back in to an
anthropom orphic god.
T h e feath ered serpents a t Teo tih u acan and
C acaxtla have specific aquatic associations.
O n the T em p le o f Q u etzalcoatl a t T e o tih u a
can, fea th e red serpents w ith ru ffed collars
How dow n the balustrades and form u n d u lat
ing friezes across the tem p le; m arin e SHELLS conch, pecten, and spondylus - H!1 the in te r
stices and g re at WAR SERPENT headdresses ju t
out fro m the frie ze a t re g u lar in tervals. In
th e m urals a t C acaxtla, a lo rd in a b ird suit
stands on top o f a b rillia n t green fea th e red
serpent w ho Hows dow n the side to the base
o f the p ain tin g , a ll the w h ile atop fres h w ate r
aqu atic life . T h e fea th e red serpents th a t
function as columns (i.e . serpent colum ns) a t
C hichen Itz , T u la , and other Postclassic
ZA L

cities m ay w e ll in d icate the channeling o f


w a te r and life -g iv in g forces from the sky to
th e EARTH.
B oth TLALOC and CHAC carry snakes in th e ir
hands horn tim e to tim e; these snakes are the

th a t som etim es replaces one o f TEZCATLiPOCA's

BLOODLETTiNC, p a rtic u la rly


as g ra p h ica lly
depicted a t Yaxchiln, M a y a n o b ility conjure

up the visiON SERPENT. T h is g re a t u n d u latin g


serpent rises fro m b u rn in g bloody PAPER, and
from its m outh em erges an ancestor or,
occasionally, a d e ity . T h e serp ent its e lf, then ,
is p ro b ab ly w h a t one sees in the clouds o f
smoke rising fro m the b u rn in g SACRIFICE, and
cloud symbols m ay Hank the vision serp ent s
body. T h e vision serp ent can b e th e veh icle by
w hich ancestors or d eities m ake them selves
m an ifest fo r h u m an ity , and is p ro b ab ly the
sky serpent com m only dep icted a t C h ich en
Itz , p a rtic u la rly on th e gold plates dredged
fro m the Sacred C en o te.
A s im ila r deiHed serpent, th e xiuHCOATL,
know n as th e Hre serpent, b u t m ore lite ra lly
turquoise snake, plays an im p o rta n t ro le in
A ztec religious iconography. HurrziLOPOCHTH
brandished the X iu h c o atl as his w eapon w hen
he was born, and the X iu h c o atl fre q u e n tly
appears in d ep en d en tly. O n th e A ztec C a le n
d ar Stone, h o w ever, tw o Xiuhcoatls carry the
SUN on th e ir backs, and from th e ir m ouths
em erge w h a t m ay be deiHed ancestors; the
tied knots o f paper on th e ir bodies are the
same b lo o d lettin g knots used a m illen n iu m
before by the M a y a . T h e snakes, then , are
the vehicle fo r the m ovem ent o f the sun, the

151

7 AND 9 ZOOMORPHIC HEADS

bearers o f ancestors, and carry references to


bloodletting.
A coATEPANTLi, o r snake w a ll, was con
structed a t m any Postclassic cities to shield
sacred buildings or precincts. T h e earlies t
know n exam ple is a t T u la , w h e re a frie ze o f
rattlesnakes spews or devours hum an skele
tons.
T h e m ain C e n tra l M ex ica n serpent gods
at the tim e o f the Spanish C onquest w ere
Q uetzalcoat! and M ixc o atl. T h e y w e re both
celestial serpents, Q u e tza lc o a tl as th e WIND,
a sky serpent, and the b ea re r o f bounty;
M ixco atl as the personification o f the MILKY
C oatlicue is characterized by h er skirt
o f snakes, b u t she does not take the form o f
a serpent. cmcoMECOATL, 7 Snake, is a MAIZE

WAY.

CODDESS w ith a calen d rical nam e; in one


instance she is v iv id ly represented by cobs o f
m aize carved on a rattlesn ake ta il.
Dances w ith snakes or in im ita tio n o f ser
p entine m ovem ents played an im p o rtan t role
in ancient rituals (see DANCE). B oth M a y a pots
and carved m onum ents d ep ict dances w ith
snakes, and in a t least one case, the text
specifically reads th a t a M a y a king "p e rfo r
m ed the snake dance." D u rin g the A ztec
VEINTENA o f P achtontli, m en, w om en, and
child ren adorned in feathers lin ked hands
and sang w h ile perform ing the serpent dance.
D u rin g To xcatl, young seasoned w arriors
lin ked hands and m oved in an undulating
p attern , p erform ing the serpent dance w h ile
young w om en sim ultaneously danced the
popcorn dance, w ith carefu l supervision a ll
the w h ile th a t none o f the w om en be seduced
by the serpent dancers.

Aztec serpent sculptures. (Top) Turquoise mosaic


pectoral of a double-headed rattlesnake. (A&ove)
Stone carving of a coiled rattlesnake.

7 and 9 zoom orphic heads T w o d istinct heads


o ften app ear as a p air in Classic M a y a icono
graphy, and each bears a coefficient in bar and
dot n um eration, one o f 7 and the other o f 9.
Both heads have long, u pturned snouts based
on the shape o f a SERPENT head, b u t the
lo w e r ja w (and som etim es the e n tire head) is
skeletal. T h e 7 head bears the glyphs
(b lack), n a /(e a r o f MAIZE), and ran (som etim es
a referen ce to m aize); the 9 head includes a
ra re glyph fo r 20 (m ay) and m ig h t re fe r to an
obscure d e ity -

Bolon M a y e l -

know n in

C onquest-era Yucatan.
T h e 7 and 9 zoom orphic heads m ay be
carried in the hand, rest on CEREMONIAL BARS,
or set Boating in space, in cised obsidians m ay
d ep ict the heads, as m ay the e xterio r surfaces
o f cache vessels. T h e m eaning o f these heads

The 7 and 9 heads, Temple of the Sun,


Palenque, Late Classic Maya.

SHAMAN
is not d e a r,

152
b u t th ey

m ig h t fun ctio n as

toponym s re fe rrin g to sup em atu ra! places.

cer, th e ja g u a r is th e sham anic s p irit com


panion p a r exce#ence. Am ong the Classic
M a y a , th e glyph d en o tin g a UAY, or sp iritu al

sham an In anthropological lite ra tu re , th e re

a lte r ego, is a stylized hum an face h a lf covered

is fre q u e n tly a d istinctio n b etw e en th e cere

by a ja g u a r skin. T h e d e ity o f sham ans and

m onial roles o f PRIEST and sham an. W h ereas


a p rie st tends to com m unicate w ith the d iv in e

sorcerers o f L a te Postclassic C en tra! M exico ,


TEZCATLiPOCA also appears to have had the

through offerings and p ra y e r, th e sham an

ja g u a r as his s p iritu a l co-essence. See a/?o

becom es an a ctu al veh icle fo r the super

NAHUAL; TONAL; UAY.

n atu ral through ecstatic trance and s p iritpossession. D u rin g ecstatic trances -

often

shark R ecen tly, T o m Jones has d ete rm in ed

brought on by DANCE, HALLUCINOGENS, or d e p ri

th a t th e E nglish w o rd shark is b orrow ed from

vation - the sham an in teracts d ire c tly w ith

th e M a y a xoc, as in tro d uced by English sailors

the s p irit w o rld . W hereas priests a re p a rt o f

w h o had encountered the c rea tu re in the

an established religious bureaucracy, sham

C a rib b e a n Sea. Because the b u ll or cub shark

ans tend to be m ore in d ep en d en t, w ith th e ir

leaves th e SEA and travels in to fresh WATER,

pow er based upon personal charism a and

th e

expertise. A lthough

M esoam ericans w ho liv e d along the sea coast

the contrast b etw een

c rea tu re

w as

fa m ilia r

not

only

to

priest and sham an is a useful dichotom y, the

b u t p ro b ab ly also to those w ho liv e d w e ll

d istinction is not hard and fast. In actual

u p riv e r, such as the M a y a o f Piedras N egras


and Yaxchiln o r th e O lm ecs o f San Lorenzo.

practice, the roles o f sham an and p riest


o verlap
considerably.
A lthough
p riestly
offices w e re com m on in the com plex urban
societies o f Postclassic M esoam erica, m any
p riestly roles suggest an o ld er substratum o f
sham anic b e lie f and practice.
T h e term sham an is not

n ative

to

M esoam erica or even to the N e w W o rld but


ra th e r derives from the Tungus language
o f S iberia. N onetheless, m any o f the traits
observed in Siberian sham anism , such as
ecstatic trance, supernatural flig h t, and
a nim al s p irit com panions, are also present in
m uch
o f the
N ew
W o rld ,
including
M esoam erica. M a n y features o f M eso am erican sham anism are o f considerable a n tiq u ity ,
and w e re probably brought from Asia by
the Erst P aleoindian in h abitan ts o f the N e w
W o rld . T h e sham anic im portance o f anim al
transform ation
and
anim al
spirits
in
M esoam erica suggests rem ote h u n te r and
g ath erer origins from b efo re the developm ent
o f agricu ltu re and food production.
A lthough sham anism was probably p resent
in M esoam erica w e ll befo re the appearance
o f a g ricu ltu re and settled v illag e life , it can
be Erst docum ented am ong the F o rm a tiv e
O lm ecs. P e ter F u rst has called a tten tio n to a
fascinating them e in O lm ec stone sculpture,
a kneeling m an th a t becomes a JAGUAR - w h a t
he term s transform ation figures. F u rst has
suggested th a t these sculptures d ep ict the
sham an being transform ed in to his a lte r ego,
the ja g u a r. W hereas the b ear is fre q u e n tly
the c reatu re o f p o w erfu l shamans and curers
in N o rth A m erica, b elo w the T ro p ic o f C a n

A te rrify in g c re a tu re to hum ans, th e shark


was d eified e a rly on in M eso am erican society.
T h e O lm ecs had a shark god, c le a rly m arked
by a shark tooth, and fossilized G re a t W h ite
Shark tee th have been found a t O lm ec sites.
A shark m ay v ery w e ll be the basis fo r the
M a y a JESTER COD, v ery e a rly versions o f w hich
have a d efin ed shark tooth, and th e shark
tooth o f C l o f the PALENQUE TRIAD also indicates
a relatio n ship w ith the shark. T h e A ztecs
cached shark tee th in to the T em p lo M a y o r
along w ith o th e r m a rin e m a te ria l.
shell N obles in an cien t M exico and G u a te
m ala im p o rted sea shells to in la n d centers from
both coasts through tra d e and trib u te . A t the
tim e o f the C onquest, the A ztecs dem anded
1600 spondylus shells a y e a r in trib u te from
coastal regions. T h e Aztecs deposited thou
sands o f shells along w ith o th e r m a rin e and
aqu atic m aterials, in clu d in g corals, snail
shells, and skeletons o f SEA creatu res, in
caches in th e T em p lo M a y o r. T h e conch
shells in clu d ed in O ffe rin g 48, a deposit o f
sacrificed c h ild ren , re fe rre d to the aquatic
n atu re o f TLALOC, to w hom th e o fferin g was
d edicated. G ia n t stone effigies o f conchs
rested along the T la lo c side o f the T w in
P yram id . A b alo n e shells, w h ich occur n a t
u ra lly no fa rth e r south than th e coast o f B aja
C a lifo rn ia , m ade th e ir w ay in to A zte c caches,
giving us some sense o f the long-distance
trad e th a t th e Aztecs m anaged.
A t T ik a l, archaeologists found spondylus
shells o f both A tla n tic and Pacific species,

153
and the pearls from such tho rn y oysters w e re
w om as je w e lry by the M a y a e lite . M a n y
spondylus shells w e re scraped to re ve al a
b rig h t red or orange concavity; w h en thus
carved, the shells w ere sew n onto cloaks,
w orn as necklaces or w o rn a t the w aist. T h e
MAIZE GOD, for exam ple, o fte n w ears such a
shell a t the w aist, as do m any w om en who

SKY

Olmec portrayal of a shark, San Lorenzo


Monument 58, Early Formative period.

w e ar the costum e, perhaps signifying fem ale


fe rtility . A t C opan, an excavated cached spon
dylus shell still held traces o f hum an BLOOD.
Along w ith strings o f dots, a lte rn a tin g cuta
ways and proHles o f spondylus shells w ere
used by the M a y a to in d ic ate w a te r in th e ir
representations. M a y a lords w o re oliva shells
as noisem aking tinklers a t the w aist. In Post
classic M a y a hieroglyphic w ritin g , a shell
functions as the com pletion sign, probably
in d icatin g th a t shells w e re used in counting
out sums.
Conch, spondylus, and pecten shells Hank
the und ulatin g body o f QUETZALCOATL on the
T em p le o f Q uetzalcoatl a t TEOTiHU AC AN. Since
the v a rie ty and num ber o f shells increased
d ra m atic ally a t T ik a l a fte r it cam e in contact
w ith Teo tih u acan , the Teotihuacanos m ay
have dom inated the shell trad e during the
Classic period. A t C acaxtla, paintings o f
shells, som etim es in h abited by creatures th a t
never d w e lt in such shells, form aquatic
borders around regal lords. T h e Olm ecs
carved JADE into the shapes o f clam shells and
then strung these large disks into necklaces.
D u rin g the L a te F o rm ative period W est M e x
ican artists m ade clay Hgures o f musicians
playing conch shell trum pets, a practice w e ll
docum ented a t the tim e o f the Conquest.
Some W est M exican nobles w ore conch shells
on th e ir heads to signify high status.
W orn around the neck as a pendant or
chest ornam ent, a cross-sectioned slice of
conch shell is one o f Q uetzalcoatl *s identifying
characteristics. Dozens o f such pieces of conch
have been found, p articularly in Veracruz.
T h e M a y a God N (seescHELLHAScoDs) usually
emerges from a shell, eith er a conch or a snail
shell. T h e C entral M exican god Tepeyollotl,
H e a rt of the M o u n tain , is often depicted w ith

Youth Hshing for marine shells, Tetitla,


Teotihuacan, Classic period. Shells are
widespread in the iconography of Teotihuacan

conch shells, w hich may be w h y the T em p lo


M a y o r, conceived to be a symbolic MOUNTAIN,
held so m any shells.
skullrack see TZOMPANTLi
sky U n lik e the realm s o f th e EARTH and UNDER
WORLD, w h ich could be p en e trated by hum ans,

Tonacatecuhtli in the highest realm of the sky,


Omeyocan, the place of duality; Codex Vaticanus
A, 16th c. Aztec.

SKY BANOS

!M

the sky was a source o f m ystery, a super


n a tu ra l re a lm e n tire ly d istin ct fro m th a t o f

sky band w ith the sam e o u tw a rd ly sloping


diagonal bars and in v e rte d " U " elem ents as

hum an beings. T h e concept o f sacredness

those th a t a p p e ar on Stela I a t L a V en ta.

w as o fte n tie d to the d eg ree o f p ro xim ity to

C a rv e d som e 500 years a fte r L a V en ta

th e heavens. Thus sacred shrines and TEMPLES

Stela 1, th e A lv ara d o Stela is roughly contem

w e re

especially

poraneous w ith Iza p a , K am in alju y u and o th er

hig h p rom ontories, such as MOUNTAINS and

Protoclassic sites o f the M a y a region. A t

fre q u e n tly

placed

ato p

Iz a p a , sky bands also ap p ear w ith the p a ir o f

PYRAMIDS.

Since a t least the F o rm a tiv e O lm ec p erio d ,

o u tw a rd ly lean in g diagonal bands, although

specific signs d e lin e a te d the sky. In th e a rt

h ere the lo w e r in v e rte d " U " elem ents are

o f C lassic M eso am erica, d eities fre q u e n tly

missing. In s te a d , the lo w e r p ortion typ ically

em erge from the sky or heavens. A m ong the

contains a c en tral v e rtic a l tab Hanked by a

Zapotees, the m o tif know n as the "ja w s o f

p a ir o f o u tw a rd ly cu rlin g elem ents. Classic

the sky" is based on the jo in e d profiles o f the

M aya

e n tity know n as E / A v e de

by a segm ented band. W ith in the re g u larly

A ncho, the

sky bands a re

usually represented

Zapotee version o f the PRINCIPAL BIRD DEITY. In

spaced segm ents are signs d e lin e a tin g the

L a te Classic Z apotee a rt, figures descend fro m

S U N , M O O N , STARS,

these celestial ja w s . Ancestors and d eities are

phenom ena. A t tim es, the lo w e r p o rtio n o f

darkness, and o th e r celestial

fre q u e n tly depicted in the u pper portion o f

the sky band m ay be m arked w ith the b elly

Classic M a y a stelae, in the region correspond


ing to the sky.

scutes o f the

SER P E NT.

T h is p ro b ab ly derives

from the fac t th a t the M a y a n w ords snake

was

and sky a re hom onym s. T h e sam e punning

believed to have d istinct levels, often cited

o f snake and sky m ay be seen in m any

as 13, p a rtic u la rly am ong the Classic and

instances o f the Classic M a y a C E R E M O N IA L BAR,


w hich can a p p ear as a bicep h alic serpent

In

ancien t

M esoam erica,

the

sky

Postclassic M a y a . A sky sign w ith the


coefficient o f 13 fre q u e n tly accom panies the
MUAN owL in M a y a representations. T h e C o l
onial A ztec V atican us A m anuscript provides
us w ith a d eta ile d account o f the 13 levels o f
the sky, w ith the creato r couple TONACATECUHTH and Tonacacihuat! residing in the
highest level also know n as O m eyocan, "place
o f d u a lity ." .See a/so SKY BANDS; SKYBEARERS.
sky bands In southern M esoam erica, the sky
was freq u e n tly rendered as a band m arked
w ith diagonal and vertic al elem ents. T h e
sky band first appears w ith the F o rm a tiv e
O lm ecs, and continues in the M a y a region
u n til the Spanish C onquest, a clear exam ple
o f c o n tin u ity from the Olm ecs to the la te r
M a y a . O ne o f the earlies t know n sky bands
appears on P otrero N uevo M o n u m e n t 2, an
E a rly F o rm a tiv e ALTAR-throne. Q u ite pro
b ab ly, this O lm ec m onum ent was considered
as a celestial THRONE, m uch lik e the sky band
thrones o f the la te r Classic M a y a . Stela 1
fro m the M id d le F o rm a tiv e O lm ec site o f L a
V e n ta displays a sky band in its upper portion.
T h e band contains the same in v erted " U "
elem ents w hich appear on the e a rlie r P otrero
N uevo M o n u m e n t, although here they are
topped by a p a ir o f o u tw ard ly lean in g diag
onal bands. T h e A lvarad o S tela, a Protoclassic
m onum ent w ritte n in the script o f the T u x tla
S tatu e tte and L a M o ja rra Stela 1, contains a

w ith a sky band body. T h e segm ented sky


band continues in M a y a a rt u n til the L a te
Postclassic, and m ay be seen in the m urals o f
T u lu m as w e ll as in the M a y a codices. *ee
a / s o SKY; SKYBEARERS.

sky bearers A ccording to Postclassic C e n tra l


M exican b e lie f, p a rtic u la r gods had th e ro le
o f sustaining the SKY. A ccording to th e F&yfona
de /os m exicanos p o r sus p in furas, the heavens
w e re raised by the fo u r sons o f the c reato r
couple along w ith fo u r o th er gods. T o assist
in this e ffo rt, QUETZALCOATL and TEZCATLIPOCA
transform ed them selves in to tw o g re a t trees.
In the Vaticanus B and B orgia codices, p a ra l
le l passages illu s tra te fo u r skybearers, each
o rien ted to a specific w o rld DIRECTION and
YEARBEARER. In both codices th e fo u r gods,
directions and y e a rb e a re r days ru n as follow s:
TLAHUizcALPANTECUHTLi w ith th e east and
A c a tl, x iu H T E C u H T L i w ith the n o rth and T e c p a t!, EHECATL-QUETZALCOATL w ith the w est and
C a lli, and fin a lly , MiCTLANTECUHTLi w ith the
south and T o c h tli. T h e C e n tra ! M exican
skybearers w e re fa r fro m being e n tire ly
benevolent. A ccording to Tezozom oc, the sky
bearers w e re T z rrziM iM E , the fierce STAR
dem ons o f darkness th a t th reaten ed to
descend and destroy the w o rld d u rin g ECLIPSES
and the NIGHT v ig il m arking the end o f the
5 2 -ye ar cycle.

155
T h e M ix te e form o f E h e ca tl-Q u e tzalc o atl,
9 W in d , was also regarded as a skybearer.
Thus on page 47 o f the Codex Vindobonensis,
9 W in d supports the sky. H o w e v e r, in this
instance, the SEA Elled w ith m arin e SHELLS is
depicted lying above the sky. W h a t p a rtic u la r
cosmic event this scene refers to is still
unknow n.
T h e ancient M a y a had h ig h ly developed
concepts regarding the skybearers. According
to D iego de L an d a, the Postclassic Yuca tec
M a y a had fou r skybearers know n as the
bacabs. As in C e n tra l M exico , each o f the
four bacabs was associated w ith a p a rtic u la r

SMILING FIGURES

../?=a

'--- =3__cm .

yearb earer day as w e ll as directio n . In creas


ing evidence suggests th a t the bacabs are
identical to the aged q u a d rip a rtite d eity
know n as PAUAHTUN. A lthough some have
suggested that Pauahtun supported the EARTH
ra th e r than the heavens, th e re a re explicit
exam ples o f Pauahtun supporting celestial
THRONES rendered w ith a seat in the form of
a SKY BAND o r SERPENT.

In ancient M esoam erica, the skybearers


w e re w id e ly id e n tifie d w ith the ofRce o f
rulership. Tezozom oc m entions an A ztec term
for the skybearers, "sustainers o f the cane
m a t," w hich re fe r to the w oven cane MAT th a t
sym bolized the seat o f kings. T h e concept
o f skybearers supporting celestial thrones
extends even as fa r back as the E a rly F o rm a
tiv e O lm ec period. T w o DWARVES support a
sky band on P otrero N uevo M o n u m en t 2.
T h e role o f skybearers probably re late d to
the M esoam erican concept o f public ofBce as
an elevated burden or CARGO to be passed
from one office-holder to another.
sm iling Egures Sm iling faces characterize
m any sm all, solid figurines as w e ll as larg er,
h o llow -bodied
ceram ic
sculptures
from
Classic period V eracru z, and they have come
to be know n by this distinctive facial
expression. T ra d itio n a lly , such figures have
been associated w ith the site o f Rem ojadas,
from w hich large num bers are reputed to
com e, b u t they have also been found at
m any o th er sites, including N opiloa and D icha
T u e rta . L ittle is know n about them archaeologically, b u t most com e from L a te Classic
burials.
Sm iling figures usually engage in pleasur
able activities: m any DANCE, others m ake
s till others hold o u t th e ir arm s in
the o ran t or prayin g position. M o s t w e a r
M u s ic ;

costumes o f ric h ly p a tte rn e d cotton CLOTH.

e
Examples of sky bands, a, Potrero Nuevo
Monument 2, Early Formative Olmec. A La
Venta Stela 1, Middle Formative Olmec, c,
Alvarado Stela, Late Formative, d, Izapa Stela
12, Protoclassic Maya, e, Sarcophagus lid of
Pacal, Palenque, Late Classic Maya.

SNAKE

HM
L iv e ly MONKEYS jo in hum ans, and a fe w o th e r

a re reg ard ed as the source o f WATER, including

an im als, such as DEER and RABBITS, a re associ

even th e RAIN clouds. T h e re ce n tly discovered

a te d w ith the sm ilin g figurines, though fe w

O lm ec

o f the anim als sm ile. Som e o f th e anim als

y ie ld e d offerings o f carved w ood, JADE, RUBBER,

site

of El

M a n a t,

V e ra cru z,

has

tu rn on w h e e le d fe e t, and such toys are th e

and o th e r goods th a t w e re placed in the

o n ly know n exam ples o f th e w h e e l in a n cien t

crystal c lea r w aters o f a n a tu ra l spring. T h e

M eso am erica.

m any CENOTES and w a te r-fille d CAVES o f Yuca

T h e sheer d elig h t o f these figurines long

tn can be considered as form s o f springs, and

m ade them a focus fo r collectors w ho sought

have been places o f w o rsh ip fo r m ille n n ia . For

an a lte rn a tiv e to the ico nographically dense

ra in cerem onies, th e con tem po rary Yucatec

a rt o f the M a y a o r A ztecs. Some investigators

M a y a s till collect the sacred 'v irg in w a te r," or

have suggested th a t th e sm iling figures m ay

zu h u y ha, fro m isolated sub terran ean pools.

be in states o f ecstatic tran sfo rm atio n or

D u rin g the Tarascan fe s tiva l o f Sicuindiro,

perhaps d ru g -ind u ced trances; h o w e ve r, it is

th e BLOOD fro m

m ore lik e ly th a t m any o f the sm iling figures

p oured in to tw o hot springs ded icated to

rep resen t perform ers.

tw o sacrificed slaves was

C u e ra v a p e ri, the m o th e r o f the gods, and


vapors rising from these h o t springs brought

snake see SERPENT

the ra in clouds. A m ong the Aztecs o f C e n tra l


M ex ico , springs w e re fre q u e n tly id e n tifie d
w ith the ahuehue% or " w a te r d ru m " tree

spider In ancient M eso am erica, spiders w e re


com m only id e n tifie d w ith fem ale goddesses
and the EARTH. A t TEOTiHUACAN, an im p o rtan t
goddess id e n tifie d by a fanged nose b ar
appears w ith spiders. It seems th a t this e n tity
was considered to be a spider earth goddess,
much lik e Spider G ran d m o th er o f the contem
p o rary A m erican Southw est. ixcHEL, the aged
Postclassic Yucatec goddess o f DiviNATioN,
m id w ife ry and cuRiNC, was also idenE ed
w ith the spider. D iv in a tio n stones re fe rre d to
as spiders played an im p o rtan t p a rt in the
cerem onies dedicated to Ixchel d u rin g the
m onth o f Z ip . In the C o lo n ial A fu a / o the
Bacahs, Ixchel is m entioned p ro m in e n tly in
a p ra ye r concerning venom ous spiders.
In Classic and Postclassic M a y a iconogra
phy, the old Pauahtun SKYBEARER can appear
w earin g a spider's w eb . T h is correlated w ith
C e n tra l M exican conceptions o f the skybearers, w ho threaten ed to descend to the earth
in the form o f dem onic T zrrziM iM E . Because o f
th e ir headlong descent, th e z/&nne w e re
com pared to the spider descending by its
thread . O n an A ztec stone copy o f the
jMuhmo/pi7h y ear BUNDLE, a tz itz im it/ star
dem on is depicted descending from the starry
sky as a spider, com plete w ith a w eb placed
a t the tip o f the abdom en. A lthough by no
m eans a n a tu ra l tra it, the curious p a ir o f
antennae is found w ith o th er A ztec spider
representations.

springs F ro m the F o rm a tiv e period to con


tem p o rary tim es, springs have been places o f
religious w orship. In m any religions, springs

(TTarodiuin m ucronaiM /n). A ccording to F ra y


D ieg o D u r n , these g re a t trees alw ays g re w
a t springs. S till today, p ilg rim s collect spring
w a te r fro m the roots o f a g re a t a h u e h u e t/
tree on the outskirts o f C h alm a.
stars

and

planets

A n c ie n t

skyw atchers

keenly observed th e m ovem ents o f a ll h eav


e n ly bodies in M eso am erica th a t could be
observed w ith th e naked eye, in clu d in g the
M e rc u ry , VENUS, M a rs , Jup iter,
and Saturn. T h e y observed the MILKY WAY,
perceived groups o f stars to fo rm constel
lations, and M a y a astronom ers - lik e th e ir
counterparts in the an cien t O ld W o rld - m ay
have recognized a zodiac along th e eclip tic.
Glass, and, by extension, lenses, w e re n ever
in ven ted in the N e w W o rld ; astronom ers
used pairs o f crossed sticks and observed
featu res on th e horizon through the notches.
T h e anom alous round b u ild in g called the
C aracol ("s n a il") a t C h ich en Itz p ro b ab ly
functioned as an observatory, its n arro w w in
dows a t th e upperm ost story guid in g observa
tions o f the m ovem ents o f Venus. O n e M ix te e
city was know n as N d is i nuu (n o w T laxiaco ),
or "c le a rly seen"; it was th e site o f a p ro m i
nen t observatory. M o u n d J, one o f the oldest
buildings a t M o n te A lb a n , p ro b ab ly acted as
an observatory fo r the rising o f the star
C a p e lla , w hich m ay have been understood to
guide the sun on the day o f the Erst zen ith
passage a t the la titu d e o f M o n te A lb n .
(Z e n ith passage occurs w h en the sun passes
d ire c tly overhead, a phenom enon w hich
occurs tw ic e an n u ally a t the E q u ato r, on the
SUN, MOON,

157
equinoxes, once an n u ally a t the T ro p ic o f
Cancer and the T ro p ic o f C ap rico rn , a t th e ir
respective sum m er solstices, and tw ice ann u
ally in b etw een , ranging according to la ti
tude.)
A lthough n e ith e r the Erst nor last astron
omers in M esoam erica, th e Classic M a y a
becam e the most s k illfu l skyw atchers w e
know of. R ecent investigations in to Classic
texts have revealed a high le v e l o f sophistic
ation in M a y a observations, p a rtic u la rly o f
planets. T h e M a y a v iew ed the M ilk y W a y as
the road to X ib a lb a and saw in the seasonal
m ovem ents o f constellations along the ecliptic
th e ir fun d am en tal CREATION story. T h e y tim ed
events o f w a r and SACRIFICE to coincide w ith
the m ovem ents o f Venus and Jup iter. A ccord
ing to his inscriptions, C h an B ahlum , a la te
7th c. P alenque king, not only live d by the
m ovem ents o f Jupiter, b u t the m ajor events
o f his life dovetailed w ith the m ovem ents o f
th a t p la n et deep in the past.
stela M esoam erican peoples erected p ris
m atic stone slabs called stelas or stelae to
celeb rate the reigns and ritu a l passages o f
the ru lin g e lite , and usually o f the suprem e
ru le r h im self. T h e im petus to erect stelae Erst
cam e in the M id d le F o rm a tiv e am ong the
O lm ec, w hen other efforts to record history
also developed. Stelae a t L a V e n ta depict
historical rulers a ttire d in re g alia th a t sym bol
ized and reinforced the oiRce and p o w er o f
an e a rly king.
T h e custom o f erecting stelae subsequently
took root in the Isth m ian region during the
L a te F o rm a tiv e and Protoclassic, p a rt o f the
constellation o f traditions characterizing east
ern M esoam erica. A t C h iap a de C orzo and
Tres Zapotes, M esoam ericans began to
inscribe long count dates (CALENDAR) on stelae,
Exing them in tim e. A t A b aj T a k a lik and
Iza p a , altars w ere p aired w ith stelae, a p a t
tern th a t continued a t most Classic M a y a
sites. Iza p a stelae featu re m ythical scenes
and g en erally lack dates; the A baj T a k a lik
m onum ents depict rulers in E a rly Classic
M a y a poses, and the hum an Egures are
accom panied by dates and long texts.
Classic M a y a stelae h ear texts th a t reveal
some ancient perceptions o f the m onum ents.
F o llo w in g the katu n ending d ate , the glyphs
on Stela 9 a t L am an ai can be read dzapah fe
un or The setting o f the stone tr e e /' as
recently deciphered by D av id Stuart and N iko
lai G rube. These stelae, then, w e re in d ivid u al

STELA
(AgAf) Spider
descending from the
starry sky as a iz/tzKcut/;
note the web at the
tip of its abdomen.
Detail from a stone
copy of a year bundle,
Late Postclassic Aztec.

(Be/ow) Stela D,
Quirigu, Late
Classic Maya.

t!M

STHLNC HYPOTHESIS
trees; as tim e passed and dozens o f m onu

M o relo s, d ep ictin g tw o jaguars c lim b in g atop

m ents clustered on a c en tral p laza th ey fo r

and a ttackin g hum an victim s, w ith no in d i


cation o f any sexual act. See a/so JAGUAR com ;

m ed w h a t L in d a Scheie and D a v id F re id e l
have called a "fo re s t o f kings."

OLMEC CODS.

T h e C lassic b u ild ers o f C h o lu la in C e n tra l


M exico adopted the custom o f e rec tin g stelae
and ALTARS, although no fig u ra tiv e carved

sun A ltho u g h the sun was u n doubtedly w o r


shipped fro m rem o te a n tiq u ity , the first clear

im ag ery survives; a t Xochicalco and T u la ,

rep resen tatio n o f it appears am ong the P roto

b efo re AD 900, ru lin g lords adopted the prac

classic M a y a in th e fo rm o f the fou r-p eta led

tice o f e rectin g stelae w ith th e ir p o rtraits . In


Y ucatan, stelae w e re erected throughout the

elem e n t com m only re fe rre d to as the Ain sign,


Am being the M a y a n term fo r "su n " or "d a y. "

Postclassic, b u t the im ag ery sh ifted , the d yn

A t th e Protoclassic site o f C erros, B elize, the

astic ru le r g ivin g w ay to representations o f

Ain sign appears on the cheek o f a b lu n t

th e setting o f th e sup ern atu ral lords o f the

snouted m ask, p ro b ab ly to id e n tify this e n tity

katu n , re flec tin g a changed society m ore

as th e solar JAGUAR. T h e Ain glyph continued

concerned

w ith

the collective

com m unity

to serve as the M a y a solar sign u n til the

than the single a ll-p o w e rfu l ru le r.

Spanish C onquest.

S tirlin g H ypothesis In 1955, the noted O lm ec

re a d ily id e n tifie d u n til the T e rm in a l Classic

In highland M exico , solar signs cannot be


archaeologist M a tth e w S tirlin g suggested th a t

p erio d . In this case, the sun is in d icated by

m any

a disk w ith

"wKRHjACUAn"

figures

app earin g

in

O lm ec a rt d erived from an ancient O lm ec


origin m yth in w hich a JACUAR copulated
w ith w om an. Thus the O lm ecs m ay have
considered them selves as "peo p le o f the
ja g u a r," a union o f ja g u a r and hum an. H o w
ever a ttra c tiv e or in trig u in g this concept m ay
be, there is little m a te ria l evidence fo r such
a creation m yth am ong the O lm ecs.
S tirlin g based his theory on tw o badly
dam aged E a rly F o rm a tiv e O lm ec m onum ents
from the region o f San Lorenzo, T en o ch titlan
M o n u m e n t 1 and P otrero N uevo M o n u m e n t 3.
According to Stirlin g , T en o ch titlan M o n u m e n t
1 represents an anthropom orphized ja g u ar
copulating w ith a supine w om an. H o w ev er, on
close inspection, it can be seen th a t the up p er
figure displays no ja g u a r a ttrib u tes b u t is fu lly
hum an. M o reo v er, the figure appears to be in
b a llp la y e r garb, m uch lik e the contem porane
ous b a llp la y e r figurines from Las Bocas.
A ltho u g h it is possible th a t the lo w e r Rgure is
a w om an, the ankles a re crossed and bound.
In stead o f representing a m yth ical copulation,
this m onum ent m ay d ep ict the S A C R IF IC E o f a
C A P T I V E in association w ith the B A L L G A M E . T h e
o th er sculpture, Potrero N uevo M o n u m e n t 3,
c le a rly displays a ram p an t ja g u ar over a
hum an. U n fo rtu n a te ly , the m onum ent is too
dam aged to provide any in d icatio n o f the gen
d er o f e ith e r figure or to d eterm in e w h e th e r
copulation is in ten d ed. I t is q u ite possible th a t
th e m onum ent depicts a ja g u a r attacking a
hapless hum an. In them e, the sculpture is not
ably sim ilar to an O lm ec-style re lie f fro m the
M id d le F o rm a tiv e site o f C halcatzingo,

ra d ia tin g

tria n g u la r elem ents

representing solar rays. O n e o f the e arlies t


occurrences o f the rayed solar disk appears
on the abdom en o f a standing ja g u a r on the
T e rm in a l Classic N evad o de T o lu ca S tela.
T h e rayed solar disk is especially com m on in
the a rt and w ritin g o f L a te Postclassic C e n tra l
M exico . In m any instances, the disk bears
the d ate 4 O llin , the nam e o f the p resent sun
created a t TEOTIHUACAN.
In an cien t M eso am erica, solar gods tend
to be yo u th fu l m ales, consistent w ith th e vigor
and p o w er o f th e rising sun. In the M a y a
region, th e sun was also id e n tifie d w ith the
m ost p o w e rfu l c rea tu re o f th e forest, the
JAGUAR. T h e N evad o de T o lu ca S tela suggests
th a t th e ja g u a r w as also considered a solar
c reatu re in C e n tra l M exico d u rin g the T e r
m in al Classic p eriod. In th e A ztec m yth o f
the creation o f th e fifth and p resen t sun, both
the ja g u a r and the EAGLE w e re born out
o f the solar p yre a t T eo tih u ac an . In L a te
Postclassic C e n tra l M ex ico , th e sun was p e rsonihed by the y o u th fu l TO N A TiuH , w ho tends
to be p o rtrayed w ith red skin, golden h a ir
and a p ro m in en t rayed solar disk. .See aVso
CREATION ACCOUNTS; DAWN; FIVE SUNS; SCHELLHAS
GODS.

sun god see KiNiCH AHAU


sw eatbath T h e sw eatb ath served th e ancient
M esoam erican com m unity as a place o f
CURING, rest, and m ain ten an ce o f h ealth .
T ra d itio n a l n ative com m unities today often
construct sweathouses and continue to use

159

SWEATBATH

them as places o f healing. In M esoam erica,


rituals o f healing w e re religious rites, in w hich
app ro p riate gods w e re invoked. T h e process
of re tre atin g to the sw eatbath offered seclu
sion from society, in its e lf a p u rify in g act, b u t
the trea tm en t by m oist h ea t was seen as
a pinnacle o f P U R IF IC A T IO N . W h en a person
em erged from a sw eatbath, th a t person was
as if "re b o rn " from the w om b o f the E A R T H .
A ncient M esoam erican sw eatbaths have
been found near the ritu a l precincts o f cities,
as w e ll as in dom estic sectors. A t th e M a y a
city o f Piedras N egras, a t least eig h t elab o r
a te, m asonry sw eatbaths served the core o f
the city, some d ire ctly adjacen t to the king's
palace and TE M P L E S . U n lik e sim pler contem
porary exam ples, each o f these Piedras
N egras sw eatbaths was encompassed w ith in
a la rg er structure, perhaps a place o f
additional ritu a l, b u t also, surely, fo r the

Stirling Hypothesis: Potrero Nuevo Monument


3, a sculpture purportedly showing the copulation
between a jaguar and a woman, Early Formative
Olmec.

m undane needs o f privacy and dressing. To


increase the tem p eratu re w ith in the bath
itse lf, the steam cham ber was a sm all, lo w ,
vau lted room w ith in the la rg e r structure, w ith
room for tw o benches and a firebox. As in
most ancient sw eatbaths, the Piedras Negras
exam ples included fireboxes lin e d w ith
broken p o ttery for repeated heatings. WATER
w ould have been throw n on this firebox to
release clouds o f steam in to the cham ber,
and a channel led outside to carry aw ay the
w a te r.
T h e recognition o f sw eatbaths a t Piedras
N egras led to fu rth e r such identifications in
o th er M esoam erican cities, b u t a t no other
place have they been found in such abund
ance or on such a scale. As the ethnohistoric
record makes clear, how ever, the sw eatbath
was a standard fea tu re o f M esoam erican
cities, and m any o f the m odern, ethnographically docum ented exam ples are sm all and
w ould be m ore d ifficu lt to recognize in an
archaeological context.
Know n in C en tra! M exico as the fem asca/,
the sw eatbath was dedicated to the god
T E Z C A T L iP O C A , according to the gloss o f the
Codex M ag liab ech iano , b u t the p ictu re o f the

Tonatiuh, the Centra! Mexican sun god, Codex


Borgia, p. 23, Late Postclassic period.

same m anuscript shows the fro n ta l face o f


the goddess TLAZOLTEOTL over the doorw ay,
and m ost sw eatbaths w e re probably d ed i
cated to h er or to Toci, a re late d fem ale
goddess. T la z o lteo tl was the A ztec goddess
know n by the e p ith e t " e a te r o f filth ," and
she w as the one to w hom

C O N FESSIO NS

w e re

m ade, so she is the m ost a p p ro p riate d eity


for the dedication o f the p u rify in g sw eatbath.

The fema^ca/, or sweatbath, Codex


Magliabechiano, 16th c. Aztec.

TAMOANCHAN
T h e C odex M a g liab ec h ia n o also inform s us
th a t

w h en any sick person w e n t to the b ath

house, [th a t sick person] o # e re d incense,


w hich th ey ca copa/, to th e id o l and covered

160
in illu stratio n s fo r the iRBcm** o f 1 C a lli.
T h e goddess p residing over this frecen# is
rrzpAPALOTL, one o f th e p rin c ip al zt&r/m/fne
dem ons.

the body in black in ven eratio n o f th e ido!


th ey c a ll T ezc ate p o c atl [T e zc a tlip o c a ], w ho

T e c p a tl see

C A L E N D A R ; F L IN T ; YEARBEARERS

is one o f th e ir m ajo r gods."


T h e s w eatb ath was especially im p o rta n t to

tem a la ca tl A ccording to various accounts, in

m idw ives and th e ir p atie n ts , p reg n an t or

o rd er to h u m ilia te the d efe ated Tepanecs and

recen t!y d e liv e re d w om en, fo r w hom T la z o l-

to reen act th e ir dem ise in a p ublic forum ,

teot! was also patroness. Sahagn cites the

M otecuhzom a.1 in v en ted a sort o f g la d ia to ria l


SACRIFICE subsequently used to cele b rate gen

form a! speech o f a m id w ife , w ho addresses


h e rs e lf to the parents o f a p re g n a n t w om an:

erations o f A ztec victo ries. In these contests,

he speciBes Y o a!ticit! as th e m o ther o f the

an A zte c w a rrio r tied a hapless prisoner to a

gods, w ith dom inion over sw eatbaths, know n

sacriBcia! stone called

in some cases as xocMca/Zi, or B ow er houses.

forced h im to engage in com bat u n til DEATH

the fe m a /a c a f/ and

O nce inside the sw eatb ath , a tten d in g PRIESTS

or d e fe a t. These round stones w e re p e rfo r

and priestesses (o r the supphcants th e m

ated by a hole a t the c en ter, and a rope ran

selves) struck the bodies o f the supphcants

from the CAPnvE s leg and through the stone,

w ith various grasses, herbs, and sticks, but

handicapping the v ictim . In such g la d ia to ria l

p regnant w om en w e re som etim es excused

com bat, the victorious w a rrio r usually donned

from such rigors. A fte r a BIRTH, a w om an

the a ttire o f a JAGUAR kn ig h t w h ile the d efe ated


one w o re a fe a th e r costum e; the victorious

rep aired to the sw eatbath for massage by the


m id w ife , probab!y to h elp shrink the uterus.
R ecently d elive re d highland M a y a w om en
and th e ir m idw ives in G u a te m ala s till fre
q u en t the sw eatbath.

w a rrio r arm ed h im s e lf w ith a m a c u a /iu /f/,


or club w ith em bedded OBSIDIAN blades dis
guised by feath ers w h ile the d e fe ated one
w ield e d a club w ith only feath ers. D esp ite
such odds, the cap tive tied to th e fe m a /a c a f/

Tam oanchan In L a te Postclassic C e n tra l


M exico , Tam oanchan was considered a m y th
ical and paradisiacal place o f origin. A t
Tam oanchan, the gods fashioned the present
race o f hum ans from p e n ite n tia l B LO O D and
ground hum an bones stolen from the U N D E R
W O R L D (see C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S ). T h e F lo re n
tin e Codex relates th a t P U L Q U E was also disco
vered a t Tam oanchan. In the F lo re n tin e
C odex account, Tam oanchan appears to be
placed in the g eneral G u lf Coast region
o f the H uastec M a y a . In fa c t, the term
Tam oanchan is a M a y a n w o rd , and could be
paraphrased as "p lace o f the m isty sky,"
an a p p ro p riate description o f th e hum id G u lf
Coast.
In the C e n tra l M exican codices, T am oan
chan is represented by a B ow ering c le ft
tre e e m ittin g blood. T h e signiBcance o f this
toponym is u n certain , although it m ay re la te
to the A ztec origin legend o f M A Y A H U E L , in
w hich TzrrziMiME dem ons tore a p a rt th e tree
containing M a y a h u e l and Q U E T Z A L C O A T L . In
th e codices, Tam oanchan com m only appears

occasionally succeeded a t b ea tin g o ff his


enem y, and perhaps several o f them in
succession. In some cases, the cap tive im m e d i
a te ly achieved his lib e rty ; in others he
was nonetheless sacriBced. In s till others, the
v a lia n t c ap tive then faced a le ft-h a n d e d
w a rrio r, w ho was alm ost c e rta in to slash and
d e fe a t his enem y.
L arg e crowds observed such g la d ia to ria l
com bat w ith in th e sacred p recin ct o f T en o ch titla n , adjacen t to the TzoMPANTLi o r skullrack,
and n ear xiPE T O T E c 's tem p le Yopico, w hence
the d efeated captives w e re rem oved fo r sacriBce by H E A R T extrusion.
tem p le T h e Spanish w o rd "te m p lo " and
English " te m p le " have com e to re fe r to w h a t
th e A ztecs called a feo ca/ii, o r lite ra lly god
house, and g en e rally in d ic ate a place o f
w orship. Thro u gh o u t M eso am erica, PRIESTS
and supplicants re p a ire d to tem ples to com
m unicate w ith th e ir CODS, to m ake offerings
to th e gods in exchange fo r d iv in e in te r
ven tio n , and to m ake them selves one w ith
the gods. In th e ir sacred p recin ct, the Aztecs
constructed 78 d iffe re n t structures, most o f
them tem ples dedicated to p a rtic u la r gods
or cults. (O th e r buildings included p riestly

161

TEOTIHUACAN

residences and schools.) T h e ifu e fe o c a /h


(G re a t T em p le or T em p!o M a y o r) re fe rre d
specihcally to the g re at d u al PYRAMID d e d i
cated to H U iT z iL O P O C H T L i and T L A L O c . T h e T e m
plo M a y o r precinct, lik e those throughout
M esoam erica, was the h e a rt o f the c ity , and
it was roughly a t the cen ter o f T e n o c h titla n .
To show conquest, the Aztecs d epicted the
failin g , burning tem p ie o f th e ir foes; they
often hauled the sculptures o f enem y gods
back to T en o c h titla n , w h e re they kep t them
in a separate tem p le o f cap tive deities. In d i
vidual tem ples w ith in the precinct m ay have
been thought to encapsulate the m ountain
homes o f various deities. Research a t the
T lalo c side o f the dual p yram id has shown
th a t the Aztecs created the m anm ade

The Aztec sign for


Tamoanchan, Codex
Vaticanus A, 16th c.

(Re/ow) Gladiatorial
sacrifice: an Aztec
warrior attacks a
prisoner tethered to
the temalacatl, or
sacrificial stone,
Codex Magliabechiano,
16th c. Aztec.

em bodim ent o f Tlaloc's m ountain through


offerings and deposits.
Am ong M esoam erican cities know n only
archaeologically, the w ord tem p le has often
been app lied w ith o u t specific know ledge o f
any religious practices th a t m ay have taken
place there. W h a t have been term ed M a y a
tem ples" and "palaces," fo r exam ple, seem
to grade in to one another, and in recent
years, archaeologists have p re fe rre d to give
structures n eu tral num bers ra th e r than nick
nam es lik e "T e m p le o f the G ia n t Jaguar."
N evertheless, M a y a tem ples can gen erally be
id e n tifie d : a tem ple has a high p latfo rm
topped by sm all cham bers; access is lim ite d
and is usually by a single staircase, although
a fe w exam ples have o th er arrangem ents.
M o st such tem ples w ere constructed a t the
death o f a king to enshrine his TOMB, as for
exam ple, a t T ik a l, although occasionally, as
at Palenque, such a tem p le was constructed
beforehand, leaving access to a sarcophagal
cham ber. A lthough clearly associated w ith
specific deities, these M a y a tem ples p rim a rily
com m em orated royal ancestors and the gods
w ith w hom the kings w ere united in death.
.S e e a / y o MOUNTAINS.

Tem plo M a y o r F e e TEMPLE


Teodhuacan T h e Aztecs b elieved in serial
creations, th a t the suN and the population o f
the EARTH had been g enerated five tim es, w ith
the c u rren t sun and hum ankind having been
m ade in the fifth and last creation. T his
final creation o f the fifth sun took place a t
T eotihuacan. A lthough a re al place, w h ere
high c iv iliza tio n in C e n tra l M exico th rive d in
the first m illen n iu m

AD,

it was also a place

(Re/ow) The double temple: the Templo Mayor


at Tenochtitlan, with its two shrines dedicated to
Tlaloc and Huitzilopochtli; Codex Ixtlilxochitl,
16th c. Aztec.

T H O T iH U A C A N C O D S

tea

o f the im a g in atio n , the locus o f religious

larg e tee th . Paaztory Id e n tifie d tw o form s

g en eratio n , w h e re the Aztecs b eliev ed the

o f T la lo c. O n e fo rm , T la lo c A , displays a
p ro m in en t set o f JAGUAR canines; q u ite fre
q u e n tly , a WATER ULY is placed in the m outh.
T h e o th e r aspect, T la lo c B , has a sei o f

gods had conjoined to c re a te the fifth sun.


A ccording to som e accounts, T eo tih u ac an was
also the b irth p la c e o f th e gods them selves.
A ccording to the F lo re n tin e C odex, d u rin g

id e n tic a lly sized conical tee th and a p ro m in en t

the

b ifu rc a te d tongue, m uch lik e the pendulous


tongue o f cocqo, th e Zapotee god o f rain and
lig h tn in g .

long

p ereg rin a tio n

from

AZTLAN

th a t

e v e n tu a lly le d to T e n o c h titla n , th e Aztecs


w e n t from TAMOAKCHAN to T e o tih u ac an , w h e re
they m ade offerings and b u ilt PYRAMIDS o ver

G re a t G oddess. A ltho u g h this term is w id e ly

the bu rials o f ru lers, thus g iving them life


everlastin g .

used in re ce n t lite ra tu re , it p ro b ab ly sub


sumes a n u m b er o f d istin ct goddesses. O ne

In 1971, archaeologists found the opening

fem a le e n tity c u rre n tly placed in this category

to a CAVE u n d er the P yram id o f th e Sun a t

w ears a fanged nose b ar. D u e to the a p p e ar

T eo tih u acan . Archaeologists found th a t this

ance o f SPIDERS w ith this fig u re, she has been

cave extended fa r b eneath the P yram id o f the

term ed the T eo tih u acan S pider W om an. Yet


a n o th er T eo tih u ac an goddess appears w ith a

Sun, w ith sm all a n c illa ry cham bers ra d ia tin g


from the centra! passagew ay. C eram ic e v i

stepped facia! p a tte rn in g around the m outh

dence indicates th a t the cave was in use from

and lo w e r cheeks. T h e significance o f this

Protoclassic u n til A ztec tim es, and it m ay


w e ll have been an ancien t site o f w orship

goddess is s till unknow n.


N e tte d /a g u a r. T h is po o rly understood e n tity

hallo w ed by the construction o f the g re at

is a jACUAR covered w ith in te rla c e d cords,

pyram id above it. T h e Aztecs claim ed to have


com e from a place called cmcoMOZTOc, or

resem bling a n et. T h is n e t p a tte rn in g is also


found on T eo tih u acan representations o f

Seven Caves: perhaps this sacred place lay

MiRRons, and it is possible th a t lik e the Post

under the ground at T eo tih u acan . In any


case, the Aztecs c ertain ly considered the
abandoned city sacred: they carried out ritu
als th e re , brought pieces o f its sculpture and

classic TEZCATLiPOCA, th e N e tte d Jaguar re p


resents a personification o f the stone m irro r,

p ain tin g back to T en o c h titla n , and m ade it


the site o f royal PILGRIMAGE. See a/so CREATION
A C C O U N T S ; F IV E SUNS.

fft/e /m e te o t/; T h e aged FIRE god o f the h e a rth ,


H u eh u ete o tl com m only appears a t T e o ti
huacan in the fo rm o f a stone efEgy censer.
C eram ic H u e h u e te o tl censers can be traced
back to Protoclassic C u icu ilco , and th e re are
still e a rlie r M id d le F o rm a tiv e exam ples from

T eotihuacan gods In the com plex and poorly


know n iconography o f T eo tih u acan , a series
o f characters th a t appear to p o rtray d istinct
deities occur tim e and tim e again. A lthough
certain o f these gods can be re ad ily id e n tifie d
as ancestral form s o f deities know n am ong
the L a te Postclassic Aztecs, other figures
app ear to be unique to Teotihuacan. In con
trast to the Classic M a y a , fem a le d ivin ities
have a p ro m in en t position. In this respect,
T eo tih u acan is sim ilar to L a te Postclassic
C e n tra l M exican relig io n , w hich also has a
g re at m any goddesses.
TTaVoc. U n til recen tly, m any d istinct T e o ti
huacan gods w e re confused w ith T la lo c, the
C e n tra l M exican god o f RAIN and LiGHTNiNC.
A ltho u g h
Alfonso
Caso
and
L a u re tte
Sjourn both m ade progress in d eterm in in g
T lalo c's characteristics, E sther Pasztory first
successfully isolated and defined the T e o ti
huacan T lalo c from other gods. A t Teotihuacan,
T la lo c ty p ic a lly appears w ith goggle eyes and
a p ro m in en t u pper lip containing a set o f

T laxcala.
Q u e & a /c o a f/. O n e o f the e a rlie s t appearances
o f the plu m ed SERPENT a t T eo tih u ac an occurs
upon the o rig in al facade o f the T e m p le o f
Q u etzalco atl. H e re fe a th e re d serpents pass
through fe a th e re d m irro r rim s and sw im in a
S H E LL-filled SEA. A t T eo tih u ac an , th e fe a th e re d
serpent is usually dep icted w ith symbols o f
ra in and standing WATER. T h e T eo tih u acan
plum ed serpent is ty p ic a lly rep resen ted w ith
a c an in e -like m uzzle and a ra ttlesn ake body
covered w ith the green plum es o f th e QUETZAL.
A lthough anthropom orphic form s o f Q u e tza lcoat! are v irtu a lly unknow n a t T eo tih u acan ,
th e p lum ed serpent can ap p ear upon a w oven
MAT, a w idespread

sym bol o f ru lersh ip in


M esoam erica. I t is thus possible th a t as in
Postclassic M eo sam erica, the T eo tih u acan
Q u etzalco atl was identiR ed w ith an im p o rtan t
office o f ru lersh ip.
W a r S e rp en t. O n the T e m p le o f Q u etzalcoatl,
the p ro jectin g fe a th e red serpent heads a lte r
nate w ith another being freq u e n tly m isiden-

163

TERMINATION RITUALS

iBed as T lalo c. R ath er than T la lo c , this form


depicts a mosaic headdress in the form o f a
serpent head. A lthough p ro b ab ly o rig in atin g
a t T eotihuacan, this serpent being is also
com m only found in Classic M a y a a rt. E ith e r
as a headdress or as a com plete serpent, it
occurs in the context o f w a r. F re q u e n tly
appearing w ith smoke or Barnes, the WAR
SERPENT is probably an ancestral form o f the
x iu H C O A T L Bre serpent o f Postclassic C e n tra l
M exico.

T!a!oc A

P u/gue Cocf. Since the tim e o f the Spanish


C onquest, Teotihuacan has been a fam ed
center for the production o f P U L Q U E . A lthough
ra re, th e re are exam ples o f a Teotihuacan
pulque d eity . This being appears w ith a
sim ple m ask, possibly o f the p a p e r-lik e MAGUEY
skin. U n d ern eath the mask, in the region o f
the eyes and m outh, it m ay be seen th a t the
face is blackened. In one instance, the head
is surrounded by pointed m aguey leaves
spouting w h ite pulque. In another exam ple,
the pulque spills from the m outh o f the god.
F a t Cocf. A com m on d eity o f Classic
M esoam erica, the F A T G O D often appears on
m old-m ade Teotihuacan Bgurines. In v a ri
ably, the h eavily lid d ed eyes are shut, as if
the Bgure is dead. In a num ber o f instances,
the F a t God appears w ith the sign o f the
REPTILE EYE or a FLOWER upon his forehead.
See

a /S 0

F A T C O D ; H U E H U E T E O T L ; P U L Q U E CODS;

QUETZALCO ATL; TLALO C .

term in atio n ritu als W h en M esoam erican


peoples cam e to the end o f th e ir use o f a
b u ild in g or even o f a period o f tim e, they
engaged in w h a t anthropologists have called
term in atio n ritu als, in w hich they ritu a lly
" k ille d " certain m a te ria l m anifestations. T h e
defacing o f O lm ec sculpture m ay be am ong
the earliest indications o f this practice. An
arm y o f w orkers ground dow n the colossal
heads and tab le-to p A LTA R S, leaving system atic
round pits; in some cases the e ffo rt o f destruc
tion equaled th a t o f the o rig in al creation.
T h e y then bu ried the defaced m onum ents
w ith layers o f specially p repared sand and
stone. T h e Olm ecs m ay have thought that
through such efforts they n eu tralized the
p o w er in h e ren t in such rep resen tatio n al
sculpture. W h e re v e r the oversized masks o f
the Protoclassic perio d are uncovered,
w h e th e r a t E l M ira d o r or C erros, there is

Putque God

evidence th a t the faces suffered active dam


age before being covered. D u rin g the reign
o f R u ler A , T ik a l M a y a lords sm ashed the

Classic period Teotihuacan gods.

TEXTILES

!64

base o f S tela 31, cached the u p p er p a rt o f the

o f ea rth and w in d , or by extension, m a tte r and

m onum ent in

tog eth er w ith

s p irit. H o w e v e r, T ezcatlip o ca encompasses

b u rn t offerings, and then b u ilt a new super

m ore than the e a rth . A ccording to the Fhyren-

stru ctu re. T h e

S tru ctu re

33

subject o f S tela

31,

K in g

tin e C odex, T ezc atlip o c a is om nipresent, and

Storm y Sky, m ay w e ll be th e in te rre d subject

causes discord and conflict e v e ryw h e re he

o f the tom b below S tru ctu re 33, and this

passes. N onetheless, the sam e passage also

destruction o f his stela w as q u ite possibly

describes h im as a c reato r as w e ll as destroyer,

p a rt o f a te rm in a tio n ritu a l in w h ich th e last

a b rin g e r o f fo rtu n e as w e ll as disaster. In

vestige o f his presence was rem oved from

C e n tra ! M exican

v ie w . A t L a g a rte ro , Susanna Ekholm

un

o n ly b attles against b u t also assists Q u e tza l

cerem o n ial

coatl in th e Creation o f the w o rld and its

covered

m iddens

o f sm ashed

b eliefs, T ezcatlip o ca not

p o ttery fre e o f any household debris, and

in h ab itan ts. M o re than anyth in g , T e z c a tli

despite the presence o f vast q u an tities o f

poca appears to be the e m b od im en t o f change

fig u rin e

through conflict.

bodies, no m atching heads w e re

found. In a ll like lih o o d , such a deposit w as

In v ie w o f his o m nipresent and v o la tile

m ade as a term in atio n ritu a l, perhaps to m ark

n a tu re , it is not surprising th a t Tezcatlipo ca

the com pletion o f a period o f tim e.

was re fe rre d

B efore the d rillin g o f the last N e w F ire

to by m any epith ets. D oris

H ey d en has counted an astonishing 360 dis

(see FiRK) b efo re the Spanish C onquest, the

tin ct phrases fo r h im in Book 6 o f the F lo re n

Aztecs carried out a term in atio n ritu a l: a ll the

tin e C odex. A m ong them a re df/acuaA uan,

old pots w e re sm ashed, a ll fires extinguished,

"h e

and pregnant w om en hidden from v ie w in

e n e m y ," y o u a //i ehecaf/, "n ig h t w in d ," and

whose

slaves

we

a re ,"

y a c /,

"th e

o rd er to start the m undane w orld an ew once

/M u lcah u a /a77qpaque, "possessor o f the sky

the N e w F ire was kindled in the open chest


o f a slain CAiTivn.

and e a rth ."


T h e first c lea r representations o f T e z c a tli

t e x t i l e s s e e CLOTH; COTTON

poca ap p e ar on T o lte c -s ty le stone sculptures


from E a rly Postclassic C hichen Itz . L ik e

T czcatlipoca O n e o f the m ore fascinating


gods o f Postclassic C en tra! M exico, T e zc a tlipoca was the o m in ip o ten t god o f rulers,
sorcerers and w arrio rs. T h e nam e o f this
being signifies "sm oking m irro r," and is a
term rich in sym bolic m eaning. F o r one,
MIRRORS o f OBSIDIAN and o th er stone w ere
w id e ly used in necrom ancy and sorcery in
ancien t M esoam erica. H o w e v e r, in the early
17th c. chants recorded by R uiz de A larcn,
the surface o f the EARTH its e lf is re fe rre d to
as a sm oking m irro r. In the m yth o f the FIVE
SUNS, T ezcatlipo ca presided over the SUN o f
earth . According to th e H is to ria d e Aw m ex
icanos p o r sus p m furas, a b a ttle raged
betw een the god o f this first sun, the sun
o f e a rth , and QUETZALCOATL, the god o f the
follo w in g sun o f WATER. Thus the first sun
ended w h en Q uetzalcoat! struck Tezcatlipoca
dow n, turnin g h im in to a JAGUAR. In tu rn ,
Tezcatlipo ca term in ated the sun o f WIND by
knocking over Q u etzalcoatl. This cosmic b a t
tle b etw een T ezcatlipo ca and Q u etzalcoatl is
also reflected in the legends o f TOLLAN, in
w hich T ezcatlipo ca eve n tu ally bests Q u e tza l
coatl through a series o f ruses. T h e conflict
b etw een Tezcatlipo ca and Q u etzalco atl could
be v iew ed in term s o f a d u alistic opposition

la te r im ages o f this being, he displays a


sm oking m irro r upon his head and a SERPENT
foot. D u rin g the L a te Postclassic p erio d , T e z
catlipoca m ay ap p e ar w ith a serp ent foot,
although in this case the serp ent usually
appears em erging from the sm oking m irro r
th a t ty p ic ally replaces his foot. T h e m irro r or
serpent foo t p ro b ab ly alludes to the creation
m yth in w hich T ezcatlip o ca loses his foot
w h ile b attlin g w ith the e a rth m onster. A side
from the sm oking obsidian m irrors m arking
his head and foot, the L a te Postclassic T e zc a t
lipoca tends to have broad a lte rn a tin g bands
o f y ello w and black across th e face. T h e
nocturnal JAGUAR, th e m ost p o w e rfu l a n im al
o f M esoam erica, was th e a n im al c o u n terp a rt
o f T ezcatlipo ca. T e p e y o llo tl, or H e a rt o f the
M o u n ta in , was a ja g u a r aspect o f T e zc a tli
poca. I t is thus e n tire ly fittin g th a t T e z c a tli
poca was p atro n o f the TRECENA 1 O celo tl. A n
o m nipotent god o f fa te and p u n itiv e ju stice,
he often m erges in to iTZTLACO LiUH Q ui-ixQ uiM iL U , the b lin d fo ld ed god o f stone and casti
gation. In this com posite form , T ezcatlipo ca
appears as th e black god o f the n o rth , and
patron o f the day A ca tl.
M ic h a e l C oe firs t noted a series o f striking
correspondences b etw e en T ezcatlipo ca and
the ancien t M a y a d e ity com m only know n as

165

THRONE

God K (see scHELLHAS GODS). L ik e T ezcatlip o ca,


God K has a serpent foot and usuaHy displays
a smoking m irro r on his head. In a d d itio n ,
both Tezcatlipoca and G od K are closely
tied into the suprem e oiRce o f ru lersh ip.
Nonetheless, despite
these d ire c t and
im portant p arallels, these gods a re not
e n tire ly equ ivalen t. W hereas the ja g u a r con
stitutes the fau n al c o u n terp art o f T e z c a tli
poca, G od K c learly has serpentine c h aracter
istics. In
add itio n ,
the
lig h tn in g and

The smoking mirror


of Tezcatlipoca,
Aztec stone
sculpture, Late
Postclassic period.

(Be/ow) Tezcatlipoca
with the twenty
trecena periods, Codex
Fejrvry-Mayer, Late
Postclassic period.

agricu ltu ral com ponent o f God K is not re ad ily


evid en t in the attrib u te s o f T ezcatlipo ca. See
a / s o C R E A T IO N A C C O U N TS .

throne M esoam erican lords ru le d from elev


ated seats o f pow er, or w h a t w e call thrones,
from around 1200 BC u n til the tran sfer o f
pow er to the Spanish conquerors. T h e socalled "ta b le -to p a lta rs " o f the Olm ecs are
probably the oldest p erm an ent thrones th a t
survive in M esoam erica, and they are am ong
the largest ever m ade. A huge stone from
K am in aljuyu depicts some o f the early
M a y a o f the G u atem ala highlands presiding
from sm all thrones du rin g the Protoclassic.
CAPTIVES kneel befo re the enthroned rulers,
each o f w hom bears w h a t m ay be a nam e
glyph in his headdress, and the sequence
m ay record a series o f rulers or a genealogical
chart.
D u rin g the L a te Classic, w edge-legged
thrones predom inated in the w estern M a y a
region, p a rtic u la rly a t Palenque, Yaxchiln,
and Piedras N egras, w h ere artists carved
thrones w ith elaborate reliefs. T h e rich ly orna
m ented throne, installed by Pacal in House E
o f the P alenque Palace in the 7th c., was
replaced by a la rg er version in an extension o f
the Palace a t the beginning o f the 8th c. Both
sculpture and p ain tin g in d icate th a t M a y a
thrones w ere often p ain ted , p a rtic u la rly in
b rig h t red and g re en ; ru lin g lords draped them
w ith ja g u a r pelts and reclined against ja g u a rcovered cushions. According to the F lo re n tin e
Codex, rulers sat on several d iffe re n t types o f
pelts, including pum a, JAG UA R , w o lf, coyote,
and various cured leathers w ith p ain ted
designs.
T h e A ztec T em p le Stone, long called the
M on u m en t o f Sacred W a r, has been recog
nized as the official throne com m issioned by
M otecuhzom a I I to com m em orate the N e w
F ire cerem ony o f 1507. A flig h t o f stairs leads
up to the seat o f the thron e, inscribed w ith
the im age o f

T L A L T E C U H T L i,

the A ztec

EARTH

(Be/ow) The Aztec Temple Stone, in fact the


throne of Motecuhzoma II, 16th c.

rLAHUIZCALPAKTECLHTH

166

m onster; w h a t w o u ld be a tem p le cham b er

c u h tli is c le a rly id e n tifie d w ith th e plum ed

form s the backrest, and it featu res th e rayed

serp ent, o r pucrzALcoATL. T h e C o lo n ial A na/e.*

d iad em o f th e sux. W h e n the th ro n e was

d e C uaA & dan states th a t a fte r being burned

occupied by th e TLATOANi, o r ru le r, his ro le in

upon th e fu n e ra l p y re , Q u e tza lc o a tl was


reborn as T la h u izc a lp a n te c u h tli. T h e god o f

sustaining the e a rth and


places was e xp lic it.
G ods,

too,

reig n ed

SUN

in th e ir p ro p er

the m o rn in g star was also closely id e n tifie d


fro m

thrones,

and

w ith the star god MixcoATL, and in a num ber

am ong th e M a y a , the h ie rarc h y am ong c er

o f instances appears w ith th e fac ial m arkings

ta in d eities is p a rtic u la rly n o tab le.

IT Z A M N A ,

o f M ix c o a tl, a field o f black surrounded by

fo r e xam p le, o fte n receives th e appeals o f

w h ite spots den o tin g stars. H o w e v e r, the

In one strikin g e xam p le, G od L

typ ical star m arkings o f T la h u izc a lp a n te c u h tli

(see scHELLHASCODs), w ho o ften presides fro m

a re Eve w h ite spots upon the nose, b ro w ,

a thron e h im self, appears h u m b ly b efo re C od

cheeks, and
chin. T la h u izc a lp a n te c u h tli
appears as one o f the fo u r sxYBEARERs, in

o th e r gods.

C , the sun god, a fte r losing his ritu a l a ttire


to a RABBrr. A ltho u g h M ix te e lords o ften sit

this case the skybearer corresponding to the

or squat on MATS to sym bolize th e ir a u th o rity ,

eastern YEARBEARER A c a tl.

M ix te e gods and oracles m ay o lfe r counsel


from elev ated seats. A ztec figurines o fte n

T la lo c T h e C e n tra ! M ex ica n god o f RAIN and

o f sm all TEMPLES th a t are

LiCHTNiNC, T la lo c first appears on ceram ic

probably thrones for the gods seated on them .

vases from T lap acoya th a t d ate to the 1st

take

the

form

In the 260-day io n a/am ai/s (see CALENDAR) o f

c. BC and p o rtra y T la lo c w ith

L a te

lig h tn in g bolts. T la lo c is one o f the m ost


com m on deities a t TEOTinuACAN and often

Postclassic

C en tra!

M exican

m anu

scripts, enthroned gods reign over in d iv id u al


TRECENAS, and

iconographic d etails o f the

thrones them selves often reveal aspects o f


the d iv in atio n .

serp entin e

appears w ith lig h tn in g , MAIZE, and WATER. L ik e


Postclassic exam ples, th e T eo tih u acan T la lo c
typ ic ally has goggled eyes and larg e, ja g u a r
tee th . In contrast to the M a y a CHAC, T la lo c is

T la h u izca lp an tec u h tli In C e n tra l M exico,


the god o f the m orning STAR was know n as
T la h u izca lp an tec u h tli, m eaning Lord o f the
D aw n . T lah u izca lp an tec u h tli represented an
especially fierce and dangerous aspect o f
V E N U S . According to M esoam erican b e lie f, the
rays o f the m orning star at heliacal rising
could in flic t g reat dam age upon p a rtic u la r
classes o f people as w e ll as on M A IZ E and
W A T E R . In the B orgia, Cospi, and Vaticanus B
codices, Venus tables p re d ict the days and
victim s o f the heliacal appearance o f the
m orning star. In these pages and o th er scenes,
T la h u izca lp an tec u h tli hurls his b a lefu l rays
in the form o f a t/-a t/ darts (see W E A P O N R Y ). In
the L eyen d a de /os so/es, T la h u izca lp an te
cu h tli hurls a d a rt a t the n ew ly created suN
a t T E O T in u A C A N . In response, the sun god
transfixes T lah u izca lp an tec u h tli, transfor
m ing h im in to IT Z T L A C O L IU H Q U I-IX Q U IM IL L I, the
god o f coldness, stone, and castigation.
T h e first clear representations o f T la h u iz
calp an tecu h tli appear d u rin g the E a rly Post
classic p eriod. T h e T o ltec-style rock p ain tin g
a t Ixtapantongo bears an eroded b u t id e n tifi
a b le representation o f the skull-faced T la h u iz
calp an tecu h tli w ith a plum ed SERPENT m arked
w ith star signs. A t Ixtapantongo and C hichen
Itz , the E a rly Postclassic T la h u izca lp an te-

c le a rly p a rt JAGUAR, and it is possible th a t the


rum blings o f th u n d er w e re com pared to the
bellow s o f the ja g u a r.
In Postclassic M exico , T la lo c was b elieved
to reside in m ountain CAV E S . These caves w e re
considered to be m iraculous treasu re houses
Riled w ith w e a lth and pro sp erity. T o the
Aztecs, T la lo c w as know n as " th e p ro v id e r,"
and depending on the rains, could be e ith e r
generous or m iserly. O n e o f the d u al T E M P L E S
upon the T em p lo M a y o r o f T e n o c h titla n was
d edicated to T la lo c , and this side o f th e
P Y R A M ID w as a p p a re n tly considered as his
M O U N T A IN abode. Excavations in the fou n d a
tions o f this tem p le have re ve ale d rich o ffe r
ings, m any o f w hich a re re la te d to w a te r
and the SEA. N e a r T e n o c h titla n , th e re was a
special m ountain tem p le d ed icated to T la lo c.
Located on th e peak o f M o u n t T la lo c, some
13,500' (c. 4100 m ) above sea le v e l, it housed
a shrine containing stone im ages o f M o u n t
T la lo c and o th er neighboring h ills and m oun
tains.
P atro n o f the day M a z a tl and th e TRECENA
o f 1 Q u ia h u id , T la lo c also presided over the
th ird sun o r w o rld , 4 Q u ia h u itl, the sun o f
ra in destroyed by a Rery deluge.
T la lo c and his consort CHALCHiUHTLicuE
governed th e T la lo q u e, lite ra lly the " T la -

167

TLALTECUHTLI

io c s /' w ho w e re recognized to be the m u ltip le


spirits o f m ountains and p o w e rfu l w e a th e r
phenom ena. See a/so cocijo; FIVE SUNS; ucHT
N IN C A N D T H U N D E R ; M O U N T A IN S ; R A IN ; T E O T IH U A C A N
GODS.

Tlalocan N ahu atl-speald ng C e n tra l M e x i


cans a t the tim e o f the C onquest called the
fourth le ve l o f the heavens or u pper w o rld

The Central Mexican


god of the morning star,
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli,
Codex TellerianoRemensis, 16th c.
Aztec. In this scene,
Tlahuizcalpantecuhtli is
named 1 Reed, the
calendrical name of
Quetzalcoatl.

Tlalocan, m eaning the place o f T L A L O C .


Because it was in the heavens, T lalo can is
often thought o f as T lalo c's paradise. Accord
ing to the Vaticanus A codex, those who
drow n or d ie from o th er aspects o f W A T E R ,
such as Roods and the strikin g o f L I G H T N IN G ,
go d ire ctly to T lalo can , as do the deform ed D W ARVES, cripples, and so fo rth - th a t are the
special charges o f T la lo c. T h e F lo re n tin e
Codex notes th a t T lalo can is v erd a n t, a place
o f endless spring, abounding in green and
yello w plants: M A IZ E , chilis, squash, A M A R A N T H ,
tom atoes, beans, and m arigolds. Tlaloc's TEM
PLE was also know n as the T lalo can .
A lthough the Classic perio d p ain tin g at
T e p a n titla has been called the T lalo can , the
w a te ry lan d o f abundance th a t it depicts
is probably not an illu stratio n o f this la te r
concept.
T la lte c u h tli T la lte c u h tli lite ra lly
means
"e a rth lo r d /' b u t most A ztec representations
c learly d ep ict this creatu re as fem ale, and
despite the m ale gender o f the nam e, some
sources call T la lte c u h tli a goddess. U sually in
a Aoc/rer, or b irth -g iv in g squat, w ith head
Rung backw ards and h er m outh o f FLINT
blades open, T la lte c u h tli m enaces h um anity
and dem ands constant appeasem ent. T la lte cuh tli's im age is usually carved on the bottom
o f A ztec sculptures, w h ere it m akes contact
w ith the E A R T H . This im age on the base o f
m onum ents m ay m erge w ith aspects o f TLALOC
and M iC T L A N T E C U H T H . O n the Stone o f Tzoc,
T la lte c u h tli is conRgured by the openm outhed fro n ta l face and m arkings o f CAIMAN
skin, the surface o f the earth .
According to the Tf/sfoyre tfu m dchigue,
Q U E T Z A L C O A T L and T E Z C A T L iP O C A carried T la lte
c u h tli dow n from the heavens and turned

The Central Mexican god, Tlaloc, Codex Laud,


p. 2, Late Postclassic period.

them selves in to g reat SERPENTS. O n e grasped


the rig h t hand and le ft foot and the o th er took
the le ft hand and rig h t foot; they squeezed
T la lte c u h tli u n til th e y had re n t h e r body
asunder. A fte r th ey had taken one h a lf aw ay
to the SKY, o th er gods descended to the earth
to console h er, and from

the

rem aining,

The earth monster Tlaltecuhtli, Aztec sculpture,


Late Postclassic period.

TLATOANI

KM

vio late d h a lf o f h er body th ey fo rm ed the


surface o f th e e a rth , m aking o f h e r h a ir ' trees
and Sow ers and grasses, o f h e r skin . . . Row

goddess o f PUMiricATiow and cuwmc, p a rtic u


la rly o f diseases caused by sexual m isdeeds
or excess. A ccording to F ra y D iego D u r n ,

ers, o f h er eyes w ells and fou n tains and little


caverns, o f h e r nose valleys and m ountains,

p e n ite n t in d ivid u als w o u ld p erfo rm (xw


FESsiON and B LO O DLETTING in fro n t o f an im age

and o f h e r shoulders m ountains. A n d this

o f T la zo lte o tl. As an in d icatio n o f h er clean

goddess cried m any tim es in th e n ig h t d esiring

sing ro le , she is com m only depicted w ith a

th e hearts o f m en to eat. A n d she w o u ld not

grass broom . In th e codices, she can be re ad ily

be q u ie t ju s t w ith . . . fru it unless it was

id e n tifie d by a black zone around h er m outh

sprin kled w ith the blood o f m e n ."

and spools o f

M id w ives exh o rted T la lte c u h tli to com e to

COTTON

in h e r headdress. She

appears to d e riv e from th e G u lf C oast and

th e ir aid w hen an in fa n t w a rrio r th rea te n ed

m ay have o rig in a lly been a H u astec goddess.

to k ill th e m o ther d u rin g a d ifE c u it lab o r.

T la zo lte o tl is p atro n o f th e day O c elo tl and

A long w ith p reparatio n s fo r w a r, prayers to

th e

TRECENA

I O llin .

T ezc atlip o c a o ften invoked T la lte c u h tli as the


toad A m p h ib ians o f the genus B ufo, toads

SUN.

A ltho u g h rep resen ted in the sculpture o f

p layed an im p o rta n t and e a rly ro le in the

M a y a p a n , T la lte c u h tli cannot be located in

religious sym bolism o f an c ie n t M eso am erica.

C lassic M a y a a rt, and h e r origins rem ain

D ep ictio n s o f toads first ap p e ar in F o rm a tiv e

obscure.

O lm ec a rt, and it is lik e ly th a t m any o f the

tlato an i W ith th e ir rise to pow er in the V a lle y


o f M exico in the 15th c., the Aztecs replaced

species, B u /b m ar/m M , a g ia n t toad th a t


produces a p o w e rfu l HALLUCINOGEN know n as

" W E R E -J A C U A R "

figures a re a c tu a lly toads. O n e

ad m in istra tive

b u fo ten in e through glands a t the back o f the

arran g em en t o f four lineage heads w ith the


position o f f/afo an /, a ru le r w ho was in turn
advised by a four-m an council, including

head, w as o f special im p o rtan ce. S tela 6 from


the Protoclassic site o f Iza p a p o rtrays a seated

th e ir

tra d itio n a l

trib a l

the cmuACOATL. L ite ra lly m eaning "h e w ho


speaks" in N a h u a tl, the i/afo am was the
suprem e A ztec ru le r in p o litical affairs, and
som etim es in religious ones as w e ll. A lthough
in theory a n ew f/afo an i could be selected or
elected by the council from one o f hundreds
o f m ale nobles, in p ractice the n ew ru le r was
alw ays b ro th e r, son, or grandson o f a previous
t/afo an /. F o r exam ple, a t the tim e o f the
C onquest, the B atoani M otecuhzom a 11,
know n also as M otecuhzom a Xocoyotzin, was
the grandson o f M otecuhzom a i, the longest
reigning A ztec ru le r. T h e Aztecs trea te d the
t%afoam as a d ivin e being, and the p ublic
ra re ly saw th e ir sovereign. Perhaps because
a d iv in e being d id not reveal m undane bodily
functions, the i^aoain a te in solitude, a carp et
protected his fe e t from touching the soil o f
the EARTH w h e rev er he w alked , and o th er
hum ans d id not touch h im in public, a taboo
vio lated w hen the Spaniard C orts reached
out to em brace M otecuhzom a a t th e ir Rrst
m eeting. See a/so ACC ESSIO N.
T la zo lte o tl As a C e n tra l M exican goddess o f
p u rific atio n , T la zo lte o tl was also id e n tifie d
w ith filth , or f/azo/A. In N a h u a tl, the term
t/azoBi can re fe r to both vices and DISEASES.
As th e goddess o f t/azeB i, T la zo lte o tl was a

toad w ith the p itte d p a ra to id gland p ro m i


n en tly displayed. T h e scrolls s w irlin g fro m
this area p ro b ab ly re fe r to b u fo ten in e exuded
from the gland. A t Iz a p a , K a m in a lju y u , and
o th er Protoclassic M a y a sites, toads com
m only ap p ear in the fo rm o f m assive A LTA R S .
These toad -altars a re usually p laced in fro n t
o f S T E L A E , and constitute an e a rly com ponent
o f the M a y a s te la -a lta r com plex.
A m ong the Classic M a y a , th e toad serves
as the zoom orphic form o f th e 2 0-d ay u ln a /
period o f the Long C o u n t. Q u ite p ro b ab ly,
this derives fro m the fa c t th a t toads, lik e
people, possess 20 digits. Thus in Yucatec
M a y a n , w hereas the nam e fo r th e 2 0-d ay
p erio d is tuna/, th e te rm fo r person is u/nic.
In re ce n tly discovered E a rly Classic stucco
reliefs fro m B alam k, C am peche, th e re a re
full-R g u re toads w ith u p w a rd ly facing heads.
Seated lords are positioned in th e ir m ouths,
as i f th e toads w e re m eta p h o rica lly giving
B IR T H to th e kings. In Classic M a y a a rt, th ere
is a clear iconographic o verlap b etw e en toads
and JAG UARS, as if toads w e re considered the
g re at predators o f th e ir d im in u tiv e w o rld.
Thus fo r exam ple, a th ree-sp o tted circu lar
elem e n t p ro b ab ly re fe rrin g to th e parotoid
gland o f the toad can substitute fo r a ja g u a r
e ar in representations o f th e p atro n god o f
Pax. In th e M a y a -s ty le m urals fro m the Red

169

TO CI

Tem ple a t C acaxtla, a toad displays th e blackspotted yello w coloration o f the ja g u ar.
tobacco Tobacco (M co R an a sp.), one o f the
most im p o rtan t ritu a l plants o f ancien t
M esoam erica, was consum ed in tw o p rin c ip al
ways, e ith e r chew ed w ith p ow dered lim e or
smoked. In m any regions o f M esoam erica,
dried tobacco was ground and m ixed w ith
lim e to increase the stim ulatin g effects o f
nicotine. T h e discovery o f lim e -E lle d pits in
the cen ter o f T ie rra s Largas phase public
buildings a t San Jose M o g o te, O axaca,
suggests th a t the practice o f chew ing tobacco
w ith lim e m ay have been present d uring the
E a rly F o rm ative period. D u rin g the Post
classic period, b o ttle gourds fille d w ith
tobacco and lim e served as insignia fo r PRIESTS.
T h e tobacco was chew ed to re lie ve fatig u e
d uring long vigils and o th er cerem onies and
possibly to induce visions as w e ll. T h e
H u ich o l, T z e lta l M a y a , and o th er contem por
a ry peoples o f M esoam erica continue to carry
ground tobacco in b o ttle gourd containers.
Am ong the ancient M a y a , cigars seem to
have been the p re fe rre d m eans o f consum ing
tobacco. In fact, P ierre V e n tu r has noted th a t
our w ord cigar derives from the highland
M a y a n siAar, signifying cigar or tobacco.
Classic and Postclassic M a y a a rt contains
abundant scenes o f actual people and gods
sm oking cigars. O n e d eity in p artic u la r, the
aged God L (see S C H E LLH A S c o D s ) , is com m only
shown sm oking a large cigar. Am ong the
Postclassic Tarascans o f M ichoacn, tobacco
was usually smoked in long-stem m ed ceram ic
pipes. E lbow -shaped pipes seem to have been
the p re fe rre d means o f sm oking tobacco over
much o f Postclassic W est M exico.
According to M e n d ie ta , the Aztecs consid
ered tobacco to be the em bodim ent o f ciHUA
coATL, an aspect o f iLAMATECUHTLi, the great
goddess o f the M ILK Y WAY. In the early 17th c.
treatise o f R uiz de A larcn, tobacco was said
to have been born o f the S tar-S kirted O ne,
th a t is, the M ilk y W ay.
T o ch tli

MOTECUHZOMA t
1440-1469

The Aztec king or tlatoani, Motecuhzoma I


(Motecuhzoma Ihuilcamina), with his grandson
Motecuhzoma II (Motecuhzoma Xocoyotzin),
Codex Mendoza, 16th c.

The goddess Tlazolteotl,


detail from a Huastec
conch shell pectoral,
Postclassic Veracruz.

Seated toad, Izapa Stela 6,


Protoclassic Maya. The
curls emanating from its
shoulder probably refer to
poisons exuded from the
parotoid glands of
particular toad species.

s e e C A L E N D A R ; M A Y A H U E L ; R A B B IT; YEAR-

BEARERS

Toci A form o f the aged g en etrix, T oci, O u r


G ran d m o th er, was a m ajor A ztec goddess.
Am ong h er o th er epithets w e re T e te o In n a n ,
or M o th e r o f the Cods, and T la lli lyo llo ,
m eaning H e a rt o f the E a rth . A n

EARTH

god

dess, T o ci was a patroness o f m id w ives and

MOTECUHZOMA t!
1502-1520

Tobacco: God L smoking a


cigar, detail from a Late
Classic Maya vase.

curers, and was closely id e n tifie d w ith the

and le g itim ac y fro m T o lla n and the Toltecs

fem ases/,

W h o w e re th e To ltecs, and w h e re exactly


w as T o llan ?

or

swEATBATH.

A ccording

to

Sahagun, T o ci w as a!so term e d T e m a zc a lte c i,


or G ra n d m o th e r o f th e S w eatbaths. She w as
d e a rly re la te d to

TLAZOLTEOTL,

and fre q u e n tly

A ccording to th e A ztecs, these Toltecs w e re


h eld to be th e inventors o f a ll a rtis try , from

displayed th e sam e b lack fa c ia l m arkings and

wRmNC to g o ld w o rkin g to m ed icine, and the

coTTO\ spool headdress. T h e m a jo r fe s tiva l o f

v ery w o rd " to lte c " m e an t a rtis t or craftsm an.

T o ci was the h arvest rite p erfo rm e d d u rin g

T h e y liv e d in u n p a ra lle le d m ajesty, reigned

the VEINTENA o f O c h p a n iztli.

o ver by QUETZALCOATL, w h o d w e lt in a palace o f

A long w ith being a goddess o f th e e a rth

fo u r b u ild in g s ,o rie n te d to the fo u r DIRECTIONS,

and ccRtNc, T o ci was id e n tifie d w ith w a r,

one o rn am en ted w ith sheets o f COLD, ano th er

and was also c alled th e W o m an o f D iscord.

w ith JADE and TURQUOISE, a n o th er o f SHELLS and

A ccording to A zte c legend, w h ile serving

silv er, and a last one em bedded w ith red

as m ercenaries fo r the C u lh u a , the A ztecs

shells and precious stones. In

received a d au g h ter o f the ru le r o f C u lh u acan .

th e re was abundance; the QUETZAL fle w and

this T o lla n

A lthough the ru le r in ten d ed his d au g h ter to

the b lu e cotinga d azzled . T h e

m a rry an im p o rta n t A ztec, HurrziLOPOCHTLi

C odex places T o lla n along the banks o f the

F lo re n tin e

in stru cted th a t the m aiden be sacrificed and

X ico c o titla n , and acknow ledges th a t this is

flayed to becom e T o ci. E nraged by this b ru ta l


act, the ru le r o f C ulhuacan banished the

can be dug fro m

Aztecs. Forced onto Lake Texcoco, th ey dis

Aztecs d id in d eed sack the cities o f th e ir

covered and founded th e ir capita! o f Tenochtitla n .

predecessors, especially T u la , H id alg o , and

the place w h e re T o lte c treasures and pots


th e e a rth . In

fact, the

they h au led the booty back to T e n o c h titla n ,


b u t the description o f tropica! birds and a

T o h i! Patron d e ity o f the Q u ich e a t the tim e


o f the Spanish C onquest, T o h il is a p rin cip al

paradisiacal abundance sounds less lik e a


place in the C e n tra l M e x ic a n highlands and

god nam ed in the POPOLvun and guides the


lineages a t the beginning o f th e ir p ereg rin a
tions. H e is the d e ity w ho dem ands BLOOD
offerings from his people, and so they sacrifice
to him both th e ir ow n blood and the blood
o f CAPTiVEs o f w a r. In the P opo/ MuA, T o h il
insists on the rig h t to suckle from his people,
m eaning to d rin k not m ilk from the breast,
b u t blood: to be suckled by T o h il is to have
one's HEART rip p ed out. T h e Q uiche estab
lished his p rin c ip al TEMPLE a t U ta tla n , th e ir
cap ital, and brought offerings to h im on the
day ToA, one o f the 20 days and corresponding
to the Yucatec day M u lu c . T o h il means OBSiDiAN, is cognate w ith T a h il in o th er M a y a n
languages, and probably can be id e n tifie d
w ith the Classic G od K (see SCHELLHAS GODs).

m ore lik e TAMOANCHAN, a m yth ical place usu


a lly thought to be dow n in th e tro pical lo w
lands, perhaps even in the M a y a area . In the
POPOL vuH, the Q u ich M a y a te l! o f a jo u rn e y
to the east, to T u la n , and th e ir T o lla n m ay
w e ll have m ean t C h ich eo Itz o r perhaps one
o f the g re a t trad in g ports along the G u lf
Coast.
T h e id ea o f T o lla n m ay w e ll d a te to the
rise o f the historical Toltecs in M eso am erica,
w ho, around th e yea r AD 900, con tro lled tra d
ing netw orks extending fro m th e A m erica n
Southw est dow n in to C e n tra ! A m erica. T h e
tw o largest cities o f th e T o lte c n etw o rk w e re
T u la , H id a lg o , and C h ich en Itz ; C h o lu la
also th riv e d in th a t era. B y A ztec tim es, the
g reat cities o f the past and th e ir achievem ents
m ay w e ll have been conflated in to a single
concept o f a glorious past, tro p ica l abundance,
and in ven tio n , w ith T o lla n m ore an id ea than
a single place.

T o lla n T h e Aztecs and m ost o th er C e n tra l


M exican peoples b elieved th a t th e re had once
been a m ore glorious era, w hen the Toltecs
had reig n ed a t T o lla n , or T u la , as it is also
called . B u t the nam e T o lla n can also sim ply
m ean "place o f rushes" and, as such, was the
term a pp lied to any g re at city. A t the tim e
o f th e C onquest, T en o c h titla n its e lf was a
T o lla n , and the archaeological sites o f both
T E O T iH U A C A N and T u la , H id alg o , w e re Tollans.
A ll across M esoam erica, from the Chichim ecs
to the M a y a , noble lineages claim ed descent

tom bs Some M esoam erican nobles w e re


in te rre d in tom bs upon th e ir DEATH, w h ile
others w e re w rap p ed in to BUNDLES w ith layers
o f CLOTH and then b u rn t or in te rre d , or both,
depending on the customs o f the c u ltu re. In
C e n tra l M exico , fo r exam ple, the noble dead
w e re w rap p ed in to m um m y bundles. M a n y
o f the g re at TEOTiHUACAN masks w e re probably

171

TOMBS

once sewn onto such bundles and then in te r


red. T h e Aztecs crem ated th e ir dead, and
then in te rre d the ashes, although victim s o f
death by drow ning w e re b u rie d . T h e Codex
M agliabechiano illu strates the m um m y b u n
dle o f a MERCHANT accom panied by th e tokens
o f his w e alth - JAGUAR p e lt, COLD, and valu ab le
beads - w ith w hich his ashes w o u ld be
in terred in case he chose to take up his
profession in the UNDERWORLD.
But

throughout

m ost

of

the

rest

of

M esoam erica, in W est M exico , in O axaca,


along the G u lf Coast, and in the M a y a lands,
nobles and ro yalty began th e ir jo u rn e y in to
the ArrERUFE once th e ir bodies had been
placed in tom bs. T h e stone sarcophagus Brst
appeared at L a V e n ta , in O lm ec tim es, w ith in
a tom b fram ed by basalt colum ns. T h e m ost
extrao rd in ary sarcophagus know n belongs
to Pacal a t Palenque and is carved on sides
and top w ith the im ages o f Pacal's descent
into the U n d erw o rld and his reception
by his forebears. Pacal's sarcophagus lies
inside a tom b deep w ith in the T em p le o f
Inscriptions, reached only by an in te rio r,
secret staircase.

Two nobles seated before the sign for Tollan, or


'place of rushes." The central mountain marked
by a snake refers to Coatepec, the birthplace of
Huitzilopocbtli; Manuscrit Tovar, 16th c. Aztec.

T h e im agery o f the M a y a tom b som etim es


suggested the en try into the U n d e rw o rld b u t
a t o th er tim es the foundation o f a MOUNTAIN.
A rtists p ainted the fine m asonry tom bs a t Rio
A zu l and elsew here d uring the E a rly Classic
period w ith symbols o f transition from this
w o rld to another, fre q u e n tly w ith symbols
o f WATER and BLOOD. L ik e the la te r A ztec
m erchants, M a y a nobles took w ith them the
things they w ould need in ano th er w o rld. A
K am in alju yu lord was in te rre d w ith the tools
for w orking ja d e ; a Copn lineage head was
accom panied by the m aterials a PRIEST or
scribe w ould need. A t U axactn, srna
TEMPLES w e re erected over the burials o f E a rly
Classic rulers in C ro u p A ; during the L ate
Classic, the same build in g com plex received
sim pler burials o f w om en and c hild ren . W hen
R u ler A o f T ik a l died in AD 725, a tom b was
dug in to the bedrock o f the G re a t Plaza, and
over his m ortal rem ains, his successors raised
up T e m p le I, p erm an ently enshrining the
king. M a n y M a y a PYRAMIDS, then , w e re great
tom b structures.
A t M o n te A lb an , the Zapotees b u ried th e ir
noble dead in tombs a t the centers o f th e ir
patios, in underground cham bers reached by
a single Bight o f stairs. N iches fo r offerings
in te rru p t rich paintings o f p arad in g d eities;
perhaps if the offerings suiRced, the in te rre d

Tomb of the Late Classic Maya king, Pacal, in


the Temple of the Inscriptions at Palenque.

TONACATECUHTLi

172

noble m ade an easy tran s itio n . T h e Zapotees

ona/A sou! o f an in fa n t was sent from the

a t M it!a b u i!t cru cifo rm tom bs u n d er th e ir

highest heaven o f O m eyocan, th e Place o f

palaces. D u rin g the L a te Postciassic, w hen

D u a lity . T h is sou! was in extricab ly tied in to

th e M ixtees h eld g re a te r p o litic a l a u th o rity

th e &Mia%x?huaM CALENDAR o f 260 days. Q u ite

in O axaca, they w e n t to an c ie n t M o n te A lb a n ,

fre q u e n tly , the ona/// corresponded to the

e m p tie d som e o f th e Z ap o tee tom bs, and

day o f b irth , w ith this p a rtic u la r d ay becom ing

b u rie d

th e ir ow n

noble dead

in

th e old

tom bs to g e th e r w ith ab u n d a n t n e w offerings,


including

the

largest

single

deposit

th e personal nam e o f an in d iv id u a l. See a/yo


NAMES AND TITLES; TONACATECUHTLI; UAY.

of

M esoam erican gold discovered in its Prehis-

T o n a tiu h T h e sun god o f Postclassic C e n tra l


M exico , TonaKiuh ty p ic a lly appears w ith red

panic context this century.


In W est M ex ico , in the 1st m ille n n iu m Be,

body p a in t, an EAGLE fe a th e r headdress, and

the peoples o f C o lim a , Jalisco, and N a y a rit

a larg e rayed solar disk. H e is first found in

dug shaft tom bs in to the bedrock, lik e th e ir

E a rly Postclassic To! tec a rt from lx tapan tongo

contem poraries

and C h ich en Itz . T h e T o lte c T o n a tiu h is

in

E cuador, a fa c t w hich

raises questions abo u t contact b etw e en N o rth

fre q u e n tly p a ired w ith QUETZALCOATL in his

and South A m erica . F re q u e n tly m u ltic h am -

aspect as the m orning star. A t C hichen Itz

b ered , these shaft tom bs received the in te r

and Ixtap an to n g o , the costum e o f T o n atiu h

m ents o f a fa m ily or lineag e, and have y ield e d

seems to be based on th a t o f a M a y a king.

the m ost d ra m atic W est M exican figures. T h e

In term s o f C e n tra l M ex ica n cosm ography,

liv in g m arked the surrounding surface area

the id en tih e atio n o f T o n a tiu h w ith the M a y a

above the shaft tombs w ith stones, possibly

is a p t, since he is the god o f the east, th a t is,

to d em arcate a place o f in terfa ce b etw een


the livin g and the dead. See a/so DEATH.

CALENDAR, he serves as the p atro n o f th e day

the region o f the M a y a . In th e L a te Postclassic


Q u ia h u itl. In the TRECENA o f 1 M iq u iz tli, or

T o n acatccu h tli Lord

of

O ur

Sustenance,

T o n acatecu h tli was a C e n tra l M exican form


o f the aged creato r god. A ccording to the
Vaticanus A codex, this d e ity and his consort,
To n acacih u atl, resided in the 13th and u p p er
most heaven, O m eyocan. From O m eyocan,
the creato r gods sent dow n the souls o f infants
to be born. T o n acatecu h tli is id e n tifie d w ith
the m iracle o f p rocreation, and in a num ber
o f scenes appears w ith copulating hum an
couples. As a god o f creations and beginnings,
it is a p p ro p riate th a t he is p atron o f C ip a c tli,
the first o f the 20 days, and the TRECENA 1
C ip a c tli, the first o f the 20 irecenas.
tonal In contem porary ethnographic lite ra
tu re , th e term onaf is fre q u e n tly used in
contrast to N A H U A L . W hereas nah n af g en erally
signifies a form -changer, fre q u e n tly in the
form o f an an im al, ona/ is used to re fe r to a
s p irit-fa m ilia r or soul. Am ong contem porary
M esoam erican peoples, the ona/is gen erally
synonymous w ith
the concept o f the
"sh ad o w " s p irit o f an in d iv id u al. Am ong a
num ber o f M esoam erican peoples, the Io n a /
o f an in d iv id u a l is discovered soon a fte r B IR T H ,
fre q u e n tly by contact w ith a p a rtic u la r
anim al. T h e term ona/ derives from the
N a h u a tl ona//i, a w o rd b earin g such conno
tations as solar h eat, day, day nam e, destiny,
and soul or s p irit. A ccording to Sahagn, the

I D e a th , he appears w ith the lu n a r god


T ec u cizte ca tl, and in this reg ard it is in te re s t
ing to note th a t the Postclassic M ix te e sun
god was know n as 1 D e a th .
T o the peoples o f C e n tra l M ex ico , T o n a tiu h
was a fierce and w a rlik e god. D u rin g the w ars
o f Spanish C onquest, the 16th c. A ztecs c alled
P edro de A lvarad o - a vicious conquistador T o n atiu h . .See a/so MixTEC GODS; s u N .
traders see MERCHANTS
trecena In th e ona/am a/(see CALENDAR), the
period o f 260 days w as d iv id ed in to recenas
(th e N a h u a tl w o rd is no lo n g er know n, and
M esoam ericanists use th e Spanish te rm ), or
periods o f 13 days, counted 1 -1 3 , w ith each
n ew trecena beginning w ith 1. T h e first day
o f th e recena and its auguries, as w e ll as one
or tw o gods, reig n ed over th e e n tire 13-day
period. A ccording to the C odex Borbonicus,
fo r exam ple, those born in th e recena 1 A tl
w ould be im poverished, and th e e n tire 13day period begun on th a t p a rtic u la r day
was in general a bad one. H o w e v e r, the
Borbonicus and the F lo re n tin e codices, the
tw o m ost com plete sources fo r the auguries
o f the recenas, do not alw ays agree on the
DiviNATiON fo r the recena.
T h e A ztec recenas and th e ir patron deities
ran as follow s:

173

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

TROPHY HEADS
trecena

patro n d eities o f each trecena

1 C ip ac tli
1 O celotl

T onacatecuhdi
Q u etzalcoat!

1 M a za tl
1 Xchitl

T ep e yo llo d , Q u etzalcoatl, or T la zo lte o tl


H uehuecoyod or M acu ilxoch id
C h alch iu h tlicu e and T la zo lte o d
T o n atiu h and Tecuciztecad

1 Acad
1 M iq u iz tli
1 Q u ia h u id

8
9
10

1 M a lin a lli
1 C oad
1 T ec p atl

11
12
13

1 C u etzp allin
1 O llin

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

1 O zo m atli

T la lo c and C hicom ecoatl or 4 Ehecad


M a y a h u e l and X o c h ip illi or C in te o tl
T la h u izca lp an tec u h d i or X iu h te cu h tli
T o n atiu h and M ic d a n te c u h tli
Patecatl and C u au h tlio celo tl
Itztla c o liu h q u i
Ixcu in a or T la zo lte o tl and Tezcadipoca
or U acd i

1 Itz c u in tli
1 C a lli

X ip e T o tee and Q uetzalcoatl


Itzp a p a lo tl

1 Cozcacuauhdi
1 A tl
1 E hecatl

X o lo tl and T la lch ito n atiu h or 4 O llin


C h alch iu h to to tl

1 C u a u h tli
1 T o ch tli

trophy heads L ik e peoples o f C e n tra l and


South A m erica, the ancient M a y a preserved
the severed heads o f CAPTIVES as trophies.
In add itio n , these heads m ay have been
considered as a source o f supernatural pow er,
the repository o f the s p irit o f the d efeated
w a rrio r. D epictions o f trophy heads abound
in Protoclassic a rt from the M a y a region.
F re q u e n tly they are held in the hand, in the
crook o f the arm , or w orn on b e lt assemblages.
T h e mask and trip le CELT b e lt assemblage
com m only w orn by Classic M a y a rulers pro
bably derives from trophy heads w orn upon
the b elt. T h e peoples o f Classic V eracruz also
seem to have had trophy heads. T h e stone
HACHAS associated w ith ballgam e belts appear
to be based on the concept o f trophy heads.
Thus the e a rlie r exam ples are not b la d e-lik e
but rounded, and com m only p o rtray lifeless
hum an heads. T h e id en tificatio n o f trophy
heads w ith ballgam e belts concerns the w id e r
association o f decapitation w ith the B A L L C A M E .

C hantico and 1 A cad or 1 C ip ac tli


Xochiquetzal and Tezcadipoca
Iztap a lto te c and X iu h te cu h tli

The aged creator god, Tonacatecuhtli, as patron


of the day Cipactli, Codex Borgia, p. 9, Late
Postclassic period.

In M esoam erica, the b all was often m etaph


o rically considered as a severed hum an head.
It is even possible th a t am ong the M a y a ,
hum an skulls w e re placed in la rg er RUBBER
balls, giving them lightness and bounce. P e r
haps the most developed use o f trophy heads
w ith the ballgam e is the T Z O M P A N T U skullrack.
A w ooden rack w ith im paled hum an skulls,
the zom pant/ appears to have been spe
cifically id e n tifie d w ith ballcourts.

The sun god, Tonatiuh, detail from a wooden


lintel at the Upper Temple of the Jaguar,
Chichen Itz, Early Postclassic period.

TUERTO

174

tu e rto S ig nifyin g an in d iv id u a] b lin d in one

C erillo s turquoise through the trad in g cen ter


o f Casas G randes in no rth ern C h ih u ah u a.

eye, the Spanish te rm fu e rfo is used to re fe r


to a p e c u lia r a n cien t m o tif, a grotesquely

T o lte c Bgures, especially w a rrio rs , a re fre

d efo rm ed and tw isted face. T y p ic a lly , th e

q u e n tly rep resen ted w e arin g costum e e le

face appears w ith one eye shut and the nose

m ents covered w ith turquoise mosaic. Some

and m outh tw is te d to one side. A t tim es, the

o f the com m on turquoise mosaic elem ents

tongue curves sidew ays o u t o f the m outh.

a re larg e back MIRRORS, pointed crow ns, and

T h e fu e rfo m o tif seems to d ate to as e a rly as

pectorals in the form o f stylized BUTTERFLIES


or D o c s . D u rin g the L a te Postclassic p eriod,

the F o rm a tiv e O lm ec, fo r an exam ple appears


on an O lm ec-style stone y u g u ifo (a sm all U -

C e n tra l

shaped stone ob ject, possibly used in the

id e n tifie d w ith turquoise. T h e Codex M a g lia -

M ex ica n

w a rrio rs

w e re

s im ila rly

BALLCAME). D u rin g the Classic p erio d , tuertos

bechiano illustrates a

a re know n fo r TEormuACAN, c en tral V e ra cru z,

b u rn in g . T h e dead w a rrio r is dressed in p ap er

MORTUARY B U N D LE

p rio r to

and the M a y a area. A ltho u g h ra re , the tu e rto

copies o f turquoise ornam ents, these being

m o tif continues in to the L a te Postclassic p e r

iod. A t the A ztec capita! o f T e n o c h titla n , a


stone tu e rto head was discovered w ith in the

dog-shaped p ecto ral. In C e n tra l M exico , the


turquoise nose piece, or yacajo h u /f/, was

Stage 11 p la tfo rm o f the T em p lo M a y o r, a

e m b lem atic o f the sou! o f the dead w a rrio r.

constructional phase d atin g to app ro xim ately


AD 1390. T h e sculpture was found on the

Perhaps because o f the b lu e color a t the


h e a rt o f in ten se flam es, turquoise was id e n t

T la lo c side o f the T em p lo M a y o r, th a t is

ified w ith

the side d edicated to


fe rtility .

M exico. T h e god o f fire ,

R A!N

and a g ricu ltu ra l

T o the Aztecs and possibly the e a rlie r


peoples o f M esoam erica, the tu e rto face m ay
have been id e n tifie d w ith gods o f rain . Am ong
the Aztecs, the teptetoton m ountain gods
w e re considered to be aspects o f T L A L O C .
A ccording to the A ztec F lo re n tin e Codex, the
teptetoton punished those w ho tasted P U L Q U E
befo re it was fu lly p repared: "A n d o f him
w ho secretly tasted it, w ho in secret drank
some, even tasting only a little , it was said
th a t his m outh w ould becom e tw isted, it
w ould stretch to one side; to one side his
m outh w ould sh ift; it w ould be d raw n o v e r."
This a ilm e n t sounds very lik e the fu erfo face.
M ato s M octecum a suggests th a t the fuero
portrays the fac ial paralysis know n as B ell s
palsy, w h ich can d erive from trau m a or expo
sure to extrem e cold. Such a condition could
easily occur am ong individuals w ho visited
the w in d y and icy fastness o f high m ountains,
th e re a lm o f the T la lo q u e and the fepicfofon.
S * e e a /% ? D E F O R M IT Y .

turquoise A n e n tire ly opaque stone o f aqua


m arin e color, turquoise was one o f the treas
u red gem stones o f ancien t M esoam erica.
H o w e v e r, turquoise does not occur n a tu ra lly
w ith in th e confines o f M esoam erica. M o s t
turquoise appearing th e re derives fro m the
C erillo s region o f N e w M exico. This turquoise
does not app ear in M esoam erica u n til the
ad ven t o f the Toltecs du rin g the E a rly Post
classic p erio d . T h e y probably secured the

p o in ted

crow n,

F IR E

nose

piece,

and

in L a te Postclassic C e n tra l
x iU H T E C U H T L i,

or

T u rq u oise L o rd , was ric h ly costum ed in


turquoise, in clu d in g a p o in ted crow n, breast
p en d an t, and shield o f turquoise
D u rin g

the

L a te

Postclassic

mosaic.

p erio d ,

the

poin ted turquoise jH u h u /izc M crow n was an


im p o rtan t distinguishing m a rk o f ru lers.
In N a h u a tl, the term x rh u /i/ signifies
"grass" and "so lar y e a r" as w e ll as turquoise.
In C e n tra l M ex ica n WRITING and a rt, these
three d istin ct m eanings a re d e lib e ra te ly
associated w ith one an o th er. Thus the Post
classic x iU H C O A T L fire serp ent is fre q u e n tly
p o rtrayed w ith grass and the tra p e ze -a n d -ra y
year sign. D u rin g the L a te Postclassic p erio d ,
turquoise is rep resen ted e ith e r as a quincunx,
or as a circle containing a c en tral e le m e n t o f
roughly hourglass fo rm .
a/so JA D E .
tu rtle B oth m arin e and te rre s tria l turtles
w e re o fte n id e n tifie d w ith W A T E R in ancien t
M esoam erica. In larg e p a rt, this c le a rly
derives fro m th e com m on occurrence o f
turtles in aqu atic h ab itats. H o w e v e r, the
id e n tific atio n w ith w a te r m ay also be due to
the use o f tu rtle shells as m usical instrum ents,
possibly as an allusion to th u n d e r. T u rtle
carapaces w e re w id e ly used as drum s, and
w e re struck w ith an a n tle r, stick, or o th er
h ard im p lem en t.
Because th e ir bodies form an in stru m en t,
tu rtles m ay have been id e n tifie d w ith M usic
in C e n tra l M exico. O n page 24 o f the Codex
B orgia, a tu rtle plays a d ru m w h ile blow ing
a conch tru m p et. T h e Y A n u i figure o f the

175
M ixtees and Zapotees fre q u e n tly w ears a
tu rtle carapace, possibly as an allusion to th e
rum ble o f thu n d er. T h e tu rtle shell o ften
w orn by the M a y a d eity PAUAHTUN m ay also
be a reference to th u n d er. O n one L a te
Classic vessel, fo u r Pauahtuns are accom
panied by fou r C H A C S , the gods o f R A m and
LIGHTNING. T h re e o f the Chacs a re p layin g
m usic, one w ith a tu rtle carapace and a n tle r.
F o r the ancient M a y a , the tu rtle shell
described the circu lar and rounded E A R T H . A
num ber o f L a te Classic ALTARS are carved in
the form o f turtles. O n e such m onum ent,
Itz im te A lta r 1, depicts C aban curls - a w e llknow n earth sign - upon the shell. T h e
Tonsured M a ize God is o ften represented
rising out o f the tu rtle shell e arth . In L a te
Postclassic Yucatn, sm all stone turtles served
as the locus for penis p erfo ratio n . Page 19 o f
the Codex M a d rid illu s tra te Eve gods engaged
in B L O O D L E T T IN G around a tu rtle a lta r. Q u ite
possibly, this rite was to fe rtiliz e the earth
w ith blood d u rin g calen d rical perio d -en din g
celebrations. A t M a y ap a n , some stone turtles
b ear probable Aafun ending dates. In one
instance, an e n tire round o f 13 Aafuns is
represented on the rim o f the shell, m aking
this sculpture a P rehispanic K atu n W h eel.

tw ins M esoam erican


peoples
g en erally
believed tw ins to be dangerous. T h e Aztecs
considered the b irth o f tw ins a m alevolent
om en and to be such a source o f m isfortune
th a t one o f them should be k ille d a t b irth .
X O L O T L is the patron o f tw ins and other
d efo rm ities, and the very w ord xo /o f/ means
tw in in N a h u a tl, and m ay also m ean a doubled
M A IZ E p la n t or, as m exo/ol/, a doubled M A G U E Y
p lan t. X o lo tl and Q U E T Z A L C O A T L are often
p aired , although probably not tw ins; because
o f this relatio n ship , c o a l/ has been corrupted
in M exican Spanish to cuafe, pal or buddy,
and cuafay, tw ins.
In the Codex B orgia, T E Z C A T L iP O C A and
Q u etzalcoatl are tw ins as they jo u rn ey
through the U N D E R W O R L D . T h e PO PO L v u n
relates the adventures o f tw o sets o f tw ins
fa th ere d by H U N n u N A H P u : H u nah p u and X b a lan q ue, the H e ro T w in s, and H u n B atz and
H u n C huen, the M o n k ey Scribe tw ins (see
MONKEY). P ain ted M a y a ceram ics reveal o th er
p aired in d ivid u als, b u t no o th er pairs o f tw ins
can be surely id e n tifie d . Some M a y a pairs,
such as the P A D D LE R C O D S , express opposition
ra th e r than id e n tity and can be like n e d to
A ztec di/rasis/nos, p aired oppositions. 5*ee
a / y o B IR T H ; D E F O R M IT Y ; D U A L IT Y .

Place sign for Xiuhtepec, meaning turquoise or


grass mountain, Matrcula de Tributos, 16th c.
Aztec.

Stone turtle bearing a Katun Wheel on its back,


Mayapan, Late Postclassic Maya. This sculpture
constitutes the only Prehispanic Katun Wheel
known.

The Hero Twins, Hunahpu and Xbalanque,


painted within Naj Tunich Cave, Guatemala,
Late Classic Maya.

rXiTZMMK

176

tz itzim im e A m ong th e most feared super


natural beings o f L a te Postclassic C e n tra l
M exico w e re the z/tz n n e (singular fz/tz/
m vf/), the star demons o f darkness. According

containing shalb and banners, or panf/f, O n


page 19 o f the Codex Borgia, the fzo m p an d/
is also depicted as a tre e w ith p a n t// banners
5e e a/yo TROPHY HEADS.

to C e n tra l M ex ic an b elie f, planets and con


stellations could be transform ed into fierce
devouring demons durin g p a rtic u la r calendrical and celestial events. Solar ECLIPSES w e re
an especially feared phenom enon, since it
was b elieved

th at the star demons w e re

@U
uay In M a y a n languages, the term n ay com

attacking the sux. This concept is probably

m only refers to sorcerers and form-changers.

based on the fact that durin g total solar

Am ong contem porary Yucatec, th ere is a

eclipses, STARS can be discerned close to the

great deal o f concern and fear regarding uay

sun, as if they w e re attacking and o verp o w er


ing it. F o r the Aztecs, the end o f the 52 -ye ar

sorcerers. In fact, the w ord even appears in

cycle was an o ther fea rfu l tim e. I f N e w F ire

fear. B u t although the u ay sorcerer corre

local Spanish as an expression o f alarm and

was not created on the H ill o f the Star

sponds closely w ith the highland M exican

(see F!RE), the tz/tznne w ould descend and


destroy the w orld.

NAHUAL, in certain M a y a n languages the term

signifies a soul-like spirit companion sim ilar

T h e iz/tz/m u n e w e re believed to dive h ead


first from the heavens, and for this reason,

to the M exican TONAL. In M a y a n languages,

they w ere com pared to the sptDEH hanging


head d ow n w ard from its thread. T h e four SKY

m ay w ell re fe r to the w idespread M a y a b e lie f


that the soul or spirit com panion travels in

BEARERS, TLAHU!XCALPANTECUHTU, X1UHTECUHTL,


EHECATL-QUETXALCOATL and MHTTLANTECUHTL!,
could also take on the role o f tzdznne star
demons, b ut the tz/fz/m /m e themselves w ere
usually considered to be fem ale. T h e Codex
M agliabechiano contains skeletal tz/fznne
w earing shell-fringed skirts. Am ong the
most im p ortan t z/fznne was the skeletal
/fzp a p a /o d , the goddess o f TAMOANCHAN.

dream s w h ile one is asleep.


Stephen Houston and D a v id S tuart have
isolated a glyph denoting uay. This sign is

tzom pantli O ne o f the m ore striking struc


tures o f M esoam erican public architecture
was the fzom pand/, or skullrack. This was
a wooden scaffold containing hum an skulls
pierced horizontally by crossbeams. T h e term
izompand? is N a h u atl, and it has been w id ely
assumed th at this structure derives from
Postclassic C entra! M exico. H o w e v e r, a pro
bable Protoclassic tzom panf/f was excavated
a t L a Coyotera, Oaxaca. M o reo ve r, there are
indications th at they w e re present a t U xm al
and other T e rm in a l Classic M a y a sites in the
Puuc region o f Yucatan.
In the Q uiche M a y a P O P O L V U H , the severed
head o f H U N H U N A H P U was placed in a gourd
tree next to the ballcourt. This gourd tree is
clearly a reference to the izom pa nf/i filled
w ith hum an skulls. In N a h u atl, the term for
head is fzonfeccvnaf/, w ith feccvnaf/signifying
gourd tree. I t appears th at like the Sumbanese
skull trees o f Indonesia, the tzompand? was
considered as a tree laden w ith fru it. In a
Toltec-style rock painting a t Ixtapantango,
there is a izo m p a n d / portrayed as a tree

uay can also m ean d ream in g or sleep. This

composed o f a stylized hum an face serving


as the sign for a/ia u or king, b u t w ith one
im p ortan t difference - h a lf the face is covered
by a jACUAR pelt. In Classic texts, anim als and
supernatural figures com m only serve as the
uay o f p articu lar M a y a lords. E ven gods are
described as having uay counterparts. Thus
a skeletal SERPENT is described as being the
uay o f C o d K, or K a u il (see scuELLHAS CODS).
In the Classic inscriptions, it is uncertain
w h e th e r form -changers or spirit companions
are being described. F o r this reason, Houston
and Stuart p re fe r to describe the u a y as a
"co-essence." .See a /fo TONAL.
U a ye b Am ong the most im p o rta n t cerem on
ies described for the contact-period M a y a o f
Yucatan w e re the rites concerning the U ayeb,
the five unlucky days a t the end o f the
year. D e ta ile d descriptions o f the U a ye b rites
appear in the 16th c. account by D ieg o de
Lan da, and in the C olonial Yucatec Cantares
de Dzff&a/cA. In addition, passages p e rta in
ing to the U a ye b rites appear in the Prehispanic D resden, Paris, and M a d rid codices.
T h e Yucatec term U a ye b probably signifies
the sleeping or resting place o f the year.
H o w e v e r, the U a ye b period clearly had more
sinister connotations. T h e C an fares de D z ffbaVcA describes this period as a tim e o f evil

177

UNDERWORLD

w hen the UNDERWORLD is open. T h e Prehispanic g!yph for the U ayeb p erio d is the 360day fun sign topped by a U -shaped skeletal
m aw , q u ite probably the cav e-lik e entrance

A tzitzimitl demon,
Codex Magliabechiano,
16th c. Aztec.

to the U n derw o rld . T h e U ayeb cerem ony


continues to be celeb rated by the T zo tzil o f
C ham ula as a n ative form o f C ath o lic C a rn i
val. In this Eve-day festival, perform ers
im personating MONKEYS and o th er dem ons
from the perim eters o f the social w o rld take
control o f the com m unity. A ccording to the
C ham ula people, this festival is p erfo rm ed
during the Eve days o f U ayeb. See aVso
CALENDAR.

U n d e rw o rld T h e M esoam erican U n d e rw o rld


was a fearsom e and d readed place. F o r
exam ple, the Q uiche M a y a w ord X ib alb a
means "place o f frig h t," and th a t it was
indeed. B ut u n like h e ll in the C h ristian w o rld ,
the M esoam erican U n d e rw o rld was not the
preserve o f sinners, b u t ra th e r the destination
o f a ll those w ho escaped v io len t d eath, for it
was only these la tte r w ho w e n t d ire ctly to one
o f the heavens. In th e ir preaching, the Spanish
friars g en erally translated the w ord for the
C h ris tia n h e ll as M ic tla n , b u t threats o f an
e te rn ity in M ic tla n had little effect, since the
audience alread y knew th a t a ll souls, w h e th e r
rich or poor, good or e v il, m ust go there.
A t the tim e o f the Conquest, most C e n tra l
M exican people believed in the cosm ographical scheme o f nine levels o f the U n d erw o rld ,
w ith 13 levels o f upper w o rld. According to
the Codex Vaticanus A , w h ere the 9 -1 3
schem e receives its most e xp licit and am ple
presentatio n , T la lticp a c, lite ra lly "on the sur
face o f the e a rth ," belongs to both sequences,
and so was considered the Erst level o f both
w orlds. T h e M a y a c ertain ly perceived layers
o f both U n d e rw o rld and up p er w o rld but the
notion o f nine levels o f the U n d e rw o rld is not
speciEc or universal for the M a y a , nor is
it fo r e ith e r the M ixtees or the Zapotees.
N evertheless, the construction o f num erous
n in e -le ve l PYRAMIDS du rin g the Classic and
T e rm in a l Classic era (e.g. T e m p le I a t T ik a l,
T e m p le o f Inscriptions a t P alenque, and the
C astillo a t C hichen Itz ) m ight reEect such a
conceit, p a rtic u la rly in the case o f fu n e ra ry
pyram ids. T h e notion o f "houses" in w hich

(AgAf) A
tzompantli
skullrack, Codex
Durn, 16th c.
Aztec
(Re/ow) A water
jaguar described
as the uay of a
Seibal lord, detail
from a Late
Classic Maya
vase.

the H e ro T w in s undergo ordeals in X ib a lb a


also suggests com partm ents, if not exactly
levels, in the U n d e rw o rld .
X ib a lb a , and the M a y a

U n d e rw o rld in

general, could be entered through a

CAVE,

or

(B/gAf) The sign for the Eve-day Uayeb


period, Palenque, Late Classic Maya.

VEINTENA

176
w h e re v e r one

g re at a tte n tio n from th e Spanish a t th e tim e

stood, th e U n d e rw o rld la y to the w est, w hich

stiH, standing WATER. F ro m

o f th e C onquest, perhaps because the series


o f 18 a g ric u ltu ra l festivals offered closer a n a l

m ay be w h y th e islands o ff C am peche, in c lu d
in g Jaina, received so m any b u ria ls: th e y

ogies to E u ro p ean m onths and C h ris tia n feast

w e re th e last lan d masses to th e w est o f the

days than any o th e r aspect o f the M es o am e ri-

Y ucatan p en insu la. In

th e

POPOL vuH,

th e

can CALENDAR. U n fo rtu n a te ly , the

N ah u at!

U n d e rw o rld geography includes a t least tw o

term fo r th e tim e perio d has been lost; no

rivers and varies m uch lik e th e geography o f

record o f the veintena survives in a C en tra!

the surface w o rld , and its re alm is vast. W h e n

M exican m anuscript m ade b efo re th e C o n

p re p a rin g fo r d eath and a jo u rn e y in to the

quest, p ro b ab ly because it d id not p lay th e

U n d e rw o rld , a M a y a steeled h im s e lf to be

sam e ro le in DiviNATiON th a t the TRECENA, as

lik e a H e ro T w in , th a t is, to b e a b le to

p a rt o f the tonaipoA ua///, d id . N evertheless,

overcom e the U n d e rw o rld gods and th e ir

because religious festivals w e re organized fo r

tria ls through w it and perseverance.

each

In C e n tra l M exico , the eig h t layers u n d er

vein ten a, the Spanish studied

them

assiduously, and fro m th e ir accounts em erge

the surface o f the EARTH o ffered discrete

some o f th e m ost d e ta ile d descriptions o f

hazards th a t had to be endured by the souls

A ztec religious practices. T h e veintena fe s ti

o f the dead: dangerous w aters, clashing MOUN

vals w e re la rg e ly a g ric u ltu ra l, w ith m any

TAINS, OBSTAN blades, a rro w SACRIFICE, and

ded icated to the RAIN gods and the MAizECODs.

HEART sacrifice am ong them , befo re the souls

V eintena cerem onies w e re w id e ly cele b rated

fin a lly reached

throughout M eso am erica, b u t usually the

M ic tla n , w h e re

M ic r L A N T E -

cuHTLi and his w ife M ic te ca cih u a tl reigned

term is reserved fo r the peoples o f C e n tra !

over the deepest n eth er region. T o aid the


dead soul in the perilous jo u rn e y , the dead

M exico . W e can also consider the M a y a count


o f m onths to have been veintenas.
T h e 18 A zte c veintenas ran as follow s, to

w e re crem ated w ith th e ir w o rld ly pos


sessions, p a rtic u la rly th e ir tools - such as a
w om an's w eavin g k it - as w e ll as precious
item s from the surface th a t m ight speed the
ordeal - such as JADE beads and fro th y hot
chocolate (see C A C A O ). W hen the souls o f the
dead fin a lly a rriv ed in M ic tla n , they offered
up th e m aterials w ith w hich the bodies had
been burned.
Some gods traveled in and out o f the
U n d e rw o rld : to create a n ew g eneration o f
m ankind,
for
exam ple,
QUETZALCO ATL
descended in to M ic tla n to steal the bones o f
a previous race o f hum ans.
Throughout M esoam erica, Docs w e re con
sidered valu ab le com panions and guides fo r
the dead sp irit, and dog skeletons are
occasionally found in TO M B S from the b egin
ning o f Classic tim es onw ard. In W est M exico,
p a rtic u la rly in C o lim a, m ourners placed
p o ttery dogs in shaft tom bs, p ro b ab ly as
an expression o f a sim ilar concept. In the
F lo re n tin e Codex, only a y ello w dog could
fe rry his m aster across the treacherous w aters
o f the U n d e rw o rld , ^ee a/so A F T E R L IF E ; D E A T H .

vein ten a T h e veintena, or 20-d ay p erio d , or


"m o n th ," in th e A ztec calendar, received

be succeeded by the nem ontem i, or nam eless


days, a fte r T ititl, b efo re the b eginning o f a
new 365-d ay year. T h e re is some disagree
m en t ab o u t the tim in g o f the p rin c ip a l feasts.

179

VEINTENA
vein ten a nam e

p rin c ip al deities

p rin cip al celebrations

Izc a lli

T la lo c, X iu h te c u h tli

ffu a uAqufVfarnaVcMa/tz/
(m eal
of
am aranth
tam ales);
feast
for
X iu h te cu h tli every four
years

A tlcahualo, X ilo m a n a liztli

T la lo q u e

C u au h u itleh u a (liftin g o f
posts, p lan tin g o f trees,
stretching
of
lim bs);
young m aize

T la ca xip e h u aliztli

X ip e Totee

Feast o f X ip e , god o f
spring; Haying o f cap
tives

T o zo zto n tli

T la lo q u e, T la lte c u h tli,
X ip e T o tee

B loodletting; first flow ers

H u ey to zo ztli

T la lo q u e, C in te o tl, C h icom ecoatl

B loodletting;
feasts
to
T lalo c, m aize gods; first

Toxcatl, T epopochtli

7
8

E tza lc u a liztli
T e c u ilh u ito n tli

T ezcatlipo ca, H u itzilo pochtli


T lalo c
H u ixto cih u a tl, X o ch ip illi

9
10

X ilo n en , m aize gods


H u itzilo p o ch tli

12

H u e y te c u ih u itl
Tlaxochim aco, M ic c a ilh u ito n tli
X o co tlhu etzi, H u eym icc a ilh u itl
O ch p an iztli

13

T eotleco or P achtontli

14

H u ey p ac h tli or T e p e ilh u itl

X iu h te cu h tli, H u itz ilo


pochtli
T la lo q u e, Xochiquetzal

15

Q uecholli

M ixcoat! or C am axtli

16

P a n q u etzaliztli

H u itzilo p o ch tli

17
18

A te m o ztli
T itit!

T lalo q u e
Ila m a te c u h tli.

11

H u eh u ete o tl, X iu h te cu h tli


T la zo lteo tl, Toci

(O p p ose) Celebrants dance around a Xocotl


pole erected during the veintena of Xocotlhuetzi.
This rite featured a climbing competition in
which noble youths tried to obtain an image
placed at the top of the pole, Codex Borbonicus,
p. 28, 16th c, Aztec.

fruits
Feasts to Tezcatlipoca and
H u itzilo p o ch tli
Feasts to young crops
Feast to goddess o f salt,
H u ixto cih uatl; exchange
o f noble clothing and
Rowers
Feast o f X ilonen
Feast o f m erchants; sm all
feast fo r the dead
Feast o f the xocot/ pole
Mamfena o f sw eeping and
bathing; feast o f T la zo l teo tl, Toci; scaffold sacri
fice; harvest feasts
B loodletting;
feast
of
H u itzilo p o ch tli
M o u n tain feasts to T lalo c;
sacrifice o f X ochiquetzal
im personator
Feasts o f M ixco atl; ritu a l
hunts
M a in festival to H u itz ilo
pochtli; banners
Feasts to w a te r deities
Feasts to Ila m a te c u h tli,
old people

As recorded in th e 7?e/a<nn cfe AircAoacdn,


the

Tarascans

abo

c ele b rated

veintenas,

although th e surviving list is in co m p lete. O n ly


C u in g o, "H a y in g ," can be surely lin k ed to a
speciHc M ex ica n fe s tiv a l, T la c a x ip e h u a liztli,
although

Johanna

B roda

has in vestigated

o th e r p a rallels . A lfonso Caso o ffe red a recon


struction:

Venus N o fem a le sym bol o f ero tic love, in


M esoam erica

the p la n et Venus em bodied

dan g er, and alw ays took anthropom orphic


form as m ale god. T h e p erio d ic m ovem ents
o f Venus o ffered w arnings o f drought, danger,
and w a rfa re . TLAHurzcALPANTEcuHTLi, C e n tra l
M ex ica n god o f the m orning star, is the
p rin c ip a l Venus god, b u t o th e r gods m ay h u rl
darts and preside o ver these b a le fu l periods.

Tarascan v ein ten a

A zte c v ein ten a


Iz c a lli

star; X O L O T L has som etim es been considered to


be his tw in and to represent the evening star,

T zitacu aren scu aro


Purecoracua

C uingo

A tlcah u alo
T la c a x ip e h u a liztli

and it m ay have been th a t T la h u izc a lp a n te -

U n isperacuaro

T o zo zto n tli

c u h tli presided over the evening star as w e ll.

n /a

H u e y to zo ztli

A m ong th e Postclassic M a y a , L ah u n C han

6
7

n /a

T oxcatl

was a m a lev o le n t Venus god. F o r the Classic

M azcu to

E tza lc u a liztli

perio d M a y a , a skeletal d e ity whose nam e is

U azcata cnscuaro

T e c u ilh u ito n tli

unknow n was the god o f the evening star.

C a h e ri cnscuaro

H u ey te cu ih u it!

H anciscuaro

Tlaxochim aco
X o co tihu etzi

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

H ic u a n d iro
S icuindiro
C h arap u zapi
U apnscuaro
C a h e ri uapnscuaro
n /a
Peunscuaro
C u rin d aro

P achtontli
H u eyp ach tii

dangerous rays: those a fra id o f its pernicious

Q u ech o lli
P a n q u etzaliztli
A te m o ztli
T ititl

it b rin g on sickness and m isfortu n e.


Venus lies closer to th e SUN than the EARTH
and orbits the sun m ore q u ickly, b u t seen
from the vantage p o in t o f the e a rth , it takes

A ztec vein ten a

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

A n thudoeni
A buoentaxi
A n ttzayo h
A tzhotho
A n ta tzh o n i
A tzib ip h i
A neguoeni
A nttzengohm uh
A ntangohm uh
A nttzengotu

11

A ntangotu

12

A m baxi
A nttzenboxegui

Iz c a lli
X ilo m a n a liztli
T la c a x ip e h u a liztli
T o zo zto n tli
H u eyto zo ztli
Toxcatl
E tza lc u a liztli
T e c u ilh u ito n tli
H u ey te cu ih u it!
M ic c a ilh u ito n tli,
Tlaxochim aco
H u ey m ic ca ilh u itl,
X o co tlhu etzi
O c h p an iztli
P ach to n tli
H u ey p ac h tli
Q u ech o lli
P a n q u e tza liztli
A te m o ztli
T ititl

18

A ncandehe
A m bue

A ccording to the F lo re n tin e C odex, the


influence o f Venus could be good o r e v il, bu t
the instructions fo r d ealin g w ith it re ve al th a t
m ost people p erceived it to be the source o f

O to m i vein ten a

A tam axegui
A n tzh o n i
A nthaxm e

b u t there is no evidence fo r these associations,

O c h p an iztli

Caso, Jacques Soustelle, Pedro C arrasco,


and Johanna B roda have also investigated
the O to m i veintenas, and these align c learly
w ith A ztec counterparts:

13
14
15
16
17

QUETZALCOATL is also a god o f the m orning

lig h t sealed any openings in th e ir houses lest

584 days fo r th e e a rth , sun, and Venus to


re tu rn to a specific alig n m en t. F ro m a t least
E a rly Classic tim es o n w ard , the M a y a k ep t
track o f the cycle (as th e Teotihuacanos m ay
w e ll have done too, although th ey have le ft
us no speciHc records), recognizing th a t this
b rig h test " s ta r" o f tw o d istin ct phases, m o rn
ing and evening star, was a single heaven ly
body. W h e n Venus rises as th e m o rning star,
it appears b efo re sunrise and leads the sun
out o f the UNDERWORLD; w h en Venus rises as
the evening star, it comes in to v ie w ju s t a fte r
sunset and then follow s th e sun in to th e
U n d e rw o rld .
W h e n Venus passes d ire c tly in fro n t o f the
sun, m odern astronom ers call its position
in fe rio r conjunction, and it g en e rally cannot
be observed fo r a fe w days (usu ally 8) before
its AeRacai ris in g as the m o rning star; it then
rises as the m orning star fo r roughly 263 days.
Its o rb it then takes Venus b eh ind the sun for
su p erio r conjunction, a period o f 55 to 60
days w h en again th e p la n e t cannot be seen,
b efo re it m akes it Erst appearance as the
evening star, in w hich position it rem ains fo r
263 days b efo re vanishing in fro n t o f the sun
again. T h e cycle takes 584 days to com plete;

181

VISION SERPENT

irreg u larities g en erally occur in days o f v ie w


ing a t a p artic u la r station ra th e r than in the
cycle over a ll. C uriously, according to both
M a y a and C en tra! M exican m anuscripts,
M esoam erican astronom ers reg u larized the
Venus periods, extending superior conjunc
tion and ab b reviatin g both the m orning and
evening star, bu t p a rtic u la rly the fo rm er, to
create unequal periods, w hereas, in fact, the
tim es o f v is ib ility are roughly equal. A ccord
ingly, in fe rio r conjunction lasted 8 days, the
m orning star 236 days, superior conjunction
90 days, and the evening star 250 days.
F iv e com plete Venus cycles = 2920 days =
8 x 365 days, so the Venus cycle easily in te r
locked w ith the solar year (see CALENDAR).
Several Precolum bian books c are fu lly chart
Venus, most notably the D resden and C ro lie r
codices (M a y a ) and the B orgia, Vaticanus B,
and Cospi (C e n tra l M ex ica n ). B oth sets show
stabbings and destruction under the auspices
o f the Venus gods, usually a t h eliacal rising.
In both C e n tra l M exico and am ong the M a y a ,
Venus calendars are read from 1 X ch itl or 1
A h au , the base day for heliacal rising. Long
thought to have been a Postclassic religious
construct, the b alefu l influence o f Venus is
now know n to be o f g re ater a n tiq u ity in
M esoam erica.
Classic M a y a inscriptions recording "star
w a rs /* or w ars tim ed to coincide w ith the
m ovem ents o f Venus and som etim es Jupiter,
in d icate th a t m any battles w ere scheduled to
occur on the days w hen Venus rose for
the first tim e a fte r its in fe rio r or superior
conjunction. T h e inscriptions also indicate
th a t
M aya
astronom ers
charted
both
m axim um brightness and greatest elongation
o f both m orning and evening star and tim ed
battles accordingly. These "star w ars" w e re
the g reatest conflagrations in Classic M a y a
tim es and took place w ith increasing fre q u
ency du rin g the 8th c., probably contributing
to the Classic M a y a collapse. Victorious M a y a
lords o f Venus w a rfa re donned costumes
laden w ith C en tra! M exican im agery, in clu d
ing

B U T T E R F L IE S , T L A L O C

SER PENT,

and the

faces,

O W LS ,

Vision Serpent Through ritu als o f


T iN C ,

the

WAR

M E X IC A N YEAR S IG N .

BLO O DLET-

Classic M a y a nobles conjured up im ages

o f rearin g

SERPENTS

whose m ouths belch gods,

ancestors, and other nobles. A t Yaxchiln,


such im ages are specifically lin k ed to penis
and tongue b lo o d lettin g and a re g en erated in
clouds o f smoke rising fro m

the burning

asssM;
(Above) A section from the
Venus pages of the Dresden
Codex, Postclassic Yucatn.

(Agbf) A Vision Serpent


rising from a burning blood
offering, Yaxchiln Lintel 15,
Late Classic Maya.

V U C U B C A Q U fX

!M

BLOOD oE ering. In a ll like lih o o d , these Vision


Serpents fun ctio n as visual m etaphors fo r
BiBTH and re b irth , w h e th e r o f d iv in itie s o r

Classic e n tity does not display th e beaded


round eye and thick beak o f the m acaw , and
m ay ra th e r be based upon the king vi LTLw

hum ans. Vision Serpents usually have a single

(Sarroram pA u^ p a p a ). Supplied w ith a WATER

head and p ro m in e n t snake m arkings; they

LILY pad headdress and a SERPENT body, this

m ay u n d u la te , although th e y ra re ly a p p ear

b ird h ead can serve as the head v a ria n t of

on the ground, and they som etim es have

th e 3 60-d ay tun p erio d and th e num eral 13.

fe a th e r crests.

In a d d itio n , this sam e character is re p


resented as th e personified b lo o d le tte r re n d

As SKY d eities , V ision Serpents also a p p ear


on the C hichen Itz gold disks, some w ith

ered w ith a headdress o f tied knots. See a/so

cloud

WATER LILY SERPENT.

m arkings along th e ir

bodies. Some

codex-style C lassic vases d ep ict the serpent


foo t o f C od K (see scHELLHAS coos) as a Vision

v u ltu re T h e

S erp en t or in the process o f becom ing one,

p a p a ), one o f the larg est birds o f M eso am er-

lin k in g the Vision S erpent to the M a y a god o f


ucHTMmc. M o rp h o lo g ic a lly , th e M a y a vision

ica, reaching a size roughly e q u iv a le n t to the


h arp y E A G L E , ra re ly ventures above 4 000'

serpent closely resem bles the Postclassic C e n

(c.

tra! M exican xiuncoATL, or fire serpent. L ik e

M esoam erican civilizatio n s outside the V a lle y

the X iu h co atl, the Vision S erpent m ay ap p ear

o f M exico , although the s m aller tu rkey v u l

1200 m ),

king

and

v u ltu re

so was

(Sarcoram phus

best know n

to

in clouds, em bodying ligh tn in g and FIRE, and

tu re (C a lA a rfe s a u ra ) and th e black v u ltu re

perhaps, by extension, p o w erfu l storm s.

(C bragypes a ira lu y ) a re com m on e ve ryw h e re


in M eso am erica. T h e C e n tra l M ex ica n day

Vucub C aquix In the popoLvuu (th e creation


epic describing the deeds o f the H e ro T w in s )

sign C o zcacu auh tli is th e v u ltu re .


A lfonso Caso and Ig n acio B ern al id en tiE ed

a g reat m onster b ird know n as V ucub C aq u ix,


or 7 M a c a w , presides over the m urky tw ilig h t
w o rld follo w in g the flood. A lthough he pro
claim s h im self to be the SUN and MOON, the
d aw ning and separation o f day and N icm have
not y e t occurred. A ngered by his arrogance,
H u nah p u and X b alanq u e w a it for the m on
ster b ird un d er his fav o rite fru it tree , and
then shoot him dow n w ith th e ir blowguns.
D u rin g the fierce b a ttle th a t ensues, H u nahpu
loses his arm . H o w ev er, through m agic and
tric ke ry, the H ero T w in s even tu ally d efe at
and k ill Vucub C aquix and restore the arm
o f H u nah p u .
A lthough the P opo/ VuA is a C olonial M a y a
docum ent, the episode o f Vucub C aquix can
be traced to th e Protoclassic beginnings o f
M a y a civiliza tio n . Stela 2 from th e site o f
Iza p a portrays the tw o H e ro T w in s running
tow ard Vucub C aquix, w ho is descending to
his fru it tre e . A t the base o f the tre e , one can
discern the crum pled rem ains o f the defeated
b ird w ith a bone ja w . T h e m onster b ird also
appears on Iza p a Stela 25, above a m ale w ith
a b leed in g stum p fo r an arm . C le a rly , this
scene portrays the fig h t in w hich Vucub
C aquix tears o ff H unah p u 's arm .
Representations o f the PRINCIPAL BIRD DEITY
abound in the a rt o f Protoclassic and Classic
M a y a and can be id e n tifie d w ith Vucub
C aquix. A lthough V ucub C aquix signified 7
M a c a w in Q u ich , the Protoclassic and

a Z apotee d e ity , E l A ve de Pico A ncho, as a


v u ltu re . This Zapotee d e ity is id e n tic al to the
PRINCIPAL BIRD DEITY o f the M a y a , w ho is also
a v u ltu re . Protoclassic kings a t K am in alju y

and L a M o ja rra a rra y e d them selves as this


god. O fte n adorned w ith a h eadband, the
king v u ltu re head substitutes fo r aAau in
M a y a n w n m N C , both fo r th e d ay sign and to
m ean " lo rd ."

W a r Serpent C re a te d d u rin g th e 3rd c. A D , the


T e m p le o f Q u etzalcoat! o rig in a lly contained
one o f the m ost e lab o ra te a rch itec tu ral
facades know n in a n cien t M eso am erica. T w o
form s o f tenoned sculpture p ro ject ou t o f the
facade. O n e o f these heads is c le a rly the
p lum ed serpent, or Q U E T Z A L C O A T L . H o w e v e r,
the o th er e n tity has been m ore d iffic u lt to
id e n tify . A ltho u g h it has been w id e ly in te r
p re te d as th e head o f T la lo c , it is a ctu ally a
m osaic headdress p o rtray in g a serpent being
w ith ja g u a r attrib u te s . Because o f its fre q u e n t
appearance w ith w eapons and w a rrio r Egures,
this e n tity can be called the W a r Serpent.
T h e W a r S erpent is p ro b ab ly an ancestral
form o f the x iu H C O A T L , th e Ere serpent o f
Postclassic C e n tra l M exico . A ltho u g h the w a r
serpent probably originates a t T E O T IH U A C A N , it

183

WATER

is also com m only found in Classic M a y a and


Zapotee a rt. <See a/so TEonHUACAN coos.
w a rrio r orders A t the tim e o f the Spanish
Conquest, certain A ztec w arrio rs w e re id en tiBed w ith p o w erfu l predators o f the n atu ra l
w o rld , p artic u la rly EAGLES and JAGUARS, and
these have come to be called the eagle knights
and the ja g u ar or tig er knights. (In m odern
M esoam erica, there are no tigers, b u t a ll w ild
cats, p a rtic u la rly pumas and jaguars, are
often called &gre in Spanish.) T h e N ah u a tl
m etaphor fo r w arrio rs, in c n a n h t/i in oce/oi/,
"th e eagles, the ja g u ars ," expressed the oppo
sitions o f SKY and EARTH and o f day and N ic m r.
T h e eagle and ja g u ar knights served HuiTZiLOP O C H T L i , the SUN, and the A ztec c u lt god p a r
exce/ience. A t the creation o f the Bfth sun
a t T eotihuacan (see CREATION ACCOUNTS), the
eagle and ja g u ar hu rled them selves into
the burning pyre a fte r N an ah u atzin and
T ecu ciztecatl to generate the Brst eagle and
ja g u ar knights. T h e A ztec m yth thus
suggests an a n tiq u ity to the w a rrio r orders.
A lthough th ere was no standing A ztec
arm y, m em bers o f the eagle and jag u ar
knights cam e from e lite society and dedicated
th e ir lives to th e ir roles. T h ey freq u e n tly
p artic ip a te d in public celebrations, p artic u
la rly o f the VEINTENAS. D u rin g the m onth o f
T la c a x ip e h u a liztli, fo r exam ple, the eagle and
ja g u a r knights fought CAPTIVES tied to the
T E M A L A C A T L in g la d iato ria l bouts, and engaged
in s treet skirm ishes w ith the X ip e im person
ators. R ecent excavations in T en o ch titlan
have revealed a tem ple to the eagle knights
adjacent to the d ual P Y R A M ID dedicated to
T L A L O C and H u itzilo p o ch tli.
P ain ted friezes o f a lte rn a tin g coyotes and
pum as or jaguars a t T E O T I H U A C A N m ay sym bol
ize e arly w a rrio r orders there, and the cults
m ay have been quickly adopted by the M a y a ,
fo r some E a rly Classic w arrio rs a t T ik a l and
elsew here include coyote fu r in th e ir costumes.
A t the end o f the 8th c., the c h ie f victorious w a r
riors in the B onam pak m uris a ll w e ar ja g u ar
costum es; in contem poraneous paintings at
C acaxtla, a noble eagle w a rrio r and ja g u a r
w a rrio r fram e a doorw ay. E agle and ja g u ar
w arrio rs parade a t both T u la (seeTOLLAN) and
C hichen Itz , and the presence o f coyotes a t
T u la and bears a t C hichen Itz suggest
add itio n al orders there as w e ll.
w a te r Because o f th e ir dependence upon
a g ricu ltu re , w a te r has been o f c en tral concern

The defeat of Vucub Caquix, Izapa Stela 2,


Protoclassic Maya. In this scene, the descending
bird is being attacked by the two Hero Twins.
Vucub Caquix appears a second time, now
defeated, at the base of the fruit tree.

(RigAf) Maya Bgure wearing


War Serpent headdress, vessel
sherd, Belize, Late Classic
Maya.

(Be/ow) The eagle and jaguar


warrior orders, Codex
Borbonicus, p. 11, 16th c.
Aztec.

WATEH LJLY

164

to both a n cien t and contem porary peoples o f

Lacandon account, the g reat god Kakoch

M eso am erica. P a rtic u la r regions, such as the


ocean, SPRINGS, and MOUNTAINS are fre q u e n tly

created a w a te r lily from w hich a ll the other


gods w e re born.

w orshipped as m agical sources o f w a te r. In

In M a y a iconography, tw o gods a re p artic u


la rly associated w ith the w a te r lily . O n e of

M es o am e ric a, the gods o f w a te r - especially


RAIN - a re am ong the m ost an c ie n t and pervas
Zap o tee cocido, and TLAjuoc o f C e n tra ! M ex ico .

these is th e U n d e rw o rld d enizen know n as


the W a te r L ily Jaguar, whose m odern nam e
derives from the w a te r lily flo w er placed

O fte n , m ale gods o f ra in a re distinguished

p ro m in e n tly on his b ro w . T h e o th er being is

iv e d eities , p a rtic u la rly the M a y a

CHAC,

the

from fem a le d eities o f standing w a te r. T h e

th e

nam e o f th e C e n tra l M e x ica n goddess CHAL

body, b e a k -lik e face, and the bound w a te r

cHiUHTLicuE, She

o f th e

Jade

S k irt,

is a

m etap h oric allusion to a shining expanse o f


v erd a n t w a te r.
As w e ll as a source o f a g ric u ltu ra l fe rtility ,

W A T E R L IL Y S E R P E N T ,

id e n tifie d by its

SERPENT

lily pad and B ow er serving as its headdress.


The

W a te r

L ily

S erpent serves as head

varian ts o f the n u m eral 13 and th e 360-day


tun p erio d . <See a/yo

jA C U A H C O D S .

w a te r was also an im p o rta n t m eans o f cere


m onial PURIFICATION. A m ong

the

M aya

of

Y ucatn, n ative pRiEsrs consecrated an area


by scattering w a te r from a s e rp e n t-ta ile d
aspergillum . T h e w a te r used in this act o f
p u rific atio n d erived from d ew gath ered from

W a te r L ily S erpent K now n only am ong the


M a y a , the W a te r L ily S erp en t sym bolizes the
surface o f s till
is an u n d u latin g

W ATER.

A ltho u g h the body

SERPENT,

the head has the

d o w n w ard curvin g b eak o f a b ird , often w ith

lected in distant locations rem oved from the

crossed bands in fixed in the lo w e r ja w . A


W A T E R L I L Y pad and F L O W E R form th e headdress,

presence o f w om en; zu h u y ha continues to


be an im p o rtan t com ponent o f m odern M a y a

a su p ern atu ral p atro n o f the NUMBER 13 and

leaves or from v irg in w a te r, zu h u y ha, col

a g ricu ltu ra l cerem onies. A m ong both the


Postclassic Yucatec M a y a and C e n tra l M e x
ican Aztecs, w a te r was used in BAPTISM cere
m onies as a means o f p u rifyin g the child.
w a te r lily O ne o f the m ore lovely flo w erin g
plants o f M esoam erica, the w a te r lily (M y /n p h aea spp.) grows in re la tiv e ly still w aters
such as ponds, lakes, and slow -m oving rivers.
These conditions correspond w e ll to the
hum id M a y a low lands, and it is thus not
surprising th a t this p la n t abounds in Classic
M a y a a rt.
In M a y a iconography, the w a te r lily fre
q u en tly denotes standing W A T E R , including
the surrounding and sustaining S E A . Perhaps
because o f its alm ost m iraculous em ergence
out o f the s till w a te r, the w a te r lily m ay have
served as a m odel fo r the creation o f the
E A R T H . T h e lid o f one E a rly Classic M a y a
ceram ic vessel depicts a p a ir o f 8sh and birds
n ib b lin g a w a te r lily , as if the p la n t is the
te rre s tria l in terfa ce b etw een the S K Y and the
w a te ry U N D E R W O R L D . M o re o v e r, th e veined
surface o f the w a te r lily le a f is fre q u e n tly
m arked w ith a n e t-lik e p a tte rn also used to
d ep ict the surface o f tu rtle shells. A m ong the
M a y a , th e TURTLE was ano th er m odel fo r the
c ircu lar e arth floating upon th e sea. T h e ro le
o f the w a te r lily in M a y a creation m ythology
continued in to this century. A ccording to one

and a 6sh o ften nibbles a t the flo w e r. H e is


substitutes fo r th a t n u m b er, and m ay also
figure as the personified fun, o r yea r, sign. A t
D zib ilc h a ltu n , W a te r L ily Serpents u n d ulate
along the u pper frie ze o f the T e m p le o f the
Seven D o lls, and ab u n d an t a d jac en t sea S H E L L
offerings suggest th a t the a n cien t c ity m ay
have represented the im age o f an oasis in
hot, d ry n o rth e rn Yucatan. T o d ay, w a te r lilie s
Boat on the D zib ilc h a lt n C E N O T E .
Classic M a y a kings and o th e r lords o ften
w e a r the head o f th e W a te r L ily S erpent
as a headdress, som etim es in contexts o f
aspersion and daubing o f p a in t. T h e W a te r
L ily S erpent is closely re la te d to th e S h e ll/
W in g dragon, w ho som etim es rests on the
W a te r L ily Serpent's headdress. T h e K an cross W a te r L ily M o n s te r, o r T u b u la r H e a d
dress M o n s te r, is p ro b ab ly a v a ria n t o f the
W a te r L ily S erpent.
w eaponry M eso am erican d eities, lik e th e ir
m o rtal counterparts, carried w eapons, and
some M esoam erican w eapons w e re th e m
selves d eities. T h e fo llo w in g lis t is not com
prehensive, b u t it includes the w eapons m ost
com m only c arried b y the gods.
E ven am ong the O lm ecs, some d eities w ere
arm ed: the e a rly flyin g figures b ea r clubs,
and seated figures - sup ern atu ral or d ivin e often hold "kn u ckled u sters:" hand stones
th a t m ay have been some sort o f w eapon.

185

WERE-JACUAR

By Classic tim es, w eaponry is fa r m ore


elaborate: both gods and hum ans w e a r
arm or, bear shields and carry a w id e v a rie ty
o f weapons. In C e n tra l M exico , a t T e o tihuacan, w arriors b ear OBsmiAN-tipped lances,
arrow s, and a f/a i/s , or d a rt throw ers, and this
la tte r w eapon retains an id e n tific atio n w ith
C e n tra l M exico throughout tim e. T h e M a y a
adom th e ir shields w ith the face o f the Jaguar
God o f the U n d erw o rld (see JAGUAR GODs), a
patron o f w a r, and som etim es the Jaguar God
o f the U n d erw o rld h im self is arm ed. M a y a
kings som etim es b ear the MANIKIN SCEPTER in
hand as if it w e re a w eapon; h eld in the
hands o f CHAC, the M a n ik in Scepter em bodies
LIGHTNING. D eitie s and w arrio rs both hold
h afted axes, often w ith bloody tips. T h e H ero
T w in s shoot pellets from th e ir blowguns.
In the Postclassic era, perhaps most
im p o rtan t am ong d eified weapons is the
xiUHCOATL, or Ere serpent, the w eapon th a t
HuiTziLOPOCHTLi bears in his hand a t b irth and
uses to k ill his h alf-sister, coYOLXAUHQui, and
to banish his h alf-b ro th ers, the C entzon H u itz nahua. O th e r A ztec deities also carry w eapons,
usually the a t/a t/, b u t occasionally long
spears. In close com bat, the Aztecs fought
w ith the m acuahuit/, a club im bedded w ith
obsidian blades.
Across M esoam erica and throughout tim e,
w eapons w e re in most cases used in com bat to
disable bu t not to k ill the opponent. Victorious
lords dispatched th e ir captured enem ies pub
licly , using knives w ith h afted obsidian blades
e ith e r to decapitate or to rem ove the H E A R T .
w e re-ja g u ar As the O lm ec civilizatio n began
to be recognized early in this century, m any
o f its zoom orphic figures w ere thought to be
o f fe lin e d erivatio n and the anthropom orphic
ones o f a h u m an -felin e blend - or w h a t have
come to be called w ere-jaguars. W e re there
h a lf hum an, h a lf J A C U A H creatures? In his
fam ous hypothesis, M a tth e w S tirlin g argued
th a t the Olm ecs believed in a supernatural
m ating betw een hum ans and jaguars, leading
to a special race o f w ere-jag u ars, b u t this
overarching theo ry cannot explain the d iv e r
sity and com plexity o f O lm ec supernaturals.
O n ly one, the R ain B aby, clea rly seems to
be a hu m an -jag uar blend. A n o th er class o f
figures th a t dem onstrates the change o f
hum ans into jaguars and o th er anim als pro
bably

illustrates

sham anic

transform ation.

^ e e a / y o JAGUAR; NAHUAL; OLMEC CODS; SHAMAN;


STTRLINC HYPOTHESIS; TONAL; UAY.

Were-jaguar: a chart by Miguel Covarrubias


suggesting the evolution of Mesoamerican rain
gods from the Olmec jaguar god.

w in d S om ething th a t m oves bu t cannot be


seen, th e w in d com m only sym bolizes the
en g en d erin g , c re a tiv e s p irit from w h ich life

an cien t M a y * relig io n , green ia the color


associated w ith the c en tral place. T h e C o lo n
ia l Yucatec C /u /a m B a/am o f C A um aye/

d erives. A m ong the Zapotees, this force w as

describes fou r /m ix yaxcAe set up a t the four

know n as p e e , sig n ifyin g w in d , b re a th , or

corners o f the w o rld , each associated w ith

s p irit, i t was b eliev ed to reside in a ll things


th a t m oved and thus show ed life . A m ong

th e c a rd in a l d ire c tio n a l COLORS o f re d , w h ite ,


black and y ello w . Thus the yaxcAe w o rld tree

the M a y a , w in d was rep resen ted by a sign

is sim ultaneously a single green tre e and fou r

resem bling

th e

L a tin

trees associated w ith a d ire ctio n al color. O n

M a y a wRiTmc, this T -sh ap ed

pages 25 to 28 o f th e Postclassic M a y a Codex

d evice is the id e n tify in g e lem e n t o f the second

D resden the fq u r d ire ctio n al trees are illu s

a lp h ab et, in

le tte r

"T "

o f th e

day nam e, ik , signifying " w in d " in Yucatec.

tra te d w ith a p a rtic u la r god and card in al

D u rin g the Classic p erio d , the head v a ria n t

region.

o f the num ber 3 fre q u e n tly displays the w in d

In the D resden passage, the w o rld trees

sign upon his cheek, possibly d enoting him

a re associated w ith th e fo u r YEARBEARERs, the

as the god o f w in d .

days by w h ich th e 3 65-d ay y ear was nam ed.

Perhaps
ancien t
CO ATL,

the

best-know n

M eso am erica

is

of

A m a rke d ly s im ila r passage occurs on pages

EHECATL QUETZAL

49 to 52 o f the C e n tra l M exican Codex B orgia,

w in d

god

th a t is, Q u etzalco atl in his aspect as

god o f w in d .

In

L a te

Postclassic C en tra!

w h e re fo u r trees a re o rie n te d to the fo u r


yearb earers and d ire c tio n a l gods. A

fifth ,

M exico , he typ ically appears w ith a red buccal

centra! tre e o f g ro w in g MAIZE appears on page

mask resem bling a duck beak, and shell


JEWKLHY, including p a rtic u la rly his "w in d

53, h ere flan ked by Q U E T Z A L C O A T L and


the green A h u iateo t! nam ed 5 M a lin a lli. In

je w e l," a pectoral form ed from the cut cross-

C en tra! M exican iconography the fo u r d ire c

section o f a conch w h o rl. A ccording to the


m yth o f the F I V E S U N S , E h ecatl-Q u etzalco atl
presided over the sun o f N ah u i E h ecatl, or 4
W in d , the w o rld destroyed by w inds. In A ztec
m ythology, E h ecatl-Q u etzalco atl is also a

tio n al trees a re distinguished by species and


by a p a rtic u la r a n im al, usually a b ird , a p p e a r

g reat c u ltu re hero w ho creates the w o rld ,


hum ans, and MARE. Scenes in the Prehispanic
Codex Vindobonensis reveal th a t 9 W in d , the
M ix te e eq u iva len t o f E h ecatl-Q u etzalco atl,
had a sim ilar role in M ix te e m ythology, See
a V s o C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S ;

M tX T E C C O D S .

w o rld trees In M esoam erican thought, the


card in al D I R E C T I O N S w e re associated w ith a
broad spectrum o f things fro m the n atu ra l
and c u ltu ra l w orlds. O n e o f the most
im p o rtan t and pervasive o f these em bodi
m ents o f the directions w e re w o rld trees,
each o rien ted to a specific d irectio n . These
trees seem to express the fo u r fo ld n atu re o f
a single g reat tre e , or axis m um #, located a t
the cen ter o f the w o rld .
Am ong the Yucatec M a y a , this c en tral tree
was a yaxcA (C e ib a spp.), the n atio n al tree
o f m odern G u atem ala. W ith its roots in the
U N D E R W O R L D and its branches in the heavens,
this g re at tre e connected the planes o f S K Y ,
E A R T H , and U n d e rw o rld . In Yucatec, the term
yaxcA signifies first or green tre e . A lthough
the concept o f firs t tree is e n tire ly a p t fo r the
cosmic tre e a t the cen ter o f the w o rld , the
referen ce to green is also a p p ro p riate; in

ing a t the top o f the tre e . O n page 1 o f the


Codex F je rv ry -M a y e r, the fo u r d ire ctio n al
trees app ear w ith th e ir accom panying birds,
gods, days, and Y E A R B E A R E R S .
T h e placing o f birds in w o rld trees is o f
considerable a n tiq u ity in the M a y a region.
A t L a te Classic P alen q u e, this m o tif occurs
on the T a b le t o f the Cross, th e T a b le t o f the
F o lia te d Cross, and th e sarcophagus lid fro m
Pacal's tom b in the T e m p le o f th e In s crip
tions. Stela 25 fro m the Protoclassic site o f
Iza p a , C hiapas, portrays a b ird ato p a tre e
lik e CAIMAN fo r a tru n k , p ro b ab ly a re fe ren c e
to the spiny green tru n k o f th e yaxcAe.
Iza p a S tela 5 bears one o f the m ost com plex
representations o f a w o rld tre e eve r carved,
b u t extensive erosion o f the m onum ent p ro
h ib its a clea r understanding o f this e a rly
and im p o rta n t scene. See a/yo C R E A T IO N
ACCO UNTS.

w ritin g C e rta in ly no la te r than 600 Be some


M esoam erican peoples kn e w how to w rite ,
for by th a t d ate, carved inscriptions app ear
a t San Jos M o g o te, O axaca. D u rin g the
Protoclassic, w ritin g th riv e d and developed
in V eracru z and O axaca, and a fe w carved
m onum ents, such as the L a M o ja rra stela,
re ve al th a t th e system w as fu lly developed,
although it rem ains im p e n etrab le to m odern

187

WRITING

scholars. By the 1st c. Be com plex calendrics


w ere inscribed in the M a y a area , w h ere
M esoam erican w ritin g e ve n tu ally achieved
its greatest sophistication.
D u rin g the Classic p erio d , the M a y a w ro te
in w h a t linguists called a "m ix e d " script,
composed o f both phonetic syllables and
logographs (th a t is, w ord pictures) th a t
allow ed them to rep licate m ost o f the nuances
of speech. T h e w ord ja g u a r, ba/am , could be
w ritte n by a ja g u a r head, or by the phonetic
syllables ba-7a-m a, w ith the 6 nal vow el silent,
or even by a m ix o f the tw o, a ja g u a r head
w ith a phonetic com plem ent, such as m a
underneath, probably to m ake it p la in th a t
the ha/am w ord was m eant fo r ja g u a r and not
some o th er synonym . D u rin g the Postclassic,
perhaps because o f the d earth o f public

The wind god Ehecatl-Quetzalcoatl or 9 Wind in


front of his wind temple, Nochistlan Vase, Late
Postclassic Mixtee. The cut conch wind jewel of
Quetzalcoatl can be seen on the thatched roof of
the temple.

m onum ents, w ritin g g rew ever m ore phonetic


and thus less accessible to those not train ed
to read and w rite .
A t the tim e o f the Conquest, the Spanish
described w ritin g in both C e n tra l M exico and
am ong the M a y a as the preserve o f P R IE S T S ,
and most w ritin g was considered sacred. F o r
the Classic M a y a , lite ra c y was probably the
province o f the n o b ility , b u t noble w om en
m ay also have learn ed to read and w rite : a t
least one noble w om an, L ad y A hau K atun of
Piedras N egras, bore the title A hau K in , or
lord sun, one o f the highest noble titles,
probably in dicating h er lite rac y.
A t T E O T i n u A C A N , despite w h at m ust have
been a fa m ilia rity w ith M a y a script, there
was little in terest in w ritin g , and even w hen
it g rew m ore com m on in Postclassic C e n tra l
M exico , fe w phonetic elem ents w ere added
u n til a fte r the C onquest, w hen Precolum bian
w ritin g flourished fo r several decades before
dying out altogether.

World trees oriented to the four directions,


Codex Fejrvry-Mayer, p. 1, Late Postclassic
period.

A ccording to sources from


separate
M esoam erican regions, the gods invented
w ritin g . T h e M a y a a ttrib u te d the invention
to rrzA M N A , w ho m ay be called ah dz/h, H e o f
the W ritin g . In the POPOL vuH, the older
brothers o f the H e ro T w in s , the M on key
Scribes, are the patrons o f w ritin g and the
arts. T h e Aztecs called w ritin g by a m etaphor,
th /h
"th e black, the re d ," w hich, as
M ic h a e l Coe has suggested, m ay re fe r to a
M a y a origin for C e n tra l M exican books and
w ritin g , since th e surviving M a y a books are
w ritte n in red and black w h ile the C e n tra l
M exican ones a re not. <See a/so scMBAL CODS.

Writing: the Mayan word &a/am, meaning


jaguar, could be written logographically (left),
phonetically (right), or logographically with a
phonetic complement (center).

KBALAKQLE

!M
ing g la d ia to ria l com bat, o f w hich X ip e was
also a p atro n . V ictorious w arrio rs donned the

gx

skins o f th e ir captives and w ore them fo r


days, engaging in mock skirm ishes throughout
T e n o c h titla n , begging alm s and then blessing

X h a la n q u e see cREATioNACCOL\Ts;popoLvm;

those w ho gave them food and offerings. T h e

TWINS

stinking sldns w e re w o rn fo r 20 days, by


w h ich tim e they had n ea rly ro tten o?, and

X ib a lb a see UNDERWORLD

th en , or 20 days hence, throw n by some


accounts in to a

X ip e T o te e X ip e T o te e , O u r L o rd the F la ye d

CAVE,

or by others in to

hole.

A t the tim e o f th e C onquest the X ip e

O n e , had achieved a targe c u lt fo llo w in g in

fes tiva l fe ll d u rin g the spring, in our m onth

C e n tra l M exico a t the tim e o f the C onquest,

o f M a rc h , and m uch o f its im ag ery suggests

and the c eleb ratio n o f his fe s tiv a l, T la ca xip e -

a g ric u ltu ra l re n e w a l: as a seed germ inates, it

h u a liz tli, re v e rb e ra te d beyond the norm al

feeds o ff the ro ttin g h u ll around it, Hnally

VENENA, or 20-d ay period. A lfonso Caso and


Ignacio B ernal id e n tifie d X ip e w ith the Zap o

im personators w ore th e old skins u n til they

le ttin g

the n ew

shoot em erge. T h e X ip e

tee god Yopi and found him com m only re p

w e re ro tte n , w hen the young m an once again

resented in Classic period urns, and Sahagn

em erged, ^ee a/so DEITY IMPERSONATION.

a ttrib u te d his origins to the Zapotees. A m ong


R ain. T h e celeb ratio n o f X ip e T o tee flourished

X iuhcoat! A ccording to A ztec accounts, the


n ew ly
born
H U iT Z iL O P O C H T L i
destroyed

along the G u lf Coast in the e arly Postclassic

coYOLXAUHQui and the C entzon H u itzn a h u a

b efo re gaining a p rom inent place in the A ztec


pantheon, probably as a result o f the A ztec
dom ination o f the G u lf Coast a fte r the
fam ines o f the m id -15th c. A ccording to A ztec

as illu s tra te d on a fra g m e n ta ry C oyolxauhqui


sculpture excavated a t the T em p lo M a y o r.

the M ixtees, X ip e was know n as the god 7

sources, X ip e was born in the first genesis o f


the gods, and is id e n tifie d also as the Red
TEZCATLPOCA.

M ost X ip e figures v iv id ly depict a hum an


inside the Hayed skin o f another m an, the
extra Hayed hands hanging lik e m ittens.
C h aracteristic v ertical stripes run from fo re
head to chin, running over or broken by the
eyes. Puckered and bubbled, the Hayed skin
usually displays an incision w h ere the HEART
was rem oved; the penis is absent; the skin is
elab o ra te ly tied on a t the back. C onceptually,
the Hayed skin m ay suggest a g lo rified fo re
skin. Some A ztec stone sculptures m ay have
been a ttire d in a Hayed hum an skin.
G oldsm iths regarded X ip e T o tee as th e ir
p atro n , and they m ade rich offerings a t his
TEMPLE, Yopico, w ith in the T em plo M a y o r.
D u rin g the T la c a x ip e h u a liztli fes tiva l, a m an
donned the skin o f a slain CAPTIVE, w hich the
goldsm iths liken ed to a golden sheathing,
and they adorned the im personator w ith red
spoonbill feathers and golden je w e lry . X ip e
also had the pow er to cure eye ailm en ts, and
offerings w ere m ade to him a t Yopico by
those w ho sought m iraculous cures.
T la c a x ip e h u a liztli, usually calculated as the
th ird vem fena o f the solar year, began w ith
th e Haying o f captives o f w a r, usually fo llo w -

w ith a Hery

SERPENT

know n as the X iu h co atl,

L ik e the b e tte r know n C oyolxauhqui m onu


m en t discovered in 1978, this was o rig in a lly
a g re at stone disk d ep ictin g the slain
C oyolxauhqui. H o w e v e r, in this case, the
X iu hco atl serpent a ctu ally p en etrates the
chest o f the goddess, w ith the body and
tasseled ta il p ro jectin g ou t o f th e w ound.
in A ztec iconography, the X iu h c o atl typ
ically has a sharply b ack-tu rn in g snout, a
segm ented body, and a ta il resem bling the
trap e ze-an d -ray yea r sign. This ta il device
p robably does re fe r to the y e a r sign; x ih u ii/
signiHes " y e a r," "tu rq u o is e ," and "grass" in
N a h u a tl, and in m any cases the ta il is m arked
w ith the sign fo r grass, p a ra lle l rods tip p ed
w ith c ircu lar elem ents. D o u b le and trip le
kno tted strips o f P A P E R (som etim es called
"b o w -tie s ") w ra p the Hre serpent's body and
lin k it to S A C R IF IC E and B L O O D L E T T I N G .
D u rin g the Postclassic p erio d , the X iu hco atl
appears w ith a ll th ree concepts: T U R Q U O IS E ,
grass, and the vague solar y ea r (see C A L E N D A R ) .
O n page 46 o f th e C odex B orgia, fo u r smoking
X iu hco atl serpents surround a b u rning tu r
quoise m irro r. S im ilar turqu o ise-rim m ed MIR
R O R S are know n fro m E a rly Postclassic T u la
(see T O L L A N ) and C h ich en Itz a , w h ere fou r
Xiuhcoatls in turquoise mosaic circle the
m irro r rim . T h e a tla n te a n w a rrio r columns
from M o u n d B a t T u la w e a r precisely this

189

XIUHTECUHTL]

type o f m irro r upon th e ir backs. In this


case, the bodies o f the fo u r sm oking serpents
disp!ay the grass m o tif o f p a ra lle l lines tip p ed
w ith dots.
T h e association o f the X iu h co atl w ith tu r
quoise, grass and the solar yea r relates to its
essential m eaning o f FERE and solar h eat.
Turquoise, d ry grass, and the vague year
w ere a ll id e n tifie d w ith Ere in Postclassic
C en tra! M exico. T h e X iu hco atl is em blem atic
o f the C en tra! M exican god o f Ere, x i u H T E c u H T L i , the Turquoise L o rd . T h e X iu hco atl
w ield ed by the n ew ly born H u itzilo p o c h tli
represents the Eery rays o f the SUN dispelling
the forces o f darkness.
A lthough the X iu hco atl can be read ily
traced back to E a rly Postclassic T u la , its
u ltim a te origins are still obscure. N o n e th e
less, the TEOTiHUACAN W a r S erpent probably
constitutes an ancestral form o f the X iu hco atl;
in Classic period iconography, the WAR SERPENT
appears w ith Barnes, the grass m o tif, and the
trap e ze-an d -ray year sign, ^ee a/so TEOTiHUACAN CODS.

( The Hayed god, Xipe Totee. (LeA) Xipe


impersonator dressed in a human skin,
Florentine Codex, Book 2, 16th c. Aztec. (AgAf)
Aztec sculpture of Xipe, Late Postclassic period.

X iu h te c u h tli A C e n tra l M exican god o f FIRE,


X iu h te c u h tli overlaps w ith the aged Ere god,
HUEHUETEOTL. According to the F lo re n tin e
Codex, H u eh u ete o tl was b u t another e p ith et
o f X iu h te c u h tli. B u t w hereas H u eh u ete o tl is
depicted as a m arkedly aged being, X iu h te
c u h tli displays no indications o f inErm old
age: he is strongly identiE ed w ith youthful
w arrio rs and rulership.
T h e nam e X iu h te cu h tli signiEes Turquoise
L o rd , and he usually appears rich ly bedecked
in TURQUOISE mosaic, the x /u A u ffzo ///c ro w n o f
rulership, and a turquoise pectoral often in
the form o f a stylized BUTTERFLY. X iu h te cu h tli
com m only w ears a descending turquoisecolored b ird , the xiu A fo fo f/ (C ofrnga am aM u s ), against his brow and the XIUHCOATL Ere
serpent on his back. M a n y o f these turquoise
costum e elem ents o f X iu h te cu h tli appear
together on E a rly Postclassic To!tec w arrio rs,
and are also associated w ith the MORTUARY
BUNDLES o f A ztec w arrio rs, as illu strate d in
the Codex M ag liab ech iano . H o w ev er, clear
depictions o f X iu h te c u h tli a re not com mon
u n til the L a te Postclassic period. T h e depic
tion o f X iu h te cu h tli on page 49 o f the Codex
D resden constitutes a rare M a y a exam ple o f
this C en tra! M exican being. T h e accom pany
ing M a y a hieroglyphic text p h o netically
nam es him cAac ja u fe i, a close gloss to the
N ah u a tl X iu h te cu h tli.

Fragment of a
monument depicting
a Xiuhcoatl serpent
tearing open the chest
of Coyolxauhqui,
Templo Mayor,
Tenochtitlan.

Xiuhtecuhtli, the
Central Mexican
god of Ere and
time, Florentine
Codex, Book 1,
16th c. Aztec.

XOCHIPILLI

190

!n N a h u a tl, x /A u /t/ signifies y e a r as w e ll as


turquoise, and according to a n u m b er o

by the H u rrz iL O P O C H T L i im personator before his


sacrifice d u ring the feast o f Tnxcatl

sources, X iu h te c u h tli was th e god o f the y e a r,


and by extension, o f tim e its e lf. In th e 2 60-d ay
CALENDAR, X iu h te c u h tli serves as th e p atro n o f
th e day A t! and the

TRECENA

I C o a t.

X o lo tl A ltho u g h liv in g in in tim a te p ro xim ity


to hum ans, the Doc breaks on a d a ily basis
m any basic social conventions observed by
p eo p le; perhaps fo r this reason, dogs w ere

X o c h ip illi

m eans

considered filth y and im m o ral in M eso am er-

" F lo w e r P rin c e ," is closely id e n tifie d w ith

X o c h ip illi,

w hose

nam e

ica. T h e canine god X o lo tl em bodies m any o f

M a c u ilx o c h itl, 5 F lo w e r, one o f th e

A H u iA T E -

the characteristics ascribed to them . This

TEO, or gods o f excess. Sahagn a ttrib u te s to

C e n tra l M ex ica n god appears to have served

X o c h ip illi the m e tin g ou t o f hem orrhoids,

as the naA uaM , o r d o u ble, o f QUETZALCOATL,


and he accom panied Q u etzalcoat! in his d e

ven erea! disease and

boils to those w ho

v io la te tim es o f fasting w ith sexual in te r

scent to the UNDERWORLD to re trie v e the bones

course, b u t he is also a god o f p ositive crea tive

o f m an kin d . As th e canine com panion o f

FLOW ERS,

Q u etzalco at!, X o lo tl w ears the cut conch pec

dancing, feasting, p ain tin g , and g am e-p lay

to ral and o th e r costum e elem ents o f E h ecatl-

ing. Because o f his g en e rativ e pow ers, he is

Q u e tza lc o a tl.
A ltho u g h the fa ith fu l assistant and com

energies, and as such is a p atro n o f

also closely linked to ciNTEOTL, the young


m aize god. X o c h ip illi was feted e a rly in the

panion to the g re at c u ltu re hero Q u etzalcoat!,

grow ing season, d u rin g T e c u ilh u ito n tli, w hen


his im personator (see DMTY IMPERSONATION) was

X o lo tl w as also id e n tifie d w ith sickness and


physical DEFORMITY. In th e codices, he com

sacrificed. See a/so VEINTENA.

m only displays a ragged-edged e a r, g en e rally

Xochiquctza! L ite ra lly " F lo w e r Q u e tz a l,"


Xochiquetza! epitom ized young fem ale sexual

believed to be due to the ru n n in g sores w hich


often occur on dogs' ears. T h e nam e X o lo tl
relates to concepts o f TWINS and d e fo rm ity . In

p ow er, FLOWERS, and pleasure, and in this


reg ard , was re late d to the AiiuiATETEO and
excess. B ut she was also a patroness o f
w eavers and the arts practiced by noble
w om en; she presided over c h ild b irth and
pregnancy and served as the g uardian o f
the young m other. In these w ays she bears
relatio n ship to Toci, TLAZOLTEOTL, and the
o th er m other goddesses, b u t u n like those
fem ale deities, X o chiquetzal rem ained ever
young and b e a u tifu l, e ver a llu rin g . D epictions
g en erally show h er in luxurious a ttire and
w earin g COLD ornam ents.
T h e p atro n o f the T R E C E N A 1 X c h itl, X ochi
q u etzal was fe te d d u rin g the VEINTENA H u e y p ach tli, especially by the practitioners o f
luxury arts - m etalsm iths, sculptors, p ainters,
w eavers, feath erw o rkers and em broiderers,
in p a rtic u la r - w ho presented a w om an to
im personate the goddess (see D E IT Y iM P E R S O N A T i O N ) . A fte r P R IE S T S sacrificed and flayed h er,
a m an donned the skin and fancy a ttire , sat
a t a loom , and p reten ded to w eave, w h ile
the m aster craftspeople danced around in
costumes o f M O N K E Y S , J A G U A R S , D O G S , coyotes,
and pum as. Subsequently the w orshippers con
fessed th e ir sins to h er idol through p en ite n tia l
tongue BLOODLETTING and com pleted th e ir
atonem ent w ith a ritu a l bath. A X ochiquetzal
im personator was one o f the four brides taken

N a h u a tl, xo/ocAam signifies " to w rin k le or


double o v e r," and in fa c t X o lo tl is fre q u e n tly
d epicted w ith a d eep ly fu rro w e d face. H o w
e ver, the w o rd x o /o f/ also fre q u e n tly refers
to tw in n ed objects in N a h u a tl; thus the term
fo r a doubled M A izc p la n t is xo/o% and
doubled MAGUEY, m exo/oi/. In Postclassic C e n
tra l M exico , tw ins w e re fe a re d m uch lik e
m onstrous b irth s o r d efo rm itie s. A ccording
to Tezozom oc, DWARVES AND HUNCHBACKS w e re
term ed xo/orne and the nam e m ay explain
w h y xoA?%7 also signified a c o u rtly page, since
dw arves, hunchbacks and o th e r p h ysically
deform ed in d ivid u als o fte n served in the
palace court. T h e id e n tific a tio n o f the dog
w ith tw in n in g and d efo rm itie s is o f g re at
a n tiq u ity in M eso am erica: tw o -h ead ed dogs
are com m only found in the Protoclassic cer
am ic sculpture o f W est M exico .
X o lo tl plays an im p o rta n t ro le in c ertain
A ztec accounts o f the creation o f the h fth
sun a t T E O T I H U A C A N (see C R E A T IO N A C C O U N T S ) .
A ccording to Sahagn, d u rin g th e S A C R IF IC E o f
the gods a t th e firs t d aw n in g , X o lo tl unsuc
cessfully tries to escape by firs t tu rn in g in to
the doubled m aize p la n t, then the doubled
m exo/oif, or m aguey, and fin a lly the sala
m ander know n as th e axoVoi/, or " w a te r
x o lo tl." H o w e v e r, in the M e n d ie ta account
o f this mass sacrifice, X o lo tl is described as

191

YEARBEARERS

the sacriRcer ra th e r than the victim . In codica!


depictions o f the TRECENA 1 C ozcacuauhtli,
Xo!ot! holds the F L IN T blade o f sacriEce. H e
also serves as the patron o f the day O llin .

Y acatecuhtli see MERCHANTS


yahui Am ong the m ore im p o rtan t supernaturals appearing in the Postclassic M ix te e
codices is a character w earin g a x iu H C O A T L
serpent headdress and ta il and the shell o f a
upon his body. As an in dication of
its Eery n atu re, the X iuhcoatl occasionally
sprouts Earning volutes from the head and
ta il. A t tim es, the Egure carries a conch
tru m p et and FLINT blades in his hands; in
m any instances he appears Eying or in the
role o f a sacriEcer tearin g the H E A R T out o f a
victim . M a ry E lizab e th Sm ith has noted th a t

TURTLE

in the Codex M u ro and Codex Sanchez-Solis,


this tu rtle -E re -s erp e n t character is nam ed
yahui. In the C olonial M ix te e A lvarad o
D ic tio n a ry, y a h u i is deRned as a certain
w izard th a t can Ey through the a ir. A ccording
to Sm ith, this Eying y a h u i m ay be id en tical
to one o f the tw o sons born to the creator
couple 1 D e e r.
Am ong the M ixtees, the y a h u i m ay have
been the com panion s p irit o f p o w erfu l trans
fo rm atio n al sorcerers, much like the nah u a/h
sorcerers o f C e n tra l M exico (see N A H U A L ).
O ne o f the most com m on com panion spirits
o f M esoam erican sorcerers is lightning, w hich
provides the SHAMAN w ith rap id Eight and
o m nipotent pow er. T h e y a h u i m ay allu d e
to both L IG H T N IN G A N D T H U N D E R . W hereas his
a b ility to Ey, the Ere serpent a ttrib u tes, and
the E int blades m ay re fe r to lightning, the
tu rtle shell and conch could be allusions to
thu n d er-m akin g instrum ents. A lthough the
y a h u i character is found w id e ly in M ixte e
codices, he was probably borrow ed from the
Zapotees. T h e serpent and tu rtle shell y a h u i

Xolotl, patron of the day


Ollin, in the form of a
diseased ahmafeof/,
Codex Borgia, p. 10, Late
Postclassic period.

o fte n occurs in Zapotee iconography and


appears in ceram ic a rt as e arly as M o n te
A lb an u.
yearbearers T o distinguish one 365-d ay year
from

another

in

the

5 2 -ye ar

CALENDAR,

M esoam erican peoples nam ed each year


a fte r a p a rtic u la r day in the coincident 260day calendar. These days are called yea r-

Flying yahui with Eint


knives in its hands,
Codex Nuttall, Late
Postclassic Mixtee.

YEAKBEAHEHS

1M

bearers A m ong the Postclassic M a y a o f Yuca

In C e n tra l M exico , the L a te C la n tc w ritin g

tan . the y e a rb e a re r occurred on the first day

o f Xochicalco indicates a y ea rb ea rer w ith

o f the solar y ea r, w h ile the A ztecs nam ed


the 260-d ay

a looped cord. In fu ll-fig u re form s o f this


convention, it can be seen th a t the cord is a

c alen d ar fa ilin g on the 360th day o f th e 3 65 day calen d ar.

as if th e y e a r w e re a burden to be supported.

th e ir years a fte r th e day in

tu m p lin e or sling fo r carryin g the year glyph,

T o caic u late the y e a rb e a re r in e ith e r sys

T h e looped cord convention also occurs at the

tem req uires tw o basic calculations re la tin g

contem poraneous sites o f C e n tra ! M exican


T eotenango d el V a lle and M a ltra ta , V eracru z.

the

260 -d a y

(1 3 x 20)

and

365-d ay

(18 x 20 + 5 ) calendars. F irs t, d iv id in g th e

A t E a rly Postclassic T u la , the looped cord

nu m b er o f day nam es, 20, in to 365 yields a

occurs as th e tu m p lin e b orne by an old man

re m ain d e r o f 5; thus fo r each successive solar

carryin g

yea r, the day nam es m ove 6ve places fo rw a rd .

M ixtees, y e a rb e a re r dates w e re designated

the year. A m ong th e Postclassic

A fte r fo u r years, the day nam ing the y ea r

by the MEXICAN YEAR SIGN. In th e ir books, the

has m oved 20 places, re tu rn in g it to the

A ztecs m arked the y ea r by placing it in a

o rig in al day nam e th a t started the series, so

tu rq u o ise-b lu e square, a convention w ith a

only fo u r days can be yearb earers. Second,

ling u istic base: in N a h u a tl jn7nMf/ signifies

d iv id in g the d ay num bers, 13, in to 365 leaves

"tu rq u o is e " as w e ll as " y e a r." A m ong the

a re m ain d e r o f 1. So w h ile the day nam es

M a y a , despite th e ir use o f the y e a rb e a re r

progress by five each year, the num erals

system , th e re is no know n y e a rb e a re r sign,

increase by one u n til reaching 13 w hen they


begin again. F o r the 16th c. Aztecs, the o rd er

possibly because fo r recording history the


M a y a favo red units o f the Long C o u n t ra th e r

o f the 52 years ran as follow s: 2 A ca tl, 3


T e c p a tl, 4 C a lli, 5 T o c h tli, 6 A catl, and so on,

than th e succession o f yearb earers.


T h e p a rtic u la r fo u r days selected as y e a r

u n til the final year o f 1 T o c h tli, w hich w ould


then be follow ed by 2 A ca tl, the first year o f
the next 5 2-ye ar cycle.

bearers v arie d w id e ly in M eso am erica. T h e


most com m on sequence was th e 3 rd , 8 th ,

Y earbearers often bore special signs to cue


the re ad er to the m eaning. Am ong the Classic
period Zapotees, a headband containing a
cross in the form o f a diadem signaled
y ea rb ea rer dates. T h is convention occurred
as e a rly as M o n te A lbn i and appears on
Stela 12. a m onum ent th a t dates to c.500 BC.

13th, and 18th day nam es, corresponding to


C a lli (H o u s e), T o c h tli (R a b b it), A c a tl (R e ed ),
and T e c p a tl (F lin t) in the A zte c series o f day
nam es. T h is series is found a t Xochicalco,
Teotenango d el V a lle , M a ltra ta , am ong the
PostclassicToltecs, M ixtees, A ztecs, and o th er
peoples o f h ig h lan d M ex ico , and in the Paris
and D resd en codices o f the Postclassic Yuca-

193

YO KE

tec M a y a . H o w ev er, am ong the Zapotees and


in neighboring G u e rrero , the yearbearers
w ere the 2nd, 7th , 12th, and 17th day nam es.
D u rin g the L a te Postclassic, some Yucatec
M a y a used yet another yea rb ea rer system ,
in this case, the 4th , 9th , 14th, and 19th day
nam es, corresponding to K an , M u lu c , lx , and
Cauac.

a/so CARCO.

yoke A yoke (som etim es know n by the Span


ish w ord yugo), the U -shaped elem en t o f the
BALLGAME costum e, was w orn around the w aist
to d eflect blows from the cen ter o f the body.
Slipped on sideways, the fro n t, back, and one
side o f the body w ere alw ays protected.
H undreds, if not thousands, o f stone ballgam e
yokes have been found in tombs along the
V eracru z coast and the Pacihc slope o f G u a te
m ala, alm ost exclusively from the Classic
period, and they have also been recovered
from surface rem ains at Copan and Palenque.
M ost stone yokes w eigh 2 5 -3 5 lb (c. 1 1 .5 15.5 kg), and although a train ed player could
m ove w earin g one, these stone yokes w ere
probabiy reserved for cerem onial use, p er
haps as a sort o f trophy - stone versions
o f w h a t was probably a w ooden piece o f
p ro tective arm or. A few have no opening and
could not have been w orn. M a n y , p artic u la rly
those from V eracru z, bear com plicated icon
ography that is d ifficu lt to decipher w ith o u t a
m odern d raw in g . Com m on im agery includes
TO A D S , sacrificial victim s, and T U E R TO S . <See a/so
HACHA.

Toltec representation of a yearbearer Hint; the


figure carries the year 11 Flint. Tula, Early
Postclassic period.

The stone yokes associated with the ballgame


can be either enclosed or open-ended, Classic
Veracruz.

Guide to Sources and Bibliography

The reader may well wonder how the authors have come to the contusions
presented in this book. The sources for the Precolumbian past in Mesoamerica are
many and diverse, and the piecing together of gods, iconography, and meaning
rare!y depends on just a single source but rather on the more convincing evidence
that comes from Ending patterns that are reflected in archaeology or ethnohistory.
In genera), we have made direct citations in this book on)y from 16th c. sources,
and we have tried to attribute important post-1950 discoveries to those responsible.
The following discussion and bibhography are by no means exhaustive or complete
(and the reader is advised to look etsewhere for a history of Mesoamerican
archaeology*) but what follows is a description of sources, how they have come
down to us, and how scholars have come to understand them.
Prehispanic Books
Despite the concerted effort by religious and civil authorities to destroy any native
manifestation of "idolatry" after the Conquest, a number of Prehispanic books screenfolds of deerskin or Eg paper painted with Ene brushes - have survived. Some
were shipped to Europe before the zeal to destroy overcame the conquerors, while
others were hidden for generations and came to tight in the 19th c. Of primary
importance for studying gods and symbols is the Borgia group of manuscripts, named
after the largest and Enest among them. Although it may have been painted in
Puebla or Cholula or perhaps even in Veracruz, the Codex Borgia is the best
surviving example of a Centra! Mexican book, containing a divinatory 260-day
calendar, sections on yearbearers and Venus, and a long, poorly understood section
("middle pages") that depicts the journey of Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca to the
nadir of the Underworld. Other manuscripts in the Borgia group lack these middle
pages, but all share a similar style and a similar constellation of gods. Most are
named for their original collector and all reside in European libraries: Borgia, Laud,
Fejrvry-Mayer, Cospi, and the Vaticanus B. Donald Robertson demonstrated that
the Codex Borbonicus, long thought to be a Prehispanic book, was made after the
Conquest, but probably before 1530; its Erst part, a tonalamatl, or 260-day calendar,
replicates a luxurious Aztec model. Because of the size and detail of the Borbonicus,
it offers one of the best guides to trecena patrons and veintena festivals.
Several Mixtee Prehispanic codices have survived, perhaps because of their
predominantly historical and genealogical content, or it may simply be that
* For histones of Mesoamerican archaeology, the reader should consult Bernal 1962, Adams 1969, Bernal 1960, and
Willey and Sablolf 1980. The history of the recognition of art in the New World is treated in Kubler 1990. See Keen
1971 and Boone 1987 for a consideration of Aztec historiography; for the Maya, see Scheie and Miller 1986, Miller
1989. Coe 1992 and Stuart 1992.

195

CUIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

manuscripts treating other subjects were usually destroyed. New genealogies in


Prehispanic style continued to be made during the 16th c. and Prehispanic
manuscripts received continued annotation after the Conquest. Some were later
presented in Colonia! courts as evidence in cases involving land tenure; owners
scraped manuscripts of all "idolatrous" imagery in order that they be accepted by
the court as evidence, and as a result, a manuscript like the Bodley was badly
mutilated. The best preserved of the Mixtee books are the Selden, Nuttal!, Colombino,
Bodley, and the Vindobonensis (or Vienna), and several are kept at the Bodleian
Library in Oxford. Of these the Vindobonensis is the richest source for Mixtee gods.
No Prehispanic Zapotee manuscripts survive.
Four Maya screenfolds - the Dresden, Madrid, Paris, and Grolier - escaped the
bonfires of Diego de Landa, the Franciscan later tried for excessive zeal in enforcing
the notorious anfo da /e in Man, Yucatan. The Grolier may have been written
several centuries before the Conquest, but the others were probably painted within
100 years of the Spanish arrival. The Dresden Codex is a particularly important
source for studying the gods and religious practices of Late Postclassic Yucatan.
Yucatec scribes wrote these books with texts in red and black pigments and illustrated
them with pictures of gods and rituals in the same colors.
Sixteenth-century European Sources
Sixteenth-century sources provide the most broad and accurate descriptions of
Mesoamerican life, and some of these, such as the Second Letter of Cortes to King
Charles V or the much later Discovery and Conguest of Mex/co by Bernal Diaz
offer vivid eye-witness descriptions of the Aztecs and their neighbors, their cities,
temples, and gods. Without such accounts, we would know nothing about such
things as the elaborate cuisine prepared for Motecuhzoma II or the sort of zoo for
exotic animals that he kept or the nature and abundance of the Aztec marketplace.
From across all Europe Charles V called Apostolic Twelves from various Catholic
religious orders - Franciscans, Dominicans, and Augustinians - to carry out the
conversion of New Spain, or Mexico, as the Spaniards soon began to call the land.
("Mexico" is a corruption of Mexica-Tenochtitlan, the Aztec name for their capita!
city.) Educated men truly interested in the land and people, these first friars soon
began to make systematic records of the New World, largely in order to speed
conversion and to understand the language and religion of the people they sought
to bring under control. Among the authors of the 16th c. sources, one name stands
above all others: Father Bernardino de Sahagun, a Franciscan friar who arrived
just a few years after the original Twelve, but who knew most of them and drew
on their experiences as well as his own.
Sahagun devoted his life to understanding the Aztecs and their neighbors in the
Valley of Mexico. He became fluent in Nahuat! and wrote dozens of sermons in it
that his minions then preached throughout the countryside. But, most importantly,
he began to gather systematically the knowledge of the Precolumbian world and to
present it in volumes along the lines of a late medieval encyclopedia. A preliminary
effort, the Primeros Memoriales (sometimes known as the Codices Matritenses),
was finished in 1560 or so, but his lifework, the Genera/ L&sfory of tAe TA/ngs of
New Spain, was completed and produced in subsequent decades. Usually known as
the Florentine Codex, the name given to the sole surviving holograph (considered
subversive, other copies sent to Spain were confiscated and presumably destroyed
by Spanish authorities), the 12-volume work is a major encyclopedia assembled by

GLIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

!M

Sahagun and a troop of Nahuatl-speaking nobles, and the text is written in parallel
columns of Nahuat! and Spanish. The work treats the gods, rehgion, history, temples
and cities, ceremonies, omens, auguries, natura! history, cosmography, mora! rhetoric,
calendar; describes different ethnic groups; and relates the Conquest itse!f, as to!d
from the native point of view. A separate Spanish-only text a!so survives. Despite
the !ens of the Spanish Conquest, the Florentine Codex is the single greatest source
for understanding the native New World.
Anonymous authors, including friars and natives, also made other early records probably in the Brst generation after the Conquest - of Aztec gods and religion that
survive only as fragments: i&sfor/a c/e /os mexicanos por sus pmfuras, Leyenda de
/os so/es, and Zd/sfoyre du meciuque. These extremely important texts recount the
deities, religion, and cosmography and describe now-lost manuscripts, probably as
presented to the friars by Aztec interlocutors. Many other friars wrote important
documents for understanding the Conquest and the social environment of the 16th
c., but they offered only a few insights into the religious iconography of the past.
The well-known Dominican, Bartolom de Las Casas, for example, wrote lengthy
tracts describing indigenous conditions and advocating social reform, but offers little
information on Mesoamerican gods not expounded more explicitly elsewhere.
Toward the end of the century, two major efforts at documentation were
completed. First, in 1577 Philip II conducted a census of New Spain, demanding
that each province answer 50 questions about its people, wealth, geography, local
administration, religious practices, and provide a map. Six years later, most of these
re/ac/onesgeogr/?cas were completed, many with the assistance of native informants.
In this same period, Diego Duran, a Berce Dominican priest who both loved Mexico
and lamented the tenacity of native religion, completed a series of important studies
known today as 77?e Boo/r of f/?e Cods and
77?e Anc/enf Ca/endar, and 77?e
L&sfory of f/?e /hd/es; the last is the most comprehensive history of the Aztec state.
The friars concentrated on the Valley of Mexico, so it is little wonder that few
records survive for other regions. Diego de Landa wrote his Z?e/ac/dn de /as cosas
de Fucafan in the 1560s while awaiting trial in Spain for his overenthusiastic
enforcement of the Inquisition. Although this document is extremely useful - Landa,
for example, wrote down the 30 characters in Maya phonetic, syllabic script that
led eventually to the phonetic decipherment of Maya hieroglyphic writing - it lacks
the richness of detail that characterizes the Centra! Mexican documents. In the 17th
c., Father Francisco de Burgoa made an important record of the Zapotees, although
nothing comparable survives for the Mixtees.
Native Documents after the Conquest
After the Spanish Conquest, native scribes worked for their new masters and made
dozens of manuscripts that survive, even though far more were lost. Some books
took on new content to suit the audience: religious iconography was spelled out in
order that a priest recognize his enemy; histories recounted peregrinations of
different ethnic groups, partly in order to express grievances regarding land
distribution or privileges; and native books turned up in Colonial legal proceedings.
The Spanish commissioned tribute records to assess the wealth of their colony and
maps to guide them to its sources. Many books required a hybrid effort: native
scribes painted the illustrations and Europeans added interpretive glosses. Where
Mesoamericans learned to represent their languages in the European alphabet, they
began to write books of their own in this new system, occasionally transcribing an

197

CUDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOCRAPH1

ancient picture book, as in the case of the Popo/ VuA. As the 16th c. progressed, the
Spanish Crown passed from Charles V to Philip II, who had less desire to understand
Mesoamerica and less patience with the eclectic sort of books made there: his
subordinates must have destroyed the missing copies of Sahagun's encyclopedia,
although he did commission the Pe/aciones geogrFcas, completed in 1583. After
the English defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588, Spain wanted little from her
colonies but precious minerals. By the end of the 16th c., 90 percent of the indigenous
population had died; the generation that had known Preconquest life was gone, and
sympathetic friars had generally given way to less educated priests dependent on
local Colonial patronage. The Crown forbade foreigners (i.e. non-Spanish born) to
visit the colonies. The Precolumbian past was passively abandoned or actively
destroyed.
The major groups of 16th c. native or hybrid works can be roughly classiBed as
follows (some are written on native paper, others on European paper; a /lenzo is
painted on cloth; the catalogue in the Handbook o Afidd/e American indians,
particularly Glass 1975, should be consulted):
MAPs: including Plano en Papel de Maguey, Mapa de Coatlinchan, Mapas de
Cuauhtinchan, Mapa Quinatzin, Mapa de Santa Cruz, among others
H iSTO RiCAL/R EUG ious CHRONICLES: including Relacin de Michoacn, Codex Boturini,
Codex Mendoza, part 1, Lienzo de Tlaxcala (orig. lost), Historia ToltecaChichimeca, the Popol Vuh
TRIBUTE LiSTs: Codex Mendoza, part 2 , and Matricula de Tributos
D E S C R I P T I O N S O F F E S T I V A L S A N D CUSTOMS: including the Codex Magliabechiano and
its group; the paired manuscripts Codex Telleriano-Remensis and Codex Rios, or
Vaticanus A; the Tovar Calendar; and Codex Mendoza, part 3
Other manuscripts, including an herbal, Codex Badianus, written in Latin by a
learned Nahuatl speaker, survive from the 16th c., but few have played a seminal
role in the decipherment of Mesoamerican gods and symbols. Some later Colonial
sources, including Tezozmoc's Crnica mexicana (c. 1600), Torquemada's MonarcAia indiana (c. 1613), Chimalpahin's Pe/aciones (c. 1625), Ixtlilxochitl's .Relaciones
and Historia cAicAimeca, and the various Mayan Books of Chilam Balam (all 18th
c.) include information not available from other sources.
The End of the Spanish Colonial Era
Perhaps in response to the general intellectual climate of the Enlightenment, Charles
III of Spain took a renewed scientiBc interest in the Americas and the Prehispanic
past, and so inaugurated the modern era in Mesoamerican studies. In 1786, he sent
out explorers to document Palenque, Chiapas, and at the beginning of the 19th c.,
his son, Charles IV, commissioned further study of abandoned archaeological sites,
their merit and contents, including Monte Alban and Mitla. The Mexican scholar
Jos Antonio Alzate published drawings and commentary on El Taj in and Xochicalco.
The German nobleman and scholar Alexander von Humboldt was granted leave to
carry out scientiBc study in the Spanish colonies, resulting in his 1810 Vues des
cordd/res et monuments des peup/e indigenes de /Amenge. By the time of
Mexican independence, the regional styles of Mesoamerican art and the presence
of different gods and religious practices began to be recognized.
In 1790 and 1791, when workmen uncovered three Aztec monoliths, the Stone of
Tizoc, the Calendar Stone, and the large Coatlicue, they were preserved rather than

CLIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBHOCRAPHY

destroyed, and the scholar Antonio Lon y Gama began deciphering their meaning
He was the Erst student to puMish accurate, measured drawings of Aztec religious
art. Although he thought the Calender Stone to be a true calendar, recording hours,
days, weeks, months, years, and other cycles, a reading no longer tenable, he
nevertheless correctly identified many symbols and gods (while misidentifying
others), and we may consider Lon y Gama s efforts as the first scientific study of
Mesoamerican iconography.
Following the Mexican declaration of independence in 1810 and the withdrawal
of Spanish authority in 1821 (and the independence oL Centra! America in 1825,
opening up yet more lands), European, North American, and Mexican investigators
surged across the countryside, exploring, studying, and collecting evidence of the
past. And when the Spanish left, they took with them quantities of documents,
including, for example, the works of Diego Durn.
The Precolumbian past and the sophisticated cultures whose wreckage lay on and
under the ground puzzled its 19th c. students and many offered fantastic explanations,
some of which the Spanish had already put forth, such as the notion that
Mesoamerican civilization was founded by the Lost Tribes of Israel or by strayed
Egyptians (see Wauchope 1962). Soon Atlantis, India, China, and Africa were added
to the stew; the Mormons saw Mesoamerican civilization as the locus for a separate
resurrection of Christ. Authors argued about the possibility for high civilization to
have flourished at all in Mesoamerica, but by the end of the century there was
near-universal consensus among scholars that it had, that there was more time depth
and antiquity than previously thought, and more diversity of cultures; among
competing explanations, the idea that these cultures had grown up in the New
World without Old World stimuli began to take root.
John Lloyd Stephens and Frederick Catherwood explored what are now Guatem
ala, Belize, Honduras, and the Mexican states of Chiapas, Yucatn, Campeche, and
Quintana Roo in 1839-42, documenting dozens of Maya cities with lively descriptions
and generally accurate illustrations. Unlike most of their contemporaries, they
believed that the living Maya descended from the city-builders, and they recognized
the uniformity of Maya writing across the vast geographic realm they traveled. They
had no reason to believe that the cities had been abandoned any earlier than the
time of the Conquest and so knew nothing of the antiquity of Maya cities. Stephens'
four volumes were bestsellers; they went through dozens of editions and printings,
perhaps creating the Erst large audience of armchair archaeologists in history, and
they undoubtedly sparked interest in those who would later be scholars of ancient
Mesoamerica.
Between 1831 and 1846, Edward King, Lord Kingsborough, drove himself into
bankruptcy by bankrolling and publishing nine elephantine folios of facsimile
reproductions of Precolumbian and Postconquest Mesoamerican codices and manu
scripts known in European collections. Despite some serious handicaps - the copyist
Agostino Aglio misinterpreted unfamiliar imagery and inevitably changed details in
his interpretations of the manuscripts, and the enormous volumes could be bought
only by major libraries or by the very wealthy - for the Erst time, the rich iconography
in these books could be consulted widely, and dozens of Precolumbian sculptures
were also illustrated. With this documentation, scholars could assemble and study
the temples, books and gods of Mesoamerica, from Teotihuacan and Tenochtitlan
in the north, on through Xochicalco, El Tajin, Monte Albn, and Mitla, to the Maya
sites in the south.

199

CUIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aztec history had been described many times by the 19th c., but the American
historian William H. Prescott wrote what we might call the first "modern" history
of the Aztecs, a 3-volume study published in 1843, using voluminous sources,
particularly Precolumbian and early Postconquest manuscripts, to build a picture of
the Aztecs that included their religious life. Sahagun's works began to be rediscovered,
and a 3-volume Spanish edition of the Genera/ ARsfory text was published in 182930. And as museums around the world were founded, Mesoamerican antiquities
began to receive a permanent, stable home; Founded in 1825, the Mexican National
Museum has always housed the world s largest collection of Aztec antiquities. By
the end of the century, the Trocadero, British Museum, American Museum of
Natural History, and Smithsonian Institution, among others, would all amass
signiBcant collections of Mesoamerican materials.
At mid-century, several scholars competed to collect Precolumbian and Colonial
manuscripts, prying them loose from archives, churches, and small towns. In the
18th c., Lorenzo Boturini had bought some 500 manuscripts before xenophobic
Spanish ofBcals deported him, confiscated the collection and then let it be dismantled.
J. M. A. Aubin spent a decade collecting manuscripts around Mexico City and
succeeded in reassembling many pieces of the Boturini corpus, which he then took
to Paris in 1840 and spent the rest of his life studying. In Mexico, despite
his antipathy for the Aztecs, Joaqun Garcia Icazbalceta assembled previously
unpublished documents relating to Mexico's history and began publishing them in
1858. Considering himself Aubin's heir, Abb Charles-Etienne Brasseur de Bourbourg traveled among the Maya and sought out manuscripts and documents that
he hoped would unravel their past. His perserverance and luck led him to make
several important discoveries: first, in Guatemala, he came upon the 18th c. copy
of the 16th c. Popo/ FuA, translated it into French and published it; then, back in
Spain, he found the Madrid Codex and a copy of Landa's Pe/ac/on and published
them as well.
Brasseur's discoveries ushered in a new phase of study, in which 16th c.
commentaries were used to decipher Precolumbian books and art. Using the variety
of sources now available to them, scholars in Mexico, the United States, and Europe
began to identify gods, symbols, and iconography. Books and journals proliferated,
fueling greater interest; national governments, academic institutions and private
backers sponsored campaigns of exploration, and eventually, of excavation.
During the long, stable reign of Porfirio Daz in Mexico (1876-1911), Mexican
scholars began to study the Aztecs and their predecessors with care. Because of
their identification with the despised Porfirio Daz regime, however, some of their
works have been unjustly neglected, or even condemned. Manuel Orozco y Berra,
Jess Snchez, Alfredo Chavero, Justo Sierra, Jos Fernando Ramrez, Cecilio
Robelo, and Jess Calindo y Villa, among others, read manuscripts, published
previously unknown documents, and began interpreting Aztec art, life and religion.
Robelo published his 2-volume D/cc/onar/o <Ze M/fo/qgia NaAuaf/ in 1905, a
compendium of Centra! Mexican religion that was rarely cited by his contemporaries
(and even less frequently today) but which must have been heavily consulted by
his contemporaries and successors. Based on the sources unearthed or published by
his learned colleagues, Robelo's dictionary is useful for any student of Aztec
gods and symbols today and has remained surprisingly current. Of his Mexican
contemporaries, Francisco Paso y Troncoso made the greatest contribution. A skilled
naAuaf/afo, or Nahuatl-speaker and translator, Paso y Troncoso dedicated much of

CLIDE TO SOURCES AND BiBUOCRAPHY

200

his tife to rediscovering the works of Bernardino de Sahagn and making them
available to scholars, although his vast project of translation and publication was
teft unhnished upon his death in Europe in 1916.
Leopold Batres carried out excavations at Mida, Teotihuacan, and Tenochtitlan,
and although the following generation of archaeologists harshly criticized Batres'
techniques and results, his efforts laid the groundwork for modern archaeology in
Mexico. After the Mexican Revolution, Manuel Camio carried out the first strati
graphic excavations in Mexico, at Atzcapotzalco, opening up the possibility of
documenting civilized life in the first millennium BC.
in France, E.-T. Hamy studied and separated Aztec from non-Aztec works in
Paris museums, publishing dozens of articles in his journal Decades amer/caines,
identifying gods and relating Teotihuacan representations to Aztec deities in useful
investigations, although he shared with Brasseur a passion for theories of non-native
origins of Mesoamerican civilization. He published the first edition of the Codex
Borbonicus in 1899. Desire Charnay had visited Mexico in 1857, but his 1880 trip
produced his most important observations, the identiheation of Tula, Hidalgo, with
the home of the Toltecs, and the linking of it culturally and temporally to Chichen
tx, but unfortunately he then went on to attribute all civilization in Mesoamerica
to Toltec genius.
Several German scholars made important contributions to the deciphering of
Mesoamerican religious imagery at the end of the 19th c., but the wide-ranging
efforts of Eduard Seler remain the most important today, perhaps because his
commentaries are almost always rooted in an object or corpus: only rarely did Seler
begin with an idea that he sought to prove, rather than starting with a text, an
object, or a building. Sponsored by the Due de Loubat, a wealthy New Yorker, from
1887 onward, Seler wrote commentaries to new facsimile editions of many codices
in which he identified the gods, explicated the calendrics and related patterns to
ethnohistoric documents. Although more skilled in his manipulation of Central
Mexican materials, Seler was the hrst to compare Maya and Mexican materials
systematically; more profoundly than any of his contemporaries, Seler drew
his interpretations from the widest possible range of sources, including history,
ethnohistory, and archaeological remains. Seler's writings began to be collected in
the 5-volume Cesamme/fe AAAant#ungan in 1902, and the final volume was issued
posthumously in 1923. Seler's vast corpus remains the point of departure for most
modern iconographic inquiries.
Once Ernst Forstemann, Royal Librarian in Dresden, began to prepare a facsimile
edition of the Dresden Codex (pub. 1880), he worked with the manuscript until he
had broken the code of the Maya calendar and mathematics, making possible the
decipherment of the Long Count of the monuments and its correlation to the
Christian calendar, as later propounded by the American journalist J. T. Goodman
in 1905. From that point on, the antiquity of the Maya monuments later attributed
to the "Classic" period was known, and the dichotomy of "Maya: Creeks of the
New World" vs. "Aztecs: Romans of the New World" took root. The sudden
cessation of Maya monuments with Long Count dates in the 9th c. came to be called
the "collapse," a problem for scholars from that time onward. In 1897, Paul ScheHhas
inaugurated modern Maya iconographic studies with his investigation of the deities
of the Maya codices in which he carefully isolated separate iconographic entities,
recognized their name glyphs, and assigned neutral letters of the alphabet to
individual gods.

201

GUIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

In the United States, Daniel Brinton translated Nahuatl poetry into English (1887)
and reacted against the excesses of enthusiasts like Chamay with skeptical attacks
on the very existence of the Toltecs, invoking, in turn, the wrath of Seler. Zelia
Nuttall, the Erst woman scholar to study Mesoamerica, published commentaries on
Precolumbian manuscripts, correctly identiEed the large piece of featherwork in the
Vienna Museum as a headdress, perhaps Motecuhzoma's, rather than a standard,
and offered hypotheses for the meanings of some Mesoamerican calendrical cycles
that her male colleagues found laughable, although some have been shown to be
probable today. She correctly proposed that a Mixtee codex (like her contemporaries,
she thought the Mixtee books were Aztec) depicted largely historical, not religious,
iconography; in her honor, the book, the Codex Nuttall, was given her name.
Probably inspired by the writings of Stephens, scholars in the United States and
England focused their attention on the Maya, particularly the discovery and
exploration of archaeological sites. Alfred P. Maudslay made extensive Maya art
available to study through publication of drawings of monuments at Copan, Quirigu,
Palenque, Yaxchiln, and Chichen Itz. Despite efforts by Cyrus Thomas and others
to use the Landa "alphabet" to decipher Maya texts, the nature of the script
remained unknown until Yuri Knorosov tackled it after World War II. J. T. Goodman
recognized the head and fu!!-Sgure variants for numbers and period glyphs, some
of which turned out to be gods. Herbert Spinden built on Schellhas's 1897 list of
Postclassic Maya gods by identifying some of them and isolating yet others in the
earlier Classic art for his 1909 Harvard dissertation, later published as A
of
Maya Art in 1913. George Vaillant established the basic chronological sequence for
Maya ceramics still in use today. Harvard sponsored campaigns of archaeological
exploration and documentation, and the Carnegie Institution of Washington domi
nated Maya archaeology between the World Wars, publishing vast quantities of
material for later iconographic exegesis.
The Problems of Early 20th c. Mesoamerican Studies
With the correlation of the Maya and European calendars settled, the Maya were
seen by many as the inventors of the calendar and gods. But problems remained
with such a construct, particularly as evidenced by the corpus of art that came to
be called "Olmec." Non-Mayanist Mesoamericanists, among them Marshall Saville,
George Vaillant, Matthew Stirling, Alfonso Caso, and Miguel Covarrubias believed
that the Olmec aesthetic and iconographic enigma, present both in Central Mexico
and in Veracruz, predated the Maya. Covarrubias earned the wrath of Mayanists
when he drew a now-famous how chart (see illustration under WERE-jACUAR, p. 185)
to show how what he called Olmec were-jaguars preceded all other rain gods in
Mesoamerica, and he called the Olmec the cu/fura madre. After World War II,
radiocarbon dating would prove the chronological primacy of the Olmec as
Mesoamerica's Erst complex culture and the Gulf Coast as its hearth.
Alfonso Caso excavated Monte Albn for several seasons in the 1930s, establishing
a stratigraphically based chronology for Oaxaca and vastly amplifying the corpus of
religious art. Caso and Ignacio Bernal studied Zapotee ceramic urns, isolating deity
complexes and relating them to both Colonial god lists made by Francisco de Burgoa
and to known Aztec gods. Unlike his predecessors, including Seler and Nuttall, Caso
recognized that the Mixtee codices were distinct from Aztec ones, and he unraveled
the major genealogies, identifying them with, known places, although scholars now
believe that he pushed the antiquity of these lineages back too far into the past.

CLIDE TO SOURCES AND BtBtJOCRAPHY

BM

Knowledgeable in all aspects of Mesoamerica except the Maya, Caso explored Aztec
religion and iconography and offered what until recently were the most explicit
studies of Mesoamerican calendars, and many of his interpretations have remained
in favor.
Unlike many other Mesoamerican sites, Teotihuacan was never lost from view.
But although Charnay had idenBed Tula, Hidalgo, as the historical home of the
Toltecs, Teotihuacan had come to be considered Tula for most of the century. The
discovery in the late 1930s of Teotihuacan-style pottery in contexts with datable
Early Classic Maya pottery at Kaminaljuy pushed Teotihuacan back into the first
millennium AD and opened a place for Tula, confirmed as the Toltec capital by
Wigberto Jimenez-Moreno at the first round table of the Sociedad mexicana de
antropologa in 1941.
As professor of anthropology at the National Autonomous University of Mexico
in the 1920s, Seler's student Hermann Beyer carried on Mesoamerican iconographic
studies, particularly of Aztec art, as did Walter Lehmann in Germany. Angel Maria
Garibay offered the first comprehensive translations of Nahuat! texts. Ignacio
Marquina explored the iconography of Mesoamerican architecture. Ignacio Bernal
carried on Caso and Covarrubias's Olmec studies.
After World War H, scholars sought unified terminologies to refer to both time
and place. Spinden and Morley's notion of Old and New Empires for the Maya, for
example, had never applied to other parts of Mesoamerica, and evidence for early
occupation of Yucatn made it impossible to believe the Maya collapse to have been
a wholesale movement of peoples. A. V. Kidder and Tatiana Proskouriakoff of the
Carnegie Institution of Washington began to refer in published works to what had
also been called the "Initial Series Period" as the Classic era, roughly AD 300-900,
and they used the term to refer to other contemporaneous cultures at Monte Alban
and Teotihuacan. The Postclassic era, then, began with the rise of the Toltecs at
Tula; the Olmec and other early developments were Preclassic, and fell in the Brst
millennium Be. Such terms implied a value judgment that the "Classic" era achieved
some ideal, a notion now out of favor, and so other terms have been proposed, but
only the substitution of "Formative" for Preclassic has taken hold.
In 1943, Paul Kirchhoff suggested the name Mesoamerica to refer to an area of
shared cultural traditions from 14 to 21 degrees north latitude, encompassing much
of Mexico, all of Guatemala and Belize, and the northern strip of Honduras and El
Salvador. This term has successfully replaced "Middle America," "Nuclear Amer
ica," or the names of modern nation-states in scholarly discussion of the region.
Later 20th c. Studies: Maya
Sir Eric Thompson dominated studies of Maya religion and iconography for most of
the 20th c. as surely as Eduard Seler had reigned over the Mesoamerican scene at
the turn of the century. (Thompson's prominent colleague Sylvanus G. Morley
operated more in the archaeological realm and ultimately followed many of
Thompson's views in his synthetic writings.) Thompson sprinkled his writings with
quotations from English literature which he used to idealize Maya gods and religion,
heightening differences between what he characterized as the peaceful Classic
period and the warlike Postclassic era. Based on his knowledge of Central Mexican
iconography - a knowledge vastly expanded by his supervision of a translation of
Seler's collected works during World War II - Thompson wrote Maya ARerogTypAic
Wr/Rng^ (1950), a compendium of iconography as well as of Maya writing. In Maya

203

GUIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

History and PeAgion (1970) he offered a new model of Maya religion, with many
gods subsumed under Itzamna.
The Carnegie Institution of Washington began to phase out its program of Maya
research after World War II, and Maya archaeologists turned away from the
excavation of major ceremonial architecture and the documentation of stone
monuments. In the held, archaeologists sought to determine the nature of Maya
settlement, without any special consideration of the elite and their art, yielding few
studies of religion, gods, and iconography, intellectual territory they had ceded to
Thompson. The contributions of Gunter Zimmermann (1956) and Ferdinand Anders
(1963), updating the works of Schellhas and other German scholars, were among
only a very few such studies of the period.
Since 1970, however, studies of Maya religion have flourished, dependent in part
on the decipherment of Maya hieroglyphic writing that began with Yuri Knorosov
(Brst comprehensively published in English in 1967), Heinrich Berlin (1958), Tatiana
Proskouriakoff (1960, 1963, 1964), David Kelley (1962, 1976) and continued on with
Victoria Bricker, Federico Fahsen, Nikolai Grube, Stephen Houston, John Justeson,
Floyd Lounsbury, Berthold Riese, Linda Scheie, and David Stuart, among others.
It took hieroglyphic decipherment, for example, for Proskouriakoff to prove that
Maya depictions represented named nobility, including women (1960), or to see
that the Classic Maya were a warlike people (e.g. Miller 1986). The 8 volumes
issued to date of the Palenque Round Table have been a forum for discussions of
Maya art and writing (1974-). Linda Scheie has tackled dozens of iconographic
problems, with many of the results published in The P/ood of Kmgy (1986) and A
Foresf of Kings (1990), and she initiated Copan Notes and Texas No fes, privately
published iconographic and epigraphic commentaries. Research jReporfs on Anc/enf
Maya Wb&ng, published by George Stuart, also treat religion and iconography. Karl
Taube has made a systematic reassessment of Postclassic Maya deities (1992).
Decipherment of Maya writing has meant not only the idenBcation of deity names
but also the recognition of verbs marking religious events, among them bloodletting,
war, sacriBce, dreaming, dancing, death, and burial. Stephen Houston and David
Stuart recently cracked the pattern of naming places in Maya script and found the
names of supernatural places along with those of the mundane world.
iconographic studies have also grown because of a near-explosion of new materials
for study from both archaeology and looting. Michael Coe has studied the new
corpus of Classic Maya ceramics and used the Popo/ VnA to decipher iconography
and identify gods (1973, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1982); Clemency Coggins analyzed the
Tikal corpus (1975), while Francis Robicsek and Donald Hales considered others
without provenience (1981, 1982). Karl Herbert Mayer has assembled photographs
of looted monuments (1980, 1991). Since 1970, Nicholas Hellmuth has been
photographing Maya vessels, building a photographic archive kept at the University
of Texas at San Antonio (e.g. Quirarte 1979) and several museums; using the archive,
Hellmuth has analyzed Early Classic iconography (1987). Justin Kerr is publishing
the corpus of Maya vessels he has photographed with his rollout camera (1989,
1990, 1992). New editions and translations of the Popo/ VuA have been useful
(Edmonson 1971; Tedlock 1985), as are new facsimile editions of the Maya codices
and the identiBcation of a fourth Preconquest book, the Grolier Codex (Coe 1973).
Archaeological exploration has promoted study of gods and iconography, particularly
with the careful line drawings of monuments now considered obligatory for any
archaeological project (Jones and Satterthwaite 1982; Beetz and Satterthwaite 1981),

GLIDE TO SOURCES AND B!BL!OCRAPHY

2M

and the Corpus project directed by tan Craham has set a high standard for at! other
)ine drawings (Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions 1975-). The tomb paintings
at Rio Azu! have ampliBed an understanding of the Maya iconography of death and
the cave paintings at Naj Tunich have revealed the world of cave rituals. Ongoing
projects at Copan and Dos Pilas continue to yield iconographic materials without
precedent.
Some archaeological discoveries also reshaped fundamental thinking about Maya
gods and religion, and discoveries at Cerros, El Mirador, and Kohunlich have shown
that those gods were known by at least 100 BC; some of th$ Postconquest Popo/ VuA
narrative appears to be explicit on highland monuments and at Izapa by no later
than AD 100. The murals of Bonampak and the discovery of the secret tomb within
the Temple of Inscriptions at Palenque both suggested persona! aggrandizement
rather than paeans to Maya gods; the subsequent discovery of a major tomb at the
base of Tikal Temple I conBrmed the pattern of tombs within temples, ultimately
leading Mayanists to recognize the role of ancestor worship in religion. Settlement
studies have revealed the complexity of urban and rural life for the Maya; ecological
archaeology has frequently resonated with iconographic patterns (Puleston 1976).
Recognition of war iconography among the Classic Maya (Riese 1984, Scheie and
Miller 1986; Scheie and Freidel 1990) has narrowed the perceived intellectual and
moral rift between the Classic Maya and the Maya at Chichen Itz, raising questions
of dating, provoking new iconographic studies of Postclassic Yucatn, and forcing a
reevaluation of the role played by Tula at Chichen Itz (Coggins and Shane 1984;
Lincoln 1990).
Later 20th c. Studies: Centra! Mexico
In 1978, excavations began again at the Templo Mayor compound, the Aztec sacred
precinct within Tenochtitlan, initiating a new era of Aztec archaeological and
iconographic studies under Eduardo Matos Moctezuma. New major monuments
such as the Coyolxauhqui stone came to light, as did abundant caches and offerings,
allowing new understandings of Aztec religious practice and meaning (Boone 1987;
Broda, Carrasco, and Matos Moctezuma 1987; Matos Moctezuma 1988), and the
provincial Aztec record has also received incisive documentation (Solis 1981).
Although buoyed by the new archaeological discoveries, Aztec textual and icono
graphic studies had long flourished, particularly in Mexico under the stewardship
of Miguel Leon-Portilla, Alfredo Lpez Austin, and Eduardo Matos Moctezuma; in
the United States led by H.B. Nicholson; and in Germany, most recently headed
by Karl Nowotny and Ferdinand Anders. Nicholson s 1971 synthesis remains a
mode! of understatement, the single best guide to Aztec gods and religious complexes.
Other contributors to the study of Aztec iconography and religion include Carmen
Aguilera, Patricia Anawalt, Johanna Broda, Jacqueline de Durand-Forest, Doris
Heyden, Cecilia Klein, Esther Pasztory, Hanns Prem, Bodo Spranz, Richard
Townsend, and Emily Umberger. Arthur J. O. Anderson and Charles Dibble have
systematically translated the Nahuatl Florentine Codex into English (Sahagun 19501982); Thelma Sullivan also translated selections of the corpus of Sahagun and his
contemporaries. In Aztecs, Inga Clendinnen (1991) paints a rich picture of the Aztec
religious world.
New facsimile editions, particularly those published by the Akademische Druckund Verlaganstalt in Graz, Austria, of Central Mexican Prehispanic and Postconquest
books have increased their availability for study, as have accompanying iconographic

205

CUIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

studies (e g. Codex Mendoza 1992). Major Internationa! exhibitions featuring or


inctuding Aztec art have improved its documentation (e g. Nicho!son with Quiones
Keber 1983; Paz et a! 1990; Levenson 1991).
Jorge Acosta !ong directed excavations at Tu!a (and at Teotihuacan) and offered
interpretations of Toltec art and gods, although the materia! is sti!! poor!y understood.
The ro!e of major Termina! Classic sites in the power vacuum after the fa!! of
Teotihuacan has come to be recognized, particu!ar!y after the 1976 discovery of
comptex paintings in Maya style at Cacaxt!a, T!axca!a (McVicker 1985; Lombardo
de Ruiz 1986), reviving interest in Xochicalco and its iconography, as we!! as the
genera! problem of an "international' iconography (Ber!o and Dieh!, eds., 1989).
Poorly documented before Wor!d War II, Teotihuacan received massive archaeoiogica! study starting in 1960, foowed more recent!y by iconographic inquiries.
Esther Pasztory (1974) sorted out the goggle-eyed gods, bringing to an end the
practice of calling al! such figures "T!a!oc," and together with George Kub!er (1967),
initiated the introduction of neutra! names for Teotihuacan gods. Female deities
have been recognized as we!l as ma!e (Taube 1983), and shared iconographic traits
with the rest of Mesoamerica have been considered (Berio, ed. in press). Hasso von
Winning has assembled a corpus of Teotihuacan iconographic signs (1987). Many
Teotihuacan mura! paintings have come to light, including the recently documented
Techinantitla corpus (Berrin 1988) that features hieroglyphs, but no texts have been
surety deciphered and a hnguistic decipherment wi!l languish as long as the language
spoken at Teotihuacan remains an enigma.
Later 20th c. Studies: Oaxaca
The antiquity and importance of writing to the early Zapotees has gained recognition
(Marcus 1980; Urcid 1992), Zapotee civilization has been studied at sites other than
Monte Alban (e g. Bernal 1979), and the Danzantes at Monte Alban have been
shown to be mutilated victims rather than "dancers " (Scott 1980). First built upon
by Mary Elizabeth Smith, Caso s studies of Mixtee codices have now been amplified
and in some cases superseded by those of Jill Furst, Maarten Jansen, John Monaghan,
John Pohl, and Nancy Troike, with new decipherments of history and places of the
Mixtee.
Later 20th c. Studies: Formative Olmec and the Protoclassic Era
Radiocarbon dating has confirmed the early date of the Olmecs, and although their
lowland origin has been settled in the minds of most investigators, discoveries
at Teopantecuanitlan, Guerrero (Martinez Donjun 1985), have reinforced the
importance of highland Mexico in this early orbit. The excavation and documentation
of La Venta, San Lorenzo, and Chalcatzingo (Drucker, Heizer and Squier 1959; Coe
and Dieh! 1980; Grove 1987), as well as the publication of looted materials from
Las Choapas (Joralemon 1971) vastly amplified the Olmec materials available for
study, leading to serious iconographic inquiry. Coe (1968) proposed a series of gods
based on incised markings of the Las Limas figure, a suggestion later systematized
by Joralemon as Cods 1-X, although the meanings of these figures are still not clear
(1971, 1976; see also Pohorilenko 1990 and Reilly 1990).
Although it is not well understood, Mesoamerican culture thrived along the
Isthmus of Tehuantepec, from Atlantic to Pacific, at the end of the Formative era,
or what is often called the Protoclassic. Even though the art of the period is often
called Izapa-style, Izapa probably did not function as a center of diffusion, nor did

CLIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

RM

Abaj Takalik, despite its importance in this era and to the later Classic Maya. The
art and religion of this period and place may be better represented in recent
discoveries at La Mojarra, discovered in 1986 (Winfield Capitaine 1988). Bearing
dates in AD 143 and 156, the La Mojarra stela shows the sophisticated development
of writing, advanced calendrical notation, iconography and ideology that encompasses
and includes the Olmec while pointing the way to the Classic Maya.
Later 20th c. Studies: Classic Veracruz
Much of the art and iconography of Classic Veracruz remains a mystery, plagued
by centuries of looting, insufficient documentation of both archaeological works and
those without provenience, and uncertainty about fundamental cultural associations
between place and ethnicity. Excavations at El Zapota! have yielded life-sized tomb
figures of deities; paintings at Las Higueras depict lords festooned with paper
strips carrying out sacrificial rituals. Catalogues of Huastec and El Tajin sculptures have
improved access to materials (de la Fuente and Gutirrez Solana 1980; Kampen 1972).
Later 20th c. Studies: West Mexico
Although long thought to be anecdotal and free of the religious meaning of the
Aztecs or Maya, the art of West Mexico has been studied for its iconographic
complexity in recent years (Furst 1965; Von Winning 1974; Gallagher 1983; Graham
n.d ), following publication of quantities of looted material, some of which has
suggested patterns of meaning and a highly stratified society. Recent excavation and
reconnaissance has revealed intersections with the rest of Mesoamerica (Foster and
Weigand 1985; Schondube and Galvn 1978).
Later 20th c. Studies: Other Problems
Anthony Aveni, Horst Hartung, and John Carlson have all demonstrated the
importance of geomancy and astronomy for ancient America (Aveni 1980; Aveni
1988; Aveni and Brotherston, eds. 1983). Johanna Broda has published a useful
synthesis and commentary of comparative Mesoamerican calendars (1969). New
journals, including Mexican,
Latin Amer/can Antiquity and Ancient Mesoamer
ica, have increased the ability of specialists to communicate their findings to one
another. Major dictionary and linguistic projects have drawn upon both modern and
Colonial sources, yielding in some cases new dictionaries (Barrera Vsquez 1980,
Laughlin 1975, Kartunnen 1983, Summer Institute of Linguistics 1974, 1985) and
new guides to older dictionaries (e.g. Campbell 1985). Ethnographers and linguists
have worked all across Mesoamerica (Bricker and Gossen 1989, Fought 1972, Furst
1965, Girard 1966, Gossen 1974 and 1986, Ichon 1973, Jansen, van der Loo, and
Manning, eds., 1988, Mendelson 1959, Sandstrom 1991, Taggart 1983, Tedlock 1982,
and Vogt 1968, among many others), and ethnohistorians have worked through
documents to offer a new view of native Mesoamerica in the years following the
Conquest (Burkhart 1989, Klor de Alva 1981, Carmack 1981).

Sources of Quotations
Direct citations from the Florentine Codex in Cods and SymAoVs of Ancient Mexico
and fAe Maya are labelled FC in the main entries and come from the A. J. O.
Anderson and C. E. Dibble translations, 1950-1982 (listed under Sahagun in the
Bibliography).
Direct citations of the Fopo/ VnA are from the Dennis Tedlock translation, 1985.

207

CUIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abbreviations
BAE Bureau of American Ethnology
CiW Carnegie institution of Washington
DOS Dumbarton Oaks Studies in Pre-Columbian
Art and Archaeology
ECM Estudios de Cultura Maya
ECN Estudios de Cultura Nhuatl
HM A/ Handbook of Middle American Indians
fCA
Proceedings of the International Congress
of Americanists
IMS Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, SUNY
Albany

MAI

Acosta, Jorge R., 1940, "Exploraciones en Tula,


Hidalgo 1940," BMEA, 14, 172-94
------, 1957, "Interpretacin de algunos de los datos
obtenidos en Tula relativos a la poca Tolteca,"
BMEA, 14, 75-100
Adams, Richard E. W., 1969, "Maya Archaeology
1958-1968, A Review," Latin American
Research Be view, 4:2, 3-45
Alcorn, Janis B , 1984, Huasfec Mayan Ethnobotany, Austin
Alva Ixtilxchit!, Fernando de, 1965, Obras histr
icas de Don Fernando de A/va Lrdiixcbid, 2 vols.
Mexico City
Alzate y Ramrez, Jos Antonio, 1791, "Descripcin
de las antigedades de Xochicalco," Supplement
to Caceta de /iteratura, No. 31, Mexico
Anawalt, Patricia, 1981, Jodian C/otbing Be/bre
Corts, Norman, Okla
Anders, Ferdinand, 1963, Das Bantbeon derMaya,
Craz
------ , and Maarten Jansen, eds., 1988, Scbriit und
Buch im a/ten Mexiho, Craz
Aubin, J. M. A., 1849, Mmoire sur /a peinture
didactique et /ecriture figurative des anciens
mexicafns, Paris
Aveni, Anthony F., 1980, SAywatchers o f Ancient
Mexico, Austin
------ , ed., 1988, N ew Directions in American
Archaeoastronomy, Oxford
------ , and Brotherston, Cordon, 1983, Ca/endars in
Mexico and Peru and Native American Compu
tations o f Time, Oxford
Badianus Manuscript: An Aztec Herbal of 1552,
1940, ed. E. W. Emmart, Baltimore
Bardawd, Lawrence, 1976, "The Principal Bird
Deity in Maya Art," PBT2, Part III, 195-209
Barlow, Robert, 1949, The Extent of the Empire of
the Culhua Mexica, ibcro-Americana 28
Barrera Vsquez, Alfredo, ed., 1980, Diccionario
Maya Cordemex. Maya-Espao/, EspanofMaya, Merida
Batres, Leopoldo, 1889, Teotihuacan, o /a ciudad
sagrada de /os 7b/tecas, Mexico City
------ , 1902, Exp/oraciones en Monte A/bn, Mexico
City
Baudez, Claude F , 1985, "The Knife and the
Lancet: the Iconography of Sacrifice at Copan,"
Fourth P B T 1980, 201-210
Bectz, Carl f a n d Linton Satterthwaitc, 1981, The
Monuments and inscriptions o f Caraco/, Be/ize,
Univ. Mus. Monograph 45, Philadelphia

Bel!, Betty, ed., 1974, The Arcbaeo/ogy o f West


Mexico, Ajijic, Jalisco
Benson, Elizabeth P., ed , 1968, The Dumbarton
OaAs Conference on the O/mec, Washington,
DC.
------ , ed., 1972, The Cu/toftheFe/ine, Washington,
DC.
------ , ed., 1973, Mesoamerican Writing Systems,
Washington, D C.
------ , ed., 1981, Mesoamerican Ates and Wor/dMfews, Washington, D C.
------ , ed., 1987, City-States o f the Maya. Art and
Architecture, Denver
------ , and Coe, Michael, eds., 1981, The O/mec
and Their Neighbors. Essays in Memory o f M.
W. Stirhng, Washington D C.
Benson, Elizabeth P., and CriIBn, Cillett, eds., 1989,
Maya iconography, Princeton
Berlin, Heinrich, 1958, "El glifo emblema en las
inscripciones mayas," /ourna/ de /a Soci t des
Americanistes, N.S. 47, 111-19
------ , 1963, "The Palenque Triad," /ourna/ de /a
Socit des Americanistes, N.S. 52, 91-99
------ , and Kelley, David H., 1970, The 819-Day
Count and Color-Direction Symbolism Among
the Classic Maya, MARI Pub. 26, 9-20
Berio, Janet Catherine, ed., 1983, Text and /mage
in Pre-Co/umbian Art. Essays on the inter
relationship o f the Merba/ and the Misua/ Arts,
Oxford
------ , 1984, Teotihuacan Art Abroad. A Study o f
Metropo/itan Sty/e and Provincia/ Trans/brmation in incensario Workshops, Oxford
------ , cd., in press, Art, Po/ity, and the City o f
Teotihuacan
------, and Diehl, Richard, eds., 1989, Mesoamerica
After the Dec/ine o f Teotihuacan, Washington,
DC.
Bernal, Ignacio, 1962, Bib/iografla de arqueo/ogia
e etnografa. Mesoamerica y Norte de Mxico,
Mexico City
------ , 1979, The Ba//p/ayers o f Dainz, Craz
------ , 1980, A Distory o f Mexican Archaeo/ogy,
London and New York
Berrn, Kathleen, 1988, Feathered Seipenfs and
F/owcring Trees, San Francisco
Beyer, Hermann, 1921, E/ //amado 'Ca/endario
Azteca,' Mexico City
------ , 1965, Mito y simbo/ismo de/ mxieo antiguo,
Mexico City

Museum of the American Indian, Heye


Foundation, New York
MARI
Middle American Research Institute
PMM
Peabody Museum Memoirs
PMP
Peabody Museum Papers
PBT
Palenque Mesa Redonda or Palenque
Round Table, ed. M. C. Robertson
BBAMW Research Reports on Ancient Maya
Writing
BMFA Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropo
lgicos
TB
Tika! Report, University Museum

GLIDE TO SOURCES AND BiBLtOCBAPHY


Bicrhorst, John, trans , 1985, Cantares Mexicanos;
Songs o the Aztecs. Stanford
Blom, Frans, 1950, "A Polychrome Plate from
Quintana Roo/' N otes on Mr&f/e American
ArcAaeo/cgy and EtAno/cgy No. 9^ CIW
------ , and La Farge, Oliver. 1925, 7r/5es and
7emp/es, M ARI Pub. 1, 2 vols.
Boone, Elizabeth Hill, ed., 1982, 71&e Art and/con
ography o Late Post-C/ass/c Centra/ Mexico,
Washington, D C.
------ , 1983, 7Ae Codex MagAaAecA/ano and the
Lost Prototype o the MagAaAecAiano Croup.
Berkeley
------ , ed., 1984, P/tua/ /fuman SachAce m
Mesoamerica, Washington, D C.
------ , ed., 1987, 7Ae Aztec 7emp/o Mayor,
Washington, D C.
------ . 1987, "Temple Mayor Research, 1521-1978."
in TAe Aztec 7*emp/o Mayor, ed. E. H. Boone,
Washington, D C.
------ , 1989, /ncarnaf/onso the Superna tura/. The
/mage o Zfu/tz/fopocAfA /n Mexico and Europe.
Philadelphia
Bowditch, Charles P , ed., 1904, Mexican and
Centra/ American Antiquities. Ca/endar Sys
tems, and //istorv. 24 Papers Ay Eduard &?/er
et a/, BAEB 28
Brasscur dc Bourbourg, Charles E., 1861, Popo/
VuA. Le /ifre saerd et /es mytAes de /antiquitd
a/ndricainc, Paris
------ , 1869, Manuscrit Troano. Etudes sur /e
systdme grapA/que et /a Zangue des Mayas, Paris
Breton, Adela C . 1917, 'Preliminary Study of the
North Building (Chamber C), Great Ball Court,
Chichen Itz, Yucatn," Z9tA 7CA, 187-94
Bricker, Victoria R., 1986, A Crammar o Maya
/iierqg/ypAs, MARI Pub. 56
------ , and Cossen, Cary H., 1989, EtAnograpAic
Encounters in ^outAern Mesoamerica. Essays in
/fonor o Even Z. Vogt, Albany
Brinton, Daniel, 1887, Ancient NaAuat/ Poet/y,
Philadelphia
Broda, Johanna, 1969, TAe Mexican Ca/endar as
Compared to Other Mesoamerican Systems,
Acta EtAno/ogica et Lingistica, 15, Vienna
Broda, Johanna, David Carrasco, and Eduardo
Matos Moctezuma, 1987, 7Ae Great Temp/e o
TenocAfif/an. Center and PeripAevy in tAe Aztec
Wbr/d Berkeley
Burgoa, Francisco de, 1674, Ceqgrd/7ca desenpeion,
Mexico
Burkhart, Louise M., 1989, 7Ae SAppery EartA.
NaAua-CAristian Mora/ Dia/cgue in SixteentAcentury Mexico, Tucson
Campbell, R. Joe, 1985, A MovpAo/ogZca/ Diction
ary o Tassica/ NaAuat/, Madison
Carlson, John B., 1983, "The Crolier Codex: A
Preliminary Report on the Content and Authen
ticity of a Thirteenth-Century Maya Venus
Almanac," in A. F. Aveni and G. Brotherston,
eds., Ca/endars in Mesoamerica and Peru.
Native Computations o Time, Oxford, 27-57
------ , 1990, Star Wars and Maya Merchants at
Cacaxt/a,
Center
for
Archaeoastronomy
Occasional Pub. 7, College Park, Md.

208
Carmack, Robert, 1981, 7Ae Quiche Maya# o
Ltat/an, Norman, Okla
Carrasco, David, 1990. PeAg/ons o Mesaamcrira.
New York
------ , ed., 1991, To CAapge P/ace. Aztec Ceremon
ia/ Landscapes, Niwot, Colo
Carrasco, Pedro, and Broda, Johanna, eds , 1978,
Economa po/ftica e ideo/ogia en e/ Mexico preAispanico, Mexico City
Caso, Alfonso, 1942, "El paraso terrenal en Teotihuacan," Cuadernos Americanos. 6, 127-38
------ , 1967, Losca^eni/ar/ospreA/sp^/ucos, Mexico
City
------ , 1969, E/ tesoro de Monte A/hn, Mexico City
------ , and Ignacio Bernal, 1952, Ernas de Oaxaca,
INAH Memorias 2
Charnay, Dsir, 1885, Les anciennes vi//es du
Nouveau Monde, Paris
Chimalpahin Cuauhtlehuanitzin, Domingo, 1965,
Pe/aciones origina/es de CAa/co Amaquemecan,
Mexico City
Clarkson, Persis, B 1978, "Classic Maya Pictorial
Ceramics: A Survey of Content and Theme," in
R. Sidrys, ed., Papers on the Economy and
Architecture o tAe Ancient Maya, Los Angeles,
86-141
Clcndinncn, Inga, 1990 "Ways to the Sacred:
Reconstructing Religion' in Sixteenth-Century
Mexico," /fistovyani/AntAropo/qgy, 5, 105-141
------ , 1991, Aztecs. An interpretation, Cambridge
and New York
Codex Aubin (Codex of 1576), 1903, Mexico City
Codex Aubin: Historia de la nacin mexicana, 1963,
ed. C. E. Dibble, Madrid
Codex Bodley, 1960, ed. A. Caso, Mexico City
Codex Borbonicus, 1974, ed. K. Nowotny, Graz
Codex Borgia, 1978, ed. K. Nowotny, Graz
Codex Boturini, 1944, Mexico City
Codex Colombino, 1966, ed. A. Caso and M. E.
Smith, Mexico City
Codex Cospi, 1968, ed. K. Nowotny, Graz
Codex Fjervry-Mayer, 1971, ed. C. Burland,
Graz
Codex Ixtlilxochitl, 1976, ed. J. de Durand-Forest,
Graz
Codex Laud, 1966, ed. C. Burland, Graz
Codex Magliabechiano, 1970, ed. F. Anders and
Jacqueline de Durand-Forest, Graz
Codex Mendoza, 1938, ed. and commentary by
James Cooper Clark, London
Codex Mendoza, 1992, ed. Frances Berdan and
Patricia Rie# Anawalt, Los Angeles
Codex Nuttall, A Picture Manuscript from Ancient
Mexico, 1975, New York
Codex Rios (Vaticanus A), 1900, Rome
Codex Selden, 1964, ed. A. Caso and M. E. Smith,
Mexico City
Codex Vaticanus Nr. 3773 (Vaticanus B), 1902, ed.
E. Seler, Berlin
Codex Vaticanus B, 1972, ed. F. Anders, Graz
Codex Vindobonensis, 1974, ed. O. Adelhofer,
Craz
Cdice Borgia, 1963, ed. and commentary by
Eduard Seler, 3 vols, Mexico City
Codice Chimalpopoca: anales de Cuauhtitlan y

209
eyenda de 0 $ so!es, 1945, trans. and ed. Primo
Feliciano Velazquez, Mexico City
Coe, Michael D., 1968, Amenca s First C/wAzaiJon.
Discovering the Olmec, New York
------, 1973, The Maya 5cribe and His World, New
York
------ , 1975, Classic Maya Pottery at Dumbarton
Oaks, Washington, D C.
------, 1977, "Supernatural Patrons of Maya Scribes
and Artists," Social Process in Maya Prehistory,
ed. N. Hammond, New York, 327-47
------ , 1978, Lords o f the Underworld, Princeton
------ , 1982, Old Cody and Young Heroes, Jerusalem
------ , 1984, Mexico, 3rd edn, London and New
York
------ , 1987, The Maya, 4th edn, London and New
York
------ , 1990, "The Hero Twins: Myth and Image,"
in J. Kerr, ed., Maya Pase Book f New York
161-84
------ , 1992, Breaking the Maya Code, London and
New York
------ , and Diehl, Richard, 1980, Vh the Land o f the
Olmec, 2 vols, Austin
Coggins, Clemency Chase, 1975, Painting and
Drawing Styles atTikal: An Historical and Iconographic Reconstruction, Ph D. Diss. Harvard
------ , and Orrin Shane HI, eds., 1984, Cenote o f
Sacrihce/ Maya Treasures /rom the Sacred We//
at Chichn ftza, Austin
Corpus of Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions, 1975-,
Drawings and maps by Ian Graham, Eric Von
Euw, Peter Mathews. Vols. 1-6, Peabody
Museum, Harvard Univ.
Cortes, Hernn, 1986, Letters /ron? Mexico, trans.
and ed. Anthony Pagden, New Haven
Cortez, Constance, 1986, The Principal Bird Deity
in Preclassic and Early Classic Maya Art, M.A.
thesis, The Univ. of Texas
Couch, N. C. C., 1985, The festiva/ Cycle o f the
Aztec Codex Borbonicus, Oxford
Covarrubias, Miguel, 1957, Indian Art o f Mexico
and Centra/ America, New York
Cresson, F. M., 1938, "Maya and Mexican Sweat
Houses," American Anthropologist, N.S. 40,
88-102

Danzel, Theodor-Wilhelm, 1922-23, Mexiko, 3


vols, Germany
Davies, Nigel, 1977 The Tb/tecs t/nti/ the fa // o f
Tula, Norman
de la Fuente, Beatriz, and Gutirrez Solana, Nelly,
1980, Escultura huasteca en piedra, catalogo,
Mexico City
Del Rio, Antonio, 1822, Description o f the ru7s
o f an ancient city discovered near Palenque,
London
Diaz del Castillo, Bernal, 1956, The Discovery and
Conquest o f Mexico, trans. A. P. Maudslay, New
York
Drucker, Philip, Heizer, Robert, and Squier, R. J.,
1955, Excavations at La Venta, Tabasco, BAEB
170
Dupaix, Capitaine, 1834, "Relation des trois expedi
tions pour la recherche des antquits du pays,"
Antiquites Mexicaines, 2 vols, Paris

GUIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY


Duran, Diego, 1964, The Aztecs, trans. F. Horcasitas
and D. Heyden, New York
------ , 1971, Book o f the Cods and Bites and The
Ancient Ca/endar, trans. D Heyden and F.
Horcasitas, Norman
Earle, Duncan M., and Snow, Dean, 1985, The
Origin of the 260-day Calendar: the Gestation
Hypothesis Reconsidered in Light of its Use
Among the Quiche-Maya," in Fi/th PB71
241-44
Easby, Elizabeth and John Scott, 1970, Be/bre
Cortes. Sculpture o f Midd/e America, New
York
Edmonson, Munroe, 1971, The Book o f Counsel.
The Popo/ Vuh o f the Quiche Maya o f Cuatema/a, MARI 35
------ , 1982, The Ancient Future o f the ftza. the
Chi/am Ba/am o f Tizimin, Austin
------ , 1986, Heaven-horn Merida and its Destiny,
Austin
Emmerich, Andre, 1965, Sweat o f the Sun and
Tears o f the Moon, New York
Essays in pre-Columbian Art and Architecture
(with essays by S. K. Lothrop et al), 1964,
Cambridge, Mass
Estrada, Alvaro, 1981, Maria Sabina. H erL i/eand
Chants, trans. and comm, by Henry Munn, Santa
Barbara
Fash, William L., 1991, Scribes, Warriors, and
Kings, London and New York
Flannery, Kent V., and Joyce Marcus, 1983, The
C/oud People. Divergent Fvo/ution o f the Zapo
tee and Mixtee Civilizations, New York
Forstemann, Ernst Wilhelm, 1880, Die Mayahandschri/t der Konrglichen Oden/ichen Bibliothek zu Dresden, Leipzig
------ , 1901, "Der Mayagott des Jahresschlusses,"
C/obus 80, 189-92
Foster, Michael 8., and Phil C. Weigand, eds ,
1985, The Archaeo/ogy o f West and Northwest
Mesoamerica, Boulder
Fought, John, 1972, Chorti ('Mayan^) Texts, Phila
delphia
Furst, Jill, 1978, Codex Vindobonensis Mexicanus
f, A Commentary, Albany
Furst, Peter, 1965, "West Mexican Tomb Sculpture
as Evidence for Shamanism in Prehispanic
Mesoamerica," Antropolgica 15
------ , ed., 1972, F/esh o f the Cods, the Bitua/ Use
o f Hallucinogens, London
------ , and Coe, Michael, 1977, "Ritual Enemas,"
Natural History, February, 88-91
alarza, Joaquin, 1974, Codex mcxicains, catalogue,
Bib/iotbeque nationa/e de Paris, Paris
Galindo y Villa, Jesus, 1922, F/ Museo Nacional de
Arqueologa Historia y Ftnogra/ra. Breve resea,
Mexico City
Gallagher, Jacki, 1983, Companions o f the Dead,
Los Angeles
Callenkamp, Charles, and Regina Elise Johnson,
eds., 1985, Maya. Treasures o f an Ancient Civili
zation, New York
Camio, Manuel, 1922, La poblacin del Valle de
Tbotibuacan, Mexico City

GLIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY


Gann, Thomas, 1900, 'Mounds in Northern Hon
duras. BAE, 19th Annua/Report
Carda Icazbalceta, Joaquin, 1886-92, Nueva co/ec
cidn de docun7entos para /a historia de Mexico,
Mexico City
Garca Payn, Jos, 1946. ' Los monumentos arque
olgicos de Malinalco," RMEA, 8, 5-64
Caribay, K , Angel Mara, 1964, Poesa nahuat/,
Mexico City
------ , 1979, Teogonia e historia de /os mex/canos.
tres opscu/os de/ srg/o XV7, Mexico City
Girard, Rafael, 1966, Los Mayas, Mexico City
Class, John, B , 1975, "A Survey of Native Middle
American Pictorial Manuscripts," ZZMAZ, 14,
3-81
Goldstein, Marilyn M , ed., 1988, Ceremonia/
Sculpture o Ancient Veracruz, Brooklyn
Gordon, George B , and J. Alden Mason, 1925-28,
Evamp/es o Maya Pottery /n the Museum and
Other Co//ections, 3 vols, Philadelphia
Cosscn, Cary, 1974, "A Chamula Solar Calendar
Board from Chiapas, Mexico," in ed. N. Ham
mond,
Mcsoamcrican Archaco/ogy.
N ew
Approaches, 217-53
------ , cd.. 1986, Symho/ and Meaning Beyond the
C/oscd Commun/ty, Albany
Graham, Mark Miller, n.d., "In Place of a World
that Never Was: Toward an Iconography of
Rulcrship in the Classic Art of West Mexico,"
paper delivered al the February 1990 College
Art Association Annual Meeting
Craulich, Michel, 1981, "The Metaphor of the Day
in Ancient Mexican Myth and Ritual," Current
/lnfhropo/ogy, 22, 45-60
Grove, David, 1970, 7heC /m ccP a/nt/ngsofO xtotit/an Cave, DOS 6
------ , 1984, Cha/catzingo, London and New York
------ , 1987, Anc/ent Cha/catzingo, Austin
Cuzmn Monroy, Virginia, 1978, Loca/rzac/dn de
cod/ces, /ienzos y mapas de/ Mr/co prehispnico
y co/onia^ Mexico City
Hamy, E-T., 1897, Galrie americaine du muse
d'ethnographie du Trocadero, 2 vols, Paris
Handbook of Middle American Indians (HMAI),
1965-, ed. Robert Wauchope, 16 vols, 4 supple
ments, Austin
Hanks, William, and Rice, Don, eds., 1989, Word
and /m age /n Maya Cu/ture, Salt Lake City
Hellmuth, Nicholas M., 1987, Monster und
Menschen /n der Maya-Eunst, Graz
Heyden, Doris, 1975, "An Interpretation of the
Cave Underneath the Pyramid of the Sun in
Teotihuacan, Mexico," American Antiquity,
40:1, 131-47
Historia de los mexicanos por sus pinturas, 1965,
in A. M. Garibay, ed., Teogonia e historia de /os
mexicanos, Mexico City, 21-90
Historia Tolteca-Chichimeca, 1976, ed. P. Kirchoif,
L. O. Cemes and L. Reyes Garca, Mexico
City
Histoyre du mchique, 1905, ed. E. de Jonghe,
/ourna/ de /a Societ des Americanistes, N.S.,
1-42
Houston, Stephen D 1989, Maya C/yphs, London
------ , 1992, "A Name Glyph for Classic Maya

210
Dwarfs, in J. Kerr ed.. The Maya Vase Booh,
vol. 3, New York, 526-31
------ . and Stuart, David, 1989, The way C/yph
Evidence /or "Co-essences" among the C/astic
Maya. RRAMW 29
Humboldt, Alexander Von. 1810, Vues des cordi//
eres et monuments des peup/es indigenes de
/lAmerique, Paris
Hvidtfeldt, Arild, 1958, Teot/ and Zxtpt/ath. Some
Centra/ Conceptions in Ancient Mexican
Rehgion, Copenhagen
Hunt, Eva, 1977, The Trans/brmation o the ZZumminghird, Ithaca
Ichon, Alain, 1973, La rehgidn de /os Totonacos de
/a sierra, Mexico City
Iconography of Middle American Sculpture (essays
by 1. Bernal et a!.), 1973, New York
Ixtlilxochitl, Fernando de Alva, 1982, Ohras Z/istdricas, 2 vols, Mexico City
Jansen, Maarten, van der Loo, P., and Manning,
R., eds., 1988, Continuity and identity in Native
America. Essays in Z/onor o Benedict Z/artmann, Leiden
Jimnez Moreno, Wigberto, 1941, "Tula y los
toltecas segn las fuentas," RMEA, 5, 79-83
Jones, Christopher, and Linton Satterthwaite Jr.,
1982, The Monuments and /r?scr/ptions o Trha/.
The Carved Monuments, TR 33a
Jones, Tom, 1985, "The Xoc, the Sharke, and the
Sea Dogs: An Historical Encounter," in TYRh
PRT 1983, San Francisco, 211-22
------ , 1991, "Jaws II: Return of the Xoc," in Sixth
PRT1 1986, Norman, Okla, 246-54
Joralcmon, P. David, 1971, A Study o O/mec
iconography, DOS 7
------ , 1974, "Ritual Blood-SacriHce Among the
Ancient Maya, Part I," i*rrst Z%T vol 2, 59-74
------ , 1976, "The Olmec Dragon: A Study in
Precolumbian Iconography," in H. B. Nicholson,
ed., The Or/gins o Rehgrous Art and icono
graphy in Prec/assic Mesoamerica, Los Angeles,
27-72
Josserand, J. Kathryn, and Dakin, Karen, eds.,
1988, Smohe and Mist. Mesoamerican Studies
in Memory o The/ma D. Su/hvan, 2 vols, Oxford
Justeson, John S., and Lyle Campbell, eds., 1984,
Zhoneticism in Mayan ZLerog/yphic Writing
IMS 9
Kampen, Michael, 1972, The Sculptures oiE/Ta/rh,
Veracruz; Mexico, Gainesville
Karttunen, Frances, 1983, An Ana/ytica/Dictionary
o Nahuat/, Austin
Keen, Benjamin, 1971, The Aztec image, New
Brunswick
Kelley, David H., 1962, "Glyphic Evidence for a
Dynastic Sequence at Quirigua, Guatemala,"
American Antiquity, 27, 323-35
------ , 1976, Deciphering the Maya Script, Austin
Kendall, Jonathan, 1991, "The Thirteen Volatiles:
Representation and Symbolism," senior essay,
Yale Univ.
Kerr, Justin, 1989-92, The Maya Vase Booh, 3 vols,
New York
Kidder, Alfred V., Jennings, Jesse D. and Shook,
Edwin M., 1946, Excavations at Xamina//uyu,

211

Cuatema/a, CIW Pub. 561


Kingsborough, Lord, 1831-48, Anbquibes o f Mex
ico, 9 vols, London
Klein, Cecilia F , 1976, The Face o the Earth.
Frontahty in Two-Dimensiona/ Mesoamerican
Art, New York
------, 1976, "The Identity of the Centra! Deity on
the Aztec Calendar Stone," Art Buhebn, 58,1-12
------, 1980, "Who was Tlaloc?" /ourna/ o La bn
American Lore, 6, 155-204
Klor de Alva, J. Jorge, 1981, "Martin Oce!ot!:
Clandestine Cu!t Leader," in D. G. Sweet and
G. B. Nash, eds, Strugg/eandSurviva/in Co/onia/
America, Berkeley, 128-41
------, Nicholson, H. B., and Quiones Keber, Eloise,
eds, 1988, The Worh o Bernardino de Sahagun,
Albany
Knorosov, Yuri, 1967, The Wribng o the Maya
Tnd/ans, trans. and ed. T. Proskouriakoff and
S. Coe, Harvard Univ. Russian Trans. Series 4
Kowalski, Jeff Karl, 1989, The Aiytbo/ogzca/ ident
ity o the Figure on the La Esperanza (""Chin/ru/bc"/ Bah Court Marker, RRAMW 27
Kublcr, George, 1967, The iconography o the Art
o Teotihuacan, DOS 4
------, 1969, Studies in C/assic Maya iconography,
Memoirs of the Connecticut Academy of Arts
and Sciences 18
------ , 1977, Aspects o C/assic Maya Ru/ersbip on
Two inscribed Lesse/s, DOS 18
------ , 1990, The Aesthetic Appreciabon o Amer
ican Art, New Haven
LaFaye, Jacques, 1974, Quetza/coat/etCuada/upe,
Paris
Landa, Diego de, 1941, Landas ite/acin de /as
cosas de Yucatan, ed. A. M. Tozzer, PMP 18
------ , 1937 (reprinted 1978), Yucatan Be/bre and
A/ter the Conquest, ed. and trans. W. Gates,
Baltimore
Laughlin, Robert M., 1975, 7he Creat Tzotzi/
Dictionary o San Lorenzo Z/nacan tan, Smithson
ian Contributions to Anthropology No. 19
Lee, Thomas, 1985, Los cdices mayas, Tuxtla
Gutirrez
Lehmann, Walter, and Gerdt Kutscher, 1981,
Ceschichte der Azte/ren. Codex Aubin und verwandte Documente, Berlin
Leon-Portilla, Miguel, 1963, Aztec Thought and
Cu/ture, Norman
------ , 1987, Mexico-Tenochtit/an* su espacio y
tiempo sagrados, Mexico City
------ , 1992, The Aztec image o Se/i and Society,
Norman
Leon y Gama, Antonio de, 1792, Descripcin histr
ica y crono/gica de /as dos piedras, Mexico City
Levenson, Jay A., ed., 1991, Circa Z492, New
Haven and London
Leyenaar, TedJ. J., 1978, U/ama. The Perpetuation
in Mexico o the Pre-Spanish Ba// Came Dhamabzt/i, trans. Inez Seeger, Leiden
------ , and Parsons, Lee, 1988, D/ama, The
Ba/^game o the Mayas and Aztecs, 2000 B .C .A.D. 2000, Leiden
Leyenda de los soles, trans. and ed. F. Paso y
Troncoso, Florence. 1903

CUIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY


Lincoln, Charles E., 1990, Ethnicity and Social
Organization at Chichn Itz, Yucatn, Mexico,
Ph D. Diss, Harvard University
Linn, Sigvald, 1934, Archaeo/ogica/Researches at
Teobhuacan, Mexico, Ethnological Museum of
Sweden Publication No. 1, N.S.
Litvak King, J., and Noem Castillo Tejero, eds ,
1972, Rebgin en mesoamerica, Mexico City
Lombardo de Ruiz, Sonia, et a!., 1986, Cacaxt/a. e/
/ugar donde muere /a /hrvia en /a berra, Mexico
City
Lpez Austin, Alfredo, 1985, Educacin mexica.
anto/ogia de documentos sahagunbnos, Mexico
City
------ , 1988, The Human Body and Tdeo/ogy. Con
cepts o the Ancient iVahuas, 2 vols, trans. T.
and B. Ortiz de Montellano, Salt Lake
Lothrop, Samuel K., 1924, Tu/um. An Archaeo
/ogica/ .Study o the East Coast o Yucatan, CIW
Pub. 335
------ , 1952, Meta/s /rom the Cenote o Sacrihce,
Chichen Ttza, Yucatan, PMM 10:2
Lounsbury, Floyd, 1973, "On the Derivation and
Reading of the Ben-Ich' Prefix, " in E. P. Benson,
ed., Mesoamerican Writing Systems, ed.,
Washington, D C., 99-143
------ , 1982, "Astronomical Knowledge and its Uses
at Bonampak, Mexico," in A. F. Aveni, ed.,
Archaeoastronomy in the New Wor/d, New York,
143-68
McVicker, Don,
1985, "The 'Mayanized'
Mexicans," American Anbquity, 50, 82-101
Ma!er,Teobert, 1901-03, Researches in the Centra/
Portion o the Usumasint/a Lahey, PMM 2
Manuscrit Tovar, 1972, ed. Jacques LaFaye, Graz
Marcus, Joyce, 1974, "The Iconography of Power
Among the Classic Maya", Wor/d Archaeology,
6:1, 83-94
------, 1980, "Zapotee Writing," Scientihc Amer
ican, 242:2 50-64
Marquina, Ignacio, 1951, Arquitectura prehispnica, Mexico City
Martinez Donjun, Guadalupe, 1985, El sitio
olmeca de Teopantecuanitln en Guerrero,"
Ana/es de Antropo/ogia, 22, 215-26
Matos Moctezuma, Eduardo, 1988, The Creat
Temp/e o the Aztecs. Treasures o Tenochtit/an,
trans. D. Heyden, New York
Matrcula de Huexotzinco, 1974, ed. Hanns j.
Prem, Graz
Maudslay, Alfred P., 1899-1902, Bio/ogia Centra/iAmericana. Archaeo/cgy, 5 vols, London
Mayer, Karl Herbert, 1980, Maya Monuments.
Scu/ptures o Un/rnown Provenance in the United
States, trans. S. L. Brizee, Ramona, Calif
------ , 1991, Maya Monuments. Sculptures o
Un/rnown Provenance, Suppl. 3, Berlin
Mendelson, E. Michael, 1959, "Maximon: An
Iconographical Introduction," Man, 59, 57-60
Merwin, Raymond E. and George C. Vaillant,
1932, 7he Ruins oH o/m u/, Cuaterna/a, PMM
11:2

Mesa Redonda de la Sociedad Mexicana de Antro


pologa XI (Teotihuacan), 1972, 2 vols, Mexico
City

CLIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY


Miller, Arthur, 973, TAe M um / Bainting o f 7eo^
tiAuacan, Washington, D C
------ , 1962, On the Ec/ge o f tAe Sea Mura/Bainting
at 7ancaA-7u/un?, Quintana Boo, Mexico,
Washington, D.C.
Miller, Mary Ellen, 1986, TAe MuraE o f BonampaA, Princeton
------ , 1989, "The History of the Study of Maya
Vase Painting," in Justin Kerr, ed.. TAe Afaya
Mase Boole, Vol. 1, New York, pp, 128-45
------ , and Stephen D Houston, 1987, "The Classic
Maya Ballgame and Its Architectural Setting,"
BES, 14, 47-65
Miller, Virginia, 1991, 7Ae f n e z e o f tAe Baiace o f
tAe Stuccoes, AcanceA, Yucatan, Mexico, DOS
31
Milln, Ren, 1974, Urbanization at 7eot?Auacan.
Mexico, 2 vols. Austin
Moholy-Nagy, Hattula, 1963, "Shells and Other
Marine Materia! from Tikal," ECM, 3, 65-83
Monaghan, John, 1990, "Sacrifice, Death and the
Origins of Agriculture in the Vienna Codex,"
American An/ifyMih, 55, 559-89
Morgan, Lewis Henry, 1877, Ancient Society, New
York and London
Morlcy, Sylvanus C., 1920, inscriptions at Copn,
C1W Pub. 219
------ , 1937-38. inscriptions o f Betn, 5 vols, C1W
Pub. *137
------ , 1946. TAc Ancient Maya, Palo Alto, Calif
------ , Ceorge W. Braincrd, and revised by Robert
Sharer, 1983 TAc Ancient Maya, 4th ed., Palo
Alto, Calif
Morris, Ear! H., Jean Chariot, and Ann Axtcl!
Morris, 1931, TAc 7empie o f tAe Warriors at
CAicAen itz, Yucatn, 2 vols, CIW Pub. 406
Nagao, Debra, 1985, "The Planting of Sustenance:
Symbolism of the Two-Horned God in Offerings
from the Templo Mayor." BES, 10, 5-27
Nicholson, H. B., 1971, "Religion in Pre-Hispanic
Centra! Mexico," H M A f 10:1, 396-446
------ , ed., 1976, Origins ofBei/gious Art and iconograpAy in BrecZassic Mesoamerica, Los Angeles
------ , with Eloise Quiones Keber, 1983, Art o f
Aztec Mexico. Treasures o f 7enocAtit/an,
Washington, D C.
Norman, Garth, 1973, izapa Sculpture, Bart 1.
AiAum, Papers of the New World Archaeological
Foundation 30
Nuttall, Zelia, 1908, "A Penitential Rite of the
Ancient Mexicans," BMM, 7, 439-65
Olmos, Andres dc, 1985, Arte de ia iengua mexicana
y vocaAu/ario, ed. Thelma Sullivan and Ren
Acua, Mexico City
Ortiz de Montellano, Bernard R, 1978, "Aztec
Cannibalism: An Ecological Necessity?" Science,
200, 611-17
Paddock, John, ed., 1966, Ancient Oaxaca, Palo
Alto
Parsons, Elsie Clews, 1939, BueAio Indian BeAgion,
2 vols, Chicago
Parsons, Lee A., 1967-69, BiiAao, Cuatemaia.
An ArcAaeoiqgicai .Study o f tAe BaciAc Coast
CotzumaiAuapa Begion, 2 vols, Milwaukee
------ , 1986, TAe Origins o f Maya Art. Monumentai

212
Stone Sculpture ofKaminai/uyd, Cuatemaia, and
tAe SdutAern BaciBc Coast, DOS 28
Pasztory, Esther, 1974, TAe iconograpAy o f tAe
Tec&Auacan T/aioc, DOS 15
------ . 1976, TAeM uraEof Tepantitia, TeotiAuacan,
New York
------ . ed, 1978. Middie Classic Meosamerica AD
460-700. New York
------ , 1983, Aztec Art, New York
Paxton, Merideth D , 1986, Codex Dresden: Stylis
tic and Iconographic Analysis of a Maya Manu
script, Ph D. diss., Univ. of New Mexico
Paz, Octavio, et al, 1990, Mexico; Spiendors o f
77nrty Centones, New York
Pendergast, David M., 1969, A/tun Ha, BritisA
Honduras (Beiize/. tAe Sun C od s Tom A, Royal
Ontario Museum Occ. Paper 19
Pohl, John, 1984, The Earth Lords: Politics and
Symbolism of the Mixtee Codices, Ph D. thesis,
UCLA
------ , and Byland, Bruce, 1990, "Mixtee Landscape
Perception and Archaeological Settlement Pat
terns, Ancient Mesoamenca 1:1, 113-31
Pohordenko, Anatole, 1990, Structure and periodiz
ation of the Olmec Representational System,
Ph D. diss., Tulane
Porter, James, 1989 "Olmec Colossal Heads as
Rccarved Thrones," BES, 17/18, 22-29
Prescott, William, 1843, TAe Conquest o f Mexico,
3 vols, New York
Proskouriakoff, Tatiana, 1946, An AiAum o f Maya
ArcAitecture, CIW Pub. 558
------ , 1950, Classic Maya Acuipture, CIW Pub. 593
------ , 1960, "Historical Implications of a Pattern of
Dates at Piedras Negras," American Antiquity,
25, 454-75
------ , 1963, "Historical Data in the Inscriptions of
Yaxchilan, Part I," Estudios de Cuitura Maya,
3, 149-67
------ , 1964, "Historical Data in the Inscriptions of
Yaxchilan, Part II," Estudios de Cuitura Maya,
4,178-201
Puleston, Dennis, 1976, "The People of the
Cayman/Crocodile: Riparian Agriculture and the
Origins of Aquatic Motifs in Ancient Maya
Iconography," in F -A . de Montequin, ed.,
Aspects o f Ancient Maya Ciw'A'zatron, Saint Paul
Quirarte, Jacinto, 1979, "Representation of Place,
Location, and Direction," in TAirdBBT 99-110
Reilly, F. Kent, 1990, "The Shaman in Transfor
mation Pose: A Study of the Theme of Rulership
in Olmec Art," Becord of The Art Museum of
Princeton University, 48:2, 4-21
Relacin de Michoacn, 1970, trans. and ed
Eugene Craine and Reginald Reindorp, Norman,
Okla
Riese, Berthold, 1984, "Kriegsberichte der klassichen Maya," Baessier-ArcAiv, Beitrge zur
VoZAerAunde, 30:2, 225-321
Ringle, William M ., 1988, O f M ice and MonAeys.
TAe Vaiue and Meaning o f T767A, tAe Cod C
HierogiypA, BBA M W 18
Robelo, Cecilio A., [reprinted] 1980, Diccionario
de mitoZogia naAuat/, 2 vols, Mexico City
Robertson, Donald, 1959, Mexican Manuscript

213
Painting o tbe Ear/y Co/onia/ Period. The
A/etropo/itar? ScbooE, New Haven
Robertson, Merle Greene, 1983-92, Tibe Scu/pture
o Pa/enque, 4 vols, Princeton
Robicsek, Francis, 1978, Tibe Smohing Cods.
Tobacco 777 Maya Art, &sfOTy and Bebgion,
Norman, Okla
------, and Hales, Donald, 1981, The Maya Boob o
tbe Dead. tbe Cera777/c Codex, Norman, Okla
------ and ------ , 1982 Maya CeraTn/cs /rom tbe
Late C/assic Period. tbe November Co//econ,
Charlottesville
Rosny, Leon de, 1864, "Les documents crits de
'antiquit amricaine," Memoires de /a Societ
d'Etbnograpbie, N.S. 1:1, 57-100
Roys, Ra!ph L., 1933, Tbe Boob o Cbv/am Ba/am
oCbumaye/, CIW Pub. 438
------ , 1965, Tbe Bitua/ o tbe Bacabs, Norman,
Okla
Ruiz de Aarcn, Hernando, 1982, Aztec Sorcerers
in /7th Ce7?tt77y Mexico, tbe Treatise 0 7 7 Superstiti077s, ed. and trans. Michael Coe and Cordon
W hittaker, IMS Pub. 7

Ruz Lhuiller, Alberto, 1973, E/ temp/o de /as


inscripciones, Pa/enque, Mexico City
Sahagn, Bernardino de, 1905-09, Tfistoria de /as
cosas de Nueva Espaa, trans. F. Paso y
Troncoso, Madrid
------ , 1950-82, Tbe F/ore77ti77e Codex. A Cenera/
History o tbe T*b77gs o N ew Spain, trans.
and ed. A. J. O. Anderson and C. E. Dibbie,
Santa Fe
------ , 1964, Cdices matritenses de /a historia
genera/ de /as cosas de /a nueva Espaa de Fr.
Berna din o de Sabagun, Madrid
------ , 1979, Cdice dorentino, 3 vo!s, Mexico City
Sandstrom, A!an, 1991, CornisourB/ood, Norman,
Ok!a
Saville, Marsha!) H , 1920, Tbe Co/dsmiths Artin
Ancient Mexico, MAI Notes and Monographs 7
------ , 1922, Turquoise Mosaic Art in Ancient Mex
ico, MAI Contribution 6
------ , 1925, Tbe Wood-carvers Art in Ancient
Mexico, MAI Contribution 9
------ , 1929, "Votive Axes from Eastern Mexico,"
MAI Notes and Monographs 6, 266-99; 335-42
------ , 1933, "Reports on the Maya Indians of
Yucatan by Santiago Mndez, Antonio Garca y
Cubas, Pedro Snchez de Aguilar and Francisco
Hernandez," MAI Notes and Monographs 9:
133-226
Scarborough, Vernon L, and Wilcox, David R , eds,
1991, Tbe Mesoamerican Bai/game, Tucson
Scheie, Linda, 1987, "Architectural Development
and Pohtica! History at Palenque, " in E. P.
Benson, ed., City-States o tbe Maya. Art and
Architecture, Denver, 110-37
, and Freide!, David, 1990, A Forest o /kings.
The f/77fo/d Story o tbe Ancient Maya, New
York
, and MiBer, Je#rey H ., 1983, Tbe Mirror, tbe
Babbit and tbe Bund/e, DOS 25
, and Mary Ellen MiBer, 1986, Tbe B/ood o
Bings. Bitua/ and Dynasty in Maya Art, Fort
Worth (London 1992)

GUIDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY


ScheBhas, Paul, 1904, Representations of Deities
in the Maya Manuscripts, B M P 4:1
Scholes, France, and Roys, Ra!ph, 1948, Tbe Maya
Chonta/ Tncbans o Aca/an-7Yxcbe/, CIW Pub.
560
Schondube, Otto, and Galvan, L. Javier, 1978,
"Salvage Archaeology at el Crillo-Tabachines,
Zapopn, Jalisco, Mexico," in C. Riley and B. C.
Hedrick, eds, Across tbe Chichimec Sea. Papers
in Honor o / Char/es Ee//ey, 144-64
Scott, John, 1980, Tbe Danzantes o Monte A/bn,
2 vols, DOS
Sjourn, Laurette, 1956, Burning Water. Thought
and Bebgion in Ancient Mexico, New York
------ , 1959, Un pa/acio de /a ciudad de /os dioses.
exp/oraciones en Z&55-5#, Mexico City
------ , 1966, E/ /engua/e de /as /ormas en Teotibuacan, Mexico City
Seler, Eduard, 1902-23, Cesamme/te Abband/ungen, Berlin
Simeon, Rmi, 1977, Diccionario de /a /engua
Nahuat/ o Mexicano, Mexico City
Sisson, Edward B., 1983, "Recent Work on the
Borgia Group Codices," Current Antbropo/ogy,
24, 653-56
Smith, Robert E., 1955, Ceramic Sequence at Uaxactun, Cuatema/a, 2 vols, MARI Pub. 20
Solis Olguin, Felipe, 1976, Museo de Santa Ceciha
Acatit/an. Cat/ogo de /a escu/tura mexica, Mex
ico City
------ , 1981, Escu/tura de/ CastiZ/o de Teayo, Vera
cruz, Mexico. Cat/ogo, Mexico City
------ , 1991, Tesoros artsticos de/ Museo Naciona/
de Antropo/ogia, Mexico City
Sosa, John Robert, 1985, The Maya Sky, the Maya
World: A Symbolic Analysis of Yucatan Maya
Cosmology, Ph D. diss, SUNY Albany
Soustelle, Jacques, 1964, The Dai/y Li/e o tbe
Aztecs on tbe Eve o tbe Spanish Conquest,
trans. P. O'Brien, London
Spinden, Herbert J., 1913, A Study o Maya Art,
PM M 6
Spranz, Bodo, 1973, Los dioses en /os codices
mexicanos de/ grupo Borgia, una investigacin
iconogrSca, Mexico City
Stcnzel, Werner, 1976, "The Military and Religious
Orders of Ancient Mexico," 42nd /CA, 7, 17987
Stephens, John Lloyd, 1841, incidents o Trave/m
Centra/ America, Chiapas, and Yucatan, 2 vols,
New York
------ , 1843, incidents oiTrave/ in Yticata/i, 2 vols,
New York
Sftern, Theodore, 1948, The Bubber-Ba// Carnes o
tbe Americas, New York
Stevenson, Robert, 1968, Music in Aztec and inca
Territory, Berkeley
Stirling, Matthew, 1943, Stone Monuments o Sou
thern Mexico, BAEB 138
Stone, Andrea, 1989, "Disconnection, Foreign
Insignia, and Political Expansion: Teotihuacan
and the Warrior Stelae of Piedras Negras, in
J. Berio and R. Diehl, eds, Mesoamerica A/ter
tbe Dechne o Teotihuacan, Washington, D C.,
153-72

CUDE TO SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY


S trenerP an , Cuy, 1971, Ancient Sources on the
Huasteca," H M A f 11:2, 582-302
Stuart, David, 1984, "Blood Symbolism in M aya
Iconography, AES, 7/8, 6 -2 0
-------, 1987, Ten Phonetic SyPahles, A R A M W 14
-------, 1988, "The Rio Azu! Cacao Pot: Epigraphic
Observations on the Function of a M aya Ceramic
Vessel, Antiquity, 62, 153-57
Stuart, Ceorge, 1992, 'Quest for Decipherment: A
Histrica! and Biographical Survey of M aya
Hierog!yphic Investigation/ in E. Danien and
R. Sharer, eds, N ew Theories on the Ancient
M aya, Philadephia, 1-63
Sullivan, The!ma, 1963, "Nahuatl Proverbs, Con
undrums and Metaphors Collected by Sahagn,"
ECN, 4, 93-177
-------, 1982, "Tlazolteotl-Ixcuina: The Great
Spinner and W eav er/' in E. Boone ed., The A rt
and iconography o f L ate Aost-C%assic Centra/
Mexico, Washington, D C.
Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1974, Ahhcgraphy
o f the Summer Institute o f Linguistics, 1935-72,
ed. A!an C Wares, Huntington Beach, Ca!if.
------ , 1985, Pih/iograA ade/Instituto Linguisticode
Verano en e/ Mexico, 1935-1984, ed. M aria De
Boc de Harris and M argarita H . de Da!y, Mexico
City
Taggart, James, 1983, Nahuat M yth and Social
-Structure, Austin
Taube, Karl A., 1983, "The Teotihuacan Spider
Woman, " /ou rn al o f Latin American Lore 9:2,
107-89
-------, 1985, "The Classic Maya M aize God: A
Reappraisal" F ilth P R T 1983, San Francisco,
171-81
-------, 1986, "The Teotihuacan Cave of Origin:
The Iconography and Architecture of Emergence
Mytho!ogy in Mesoamerica and the American
Southwest," AES, 12, 51-86
-------, 1992, The M a/or Gods o f Ancient Yucatan,
DOS 32
-------, and Bade, Bonnie L. 1991, An Appearance
o f Aluhtecuhth in the Dresden Venus Pages,
A R A M W 35
Tedlock, Barbara, 1982, Time and the Lhgh/and
M aya, Albuquerque
Tedlock, Dennis, 1985, Popo! Vuh. The Dehnitive
Edition o f the M ayan Aooh o f the Dawn o f L ite
and the C/ories o f Gods and Aingy, New York
Tezozmoc, F . Alvarado, 1944, Crdnica mexicana
escrita haca e / ao de i <59#, Mexico City
-------, 1949, Grdnica mexic^yotl, Mexico City
Thompson, J. Eric S., 1930, Ethnology o f the Mayas
o f -Southern and Central Aritish Honduras, Field
Mus. of Nat. Hist. Anthro. Series 18:2
-------, 1961, "A Blood-drawing Ceremony Painted
on a M aya V ase/' EG M , 1, 13-20
-------, 1962, A Catalog o f M aya Hieroglyphs, Nor
man, Okla
-------, 1970, M aya History and Aehgion, Norman,
Okla

214
-------, 1971, M aya Hieroglyphic Writing; 3rd edl
tion, Norman, Okla
-------, 1972, A Commentary on the Dresden Codex.
Philadelphia
Torquemada, Juan de, 1975-83, Monarqua indi
ana, ed. M . Leon-Portilla, 7 vols, Mexico City
Tovar Calendar, 1951, ed. G. K ublerandC. Gibson,
New Haven
Townsend, Richard, F ., 1979, State and Cosmos in
the A rt o f Tenochtitlan, D O # 20
-------, 1992, 7he Aztecs, London and New York
Tozzer, A. M ., 1907, A Comparative Study o f the
M ayas and the Lacandones, London
-------, 1957, Chichen ftz and its Cenote o f Sacrihce,
2 vols, P M M 12
Trejo, Silvia, 1989, Escultura huaxteca de Alo
Tamurh, Mexico City
Troike, Nancy P. 1978, "Fundam ental Changes
in the Interpretations of the Mixtee Codices,"
American Antiquity, 43:4, 553-68
Umberger, Em ily, 1981, Aztec Sculptures, Hiero
glyphs, and History, Ph D. diss, Columbia Univ.
-------, 1984, "E l trono de M octezum a," ECN, 17,
63-87
Urcid, Javier, 1992, Zapotee Hieroglyphic W riting,
Ph D. diss, Yale Univ.
Vaillant, Ceorge C ., 1927, The Chronological Sig
nificance of M aya Ceramics, Ph D. diss. Harvard
Univ.
Villacorta, J. A ., and C. A. Villacorta, 1930, Cddices
M aya, Guatemala C ity
Villela F ., Samuel, 1989, "Cacahuazqui: nuevo
testamonio rupestre olmeca en el oriente de
Guerrero, Arqueologa, 2, 37-48
Vogt, Evon Z., 1968, Zinacantan. A M aya Com
m unity in the Highlands o f Chiapas, New York
-------, 1976, Tortillas lo r the Cods. A Symbolic
Analysis o f Zihacanteco Aituals, Cambridge,
Mass
Von W inning, Hasso, 1974, The Shalt Tomh Figures
o f West Mexico, Los Angeles
-------, 1987, La IconograAa de Teotihuacan, 2 vols,
Mexico City
-------, and Olga Hammer, 1972, Anecdotal Sculp
ture o f West Mexico, Los Angeles
W aldeck, Frederick de, 1838, Voyage pittoresque
et archeologique dans la province d Tuca tan
pendant les anndes 1#34 e t 1##3 Paris
W ard, Fred, 1987, "Jade: Stone of Heaven,"
National Geographic Magazine, 172:3, 282-315
Wauchope, Robert, 1962, Lost Tribes and SunJren
Continents, London
Wilkerson, S. Jeffrey K ., 1980, "M an's Eighty
Centuries in Veracruz," National Geographic
Magazine, 1<5#.\2, fP S -S l
W illey, Cordon R., and Jeremy A. Sabloff, 1980, A
H lstoiy o f American Archaeology, San Francisco
WinReld Capitaine, Fernando, 1988, La Estela 1
de La M o/arra, Veracruz, Mexico, RRAM W 16
Zimmermann, Gunter, 1956, D ie Hiercglyphen der
M aya -Handschriften, Hamburg

Sources of Illustrations

Unless otherwise credited, all line drawings


are by Karl Taube
a = above c = center b = below
1= left r = right

Frontispiece Museo Nacional de Antropologa,


Mexico; page 8a Courtesy Peabody Museum,
Harvard University; 8b Photo J. A. Sabloff; 12-13
Drawing Hanni Bailey; 16 Photo Mary Miller; 19
Photo O Rene Milln; 21a Photo J. A. Sabloff; 21bl
Courtesy University Museum, Philadelphia; 21br
Drawing P. P. Pratt after Ruz; 22 Drawing David
Kiphuth, after photo by M. D. Coe; 23 Drawing P. P.
Pratt; 25 Reconstruction painting Ignacio Marquina,
Instituto Nacional de Antropologa e Historia,
Mexico; 27 Courtesy Frank Hole; 29 Drawing F.
Pratt, after Carlo Gay, Xochipa?n. the beginning of
0?mcc Art, 1972; 31 After Matos Moctezuma, Greet
7e?np?e ofthe Aztecs, 1988; 34 After W. J. More and S.
M. Higuera, Cdice de %nhntt?en, 1940; 41c
Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt; 43a After
Matos Moctezuma, Great Yemp?e, 1988; 43c Sketch
by Karl Weiditz, 1528; 45ca Museo Nacional de
Antropologa, Mexico; 45cb Drawing Linda Scheie;
47a From M. D. Coe, Mexico, 1984; 47cb Akademis
che Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt; 51a After J. E. S.
Thompson; 51b Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsan
stalt; 53a Courtesy University Museum, Philadelphia;
53b From M. D. Coe, Breaking the Muye Code, 1992;
drawing John Montgomery 55a Archivo General de
la Nacin, Mexico; 55b Photo J. A. Sabloff; 57a
From M. D. Coe, The Maya, 1987; 59a Courtesy
American Museum of Natural History; 61a Photo M.
D. Coe; 61c Theodor-Wilhelm Danzel, Mexiko 1,
1923, 61b Bibliothque Nationale, Paris; 63a
%ticanus Vo. 3773, 1902-1903; 65a After Matos
Moctezuma, Great 7emp?e, 1988; 65c Photo Irmgard
Groth-Kimball; 65b Courtesy American Museum of
Natural History; 67c Photo Irmgard Groth-Kimball;
69a Drawing David Kiphuth, from Coe, Mexico,
1984; 71a Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt; 73a
Archivo General de la Nacin, Mexico; 73c Courtesy
Carter Brown Memorial Library, Brown University,
Providence, Rhode Island; 73b After Hellmuth 1987;
75c Photo Salvador Cuilliem, courtesy Great Temple
Project; 77a After A. Kidder, Arti/ects of Uaxactnn,
Caatema/a, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Pub
lication 576, 1947; 79a Courtesy Merseyside County
Museums; 79b Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsan
stalt; 81a, 81c Photo Irmgard Groth-Kimball; 81b

Vatican Library, Rome; 83c Photo Salvador Guilliem,


courtesy Great Temple Project; 85c Photo Irmgard
Groth-Kimball; 87a Akademische Druck-u. Verlag
sanstalt; 87ca, 87b Theodor-Wilhelm Danzel,
Mexiko f, 1923; 89a Photo Irmgard Groth-Kimball;
89b Trustees of the British Museum; 91a Archivo
General de la Nacin, Mexico; 91ca After Miguel
Covarrubias, Inchon Art of Mexico end Centro?
Mexico, 1957: fig. 72; 93a Akademische Druck-u.
Verlagsanstalt; 93b Photo Salvador Guilliem, cour
tesy Great Temple Project; 95b After Matos
Moctezuma, Greet 7emp?e, 1988; 97b Archivo
General de la Nacin, Mexico; 99b From Alfred
Tozzer, A Comperetiue Study of the Moyo end the
Lecondones, 1907, 101c Akademische Druck-u. Ver
lagsanstalt; 103a Photo Salvador Guilliem, courtesy
Great Temple Project; 103c After Henderson 1981:
pp. 154-155, Rg. 50; 105b Drawing Linda Scheie;
107a Drawing Linda Scheie; 109a Archivo General
de la Nacin, Mexico; 111a Drawing Linda Scheie;
113a From Sahagn, Historio de ios Cosos de Vueue
Espee, 1905; 115b Veticenus No. 3773,1902-1903;
117c Photo Irmgard Groth-Kimball; 119c Drawing
Linda Scheie; 119b From Codex Magliabechiano,
facsimile edition (1904); 123a Archivo General de la
Nacin, Mexico; 123b After Warwick Bray, Ecerydey
Li/e of the Aztecs, 1968, Rg. 12 (drawing Eva Wilson);
125cb After M. D. Coe, Breeking the Moyo Code,
1992; drawing John Montgomery 127a After M. D.
Coe and Richard Diehl, in the Lond of the Olmec,
1980 (drawing Felipe Dvalos); 127ca, 127cb After
Peter David Joralemon, A Study of Obnec Iconogrophy, 1971; 127b From Dresden Codex; 129c,
129b Drawings Linda Scheie; 131ar After Nicholas
Hellmuth 1987, drawing S. Reisinger; 131c After
Miguel Covarrubias, fndien Art o f Mexico ond
Centro? Mexico, 1957: Rg. 72; 133a Photo Irmgard
Groth-Kimball; 133c From Codex Magliabechiano,
facsimile edition (1904); 133b From William L. Fash,
Scribes, Werriors ond Kings, 1991: 164 (drawing
Barbara Fash); 137a Bodleian Library, Oxford; 139a
From Eduard Seler, Gesomme?te Abhend ?ungen
zttr Amerikenischen Sprech-und A?tertumskunde,
1902-1923; 139b From Codex Magliabechiano, fac
simile edition (1904); 141a Archivo General de la
Nacin, Mexico; 141c Theodor-Wilhelm Danzel,
Mexiko , 1923; 143c Archivo General de la Nacin,
Mexico; 145a Drawing Ian Graham, courtesy
Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology,
Harvard University; 147 Drawing Paul Schellhas,
courtesy Peabody Museum of Archaeology and

UL HCES OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Ethnolog), Harvard University; 149a Drawing
Stephen Houston, from S. Houston 1989: 149b Photo
Salvador GuilRem. courtesv Great Temple Project;
151a, 151c Photos Trustees of the British Museum;
151b Drawing Linda Scheie: 153b Vatican Libran,
Rome: 155c Photo courtesy Matthew Stirling and the
National Geographic Society: 155b Photo Irmgard
Croth-Kimbaii; 157b Photo A. P Maudslav. courtesv
American Museum of Natural History: 159a After M.
D. Coe and Richard Diehl, /n the
the O/urec.
1980 (drawing Felipe Dvalos); 159c From Codex
Borgia: 159b From Codex Magliabechiano, facsimile
edition (1904); 161c Akademische Druck-u.
Verlagsanstalt; 161b Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris:
165c Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt; 165b
Museo Nacional de Antropologa, Mexico; 167a
Theodor-Wilhelm Dnzek Mexico 7, 1923; 167c
Bodleian Librar), Oxford; 167b Photo Salvador
Culliem, courtesy Great Temple Project; 169a From
Richard F. Townsend, The A^ecy, 1992 (drawing

2m
Annick Peterson); 171a Akademische Dnrek u
Verlagsanstalt; 171b Photo Alberti) Ruz !, !73a
From Codex Borgia: 173b Drawing Linda Sf he!*
177a Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt; 177ca
From Matos Moctezuma. Crrat Tbwp/r. 1988; !77cb
Drawing David Stuart; 178 Akademische Dmek u
Verlagsanstalt; 181a From Dresden Codex; 185c
Drawing lan Graham, from Coe. The Ahu/n 1987:
186b After Miguel Covarrubias, 'Ll arte Olmeca o
de La Venta." Cuar/emoA Americanos, 1946; 187c
Courtesy Merseyside County Museums: 187b After
M. D. Coe, Breaking the Mar/a Code, 1992; 189al
Archivo General de la Nacin. Mexico; 189ar Photo
lrmg;u*d Groth-Kimball; 189b Archivo General de la
Nacin, Mexico; 191a Museo Nacional de
Antropologa, Mexico; 191ca Akademische Druck-u.
Verlagsanstalt; 191cb MzticanM.? No. 3773. 1902-3;
193b After Miguel Covarrubias, Indian Art r^Afexico
and Centra/ Aexico, 1957: Rg. 72.

A
]
-R .
to this

^he myths and beliefs of the great Precolumbian civilizations of Mesoamerica


have baffled and fascinated outsiders ever since the Spanish Conquest.
Yet, until now, no single-volume introduction has existed to act as a guide
labyrinthine symbolic world. In A??
AA(y^ nearly 300 entries, from accession to yoke,
describe the main gods and symbols of the Olmecs, Zapotees, Maya, Teotihuacanos,
Mixtees, Toltecs and Aztecs. Topics range from jaguar and jester gods to reptile eye
and rubber, from creation accounts and sacred places to ritual practices such as
bloodletting, confession, dance and pilgrimage. Two introductory essays provide
succinct accounts of Mesoamerican history and religion, while a substantial
bibliographical survey directs the reader to original sources and recent discussions.
Dictionary entries are illustrated with photographs and commissioned line
drawings.This is an authoritative work, a standard reference for students,
scholars and travellers.
Mary Miller, Professor of History of Art at Yale, is the author of TAf
and co-author with Linda Scheie of
both published by Thames and Hudson. Karl Taube, Associate Professor in the
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, is a leading
scholar of Mesoamerican writing and iconography, and the author of

AAzyzTUyiAy.
Well-written and comprehensive . . . the book has not left my desk'
A unique compendium of terms and their explanations . . .
the erudition here is unmatched' ScAwf

)SBN 0 -5 0 0 -2 7 9 2 8 -4
TH A M ES AND H U D SO N
30 Bloomsbury Street, London WCiB 3 QP

Printed in Singapore

7 8 0 5 0 0 279281

You might also like